Executive Solution Overview
i have an writing assignment I need help with i need it in a few hours. Instructions attached – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## _Research_Article_ReviewInstructions1.docx – ## ResearchArticleReview_Rubric1.docx **## _Research_Article_ReviewInstructions1.docx** ### Research Article Review (Link…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
i have an writing assignment I need help with i need it in a few hours. Instructions attached
– 2 years ago
**files (2)**
– ## _Research_Article_ReviewInstructions1.docx
– ## ResearchArticleReview_Rubric1.docx
**## _Research_Article_ReviewInstructions1.docx**
### Research Article Review (Linking to Evidence-Based Practice)
_Directions:_ Find a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article from within the past 5 years relating to your own professional practice. Create an APA article review following the prompts below. The paper should include a title and a reference page including the article information and link to the article. The paper should be two to three pages of typewritten text, not including your “Title” or “Reference” page. Review the article addressing the following:
1. Address the essential parts of the study addressed within the abstract.
2. What is the problem statement and significance to nursing practice?
3. What is the purpose of the study?
4. What type of research method was used?
5. Detail the applications to practice and how you can incorporate this into your own practice.
6. What future studies would you recommend?
Copyright © Wolters Kluwer. All rights reserved.
**## ResearchArticleReview_Rubric1.docx**
## Research Article Review Grading Rubric – _____ Points
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Distinguished**<br>**16–20** | **Good**<br>**11–15** | **Satisfactory**<br>**6–10** | **Unsatisfactory**<br>**0–5** | **Total Points** |
| **Purpose** | **____ Points**<br>The writer’s central purpose or argument is readily apparent to the reader. | **____ Points**<br>The writing has a clear purpose or argument but may sometimes digress from it. | **____ Points**<br>The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>The purpose or argument is generally unclear. | |
| **Content** | **____ Points**<br>Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights. | **____ Points**<br>Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains some insights. | **____ Points**<br>Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gains few insights. | **____ Points**<br>Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed. | |
| **Organization** | **____ Points**<br>Ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked. The reader can follow the line of reasoning. It is consistently professional and appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>Ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. It is appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>In general, the writing is arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what the writer intends. It is not consistently professional or appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>The writing is not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest. It is not appropriate for an academic research paper. | |
| **Writing Composition**<br>**(Spelling, Grammar, Sentence Structure)** | **____ Points**<br>An occasional error may occur, but writing, grammar, spelling, transitions, readability, and sentence structure are essentially error free. | **____ Points**<br>Some minor errors (1-3 errors) may occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure but are not consistent throughout the presentation. Errors do not interfere with the readability or comprehension of information. | **____ Points**<br>Frequent errors (4-5 errors) occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, sentence structure, and readability throughout the presentation. | **____ Points**<br>Numerous errors (>6 errors) occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure, throughout the presentation, which make it very difficult to read and understand the information presented. | |
| **APA Format** | **____ Points**<br>An occasional error may occur, but the paper is essentially error-free, following APA format in the body of the paper and reference page. | **____ Points**<br>Some minor errors (1-3 errors) may occur with APA format but errors are not consistent throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>Frequent errors (4-5 errors) occur with APA format throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>Numerous errors (>6 errors) occur with APA format consistently throughout the paper, indicating that little effort was placed on understanding the format guidelines. | |
**## ResearchArticleReview_Rubric1.docx**
## Research Article Review Grading Rubric – _____ Points
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Distinguished**<br>**16–20** | **Good**<br>**11–15** | **Satisfactory**<br>**6–10** | **Unsatisfactory**<br>**0–5** | **Total Points** |
| **Purpose** | **____ Points**<br>The writer’s central purpose or argument is readily apparent to the reader. | **____ Points**<br>The writing has a clear purpose or argument but may sometimes digress from it. | **____ Points**<br>The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>The purpose or argument is generally unclear. | |
| **Content** | **____ Points**<br>Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights. | **____ Points**<br>Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains some insights. | **____ Points**<br>Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gains few insights. | **____ Points**<br>Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed. | |
| **Organization** | **____ Points**<br>Ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked. The reader can follow the line of reasoning. It is consistently professional and appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>Ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. It is appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>In general, the writing is arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what the writer intends. It is not consistently professional or appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>The writing is not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest. It is not appropriate for an academic research paper. | |
| **Writing Composition**<br>**(Spelling, Grammar, Sentence Structure)** | **____ Points**<br>An occasional error may occur, but writing, grammar, spelling, transitions, readability, and sentence structure are essentially error free. | **____ Points**<br>Some minor errors (1-3 errors) may occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure but are not consistent throughout the presentation. Errors do not interfere with the readability or comprehension of information. | **____ Points**<br>Frequent errors (4-5 errors) occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, sentence structure, and readability throughout the presentation. | **____ Points**<br>Numerous errors (>6 errors) occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure, throughout the presentation, which make it very difficult to read and understand the information presented. | |
| **APA Format** | **____ Points**<br>An occasional error may occur, but the paper is essentially error-free, following APA format in the body of the paper and reference page. | **____ Points**<br>Some minor errors (1-3 errors) may occur with APA format but errors are not consistent throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>Frequent errors (4-5 errors) occur with APA format throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>Numerous errors (>6 errors) occur with APA format consistently throughout the paper, indicating that little effort was placed on understanding the format guidelines. | |
**## _Research_Article_ReviewInstructions1.docx**
### Research Article Review (Linking to Evidence-Based Practice)
_Directions:_ Find a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article from within the past 5 years relating to your own professional practice. Create an APA article review following the prompts below. The paper should include a title and a reference page including the article information and link to the article. The paper should be two to three pages of typewritten text, not including your “Title” or “Reference” page. Review the article addressing the following:
1. Address the essential parts of the study addressed within the abstract.
2. What is the problem statement and significance to nursing practice?
3. What is the purpose of the study?
4. What type of research method was used?
5. Detail the applications to practice and how you can incorporate this into your own practice.
6. What future studies would you recommend?
Copyright © Wolters Kluwer. All rights reserved.
**## ResearchArticleReview_Rubric1.docx**
## Research Article Review Grading Rubric – _____ Points
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Distinguished**<br>**16–20** | **Good**<br>**11–15** | **Satisfactory**<br>**6–10** | **Unsatisfactory**<br>**0–5** | **Total Points** |
| **Purpose** | **____ Points**<br>The writer’s central purpose or argument is readily apparent to the reader. | **____ Points**<br>The writing has a clear purpose or argument but may sometimes digress from it. | **____ Points**<br>The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>The purpose or argument is generally unclear. | |
| **Content** | **____ Points**<br>Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights. | **____ Points**<br>Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains some insights. | **____ Points**<br>Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gains few insights. | **____ Points**<br>Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed. | |
| **Organization** | **____ Points**<br>Ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked. The reader can follow the line of reasoning. It is consistently professional and appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>Ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. It is appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>In general, the writing is arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what the writer intends. It is not consistently professional or appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>The writing is not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest. It is not appropriate for an academic research paper. | |
| **Writing Composition**<br>**(Spelling, Grammar, Sentence Structure)** | **____ Points**<br>An occasional error may occur, but writing, grammar, spelling, transitions, readability, and sentence structure are essentially error free. | **____ Points**<br>Some minor errors (1-3 errors) may occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure but are not consistent throughout the presentation. Errors do not interfere with the readability or comprehension of information. | **____ Points**<br>Frequent errors (4-5 errors) occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, sentence structure, and readability throughout the presentation. | **____ Points**<br>Numerous errors (>6 errors) occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure, throughout the presentation, which make it very difficult to read and understand the information presented. | |
| **APA Format** | **____ Points**<br>An occasional error may occur, but the paper is essentially error-free, following APA format in the body of the paper and reference page. | **____ Points**<br>Some minor errors (1-3 errors) may occur with APA format but errors are not consistent throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>Frequent errors (4-5 errors) occur with APA format throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>Numerous errors (>6 errors) occur with APA format consistently throughout the paper, indicating that little effort was placed on understanding the format guidelines. | |
**## _Research_Article_ReviewInstructions1.docx**
### Research Article Review (Linking to Evidence-Based Practice)
_Directions:_ Find a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article from within the past 5 years relating to your own professional practice. Create an APA article review following the prompts below. The paper should include a title and a reference page including the article information and link to the article. The paper should be two to three pages of typewritten text, not including your “Title” or “Reference” page. Review the article addressing the following:
1. Address the essential parts of the study addressed within the abstract.
2. What is the problem statement and significance to nursing practice?
3. What is the purpose of the study?
4. What type of research method was used?
5. Detail the applications to practice and how you can incorporate this into your own practice.
6. What future studies would you recommend?
Copyright © Wolters Kluwer. All rights reserved.
**## ResearchArticleReview_Rubric1.docx**
## Research Article Review Grading Rubric – _____ Points
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| **Criteria** | **Distinguished**<br>**16–20** | **Good**<br>**11–15** | **Satisfactory**<br>**6–10** | **Unsatisfactory**<br>**0–5** | **Total Points** |
| **Purpose** | **____ Points**<br>The writer’s central purpose or argument is readily apparent to the reader. | **____ Points**<br>The writing has a clear purpose or argument but may sometimes digress from it. | **____ Points**<br>The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>The purpose or argument is generally unclear. | |
| **Content** | **____ Points**<br>Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights. | **____ Points**<br>Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains some insights. | **____ Points**<br>Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gains few insights. | **____ Points**<br>Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed. | |
| **Organization** | **____ Points**<br>Ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked. The reader can follow the line of reasoning. It is consistently professional and appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>Ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. It is appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>In general, the writing is arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what the writer intends. It is not consistently professional or appropriate for an academic research paper. | **____ Points**<br>The writing is not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest. It is not appropriate for an academic research paper. | |
| **Writing Composition**<br>**(Spelling, Grammar, Sentence Structure)** | **____ Points**<br>An occasional error may occur, but writing, grammar, spelling, transitions, readability, and sentence structure are essentially error free. | **____ Points**<br>Some minor errors (1-3 errors) may occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure but are not consistent throughout the presentation. Errors do not interfere with the readability or comprehension of information. | **____ Points**<br>Frequent errors (4-5 errors) occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, sentence structure, and readability throughout the presentation. | **____ Points**<br>Numerous errors (>6 errors) occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure, throughout the presentation, which make it very difficult to read and understand the information presented. | |
| **APA Format** | **____ Points**<br>An occasional error may occur, but the paper is essentially error-free, following APA format in the body of the paper and reference page. | **____ Points**<br>Some minor errors (1-3 errors) may occur with APA format but errors are not consistent throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>Frequent errors (4-5 errors) occur with APA format throughout the paper. | **____ Points**<br>Numerous errors (>6 errors) occur with APA format consistently throughout the paper, indicating that little effort was placed on understanding the format guidelines. | |
Leave a Reply