Executive Solution Overview
[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) **files (2)** – ## CourseSchedule-SCMG502I001Summer2026.pdf – ## SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf **## CourseSchedule-SCMG502I001Summer2026.pdf** Week 4: Case Assignment II – Due Aug 30, 2026 11:59 PM SCMG502…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)
**files (2)**
– ## CourseSchedule-SCMG502I001Summer2026.pdf
– ## SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf
**## CourseSchedule-SCMG502I001Summer2026.pdf**
Week 4: Case Assignment II – Due
Aug 30, 2026 11:59 PM
SCMG502 I001 Summer 2026
SCMG502 I001 Summer 20… JI
Microsoft 365 Course Home Content Discussions Class Progress Course Tools Library
Help More
Today and tomorrow Week 4: Case Assignment II – Due Print Settings
Course Objective:
C03: Categorize issues and concerns in global
sourcing decisions
Prompt:
Discuss the use of Incoterms in international trade. At
a minimum, address aspects such as the value
Incoterms bring to an agreement, the advantages or
disadvantages of using a specific Incoterm, and what
companies need to know when using Incoterms.
Information from the International Chamber of
Commerce about the newest Incoterms 2020 is
available at their site: Which Incoterms rule should I
use?
Instructions:
Label your Word document as follows:
yourlastname.doc (ex: Johnson.docx)
Write a 1,000 word APA formatted paper on
the use of Incoterms in international trade
All charts, graphs, pictures are to go in the
appendix (not a substitute for content)
Make sure you use three to five credible and
reliable resources; format in APA
Refrain from excessive use of quotes in your
response (less than 5%)
Once you submit your document to the
assignment folder it will automatically be
Tasks
Add a task…
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lp/ouHome/defaultHome.d2l](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lp/ouHome/defaultHome.d2l)
[http://mail.mycampus.apus.edu/](http://mail.mycampus.apus.edu/)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/1399203/discussions/List](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/1399203/discussions/List)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/userprogress/315916/1399203/Summary?searchString=&sortField=SortLastName&sortDirection=0](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/userprogress/315916/1399203/Summary?searchString=&sortField=SortLastName&sortDirection=0)
[https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/calendar/1399203/home/list?day=20&month=8&year=2026](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/calendar/1399203/home/list?day=20&month=8&year=2026)
[https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/](https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/)
[https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/](https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/)
Week 4: Case Assignment II
Due August 30 at 11:59 PM
loaded to Copyleaks within the course. Your
similarity scan score must be 20% or less (the
following will be excluded: headers,
bibliography, etc. prior to instructor grading
paper—focus on the content of scan
percentage)
Plagiarism will result in an automatic zero for
this assignment
There are no late assignments accepted
after the last day of the course
Grading Rubric: See the grading rubric for more
information on assignment grading.
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=1399203&db=702536](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=1399203&db=702536)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/content/enforced/1399203-812029/SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/content/enforced/1399203-812029/SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf)
**## SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf**
Research Paper
Graduate Level Rubric:
APUS
Assignment
Graduate Level
Rubric
500-600
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
TOTAL
POINTS
FOCUS AND
THESIS
Student exhibits a
defined and clear
understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well
constructed to help
guide the reader
throughout the
assignment. Student
builds upon the thesis of
the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
10 points
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the thesis.
Student demonstrates
an effective
presentation of thesis,
with most support
statements helping to
support the key focus
of assignment.
7 points
Student exhibits a
basic understanding
of the intended
assignment, but the
thesis is not fully
supported throughout
the assignment.
While thesis helps to
guide the
development of the
assignment, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between thoughts.
While student has
included a few
supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of
the assignment.
5 points
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader
is unable to follow
the logic used for the
thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction
of thesis is not clearly
evident, and reader
must look deeper to
discover the focus of
the writer. Student’s
writing is weak in the
inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
1 point
/10
CONTENT AND
SUBJECT
KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of
the subject matter in the
assignment.
Assignment shows an
impressive level of
depth of student’s
ability to relate course
content to practical
examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details,
facts, and concepts in a
logical sequence.
25 points
Student exhibits
above average usage
of subject matter in
assignment. Student
provides above
average ability in
relating course
content in examples
given. Details and
facts presented
provide an adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
20 points
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a general,
fundamental
understanding of the
course material.
Whereas, there are
areas of some
concerning in the
linkages provided
between facts and
supporting
statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only
meets the minimum
requirements in this
area.
15 points
Student tries to
explain some
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Assignment
appears vague or
incomplete in various
segments. Student
presents concepts in
isolation, and does
not perceive to have a
logical sequencing of
ideas.
10 points
/25
CRITICAL
THINKING
SKILLS
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for
500-600 level work.
Learner provides a
strategic approach in
presenting examples of
problem solving or
critical thinking, while
drawing logical
conclusions which are
not immediately
Student exhibits a
good command of
critical thinking skills
in the presentation of
material and
supporting
statements.
Assignment
demonstrates the
student’s above
average use of
relating concepts by
Student takes a
common,
conventional
approach in guiding
the reader through
various linkages and
connections
presented in
assignment.
However, student
presents a limited
perspective on key
Student demonstrates
beginning
understanding of key
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Learner is
unable to apply
information in a
problem-solving
fashion. Student
presents confusing
statements and facts
/25
obvious. Student
provides well-supported
ideas and reflection
with a variety of current
and/or world views in
the assignment. Student
presents a genuine
intellectual
development of ideas
throughout assignment.
25 points
using a variety of
factors. Overall,
student provides
adequate conclusions,
with 2 or fewer
errors.
20 points
concepts throughout
assignment. Student
appears to have
problems applying
information in a
problem-solving
manner.
15 points
in assignment. No
evidence or little
semblance of critical
thinking skills.
10 points
ORGANIZATIO
N OF IDEAS
AND FORMAT
Student thoroughly
understands and excels
in explaining all major
points. An original,
unique, and/or
imaginative approach to
overall ideas, concepts,
and findings is
presented. Overall
format of assignment
includes an appropriate
introduction (or
abstract), well-
developed paragraphs,
and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s
ability to plan and
organize research in a
logical sequence.
Student uses at least of
5-7 references in
assignment.
15 points
Student explains the
majority of points
and concepts in the
assignment. Learner
demonstrates a good
skill level in
formatting and
organizing material
in assignment.
Student presents an
above average level
of preparedness, with
a few formatting
errors. Assignment
contains less than 5
resources.
10 points
Learner applies some
points and concepts
incorrectly. Student
uses a variety of
formatting styles,
with some
inconsistencies
throughout the paper.
Assignment does not
have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing. Student
uses less than 3
sources or references.
7 points
Assignment reveals
formatting errors and
a lack of
organization.
Student presents an
incomplete attempt to
provide linkages or
explanation of key
terms. The lack of
appropriate
references or source
materials
demonstrates the
student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to
review and revise the
assignment.
1 point
/15
WRITING
CONVENTIONS
(GRAMMAR &
MECHANICS)
Student demonstrates an
excellent command of
grammar, as well as
presents research in a
clear and concise
writing style. Presents
a thorough, extensive
understanding of word
usage. Student excels
in the selection and
development of a well-
planned research
assignment.
Assignment is error-free
and reflects student’s
ability to prepare a
high-quality academic
assignment.
10 points
Student provides an
effective display of
good writing and
grammar.
Assignment reflects
student’s ability to
select appropriate
word usage and
present an above
average presentation
of a given topic or
issue. Assignment
appears to be well
written with no more
than 3-5 errors.
Student provides a
final written product
that covers the
above-minimal
requirements.
7 points
Assignment reflects
basic writing and
grammar, but more
than 5 errors. Key
terms and concepts
are somewhat vague
and not completely
explained by student.
Student uses a basic
vocabulary in
assignment.
Student’s writing
ability is average, but
demonstrates a basic
understanding of the
subject matter.
5 points
Topics, concepts, and
ideas are not
coherently discussed
or expressed in
assignments.
Student’s writing
style is weak and
needs improvement,
along with numerous
proofreading errors.
Assignment lacks
clarity, consistency,
and correctness.
Student needs to
review and revise
assignment.
1 point
/10
USE OF
COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY/
AND
APPLICATIONS
Student provides a
high-caliber, formatted
assignment. Learner
exhibits excellent use of
computer technology in
the development of
Assignment presents
an above-average use
of formatting skills,
with less than 3
errors. Students has
a good command of
Student demonstrates
a basic knowledge of
computer
applications.
Appearance of final
assignment
Student needs to
develop better
formatting skills.
The student may
need to take
additional training or
/5
assignment. Quality
and appropriateness of
stated references
demonstrate the
student’s ability to use
technology to conduct
applicable research.
Given assignment
includes appropriate
word processing,
spreadsheet and/or other
computer applications
as part of the final
product.
5 points
computer
applications to format
information and/or
figures in an
appropriate format.
Student uses at least
two types of
computer
applications to
produce a quality
assignment.
4 points
demonstrates the
student’s limited
ability to format and
present data.
Resources used in
assignment are
limited. Student may
need to obtain further
help in the use of
computer
applications and
Internet research.
3 points
obtain help from the
Educator Help Desk
while preparing an
assignment.
Research and
resources presented
in the assignment are
limited. Student
needs to expand
research scope. The
number of formatting
errors is not
acceptable.
1 point
RESEARCH
SKILL
Student provides
sophisticated synthesis
of complex body of
information in the
preparation of
assignment. Research
provided by student
contributes significantly
to the development of
the overall thesis.
Student incorporates at
least of 7-10 quality
references in
assignment. Student
incorporates a variety of
research resources and
methodology in the
preparation of
assignment.
10 points
Student achieves an
above average
synthesis of research,
but interpretation is
narrow in scope and
description within
assignment.
Assignment contains
less than 7 resources,
and presents an
average overview of
key concepts.
7 points
Assignment provides
a basic, but
borderline
perspective of
student’s research
abilities. Student has
incorporated less than
4 sources, which does
not attempt to cover
key elements of
assignment.
5 points
Student fails to
provide an adequate
synthesis of research
collected for
assignment. The lack
of appropriate
references or source
materials
demonstrates the
student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to
review and revise the
assignment. The
paper is not of
acceptable quality for
graduate-level work.
1 point
/10
TOTAL POINTS /100
**## SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf**
Research Paper
Graduate Level Rubric:
APUS
Assignment
Graduate Level
Rubric
500-600
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
TOTAL
POINTS
FOCUS AND
THESIS
Student exhibits a
defined and clear
understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well
constructed to help
guide the reader
throughout the
assignment. Student
builds upon the thesis of
the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
10 points
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the thesis.
Student demonstrates
an effective
presentation of thesis,
with most support
statements helping to
support the key focus
of assignment.
7 points
Student exhibits a
basic understanding
of the intended
assignment, but the
thesis is not fully
supported throughout
the assignment.
While thesis helps to
guide the
development of the
assignment, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between thoughts.
While student has
included a few
supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of
the assignment.
5 points
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader
is unable to follow
the logic used for the
thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction
of thesis is not clearly
evident, and reader
must look deeper to
discover the focus of
the writer. Student’s
writing is weak in the
inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
1 point
/10
CONTENT AND
SUBJECT
KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of
the subject matter in the
assignment.
Assignment shows an
impressive level of
depth of student’s
ability to relate course
content to practical
examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details,
facts, and concepts in a
logical sequence.
25 points
Student exhibits
above average usage
of subject matter in
assignment. Student
provides above
average ability in
relating course
content in examples
given. Details and
facts presented
provide an adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
20 points
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a general,
fundamental
understanding of the
course material.
Whereas, there are
areas of some
concerning in the
linkages provided
between facts and
supporting
statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only
meets the minimum
requirements in this
area.
15 points
Student tries to
explain some
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Assignment
appears vague or
incomplete in various
segments. Student
presents concepts in
isolation, and does
not perceive to have a
logical sequencing of
ideas.
10 points
/25
CRITICAL
THINKING
SKILLS
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for
500-600 level work.
Learner provides a
strategic approach in
presenting examples of
problem solving or
critical thinking, while
drawing logical
conclusions which are
not immediately
Student exhibits a
good command of
critical thinking skills
in the presentation of
material and
supporting
statements.
Assignment
demonstrates the
student’s above
average use of
relating concepts by
Student takes a
common,
conventional
approach in guiding
the reader through
various linkages and
connections
presented in
assignment.
However, student
presents a limited
perspective on key
Student demonstrates
beginning
understanding of key
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Learner is
unable to apply
information in a
problem-solving
fashion. Student
presents confusing
statements and facts
/25
obvious. Student
provides well-supported
ideas and reflection
with a variety of current
and/or world views in
the assignment. Student
presents a genuine
intellectual
development of ideas
throughout assignment.
25 points
using a variety of
factors. Overall,
student provides
adequate conclusions,
with 2 or fewer
errors.
20 points
concepts throughout
assignment. Student
appears to have
problems applying
information in a
problem-solving
manner.
15 points
in assignment. No
evidence or little
semblance of critical
thinking skills.
10 points
ORGANIZATIO
N OF IDEAS
AND FORMAT
Student thoroughly
understands and excels
in explaining all major
points. An original,
unique, and/or
imaginative approach to
overall ideas, concepts,
and findings is
presented. Overall
format of assignment
includes an appropriate
introduction (or
abstract), well-
developed paragraphs,
and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s
ability to plan and
organize research in a
logical sequence.
Student uses at least of
5-7 references in
assignment.
15 points
Student explains the
majority of points
and concepts in the
assignment. Learner
demonstrates a good
skill level in
formatting and
organizing material
in assignment.
Student presents an
above average level
of preparedness, with
a few formatting
errors. Assignment
contains less than 5
resources.
10 points
Learner applies some
points and concepts
incorrectly. Student
uses a variety of
formatting styles,
with some
inconsistencies
throughout the paper.
Assignment does not
have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing. Student
uses less than 3
sources or references.
7 points
Assignment reveals
formatting errors and
a lack of
organization.
Student presents an
incomplete attempt to
provide linkages or
explanation of key
terms. The lack of
appropriate
references or source
materials
demonstrates the
student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to
review and revise the
assignment.
1 point
/15
WRITING
CONVENTIONS
(GRAMMAR &
MECHANICS)
Student demonstrates an
excellent command of
grammar, as well as
presents research in a
clear and concise
writing style. Presents
a thorough, extensive
understanding of word
usage. Student excels
in the selection and
development of a well-
planned research
assignment.
Assignment is error-free
and reflects student’s
ability to prepare a
high-quality academic
assignment.
10 points
Student provides an
effective display of
good writing and
grammar.
Assignment reflects
student’s ability to
select appropriate
word usage and
present an above
average presentation
of a given topic or
issue. Assignment
appears to be well
written with no more
than 3-5 errors.
Student provides a
final written product
that covers the
above-minimal
requirements.
7 points
Assignment reflects
basic writing and
grammar, but more
than 5 errors. Key
terms and concepts
are somewhat vague
and not completely
explained by student.
Student uses a basic
vocabulary in
assignment.
Student’s writing
ability is average, but
demonstrates a basic
understanding of the
subject matter.
5 points
Topics, concepts, and
ideas are not
coherently discussed
or expressed in
assignments.
Student’s writing
style is weak and
needs improvement,
along with numerous
proofreading errors.
Assignment lacks
clarity, consistency,
and correctness.
Student needs to
review and revise
assignment.
1 point
/10
USE OF
COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY/
AND
APPLICATIONS
Student provides a
high-caliber, formatted
assignment. Learner
exhibits excellent use of
computer technology in
the development of
Assignment presents
an above-average use
of formatting skills,
with less than 3
errors. Students has
a good command of
Student demonstrates
a basic knowledge of
computer
applications.
Appearance of final
assignment
Student needs to
develop better
formatting skills.
The student may
need to take
additional training or
/5
assignment. Quality
and appropriateness of
stated references
demonstrate the
student’s ability to use
technology to conduct
applicable research.
Given assignment
includes appropriate
word processing,
spreadsheet and/or other
computer applications
as part of the final
product.
5 points
computer
applications to format
information and/or
figures in an
appropriate format.
Student uses at least
two types of
computer
applications to
produce a quality
assignment.
4 points
demonstrates the
student’s limited
ability to format and
present data.
Resources used in
assignment are
limited. Student may
need to obtain further
help in the use of
computer
applications and
Internet research.
3 points
obtain help from the
Educator Help Desk
while preparing an
assignment.
Research and
resources presented
in the assignment are
limited. Student
needs to expand
research scope. The
number of formatting
errors is not
acceptable.
1 point
RESEARCH
SKILL
Student provides
sophisticated synthesis
of complex body of
information in the
preparation of
assignment. Research
provided by student
contributes significantly
to the development of
the overall thesis.
Student incorporates at
least of 7-10 quality
references in
assignment. Student
incorporates a variety of
research resources and
methodology in the
preparation of
assignment.
10 points
Student achieves an
above average
synthesis of research,
but interpretation is
narrow in scope and
description within
assignment.
Assignment contains
less than 7 resources,
and presents an
average overview of
key concepts.
7 points
Assignment provides
a basic, but
borderline
perspective of
student’s research
abilities. Student has
incorporated less than
4 sources, which does
not attempt to cover
key elements of
assignment.
5 points
Student fails to
provide an adequate
synthesis of research
collected for
assignment. The lack
of appropriate
references or source
materials
demonstrates the
student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to
review and revise the
assignment. The
paper is not of
acceptable quality for
graduate-level work.
1 point
/10
TOTAL POINTS /100
**## CourseSchedule-SCMG502I001Summer2026.pdf**
Week 4: Case Assignment II – Due
Aug 30, 2026 11:59 PM
SCMG502 I001 Summer 2026
SCMG502 I001 Summer 20… JI
Microsoft 365 Course Home Content Discussions Class Progress Course Tools Library
Help More
Today and tomorrow Week 4: Case Assignment II – Due Print Settings
Course Objective:
C03: Categorize issues and concerns in global
sourcing decisions
Prompt:
Discuss the use of Incoterms in international trade. At
a minimum, address aspects such as the value
Incoterms bring to an agreement, the advantages or
disadvantages of using a specific Incoterm, and what
companies need to know when using Incoterms.
Information from the International Chamber of
Commerce about the newest Incoterms 2020 is
available at their site: Which Incoterms rule should I
use?
Instructions:
Label your Word document as follows:
yourlastname.doc (ex: Johnson.docx)
Write a 1,000 word APA formatted paper on
the use of Incoterms in international trade
All charts, graphs, pictures are to go in the
appendix (not a substitute for content)
Make sure you use three to five credible and
reliable resources; format in APA
Refrain from excessive use of quotes in your
response (less than 5%)
Once you submit your document to the
assignment folder it will automatically be
Tasks
Add a task…
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lp/ouHome/defaultHome.d2l](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lp/ouHome/defaultHome.d2l)
[http://mail.mycampus.apus.edu/](http://mail.mycampus.apus.edu/)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/1399203/discussions/List](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/1399203/discussions/List)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/userprogress/315916/1399203/Summary?searchString=&sortField=SortLastName&sortDirection=0](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/userprogress/315916/1399203/Summary?searchString=&sortField=SortLastName&sortDirection=0)
[https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/calendar/1399203/home/list?day=20&month=8&year=2026](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/calendar/1399203/home/list?day=20&month=8&year=2026)
[https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/](https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/)
[https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/](https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/)
Week 4: Case Assignment II
Due August 30 at 11:59 PM
loaded to Copyleaks within the course. Your
similarity scan score must be 20% or less (the
following will be excluded: headers,
bibliography, etc. prior to instructor grading
paper—focus on the content of scan
percentage)
Plagiarism will result in an automatic zero for
this assignment
There are no late assignments accepted
after the last day of the course
Grading Rubric: See the grading rubric for more
information on assignment grading.
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=1399203&db=702536](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=1399203&db=702536)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/content/enforced/1399203-812029/SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/content/enforced/1399203-812029/SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf)
**## SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf**
Research Paper
Graduate Level Rubric:
APUS
Assignment
Graduate Level
Rubric
500-600
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
TOTAL
POINTS
FOCUS AND
THESIS
Student exhibits a
defined and clear
understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well
constructed to help
guide the reader
throughout the
assignment. Student
builds upon the thesis of
the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
10 points
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the thesis.
Student demonstrates
an effective
presentation of thesis,
with most support
statements helping to
support the key focus
of assignment.
7 points
Student exhibits a
basic understanding
of the intended
assignment, but the
thesis is not fully
supported throughout
the assignment.
While thesis helps to
guide the
development of the
assignment, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between thoughts.
While student has
included a few
supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of
the assignment.
5 points
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader
is unable to follow
the logic used for the
thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction
of thesis is not clearly
evident, and reader
must look deeper to
discover the focus of
the writer. Student’s
writing is weak in the
inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
1 point
/10
CONTENT AND
SUBJECT
KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of
the subject matter in the
assignment.
Assignment shows an
impressive level of
depth of student’s
ability to relate course
content to practical
examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details,
facts, and concepts in a
logical sequence.
25 points
Student exhibits
above average usage
of subject matter in
assignment. Student
provides above
average ability in
relating course
content in examples
given. Details and
facts presented
provide an adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
20 points
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a general,
fundamental
understanding of the
course material.
Whereas, there are
areas of some
concerning in the
linkages provided
between facts and
supporting
statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only
meets the minimum
requirements in this
area.
15 points
Student tries to
explain some
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Assignment
appears vague or
incomplete in various
segments. Student
presents concepts in
isolation, and does
not perceive to have a
logical sequencing of
ideas.
10 points
/25
CRITICAL
THINKING
SKILLS
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for
500-600 level work.
Learner provides a
strategic approach in
presenting examples of
problem solving or
critical thinking, while
drawing logical
conclusions which are
not immediately
Student exhibits a
good command of
critical thinking skills
in the presentation of
material and
supporting
statements.
Assignment
demonstrates the
student’s above
average use of
relating concepts by
Student takes a
common,
conventional
approach in guiding
the reader through
various linkages and
connections
presented in
assignment.
However, student
presents a limited
perspective on key
Student demonstrates
beginning
understanding of key
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Learner is
unable to apply
information in a
problem-solving
fashion. Student
presents confusing
statements and facts
/25
obvious. Student
provides well-supported
ideas and reflection
with a variety of current
and/or world views in
the assignment. Student
presents a genuine
intellectual
development of ideas
throughout assignment.
25 points
using a variety of
factors. Overall,
student provides
adequate conclusions,
with 2 or fewer
errors.
20 points
concepts throughout
assignment. Student
appears to have
problems applying
information in a
problem-solving
manner.
15 points
in assignment. No
evidence or little
semblance of critical
thinking skills.
10 points
ORGANIZATIO
N OF IDEAS
AND FORMAT
Student thoroughly
understands and excels
in explaining all major
points. An original,
unique, and/or
imaginative approach to
overall ideas, concepts,
and findings is
presented. Overall
format of assignment
includes an appropriate
introduction (or
abstract), well-
developed paragraphs,
and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s
ability to plan and
organize research in a
logical sequence.
Student uses at least of
5-7 references in
assignment.
15 points
Student explains the
majority of points
and concepts in the
assignment. Learner
demonstrates a good
skill level in
formatting and
organizing material
in assignment.
Student presents an
above average level
of preparedness, with
a few formatting
errors. Assignment
contains less than 5
resources.
10 points
Learner applies some
points and concepts
incorrectly. Student
uses a variety of
formatting styles,
with some
inconsistencies
throughout the paper.
Assignment does not
have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing. Student
uses less than 3
sources or references.
7 points
Assignment reveals
formatting errors and
a lack of
organization.
Student presents an
incomplete attempt to
provide linkages or
explanation of key
terms. The lack of
appropriate
references or source
materials
demonstrates the
student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to
review and revise the
assignment.
1 point
/15
WRITING
CONVENTIONS
(GRAMMAR &
MECHANICS)
Student demonstrates an
excellent command of
grammar, as well as
presents research in a
clear and concise
writing style. Presents
a thorough, extensive
understanding of word
usage. Student excels
in the selection and
development of a well-
planned research
assignment.
Assignment is error-free
and reflects student’s
ability to prepare a
high-quality academic
assignment.
10 points
Student provides an
effective display of
good writing and
grammar.
Assignment reflects
student’s ability to
select appropriate
word usage and
present an above
average presentation
of a given topic or
issue. Assignment
appears to be well
written with no more
than 3-5 errors.
Student provides a
final written product
that covers the
above-minimal
requirements.
7 points
Assignment reflects
basic writing and
grammar, but more
than 5 errors. Key
terms and concepts
are somewhat vague
and not completely
explained by student.
Student uses a basic
vocabulary in
assignment.
Student’s writing
ability is average, but
demonstrates a basic
understanding of the
subject matter.
5 points
Topics, concepts, and
ideas are not
coherently discussed
or expressed in
assignments.
Student’s writing
style is weak and
needs improvement,
along with numerous
proofreading errors.
Assignment lacks
clarity, consistency,
and correctness.
Student needs to
review and revise
assignment.
1 point
/10
USE OF
COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY/
AND
APPLICATIONS
Student provides a
high-caliber, formatted
assignment. Learner
exhibits excellent use of
computer technology in
the development of
Assignment presents
an above-average use
of formatting skills,
with less than 3
errors. Students has
a good command of
Student demonstrates
a basic knowledge of
computer
applications.
Appearance of final
assignment
Student needs to
develop better
formatting skills.
The student may
need to take
additional training or
/5
assignment. Quality
and appropriateness of
stated references
demonstrate the
student’s ability to use
technology to conduct
applicable research.
Given assignment
includes appropriate
word processing,
spreadsheet and/or other
computer applications
as part of the final
product.
5 points
computer
applications to format
information and/or
figures in an
appropriate format.
Student uses at least
two types of
computer
applications to
produce a quality
assignment.
4 points
demonstrates the
student’s limited
ability to format and
present data.
Resources used in
assignment are
limited. Student may
need to obtain further
help in the use of
computer
applications and
Internet research.
3 points
obtain help from the
Educator Help Desk
while preparing an
assignment.
Research and
resources presented
in the assignment are
limited. Student
needs to expand
research scope. The
number of formatting
errors is not
acceptable.
1 point
RESEARCH
SKILL
Student provides
sophisticated synthesis
of complex body of
information in the
preparation of
assignment. Research
provided by student
contributes significantly
to the development of
the overall thesis.
Student incorporates at
least of 7-10 quality
references in
assignment. Student
incorporates a variety of
research resources and
methodology in the
preparation of
assignment.
10 points
Student achieves an
above average
synthesis of research,
but interpretation is
narrow in scope and
description within
assignment.
Assignment contains
less than 7 resources,
and presents an
average overview of
key concepts.
7 points
Assignment provides
a basic, but
borderline
perspective of
student’s research
abilities. Student has
incorporated less than
4 sources, which does
not attempt to cover
key elements of
assignment.
5 points
Student fails to
provide an adequate
synthesis of research
collected for
assignment. The lack
of appropriate
references or source
materials
demonstrates the
student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to
review and revise the
assignment. The
paper is not of
acceptable quality for
graduate-level work.
1 point
/10
TOTAL POINTS /100
**## CourseSchedule-SCMG502I001Summer2026.pdf**
Week 4: Case Assignment II – Due
Aug 30, 2026 11:59 PM
SCMG502 I001 Summer 2026
SCMG502 I001 Summer 20… JI
Microsoft 365 Course Home Content Discussions Class Progress Course Tools Library
Help More
Today and tomorrow Week 4: Case Assignment II – Due Print Settings
Course Objective:
C03: Categorize issues and concerns in global
sourcing decisions
Prompt:
Discuss the use of Incoterms in international trade. At
a minimum, address aspects such as the value
Incoterms bring to an agreement, the advantages or
disadvantages of using a specific Incoterm, and what
companies need to know when using Incoterms.
Information from the International Chamber of
Commerce about the newest Incoterms 2020 is
available at their site: Which Incoterms rule should I
use?
Instructions:
Label your Word document as follows:
yourlastname.doc (ex: Johnson.docx)
Write a 1,000 word APA formatted paper on
the use of Incoterms in international trade
All charts, graphs, pictures are to go in the
appendix (not a substitute for content)
Make sure you use three to five credible and
reliable resources; format in APA
Refrain from excessive use of quotes in your
response (less than 5%)
Once you submit your document to the
assignment folder it will automatically be
Tasks
Add a task…
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lp/ouHome/defaultHome.d2l](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lp/ouHome/defaultHome.d2l)
[http://mail.mycampus.apus.edu/](http://mail.mycampus.apus.edu/)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/home/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/1399203](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/1399203)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/1399203/discussions/List](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/1399203/discussions/List)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/userprogress/315916/1399203/Summary?searchString=&sortField=SortLastName&sortDirection=0](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/userprogress/315916/1399203/Summary?searchString=&sortField=SortLastName&sortDirection=0)
[https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/](https://www.apus.edu/apus-library/)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/calendar/1399203/home/list?day=20&month=8&year=2026](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/calendar/1399203/home/list?day=20&month=8&year=2026)
[https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/](https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/)
[https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/](https://iccwbo.org/resources-for-business/incoterms-rules/what-are-the-key-changes-in-incoterms-2020/)
Week 4: Case Assignment II
Due August 30 at 11:59 PM
loaded to Copyleaks within the course. Your
similarity scan score must be 20% or less (the
following will be excluded: headers,
bibliography, etc. prior to instructor grading
paper—focus on the content of scan
percentage)
Plagiarism will result in an automatic zero for
this assignment
There are no late assignments accepted
after the last day of the course
Grading Rubric: See the grading rubric for more
information on assignment grading.
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=1399203&db=702536](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=1399203&db=702536)
[https://myclassroom.apus.edu/content/enforced/1399203-812029/SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/content/enforced/1399203-812029/SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf)
**## SCMG-Graduate-Written-Rubrics.pdf**
Research Paper
Graduate Level Rubric:
APUS
Assignment
Graduate Level
Rubric
500-600
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
TOTAL
POINTS
FOCUS AND
THESIS
Student exhibits a
defined and clear
understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well
constructed to help
guide the reader
throughout the
assignment. Student
builds upon the thesis of
the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
10 points
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the thesis.
Student demonstrates
an effective
presentation of thesis,
with most support
statements helping to
support the key focus
of assignment.
7 points
Student exhibits a
basic understanding
of the intended
assignment, but the
thesis is not fully
supported throughout
the assignment.
While thesis helps to
guide the
development of the
assignment, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between thoughts.
While student has
included a few
supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of
the assignment.
5 points
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader
is unable to follow
the logic used for the
thesis and
development of key
themes. Introduction
of thesis is not clearly
evident, and reader
must look deeper to
discover the focus of
the writer. Student’s
writing is weak in the
inclusion of
supporting facts or
statements.
1 point
/10
CONTENT AND
SUBJECT
KNOWLEDGE
Student demonstrates
proficient command of
the subject matter in the
assignment.
Assignment shows an
impressive level of
depth of student’s
ability to relate course
content to practical
examples and
applications. Student
provides comprehensive
analysis of details,
facts, and concepts in a
logical sequence.
25 points
Student exhibits
above average usage
of subject matter in
assignment. Student
provides above
average ability in
relating course
content in examples
given. Details and
facts presented
provide an adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
20 points
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a general,
fundamental
understanding of the
course material.
Whereas, there are
areas of some
concerning in the
linkages provided
between facts and
supporting
statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only
meets the minimum
requirements in this
area.
15 points
Student tries to
explain some
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Assignment
appears vague or
incomplete in various
segments. Student
presents concepts in
isolation, and does
not perceive to have a
logical sequencing of
ideas.
10 points
/25
CRITICAL
THINKING
SKILLS
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical
thinking necessary for
500-600 level work.
Learner provides a
strategic approach in
presenting examples of
problem solving or
critical thinking, while
drawing logical
conclusions which are
not immediately
Student exhibits a
good command of
critical thinking skills
in the presentation of
material and
supporting
statements.
Assignment
demonstrates the
student’s above
average use of
relating concepts by
Student takes a
common,
conventional
approach in guiding
the reader through
various linkages and
connections
presented in
assignment.
However, student
presents a limited
perspective on key
Student demonstrates
beginning
understanding of key
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Learner is
unable to apply
information in a
problem-solving
fashion. Student
presents confusing
statements and facts
/25
obvious. Student
provides well-supported
ideas and reflection
with a variety of current
and/or world views in
the assignment. Student
presents a genuine
intellectual
development of ideas
throughout assignment.
25 points
using a variety of
factors. Overall,
student provides
adequate conclusions,
with 2 or fewer
errors.
20 points
concepts throughout
assignment. Student
appears to have
problems applying
information in a
problem-solving
manner.
15 points
in assignment. No
evidence or little
semblance of critical
thinking skills.
10 points
ORGANIZATIO
N OF IDEAS
AND FORMAT
Student thoroughly
understands and excels
in explaining all major
points. An original,
unique, and/or
imaginative approach to
overall ideas, concepts,
and findings is
presented. Overall
format of assignment
includes an appropriate
introduction (or
abstract), well-
developed paragraphs,
and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s
ability to plan and
organize research in a
logical sequence.
Student uses at least of
5-7 references in
assignment.
15 points
Student explains the
majority of points
and concepts in the
assignment. Learner
demonstrates a good
skill level in
formatting and
organizing material
in assignment.
Student presents an
above average level
of preparedness, with
a few formatting
errors. Assignment
contains less than 5
resources.
10 points
Learner applies some
points and concepts
incorrectly. Student
uses a variety of
formatting styles,
with some
inconsistencies
throughout the paper.
Assignment does not
have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing. Student
uses less than 3
sources or references.
7 points
Assignment reveals
formatting errors and
a lack of
organization.
Student presents an
incomplete attempt to
provide linkages or
explanation of key
terms. The lack of
appropriate
references or source
materials
demonstrates the
student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to
review and revise the
assignment.
1 point
/15
WRITING
CONVENTIONS
(GRAMMAR &
MECHANICS)
Student demonstrates an
excellent command of
grammar, as well as
presents research in a
clear and concise
writing style. Presents
a thorough, extensive
understanding of word
usage. Student excels
in the selection and
development of a well-
planned research
assignment.
Assignment is error-free
and reflects student’s
ability to prepare a
high-quality academic
assignment.
10 points
Student provides an
effective display of
good writing and
grammar.
Assignment reflects
student’s ability to
select appropriate
word usage and
present an above
average presentation
of a given topic or
issue. Assignment
appears to be well
written with no more
than 3-5 errors.
Student provides a
final written product
that covers the
above-minimal
requirements.
7 points
Assignment reflects
basic writing and
grammar, but more
than 5 errors. Key
terms and concepts
are somewhat vague
and not completely
explained by student.
Student uses a basic
vocabulary in
assignment.
Student’s writing
ability is average, but
demonstrates a basic
understanding of the
subject matter.
5 points
Topics, concepts, and
ideas are not
coherently discussed
or expressed in
assignments.
Student’s writing
style is weak and
needs improvement,
along with numerous
proofreading errors.
Assignment lacks
clarity, consistency,
and correctness.
Student needs to
review and revise
assignment.
1 point
/10
USE OF
COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY/
AND
APPLICATIONS
Student provides a
high-caliber, formatted
assignment. Learner
exhibits excellent use of
computer technology in
the development of
Assignment presents
an above-average use
of formatting skills,
with less than 3
errors. Students has
a good command of
Student demonstrates
a basic knowledge of
computer
applications.
Appearance of final
assignment
Student needs to
develop better
formatting skills.
The student may
need to take
additional training or
/5
assignment. Quality
and appropriateness of
stated references
demonstrate the
student’s ability to use
technology to conduct
applicable research.
Given assignment
includes appropriate
word processing,
spreadsheet and/or other
computer applications
as part of the final
product.
5 points
computer
applications to format
information and/or
figures in an
appropriate format.
Student uses at least
two types of
computer
applications to
produce a quality
assignment.
4 points
demonstrates the
student’s limited
ability to format and
present data.
Resources used in
assignment are
limited. Student may
need to obtain further
help in the use of
computer
applications and
Internet research.
3 points
obtain help from the
Educator Help Desk
while preparing an
assignment.
Research and
resources presented
in the assignment are
limited. Student
needs to expand
research scope. The
number of formatting
errors is not
acceptable.
1 point
RESEARCH
SKILL
Student provides
sophisticated synthesis
of complex body of
information in the
preparation of
assignment. Research
provided by student
contributes significantly
to the development of
the overall thesis.
Student incorporates at
least of 7-10 quality
references in
assignment. Student
incorporates a variety of
research resources and
methodology in the
preparation of
assignment.
10 points
Student achieves an
above average
synthesis of research,
but interpretation is
narrow in scope and
description within
assignment.
Assignment contains
less than 7 resources,
and presents an
average overview of
key concepts.
7 points
Assignment provides
a basic, but
borderline
perspective of
student’s research
abilities. Student has
incorporated less than
4 sources, which does
not attempt to cover
key elements of
assignment.
5 points
Student fails to
provide an adequate
synthesis of research
collected for
assignment. The lack
of appropriate
references or source
materials
demonstrates the
student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to
review and revise the
assignment. The
paper is not of
acceptable quality for
graduate-level work.
1 point
/10
TOTAL POINTS /100
Leave a Reply