Executive Solution Overview
will probably not use all files – ## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug271.xlsx – ## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug27.xlsx – ## transportationsept10.xlsx – ## LPbasicwordproblemaug20.xlsx – Decisiontheory1QUAN4630sept24.xlsx – LPbasicaug13.xlsx – Utilityoct8.xlsx – SKM_C300i25100117370….
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
will probably not use all files
– ## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug271.xlsx
– ## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug27.xlsx
– ## transportationsept10.xlsx
– ## LPbasicwordproblemaug20.xlsx
– Decisiontheory1QUAN4630sept24.xlsx
– LPbasicaug13.xlsx
– Utilityoct8.xlsx
– SKM_C300i25100117370.pdf
– CuttingLPrevisedaug20.xlsx
– ClassificationwithDiscriminantAnalysisOct29.xlsx
– ForecastingQUAN4630nov12.xlsx
– CollegesandUniversitiesClusterAnalysisWorksheetNov5.xlsx
– QUAN4630takehomeFA25.xlsx
– RegressionQUAN4640oct15.xlsx
**## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug271.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 |
| | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 | | total expected $ return | $ 530,000.00 | <= | Available |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | | total cash spent | $ 140,000.00 | | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | | total number of empl | 10 | | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug27.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 |
| | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 | | total expected $ return | $ 530,000.00 | <= | Available |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | | total cash spent | $ 140,000.00 | | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | | total number of empl | 10 | | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## transportationsept10.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix |
| Marietta | 0 | 350 | 0 | 850 | integers |
| Minneapolis | 150 | 0 | 500 | 150 |
| min total ship cost | $ 28,171.00 |
| constraints | | total shipped | <= | capacity |
| Marietta shipping | | 1200 | | 1200 |
| Minn shipping | | 800 | | 800 |
| | | total received | >= | demand |
| Cleveland receiving | | 150 | | 150 |
| Baltimore receiving | | 350 | | 350 |
| Chicago receiving | | 500 | | 500 |
| Phoenix receiving | | 1000 | | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## LPbasicwordproblemaug20.xlsx**
## Basic LP
|
|
Maximize 5A -3B +10C
subject to:
A + B + 3C <= 20
B >= 2
3A – 2B <= 15
A,B,C >= 0
## Sheds
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | | | | | | type A | type B | type C |
| | | | | | | | 2 | 0 | 49 |
| | | | | | | profit | 80 | 84 | 85 | max | $ 4,325.00 |
| | | | | | | mach time | 2 | 3 | 4 | | 200 | <= | 200 |
| | | | | | | craft time | 5 | 5 | 3 | | 157 | <= | 160 |
A small firm builds three types of garden sheds.
Type A requires 2 hours of machine time and 5 hours of craftsman time.
Type B requires 3 hours of machine time and 5 hours of craftsman time.
Type C requires 4 hours of machine time and 3 hours of craftsman time.
Each day there are 200 hours of machine time available and 160 hours of craftsman time.
The profit on each type A shed is $80, on each type B shed is $84, and on each type C shed is 85 .
How many sheds of each type should we make to maximize the profit?
**Decisiontheory1QUAN4630sept24.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/decisiontheory1quan4630sept24-xlsx-10462391)
**LPbasicaug13.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lpbasicaug13-xlsx-10462367)
**Utilityoct8.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/utilityoct8-xlsx-10462379)
**SKM_C300i25100117370.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/skm-c300i25100117370-pdf-10462393)
**CuttingLPrevisedaug20.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cuttinglprevisedaug20-xlsx-10462369)
**ClassificationwithDiscriminantAnalysisOct29.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/classificationwithdiscriminantanalysisoct29-xlsx-10462389)
**ForecastingQUAN4630nov12.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/forecastingquan4630nov12-xlsx-10462387)
**CollegesandUniversitiesClusterAnalysisWorksheetNov5.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/collegesanduniversitiesclusteranalysisworksheetnov5-xlsx-10462383)
**QUAN4630takehomeFA25.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/quan4630takehomefa25-xlsx-10462385)
**RegressionQUAN4640oct15.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/regressionquan4640oct15-xlsx-10462377)
**RegressionQUAN4640oct15.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/regressionquan4640oct15-xlsx-10462377)
**## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug271.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 |
| | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 | | total expected $ return | $ 530,000.00 | <= | Available |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | | total cash spent | $ 140,000.00 | | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | | total number of empl | 10 | | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug27.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 |
| | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 | | total expected $ return | $ 530,000.00 | <= | Available |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | | total cash spent | $ 140,000.00 | | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | | total number of empl | 10 | | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## transportationsept10.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix |
| Marietta | 0 | 350 | 0 | 850 | integers |
| Minneapolis | 150 | 0 | 500 | 150 |
| min total ship cost | $ 28,171.00 |
| constraints | | total shipped | <= | capacity |
| Marietta shipping | | 1200 | | 1200 |
| Minn shipping | | 800 | | 800 |
| | | total received | >= | demand |
| Cleveland receiving | | 150 | | 150 |
| Baltimore receiving | | 350 | | 350 |
| Chicago receiving | | 500 | | 500 |
| Phoenix receiving | | 1000 | | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## LPbasicwordproblemaug20.xlsx**
## Basic LP
|
|
Maximize 5A -3B +10C
subject to:
A + B + 3C <= 20
B >= 2
3A – 2B <= 15
A,B,C >= 0
## Sheds
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | | | | | | type A | type B | type C |
| | | | | | | | 2 | 0 | 49 |
| | | | | | | profit | 80 | 84 | 85 | max | $ 4,325.00 |
| | | | | | | mach time | 2 | 3 | 4 | | 200 | <= | 200 |
| | | | | | | craft time | 5 | 5 | 3 | | 157 | <= | 160 |
A small firm builds three types of garden sheds.
Type A requires 2 hours of machine time and 5 hours of craftsman time.
Type B requires 3 hours of machine time and 5 hours of craftsman time.
Type C requires 4 hours of machine time and 3 hours of craftsman time.
Each day there are 200 hours of machine time available and 160 hours of craftsman time.
The profit on each type A shed is $80, on each type B shed is $84, and on each type C shed is 85 .
How many sheds of each type should we make to maximize the profit?
**Decisiontheory1QUAN4630sept24.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/decisiontheory1quan4630sept24-xlsx-10462391)
**LPbasicaug13.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lpbasicaug13-xlsx-10462367)
**Utilityoct8.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/utilityoct8-xlsx-10462379)
**SKM_C300i25100117370.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/skm-c300i25100117370-pdf-10462393)
**CuttingLPrevisedaug20.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cuttinglprevisedaug20-xlsx-10462369)
**ClassificationwithDiscriminantAnalysisOct29.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/classificationwithdiscriminantanalysisoct29-xlsx-10462389)
**ForecastingQUAN4630nov12.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/forecastingquan4630nov12-xlsx-10462387)
**CollegesandUniversitiesClusterAnalysisWorksheetNov5.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/collegesanduniversitiesclusteranalysisworksheetnov5-xlsx-10462383)
**QUAN4630takehomeFA25.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/quan4630takehomefa25-xlsx-10462385)
**RegressionQUAN4640oct15.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/regressionquan4640oct15-xlsx-10462377)
**## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug271.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 |
| | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 | | total expected $ return | $ 530,000.00 | <= | Available |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | | total cash spent | $ 140,000.00 | | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | | total number of empl | 10 | | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## LPprojectselectionandtransportationaug27.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 |
| | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 | | total expected $ return | $ 530,000.00 | <= | Available |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | | total cash spent | $ 140,000.00 | | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | | total number of empl | 10 | | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## transportationsept10.xlsx**
## project selection
| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | Project 1 | Project 2 | Project 3 | Project 4 | Project 5 | Available |
| Expected dollar return | $ 180,000.00 | $ 220,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 200,000.00 |
| Cash needed | $ 55,000.00 | $ 83,000.00 | $ 24,000.00 | $ 49,000.00 | $ 61,000.00 | $ 150,000.00 |
| No. of employees | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
We are charged with selecting from the five projects (shown at left). We do not have enough cash or employees to select all of them, so we will have to select a subset.
Our goal is to maximize the expected dollar return while keeping within our available resources (cash and employees).
## transportation
| | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix | Capacity |
| Marietta | $ 12.60 | $ 14.35 | $ 11.52 | $ 17.58 | 1200 |
| Minneapolis | $ 9.75 | $ 16.26 | $ 8.11 | $ 17.92 | 800 |
| Demand | 150 | 350 | 500 | 1000 |
| | | DISTRIBUTION | CENTER |
| PLANT | Cleveland | Baltimore | Chicago | Phoenix |
| Marietta | 0 | 350 | 0 | 850 | integers |
| Minneapolis | 150 | 0 | 500 | 150 |
| min total ship cost | $ 28,171.00 |
| constraints | | total shipped | <= | capacity |
| Marietta shipping | | 1200 | | 1200 |
| Minn shipping | | 800 | | 800 |
| | | total received | >= | demand |
| Cleveland receiving | | 150 | | 150 |
| Baltimore receiving | | 350 | | 350 |
| Chicago receiving | | 500 | | 500 |
| Phoenix receiving | | 1000 | | 1000 |
Suppose we need to ship refrigerators from our plants in Marietta and Minneapolis to our distribution centers in Cleveland, Baltimore, Chicago, and Phoenix.
Capacities, demand, and unit shipping costs are shown in the table. Our goal is to meet demand at the lowest total shipping cost.
**## LPbasicwordproblemaug20.xlsx**
## Basic LP
|
|
Maximize 5A -3B +10C
subject to:
A + B + 3C <= 20
B >= 2
3A – 2B <= 15
A,B,C >= 0
## Sheds
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | | | | | | type A | type B | type C |
| | | | | | | | 2 | 0 | 49 |
| | | | | | | profit | 80 | 84 | 85 | max | $ 4,325.00 |
| | | | | | | mach time | 2 | 3 | 4 | | 200 | <= | 200 |
| | | | | | | craft time | 5 | 5 | 3 | | 157 | <= | 160 |
A small firm builds three types of garden sheds.
Type A requires 2 hours of machine time and 5 hours of craftsman time.
Type B requires 3 hours of machine time and 5 hours of craftsman time.
Type C requires 4 hours of machine time and 3 hours of craftsman time.
Each day there are 200 hours of machine time available and 160 hours of craftsman time.
The profit on each type A shed is $80, on each type B shed is $84, and on each type C shed is 85 .
How many sheds of each type should we make to maximize the profit?
**Decisiontheory1QUAN4630sept24.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/decisiontheory1quan4630sept24-xlsx-10462391)
**LPbasicaug13.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lpbasicaug13-xlsx-10462367)
**Utilityoct8.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/utilityoct8-xlsx-10462379)
**SKM_C300i25100117370.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/skm-c300i25100117370-pdf-10462393)
**CuttingLPrevisedaug20.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cuttinglprevisedaug20-xlsx-10462369)
**ClassificationwithDiscriminantAnalysisOct29.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/classificationwithdiscriminantanalysisoct29-xlsx-10462389)
**ForecastingQUAN4630nov12.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/forecastingquan4630nov12-xlsx-10462387)
**CollegesandUniversitiesClusterAnalysisWorksheetNov5.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/collegesanduniversitiesclusteranalysisworksheetnov5-xlsx-10462383)
**QUAN4630takehomeFA25.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/quan4630takehomefa25-xlsx-10462385)
**RegressionQUAN4640oct15.xlsx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/regressionquan4640oct15-xlsx-10462377)
– 1
– 2
– 3
– 4
– 5
– 6
– 7
– 8
– 9
– 10
– 11
– 12
– 13
– 14