Assignment Prompt & Instructions
attached
**files (2)**
– ## ArgumentBlueprintMappingTemplate.docx
– ## blueprintmapping.docx
**## ArgumentBlueprintMappingTemplate.docx**
## **Argument Blueprint Mapping Template (Classical form)**
_Use the included Classical argument form template to outline your argument, bringing your preliminary research from last week into this template as supplemental material to create your fully complete argument outline map._
_Remember to use the material you started when researching last week in your Research and Exploration Findings Log._
_Start by developing a position statement based on your research. Be sure that your position statement does not use “I” anywhere and that it uses the_
_**Although+Claim+Because** form explained in your lecture._
_Ex:_
_**Although** some claim ________ (insert their objection), _________ (insert your_
_**claim**)_
_**because** _______ (insert your major reasons)._
**_Although_** _some claim that genetically modified organisms are dangerous to human health and should be banned, genetically modified crops are important to world nutrition_
_**because** they may be grown in hostile ecosystems, they often amplify nutrients, and they have not been shown to produce harmful effects in humans._
_Develop your argument by bringing in your source material from last week and expanding your ideas to create a full argument outline. You will use this outline next week while debating, so you want this outline to be as comprehensive as possible for a smoother debate next week._
| |
| — |
| **Introduction** |
| **Background (minimum of four sentences):**<br>**Importance (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Position Statement (one sentence that follows the Although+Claim+Because formula):** |
| **Argument 1 in support of your position** |
| **First major point supporting the position (minimum of one sentence):**<br>**Evidence supporting the major point (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Argument 2 in support of your position** |
| **Second major point supporting the position (minimum of one sentence):**<br>**Evidence supporting the major point (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Objections and Refutation** |
| **What may be objected (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**Evidence supporting the objection (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**Refutation (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Conclusion** |
| **Summary of argument (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**What compromise or solution can be reached on the topic? (minimum of two sentences)**<br>**Call to Action (minimum of two sentences):** |
**## blueprintmapping.docx**
Assignment: Argument Blueprint Mapping
By the end of this assignment, you will have a comprehensive argument map that both details your argument for the Week 9 debate and integrates your research from last week into the structure of your argument.
This assignment will serve as the foundation for your final debate. You will use your completed comprehensive argument map to engage in live argumentation with an AI tool next week. Therefore, you will want this Argument Blueprint to be as complete as possible, considering all aspects of the argument that may come up in your impromptu debate and using credible source material to support your claims.
· Use the
**Classical model** of argument as outlined in this week’s lecture and on the assignment template.
· Use the provided template and map your argument with your sources from last week integrated. Show where each source will appear in detail.
· Your outline should demonstrate not only your position, but also how evidence and objections fit into your reasoning.
**Submission**: Upload the completed outline with sources and argument map to Canvas for Week 8.
[**Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18654937?wrap=1) [**Download Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18654937/download?download_frd=1) **to complete your work and submit it for this week’s assignment.**
Rubric
**Argument Blueprint Mapping Grading Rubric (75 points total) (1)**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Argument Blueprint Mapping Grading Rubric (75 points total) (1) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction – Background & Importance (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Provides a thorough, clear background (at least 4 sentences) and detailed explanation of importance (at least 3 sentences). Fully contextualizes the issue and prepares the reader for the argument.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Background and importance included and mostly clear; may be missing 1–2 required sentences total (e.g., 5–6 total sentences instead of 7). May have minor gaps in detail.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Background or importance present but vague, incomplete, or significantly under length (4–5 total sentences).<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Background and/or importance minimal, unclear, or brief (3 or fewer total sentences).<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No background or importance provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePosition Statement (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Complete, concise, and well-formed Although+Claim+Because statement; clearly reflects research; uses no "I"; directly states stance.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Position statement mostly correct, minor clarity or format issues; reflects research.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Statement present but vague, missing part of the formula, or not fully grounded in research.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Statement unclear, incomplete, or does not follow formula.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No position statement provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTwo Supporting Arguments – Evidence & Reasoning (20 points) | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Includes two fully developed arguments. Each argument has 1 sentence for the main point and at least 3 sentences of evidence (minimum 4 total per argument). Reasoning is clear, logical, and well-supported by research.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsProficient** Two arguments present, but one may fall short of sentence minimum (e.g., 2 sentences of evidence). Reasoning mostly clear; minor depth issues.<br> <br>**15 to >11.0 ptsSatisfactory** One or both arguments underdeveloped or missing evidence (e.g., only 1–2 total sentences per argument).<br> <br>**11 to >6.0 ptsDeveloping** Arguments minimal or unclear; most sections fail to meet sentence requirements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsMissing** No complete arguments or evidence provided | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjections and Refutation (15 points) | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Addresses objections in full with strong reasoning and evidence. Includes at least 3 sentences for the objection, 3 sentences of supporting evidence, and 3 sentences of refutation (9 total). Logical and persuasive refutation connects back to main argument.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsProficient** Objection, evidence, and refutation present but one part may fall slightly short (e.g., 2 sentences instead of 3 in one section). Mostly clear and supported.<br> <br>**11 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactory** All three sections included but 2 or more fall short of sentence minimums or reasoning is vague.<br> <br>**8 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Objection or refutation minimal or unclear; fails to meet most sentence expectations.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** No objection or refutation included. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion – Summary, Compromise/Solution, and Call to Action (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Conclusion includes all three required components: summary (at least 3 sentences), compromise/solution (at least 2 sentences), and call to action (at least 2 sentences). Persuasive and logically connected to the argument.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** All elements included but one area may be slightly under length (e.g., 1 sentence short) or lacks minor detail.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Conclusion present but missing one of the three parts or under length in multiple sections.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Conclusion minimal or unclear; fails to meet sentence expectations for most elements.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No conclusion provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Research & Completeness (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Integrates research from Findings Log thoroughly across sections; all sections complete, showing a comprehensive blueprint.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Research included in most sections; most sections complete.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Some use of research; several sections incomplete or partially developed.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Minimal evidence of research; most sections incomplete.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No evidence of research; blueprint incomplete. | 10 pts |
Total Points: 75
**## blueprintmapping.docx**
Assignment: Argument Blueprint Mapping
By the end of this assignment, you will have a comprehensive argument map that both details your argument for the Week 9 debate and integrates your research from last week into the structure of your argument.
This assignment will serve as the foundation for your final debate. You will use your completed comprehensive argument map to engage in live argumentation with an AI tool next week. Therefore, you will want this Argument Blueprint to be as complete as possible, considering all aspects of the argument that may come up in your impromptu debate and using credible source material to support your claims.
· Use the
**Classical model** of argument as outlined in this week’s lecture and on the assignment template.
· Use the provided template and map your argument with your sources from last week integrated. Show where each source will appear in detail.
· Your outline should demonstrate not only your position, but also how evidence and objections fit into your reasoning.
**Submission**: Upload the completed outline with sources and argument map to Canvas for Week 8.
[**Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18654937?wrap=1) [**Download Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18654937/download?download_frd=1) **to complete your work and submit it for this week’s assignment.**
Rubric
**Argument Blueprint Mapping Grading Rubric (75 points total) (1)**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Argument Blueprint Mapping Grading Rubric (75 points total) (1) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction – Background & Importance (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Provides a thorough, clear background (at least 4 sentences) and detailed explanation of importance (at least 3 sentences). Fully contextualizes the issue and prepares the reader for the argument.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Background and importance included and mostly clear; may be missing 1–2 required sentences total (e.g., 5–6 total sentences instead of 7). May have minor gaps in detail.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Background or importance present but vague, incomplete, or significantly under length (4–5 total sentences).<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Background and/or importance minimal, unclear, or brief (3 or fewer total sentences).<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No background or importance provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePosition Statement (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Complete, concise, and well-formed Although+Claim+Because statement; clearly reflects research; uses no "I"; directly states stance.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Position statement mostly correct, minor clarity or format issues; reflects research.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Statement present but vague, missing part of the formula, or not fully grounded in research.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Statement unclear, incomplete, or does not follow formula.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No position statement provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTwo Supporting Arguments – Evidence & Reasoning (20 points) | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Includes two fully developed arguments. Each argument has 1 sentence for the main point and at least 3 sentences of evidence (minimum 4 total per argument). Reasoning is clear, logical, and well-supported by research.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsProficient** Two arguments present, but one may fall short of sentence minimum (e.g., 2 sentences of evidence). Reasoning mostly clear; minor depth issues.<br> <br>**15 to >11.0 ptsSatisfactory** One or both arguments underdeveloped or missing evidence (e.g., only 1–2 total sentences per argument).<br> <br>**11 to >6.0 ptsDeveloping** Arguments minimal or unclear; most sections fail to meet sentence requirements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsMissing** No complete arguments or evidence provided | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjections and Refutation (15 points) | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Addresses objections in full with strong reasoning and evidence. Includes at least 3 sentences for the objection, 3 sentences of supporting evidence, and 3 sentences of refutation (9 total). Logical and persuasive refutation connects back to main argument.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsProficient** Objection, evidence, and refutation present but one part may fall slightly short (e.g., 2 sentences instead of 3 in one section). Mostly clear and supported.<br> <br>**11 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactory** All three sections included but 2 or more fall short of sentence minimums or reasoning is vague.<br> <br>**8 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Objection or refutation minimal or unclear; fails to meet most sentence expectations.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** No objection or refutation included. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion – Summary, Compromise/Solution, and Call to Action (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Conclusion includes all three required components: summary (at least 3 sentences), compromise/solution (at least 2 sentences), and call to action (at least 2 sentences). Persuasive and logically connected to the argument.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** All elements included but one area may be slightly under length (e.g., 1 sentence short) or lacks minor detail.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Conclusion present but missing one of the three parts or under length in multiple sections.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Conclusion minimal or unclear; fails to meet sentence expectations for most elements.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No conclusion provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Research & Completeness (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Integrates research from Findings Log thoroughly across sections; all sections complete, showing a comprehensive blueprint.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Research included in most sections; most sections complete.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Some use of research; several sections incomplete or partially developed.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Minimal evidence of research; most sections incomplete.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No evidence of research; blueprint incomplete. | 10 pts |
Total Points: 75
**## ArgumentBlueprintMappingTemplate.docx**
## **Argument Blueprint Mapping Template (Classical form)**
_Use the included Classical argument form template to outline your argument, bringing your preliminary research from last week into this template as supplemental material to create your fully complete argument outline map._
_Remember to use the material you started when researching last week in your Research and Exploration Findings Log._
_Start by developing a position statement based on your research. Be sure that your position statement does not use “I” anywhere and that it uses the_
_**Although+Claim+Because** form explained in your lecture._
_Ex:_
_**Although** some claim ________ (insert their objection), _________ (insert your_
_**claim**)_
_**because** _______ (insert your major reasons)._
**_Although_** _some claim that genetically modified organisms are dangerous to human health and should be banned, genetically modified crops are important to world nutrition_
_**because** they may be grown in hostile ecosystems, they often amplify nutrients, and they have not been shown to produce harmful effects in humans._
_Develop your argument by bringing in your source material from last week and expanding your ideas to create a full argument outline. You will use this outline next week while debating, so you want this outline to be as comprehensive as possible for a smoother debate next week._
| |
| — |
| **Introduction** |
| **Background (minimum of four sentences):**<br>**Importance (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Position Statement (one sentence that follows the Although+Claim+Because formula):** |
| **Argument 1 in support of your position** |
| **First major point supporting the position (minimum of one sentence):**<br>**Evidence supporting the major point (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Argument 2 in support of your position** |
| **Second major point supporting the position (minimum of one sentence):**<br>**Evidence supporting the major point (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Objections and Refutation** |
| **What may be objected (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**Evidence supporting the objection (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**Refutation (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Conclusion** |
| **Summary of argument (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**What compromise or solution can be reached on the topic? (minimum of two sentences)**<br>**Call to Action (minimum of two sentences):** |
**## blueprintmapping.docx**
Assignment: Argument Blueprint Mapping
By the end of this assignment, you will have a comprehensive argument map that both details your argument for the Week 9 debate and integrates your research from last week into the structure of your argument.
This assignment will serve as the foundation for your final debate. You will use your completed comprehensive argument map to engage in live argumentation with an AI tool next week. Therefore, you will want this Argument Blueprint to be as complete as possible, considering all aspects of the argument that may come up in your impromptu debate and using credible source material to support your claims.
· Use the
**Classical model** of argument as outlined in this week’s lecture and on the assignment template.
· Use the provided template and map your argument with your sources from last week integrated. Show where each source will appear in detail.
· Your outline should demonstrate not only your position, but also how evidence and objections fit into your reasoning.
**Submission**: Upload the completed outline with sources and argument map to Canvas for Week 8.
[**Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18654937?wrap=1) [**Download Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18654937/download?download_frd=1) **to complete your work and submit it for this week’s assignment.**
Rubric
**Argument Blueprint Mapping Grading Rubric (75 points total) (1)**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Argument Blueprint Mapping Grading Rubric (75 points total) (1) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction – Background & Importance (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Provides a thorough, clear background (at least 4 sentences) and detailed explanation of importance (at least 3 sentences). Fully contextualizes the issue and prepares the reader for the argument.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Background and importance included and mostly clear; may be missing 1–2 required sentences total (e.g., 5–6 total sentences instead of 7). May have minor gaps in detail.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Background or importance present but vague, incomplete, or significantly under length (4–5 total sentences).<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Background and/or importance minimal, unclear, or brief (3 or fewer total sentences).<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No background or importance provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePosition Statement (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Complete, concise, and well-formed Although+Claim+Because statement; clearly reflects research; uses no "I"; directly states stance.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Position statement mostly correct, minor clarity or format issues; reflects research.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Statement present but vague, missing part of the formula, or not fully grounded in research.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Statement unclear, incomplete, or does not follow formula.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No position statement provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTwo Supporting Arguments – Evidence & Reasoning (20 points) | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Includes two fully developed arguments. Each argument has 1 sentence for the main point and at least 3 sentences of evidence (minimum 4 total per argument). Reasoning is clear, logical, and well-supported by research.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsProficient** Two arguments present, but one may fall short of sentence minimum (e.g., 2 sentences of evidence). Reasoning mostly clear; minor depth issues.<br> <br>**15 to >11.0 ptsSatisfactory** One or both arguments underdeveloped or missing evidence (e.g., only 1–2 total sentences per argument).<br> <br>**11 to >6.0 ptsDeveloping** Arguments minimal or unclear; most sections fail to meet sentence requirements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsMissing** No complete arguments or evidence provided | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjections and Refutation (15 points) | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Addresses objections in full with strong reasoning and evidence. Includes at least 3 sentences for the objection, 3 sentences of supporting evidence, and 3 sentences of refutation (9 total). Logical and persuasive refutation connects back to main argument.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsProficient** Objection, evidence, and refutation present but one part may fall slightly short (e.g., 2 sentences instead of 3 in one section). Mostly clear and supported.<br> <br>**11 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactory** All three sections included but 2 or more fall short of sentence minimums or reasoning is vague.<br> <br>**8 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Objection or refutation minimal or unclear; fails to meet most sentence expectations.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** No objection or refutation included. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion – Summary, Compromise/Solution, and Call to Action (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Conclusion includes all three required components: summary (at least 3 sentences), compromise/solution (at least 2 sentences), and call to action (at least 2 sentences). Persuasive and logically connected to the argument.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** All elements included but one area may be slightly under length (e.g., 1 sentence short) or lacks minor detail.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Conclusion present but missing one of the three parts or under length in multiple sections.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Conclusion minimal or unclear; fails to meet sentence expectations for most elements.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No conclusion provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Research & Completeness (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Integrates research from Findings Log thoroughly across sections; all sections complete, showing a comprehensive blueprint.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Research included in most sections; most sections complete.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Some use of research; several sections incomplete or partially developed.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Minimal evidence of research; most sections incomplete.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No evidence of research; blueprint incomplete. | 10 pts |
Total Points: 75
**## ArgumentBlueprintMappingTemplate.docx**
## **Argument Blueprint Mapping Template (Classical form)**
_Use the included Classical argument form template to outline your argument, bringing your preliminary research from last week into this template as supplemental material to create your fully complete argument outline map._
_Remember to use the material you started when researching last week in your Research and Exploration Findings Log._
_Start by developing a position statement based on your research. Be sure that your position statement does not use “I” anywhere and that it uses the_
_**Although+Claim+Because** form explained in your lecture._
_Ex:_
_**Although** some claim ________ (insert their objection), _________ (insert your_
_**claim**)_
_**because** _______ (insert your major reasons)._
**_Although_** _some claim that genetically modified organisms are dangerous to human health and should be banned, genetically modified crops are important to world nutrition_
_**because** they may be grown in hostile ecosystems, they often amplify nutrients, and they have not been shown to produce harmful effects in humans._
_Develop your argument by bringing in your source material from last week and expanding your ideas to create a full argument outline. You will use this outline next week while debating, so you want this outline to be as comprehensive as possible for a smoother debate next week._
| |
| — |
| **Introduction** |
| **Background (minimum of four sentences):**<br>**Importance (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Position Statement (one sentence that follows the Although+Claim+Because formula):** |
| **Argument 1 in support of your position** |
| **First major point supporting the position (minimum of one sentence):**<br>**Evidence supporting the major point (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Argument 2 in support of your position** |
| **Second major point supporting the position (minimum of one sentence):**<br>**Evidence supporting the major point (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Objections and Refutation** |
| **What may be objected (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**Evidence supporting the objection (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**Refutation (minimum of three sentences):** |
| **Conclusion** |
| **Summary of argument (minimum of three sentences):**<br>**What compromise or solution can be reached on the topic? (minimum of two sentences)**<br>**Call to Action (minimum of two sentences):** |
**## blueprintmapping.docx**
Assignment: Argument Blueprint Mapping
By the end of this assignment, you will have a comprehensive argument map that both details your argument for the Week 9 debate and integrates your research from last week into the structure of your argument.
This assignment will serve as the foundation for your final debate. You will use your completed comprehensive argument map to engage in live argumentation with an AI tool next week. Therefore, you will want this Argument Blueprint to be as complete as possible, considering all aspects of the argument that may come up in your impromptu debate and using credible source material to support your claims.
· Use the
**Classical model** of argument as outlined in this week’s lecture and on the assignment template.
· Use the provided template and map your argument with your sources from last week integrated. Show where each source will appear in detail.
· Your outline should demonstrate not only your position, but also how evidence and objections fit into your reasoning.
**Submission**: Upload the completed outline with sources and argument map to Canvas for Week 8.
[**Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18654937?wrap=1) [**Download Download this template**](https://canvas.south.edu/courses/75181/files/18654937/download?download_frd=1) **to complete your work and submit it for this week’s assignment.**
Rubric
**Argument Blueprint Mapping Grading Rubric (75 points total) (1)**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Argument Blueprint Mapping Grading Rubric (75 points total) (1) |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction – Background & Importance (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Provides a thorough, clear background (at least 4 sentences) and detailed explanation of importance (at least 3 sentences). Fully contextualizes the issue and prepares the reader for the argument.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Background and importance included and mostly clear; may be missing 1–2 required sentences total (e.g., 5–6 total sentences instead of 7). May have minor gaps in detail.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Background or importance present but vague, incomplete, or significantly under length (4–5 total sentences).<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Background and/or importance minimal, unclear, or brief (3 or fewer total sentences).<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No background or importance provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePosition Statement (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Complete, concise, and well-formed Although+Claim+Because statement; clearly reflects research; uses no "I"; directly states stance.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Position statement mostly correct, minor clarity or format issues; reflects research.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Statement present but vague, missing part of the formula, or not fully grounded in research.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Statement unclear, incomplete, or does not follow formula.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No position statement provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTwo Supporting Arguments – Evidence & Reasoning (20 points) | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Includes two fully developed arguments. Each argument has 1 sentence for the main point and at least 3 sentences of evidence (minimum 4 total per argument). Reasoning is clear, logical, and well-supported by research.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsProficient** Two arguments present, but one may fall short of sentence minimum (e.g., 2 sentences of evidence). Reasoning mostly clear; minor depth issues.<br> <br>**15 to >11.0 ptsSatisfactory** One or both arguments underdeveloped or missing evidence (e.g., only 1–2 total sentences per argument).<br> <br>**11 to >6.0 ptsDeveloping** Arguments minimal or unclear; most sections fail to meet sentence requirements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsMissing** No complete arguments or evidence provided | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjections and Refutation (15 points) | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Addresses objections in full with strong reasoning and evidence. Includes at least 3 sentences for the objection, 3 sentences of supporting evidence, and 3 sentences of refutation (9 total). Logical and persuasive refutation connects back to main argument.<br> <br>**14 to >11.0 ptsProficient** Objection, evidence, and refutation present but one part may fall slightly short (e.g., 2 sentences instead of 3 in one section). Mostly clear and supported.<br> <br>**11 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactory** All three sections included but 2 or more fall short of sentence minimums or reasoning is vague.<br> <br>**8 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Objection or refutation minimal or unclear; fails to meet most sentence expectations.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** No objection or refutation included. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion – Summary, Compromise/Solution, and Call to Action (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Conclusion includes all three required components: summary (at least 3 sentences), compromise/solution (at least 2 sentences), and call to action (at least 2 sentences). Persuasive and logically connected to the argument.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** All elements included but one area may be slightly under length (e.g., 1 sentence short) or lacks minor detail.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Conclusion present but missing one of the three parts or under length in multiple sections.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Conclusion minimal or unclear; fails to meet sentence expectations for most elements.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No conclusion provided. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Research & Completeness (10 points) | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Integrates research from Findings Log thoroughly across sections; all sections complete, showing a comprehensive blueprint.<br> <br>**9 to >7.0 ptsProficient** Research included in most sections; most sections complete.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactory** Some use of research; several sections incomplete or partially developed.<br> <br>**5 to >3.0 ptsDeveloping** Minimal evidence of research; most sections incomplete.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsMissing** No evidence of research; blueprint incomplete. | 10 pts |
Total Points: 75