Category: Education

  • [Solved] RESPONSES 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## DiscussionReplies2.docx **## DiscussionReplies2.docx** **Directions:** You must respond to the 2 classmates replies below of at least 100 words each. To encourage an atmosphere of a conversational discussion, citations and references are not required for the reply po…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## DiscussionReplies2.docx

    **## DiscussionReplies2.docx**

    **Directions:** You must respond to the 2 classmates replies below of at least 100 words each. To encourage an atmosphere of a conversational discussion, citations and references are not required for the reply posts. However, any sources cited must have been published within the last five years unless the student is citing classic or historical theoretical information or research. Acceptable sources include course materials, scholarly peer-reviewed sources, and/or the Bible, in current APA format, with at least 1 of the sources being from course materials or scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or texts. Each reply must be labeled in order to identify the classmate you are responding to.

    **Classmate One Jessica:**

    Chapter five has been my favorite chapter so far. I have always enjoyed learning about stage theories of development and how relatable they are to our own development. I now have a deeper understanding that stages are qualitative and can be met through proper development, but stages are to be met in a certain order and cannot be skipped or repeated (Lerner, 2018). Nature vs. nurture, or as I like to refer to it, the “great debate”, has also been an interest of mine, so when I learned about T.C. Schneirla and Anne Anastasi I was surprised that I had not heard of them until now.

    Another point about nature and nurture is that there are levels of the environment that may explain how the relationship works and how in some cases the environment can also have an effect on physical characteristics (Lerner, 2018). I found an interesting section on the human genome website, it said our genome is affected by the way we live (NIH, 2019), I feel this is another great example of how the theory of nature vs. nurture works and further credits information in our book.

    This week’s video; Developmental Psychology Theories 3: Ethological/Attachment and Humanistic Development Theories featured two theorists, Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow and their theory of humanism which came at the end of psychoanalysis and behaviorism, which were more about the experiences one had as a child that would shape their future. The humanistic approach was about self-actualization, Maslow and Rogers’ theory is still being used today in developmental psychology, but also as a way of teaching (DeRobertis and Bland, 2020). In my developmental psychology course, I teach nursing students but have a few students in the ECD program, we go over Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and I stress to them they will see it multiple times in their careers with their patients and students. Two positive aspects about the humanistic approach are it is patient-centered, and the data can be measured.

    References:

    DeRobertis, E. M., & Bland, A. M. (2020). Lifespan human development and “The humanistic perspective”: A contribution toward inclusion. The Humanistic Psychologist, 48(1), 3–27.
    [https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000141\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000141).

    Introduction to genomics. Genome.gov. (2019).
    [https://www.genome.gov/About-Genomics/Introduction-to-Genomics#one\
    Links to an external site.](https://www.genome.gov/About-Genomics/Introduction-to-Genomics).

    Lerner, R. M. (2018). Chapter 5/Theoretical roots of contemporary developmental science: Nomothetic (stage), differential, and idiographic (ipsative) approaches. In Concepts and Theories of Human Development (4th ed., p. 140). essay, Routledge.

    Lerner, R. M. (2018). Chapter 6/Toward resolving the nature-nurture controversy. In Concepts and Theories of Human Development (4th ed., p. 180). essay, Routledge.

    **Classmate two Tiffany:**

    I first became interested in attachment theory after working with a child diagnosed with Reactive Attachment Disorder. This sent me on quite the journey into the world of attachment. John Bowlby established the theory of attachment that stressed the importance of early relationships and the lasting impacts that can be left when there is separation or distance in those relationships. Twohig et al. (2024) discussed that attachment theory defines the lasting impact across a person's lifespan. John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, through observation and experiment, developed insight into how disorganized attachment could have tremendous consequences (Twohig et al., 2024). Children who develop Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) experience severe abuse and neglect and often suffer from lasting psychological effects (Betcher et al., 2023). Children who were diagnosed with RAD were exponentially more likely to suffer from substance use disorders, suicide attempts, high rates of unemployment and hospitalization (Betcher et al., 2023).

    The work of Bowlby and Ainsworth explored how disconnect between caregiver and child can create dysregulation and wreak total havoc on the nervous system, which can have a lasting impact on future social development (Twohig et. al, 2024). A child who is unable to build a secure attachment early in childhood are likely to struggle with attachment style later in life (Betcher et al., 2023). From the work I did early in my career, I recall the victim of severe neglect from infancy to 9 months old. At five years old, this individual required medication to stabilize mood, would often become violent with adoptive parents, and with peers. The sheer amount of dysregulation experienced often caused this individual to act out violently and hurt whoever was close by. The nervous system was shot and required intensive therapy to regain some sense of regulation. I find that a lot of the work done in attachment theory does prove helpful in addressing diagnoses such as RAD and the research is very applicable.

    References

    Betcher, H. K., Bommersbach, T. J., Perossa, B. A., Larrabee, B., Betcher, H. K., Bommersbach, T. J., Perossa, B. A., Croarkin, P. E., Romanowicz, M., Voort, J. L. V., & McKean, A. J. (2023). Adult outcomes of children with reactive attachment disorder in a non-institutionalized sample.
    _The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry._,
    _84_(6).
    [https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m14994\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m14994)

    Twohig, A., Lyne, J., & McNicolas, F. (2024). Attachment theory: survival, trauma, and war through the eyes of Bowlby.
    _Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine._,
    _41_(3), 273–275.
    [https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.12\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.12)

    **## DiscussionReplies2.docx**

    **Directions:** You must respond to the 2 classmates replies below of at least 100 words each. To encourage an atmosphere of a conversational discussion, citations and references are not required for the reply posts. However, any sources cited must have been published within the last five years unless the student is citing classic or historical theoretical information or research. Acceptable sources include course materials, scholarly peer-reviewed sources, and/or the Bible, in current APA format, with at least 1 of the sources being from course materials or scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or texts. Each reply must be labeled in order to identify the classmate you are responding to.

    **Classmate One Jessica:**

    Chapter five has been my favorite chapter so far. I have always enjoyed learning about stage theories of development and how relatable they are to our own development. I now have a deeper understanding that stages are qualitative and can be met through proper development, but stages are to be met in a certain order and cannot be skipped or repeated (Lerner, 2018). Nature vs. nurture, or as I like to refer to it, the “great debate”, has also been an interest of mine, so when I learned about T.C. Schneirla and Anne Anastasi I was surprised that I had not heard of them until now.

    Another point about nature and nurture is that there are levels of the environment that may explain how the relationship works and how in some cases the environment can also have an effect on physical characteristics (Lerner, 2018). I found an interesting section on the human genome website, it said our genome is affected by the way we live (NIH, 2019), I feel this is another great example of how the theory of nature vs. nurture works and further credits information in our book.

    This week’s video; Developmental Psychology Theories 3: Ethological/Attachment and Humanistic Development Theories featured two theorists, Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow and their theory of humanism which came at the end of psychoanalysis and behaviorism, which were more about the experiences one had as a child that would shape their future. The humanistic approach was about self-actualization, Maslow and Rogers’ theory is still being used today in developmental psychology, but also as a way of teaching (DeRobertis and Bland, 2020). In my developmental psychology course, I teach nursing students but have a few students in the ECD program, we go over Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and I stress to them they will see it multiple times in their careers with their patients and students. Two positive aspects about the humanistic approach are it is patient-centered, and the data can be measured.

    References:

    DeRobertis, E. M., & Bland, A. M. (2020). Lifespan human development and “The humanistic perspective”: A contribution toward inclusion. The Humanistic Psychologist, 48(1), 3–27.
    [https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000141\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000141).

    Introduction to genomics. Genome.gov. (2019).
    [https://www.genome.gov/About-Genomics/Introduction-to-Genomics#one\
    Links to an external site.](https://www.genome.gov/About-Genomics/Introduction-to-Genomics).

    Lerner, R. M. (2018). Chapter 5/Theoretical roots of contemporary developmental science: Nomothetic (stage), differential, and idiographic (ipsative) approaches. In Concepts and Theories of Human Development (4th ed., p. 140). essay, Routledge.

    Lerner, R. M. (2018). Chapter 6/Toward resolving the nature-nurture controversy. In Concepts and Theories of Human Development (4th ed., p. 180). essay, Routledge.

    **Classmate two Tiffany:**

    I first became interested in attachment theory after working with a child diagnosed with Reactive Attachment Disorder. This sent me on quite the journey into the world of attachment. John Bowlby established the theory of attachment that stressed the importance of early relationships and the lasting impacts that can be left when there is separation or distance in those relationships. Twohig et al. (2024) discussed that attachment theory defines the lasting impact across a person's lifespan. John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, through observation and experiment, developed insight into how disorganized attachment could have tremendous consequences (Twohig et al., 2024). Children who develop Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) experience severe abuse and neglect and often suffer from lasting psychological effects (Betcher et al., 2023). Children who were diagnosed with RAD were exponentially more likely to suffer from substance use disorders, suicide attempts, high rates of unemployment and hospitalization (Betcher et al., 2023).

    The work of Bowlby and Ainsworth explored how disconnect between caregiver and child can create dysregulation and wreak total havoc on the nervous system, which can have a lasting impact on future social development (Twohig et. al, 2024). A child who is unable to build a secure attachment early in childhood are likely to struggle with attachment style later in life (Betcher et al., 2023). From the work I did early in my career, I recall the victim of severe neglect from infancy to 9 months old. At five years old, this individual required medication to stabilize mood, would often become violent with adoptive parents, and with peers. The sheer amount of dysregulation experienced often caused this individual to act out violently and hurt whoever was close by. The nervous system was shot and required intensive therapy to regain some sense of regulation. I find that a lot of the work done in attachment theory does prove helpful in addressing diagnoses such as RAD and the research is very applicable.

    References

    Betcher, H. K., Bommersbach, T. J., Perossa, B. A., Larrabee, B., Betcher, H. K., Bommersbach, T. J., Perossa, B. A., Croarkin, P. E., Romanowicz, M., Voort, J. L. V., & McKean, A. J. (2023). Adult outcomes of children with reactive attachment disorder in a non-institutionalized sample.
    _The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry._,
    _84_(6).
    [https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m14994\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m14994)

    Twohig, A., Lyne, J., & McNicolas, F. (2024). Attachment theory: survival, trauma, and war through the eyes of Bowlby.
    _Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine._,
    _41_(3), 273–275.
    [https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.12\
    Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.12)

  • [Solved] Education Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Education Homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Education Week 4 assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached no plagiarism or AI need originality quality work week 4 attached – 2 years ago **files (4)** – ## Week4assingment.docx – ## _Week3Assignment-v1.docx – Chptr10.pdf – Chptr13.pdf **## Week4assingment.docx** ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-week-4-assignment-2088255…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached no plagiarism or AI need originality quality work week 4  attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (4)**

    – ## Week4assingment.docx

    – ## _Week3Assignment-v1.docx

    – Chptr10.pdf
    – Chptr13.pdf

    **## Week4assingment.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-week-4-assignment-20882555)**_The Search & Annotated Bibliography_**

    **Directions:**

    The goal of this assignment is to develop your critical thinking and research skills by evaluating and synthesizing information from different sources on a specific topic. You will assess the relevance, accuracy, and quality of each source and reflect on how it contributes to your understanding of the topic. The overall objective is to ensure you develop a broad range of research-based interpretive understanding of your topic. You are to review a minimum of three scholarly articles related to your research topic.

    1.
    **Select Your Sources**

    · Choose three credible and relevant sources. These can be academic journal articles, books, or reputable reports.

    · Ensure the sources are related to your research topic and provide a range of perspectives or insights.

    2.
    **Write the Citation (Current APA Style)**

    · For each source, begin with a full citation using the current APA format.

    · Ensure your citations are complete and properly formatted.

    3.
    **Summarize the Source (100-150 words per source)**

    · Provide a concise summary of the key points, arguments, or findings of the source.

    · Highlight the author’s main thesis and any relevant details that contribute to your research topic.

    4.
    **Evaluate the Source (100-150 words per source)**

    · Critically evaluate the credibility and reliability of the source.

    · Consider the author's qualifications, publication venue, and date of publication.

    · Assess the quality of the evidence provided, including whether it is backed by data, case studies, or peer-reviewed research.

    · Reflect on any potential bias, gaps, or limitations in the source.

    5.
    **Reflect on the Source's Relevance (100-150 words per source)**

    · Explain how this source is relevant to your research.

    · Discuss how the information contributes to your understanding of the topic, and how you might use it in your paper or project.

    · Compare this source with others you’ve found and explain whether it confirms, contradicts, or adds new perspectives.

    6.
    **Organize the Bibliography**

    · List the three sources in alphabetical order according to the author’s last name.

    · Ensure consistency in formatting and structure throughout the bibliography.

    ## image1.png

    **## _Week3Assignment-v1.docx**

    Running head: THE BASED OF PREDICTIONS & RATIONALE 2

    THE BASE OF PREDICTIONS & RATIONAL 2

    **The Base of Predictions & Rationale**

    St Thomas University

    EDU 530 Educational Measurement

    February 2, 2025

    **The Base of Predictions & Rational**

    The growing use of digital technologies in education informs my understanding of AI's potential in formative assessment. AI is used in educational technology to deliver real-time feedback, tailor learning, and help instructors. According to my coursework and readings, formative evaluation allows instructors to detect knowledge gaps, measure progress, and alter teaching (Sortwell et al., 2024). However, AI's ability to improve formative assessment faces severe practical difficulties. Many instructors have challenges using AI-driven formative assessment systems because of insufficient training, equity issues, and technical limits (Børte et al., 2023). AI can create individualized feedback on a scale, but its quality and trustworthiness compared to human review are disputed.

    One of my primary assumptions is that AI-embedded formative assessment will enhance K-12 individualized feedback and decision-making. Previous research has shown that AI can assess student replies, discover trends, and customize feedback to specific learning requirements (Weigand et al., 2024). AI-driven assessment systems might save instructors from grading and assessing student work, letting them concentrate on teaching and student engagement. However, AI may depersonalize education and reduce instructors' participation in formative evaluation. I assume that AI models are bias-free, yet research reveals that many AI systems inherit biases from their training data, which might lead to inequitable evaluation results (Dolata et al., 2023). Identifying bias in AI models raises questions about how AI-generated feedback can affect diverse student groups, especially underprivileged ones.

    The prediction is that AI-embedded formative assessment systems will reduce teacher effort as they improve. Formative assessment is time-consuming. Therefore, AI's capacity to automate processes like grading multiple-choice questions, delivering quick feedback, and creating progress reports should help instructors save time. However, instructors must still analyze AI-generated insights and ensure that feedback meets students' requirements. Higher-order thinking abilities like critical analysis and creativity are frequently best assessed via open-ended replies and classroom discussions. AI may not be able to do so. While AI has shown potential in essay scoring and natural language processing, its capacity to deliver nuanced feedback on complicated student work needs additional study (Sortwell et al., 2024). AI will complement teacher-driven formative evaluation, not replace it.

    One of my uncertainties regarding AI-embedded formative evaluation is my long-term impact on student engagement and motivation. While real-time feedback may help students improve, AI-driven assessment may reduce intrinsic motivation. Impersonal or mechanistic AI comments may deter students. AI-driven formative assessment systems may favor digitally savvy youngsters, creating a digital divide between students with and without home devices. Research suggests equitable access and teacher support enhance digital formative assessment (Borte et al., 2023). These worries suggest further research into how AI might boost student engagement and digital equity.

    My academic interests include education, technology, and assessment techniques. So, I am inspired by AI in assessment, and as someone interested in new teaching and learning approaches, personalized training and assessment using AI-driven technologies intrigues me. Teachers and students need to know how AI can improve formative assessment, which impacts student learning. I would like to understand how AI can help teachers with their decision-making while using technologies for education. When AI is integrated into education, ethics, and practical challenges arise: data privacy, risk of algorithmic bias, human assessment supervision, and others must be addressed. The research question I stated previously is “How could AI-embedded formative assessment improve personal feedback and decision-making in K-12 education, and what does that indicate for the workload and burden of teachers?” The research question has a transparent meaning for K-12 education and policy. Formative assessment with AI might revolutionize schools with scalable, tailored learning. However, educators and technology developers should collaborate to solve AI implementation challenges and make these tools effective and equitable. Also, this research may contribute to education technology discussions by examining how AI-driven formative assessment influences teacher and student learning. This work may inspire professional development programs to help educators employ AI-based assessment systems. As teachers' training delays technology uptake in education (Borte et al., 2023), practical professional development approaches are essential for this research.

    I aim to raise awareness of how AI may enhance formative assessment for equity, teacher burden, and student engagement. I want to answer my research question to produce ethical and practical AI-driven formative assessments. However, this work may shape future schooling to ensure AI supports teachers. Education must critically assess its effects to guarantee that AI breakthroughs match educational best practices and student learning objectives.

    **References**

    Borte, K., Lillejord, S., Erduran, S., Wasson, B., & Greiff, S. (2023). Prerequisites for teachers’ technology use in formative assessment practices: A systematic review.
    _Educational Research Review_, 100568–100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568

    Dolata, M., Katsiuba, D., Wellnhammer, N., & Schwabe, G. (2023). Learning with Digital Agents: An Analysis based on the Activity Theory.
    _Journal of Management Information Systems_,
    _40_(1), 56–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2172775

    Sortwell, A., Trimble, K., Ferraz, R., Geelan, D. R., Hine, G., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Bastian Carter-Thuiller, E. Gkintoni, & Xuan, Q. (2024). A systematic review of meta-analyses on the impact of formative assessment on K-12 students’ learning: Toward sustainable quality education.
    _Sustainability_,
    _16_(17), 7826–7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177826

    Weigand, H.-G., Trgalova, J., & Tabach, M. (2024). Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age.
    _ZDM_. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9

    **Chptr10.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chptr10-pdf)

    **Chptr13.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chptr13-pdf)

    **Chptr13.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chptr13-pdf)

    **## Week4assingment.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-week-4-assignment-20882555)**_The Search & Annotated Bibliography_**

    **Directions:**

    The goal of this assignment is to develop your critical thinking and research skills by evaluating and synthesizing information from different sources on a specific topic. You will assess the relevance, accuracy, and quality of each source and reflect on how it contributes to your understanding of the topic. The overall objective is to ensure you develop a broad range of research-based interpretive understanding of your topic. You are to review a minimum of three scholarly articles related to your research topic.

    1.
    **Select Your Sources**

    · Choose three credible and relevant sources. These can be academic journal articles, books, or reputable reports.

    · Ensure the sources are related to your research topic and provide a range of perspectives or insights.

    2.
    **Write the Citation (Current APA Style)**

    · For each source, begin with a full citation using the current APA format.

    · Ensure your citations are complete and properly formatted.

    3.
    **Summarize the Source (100-150 words per source)**

    · Provide a concise summary of the key points, arguments, or findings of the source.

    · Highlight the author’s main thesis and any relevant details that contribute to your research topic.

    4.
    **Evaluate the Source (100-150 words per source)**

    · Critically evaluate the credibility and reliability of the source.

    · Consider the author's qualifications, publication venue, and date of publication.

    · Assess the quality of the evidence provided, including whether it is backed by data, case studies, or peer-reviewed research.

    · Reflect on any potential bias, gaps, or limitations in the source.

    5.
    **Reflect on the Source's Relevance (100-150 words per source)**

    · Explain how this source is relevant to your research.

    · Discuss how the information contributes to your understanding of the topic, and how you might use it in your paper or project.

    · Compare this source with others you’ve found and explain whether it confirms, contradicts, or adds new perspectives.

    6.
    **Organize the Bibliography**

    · List the three sources in alphabetical order according to the author’s last name.

    · Ensure consistency in formatting and structure throughout the bibliography.

    ## image1.png

    **## _Week3Assignment-v1.docx**

    Running head: THE BASED OF PREDICTIONS & RATIONALE 2

    THE BASE OF PREDICTIONS & RATIONAL 2

    **The Base of Predictions & Rationale**

    St Thomas University

    EDU 530 Educational Measurement

    February 2, 2025

    **The Base of Predictions & Rational**

    The growing use of digital technologies in education informs my understanding of AI's potential in formative assessment. AI is used in educational technology to deliver real-time feedback, tailor learning, and help instructors. According to my coursework and readings, formative evaluation allows instructors to detect knowledge gaps, measure progress, and alter teaching (Sortwell et al., 2024). However, AI's ability to improve formative assessment faces severe practical difficulties. Many instructors have challenges using AI-driven formative assessment systems because of insufficient training, equity issues, and technical limits (Børte et al., 2023). AI can create individualized feedback on a scale, but its quality and trustworthiness compared to human review are disputed.

    One of my primary assumptions is that AI-embedded formative assessment will enhance K-12 individualized feedback and decision-making. Previous research has shown that AI can assess student replies, discover trends, and customize feedback to specific learning requirements (Weigand et al., 2024). AI-driven assessment systems might save instructors from grading and assessing student work, letting them concentrate on teaching and student engagement. However, AI may depersonalize education and reduce instructors' participation in formative evaluation. I assume that AI models are bias-free, yet research reveals that many AI systems inherit biases from their training data, which might lead to inequitable evaluation results (Dolata et al., 2023). Identifying bias in AI models raises questions about how AI-generated feedback can affect diverse student groups, especially underprivileged ones.

    The prediction is that AI-embedded formative assessment systems will reduce teacher effort as they improve. Formative assessment is time-consuming. Therefore, AI's capacity to automate processes like grading multiple-choice questions, delivering quick feedback, and creating progress reports should help instructors save time. However, instructors must still analyze AI-generated insights and ensure that feedback meets students' requirements. Higher-order thinking abilities like critical analysis and creativity are frequently best assessed via open-ended replies and classroom discussions. AI may not be able to do so. While AI has shown potential in essay scoring and natural language processing, its capacity to deliver nuanced feedback on complicated student work needs additional study (Sortwell et al., 2024). AI will complement teacher-driven formative evaluation, not replace it.

    One of my uncertainties regarding AI-embedded formative evaluation is my long-term impact on student engagement and motivation. While real-time feedback may help students improve, AI-driven assessment may reduce intrinsic motivation. Impersonal or mechanistic AI comments may deter students. AI-driven formative assessment systems may favor digitally savvy youngsters, creating a digital divide between students with and without home devices. Research suggests equitable access and teacher support enhance digital formative assessment (Borte et al., 2023). These worries suggest further research into how AI might boost student engagement and digital equity.

    My academic interests include education, technology, and assessment techniques. So, I am inspired by AI in assessment, and as someone interested in new teaching and learning approaches, personalized training and assessment using AI-driven technologies intrigues me. Teachers and students need to know how AI can improve formative assessment, which impacts student learning. I would like to understand how AI can help teachers with their decision-making while using technologies for education. When AI is integrated into education, ethics, and practical challenges arise: data privacy, risk of algorithmic bias, human assessment supervision, and others must be addressed. The research question I stated previously is “How could AI-embedded formative assessment improve personal feedback and decision-making in K-12 education, and what does that indicate for the workload and burden of teachers?” The research question has a transparent meaning for K-12 education and policy. Formative assessment with AI might revolutionize schools with scalable, tailored learning. However, educators and technology developers should collaborate to solve AI implementation challenges and make these tools effective and equitable. Also, this research may contribute to education technology discussions by examining how AI-driven formative assessment influences teacher and student learning. This work may inspire professional development programs to help educators employ AI-based assessment systems. As teachers' training delays technology uptake in education (Borte et al., 2023), practical professional development approaches are essential for this research.

    I aim to raise awareness of how AI may enhance formative assessment for equity, teacher burden, and student engagement. I want to answer my research question to produce ethical and practical AI-driven formative assessments. However, this work may shape future schooling to ensure AI supports teachers. Education must critically assess its effects to guarantee that AI breakthroughs match educational best practices and student learning objectives.

    **References**

    Borte, K., Lillejord, S., Erduran, S., Wasson, B., & Greiff, S. (2023). Prerequisites for teachers’ technology use in formative assessment practices: A systematic review.
    _Educational Research Review_, 100568–100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568

    Dolata, M., Katsiuba, D., Wellnhammer, N., & Schwabe, G. (2023). Learning with Digital Agents: An Analysis based on the Activity Theory.
    _Journal of Management Information Systems_,
    _40_(1), 56–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2172775

    Sortwell, A., Trimble, K., Ferraz, R., Geelan, D. R., Hine, G., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Bastian Carter-Thuiller, E. Gkintoni, & Xuan, Q. (2024). A systematic review of meta-analyses on the impact of formative assessment on K-12 students’ learning: Toward sustainable quality education.
    _Sustainability_,
    _16_(17), 7826–7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177826

    Weigand, H.-G., Trgalova, J., & Tabach, M. (2024). Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age.
    _ZDM_. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9

    **Chptr10.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chptr10-pdf)

    **Chptr13.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chptr13-pdf)

    **## Week4assingment.docx**

    ![icon](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/education-week-4-assignment-20882555)**_The Search & Annotated Bibliography_**

    **Directions:**

    The goal of this assignment is to develop your critical thinking and research skills by evaluating and synthesizing information from different sources on a specific topic. You will assess the relevance, accuracy, and quality of each source and reflect on how it contributes to your understanding of the topic. The overall objective is to ensure you develop a broad range of research-based interpretive understanding of your topic. You are to review a minimum of three scholarly articles related to your research topic.

    1.
    **Select Your Sources**

    · Choose three credible and relevant sources. These can be academic journal articles, books, or reputable reports.

    · Ensure the sources are related to your research topic and provide a range of perspectives or insights.

    2.
    **Write the Citation (Current APA Style)**

    · For each source, begin with a full citation using the current APA format.

    · Ensure your citations are complete and properly formatted.

    3.
    **Summarize the Source (100-150 words per source)**

    · Provide a concise summary of the key points, arguments, or findings of the source.

    · Highlight the author’s main thesis and any relevant details that contribute to your research topic.

    4.
    **Evaluate the Source (100-150 words per source)**

    · Critically evaluate the credibility and reliability of the source.

    · Consider the author's qualifications, publication venue, and date of publication.

    · Assess the quality of the evidence provided, including whether it is backed by data, case studies, or peer-reviewed research.

    · Reflect on any potential bias, gaps, or limitations in the source.

    5.
    **Reflect on the Source's Relevance (100-150 words per source)**

    · Explain how this source is relevant to your research.

    · Discuss how the information contributes to your understanding of the topic, and how you might use it in your paper or project.

    · Compare this source with others you’ve found and explain whether it confirms, contradicts, or adds new perspectives.

    6.
    **Organize the Bibliography**

    · List the three sources in alphabetical order according to the author’s last name.

    · Ensure consistency in formatting and structure throughout the bibliography.

    ## image1.png

    **## _Week3Assignment-v1.docx**

    Running head: THE BASED OF PREDICTIONS & RATIONALE 2

    THE BASE OF PREDICTIONS & RATIONAL 2

    **The Base of Predictions & Rationale**

    St Thomas University

    EDU 530 Educational Measurement

    February 2, 2025

    **The Base of Predictions & Rational**

    The growing use of digital technologies in education informs my understanding of AI's potential in formative assessment. AI is used in educational technology to deliver real-time feedback, tailor learning, and help instructors. According to my coursework and readings, formative evaluation allows instructors to detect knowledge gaps, measure progress, and alter teaching (Sortwell et al., 2024). However, AI's ability to improve formative assessment faces severe practical difficulties. Many instructors have challenges using AI-driven formative assessment systems because of insufficient training, equity issues, and technical limits (Børte et al., 2023). AI can create individualized feedback on a scale, but its quality and trustworthiness compared to human review are disputed.

    One of my primary assumptions is that AI-embedded formative assessment will enhance K-12 individualized feedback and decision-making. Previous research has shown that AI can assess student replies, discover trends, and customize feedback to specific learning requirements (Weigand et al., 2024). AI-driven assessment systems might save instructors from grading and assessing student work, letting them concentrate on teaching and student engagement. However, AI may depersonalize education and reduce instructors' participation in formative evaluation. I assume that AI models are bias-free, yet research reveals that many AI systems inherit biases from their training data, which might lead to inequitable evaluation results (Dolata et al., 2023). Identifying bias in AI models raises questions about how AI-generated feedback can affect diverse student groups, especially underprivileged ones.

    The prediction is that AI-embedded formative assessment systems will reduce teacher effort as they improve. Formative assessment is time-consuming. Therefore, AI's capacity to automate processes like grading multiple-choice questions, delivering quick feedback, and creating progress reports should help instructors save time. However, instructors must still analyze AI-generated insights and ensure that feedback meets students' requirements. Higher-order thinking abilities like critical analysis and creativity are frequently best assessed via open-ended replies and classroom discussions. AI may not be able to do so. While AI has shown potential in essay scoring and natural language processing, its capacity to deliver nuanced feedback on complicated student work needs additional study (Sortwell et al., 2024). AI will complement teacher-driven formative evaluation, not replace it.

    One of my uncertainties regarding AI-embedded formative evaluation is my long-term impact on student engagement and motivation. While real-time feedback may help students improve, AI-driven assessment may reduce intrinsic motivation. Impersonal or mechanistic AI comments may deter students. AI-driven formative assessment systems may favor digitally savvy youngsters, creating a digital divide between students with and without home devices. Research suggests equitable access and teacher support enhance digital formative assessment (Borte et al., 2023). These worries suggest further research into how AI might boost student engagement and digital equity.

    My academic interests include education, technology, and assessment techniques. So, I am inspired by AI in assessment, and as someone interested in new teaching and learning approaches, personalized training and assessment using AI-driven technologies intrigues me. Teachers and students need to know how AI can improve formative assessment, which impacts student learning. I would like to understand how AI can help teachers with their decision-making while using technologies for education. When AI is integrated into education, ethics, and practical challenges arise: data privacy, risk of algorithmic bias, human assessment supervision, and others must be addressed. The research question I stated previously is “How could AI-embedded formative assessment improve personal feedback and decision-making in K-12 education, and what does that indicate for the workload and burden of teachers?” The research question has a transparent meaning for K-12 education and policy. Formative assessment with AI might revolutionize schools with scalable, tailored learning. However, educators and technology developers should collaborate to solve AI implementation challenges and make these tools effective and equitable. Also, this research may contribute to education technology discussions by examining how AI-driven formative assessment influences teacher and student learning. This work may inspire professional development programs to help educators employ AI-based assessment systems. As teachers' training delays technology uptake in education (Borte et al., 2023), practical professional development approaches are essential for this research.

    I aim to raise awareness of how AI may enhance formative assessment for equity, teacher burden, and student engagement. I want to answer my research question to produce ethical and practical AI-driven formative assessments. However, this work may shape future schooling to ensure AI supports teachers. Education must critically assess its effects to guarantee that AI breakthroughs match educational best practices and student learning objectives.

    **References**

    Borte, K., Lillejord, S., Erduran, S., Wasson, B., & Greiff, S. (2023). Prerequisites for teachers’ technology use in formative assessment practices: A systematic review.
    _Educational Research Review_, 100568–100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568

    Dolata, M., Katsiuba, D., Wellnhammer, N., & Schwabe, G. (2023). Learning with Digital Agents: An Analysis based on the Activity Theory.
    _Journal of Management Information Systems_,
    _40_(1), 56–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2172775

    Sortwell, A., Trimble, K., Ferraz, R., Geelan, D. R., Hine, G., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Bastian Carter-Thuiller, E. Gkintoni, & Xuan, Q. (2024). A systematic review of meta-analyses on the impact of formative assessment on K-12 students’ learning: Toward sustainable quality education.
    _Sustainability_,
    _16_(17), 7826–7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177826

    Weigand, H.-G., Trgalova, J., & Tabach, M. (2024). Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age.
    _ZDM_. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9

    **Chptr10.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chptr10-pdf)

    **Chptr13.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/chptr13-pdf)

  • [Solved] Catherine Owens – CH. 3-5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Catherine Owens – CH. 3-5.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Project Implementation Plan IB Internet Bank

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – **Produce** a project implementation plan that presents a schedule of all tasks that would need to be completed to begin your project. **Download** and **complete** the [Project Implementation Plan Example](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/BSA425v2/bsa425_v2_wk5_project_implementatio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – **Produce** a project implementation plan that presents a schedule of all tasks that would need to be completed to begin your project. **Download** and **complete** the [Project Implementation Plan Example](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/BSA425v2/bsa425_v2_wk5_project_implementation_plan_example.docx) and **develop** a plan for your project based on the example. Do not just submit the template as your Implementation Plan as I know what is in it and that would affect your grade.
    – **Download** and **Use** the [Post-Mortem](https://myresource.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/BSA425v2/bsa425_v2_wk5_post_mortem.docx) template, conduct a postmortem of your work to this point in the course. The goal of the postmortem is to identify 5 specific approaches that worked well for you during this project and 5 approaches you plan to improve the next time you are involved with a project’s implementation.
    – **Review** and **update** your project deliverables from your assignments in Week 1 — Week 4, based on your completed postmortem and instructor feedback.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Operation Art Design

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Help with Analyzing the concepts and theories you read about in J300; utilizing key language and terms from these concepts and theories, analyze the operational art and design concepts and _**describe how a SGM can assist a staff in developing plans and orders through the application of operational …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Help with Analyzing the concepts and theories you read about in J300; utilizing key language and terms from these concepts and theories, analyze the operational art and design concepts and _**describe how a SGM can assist a staff in developing plans and orders through the application of operational art and operational design focusing on end, ways and means in conjunction with Joint Planning Process (JPP).**_ Do not simply define what operational art and design is. The document must address concepts and theories and the applicability from a Sergeant Major’s perspective in the planning process. Include accurate and relevant examples to demonstrate your mastery and knowledge of the material.

    **Instructions:** The analyzation must be between 1100 and 1400 words written in APA 7 format. The document must include a title page, six Level 1 headings (Introduction, Ends, Ways, Means, Risk and Conclusion, and a reference page with a minimum of three references to support your understanding of the concepts and theories you are addressing.

    use Joint Publication 5-0, must be clear and concise

    format attached, no AI and plagiarism

    – [\
    \
    J520A-Paper-Outline.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/j520a-paper-outline-docx "J520A-Paper-Outline.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] AI

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## 730.docx – ## EXAMPLE1.pdf – LearningSupercharged.pdf **## 730.docx** EDUC 730 **Discussion Assignment Instructions** Directions: You will post one thread of at least 300 words. The discussion threads in this course require a high level of thought and investigation o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## 730.docx

    – ## EXAMPLE1.pdf

    – LearningSupercharged.pdf

    **## 730.docx**

    EDUC 730

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Directions: You will post one thread of at least 300 words. The discussion threads in this course require a high level of thought and investigation on a number of important topics and related questions. Your posts must demonstrate course-related knowledge from the assigned readings and presentations, and you are to support your assertions with at least two scholarly research articles in current APA format. Sources cited must have been published within the last five years.

    Readings:

    · Where is the “Theory” within the Field of Educational technology Research? (Article Attached)

    · K-12 Generative AI Readiness Checklist
    [https://www.cgcs.org/genaichecklist](https://www.cgcs.org/genaichecklist)

    · Explore: CoSN AI Resource Library

    [https://www.cosn.org/tools-resources/resource-library/?_edtech_topics=artificial-intelligence](https://www.cosn.org/tools-resources/resource-library/?_edtech_topics=artificial-intelligence)

    **Discussion Thread: The AI Inflection Point in Education – Boon or Bane?**

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, and its potential impact on education is undeniable. This exponential growth presents both exciting opportunities and significant challenges. Doctoral students in education have a unique responsibility to critically analyze the role of AI in shaping the future of learning. Let us engage in a thoughtful and stimulating discussion. Share your insights, concerns, and visions for the future of AI in education. Consider how AI can contribute to your own work within your profession. Support your assertions with at least one educational technology theory.

    Select one question from the list below to address for this discussion post:

    · How can AI become a valuable tool to augment the educator’s role, allowing them to focus on higher-order thinking skills and fostering positive student-teacher relationships?

    · Imagine a future classroom heavily integrated with AI. What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of this learning environment?

    · How can educators best prepare themselves for the integration of AI in education?

    · What research questions should be prioritized to guide the responsible development and implementation of AI in the classroom?

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## EXAMPLE1.pdf**

    A future classroom integrated with AI presents numerous potential benefits, but also significant
    drawbacks, which must be carefully considered to maximize its effectiveness and address its
    challenges.

    One of the primary benefits of AI integration in education is the ability to offer personalized
    learning experiences. AI-powered systems can analyze students' performance and learning styles,
    enabling the creation of tailored educational content that addresses individual needs. This
    approach not only enhances student engagement but also helps bridge learning gaps by providing
    immediate feedback and adaptive learning paths. Studies show that personalized AI systems can
    significantly improve student outcomes, particularly in diverse and mixed-ability classrooms, by
    accommodating different learning speeds and styles (Miao et al., 2021). Furthermore, AI can
    automate administrative tasks such as grading, freeing up teachers to focus more on interactive
    and creative aspects of teaching (Anderson et al., 2018).

    However, the integration of AI into the classroom also raises substantial concerns. One
    significant drawback is the risk of over-reliance on technology, which might undermine the
    essential human elements of teaching, such as empathy, creativity, and the ability to inspire
    students. AI systems, while advanced, are not capable of understanding the full complexity of
    human emotions and social interactions, which are crucial in a learning environment (Kim et al.,
    2022). Additionally, ethical concerns arise regarding data privacy, as AI systems often require
    access to sensitive student data to function effectively. The potential for bias in AI algorithms,
    which could lead to unequal treatment of students based on flawed or incomplete data, is another
    critical issue (Fügener et al., 2022).

    In conclusion, while AI has the potential to revolutionize education by providing personalized
    learning and reducing teacher workloads, it is essential to approach its integration with caution.
    Balancing the technological benefits with the preservation of human-centric education values
    and addressing ethical concerns are crucial for creating a learning environment that truly
    enhances student outcomes without compromising their well-being.

    References

    – Miao, F., Holmes, W., & Sharples, M. (2021). Exploring AI in education: Promises and
    implications. Education and Information Technologies.

    – Kim, Y. J., Hong, H. S., & Lee, J. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing
    ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 3(2), 157-173.

    This study source was downloaded by 100000825965683 from CourseHero.com on 11-17-2024 22:11:52 GMT -06:00

    https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/
    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

    [https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/](https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/)

    [http://www.tcpdf.org](http://www.tcpdf.org/)

    **LearningSupercharged.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/learningsupercharged-pdf)

    **LearningSupercharged.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/learningsupercharged-pdf)

    **## 730.docx**

    EDUC 730

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Directions: You will post one thread of at least 300 words. The discussion threads in this course require a high level of thought and investigation on a number of important topics and related questions. Your posts must demonstrate course-related knowledge from the assigned readings and presentations, and you are to support your assertions with at least two scholarly research articles in current APA format. Sources cited must have been published within the last five years.

    Readings:

    · Where is the “Theory” within the Field of Educational technology Research? (Article Attached)

    · K-12 Generative AI Readiness Checklist
    [https://www.cgcs.org/genaichecklist](https://www.cgcs.org/genaichecklist)

    · Explore: CoSN AI Resource Library

    [https://www.cosn.org/tools-resources/resource-library/?_edtech_topics=artificial-intelligence](https://www.cosn.org/tools-resources/resource-library/?_edtech_topics=artificial-intelligence)

    **Discussion Thread: The AI Inflection Point in Education – Boon or Bane?**

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, and its potential impact on education is undeniable. This exponential growth presents both exciting opportunities and significant challenges. Doctoral students in education have a unique responsibility to critically analyze the role of AI in shaping the future of learning. Let us engage in a thoughtful and stimulating discussion. Share your insights, concerns, and visions for the future of AI in education. Consider how AI can contribute to your own work within your profession. Support your assertions with at least one educational technology theory.

    Select one question from the list below to address for this discussion post:

    · How can AI become a valuable tool to augment the educator’s role, allowing them to focus on higher-order thinking skills and fostering positive student-teacher relationships?

    · Imagine a future classroom heavily integrated with AI. What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of this learning environment?

    · How can educators best prepare themselves for the integration of AI in education?

    · What research questions should be prioritized to guide the responsible development and implementation of AI in the classroom?

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## EXAMPLE1.pdf**

    A future classroom integrated with AI presents numerous potential benefits, but also significant
    drawbacks, which must be carefully considered to maximize its effectiveness and address its
    challenges.

    One of the primary benefits of AI integration in education is the ability to offer personalized
    learning experiences. AI-powered systems can analyze students' performance and learning styles,
    enabling the creation of tailored educational content that addresses individual needs. This
    approach not only enhances student engagement but also helps bridge learning gaps by providing
    immediate feedback and adaptive learning paths. Studies show that personalized AI systems can
    significantly improve student outcomes, particularly in diverse and mixed-ability classrooms, by
    accommodating different learning speeds and styles (Miao et al., 2021). Furthermore, AI can
    automate administrative tasks such as grading, freeing up teachers to focus more on interactive
    and creative aspects of teaching (Anderson et al., 2018).

    However, the integration of AI into the classroom also raises substantial concerns. One
    significant drawback is the risk of over-reliance on technology, which might undermine the
    essential human elements of teaching, such as empathy, creativity, and the ability to inspire
    students. AI systems, while advanced, are not capable of understanding the full complexity of
    human emotions and social interactions, which are crucial in a learning environment (Kim et al.,
    2022). Additionally, ethical concerns arise regarding data privacy, as AI systems often require
    access to sensitive student data to function effectively. The potential for bias in AI algorithms,
    which could lead to unequal treatment of students based on flawed or incomplete data, is another
    critical issue (Fügener et al., 2022).

    In conclusion, while AI has the potential to revolutionize education by providing personalized
    learning and reducing teacher workloads, it is essential to approach its integration with caution.
    Balancing the technological benefits with the preservation of human-centric education values
    and addressing ethical concerns are crucial for creating a learning environment that truly
    enhances student outcomes without compromising their well-being.

    References

    – Miao, F., Holmes, W., & Sharples, M. (2021). Exploring AI in education: Promises and
    implications. Education and Information Technologies.

    – Kim, Y. J., Hong, H. S., & Lee, J. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing
    ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 3(2), 157-173.

    This study source was downloaded by 100000825965683 from CourseHero.com on 11-17-2024 22:11:52 GMT -06:00

    https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/
    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

    [https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/](https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/)

    [http://www.tcpdf.org](http://www.tcpdf.org/)

    **LearningSupercharged.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/learningsupercharged-pdf)

    **## 730.docx**

    EDUC 730

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Directions: You will post one thread of at least 300 words. The discussion threads in this course require a high level of thought and investigation on a number of important topics and related questions. Your posts must demonstrate course-related knowledge from the assigned readings and presentations, and you are to support your assertions with at least two scholarly research articles in current APA format. Sources cited must have been published within the last five years.

    Readings:

    · Where is the “Theory” within the Field of Educational technology Research? (Article Attached)

    · K-12 Generative AI Readiness Checklist
    [https://www.cgcs.org/genaichecklist](https://www.cgcs.org/genaichecklist)

    · Explore: CoSN AI Resource Library

    [https://www.cosn.org/tools-resources/resource-library/?_edtech_topics=artificial-intelligence](https://www.cosn.org/tools-resources/resource-library/?_edtech_topics=artificial-intelligence)

    **Discussion Thread: The AI Inflection Point in Education – Boon or Bane?**

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, and its potential impact on education is undeniable. This exponential growth presents both exciting opportunities and significant challenges. Doctoral students in education have a unique responsibility to critically analyze the role of AI in shaping the future of learning. Let us engage in a thoughtful and stimulating discussion. Share your insights, concerns, and visions for the future of AI in education. Consider how AI can contribute to your own work within your profession. Support your assertions with at least one educational technology theory.

    Select one question from the list below to address for this discussion post:

    · How can AI become a valuable tool to augment the educator’s role, allowing them to focus on higher-order thinking skills and fostering positive student-teacher relationships?

    · Imagine a future classroom heavily integrated with AI. What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of this learning environment?

    · How can educators best prepare themselves for the integration of AI in education?

    · What research questions should be prioritized to guide the responsible development and implementation of AI in the classroom?

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## EXAMPLE1.pdf**

    A future classroom integrated with AI presents numerous potential benefits, but also significant
    drawbacks, which must be carefully considered to maximize its effectiveness and address its
    challenges.

    One of the primary benefits of AI integration in education is the ability to offer personalized
    learning experiences. AI-powered systems can analyze students' performance and learning styles,
    enabling the creation of tailored educational content that addresses individual needs. This
    approach not only enhances student engagement but also helps bridge learning gaps by providing
    immediate feedback and adaptive learning paths. Studies show that personalized AI systems can
    significantly improve student outcomes, particularly in diverse and mixed-ability classrooms, by
    accommodating different learning speeds and styles (Miao et al., 2021). Furthermore, AI can
    automate administrative tasks such as grading, freeing up teachers to focus more on interactive
    and creative aspects of teaching (Anderson et al., 2018).

    However, the integration of AI into the classroom also raises substantial concerns. One
    significant drawback is the risk of over-reliance on technology, which might undermine the
    essential human elements of teaching, such as empathy, creativity, and the ability to inspire
    students. AI systems, while advanced, are not capable of understanding the full complexity of
    human emotions and social interactions, which are crucial in a learning environment (Kim et al.,
    2022). Additionally, ethical concerns arise regarding data privacy, as AI systems often require
    access to sensitive student data to function effectively. The potential for bias in AI algorithms,
    which could lead to unequal treatment of students based on flawed or incomplete data, is another
    critical issue (Fügener et al., 2022).

    In conclusion, while AI has the potential to revolutionize education by providing personalized
    learning and reducing teacher workloads, it is essential to approach its integration with caution.
    Balancing the technological benefits with the preservation of human-centric education values
    and addressing ethical concerns are crucial for creating a learning environment that truly
    enhances student outcomes without compromising their well-being.

    References

    – Miao, F., Holmes, W., & Sharples, M. (2021). Exploring AI in education: Promises and
    implications. Education and Information Technologies.

    – Kim, Y. J., Hong, H. S., & Lee, J. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing
    ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 3(2), 157-173.

    This study source was downloaded by 100000825965683 from CourseHero.com on 11-17-2024 22:11:52 GMT -06:00

    https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/
    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

    [https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/](https://www.coursehero.com/file/239374995/liberty-EDUC730-discussion-1docx/)

    [http://www.tcpdf.org](http://www.tcpdf.org/)

    **LearningSupercharged.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/learningsupercharged-pdf)

  • [Solved] week 4 data anaysis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    See attached no plagiarism or AI need originality quality work – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## InterpretingSchoolDataAssignment4.pdf – ## DataAnalysisWorksheet4.docx **## InterpretingSchoolDataAssignment4.pdf** Analyzing Bar Graph Scenario D This is the kind of data chart that some student data sys…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    See attached no plagiarism or AI need originality quality work

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## InterpretingSchoolDataAssignment4.pdf

    – ## DataAnalysisWorksheet4.docx

    **## InterpretingSchoolDataAssignment4.pdf**

    Analyzing Bar Graph
    Scenario D
    This is the kind of data chart that some student data systems produce. I’m going to ask you to
    find some information from the graph and then I’d like for you to tell me on a scale of 1 to 10,
    with 10 being extremely difficult, how hard or easy it was to find the information in the chart.
    Ready?

    Figure 4

    Go to Data Worksheet 1 and answer the questions for Scenario D using Figure 4.

    – Analyzing Bar Graph

    **## DataAnalysisWorksheet4.docx**

    **Interpreting School Data Assignment**

    Please fill in your responses and submit the completed form.

    Analyzing Bar Graph

    **Scenario D**

    **Questions**

    1.
    Looking at this graph, can you find the average (or mean) English Language Arts scale score for the Latino fifth-grade girls who took the test? How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    2. Can you find the mean score for Asian/Pacific Islander fourth-grade boys who took the test?  How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    3. Which student group had the highest average ELA score in Grade 4? How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    4. How many African American third-grade boys took the test? How easy was it to find this information in the table?

    **## DataAnalysisWorksheet4.docx**

    **Interpreting School Data Assignment**

    Please fill in your responses and submit the completed form.

    Analyzing Bar Graph

    **Scenario D**

    **Questions**

    1.
    Looking at this graph, can you find the average (or mean) English Language Arts scale score for the Latino fifth-grade girls who took the test? How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    2. Can you find the mean score for Asian/Pacific Islander fourth-grade boys who took the test?  How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    3. Which student group had the highest average ELA score in Grade 4? How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    4. How many African American third-grade boys took the test? How easy was it to find this information in the table?

    **## InterpretingSchoolDataAssignment4.pdf**

    Analyzing Bar Graph
    Scenario D
    This is the kind of data chart that some student data systems produce. I’m going to ask you to
    find some information from the graph and then I’d like for you to tell me on a scale of 1 to 10,
    with 10 being extremely difficult, how hard or easy it was to find the information in the chart.
    Ready?

    Figure 4

    Go to Data Worksheet 1 and answer the questions for Scenario D using Figure 4.

    – Analyzing Bar Graph

    **## DataAnalysisWorksheet4.docx**

    **Interpreting School Data Assignment**

    Please fill in your responses and submit the completed form.

    Analyzing Bar Graph

    **Scenario D**

    **Questions**

    1.
    Looking at this graph, can you find the average (or mean) English Language Arts scale score for the Latino fifth-grade girls who took the test? How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    2. Can you find the mean score for Asian/Pacific Islander fourth-grade boys who took the test?  How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    3. Which student group had the highest average ELA score in Grade 4? How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    4. How many African American third-grade boys took the test? How easy was it to find this information in the table?

    **## InterpretingSchoolDataAssignment4.pdf**

    Analyzing Bar Graph
    Scenario D
    This is the kind of data chart that some student data systems produce. I’m going to ask you to
    find some information from the graph and then I’d like for you to tell me on a scale of 1 to 10,
    with 10 being extremely difficult, how hard or easy it was to find the information in the chart.
    Ready?

    Figure 4

    Go to Data Worksheet 1 and answer the questions for Scenario D using Figure 4.

    – Analyzing Bar Graph

    **## DataAnalysisWorksheet4.docx**

    **Interpreting School Data Assignment**

    Please fill in your responses and submit the completed form.

    Analyzing Bar Graph

    **Scenario D**

    **Questions**

    1.
    Looking at this graph, can you find the average (or mean) English Language Arts scale score for the Latino fifth-grade girls who took the test? How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    2. Can you find the mean score for Asian/Pacific Islander fourth-grade boys who took the test?  How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    3. Which student group had the highest average ELA score in Grade 4? How easy was it to get this information from the chart?

    4. How many African American third-grade boys took the test? How easy was it to find this information in the table?

  • [Solved] Education Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Education Homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Education week 5 assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ### Executive Summary – Read Chapter 5: Taking Action and Leading Change of the course textbook, _One Step at a Time:_ _A Roadmap for Problem Solving & Making a Difference_. – Review [_A Closer Look: Week 5: Social Responsibility and Change Agency_](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/141283/module…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ### Executive Summary

    – Read Chapter 5: Taking Action and Leading Change of the course textbook, _One Step at a Time:_ _A Roadmap for Problem Solving & Making a Difference_.
    – Review [_A Closer Look: Week 5: Social Responsibility and Change Agency_](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/141283/modules/items/7190216) _._
    – Read [_Writing an Executive Summary_Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/writing-executive-summary).
    – Review the [_Model Executive Summary_](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/141283/files/22664297/?wrap=1) [Download Model Executive Summary](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/141283/files/22664297//download?download_frd=1).
    – Review all the feedback you received over the last four weeks.
    – Download the [_Executive Summary Template_](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/141283/files/22664343/?wrap=1) [Download Executive Summary Template](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/141283/files/22664343//download?download_frd=1).
    – Review technical requirements for page length and source requirement.

    ### Required Elements to be Included in Executive Summary Template

    **Select** each arrow to review the requirements for each section of the Executive Summary Final Paper.

    **In the Problem Section,**

    – Describe the problem using the 5W1H method.
    – Write the problem statement.

    **In the Background Overview Section,**

    – Explain whether the problem exists in a personal or professional context.
    – Describe any cultural influences that may have caused or contributed to the problem.
    – Evaluate the urgency of the problem.
    – Explain why you think the problem is important.

    **In the Research Results Section,**

    – Share the results of your theoretical investigation and data collection.
    – Share the results of your examination of sources for bias and trustworthiness.
    – Share the results of the interviews you conducted about the problem.

    **In the Potential Solutions Section,**

    – Describe at least two potential solutions.
    – Assess the realistic expectations to implement either solution.
    – Evaluate the benefits and barriers to each solution.
    – Identify the preferred solution and explain the choice.

    **In the Recommendations Section,**

    – Briefly describe your action plan to implement the solution.
    – Explain how you can serve as a change agent for this problem.
    – Describe the degree of change you can reasonably expect to achieve.
    – Discuss how you can motivate others to be agents of change for this problem.

    **Select** the arrow to review the formatting guidelines for the Executive Summary Final Paper.

    **Formatting Guidelines for the Executive Summary Final Paper**

    – must be 3 to 4 (not to exceed 4) double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to [_APA Style_Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style) as outlined in the Writing Center’s [_APA Formatting for Microsoft Word_Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-formatting-microsoft-word) resource.
    – must not exceed four pages in length.
    – must include a separate title page with the following in title case:
    – title of page in bold font
    – Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
    – student’s name
    – name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    – course name and number
    – instructor’s name
    – due date
    – must utilize first person _or_ academic voice. Review the [_Academic Voice_Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/academic-voice) resource for additional guidance.
    – must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.
    – Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
    – For assistance on writing [_Introductions & Conclusions_Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions), refer to the Writing Center resources.
    – must use at least four credible sources in addition to the course text.
    – The [_Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources_Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/e5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/Scholarly%20Peer-Reviewed%20and%20Other%20Credible%20Sources.pdf) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.
    – To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, review this [_Quick and Easy Library Research_Links to an external site.](https://ashford.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Ashford+University+Library+Quick+%27n%27+Dirty/0_bcsbcjee) tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
    – must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s [_APA: Citing Within Your Paper_Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-citing-within-your-paper) guide.
    – must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. Review the [_APA: Formatting Your References List_Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/format-your-reference-list) resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

    Convert your completed template (paper) to a PDF document. Save the completed PDF of your paper to your computer and upload it to Waypoint. Be sure to double-check that it was properly saved and uploaded successfully.

    Carefully review the [Grading Rubric Links to an external site.](http://au.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/36799/preview) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

    ## Waypoint Assignment Submission

    The assignments in this course will be submitted to Waypoint. Please refer to the instructions below to submit your assignment.

    1. Click on the **Assignment Submission** button below. The Waypoint "Student Dashboard" will open in a new browser window.
    2. **Browse** for your assignment.
    3. Click **Upload**.
    4. Confirm that your assignment was successfully submitted by viewing the appropriate week's assignment tab in Waypoint.

    For more detailed instructions, refer to the [Waypoint Tutorial Links to an external site.](https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/dc358708-3d2b-41a6-a000-ff53b3cc3794/1/Waypoint%20Tutorial.pdf "Waypoint Tutorial.pdf").

    This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window The session for this tool has expired. Please reload the page to access the tool again The following content is partner provided The preceding content is partner provided [Previous](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/141283/modules/items/7190219)

    This executive summary will provide a high-level overview of the problem you selected in this course, the context of the problem, your research efforts and results, the different potential solutions, your recommended solution, and how a person can be an agent of change.

    This executive summary will provide a high-level overview of the problem you selected in this course, the context of the problem, your research efforts and results, the different potential solutions, your recommended solution, and how a person can be an agent of change.

    – [\
    \
    Week5FinalExecutiveSummaryTemplate1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5finalexecutivesummarytemplate1-docx-10185565 "Week5FinalExecutiveSummaryTemplate1.docx")
    – [\
    \
    Week5ModelExecutiveSummary.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week5modelexecutivesummary-pdf-10185567 "Week5ModelExecutiveSummary.pdf")

    – 2 years ago