Category: Nursing

[Solved] assessment 3

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

attached – ## assessment3.docx **## assessment3.docx** Analyze the application of technology and professional standards related to your health process issue at your practicum site in a 4–6 page paper, and submit your required practicum hours. In your previous assessment, you defined and analyzed you…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

attached

– ## assessment3.docx

**## assessment3.docx**

Analyze the application of technology and professional standards related to your health process issue at your practicum site in a 4–6 page paper, and submit your required practicum hours.

In your previous assessment, you defined and analyzed your health process issue in the context of your practicum site. Now that you've gained more experience, continue to build on the information you've gathered about your practicum site and research your chosen issue. In Assessment 3, you'll focus on the application of technology and professional standards. Your ultimate goal at the end of the course will be to present a strategy for improving your selected process issue.

Expand All

**Instructions**

· Explain aspects of your role in process change and professional standards.

· Explain the aspects of the role of the BSN-prepared RN in process change and professional standards.

· Identify your potential role in process change at your existing practicum. If so, describe that role.

· If your role is limited, explain how you would envision your role in process change if you were a nurse at this site.

· Summarize what your state's nurse practice act says related to the nurses role and process change. (The
_Find Your Nurse Practice Act_ website in your Assessment 3 resources provides a search function to assist you in finding individual state nurse practice acts.)

· Explain what interprofessional collaboration you have and will implement.

· What opportunities for collaboration do you see?

· Are you able to implement some of them in your current role at your practicum site? If not, how would you implement interprofessional collaboration as a nurse at this site?

· Review government agencies associated with your process of concern. Explain the recommendations.

· Examples of agencies include:

· Joint Commission.

· NDNQI.

· CMC.

· Describe current technology used in your practicum site to address your practice issue.

· What are they currently using? Did you notice any problems or issues with the use of this technology?

· Review the literature to determine technology available and recommended for your practice issue. Summarize the recommendations.

· Do you see new technology that isn't being used?

· Describe any potential implementation issues you see for using the new technology?

**Additional Requirements**

·
**Format:** Format your paper using APA style. Refer to
[APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4243) for guidance in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include the following:

· A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.

· Appropriate section headings.

·
**Length:** Your paper should be approximately 4–6 pages in length, not including the reference page.

·
**Supporting evidence:** Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

·
**Proofreading:** Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

**Practicum Hours Submission**

·

·

·

**Reflective Journaling**

**Submission Checklist**

·

**Competencies Measured**

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

· Explain aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.

· Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

· Explain the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.

· Describe current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology.

· Summarize the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature.

· Competency 5: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes.

· Explain what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site.

· Competency 6: Implement patient centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

· Describe any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.

· Competency 8: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to create effective written and oral communications.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

· Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

· Complete a minimum 20–25 MORE hours of clinical practicum. Submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Scoring Guide**

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Expand All

**Criterion 1**

**Explain aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.**

**Distinguished**

Explains aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards, providing examples.

**Proficient**

Explains aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.

**Basic**

Identifies aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.

**Criterion 2**

**Explain what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site.**

**Distinguished**

Explains what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site, and includes the benefits of this collaboration.

**Proficient**

Explains what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site.

**Basic**

Identifies opportunities for collaboration.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site.

**Criterion 3**

**Explain the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.**

**Distinguished**

Explains the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site, explaining the assumptions on which the recommendations are based.

**Proficient**

Explains the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.

**Basic**

Explains the recommendations of government agencies, though it's unclear how they apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.

**Criterion 4**

**Describe current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology.**

**Distinguished**

Describes current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology, as well as the impact of the technology on outcomes for the site.

**Proficient**

Describes current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology.

**Basic**

Describes current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology.

**Criterion 5**

**Summarize the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature.**

**Distinguished**

Summarizes the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature, outlining pros and cons.

**Proficient**

Summarizes the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature.

**Basic**

Summarizes technology available for a clinical practice issue, though the recommendation is not based on the literature.

**Non Performance**

Does not summarize the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature.

**Criterion 6**

**Describe any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.**

**Distinguished**

Describes any potential implementation issues for using the new technology and how those issues might be addressed.

**Proficient**

Describes any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.

**Basic**

Identifies any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.

**Criterion 7**

**Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.**

**Distinguished**

Organizes content so clarity is enhanced and all ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

**Proficient**

Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

**Basic**

Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions.

**Non Performance**

Does not organize content for ideas to flow logically with smooth transitions.

**Criterion 8**

**Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.**

**Distinguished**

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions.

**Proficient**

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

**Basic**

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.

**Non Performance**

Does not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

**Criterion 9**

**Complete a minimum 20–25 MORE hours of clinical practicum. Submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.**

**Distinguished**

Completes a total of more than 20–25 more hours of clinical practicum. Submits clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Proficient**

Completes a minimum 20–25 MORE hours of clinical practicum. Submits clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Basic**

Completes fewer than 20 more hours of clinical practicum.

**Non Performance**

Does not complete a minimum of 20 more hours of clinical practicum, and does not submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**## assessment3.docx**

Analyze the application of technology and professional standards related to your health process issue at your practicum site in a 4–6 page paper, and submit your required practicum hours.

In your previous assessment, you defined and analyzed your health process issue in the context of your practicum site. Now that you've gained more experience, continue to build on the information you've gathered about your practicum site and research your chosen issue. In Assessment 3, you'll focus on the application of technology and professional standards. Your ultimate goal at the end of the course will be to present a strategy for improving your selected process issue.

Expand All

**Instructions**

· Explain aspects of your role in process change and professional standards.

· Explain the aspects of the role of the BSN-prepared RN in process change and professional standards.

· Identify your potential role in process change at your existing practicum. If so, describe that role.

· If your role is limited, explain how you would envision your role in process change if you were a nurse at this site.

· Summarize what your state's nurse practice act says related to the nurses role and process change. (The
_Find Your Nurse Practice Act_ website in your Assessment 3 resources provides a search function to assist you in finding individual state nurse practice acts.)

· Explain what interprofessional collaboration you have and will implement.

· What opportunities for collaboration do you see?

· Are you able to implement some of them in your current role at your practicum site? If not, how would you implement interprofessional collaboration as a nurse at this site?

· Review government agencies associated with your process of concern. Explain the recommendations.

· Examples of agencies include:

· Joint Commission.

· NDNQI.

· CMC.

· Describe current technology used in your practicum site to address your practice issue.

· What are they currently using? Did you notice any problems or issues with the use of this technology?

· Review the literature to determine technology available and recommended for your practice issue. Summarize the recommendations.

· Do you see new technology that isn't being used?

· Describe any potential implementation issues you see for using the new technology?

**Additional Requirements**

·
**Format:** Format your paper using APA style. Refer to
[APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4243) for guidance in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include the following:

· A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.

· Appropriate section headings.

·
**Length:** Your paper should be approximately 4–6 pages in length, not including the reference page.

·
**Supporting evidence:** Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

·
**Proofreading:** Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.

**Practicum Hours Submission**

·

·

·

**Reflective Journaling**

**Submission Checklist**

·

**Competencies Measured**

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

· Explain aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.

· Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

· Explain the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.

· Describe current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology.

· Summarize the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature.

· Competency 5: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes.

· Explain what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site.

· Competency 6: Implement patient centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

· Describe any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.

· Competency 8: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to create effective written and oral communications.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

· Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

· Complete a minimum 20–25 MORE hours of clinical practicum. Submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Scoring Guide**

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Expand All

**Criterion 1**

**Explain aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.**

**Distinguished**

Explains aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards, providing examples.

**Proficient**

Explains aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.

**Basic**

Identifies aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain aspects of one's role in process change and professional standards.

**Criterion 2**

**Explain what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site.**

**Distinguished**

Explains what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site, and includes the benefits of this collaboration.

**Proficient**

Explains what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site.

**Basic**

Identifies opportunities for collaboration.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain what interprofessional collaboration one has and will implement at a specific clinical site.

**Criterion 3**

**Explain the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.**

**Distinguished**

Explains the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site, explaining the assumptions on which the recommendations are based.

**Proficient**

Explains the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.

**Basic**

Explains the recommendations of government agencies, though it's unclear how they apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain the recommendations of government agencies that apply to a practice issue or problem at a specific clinical site.

**Criterion 4**

**Describe current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology.**

**Distinguished**

Describes current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology, as well as the impact of the technology on outcomes for the site.

**Proficient**

Describes current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology.

**Basic**

Describes current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe current technology used in a clinical site to address a practice issue, including issues with use of the technology.

**Criterion 5**

**Summarize the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature.**

**Distinguished**

Summarizes the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature, outlining pros and cons.

**Proficient**

Summarizes the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature.

**Basic**

Summarizes technology available for a clinical practice issue, though the recommendation is not based on the literature.

**Non Performance**

Does not summarize the technology available and recommended for a clinical practice issue based on the literature.

**Criterion 6**

**Describe any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.**

**Distinguished**

Describes any potential implementation issues for using the new technology and how those issues might be addressed.

**Proficient**

Describes any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.

**Basic**

Identifies any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe any potential implementation issues for using the new technology.

**Criterion 7**

**Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.**

**Distinguished**

Organizes content so clarity is enhanced and all ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

**Proficient**

Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

**Basic**

Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions.

**Non Performance**

Does not organize content for ideas to flow logically with smooth transitions.

**Criterion 8**

**Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.**

**Distinguished**

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions.

**Proficient**

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

**Basic**

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.

**Non Performance**

Does not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

**Criterion 9**

**Complete a minimum 20–25 MORE hours of clinical practicum. Submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.**

**Distinguished**

Completes a total of more than 20–25 more hours of clinical practicum. Submits clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Proficient**

Completes a minimum 20–25 MORE hours of clinical practicum. Submits clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Basic**

Completes fewer than 20 more hours of clinical practicum.

**Non Performance**

Does not complete a minimum of 20 more hours of clinical practicum, and does not submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] assessment 4

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

attached – ## assesment4.docx **## assesment4.docx** Develop a proposal for an intervention to address your current issue of concern at your practicum site, and prepare a professional presentation to deliver to your peers. Submit your required practicum hours. In your previous assessments, you appli…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

attached

– ## assesment4.docx

**## assesment4.docx**

Develop a proposal for an intervention to address your current issue of concern at your practicum site, and prepare a professional presentation to deliver to your peers. Submit your required practicum hours.

In your previous assessments, you applied new knowledge and insight gleaned from the literature, organizational data, and direct experience at your practicum site to your assessment of a current practice or issue of concern. Now it’s time to turn your attention to proposing an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the problem.

Expand All

**Instructions**

In this assessment, you will develop a proposal for an intervention to address a current practice or issue of concern. You will also develop a professional presentation to deliver to your peers to convince your peers at your practicum site to adopt and implement your proposal.

Your assessment is in two parts:

· Part 1: Intervention proposal:

· 5–7 page paper.

· Part 2: Create a power point 10 – 12 slides

**Part 1**

In your intervention proposal paper:

· Identify your practice issue of concern.

· Identify current practice.

· Propose strategy to improve current practice. What is the strategy, including the changes for people and process needed?

· How does this enhance quality, safety, and reduce cost?

· Describe the application of technology in your strategy for improvement.

· What evidence are you basing your decisions on?

· How would you implement this strategy at your practicum site? What challenges for implementation do you see at your site, and how would you overcome them?

· What does successful interprofessional collaboration look like to implement this strategy? What interprofessional collaboration have or would you implement?

**Part 2**

Now develop a short, narrated presentation to make the actual change. Your presentation should explain to your peers at your practicum site:

· The need for change.

· The key aspects of your proposal.

· Include the reason to implement it.

In the presentation, you're selling your proposal and educating your peers on how to put it into action.

**Requirements**

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

·
**Length of paper:** 5–7 pages.

·
**Length of video:** 5–10 minutes.

·
**References:** Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

·
**APA reference page:** Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

·
**Video and Narrative:** You must submit a written narrative of all of your video content. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

·

**Competencies Measured**

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

· Describe a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes.

· Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.

· Explain how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care.

· Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

· Describe the application of technology in a strategy for improvement.

· Competency 5: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes.

· Describe interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice.

· Competency 6: Implement patient centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

· Explain how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them.

· Competency 8: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to create effective written and oral communications.

· Create a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation; integrate sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

· Complete the remainder of the practicum hours for a total of 40 hours of clinical practicum. Submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Scoring Guide**

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Expand All

**Criterion 1**

**Describe a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes.**

**Distinguished**

Describes a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes; includes assumptions on which the strategy for improvement in practice is based.

**Proficient**

Describes a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes.

**Basic**

Describes a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, but without describing the changes needed for people and processes.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes that.

**Criterion 2**

**Explain how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care.**

**Distinguished**

Explains how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care, impartially explaining the pros and cons of the changes.

**Proficient**

Explains how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care.

**Basic**

Explains how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, or cost of patient care, but without explaining the enhancement to all three.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care.

**Criterion 3**

**Describe the application of technology in a strategy for improvement.**

**Distinguished**

Describes the application of technology in a strategy for improvement, providing reasons for this being the most appropriate application of technology for the strategy.

**Proficient**

Describes the application of technology in a strategy for improvement.

**Basic**

Identifies technology used in a strategy for improvement.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe the application of technology in a strategy for improvement.

**Criterion 4**

**Explain how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them.**

**Distinguished**

Explains how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them, and provides examples.

**Proficient**

Explains how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them.

**Basic**

Explains how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, without including site-specific challenges or ways to overcome them.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them.

**Criterion 5**

**Describe interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice.**

**Distinguished**

Describes interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice, and provides examples.

**Proficient**

Describes interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice.

**Basic**

Describes interprofessional collaboration, though it's unclear how it supports a strategy to improve practice.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice.

**Criterion 6**

**Create a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation; integrate sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.**

**Distinguished**

Creates a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation; integrates sufficient and relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style and specifying the audience for the presentation.

**Proficient**

Creates a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation; integrates sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

**Basic**

Creates a coherent audiovisual presentation; integrates sources to support arguments.

**Non Performance**

Does not create a persuasive, coherent, or effective audiovisual presentation; does not integrate sources to support arguments, correctly or format citations and references using current APA style.

**Criterion 7**

**Complete the remainder of the practicum hours for a total of 40 hours of clinical practicum. Submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.**

**Distinguished**

Completes the remainder of the practicum hours for a total of more than 40 hours. Submits clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Proficient**

Completes the remainder of the practicum hours for a total of 40 hours of clinical practicum. Submits clinical hour documentation to CAPS and includes screenshots of logged hours in CAP to the assessment submission area.

**Basic**

Completes fewer than 40 hours of clinical practicum.

**Non Performance**

Does not complete a minimum 30 hours of clinical practicum, and does not submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**## assesment4.docx**

Develop a proposal for an intervention to address your current issue of concern at your practicum site, and prepare a professional presentation to deliver to your peers. Submit your required practicum hours.

In your previous assessments, you applied new knowledge and insight gleaned from the literature, organizational data, and direct experience at your practicum site to your assessment of a current practice or issue of concern. Now it’s time to turn your attention to proposing an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the problem.

Expand All

**Instructions**

In this assessment, you will develop a proposal for an intervention to address a current practice or issue of concern. You will also develop a professional presentation to deliver to your peers to convince your peers at your practicum site to adopt and implement your proposal.

Your assessment is in two parts:

· Part 1: Intervention proposal:

· 5–7 page paper.

· Part 2: Create a power point 10 – 12 slides

**Part 1**

In your intervention proposal paper:

· Identify your practice issue of concern.

· Identify current practice.

· Propose strategy to improve current practice. What is the strategy, including the changes for people and process needed?

· How does this enhance quality, safety, and reduce cost?

· Describe the application of technology in your strategy for improvement.

· What evidence are you basing your decisions on?

· How would you implement this strategy at your practicum site? What challenges for implementation do you see at your site, and how would you overcome them?

· What does successful interprofessional collaboration look like to implement this strategy? What interprofessional collaboration have or would you implement?

**Part 2**

Now develop a short, narrated presentation to make the actual change. Your presentation should explain to your peers at your practicum site:

· The need for change.

· The key aspects of your proposal.

· Include the reason to implement it.

In the presentation, you're selling your proposal and educating your peers on how to put it into action.

**Requirements**

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

·
**Length of paper:** 5–7 pages.

·
**Length of video:** 5–10 minutes.

·
**References:** Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

·
**APA reference page:** Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

·
**Video and Narrative:** You must submit a written narrative of all of your video content. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

·

**Competencies Measured**

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.

· Describe a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes.

· Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.

· Explain how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care.

· Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

· Describe the application of technology in a strategy for improvement.

· Competency 5: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes.

· Describe interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice.

· Competency 6: Implement patient centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

· Explain how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them.

· Competency 8: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to create effective written and oral communications.

· Create a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation; integrate sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

· Complete the remainder of the practicum hours for a total of 40 hours of clinical practicum. Submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Scoring Guide**

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Expand All

**Criterion 1**

**Describe a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes.**

**Distinguished**

Describes a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes; includes assumptions on which the strategy for improvement in practice is based.

**Proficient**

Describes a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes.

**Basic**

Describes a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, but without describing the changes needed for people and processes.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe a strategy to improve current practice at a clinical site, including the changes needed for people and processes that.

**Criterion 2**

**Explain how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care.**

**Distinguished**

Explains how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care, impartially explaining the pros and cons of the changes.

**Proficient**

Explains how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care.

**Basic**

Explains how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, or cost of patient care, but without explaining the enhancement to all three.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain how a strategy to improve current practice enhances the quality, safety, and cost of patient care.

**Criterion 3**

**Describe the application of technology in a strategy for improvement.**

**Distinguished**

Describes the application of technology in a strategy for improvement, providing reasons for this being the most appropriate application of technology for the strategy.

**Proficient**

Describes the application of technology in a strategy for improvement.

**Basic**

Identifies technology used in a strategy for improvement.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe the application of technology in a strategy for improvement.

**Criterion 4**

**Explain how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them.**

**Distinguished**

Explains how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them, and provides examples.

**Proficient**

Explains how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them.

**Basic**

Explains how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, without including site-specific challenges or ways to overcome them.

**Non Performance**

Does not explain how to implement an improvement strategy at a clinical site, including site-specific challenges and ways to overcome them.

**Criterion 5**

**Describe interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice.**

**Distinguished**

Describes interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice, and provides examples.

**Proficient**

Describes interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice.

**Basic**

Describes interprofessional collaboration, though it's unclear how it supports a strategy to improve practice.

**Non Performance**

Does not describe interprofessional collaboration that supports a strategy to improve practice.

**Criterion 6**

**Create a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation; integrate sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.**

**Distinguished**

Creates a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation; integrates sufficient and relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style and specifying the audience for the presentation.

**Proficient**

Creates a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation; integrates sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

**Basic**

Creates a coherent audiovisual presentation; integrates sources to support arguments.

**Non Performance**

Does not create a persuasive, coherent, or effective audiovisual presentation; does not integrate sources to support arguments, correctly or format citations and references using current APA style.

**Criterion 7**

**Complete the remainder of the practicum hours for a total of 40 hours of clinical practicum. Submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.**

**Distinguished**

Completes the remainder of the practicum hours for a total of more than 40 hours. Submits clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

**Proficient**

Completes the remainder of the practicum hours for a total of 40 hours of clinical practicum. Submits clinical hour documentation to CAPS and includes screenshots of logged hours in CAP to the assessment submission area.

**Basic**

Completes fewer than 40 hours of clinical practicum.

**Non Performance**

Does not complete a minimum 30 hours of clinical practicum, and does not submit clinical hour documentation to CAPS.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Annotated

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Annotated.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Nursing assignment 99

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

see the attachments – ## paperprimary1outline.docx – ## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx – SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx **## paperprimary1outline.docx** I am writing this paper as a family **nurse practitioner student:** Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper sho…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

see the attachments

– ## paperprimary1outline.docx

– ## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx

– SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx

**## paperprimary1outline.docx**

I am writing this paper as a family
**nurse practitioner student:**

Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper should review a specific population with a specific disease process and seek out the evidence-based interventions that could close the gap towards optimum health in that particular population. The paper is
**not to** compare one race against another. The paper aims to identify an
**adult** population, health problem (s), innovative and evidence-based health promotion or intervention strategies, and proposed changes related to the nurse practitioner's
**primary care** role. The population may be defined by gender, ethnic culture,or age group and then look at the disease outcomes.  Health problems should be among the topics presented in this course.
**Proposed interventions must be based on the evidence (based on the literature review students do for this paper)**. This is a scholarly paper and should be referenced accordingly.

· Papers that are not coherent or have poor mechanics will not be accepted and the student will be referred to the writing center.

· This paper is subject to Copyleaks Plagiarism scrutiny and must be turned in through this mechanism to be considered for grading.
**Do not** **plagiarize** your paper. If unfamiliar with what constitutes plagiarism, please work with the Writing Center

My topic:
**Obesity and Cardio metabolic Risk in Middle-Aged Hispanic Women**

**Instructor suggestion: would suggest is that it should not focus on screening, but on the actual diagnosis. We want to see how the outcomes are different when a certain population has the disease, not just being screened or not screened for it.**

**See the Rubric and sample paper that I attached**

**## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx**

**Healthcare Disparity Rubric**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Healthcare Disparity Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of problem and population | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **30 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>1. The problems and are thoroughly addressed with emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. In-depth description of problem. 2. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem. 3. In-depth description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given. 4. Background provides context for the Problem & phenomenon of interest on a national scale. 5. Significance is clearly articulated. 6. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data/) 7. Purpose statement is clear and relates to the entire paper. | **24 pts**<br>**B**<br>The problems are discussed but weak emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem but references are weak. Description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given but not in depth. Background provides context for the problem & phenomenon of interest but no data on a national scale. Significance is articulated but clear. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data but not thorough. Purpose statement is ambiguous and not clear and relates to the entire paper. | **21 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 5-6 points are addressed In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **18 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism. ( 0 point) | | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Innovative solutions & recommendations for change. | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **50 pts**<br>**A**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. Well- researched with all references cited. How the review of literature was done is clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. The review includes sufficient studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest. The review is critical and not a catalog of studies 3. A summary statement at the end of the review synthesizes major research findings that point to the scientific/clinical importance of phenomenon (the problem that you discussed in the introductory section) under question. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, or are clear and appropriate to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are articulated and prioritized The proposed intervention plan is reasonable, feasible, and sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5. The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is clearly articulated. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are clearly described Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions. | **40 pts**<br>**B**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. But references are not relevant or not cited. The process of the review of literature is not clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. Studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest is weak and not enough. The review is critical but not in depth. 3. A summary statement at the end of the review is present but not clear and thorough. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet minimum expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, are ambiguous or not related to to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are not articulated or prioritized The proposed intervention plan is not reasonable, feasible, or sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5 The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is articulated but not in detail. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are described but not in depth Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided but weak. 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions but not in depth. | **35 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Not enough of references Conclusion is present but not clear neither strong. | **30 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 1-2 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Lack of references Conclusion is missing. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism | | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence and mechanisms of writing. | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• There is evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • Almost no errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Good organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Very good flow and readability is evident | **8 pts**<br>**8**<br>• There is weak evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • < 10 errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Fair organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Good flow and readability is evident | **7 pts**<br>**C**<br>Critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper is not present. Many errors in in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted Poorly organized paper with poor standard English structures are noted Poor | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Difficult to read. Numerous and major mechanical errors. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Writing is very unclear. | | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• Works are cited correctly in 7th edition APA Citations are complete and correct. No formatting errors | **8 pts**<br>**B**<br>5 -10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**C**<br>More than 10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Incomplete or weak citations to points in the paper AND Major formatting errors | **0 pts**<br>**NoF Marks**<br>No citations. Difficult to read | | 10 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |

**SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/samplehealthdisparitypaper-capaamales31-docx)

**SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/samplehealthdisparitypaper-capaamales31-docx)

**## paperprimary1outline.docx**

I am writing this paper as a family
**nurse practitioner student:**

Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper should review a specific population with a specific disease process and seek out the evidence-based interventions that could close the gap towards optimum health in that particular population. The paper is
**not to** compare one race against another. The paper aims to identify an
**adult** population, health problem (s), innovative and evidence-based health promotion or intervention strategies, and proposed changes related to the nurse practitioner's
**primary care** role. The population may be defined by gender, ethnic culture,or age group and then look at the disease outcomes.  Health problems should be among the topics presented in this course.
**Proposed interventions must be based on the evidence (based on the literature review students do for this paper)**. This is a scholarly paper and should be referenced accordingly.

· Papers that are not coherent or have poor mechanics will not be accepted and the student will be referred to the writing center.

· This paper is subject to Copyleaks Plagiarism scrutiny and must be turned in through this mechanism to be considered for grading.
**Do not** **plagiarize** your paper. If unfamiliar with what constitutes plagiarism, please work with the Writing Center

My topic:
**Obesity and Cardio metabolic Risk in Middle-Aged Hispanic Women**

**Instructor suggestion: would suggest is that it should not focus on screening, but on the actual diagnosis. We want to see how the outcomes are different when a certain population has the disease, not just being screened or not screened for it.**

**See the Rubric and sample paper that I attached**

**## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx**

**Healthcare Disparity Rubric**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Healthcare Disparity Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of problem and population | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **30 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>1. The problems and are thoroughly addressed with emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. In-depth description of problem. 2. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem. 3. In-depth description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given. 4. Background provides context for the Problem & phenomenon of interest on a national scale. 5. Significance is clearly articulated. 6. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data/) 7. Purpose statement is clear and relates to the entire paper. | **24 pts**<br>**B**<br>The problems are discussed but weak emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem but references are weak. Description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given but not in depth. Background provides context for the problem & phenomenon of interest but no data on a national scale. Significance is articulated but clear. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data but not thorough. Purpose statement is ambiguous and not clear and relates to the entire paper. | **21 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 5-6 points are addressed In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **18 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism. ( 0 point) | | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Innovative solutions & recommendations for change. | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **50 pts**<br>**A**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. Well- researched with all references cited. How the review of literature was done is clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. The review includes sufficient studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest. The review is critical and not a catalog of studies 3. A summary statement at the end of the review synthesizes major research findings that point to the scientific/clinical importance of phenomenon (the problem that you discussed in the introductory section) under question. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, or are clear and appropriate to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are articulated and prioritized The proposed intervention plan is reasonable, feasible, and sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5. The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is clearly articulated. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are clearly described Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions. | **40 pts**<br>**B**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. But references are not relevant or not cited. The process of the review of literature is not clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. Studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest is weak and not enough. The review is critical but not in depth. 3. A summary statement at the end of the review is present but not clear and thorough. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet minimum expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, are ambiguous or not related to to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are not articulated or prioritized The proposed intervention plan is not reasonable, feasible, or sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5 The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is articulated but not in detail. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are described but not in depth Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided but weak. 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions but not in depth. | **35 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Not enough of references Conclusion is present but not clear neither strong. | **30 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 1-2 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Lack of references Conclusion is missing. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism | | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence and mechanisms of writing. | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• There is evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • Almost no errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Good organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Very good flow and readability is evident | **8 pts**<br>**8**<br>• There is weak evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • < 10 errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Fair organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Good flow and readability is evident | **7 pts**<br>**C**<br>Critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper is not present. Many errors in in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted Poorly organized paper with poor standard English structures are noted Poor | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Difficult to read. Numerous and major mechanical errors. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Writing is very unclear. | | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• Works are cited correctly in 7th edition APA Citations are complete and correct. No formatting errors | **8 pts**<br>**B**<br>5 -10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**C**<br>More than 10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Incomplete or weak citations to points in the paper AND Major formatting errors | **0 pts**<br>**NoF Marks**<br>No citations. Difficult to read | | 10 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |

**SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/samplehealthdisparitypaper-capaamales31-docx)

**## paperprimary1outline.docx**

I am writing this paper as a family
**nurse practitioner student:**

Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper should review a specific population with a specific disease process and seek out the evidence-based interventions that could close the gap towards optimum health in that particular population. The paper is
**not to** compare one race against another. The paper aims to identify an
**adult** population, health problem (s), innovative and evidence-based health promotion or intervention strategies, and proposed changes related to the nurse practitioner's
**primary care** role. The population may be defined by gender, ethnic culture,or age group and then look at the disease outcomes.  Health problems should be among the topics presented in this course.
**Proposed interventions must be based on the evidence (based on the literature review students do for this paper)**. This is a scholarly paper and should be referenced accordingly.

· Papers that are not coherent or have poor mechanics will not be accepted and the student will be referred to the writing center.

· This paper is subject to Copyleaks Plagiarism scrutiny and must be turned in through this mechanism to be considered for grading.
**Do not** **plagiarize** your paper. If unfamiliar with what constitutes plagiarism, please work with the Writing Center

My topic:
**Obesity and Cardio metabolic Risk in Middle-Aged Hispanic Women**

**Instructor suggestion: would suggest is that it should not focus on screening, but on the actual diagnosis. We want to see how the outcomes are different when a certain population has the disease, not just being screened or not screened for it.**

**See the Rubric and sample paper that I attached**

**## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx**

**Healthcare Disparity Rubric**

| | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Healthcare Disparity Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of problem and population | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **30 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>1. The problems and are thoroughly addressed with emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. In-depth description of problem. 2. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem. 3. In-depth description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given. 4. Background provides context for the Problem & phenomenon of interest on a national scale. 5. Significance is clearly articulated. 6. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data/) 7. Purpose statement is clear and relates to the entire paper. | **24 pts**<br>**B**<br>The problems are discussed but weak emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem but references are weak. Description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given but not in depth. Background provides context for the problem & phenomenon of interest but no data on a national scale. Significance is articulated but clear. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data but not thorough. Purpose statement is ambiguous and not clear and relates to the entire paper. | **21 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 5-6 points are addressed In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **18 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism. ( 0 point) | | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Innovative solutions & recommendations for change. | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **50 pts**<br>**A**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. Well- researched with all references cited. How the review of literature was done is clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. The review includes sufficient studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest. The review is critical and not a catalog of studies 3. A summary statement at the end of the review synthesizes major research findings that point to the scientific/clinical importance of phenomenon (the problem that you discussed in the introductory section) under question. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, or are clear and appropriate to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are articulated and prioritized The proposed intervention plan is reasonable, feasible, and sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5. The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is clearly articulated. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are clearly described Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions. | **40 pts**<br>**B**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. But references are not relevant or not cited. The process of the review of literature is not clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. Studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest is weak and not enough. The review is critical but not in depth. 3. A summary statement at the end of the review is present but not clear and thorough. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet minimum expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, are ambiguous or not related to to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are not articulated or prioritized The proposed intervention plan is not reasonable, feasible, or sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5 The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is articulated but not in detail. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are described but not in depth Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided but weak. 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions but not in depth. | **35 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Not enough of references Conclusion is present but not clear neither strong. | **30 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 1-2 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Lack of references Conclusion is missing. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism | | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence and mechanisms of writing. | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• There is evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • Almost no errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Good organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Very good flow and readability is evident | **8 pts**<br>**8**<br>• There is weak evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • < 10 errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Fair organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Good flow and readability is evident | **7 pts**<br>**C**<br>Critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper is not present. Many errors in in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted Poorly organized paper with poor standard English structures are noted Poor | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Difficult to read. Numerous and major mechanical errors. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Writing is very unclear. | | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• Works are cited correctly in 7th edition APA Citations are complete and correct. No formatting errors | **8 pts**<br>**B**<br>5 -10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**C**<br>More than 10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Incomplete or weak citations to points in the paper AND Major formatting errors | **0 pts**<br>**NoF Marks**<br>No citations. Difficult to read | | 10 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |

**SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/samplehealthdisparitypaper-capaamales31-docx)

– 1
– 2
– 3

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Nursing SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Help

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Help.

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

November 5, 2026
[Solved] nursing

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

see attachment – ## fall25assignment3.docx **## fall25assignment3.docx** In this assessment, you will assume the role of the senior nurse at a regional hospital who has been assigned to develop a disaster recovery plan for the community using MAP-IT and trace-mapping, which you will present to city …

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

see attachment

– ## fall25assignment3.docx

**## fall25assignment3.docx**

In this assessment, you will assume the role of the senior nurse at a regional hospital who has
been assigned to develop a disaster recovery plan for the community using MAP-IT and trace-mapping, which you will present to city officials and the disaster relief team.

Introduction
For a health care facility to be able to fill its role in the community, it must actively plan not only for normal operation, but also for worst-case scenarios which could occur. In such disasters, the
hospital's services will be particularly crucial, even if the specifics of the disaster make it more difficult for the facility to stay open.
As the senior nurse at the Smallville Regional Hospital, you play a vital role in ensuring the
hospital's readiness for disasters and its ability to recover from them. The hospital administrator wants to discuss disaster preparedness and recovery with you. Before the conversation, it would be helpful to familiarize yourself with the background information on events that have occurred in Smallville in recent years, including the involvement of the hospital.

Background
Investigate further for relevant background information.
Newspaper Headline: “Smallville Devastated by Wildfire: Rebuilding and Recovery Underway”
November 8, 2022
Smallville, CA – In a tragic turn of events, the northern California town of Smallville was ravaged by a devastating wildfire on July 6, 2021. The fire, which quickly spread through the town, destroyed nearly 19,000 structures and claimed the lives of 31 residents. The community is now faced with the daunting task of rebuilding and recovering from this catastrophic event. The fire, known as the Blaze, raced into Smallville with unprecedented speed and intensity, leaving residents with little time to evacuate. Many were forced to flee on foot, seeking refuge in parking lots and commercial buildings that were never intended to serve as temporary shelters
in a firestorm.

2
The impact of this disaster was felt particularly hard by residents of low socioeconomic status (SES). People in poverty, with low incomes, and of low SES often face greater challenges in recovering from disasters. The loss of homes, possessions, and livelihoods has left many in a state of uncertainty and vulnerability.
However, amidst the devastation, there is hope. The community has come together to support one another and begin the process of rebuilding. Local organizations, government agencies, and volunteers have joined forces to provide assistance and resources to those affected by the
fire. Experts studying the response to disasters like the Blaze emphasize the need for a radical overhaul in how we prepare for and respond to such events in the era of climate change.
This includes rethinking disaster recovery strategies and implementing measures to mitigate the impact of future disasters.
The town of Smallville is determined to rise from the ashes and rebuild stronger than ever. City leaders are working on developing comprehensive emergency plans and evacuation standards to ensure the safety of residents in the face of future wildfires.
The community is resilient and united in their efforts to restore their beloved town. As the
rebuilding and recovery process continues, it is crucial for the nation to learn from this tragedy and implement measures to better prepare for and respond to disasters.
The lessons learned from the Blaze will serve as a wake-up call for communities across the
country, emphasizing the importance of proactive planning and effective disaster response
strategies.
Fact Sheet: Smallville, CA
Population: 5,200
Median Household Income: $60,000
Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line: 22%
Racial/Ethnic Composition:
White: 69%
African American: 6%
Native American: 2%
Asian/Pacific Islander: 10%
Other Races: 8%
Two or More Races: 5%

3
Additionally, there are an unknown number of undocumented migrant workers with limited
English proficiency.
Education
High school graduate or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+: 84.0%
Bachelor's degree or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+: 18.5%
Health
With a disability, under age 65 years: 10.8%
Persons without health insurance, under age 65 years: 12.5%
Income & Poverty
Median household income: $37,476
Per capita income in past 12 months: $20,274
Persons in poverty: 23.0%
Staff Interviews
Dr. Peter Jenski, Internal Medicine. "The impact of the fire on the residents of Smallville has
been devastating. Many of them have lost their homes, possessions, and livelihoods. The fire
has also had a significant impact on their physical and mental health."
Bill Reiner, Social Worker: "Yes, I agree. People in low socioeconomic status groups are
particularly vulnerable to the effects of disasters like this one. They often face greater
challenges in recovering from disasters."
Nurse Kaley Grant, ICU: "That's right. The fire has increased the risk of respiratory and lung
diseases, which can be particularly harmful to people with pre-existing conditions."
Dr. Linh Boswell, Psychiatrist: "And let's not forget about the mental health impact. The
trauma of losing everything in a fire can be overwhelming. Many residents are experiencing
symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression."
Dr. Tom Sowka, Pharmacist: "It's important that we provide comprehensive care to these
patients, addressing both their physical and mental health needs. We need to work together to
ensure that they receive the care and resources they need to recover from this disaster."
Dr. Luisa Gonzalez, Hospital Administrator: " I couldn't agree more. We need to work
together as a medical community to support the affected residents and implement
comprehensive emergency plans and evacuation standards to mitigate the impact of future
disasters. We can learn from previous disasters and use those lessons to better prepare for
future events."

4
Request from Administrator
Dr. Luisa Gonzalez, Smallville Hospital Administrator, has asked you to present a compelling
case to community stakeholders for the proposed disaster recovery plan. She requests you use
the MAP-IT model, which is a step-by-step, structured plan that can be developed by a coalition
that is tailored to a specific community's needs.
The MAP-IT model involves all stakeholders, making for a widely-supported and community-
owned effort. It assesses assets as well as needs and looks for ways to use them.
The five steps of the MAP-IT model are:
1. Mobilize individuals and organizations that care about the health of your community into
a coalition.
2. Assess the areas of greatest need in your community, as well as the resources and
other strengths that you can tap into to address those areas.
3. Plan your approach: start with a vision of where you want to be as a community; then
add strategies and action steps to help you achieve that vision.
4. Implement your plan using concrete action steps that can be monitored and will make a
difference.
5. Track your progress over time.

In addition to using the MAP-IT model, work up an approach supported by Healthy People 2020 and put it all into a PowerPoint. You can save the PowerPoint deck and the audio of its
accompanying presentation at the public library so that the public can access it and see that
you're serious. By doing this, you can create a prototype for other local communities near thisone, and possibly other facilities in the organization. To ensure that the disaster recovery plan is effective, you can also involve diverse stakeholders, replace guesswork and hunches with data-
driven decisions, and create comprehensive, detailed plans that define the roles and
responsibilities of disaster recovery team members and outline the criteria to launch the plan into action.

**Complete the following:**

1. Develop a disaster recovery plan for the community that will reduce health disparities and improve access to services after a disaster.

· Assess community needs.

· Consider resources, personnel, budget, and community makeup.

· Identify the people accountable for implementation of the plan and describe their roles.

· Focus on specific Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives.

· Include a timeline for the recovery effort.

2. Apply the MAP-IT (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track) framework to guide the development of your plan:

·
**M** obilize collaborative partners.

·
**A** ssess community needs.

· Use the demographic data and specifics related to the disaster to identify the needs of the community and develop a recovery plan. Consider physical, emotional, cultural, and financial needs of the entire community.

· Include in your plan the equitable allocation of services for the diverse community.

· Apply the triage classification to provide a rationale for those who may have been injured during the train derailment. Provide support for your position.

· Include in your plan contact tracing of the homeless, disabled, displaced community members, migrant workers, and those who have hearing impairment or English as a second language in the event of severe tornadoes.

·
**P** lan to reduce health disparities and improve access to services.

·
**I** mplement a plan to reach Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives.

·
**T** rack and trace-map community progress.

· Use the CDC's
[Contract Tracing Resources for Health Departments](https://www.cdc.gov/museum/pdf/cdcm-pha-stem-lesson-contact-tracing-lesson.pdf) as a template to create your contact tracing.

· Describe the plan for contact tracing during the disaster and recovery phase.

3. Develop a slide presentation of your disaster recovery plan with an audio recording of you presenting your assessment of the scenario and associated data in the
[Assessment 03 Supplement: Disaster Recover Plan [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/52569/files/9863460?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Disaster Recover Plan [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/52569/files/9863460/download?download_frd=1) resource for city officials and the disaster relief team. Be sure to also include speaker notes.

**Presentation Format and Length**

You may use Microsoft PowerPoint (preferred) or other suitable presentation software to create your slides and add your voice-over along with speaker notes. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

· Title slide.

· Recovery plan title.

· Your name.

· Date.

· Course number and title.

· References (at the end of your presentation).

Your slide deck should consist of 10–12 content slides plus title and references slides. Use the speaker's notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources as appropriate. Be sure to also include a transcript that matches your recorded voice-over. The transcript can be submitted on a separate Word document. Make sure to review the Microsoft PowerPoint tutorial for directions.

**Supporting Evidence**

Cite at least three credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications within the past 5 years to support your plan.

**Graded Requirements**

The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point:

· Describe the determinants of health and the cultural, social, and economic barriers that impact safety, health, and recovery efforts in the community.

· Consider the interrelationships among these factors.

· Explain how your proposed disaster recovery plan will lessen health disparities and improve access to community services.

· Consider principles of social justice and cultural sensitivity with respect to ensuring health equity for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.

· Explain how health and governmental policy impact disaster recovery efforts.

· Consider the implications for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community of legislation that includes, but is not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and the Disaster Recovery Reform Act (DRRA).

· Present specific, evidence-based strategies to overcome communication barriers and enhance interprofessional collaboration to improve the disaster recovery effort.

· Consider how your proposed strategies will affect members of the disaster relief team, individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.

· Include evidence to support your strategies.

· Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

· Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed audio and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

· Develop your presentation with a specific purpose and audience in mind.

· Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

**Additional Requirements**

Before submitting your assessment, proofread all elements to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your presentation.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze health risks and health care needs among distinct populations.

·

·

· Describe the determinants of health and the cultural, social, and economic barriers that impact safety, health, and disaster recovery efforts in a community.

Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.

·

·

· Present specific, evidence-based strategies to overcome communication barriers and enhance interprofessional collaboration to improve disaster recovery efforts.

Competency 3: Evaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

·

·

· Explain how health and governmental policy impact disaster recovery efforts.

Competency 4: Integrate principles of social justice in community health interventions.

·

·

· Explain how a proposed disaster recovery plan will lessen health disparities and improve access to community services.

Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.

·

·

· Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

· Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented

NO USE OF AI

**## fall25assignment3.docx**

In this assessment, you will assume the role of the senior nurse at a regional hospital who has
been assigned to develop a disaster recovery plan for the community using MAP-IT and trace-mapping, which you will present to city officials and the disaster relief team.

Introduction
For a health care facility to be able to fill its role in the community, it must actively plan not only for normal operation, but also for worst-case scenarios which could occur. In such disasters, the
hospital's services will be particularly crucial, even if the specifics of the disaster make it more difficult for the facility to stay open.
As the senior nurse at the Smallville Regional Hospital, you play a vital role in ensuring the
hospital's readiness for disasters and its ability to recover from them. The hospital administrator wants to discuss disaster preparedness and recovery with you. Before the conversation, it would be helpful to familiarize yourself with the background information on events that have occurred in Smallville in recent years, including the involvement of the hospital.

Background
Investigate further for relevant background information.
Newspaper Headline: “Smallville Devastated by Wildfire: Rebuilding and Recovery Underway”
November 8, 2022
Smallville, CA – In a tragic turn of events, the northern California town of Smallville was ravaged by a devastating wildfire on July 6, 2021. The fire, which quickly spread through the town, destroyed nearly 19,000 structures and claimed the lives of 31 residents. The community is now faced with the daunting task of rebuilding and recovering from this catastrophic event. The fire, known as the Blaze, raced into Smallville with unprecedented speed and intensity, leaving residents with little time to evacuate. Many were forced to flee on foot, seeking refuge in parking lots and commercial buildings that were never intended to serve as temporary shelters
in a firestorm.

2
The impact of this disaster was felt particularly hard by residents of low socioeconomic status (SES). People in poverty, with low incomes, and of low SES often face greater challenges in recovering from disasters. The loss of homes, possessions, and livelihoods has left many in a state of uncertainty and vulnerability.
However, amidst the devastation, there is hope. The community has come together to support one another and begin the process of rebuilding. Local organizations, government agencies, and volunteers have joined forces to provide assistance and resources to those affected by the
fire. Experts studying the response to disasters like the Blaze emphasize the need for a radical overhaul in how we prepare for and respond to such events in the era of climate change.
This includes rethinking disaster recovery strategies and implementing measures to mitigate the impact of future disasters.
The town of Smallville is determined to rise from the ashes and rebuild stronger than ever. City leaders are working on developing comprehensive emergency plans and evacuation standards to ensure the safety of residents in the face of future wildfires.
The community is resilient and united in their efforts to restore their beloved town. As the
rebuilding and recovery process continues, it is crucial for the nation to learn from this tragedy and implement measures to better prepare for and respond to disasters.
The lessons learned from the Blaze will serve as a wake-up call for communities across the
country, emphasizing the importance of proactive planning and effective disaster response
strategies.
Fact Sheet: Smallville, CA
Population: 5,200
Median Household Income: $60,000
Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line: 22%
Racial/Ethnic Composition:
White: 69%
African American: 6%
Native American: 2%
Asian/Pacific Islander: 10%
Other Races: 8%
Two or More Races: 5%

3
Additionally, there are an unknown number of undocumented migrant workers with limited
English proficiency.
Education
High school graduate or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+: 84.0%
Bachelor's degree or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+: 18.5%
Health
With a disability, under age 65 years: 10.8%
Persons without health insurance, under age 65 years: 12.5%
Income & Poverty
Median household income: $37,476
Per capita income in past 12 months: $20,274
Persons in poverty: 23.0%
Staff Interviews
Dr. Peter Jenski, Internal Medicine. "The impact of the fire on the residents of Smallville has
been devastating. Many of them have lost their homes, possessions, and livelihoods. The fire
has also had a significant impact on their physical and mental health."
Bill Reiner, Social Worker: "Yes, I agree. People in low socioeconomic status groups are
particularly vulnerable to the effects of disasters like this one. They often face greater
challenges in recovering from disasters."
Nurse Kaley Grant, ICU: "That's right. The fire has increased the risk of respiratory and lung
diseases, which can be particularly harmful to people with pre-existing conditions."
Dr. Linh Boswell, Psychiatrist: "And let's not forget about the mental health impact. The
trauma of losing everything in a fire can be overwhelming. Many residents are experiencing
symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression."
Dr. Tom Sowka, Pharmacist: "It's important that we provide comprehensive care to these
patients, addressing both their physical and mental health needs. We need to work together to
ensure that they receive the care and resources they need to recover from this disaster."
Dr. Luisa Gonzalez, Hospital Administrator: " I couldn't agree more. We need to work
together as a medical community to support the affected residents and implement
comprehensive emergency plans and evacuation standards to mitigate the impact of future
disasters. We can learn from previous disasters and use those lessons to better prepare for
future events."

4
Request from Administrator
Dr. Luisa Gonzalez, Smallville Hospital Administrator, has asked you to present a compelling
case to community stakeholders for the proposed disaster recovery plan. She requests you use
the MAP-IT model, which is a step-by-step, structured plan that can be developed by a coalition
that is tailored to a specific community's needs.
The MAP-IT model involves all stakeholders, making for a widely-supported and community-
owned effort. It assesses assets as well as needs and looks for ways to use them.
The five steps of the MAP-IT model are:
1. Mobilize individuals and organizations that care about the health of your community into
a coalition.
2. Assess the areas of greatest need in your community, as well as the resources and
other strengths that you can tap into to address those areas.
3. Plan your approach: start with a vision of where you want to be as a community; then
add strategies and action steps to help you achieve that vision.
4. Implement your plan using concrete action steps that can be monitored and will make a
difference.
5. Track your progress over time.

In addition to using the MAP-IT model, work up an approach supported by Healthy People 2020 and put it all into a PowerPoint. You can save the PowerPoint deck and the audio of its
accompanying presentation at the public library so that the public can access it and see that
you're serious. By doing this, you can create a prototype for other local communities near thisone, and possibly other facilities in the organization. To ensure that the disaster recovery plan is effective, you can also involve diverse stakeholders, replace guesswork and hunches with data-
driven decisions, and create comprehensive, detailed plans that define the roles and
responsibilities of disaster recovery team members and outline the criteria to launch the plan into action.

**Complete the following:**

1. Develop a disaster recovery plan for the community that will reduce health disparities and improve access to services after a disaster.

· Assess community needs.

· Consider resources, personnel, budget, and community makeup.

· Identify the people accountable for implementation of the plan and describe their roles.

· Focus on specific Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives.

· Include a timeline for the recovery effort.

2. Apply the MAP-IT (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track) framework to guide the development of your plan:

·
**M** obilize collaborative partners.

·
**A** ssess community needs.

· Use the demographic data and specifics related to the disaster to identify the needs of the community and develop a recovery plan. Consider physical, emotional, cultural, and financial needs of the entire community.

· Include in your plan the equitable allocation of services for the diverse community.

· Apply the triage classification to provide a rationale for those who may have been injured during the train derailment. Provide support for your position.

· Include in your plan contact tracing of the homeless, disabled, displaced community members, migrant workers, and those who have hearing impairment or English as a second language in the event of severe tornadoes.

·
**P** lan to reduce health disparities and improve access to services.

·
**I** mplement a plan to reach Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives.

·
**T** rack and trace-map community progress.

· Use the CDC's
[Contract Tracing Resources for Health Departments](https://www.cdc.gov/museum/pdf/cdcm-pha-stem-lesson-contact-tracing-lesson.pdf) as a template to create your contact tracing.

· Describe the plan for contact tracing during the disaster and recovery phase.

3. Develop a slide presentation of your disaster recovery plan with an audio recording of you presenting your assessment of the scenario and associated data in the
[Assessment 03 Supplement: Disaster Recover Plan [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/52569/files/9863460?wrap=1) [Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Disaster Recover Plan [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/52569/files/9863460/download?download_frd=1) resource for city officials and the disaster relief team. Be sure to also include speaker notes.

**Presentation Format and Length**

You may use Microsoft PowerPoint (preferred) or other suitable presentation software to create your slides and add your voice-over along with speaker notes. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

· Title slide.

· Recovery plan title.

· Your name.

· Date.

· Course number and title.

· References (at the end of your presentation).

Your slide deck should consist of 10–12 content slides plus title and references slides. Use the speaker's notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources as appropriate. Be sure to also include a transcript that matches your recorded voice-over. The transcript can be submitted on a separate Word document. Make sure to review the Microsoft PowerPoint tutorial for directions.

**Supporting Evidence**

Cite at least three credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications within the past 5 years to support your plan.

**Graded Requirements**

The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point:

· Describe the determinants of health and the cultural, social, and economic barriers that impact safety, health, and recovery efforts in the community.

· Consider the interrelationships among these factors.

· Explain how your proposed disaster recovery plan will lessen health disparities and improve access to community services.

· Consider principles of social justice and cultural sensitivity with respect to ensuring health equity for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.

· Explain how health and governmental policy impact disaster recovery efforts.

· Consider the implications for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community of legislation that includes, but is not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and the Disaster Recovery Reform Act (DRRA).

· Present specific, evidence-based strategies to overcome communication barriers and enhance interprofessional collaboration to improve the disaster recovery effort.

· Consider how your proposed strategies will affect members of the disaster relief team, individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.

· Include evidence to support your strategies.

· Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

· Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed audio and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

· Develop your presentation with a specific purpose and audience in mind.

· Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

**Additional Requirements**

Before submitting your assessment, proofread all elements to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your presentation.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze health risks and health care needs among distinct populations.

·

·

· Describe the determinants of health and the cultural, social, and economic barriers that impact safety, health, and disaster recovery efforts in a community.

Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.

·

·

· Present specific, evidence-based strategies to overcome communication barriers and enhance interprofessional collaboration to improve disaster recovery efforts.

Competency 3: Evaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

·

·

· Explain how health and governmental policy impact disaster recovery efforts.

Competency 4: Integrate principles of social justice in community health interventions.

·

·

· Explain how a proposed disaster recovery plan will lessen health disparities and improve access to community services.

Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.

·

·

· Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

· Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented

NO USE OF AI

November 5, 2026
[Solved] NUR514W5

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– ## NUR514W5.docx **## NUR514W5.docx** **DISCUSSION:** ![A screenshot of a medical report AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur514w5) Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topic…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## NUR514W5.docx

**## NUR514W5.docx**

**DISCUSSION:**

![A screenshot of a medical report AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur514w5)

Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case:

1.
**An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach maximal health potential on individuals.**

2.
**Name the different family developmental stages and give examples of each one.**

3.
**Describe family structure and function and the relationship with health care.**

**INSTRUCTIONS:**

· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

· Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs

· Please write in paragraph form, no bullet points

· Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

· Please ensure APA formatting is correct

PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW FOR SCORE OF 10 POINTS

![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur514w5)

## image1.png

## image2.png

**## NUR514W5.docx**

**DISCUSSION:**

![A screenshot of a medical report AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur514w5)

Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case:

1.
**An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach maximal health potential on individuals.**

2.
**Name the different family developmental stages and give examples of each one.**

3.
**Describe family structure and function and the relationship with health care.**

**INSTRUCTIONS:**

· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

· Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs

· Please write in paragraph form, no bullet points

· Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

· Please ensure APA formatting is correct

PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW FOR SCORE OF 10 POINTS

![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur514w5)

## image1.png

## image2.png

November 5, 2026
[Solved] NUR514CLW5

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

– ## NUR514CLW5.docx **## NUR514CLW5.docx** **DISCUSSION:** Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 pos…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## NUR514CLW5.docx

**## NUR514CLW5.docx**

**DISCUSSION:**

Describe your clinical experience for this week.

· Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?

· Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
**(EXTREME CRAMPS FOLLOWING IUD PLACEMENT)**

· Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.

· What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?

· Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

· You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

· All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

· Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

· You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

**INSTRUCTIONS:**

· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

· Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs

· Please write in paragraph form, no bullet points

· Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

· Please ensure APA formatting is correct

PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW FOR SCORE OF 10 POINTS

![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur514clw5)

## image1.png

**## NUR514CLW5.docx**

**DISCUSSION:**

Describe your clinical experience for this week.

· Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?

· Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
**(EXTREME CRAMPS FOLLOWING IUD PLACEMENT)**

· Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.

· What did you learn from this week's clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?

· Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

**Submission Instructions:**

· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

· You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

· All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

· Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

· You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

**INSTRUCTIONS:**

· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

· Please include introduction and conclusion paragraphs

· Please write in paragraph form, no bullet points

· Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).

· Please ensure APA formatting is correct

PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW FOR SCORE OF 10 POINTS

![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nur514clw5)

## image1.png

November 5, 2026
[Solved] Nursing IVC and Crisis assignment

✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

Executive Solution Overview

For this assignment, you will need to write in narrative form. **PLEASE NOTE THAT CUTTING AND PASTING THE INFORMATION FROM WEBSITES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT. This is very important because you may need this information quickly and not have time in an emergency to be trying to figure thi…

Instant Solution Download
$6.99

Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

For this assignment, you will need to write in narrative form. **PLEASE NOTE THAT CUTTING AND PASTING THE INFORMATION FROM WEBSITES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT. This is very important because you may need this information quickly and not have time in an emergency to be trying to figure this out.**
1. Identify your state
2. Identify the process of IVC in your state in your own words, not taken from a website and pasted.
3. Does your state have an outpatient commitment? What is the process, and what facilities in your area could a patient go to for this treatment? Specific names of places to suggest to a patient in your area, if available, or surrounding areas.
4. Identify the crisis intervention resources and any other services where a patient can be sent in a psychiatric emergency situation, such as a mental health facility. In your area, do you have a crisis center? Do you have a crisis line? List the resources, including the crisis line, as follows
XYZ Crisis Center
phone number
address
hours
referral process
If you do not have either, say that and then document if your law enforcement officers are trained in crisis management for psychiatric emergencies.
5. You must use numbered titles for each section (example **1. Identify your state**) with bold font.
It may take you some time to find this information, so plan your time accordingly. You can call the magistrate's office, your local crisis center, or the Emergency Department to help find this information as well as any other source you find.
State: Florida

November 5, 2026