My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] Research for Annotated Bibliography 416 / Annotated Bibliography 6/7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Compile research for an annotated bibliography related to clinical practice. Submit a reference page of 6 articles, which can include the 2 you submitted for the Article Summary assignments. These will be the articles you plan on using in your annotated bibliography Part2- Create an annotated biblio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Compile research for an annotated bibliography related to clinical practice.

    Submit a reference page of 6 articles, which can include the 2 you submitted for the Article Summary assignments. These will be the articles you plan on using in your annotated bibliography

    Part2-

    Create an annotated bibliography. Your bibliography should be based on the **6 articles compiled in the Module 6 Assignment** related to clinical practice and should include:

    1. A brief overview of each article, including the research type, major findings, and conclusions following the current APA style for annotated bibliographies.

    2. A description of the relevance of each article for clinical practice.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – The bibliography should be original and logically organized.
    – The bibliography should follow the current APA format for citing and documenting references.

    Incorporate a minimum of 6 current (published within the last five years) references from peer-reviewed journals ( the same 6 from the top)

    \*\*\* need Turnitin report***  No AI  Rubic added

    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-02-20at10.03.51AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-02-20at10-03-51am-png "ScreenShot2025-02-20at10.03.51AM.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Quality Improvement Initiative 416/7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe a quality improvement initiative in your current or recent practice setting. What was the nurse’s role in the project? What was the outcome of the project? Has the improvement been sustained? **Submission Instructions:** – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe a quality improvement initiative in your current or recent practice setting. What was the nurse’s role in the project? What was the outcome of the project? Has the improvement been sustained?

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

    No AI Need Turnit report

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] obgyn clinical experience

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe your clinical experience for this week. – [\ \ ScreenShot2025-02-20at6.34.45PM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-02-20at6-34-45pm-png "ScreenShot2025-02-20at6.34.45PM.png") – [\ \ ScreenShot2025-02-20at6.35.10PM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-02-…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe your clinical experience for this week.

    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-02-20at6.34.45PM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-02-20at6-34-45pm-png "ScreenShot2025-02-20at6.34.45PM.png")
    – [\
    \
    ScreenShot2025-02-20at6.35.10PM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-02-20at6-35-10pm-png "ScreenShot2025-02-20at6.35.10PM.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] what is health?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering what is health?.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] week7 re

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Consider the following questions as you watch your peers’ presentations: – Did the presentation include strong evidence to influence practice change? – Was the presentation organized, clear, and easy to follow? – Was the presentation delivery professional with appropriate video and sound quality? …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Consider the following questions as you watch your peers’ presentations:
    – Did the presentation include strong evidence to influence practice change?
    – Was the presentation organized, clear, and easy to follow?
    – Was the presentation delivery professional with appropriate video and sound quality?
    – Did the presenter appear to be prepared with the use of clear speech and professional attire?
    – Was the presentation free of background noise and distraction?
    – Did the presentation contain appropriate use of fonts, visual aids, and short bullet points?
    – Respond to your peer by sharing:
    – What is one thing that you learned from this presentation?
    – What is one thing that the presenter did well?
    – What is one suggestion to help the presenter improve future presentations?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] week 7 remediation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering week 7 remediation.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] health and wellness

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx **## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx** ### **NR222 Health and Wellness** ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Project Guidelines** ## TOPIC: The impact of universal health coverage on public health outcomes’ 1. Discuss the prof…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx

    **## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx**

    ### **NR222 Health and Wellness**

    ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Project Guidelines**

    ## TOPIC: The impact of universal health coverage on public health outcomes’

    1. Discuss the professional nurse’s role in health promotion activities.

    3. Discuss health promotion, illness prevention, health maintenance, health restoration, and rehabilitation in relation to the nurse’s role in working with various populations.

    7. Identify health promotion strategies throughout the life span.

    Follow these guidelines when completing this.

    1) Identify a health problem or need for health promotion for a particular stage in the life span of a population from a specific culture in your area.

    2) Research a topic related to health and wellness associated with one of the Healthy People topic areas.

    3) You will develop an educational health promotion project addressing the population/culture in your area.

    4) Include the following sections
    _(detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric)._

    ·
    _Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area._

    ·
    _Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest._

    ·
    _Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper._

    ·
    _Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper._

    b.
    _Relate Topic to Target Population-_

    ·
    _Describes the topic and target cultural population._

    ·
    _Includes statistics to support significance of the topic._

    ·
    _Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area._

    ·
    _Applies health promotion concepts._

    c.
    _Summary of Articles_

    ·
    _A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources._

    ·
    _Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content._

    ·
    _At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group._

    ·
    _Summaries all key points and findings from the articles._

    ·
    _Includes statistics to support significance of the topic._

    ·
    _Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples._

    d.
    _Health Promotion Discussion -_

    ·
    _Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic._

    ·
    _The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population._

    ·
    _Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population._

    ·
    _Applies health promotion strategies._

    e.
    _APA Style and Organization_

    ### ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/health-and-wellness-20886201)

    ### **NR283 Pathophysiology**

    ### **RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines**

    ### ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/health-and-wellness-20886201)

    ### **NR222 Health and Wellness**

    ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Paper Guidelines**

    NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V2.docx Revised: 04/2018

    11

    NR222 Health Promotion Project Guidelines V6.docx ®2022 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

    41

    4

    ## | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | | | | | | | | **Introduction and Conclusion** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area. <br>2. Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest. <br>3. Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper.<br>4. Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper. | | | | | | | **Relate Topic to Target Population** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Describes the topic and target cultural population.<br>2. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.<br>3. Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area. <br>4. Applies health promotion concepts. | | | | | | | **Summary of Articles** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources. <br>2. Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content.<br>3. At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group. <br>4. Summaries all key points and findings from the articles.<br>5. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.<br>6. Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples. | | | | | | | **Health Promotion Discussion** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic. <br>2. The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population.<br>3. Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population.<br>4. Applies health promotion strategies. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ## image1.png

    **## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx**

    ### **NR222 Health and Wellness**

    ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Project Guidelines**

    ## TOPIC: The impact of universal health coverage on public health outcomes’

    1. Discuss the professional nurse’s role in health promotion activities.

    3. Discuss health promotion, illness prevention, health maintenance, health restoration, and rehabilitation in relation to the nurse’s role in working with various populations.

    7. Identify health promotion strategies throughout the life span.

    Follow these guidelines when completing this.

    1) Identify a health problem or need for health promotion for a particular stage in the life span of a population from a specific culture in your area.

    2) Research a topic related to health and wellness associated with one of the Healthy People topic areas.

    3) You will develop an educational health promotion project addressing the population/culture in your area.

    4) Include the following sections
    _(detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric)._

    ·
    _Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area._

    ·
    _Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest._

    ·
    _Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper._

    ·
    _Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper._

    b.
    _Relate Topic to Target Population-_

    ·
    _Describes the topic and target cultural population._

    ·
    _Includes statistics to support significance of the topic._

    ·
    _Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area._

    ·
    _Applies health promotion concepts._

    c.
    _Summary of Articles_

    ·
    _A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources._

    ·
    _Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content._

    ·
    _At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group._

    ·
    _Summaries all key points and findings from the articles._

    ·
    _Includes statistics to support significance of the topic._

    ·
    _Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples._

    d.
    _Health Promotion Discussion -_

    ·
    _Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic._

    ·
    _The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population._

    ·
    _Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population._

    ·
    _Applies health promotion strategies._

    e.
    _APA Style and Organization_

    ### ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/health-and-wellness-20886201)

    ### **NR283 Pathophysiology**

    ### **RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines**

    ### ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/health-and-wellness-20886201)

    ### **NR222 Health and Wellness**

    ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Paper Guidelines**

    NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V2.docx Revised: 04/2018

    11

    NR222 Health Promotion Project Guidelines V6.docx ®2022 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

    41

    4

    ## | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | | | | | | | | **Introduction and Conclusion** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area. <br>2. Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest. <br>3. Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper.<br>4. Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper. | | | | | | | **Relate Topic to Target Population** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Describes the topic and target cultural population.<br>2. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.<br>3. Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area. <br>4. Applies health promotion concepts. | | | | | | | **Summary of Articles** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources. <br>2. Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content.<br>3. At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group. <br>4. Summaries all key points and findings from the articles.<br>5. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.<br>6. Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples. | | | | | | | **Health Promotion Discussion** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic. <br>2. The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population.<br>3. Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population.<br>4. Applies health promotion strategies. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ## image1.png

  • [Solved] weekly clinical experience

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering weekly clinical experience.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Module6ClinicalWork.docx – AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf **## Module6ClinicalWork.docx** **Module 6:** _Clinical Work_ **Instructions** Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed jou…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Module6ClinicalWork.docx

    – AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf

    **## Module6ClinicalWork.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Clinical Work_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    **Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **40 to >36.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **36 to >32.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **32 to >28.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **28 to >24.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **24 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested. | **20 to >18.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested. | **18 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested. | **15 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **14 to >12.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **12 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **11 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. | **9 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    ·
    [Previous](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930550) [Next](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930552)

    **AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixeresearchevidenceappraisaltool2022-pdf)

    **AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixeresearchevidenceappraisaltool2022-pdf)

    **## Module6ClinicalWork.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Clinical Work_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    **Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **40 to >36.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **36 to >32.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **32 to >28.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **28 to >24.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **24 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested. | **20 to >18.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested. | **18 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested. | **15 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **14 to >12.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **12 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **11 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. | **9 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    ·
    [Previous](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930550) [Next](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930552)

    **AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixeresearchevidenceappraisaltool2022-pdf)

    **## Module6ClinicalWork.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Clinical Work_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    **Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **40 to >36.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **36 to >32.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **32 to >28.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **28 to >24.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **24 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested. | **20 to >18.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested. | **18 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested. | **15 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **14 to >12.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **12 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **11 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. | **9 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    ·
    [Previous](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930550) [Next](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930552)

    **AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixeresearchevidenceappraisaltool2022-pdf)

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx **## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx** **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics_ **Instructions** Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of artic…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx

    **## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics_

    **Instructions**

    Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.

    Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.

    1. What is the purpose of the article organization?

    2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?

    3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics_

    **Instructions**

    Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.

    Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.

    1. What is the purpose of the article organization?

    2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?

    3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.