Category: Reading Analysis

  • [Solved] NEED TODAY

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHED **files (1)** – ## WEEK7BIBL261.pdf **## WEEK7BIBL261.pdf** Exegetical-Historical Paper! In 5-7 double-spaced pgs., you will select one doctrine, development, or practice from the ancient, medieval, or early modern Church and will assess it as to its Biblical accuracy. The goal here is …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHED

    **files (1)**

    – ## WEEK7BIBL261.pdf

    **## WEEK7BIBL261.pdf**

    Exegetical-Historical Paper!

    In 5-7 double-spaced pgs., you will select one doctrine, development, or practice
    from the ancient, medieval, or early modern Church and will assess it as to its
    Biblical accuracy. The goal here is twofold, 1) to bring your exegesis to bear upon
    Church history, and 2) to understand the power that historical circumstances play in
    shaping our beliefs and practices. The paper will be organized into four parts, 1) an
    introduction, 2) exegesis concerning the subject, 3) a consideration of the historical
    circumstances that led to the subject, and 4) a conclusion. The goal of the introduction
    is to clearly state your chosen subject (e.g., predestination) and whether it is Scriptural.
    Next, your exegesis section (approx. 2 ½ pgs.) will set out to prove your argument from
    Scripture (e.g., why predestination is or is not Scriptural). Here you will engage biblical
    theology and the tools of exegesis, (i.e., commentaries, dictionaries, concordances, and
    especially Accordance Bible Software) to defend your claim. (Ensure that you cite all
    the sources.) Your next section (approx. 2 ½ pgs.) will then assess the historical
    circumstances that led to the doctrine, development, or practice. If, for instance, the
    Church leaders deployed something that has less basis in the Bible, why, then, did they
    deploy it? Discuss the historical circumstances that led to this change or
    implementation. Lastly, you will have a conclusion that restates your findings. For a list
    of possible candidates for this paper, please consult the syllabus.

    Possible Candidates from Syllabus:

    · Theology of the Cross
    · Penal Substitutionary Atonement
    · Predestination
    · Double Predestination
    · Paedo-Baptism
    · Credo-Baptism
    · Re-Baptism
    · Consubstantiation
    · Confessionalism
    · Various liturgical practices
    · Pietist asceticism
    · Interior piety of the Catholic mystics
    · Evangelical emphasis on the “new birth”
    · disestablishment
    · Theological Liberalism
    · Higher Criticism
    · Pentecostalism

    · Speaking in Tongues
    · Charles G. Finney’s Decisionist Christianity

    Exegetical-Historical Paper

    Criteria Ratings Point
    s

    Introductio
    n

    Excellent
    Clearly states both topic and thesis.
    10 to >9 pts
    Good
    States both topic and thesis, but both could be clearer.
    9 to >8 pts
    Fair
    States either topic or thesis, but not both. Or, states both topic and
    thesis in a vague way.
    8 to >7 pts
    Poor
    Does not present a clear topic and thesis.
    7 to >0 pts

    /10
    pts

    Exegetical
    Section

    Excellent
    Presents a thorough and compelling analysis of the topic's
    Scriptural credibility. Utilizes various key Scriptures and implements
    biblical studies tools throughout.
    35 to >32 pts
    Good
    Presents a good analysis of the topic's Scriptural credibility. Utilizes
    some key Scriptures and implements biblical studies tools in part.
    The deficiency here is that the analysis could be more concrete.
    32 to >29 pts
    Fair

    /35
    pts

    Presents an acceptable analysis of the topic's Scriptural credibility.
    Points to a key passage here and there, but only in a surface-level
    way. Implements biblical studies tools sparingly but, again, only at a
    surface level.
    29 to >26 pts
    Poor
    Presents a vague analysis of the topic's Scriptural credibility. Does
    not point to key Scriptures and does not implement biblical studies
    tools.
    26 to >0 pts

    Historical
    Section

    Excellent
    Presents a thorough, nuanced, and compelling analysis of the
    topic's historical development. It provides several reasons and
    delves into each in a concrete fashion.
    35 to >32 pts
    Good
    Presents a good analysis of the topic's historical development. It
    provides some reasons and delves into each adequately but not as
    concretely as it could.
    32 to >29 pts
    Fair
    Presents an acceptable analysis of the topic's historical
    development. It provides several reasons but does not delve into
    them in a concrete way.
    29 to >26 pts
    Poor
    Does not adequately engage the topic's historical development. It
    may only provide one reason (or speak of the reasons as a whole
    in a generic way), without delving into them concretely.
    26 to >0 pts

    /35
    pts

    Grammar
    and Style

    Excellent
    Free of grammatical and stylistic issues.
    10 to >9 pts
    Good
    Has only a few grammatical and stylistic errors.
    9 to >7 pts
    Fair
    Has several grammatical and stylistic errors.
    7 to >6 pts
    Poor
    Grammatical and stylistic errors inhibit the flow of the paper.
    6 to >0 pts

    /10
    pts

    Document
    ation

    Excellent
    Documents all sources per Turabian standards.
    10 to >9 pts
    Good
    Documents most sources per Turabian standards.
    9 to >7 pts
    Fair
    Documents some sources per Turabian standards.
    7 to >6 pts
    Poor
    Fails to document sources adequately per Turabian standards.
    6 to >0 pts

    /10
    pts

    **## WEEK7BIBL261.pdf**

    Exegetical-Historical Paper!

    In 5-7 double-spaced pgs., you will select one doctrine, development, or practice
    from the ancient, medieval, or early modern Church and will assess it as to its
    Biblical accuracy. The goal here is twofold, 1) to bring your exegesis to bear upon
    Church history, and 2) to understand the power that historical circumstances play in
    shaping our beliefs and practices. The paper will be organized into four parts, 1) an
    introduction, 2) exegesis concerning the subject, 3) a consideration of the historical
    circumstances that led to the subject, and 4) a conclusion. The goal of the introduction
    is to clearly state your chosen subject (e.g., predestination) and whether it is Scriptural.
    Next, your exegesis section (approx. 2 ½ pgs.) will set out to prove your argument from
    Scripture (e.g., why predestination is or is not Scriptural). Here you will engage biblical
    theology and the tools of exegesis, (i.e., commentaries, dictionaries, concordances, and
    especially Accordance Bible Software) to defend your claim. (Ensure that you cite all
    the sources.) Your next section (approx. 2 ½ pgs.) will then assess the historical
    circumstances that led to the doctrine, development, or practice. If, for instance, the
    Church leaders deployed something that has less basis in the Bible, why, then, did they
    deploy it? Discuss the historical circumstances that led to this change or
    implementation. Lastly, you will have a conclusion that restates your findings. For a list
    of possible candidates for this paper, please consult the syllabus.

    Possible Candidates from Syllabus:

    · Theology of the Cross
    · Penal Substitutionary Atonement
    · Predestination
    · Double Predestination
    · Paedo-Baptism
    · Credo-Baptism
    · Re-Baptism
    · Consubstantiation
    · Confessionalism
    · Various liturgical practices
    · Pietist asceticism
    · Interior piety of the Catholic mystics
    · Evangelical emphasis on the “new birth”
    · disestablishment
    · Theological Liberalism
    · Higher Criticism
    · Pentecostalism

    · Speaking in Tongues
    · Charles G. Finney’s Decisionist Christianity

    Exegetical-Historical Paper

    Criteria Ratings Point
    s

    Introductio
    n

    Excellent
    Clearly states both topic and thesis.
    10 to >9 pts
    Good
    States both topic and thesis, but both could be clearer.
    9 to >8 pts
    Fair
    States either topic or thesis, but not both. Or, states both topic and
    thesis in a vague way.
    8 to >7 pts
    Poor
    Does not present a clear topic and thesis.
    7 to >0 pts

    /10
    pts

    Exegetical
    Section

    Excellent
    Presents a thorough and compelling analysis of the topic's
    Scriptural credibility. Utilizes various key Scriptures and implements
    biblical studies tools throughout.
    35 to >32 pts
    Good
    Presents a good analysis of the topic's Scriptural credibility. Utilizes
    some key Scriptures and implements biblical studies tools in part.
    The deficiency here is that the analysis could be more concrete.
    32 to >29 pts
    Fair

    /35
    pts

    Presents an acceptable analysis of the topic's Scriptural credibility.
    Points to a key passage here and there, but only in a surface-level
    way. Implements biblical studies tools sparingly but, again, only at a
    surface level.
    29 to >26 pts
    Poor
    Presents a vague analysis of the topic's Scriptural credibility. Does
    not point to key Scriptures and does not implement biblical studies
    tools.
    26 to >0 pts

    Historical
    Section

    Excellent
    Presents a thorough, nuanced, and compelling analysis of the
    topic's historical development. It provides several reasons and
    delves into each in a concrete fashion.
    35 to >32 pts
    Good
    Presents a good analysis of the topic's historical development. It
    provides some reasons and delves into each adequately but not as
    concretely as it could.
    32 to >29 pts
    Fair
    Presents an acceptable analysis of the topic's historical
    development. It provides several reasons but does not delve into
    them in a concrete way.
    29 to >26 pts
    Poor
    Does not adequately engage the topic's historical development. It
    may only provide one reason (or speak of the reasons as a whole
    in a generic way), without delving into them concretely.
    26 to >0 pts

    /35
    pts

    Grammar
    and Style

    Excellent
    Free of grammatical and stylistic issues.
    10 to >9 pts
    Good
    Has only a few grammatical and stylistic errors.
    9 to >7 pts
    Fair
    Has several grammatical and stylistic errors.
    7 to >6 pts
    Poor
    Grammatical and stylistic errors inhibit the flow of the paper.
    6 to >0 pts

    /10
    pts

    Document
    ation

    Excellent
    Documents all sources per Turabian standards.
    10 to >9 pts
    Good
    Documents most sources per Turabian standards.
    9 to >7 pts
    Fair
    Documents some sources per Turabian standards.
    7 to >6 pts
    Poor
    Fails to document sources adequately per Turabian standards.
    6 to >0 pts

    /10
    pts

  • [Solved] urgent help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering urgent help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] HELP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHED **files (1)** – ## WEEK8BIBL220.pdf **## WEEK8BIBL220.pdf** For this week's group dialogue, please respond to the prompt stated below. A grading rubric for this assignment can be found by clicking on the three vertical dots above right, and clicking on "Show Rubric." Original threads mu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHED

    **files (1)**

    – ## WEEK8BIBL220.pdf

    **## WEEK8BIBL220.pdf**

    For this week's group dialogue, please respond to the prompt stated below. A grading
    rubric for this assignment can be found by clicking on the three vertical dots above
    right, and clicking on "Show Rubric." Original threads must be at least 500 words. (Word
    count applies to substantive content only, excluding quotations.)

    Choose one of the "Fundamental Principles" listed in Section 3 of the textbook. Then,
    after carefully reviewing the grading rubric, complete the following (a good post will
    include additional genres):

    ● Summarize the principle that you chose in a manner that is clear, and is
    accurate to the text of Genesis 2-4.

    ● Identify and briefly explain at least one appearance of that principle in at
    least two of the six genres of Scripture. However, be sure to read the rubric
    for total number of genres that must be addressed to maximize your grade in
    this area.

    ○ Historical Narrative – Genesis, Exodus 1-19, Numbers, Joshua,
    Judges, Ruth, Samuel-Kings, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Daniel 1-6,
    Acts

    ○ Law – Exodus 20-40, Leviticus & Deuteronomy
    ○ Prophecy – Isaiah through Malachi, Daniel 7-12, Revelation
    ○ Wisdom Literature – Job, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes
    ○ Gospels – Matthew, Mark, Luke, John
    ○ Epistles – 1 Corinthians through Jude

    ● Apply that principle to modern life

    See syllabus for minimum word count for initial posts. [500 words minimum for initial
    posts]. Keep in mind that minimum word count does not count references, quotes, or
    citations.

    See syllabus for requirements of robust integration with learning from assigned readings
    in all textbooks with appropriate footnotes to those readings

    Fundamental Principle
    God calls people to represent him and to be involved in his work of taking
    death and turning it into life. But people involved in ministry often assume
    authority that is not theirs. People in ministry often think they know how to
    interact with others with whom God is working. What we see with the
    knowledge of good and bad is that we simply do not have the capacity to be
    able to make proper assessments, to know when a particular action should
    be taken in contrast to another, or even whether an action should be taken at
    all. Yes, as God’s representatives, we have a responsibility. However, that
    responsibility should never be taken independently of the guiding of the Holy
    Spirit. We need to depend on him for proper understanding. We need to
    depend on him regarding whether we should do something or not. If he does
    call us to do something, we need to depend on him to show us the proper
    timing and approach. In any situation, there is always more going on than we
    can know. Therefore, when representing God in his work of turning death to
    life, we must be in complete dependence on the Holy Spirit for wisdom and
    guidance.

    Citation Style
    According to the Academic Catalog, “students are expected to follow the style handbook
    associated with the academic discipline of the course they are taking…the Turabian
    style manual is used in Biblical Studies and Christian Ministry courses.” Therefore, the
    writing style to be used in this course is Turabian. Regardless of references any other
    place throughout the Course Content to other writing styles, students in this class will
    use Turabian as their writing style. THIS GUIDANCE ALSO APPLIES TO DISCUSSION
    POSTS. If students reference or use the writings, ideas, thoughts, insights, etc of any
    other person, footnotes should be carefully documented in Turabian format so that
    students reading and responding to your discussion posts are able to tell exactly which
    thoughts and ideas are yours, and which thoughts, ideas and concepts come from

    another person. If they are from another person, they need to be referenced
    appropriately in all cases. However, title page, table of contents, etc., are not required in
    Discussion Posts. Please Note: In this course, Turabian author-date style WILL NOT be
    used. This means students will not be using the styles in Chapters 18 & 19 of A Manual
    for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations by Kate L. Turabian. All
    students will use the Notes-Bibliography (footnotes or endnotes) and Bibliography style
    according to Turabian. (See Chapters 16 & 17 of the Turabian textbook.) This means all
    discussion posts must use footnotes for every reference cited. No bibliography is
    required in Discussion Posts. For supplemental information and helpful tips, students
    should also refer to the DEPARTMENT OF BIBLICAL STUDIES & CHRISTIAN
    MINISTRY SUPPLEMENT TO KATE L. TURABIAN’S MANUAL FOR WRITERS OF
    TERM PAPERS, THESES, AND DISSERTATIONS, 9TH ed. You may download this
    supplement under the Course Content module which is on the Modules page. This is a
    great resource to help you with Turabian!

    – Fundamental Principle

    **## WEEK8BIBL220.pdf**

    For this week's group dialogue, please respond to the prompt stated below. A grading
    rubric for this assignment can be found by clicking on the three vertical dots above
    right, and clicking on "Show Rubric." Original threads must be at least 500 words. (Word
    count applies to substantive content only, excluding quotations.)

    Choose one of the "Fundamental Principles" listed in Section 3 of the textbook. Then,
    after carefully reviewing the grading rubric, complete the following (a good post will
    include additional genres):

    ● Summarize the principle that you chose in a manner that is clear, and is
    accurate to the text of Genesis 2-4.

    ● Identify and briefly explain at least one appearance of that principle in at
    least two of the six genres of Scripture. However, be sure to read the rubric
    for total number of genres that must be addressed to maximize your grade in
    this area.

    ○ Historical Narrative – Genesis, Exodus 1-19, Numbers, Joshua,
    Judges, Ruth, Samuel-Kings, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Daniel 1-6,
    Acts

    ○ Law – Exodus 20-40, Leviticus & Deuteronomy
    ○ Prophecy – Isaiah through Malachi, Daniel 7-12, Revelation
    ○ Wisdom Literature – Job, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes
    ○ Gospels – Matthew, Mark, Luke, John
    ○ Epistles – 1 Corinthians through Jude

    ● Apply that principle to modern life

    See syllabus for minimum word count for initial posts. [500 words minimum for initial
    posts]. Keep in mind that minimum word count does not count references, quotes, or
    citations.

    See syllabus for requirements of robust integration with learning from assigned readings
    in all textbooks with appropriate footnotes to those readings

    Fundamental Principle
    God calls people to represent him and to be involved in his work of taking
    death and turning it into life. But people involved in ministry often assume
    authority that is not theirs. People in ministry often think they know how to
    interact with others with whom God is working. What we see with the
    knowledge of good and bad is that we simply do not have the capacity to be
    able to make proper assessments, to know when a particular action should
    be taken in contrast to another, or even whether an action should be taken at
    all. Yes, as God’s representatives, we have a responsibility. However, that
    responsibility should never be taken independently of the guiding of the Holy
    Spirit. We need to depend on him for proper understanding. We need to
    depend on him regarding whether we should do something or not. If he does
    call us to do something, we need to depend on him to show us the proper
    timing and approach. In any situation, there is always more going on than we
    can know. Therefore, when representing God in his work of turning death to
    life, we must be in complete dependence on the Holy Spirit for wisdom and
    guidance.

    Citation Style
    According to the Academic Catalog, “students are expected to follow the style handbook
    associated with the academic discipline of the course they are taking…the Turabian
    style manual is used in Biblical Studies and Christian Ministry courses.” Therefore, the
    writing style to be used in this course is Turabian. Regardless of references any other
    place throughout the Course Content to other writing styles, students in this class will
    use Turabian as their writing style. THIS GUIDANCE ALSO APPLIES TO DISCUSSION
    POSTS. If students reference or use the writings, ideas, thoughts, insights, etc of any
    other person, footnotes should be carefully documented in Turabian format so that
    students reading and responding to your discussion posts are able to tell exactly which
    thoughts and ideas are yours, and which thoughts, ideas and concepts come from

    another person. If they are from another person, they need to be referenced
    appropriately in all cases. However, title page, table of contents, etc., are not required in
    Discussion Posts. Please Note: In this course, Turabian author-date style WILL NOT be
    used. This means students will not be using the styles in Chapters 18 & 19 of A Manual
    for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations by Kate L. Turabian. All
    students will use the Notes-Bibliography (footnotes or endnotes) and Bibliography style
    according to Turabian. (See Chapters 16 & 17 of the Turabian textbook.) This means all
    discussion posts must use footnotes for every reference cited. No bibliography is
    required in Discussion Posts. For supplemental information and helpful tips, students
    should also refer to the DEPARTMENT OF BIBLICAL STUDIES & CHRISTIAN
    MINISTRY SUPPLEMENT TO KATE L. TURABIAN’S MANUAL FOR WRITERS OF
    TERM PAPERS, THESES, AND DISSERTATIONS, 9TH ed. You may download this
    supplement under the Course Content module which is on the Modules page. This is a
    great resource to help you with Turabian!

    – Fundamental Principle

  • [Solved] Practical Exercise

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    reference the attached sheet to answer each study question answer all three studies no more than 750 words all together 1 reference for each study – [\ \ PE2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pe2-docx "PE2.docx")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    reference the attached sheet to answer each study question

    answer all three studies no more than 750 words all together

    1 reference for each study

    – [\
    \
    PE2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pe2-docx "PE2.docx")

  • [Solved] Reading Comp Help Persuasive Writing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Zero AI with Plagiarism Reports Please. **files (2)** – ## Aug13.pdf – ## TheVitalRoleofScholarshipinPublicDiscourse.pdf **## Aug13.pdf** Read Mooney's (2017) article and annotate the text while reading. Then, write a full persuasive essay that answers to the following prompt: Should scholars partic…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Zero AI with Plagiarism Reports Please.

    **files (2)**

    – ## Aug13.pdf

    – ## TheVitalRoleofScholarshipinPublicDiscourse.pdf

    **## Aug13.pdf**

    Read Mooney's (2017) article and annotate the text while reading. Then, write a full persuasive

    essay that answers to the following prompt:

    Should scholars participate in civic life based on their expertise?

    Your essay must have a proper introduction paragraph, two bodies that defend your point of view,

    one body that presents and explains the counterargument, and then refutes it. Finish with a proper

    conclusion paragraph. Cite at least one external source in each body paragraph. Each body

    paragraph needs to be 12-16-lines long.

    Note: Please note that this assignment needs to follow the APA format for student papers;

    therefore, you need to have Cover and References pages.

    [https://mri.mrooms.net/pluginfile.php/1245816/mod_assign/intro/The%20Vital%20Role%20of%20Scholarship%20in%20Public%20Discourse.pdf](https://mri.mrooms.net/pluginfile.php/1245816/mod_assign/intro/The%20Vital%20Role%20of%20Scholarship%20in%20Public%20Discourse.pdf)

    **## TheVitalRoleofScholarshipinPublicDiscourse.pdf**

    Disclaimer: This is a machine generated PDF of selected content from our products. This functionality is provided solely for your
    convenience and is in no way intended to replace original scanned PDF. Neither Cengage Learning nor its licensors make any
    representations or warranties with respect to the machine generated PDF. The PDF is automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS
    AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. CENGAGE LEARNING AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY
    AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY,
    ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
    PURPOSE. Your use of the machine generated PDF is subject to all use restrictions contained in The Cengage Learning
    Subscription and License Agreement and/or the Gale College Collection Terms and Conditions and by using the machine generated
    PDF functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against Cengage Learning or its licensors for your use of the machine
    generated PDF functionality and any output derived therefrom.

    The Vital Role of Scholarship in Public Discourse
    Author: Christopher Z. Mooney
    Date: Dec. 8, 2017
    From: The Chronicle of Higher Education(Vol. 64, Issue 15)
    Publisher: Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.
    Document Type: Viewpoint essay
    Length: 1,166 words

    Full Text:
    In an era of fake news, partisan deadlock, and rising ideological hysteria on both ends of the American political spectrum, public
    universities are uniquely positioned to promote rational, evidence-based governance. Scholars have the long and broad view devoted
    to W the pursuit of knowledge that policy makers and the public can't get elsewhere.

    But unfortunately for both American public higher education and society, we have systematically failed to engage the public-policy
    conversation effectively. We need to fix this.

    Universities are repositories of a long history of human intellectual development, filled with well-trained experts on virtually every
    public problem that policy makers face. Furthermore, this knowledge has been paid for in large part by public funds, one way or
    another. We have an obligation to give the public a return on its investment.

    If scholars don't contribute their informed, disinterested perspectives, others will happily fill the gap. But these other voices also bring
    an interest in policy outcomes, whether partisan, ideological, or economic. As scholars, our interest is the truth. Now, I'm not so naive
    as to believe that academics have no self-interest in public policy (in fact, my call for action is itself promotional) or that we have a
    monopoly on truth. Far from it. But certainly we know much that is not common currency in the policy conversation, but should be.

    If we isolate ourselves in our labs and offices, both higher education and society suffer. If we aren't part of the policy conversation, if
    we aren't seen as contributing broadly to the public good, policy makers and taxpayers will continue to see higher education as
    merely a private good and support it as such. By participating in the policy conversation, scholars can generate a very visible public
    good.

    So, why don't we? There are three basic reasons.

    First, we are leery of making strong claims. As good methodologists, we avoid sweeping statements of fact, with due deference to the
    vagaries of empirical research, changing circumstances, and the complexity of the world. There should be proper skepticism about
    the results of individual studies, and large holes exist in our knowledge. But just because we don't know everything doesn't mean we
    know nothing. It doesn't mean that we can't make a valuable and unique contribution to the discussion.

    We can be reasonably confident about knowledge in our respective fields, particularly where there is some level of consensus.
    Focused primarily on cutting-edge research, we often take for granted these areas of consensus–except perhaps when teaching
    undergraduates. Indeed, this is exactly what we do teach our students. And the public, the media, and policy makers could benefit
    enormously from much of this baseline information. This knowledge-based information would be much more helpful to a journalist or
    policy maker than would the average academic journal article.

    Let me be clear: We don't need to be TV talking heads making categorical statements on the fly, but we should rightly feel some
    intellectual confidence from our years of education, research, and teaching on a subject. We are experts in our fields, and we need to
    own that.

    Second, we have a translation problem. Among the distinguishing characteristics of academic communication are the use of jargon,
    the assumption of tremendous audience background knowledge, and an awkward pride in the obtuseness of our prose and speech.
    Some of this is because our professional focus is often on third-order research problems, as is appropriate in the pursuit of science.
    We focus on what those outside our fields see as minutiae, which also can make our scholarship in comprehensible to nonspecialists.

    But we aren't always obtuse. In the classroom, especially with undergraduates, each of us adapts our communication style and
    content to people who are not so well versed in our jargon and assumptions. So with some effort, we could also do this for audiences
    off campus.

    Third, we lack incentives. As scholars, we have virtually no professional reason to reach beyond the walls of academe. Generally, we
    get hired, promoted, tenured, and otherwise rewarded based on our scholarship. We also must teach at least passably well. But the
    third leg of the tenure-and-promotion stool–service–is far less important. I recently asked a new chancellor at a research-intensive
    university what I thought was a rhetorical question: Had he ever denied tenure or promotion solely on the basis of lack of service? To
    my great surprise, he told me that he had. Silently, I assumed he was lying.

    In the social sciences, if your teaching and scholarship are adequate for whatever step on the personnel ladder you are facing, you
    will advance. Adequate service might consist of a couple of on-campus committee assignments and reviewing a few journal
    submissions. As such, most scholars have no incentive to involve themselves in their communities professionally. And those who are
    drawn to this work out of personal interest may even be actively discouraged from "wasting their time" writing an op-ed or speaking to
    the Kiwanis Club.

    Universities can and should address the translation and incentives problems. Workshops on how to work with the press, write for
    general audiences, testify before policy makers, or speak to civic groups can be sponsored, and should be actively promoted. Most
    universities have units that link professors to the media, and those units can be beefed up in terms of skill development and activity
    levels. As for incentives, establishing service requirements with bite could help. But perhaps not every scholar can or should be
    talking to the press and policy makers, so such requirements for service could become watered down in the end, as they are now.

    But to be most effective in generating high-quality public engagement, university administrators should think about ways to offer
    scholars their most valuable commodity –time. Typically, faculty members must sacrifice either research time or personal time to
    engage the public. While some might sacrifice research for engagement, these may not be those we want out in the community. And
    we can't rely on scholars sacrificing their personal time, for a whole host of reasons.

    However, professors might be willing to sacrifice a class to contribute to their expertise to the national conversation. Some sort of
    course-release arrangement is the best way to encourage and help scholars conduct sustained, informed public engagement. Of
    course, such an arrangement would have to be monitored closely to ensure that the university is getting its money's worth. But, along
    with a bit of training and staff support, through this approach a university can enhance its public profile through its best asset–its
    faculty.

    In the end, those of us in academe have a moral obligation to give society a broader return on its investments in higher education,
    just as we have a self-interest and an institutional interest in doing so. With more encouragement, and with scholars reconceiving
    public engagement as another teaching opportunity, we can and should do better.

    Christopher Z. Mooney is a professor of state politics at the University of Illinois at Springfield and at the university's Institute of
    Government and Public Affairs.

    Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2017 Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.
    http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83
    Source Citation (APA 7th Edition)
    Mooney, C. Z. (2017). The Vital Role of Scholarship in Public Discourse. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 64(15), A40.

    https://link.gale.com/apps/doc//GCCO?u=mia56118&sid=lms-GCCO&xid=dcbb4810
    Gale Document Number: GALE|A520581487

    [http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83](http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83)

    **## TheVitalRoleofScholarshipinPublicDiscourse.pdf**

    Disclaimer: This is a machine generated PDF of selected content from our products. This functionality is provided solely for your
    convenience and is in no way intended to replace original scanned PDF. Neither Cengage Learning nor its licensors make any
    representations or warranties with respect to the machine generated PDF. The PDF is automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS
    AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. CENGAGE LEARNING AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY
    AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY,
    ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
    PURPOSE. Your use of the machine generated PDF is subject to all use restrictions contained in The Cengage Learning
    Subscription and License Agreement and/or the Gale College Collection Terms and Conditions and by using the machine generated
    PDF functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against Cengage Learning or its licensors for your use of the machine
    generated PDF functionality and any output derived therefrom.

    The Vital Role of Scholarship in Public Discourse
    Author: Christopher Z. Mooney
    Date: Dec. 8, 2017
    From: The Chronicle of Higher Education(Vol. 64, Issue 15)
    Publisher: Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.
    Document Type: Viewpoint essay
    Length: 1,166 words

    Full Text:
    In an era of fake news, partisan deadlock, and rising ideological hysteria on both ends of the American political spectrum, public
    universities are uniquely positioned to promote rational, evidence-based governance. Scholars have the long and broad view devoted
    to W the pursuit of knowledge that policy makers and the public can't get elsewhere.

    But unfortunately for both American public higher education and society, we have systematically failed to engage the public-policy
    conversation effectively. We need to fix this.

    Universities are repositories of a long history of human intellectual development, filled with well-trained experts on virtually every
    public problem that policy makers face. Furthermore, this knowledge has been paid for in large part by public funds, one way or
    another. We have an obligation to give the public a return on its investment.

    If scholars don't contribute their informed, disinterested perspectives, others will happily fill the gap. But these other voices also bring
    an interest in policy outcomes, whether partisan, ideological, or economic. As scholars, our interest is the truth. Now, I'm not so naive
    as to believe that academics have no self-interest in public policy (in fact, my call for action is itself promotional) or that we have a
    monopoly on truth. Far from it. But certainly we know much that is not common currency in the policy conversation, but should be.

    If we isolate ourselves in our labs and offices, both higher education and society suffer. If we aren't part of the policy conversation, if
    we aren't seen as contributing broadly to the public good, policy makers and taxpayers will continue to see higher education as
    merely a private good and support it as such. By participating in the policy conversation, scholars can generate a very visible public
    good.

    So, why don't we? There are three basic reasons.

    First, we are leery of making strong claims. As good methodologists, we avoid sweeping statements of fact, with due deference to the
    vagaries of empirical research, changing circumstances, and the complexity of the world. There should be proper skepticism about
    the results of individual studies, and large holes exist in our knowledge. But just because we don't know everything doesn't mean we
    know nothing. It doesn't mean that we can't make a valuable and unique contribution to the discussion.

    We can be reasonably confident about knowledge in our respective fields, particularly where there is some level of consensus.
    Focused primarily on cutting-edge research, we often take for granted these areas of consensus–except perhaps when teaching
    undergraduates. Indeed, this is exactly what we do teach our students. And the public, the media, and policy makers could benefit
    enormously from much of this baseline information. This knowledge-based information would be much more helpful to a journalist or
    policy maker than would the average academic journal article.

    Let me be clear: We don't need to be TV talking heads making categorical statements on the fly, but we should rightly feel some
    intellectual confidence from our years of education, research, and teaching on a subject. We are experts in our fields, and we need to
    own that.

    Second, we have a translation problem. Among the distinguishing characteristics of academic communication are the use of jargon,
    the assumption of tremendous audience background knowledge, and an awkward pride in the obtuseness of our prose and speech.
    Some of this is because our professional focus is often on third-order research problems, as is appropriate in the pursuit of science.
    We focus on what those outside our fields see as minutiae, which also can make our scholarship in comprehensible to nonspecialists.

    But we aren't always obtuse. In the classroom, especially with undergraduates, each of us adapts our communication style and
    content to people who are not so well versed in our jargon and assumptions. So with some effort, we could also do this for audiences
    off campus.

    Third, we lack incentives. As scholars, we have virtually no professional reason to reach beyond the walls of academe. Generally, we
    get hired, promoted, tenured, and otherwise rewarded based on our scholarship. We also must teach at least passably well. But the
    third leg of the tenure-and-promotion stool–service–is far less important. I recently asked a new chancellor at a research-intensive
    university what I thought was a rhetorical question: Had he ever denied tenure or promotion solely on the basis of lack of service? To
    my great surprise, he told me that he had. Silently, I assumed he was lying.

    In the social sciences, if your teaching and scholarship are adequate for whatever step on the personnel ladder you are facing, you
    will advance. Adequate service might consist of a couple of on-campus committee assignments and reviewing a few journal
    submissions. As such, most scholars have no incentive to involve themselves in their communities professionally. And those who are
    drawn to this work out of personal interest may even be actively discouraged from "wasting their time" writing an op-ed or speaking to
    the Kiwanis Club.

    Universities can and should address the translation and incentives problems. Workshops on how to work with the press, write for
    general audiences, testify before policy makers, or speak to civic groups can be sponsored, and should be actively promoted. Most
    universities have units that link professors to the media, and those units can be beefed up in terms of skill development and activity
    levels. As for incentives, establishing service requirements with bite could help. But perhaps not every scholar can or should be
    talking to the press and policy makers, so such requirements for service could become watered down in the end, as they are now.

    But to be most effective in generating high-quality public engagement, university administrators should think about ways to offer
    scholars their most valuable commodity –time. Typically, faculty members must sacrifice either research time or personal time to
    engage the public. While some might sacrifice research for engagement, these may not be those we want out in the community. And
    we can't rely on scholars sacrificing their personal time, for a whole host of reasons.

    However, professors might be willing to sacrifice a class to contribute to their expertise to the national conversation. Some sort of
    course-release arrangement is the best way to encourage and help scholars conduct sustained, informed public engagement. Of
    course, such an arrangement would have to be monitored closely to ensure that the university is getting its money's worth. But, along
    with a bit of training and staff support, through this approach a university can enhance its public profile through its best asset–its
    faculty.

    In the end, those of us in academe have a moral obligation to give society a broader return on its investments in higher education,
    just as we have a self-interest and an institutional interest in doing so. With more encouragement, and with scholars reconceiving
    public engagement as another teaching opportunity, we can and should do better.

    Christopher Z. Mooney is a professor of state politics at the University of Illinois at Springfield and at the university's Institute of
    Government and Public Affairs.

    Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2017 Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.
    http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83
    Source Citation (APA 7th Edition)
    Mooney, C. Z. (2017). The Vital Role of Scholarship in Public Discourse. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 64(15), A40.

    https://link.gale.com/apps/doc//GCCO?u=mia56118&sid=lms-GCCO&xid=dcbb4810
    Gale Document Number: GALE|A520581487

    [http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83](http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83)

    **## Aug13.pdf**

    Read Mooney's (2017) article and annotate the text while reading. Then, write a full persuasive

    essay that answers to the following prompt:

    Should scholars participate in civic life based on their expertise?

    Your essay must have a proper introduction paragraph, two bodies that defend your point of view,

    one body that presents and explains the counterargument, and then refutes it. Finish with a proper

    conclusion paragraph. Cite at least one external source in each body paragraph. Each body

    paragraph needs to be 12-16-lines long.

    Note: Please note that this assignment needs to follow the APA format for student papers;

    therefore, you need to have Cover and References pages.

    [https://mri.mrooms.net/pluginfile.php/1245816/mod_assign/intro/The%20Vital%20Role%20of%20Scholarship%20in%20Public%20Discourse.pdf](https://mri.mrooms.net/pluginfile.php/1245816/mod_assign/intro/The%20Vital%20Role%20of%20Scholarship%20in%20Public%20Discourse.pdf)

    **## TheVitalRoleofScholarshipinPublicDiscourse.pdf**

    Disclaimer: This is a machine generated PDF of selected content from our products. This functionality is provided solely for your
    convenience and is in no way intended to replace original scanned PDF. Neither Cengage Learning nor its licensors make any
    representations or warranties with respect to the machine generated PDF. The PDF is automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS
    AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. CENGAGE LEARNING AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY
    AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY,
    ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
    PURPOSE. Your use of the machine generated PDF is subject to all use restrictions contained in The Cengage Learning
    Subscription and License Agreement and/or the Gale College Collection Terms and Conditions and by using the machine generated
    PDF functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against Cengage Learning or its licensors for your use of the machine
    generated PDF functionality and any output derived therefrom.

    The Vital Role of Scholarship in Public Discourse
    Author: Christopher Z. Mooney
    Date: Dec. 8, 2017
    From: The Chronicle of Higher Education(Vol. 64, Issue 15)
    Publisher: Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.
    Document Type: Viewpoint essay
    Length: 1,166 words

    Full Text:
    In an era of fake news, partisan deadlock, and rising ideological hysteria on both ends of the American political spectrum, public
    universities are uniquely positioned to promote rational, evidence-based governance. Scholars have the long and broad view devoted
    to W the pursuit of knowledge that policy makers and the public can't get elsewhere.

    But unfortunately for both American public higher education and society, we have systematically failed to engage the public-policy
    conversation effectively. We need to fix this.

    Universities are repositories of a long history of human intellectual development, filled with well-trained experts on virtually every
    public problem that policy makers face. Furthermore, this knowledge has been paid for in large part by public funds, one way or
    another. We have an obligation to give the public a return on its investment.

    If scholars don't contribute their informed, disinterested perspectives, others will happily fill the gap. But these other voices also bring
    an interest in policy outcomes, whether partisan, ideological, or economic. As scholars, our interest is the truth. Now, I'm not so naive
    as to believe that academics have no self-interest in public policy (in fact, my call for action is itself promotional) or that we have a
    monopoly on truth. Far from it. But certainly we know much that is not common currency in the policy conversation, but should be.

    If we isolate ourselves in our labs and offices, both higher education and society suffer. If we aren't part of the policy conversation, if
    we aren't seen as contributing broadly to the public good, policy makers and taxpayers will continue to see higher education as
    merely a private good and support it as such. By participating in the policy conversation, scholars can generate a very visible public
    good.

    So, why don't we? There are three basic reasons.

    First, we are leery of making strong claims. As good methodologists, we avoid sweeping statements of fact, with due deference to the
    vagaries of empirical research, changing circumstances, and the complexity of the world. There should be proper skepticism about
    the results of individual studies, and large holes exist in our knowledge. But just because we don't know everything doesn't mean we
    know nothing. It doesn't mean that we can't make a valuable and unique contribution to the discussion.

    We can be reasonably confident about knowledge in our respective fields, particularly where there is some level of consensus.
    Focused primarily on cutting-edge research, we often take for granted these areas of consensus–except perhaps when teaching
    undergraduates. Indeed, this is exactly what we do teach our students. And the public, the media, and policy makers could benefit
    enormously from much of this baseline information. This knowledge-based information would be much more helpful to a journalist or
    policy maker than would the average academic journal article.

    Let me be clear: We don't need to be TV talking heads making categorical statements on the fly, but we should rightly feel some
    intellectual confidence from our years of education, research, and teaching on a subject. We are experts in our fields, and we need to
    own that.

    Second, we have a translation problem. Among the distinguishing characteristics of academic communication are the use of jargon,
    the assumption of tremendous audience background knowledge, and an awkward pride in the obtuseness of our prose and speech.
    Some of this is because our professional focus is often on third-order research problems, as is appropriate in the pursuit of science.
    We focus on what those outside our fields see as minutiae, which also can make our scholarship in comprehensible to nonspecialists.

    But we aren't always obtuse. In the classroom, especially with undergraduates, each of us adapts our communication style and
    content to people who are not so well versed in our jargon and assumptions. So with some effort, we could also do this for audiences
    off campus.

    Third, we lack incentives. As scholars, we have virtually no professional reason to reach beyond the walls of academe. Generally, we
    get hired, promoted, tenured, and otherwise rewarded based on our scholarship. We also must teach at least passably well. But the
    third leg of the tenure-and-promotion stool–service–is far less important. I recently asked a new chancellor at a research-intensive
    university what I thought was a rhetorical question: Had he ever denied tenure or promotion solely on the basis of lack of service? To
    my great surprise, he told me that he had. Silently, I assumed he was lying.

    In the social sciences, if your teaching and scholarship are adequate for whatever step on the personnel ladder you are facing, you
    will advance. Adequate service might consist of a couple of on-campus committee assignments and reviewing a few journal
    submissions. As such, most scholars have no incentive to involve themselves in their communities professionally. And those who are
    drawn to this work out of personal interest may even be actively discouraged from "wasting their time" writing an op-ed or speaking to
    the Kiwanis Club.

    Universities can and should address the translation and incentives problems. Workshops on how to work with the press, write for
    general audiences, testify before policy makers, or speak to civic groups can be sponsored, and should be actively promoted. Most
    universities have units that link professors to the media, and those units can be beefed up in terms of skill development and activity
    levels. As for incentives, establishing service requirements with bite could help. But perhaps not every scholar can or should be
    talking to the press and policy makers, so such requirements for service could become watered down in the end, as they are now.

    But to be most effective in generating high-quality public engagement, university administrators should think about ways to offer
    scholars their most valuable commodity –time. Typically, faculty members must sacrifice either research time or personal time to
    engage the public. While some might sacrifice research for engagement, these may not be those we want out in the community. And
    we can't rely on scholars sacrificing their personal time, for a whole host of reasons.

    However, professors might be willing to sacrifice a class to contribute to their expertise to the national conversation. Some sort of
    course-release arrangement is the best way to encourage and help scholars conduct sustained, informed public engagement. Of
    course, such an arrangement would have to be monitored closely to ensure that the university is getting its money's worth. But, along
    with a bit of training and staff support, through this approach a university can enhance its public profile through its best asset–its
    faculty.

    In the end, those of us in academe have a moral obligation to give society a broader return on its investments in higher education,
    just as we have a self-interest and an institutional interest in doing so. With more encouragement, and with scholars reconceiving
    public engagement as another teaching opportunity, we can and should do better.

    Christopher Z. Mooney is a professor of state politics at the University of Illinois at Springfield and at the university's Institute of
    Government and Public Affairs.

    Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2017 Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.
    http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83
    Source Citation (APA 7th Edition)
    Mooney, C. Z. (2017). The Vital Role of Scholarship in Public Discourse. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 64(15), A40.

    https://link.gale.com/apps/doc//GCCO?u=mia56118&sid=lms-GCCO&xid=dcbb4810
    Gale Document Number: GALE|A520581487

    [http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83](http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83)

    **## Aug13.pdf**

    Read Mooney's (2017) article and annotate the text while reading. Then, write a full persuasive

    essay that answers to the following prompt:

    Should scholars participate in civic life based on their expertise?

    Your essay must have a proper introduction paragraph, two bodies that defend your point of view,

    one body that presents and explains the counterargument, and then refutes it. Finish with a proper

    conclusion paragraph. Cite at least one external source in each body paragraph. Each body

    paragraph needs to be 12-16-lines long.

    Note: Please note that this assignment needs to follow the APA format for student papers;

    therefore, you need to have Cover and References pages.

    [https://mri.mrooms.net/pluginfile.php/1245816/mod_assign/intro/The%20Vital%20Role%20of%20Scholarship%20in%20Public%20Discourse.pdf](https://mri.mrooms.net/pluginfile.php/1245816/mod_assign/intro/The%20Vital%20Role%20of%20Scholarship%20in%20Public%20Discourse.pdf)

    **## TheVitalRoleofScholarshipinPublicDiscourse.pdf**

    Disclaimer: This is a machine generated PDF of selected content from our products. This functionality is provided solely for your
    convenience and is in no way intended to replace original scanned PDF. Neither Cengage Learning nor its licensors make any
    representations or warranties with respect to the machine generated PDF. The PDF is automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS
    AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. CENGAGE LEARNING AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY
    AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY,
    ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
    PURPOSE. Your use of the machine generated PDF is subject to all use restrictions contained in The Cengage Learning
    Subscription and License Agreement and/or the Gale College Collection Terms and Conditions and by using the machine generated
    PDF functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against Cengage Learning or its licensors for your use of the machine
    generated PDF functionality and any output derived therefrom.

    The Vital Role of Scholarship in Public Discourse
    Author: Christopher Z. Mooney
    Date: Dec. 8, 2017
    From: The Chronicle of Higher Education(Vol. 64, Issue 15)
    Publisher: Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.
    Document Type: Viewpoint essay
    Length: 1,166 words

    Full Text:
    In an era of fake news, partisan deadlock, and rising ideological hysteria on both ends of the American political spectrum, public
    universities are uniquely positioned to promote rational, evidence-based governance. Scholars have the long and broad view devoted
    to W the pursuit of knowledge that policy makers and the public can't get elsewhere.

    But unfortunately for both American public higher education and society, we have systematically failed to engage the public-policy
    conversation effectively. We need to fix this.

    Universities are repositories of a long history of human intellectual development, filled with well-trained experts on virtually every
    public problem that policy makers face. Furthermore, this knowledge has been paid for in large part by public funds, one way or
    another. We have an obligation to give the public a return on its investment.

    If scholars don't contribute their informed, disinterested perspectives, others will happily fill the gap. But these other voices also bring
    an interest in policy outcomes, whether partisan, ideological, or economic. As scholars, our interest is the truth. Now, I'm not so naive
    as to believe that academics have no self-interest in public policy (in fact, my call for action is itself promotional) or that we have a
    monopoly on truth. Far from it. But certainly we know much that is not common currency in the policy conversation, but should be.

    If we isolate ourselves in our labs and offices, both higher education and society suffer. If we aren't part of the policy conversation, if
    we aren't seen as contributing broadly to the public good, policy makers and taxpayers will continue to see higher education as
    merely a private good and support it as such. By participating in the policy conversation, scholars can generate a very visible public
    good.

    So, why don't we? There are three basic reasons.

    First, we are leery of making strong claims. As good methodologists, we avoid sweeping statements of fact, with due deference to the
    vagaries of empirical research, changing circumstances, and the complexity of the world. There should be proper skepticism about
    the results of individual studies, and large holes exist in our knowledge. But just because we don't know everything doesn't mean we
    know nothing. It doesn't mean that we can't make a valuable and unique contribution to the discussion.

    We can be reasonably confident about knowledge in our respective fields, particularly where there is some level of consensus.
    Focused primarily on cutting-edge research, we often take for granted these areas of consensus–except perhaps when teaching
    undergraduates. Indeed, this is exactly what we do teach our students. And the public, the media, and policy makers could benefit
    enormously from much of this baseline information. This knowledge-based information would be much more helpful to a journalist or
    policy maker than would the average academic journal article.

    Let me be clear: We don't need to be TV talking heads making categorical statements on the fly, but we should rightly feel some
    intellectual confidence from our years of education, research, and teaching on a subject. We are experts in our fields, and we need to
    own that.

    Second, we have a translation problem. Among the distinguishing characteristics of academic communication are the use of jargon,
    the assumption of tremendous audience background knowledge, and an awkward pride in the obtuseness of our prose and speech.
    Some of this is because our professional focus is often on third-order research problems, as is appropriate in the pursuit of science.
    We focus on what those outside our fields see as minutiae, which also can make our scholarship in comprehensible to nonspecialists.

    But we aren't always obtuse. In the classroom, especially with undergraduates, each of us adapts our communication style and
    content to people who are not so well versed in our jargon and assumptions. So with some effort, we could also do this for audiences
    off campus.

    Third, we lack incentives. As scholars, we have virtually no professional reason to reach beyond the walls of academe. Generally, we
    get hired, promoted, tenured, and otherwise rewarded based on our scholarship. We also must teach at least passably well. But the
    third leg of the tenure-and-promotion stool–service–is far less important. I recently asked a new chancellor at a research-intensive
    university what I thought was a rhetorical question: Had he ever denied tenure or promotion solely on the basis of lack of service? To
    my great surprise, he told me that he had. Silently, I assumed he was lying.

    In the social sciences, if your teaching and scholarship are adequate for whatever step on the personnel ladder you are facing, you
    will advance. Adequate service might consist of a couple of on-campus committee assignments and reviewing a few journal
    submissions. As such, most scholars have no incentive to involve themselves in their communities professionally. And those who are
    drawn to this work out of personal interest may even be actively discouraged from "wasting their time" writing an op-ed or speaking to
    the Kiwanis Club.

    Universities can and should address the translation and incentives problems. Workshops on how to work with the press, write for
    general audiences, testify before policy makers, or speak to civic groups can be sponsored, and should be actively promoted. Most
    universities have units that link professors to the media, and those units can be beefed up in terms of skill development and activity
    levels. As for incentives, establishing service requirements with bite could help. But perhaps not every scholar can or should be
    talking to the press and policy makers, so such requirements for service could become watered down in the end, as they are now.

    But to be most effective in generating high-quality public engagement, university administrators should think about ways to offer
    scholars their most valuable commodity –time. Typically, faculty members must sacrifice either research time or personal time to
    engage the public. While some might sacrifice research for engagement, these may not be those we want out in the community. And
    we can't rely on scholars sacrificing their personal time, for a whole host of reasons.

    However, professors might be willing to sacrifice a class to contribute to their expertise to the national conversation. Some sort of
    course-release arrangement is the best way to encourage and help scholars conduct sustained, informed public engagement. Of
    course, such an arrangement would have to be monitored closely to ensure that the university is getting its money's worth. But, along
    with a bit of training and staff support, through this approach a university can enhance its public profile through its best asset–its
    faculty.

    In the end, those of us in academe have a moral obligation to give society a broader return on its investments in higher education,
    just as we have a self-interest and an institutional interest in doing so. With more encouragement, and with scholars reconceiving
    public engagement as another teaching opportunity, we can and should do better.

    Christopher Z. Mooney is a professor of state politics at the University of Illinois at Springfield and at the university's Institute of
    Government and Public Affairs.

    Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2017 Chronicle of Higher Education, Inc.
    http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83
    Source Citation (APA 7th Edition)
    Mooney, C. Z. (2017). The Vital Role of Scholarship in Public Discourse. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 64(15), A40.

    https://link.gale.com/apps/doc//GCCO?u=mia56118&sid=lms-GCCO&xid=dcbb4810
    Gale Document Number: GALE|A520581487

    [http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83](http://chronicle.com/section/About-the-Chronicle/83)

  • [Solved] Is There A Best Hire For Spying Cheating Spouse

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    We are both married and blessed with 3 kids( A boy and two girls) It's really sad and berserk when your husband is having a secret affair with your best friend. I noticed they were getting too close and intimate. He now answers calls in private, Changed his password and got too clingy with his phone…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    We are both married and blessed with 3 kids( A boy and two girls) It's really sad and berserk when your husband is having a secret affair with your best friend. I noticed they were getting too close and intimate. He now answers calls in private, Changed his password and got too clingy with his phone. I needed to get a grip of the whole situation so I asked hackerspytech @ gmail . com to help me get his phone cloned, I was able to see all his secret conversations as well as deleted text messages. I was really devastated as she was already carrying his baby. I feel betrayed and I'm currently filing for divorce.

  • [Solved] Reading 3 part assignment (bran & TC)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## 3partassignmentTiffanyC.docx **## 3partassignmentTiffanyC.docx** **Discussion 1 ( don’t have the textbook yet, however I found this information online, thus if you could do them without the text, that would be great)** 300 words In the discussion board, you will choose an Inquiry …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## 3partassignmentTiffanyC.docx

    **## 3partassignmentTiffanyC.docx**

    **Discussion 1 ( don’t have the textbook yet, however I found this information online, thus if you could do them without the text, that would be great)**

    300 words In the discussion board, you will choose an Inquiry from Ruggiero (pp 34-36), briefly describe the Inquiry and respond accordingly. (Be sure to incorporate this week’s readings Chapters 1 & 3)

    **Discussion Board 2**

    300 words  In the discussion board, you will choose one of the
    _Inquiries_ from Ruggiero (pp  49-50) # 11 a-d, briefly describe the
    _Inquiry_ and respond accordingly. (Be sure to incorporate this week’s readings Chapters 4 & 5)

    **Part 3**

    Read "Academic Integrity" BEFORE Syllabus Quiz

    **Academic Integrity and AI Policy and Procedures for COM 231**

    **100 Points**

    **Directions:** Read, understand, and paraphrase in your own words, the following excerpt taken from your course syllabus for COM 231 Public Speaking about "Academic Integrity".  In the text box provided, confirm your reading and understanding by writing a brief paragraph (5-7 sentences) summarizing the content of the policy and the consequences of not following the policies when completing assignments for this course.

    **Sandhills Community College holds a strong commitment to academic integrity and acknowledges that generative artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool is here to stay. Therefore, it is appropriate to set clear guidelines for responsible and ethical use of available AI tools. These expectations may differ from course to course and between individual assignments within a course. For this course the expectations are as follows:**

    ·
    **Creative AI is acceptable for automated idea generation, structuring, and/or editing. Students may use generative AI to improve clarity or quality of coursework when expressly permitted by instructor. Automation must be disclosed, and the AI-generated content must be properly attributed.**

    ·
    **Plagiarism occurs when representing the work of another person or an artificial intelligence program (such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, Copilot, ‘Humanizers,’ etc.) as one’s own. Failing to cite the original source of an idea, information, or words that are not one’s own; resubmitting work from another course; copying the work of another is not acceptable in this course.**

    ·
    **Unauthorized Collaboration occurs when working with another person (such as a parent or peer) or artificial intelligence program (such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, Copilot, ‘Humanizers,’ ) on an assignment without express instructor authorization and without indicating that collaboration has occurred.**

    **Penalties for academic dishonesty may include the following:**

    ·
    **Failing grade on the test or assignment;**

    ·
    **Failing grade (F or FW) for the course (depending on the point in the semester) as well as immediate dismissal from the course;**

    ·
    **Disciplinary drop from the course reported as an academic honesty violation;**

    ·
    **Suspension or expulsion from the college due to repeated breaches of academic**

    **When a student is believed to have violated the academic honesty policy, the resolution is between the professor and the student. If the solution is unsatisfactory, there is an inherent right to appeal; however, while the accusation of academic dishonesty may be appealed, the penalty may not. The appeal shall be in accordance with the Student Grievance Procedure.**

    **Supplemental Artificial Intelligence Policy and Procedures for COM 231**

    **In COM courses, assignments must be completed by using your own voice. In some brainstorming situations, generative AI assistance may be encouraged as part of the assignment with the use of generative AI by students and for students.  All students need to rely on their own knowledge, understanding, language, and skills to complete work. Without exception, outside ideas must be honestly acknowledged and properly attributed. You are encouraged to use Level 1 of the AI Assessment Scale (Perkins, Furze, Roe and MacVaugh 2024) that will serve as a guideline in the course. Co-Pilot is the recommended AI tool because it is approved and vetted by the North Carolina Community College System Office and Sandhills Community College.**

    **Acceptable use of Co-Pilot, Perplexity, Ad Fontes Media, Opposing Viewpoints, etc. as an AI Tool in COM 231:**

    ·
    **Idea generation, drafting, feedback, and refinement.**

    ·
    **You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use.**

    ·
    **The content and the tool must be identified and cited as a source.**

    **If unacceptable AI use is suspected in submitted work:**

    ·
    **The student will be notified of the suspected unacceptable AI use and pending failing grade via the assignment feedback/grade in Moodle or by email. Your instructor welcomes the opportunity to discuss the submitted work through the appeal process for the student’s ability to learn.**

    ·
    **In order to appeal, the student must email the instructor to schedule a telephone or Collaborate meeting within 48 hours of timestamped notification of suspected AI use in the assignment. Telephone and Collaborate meetings are available between 8:00 m.-2:00 p.m. Monday-Thursday, excluding holidays. Professional communication is required throughout the process, or the student forfeits the right to appeal.**

    ·
    **The student will be expected to defend the originality and authenticity of their work in the assignment by providing documentation reflecting proof of process (such as notes, timestamped drafts, or similar means) during the in-person Argument alone does not qualify as proof of process.**

    ·
    **At the instructor’s discretion, the student may be allowed to complete an in-person assessment to defend the originality and authenticity of the assignment suspected of violating the artificial intelligence policy.**

    ·
    **If the student does not attend the required telephone or Collaborate meeting or the student does not provide adequate defense/documentation during the meeting, the assignment will receive an automatic failing grade. Artificial intelligence and plagiarism Academic Honesty violations resulting in a failing grade, could be reported to SCC administration.**

    ·
    **Withdrawals of students due to artificial intelligence and plagiarism violations could be recorded as such under the “Disciplinary”**

    ·
    **Per SCC’s Academic Honesty policy, repeated breaches of academic honesty will result in suspension or**

    **## 3partassignmentTiffanyC.docx**

    **Discussion 1 ( don’t have the textbook yet, however I found this information online, thus if you could do them without the text, that would be great)**

    300 words In the discussion board, you will choose an Inquiry from Ruggiero (pp 34-36), briefly describe the Inquiry and respond accordingly. (Be sure to incorporate this week’s readings Chapters 1 & 3)

    **Discussion Board 2**

    300 words  In the discussion board, you will choose one of the
    _Inquiries_ from Ruggiero (pp  49-50) # 11 a-d, briefly describe the
    _Inquiry_ and respond accordingly. (Be sure to incorporate this week’s readings Chapters 4 & 5)

    **Part 3**

    Read "Academic Integrity" BEFORE Syllabus Quiz

    **Academic Integrity and AI Policy and Procedures for COM 231**

    **100 Points**

    **Directions:** Read, understand, and paraphrase in your own words, the following excerpt taken from your course syllabus for COM 231 Public Speaking about "Academic Integrity".  In the text box provided, confirm your reading and understanding by writing a brief paragraph (5-7 sentences) summarizing the content of the policy and the consequences of not following the policies when completing assignments for this course.

    **Sandhills Community College holds a strong commitment to academic integrity and acknowledges that generative artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool is here to stay. Therefore, it is appropriate to set clear guidelines for responsible and ethical use of available AI tools. These expectations may differ from course to course and between individual assignments within a course. For this course the expectations are as follows:**

    ·
    **Creative AI is acceptable for automated idea generation, structuring, and/or editing. Students may use generative AI to improve clarity or quality of coursework when expressly permitted by instructor. Automation must be disclosed, and the AI-generated content must be properly attributed.**

    ·
    **Plagiarism occurs when representing the work of another person or an artificial intelligence program (such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, Copilot, ‘Humanizers,’ etc.) as one’s own. Failing to cite the original source of an idea, information, or words that are not one’s own; resubmitting work from another course; copying the work of another is not acceptable in this course.**

    ·
    **Unauthorized Collaboration occurs when working with another person (such as a parent or peer) or artificial intelligence program (such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, Copilot, ‘Humanizers,’ ) on an assignment without express instructor authorization and without indicating that collaboration has occurred.**

    **Penalties for academic dishonesty may include the following:**

    ·
    **Failing grade on the test or assignment;**

    ·
    **Failing grade (F or FW) for the course (depending on the point in the semester) as well as immediate dismissal from the course;**

    ·
    **Disciplinary drop from the course reported as an academic honesty violation;**

    ·
    **Suspension or expulsion from the college due to repeated breaches of academic**

    **When a student is believed to have violated the academic honesty policy, the resolution is between the professor and the student. If the solution is unsatisfactory, there is an inherent right to appeal; however, while the accusation of academic dishonesty may be appealed, the penalty may not. The appeal shall be in accordance with the Student Grievance Procedure.**

    **Supplemental Artificial Intelligence Policy and Procedures for COM 231**

    **In COM courses, assignments must be completed by using your own voice. In some brainstorming situations, generative AI assistance may be encouraged as part of the assignment with the use of generative AI by students and for students.  All students need to rely on their own knowledge, understanding, language, and skills to complete work. Without exception, outside ideas must be honestly acknowledged and properly attributed. You are encouraged to use Level 1 of the AI Assessment Scale (Perkins, Furze, Roe and MacVaugh 2024) that will serve as a guideline in the course. Co-Pilot is the recommended AI tool because it is approved and vetted by the North Carolina Community College System Office and Sandhills Community College.**

    **Acceptable use of Co-Pilot, Perplexity, Ad Fontes Media, Opposing Viewpoints, etc. as an AI Tool in COM 231:**

    ·
    **Idea generation, drafting, feedback, and refinement.**

    ·
    **You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use.**

    ·
    **The content and the tool must be identified and cited as a source.**

    **If unacceptable AI use is suspected in submitted work:**

    ·
    **The student will be notified of the suspected unacceptable AI use and pending failing grade via the assignment feedback/grade in Moodle or by email. Your instructor welcomes the opportunity to discuss the submitted work through the appeal process for the student’s ability to learn.**

    ·
    **In order to appeal, the student must email the instructor to schedule a telephone or Collaborate meeting within 48 hours of timestamped notification of suspected AI use in the assignment. Telephone and Collaborate meetings are available between 8:00 m.-2:00 p.m. Monday-Thursday, excluding holidays. Professional communication is required throughout the process, or the student forfeits the right to appeal.**

    ·
    **The student will be expected to defend the originality and authenticity of their work in the assignment by providing documentation reflecting proof of process (such as notes, timestamped drafts, or similar means) during the in-person Argument alone does not qualify as proof of process.**

    ·
    **At the instructor’s discretion, the student may be allowed to complete an in-person assessment to defend the originality and authenticity of the assignment suspected of violating the artificial intelligence policy.**

    ·
    **If the student does not attend the required telephone or Collaborate meeting or the student does not provide adequate defense/documentation during the meeting, the assignment will receive an automatic failing grade. Artificial intelligence and plagiarism Academic Honesty violations resulting in a failing grade, could be reported to SCC administration.**

    ·
    **Withdrawals of students due to artificial intelligence and plagiarism violations could be recorded as such under the “Disciplinary”**

    ·
    **Per SCC’s Academic Honesty policy, repeated breaches of academic honesty will result in suspension or**

  • [Solved] Comp 120

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Communication120Tiffany.docx **## Communication120Tiffany.docx** **Communication 120 Tiffany** **Part A** **Discussion Forum: "How Culture Drives Behaviors" by Dr. Julien Bourrelle** **Discussion Forum** **50 Points Possible -** **IMPORTANT NOTE: For this discussion forum, you mus…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Communication120Tiffany.docx

    **## Communication120Tiffany.docx**

    **Communication 120 Tiffany**

    **Part A**

    **Discussion Forum: "How Culture Drives Behaviors" by Dr. Julien Bourrelle**

    **Discussion Forum**

    **50 Points Possible -**

    **IMPORTANT NOTE:  For this discussion forum, you must respond to the topic prompt BEFORE viewing other replies.**

    In this discussion forum, you will watch a
    **TEDTalk by Dr. Julien Bourrelle** entitled "How Culture Drives Behaviors" — and I wish I had seen his talk when I was in college!  He will beautifully explain how communication behaviors are different when compared to the communication behaviors between different countries.  I learned what he is teaching in this TEDTalk the hard way when I was Training Director for Orange Julius International early in my business career.  I was sent to Singapore to teach a two week course to the managers of Orange Julius stores in Singapore and Malaysia.  It was my first trip abroad, and I had not done my homework before leaving Los Angeles.  Our Vice President of Operations said to simply follow the lead of our Chinese licensee in Singapore, and I would do a great job.  He was only  partially correct.  You see, like Dorothy in the "Wizard of Oz" movie, I quickly realized I wasn't in Kansas anymore when I was greeted at the airport by my sponsor only to be whisked away to trash my "Cosmopolitan" magazine before I was arrested for carrying contraband into the country.

    **Dr. Bourrelle is a** **mechanical engineer in field of astrodynamics – and he calls himself a "rocket scientist"** who speaks all over the world to teach people in many countries how culture not only influences communication behaviors — but culture DRIVES communication behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge.  Watch the TEDTalk, and
    **determine what you believe to be the main message from Mr. Bourrelle** about intercultural communication that he wants his audience to learn and take away from his presentation.  Tell us his message in your own words to begin your posting for the discussion.

    **Directions:**

    1.
    **Clearly state two or three observations or messages that are communicated by Dr. Bourrelle about intercultural communication** that you want to be sure to carry away with you from this course.

    2. Then, reflect on the facts and examples that Dr. Bourrelle provided during his talk and share with us YOUR thoughts about what Dr. Bourrelle explained that you already knew about intercultural communication, and what
    **were a complete surprise to you.  Explain why it was surprising.**

    3. Conclude your posting by revisiting
    **Section 6.2, 6.3, and/or 6.4 in your textbook.  Make THREE connections between key concepts presented in this section and what Dr. Bourrelle communicated** in his TEDTalk.  Write those connections clearly and
    **BOLD your use of communication terms** from that section.  Your thoughts may include why YOU think I could have benefited by seeing this video before working in Singapore, or how the information in this video and the textbook will help you select the country for your term paper and complete the writing of your term paper.  HOW could this message be relevant to you — regardless of your current or future occupation?  How could this message be relevant to everyone when interacting with someone from a different country or culture?

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-Yy6poJ2zs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-Yy6poJ2zs)

    **Part B**

    Submit THREE (3) Proposals (on ONE document) for Term Paper

    ·
    **Due** Sunday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Available** Aug 17 at 12am – Aug 30 at 11:59pm

    **100 points Points**

    **An Important Note:  Proposals will be approved on a first-come bases, and you will receive written notification in Moodle for which proposal is approved — along with your grade on this assignment.**

    **Directions for Submitting 3 Proposals on 1 Document for your Term Paper**

    1. Place your name (first and last) at the top of the paper.

    2.
    **Write a single paragraph for each proposal on ONE document,** and include the following information in each paragraph proposal:

    · The country, culture, or region, etc. The country must be OUTSIDE NORTH AMERICA.  Select a country that is very different from your home country.

    · Include a minimum of THREE interpersonal communication terms, theories, or practices discussed in textbook that will help you to better communicate with people from this region of the world;

    · Explain WHY it is important for you to better understand this community; and

    · Describe HOW the interpersonal communication term, theory, or practice might help you to have a more productive and respectful relationship with members of this community.

    3. Upload your document with the three proposals on one document here.
    **Do NOT submit a google.doc and do NOT submit a document linked to your OneDrive.**

    **_Important Note!  See the SAMPLE document with three proposals written by a student posted at the top of Module One to understand what is required.  Let me know if you need help!_**

    **Grading Rubric:  This assignment is worth 100 points.  Follow these guidelines when writing your reflection paper.  It is critically important for you to make direct connections between the readings, the video, and your personal life.**

    **75 pts**. Utilize key terms from the textbook and clearly demonstrate an understanding and application of these communication terms, theories, and practices learned from reading the textbook and use of research.

    **20 pts**. Provide page number or section number references (in parentheses) after using a communication term, theory, or practice from the textbook and note time stamps (in parentheses) when referring to the video.

    **5 pts**. Write in a professional manner that is easy to read and understand.  Your paper should be two to three pages, double-spaced, have 1" margins, with proper capitalization, grammar, and punctuation.  Be sure to proofread your paper before submission to catch spelling errors or typos.

    **Required Formatting:**

    ·

    ·

    · Name at Top of Paper

    · Length: 2-3 pages

    · Margins: 1 inch

    · Spacing: Double-spaced

    · Paragraphs: At least three

    **## Communication120Tiffany.docx**

    **Communication 120 Tiffany**

    **Part A**

    **Discussion Forum: "How Culture Drives Behaviors" by Dr. Julien Bourrelle**

    **Discussion Forum**

    **50 Points Possible -**

    **IMPORTANT NOTE:  For this discussion forum, you must respond to the topic prompt BEFORE viewing other replies.**

    In this discussion forum, you will watch a
    **TEDTalk by Dr. Julien Bourrelle** entitled "How Culture Drives Behaviors" — and I wish I had seen his talk when I was in college!  He will beautifully explain how communication behaviors are different when compared to the communication behaviors between different countries.  I learned what he is teaching in this TEDTalk the hard way when I was Training Director for Orange Julius International early in my business career.  I was sent to Singapore to teach a two week course to the managers of Orange Julius stores in Singapore and Malaysia.  It was my first trip abroad, and I had not done my homework before leaving Los Angeles.  Our Vice President of Operations said to simply follow the lead of our Chinese licensee in Singapore, and I would do a great job.  He was only  partially correct.  You see, like Dorothy in the "Wizard of Oz" movie, I quickly realized I wasn't in Kansas anymore when I was greeted at the airport by my sponsor only to be whisked away to trash my "Cosmopolitan" magazine before I was arrested for carrying contraband into the country.

    **Dr. Bourrelle is a** **mechanical engineer in field of astrodynamics – and he calls himself a "rocket scientist"** who speaks all over the world to teach people in many countries how culture not only influences communication behaviors — but culture DRIVES communication behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge.  Watch the TEDTalk, and
    **determine what you believe to be the main message from Mr. Bourrelle** about intercultural communication that he wants his audience to learn and take away from his presentation.  Tell us his message in your own words to begin your posting for the discussion.

    **Directions:**

    1.
    **Clearly state two or three observations or messages that are communicated by Dr. Bourrelle about intercultural communication** that you want to be sure to carry away with you from this course.

    2. Then, reflect on the facts and examples that Dr. Bourrelle provided during his talk and share with us YOUR thoughts about what Dr. Bourrelle explained that you already knew about intercultural communication, and what
    **were a complete surprise to you.  Explain why it was surprising.**

    3. Conclude your posting by revisiting
    **Section 6.2, 6.3, and/or 6.4 in your textbook.  Make THREE connections between key concepts presented in this section and what Dr. Bourrelle communicated** in his TEDTalk.  Write those connections clearly and
    **BOLD your use of communication terms** from that section.  Your thoughts may include why YOU think I could have benefited by seeing this video before working in Singapore, or how the information in this video and the textbook will help you select the country for your term paper and complete the writing of your term paper.  HOW could this message be relevant to you — regardless of your current or future occupation?  How could this message be relevant to everyone when interacting with someone from a different country or culture?

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-Yy6poJ2zs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-Yy6poJ2zs)

    **Part B**

    Submit THREE (3) Proposals (on ONE document) for Term Paper

    ·
    **Due** Sunday by 11:59pm

    ·
    **Available** Aug 17 at 12am – Aug 30 at 11:59pm

    **100 points Points**

    **An Important Note:  Proposals will be approved on a first-come bases, and you will receive written notification in Moodle for which proposal is approved — along with your grade on this assignment.**

    **Directions for Submitting 3 Proposals on 1 Document for your Term Paper**

    1. Place your name (first and last) at the top of the paper.

    2.
    **Write a single paragraph for each proposal on ONE document,** and include the following information in each paragraph proposal:

    · The country, culture, or region, etc. The country must be OUTSIDE NORTH AMERICA.  Select a country that is very different from your home country.

    · Include a minimum of THREE interpersonal communication terms, theories, or practices discussed in textbook that will help you to better communicate with people from this region of the world;

    · Explain WHY it is important for you to better understand this community; and

    · Describe HOW the interpersonal communication term, theory, or practice might help you to have a more productive and respectful relationship with members of this community.

    3. Upload your document with the three proposals on one document here.
    **Do NOT submit a google.doc and do NOT submit a document linked to your OneDrive.**

    **_Important Note!  See the SAMPLE document with three proposals written by a student posted at the top of Module One to understand what is required.  Let me know if you need help!_**

    **Grading Rubric:  This assignment is worth 100 points.  Follow these guidelines when writing your reflection paper.  It is critically important for you to make direct connections between the readings, the video, and your personal life.**

    **75 pts**. Utilize key terms from the textbook and clearly demonstrate an understanding and application of these communication terms, theories, and practices learned from reading the textbook and use of research.

    **20 pts**. Provide page number or section number references (in parentheses) after using a communication term, theory, or practice from the textbook and note time stamps (in parentheses) when referring to the video.

    **5 pts**. Write in a professional manner that is easy to read and understand.  Your paper should be two to three pages, double-spaced, have 1" margins, with proper capitalization, grammar, and punctuation.  Be sure to proofread your paper before submission to catch spelling errors or typos.

    **Required Formatting:**

    ·

    ·

    · Name at Top of Paper

    · Length: 2-3 pages

    · Margins: 1 inch

    · Spacing: Double-spaced

    · Paragraphs: At least three

  • [Solved] CJ & Engl

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (5)** – ## CJEngl.docx – ## CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx – CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx – CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx – CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx **## CJEngl.docx** **Criminal Justice 300 words ( I attached the PowerPoints for this assignment)** Discussion Board Module 1 – Make connections between readings (CH 1-2)…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (5)**

    – ## CJEngl.docx

    – ## CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx

    – CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx
    – CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx
    – CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx

    **## CJEngl.docx**

    **Criminal Justice 300 words ( I attached the PowerPoints for this assignment)**

    Discussion Board Module 1 – Make connections between readings (CH 1-2) and modern society. 300 words

    Show your understanding of Ch 1, 2, the videos, and PowerPoint slides for this week make a connection from a term or theme to something from another class, a current event, or historical event (lets avoid personal experience for now). The point of this assignment is to demonstrate you learned something important from the class material this week.

    **English Assignments**

    **Annotated Biblio (Title: traumatic brain injuries in football)**

    This week's module will discuss the annotated bibliography. Annotated bibliographies describe, give publication information, and evaluate each work on a list of sources. Students will have a working annotated bibliography that will list four sources with an annotated summary.

    First, you are still working with the topic you chose from last week, You will be able to create an annotated bibliography based on research that you conducted. Along with creating an annotated bibliography, you will research using the library's databases, read and annotate scholarly sources, and evaluate journal articles.

    For this paper, you will construct an annotated bibliography that will provide the groundwork for the Research Paper–Report Essay. Many research papers begin with an annotated bibliography, which is a references page containing annotations.

    Remember, you are not writing the paper itself, and continue with the topic you choose from Week 1– Research topic Generator.

    **## CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx**

    Chapter 2

    Public Opinion, News Media and the Crime Problem

    (Publisher slides were used as the basis for this document, however, the information has been updated and includes information not in the book.)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Reminders

    These slides are like my lecture notes. I will not review every item from the readings. You cannot pass the class with the PP slides only. I will add information in addition to the book to the slides. You will be tested on this information.

    You should read and take notes on the book, and then review my slides for additional examples and new information related to the topic of the chapter.

    When you highlight information you identify it as important

    When you write information in your notes you start to remember it so you can apply it and evaluate it

    ALL INFORMATION in the textbook, the slides, and the videos is subject to Reading Quiz and Exam questions.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Introduction

    Crime is very real

    Individual experiences

    News media depictions

    TV/Movie portrayals (entertainment media; Forensic Files, etc.)

    Crime is actually a very rare event, it does not happen often (see crime rates and victimization reports).

    However, we study crime due to the terrible impact is has on people and society when it does happen, so we can try to prevent and control events and offenders

    We study crime through the format of social science so we can develop a logical pattern of events and behaviors rather than simply anecdotal personal experience, and then create public policy responses.

    Crime does not happen randomly in society. Ch 2-4 help us document this fact. For example, there are geographic crime hot spots, there are variations in victimization rates that are not random (look for age and gender examples in later chanters)

    It is important to recognize crime myths (cut and paste link into a browser)

    [Myths and Realities: Understanding Recent Trends in Violent Crime | Brennan Center for Justice](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/myths-and-realities-understanding-recent-trends-violent-crime)

    What did you learn from reviewing this material? This is a great short answer or extra credit question.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion About Crime: History is important to studying social phenomena
    (pg 19)

    Media, religious figures, and politicians have always said: There is too much crime, and they typically say that crime is increasing (is crime always rising?)

    Salem witch trials

    Mob violence (gangs and labor disputes) in the Northeast during the early 1800s

    The outlaws in the Old West

    High crime rates in the 1920s-30s

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion and Crime Policy

    Democratic theory (Dye; Saward)

    This theory proposes that public policy should reflect public opinion

    What is the flaw in this position? (hint: mob rule)

    What if laws reflect the view of the few – minority rule of politically powerful

    Public officials can be influenced by a small, powerful elite

    The Golden Rule – “those who have the gold make the rules”

    Search current information about marriage equality public opinion vs public policy and Abortion/choice public opinion vs policy

    What if we do the greatest good from the greatest number of “people who count”?

    Majority opinion may violate principles of fairness, equality, and justice

    Consider civil rights and marriage equality – this changed recently, will it change back?

    Public opinion is often inaccurate: 1) Is crime increasing, decreasing or stable? 2) Are children more likely to be victimized by strangers? 3) Do the elderly have the highest victimization rates?

    Answers: 1) crime decreasing in some areas and slight increases in others, with fairly stable in others (not a return to the highs of the 1990s); 2) non-strangers like family members are more likely to victimize children; 3) young, black males have higher victimization rates than the elderly

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion and Crime (cont.)

    Personal Opinions about criminal justice stem from:

    News media and social media (memes)

    Politicians on websites, in speeches, on news shows

    May differ by a person's race, ethnicity, gender, age, nationality, religion, immigration status,

    May differ by personal experiences and experiences of friends

    We can use social science surveys to study public opinion – have you ever participated in an opinion survey?

    What can social science studies tell us about crime and victimization? Can public opinion studies reveal anti-democratic attitudes like racial prejudice, gender prejudice, anti-Jewish prejudices, etc.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Overdramatization of Crime (pg 20-23)

    Does the media depict crime accurately?

    Remember the crack baby crisis? Where are these children now? Typically, functioning the same as non-crack babies

    It is fetal alcohol syndrome babies that have more long-term deficiencies

    Search for information on opioid addicted babies

    Crime stories used because they capture viewers/readers attention

    Terrorism! We have more domestic terrorist events and prosecutions in the US each year than international terrorism events Check the Southern Poverty Law Center webpage)

    Do illegal immigrants commit more crime than native-born Americans? (NO! search in Google Scholar for research)

    Most dramatic crime in TV/movies is violent crime

    By contrast, most crime is property crime; crime – a way to generate income – theft, stolen cars, robbery, burglary, drug sales, prostitution, white color crime, etc.

    Inaccurate information creates flawed public policy.

    Will the drugs that come to the US from Mexico be prevented by the border wall? Or, are most of them coming through the ports, railroad lines, tunnels and trucking industries?

    KEY: Social Science based studies reflect more accurate understanding and explanation of crime as a basis for public policy.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Overdramatization of Crime: Media Driven Crime Waves

    When the media devotes much attention to small number of crimes

    Typically, about violence and drugs

    However, when crimes are counted, most common crimes are property crimes – crime is essentially an income generating activity (more in later chapters)

    Some stories are reflective of real problems – opioid drug epidemic – but this epidemic did not come out of no where and must be seen in an historical and cultural context

    What is the current “crime wave”? (check current events)

    Creates false impression that crime is rampant/common

    This discussion often occurs even when crime rate is falling

    Review Missing children information – stranger vs non-stranger

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Other Problems with media Coverage (pg 23-25)

    False beliefs about crime (start in chapter 2 and continue with chapters 3 and 4)

    People of Color: “Racial/Ethnic minorities are the typical offenders in all violent crime, property crime and drugs”

    All racial groups commit these crimes, minorities and males are overrepresented in arrest rates, but they are also overrepresented as victims

    Often the typical offender is a white male

    Youth commit all of the crime

    All of us do crime of some sort in our lives, typically, young people commit more crime than older people, but we typically age out of committing crime by 18 years old.

    Young people also have the highest victimization rates

    Virtuous victims (review this discussion in the book)

    What is this discussion about? Give current examples

    Expect a Reading Quiz question

    “Crime is rampant and overwhelmingly violent” – not what the data show – the typical crime is property crime – thus, crime is oncome generating activity (seel a service or turn a stolen item into cash.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Additional Problems in Media Coverage
    (pg 24, highlight box)

    Selecting people to interview based on reporter’s point of view

    Use of value-laden language

    Presenting misleading data

    Neglect of white-collar crime

    Lack of social/historical context

    Be able to explain each issue and why it is a problem and be able to provide examples

    Does Fox News interview the same crime experts as MSNBC?

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Effects of Media Coverage (pg 25-27)

    REVIEW: The media can provide misleading depictions of aspects of crime (amount of crime, type of crime, location of crime, prevalence of crime, types of victims, etc.)

    What impact is there on the public understanding of crime?

    Example: Violent crimes are overrepresented

    However, while most of us experience some type of violence in our lifetime, it is typically a simple assault and committed by a non-stranger

    Effects of Flawed Media Coverage

    Public ignorance about prevalence of crime victimization

    We are all victims at come point in our lives of violence crime and property crime – but not with great frequency and most often of a non-serious nature

    Public fear and concern about things that are not realistic

    Crime wave by illegal immigrants (research shows less delinquency than native born population)

    Obscuring underlying forces (historic and cultural)

    Drug war and opioid crisis have economic roots

    Diversion of our attention from white-collar crime

    Did people lose more money last year to their bank charging inappropriate fees or household burglary?

    Racial and ethnic stereotyping of typical offenders can fuel racial/ethnic tensions

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Not in the book: Who benefits from flawed news stories?

    J. Reiman (The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison) says that a distorted view of crime keeps citizens distracted from larger societal issues such as the impact of state crime, environmental crime, white collar crime, etc.

    Are you more worried about getting mugged walking to your car at night or being ripped off by bogus bank charge fees? A higher mortgage fee because of race/gender?

    See recent news stories on Wells Fargo fraud charges

    Reiman calls this distorted view of crime a carnival mirror. He argues that the Criminal Justice system is designed to fail. We are conditioned to worry more about the poor and black/brown people as criminal offenders rather than bankers and politicians.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: (pg 27-31):
    1a) Fear of Crime

    Crime is threatening

    Especially if done by strangers

    Crime can lead to physical and psychological injury

    Elderly victims are rationally fearful about losing money on a fixed income and physical injury that can result in loss of mobility and freedom to live alone

    According to the 2021 GSS, 36% of respondents report they are afraid to walk in their neighborhood alone at night

    We fear gun crime by strangers, but gun injuries are more likely to occur in the home with a legally obtained weapon, through anger or accident
    [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1559827610396294](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1559827610396294)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: 1b) Structural Factors & Fear of Crime

    Fear of crime is linked to various community characteristics

    Dilapidated living conditions of neighborhood

    Broken Windows Theory of social disorganization leading to neighborhood decline has been used to justify to zero tolerance policing and aggressive stop and frisk policies
    [Broken Windows Theory of Policing (Wilson &](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html) [Kelling](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html) [) (simplypsychology.org)](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html)

    Proportion of people of color or another nationality living nearby

    The “other” is always feared, this is fueled by racial composition of neighborhoods and population trends of whites no longer majority population
    [Did The U.S. White Population Decline And Shrink? It's Complicated : NPR](https://www.npr.org/2021/08/22/1029609786/2020-census-data-results-white-population-shrinking-decline-non-hispanic-race) AND
    [Census: Whites no longer a majority in U.S. by 2043 – CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/census-whites-no-longer-a-majority-in-us-by-2043/)

    [Full article: Race and Ethnic Differences in Fear of Property, Personal, and Gang Victimization among People Involved in Crime: Testing the Effects of Perceived Neighborhood Characteristics (tandfonline.com)](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15564886.2020.1737611)

    Urban areas (see Figure 2.1)

    Crime rates are often higher in urban areas than in rural areas

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: 1c) Individual Characteristics of Fear and Crime

    Higher fear of crime linked to demographic variables:

    Elderly more fear than younger people

    Females (Figure 2.2) more fear compared to males

    Race/ethnicity, especially among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to whites (Figure 2.3)

    INTERSECTIONALITY (see Ch 1, Figure 2.4) what should you remember?

    Income – lower income more fear

    Mixed results on link between prior victimization increasing fear of crime

    Victimization- termination link: Some drug offenders stop selling drugs after being the victim of robberies:
    [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00131.x](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00131.x)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Consequences: Fear of crime can negatively impact your life

    Leads to mistrust of others and change to your work, leisure, church, family activities as a result

    Leads to population turnover, move out of certain perceived “bad” neighborhoods, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy of bad school, bad parks, etc.

    Threatens economic viability of neighborhoods, when people move out, so do businesses, churches, banks, etc.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Additional Research on Public Beliefs about Crime and Punitiveness(31-34)

    2) Anger about Crime –

    Is anger higher than fear?

    More fear if younger, lower income and lower education

    What explanation can you offer for these facts? Think logically.

    3) Seriousness of Crime – will my opinion lead me to install alarms? cameras? Etc. at my home and business? Support this answer

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research Cont.: What the social science research says about perceptions ot …

    Punitiveness

    Public perception concerning judgment of appropriate punishment for convicted criminals.

    Americans are punitive in relation to crime and criminals

    Interactions between opinions and race: What is the significance of racial prejudice and resentment on harsher sentencing of offenders?

    Public policy in a democratic society should not be influenced by racial resentment – see democratic theory pg 19

    Support for the Death Penalty in murder cases

    Those likely to support the death penalty: Men, Caucasians, Older people, less educated individuals, Southerners, political conservatives – what does this mean?

    No empirical social science research supports deterrent effect of the death penalty – its purpose is vengeance and/or retaliation
    [There’s no evidence that death penalty is a deterrent against crime (theconversation.com)](https://theconversation.com/theres-no-evidence-that-death-penalty-is-a-deterrent-against-crime-43227#:~:text=A%20panel%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences,credible%20evidence%20that%20the%20death%20penalty%20deters%20homicides.)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    What social science research says about perceptions of …. (pg 34-36)

    Our Views about the Police

    In general, dis-satisfaction with police linked to our interactions with the police – we are happy with them until we interact wit them (1 in 20 people a year interact with police for crime or traffic problem):

    Those stopped by police for traffic violations (is this ever fair?) have less satisfaction with police

    Young people of color (often profiled and over-enforced; zero-tolerance policing in schools [school to prison pipeline], and stop and frisk)

    Those living in high-crime communities (over-policing or under-policing?)

    Review and summarize information in these two areas

    1) Criminal Injustice

    2) Criminal Justice Spending

    READ ABOUT THESE ISSUES AND BE PREPARED TO DESCRIBE THEM AND OFFER CURRENT CRITIQUE and CURRENT EXAMPLES

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Social Science note

    Keep in mind, the statements from the previous slides are empirical patterns observed from social research, police records, victimization surveys, etc.

    These patterns emerge from the review of a collection of experiences. Thus, individual personal experience might be different. However, public policy in our democratic society is created to provide the greatest good/benefit the greatness number of people (the principle of utilitarianism), so we need to know reliable patterns to understand, explain, predict and control …

    Note, a conflict theorist (check readings to remember this term) would argue that utilitarianism is to be understood with two additional words: government functions to ensure “the greatest good for the greatest number of people” – who count.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Key Takeaways

    In what ways was social science and social science research present in this chapter?

    Crime is a rare event, but the media makes it seem like a “real” event to us. Media reports often have little context to help us understand numbers and trends.

    Crime victimization is not equally occurring across race, gender, age, social status (more on this later in the semester)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    ## image1.jpeg

    **CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch1-pptx)

    **CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch1-pptx-10590651)

    **CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch2-pptx-10590649)

    **CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch2-pptx-10590649)

    **## CJEngl.docx**

    **Criminal Justice 300 words ( I attached the PowerPoints for this assignment)**

    Discussion Board Module 1 – Make connections between readings (CH 1-2) and modern society. 300 words

    Show your understanding of Ch 1, 2, the videos, and PowerPoint slides for this week make a connection from a term or theme to something from another class, a current event, or historical event (lets avoid personal experience for now). The point of this assignment is to demonstrate you learned something important from the class material this week.

    **English Assignments**

    **Annotated Biblio (Title: traumatic brain injuries in football)**

    This week's module will discuss the annotated bibliography. Annotated bibliographies describe, give publication information, and evaluate each work on a list of sources. Students will have a working annotated bibliography that will list four sources with an annotated summary.

    First, you are still working with the topic you chose from last week, You will be able to create an annotated bibliography based on research that you conducted. Along with creating an annotated bibliography, you will research using the library's databases, read and annotate scholarly sources, and evaluate journal articles.

    For this paper, you will construct an annotated bibliography that will provide the groundwork for the Research Paper–Report Essay. Many research papers begin with an annotated bibliography, which is a references page containing annotations.

    Remember, you are not writing the paper itself, and continue with the topic you choose from Week 1– Research topic Generator.

    **## CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx**

    Chapter 2

    Public Opinion, News Media and the Crime Problem

    (Publisher slides were used as the basis for this document, however, the information has been updated and includes information not in the book.)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Reminders

    These slides are like my lecture notes. I will not review every item from the readings. You cannot pass the class with the PP slides only. I will add information in addition to the book to the slides. You will be tested on this information.

    You should read and take notes on the book, and then review my slides for additional examples and new information related to the topic of the chapter.

    When you highlight information you identify it as important

    When you write information in your notes you start to remember it so you can apply it and evaluate it

    ALL INFORMATION in the textbook, the slides, and the videos is subject to Reading Quiz and Exam questions.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Introduction

    Crime is very real

    Individual experiences

    News media depictions

    TV/Movie portrayals (entertainment media; Forensic Files, etc.)

    Crime is actually a very rare event, it does not happen often (see crime rates and victimization reports).

    However, we study crime due to the terrible impact is has on people and society when it does happen, so we can try to prevent and control events and offenders

    We study crime through the format of social science so we can develop a logical pattern of events and behaviors rather than simply anecdotal personal experience, and then create public policy responses.

    Crime does not happen randomly in society. Ch 2-4 help us document this fact. For example, there are geographic crime hot spots, there are variations in victimization rates that are not random (look for age and gender examples in later chanters)

    It is important to recognize crime myths (cut and paste link into a browser)

    [Myths and Realities: Understanding Recent Trends in Violent Crime | Brennan Center for Justice](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/myths-and-realities-understanding-recent-trends-violent-crime)

    What did you learn from reviewing this material? This is a great short answer or extra credit question.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion About Crime: History is important to studying social phenomena
    (pg 19)

    Media, religious figures, and politicians have always said: There is too much crime, and they typically say that crime is increasing (is crime always rising?)

    Salem witch trials

    Mob violence (gangs and labor disputes) in the Northeast during the early 1800s

    The outlaws in the Old West

    High crime rates in the 1920s-30s

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion and Crime Policy

    Democratic theory (Dye; Saward)

    This theory proposes that public policy should reflect public opinion

    What is the flaw in this position? (hint: mob rule)

    What if laws reflect the view of the few – minority rule of politically powerful

    Public officials can be influenced by a small, powerful elite

    The Golden Rule – “those who have the gold make the rules”

    Search current information about marriage equality public opinion vs public policy and Abortion/choice public opinion vs policy

    What if we do the greatest good from the greatest number of “people who count”?

    Majority opinion may violate principles of fairness, equality, and justice

    Consider civil rights and marriage equality – this changed recently, will it change back?

    Public opinion is often inaccurate: 1) Is crime increasing, decreasing or stable? 2) Are children more likely to be victimized by strangers? 3) Do the elderly have the highest victimization rates?

    Answers: 1) crime decreasing in some areas and slight increases in others, with fairly stable in others (not a return to the highs of the 1990s); 2) non-strangers like family members are more likely to victimize children; 3) young, black males have higher victimization rates than the elderly

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion and Crime (cont.)

    Personal Opinions about criminal justice stem from:

    News media and social media (memes)

    Politicians on websites, in speeches, on news shows

    May differ by a person's race, ethnicity, gender, age, nationality, religion, immigration status,

    May differ by personal experiences and experiences of friends

    We can use social science surveys to study public opinion – have you ever participated in an opinion survey?

    What can social science studies tell us about crime and victimization? Can public opinion studies reveal anti-democratic attitudes like racial prejudice, gender prejudice, anti-Jewish prejudices, etc.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Overdramatization of Crime (pg 20-23)

    Does the media depict crime accurately?

    Remember the crack baby crisis? Where are these children now? Typically, functioning the same as non-crack babies

    It is fetal alcohol syndrome babies that have more long-term deficiencies

    Search for information on opioid addicted babies

    Crime stories used because they capture viewers/readers attention

    Terrorism! We have more domestic terrorist events and prosecutions in the US each year than international terrorism events Check the Southern Poverty Law Center webpage)

    Do illegal immigrants commit more crime than native-born Americans? (NO! search in Google Scholar for research)

    Most dramatic crime in TV/movies is violent crime

    By contrast, most crime is property crime; crime – a way to generate income – theft, stolen cars, robbery, burglary, drug sales, prostitution, white color crime, etc.

    Inaccurate information creates flawed public policy.

    Will the drugs that come to the US from Mexico be prevented by the border wall? Or, are most of them coming through the ports, railroad lines, tunnels and trucking industries?

    KEY: Social Science based studies reflect more accurate understanding and explanation of crime as a basis for public policy.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Overdramatization of Crime: Media Driven Crime Waves

    When the media devotes much attention to small number of crimes

    Typically, about violence and drugs

    However, when crimes are counted, most common crimes are property crimes – crime is essentially an income generating activity (more in later chapters)

    Some stories are reflective of real problems – opioid drug epidemic – but this epidemic did not come out of no where and must be seen in an historical and cultural context

    What is the current “crime wave”? (check current events)

    Creates false impression that crime is rampant/common

    This discussion often occurs even when crime rate is falling

    Review Missing children information – stranger vs non-stranger

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Other Problems with media Coverage (pg 23-25)

    False beliefs about crime (start in chapter 2 and continue with chapters 3 and 4)

    People of Color: “Racial/Ethnic minorities are the typical offenders in all violent crime, property crime and drugs”

    All racial groups commit these crimes, minorities and males are overrepresented in arrest rates, but they are also overrepresented as victims

    Often the typical offender is a white male

    Youth commit all of the crime

    All of us do crime of some sort in our lives, typically, young people commit more crime than older people, but we typically age out of committing crime by 18 years old.

    Young people also have the highest victimization rates

    Virtuous victims (review this discussion in the book)

    What is this discussion about? Give current examples

    Expect a Reading Quiz question

    “Crime is rampant and overwhelmingly violent” – not what the data show – the typical crime is property crime – thus, crime is oncome generating activity (seel a service or turn a stolen item into cash.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Additional Problems in Media Coverage
    (pg 24, highlight box)

    Selecting people to interview based on reporter’s point of view

    Use of value-laden language

    Presenting misleading data

    Neglect of white-collar crime

    Lack of social/historical context

    Be able to explain each issue and why it is a problem and be able to provide examples

    Does Fox News interview the same crime experts as MSNBC?

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Effects of Media Coverage (pg 25-27)

    REVIEW: The media can provide misleading depictions of aspects of crime (amount of crime, type of crime, location of crime, prevalence of crime, types of victims, etc.)

    What impact is there on the public understanding of crime?

    Example: Violent crimes are overrepresented

    However, while most of us experience some type of violence in our lifetime, it is typically a simple assault and committed by a non-stranger

    Effects of Flawed Media Coverage

    Public ignorance about prevalence of crime victimization

    We are all victims at come point in our lives of violence crime and property crime – but not with great frequency and most often of a non-serious nature

    Public fear and concern about things that are not realistic

    Crime wave by illegal immigrants (research shows less delinquency than native born population)

    Obscuring underlying forces (historic and cultural)

    Drug war and opioid crisis have economic roots

    Diversion of our attention from white-collar crime

    Did people lose more money last year to their bank charging inappropriate fees or household burglary?

    Racial and ethnic stereotyping of typical offenders can fuel racial/ethnic tensions

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Not in the book: Who benefits from flawed news stories?

    J. Reiman (The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison) says that a distorted view of crime keeps citizens distracted from larger societal issues such as the impact of state crime, environmental crime, white collar crime, etc.

    Are you more worried about getting mugged walking to your car at night or being ripped off by bogus bank charge fees? A higher mortgage fee because of race/gender?

    See recent news stories on Wells Fargo fraud charges

    Reiman calls this distorted view of crime a carnival mirror. He argues that the Criminal Justice system is designed to fail. We are conditioned to worry more about the poor and black/brown people as criminal offenders rather than bankers and politicians.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: (pg 27-31):
    1a) Fear of Crime

    Crime is threatening

    Especially if done by strangers

    Crime can lead to physical and psychological injury

    Elderly victims are rationally fearful about losing money on a fixed income and physical injury that can result in loss of mobility and freedom to live alone

    According to the 2021 GSS, 36% of respondents report they are afraid to walk in their neighborhood alone at night

    We fear gun crime by strangers, but gun injuries are more likely to occur in the home with a legally obtained weapon, through anger or accident
    [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1559827610396294](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1559827610396294)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: 1b) Structural Factors & Fear of Crime

    Fear of crime is linked to various community characteristics

    Dilapidated living conditions of neighborhood

    Broken Windows Theory of social disorganization leading to neighborhood decline has been used to justify to zero tolerance policing and aggressive stop and frisk policies
    [Broken Windows Theory of Policing (Wilson &](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html) [Kelling](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html) [) (simplypsychology.org)](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html)

    Proportion of people of color or another nationality living nearby

    The “other” is always feared, this is fueled by racial composition of neighborhoods and population trends of whites no longer majority population
    [Did The U.S. White Population Decline And Shrink? It's Complicated : NPR](https://www.npr.org/2021/08/22/1029609786/2020-census-data-results-white-population-shrinking-decline-non-hispanic-race) AND
    [Census: Whites no longer a majority in U.S. by 2043 – CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/census-whites-no-longer-a-majority-in-us-by-2043/)

    [Full article: Race and Ethnic Differences in Fear of Property, Personal, and Gang Victimization among People Involved in Crime: Testing the Effects of Perceived Neighborhood Characteristics (tandfonline.com)](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15564886.2020.1737611)

    Urban areas (see Figure 2.1)

    Crime rates are often higher in urban areas than in rural areas

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: 1c) Individual Characteristics of Fear and Crime

    Higher fear of crime linked to demographic variables:

    Elderly more fear than younger people

    Females (Figure 2.2) more fear compared to males

    Race/ethnicity, especially among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to whites (Figure 2.3)

    INTERSECTIONALITY (see Ch 1, Figure 2.4) what should you remember?

    Income – lower income more fear

    Mixed results on link between prior victimization increasing fear of crime

    Victimization- termination link: Some drug offenders stop selling drugs after being the victim of robberies:
    [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00131.x](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00131.x)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Consequences: Fear of crime can negatively impact your life

    Leads to mistrust of others and change to your work, leisure, church, family activities as a result

    Leads to population turnover, move out of certain perceived “bad” neighborhoods, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy of bad school, bad parks, etc.

    Threatens economic viability of neighborhoods, when people move out, so do businesses, churches, banks, etc.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Additional Research on Public Beliefs about Crime and Punitiveness(31-34)

    2) Anger about Crime –

    Is anger higher than fear?

    More fear if younger, lower income and lower education

    What explanation can you offer for these facts? Think logically.

    3) Seriousness of Crime – will my opinion lead me to install alarms? cameras? Etc. at my home and business? Support this answer

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research Cont.: What the social science research says about perceptions ot …

    Punitiveness

    Public perception concerning judgment of appropriate punishment for convicted criminals.

    Americans are punitive in relation to crime and criminals

    Interactions between opinions and race: What is the significance of racial prejudice and resentment on harsher sentencing of offenders?

    Public policy in a democratic society should not be influenced by racial resentment – see democratic theory pg 19

    Support for the Death Penalty in murder cases

    Those likely to support the death penalty: Men, Caucasians, Older people, less educated individuals, Southerners, political conservatives – what does this mean?

    No empirical social science research supports deterrent effect of the death penalty – its purpose is vengeance and/or retaliation
    [There’s no evidence that death penalty is a deterrent against crime (theconversation.com)](https://theconversation.com/theres-no-evidence-that-death-penalty-is-a-deterrent-against-crime-43227#:~:text=A%20panel%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences,credible%20evidence%20that%20the%20death%20penalty%20deters%20homicides.)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    What social science research says about perceptions of …. (pg 34-36)

    Our Views about the Police

    In general, dis-satisfaction with police linked to our interactions with the police – we are happy with them until we interact wit them (1 in 20 people a year interact with police for crime or traffic problem):

    Those stopped by police for traffic violations (is this ever fair?) have less satisfaction with police

    Young people of color (often profiled and over-enforced; zero-tolerance policing in schools [school to prison pipeline], and stop and frisk)

    Those living in high-crime communities (over-policing or under-policing?)

    Review and summarize information in these two areas

    1) Criminal Injustice

    2) Criminal Justice Spending

    READ ABOUT THESE ISSUES AND BE PREPARED TO DESCRIBE THEM AND OFFER CURRENT CRITIQUE and CURRENT EXAMPLES

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Social Science note

    Keep in mind, the statements from the previous slides are empirical patterns observed from social research, police records, victimization surveys, etc.

    These patterns emerge from the review of a collection of experiences. Thus, individual personal experience might be different. However, public policy in our democratic society is created to provide the greatest good/benefit the greatness number of people (the principle of utilitarianism), so we need to know reliable patterns to understand, explain, predict and control …

    Note, a conflict theorist (check readings to remember this term) would argue that utilitarianism is to be understood with two additional words: government functions to ensure “the greatest good for the greatest number of people” – who count.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Key Takeaways

    In what ways was social science and social science research present in this chapter?

    Crime is a rare event, but the media makes it seem like a “real” event to us. Media reports often have little context to help us understand numbers and trends.

    Crime victimization is not equally occurring across race, gender, age, social status (more on this later in the semester)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    ## image1.jpeg

    **CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch1-pptx)

    **CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch1-pptx-10590651)

    **CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch2-pptx-10590649)

    **## CJEngl.docx**

    **Criminal Justice 300 words ( I attached the PowerPoints for this assignment)**

    Discussion Board Module 1 – Make connections between readings (CH 1-2) and modern society. 300 words

    Show your understanding of Ch 1, 2, the videos, and PowerPoint slides for this week make a connection from a term or theme to something from another class, a current event, or historical event (lets avoid personal experience for now). The point of this assignment is to demonstrate you learned something important from the class material this week.

    **English Assignments**

    **Annotated Biblio (Title: traumatic brain injuries in football)**

    This week's module will discuss the annotated bibliography. Annotated bibliographies describe, give publication information, and evaluate each work on a list of sources. Students will have a working annotated bibliography that will list four sources with an annotated summary.

    First, you are still working with the topic you chose from last week, You will be able to create an annotated bibliography based on research that you conducted. Along with creating an annotated bibliography, you will research using the library's databases, read and annotate scholarly sources, and evaluate journal articles.

    For this paper, you will construct an annotated bibliography that will provide the groundwork for the Research Paper–Report Essay. Many research papers begin with an annotated bibliography, which is a references page containing annotations.

    Remember, you are not writing the paper itself, and continue with the topic you choose from Week 1– Research topic Generator.

    **## CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx**

    Chapter 2

    Public Opinion, News Media and the Crime Problem

    (Publisher slides were used as the basis for this document, however, the information has been updated and includes information not in the book.)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Reminders

    These slides are like my lecture notes. I will not review every item from the readings. You cannot pass the class with the PP slides only. I will add information in addition to the book to the slides. You will be tested on this information.

    You should read and take notes on the book, and then review my slides for additional examples and new information related to the topic of the chapter.

    When you highlight information you identify it as important

    When you write information in your notes you start to remember it so you can apply it and evaluate it

    ALL INFORMATION in the textbook, the slides, and the videos is subject to Reading Quiz and Exam questions.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Introduction

    Crime is very real

    Individual experiences

    News media depictions

    TV/Movie portrayals (entertainment media; Forensic Files, etc.)

    Crime is actually a very rare event, it does not happen often (see crime rates and victimization reports).

    However, we study crime due to the terrible impact is has on people and society when it does happen, so we can try to prevent and control events and offenders

    We study crime through the format of social science so we can develop a logical pattern of events and behaviors rather than simply anecdotal personal experience, and then create public policy responses.

    Crime does not happen randomly in society. Ch 2-4 help us document this fact. For example, there are geographic crime hot spots, there are variations in victimization rates that are not random (look for age and gender examples in later chanters)

    It is important to recognize crime myths (cut and paste link into a browser)

    [Myths and Realities: Understanding Recent Trends in Violent Crime | Brennan Center for Justice](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/myths-and-realities-understanding-recent-trends-violent-crime)

    What did you learn from reviewing this material? This is a great short answer or extra credit question.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion About Crime: History is important to studying social phenomena
    (pg 19)

    Media, religious figures, and politicians have always said: There is too much crime, and they typically say that crime is increasing (is crime always rising?)

    Salem witch trials

    Mob violence (gangs and labor disputes) in the Northeast during the early 1800s

    The outlaws in the Old West

    High crime rates in the 1920s-30s

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion and Crime Policy

    Democratic theory (Dye; Saward)

    This theory proposes that public policy should reflect public opinion

    What is the flaw in this position? (hint: mob rule)

    What if laws reflect the view of the few – minority rule of politically powerful

    Public officials can be influenced by a small, powerful elite

    The Golden Rule – “those who have the gold make the rules”

    Search current information about marriage equality public opinion vs public policy and Abortion/choice public opinion vs policy

    What if we do the greatest good from the greatest number of “people who count”?

    Majority opinion may violate principles of fairness, equality, and justice

    Consider civil rights and marriage equality – this changed recently, will it change back?

    Public opinion is often inaccurate: 1) Is crime increasing, decreasing or stable? 2) Are children more likely to be victimized by strangers? 3) Do the elderly have the highest victimization rates?

    Answers: 1) crime decreasing in some areas and slight increases in others, with fairly stable in others (not a return to the highs of the 1990s); 2) non-strangers like family members are more likely to victimize children; 3) young, black males have higher victimization rates than the elderly

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Public Opinion and Crime (cont.)

    Personal Opinions about criminal justice stem from:

    News media and social media (memes)

    Politicians on websites, in speeches, on news shows

    May differ by a person's race, ethnicity, gender, age, nationality, religion, immigration status,

    May differ by personal experiences and experiences of friends

    We can use social science surveys to study public opinion – have you ever participated in an opinion survey?

    What can social science studies tell us about crime and victimization? Can public opinion studies reveal anti-democratic attitudes like racial prejudice, gender prejudice, anti-Jewish prejudices, etc.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Overdramatization of Crime (pg 20-23)

    Does the media depict crime accurately?

    Remember the crack baby crisis? Where are these children now? Typically, functioning the same as non-crack babies

    It is fetal alcohol syndrome babies that have more long-term deficiencies

    Search for information on opioid addicted babies

    Crime stories used because they capture viewers/readers attention

    Terrorism! We have more domestic terrorist events and prosecutions in the US each year than international terrorism events Check the Southern Poverty Law Center webpage)

    Do illegal immigrants commit more crime than native-born Americans? (NO! search in Google Scholar for research)

    Most dramatic crime in TV/movies is violent crime

    By contrast, most crime is property crime; crime – a way to generate income – theft, stolen cars, robbery, burglary, drug sales, prostitution, white color crime, etc.

    Inaccurate information creates flawed public policy.

    Will the drugs that come to the US from Mexico be prevented by the border wall? Or, are most of them coming through the ports, railroad lines, tunnels and trucking industries?

    KEY: Social Science based studies reflect more accurate understanding and explanation of crime as a basis for public policy.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Overdramatization of Crime: Media Driven Crime Waves

    When the media devotes much attention to small number of crimes

    Typically, about violence and drugs

    However, when crimes are counted, most common crimes are property crimes – crime is essentially an income generating activity (more in later chapters)

    Some stories are reflective of real problems – opioid drug epidemic – but this epidemic did not come out of no where and must be seen in an historical and cultural context

    What is the current “crime wave”? (check current events)

    Creates false impression that crime is rampant/common

    This discussion often occurs even when crime rate is falling

    Review Missing children information – stranger vs non-stranger

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Other Problems with media Coverage (pg 23-25)

    False beliefs about crime (start in chapter 2 and continue with chapters 3 and 4)

    People of Color: “Racial/Ethnic minorities are the typical offenders in all violent crime, property crime and drugs”

    All racial groups commit these crimes, minorities and males are overrepresented in arrest rates, but they are also overrepresented as victims

    Often the typical offender is a white male

    Youth commit all of the crime

    All of us do crime of some sort in our lives, typically, young people commit more crime than older people, but we typically age out of committing crime by 18 years old.

    Young people also have the highest victimization rates

    Virtuous victims (review this discussion in the book)

    What is this discussion about? Give current examples

    Expect a Reading Quiz question

    “Crime is rampant and overwhelmingly violent” – not what the data show – the typical crime is property crime – thus, crime is oncome generating activity (seel a service or turn a stolen item into cash.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Additional Problems in Media Coverage
    (pg 24, highlight box)

    Selecting people to interview based on reporter’s point of view

    Use of value-laden language

    Presenting misleading data

    Neglect of white-collar crime

    Lack of social/historical context

    Be able to explain each issue and why it is a problem and be able to provide examples

    Does Fox News interview the same crime experts as MSNBC?

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Effects of Media Coverage (pg 25-27)

    REVIEW: The media can provide misleading depictions of aspects of crime (amount of crime, type of crime, location of crime, prevalence of crime, types of victims, etc.)

    What impact is there on the public understanding of crime?

    Example: Violent crimes are overrepresented

    However, while most of us experience some type of violence in our lifetime, it is typically a simple assault and committed by a non-stranger

    Effects of Flawed Media Coverage

    Public ignorance about prevalence of crime victimization

    We are all victims at come point in our lives of violence crime and property crime – but not with great frequency and most often of a non-serious nature

    Public fear and concern about things that are not realistic

    Crime wave by illegal immigrants (research shows less delinquency than native born population)

    Obscuring underlying forces (historic and cultural)

    Drug war and opioid crisis have economic roots

    Diversion of our attention from white-collar crime

    Did people lose more money last year to their bank charging inappropriate fees or household burglary?

    Racial and ethnic stereotyping of typical offenders can fuel racial/ethnic tensions

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Not in the book: Who benefits from flawed news stories?

    J. Reiman (The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison) says that a distorted view of crime keeps citizens distracted from larger societal issues such as the impact of state crime, environmental crime, white collar crime, etc.

    Are you more worried about getting mugged walking to your car at night or being ripped off by bogus bank charge fees? A higher mortgage fee because of race/gender?

    See recent news stories on Wells Fargo fraud charges

    Reiman calls this distorted view of crime a carnival mirror. He argues that the Criminal Justice system is designed to fail. We are conditioned to worry more about the poor and black/brown people as criminal offenders rather than bankers and politicians.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: (pg 27-31):
    1a) Fear of Crime

    Crime is threatening

    Especially if done by strangers

    Crime can lead to physical and psychological injury

    Elderly victims are rationally fearful about losing money on a fixed income and physical injury that can result in loss of mobility and freedom to live alone

    According to the 2021 GSS, 36% of respondents report they are afraid to walk in their neighborhood alone at night

    We fear gun crime by strangers, but gun injuries are more likely to occur in the home with a legally obtained weapon, through anger or accident
    [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1559827610396294](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1559827610396294)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: 1b) Structural Factors & Fear of Crime

    Fear of crime is linked to various community characteristics

    Dilapidated living conditions of neighborhood

    Broken Windows Theory of social disorganization leading to neighborhood decline has been used to justify to zero tolerance policing and aggressive stop and frisk policies
    [Broken Windows Theory of Policing (Wilson &](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html) [Kelling](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html) [) (simplypsychology.org)](https://www.simplypsychology.org/broken-windows-theory.html)

    Proportion of people of color or another nationality living nearby

    The “other” is always feared, this is fueled by racial composition of neighborhoods and population trends of whites no longer majority population
    [Did The U.S. White Population Decline And Shrink? It's Complicated : NPR](https://www.npr.org/2021/08/22/1029609786/2020-census-data-results-white-population-shrinking-decline-non-hispanic-race) AND
    [Census: Whites no longer a majority in U.S. by 2043 – CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/census-whites-no-longer-a-majority-in-us-by-2043/)

    [Full article: Race and Ethnic Differences in Fear of Property, Personal, and Gang Victimization among People Involved in Crime: Testing the Effects of Perceived Neighborhood Characteristics (tandfonline.com)](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15564886.2020.1737611)

    Urban areas (see Figure 2.1)

    Crime rates are often higher in urban areas than in rural areas

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research on Public Beliefs: 1c) Individual Characteristics of Fear and Crime

    Higher fear of crime linked to demographic variables:

    Elderly more fear than younger people

    Females (Figure 2.2) more fear compared to males

    Race/ethnicity, especially among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to whites (Figure 2.3)

    INTERSECTIONALITY (see Ch 1, Figure 2.4) what should you remember?

    Income – lower income more fear

    Mixed results on link between prior victimization increasing fear of crime

    Victimization- termination link: Some drug offenders stop selling drugs after being the victim of robberies:
    [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00131.x](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00131.x)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Consequences: Fear of crime can negatively impact your life

    Leads to mistrust of others and change to your work, leisure, church, family activities as a result

    Leads to population turnover, move out of certain perceived “bad” neighborhoods, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy of bad school, bad parks, etc.

    Threatens economic viability of neighborhoods, when people move out, so do businesses, churches, banks, etc.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Additional Research on Public Beliefs about Crime and Punitiveness(31-34)

    2) Anger about Crime –

    Is anger higher than fear?

    More fear if younger, lower income and lower education

    What explanation can you offer for these facts? Think logically.

    3) Seriousness of Crime – will my opinion lead me to install alarms? cameras? Etc. at my home and business? Support this answer

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Research Cont.: What the social science research says about perceptions ot …

    Punitiveness

    Public perception concerning judgment of appropriate punishment for convicted criminals.

    Americans are punitive in relation to crime and criminals

    Interactions between opinions and race: What is the significance of racial prejudice and resentment on harsher sentencing of offenders?

    Public policy in a democratic society should not be influenced by racial resentment – see democratic theory pg 19

    Support for the Death Penalty in murder cases

    Those likely to support the death penalty: Men, Caucasians, Older people, less educated individuals, Southerners, political conservatives – what does this mean?

    No empirical social science research supports deterrent effect of the death penalty – its purpose is vengeance and/or retaliation
    [There’s no evidence that death penalty is a deterrent against crime (theconversation.com)](https://theconversation.com/theres-no-evidence-that-death-penalty-is-a-deterrent-against-crime-43227#:~:text=A%20panel%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences,credible%20evidence%20that%20the%20death%20penalty%20deters%20homicides.)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    What social science research says about perceptions of …. (pg 34-36)

    Our Views about the Police

    In general, dis-satisfaction with police linked to our interactions with the police – we are happy with them until we interact wit them (1 in 20 people a year interact with police for crime or traffic problem):

    Those stopped by police for traffic violations (is this ever fair?) have less satisfaction with police

    Young people of color (often profiled and over-enforced; zero-tolerance policing in schools [school to prison pipeline], and stop and frisk)

    Those living in high-crime communities (over-policing or under-policing?)

    Review and summarize information in these two areas

    1) Criminal Injustice

    2) Criminal Justice Spending

    READ ABOUT THESE ISSUES AND BE PREPARED TO DESCRIBE THEM AND OFFER CURRENT CRITIQUE and CURRENT EXAMPLES

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Social Science note

    Keep in mind, the statements from the previous slides are empirical patterns observed from social research, police records, victimization surveys, etc.

    These patterns emerge from the review of a collection of experiences. Thus, individual personal experience might be different. However, public policy in our democratic society is created to provide the greatest good/benefit the greatness number of people (the principle of utilitarianism), so we need to know reliable patterns to understand, explain, predict and control …

    Note, a conflict theorist (check readings to remember this term) would argue that utilitarianism is to be understood with two additional words: government functions to ensure “the greatest good for the greatest number of people” – who count.

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    Key Takeaways

    In what ways was social science and social science research present in this chapter?

    Crime is a rare event, but the media makes it seem like a “real” event to us. Media reports often have little context to help us understand numbers and trends.

    Crime victimization is not equally occurring across race, gender, age, social status (more on this later in the semester)

    Copyright © 2018, 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc.

    All Rights Reserved

    ## image1.jpeg

    **CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch1-pptx)

    **CRJC210BarkanCh1.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch1-pptx-10590651)

    **CRJC210BarkanCh2.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/crjc210barkanch2-pptx-10590649)

  • [Solved] Religion HW

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## REL12026.docx **## REL12026.docx** REL 1 Part1 **Question 1** Initial posts: Identify and explain a significant element in Dei Verbum corresponding to one of its 6 chapters. Connect this idea to another element in the text from another chapter. Choose two elements not chosen by an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## REL12026.docx

    **## REL12026.docx**

    REL 1

    Part1

    **Question 1**

    Initial posts: Identify and explain a significant element in Dei Verbum corresponding to one of its 6 chapters. Connect this idea to another element in the text from another chapter. Choose two elements not chosen by another peer.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by connecting one of the elements presented in the initial post with a different element from either Verbum Domini or the Reading Guide material for the module. Be sure to give some explanation and context for the element of your choosing.

    **Question 2**

    Initial posts: Describe the presentation of one of the of the following topics found in our selections of Verbum Domini: sacred tradition, the life of the Church in authentic interpretation of scriptures, faith and reason, or the relationship between the Old and New Testaments. Explain how this information you have presented relates to another section of the selections.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by clarifying how the topic of the initial post can be enhanced by an element from either Dei Verbum or the Reading Guide. Be sure to give some explanation and context for the element of your choosing.

    **Question 3**

    Initial posts: Choose a topic from the selections of the Reading Guide to explain. Topics can include a section of the methods of interpretation, Scripture as/and tradition, or archeology. Explain how the section you selected fits within the larger section of the Reading Guide.

    Part 2

    This discussion board will allow us to begin combining the perspectives we have been gaining from church documents, such as Dei Verbum and Verbum Domini, and the scholarly material in the Reading Guides with the text of the Bible itself.

    Materials for this discussion board include an introduction to the Pentateuch as well as the Reading Guide's introduction to major themes present in Genesis 1-11. Genesis 1-11 contains creation, the fall of humanity, the increase of violence, the flood, the story of Noah's family, and the story of the Tower of Babel. These narratives, when viewed together, give us elements necessary to understanding the rest of the Bible.

    **Question 1**

    Initial posts: Select an element from the Reading Guide module assignment which you think will be important to your reading of the biblical text either this module or in the modules to come. Explain in light of the information provided in the readings of either this module or the prior module.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by enhancing the justification of importance found in the initial post with different information found in the Reading Guide information from this module or the reading materials of the prior module.

    **Question 2**

    Initial posts: Identify a narrative section in Genesis 1-11 which effectively portrays a central feature of the Bible's understanding of either human nature or human activity. Explain how this idea fits with another element of the non-scriptural reading materials for the course.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by comparing or contrasting the selected narrative with another narrative from Genesis 1-11. Support your ideas with at least one reference to non-scriptural material from the course.

    **Question 3**

    Initial posts: Identify a section of Genesis 1-11 which portrays God's words or actions in response to human activity. Explain how the chosen selection seems to fit with any element presented in the other reading materials for the module.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by comparing or contrasting the initial post's selection with a different element from Genesis 1-11. Explain carefully how and why you see either harmony or distinction between your example and that chosen by the initial poster.

    **## REL12026.docx**

    REL 1

    Part1

    **Question 1**

    Initial posts: Identify and explain a significant element in Dei Verbum corresponding to one of its 6 chapters. Connect this idea to another element in the text from another chapter. Choose two elements not chosen by another peer.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by connecting one of the elements presented in the initial post with a different element from either Verbum Domini or the Reading Guide material for the module. Be sure to give some explanation and context for the element of your choosing.

    **Question 2**

    Initial posts: Describe the presentation of one of the of the following topics found in our selections of Verbum Domini: sacred tradition, the life of the Church in authentic interpretation of scriptures, faith and reason, or the relationship between the Old and New Testaments. Explain how this information you have presented relates to another section of the selections.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by clarifying how the topic of the initial post can be enhanced by an element from either Dei Verbum or the Reading Guide. Be sure to give some explanation and context for the element of your choosing.

    **Question 3**

    Initial posts: Choose a topic from the selections of the Reading Guide to explain. Topics can include a section of the methods of interpretation, Scripture as/and tradition, or archeology. Explain how the section you selected fits within the larger section of the Reading Guide.

    Part 2

    This discussion board will allow us to begin combining the perspectives we have been gaining from church documents, such as Dei Verbum and Verbum Domini, and the scholarly material in the Reading Guides with the text of the Bible itself.

    Materials for this discussion board include an introduction to the Pentateuch as well as the Reading Guide's introduction to major themes present in Genesis 1-11. Genesis 1-11 contains creation, the fall of humanity, the increase of violence, the flood, the story of Noah's family, and the story of the Tower of Babel. These narratives, when viewed together, give us elements necessary to understanding the rest of the Bible.

    **Question 1**

    Initial posts: Select an element from the Reading Guide module assignment which you think will be important to your reading of the biblical text either this module or in the modules to come. Explain in light of the information provided in the readings of either this module or the prior module.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by enhancing the justification of importance found in the initial post with different information found in the Reading Guide information from this module or the reading materials of the prior module.

    **Question 2**

    Initial posts: Identify a narrative section in Genesis 1-11 which effectively portrays a central feature of the Bible's understanding of either human nature or human activity. Explain how this idea fits with another element of the non-scriptural reading materials for the course.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by comparing or contrasting the selected narrative with another narrative from Genesis 1-11. Support your ideas with at least one reference to non-scriptural material from the course.

    **Question 3**

    Initial posts: Identify a section of Genesis 1-11 which portrays God's words or actions in response to human activity. Explain how the chosen selection seems to fit with any element presented in the other reading materials for the module.

    · Response posts: Build on the work of the initial post by comparing or contrasting the initial post's selection with a different element from Genesis 1-11. Explain carefully how and why you see either harmony or distinction between your example and that chosen by the initial poster.