Tag: Civil Engineering

  • [Solved] Finite Element Software Report based on the dynamic explicit analysis performed on a truss bridge, using Abaqus

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## question.pdf **## question.pdf** Learning Outcomes of the Assessment LO2: Evaluate different material models and element types to approximate the behaviour of different materials and structures. LO4: Apply commercial Finite Element Analysis software for linear and nonlinear analysis of structur…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## question.pdf

    **## question.pdf**

    Learning Outcomes of the Assessment

    LO2: Evaluate different material models and element types to approximate the behaviour of

    different materials and structures.

    LO4: Apply commercial Finite Element Analysis software for linear and nonlinear analysis of

    structures.

    LO5: Critically apply elastoplastic constitutive models.

    Assessment guidelines

    Produce a 2000-word +/- 10% (excluding references and appendices) Finite Element Software

    Report based on the dynamic explicit analysis performed on the truss bridge below, using

    Abaqus/Explicit. The truss in the figure below is a 2D structure, which is dynamically loaded with

    the concentrated forces shown during a 1 second loading step time, and 10 seconds total duration

    with 9 increments. The selection of all material parameters, such as Young’s Modulus, Poisson’s

    ratio, loading steps and types, applied boundary conditions etc., has been performed. The structural

    material for the truss system is AISI 1005 (UNSG10050) carbon steel, Young’s Modulus of

    200E+9, Poisson’s Ratio of 0.3, Density of 7872kg/m3, Specified minimum yield strength of

    280MPa, Ultimate tensile strength of 310 MPa and a cross-sectional thickness of 3.14E-4 m. The

    span of the truss is 60 m and a height of 10 m. Each section is reinforced as indicated, below.

    Your report should be structured in line with the assessment need as follows.

    (1) An introduction and essential background to the Dynamic Explicit analysis and the key

    structural characteristics of the given truss bridge, and a clear definition of the objectives of

    the assignment.

    (2) Based on the course material for week 7, produce a clear outline and description of the

    procedure you would have followed to create and model the above structure in Abaqus.

    (3) Provide a detailed deductive report based on the resulting assembly of the truss structure

    created on the Abaqus software with the concentrated loads, nodes and edges provided below

    (Figures 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8). Support your position with relevant literature. The units of

    the measured variables are as followed: Stress (Pa), Deformation (m), Force (N)

    Figure 1. Forces

    Figure 2. Vertical Reaction Forces

    NN N

    N N

    Figure 3. Horizontal Reaction Forces

    Figure 4. Deformation – Resultant (Cross-sectional thickness: 3.14E-4)

    Figure 5. Principal Stresses in S11 Direction (Cross-sectional thickness: 3.14E-4)

    The edges around the highest deformation area (2,3 and 13) are plotted below. If the acceptable

    maximum strain is 40%, what is your judgement of the selected material?

    Figure 6. Deformation – Resultant (Edge 2)

    N N

    Figure 7. Deformation – Resultant (Edge 3)

    Figure 8. Deformation – Resultant (Edge 13)

    (4) Based on the stress information provided in this brief and the results so far, justify and

    explain why the material selected for the construction for the truss is fit for purpose or not.

    The adopted safety factor for the design is 0.75.

    (5) Explain the difference between the plots for edges 1_9, and edges 10_14. Is the structure

    stable under the condition of edges 1_9, and edges 10_14? Provide detailed explanation and

    supported with relevant literature.

    Figure 9.Combined Deformation – Resultant (Edges 1-9 and 10-14)

    (6) Based on the contour map in Figure 5, extract relevant results of stress and deformation from

    any 5 nodes and 5 edges in a tabular form.

    (7) If the cross-sectional area of the truss material is increased to 5.0E-3, what difference will it

    make in the design life of the truss bridge when compared with the original design cross-

    sectional thickness of 3.14E-4 above. Outside stress and deformation, equally consider cost

    of the material in your analysis.

    Figure 10. Deformation – Resultant (Cross-sectional thickness: 5.0E-3)

    Figure 11. Principal Stresses in S11 Direction (Cross-sectional thickness: 5.0E-3)

    (8) Provide critical discussion and interpretation of the results, and comments regarding whether

    the structure is strong enough to withstand the applied loads.

    (9) Design/structural improvements that could be made so that the bridge can withstand greater

    loads of longer duration.

    Your assignment should be structured as follows

    Section/Aspect Content to cover
    Marks

    available

    Introduction

    1. Provision an essential background to the Dynamic

    Explicit analysis and the key structural characteristics

    of the given truss bridge. Clear definition of the

    objectives of the assignment.

    10

    Main Body:

    Discussion and

    Critical Analysis

    2. Based on the course material for week 7, produce a

    clear outline and description of the procedure followed

    to create and model the above structure in Abaqus.

    3. Provide a detailed deductive report based on the

    resulting assembly of the truss structure created on the

    Abaqus software with the concentrated loads, nodes

    and edges provided below (Figures 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,

    and 8). Support your position with relevant literature.

    4. Based on the stress information provided in this brief

    and the results so far, justify and explain why the

    material selected for the construction for the truss is fit

    for purpose or not. The adopted safety factor for the

    design is 0.75.

    5. Explain the difference between the plots for edges 1_9,

    and edges 10_14. Is the structure stable under the

    condition of edges 1_9, and edges 10_14? Provide

    detailed explanation and supported with relevant

    literature.

    6. Based on the contour map in Figure 5, extract relevant

    results of stress and deformation from the any 5 nodes

    and 5 edges in a tabular form. Justify your choice.

    7. If the cross-sectional area of the truss material is

    increased to 5.0E-3, what difference will it make in the

    design life of the truss bridge when compared with the

    original design cross-sectional thickness of 3.14E-4

    above. Outside stress and deformation, equally

    consider cost of the material in your analysis.

    70

    8. Provide critical discussion and interpretation of the

    results, and comments regarding whether the structure

    is strong enough to withstand the applied loads.

    9. Design/structural improvements that could be made so

    that the bridge can withstand greater loads of longer

    duration.

    Conclusion

    Effective summary of the critical points addressed in
    the assignment, and the most important findings of the
    discussion. You recommendation should be action-
    driven, with emphasis on cost and design life
    implications.

    10

    Layout and

    Referencing (list of
    references can take as

    many pages as

    necessary/not
    included in the 2000-

    word count)

    A high-quality presentation that conforms to principles
    of academic writing and contains minimal errors in
    sentence construction, grammar, and punctuation.

    The assignment should follow appropriate academic
    conventions regarding in-text citations and references
    using the Harvard referencing system.

    10

    Total: 2000 words 100

    **## question.pdf**

    Learning Outcomes of the Assessment

    LO2: Evaluate different material models and element types to approximate the behaviour of

    different materials and structures.

    LO4: Apply commercial Finite Element Analysis software for linear and nonlinear analysis of

    structures.

    LO5: Critically apply elastoplastic constitutive models.

    Assessment guidelines

    Produce a 2000-word +/- 10% (excluding references and appendices) Finite Element Software

    Report based on the dynamic explicit analysis performed on the truss bridge below, using

    Abaqus/Explicit. The truss in the figure below is a 2D structure, which is dynamically loaded with

    the concentrated forces shown during a 1 second loading step time, and 10 seconds total duration

    with 9 increments. The selection of all material parameters, such as Young’s Modulus, Poisson’s

    ratio, loading steps and types, applied boundary conditions etc., has been performed. The structural

    material for the truss system is AISI 1005 (UNSG10050) carbon steel, Young’s Modulus of

    200E+9, Poisson’s Ratio of 0.3, Density of 7872kg/m3, Specified minimum yield strength of

    280MPa, Ultimate tensile strength of 310 MPa and a cross-sectional thickness of 3.14E-4 m. The

    span of the truss is 60 m and a height of 10 m. Each section is reinforced as indicated, below.

    Your report should be structured in line with the assessment need as follows.

    (1) An introduction and essential background to the Dynamic Explicit analysis and the key

    structural characteristics of the given truss bridge, and a clear definition of the objectives of

    the assignment.

    (2) Based on the course material for week 7, produce a clear outline and description of the

    procedure you would have followed to create and model the above structure in Abaqus.

    (3) Provide a detailed deductive report based on the resulting assembly of the truss structure

    created on the Abaqus software with the concentrated loads, nodes and edges provided below

    (Figures 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8). Support your position with relevant literature. The units of

    the measured variables are as followed: Stress (Pa), Deformation (m), Force (N)

    Figure 1. Forces

    Figure 2. Vertical Reaction Forces

    NN N

    N N

    Figure 3. Horizontal Reaction Forces

    Figure 4. Deformation – Resultant (Cross-sectional thickness: 3.14E-4)

    Figure 5. Principal Stresses in S11 Direction (Cross-sectional thickness: 3.14E-4)

    The edges around the highest deformation area (2,3 and 13) are plotted below. If the acceptable

    maximum strain is 40%, what is your judgement of the selected material?

    Figure 6. Deformation – Resultant (Edge 2)

    N N

    Figure 7. Deformation – Resultant (Edge 3)

    Figure 8. Deformation – Resultant (Edge 13)

    (4) Based on the stress information provided in this brief and the results so far, justify and

    explain why the material selected for the construction for the truss is fit for purpose or not.

    The adopted safety factor for the design is 0.75.

    (5) Explain the difference between the plots for edges 1_9, and edges 10_14. Is the structure

    stable under the condition of edges 1_9, and edges 10_14? Provide detailed explanation and

    supported with relevant literature.

    Figure 9.Combined Deformation – Resultant (Edges 1-9 and 10-14)

    (6) Based on the contour map in Figure 5, extract relevant results of stress and deformation from

    any 5 nodes and 5 edges in a tabular form.

    (7) If the cross-sectional area of the truss material is increased to 5.0E-3, what difference will it

    make in the design life of the truss bridge when compared with the original design cross-

    sectional thickness of 3.14E-4 above. Outside stress and deformation, equally consider cost

    of the material in your analysis.

    Figure 10. Deformation – Resultant (Cross-sectional thickness: 5.0E-3)

    Figure 11. Principal Stresses in S11 Direction (Cross-sectional thickness: 5.0E-3)

    (8) Provide critical discussion and interpretation of the results, and comments regarding whether

    the structure is strong enough to withstand the applied loads.

    (9) Design/structural improvements that could be made so that the bridge can withstand greater

    loads of longer duration.

    Your assignment should be structured as follows

    Section/Aspect Content to cover
    Marks

    available

    Introduction

    1. Provision an essential background to the Dynamic

    Explicit analysis and the key structural characteristics

    of the given truss bridge. Clear definition of the

    objectives of the assignment.

    10

    Main Body:

    Discussion and

    Critical Analysis

    2. Based on the course material for week 7, produce a

    clear outline and description of the procedure followed

    to create and model the above structure in Abaqus.

    3. Provide a detailed deductive report based on the

    resulting assembly of the truss structure created on the

    Abaqus software with the concentrated loads, nodes

    and edges provided below (Figures 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,

    and 8). Support your position with relevant literature.

    4. Based on the stress information provided in this brief

    and the results so far, justify and explain why the

    material selected for the construction for the truss is fit

    for purpose or not. The adopted safety factor for the

    design is 0.75.

    5. Explain the difference between the plots for edges 1_9,

    and edges 10_14. Is the structure stable under the

    condition of edges 1_9, and edges 10_14? Provide

    detailed explanation and supported with relevant

    literature.

    6. Based on the contour map in Figure 5, extract relevant

    results of stress and deformation from the any 5 nodes

    and 5 edges in a tabular form. Justify your choice.

    7. If the cross-sectional area of the truss material is

    increased to 5.0E-3, what difference will it make in the

    design life of the truss bridge when compared with the

    original design cross-sectional thickness of 3.14E-4

    above. Outside stress and deformation, equally

    consider cost of the material in your analysis.

    70

    8. Provide critical discussion and interpretation of the

    results, and comments regarding whether the structure

    is strong enough to withstand the applied loads.

    9. Design/structural improvements that could be made so

    that the bridge can withstand greater loads of longer

    duration.

    Conclusion

    Effective summary of the critical points addressed in
    the assignment, and the most important findings of the
    discussion. You recommendation should be action-
    driven, with emphasis on cost and design life
    implications.

    10

    Layout and

    Referencing (list of
    references can take as

    many pages as

    necessary/not
    included in the 2000-

    word count)

    A high-quality presentation that conforms to principles
    of academic writing and contains minimal errors in
    sentence construction, grammar, and punctuation.

    The assignment should follow appropriate academic
    conventions regarding in-text citations and references
    using the Harvard referencing system.

    10

    Total: 2000 words 100