My Blog

Tag: Constitutional

  • [Solved] Article 4 Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) See two attachments – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx – Article4.pdf **## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx** Instructions · See ATTACHED ARTICLE to complete an article critique · 100% NO PLAIGIR…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    See two attachments

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx

    – Article4.pdf

    **## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx**

    Instructions

    · See ATTACHED ARTICLE to complete an article critique

    · 100% NO PLAIGIRISM

    · 2 Pages in length

    · APA format

    · Must contain the three parts below

    1. Summary: After completing the assigned readings ask yourself: What are the main arguments? What is the point this book/article/chapter is trying to make? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book/chapter is about, what would you say? If someone asked what are the topics in the subject/topic area that this article/book/chapter discussed, what would you say? Are there vague or sweeping generalizations that aren't backed up with evidence? Are arguments very one-sided with no acknowledgment of other viewpoints?

    2. Assessment: After summarizing, it is helpful to evaluate/assess what was read. Reading materials are divided into logical presentation sections (i.e. a beginning,  a middle, and an end). Summarize the main points of the section(s) you evaluate as having the most relevant/important material. It might be helpful, the following questions are suggestions: What have you learned about the subject? What is(are) the issue(s)? Is there consensus/disagreement: in what areas, what about that consensus/disagreement? What areas are still being researched? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? Is the evidence based on a few studies or many? Does the author use a good mix of sources of information (primary and secondary)?

    3. Reflection: Once you've summarized and assessed, you need to ask how it fits in the class and/or your research interest. Was this source helpful in identifying issues? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic or the theory? Does the author offer sound reasons for reaching conclusions? How timely is the source? But be aware that some books/articles become dated when new research is available, but another source can be quite sound 50 or 100 years later.

    **Article4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article4-pdf-10181573)

    **Article4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article4-pdf-10181573)

    **## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx**

    Instructions

    · See ATTACHED ARTICLE to complete an article critique

    · 100% NO PLAIGIRISM

    · 2 Pages in length

    · APA format

    · Must contain the three parts below

    1. Summary: After completing the assigned readings ask yourself: What are the main arguments? What is the point this book/article/chapter is trying to make? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book/chapter is about, what would you say? If someone asked what are the topics in the subject/topic area that this article/book/chapter discussed, what would you say? Are there vague or sweeping generalizations that aren't backed up with evidence? Are arguments very one-sided with no acknowledgment of other viewpoints?

    2. Assessment: After summarizing, it is helpful to evaluate/assess what was read. Reading materials are divided into logical presentation sections (i.e. a beginning,  a middle, and an end). Summarize the main points of the section(s) you evaluate as having the most relevant/important material. It might be helpful, the following questions are suggestions: What have you learned about the subject? What is(are) the issue(s)? Is there consensus/disagreement: in what areas, what about that consensus/disagreement? What areas are still being researched? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? Is the evidence based on a few studies or many? Does the author use a good mix of sources of information (primary and secondary)?

    3. Reflection: Once you've summarized and assessed, you need to ask how it fits in the class and/or your research interest. Was this source helpful in identifying issues? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic or the theory? Does the author offer sound reasons for reaching conclusions? How timely is the source? But be aware that some books/articles become dated when new research is available, but another source can be quite sound 50 or 100 years later.

    **Article4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article4-pdf-10181573)

    **## ArticleCritiqueInstructions.docx**

    Instructions

    · See ATTACHED ARTICLE to complete an article critique

    · 100% NO PLAIGIRISM

    · 2 Pages in length

    · APA format

    · Must contain the three parts below

    1. Summary: After completing the assigned readings ask yourself: What are the main arguments? What is the point this book/article/chapter is trying to make? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book/chapter is about, what would you say? If someone asked what are the topics in the subject/topic area that this article/book/chapter discussed, what would you say? Are there vague or sweeping generalizations that aren't backed up with evidence? Are arguments very one-sided with no acknowledgment of other viewpoints?

    2. Assessment: After summarizing, it is helpful to evaluate/assess what was read. Reading materials are divided into logical presentation sections (i.e. a beginning,  a middle, and an end). Summarize the main points of the section(s) you evaluate as having the most relevant/important material. It might be helpful, the following questions are suggestions: What have you learned about the subject? What is(are) the issue(s)? Is there consensus/disagreement: in what areas, what about that consensus/disagreement? What areas are still being researched? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? Is the evidence based on a few studies or many? Does the author use a good mix of sources of information (primary and secondary)?

    3. Reflection: Once you've summarized and assessed, you need to ask how it fits in the class and/or your research interest. Was this source helpful in identifying issues? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic or the theory? Does the author offer sound reasons for reaching conclusions? How timely is the source? But be aware that some books/articles become dated when new research is available, but another source can be quite sound 50 or 100 years later.

    **Article4.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/article4-pdf-10181573)

  • [Solved] DB coll133

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) | | | | — | — | | | | | | | ![Turnitin™ enabled](https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/img/0/Dropbox.TurnItIn.infTIIEnabled.gif?v=20.25.1.19074)This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. | | | | | | – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | |
    | | |
    | ![Turnitin™ enabled](https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/img/0/Dropbox.TurnItIn.infTIIEnabled.gif?v=20.25.1.19074)This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. |
    | | |
    | |

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Law Module 2 – Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Module 2 – Assignment ## Module 2 – Assignment – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Module 2 – Assignment

    ## Module 2 – Assignment

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Jenkins 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **In today's world, there is a growing trend toward privatization of governmental services. What are some of the benefits and detriments of privatization? What is your position on privatization and why?** – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **In today's world, there is a growing trend toward privatization of governmental services. What are some of the benefits and detriments of privatization? What is your position on privatization and why?**

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] disaster plan pt2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) apa 7th edition format AI and Turnitin report – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    apa 7th edition format

    AI and Turnitin report

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) homework – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    homework

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Response 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## response2.docx **## response2.docx** 200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Ronnie Respond to the post and explain how Utilitarianism works differently than Ethical Egoism and if Ethical Egoism would result in a different conclusion if the adminis…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## response2.docx

    **## response2.docx**

    200 word response 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Ronnie

    Respond to the post and explain how Utilitarianism works differently than Ethical Egoism and if Ethical Egoism would result in a different conclusion if the administrative agency (DBPR)  is acting ethical or not in revoking the business license and liquor license under these facts.

    The ethical theory I selected is Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean. According to this theory, virtue lies between two vices, with extremes representing vice. Aristotle argued that any "extreme" is a vice, and virtue is found in the balance between excess and deficiency. Essentially, we should strive to be virtuous by doing the right thing toward the right people in the right way. In Aristotle’s
    _Nicomachean Ethics_, Aristotle emphasized that there are no universal laws that apply to all situations, and we must approach each case individually. In the specific case of the DBPR revoking the business’s liquor license due to drag performances, the business could argue that the DBPR’s actions are excessive and an extreme response. From Aristotle’s perspective, the DBPR’s decision can be seen as restrictive and falls into the category of excess. Thus, under Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean, the DBPR’s decision seems unethical, as it represents an extreme and disproportionate punishment. Aristotle would likely advocate for a more balanced approach that respects the rights of the business while also considering the values of both the political leaders and the community.

    **## response2.docx**

    200 word response 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Ronnie

    Respond to the post and explain how Utilitarianism works differently than Ethical Egoism and if Ethical Egoism would result in a different conclusion if the administrative agency (DBPR)  is acting ethical or not in revoking the business license and liquor license under these facts.

    The ethical theory I selected is Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean. According to this theory, virtue lies between two vices, with extremes representing vice. Aristotle argued that any "extreme" is a vice, and virtue is found in the balance between excess and deficiency. Essentially, we should strive to be virtuous by doing the right thing toward the right people in the right way. In Aristotle’s
    _Nicomachean Ethics_, Aristotle emphasized that there are no universal laws that apply to all situations, and we must approach each case individually. In the specific case of the DBPR revoking the business’s liquor license due to drag performances, the business could argue that the DBPR’s actions are excessive and an extreme response. From Aristotle’s perspective, the DBPR’s decision can be seen as restrictive and falls into the category of excess. Thus, under Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean, the DBPR’s decision seems unethical, as it represents an extreme and disproportionate punishment. Aristotle would likely advocate for a more balanced approach that respects the rights of the business while also considering the values of both the political leaders and the community.

  • [Solved] Response 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## response1.docx **## response1.docx** 200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Hicks Respond to the post and explain how Utilitarianism works differently than Ethical Egoism and if Ethical Egoism would result in a different conclusion if the administ…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## response1.docx

    **## response1.docx**

    200 word response 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Hicks

    Respond to the post and explain how Utilitarianism works differently than Ethical Egoism and if Ethical Egoism would result in a different conclusion if the administrative agency (DBPR)  is acting ethical or not in revoking the business license and liquor license under these facts.

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that evaluates actions based on their consequences, emphasizing the greatest good for the greatest number (Mill, 1863). According to utilitarianism, an action is considered ethical if it maximizes overall happiness and minimizes harm. Act utilitarianism assesses each action’s direct impact, while rule utilitarianism considers whether the action aligns with rules that generally promote overall well-being. Applying utilitarianism to DBPR’s decision requires weighing the potential benefits and harms of revoking the business’s licenses.

    From DBPR’s perspective, the agency may argue that its actions serve the public interest by enforcing laws that maintain “decency” in entertainment, particularly in venues accessible to minors. By shutting down the business, DBPR might claim that it is upholding moral standards and responding to community concerns. Additionally, the state may justify the action as part of broader efforts to regulate businesses and ensure compliance with laws governing public performances. However, these potential benefits must be weighed against the extensive harm caused by DBPR’s actions.

    The revocation of the business’s licenses results in immediate economic harm, including job losses for employees and financial strain on the business owners. Additionally, this action sets a dangerous precedent for censorship of unpopular or minority expressions, creating a chilling effect on free speech. It disproportionately impacts LGBTQ+ communities, reinforcing social discrimination and marginalization. The enforcement also imposes legal costs on both the business and taxpayers, as Florida will likely face prolonged litigation, given that similar laws have already been struck down in federal court. Since DBPR’s action does not provide significant societal benefits and instead results in economic, social, and legal harm, the decision fails the utilitarian test. The negative consequences outweigh any perceived benefits, making DBPR’s actions unethical from a utilitarian perspective.

    Thus, applying utilitarianism, in my opinion, DBPR’s enforcement is morally unjustified, as it causes more harm than good. The revocation of business licenses suppresses free expression, undermines economic stability, and disproportionately harms marginalized communities without a compelling public benefit. The principle of maximizing happiness and minimizing harm suggests that allowing the business to operate freely would result in a greater overall benefit to society.

    **## response1.docx**

    200 word response 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Hicks

    Respond to the post and explain how Utilitarianism works differently than Ethical Egoism and if Ethical Egoism would result in a different conclusion if the administrative agency (DBPR)  is acting ethical or not in revoking the business license and liquor license under these facts.

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that evaluates actions based on their consequences, emphasizing the greatest good for the greatest number (Mill, 1863). According to utilitarianism, an action is considered ethical if it maximizes overall happiness and minimizes harm. Act utilitarianism assesses each action’s direct impact, while rule utilitarianism considers whether the action aligns with rules that generally promote overall well-being. Applying utilitarianism to DBPR’s decision requires weighing the potential benefits and harms of revoking the business’s licenses.

    From DBPR’s perspective, the agency may argue that its actions serve the public interest by enforcing laws that maintain “decency” in entertainment, particularly in venues accessible to minors. By shutting down the business, DBPR might claim that it is upholding moral standards and responding to community concerns. Additionally, the state may justify the action as part of broader efforts to regulate businesses and ensure compliance with laws governing public performances. However, these potential benefits must be weighed against the extensive harm caused by DBPR’s actions.

    The revocation of the business’s licenses results in immediate economic harm, including job losses for employees and financial strain on the business owners. Additionally, this action sets a dangerous precedent for censorship of unpopular or minority expressions, creating a chilling effect on free speech. It disproportionately impacts LGBTQ+ communities, reinforcing social discrimination and marginalization. The enforcement also imposes legal costs on both the business and taxpayers, as Florida will likely face prolonged litigation, given that similar laws have already been struck down in federal court. Since DBPR’s action does not provide significant societal benefits and instead results in economic, social, and legal harm, the decision fails the utilitarian test. The negative consequences outweigh any perceived benefits, making DBPR’s actions unethical from a utilitarian perspective.

    Thus, applying utilitarianism, in my opinion, DBPR’s enforcement is morally unjustified, as it causes more harm than good. The revocation of business licenses suppresses free expression, undermines economic stability, and disproportionately harms marginalized communities without a compelling public benefit. The principle of maximizing happiness and minimizing harm suggests that allowing the business to operate freely would result in a greater overall benefit to society.

  • [Solved] American Court system

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **Module 2 Activity 3: Cruel and Unusual?** **Research** Go back to the cruel and unusual definition wiki that you completed with your classmates. Look through the definitions and find the one with the most "same" comments tha…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **Module 2 Activity 3: Cruel and Unusual?**

    **Research**

    Go back to the cruel and unusual definition wiki that you completed with your classmates.  Look through the definitions and find the one with the most "same" comments that resonates most with your own perspective.  This might be the definition that you wrote and it might not be!

    **Written Discussion**

    Begin your discussion by identifying the definition that you will be applying to the hypothetical situation.  Then, read the hypothetical below and answer the questions.

    _Hypothetical_

    Christopher, a high school junior who was almost 18 (a legal adult) told two of his friends, aged 15 and 16, that he wanted to murder someone. He had a plan. Christopher would break into Shirley’s home, tie her up, and throw her off a bridge. His two friends weren’t sure, but they decided to help Christopher when he told them they could “get away with it” because they were minors. The three boys met at 2:00 a.m. on the night of the murder, but Christopher’s 16-year-old friend was nervous and backed out. Christopher and his 15-year-old friend went to commit the crime they’d planned. The pair entered Shirley’s home through an open window, waking her up. While she turned on a hallway light and asked “Who’s there?” Christopher went down the hall and entered Shirley’s bedroom. He recognized her from a car accident the two had been in, which he later admitted supported his decision to kill. The boys tied Shirley’s hands, covered her eyes, and drove her to a nearby bridge. They threw her into the river, where she drowned. Christopher was overheard bragging about the murder the next day at school where police arrested him. He waived [refused] his rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present. Christopher then admitted to the murder and agreed to reenact the crime on videotape. His first-degree murder trial occurred nine months later after he had turned 18. After hearing about the plan, Christopher’s bragging, and watching the videotaped reenactment, the jury quickly convicted him and recommended the death penalty. The judge agreed, and Christopher was sentenced to death.

    _Questions_

    1. What arguments would convince you that the punishment in this situation IS NOT cruel and unusual?

    2. What arguments would convince you that the punishment in this situation IS cruel and unusual?

    3. Using the definition you chose, how would you rule in this case?  Make sure to clearly identify how you used the definition to come to your decision.

    4. Is there anything about the details of this case that, if different, would change your ruling? Explain.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] American Court System

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Begin this discussion by reviewing some of the disciplinary actions found at this link: [https://www.floridabar.org/news_article_section/disciplinary-actions/Links to an external site.](https://www.floridabar.org/news_articl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Begin this discussion by reviewing some of the disciplinary actions found at this link: [https://www.floridabar.org/news_article_section/disciplinary-actions/Links to an external site.](https://www.floridabar.org/news_article_section/disciplinary-actions/).  You can choose any month to review.  Find one that you think sounds interesting and go to this link: [https://www.floridabar.org/directories/find-mbr/Links to an external site.](https://www.floridabar.org/directories/find-mbr/).  Type the name of the lawyer into the search database, and then open up that attorney's page.  You can then scroll down to "10-Year Discipline History" and find the documents for the disciplinary action under the case number ("Reference").  The Consent Judgment is a good place to start and has a lot of information about the case.

    – 2 years ago