Executive Solution Overview
– 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## 5DOWNLOAD-EXCELRESEARCHTRACKER2024-2025.xlsx – ## HW-EXCELResearchTrackerW.5.docx – ## 3OPENANDUSE-NavigatingResearchArticles-2024.pdf **## 5DOWNLOAD-EXCELRESEARCHTRACKER2024-2025.xlsx** ## Sheet1 | | | | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | …
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (3)**
– ## 5DOWNLOAD-EXCELRESEARCHTRACKER2024-2025.xlsx
– ## HW-EXCELResearchTrackerW.5.docx
– ## 3OPENANDUSE-NavigatingResearchArticles-2024.pdf
**## 5DOWNLOAD-EXCELRESEARCHTRACKER2024-2025.xlsx**
## Sheet1
| | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fill in your approved research question: What have researchers learned about __________________ and how to mitigate this ________________? |
| WHO | WHEN | WHERE | WHY | HOW Process | HOW Methodology | WHAT | RECOMMEND-ATIONS | ARTICLE DOI |
| Who conducted the research | What year was the research conducted (if lit. review, what years were used as criteria to select literature? (HINT: see HOW process column) | Where was the data collected (if lit. review, what locations were used as criteria to select articles? (HINT: see HOW process column) | Why was the research conducted (what did the researchers hope to learn?) (HINT: often starts with "in order to…") | Describe the process (like a cookbook recipe so it can be recreated): – for PRIMARY research (qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods) include who the participants were, how many, how were they selected, what kinds of questions were asked? – for SECONDARY research (lit. review and meta-analysis) include how they chose their articles (inclusion and exclusion criteria) | Name one of the 5 we learned (qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods, lit. review, or meta-analysis) | What the researchers learned – the results (tell this like a story) | What recommendations did the researchers make? (HINT: usually in discussion or conclusion sections) | (Hint: the DOI will always start with 10. Look in the upper left corner, in the margins, or at the end of the article for it.) |
**## HW-EXCELResearchTrackerW.5.docx**
HW: EXCEL Research Tracker (W. 5)
**Prep Task**
Complete the
**Prep Tasks** below:
**(1) CONFIRM** that you have completed the items below before you progress:
**I have** an
· APPROVED research question/topic
· and, APPROVED research articles (3) related to the above.
**(2) WATCH** the following video to learn how to TACTFULLY read a research article:
Click here –>
[How to Read a Research Article](https://monroecollege0.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/KG604/Shared%20Documents/General/Repository%20of%20Materials%20to%20Refresh%20Each%20Semester/Week%206%20-%20References%20Page%20%26%20Navigating%20Research%20Articles%20for%20Points%20of%20the%20Objective%20Summary/youtu.be.url?csf=1&web=1&e=MjxqCw)
**(3) OPEN AND USE** the document below to help you navigate each research article you have:
**(3) OPEN AND USE – Navigating Research Articles – 2024.pdf**
**(4) REVIEW** the sample submission below to make sure yours looks similar prior to submission:
**(4) REVIEW – STUDENT SAMPLE – EXCEL TO FILL OUT 2024-2025 (1).xlsx**
**(5) DOWNLOAD** the EXCEL document below and proceed:
**(5) DOWNLOAD – EXCEL RESEARCH TRACKER 2024-2025.xlsx**
**Submission Task**
**Submission Tasks:**
**STEP 1:** For each article you have, complete a full row. Use the provided navigation resource above (#3) to help you find where the
required elements are presented in an article.
**STEP 2: SAVE AS an EXCEL (NOT a PDF)**
**STEP 3:** Submit the complete form here. (
_No title page needed_ for this assignment: excel document only)
**## 3OPENANDUSE-NavigatingResearchArticles-2024.pdf**
Navigating Research Articles
When summarizing research articles, students should identify the following elements that provide the reader with a high-level
understanding of the quality of research undergone in an article. This can help students decide if a research article is right for their
work.
Required Element Common Places to Look Common Indicator Words
Who (conducted the research)? – Top of an article, near the title
Why (was the study conducted
[purpose])?
– Abstract
– Introduction
– the purpose of the study…
– …in order to…
– …to understand…
– …to explore…
When (was data collected)? – Abstract
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
Not to be confused with the
publication year.
\*\*\* If secondary research was
conducted, look for the
researchers’ search parameters.
Did they only look at data within
a certain timeframe? ***
Where (was data collected)? – Abstract
– Introduction
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
Not to be confused with the
location of the publishing journal.
\*\*\* If secondary research was
conducted, look for the
researchers’ search parameters.
Did they only look at data from a
specific location? ***
How (data was collected [research
methodology + description)?
Brief mention may be found…
– Abstract
– Introduction
For description see…
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
\*\*\* Think of details about
participants – gender, age,
demographic. Was a survey used?
Were interviews done? Face-to-
face? Over the phone? Look for
tables with questions. ***
What (was found [findings/results])? Brief mention may be found…
– Abstract
For summary see…
– Findings
– Discussion
– Conclusion
– …it was found…
– …results indicate…
– …findings suggest…
Limitations (what did the researchers
identify as limitation [weakness] of the
study?)
– Methods
– Limitation
– Discussion
– Conclusion
…limitations to the study were…
…acknowledged the following
limitations to the study…
…a limitation to the study was…
Types of Methodology/Research Design Common Indicator Words/Themes to Look For
PRIMARY Research Methodologies/Designs
Qualitative – Participants/description of participants
– Interviews
– Questionnaire/open-ended
– Survey/open-ended
– Focus groups
– Seeing exact wording from participants’ responses
Quantitative – Participants/description of participants
– Survey/close-ended
– Questionnaire/close-ended
– Multiple Choice Survey
– Seeing percentages or numerical figures
– Likert scale
Mixed-Method This one is a combination of the above two. It is often conducted in
phases.
– First phase/stage/step (this is typically qualitative in nature)
– Second phase/stage/step (this is typically quantitative in nature)
– Coding words to quantify the frequency of mentions among participants
(Nvivo or other systems can do this, so researchers may make mention of a
program that helped them code)
– Likert Scale
SECONDARY Research Methodologies/Designs
Literature Review Literature reviews will not have their own participants to gather data
from; they use existing information from varying databases.
– Systematic literature review
– Names of databases included
– Keywords researchers used included
– Number of articles/studies used is indicated
PRIMARY OR SECONDARY Research
Methodologies/Designs
Meta-Analysis – Can include primary/secondary but uses significant statistical analysis to
identify trends among many similar types of studies
– Often studies trends over a period of time
**## 3OPENANDUSE-NavigatingResearchArticles-2024.pdf**
Navigating Research Articles
When summarizing research articles, students should identify the following elements that provide the reader with a high-level
understanding of the quality of research undergone in an article. This can help students decide if a research article is right for their
work.
Required Element Common Places to Look Common Indicator Words
Who (conducted the research)? – Top of an article, near the title
Why (was the study conducted
[purpose])?
– Abstract
– Introduction
– the purpose of the study…
– …in order to…
– …to understand…
– …to explore…
When (was data collected)? – Abstract
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
Not to be confused with the
publication year.
\*\*\* If secondary research was
conducted, look for the
researchers’ search parameters.
Did they only look at data within
a certain timeframe? ***
Where (was data collected)? – Abstract
– Introduction
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
Not to be confused with the
location of the publishing journal.
\*\*\* If secondary research was
conducted, look for the
researchers’ search parameters.
Did they only look at data from a
specific location? ***
How (data was collected [research
methodology + description)?
Brief mention may be found…
– Abstract
– Introduction
For description see…
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
\*\*\* Think of details about
participants – gender, age,
demographic. Was a survey used?
Were interviews done? Face-to-
face? Over the phone? Look for
tables with questions. ***
What (was found [findings/results])? Brief mention may be found…
– Abstract
For summary see…
– Findings
– Discussion
– Conclusion
– …it was found…
– …results indicate…
– …findings suggest…
Limitations (what did the researchers
identify as limitation [weakness] of the
study?)
– Methods
– Limitation
– Discussion
– Conclusion
…limitations to the study were…
…acknowledged the following
limitations to the study…
…a limitation to the study was…
Types of Methodology/Research Design Common Indicator Words/Themes to Look For
PRIMARY Research Methodologies/Designs
Qualitative – Participants/description of participants
– Interviews
– Questionnaire/open-ended
– Survey/open-ended
– Focus groups
– Seeing exact wording from participants’ responses
Quantitative – Participants/description of participants
– Survey/close-ended
– Questionnaire/close-ended
– Multiple Choice Survey
– Seeing percentages or numerical figures
– Likert scale
Mixed-Method This one is a combination of the above two. It is often conducted in
phases.
– First phase/stage/step (this is typically qualitative in nature)
– Second phase/stage/step (this is typically quantitative in nature)
– Coding words to quantify the frequency of mentions among participants
(Nvivo or other systems can do this, so researchers may make mention of a
program that helped them code)
– Likert Scale
SECONDARY Research Methodologies/Designs
Literature Review Literature reviews will not have their own participants to gather data
from; they use existing information from varying databases.
– Systematic literature review
– Names of databases included
– Keywords researchers used included
– Number of articles/studies used is indicated
PRIMARY OR SECONDARY Research
Methodologies/Designs
Meta-Analysis – Can include primary/secondary but uses significant statistical analysis to
identify trends among many similar types of studies
– Often studies trends over a period of time
**## 5DOWNLOAD-EXCELRESEARCHTRACKER2024-2025.xlsx**
## Sheet1
| | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fill in your approved research question: What have researchers learned about __________________ and how to mitigate this ________________? |
| WHO | WHEN | WHERE | WHY | HOW Process | HOW Methodology | WHAT | RECOMMEND-ATIONS | ARTICLE DOI |
| Who conducted the research | What year was the research conducted (if lit. review, what years were used as criteria to select literature? (HINT: see HOW process column) | Where was the data collected (if lit. review, what locations were used as criteria to select articles? (HINT: see HOW process column) | Why was the research conducted (what did the researchers hope to learn?) (HINT: often starts with "in order to…") | Describe the process (like a cookbook recipe so it can be recreated): – for PRIMARY research (qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods) include who the participants were, how many, how were they selected, what kinds of questions were asked? – for SECONDARY research (lit. review and meta-analysis) include how they chose their articles (inclusion and exclusion criteria) | Name one of the 5 we learned (qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods, lit. review, or meta-analysis) | What the researchers learned – the results (tell this like a story) | What recommendations did the researchers make? (HINT: usually in discussion or conclusion sections) | (Hint: the DOI will always start with 10. Look in the upper left corner, in the margins, or at the end of the article for it.) |
**## HW-EXCELResearchTrackerW.5.docx**
HW: EXCEL Research Tracker (W. 5)
**Prep Task**
Complete the
**Prep Tasks** below:
**(1) CONFIRM** that you have completed the items below before you progress:
**I have** an
· APPROVED research question/topic
· and, APPROVED research articles (3) related to the above.
**(2) WATCH** the following video to learn how to TACTFULLY read a research article:
Click here –>
[How to Read a Research Article](https://monroecollege0.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/KG604/Shared%20Documents/General/Repository%20of%20Materials%20to%20Refresh%20Each%20Semester/Week%206%20-%20References%20Page%20%26%20Navigating%20Research%20Articles%20for%20Points%20of%20the%20Objective%20Summary/youtu.be.url?csf=1&web=1&e=MjxqCw)
**(3) OPEN AND USE** the document below to help you navigate each research article you have:
**(3) OPEN AND USE – Navigating Research Articles – 2024.pdf**
**(4) REVIEW** the sample submission below to make sure yours looks similar prior to submission:
**(4) REVIEW – STUDENT SAMPLE – EXCEL TO FILL OUT 2024-2025 (1).xlsx**
**(5) DOWNLOAD** the EXCEL document below and proceed:
**(5) DOWNLOAD – EXCEL RESEARCH TRACKER 2024-2025.xlsx**
**Submission Task**
**Submission Tasks:**
**STEP 1:** For each article you have, complete a full row. Use the provided navigation resource above (#3) to help you find where the
required elements are presented in an article.
**STEP 2: SAVE AS an EXCEL (NOT a PDF)**
**STEP 3:** Submit the complete form here. (
_No title page needed_ for this assignment: excel document only)
**## 3OPENANDUSE-NavigatingResearchArticles-2024.pdf**
Navigating Research Articles
When summarizing research articles, students should identify the following elements that provide the reader with a high-level
understanding of the quality of research undergone in an article. This can help students decide if a research article is right for their
work.
Required Element Common Places to Look Common Indicator Words
Who (conducted the research)? – Top of an article, near the title
Why (was the study conducted
[purpose])?
– Abstract
– Introduction
– the purpose of the study…
– …in order to…
– …to understand…
– …to explore…
When (was data collected)? – Abstract
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
Not to be confused with the
publication year.
\*\*\* If secondary research was
conducted, look for the
researchers’ search parameters.
Did they only look at data within
a certain timeframe? ***
Where (was data collected)? – Abstract
– Introduction
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
Not to be confused with the
location of the publishing journal.
\*\*\* If secondary research was
conducted, look for the
researchers’ search parameters.
Did they only look at data from a
specific location? ***
How (data was collected [research
methodology + description)?
Brief mention may be found…
– Abstract
– Introduction
For description see…
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
\*\*\* Think of details about
participants – gender, age,
demographic. Was a survey used?
Were interviews done? Face-to-
face? Over the phone? Look for
tables with questions. ***
What (was found [findings/results])? Brief mention may be found…
– Abstract
For summary see…
– Findings
– Discussion
– Conclusion
– …it was found…
– …results indicate…
– …findings suggest…
Limitations (what did the researchers
identify as limitation [weakness] of the
study?)
– Methods
– Limitation
– Discussion
– Conclusion
…limitations to the study were…
…acknowledged the following
limitations to the study…
…a limitation to the study was…
Types of Methodology/Research Design Common Indicator Words/Themes to Look For
PRIMARY Research Methodologies/Designs
Qualitative – Participants/description of participants
– Interviews
– Questionnaire/open-ended
– Survey/open-ended
– Focus groups
– Seeing exact wording from participants’ responses
Quantitative – Participants/description of participants
– Survey/close-ended
– Questionnaire/close-ended
– Multiple Choice Survey
– Seeing percentages or numerical figures
– Likert scale
Mixed-Method This one is a combination of the above two. It is often conducted in
phases.
– First phase/stage/step (this is typically qualitative in nature)
– Second phase/stage/step (this is typically quantitative in nature)
– Coding words to quantify the frequency of mentions among participants
(Nvivo or other systems can do this, so researchers may make mention of a
program that helped them code)
– Likert Scale
SECONDARY Research Methodologies/Designs
Literature Review Literature reviews will not have their own participants to gather data
from; they use existing information from varying databases.
– Systematic literature review
– Names of databases included
– Keywords researchers used included
– Number of articles/studies used is indicated
PRIMARY OR SECONDARY Research
Methodologies/Designs
Meta-Analysis – Can include primary/secondary but uses significant statistical analysis to
identify trends among many similar types of studies
– Often studies trends over a period of time
**## 5DOWNLOAD-EXCELRESEARCHTRACKER2024-2025.xlsx**
## Sheet1
| | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fill in your approved research question: What have researchers learned about __________________ and how to mitigate this ________________? |
| WHO | WHEN | WHERE | WHY | HOW Process | HOW Methodology | WHAT | RECOMMEND-ATIONS | ARTICLE DOI |
| Who conducted the research | What year was the research conducted (if lit. review, what years were used as criteria to select literature? (HINT: see HOW process column) | Where was the data collected (if lit. review, what locations were used as criteria to select articles? (HINT: see HOW process column) | Why was the research conducted (what did the researchers hope to learn?) (HINT: often starts with "in order to…") | Describe the process (like a cookbook recipe so it can be recreated): – for PRIMARY research (qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods) include who the participants were, how many, how were they selected, what kinds of questions were asked? – for SECONDARY research (lit. review and meta-analysis) include how they chose their articles (inclusion and exclusion criteria) | Name one of the 5 we learned (qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods, lit. review, or meta-analysis) | What the researchers learned – the results (tell this like a story) | What recommendations did the researchers make? (HINT: usually in discussion or conclusion sections) | (Hint: the DOI will always start with 10. Look in the upper left corner, in the margins, or at the end of the article for it.) |
**## HW-EXCELResearchTrackerW.5.docx**
HW: EXCEL Research Tracker (W. 5)
**Prep Task**
Complete the
**Prep Tasks** below:
**(1) CONFIRM** that you have completed the items below before you progress:
**I have** an
· APPROVED research question/topic
· and, APPROVED research articles (3) related to the above.
**(2) WATCH** the following video to learn how to TACTFULLY read a research article:
Click here –>
[How to Read a Research Article](https://monroecollege0.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/KG604/Shared%20Documents/General/Repository%20of%20Materials%20to%20Refresh%20Each%20Semester/Week%206%20-%20References%20Page%20%26%20Navigating%20Research%20Articles%20for%20Points%20of%20the%20Objective%20Summary/youtu.be.url?csf=1&web=1&e=MjxqCw)
**(3) OPEN AND USE** the document below to help you navigate each research article you have:
**(3) OPEN AND USE – Navigating Research Articles – 2024.pdf**
**(4) REVIEW** the sample submission below to make sure yours looks similar prior to submission:
**(4) REVIEW – STUDENT SAMPLE – EXCEL TO FILL OUT 2024-2025 (1).xlsx**
**(5) DOWNLOAD** the EXCEL document below and proceed:
**(5) DOWNLOAD – EXCEL RESEARCH TRACKER 2024-2025.xlsx**
**Submission Task**
**Submission Tasks:**
**STEP 1:** For each article you have, complete a full row. Use the provided navigation resource above (#3) to help you find where the
required elements are presented in an article.
**STEP 2: SAVE AS an EXCEL (NOT a PDF)**
**STEP 3:** Submit the complete form here. (
_No title page needed_ for this assignment: excel document only)
**## 3OPENANDUSE-NavigatingResearchArticles-2024.pdf**
Navigating Research Articles
When summarizing research articles, students should identify the following elements that provide the reader with a high-level
understanding of the quality of research undergone in an article. This can help students decide if a research article is right for their
work.
Required Element Common Places to Look Common Indicator Words
Who (conducted the research)? – Top of an article, near the title
Why (was the study conducted
[purpose])?
– Abstract
– Introduction
– the purpose of the study…
– …in order to…
– …to understand…
– …to explore…
When (was data collected)? – Abstract
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
Not to be confused with the
publication year.
\*\*\* If secondary research was
conducted, look for the
researchers’ search parameters.
Did they only look at data within
a certain timeframe? ***
Where (was data collected)? – Abstract
– Introduction
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
Not to be confused with the
location of the publishing journal.
\*\*\* If secondary research was
conducted, look for the
researchers’ search parameters.
Did they only look at data from a
specific location? ***
How (data was collected [research
methodology + description)?
Brief mention may be found…
– Abstract
– Introduction
For description see…
– Methodology/Methods
– Data Collection
\*\*\* Think of details about
participants – gender, age,
demographic. Was a survey used?
Were interviews done? Face-to-
face? Over the phone? Look for
tables with questions. ***
What (was found [findings/results])? Brief mention may be found…
– Abstract
For summary see…
– Findings
– Discussion
– Conclusion
– …it was found…
– …results indicate…
– …findings suggest…
Limitations (what did the researchers
identify as limitation [weakness] of the
study?)
– Methods
– Limitation
– Discussion
– Conclusion
…limitations to the study were…
…acknowledged the following
limitations to the study…
…a limitation to the study was…
Types of Methodology/Research Design Common Indicator Words/Themes to Look For
PRIMARY Research Methodologies/Designs
Qualitative – Participants/description of participants
– Interviews
– Questionnaire/open-ended
– Survey/open-ended
– Focus groups
– Seeing exact wording from participants’ responses
Quantitative – Participants/description of participants
– Survey/close-ended
– Questionnaire/close-ended
– Multiple Choice Survey
– Seeing percentages or numerical figures
– Likert scale
Mixed-Method This one is a combination of the above two. It is often conducted in
phases.
– First phase/stage/step (this is typically qualitative in nature)
– Second phase/stage/step (this is typically quantitative in nature)
– Coding words to quantify the frequency of mentions among participants
(Nvivo or other systems can do this, so researchers may make mention of a
program that helped them code)
– Likert Scale
SECONDARY Research Methodologies/Designs
Literature Review Literature reviews will not have their own participants to gather data
from; they use existing information from varying databases.
– Systematic literature review
– Names of databases included
– Keywords researchers used included
– Number of articles/studies used is indicated
PRIMARY OR SECONDARY Research
Methodologies/Designs
Meta-Analysis – Can include primary/secondary but uses significant statistical analysis to
identify trends among many similar types of studies
– Often studies trends over a period of time
– 1
– 2
– 3