Assignment Prompt & Instructions
[>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)
## **Overview**
By exploring practical instances where businesses and teams have effectively utilized panel discussions, individuals will better understand how collaboration between different departments can be strengthened.
## **Instructions**
For each of the following statements, respond in 1—2 paragraphs:
1. Identify delegation techniques that are well-known.
2. Describe what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches.
3. Discuss how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions.
4. Describe examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation.
5. Include relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the [Library site](https://library.strayer.edu/sws) for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
**View Rubric** Week 7 Activity – Collaboration and Cross Functional Interaction **Week 7 Activity – Collaboration and Cross Functional InteractionCriteriaRatingsPts** Identify delegation techniques that are well-known. **7.5 to >6.74 ptsExemplary** Identified delegation techniques that are well-known. **6.74 to >5.99 ptsCompetent** Identified delegation techniques, but the delegation techniques success are unclear. **5.99 to >5.24 ptsNeeds Improvement** Identified delegation techniques, but the delegation techniques are not well known. **5.24 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not identify delegation techniques that are well-known./ 7.5 ptsDescribe what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches. **10 to >8.99 ptsExemplary** Described what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches. **8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetent** Described what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches, but the description is incomplete. **7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds Improvement** Described what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches, but the description is incorrect. **6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not describe what can be learned or gained from delegation and team empowerment approaches./ 10 ptsDiscuss how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions. **10 to >8.99 ptsExemplary** Discussed how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions. **8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetent** Discussed how delegation can be used to encourage team members’ collaboration and cross-functional interactions, but the discussion is incomplete. **7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds Improvement** Discussed how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions, but the discussion is incorrect. **6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not discuss how delegation can be used to encourage team members' collaboration and cross-functional interactions./ 10 ptsDescribe examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation. **10 to >8.99 ptsExemplary** Described examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation. **8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetent** Described examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation, but the description is incomplete. **7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds Improvement** Described examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation, but the description lacks clarity. **6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not describe examples of businesses or teams that have used panels to improve interdepartmental cooperation./ 10 ptsInclude relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points. **7.5 to >6.74 ptsExemplary** Identified relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points. **6.74 to >5.99 ptsCompetent** Identified relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points, but not all of the sources support your point. **5.99 to >5.24 ptsNeeds Improvement** Identified relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points, but the sources do not support your points. **5.24 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Did not identify relevant sources that give actual evidence, case studies, expert opinions, or theoretical frameworks to support each of your points./ 7.5 ptsWriting is clear, includes appropriate writing mechanics, and follows SWS formatting requirements. **5 to >4.49 ptsExemplary** Writing has very few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; few fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 0–2 errors present. **4.49 to >3.99 ptsCompetent** Writing has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that are distracting in a few places; few fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 3–4 errors present. **3.99 to >3.49 ptsNeeds Improvement** Writing has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that are distracting in some places. 5–6 errors present. **3.49 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Writing has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors, fragments, comma splices and run-ons that distract from the message. More than 6 errors present./ 5 ptsTotal Points: 0
– 2 years ago