Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Week 1 DB 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Economics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-economics) See attached – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Economics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-economics)

    See attached

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] violent behavior

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## SSC130_Essay.docx **## SSC130_Essay.docx** ## SSC130: Essay Your project must be submitted as a Word document (.docx, .doc). Your project will be individually graded by your instructor and therefore may take up to five to seven days to grade. Be sure that each of y…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## SSC130_Essay.docx

    **## SSC130_Essay.docx**

    ## SSC130: Essay

    Your project must be submitted as a Word document (.docx, .doc). Your project will be individually graded by your instructor and therefore may take up to five to seven days to grade.

    Be sure that each of your files contains the following information:

    · Your name

    · Your student ID number

    · The exam number (found on the lesson assignment upload page)

    To submit your graded project, proceed to the Graded Assignment page in this lesson. Follow the instructions provided to upload the file and submit it for grading.

    Be sure to keep a backup copy of any files you submit to the school!

    After your assignment has been graded, feedback will be available on the Graded Assignment page within the course. It will have an option to download the feedback from the instructor.

    ## **Objective**

    To successfully complete this course, you must write a research essay based on information found in your textbook,
    _Psychology and Your Life_, by Robert S. Feldman, and three outside sources. You'll choose one of the three topics below and write an essay of six complete paragraphs for or against the question being asked. After presenting both sides of the debate, you'll make three claims to support your thesis and convince the reader why your opinion is correct.

    ## **Topics**

    1. Media Violence: Does media violence cause violent behavior?

    2. Eyewitness Testimony: Is eyewitness testimony reliable in the court of law?

    3. The Opioid Epidemic: Are doctors who overprescribe narcotic pain medication causing the opioid epidemic?

    _Note:_ You’re to select only one topic for your paper.

    ## **Process**

    Your essay must include the following:

    1. A title page

    2. Introduction paragraph and thesis statement

    3. Topic background paragraph that presents both sides of the debate

    4. Body consisting of three claim paragraphs and supporting evidence

    5. Conclusion paragraph

    6. APA style reference page

    ## **The Title Page**

    The first page of your essay will be the title page. Provide the following information:

    · The title of your research essay

    · Your name and student ID

    · “SSC130: Essentials of Psychology”

    · Exam number

    · “Penn Foster College”

    · Current date

    ## **Formatting**

    Format your essay following American Psychological Association (APA) style using 12 pt. Times New Roman font. Set your paragraph line spacing to 2.0, double-spacing. Use 1 inch margins. Include a header with a shortened title in ALL CAPS on the left and the page number on the right. In-text citations and the reference page must be in APA style. On this page list websites, journals, and all other references used in preparing the submission. Also include a cover page and in-text citations. For assistance with this project and APA in-text citations and references, please see the
    [Biology page in the Penn Foster Virtual Library](http://pflibrary.pennfoster.edu/c.php?g=589955).

    Remember that grammar counts! Be sure to reread, revise and proofread your essay for polished English grammar, spelling, capitalization, spacing, and mechanics.

    ## **Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **SSC130: Essentials of Psychology**<br>**Research Essay Evaluation** |
    | Name:<br>Student ID: | A | B | C | F |
    | CONTENT<br>• The student clearly stated his/her opinion on a chosen topic.<br>• The student used at least three different sources and listed these sources on an APA-style reference page.<br>• The student presented both sides of the debate.<br>• The student wrote three claims to support the thesis.<br>• The student cited evidence to support each claim. | 70–64 | 63–58 | 57–50 | 49–0 |
    | GRAMMAR, SENTENCES, and MECHANICS<br>• The student used correct grammar, spelling, mechanics, punctuation, and sentence structure.<br>• The student formed six complete paragraphs. | 15–13 | 12–11 | 10–9 | 8–0 |
    | FORMAT and LENGTH<br>• The student’s title page contains all the required information (title; name and student number; course title and number; exam number, and current date) and includes a header with page numbers.<br>• The student used Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced and 1-inch margins.<br>• The student included APA style in-text citations and a reference page. | 15–13 | 12–11 | 10–9 | 8–0 |

    **## SSC130_Essay.docx**

    ## SSC130: Essay

    Your project must be submitted as a Word document (.docx, .doc). Your project will be individually graded by your instructor and therefore may take up to five to seven days to grade.

    Be sure that each of your files contains the following information:

    · Your name

    · Your student ID number

    · The exam number (found on the lesson assignment upload page)

    To submit your graded project, proceed to the Graded Assignment page in this lesson. Follow the instructions provided to upload the file and submit it for grading.

    Be sure to keep a backup copy of any files you submit to the school!

    After your assignment has been graded, feedback will be available on the Graded Assignment page within the course. It will have an option to download the feedback from the instructor.

    ## **Objective**

    To successfully complete this course, you must write a research essay based on information found in your textbook,
    _Psychology and Your Life_, by Robert S. Feldman, and three outside sources. You'll choose one of the three topics below and write an essay of six complete paragraphs for or against the question being asked. After presenting both sides of the debate, you'll make three claims to support your thesis and convince the reader why your opinion is correct.

    ## **Topics**

    1. Media Violence: Does media violence cause violent behavior?

    2. Eyewitness Testimony: Is eyewitness testimony reliable in the court of law?

    3. The Opioid Epidemic: Are doctors who overprescribe narcotic pain medication causing the opioid epidemic?

    _Note:_ You’re to select only one topic for your paper.

    ## **Process**

    Your essay must include the following:

    1. A title page

    2. Introduction paragraph and thesis statement

    3. Topic background paragraph that presents both sides of the debate

    4. Body consisting of three claim paragraphs and supporting evidence

    5. Conclusion paragraph

    6. APA style reference page

    ## **The Title Page**

    The first page of your essay will be the title page. Provide the following information:

    · The title of your research essay

    · Your name and student ID

    · “SSC130: Essentials of Psychology”

    · Exam number

    · “Penn Foster College”

    · Current date

    ## **Formatting**

    Format your essay following American Psychological Association (APA) style using 12 pt. Times New Roman font. Set your paragraph line spacing to 2.0, double-spacing. Use 1 inch margins. Include a header with a shortened title in ALL CAPS on the left and the page number on the right. In-text citations and the reference page must be in APA style. On this page list websites, journals, and all other references used in preparing the submission. Also include a cover page and in-text citations. For assistance with this project and APA in-text citations and references, please see the
    [Biology page in the Penn Foster Virtual Library](http://pflibrary.pennfoster.edu/c.php?g=589955).

    Remember that grammar counts! Be sure to reread, revise and proofread your essay for polished English grammar, spelling, capitalization, spacing, and mechanics.

    ## **Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **SSC130: Essentials of Psychology**<br>**Research Essay Evaluation** |
    | Name:<br>Student ID: | A | B | C | F |
    | CONTENT<br>• The student clearly stated his/her opinion on a chosen topic.<br>• The student used at least three different sources and listed these sources on an APA-style reference page.<br>• The student presented both sides of the debate.<br>• The student wrote three claims to support the thesis.<br>• The student cited evidence to support each claim. | 70–64 | 63–58 | 57–50 | 49–0 |
    | GRAMMAR, SENTENCES, and MECHANICS<br>• The student used correct grammar, spelling, mechanics, punctuation, and sentence structure.<br>• The student formed six complete paragraphs. | 15–13 | 12–11 | 10–9 | 8–0 |
    | FORMAT and LENGTH<br>• The student’s title page contains all the required information (title; name and student number; course title and number; exam number, and current date) and includes a header with page numbers.<br>• The student used Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced and 1-inch margins.<br>• The student included APA style in-text citations and a reference page. | 15–13 | 12–11 | 10–9 | 8–0 |

  • [Solved] Time

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Time.pdf – ## TalkLess.pdf **## Time.pdf** Rocks, pebbles, sand: There’s very little extra time in education, particularly when so many other urgent and important items rise to the top of the agenda. After reviewing the examples provided, how would you approach this …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Time.pdf

    – ## TalkLess.pdf

    **## Time.pdf**

    Rocks, pebbles, sand:

    There’s very little extra time in education, particularly when so many other urgent and
    important items rise to the top of the agenda. After reviewing the examples provided,
    how would you approach this differently? What similar scenario have you observed in
    your setting?

    Submit a Word document with your answers.

    here is a short visual interpretation of the story.

    [http://www.youtube.com/embed/cPgMeKfQFq8](http://www.youtube.com/embed/cPgMeKfQFq8)

    **## TalkLess.pdf**

    Talk Less. Listen More. Here’s How.
    Lessons in the art of listening, from a C.I.A. agent, a focus group moderator and more.

    Jan. 9, 2020
    By Kate Murphy

    When was the last time you listened to someone? Really listened, without thinking
    about what you wanted to say next, glancing down at your phone or jumping in to offer
    your opinion? And when was the last time someone really listened to you? Was so
    attentive to what you were saying and whose response was so spot on that you felt truly
    understood?

    We are encouraged to listen to our hearts, our inner voices and our guts, but rarely are
    we encouraged to listen carefully and purposefully to other people. Instead, we talk over
    one another at cocktail parties, work meetings and even family dinners. Online and in
    person, it’s all about defining yourself, shaping the narrative and staying on message.

    And yet, listening can be more valuable than speaking. Wars have been fought, fortunes
    lost and friendships wrecked for lack of listening. It is only by listening that we engage,
    understand, empathize, cooperate and develop as human beings. It is fundamental to
    any successful relationship — personal, professional and political.

    In writing a book about listening, I asked people from Brooklyn to Beijing what it meant
    to be a good listener. The typical response was a blank stare. People had no trouble,
    however, telling me what it meant to be a bad listener, rattling off actions such as
    interrupting, looking at a phone, and responding in a narcissistic or confused way. The
    sad truth is that people have more experience being cut off, ignored and misunderstood
    than heard to their satisfaction.

    Of course, technology plays a role. Social media provides a virtual megaphone, along
    with the means to filter out opposing views. People find phone calls intrusive and ignore
    voice mail, preferring text or wordless emoji. If people are listening to anything, it’s
    likely through headphones or earbuds, where they feel safe inside their own curated
    sound bubbles. This is all fueling what public health officials describe as an epidemic of
    loneliness in the United States.

    But tech is not the only culprit. High schools and colleges have debate teams and
    courses in rhetoric and persuasion, but rarely, if ever, offer classes or extracurricular
    activities that teach careful listening. You can get a doctorate in speech communication
    and join clubs such as Toastmasters to perfect your public speaking, but who strives for
    excellence in listening? The image of success and power today is someone miked up and
    prowling around a stage or orating from behind a lectern. Giving a TED talk or
    delivering a commencement speech is living the dream.

    [https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america](https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america)

    [https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america](https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america)

    The cacophony of modern life also stops us from listening. The acoustics in restaurants
    can make it difficult, if not impossible, for diners to clearly hear one another. Offices
    with an open design ensure every keyboard click, telephone call and after-lunch belch
    make for constant racket. Traffic noise on city streets, music playing in shops and the
    bean grinder at your favorite coffeehouse exceed the volume of normal conversation by
    as much as 30 decibels, and can even cause hearing loss.

    So how can we reclaim the lost art of listening? After a couple of years studying the
    neuroscience, psychology and sociology of listening, as well as consulting some of the
    best professional listeners out there (including a C.I.A. agent, focus group moderator,
    radio producer, priest, bartender and furniture salesmen), I discovered that listening
    goes beyond simply hearing what people say. It also involves paying attention to how
    they say it and what they do while they are saying it, in what context, and how what they
    say resonates within you.

    It’s not about merely holding your peace while someone else holds forth. Quite the
    opposite. A lot of listening has to do with how you respond — the degree to which you
    facilitate the clear expression of another person’s thoughts and, in the process,
    crystallize your own.

    Good listeners ask good questions. One of the most valuable lessons I’ve learned as a
    journalist is that anyone can be interesting if you ask the right questions. That is, if you
    ask truly curious questions that don’t have the hidden agenda of fixing, saving, advising,
    convincing or correcting. Curious questions don’t begin with “Wouldn’t you agree…?” or
    “Don’t you think…?” and they definitely don’t end with “right?” The idea is to explore
    the other person’s point of view, not sway it.

    For example, when trying to find out why people might go to the grocery store late at
    night, a focus group moderator told me, she didn’t ask leading questions like, “Do you
    shop late a night because you didn’t get around to it during the day?” or “Do you shop at
    night because that’s when they restock the shelves?” Instead, she turned her question
    into an invitation: “Tell me about the last time you went grocery shopping late at night.”
    This, she said, prompted a quiet, unassuming woman who had hardly spoken up to that
    point to raise her hand. “I had just smoked a joint and was looking for a ménage à trois
    — me, Ben and Jerry,” she said. Grocers, take note.

    You also want to avoid asking people personal and appraising questions like “What do
    you do for a living?” or “What part of town do you live in?” or “What school did you go
    to?” or “Are you married?” This line of questioning is not an honest attempt to get to
    know who you’re talking to so much as rank them in the social hierarchy. It’s more like
    an interrogation and, as a former C.I.A. agent told me, interrogation will get you
    information, but it won’t be credible or reliable.

    In social situations, peppering people with judgmental questions is likely to shift the
    conversation into a superficial, self-promoting elevator pitch. In other words, the kinds
    of conversations that make you want to leave the party early and rush home to your dog.

    [http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/](http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/)

    Instead, ask about people’s interests. Try to find out what excites or aggravates them —
    their daily pleasures or what keeps them up at night. Ask about the last movie they saw
    or for the story behind a piece of jewelry they’re wearing. Also good are expansive
    questions, such as, “If you could spend a month anywhere in the world, where would
    you go?”

    Research indicates that when people who don’t know each other well ask each other
    these types of questions, they feel more connected than if they spent time together
    accomplishing a task. They are the same kinds of questions listed in the widely
    circulated article “36 Questions That Lead to Love” and are similar to the conversation
    starters suggested by the Family Dinner Project, which encourages device-free and
    listening-focused meals.

    Because our brains can think a lot faster than people can talk, beware of the tendency to
    take mental side trips when you should be listening. Smart people are particularly apt to
    get distracted by their own galloping thoughts. They are also more likely to assume they
    already know what the other person is going to say.

    People with higher I.Q.s also tend to be more neurotic and self-conscious, which means
    that worry and anxiety are more likely to hijack their attention. If you fall in this
    category, it could be helpful to consider listening a kind of meditation, where you make
    yourself aware of and acknowledge distractions, then return to focusing. Rather than
    concentrating on your breathing or a mantra, return your attention to the speaker.

    The reward of good listening will almost certainly be more interesting conversations.
    Researchers have found that when talking to inattentive listeners, the speakers
    volunteered less information and conveyed information less articulately. Conversely,
    they found that attentive listeners received more information, relevant details and
    elaboration from speakers, even when the listeners didn’t ask any questions.

    How you listen can work like a self-fulfilling prophecy: If you’re barely listening to
    someone because you think that person is boring or not worth your time, you could
    actually make it so. Moreover, listening to other people makes it more likely other
    people will listen to you. This is partly because it’s human nature to return courtesies,
    but also because good listening improves your chances of delivering a message that
    resonates.

    Listening is a skill. And as with any skill, it degrades if you don’t do it enough. Some
    people may have stronger natural ability while others may have to work harder, but each
    of us can become a better listener with practice. The more people you listen to, the more
    aspects of humanity you will recognize, and the better your instincts will be. Listening
    well can help you understand other people’s attitudes and motivations, which is
    essential in building cooperative and productive relationships, as well as discerning
    which relationships you’d be better off avoiding.

    [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167297234003](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167297234003)

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/36-questions-that-lead-to-love.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/36-questions-that-lead-to-love.html)

    [https://thefamilydinnerproject.org/](https://thefamilydinnerproject.org/)

    [https://hbr.org/1957/09/listening-to-people](https://hbr.org/1957/09/listening-to-people)

    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914005558](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914005558)

    [https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363](https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363)

    We are, each of us, the sum of what we attend to in life. The soothing voice of a mother,
    the whisper of a lover, the guidance of a mentor, the admonishment of a supervisor, the
    rallying call of a leader and the taunts of a rival ultimately form and shape us. And to
    listen poorly, selectively or not at all limits your understanding of the world and
    prevents you from becoming the best you can be.

    Kate Murphy is a journalist and the author of “You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing
    and Why It Matters,” from which this essay is adapted.

    The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear
    what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our
    email: letters@nytimes.com.

    Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter
    (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

    [https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192](https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192)

    [https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192](https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192)

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html)

    [https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor)

    [mailto:letters@nytimes.com](mailto:letters@nytimes.com)

    [https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion](https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion)

    [http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion](http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion)

    [http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion](http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion)

    [https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/](https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/)

    – Talk Less. Listen More. Here’s How.

    **## TalkLess.pdf**

    Talk Less. Listen More. Here’s How.
    Lessons in the art of listening, from a C.I.A. agent, a focus group moderator and more.

    Jan. 9, 2020
    By Kate Murphy

    When was the last time you listened to someone? Really listened, without thinking
    about what you wanted to say next, glancing down at your phone or jumping in to offer
    your opinion? And when was the last time someone really listened to you? Was so
    attentive to what you were saying and whose response was so spot on that you felt truly
    understood?

    We are encouraged to listen to our hearts, our inner voices and our guts, but rarely are
    we encouraged to listen carefully and purposefully to other people. Instead, we talk over
    one another at cocktail parties, work meetings and even family dinners. Online and in
    person, it’s all about defining yourself, shaping the narrative and staying on message.

    And yet, listening can be more valuable than speaking. Wars have been fought, fortunes
    lost and friendships wrecked for lack of listening. It is only by listening that we engage,
    understand, empathize, cooperate and develop as human beings. It is fundamental to
    any successful relationship — personal, professional and political.

    In writing a book about listening, I asked people from Brooklyn to Beijing what it meant
    to be a good listener. The typical response was a blank stare. People had no trouble,
    however, telling me what it meant to be a bad listener, rattling off actions such as
    interrupting, looking at a phone, and responding in a narcissistic or confused way. The
    sad truth is that people have more experience being cut off, ignored and misunderstood
    than heard to their satisfaction.

    Of course, technology plays a role. Social media provides a virtual megaphone, along
    with the means to filter out opposing views. People find phone calls intrusive and ignore
    voice mail, preferring text or wordless emoji. If people are listening to anything, it’s
    likely through headphones or earbuds, where they feel safe inside their own curated
    sound bubbles. This is all fueling what public health officials describe as an epidemic of
    loneliness in the United States.

    But tech is not the only culprit. High schools and colleges have debate teams and
    courses in rhetoric and persuasion, but rarely, if ever, offer classes or extracurricular
    activities that teach careful listening. You can get a doctorate in speech communication
    and join clubs such as Toastmasters to perfect your public speaking, but who strives for
    excellence in listening? The image of success and power today is someone miked up and
    prowling around a stage or orating from behind a lectern. Giving a TED talk or
    delivering a commencement speech is living the dream.

    [https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america](https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america)

    [https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america](https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america)

    The cacophony of modern life also stops us from listening. The acoustics in restaurants
    can make it difficult, if not impossible, for diners to clearly hear one another. Offices
    with an open design ensure every keyboard click, telephone call and after-lunch belch
    make for constant racket. Traffic noise on city streets, music playing in shops and the
    bean grinder at your favorite coffeehouse exceed the volume of normal conversation by
    as much as 30 decibels, and can even cause hearing loss.

    So how can we reclaim the lost art of listening? After a couple of years studying the
    neuroscience, psychology and sociology of listening, as well as consulting some of the
    best professional listeners out there (including a C.I.A. agent, focus group moderator,
    radio producer, priest, bartender and furniture salesmen), I discovered that listening
    goes beyond simply hearing what people say. It also involves paying attention to how
    they say it and what they do while they are saying it, in what context, and how what they
    say resonates within you.

    It’s not about merely holding your peace while someone else holds forth. Quite the
    opposite. A lot of listening has to do with how you respond — the degree to which you
    facilitate the clear expression of another person’s thoughts and, in the process,
    crystallize your own.

    Good listeners ask good questions. One of the most valuable lessons I’ve learned as a
    journalist is that anyone can be interesting if you ask the right questions. That is, if you
    ask truly curious questions that don’t have the hidden agenda of fixing, saving, advising,
    convincing or correcting. Curious questions don’t begin with “Wouldn’t you agree…?” or
    “Don’t you think…?” and they definitely don’t end with “right?” The idea is to explore
    the other person’s point of view, not sway it.

    For example, when trying to find out why people might go to the grocery store late at
    night, a focus group moderator told me, she didn’t ask leading questions like, “Do you
    shop late a night because you didn’t get around to it during the day?” or “Do you shop at
    night because that’s when they restock the shelves?” Instead, she turned her question
    into an invitation: “Tell me about the last time you went grocery shopping late at night.”
    This, she said, prompted a quiet, unassuming woman who had hardly spoken up to that
    point to raise her hand. “I had just smoked a joint and was looking for a ménage à trois
    — me, Ben and Jerry,” she said. Grocers, take note.

    You also want to avoid asking people personal and appraising questions like “What do
    you do for a living?” or “What part of town do you live in?” or “What school did you go
    to?” or “Are you married?” This line of questioning is not an honest attempt to get to
    know who you’re talking to so much as rank them in the social hierarchy. It’s more like
    an interrogation and, as a former C.I.A. agent told me, interrogation will get you
    information, but it won’t be credible or reliable.

    In social situations, peppering people with judgmental questions is likely to shift the
    conversation into a superficial, self-promoting elevator pitch. In other words, the kinds
    of conversations that make you want to leave the party early and rush home to your dog.

    [http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/](http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/)

    Instead, ask about people’s interests. Try to find out what excites or aggravates them —
    their daily pleasures or what keeps them up at night. Ask about the last movie they saw
    or for the story behind a piece of jewelry they’re wearing. Also good are expansive
    questions, such as, “If you could spend a month anywhere in the world, where would
    you go?”

    Research indicates that when people who don’t know each other well ask each other
    these types of questions, they feel more connected than if they spent time together
    accomplishing a task. They are the same kinds of questions listed in the widely
    circulated article “36 Questions That Lead to Love” and are similar to the conversation
    starters suggested by the Family Dinner Project, which encourages device-free and
    listening-focused meals.

    Because our brains can think a lot faster than people can talk, beware of the tendency to
    take mental side trips when you should be listening. Smart people are particularly apt to
    get distracted by their own galloping thoughts. They are also more likely to assume they
    already know what the other person is going to say.

    People with higher I.Q.s also tend to be more neurotic and self-conscious, which means
    that worry and anxiety are more likely to hijack their attention. If you fall in this
    category, it could be helpful to consider listening a kind of meditation, where you make
    yourself aware of and acknowledge distractions, then return to focusing. Rather than
    concentrating on your breathing or a mantra, return your attention to the speaker.

    The reward of good listening will almost certainly be more interesting conversations.
    Researchers have found that when talking to inattentive listeners, the speakers
    volunteered less information and conveyed information less articulately. Conversely,
    they found that attentive listeners received more information, relevant details and
    elaboration from speakers, even when the listeners didn’t ask any questions.

    How you listen can work like a self-fulfilling prophecy: If you’re barely listening to
    someone because you think that person is boring or not worth your time, you could
    actually make it so. Moreover, listening to other people makes it more likely other
    people will listen to you. This is partly because it’s human nature to return courtesies,
    but also because good listening improves your chances of delivering a message that
    resonates.

    Listening is a skill. And as with any skill, it degrades if you don’t do it enough. Some
    people may have stronger natural ability while others may have to work harder, but each
    of us can become a better listener with practice. The more people you listen to, the more
    aspects of humanity you will recognize, and the better your instincts will be. Listening
    well can help you understand other people’s attitudes and motivations, which is
    essential in building cooperative and productive relationships, as well as discerning
    which relationships you’d be better off avoiding.

    [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167297234003](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167297234003)

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/36-questions-that-lead-to-love.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/36-questions-that-lead-to-love.html)

    [https://thefamilydinnerproject.org/](https://thefamilydinnerproject.org/)

    [https://hbr.org/1957/09/listening-to-people](https://hbr.org/1957/09/listening-to-people)

    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914005558](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914005558)

    [https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363](https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363)

    We are, each of us, the sum of what we attend to in life. The soothing voice of a mother,
    the whisper of a lover, the guidance of a mentor, the admonishment of a supervisor, the
    rallying call of a leader and the taunts of a rival ultimately form and shape us. And to
    listen poorly, selectively or not at all limits your understanding of the world and
    prevents you from becoming the best you can be.

    Kate Murphy is a journalist and the author of “You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing
    and Why It Matters,” from which this essay is adapted.

    The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear
    what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our
    email: letters@nytimes.com.

    Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter
    (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

    [https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192](https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192)

    [https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192](https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192)

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html)

    [https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor)

    [mailto:letters@nytimes.com](mailto:letters@nytimes.com)

    [https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion](https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion)

    [http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion](http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion)

    [http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion](http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion)

    [https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/](https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/)

    – Talk Less. Listen More. Here’s How.

    **## Time.pdf**

    Rocks, pebbles, sand:

    There’s very little extra time in education, particularly when so many other urgent and
    important items rise to the top of the agenda. After reviewing the examples provided,
    how would you approach this differently? What similar scenario have you observed in
    your setting?

    Submit a Word document with your answers.

    here is a short visual interpretation of the story.

    [http://www.youtube.com/embed/cPgMeKfQFq8](http://www.youtube.com/embed/cPgMeKfQFq8)

    **## TalkLess.pdf**

    Talk Less. Listen More. Here’s How.
    Lessons in the art of listening, from a C.I.A. agent, a focus group moderator and more.

    Jan. 9, 2020
    By Kate Murphy

    When was the last time you listened to someone? Really listened, without thinking
    about what you wanted to say next, glancing down at your phone or jumping in to offer
    your opinion? And when was the last time someone really listened to you? Was so
    attentive to what you were saying and whose response was so spot on that you felt truly
    understood?

    We are encouraged to listen to our hearts, our inner voices and our guts, but rarely are
    we encouraged to listen carefully and purposefully to other people. Instead, we talk over
    one another at cocktail parties, work meetings and even family dinners. Online and in
    person, it’s all about defining yourself, shaping the narrative and staying on message.

    And yet, listening can be more valuable than speaking. Wars have been fought, fortunes
    lost and friendships wrecked for lack of listening. It is only by listening that we engage,
    understand, empathize, cooperate and develop as human beings. It is fundamental to
    any successful relationship — personal, professional and political.

    In writing a book about listening, I asked people from Brooklyn to Beijing what it meant
    to be a good listener. The typical response was a blank stare. People had no trouble,
    however, telling me what it meant to be a bad listener, rattling off actions such as
    interrupting, looking at a phone, and responding in a narcissistic or confused way. The
    sad truth is that people have more experience being cut off, ignored and misunderstood
    than heard to their satisfaction.

    Of course, technology plays a role. Social media provides a virtual megaphone, along
    with the means to filter out opposing views. People find phone calls intrusive and ignore
    voice mail, preferring text or wordless emoji. If people are listening to anything, it’s
    likely through headphones or earbuds, where they feel safe inside their own curated
    sound bubbles. This is all fueling what public health officials describe as an epidemic of
    loneliness in the United States.

    But tech is not the only culprit. High schools and colleges have debate teams and
    courses in rhetoric and persuasion, but rarely, if ever, offer classes or extracurricular
    activities that teach careful listening. You can get a doctorate in speech communication
    and join clubs such as Toastmasters to perfect your public speaking, but who strives for
    excellence in listening? The image of success and power today is someone miked up and
    prowling around a stage or orating from behind a lectern. Giving a TED talk or
    delivering a commencement speech is living the dream.

    [https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america](https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america)

    [https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america](https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america)

    The cacophony of modern life also stops us from listening. The acoustics in restaurants
    can make it difficult, if not impossible, for diners to clearly hear one another. Offices
    with an open design ensure every keyboard click, telephone call and after-lunch belch
    make for constant racket. Traffic noise on city streets, music playing in shops and the
    bean grinder at your favorite coffeehouse exceed the volume of normal conversation by
    as much as 30 decibels, and can even cause hearing loss.

    So how can we reclaim the lost art of listening? After a couple of years studying the
    neuroscience, psychology and sociology of listening, as well as consulting some of the
    best professional listeners out there (including a C.I.A. agent, focus group moderator,
    radio producer, priest, bartender and furniture salesmen), I discovered that listening
    goes beyond simply hearing what people say. It also involves paying attention to how
    they say it and what they do while they are saying it, in what context, and how what they
    say resonates within you.

    It’s not about merely holding your peace while someone else holds forth. Quite the
    opposite. A lot of listening has to do with how you respond — the degree to which you
    facilitate the clear expression of another person’s thoughts and, in the process,
    crystallize your own.

    Good listeners ask good questions. One of the most valuable lessons I’ve learned as a
    journalist is that anyone can be interesting if you ask the right questions. That is, if you
    ask truly curious questions that don’t have the hidden agenda of fixing, saving, advising,
    convincing or correcting. Curious questions don’t begin with “Wouldn’t you agree…?” or
    “Don’t you think…?” and they definitely don’t end with “right?” The idea is to explore
    the other person’s point of view, not sway it.

    For example, when trying to find out why people might go to the grocery store late at
    night, a focus group moderator told me, she didn’t ask leading questions like, “Do you
    shop late a night because you didn’t get around to it during the day?” or “Do you shop at
    night because that’s when they restock the shelves?” Instead, she turned her question
    into an invitation: “Tell me about the last time you went grocery shopping late at night.”
    This, she said, prompted a quiet, unassuming woman who had hardly spoken up to that
    point to raise her hand. “I had just smoked a joint and was looking for a ménage à trois
    — me, Ben and Jerry,” she said. Grocers, take note.

    You also want to avoid asking people personal and appraising questions like “What do
    you do for a living?” or “What part of town do you live in?” or “What school did you go
    to?” or “Are you married?” This line of questioning is not an honest attempt to get to
    know who you’re talking to so much as rank them in the social hierarchy. It’s more like
    an interrogation and, as a former C.I.A. agent told me, interrogation will get you
    information, but it won’t be credible or reliable.

    In social situations, peppering people with judgmental questions is likely to shift the
    conversation into a superficial, self-promoting elevator pitch. In other words, the kinds
    of conversations that make you want to leave the party early and rush home to your dog.

    [http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/](http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/)

    Instead, ask about people’s interests. Try to find out what excites or aggravates them —
    their daily pleasures or what keeps them up at night. Ask about the last movie they saw
    or for the story behind a piece of jewelry they’re wearing. Also good are expansive
    questions, such as, “If you could spend a month anywhere in the world, where would
    you go?”

    Research indicates that when people who don’t know each other well ask each other
    these types of questions, they feel more connected than if they spent time together
    accomplishing a task. They are the same kinds of questions listed in the widely
    circulated article “36 Questions That Lead to Love” and are similar to the conversation
    starters suggested by the Family Dinner Project, which encourages device-free and
    listening-focused meals.

    Because our brains can think a lot faster than people can talk, beware of the tendency to
    take mental side trips when you should be listening. Smart people are particularly apt to
    get distracted by their own galloping thoughts. They are also more likely to assume they
    already know what the other person is going to say.

    People with higher I.Q.s also tend to be more neurotic and self-conscious, which means
    that worry and anxiety are more likely to hijack their attention. If you fall in this
    category, it could be helpful to consider listening a kind of meditation, where you make
    yourself aware of and acknowledge distractions, then return to focusing. Rather than
    concentrating on your breathing or a mantra, return your attention to the speaker.

    The reward of good listening will almost certainly be more interesting conversations.
    Researchers have found that when talking to inattentive listeners, the speakers
    volunteered less information and conveyed information less articulately. Conversely,
    they found that attentive listeners received more information, relevant details and
    elaboration from speakers, even when the listeners didn’t ask any questions.

    How you listen can work like a self-fulfilling prophecy: If you’re barely listening to
    someone because you think that person is boring or not worth your time, you could
    actually make it so. Moreover, listening to other people makes it more likely other
    people will listen to you. This is partly because it’s human nature to return courtesies,
    but also because good listening improves your chances of delivering a message that
    resonates.

    Listening is a skill. And as with any skill, it degrades if you don’t do it enough. Some
    people may have stronger natural ability while others may have to work harder, but each
    of us can become a better listener with practice. The more people you listen to, the more
    aspects of humanity you will recognize, and the better your instincts will be. Listening
    well can help you understand other people’s attitudes and motivations, which is
    essential in building cooperative and productive relationships, as well as discerning
    which relationships you’d be better off avoiding.

    [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167297234003](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167297234003)

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/36-questions-that-lead-to-love.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/36-questions-that-lead-to-love.html)

    [https://thefamilydinnerproject.org/](https://thefamilydinnerproject.org/)

    [https://hbr.org/1957/09/listening-to-people](https://hbr.org/1957/09/listening-to-people)

    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914005558](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914005558)

    [https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363](https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363)

    We are, each of us, the sum of what we attend to in life. The soothing voice of a mother,
    the whisper of a lover, the guidance of a mentor, the admonishment of a supervisor, the
    rallying call of a leader and the taunts of a rival ultimately form and shape us. And to
    listen poorly, selectively or not at all limits your understanding of the world and
    prevents you from becoming the best you can be.

    Kate Murphy is a journalist and the author of “You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing
    and Why It Matters,” from which this essay is adapted.

    The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear
    what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our
    email: letters@nytimes.com.

    Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter
    (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

    [https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192](https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192)

    [https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192](https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192)

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html)

    [https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor)

    [mailto:letters@nytimes.com](mailto:letters@nytimes.com)

    [https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion](https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion)

    [http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion](http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion)

    [http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion](http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion)

    [https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/](https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/)

    – Talk Less. Listen More. Here’s How.

    **## Time.pdf**

    Rocks, pebbles, sand:

    There’s very little extra time in education, particularly when so many other urgent and
    important items rise to the top of the agenda. After reviewing the examples provided,
    how would you approach this differently? What similar scenario have you observed in
    your setting?

    Submit a Word document with your answers.

    here is a short visual interpretation of the story.

    [http://www.youtube.com/embed/cPgMeKfQFq8](http://www.youtube.com/embed/cPgMeKfQFq8)

    **## TalkLess.pdf**

    Talk Less. Listen More. Here’s How.
    Lessons in the art of listening, from a C.I.A. agent, a focus group moderator and more.

    Jan. 9, 2020
    By Kate Murphy

    When was the last time you listened to someone? Really listened, without thinking
    about what you wanted to say next, glancing down at your phone or jumping in to offer
    your opinion? And when was the last time someone really listened to you? Was so
    attentive to what you were saying and whose response was so spot on that you felt truly
    understood?

    We are encouraged to listen to our hearts, our inner voices and our guts, but rarely are
    we encouraged to listen carefully and purposefully to other people. Instead, we talk over
    one another at cocktail parties, work meetings and even family dinners. Online and in
    person, it’s all about defining yourself, shaping the narrative and staying on message.

    And yet, listening can be more valuable than speaking. Wars have been fought, fortunes
    lost and friendships wrecked for lack of listening. It is only by listening that we engage,
    understand, empathize, cooperate and develop as human beings. It is fundamental to
    any successful relationship — personal, professional and political.

    In writing a book about listening, I asked people from Brooklyn to Beijing what it meant
    to be a good listener. The typical response was a blank stare. People had no trouble,
    however, telling me what it meant to be a bad listener, rattling off actions such as
    interrupting, looking at a phone, and responding in a narcissistic or confused way. The
    sad truth is that people have more experience being cut off, ignored and misunderstood
    than heard to their satisfaction.

    Of course, technology plays a role. Social media provides a virtual megaphone, along
    with the means to filter out opposing views. People find phone calls intrusive and ignore
    voice mail, preferring text or wordless emoji. If people are listening to anything, it’s
    likely through headphones or earbuds, where they feel safe inside their own curated
    sound bubbles. This is all fueling what public health officials describe as an epidemic of
    loneliness in the United States.

    But tech is not the only culprit. High schools and colleges have debate teams and
    courses in rhetoric and persuasion, but rarely, if ever, offer classes or extracurricular
    activities that teach careful listening. You can get a doctorate in speech communication
    and join clubs such as Toastmasters to perfect your public speaking, but who strives for
    excellence in listening? The image of success and power today is someone miked up and
    prowling around a stage or orating from behind a lectern. Giving a TED talk or
    delivering a commencement speech is living the dream.

    [https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america](https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america)

    [https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america](https://www.cigna.com/about-us/newsroom/studies-and-reports/loneliness-epidemic-america)

    The cacophony of modern life also stops us from listening. The acoustics in restaurants
    can make it difficult, if not impossible, for diners to clearly hear one another. Offices
    with an open design ensure every keyboard click, telephone call and after-lunch belch
    make for constant racket. Traffic noise on city streets, music playing in shops and the
    bean grinder at your favorite coffeehouse exceed the volume of normal conversation by
    as much as 30 decibels, and can even cause hearing loss.

    So how can we reclaim the lost art of listening? After a couple of years studying the
    neuroscience, psychology and sociology of listening, as well as consulting some of the
    best professional listeners out there (including a C.I.A. agent, focus group moderator,
    radio producer, priest, bartender and furniture salesmen), I discovered that listening
    goes beyond simply hearing what people say. It also involves paying attention to how
    they say it and what they do while they are saying it, in what context, and how what they
    say resonates within you.

    It’s not about merely holding your peace while someone else holds forth. Quite the
    opposite. A lot of listening has to do with how you respond — the degree to which you
    facilitate the clear expression of another person’s thoughts and, in the process,
    crystallize your own.

    Good listeners ask good questions. One of the most valuable lessons I’ve learned as a
    journalist is that anyone can be interesting if you ask the right questions. That is, if you
    ask truly curious questions that don’t have the hidden agenda of fixing, saving, advising,
    convincing or correcting. Curious questions don’t begin with “Wouldn’t you agree…?” or
    “Don’t you think…?” and they definitely don’t end with “right?” The idea is to explore
    the other person’s point of view, not sway it.

    For example, when trying to find out why people might go to the grocery store late at
    night, a focus group moderator told me, she didn’t ask leading questions like, “Do you
    shop late a night because you didn’t get around to it during the day?” or “Do you shop at
    night because that’s when they restock the shelves?” Instead, she turned her question
    into an invitation: “Tell me about the last time you went grocery shopping late at night.”
    This, she said, prompted a quiet, unassuming woman who had hardly spoken up to that
    point to raise her hand. “I had just smoked a joint and was looking for a ménage à trois
    — me, Ben and Jerry,” she said. Grocers, take note.

    You also want to avoid asking people personal and appraising questions like “What do
    you do for a living?” or “What part of town do you live in?” or “What school did you go
    to?” or “Are you married?” This line of questioning is not an honest attempt to get to
    know who you’re talking to so much as rank them in the social hierarchy. It’s more like
    an interrogation and, as a former C.I.A. agent told me, interrogation will get you
    information, but it won’t be credible or reliable.

    In social situations, peppering people with judgmental questions is likely to shift the
    conversation into a superficial, self-promoting elevator pitch. In other words, the kinds
    of conversations that make you want to leave the party early and rush home to your dog.

    [http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/](http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/)

    Instead, ask about people’s interests. Try to find out what excites or aggravates them —
    their daily pleasures or what keeps them up at night. Ask about the last movie they saw
    or for the story behind a piece of jewelry they’re wearing. Also good are expansive
    questions, such as, “If you could spend a month anywhere in the world, where would
    you go?”

    Research indicates that when people who don’t know each other well ask each other
    these types of questions, they feel more connected than if they spent time together
    accomplishing a task. They are the same kinds of questions listed in the widely
    circulated article “36 Questions That Lead to Love” and are similar to the conversation
    starters suggested by the Family Dinner Project, which encourages device-free and
    listening-focused meals.

    Because our brains can think a lot faster than people can talk, beware of the tendency to
    take mental side trips when you should be listening. Smart people are particularly apt to
    get distracted by their own galloping thoughts. They are also more likely to assume they
    already know what the other person is going to say.

    People with higher I.Q.s also tend to be more neurotic and self-conscious, which means
    that worry and anxiety are more likely to hijack their attention. If you fall in this
    category, it could be helpful to consider listening a kind of meditation, where you make
    yourself aware of and acknowledge distractions, then return to focusing. Rather than
    concentrating on your breathing or a mantra, return your attention to the speaker.

    The reward of good listening will almost certainly be more interesting conversations.
    Researchers have found that when talking to inattentive listeners, the speakers
    volunteered less information and conveyed information less articulately. Conversely,
    they found that attentive listeners received more information, relevant details and
    elaboration from speakers, even when the listeners didn’t ask any questions.

    How you listen can work like a self-fulfilling prophecy: If you’re barely listening to
    someone because you think that person is boring or not worth your time, you could
    actually make it so. Moreover, listening to other people makes it more likely other
    people will listen to you. This is partly because it’s human nature to return courtesies,
    but also because good listening improves your chances of delivering a message that
    resonates.

    Listening is a skill. And as with any skill, it degrades if you don’t do it enough. Some
    people may have stronger natural ability while others may have to work harder, but each
    of us can become a better listener with practice. The more people you listen to, the more
    aspects of humanity you will recognize, and the better your instincts will be. Listening
    well can help you understand other people’s attitudes and motivations, which is
    essential in building cooperative and productive relationships, as well as discerning
    which relationships you’d be better off avoiding.

    [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167297234003](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167297234003)

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/36-questions-that-lead-to-love.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/style/36-questions-that-lead-to-love.html)

    [https://thefamilydinnerproject.org/](https://thefamilydinnerproject.org/)

    [https://hbr.org/1957/09/listening-to-people](https://hbr.org/1957/09/listening-to-people)

    [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914005558](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886914005558)

    [https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363](https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363)

    We are, each of us, the sum of what we attend to in life. The soothing voice of a mother,
    the whisper of a lover, the guidance of a mentor, the admonishment of a supervisor, the
    rallying call of a leader and the taunts of a rival ultimately form and shape us. And to
    listen poorly, selectively or not at all limits your understanding of the world and
    prevents you from becoming the best you can be.

    Kate Murphy is a journalist and the author of “You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing
    and Why It Matters,” from which this essay is adapted.

    The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear
    what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our
    email: letters@nytimes.com.

    Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter
    (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

    [https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192](https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192)

    [https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192](https://www.amazon.com/Youre-Not-Listening-Missing-Matters/dp/1250297192)

    [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/opinion/letters/letters-to-editor-new-york-times-women.html)

    [https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-submit-a-letter-to-the-editor)

    [mailto:letters@nytimes.com](mailto:letters@nytimes.com)

    [https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion](https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion)

    [http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion](http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion)

    [http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion](http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion)

    [https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/](https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/)

    – Talk Less. Listen More. Here’s How.

  • [Solved] FD

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) I'll post question after I accept ur bid – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    I'll post question after I accept ur bid

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Human Trafficking

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Explain human trafficking – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Explain human trafficking

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Reflect

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) Teach me about this subject – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    Teach me about this subject

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] pre algebra

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    What is the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a nonagon? degrees – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    What is the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a nonagon?

    degrees

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Dis 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Dis.docx **## Dis.docx** **Part 1:** Report on either Exercise 7.4 Grief Therapy or Exercise 7.5 Spirituality answering the questions from page 179 (see page 179, _Exercise 7.4 Grief Therapy and Exercise 7.5 Spirituality_ as the last two sections on page 179) (5 pts)…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Dis.docx

    **## Dis.docx**

    **Part 1:**

    Report on either Exercise 7.4 Grief Therapy or Exercise 7.5 Spirituality answering the questions from page 179 (see page 179,
    _Exercise 7.4 Grief Therapy and Exercise 7.5 Spirituality_ as the last two sections on page 179) (5 pts).  ~~ Respond to 2 other classmates’ postings for full credit. Response credit follows Discussion rubric available on Canvas. Remember: 1) The discussion deadline for all initial discussion posts and response posts is 11:59p CT on the Sunday that marks the end of each class week (see syllabus for discussion deadlines). 2) You must respond meaningfully (no simple “I agree” replies) to 2 classmates for full credit on discussion posts  (3 pts for the original post, 1 pt each response to the discussions).

    **6-10 paragraphs**

    Remember:

    1) The discussion deadline for all initial discussion posts
    **and** response posts is 11:59p CT on the Sunday that marks the end of each class week (see syllabus for discussion deadlines).

    2) You must respond meaningfully (no simple “I agree” replies) to 2 classmates for full credit on discussion posts (3 pts for the original post, 1 pt each for each response to the  discussions).

    3) Also remember that the Rubric for Online Discussion Posting (in the Files section of this course) deducts points for discussion or response postings late in the timeline for the week’s discussion assignment as last day/last hour postings restrict other student’s opportunity to read and respond to your posting, or to read your responses to their postings. As discussions are most beneficial when the discussants are able to interact in the discussion, I am using the Discussion Rubric to engender a greater opportunity for them to do so. So please be aware that posting within 12 hours of the discussion deadline will deduct 33% of the available points and posting within 4 hours of the deadline will cost from 66%-90% of the available points.

    4) No discussion or response points will be gained if the discussion post, or the response posts are after the discussion deadline.

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/dis-6-20886367)

    **Part 2: Respond to two other students’ response.**

    Student #1 response:

    Exercise 7.4 Grief Therapy

    This was an uncomfortable section to read as I feel I am in this place right now. I am mourning the apparent loss of two significant friendships.

    Recently, I have experienced anxiety in both of these situations, wanting to find a resolution, but knowing that I cannot control the wishes or behaviors of others. There has been a lot of self-doubt as well as ruminating and wondering “what if?” I have created narratives on both ends of the spectrum of a happy outcome and a disastrous outcome.

    There are so many “messages” that could speak to my anxiety and grief as well as how to approach these situations for a positive outcome. It can be confusing and frustrating as they are all over the spectrum and not necessarily helpful.

    However, I actually had this thought earlier, how would I counsel someone in my shoes? I think ultimately is to understand that situations can change, so never close the door to the future. Because of that, I think a person (myself in this case) should guard against false hope while recognizing that sadness of loss. Fight acting out in a way that makes things worse. Don’t seek revenge toward a person. Don’t seek coping or medicating through unwise or bad behaviors. Feel it. Grieve it. Leave an opening for reconciliation in the future, but knowing it may never come. There’s also a need to own my part of the conflict. I should  make peace with myself over those actions and forgive myself. I should write a letter or inventory of the friendships, acknowledging their great value and the sadness of their great loss.

    Student 2 response:

    A weakness is that I do not know much about spirituality, but a strength is that I do have a strong desire and the curiosity to learn more about it. I do believe that my curiosity to gather information in my daily life will be helpful in terms of future work in whatever work environment and population I will work with. Strength – I like being prepared, having a variety of info, and I don’t like leaving things unfinished, so I think I can draw on that to focus on a client situation on spirituality.  Really get deep into a specific topic or so, though hopefully I don’t get to zone into one area that I lack balance with other tasks such as my health or with other areas of spirituality which is a weakness. It depends on the specific topic and my level of interest in it (a little bit of interest, a lot of interest, etc.) which would influence my level of knowledge in an area of spirituality. Another weakness is that even if I do expand my knowledge on the topic, there is that slight worry in the back of my mind that I may still feel that I don’t know enough to be able to connect with my client – that there will be a feeling of inadequacy I suppose. Though, hopefully with time and with steadily learning more, this worry will lessen. Yet another strength is my religion I suppose. Religions vary and it’s different yet also similar to spirituality in that there can be shared values. Those values such as empathy, hope, compassion, and gratitude can be helpful for myself and with working with clients. It could help the client feel hopeful about their situation and help me stay encouraged in my role in helping them and also my job as a counselor. Counseling can be hard on a person, especially with certain work environments and cases. Having compassion for yourself, especially when things don’t go as one would like is important. A lot of values emphasized in religions can be seen in counselors and even expected from them (e.g. empathy, respect).

    When it comes to reducing the impact of my weaknesses, I could develop some kind of outline and plan of study for spirituality. That way I could decrease the feelings of being overwhelmed while also being able to steadily improve my awareness and knowledge in spirituality which would then lead to an increase of self-confidence in this area as well as my overall ability to aid clients. Another thing I can do is work on my own spirituality as self-awareness is important as a counselor. It would also help me better understand spirituality overall and be able to understand others with their journey in spirituality as well. If you have experience in something, it can help you better understand it and connect with those who have similar experiences and struggles too. Also there is the whole practice what you preach kind of thing here too.

    ## image1.png

    **## Dis.docx**

    **Part 1:**

    Report on either Exercise 7.4 Grief Therapy or Exercise 7.5 Spirituality answering the questions from page 179 (see page 179,
    _Exercise 7.4 Grief Therapy and Exercise 7.5 Spirituality_ as the last two sections on page 179) (5 pts).  ~~ Respond to 2 other classmates’ postings for full credit. Response credit follows Discussion rubric available on Canvas. Remember: 1) The discussion deadline for all initial discussion posts and response posts is 11:59p CT on the Sunday that marks the end of each class week (see syllabus for discussion deadlines). 2) You must respond meaningfully (no simple “I agree” replies) to 2 classmates for full credit on discussion posts  (3 pts for the original post, 1 pt each response to the discussions).

    **6-10 paragraphs**

    Remember:

    1) The discussion deadline for all initial discussion posts
    **and** response posts is 11:59p CT on the Sunday that marks the end of each class week (see syllabus for discussion deadlines).

    2) You must respond meaningfully (no simple “I agree” replies) to 2 classmates for full credit on discussion posts (3 pts for the original post, 1 pt each for each response to the  discussions).

    3) Also remember that the Rubric for Online Discussion Posting (in the Files section of this course) deducts points for discussion or response postings late in the timeline for the week’s discussion assignment as last day/last hour postings restrict other student’s opportunity to read and respond to your posting, or to read your responses to their postings. As discussions are most beneficial when the discussants are able to interact in the discussion, I am using the Discussion Rubric to engender a greater opportunity for them to do so. So please be aware that posting within 12 hours of the discussion deadline will deduct 33% of the available points and posting within 4 hours of the deadline will cost from 66%-90% of the available points.

    4) No discussion or response points will be gained if the discussion post, or the response posts are after the discussion deadline.

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/dis-6-20886367)

    **Part 2: Respond to two other students’ response.**

    Student #1 response:

    Exercise 7.4 Grief Therapy

    This was an uncomfortable section to read as I feel I am in this place right now. I am mourning the apparent loss of two significant friendships.

    Recently, I have experienced anxiety in both of these situations, wanting to find a resolution, but knowing that I cannot control the wishes or behaviors of others. There has been a lot of self-doubt as well as ruminating and wondering “what if?” I have created narratives on both ends of the spectrum of a happy outcome and a disastrous outcome.

    There are so many “messages” that could speak to my anxiety and grief as well as how to approach these situations for a positive outcome. It can be confusing and frustrating as they are all over the spectrum and not necessarily helpful.

    However, I actually had this thought earlier, how would I counsel someone in my shoes? I think ultimately is to understand that situations can change, so never close the door to the future. Because of that, I think a person (myself in this case) should guard against false hope while recognizing that sadness of loss. Fight acting out in a way that makes things worse. Don’t seek revenge toward a person. Don’t seek coping or medicating through unwise or bad behaviors. Feel it. Grieve it. Leave an opening for reconciliation in the future, but knowing it may never come. There’s also a need to own my part of the conflict. I should  make peace with myself over those actions and forgive myself. I should write a letter or inventory of the friendships, acknowledging their great value and the sadness of their great loss.

    Student 2 response:

    A weakness is that I do not know much about spirituality, but a strength is that I do have a strong desire and the curiosity to learn more about it. I do believe that my curiosity to gather information in my daily life will be helpful in terms of future work in whatever work environment and population I will work with. Strength – I like being prepared, having a variety of info, and I don’t like leaving things unfinished, so I think I can draw on that to focus on a client situation on spirituality.  Really get deep into a specific topic or so, though hopefully I don’t get to zone into one area that I lack balance with other tasks such as my health or with other areas of spirituality which is a weakness. It depends on the specific topic and my level of interest in it (a little bit of interest, a lot of interest, etc.) which would influence my level of knowledge in an area of spirituality. Another weakness is that even if I do expand my knowledge on the topic, there is that slight worry in the back of my mind that I may still feel that I don’t know enough to be able to connect with my client – that there will be a feeling of inadequacy I suppose. Though, hopefully with time and with steadily learning more, this worry will lessen. Yet another strength is my religion I suppose. Religions vary and it’s different yet also similar to spirituality in that there can be shared values. Those values such as empathy, hope, compassion, and gratitude can be helpful for myself and with working with clients. It could help the client feel hopeful about their situation and help me stay encouraged in my role in helping them and also my job as a counselor. Counseling can be hard on a person, especially with certain work environments and cases. Having compassion for yourself, especially when things don’t go as one would like is important. A lot of values emphasized in religions can be seen in counselors and even expected from them (e.g. empathy, respect).

    When it comes to reducing the impact of my weaknesses, I could develop some kind of outline and plan of study for spirituality. That way I could decrease the feelings of being overwhelmed while also being able to steadily improve my awareness and knowledge in spirituality which would then lead to an increase of self-confidence in this area as well as my overall ability to aid clients. Another thing I can do is work on my own spirituality as self-awareness is important as a counselor. It would also help me better understand spirituality overall and be able to understand others with their journey in spirituality as well. If you have experience in something, it can help you better understand it and connect with those who have similar experiences and struggles too. Also there is the whole practice what you preach kind of thing here too.

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Midterm

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    understanding of the transportation topic and should follow this format – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    understanding of the transportation topic and should follow this format

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] osha powerpoint

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    you will create a PowerPoint presentation covering these main safety profession concepts, (important concepts related to OSH, including roles, accidents and injuries, OSHA, and workplace hazards). including the following: overview of OSHA’s primary functions the roles of organizations that were impo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    you will create a PowerPoint presentation covering these main safety profession concepts, (important concepts related to OSH, including roles, accidents and injuries, OSHA, and workplace hazards). including the following:

    overview of OSHA’s primary functions the roles of organizations that were important to shaping the safety movement in the United States

    the leadership role of the safety professional the importance of recordkeeping and accident investigations the direct

    and indirect costs of accidents at least two common workplace hazards regulated by OSHA

    the PowerPoint Presentation must be at least 10 slides in length, not counting the title or reference slides. the slides should utilize bullet points. Do not include full paragraphs of written text. Please use the slide notes function for each slide to add supplementary information that you would use to aid you in the presentation. reference are provided

    – [\
    \
    ckae197week3.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ckae197week3-pdf "ckae197week3.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    buildings-13-012373week3.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/buildings-13-012373week3-pdf "buildings-13-012373week3.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    WRAP-role-theory-perspectives-past-present-future-applications-role-theories-management-research-week3.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wrap-role-theory-perspectives-past-present-future-applications-role-theories-management-research-week3-pdf "WRAP-role-theory-perspectives-past-present-future-applications-role-theories-management-research-week3.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    Weil.Enforcing-OSHA-Role-of-Unions.IR.1991week1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/weil-enforcing-osha-role-of-unions-ir-1991week1-pdf "Weil.Enforcing-OSHA-Role-of-Unions.IR.1991week1.pdf")

    – 2 years ago