Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (4)**
– ## W3AssignmentInstructions.pdf
– ## W3Template.docx
– ## W3GradingRubric.pdf
– EXAMPLE.pdf
**## W3AssignmentInstructions.pdf**
EDUC 730
STEM, ROBOTICS, CODING, AND MAKER’S SPACES OVERVIEW ASSIGNMENT
INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
Maker’s spaces and personal manufacturing present a fascinating future for education with some
tantalizing possibilities. The barriers to adoption are real but worth overcoming for the potential
benefits. STEM, Robots, Codes, and Maker’s Spaces are increasingly ubiquitous in the
educational experience in classrooms.
For this assignment, you will explore each of these four initiatives from the perspective of your
own local community so that you can inform others in your locale of the resources available to
them. Seek knowledge and resources most appropriate to the interests and needs of your own
work setting, colleagues, and potential users/learners.
INSTRUCTIONS
Using the provided STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker’s Spaces Overview Template and
knowledge gleaned from current scholarly articles, you will write a 2-3 paragraph introduction
and then provide a brief overview of each of the four initiatives. Then, you will respond to each of
the follow-up questions in the template for each initiative, discussing the significance, barriers,
practices, and implications for teaching and learning. You must reference scholarly sources to
support your claims throughout the template.
For resources in your geographical area, check local libraries, school websites, universities, or
other community resources to identify what is available to you . Seek as many hands-on facilities
as you can find; you should try to avoid digital-only sources, if possible. The template will ask
you to include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource for each initiative.
Pursue local resources in your own community first. If none are found, broaden your search to
surrounding locations to identify the closest resources to you for each initiative.
Include a minimum of two scholarly references for each initiative for a total of at least eight
sources. Each source should be relevant to the given initiative and published within the last five
years. Follow current APA style for citing your sources, both in-text and within the references
section.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## W3Template.docx**
EDUC 730
**STEM, Robotics, Coding, Maker’s Spaces Overview Template**
**[Insert your name]**
Begin with a 2-3-paragraph introduction briefly describing the information presented in the paper. An abstract is not required. Any directions, like these sentences, should be deleted after you read them.
**STEM**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Robotics (in education)**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Coding (in education)**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Maker’s Spaces**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**References**
Insert all references in current APA format here.
Page 2 of 2
**## W3GradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction and
Initiative Overviews
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
The candidate has
written a strong, brief
introduction
describing the
information presented
in the paper. The
introduction meets
the 2-3 paragraph
required length. The
candidate provides an
sufficiently in-depth
and accurate
overview for each of
the four initiatives
under consideration.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
The candidate has
written a generally
strong, brief
introduction that
introduces the
information presented
in the paper. The
introduction may miss
the 2-3 paragraph
required length by a
small margin. .The
candidate provides an
sufficiently in-depth
and accurate
overview for each of
the four initiatives
under consideration.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate has written a
introduction that lacks
strength and/or brevity and
does not always introduce
the information presented in
the paper. The introduction
may miss the 2-3 paragraph
required length by a large
margin. The candidate
provides a somewhat
shallow and/or inaccurate
overview for one or more of
of the four initiatives under
consideration.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Ethical
Considerations and
Best Practices for
Implementation
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate describes
the ethical
considerations and
best practices for
implementation with
sufficient detail.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidates describes
the ethical
considerations and
best practices for
implementation with
general detail.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate may not
have responded to one or
more of each of the four
initiatives. The candidate's
description of ethical
considerations and best
practices for implementation
that has been provided may
be lacking in detail.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
25 pts
STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker's Spaces Overview Grading
Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520
Criteria Ratings Points
Significance,
Downsides/Barriers,
Future Implications,
and Local
Assessment
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate has
accurately and
completely provided
all of the following
information:
description of
significance;
description of
downsides/barriers
and how they might
be overcome; future
Implications; a
one-sentence
description and link
for at least one
resource available in
the candidate's area.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate has
accurately and
completely provided
most of the following
information:
description of
significance;
description of
downsides/barriers
and how they might
be overcome; future
Implications; a
one-sentence
description and link
for at least one
resource available in
the candidate's area.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
For each of the four
initiatives, the candidate has
inaccurately and/or
incompletely provided much
of the following information:
description of significance;
description of
downsides/barriers and how
they might be overcome;
future Implications; a
one-sentence description
and link for at least one
resource available in the
candidate's area. One or
more of the initiatives may
not have been responded to
altogether.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
40 pts
Current APA
Formatting
5 to >4 pts
Advanced
The candidate uses
current APA
formatting for in-text
and reference page
citations.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
The candidate only
has one error in APA
formatting for in-text
and reference page
citations.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate has two or
more errors in APA
formatting for in-text and
reference page citations.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
5 pts
References 15 to >13 pts
Advanced
The candidate
provides a minimum
of 2 scholarly
references for each of
the four initiatives.
Each reference is
relevant to the given
initiative and has
been published within
the last five years.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
The candidate may
provide less than 2
scholarly references
for one or two of the
four initiatives. The
references are
generally relevant to
the given initiative and
have generally been
published within the
last five years.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate may provide
less than 2 scholarly
references for three or all
four of the four initiatives.
The references are often
lacking in relevance to the
given initiative an/or have
often not been published
within the last five years.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Total Points: 100
STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker's Spaces Overview Grading
Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520
**EXAMPLE.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/example-pdf-10203885)
**EXAMPLE.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/example-pdf-10203885)
**## W3AssignmentInstructions.pdf**
EDUC 730
STEM, ROBOTICS, CODING, AND MAKER’S SPACES OVERVIEW ASSIGNMENT
INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
Maker’s spaces and personal manufacturing present a fascinating future for education with some
tantalizing possibilities. The barriers to adoption are real but worth overcoming for the potential
benefits. STEM, Robots, Codes, and Maker’s Spaces are increasingly ubiquitous in the
educational experience in classrooms.
For this assignment, you will explore each of these four initiatives from the perspective of your
own local community so that you can inform others in your locale of the resources available to
them. Seek knowledge and resources most appropriate to the interests and needs of your own
work setting, colleagues, and potential users/learners.
INSTRUCTIONS
Using the provided STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker’s Spaces Overview Template and
knowledge gleaned from current scholarly articles, you will write a 2-3 paragraph introduction
and then provide a brief overview of each of the four initiatives. Then, you will respond to each of
the follow-up questions in the template for each initiative, discussing the significance, barriers,
practices, and implications for teaching and learning. You must reference scholarly sources to
support your claims throughout the template.
For resources in your geographical area, check local libraries, school websites, universities, or
other community resources to identify what is available to you . Seek as many hands-on facilities
as you can find; you should try to avoid digital-only sources, if possible. The template will ask
you to include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource for each initiative.
Pursue local resources in your own community first. If none are found, broaden your search to
surrounding locations to identify the closest resources to you for each initiative.
Include a minimum of two scholarly references for each initiative for a total of at least eight
sources. Each source should be relevant to the given initiative and published within the last five
years. Follow current APA style for citing your sources, both in-text and within the references
section.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## W3Template.docx**
EDUC 730
**STEM, Robotics, Coding, Maker’s Spaces Overview Template**
**[Insert your name]**
Begin with a 2-3-paragraph introduction briefly describing the information presented in the paper. An abstract is not required. Any directions, like these sentences, should be deleted after you read them.
**STEM**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Robotics (in education)**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Coding (in education)**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Maker’s Spaces**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**References**
Insert all references in current APA format here.
Page 2 of 2
**## W3GradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction and
Initiative Overviews
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
The candidate has
written a strong, brief
introduction
describing the
information presented
in the paper. The
introduction meets
the 2-3 paragraph
required length. The
candidate provides an
sufficiently in-depth
and accurate
overview for each of
the four initiatives
under consideration.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
The candidate has
written a generally
strong, brief
introduction that
introduces the
information presented
in the paper. The
introduction may miss
the 2-3 paragraph
required length by a
small margin. .The
candidate provides an
sufficiently in-depth
and accurate
overview for each of
the four initiatives
under consideration.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate has written a
introduction that lacks
strength and/or brevity and
does not always introduce
the information presented in
the paper. The introduction
may miss the 2-3 paragraph
required length by a large
margin. The candidate
provides a somewhat
shallow and/or inaccurate
overview for one or more of
of the four initiatives under
consideration.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Ethical
Considerations and
Best Practices for
Implementation
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate describes
the ethical
considerations and
best practices for
implementation with
sufficient detail.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidates describes
the ethical
considerations and
best practices for
implementation with
general detail.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate may not
have responded to one or
more of each of the four
initiatives. The candidate's
description of ethical
considerations and best
practices for implementation
that has been provided may
be lacking in detail.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
25 pts
STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker's Spaces Overview Grading
Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520
Criteria Ratings Points
Significance,
Downsides/Barriers,
Future Implications,
and Local
Assessment
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate has
accurately and
completely provided
all of the following
information:
description of
significance;
description of
downsides/barriers
and how they might
be overcome; future
Implications; a
one-sentence
description and link
for at least one
resource available in
the candidate's area.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate has
accurately and
completely provided
most of the following
information:
description of
significance;
description of
downsides/barriers
and how they might
be overcome; future
Implications; a
one-sentence
description and link
for at least one
resource available in
the candidate's area.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
For each of the four
initiatives, the candidate has
inaccurately and/or
incompletely provided much
of the following information:
description of significance;
description of
downsides/barriers and how
they might be overcome;
future Implications; a
one-sentence description
and link for at least one
resource available in the
candidate's area. One or
more of the initiatives may
not have been responded to
altogether.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
40 pts
Current APA
Formatting
5 to >4 pts
Advanced
The candidate uses
current APA
formatting for in-text
and reference page
citations.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
The candidate only
has one error in APA
formatting for in-text
and reference page
citations.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate has two or
more errors in APA
formatting for in-text and
reference page citations.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
5 pts
References 15 to >13 pts
Advanced
The candidate
provides a minimum
of 2 scholarly
references for each of
the four initiatives.
Each reference is
relevant to the given
initiative and has
been published within
the last five years.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
The candidate may
provide less than 2
scholarly references
for one or two of the
four initiatives. The
references are
generally relevant to
the given initiative and
have generally been
published within the
last five years.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate may provide
less than 2 scholarly
references for three or all
four of the four initiatives.
The references are often
lacking in relevance to the
given initiative an/or have
often not been published
within the last five years.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Total Points: 100
STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker's Spaces Overview Grading
Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520
**EXAMPLE.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/example-pdf-10203885)
**## W3AssignmentInstructions.pdf**
EDUC 730
STEM, ROBOTICS, CODING, AND MAKER’S SPACES OVERVIEW ASSIGNMENT
INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
Maker’s spaces and personal manufacturing present a fascinating future for education with some
tantalizing possibilities. The barriers to adoption are real but worth overcoming for the potential
benefits. STEM, Robots, Codes, and Maker’s Spaces are increasingly ubiquitous in the
educational experience in classrooms.
For this assignment, you will explore each of these four initiatives from the perspective of your
own local community so that you can inform others in your locale of the resources available to
them. Seek knowledge and resources most appropriate to the interests and needs of your own
work setting, colleagues, and potential users/learners.
INSTRUCTIONS
Using the provided STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker’s Spaces Overview Template and
knowledge gleaned from current scholarly articles, you will write a 2-3 paragraph introduction
and then provide a brief overview of each of the four initiatives. Then, you will respond to each of
the follow-up questions in the template for each initiative, discussing the significance, barriers,
practices, and implications for teaching and learning. You must reference scholarly sources to
support your claims throughout the template.
For resources in your geographical area, check local libraries, school websites, universities, or
other community resources to identify what is available to you . Seek as many hands-on facilities
as you can find; you should try to avoid digital-only sources, if possible. The template will ask
you to include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource for each initiative.
Pursue local resources in your own community first. If none are found, broaden your search to
surrounding locations to identify the closest resources to you for each initiative.
Include a minimum of two scholarly references for each initiative for a total of at least eight
sources. Each source should be relevant to the given initiative and published within the last five
years. Follow current APA style for citing your sources, both in-text and within the references
section.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## W3Template.docx**
EDUC 730
**STEM, Robotics, Coding, Maker’s Spaces Overview Template**
**[Insert your name]**
Begin with a 2-3-paragraph introduction briefly describing the information presented in the paper. An abstract is not required. Any directions, like these sentences, should be deleted after you read them.
**STEM**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Robotics (in education)**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Coding (in education)**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**Maker’s Spaces**
[Brief overview].
**_Why is it significant?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What are the downsides and/or barriers and how might these be overcome?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_What ethical considerations and best practices for implementation have been identified?_**
**[** Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Where is it going in the future?_**
[Begin your paragraph(s) here.]
**_Resources available in_[insert your city and/or state]**
**_and the surrounding area._**
[Include a one-sentence description and link for at least one resource available in your area.]
**References**
Insert all references in current APA format here.
Page 2 of 2
**## W3GradingRubric.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction and
Initiative Overviews
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
The candidate has
written a strong, brief
introduction
describing the
information presented
in the paper. The
introduction meets
the 2-3 paragraph
required length. The
candidate provides an
sufficiently in-depth
and accurate
overview for each of
the four initiatives
under consideration.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
The candidate has
written a generally
strong, brief
introduction that
introduces the
information presented
in the paper. The
introduction may miss
the 2-3 paragraph
required length by a
small margin. .The
candidate provides an
sufficiently in-depth
and accurate
overview for each of
the four initiatives
under consideration.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate has written a
introduction that lacks
strength and/or brevity and
does not always introduce
the information presented in
the paper. The introduction
may miss the 2-3 paragraph
required length by a large
margin. The candidate
provides a somewhat
shallow and/or inaccurate
overview for one or more of
of the four initiatives under
consideration.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Ethical
Considerations and
Best Practices for
Implementation
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate describes
the ethical
considerations and
best practices for
implementation with
sufficient detail.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidates describes
the ethical
considerations and
best practices for
implementation with
general detail.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate may not
have responded to one or
more of each of the four
initiatives. The candidate's
description of ethical
considerations and best
practices for implementation
that has been provided may
be lacking in detail.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
25 pts
STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker's Spaces Overview Grading
Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520
Criteria Ratings Points
Significance,
Downsides/Barriers,
Future Implications,
and Local
Assessment
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate has
accurately and
completely provided
all of the following
information:
description of
significance;
description of
downsides/barriers
and how they might
be overcome; future
Implications; a
one-sentence
description and link
for at least one
resource available in
the candidate's area.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
For each of the four
initiatives, the
candidate has
accurately and
completely provided
most of the following
information:
description of
significance;
description of
downsides/barriers
and how they might
be overcome; future
Implications; a
one-sentence
description and link
for at least one
resource available in
the candidate's area.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
For each of the four
initiatives, the candidate has
inaccurately and/or
incompletely provided much
of the following information:
description of significance;
description of
downsides/barriers and how
they might be overcome;
future Implications; a
one-sentence description
and link for at least one
resource available in the
candidate's area. One or
more of the initiatives may
not have been responded to
altogether.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
40 pts
Current APA
Formatting
5 to >4 pts
Advanced
The candidate uses
current APA
formatting for in-text
and reference page
citations.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
The candidate only
has one error in APA
formatting for in-text
and reference page
citations.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate has two or
more errors in APA
formatting for in-text and
reference page citations.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
5 pts
References 15 to >13 pts
Advanced
The candidate
provides a minimum
of 2 scholarly
references for each of
the four initiatives.
Each reference is
relevant to the given
initiative and has
been published within
the last five years.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
The candidate may
provide less than 2
scholarly references
for one or two of the
four initiatives. The
references are
generally relevant to
the given initiative and
have generally been
published within the
last five years.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
The candidate may provide
less than 2 scholarly
references for three or all
four of the four initiatives.
The references are often
lacking in relevance to the
given initiative an/or have
often not been published
within the last five years.
0 pts
Not
Present
Not
present
15 pts
Total Points: 100
STEM, Robotics, Coding, and Maker's Spaces Overview Grading
Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520
**EXAMPLE.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/example-pdf-10203885)