Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] PHIL

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Philosophy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-philosophy) – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## APUAPATemplate.docx – ## PHL302.docx – ## PHIL302Week5EssayMovieTimeRubric.pdf **## APUAPATemplate.docx** 2 2 **Title of Paper** Student Name American Public University Course # …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Philosophy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-philosophy)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## APUAPATemplate.docx

    – ## PHL302.docx

    – ## PHIL302Week5EssayMovieTimeRubric.pdf

    **## APUAPATemplate.docx**

    2

    2

    **Title of Paper**

    Student Name

    American Public University

    Course #

    Faculty Member

    Date

    **Title of Paper**

    [Introduction and Thesis] This template is formatted properly according to APA Style. It contains the correct order, placement, margins, fonts, headings, etc. Use it as a form and just fill in your information in the appropriate places.

    [Supporting Paragraphs] Remember, you need to cite all information in your paper that originates from outside sources. To do this properly according to APA Style, you will need to include both in-text citation and a Reference list. An “in-text citation” is a brief parenthetical citation that comes directly after a quote or paraphrased information. The general in-text citation format is: (Author’s Last name, Year, p. #). Here is an example that paraphrases the conclusion of a research study: Research shows that 30% of teenagers prefer green grapes (Smith, 2015, p. 89). Another way to format this statement: Smith (2015) conducted a study that shows that 30% of teenagers in the United States select green grapes over any other color of grape (p. 89).

    Never repeat the author’s last name in a sentence and then again in the citation. In the previous example, notice the author’s last name was not included in the in-text citation and that the year always follows the author’s last name. Would you prefer to use a direct quote instead? Follow this format: Smith (2015) concludes in his study, “After analyzing the preferences of 570 teenagers in the United we have determined that 29.8% selected green grapes over other varieties” (p. 89). If you are using a direct quote and the source does not have page numbers, count and list the paragraph number: (Doe, 2015, para. 16).

    For more on APA citations, see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_the_basics.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_the_basics.html)

    References

    Note- references should be in alphabetic order.

    Velasquez, M. (2017).
    _Philosophy: A Text With Readings_ (13th ed). New York: Cengage Learning.

    For electronic resources, the rules changed in the 2019 edition. The “retrieved on date” has been eliminated for most sources. If a DOI is listed, use that instead of the URL. For more, see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html)

    [Note, per APA, you cannot have a reference unless you first have a citation in the body of the paper demonstrating where and that you used the source.]

    For more on APA, references see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html)

    **## PHL302.docx**

    Discussion Post

    · drill down into one section or set of sections covering a topic and explain what you feel the reader should be getting from the words of Aristotle. Also, elaborate on whether you see his description, theory, or conception as tenable in today's world.

    · For example, in Book II, sections 5-7 are considered together to offer a definition of moral virtue. Note that you may need to find an edition that has a proper outline or take your best guess on what sections go together to detail some concept.

    · On the Soul By Aristotle Book 2

    ·
    [http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.2.ii.html](http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.2.ii.html)

    Writing Assignment

    · Identify a film that, through a plot line, scene, or a section of dialogue, effectively illustrates a key philosophical notion of either Plato or Aristotle. For example, your film might illustrate class structure, notions of truth, constructs of justice – virtually any philosophical school of thought or philosophical idea discussed by either Plato or Aristotle. Once you've identified your film you should

    · Give a brief synopsis of the movie.

    · Indicate clearly the notion you're exploring and how the film supports that idea/belief of either Plato or Aristotle. Then, consider how this same belief now plays out in today's society.

    · Be sure to use passages from one or more dialogues to backup your assertions.

    · The Details

    · The paper is to be no less than 1100 words, not counting the works cited page.

    · You should support your discussion by engaging reliable scholarly sources. Use A minimum of three reliable resources in addition to the film you've selected.

    · Your paper is to be completed using MLA or APA formatting. This includes in-text citations and a Works Cited/References page. If you choose to use APA, be consistent and include a proper cover page.

    A Few Examples

    · To get you started, here are a few movies to consider:

    · "The Croods" – a cave family that survives because of a sheltered life – you will see much of Plato's "The Republic" as the story develops. In this you will see the theme of justice, government, and just man.

    · "Man of Steel" – Superman – you will once again see much of Plato's "The Republic" as the story develops. In this you will see the theme of justice, government, and just man.

    · "The Matrix" movies – Plato's allegory of the cave in the movies along with Socrates and the Oracle of Delphi.

    · Other suggestions: Any movie that depicts a class system and/or extreme censorship to maintain order or that "reality" is beyond what we see for Plato.

    · Any movie depicting the benefits of being a virtuous person or that there is nothing beyond what we can see as reality for Aristotle.

    · Here is a link to more movie ideas if you are seeking more choices. Keep in mind all may not be related to Plato or Aristotle: https://mubi.com/lists/essential-movies-for-a-student-of-philosophy

    **## PHIL302Week5EssayMovieTimeRubric.pdf**

    PHIL302 Week 5 Essay: Movie Time

    Week 5 Essay: Movie Time
    100 % Enter rubric description

    Exemplary

    4 pts

    Accomplished

    3.4 pts

    Developing

    3 pts

    Beginning

    2.6 pts

    Did not attempt

    (N/A)
    Digital Literacy

    15 % Quotes, paraphrases, and cites

    information correctly and
    consistently, with very few citation

    errors and misinterpretations/misuses

    of source material.

    Exemplary

    Student quotes, paraphrases,
    and cites information clearly,

    with no errors or

    misinterpretations/ misuses of
    source material.

    Accomplished

    Six out of eight of the
    following criteria are met:

    Student quotes, paraphrase,

    and cites information clearly
    and consistently, with very

    few errors or

    misinterpretations/ misuses of
    source material.

    Developing

    Four out of eight of the
    following criteria are met:

    Student quotes, paraphrases,

    and cites information, but has
    more than a few minor errors

    or misinterpretations /misuses

    of source material.

    Beginning

    Two out of eight of the
    following criteria are

    met:Student attempts to

    quote, paraphrase, and cite
    information, but multiple

    errors and/or

    misinterpretations indicate
    difficulty with the processes.

    Did not attempt

    Student does not attempt to
    quote, paraphrase, and cite

    information, there are

    multiple errors and/or
    misinterpretations indicate

    difficulty with the processes.

    Program Objective

    35 % Information explains
    reasonable schools of philosophical

    and moral thought, the history behind
    their development, and the rationale

    for their acceptance and practice by

    connection to a movie of choice (any
    genre) to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Exemplary

    Fully explains the various

    schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice by

    connection to a movie of

    choice (any genre) to a
    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Accomplished

    Information explains

    reasonable schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Developing

    Information explains partial

    reasonable schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Beginning

    Information explains

    inconsistent or not clear
    support at times for schools

    of philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind
    their development, and the

    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to
    a movie of choice (any genre)

    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Did not attempt

    Information explained is not

    clear support at times schools
    of philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Mastery of Subject Matter

    15 % This section is related to your

    understanding of the subject matter.

    Exemplary

    The author shows exceptional

    familiarity with the subject

    matter (schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice, etc.).

    Accomplished

    The author shows familiarity

    with the subject matter

    (schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice,

    etc.).

    Developing

    The author shows familiarity

    with the subject matter

    (schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice, etc.)

    with occasional mistakes –

    e.g. misidentifying school of

    Beginning

    The author shows insufficient

    familiarity with the subject

    matter. There are often
    instance of mistakes,

    confusions, and omissions.

    Did not attempt

    The author's grasp of the

    subject matter is deficient

    and/or the information
    contained is entirely off the

    mark.

    thought and/or omissions

    about rationale of practice.

    Movie Connection

    10 % This section is used to review
    your connection between the movie

    and the philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Exemplary

    Detailed depth of thought is

    evident as to why movie was

    selected; clear and concise
    connections are drawn

    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato
    or Aristotle.

    Accomplished

    Depth of thought is evident as

    to why movie was selected;

    connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Developing

    Some thought is evident as to

    why movie was selected;

    some connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Beginning

    Little thought is evident as to

    why movie was selected; few

    connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Did not attempt

    No discernible thought is

    evident as to why movie was

    selected; no connections are
    drawn between the movie and

    the philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Organization
    10 % This section is related to the

    organization and coherence of your

    assignment.

    Exemplary

    The paper is concisely and

    clearly organized in a logical
    and coherent manner. The

    paper creates a sense of

    gradual and cumulative
    development. It guides the

    reader smoothly through each

    point.

    Accomplished

    The paper is organized in a

    logical and coherent manner.
    Parts demonstrate gradual and

    cumulative development with

    minor areas for
    improvement.

    Developing

    The paper displays control of

    the direction and organization
    most of the time. Generally a

    logical line of points is made

    but some improvement is
    needed.

    Beginning

    The paper has some

    discernible main parts and
    points but lacks an overall

    coherent structure or it is not

    organized in the most
    efficient manner.

    Did not attempt

    The paper has no discernible

    plan of organization and is a
    mere flow of scattered

    thoughts.

    Grammar/Structure

    15 % This section is related to the

    grammar of your assignment.

    Exemplary

    There are no grammar flaws.

    Perhaps a suggestion is made

    but only on style.

    Accomplished

    There are few grammar

    issues, perhaps 3 or 5 but no

    unique types that are
    repetitive in nature.

    Developing

    There are more than 6 to 10

    unique grammar events.

    Beginning

    There are more than 10

    unique grammar events.

    Did not attempt

    There are more than 10

    unique grammar events, and

    errors of grammar and usage
    make the assignment

    impossible to understand

    without significant effort.

    **## PHIL302Week5EssayMovieTimeRubric.pdf**

    PHIL302 Week 5 Essay: Movie Time

    Week 5 Essay: Movie Time
    100 % Enter rubric description

    Exemplary

    4 pts

    Accomplished

    3.4 pts

    Developing

    3 pts

    Beginning

    2.6 pts

    Did not attempt

    (N/A)
    Digital Literacy

    15 % Quotes, paraphrases, and cites

    information correctly and
    consistently, with very few citation

    errors and misinterpretations/misuses

    of source material.

    Exemplary

    Student quotes, paraphrases,
    and cites information clearly,

    with no errors or

    misinterpretations/ misuses of
    source material.

    Accomplished

    Six out of eight of the
    following criteria are met:

    Student quotes, paraphrase,

    and cites information clearly
    and consistently, with very

    few errors or

    misinterpretations/ misuses of
    source material.

    Developing

    Four out of eight of the
    following criteria are met:

    Student quotes, paraphrases,

    and cites information, but has
    more than a few minor errors

    or misinterpretations /misuses

    of source material.

    Beginning

    Two out of eight of the
    following criteria are

    met:Student attempts to

    quote, paraphrase, and cite
    information, but multiple

    errors and/or

    misinterpretations indicate
    difficulty with the processes.

    Did not attempt

    Student does not attempt to
    quote, paraphrase, and cite

    information, there are

    multiple errors and/or
    misinterpretations indicate

    difficulty with the processes.

    Program Objective

    35 % Information explains
    reasonable schools of philosophical

    and moral thought, the history behind
    their development, and the rationale

    for their acceptance and practice by

    connection to a movie of choice (any
    genre) to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Exemplary

    Fully explains the various

    schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice by

    connection to a movie of

    choice (any genre) to a
    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Accomplished

    Information explains

    reasonable schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Developing

    Information explains partial

    reasonable schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Beginning

    Information explains

    inconsistent or not clear
    support at times for schools

    of philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind
    their development, and the

    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to
    a movie of choice (any genre)

    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Did not attempt

    Information explained is not

    clear support at times schools
    of philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Mastery of Subject Matter

    15 % This section is related to your

    understanding of the subject matter.

    Exemplary

    The author shows exceptional

    familiarity with the subject

    matter (schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice, etc.).

    Accomplished

    The author shows familiarity

    with the subject matter

    (schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice,

    etc.).

    Developing

    The author shows familiarity

    with the subject matter

    (schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice, etc.)

    with occasional mistakes –

    e.g. misidentifying school of

    Beginning

    The author shows insufficient

    familiarity with the subject

    matter. There are often
    instance of mistakes,

    confusions, and omissions.

    Did not attempt

    The author's grasp of the

    subject matter is deficient

    and/or the information
    contained is entirely off the

    mark.

    thought and/or omissions

    about rationale of practice.

    Movie Connection

    10 % This section is used to review
    your connection between the movie

    and the philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Exemplary

    Detailed depth of thought is

    evident as to why movie was

    selected; clear and concise
    connections are drawn

    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato
    or Aristotle.

    Accomplished

    Depth of thought is evident as

    to why movie was selected;

    connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Developing

    Some thought is evident as to

    why movie was selected;

    some connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Beginning

    Little thought is evident as to

    why movie was selected; few

    connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Did not attempt

    No discernible thought is

    evident as to why movie was

    selected; no connections are
    drawn between the movie and

    the philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Organization
    10 % This section is related to the

    organization and coherence of your

    assignment.

    Exemplary

    The paper is concisely and

    clearly organized in a logical
    and coherent manner. The

    paper creates a sense of

    gradual and cumulative
    development. It guides the

    reader smoothly through each

    point.

    Accomplished

    The paper is organized in a

    logical and coherent manner.
    Parts demonstrate gradual and

    cumulative development with

    minor areas for
    improvement.

    Developing

    The paper displays control of

    the direction and organization
    most of the time. Generally a

    logical line of points is made

    but some improvement is
    needed.

    Beginning

    The paper has some

    discernible main parts and
    points but lacks an overall

    coherent structure or it is not

    organized in the most
    efficient manner.

    Did not attempt

    The paper has no discernible

    plan of organization and is a
    mere flow of scattered

    thoughts.

    Grammar/Structure

    15 % This section is related to the

    grammar of your assignment.

    Exemplary

    There are no grammar flaws.

    Perhaps a suggestion is made

    but only on style.

    Accomplished

    There are few grammar

    issues, perhaps 3 or 5 but no

    unique types that are
    repetitive in nature.

    Developing

    There are more than 6 to 10

    unique grammar events.

    Beginning

    There are more than 10

    unique grammar events.

    Did not attempt

    There are more than 10

    unique grammar events, and

    errors of grammar and usage
    make the assignment

    impossible to understand

    without significant effort.

    **## APUAPATemplate.docx**

    2

    2

    **Title of Paper**

    Student Name

    American Public University

    Course #

    Faculty Member

    Date

    **Title of Paper**

    [Introduction and Thesis] This template is formatted properly according to APA Style. It contains the correct order, placement, margins, fonts, headings, etc. Use it as a form and just fill in your information in the appropriate places.

    [Supporting Paragraphs] Remember, you need to cite all information in your paper that originates from outside sources. To do this properly according to APA Style, you will need to include both in-text citation and a Reference list. An “in-text citation” is a brief parenthetical citation that comes directly after a quote or paraphrased information. The general in-text citation format is: (Author’s Last name, Year, p. #). Here is an example that paraphrases the conclusion of a research study: Research shows that 30% of teenagers prefer green grapes (Smith, 2015, p. 89). Another way to format this statement: Smith (2015) conducted a study that shows that 30% of teenagers in the United States select green grapes over any other color of grape (p. 89).

    Never repeat the author’s last name in a sentence and then again in the citation. In the previous example, notice the author’s last name was not included in the in-text citation and that the year always follows the author’s last name. Would you prefer to use a direct quote instead? Follow this format: Smith (2015) concludes in his study, “After analyzing the preferences of 570 teenagers in the United we have determined that 29.8% selected green grapes over other varieties” (p. 89). If you are using a direct quote and the source does not have page numbers, count and list the paragraph number: (Doe, 2015, para. 16).

    For more on APA citations, see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_the_basics.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_the_basics.html)

    References

    Note- references should be in alphabetic order.

    Velasquez, M. (2017).
    _Philosophy: A Text With Readings_ (13th ed). New York: Cengage Learning.

    For electronic resources, the rules changed in the 2019 edition. The “retrieved on date” has been eliminated for most sources. If a DOI is listed, use that instead of the URL. For more, see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html)

    [Note, per APA, you cannot have a reference unless you first have a citation in the body of the paper demonstrating where and that you used the source.]

    For more on APA, references see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html)

    **## PHL302.docx**

    Discussion Post

    · drill down into one section or set of sections covering a topic and explain what you feel the reader should be getting from the words of Aristotle. Also, elaborate on whether you see his description, theory, or conception as tenable in today's world.

    · For example, in Book II, sections 5-7 are considered together to offer a definition of moral virtue. Note that you may need to find an edition that has a proper outline or take your best guess on what sections go together to detail some concept.

    · On the Soul By Aristotle Book 2

    ·
    [http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.2.ii.html](http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.2.ii.html)

    Writing Assignment

    · Identify a film that, through a plot line, scene, or a section of dialogue, effectively illustrates a key philosophical notion of either Plato or Aristotle. For example, your film might illustrate class structure, notions of truth, constructs of justice – virtually any philosophical school of thought or philosophical idea discussed by either Plato or Aristotle. Once you've identified your film you should

    · Give a brief synopsis of the movie.

    · Indicate clearly the notion you're exploring and how the film supports that idea/belief of either Plato or Aristotle. Then, consider how this same belief now plays out in today's society.

    · Be sure to use passages from one or more dialogues to backup your assertions.

    · The Details

    · The paper is to be no less than 1100 words, not counting the works cited page.

    · You should support your discussion by engaging reliable scholarly sources. Use A minimum of three reliable resources in addition to the film you've selected.

    · Your paper is to be completed using MLA or APA formatting. This includes in-text citations and a Works Cited/References page. If you choose to use APA, be consistent and include a proper cover page.

    A Few Examples

    · To get you started, here are a few movies to consider:

    · "The Croods" – a cave family that survives because of a sheltered life – you will see much of Plato's "The Republic" as the story develops. In this you will see the theme of justice, government, and just man.

    · "Man of Steel" – Superman – you will once again see much of Plato's "The Republic" as the story develops. In this you will see the theme of justice, government, and just man.

    · "The Matrix" movies – Plato's allegory of the cave in the movies along with Socrates and the Oracle of Delphi.

    · Other suggestions: Any movie that depicts a class system and/or extreme censorship to maintain order or that "reality" is beyond what we see for Plato.

    · Any movie depicting the benefits of being a virtuous person or that there is nothing beyond what we can see as reality for Aristotle.

    · Here is a link to more movie ideas if you are seeking more choices. Keep in mind all may not be related to Plato or Aristotle: https://mubi.com/lists/essential-movies-for-a-student-of-philosophy

    **## PHIL302Week5EssayMovieTimeRubric.pdf**

    PHIL302 Week 5 Essay: Movie Time

    Week 5 Essay: Movie Time
    100 % Enter rubric description

    Exemplary

    4 pts

    Accomplished

    3.4 pts

    Developing

    3 pts

    Beginning

    2.6 pts

    Did not attempt

    (N/A)
    Digital Literacy

    15 % Quotes, paraphrases, and cites

    information correctly and
    consistently, with very few citation

    errors and misinterpretations/misuses

    of source material.

    Exemplary

    Student quotes, paraphrases,
    and cites information clearly,

    with no errors or

    misinterpretations/ misuses of
    source material.

    Accomplished

    Six out of eight of the
    following criteria are met:

    Student quotes, paraphrase,

    and cites information clearly
    and consistently, with very

    few errors or

    misinterpretations/ misuses of
    source material.

    Developing

    Four out of eight of the
    following criteria are met:

    Student quotes, paraphrases,

    and cites information, but has
    more than a few minor errors

    or misinterpretations /misuses

    of source material.

    Beginning

    Two out of eight of the
    following criteria are

    met:Student attempts to

    quote, paraphrase, and cite
    information, but multiple

    errors and/or

    misinterpretations indicate
    difficulty with the processes.

    Did not attempt

    Student does not attempt to
    quote, paraphrase, and cite

    information, there are

    multiple errors and/or
    misinterpretations indicate

    difficulty with the processes.

    Program Objective

    35 % Information explains
    reasonable schools of philosophical

    and moral thought, the history behind
    their development, and the rationale

    for their acceptance and practice by

    connection to a movie of choice (any
    genre) to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Exemplary

    Fully explains the various

    schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice by

    connection to a movie of

    choice (any genre) to a
    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Accomplished

    Information explains

    reasonable schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Developing

    Information explains partial

    reasonable schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Beginning

    Information explains

    inconsistent or not clear
    support at times for schools

    of philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind
    their development, and the

    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to
    a movie of choice (any genre)

    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Did not attempt

    Information explained is not

    clear support at times schools
    of philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Mastery of Subject Matter

    15 % This section is related to your

    understanding of the subject matter.

    Exemplary

    The author shows exceptional

    familiarity with the subject

    matter (schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice, etc.).

    Accomplished

    The author shows familiarity

    with the subject matter

    (schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice,

    etc.).

    Developing

    The author shows familiarity

    with the subject matter

    (schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice, etc.)

    with occasional mistakes –

    e.g. misidentifying school of

    Beginning

    The author shows insufficient

    familiarity with the subject

    matter. There are often
    instance of mistakes,

    confusions, and omissions.

    Did not attempt

    The author's grasp of the

    subject matter is deficient

    and/or the information
    contained is entirely off the

    mark.

    thought and/or omissions

    about rationale of practice.

    Movie Connection

    10 % This section is used to review
    your connection between the movie

    and the philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Exemplary

    Detailed depth of thought is

    evident as to why movie was

    selected; clear and concise
    connections are drawn

    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato
    or Aristotle.

    Accomplished

    Depth of thought is evident as

    to why movie was selected;

    connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Developing

    Some thought is evident as to

    why movie was selected;

    some connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Beginning

    Little thought is evident as to

    why movie was selected; few

    connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Did not attempt

    No discernible thought is

    evident as to why movie was

    selected; no connections are
    drawn between the movie and

    the philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Organization
    10 % This section is related to the

    organization and coherence of your

    assignment.

    Exemplary

    The paper is concisely and

    clearly organized in a logical
    and coherent manner. The

    paper creates a sense of

    gradual and cumulative
    development. It guides the

    reader smoothly through each

    point.

    Accomplished

    The paper is organized in a

    logical and coherent manner.
    Parts demonstrate gradual and

    cumulative development with

    minor areas for
    improvement.

    Developing

    The paper displays control of

    the direction and organization
    most of the time. Generally a

    logical line of points is made

    but some improvement is
    needed.

    Beginning

    The paper has some

    discernible main parts and
    points but lacks an overall

    coherent structure or it is not

    organized in the most
    efficient manner.

    Did not attempt

    The paper has no discernible

    plan of organization and is a
    mere flow of scattered

    thoughts.

    Grammar/Structure

    15 % This section is related to the

    grammar of your assignment.

    Exemplary

    There are no grammar flaws.

    Perhaps a suggestion is made

    but only on style.

    Accomplished

    There are few grammar

    issues, perhaps 3 or 5 but no

    unique types that are
    repetitive in nature.

    Developing

    There are more than 6 to 10

    unique grammar events.

    Beginning

    There are more than 10

    unique grammar events.

    Did not attempt

    There are more than 10

    unique grammar events, and

    errors of grammar and usage
    make the assignment

    impossible to understand

    without significant effort.

    **## APUAPATemplate.docx**

    2

    2

    **Title of Paper**

    Student Name

    American Public University

    Course #

    Faculty Member

    Date

    **Title of Paper**

    [Introduction and Thesis] This template is formatted properly according to APA Style. It contains the correct order, placement, margins, fonts, headings, etc. Use it as a form and just fill in your information in the appropriate places.

    [Supporting Paragraphs] Remember, you need to cite all information in your paper that originates from outside sources. To do this properly according to APA Style, you will need to include both in-text citation and a Reference list. An “in-text citation” is a brief parenthetical citation that comes directly after a quote or paraphrased information. The general in-text citation format is: (Author’s Last name, Year, p. #). Here is an example that paraphrases the conclusion of a research study: Research shows that 30% of teenagers prefer green grapes (Smith, 2015, p. 89). Another way to format this statement: Smith (2015) conducted a study that shows that 30% of teenagers in the United States select green grapes over any other color of grape (p. 89).

    Never repeat the author’s last name in a sentence and then again in the citation. In the previous example, notice the author’s last name was not included in the in-text citation and that the year always follows the author’s last name. Would you prefer to use a direct quote instead? Follow this format: Smith (2015) concludes in his study, “After analyzing the preferences of 570 teenagers in the United we have determined that 29.8% selected green grapes over other varieties” (p. 89). If you are using a direct quote and the source does not have page numbers, count and list the paragraph number: (Doe, 2015, para. 16).

    For more on APA citations, see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_the_basics.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/in_text_citations_the_basics.html)

    References

    Note- references should be in alphabetic order.

    Velasquez, M. (2017).
    _Philosophy: A Text With Readings_ (13th ed). New York: Cengage Learning.

    For electronic resources, the rules changed in the 2019 edition. The “retrieved on date” has been eliminated for most sources. If a DOI is listed, use that instead of the URL. For more, see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_electronic_sources.html)

    [Note, per APA, you cannot have a reference unless you first have a citation in the body of the paper demonstrating where and that you used the source.]

    For more on APA, references see
    [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html)

    **## PHL302.docx**

    Discussion Post

    · drill down into one section or set of sections covering a topic and explain what you feel the reader should be getting from the words of Aristotle. Also, elaborate on whether you see his description, theory, or conception as tenable in today's world.

    · For example, in Book II, sections 5-7 are considered together to offer a definition of moral virtue. Note that you may need to find an edition that has a proper outline or take your best guess on what sections go together to detail some concept.

    · On the Soul By Aristotle Book 2

    ·
    [http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.2.ii.html](http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.2.ii.html)

    Writing Assignment

    · Identify a film that, through a plot line, scene, or a section of dialogue, effectively illustrates a key philosophical notion of either Plato or Aristotle. For example, your film might illustrate class structure, notions of truth, constructs of justice – virtually any philosophical school of thought or philosophical idea discussed by either Plato or Aristotle. Once you've identified your film you should

    · Give a brief synopsis of the movie.

    · Indicate clearly the notion you're exploring and how the film supports that idea/belief of either Plato or Aristotle. Then, consider how this same belief now plays out in today's society.

    · Be sure to use passages from one or more dialogues to backup your assertions.

    · The Details

    · The paper is to be no less than 1100 words, not counting the works cited page.

    · You should support your discussion by engaging reliable scholarly sources. Use A minimum of three reliable resources in addition to the film you've selected.

    · Your paper is to be completed using MLA or APA formatting. This includes in-text citations and a Works Cited/References page. If you choose to use APA, be consistent and include a proper cover page.

    A Few Examples

    · To get you started, here are a few movies to consider:

    · "The Croods" – a cave family that survives because of a sheltered life – you will see much of Plato's "The Republic" as the story develops. In this you will see the theme of justice, government, and just man.

    · "Man of Steel" – Superman – you will once again see much of Plato's "The Republic" as the story develops. In this you will see the theme of justice, government, and just man.

    · "The Matrix" movies – Plato's allegory of the cave in the movies along with Socrates and the Oracle of Delphi.

    · Other suggestions: Any movie that depicts a class system and/or extreme censorship to maintain order or that "reality" is beyond what we see for Plato.

    · Any movie depicting the benefits of being a virtuous person or that there is nothing beyond what we can see as reality for Aristotle.

    · Here is a link to more movie ideas if you are seeking more choices. Keep in mind all may not be related to Plato or Aristotle: https://mubi.com/lists/essential-movies-for-a-student-of-philosophy

    **## PHIL302Week5EssayMovieTimeRubric.pdf**

    PHIL302 Week 5 Essay: Movie Time

    Week 5 Essay: Movie Time
    100 % Enter rubric description

    Exemplary

    4 pts

    Accomplished

    3.4 pts

    Developing

    3 pts

    Beginning

    2.6 pts

    Did not attempt

    (N/A)
    Digital Literacy

    15 % Quotes, paraphrases, and cites

    information correctly and
    consistently, with very few citation

    errors and misinterpretations/misuses

    of source material.

    Exemplary

    Student quotes, paraphrases,
    and cites information clearly,

    with no errors or

    misinterpretations/ misuses of
    source material.

    Accomplished

    Six out of eight of the
    following criteria are met:

    Student quotes, paraphrase,

    and cites information clearly
    and consistently, with very

    few errors or

    misinterpretations/ misuses of
    source material.

    Developing

    Four out of eight of the
    following criteria are met:

    Student quotes, paraphrases,

    and cites information, but has
    more than a few minor errors

    or misinterpretations /misuses

    of source material.

    Beginning

    Two out of eight of the
    following criteria are

    met:Student attempts to

    quote, paraphrase, and cite
    information, but multiple

    errors and/or

    misinterpretations indicate
    difficulty with the processes.

    Did not attempt

    Student does not attempt to
    quote, paraphrase, and cite

    information, there are

    multiple errors and/or
    misinterpretations indicate

    difficulty with the processes.

    Program Objective

    35 % Information explains
    reasonable schools of philosophical

    and moral thought, the history behind
    their development, and the rationale

    for their acceptance and practice by

    connection to a movie of choice (any
    genre) to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Exemplary

    Fully explains the various

    schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice by

    connection to a movie of

    choice (any genre) to a
    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Accomplished

    Information explains

    reasonable schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Developing

    Information explains partial

    reasonable schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Beginning

    Information explains

    inconsistent or not clear
    support at times for schools

    of philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind
    their development, and the

    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to
    a movie of choice (any genre)

    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Did not attempt

    Information explained is not

    clear support at times schools
    of philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice by connection to

    a movie of choice (any genre)
    to a philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Mastery of Subject Matter

    15 % This section is related to your

    understanding of the subject matter.

    Exemplary

    The author shows exceptional

    familiarity with the subject

    matter (schools of
    philosophical and moral

    thought, the history behind

    their development, and the
    rationale for their acceptance

    and practice, etc.).

    Accomplished

    The author shows familiarity

    with the subject matter

    (schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice,

    etc.).

    Developing

    The author shows familiarity

    with the subject matter

    (schools of philosophical and
    moral thought, the history

    behind their development,

    and the rationale for their
    acceptance and practice, etc.)

    with occasional mistakes –

    e.g. misidentifying school of

    Beginning

    The author shows insufficient

    familiarity with the subject

    matter. There are often
    instance of mistakes,

    confusions, and omissions.

    Did not attempt

    The author's grasp of the

    subject matter is deficient

    and/or the information
    contained is entirely off the

    mark.

    thought and/or omissions

    about rationale of practice.

    Movie Connection

    10 % This section is used to review
    your connection between the movie

    and the philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Exemplary

    Detailed depth of thought is

    evident as to why movie was

    selected; clear and concise
    connections are drawn

    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato
    or Aristotle.

    Accomplished

    Depth of thought is evident as

    to why movie was selected;

    connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Developing

    Some thought is evident as to

    why movie was selected;

    some connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Beginning

    Little thought is evident as to

    why movie was selected; few

    connections are drawn
    between the movie and the

    philosophical belief of Plato

    or Aristotle.

    Did not attempt

    No discernible thought is

    evident as to why movie was

    selected; no connections are
    drawn between the movie and

    the philosophical belief of

    Plato or Aristotle.

    Organization
    10 % This section is related to the

    organization and coherence of your

    assignment.

    Exemplary

    The paper is concisely and

    clearly organized in a logical
    and coherent manner. The

    paper creates a sense of

    gradual and cumulative
    development. It guides the

    reader smoothly through each

    point.

    Accomplished

    The paper is organized in a

    logical and coherent manner.
    Parts demonstrate gradual and

    cumulative development with

    minor areas for
    improvement.

    Developing

    The paper displays control of

    the direction and organization
    most of the time. Generally a

    logical line of points is made

    but some improvement is
    needed.

    Beginning

    The paper has some

    discernible main parts and
    points but lacks an overall

    coherent structure or it is not

    organized in the most
    efficient manner.

    Did not attempt

    The paper has no discernible

    plan of organization and is a
    mere flow of scattered

    thoughts.

    Grammar/Structure

    15 % This section is related to the

    grammar of your assignment.

    Exemplary

    There are no grammar flaws.

    Perhaps a suggestion is made

    but only on style.

    Accomplished

    There are few grammar

    issues, perhaps 3 or 5 but no

    unique types that are
    repetitive in nature.

    Developing

    There are more than 6 to 10

    unique grammar events.

    Beginning

    There are more than 10

    unique grammar events.

    Did not attempt

    There are more than 10

    unique grammar events, and

    errors of grammar and usage
    make the assignment

    impossible to understand

    without significant effort.

  • [Solved] PMHNP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe how cultural awareness is necessary to be a successful patient advocate as an PMHNP in 4 slides and add a peer review article used to answer question. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe how cultural awareness is necessary to be a successful patient advocate as an PMHNP  in 4 slides and add a peer review article used to answer question.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Health promotion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. What are the key components to promoting good mental health in individuals, families, and communities? As you think about these key components, address the issue from **one of the three viewpoints below**. Include evidence-based support and guidance in your response. – **If you are an FNP current…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1.  What are the key components to promoting good mental health in individuals, families, and communities?  As you think about these key components, address the issue from **one of the three viewpoints below**.  Include evidence-based support and guidance in your response.

    – **If you are an FNP currently providing full-spectrum primary care across the lifespan** how do you feel your practice will change as a PMHNP in regards to assuring adequate health promotion, preventive medicine, health protection, anticipatory guidance, counseling, and disease management working with those with mental health issues including those who are severely mentally ill, pregnancy, pediatrics, geriatrics, adults and those with substance abuse issues? What do you envision the barriers to preventive medicine will be and how could you work to enhance primary care/preventive medicine services for your patient population?
    – **If you are a WHNP, CNM, APN, GNP, or PNP who has predominantly practiced within one specialty area** how do you envision integrating full-spectrum care to both men and women providing adequate health promotion, preventive medicine, health protection, anticipatory guidance, counseling and disease management working with those with mental health issues including those who are severely mentally ill, pregnancy, pediatrics, geriatrics, adults, and those with substance abuse issues? What do you envision the barriers to preventive medicine will be and how could you work to enhance primary care/preventive medicine services for your patient population?
    – **If you are an RN who is not in an advanced practice role**, why do you think it is important for a PMHNP to have an eye on health promotion, preventive medicine, health protection, anticipatory guidance, counseling & disease management of mental health issues as well as physical health needs.   How do you feel you could stay up to date with those areas of primary care when your primary focus is psychiatry?

    ### **Step 2:**

    Look over the following article to identify some important parameters of the involuntary emergency admission process for your state.   You will also look at your IEA process in-depth in the next step.  This article outlines the parameters of involuntary commitment:  [State Laws on Emergency Holds for Mental Health Stabilization](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4756/files/2749194?wrap=1 "State Laws on Emergency Holds.pdf") [Download State Laws on Emergency Holds for Mental Health Stabilization](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4756/files/2749194/download?download_frd=1)

    ### **Step 3:**

    From time to time, patients with severe mental health issues may require a higher level of care than can be provided in the community setting.  This may require the implementation of the emergency admission process.

    It is important to understand the IEA process in your state,  When you are in a crisis situation, you may have to respond quickly to the patient’s need for safety and you will not have time to look up the process for involuntary emergency admission (IEA).  The purpose of this assignment is for you to investigate the process, understand how to initiate the process, and understand the consequences of involuntary commitment in your state.  Please respond to the items below and keep this information as a reference when you begin to practice.  [USE THIS TEMPLATE to record your information](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4756/files/2749218?wrap=1 "IEA Process Assignment Template.docx") [Download USE THIS TEMPLATE to record your information](https://frontiernursing.instructure.com/courses/4756/files/2749218/download?download_frd=1)

    – Outline the process for involuntary emergency admission, starting with the identification of a patient at risk who is in need of emergency mental health services all the way through admission to the facility, treatment, and discharge.
    – What types of situations would necessitate the initiation of the involuntary emergency admission process?
    – What are the resources for follow-up after the patient has been released?  Give an example of how you would implement a health promotion plan for the patient who returns to the community.
    – What are your thoughts on the IEA process in your state? Do you think it is reasonable, necessary, and accessible?
    – How could you apply the TeamSTEPPS Model before, during, or after commitment to facilitate the best care for the patient? Remember to refer to your readings on TeamSTEPPS to give you some guidance on making your team choices.
    – Identify a culture other than your own and discuss the implications of receiving a mental health diagnosis as well as being admitted to a psychiatric facility based on their cultural view of mental health/mental illness.

    – [\
    \
    IEAProcessAssignmentTemplate.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ieaprocessassignmenttemplate-docx "IEAProcessAssignmentTemplate.docx")
    – [\
    \
    StateLawsonEmergencyHolds.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/statelawsonemergencyholds-pdf "StateLawsonEmergencyHolds.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    plz read instruction. – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## a5.Instruction..pdf – InterventionFeedbackForm.png **## a5.Instruction..pdf** Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection (3 pages Scripts- use spoken word plz) Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    plz read instruction.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## a5.Instruction..pdf

    – InterventionFeedbackForm.png

    **## a5.Instruction..pdf**

    Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection (3 pages
    Scripts- use spoken word plz)

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and record a 10–15
    minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your
    capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your
    RN-to-BSN program.

    Introduction

    Baccalaureate-prepared nurses have many opportunities to reflect on their contributions
    to patient care outcomes during clinical experiences. Research suggests that creating
    and sharing video reflections may enhance learning (Speed, Lucarelli, & Macaulay,
    2018).

    For this assessment, you'll present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or
    group and reflect on various aspects of your capstone practicum experience. Such
    reflection will give you a chance to discuss elements of the project of which you are
    most proud and aspects of the experience that will help you grow in your personal
    practice and nursing career.

    Reference

    Speed, C. J., Lucarelli, G. A., & Macaulay, J. O. (2018). Student produced
    videos—An innovative and creative approach to assessment. Sciedu International
    Journal of Higher Education, 7(4).

    Instructions
    Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) present your approved intervention to the
    patient, family, or group and (b) record a video reflection on your practicum experience,
    the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth
    over the course of your RN-to-BSN program.

    Part 1

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group. Plan to spend at
    least 3 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family,
    or group. During this time, you may also consult with subject matter and industry
    experts of your choice.

    Use the Intervention Feedback Form as a guide to capturing patient, family, or group
    feedback about your intervention. You'll include the feedback as part of your capstone
    reflection video.

    Part 2

    Record a 10–15 minute(3 pages Scripts- use spoken word plz)video reflection on your
    practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and
    professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program. A transcript of your
    video is not required.

    Requirements
    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion
    to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for
    supporting evidence.

    ● Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction
    and quality of life.

    ○ Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group
    on your intervention as a solution to the problem.

    ○ Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or
    group experience.

    ● Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and
    implement your capstone project.

    ○ Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed
    this aspect of your project.

    ● Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care
    technology in your capstone project to improve outcomes or communication
    with the patient, family, or group.

    ○ Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in
    future practice.

    ● Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of
    your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to
    policy development.

    ○ Note specific observations related to the
    baccalaureate-prepared nurse's role in policy implementation
    and development.

    ● Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched your initial
    predictions.

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486248?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486248?wrap=1)

    ○ Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell
    short of your expectations.

    ○ Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a
    best practice.

    ○ Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this
    particular setting.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone
    project and the RN-to-BSN program.

    ○ Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of
    professional standards.

    ○ Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in
    which you have taken particular satisfaction.

    ● Communicate professionally in a clear, audible, and well-organized video.

    Competencies Measured
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the
    best available evidence.

    ○ Describe one's use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to
    plan and implement a capstone project.

    ● Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient
    safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    ○ Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched one's
    initial predictions

    ○ Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to
    improve patient and systems outcomes.

    ○ Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health
    care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or
    communication with a patient, family, or group.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Explain how health policy influenced the planning and
    implementation of one's capstone project, as well as any
    contributions the project made to policy development.

    ● Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care
    and the patient experience.

    ○ Assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or
    group satisfaction and quality of life.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    ○ Assess one's personal and professional growth throughout a

    capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.
    ○ Communicate professionally in a clear and well-organized

    video.

    Additional Requirements

    Cite at least three scholarly or authoritative sources to support your assertions. In
    addition to your reflection video, submit a separate APA-formatted reference list of your
    sources.

    – Introduction

    – Reference

    – Instructions

    – Part 1
    – Part 2

    – Requirements
    – Competencies Measured
    – Additional Requirements

    **InterventionFeedbackForm.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/interventionfeedbackform-png)

    **InterventionFeedbackForm.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/interventionfeedbackform-png)

    **## a5.Instruction..pdf**

    Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection (3 pages
    Scripts- use spoken word plz)

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and record a 10–15
    minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your
    capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your
    RN-to-BSN program.

    Introduction

    Baccalaureate-prepared nurses have many opportunities to reflect on their contributions
    to patient care outcomes during clinical experiences. Research suggests that creating
    and sharing video reflections may enhance learning (Speed, Lucarelli, & Macaulay,
    2018).

    For this assessment, you'll present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or
    group and reflect on various aspects of your capstone practicum experience. Such
    reflection will give you a chance to discuss elements of the project of which you are
    most proud and aspects of the experience that will help you grow in your personal
    practice and nursing career.

    Reference

    Speed, C. J., Lucarelli, G. A., & Macaulay, J. O. (2018). Student produced
    videos—An innovative and creative approach to assessment. Sciedu International
    Journal of Higher Education, 7(4).

    Instructions
    Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) present your approved intervention to the
    patient, family, or group and (b) record a video reflection on your practicum experience,
    the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth
    over the course of your RN-to-BSN program.

    Part 1

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group. Plan to spend at
    least 3 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family,
    or group. During this time, you may also consult with subject matter and industry
    experts of your choice.

    Use the Intervention Feedback Form as a guide to capturing patient, family, or group
    feedback about your intervention. You'll include the feedback as part of your capstone
    reflection video.

    Part 2

    Record a 10–15 minute(3 pages Scripts- use spoken word plz)video reflection on your
    practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and
    professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program. A transcript of your
    video is not required.

    Requirements
    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion
    to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for
    supporting evidence.

    ● Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction
    and quality of life.

    ○ Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group
    on your intervention as a solution to the problem.

    ○ Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or
    group experience.

    ● Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and
    implement your capstone project.

    ○ Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed
    this aspect of your project.

    ● Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care
    technology in your capstone project to improve outcomes or communication
    with the patient, family, or group.

    ○ Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in
    future practice.

    ● Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of
    your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to
    policy development.

    ○ Note specific observations related to the
    baccalaureate-prepared nurse's role in policy implementation
    and development.

    ● Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched your initial
    predictions.

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486248?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486248?wrap=1)

    ○ Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell
    short of your expectations.

    ○ Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a
    best practice.

    ○ Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this
    particular setting.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone
    project and the RN-to-BSN program.

    ○ Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of
    professional standards.

    ○ Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in
    which you have taken particular satisfaction.

    ● Communicate professionally in a clear, audible, and well-organized video.

    Competencies Measured
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the
    best available evidence.

    ○ Describe one's use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to
    plan and implement a capstone project.

    ● Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient
    safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    ○ Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched one's
    initial predictions

    ○ Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to
    improve patient and systems outcomes.

    ○ Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health
    care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or
    communication with a patient, family, or group.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Explain how health policy influenced the planning and
    implementation of one's capstone project, as well as any
    contributions the project made to policy development.

    ● Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care
    and the patient experience.

    ○ Assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or
    group satisfaction and quality of life.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    ○ Assess one's personal and professional growth throughout a

    capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.
    ○ Communicate professionally in a clear and well-organized

    video.

    Additional Requirements

    Cite at least three scholarly or authoritative sources to support your assertions. In
    addition to your reflection video, submit a separate APA-formatted reference list of your
    sources.

    – Introduction

    – Reference

    – Instructions

    – Part 1
    – Part 2

    – Requirements
    – Competencies Measured
    – Additional Requirements

    **InterventionFeedbackForm.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/interventionfeedbackform-png)

    **## a5.Instruction..pdf**

    Intervention Presentation and Capstone Video Reflection (3 pages
    Scripts- use spoken word plz)

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group and record a 10–15
    minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your
    capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your
    RN-to-BSN program.

    Introduction

    Baccalaureate-prepared nurses have many opportunities to reflect on their contributions
    to patient care outcomes during clinical experiences. Research suggests that creating
    and sharing video reflections may enhance learning (Speed, Lucarelli, & Macaulay,
    2018).

    For this assessment, you'll present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or
    group and reflect on various aspects of your capstone practicum experience. Such
    reflection will give you a chance to discuss elements of the project of which you are
    most proud and aspects of the experience that will help you grow in your personal
    practice and nursing career.

    Reference

    Speed, C. J., Lucarelli, G. A., & Macaulay, J. O. (2018). Student produced
    videos—An innovative and creative approach to assessment. Sciedu International
    Journal of Higher Education, 7(4).

    Instructions
    Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) present your approved intervention to the
    patient, family, or group and (b) record a video reflection on your practicum experience,
    the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth
    over the course of your RN-to-BSN program.

    Part 1

    Present your approved intervention to the patient, family, or group. Plan to spend at
    least 3 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family,
    or group. During this time, you may also consult with subject matter and industry
    experts of your choice.

    Use the Intervention Feedback Form as a guide to capturing patient, family, or group
    feedback about your intervention. You'll include the feedback as part of your capstone
    reflection video.

    Part 2

    Record a 10–15 minute(3 pages Scripts- use spoken word plz)video reflection on your
    practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and
    professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program. A transcript of your
    video is not required.

    Requirements
    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion
    to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for
    supporting evidence.

    ● Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction
    and quality of life.

    ○ Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group
    on your intervention as a solution to the problem.

    ○ Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or
    group experience.

    ● Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and
    implement your capstone project.

    ○ Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed
    this aspect of your project.

    ● Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care
    technology in your capstone project to improve outcomes or communication
    with the patient, family, or group.

    ○ Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in
    future practice.

    ● Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of
    your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to
    policy development.

    ○ Note specific observations related to the
    baccalaureate-prepared nurse's role in policy implementation
    and development.

    ● Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched your initial
    predictions.

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486248?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486248?wrap=1)

    ○ Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell
    short of your expectations.

    ○ Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a
    best practice.

    ○ Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this
    particular setting.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone
    project and the RN-to-BSN program.

    ○ Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of
    professional standards.

    ○ Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in
    which you have taken particular satisfaction.

    ● Communicate professionally in a clear, audible, and well-organized video.

    Competencies Measured
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the
    best available evidence.

    ○ Describe one's use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to
    plan and implement a capstone project.

    ● Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient
    safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    ○ Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched one's
    initial predictions

    ○ Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to
    improve patient and systems outcomes.

    ○ Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health
    care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or
    communication with a patient, family, or group.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Explain how health policy influenced the planning and
    implementation of one's capstone project, as well as any
    contributions the project made to policy development.

    ● Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care
    and the patient experience.

    ○ Assess the contribution of an intervention to patient, family, or
    group satisfaction and quality of life.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    ○ Assess one's personal and professional growth throughout a

    capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.
    ○ Communicate professionally in a clear and well-organized

    video.

    Additional Requirements

    Cite at least three scholarly or authoritative sources to support your assertions. In
    addition to your reflection video, submit a separate APA-formatted reference list of your
    sources.

    – Introduction

    – Reference

    – Instructions

    – Part 1
    – Part 2

    – Requirements
    – Competencies Measured
    – Additional Requirements

    **InterventionFeedbackForm.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/interventionfeedbackform-png)

  • [Solved] Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    plz read instructions – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## a4.Instruction.pdf **## a4.Instruction.pdf** Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution Please submit both your solution/intervention and the 5 page analysis to complete . Develop an intervention , as a solution to the patient, famil…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    plz read instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## a4.Instruction.pdf

    **## a4.Instruction.pdf**

    Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution
    Please submit both your solution/intervention and the 5 page analysis to complete .

    Develop an intervention , as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem
    you've defined. Submit the proposed intervention to the faculty for review and approval.
    This solution needs to be implemented (shared) with your patient, family, or group. In a
    separate written deliverable, write a 5 page analysis of your intervention.

    Introduction

    In your first three assessments, you applied new knowledge and insight gleaned from
    the literature, from organizational data, and from direct consultation with the patient,
    family, or group (and perhaps with subject matter and industry experts) to your
    assessment of the problem. You've examined the problem from the perspectives of
    leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, policy, quality of care,
    patient safety, costs to the system and individual, technology, care coordination, and
    community resources. Now it's time to turn your attention to proposing an intervention
    (your capstone project), as a solution to the problem.

    Instructions

    Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an intervention as a solution to the
    problem and (b) submit your proposed intervention, with a written analysis, to your
    faculty for review and approval.

    Part 1

    Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based on your assessment and
    supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based sources.

    Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your
    understanding of the problem:

    ● Leadership.
    ● Collaboration.
    ● Communication.
    ● Change management.
    ● Policy.

    ● Quality of care.
    ● Patient safety.
    ● Costs to the system and individual.
    ● Technology.
    ● Care coordination.
    ● Community resources.

    Part 2

    Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval.

    In a separate written deliverable, write a 5 page analysis of your intervention.

    ● Summarize the patient, family, or population problem.
    ● Explain why you selected this problem as the focus of your project.
    ● Explain why the problem is relevant to your professional practice and to the

    patient, family, or group.

    In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These requirements correspond to
    the scoring guide criteria for this assessment, so be sure to address each main point.
    Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be
    assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length
    and for supporting evidence.

    ● Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing the
    problem.

    ○ Explain how leadership and change management strategies
    influenced the development of your proposed intervention.

    ○ Explain how nursing ethics informed the development of your
    proposed intervention.

    ○ Include a copy of the intervention/solution/professional product.
    ● Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with the patient,

    family, or group to improve outcomes associated with the problem.
    ○ Identify the patient, family, or group.
    ○ Discuss the benefits of gathering their input to improve care

    associated with the problem.
    ○ Identify best-practice strategies from the literature for effective

    communication and collaboration to improve outcomes.

    ● Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or
    governmental policies guided the development of your proposed
    intervention.

    ○ Cite the standards and/or policies that guided your work.
    ○ Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these

    standards and/or policies in improving outcomes for this
    problem.

    ● Explain how your proposed intervention will improve the quality of care,
    enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that supports your
    conclusions.

    ○ Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on
    care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual.

    ● Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community
    resources can be applied in addressing the problem.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that supports your
    conclusions.

    ● Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
    ● Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems,
    and population outcomes.

    ○ Define the role of leadership and change management in
    addressing a patient, family, or population health problem and
    includes a copy of intervention/solution/professional product.

    ● Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient
    safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    ○ Explain how a proposed intervention to address a patient,
    family, or population health problem will improve the quality of
    care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system
    and individual.

    ● Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to
    improve patient and systems outcomes.

    ○ Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization
    of community resources can be applied in addressing a
    patient, family, or population health problem.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or
    organizational or governmental policies guided the
    development of a proposed intervention.

    ● Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and
    population outcomes.

    ○ Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with a
    patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with a
    patient, family, or population health problem.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    ○ Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
    ○ Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

    Additional Requirements

    ● Format: Format the written analysis of your intervention using APA style.
    Be sure to include:

    ○ A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    ○ Appropriate section headings.

    ● Length: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not
    including the reference page.

    ● Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or
    professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be
    no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA
    format.

    ● Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize
    errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus
    on its substance.

    – Introduction
    – Instructions

    – Part 1
    – Part 2

    – Competencies Measured
    – Additional Requirements

    **## a4.Instruction.pdf**

    Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution
    Please submit both your solution/intervention and the 5 page analysis to complete .

    Develop an intervention , as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem
    you've defined. Submit the proposed intervention to the faculty for review and approval.
    This solution needs to be implemented (shared) with your patient, family, or group. In a
    separate written deliverable, write a 5 page analysis of your intervention.

    Introduction

    In your first three assessments, you applied new knowledge and insight gleaned from
    the literature, from organizational data, and from direct consultation with the patient,
    family, or group (and perhaps with subject matter and industry experts) to your
    assessment of the problem. You've examined the problem from the perspectives of
    leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, policy, quality of care,
    patient safety, costs to the system and individual, technology, care coordination, and
    community resources. Now it's time to turn your attention to proposing an intervention
    (your capstone project), as a solution to the problem.

    Instructions

    Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an intervention as a solution to the
    problem and (b) submit your proposed intervention, with a written analysis, to your
    faculty for review and approval.

    Part 1

    Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based on your assessment and
    supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based sources.

    Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your
    understanding of the problem:

    ● Leadership.
    ● Collaboration.
    ● Communication.
    ● Change management.
    ● Policy.

    ● Quality of care.
    ● Patient safety.
    ● Costs to the system and individual.
    ● Technology.
    ● Care coordination.
    ● Community resources.

    Part 2

    Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval.

    In a separate written deliverable, write a 5 page analysis of your intervention.

    ● Summarize the patient, family, or population problem.
    ● Explain why you selected this problem as the focus of your project.
    ● Explain why the problem is relevant to your professional practice and to the

    patient, family, or group.

    In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These requirements correspond to
    the scoring guide criteria for this assessment, so be sure to address each main point.
    Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be
    assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length
    and for supporting evidence.

    ● Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing the
    problem.

    ○ Explain how leadership and change management strategies
    influenced the development of your proposed intervention.

    ○ Explain how nursing ethics informed the development of your
    proposed intervention.

    ○ Include a copy of the intervention/solution/professional product.
    ● Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with the patient,

    family, or group to improve outcomes associated with the problem.
    ○ Identify the patient, family, or group.
    ○ Discuss the benefits of gathering their input to improve care

    associated with the problem.
    ○ Identify best-practice strategies from the literature for effective

    communication and collaboration to improve outcomes.

    ● Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or
    governmental policies guided the development of your proposed
    intervention.

    ○ Cite the standards and/or policies that guided your work.
    ○ Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these

    standards and/or policies in improving outcomes for this
    problem.

    ● Explain how your proposed intervention will improve the quality of care,
    enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that supports your
    conclusions.

    ○ Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on
    care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual.

    ● Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community
    resources can be applied in addressing the problem.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that supports your
    conclusions.

    ● Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
    ● Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems,
    and population outcomes.

    ○ Define the role of leadership and change management in
    addressing a patient, family, or population health problem and
    includes a copy of intervention/solution/professional product.

    ● Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient
    safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    ○ Explain how a proposed intervention to address a patient,
    family, or population health problem will improve the quality of
    care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system
    and individual.

    ● Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to
    improve patient and systems outcomes.

    ○ Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization
    of community resources can be applied in addressing a
    patient, family, or population health problem.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or
    organizational or governmental policies guided the
    development of a proposed intervention.

    ● Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and
    population outcomes.

    ○ Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with a
    patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with a
    patient, family, or population health problem.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    ○ Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
    ○ Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

    Additional Requirements

    ● Format: Format the written analysis of your intervention using APA style.
    Be sure to include:

    ○ A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    ○ Appropriate section headings.

    ● Length: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not
    including the reference page.

    ● Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or
    professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be
    no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA
    format.

    ● Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize
    errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus
    on its substance.

    – Introduction
    – Instructions

    – Part 1
    – Part 2

    – Competencies Measured
    – Additional Requirements

  • [Solved] Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Plz see Instruction. – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Instruction2.pdf – PracticumFocusSheet.png **## Instruction2.pdf** Assessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations In a 5 page written assessment, determine how health care technology, coordination of …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Plz see Instruction.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Instruction2.pdf

    – PracticumFocusSheet.png

    **## Instruction2.pdf**

    Assessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and
    Community Resources Considerations

    In a 5 page written assessment, determine how health care technology, coordination of
    care, and community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or
    population problem you've defined. In addition, plan to spend approximately 2 direct
    practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group
    you've chosen to work with and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry
    experts. Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.

    Introduction
    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you'll be positioned to maximize the use of
    technology to achieve positive patient outcomes and improve organizational
    effectiveness. Providing holistic coordination of patient care across the entire health
    care continuum and leveraging community resource services can lead both to positive
    patient outcomes and to organizational improvements.

    Instructions
    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    Part 1

    Determine how health care technology, the coordination of care, and the use of
    community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or population
    problem you've defined. Plan to spend at least 2 practicum hours exploring these
    aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also
    consult with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Use the Practicum
    Focus Sheet: provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal
    interactions.

    Part 2

    Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.

    ● Whom did you meet with?
    ○ What did you learn from them?

    ● Comment on the evidence-based practice (EBP) documents or websites
    you reviewed.

    ○ What did you learn from that review?

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1)

    ● Share the process and experience of exploring the effect of the problem on
    the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Did your plan to address the problem change, based upon your
    experiences?

    ○ What surprised you, or was of particular interest to you, and
    why?

    Requirements
    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for
    each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional
    requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    ● Analyze the impact of health care technology on the patient, family, or
    population problem.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that addresses the
    advantages and disadvantages of specific technologies,
    including research studies that present opposing views.

    ○ Determine whether the evidence is consistent with technology
    use you see in your nursing practice.

    ○ Identify potential barriers and costs associated with the use of
    specific technologies and how those technologies are applied
    within the context of this problem.

    ● Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community resources
    can be used to address the patient, family, or population problem.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that addresses the benefits of
    care coordination and the utilization of community resources,
    including research studies that present opposing views.

    ○ Determine whether the evidence is consistent with how you
    see care coordination and community resources used in your
    nursing practice.

    ○ Identify barriers to the use of care coordination and community
    resources in the context of this problem.

    ● Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or
    governmental policies associated with health care technology, care
    coordination, and community resources and document the practicum hours
    spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal
    Volunteer Experience Form.

    ○ Explain how these standards or policies will guide your actions
    in applying technology, care coordination, and community
    resources to address care quality, patient safety, and costs to
    the system and individual.

    ○ Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or
    legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context
    of technology, care coordination, and community resources.

    ○ Explain how nursing ethics will inform your approach to
    addressing the problem through the use of applied technology,
    care coordination, and community resources.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or
    recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    ● Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to
    improve patient and systems outcomes.

    ○ Analyze the impact of health care technology on a patient,
    family, or population problem.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or
    organizational or governmental policies associated with health
    technology, care coordination, and community resources and
    document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or
    group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience
    Form.

    ● Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and
    population outcomes.

    ○ Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community
    resources can be used to address a patient, family, or
    population problem.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    ○ Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or
    recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    ○ Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing

    Format:

    ● Format: Format your paper using APA style.
    ○ A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    ○ Appropriate section headings.

    ● Length: Your paper should be approximately 5 pages in length, not
    including the reference page.

    ● Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional
    evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more
    than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ● Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors
    that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its
    substance.

    – Introduction
    – Instructions

    – Part 1
    – Part 2

    – Requirements
    – Competencies Measured

    **PracticumFocusSheet.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicumfocussheet-png-10184105)

    **PracticumFocusSheet.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicumfocussheet-png-10184105)

    **## Instruction2.pdf**

    Assessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and
    Community Resources Considerations

    In a 5 page written assessment, determine how health care technology, coordination of
    care, and community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or
    population problem you've defined. In addition, plan to spend approximately 2 direct
    practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group
    you've chosen to work with and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry
    experts. Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.

    Introduction
    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you'll be positioned to maximize the use of
    technology to achieve positive patient outcomes and improve organizational
    effectiveness. Providing holistic coordination of patient care across the entire health
    care continuum and leveraging community resource services can lead both to positive
    patient outcomes and to organizational improvements.

    Instructions
    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    Part 1

    Determine how health care technology, the coordination of care, and the use of
    community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or population
    problem you've defined. Plan to spend at least 2 practicum hours exploring these
    aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also
    consult with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Use the Practicum
    Focus Sheet: provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal
    interactions.

    Part 2

    Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.

    ● Whom did you meet with?
    ○ What did you learn from them?

    ● Comment on the evidence-based practice (EBP) documents or websites
    you reviewed.

    ○ What did you learn from that review?

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1)

    ● Share the process and experience of exploring the effect of the problem on
    the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Did your plan to address the problem change, based upon your
    experiences?

    ○ What surprised you, or was of particular interest to you, and
    why?

    Requirements
    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for
    each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional
    requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    ● Analyze the impact of health care technology on the patient, family, or
    population problem.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that addresses the
    advantages and disadvantages of specific technologies,
    including research studies that present opposing views.

    ○ Determine whether the evidence is consistent with technology
    use you see in your nursing practice.

    ○ Identify potential barriers and costs associated with the use of
    specific technologies and how those technologies are applied
    within the context of this problem.

    ● Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community resources
    can be used to address the patient, family, or population problem.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that addresses the benefits of
    care coordination and the utilization of community resources,
    including research studies that present opposing views.

    ○ Determine whether the evidence is consistent with how you
    see care coordination and community resources used in your
    nursing practice.

    ○ Identify barriers to the use of care coordination and community
    resources in the context of this problem.

    ● Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or
    governmental policies associated with health care technology, care
    coordination, and community resources and document the practicum hours
    spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal
    Volunteer Experience Form.

    ○ Explain how these standards or policies will guide your actions
    in applying technology, care coordination, and community
    resources to address care quality, patient safety, and costs to
    the system and individual.

    ○ Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or
    legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context
    of technology, care coordination, and community resources.

    ○ Explain how nursing ethics will inform your approach to
    addressing the problem through the use of applied technology,
    care coordination, and community resources.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or
    recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    ● Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to
    improve patient and systems outcomes.

    ○ Analyze the impact of health care technology on a patient,
    family, or population problem.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or
    organizational or governmental policies associated with health
    technology, care coordination, and community resources and
    document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or
    group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience
    Form.

    ● Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and
    population outcomes.

    ○ Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community
    resources can be used to address a patient, family, or
    population problem.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    ○ Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or
    recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    ○ Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing

    Format:

    ● Format: Format your paper using APA style.
    ○ A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    ○ Appropriate section headings.

    ● Length: Your paper should be approximately 5 pages in length, not
    including the reference page.

    ● Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional
    evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more
    than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ● Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors
    that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its
    substance.

    – Introduction
    – Instructions

    – Part 1
    – Part 2

    – Requirements
    – Competencies Measured

    **PracticumFocusSheet.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicumfocussheet-png-10184105)

    **## Instruction2.pdf**

    Assessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and
    Community Resources Considerations

    In a 5 page written assessment, determine how health care technology, coordination of
    care, and community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or
    population problem you've defined. In addition, plan to spend approximately 2 direct
    practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group
    you've chosen to work with and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry
    experts. Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.

    Introduction
    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you'll be positioned to maximize the use of
    technology to achieve positive patient outcomes and improve organizational
    effectiveness. Providing holistic coordination of patient care across the entire health
    care continuum and leveraging community resource services can lead both to positive
    patient outcomes and to organizational improvements.

    Instructions
    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    Part 1

    Determine how health care technology, the coordination of care, and the use of
    community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or population
    problem you've defined. Plan to spend at least 2 practicum hours exploring these
    aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also
    consult with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Use the Practicum
    Focus Sheet: provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal
    interactions.

    Part 2

    Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.

    ● Whom did you meet with?
    ○ What did you learn from them?

    ● Comment on the evidence-based practice (EBP) documents or websites
    you reviewed.

    ○ What did you learn from that review?

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1)

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486242?wrap=1)

    ● Share the process and experience of exploring the effect of the problem on
    the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Did your plan to address the problem change, based upon your
    experiences?

    ○ What surprised you, or was of particular interest to you, and
    why?

    Requirements
    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for
    each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional
    requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    ● Analyze the impact of health care technology on the patient, family, or
    population problem.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that addresses the
    advantages and disadvantages of specific technologies,
    including research studies that present opposing views.

    ○ Determine whether the evidence is consistent with technology
    use you see in your nursing practice.

    ○ Identify potential barriers and costs associated with the use of
    specific technologies and how those technologies are applied
    within the context of this problem.

    ● Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community resources
    can be used to address the patient, family, or population problem.

    ○ Cite evidence from the literature that addresses the benefits of
    care coordination and the utilization of community resources,
    including research studies that present opposing views.

    ○ Determine whether the evidence is consistent with how you
    see care coordination and community resources used in your
    nursing practice.

    ○ Identify barriers to the use of care coordination and community
    resources in the context of this problem.

    ● Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or
    governmental policies associated with health care technology, care
    coordination, and community resources and document the practicum hours
    spent with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal
    Volunteer Experience Form.

    ○ Explain how these standards or policies will guide your actions
    in applying technology, care coordination, and community
    resources to address care quality, patient safety, and costs to
    the system and individual.

    ○ Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or
    legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context
    of technology, care coordination, and community resources.

    ○ Explain how nursing ethics will inform your approach to
    addressing the problem through the use of applied technology,
    care coordination, and community resources.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or
    recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    ● Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to
    improve patient and systems outcomes.

    ○ Analyze the impact of health care technology on a patient,
    family, or population problem.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Analyze state board nursing practice standards and/or
    organizational or governmental policies associated with health
    technology, care coordination, and community resources and
    document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or
    group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience
    Form.

    ● Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and
    population outcomes.

    ○ Explain how care coordination and the utilization of community
    resources can be used to address a patient, family, or
    population problem.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

    ○ Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or
    recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

    ○ Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing

    Format:

    ● Format: Format your paper using APA style.
    ○ A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    ○ Appropriate section headings.

    ● Length: Your paper should be approximately 5 pages in length, not
    including the reference page.

    ● Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional
    evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more
    than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ● Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors
    that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its
    substance.

    – Introduction
    – Instructions

    – Part 1
    – Part 2

    – Requirements
    – Competencies Measured

    **PracticumFocusSheet.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicumfocussheet-png-10184105)

  • [Solved] human resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help – [\ \ Discussion1.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion1-jpeg-10184091 "Discussion1.jpeg") – [\ \ Discussion2.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion2-jpeg-10184093 "Discussion2.jpeg") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help

    – [\
    \
    Discussion1.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion1-jpeg-10184091 "Discussion1.jpeg")
    – [\
    \
    Discussion2.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion2-jpeg-10184093 "Discussion2.jpeg")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Quality, Safety, and Cost Considerations

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see Instruction. – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Instruction2.pdf – PracticumFocusSheet.png **## Instruction2.pdf** Assessing the Problem: Quality, Safety, and Cost Considerations In a 5 page written assessment, assess the effect of the patient, family, or population problem you've previousl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see Instruction.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Instruction2.pdf

    – PracticumFocusSheet.png

    **## Instruction2.pdf**

    Assessing the Problem: Quality, Safety, and Cost Considerations

    In a 5 page written assessment, assess the effect of the patient, family, or population
    problem you've previously defined on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the
    system and individual. Plan to spend approximately 2 direct practicum hours exploring
    these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group you've chosen to work
    with and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts.

    Introduction:

    Organizational data, such as readmission rates, hospital-acquired infections, falls,
    medication errors, staff satisfaction, serious safety events, and patient experience can
    be used to prioritize time, resources, and finances. Health care organizations and
    government agencies use benchmark data to compare the quality of organizational
    services and report the status of patient safety. Professional nurses are key to
    comprehensive data collection, reporting, and monitoring of metrics to improve quality
    and patient safety.

    Instruction:

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    Part 1

    Assess the effect of the patient, family, or population problem you defined in the
    previous assessment on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual. Plan to spend at least 2 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the
    problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also consult with
    subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Use the Practicum Focus Sheet
    provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions.

    Part 2

    Report on your experiences during your first 2 practicum hours, including how you
    presented your ideas about the health problem to the patient, family, or group.

    ● Whom did you meet with?
    ○ What did you learn from them?

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486240?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486240?wrap=1)

    ● Comment on the evidence-based practice (EBP) documents or websites
    you reviewed.

    ○ What did you learn from that review?
    ● Share the process and experience of exploring the influence of leadership,

    collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the
    problem.

    ○ What barriers, if any, did you encounter when presenting the
    problem to the patient, family, or group?

    ■ Did the patient, family, or group agree with you
    about the presence of the problem and its
    significance and relevance?

    ■ What leadership, communication, collaboration, or
    change management skills did you employ during
    your interactions to overcome these barriers or
    change the patient's, family's, or group's thinking
    about the problem (for example, creating a sense
    of urgency based on data or policy requirements)?

    ○ What changes, if any, did you make to your definition of the
    problem, based on your discussions?

    ○ What might you have done differently?

    Requirement:

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for
    each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional
    requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    ● Explain how the patient, family, or population problem impacts the quality of
    care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Cite evidence that supports the stated impact.
    ○ Note whether the supporting evidence is consistent with what

    you see in your nursing practice.
    ● Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or

    governmental policies can affect the problem's impact on the quality of
    care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these
    standards and/or policies in addressing care quality, patient
    safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Explain how these standards and/or policies will guide your
    actions in addressing care quality, patient safety, and costs to
    the system and individual.

    ○ Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or
    legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context
    of care quality, patient safety, and cost to the system and
    individual.

    ● Propose strategies to improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety,
    and reduce costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Discuss research on the effectiveness of these strategies in
    addressing care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system
    and individual.

    ○ Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on
    care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from external
    sources.

    ● Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Competencies Measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient
    safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    ○ Explain how a patient, family, or population problem impacts
    the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual.

    ○ Propose strategies to improve the quality of care, enhance
    patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual
    and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals

    or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience
    Form.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or
    organizational or governmental policies can affect a patient,
    family, or population problem's impact on the quality of care,
    patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    ○ Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from

    external sources.
    ○ Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Format:

    ● Format: Format your paper using APA style.
    ○ A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    ○ Appropriate section headings.

    ● Length: Your paper should be approximately 5 pages in length, not
    including the reference page.

    ● Supporting evidence: Cite at least 5 sources of scholarly or professional
    evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more
    than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ● Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors
    that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its
    substance.

    – Part 1
    – Part 2
    – Competencies Measured:

    **PracticumFocusSheet.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicumfocussheet-png)

    **PracticumFocusSheet.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicumfocussheet-png)

    **## Instruction2.pdf**

    Assessing the Problem: Quality, Safety, and Cost Considerations

    In a 5 page written assessment, assess the effect of the patient, family, or population
    problem you've previously defined on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the
    system and individual. Plan to spend approximately 2 direct practicum hours exploring
    these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group you've chosen to work
    with and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts.

    Introduction:

    Organizational data, such as readmission rates, hospital-acquired infections, falls,
    medication errors, staff satisfaction, serious safety events, and patient experience can
    be used to prioritize time, resources, and finances. Health care organizations and
    government agencies use benchmark data to compare the quality of organizational
    services and report the status of patient safety. Professional nurses are key to
    comprehensive data collection, reporting, and monitoring of metrics to improve quality
    and patient safety.

    Instruction:

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    Part 1

    Assess the effect of the patient, family, or population problem you defined in the
    previous assessment on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual. Plan to spend at least 2 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the
    problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also consult with
    subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Use the Practicum Focus Sheet
    provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions.

    Part 2

    Report on your experiences during your first 2 practicum hours, including how you
    presented your ideas about the health problem to the patient, family, or group.

    ● Whom did you meet with?
    ○ What did you learn from them?

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486240?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486240?wrap=1)

    ● Comment on the evidence-based practice (EBP) documents or websites
    you reviewed.

    ○ What did you learn from that review?
    ● Share the process and experience of exploring the influence of leadership,

    collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the
    problem.

    ○ What barriers, if any, did you encounter when presenting the
    problem to the patient, family, or group?

    ■ Did the patient, family, or group agree with you
    about the presence of the problem and its
    significance and relevance?

    ■ What leadership, communication, collaboration, or
    change management skills did you employ during
    your interactions to overcome these barriers or
    change the patient's, family's, or group's thinking
    about the problem (for example, creating a sense
    of urgency based on data or policy requirements)?

    ○ What changes, if any, did you make to your definition of the
    problem, based on your discussions?

    ○ What might you have done differently?

    Requirement:

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for
    each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional
    requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    ● Explain how the patient, family, or population problem impacts the quality of
    care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Cite evidence that supports the stated impact.
    ○ Note whether the supporting evidence is consistent with what

    you see in your nursing practice.
    ● Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or

    governmental policies can affect the problem's impact on the quality of
    care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these
    standards and/or policies in addressing care quality, patient
    safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Explain how these standards and/or policies will guide your
    actions in addressing care quality, patient safety, and costs to
    the system and individual.

    ○ Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or
    legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context
    of care quality, patient safety, and cost to the system and
    individual.

    ● Propose strategies to improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety,
    and reduce costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Discuss research on the effectiveness of these strategies in
    addressing care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system
    and individual.

    ○ Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on
    care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from external
    sources.

    ● Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Competencies Measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient
    safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    ○ Explain how a patient, family, or population problem impacts
    the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual.

    ○ Propose strategies to improve the quality of care, enhance
    patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual
    and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals

    or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience
    Form.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or
    organizational or governmental policies can affect a patient,
    family, or population problem's impact on the quality of care,
    patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    ○ Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from

    external sources.
    ○ Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Format:

    ● Format: Format your paper using APA style.
    ○ A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    ○ Appropriate section headings.

    ● Length: Your paper should be approximately 5 pages in length, not
    including the reference page.

    ● Supporting evidence: Cite at least 5 sources of scholarly or professional
    evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more
    than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ● Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors
    that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its
    substance.

    – Part 1
    – Part 2
    – Competencies Measured:

    **PracticumFocusSheet.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicumfocussheet-png)

    **## Instruction2.pdf**

    Assessing the Problem: Quality, Safety, and Cost Considerations

    In a 5 page written assessment, assess the effect of the patient, family, or population
    problem you've previously defined on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the
    system and individual. Plan to spend approximately 2 direct practicum hours exploring
    these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group you've chosen to work
    with and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts.

    Introduction:

    Organizational data, such as readmission rates, hospital-acquired infections, falls,
    medication errors, staff satisfaction, serious safety events, and patient experience can
    be used to prioritize time, resources, and finances. Health care organizations and
    government agencies use benchmark data to compare the quality of organizational
    services and report the status of patient safety. Professional nurses are key to
    comprehensive data collection, reporting, and monitoring of metrics to improve quality
    and patient safety.

    Instruction:

    Complete this assessment in two parts.

    Part 1

    Assess the effect of the patient, family, or population problem you defined in the
    previous assessment on the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual. Plan to spend at least 2 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the
    problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also consult with
    subject matter and industry experts of your choice. Use the Practicum Focus Sheet
    provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions.

    Part 2

    Report on your experiences during your first 2 practicum hours, including how you
    presented your ideas about the health problem to the patient, family, or group.

    ● Whom did you meet with?
    ○ What did you learn from them?

    [https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486240?wrap=1](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/36975/files/6486240?wrap=1)

    ● Comment on the evidence-based practice (EBP) documents or websites
    you reviewed.

    ○ What did you learn from that review?
    ● Share the process and experience of exploring the influence of leadership,

    collaboration, communication, change management, and policy on the
    problem.

    ○ What barriers, if any, did you encounter when presenting the
    problem to the patient, family, or group?

    ■ Did the patient, family, or group agree with you
    about the presence of the problem and its
    significance and relevance?

    ■ What leadership, communication, collaboration, or
    change management skills did you employ during
    your interactions to overcome these barriers or
    change the patient's, family's, or group's thinking
    about the problem (for example, creating a sense
    of urgency based on data or policy requirements)?

    ○ What changes, if any, did you make to your definition of the
    problem, based on your discussions?

    ○ What might you have done differently?

    Requirement:

    The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria,
    so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for
    each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional
    requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

    ● Explain how the patient, family, or population problem impacts the quality of
    care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Cite evidence that supports the stated impact.
    ○ Note whether the supporting evidence is consistent with what

    you see in your nursing practice.
    ● Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or

    governmental policies can affect the problem's impact on the quality of
    care, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these
    standards and/or policies in addressing care quality, patient
    safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Explain how these standards and/or policies will guide your
    actions in addressing care quality, patient safety, and costs to
    the system and individual.

    ○ Describe the effects of local, state, and federal policies or
    legislation on your nursing scope of practice, within the context
    of care quality, patient safety, and cost to the system and
    individual.

    ● Propose strategies to improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety,
    and reduce costs to the system and individual.

    ○ Discuss research on the effectiveness of these strategies in
    addressing care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system
    and individual.

    ○ Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on
    care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual.

    ○ Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these
    individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer
    Experience Form.

    ● Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from external
    sources.

    ● Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Competencies Measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient
    safety, and reduce the cost of care.

    ○ Explain how a patient, family, or population problem impacts
    the quality of care, patient safety, and costs to the system and
    individual.

    ○ Propose strategies to improve the quality of care, enhance
    patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual
    and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals

    or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience
    Form.

    ● Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of
    care.

    ○ Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or
    organizational or governmental policies can affect a patient,
    family, or population problem's impact on the quality of care,
    patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.

    ● Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    ○ Use paraphrasing and summarization to represent ideas from

    external sources.
    ○ Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Format:

    ● Format: Format your paper using APA style.
    ○ A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    ○ Appropriate section headings.

    ● Length: Your paper should be approximately 5 pages in length, not
    including the reference page.

    ● Supporting evidence: Cite at least 5 sources of scholarly or professional
    evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more
    than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.

    ● Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors
    that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its
    substance.

    – Part 1
    – Part 2
    – Competencies Measured:

    **PracticumFocusSheet.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/practicumfocussheet-png)

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Marketing homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-marketing) What are 2 challenges for building a business plan for small businesses in your opinion? 150 or more words Source: Textbook attached Sections 5.2 ("The Necessity for a Business Plan") and 5.3 ("Building a Plan")…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Marketing homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-marketing)

    What are 2 challenges for building a business plan for small businesses in your opinion? 150 or more words

    Source: Textbook attached Sections 5.2 ("The Necessity for a Business Plan") and 5.3 ("Building a Plan"), which discuss the importance of planning and offer guidance on structuring a business plan

    NO AI-generated response

    – [\
    \
    SmallBusinessManagementinthe21stCentury.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/smallbusinessmanagementinthe21stcentury-pdf-10184375 "SmallBusinessManagementinthe21stCentury.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] human resource

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## JWI510_WK6_LectureNotes_1194.pdf – ## TheVroomYettonDecisonModel.pdf – Week6Discussion.jpeg **## JWI510_WK6_LectureNotes_1194.pdf** JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century Lecture Notes © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document c…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## JWI510_WK6_LectureNotes_1194.pdf

    – ## TheVroomYettonDecisonModel.pdf

    – Week6Discussion.jpeg

    **## JWI510_WK6_LectureNotes_1194.pdf**

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 1 of 3

    Week 6: Leadership and Decision Making

    Leaders are heavily relied upon for their ability to make decisions, especially during stressful times. As you
    develop your leadership skills, you may be wondering if there are models or techniques that can aid you
    during such times. Thankfully, there are. One such model is the Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model.

    Inasmuch as any single model can guide an organization as large and as diverse as GE, this framework
    does offer a compelling approach. The formula, which management theorists like Maier (1970) and
    Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) first used to great advantage, was the intellectual driver for the work
    Jack accomplished at GE. During 1981–1988, the first seven years that Jack served as CEO, he worked
    on activities such as downsizing, de-layering, and divestiture of unprofitable businesses. It was during this
    phase that Welch declared that GE’s businesses would be Number 1 or Number 2 in any market they were
    in, or he would "fix, sell, or close" them. By late 1988, Jack's efforts had dramatically improved the quality
    of GE’s systems and processes.

    The Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model

    The three main questions we will begin with are:

    1. What is the Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model?

    2. How do we use it?

    3. To what extent should a leader involve employees in the decision making process?

    The equation that underpins Vroom’s model is one of the most powerful tools in the leadership toolkit. The
    formula posits that the quality of any decision, when multiplied by its level of acceptance, will determine its
    effectiveness. Restated, the formula becomes:

    Q x A = E

    The multiplication sign in the equation is not meant to be taken literally. Its main purpose is to serve as a
    reminder, as hard-charging business people all too often forget, that anything times zero is zero. A super-
    brilliant idea (high Q) that team members will hate, oppose, and subvert (low A) is a poor idea; a leader
    should think long and hard about how to modify the idea to get more employee (or customer) buy-in, even
    if some decision quality must be sacrificed.

    Conversely, the tendency to just do it if it feels good, without regard for the wisdom of an idea, will usually
    produce a high A / low Q outcome that is similarly disappointing.

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 2 of 3

    Since its inception, nearly 40 years ago, the Vroom-Yetton Model has been improved many times, but the
    centrality of the leader's analysis of a particular situation, with a focus on decision quality and acceptance,
    remains the same. A series of questions are asked to drive the analysis, such as:

    • Quality Requirement
    How important is the technical quality of the decision? Is there an optimal solution to a problem,
    say, from a technical standpoint?

    • Leader Information
    Does a leader have sufficient information to make a high-quality decision?

    • Problem Structure
    Is the problem well structured? Is it clear and well defined? Does it lend itself to statistical tools
    and quantitative analysis?

    • Commitment Requirement
    Is employee commitment to the decision critical for effective implementation?

    • Commitment Probability
    If the leader makes the decision without employees' input, is it reasonably certain that people will
    not be committed to the decision?

    • Goal Congruence
    Do employees share the organizational goals to be attained in solving the problem?

    • Employee Conflict
    Is conflict among employees likely to occur in the preferred solutions?

    Depending on how these questions are answered, the model directs leaders to:

    A. Make the decision alone, either with or without obtaining relevant information from subordinates

    B. Share the problem with your team and get their ideas, either one-on-one or in a group, before
    making the decision

    C. Present the problem to the group, and inform them that, if they can agree on a solution, it will be
    accepted. The model reminds us that one of a leader’s key responsibilities is to determine, with
    each new decision, whether to go it alone or bring people into the process.

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 3 of 3

    The model works best when the facts pertaining to the quality and acceptance of decisions are known and
    readily available. In many cases, the likely quality and acceptability of a decision cannot be known in
    advance. In these situations, even the most data-driven leaders should be comfortable relying on their
    own instincts. Vroom and Yetton’s model is yet another starting point on your journey of self-
    understanding.

    As you practice leadership, remember that how you make decisions has an undeniable impact on your
    effectiveness. Think – and plan – before you act.

    Your Leadership Journey

    • If you are new to leadership, review the hidden traps of decision-making, so you are prepared if
    you see them arise

    • If you are a team leader, apply the Five Dysfunctions of a Team to your own team, and see
    where it has the potential to reinvent itself

    • If you are a senior/veteran leader, consider the applicability of the Vroom-Yetton Contingency
    Model to your decision-making

    **## TheVroomYettonDecisonModel.pdf**

    The Vroom-Yetton Decision
    Model
    Deciding How to Decide

    Steer your decision-making process in the right direction.

    There are lots of different ways of making a decision, and choosing your approach can be
    just as difficult as making the decision itself!

    Sometimes you have to take charge, and decide what to do on your own, but you don't want
    to appear autocratic to your team (particularly in situations where you need their input).
    At other times it's better to make a decision based on the group consensus, but this can use
    up precious time and resources. So how do you decide which approach is best?

    Every manager needs to be able to make good decisions . A systematic approach to
    decision making, such as the Vroom-Yetton Decision Model, allows you to bring consistency
    and order to a process that might otherwise feel idiosyncratic and instinctive. It can also
    help you to determine the most effective means of reaching a decision.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_79.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_79.htm)

    Understanding the Model
    The Vroom-Yetton model is designed to help you to identify the best decision-making
    approach and leadership style to take, based on your current situation. It was originally
    developed by Victor Vroom and Philip Yetton in their 1973 book, "Leadership and Decision
    Making." [1]

    No single decision-making process fits every scenario. Instead, Vroom-Yetton offers a
    number of different processes and directs you toward the best one for your situation. For
    example, if speed and decisiveness are required then it will likely point you toward an
    autocratic process. If collaboration is what's needed, then it will nudge you toward a
    more democratic process.

    Researchers have found that managers are more effective, and their teams more productive
    and satisfied, when they follow the model. [2][3] The simplicity of Vroom-Yetton also
    means that anyone – from the boardroom to the factory floor – can use it.

    Although a little long-winded at times, it can be particularly helpful in new or unusual
    situations. Practice using it, and you'll quickly get a feel for the right approach to take,
    whether you're making a decision about a day-to-day issue or dealing with a more complex
    problem.

    Before you start using the model, you'll need to consider these three factors:

    • Decision quality – Sometimes, making the "right" decision is critical, and you'll
    need to use a large number of resources (people, time, information, and so on) to
    ensure that the action you take has been well thought through and is of high
    quality.

    • Team commitment – Some of your decisions will have a major impact on your
    team, while others will go unnoticed. When a decision will likely impact your
    team, it's best to use a collaborative process. This will improve the quality of the
    decision, and you'll likely deliver a successful result faster.

    • Time constraints – When the issue at hand isn't time sensitive, you have more
    "space" to research your options and to include others, which will help to boost
    the quality of your decision. If your time is limited, however, it may not be
    feasible to include others or to undertake thorough research.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/codm.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/codm.htm)

    Specific Leadership Processes
    Figure 1, below, shows the Vroom-Yetton model. The framework poses seven "yes/no"
    questions, which you need to answer to find the best decision-making process for your
    situation.

    As you answer each of the questions, you work your way through a decision tree until you
    arrive at a code (A1, A2, C1, C2, or G2). This code identifies the best decision-making
    process for you and your team. (Note that, in some scenarios, you won't need to answer all
    of the questions.)

    Figure 1: The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model

    The Vroom-Yetton Decision Tree: Adapted from Leadership and Decision Making by Victor H. Vroom
    and Philip W. Yetton by permission of the University of Pittsburgh Press. Copyright © 1973 University of
    Pittsburgh Press.

    The following codes represent the five decision-making processes that are described by the
    model:

    Autocratic (A1): You use the information that you already have to make the decision,
    without requiring any further input from your team.

    Autocratic (A2): You consult your team to obtain specific information that you need, and
    then you make the final decision.

    Consultative (C1): You inform your team of the situation and ask for members' opinions
    individually, but you don't bring the group together for a discussion. You make the final
    decision.

    Consultative (C2): You get your team together for a group discussion about the issue and
    to seek their suggestions, but you still make the final decision by yourself.

    Collaborative (G2): You work with your team to reach a group consensus . Your role is
    mostly facilitative, and you help team members to reach a decision that they all agree on.

    In general, a consultative or collaborative style is most appropriate when:

    • You need information from others to solve a problem.

    • The problem can't be easily defined.

    • Team members' buy-in to the decision is important.

    • You have enough time available to manage a group decision.

    An autocratic style is most appropriate when:

    • You have greater expertise on the subject than others.

    • You are confident about acting alone.

    • The team will accept your decision.

    • There is little time available.

    Note:
    Vroom-Yetton is a useful model, but it's not necessarily appropriate for all eventualities. It
    misses out several important considerations, and its rigid structure means that it fails to
    take into account subtleties, such as the emotions and dynamics of your team, and the
    task’s complexity. The seven questions are imprecise, too – "importance" and "quality," for
    example, are vague terms – and it can be difficult to give straight "yes" or "no" answers to
    them.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_03.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_03.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_86.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_86.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/managing-emotion-in-team.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/managing-emotion-in-team.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/improving-group-dynamics.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/improving-group-dynamics.htm)

    Vroom and Arthur Jago addressed these weaknesses and amended the original model in
    their 1988 book, "The New Leadership." [4] The newer model is more complex and
    includes several additional questions, which allow users to take other constraints, such as
    geographic location, into account when making their decision. It also uses a mathematical
    formula to help people to pinpoint the optimum decision-making process for their
    situation. The newer version of the model is often referred to as either Vroom-Jago or
    Vroom-Yetton-Jago.

    Key Points
    The underlying assumption of the Vroom-Yetton Decision Model is that no single
    leadership style or decision-making process fits all situations.

    To find the process best suited to your situation, you need to consider a number of factors.
    These include time constraints, the level of team participation required, and the quality of
    the final decision.

    The model walks you through these factors logically, to help you to identify the most
    appropriate process and style. It is particularly useful for managers and leaders who are
    trying to balance the benefits of participative management with the need to make decisions
    effectively.

    Infographic
    You can see our infographic of the Vroom-Yetton Model here:

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/vroom-yetton-infographic.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/vroom-yetton-infographic.htm)

    – The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model
    – Deciding How to Decide
    – Understanding the Model
    – Specific Leadership Processes

    – Figure 1: The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model
    – Note:
    – Key Points

    – Infographic

    **Week6Discussion.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week6discussion-jpeg)

    **Week6Discussion.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week6discussion-jpeg)

    **## JWI510_WK6_LectureNotes_1194.pdf**

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 1 of 3

    Week 6: Leadership and Decision Making

    Leaders are heavily relied upon for their ability to make decisions, especially during stressful times. As you
    develop your leadership skills, you may be wondering if there are models or techniques that can aid you
    during such times. Thankfully, there are. One such model is the Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model.

    Inasmuch as any single model can guide an organization as large and as diverse as GE, this framework
    does offer a compelling approach. The formula, which management theorists like Maier (1970) and
    Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) first used to great advantage, was the intellectual driver for the work
    Jack accomplished at GE. During 1981–1988, the first seven years that Jack served as CEO, he worked
    on activities such as downsizing, de-layering, and divestiture of unprofitable businesses. It was during this
    phase that Welch declared that GE’s businesses would be Number 1 or Number 2 in any market they were
    in, or he would "fix, sell, or close" them. By late 1988, Jack's efforts had dramatically improved the quality
    of GE’s systems and processes.

    The Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model

    The three main questions we will begin with are:

    1. What is the Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model?

    2. How do we use it?

    3. To what extent should a leader involve employees in the decision making process?

    The equation that underpins Vroom’s model is one of the most powerful tools in the leadership toolkit. The
    formula posits that the quality of any decision, when multiplied by its level of acceptance, will determine its
    effectiveness. Restated, the formula becomes:

    Q x A = E

    The multiplication sign in the equation is not meant to be taken literally. Its main purpose is to serve as a
    reminder, as hard-charging business people all too often forget, that anything times zero is zero. A super-
    brilliant idea (high Q) that team members will hate, oppose, and subvert (low A) is a poor idea; a leader
    should think long and hard about how to modify the idea to get more employee (or customer) buy-in, even
    if some decision quality must be sacrificed.

    Conversely, the tendency to just do it if it feels good, without regard for the wisdom of an idea, will usually
    produce a high A / low Q outcome that is similarly disappointing.

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 2 of 3

    Since its inception, nearly 40 years ago, the Vroom-Yetton Model has been improved many times, but the
    centrality of the leader's analysis of a particular situation, with a focus on decision quality and acceptance,
    remains the same. A series of questions are asked to drive the analysis, such as:

    • Quality Requirement
    How important is the technical quality of the decision? Is there an optimal solution to a problem,
    say, from a technical standpoint?

    • Leader Information
    Does a leader have sufficient information to make a high-quality decision?

    • Problem Structure
    Is the problem well structured? Is it clear and well defined? Does it lend itself to statistical tools
    and quantitative analysis?

    • Commitment Requirement
    Is employee commitment to the decision critical for effective implementation?

    • Commitment Probability
    If the leader makes the decision without employees' input, is it reasonably certain that people will
    not be committed to the decision?

    • Goal Congruence
    Do employees share the organizational goals to be attained in solving the problem?

    • Employee Conflict
    Is conflict among employees likely to occur in the preferred solutions?

    Depending on how these questions are answered, the model directs leaders to:

    A. Make the decision alone, either with or without obtaining relevant information from subordinates

    B. Share the problem with your team and get their ideas, either one-on-one or in a group, before
    making the decision

    C. Present the problem to the group, and inform them that, if they can agree on a solution, it will be
    accepted. The model reminds us that one of a leader’s key responsibilities is to determine, with
    each new decision, whether to go it alone or bring people into the process.

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 3 of 3

    The model works best when the facts pertaining to the quality and acceptance of decisions are known and
    readily available. In many cases, the likely quality and acceptability of a decision cannot be known in
    advance. In these situations, even the most data-driven leaders should be comfortable relying on their
    own instincts. Vroom and Yetton’s model is yet another starting point on your journey of self-
    understanding.

    As you practice leadership, remember that how you make decisions has an undeniable impact on your
    effectiveness. Think – and plan – before you act.

    Your Leadership Journey

    • If you are new to leadership, review the hidden traps of decision-making, so you are prepared if
    you see them arise

    • If you are a team leader, apply the Five Dysfunctions of a Team to your own team, and see
    where it has the potential to reinvent itself

    • If you are a senior/veteran leader, consider the applicability of the Vroom-Yetton Contingency
    Model to your decision-making

    **## TheVroomYettonDecisonModel.pdf**

    The Vroom-Yetton Decision
    Model
    Deciding How to Decide

    Steer your decision-making process in the right direction.

    There are lots of different ways of making a decision, and choosing your approach can be
    just as difficult as making the decision itself!

    Sometimes you have to take charge, and decide what to do on your own, but you don't want
    to appear autocratic to your team (particularly in situations where you need their input).
    At other times it's better to make a decision based on the group consensus, but this can use
    up precious time and resources. So how do you decide which approach is best?

    Every manager needs to be able to make good decisions . A systematic approach to
    decision making, such as the Vroom-Yetton Decision Model, allows you to bring consistency
    and order to a process that might otherwise feel idiosyncratic and instinctive. It can also
    help you to determine the most effective means of reaching a decision.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_79.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_79.htm)

    Understanding the Model
    The Vroom-Yetton model is designed to help you to identify the best decision-making
    approach and leadership style to take, based on your current situation. It was originally
    developed by Victor Vroom and Philip Yetton in their 1973 book, "Leadership and Decision
    Making." [1]

    No single decision-making process fits every scenario. Instead, Vroom-Yetton offers a
    number of different processes and directs you toward the best one for your situation. For
    example, if speed and decisiveness are required then it will likely point you toward an
    autocratic process. If collaboration is what's needed, then it will nudge you toward a
    more democratic process.

    Researchers have found that managers are more effective, and their teams more productive
    and satisfied, when they follow the model. [2][3] The simplicity of Vroom-Yetton also
    means that anyone – from the boardroom to the factory floor – can use it.

    Although a little long-winded at times, it can be particularly helpful in new or unusual
    situations. Practice using it, and you'll quickly get a feel for the right approach to take,
    whether you're making a decision about a day-to-day issue or dealing with a more complex
    problem.

    Before you start using the model, you'll need to consider these three factors:

    • Decision quality – Sometimes, making the "right" decision is critical, and you'll
    need to use a large number of resources (people, time, information, and so on) to
    ensure that the action you take has been well thought through and is of high
    quality.

    • Team commitment – Some of your decisions will have a major impact on your
    team, while others will go unnoticed. When a decision will likely impact your
    team, it's best to use a collaborative process. This will improve the quality of the
    decision, and you'll likely deliver a successful result faster.

    • Time constraints – When the issue at hand isn't time sensitive, you have more
    "space" to research your options and to include others, which will help to boost
    the quality of your decision. If your time is limited, however, it may not be
    feasible to include others or to undertake thorough research.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/codm.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/codm.htm)

    Specific Leadership Processes
    Figure 1, below, shows the Vroom-Yetton model. The framework poses seven "yes/no"
    questions, which you need to answer to find the best decision-making process for your
    situation.

    As you answer each of the questions, you work your way through a decision tree until you
    arrive at a code (A1, A2, C1, C2, or G2). This code identifies the best decision-making
    process for you and your team. (Note that, in some scenarios, you won't need to answer all
    of the questions.)

    Figure 1: The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model

    The Vroom-Yetton Decision Tree: Adapted from Leadership and Decision Making by Victor H. Vroom
    and Philip W. Yetton by permission of the University of Pittsburgh Press. Copyright © 1973 University of
    Pittsburgh Press.

    The following codes represent the five decision-making processes that are described by the
    model:

    Autocratic (A1): You use the information that you already have to make the decision,
    without requiring any further input from your team.

    Autocratic (A2): You consult your team to obtain specific information that you need, and
    then you make the final decision.

    Consultative (C1): You inform your team of the situation and ask for members' opinions
    individually, but you don't bring the group together for a discussion. You make the final
    decision.

    Consultative (C2): You get your team together for a group discussion about the issue and
    to seek their suggestions, but you still make the final decision by yourself.

    Collaborative (G2): You work with your team to reach a group consensus . Your role is
    mostly facilitative, and you help team members to reach a decision that they all agree on.

    In general, a consultative or collaborative style is most appropriate when:

    • You need information from others to solve a problem.

    • The problem can't be easily defined.

    • Team members' buy-in to the decision is important.

    • You have enough time available to manage a group decision.

    An autocratic style is most appropriate when:

    • You have greater expertise on the subject than others.

    • You are confident about acting alone.

    • The team will accept your decision.

    • There is little time available.

    Note:
    Vroom-Yetton is a useful model, but it's not necessarily appropriate for all eventualities. It
    misses out several important considerations, and its rigid structure means that it fails to
    take into account subtleties, such as the emotions and dynamics of your team, and the
    task’s complexity. The seven questions are imprecise, too – "importance" and "quality," for
    example, are vague terms – and it can be difficult to give straight "yes" or "no" answers to
    them.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_03.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_03.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_86.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_86.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/managing-emotion-in-team.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/managing-emotion-in-team.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/improving-group-dynamics.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/improving-group-dynamics.htm)

    Vroom and Arthur Jago addressed these weaknesses and amended the original model in
    their 1988 book, "The New Leadership." [4] The newer model is more complex and
    includes several additional questions, which allow users to take other constraints, such as
    geographic location, into account when making their decision. It also uses a mathematical
    formula to help people to pinpoint the optimum decision-making process for their
    situation. The newer version of the model is often referred to as either Vroom-Jago or
    Vroom-Yetton-Jago.

    Key Points
    The underlying assumption of the Vroom-Yetton Decision Model is that no single
    leadership style or decision-making process fits all situations.

    To find the process best suited to your situation, you need to consider a number of factors.
    These include time constraints, the level of team participation required, and the quality of
    the final decision.

    The model walks you through these factors logically, to help you to identify the most
    appropriate process and style. It is particularly useful for managers and leaders who are
    trying to balance the benefits of participative management with the need to make decisions
    effectively.

    Infographic
    You can see our infographic of the Vroom-Yetton Model here:

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/vroom-yetton-infographic.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/vroom-yetton-infographic.htm)

    – The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model
    – Deciding How to Decide
    – Understanding the Model
    – Specific Leadership Processes

    – Figure 1: The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model
    – Note:
    – Key Points

    – Infographic

    **Week6Discussion.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week6discussion-jpeg)

    **## JWI510_WK6_LectureNotes_1194.pdf**

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 1 of 3

    Week 6: Leadership and Decision Making

    Leaders are heavily relied upon for their ability to make decisions, especially during stressful times. As you
    develop your leadership skills, you may be wondering if there are models or techniques that can aid you
    during such times. Thankfully, there are. One such model is the Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model.

    Inasmuch as any single model can guide an organization as large and as diverse as GE, this framework
    does offer a compelling approach. The formula, which management theorists like Maier (1970) and
    Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) first used to great advantage, was the intellectual driver for the work
    Jack accomplished at GE. During 1981–1988, the first seven years that Jack served as CEO, he worked
    on activities such as downsizing, de-layering, and divestiture of unprofitable businesses. It was during this
    phase that Welch declared that GE’s businesses would be Number 1 or Number 2 in any market they were
    in, or he would "fix, sell, or close" them. By late 1988, Jack's efforts had dramatically improved the quality
    of GE’s systems and processes.

    The Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model

    The three main questions we will begin with are:

    1. What is the Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model?

    2. How do we use it?

    3. To what extent should a leader involve employees in the decision making process?

    The equation that underpins Vroom’s model is one of the most powerful tools in the leadership toolkit. The
    formula posits that the quality of any decision, when multiplied by its level of acceptance, will determine its
    effectiveness. Restated, the formula becomes:

    Q x A = E

    The multiplication sign in the equation is not meant to be taken literally. Its main purpose is to serve as a
    reminder, as hard-charging business people all too often forget, that anything times zero is zero. A super-
    brilliant idea (high Q) that team members will hate, oppose, and subvert (low A) is a poor idea; a leader
    should think long and hard about how to modify the idea to get more employee (or customer) buy-in, even
    if some decision quality must be sacrificed.

    Conversely, the tendency to just do it if it feels good, without regard for the wisdom of an idea, will usually
    produce a high A / low Q outcome that is similarly disappointing.

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 2 of 3

    Since its inception, nearly 40 years ago, the Vroom-Yetton Model has been improved many times, but the
    centrality of the leader's analysis of a particular situation, with a focus on decision quality and acceptance,
    remains the same. A series of questions are asked to drive the analysis, such as:

    • Quality Requirement
    How important is the technical quality of the decision? Is there an optimal solution to a problem,
    say, from a technical standpoint?

    • Leader Information
    Does a leader have sufficient information to make a high-quality decision?

    • Problem Structure
    Is the problem well structured? Is it clear and well defined? Does it lend itself to statistical tools
    and quantitative analysis?

    • Commitment Requirement
    Is employee commitment to the decision critical for effective implementation?

    • Commitment Probability
    If the leader makes the decision without employees' input, is it reasonably certain that people will
    not be committed to the decision?

    • Goal Congruence
    Do employees share the organizational goals to be attained in solving the problem?

    • Employee Conflict
    Is conflict among employees likely to occur in the preferred solutions?

    Depending on how these questions are answered, the model directs leaders to:

    A. Make the decision alone, either with or without obtaining relevant information from subordinates

    B. Share the problem with your team and get their ideas, either one-on-one or in a group, before
    making the decision

    C. Present the problem to the group, and inform them that, if they can agree on a solution, it will be
    accepted. The model reminds us that one of a leader’s key responsibilities is to determine, with
    each new decision, whether to go it alone or bring people into the process.

    JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century
    Lecture Notes

    © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be
    copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.

    JWI 510 – Lecture Notes (1194) Page 3 of 3

    The model works best when the facts pertaining to the quality and acceptance of decisions are known and
    readily available. In many cases, the likely quality and acceptability of a decision cannot be known in
    advance. In these situations, even the most data-driven leaders should be comfortable relying on their
    own instincts. Vroom and Yetton’s model is yet another starting point on your journey of self-
    understanding.

    As you practice leadership, remember that how you make decisions has an undeniable impact on your
    effectiveness. Think – and plan – before you act.

    Your Leadership Journey

    • If you are new to leadership, review the hidden traps of decision-making, so you are prepared if
    you see them arise

    • If you are a team leader, apply the Five Dysfunctions of a Team to your own team, and see
    where it has the potential to reinvent itself

    • If you are a senior/veteran leader, consider the applicability of the Vroom-Yetton Contingency
    Model to your decision-making

    **## TheVroomYettonDecisonModel.pdf**

    The Vroom-Yetton Decision
    Model
    Deciding How to Decide

    Steer your decision-making process in the right direction.

    There are lots of different ways of making a decision, and choosing your approach can be
    just as difficult as making the decision itself!

    Sometimes you have to take charge, and decide what to do on your own, but you don't want
    to appear autocratic to your team (particularly in situations where you need their input).
    At other times it's better to make a decision based on the group consensus, but this can use
    up precious time and resources. So how do you decide which approach is best?

    Every manager needs to be able to make good decisions . A systematic approach to
    decision making, such as the Vroom-Yetton Decision Model, allows you to bring consistency
    and order to a process that might otherwise feel idiosyncratic and instinctive. It can also
    help you to determine the most effective means of reaching a decision.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_79.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_79.htm)

    Understanding the Model
    The Vroom-Yetton model is designed to help you to identify the best decision-making
    approach and leadership style to take, based on your current situation. It was originally
    developed by Victor Vroom and Philip Yetton in their 1973 book, "Leadership and Decision
    Making." [1]

    No single decision-making process fits every scenario. Instead, Vroom-Yetton offers a
    number of different processes and directs you toward the best one for your situation. For
    example, if speed and decisiveness are required then it will likely point you toward an
    autocratic process. If collaboration is what's needed, then it will nudge you toward a
    more democratic process.

    Researchers have found that managers are more effective, and their teams more productive
    and satisfied, when they follow the model. [2][3] The simplicity of Vroom-Yetton also
    means that anyone – from the boardroom to the factory floor – can use it.

    Although a little long-winded at times, it can be particularly helpful in new or unusual
    situations. Practice using it, and you'll quickly get a feel for the right approach to take,
    whether you're making a decision about a day-to-day issue or dealing with a more complex
    problem.

    Before you start using the model, you'll need to consider these three factors:

    • Decision quality – Sometimes, making the "right" decision is critical, and you'll
    need to use a large number of resources (people, time, information, and so on) to
    ensure that the action you take has been well thought through and is of high
    quality.

    • Team commitment – Some of your decisions will have a major impact on your
    team, while others will go unnoticed. When a decision will likely impact your
    team, it's best to use a collaborative process. This will improve the quality of the
    decision, and you'll likely deliver a successful result faster.

    • Time constraints – When the issue at hand isn't time sensitive, you have more
    "space" to research your options and to include others, which will help to boost
    the quality of your decision. If your time is limited, however, it may not be
    feasible to include others or to undertake thorough research.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/codm.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/codm.htm)

    Specific Leadership Processes
    Figure 1, below, shows the Vroom-Yetton model. The framework poses seven "yes/no"
    questions, which you need to answer to find the best decision-making process for your
    situation.

    As you answer each of the questions, you work your way through a decision tree until you
    arrive at a code (A1, A2, C1, C2, or G2). This code identifies the best decision-making
    process for you and your team. (Note that, in some scenarios, you won't need to answer all
    of the questions.)

    Figure 1: The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model

    The Vroom-Yetton Decision Tree: Adapted from Leadership and Decision Making by Victor H. Vroom
    and Philip W. Yetton by permission of the University of Pittsburgh Press. Copyright © 1973 University of
    Pittsburgh Press.

    The following codes represent the five decision-making processes that are described by the
    model:

    Autocratic (A1): You use the information that you already have to make the decision,
    without requiring any further input from your team.

    Autocratic (A2): You consult your team to obtain specific information that you need, and
    then you make the final decision.

    Consultative (C1): You inform your team of the situation and ask for members' opinions
    individually, but you don't bring the group together for a discussion. You make the final
    decision.

    Consultative (C2): You get your team together for a group discussion about the issue and
    to seek their suggestions, but you still make the final decision by yourself.

    Collaborative (G2): You work with your team to reach a group consensus . Your role is
    mostly facilitative, and you help team members to reach a decision that they all agree on.

    In general, a consultative or collaborative style is most appropriate when:

    • You need information from others to solve a problem.

    • The problem can't be easily defined.

    • Team members' buy-in to the decision is important.

    • You have enough time available to manage a group decision.

    An autocratic style is most appropriate when:

    • You have greater expertise on the subject than others.

    • You are confident about acting alone.

    • The team will accept your decision.

    • There is little time available.

    Note:
    Vroom-Yetton is a useful model, but it's not necessarily appropriate for all eventualities. It
    misses out several important considerations, and its rigid structure means that it fails to
    take into account subtleties, such as the emotions and dynamics of your team, and the
    task’s complexity. The seven questions are imprecise, too – "importance" and "quality," for
    example, are vague terms – and it can be difficult to give straight "yes" or "no" answers to
    them.

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_03.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_03.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_86.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_86.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/managing-emotion-in-team.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/managing-emotion-in-team.htm)

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/improving-group-dynamics.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/improving-group-dynamics.htm)

    Vroom and Arthur Jago addressed these weaknesses and amended the original model in
    their 1988 book, "The New Leadership." [4] The newer model is more complex and
    includes several additional questions, which allow users to take other constraints, such as
    geographic location, into account when making their decision. It also uses a mathematical
    formula to help people to pinpoint the optimum decision-making process for their
    situation. The newer version of the model is often referred to as either Vroom-Jago or
    Vroom-Yetton-Jago.

    Key Points
    The underlying assumption of the Vroom-Yetton Decision Model is that no single
    leadership style or decision-making process fits all situations.

    To find the process best suited to your situation, you need to consider a number of factors.
    These include time constraints, the level of team participation required, and the quality of
    the final decision.

    The model walks you through these factors logically, to help you to identify the most
    appropriate process and style. It is particularly useful for managers and leaders who are
    trying to balance the benefits of participative management with the need to make decisions
    effectively.

    Infographic
    You can see our infographic of the Vroom-Yetton Model here:

    [https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/vroom-yetton-infographic.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/vroom-yetton-infographic.htm)

    – The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model
    – Deciding How to Decide
    – Understanding the Model
    – Specific Leadership Processes

    – Figure 1: The Vroom-Yetton Decision Model
    – Note:
    – Key Points

    – Infographic

    **Week6Discussion.jpeg**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week6discussion-jpeg)