Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Presentation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Create a PowerPoint presentation that distills down your _This I Believe_ Paper as if you were presenting the information to the class. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Create a PowerPoint presentation that distills down your _This I Believe_ Paper as if you were presenting the information to the class.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] health and wellness

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx **## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx** ### **NR222 Health and Wellness** ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Project Guidelines** ## TOPIC: The impact of universal health coverage on public health outcomes’ 1. Discuss the prof…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx

    **## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx**

    ### **NR222 Health and Wellness**

    ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Project Guidelines**

    ## TOPIC: The impact of universal health coverage on public health outcomes’

    1. Discuss the professional nurse’s role in health promotion activities.

    3. Discuss health promotion, illness prevention, health maintenance, health restoration, and rehabilitation in relation to the nurse’s role in working with various populations.

    7. Identify health promotion strategies throughout the life span.

    Follow these guidelines when completing this.

    1) Identify a health problem or need for health promotion for a particular stage in the life span of a population from a specific culture in your area.

    2) Research a topic related to health and wellness associated with one of the Healthy People topic areas.

    3) You will develop an educational health promotion project addressing the population/culture in your area.

    4) Include the following sections
    _(detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric)._

    ·
    _Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area._

    ·
    _Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest._

    ·
    _Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper._

    ·
    _Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper._

    b.
    _Relate Topic to Target Population-_

    ·
    _Describes the topic and target cultural population._

    ·
    _Includes statistics to support significance of the topic._

    ·
    _Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area._

    ·
    _Applies health promotion concepts._

    c.
    _Summary of Articles_

    ·
    _A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources._

    ·
    _Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content._

    ·
    _At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group._

    ·
    _Summaries all key points and findings from the articles._

    ·
    _Includes statistics to support significance of the topic._

    ·
    _Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples._

    d.
    _Health Promotion Discussion -_

    ·
    _Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic._

    ·
    _The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population._

    ·
    _Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population._

    ·
    _Applies health promotion strategies._

    e.
    _APA Style and Organization_

    ### ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/health-and-wellness-20886201)

    ### **NR283 Pathophysiology**

    ### **RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines**

    ### ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/health-and-wellness-20886201)

    ### **NR222 Health and Wellness**

    ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Paper Guidelines**

    NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V2.docx Revised: 04/2018

    11

    NR222 Health Promotion Project Guidelines V6.docx ®2022 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

    41

    4

    ## | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | | | | | | | | **Introduction and Conclusion** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area. <br>2. Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest. <br>3. Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper.<br>4. Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper. | | | | | | | **Relate Topic to Target Population** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Describes the topic and target cultural population.<br>2. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.<br>3. Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area. <br>4. Applies health promotion concepts. | | | | | | | **Summary of Articles** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources. <br>2. Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content.<br>3. At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group. <br>4. Summaries all key points and findings from the articles.<br>5. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.<br>6. Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples. | | | | | | | **Health Promotion Discussion** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic. <br>2. The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population.<br>3. Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population.<br>4. Applies health promotion strategies. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ## image1.png

    **## WEEK7HEALTHANDWELLNESS.docx**

    ### **NR222 Health and Wellness**

    ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Project Guidelines**

    ## TOPIC: The impact of universal health coverage on public health outcomes’

    1. Discuss the professional nurse’s role in health promotion activities.

    3. Discuss health promotion, illness prevention, health maintenance, health restoration, and rehabilitation in relation to the nurse’s role in working with various populations.

    7. Identify health promotion strategies throughout the life span.

    Follow these guidelines when completing this.

    1) Identify a health problem or need for health promotion for a particular stage in the life span of a population from a specific culture in your area.

    2) Research a topic related to health and wellness associated with one of the Healthy People topic areas.

    3) You will develop an educational health promotion project addressing the population/culture in your area.

    4) Include the following sections
    _(detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric)._

    ·
    _Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area._

    ·
    _Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest._

    ·
    _Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper._

    ·
    _Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper._

    b.
    _Relate Topic to Target Population-_

    ·
    _Describes the topic and target cultural population._

    ·
    _Includes statistics to support significance of the topic._

    ·
    _Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area._

    ·
    _Applies health promotion concepts._

    c.
    _Summary of Articles_

    ·
    _A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources._

    ·
    _Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content._

    ·
    _At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group._

    ·
    _Summaries all key points and findings from the articles._

    ·
    _Includes statistics to support significance of the topic._

    ·
    _Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples._

    d.
    _Health Promotion Discussion -_

    ·
    _Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic._

    ·
    _The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population._

    ·
    _Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population._

    ·
    _Applies health promotion strategies._

    e.
    _APA Style and Organization_

    ### ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/health-and-wellness-20886201)

    ### **NR283 Pathophysiology**

    ### **RUA: Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines**

    ### ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/health-and-wellness-20886201)

    ### **NR222 Health and Wellness**

    ### **Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Paper Guidelines**

    NR283 Pathophysiological Processes Guidelines V2.docx Revised: 04/2018

    11

    NR222 Health Promotion Project Guidelines V6.docx ®2022 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

    41

    4

    ## | | | | | | | | — | — | — | — | — | — | | | | | | | | | **Introduction and Conclusion** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Introduction establishes the purpose of the paper and describes why topic is important to health promotion in the target population in your area. <br>2. Introduction stimulates the reader’s interest. <br>3. Conclusion includes the main ideas from the body of the paper.<br>4. Conclusion includes the major support points from the body of the paper. | | | | | | | **Relate Topic to Target Population** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Describes the topic and target cultural population.<br>2. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.<br>3. Explains how the project relates to the selected Healthy People topic area. <br>4. Applies health promotion concepts. | | | | | | | **Summary of Articles** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. A minimum of three (3) scholarly articles, from the last 5 years, are used as sources. <br>2. Articles meet criteria of being from scholarly journals and include health promotion and wellness content.<br>3. At least one article is related to the chosen cultural group. <br>4. Summaries all key points and findings from the articles.<br>5. Includes statistics to support significance of the topic.<br>6. Discusses how information from the articles is used in the Health Promotion Project, including specific examples. | | | | | | | **Health Promotion Discussion** | | | | | | | **Required criteria**<br>1. Describes approaches to educate the target population about the topic. <br>2. The approaches are appropriate for the cultural target population.<br>3. Identifies specific ways to promote lifestyle changes within the target population.<br>4. Applies health promotion strategies. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ## image1.png

  • [Solved] HELP PLS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    WILL SEND INSTRUCTIONS – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    WILL SEND INSTRUCTIONS

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] weekly clinical experience

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering weekly clinical experience.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion Post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Module6ClinicalWork.docx – AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf **## Module6ClinicalWork.docx** **Module 6:** _Clinical Work_ **Instructions** Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed jou…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Module6ClinicalWork.docx

    – AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf

    **## Module6ClinicalWork.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Clinical Work_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    **Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **40 to >36.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **36 to >32.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **32 to >28.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **28 to >24.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **24 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested. | **20 to >18.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested. | **18 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested. | **15 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **14 to >12.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **12 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **11 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. | **9 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    ·
    [Previous](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930550) [Next](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930552)

    **AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixeresearchevidenceappraisaltool2022-pdf)

    **AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixeresearchevidenceappraisaltool2022-pdf)

    **## Module6ClinicalWork.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Clinical Work_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    **Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **40 to >36.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **36 to >32.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **32 to >28.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **28 to >24.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **24 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested. | **20 to >18.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested. | **18 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested. | **15 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **14 to >12.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **12 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **11 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. | **9 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    ·
    [Previous](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930550) [Next](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930552)

    **AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixeresearchevidenceappraisaltool2022-pdf)

    **## Module6ClinicalWork.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Clinical Work_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    **Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **40 to >36.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **36 to >32.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **32 to >28.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **28 to >24.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. | **24 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested. | **20 to >18.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested. | **18 to >15.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested. | **15 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **15 to >14.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **14 to >12.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **12 to >11.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. | **11 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. | **9 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 to >9.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **9 to >8.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. | **8 to >7.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **7 to >6.0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements. | **6 to >0 pts**<br>**Unacceptable**<br>The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    ·
    [Previous](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930550) [Next](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/34857/modules/items/1930552)

    **AppendixEResearchevidenceappraisaltool2022.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixeresearchevidenceappraisaltool2022-pdf)

  • [Solved] Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion Post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx **## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx** **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics_ **Instructions** Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of artic…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx

    **## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics_

    **Instructions**

    Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.

    Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.

    1. What is the purpose of the article organization?

    2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?

    3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **## Module6DescriptiveandInferentialStatistics.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics_

    **Instructions**

    Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.

    Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.

    1. What is the purpose of the article organization?

    2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?

    3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

  • [Solved] WEEK 6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHED – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf – ## WEEK6DISRES78HRA549.docx **## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf** TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expec…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHED

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf

    – ## WEEK6DISRES78HRA549.docx

    **## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf**

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    Criteria No Submission

    0 points

    Novice
    (Criterion is missing or not

    in evidence)
    1-13 points

    Basic
    (works towards meeting

    expectations;
    performance needs

    improvement)
    14-16 points

    Proficient
    (meets expectations;

    performance is satisfactory)
    17-18 points

    Exemplary
    (exceeds expectations;

    performance is outstanding)
    19-20 points

    Support of
    Week's Reading

    No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not refer to the
    readings to support postings

    (1-13 points)

    Alludes to the readings
    to support postings

    (14-16 points)

    Refers to examples from the
    readings to support postings

    (17-18 points)

    Provides concrete examples from
    the readings to support postings;

    integrates prior readings in
    postings

    (19-20 points)

    Observations No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not integrate personal
    observations or knowledge;

    does not present new
    observations
    (1-13 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and

    knowledge in a cursory
    manner; does not

    present new
    observations

    (14-16 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and knowledge
    in an accurate way; presents

    new observations
    (17-18 points)

    Integrates personal observations
    and knowledge in an accurate and

    highly insightful way; presents
    new observations

    (19-20 points)

    Response to
    Classmates

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Responds in a cursory
    manner to classmates’

    postings
    (1-13 points)

    Constructively responds
    to classmates’ postings

    (14-16 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; offers

    insight that encourages other
    students to think critically

    about their own work.
    (17-18 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; masterfully
    connects the material presented
    in classmates’ postings to their

    responses; encourages classmates
    to think critically about their own

    work.
    (19-20 points)

    Organization,
    Word Choice,
    and Sentence

    Structure

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Posts are disorganized and
    information is not presented
    in a logical sequence; word

    choice and sentence
    structure are not suitable

    (1-13 points)

    Posts are somewhat
    disorganized, and
    information is not

    presented in a logical
    sequence; word choice
    and sentence structure

    are not suitable
    (14-16 points)

    Posts are organized, and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word
    choice and sentence

    structure are suitable; there
    are a few errors; however,

    errors do not affect
    readability.

    (17-18 points)

    Posts are organized and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word choice and
    sentence structure are suitable;

    no errors in the response.
    (19-20 points)

    References No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Includes no sources to
    support conclusions

    (1-13 points)

    Includes 1 outside
    source to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    sources are properly cited in

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and enrich the
    discussion; sources are cited using

    APA format; style guidelines are

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    sources are not properly
    cited in APA format

    (14-16 points)

    APA format and are properly
    integrated into the discussion

    response
    (17-18 points)

    masterfully integrated into the
    discussion response.

    (19-20 points)

    **## WEEK6DISRES78HRA549.docx**

    **Specifically, focus your responses to your peers' initial postings FOR 1A AND B. Cite scholarly authors, C & D discussion.**

    **1A KW…** I believe there should not be a strict age limit on when individuals must stop working as long as they can perform their duties effectively. While many still see 65 as a reasonable retirement age, others prefer to work into their 70s or beyond. The elimination of mandatory retirement under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) reflects that individuals should not be forced to leave the workforce solely based on age (Moran, 2014).

    As people age, many want to stay engaged in the workforce for financial reasons or personal fulfillment (Harrar, 2022). However, concerns about productivity and safety are valid, particularly in physically demanding roles. Employers should assess employees based on their abilities rather than making assumptions about age-related decline. Age bias remains a significant issue, as highlighted by a survey from the American Staffing Association (ASA), which found that 78% of baby boomers feel their age negatively impacts their hiring chances. Moreover, only 24% of boomers are considering job changes this year, compared to higher rates among younger generations (Terrell, 2024).

    To further protect employees from discrimination, additional policies could strengthen existing laws. For example, expanding workplace accommodations, implementing robust training to address age bias, and enhancing legal protections against subtle forms of discrimination could foster a more inclusive work environment. AARP (2023) suggests that employers include age as part of their diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy, ensure age-neutral hiring practices, and offer career development opportunities to workers of all ages. Furthermore, they advocate for strengthening and enforcing age discrimination laws to better protect older workers (Choi-Allum, 2023).

    **References:**

    Choi-Allum, L. (2023, September 5).
    _The value of older workers: Breaking barriers and embracing experience_. AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/work-finances-retirement/employers-workforce/value-of-older-workers-breaking-barriers-embracing-experience](https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/work-finances-retirement/employers-workforce/value-of-older-workers-breaking-barriers-embracing-experience)

    Harrar, S. (2022, June 6).
    _It’s time to throw out stereotypes on aging._ AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2022/aging-survey.html](https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2022/aging-survey.html)

    Moran, J. J. (2014).
    _Employment law: New challenges in the business environment_(7th ed.). Pearson.

    Terrell, K. (2024, March 22).
    _Does age matter when looking for jobs? Most boomers say yes_. AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/work/job-search/boomers-age-looking-for-jobs/](https://www.aarp.org/work/job-search/boomers-age-looking-for-jobs/)

    **1B**. The retirement age in America is constantly in question. In 1983, Congress passed a law that gradually increased the full retirement age (FRA) since people are living longer. For individuals born between 1943 and 1954, their FRA is 66. They can start receiving Social Security benefits at 62. For people born after 1960, their FRA is 67 even though they can also start receiving Social Security benefits at 62 (SSA, n.d.). Recently, the Republican Study Committee (RSC) recommended the FRA be increased to 69. Under current law, the FRA is set at 67 (Ross, 2024).

    Personally, I am of the opinion that people should be allowed to work for as long as they have the mental, emotional, and physical capacity to do so. If people want to work past the age of 65, they should be allowed to. BettyReid Sokin made history as the longest serving National Park Services Park Ranger. She retired at 100 years old. She started working for the NPS when she was 84 years old (National Park Service, 2022).

    Many Americans are choosing to delay their retirement or re-enter the workforce due to the economy. Due to this, more and more senior citizens are in the workforce. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protects employees over the age of 40 from discrimination due to their age. They are protected in “hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms, conditions or privileges of employment” (U.S. Department of Labor, n.d.). I think this law is adequate, however; there could be some additional laws to strengthen protections. As the FRA increases, more senior citizens will need protection.

    ‌References

    Benefits Planner: Retirement | Born between 1943 and 1954 | SSA. (n.d.).
    [www.ssa.gov](https://www.ssa.gov/).
    [https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1943.html](https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1943.html)

    ‌Ross, K. (2024, July 31). Raising the Retirement Age for Social Security Would Cut Benefits by Thousands of Dollars Each Year. Center for American Progress.
    [https://doi.org/10.2105//AJPH.2023.307310/](https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307310/)

    U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). Age Discrimination | U.S. Department of Labor. Dol.gov; U.S. Department of Labor.
    [https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination/agedisc](https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination/agedisc)

    ‌100 year-old National Park Service Ranger Betty Reid Soskin retires after remarkable career – Office of Communications (U.S. National Park Service). (2022, March 31). Nps.gov.
    [https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/soskin-retires-2022.htm](https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/soskin-retires-2022.htm)

    **1C. DIS**….Think about your own orientation and onboarding experiences in the workplace. Describe examples of experiences you have had as a new hire that have been particularly effective and/or ineffective. Why were they effective or ineffective? What could have been done to improve your experiences? Did your experiences affect your decision to remain employed in the organization(s)?

    **1D:** Conduct either an exit interview OR what Sullivan calls a “stay interview”:

    **Exit Interview**
    Conduct a “post-exit” interview with someone who has
    **_voluntarily_** left a job within the past 2 years. You
    **may not** interview yourself, and you
    **may not** interview someone who was fired, laid off (no involuntary turnover), or someone who left due to retirement or a medical issue (no unavoidable turnover).

    **Stay Interview**
    Conduct a stay interview with a colleague, friend, or significant other who has been with his or her organization for at least 2 years. Again, you
    **may not** interview yourself. Likewise, do not interview a coworker unless it is within your power to make changes based on the coworker’s feedback.

    **In your interview, obtain the following information:**

    · Job title

    · Brief job description

    · Approximate length of time in the job

    **For an exit interview:**

    · Reasons for leaving the job

    · Any attempts to negotiate with the organization before leaving

    **For a stay interview:**

    · Reasons for staying on the job

    · Reasons the employee would consider leaving

    Summarize this information in a discussion post to share with your classmates. Additionally, use what you have learned from this module’s readings to highlight aspects of the job that may lead/or may have led to voluntary turnover and any retention efforts that could be/could have been used to keep that employee working at the job.

    **## WEEK6DISRES78HRA549.docx**

    **Specifically, focus your responses to your peers' initial postings FOR 1A AND B. Cite scholarly authors, C & D discussion.**

    **1A KW…** I believe there should not be a strict age limit on when individuals must stop working as long as they can perform their duties effectively. While many still see 65 as a reasonable retirement age, others prefer to work into their 70s or beyond. The elimination of mandatory retirement under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) reflects that individuals should not be forced to leave the workforce solely based on age (Moran, 2014).

    As people age, many want to stay engaged in the workforce for financial reasons or personal fulfillment (Harrar, 2022). However, concerns about productivity and safety are valid, particularly in physically demanding roles. Employers should assess employees based on their abilities rather than making assumptions about age-related decline. Age bias remains a significant issue, as highlighted by a survey from the American Staffing Association (ASA), which found that 78% of baby boomers feel their age negatively impacts their hiring chances. Moreover, only 24% of boomers are considering job changes this year, compared to higher rates among younger generations (Terrell, 2024).

    To further protect employees from discrimination, additional policies could strengthen existing laws. For example, expanding workplace accommodations, implementing robust training to address age bias, and enhancing legal protections against subtle forms of discrimination could foster a more inclusive work environment. AARP (2023) suggests that employers include age as part of their diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy, ensure age-neutral hiring practices, and offer career development opportunities to workers of all ages. Furthermore, they advocate for strengthening and enforcing age discrimination laws to better protect older workers (Choi-Allum, 2023).

    **References:**

    Choi-Allum, L. (2023, September 5).
    _The value of older workers: Breaking barriers and embracing experience_. AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/work-finances-retirement/employers-workforce/value-of-older-workers-breaking-barriers-embracing-experience](https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/work-finances-retirement/employers-workforce/value-of-older-workers-breaking-barriers-embracing-experience)

    Harrar, S. (2022, June 6).
    _It’s time to throw out stereotypes on aging._ AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2022/aging-survey.html](https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2022/aging-survey.html)

    Moran, J. J. (2014).
    _Employment law: New challenges in the business environment_(7th ed.). Pearson.

    Terrell, K. (2024, March 22).
    _Does age matter when looking for jobs? Most boomers say yes_. AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/work/job-search/boomers-age-looking-for-jobs/](https://www.aarp.org/work/job-search/boomers-age-looking-for-jobs/)

    **1B**. The retirement age in America is constantly in question. In 1983, Congress passed a law that gradually increased the full retirement age (FRA) since people are living longer. For individuals born between 1943 and 1954, their FRA is 66. They can start receiving Social Security benefits at 62. For people born after 1960, their FRA is 67 even though they can also start receiving Social Security benefits at 62 (SSA, n.d.). Recently, the Republican Study Committee (RSC) recommended the FRA be increased to 69. Under current law, the FRA is set at 67 (Ross, 2024).

    Personally, I am of the opinion that people should be allowed to work for as long as they have the mental, emotional, and physical capacity to do so. If people want to work past the age of 65, they should be allowed to. BettyReid Sokin made history as the longest serving National Park Services Park Ranger. She retired at 100 years old. She started working for the NPS when she was 84 years old (National Park Service, 2022).

    Many Americans are choosing to delay their retirement or re-enter the workforce due to the economy. Due to this, more and more senior citizens are in the workforce. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protects employees over the age of 40 from discrimination due to their age. They are protected in “hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms, conditions or privileges of employment” (U.S. Department of Labor, n.d.). I think this law is adequate, however; there could be some additional laws to strengthen protections. As the FRA increases, more senior citizens will need protection.

    ‌References

    Benefits Planner: Retirement | Born between 1943 and 1954 | SSA. (n.d.).
    [www.ssa.gov](https://www.ssa.gov/).
    [https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1943.html](https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1943.html)

    ‌Ross, K. (2024, July 31). Raising the Retirement Age for Social Security Would Cut Benefits by Thousands of Dollars Each Year. Center for American Progress.
    [https://doi.org/10.2105//AJPH.2023.307310/](https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307310/)

    U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). Age Discrimination | U.S. Department of Labor. Dol.gov; U.S. Department of Labor.
    [https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination/agedisc](https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination/agedisc)

    ‌100 year-old National Park Service Ranger Betty Reid Soskin retires after remarkable career – Office of Communications (U.S. National Park Service). (2022, March 31). Nps.gov.
    [https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/soskin-retires-2022.htm](https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/soskin-retires-2022.htm)

    **1C. DIS**….Think about your own orientation and onboarding experiences in the workplace. Describe examples of experiences you have had as a new hire that have been particularly effective and/or ineffective. Why were they effective or ineffective? What could have been done to improve your experiences? Did your experiences affect your decision to remain employed in the organization(s)?

    **1D:** Conduct either an exit interview OR what Sullivan calls a “stay interview”:

    **Exit Interview**
    Conduct a “post-exit” interview with someone who has
    **_voluntarily_** left a job within the past 2 years. You
    **may not** interview yourself, and you
    **may not** interview someone who was fired, laid off (no involuntary turnover), or someone who left due to retirement or a medical issue (no unavoidable turnover).

    **Stay Interview**
    Conduct a stay interview with a colleague, friend, or significant other who has been with his or her organization for at least 2 years. Again, you
    **may not** interview yourself. Likewise, do not interview a coworker unless it is within your power to make changes based on the coworker’s feedback.

    **In your interview, obtain the following information:**

    · Job title

    · Brief job description

    · Approximate length of time in the job

    **For an exit interview:**

    · Reasons for leaving the job

    · Any attempts to negotiate with the organization before leaving

    **For a stay interview:**

    · Reasons for staying on the job

    · Reasons the employee would consider leaving

    Summarize this information in a discussion post to share with your classmates. Additionally, use what you have learned from this module’s readings to highlight aspects of the job that may lead/or may have led to voluntary turnover and any retention efforts that could be/could have been used to keep that employee working at the job.

    **## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf**

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    Criteria No Submission

    0 points

    Novice
    (Criterion is missing or not

    in evidence)
    1-13 points

    Basic
    (works towards meeting

    expectations;
    performance needs

    improvement)
    14-16 points

    Proficient
    (meets expectations;

    performance is satisfactory)
    17-18 points

    Exemplary
    (exceeds expectations;

    performance is outstanding)
    19-20 points

    Support of
    Week's Reading

    No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not refer to the
    readings to support postings

    (1-13 points)

    Alludes to the readings
    to support postings

    (14-16 points)

    Refers to examples from the
    readings to support postings

    (17-18 points)

    Provides concrete examples from
    the readings to support postings;

    integrates prior readings in
    postings

    (19-20 points)

    Observations No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not integrate personal
    observations or knowledge;

    does not present new
    observations
    (1-13 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and

    knowledge in a cursory
    manner; does not

    present new
    observations

    (14-16 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and knowledge
    in an accurate way; presents

    new observations
    (17-18 points)

    Integrates personal observations
    and knowledge in an accurate and

    highly insightful way; presents
    new observations

    (19-20 points)

    Response to
    Classmates

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Responds in a cursory
    manner to classmates’

    postings
    (1-13 points)

    Constructively responds
    to classmates’ postings

    (14-16 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; offers

    insight that encourages other
    students to think critically

    about their own work.
    (17-18 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; masterfully
    connects the material presented
    in classmates’ postings to their

    responses; encourages classmates
    to think critically about their own

    work.
    (19-20 points)

    Organization,
    Word Choice,
    and Sentence

    Structure

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Posts are disorganized and
    information is not presented
    in a logical sequence; word

    choice and sentence
    structure are not suitable

    (1-13 points)

    Posts are somewhat
    disorganized, and
    information is not

    presented in a logical
    sequence; word choice
    and sentence structure

    are not suitable
    (14-16 points)

    Posts are organized, and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word
    choice and sentence

    structure are suitable; there
    are a few errors; however,

    errors do not affect
    readability.

    (17-18 points)

    Posts are organized and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word choice and
    sentence structure are suitable;

    no errors in the response.
    (19-20 points)

    References No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Includes no sources to
    support conclusions

    (1-13 points)

    Includes 1 outside
    source to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    sources are properly cited in

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and enrich the
    discussion; sources are cited using

    APA format; style guidelines are

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    sources are not properly
    cited in APA format

    (14-16 points)

    APA format and are properly
    integrated into the discussion

    response
    (17-18 points)

    masterfully integrated into the
    discussion response.

    (19-20 points)

    **## WEEK6DISRES78HRA549.docx**

    **Specifically, focus your responses to your peers' initial postings FOR 1A AND B. Cite scholarly authors, C & D discussion.**

    **1A KW…** I believe there should not be a strict age limit on when individuals must stop working as long as they can perform their duties effectively. While many still see 65 as a reasonable retirement age, others prefer to work into their 70s or beyond. The elimination of mandatory retirement under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) reflects that individuals should not be forced to leave the workforce solely based on age (Moran, 2014).

    As people age, many want to stay engaged in the workforce for financial reasons or personal fulfillment (Harrar, 2022). However, concerns about productivity and safety are valid, particularly in physically demanding roles. Employers should assess employees based on their abilities rather than making assumptions about age-related decline. Age bias remains a significant issue, as highlighted by a survey from the American Staffing Association (ASA), which found that 78% of baby boomers feel their age negatively impacts their hiring chances. Moreover, only 24% of boomers are considering job changes this year, compared to higher rates among younger generations (Terrell, 2024).

    To further protect employees from discrimination, additional policies could strengthen existing laws. For example, expanding workplace accommodations, implementing robust training to address age bias, and enhancing legal protections against subtle forms of discrimination could foster a more inclusive work environment. AARP (2023) suggests that employers include age as part of their diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy, ensure age-neutral hiring practices, and offer career development opportunities to workers of all ages. Furthermore, they advocate for strengthening and enforcing age discrimination laws to better protect older workers (Choi-Allum, 2023).

    **References:**

    Choi-Allum, L. (2023, September 5).
    _The value of older workers: Breaking barriers and embracing experience_. AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/work-finances-retirement/employers-workforce/value-of-older-workers-breaking-barriers-embracing-experience](https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/work-finances-retirement/employers-workforce/value-of-older-workers-breaking-barriers-embracing-experience)

    Harrar, S. (2022, June 6).
    _It’s time to throw out stereotypes on aging._ AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2022/aging-survey.html](https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2022/aging-survey.html)

    Moran, J. J. (2014).
    _Employment law: New challenges in the business environment_(7th ed.). Pearson.

    Terrell, K. (2024, March 22).
    _Does age matter when looking for jobs? Most boomers say yes_. AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/work/job-search/boomers-age-looking-for-jobs/](https://www.aarp.org/work/job-search/boomers-age-looking-for-jobs/)

    **1B**. The retirement age in America is constantly in question. In 1983, Congress passed a law that gradually increased the full retirement age (FRA) since people are living longer. For individuals born between 1943 and 1954, their FRA is 66. They can start receiving Social Security benefits at 62. For people born after 1960, their FRA is 67 even though they can also start receiving Social Security benefits at 62 (SSA, n.d.). Recently, the Republican Study Committee (RSC) recommended the FRA be increased to 69. Under current law, the FRA is set at 67 (Ross, 2024).

    Personally, I am of the opinion that people should be allowed to work for as long as they have the mental, emotional, and physical capacity to do so. If people want to work past the age of 65, they should be allowed to. BettyReid Sokin made history as the longest serving National Park Services Park Ranger. She retired at 100 years old. She started working for the NPS when she was 84 years old (National Park Service, 2022).

    Many Americans are choosing to delay their retirement or re-enter the workforce due to the economy. Due to this, more and more senior citizens are in the workforce. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protects employees over the age of 40 from discrimination due to their age. They are protected in “hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms, conditions or privileges of employment” (U.S. Department of Labor, n.d.). I think this law is adequate, however; there could be some additional laws to strengthen protections. As the FRA increases, more senior citizens will need protection.

    ‌References

    Benefits Planner: Retirement | Born between 1943 and 1954 | SSA. (n.d.).
    [www.ssa.gov](https://www.ssa.gov/).
    [https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1943.html](https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1943.html)

    ‌Ross, K. (2024, July 31). Raising the Retirement Age for Social Security Would Cut Benefits by Thousands of Dollars Each Year. Center for American Progress.
    [https://doi.org/10.2105//AJPH.2023.307310/](https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307310/)

    U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). Age Discrimination | U.S. Department of Labor. Dol.gov; U.S. Department of Labor.
    [https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination/agedisc](https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination/agedisc)

    ‌100 year-old National Park Service Ranger Betty Reid Soskin retires after remarkable career – Office of Communications (U.S. National Park Service). (2022, March 31). Nps.gov.
    [https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/soskin-retires-2022.htm](https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/soskin-retires-2022.htm)

    **1C. DIS**….Think about your own orientation and onboarding experiences in the workplace. Describe examples of experiences you have had as a new hire that have been particularly effective and/or ineffective. Why were they effective or ineffective? What could have been done to improve your experiences? Did your experiences affect your decision to remain employed in the organization(s)?

    **1D:** Conduct either an exit interview OR what Sullivan calls a “stay interview”:

    **Exit Interview**
    Conduct a “post-exit” interview with someone who has
    **_voluntarily_** left a job within the past 2 years. You
    **may not** interview yourself, and you
    **may not** interview someone who was fired, laid off (no involuntary turnover), or someone who left due to retirement or a medical issue (no unavoidable turnover).

    **Stay Interview**
    Conduct a stay interview with a colleague, friend, or significant other who has been with his or her organization for at least 2 years. Again, you
    **may not** interview yourself. Likewise, do not interview a coworker unless it is within your power to make changes based on the coworker’s feedback.

    **In your interview, obtain the following information:**

    · Job title

    · Brief job description

    · Approximate length of time in the job

    **For an exit interview:**

    · Reasons for leaving the job

    · Any attempts to negotiate with the organization before leaving

    **For a stay interview:**

    · Reasons for staying on the job

    · Reasons the employee would consider leaving

    Summarize this information in a discussion post to share with your classmates. Additionally, use what you have learned from this module’s readings to highlight aspects of the job that may lead/or may have led to voluntary turnover and any retention efforts that could be/could have been used to keep that employee working at the job.

    **## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf**

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    Criteria No Submission

    0 points

    Novice
    (Criterion is missing or not

    in evidence)
    1-13 points

    Basic
    (works towards meeting

    expectations;
    performance needs

    improvement)
    14-16 points

    Proficient
    (meets expectations;

    performance is satisfactory)
    17-18 points

    Exemplary
    (exceeds expectations;

    performance is outstanding)
    19-20 points

    Support of
    Week's Reading

    No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not refer to the
    readings to support postings

    (1-13 points)

    Alludes to the readings
    to support postings

    (14-16 points)

    Refers to examples from the
    readings to support postings

    (17-18 points)

    Provides concrete examples from
    the readings to support postings;

    integrates prior readings in
    postings

    (19-20 points)

    Observations No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not integrate personal
    observations or knowledge;

    does not present new
    observations
    (1-13 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and

    knowledge in a cursory
    manner; does not

    present new
    observations

    (14-16 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and knowledge
    in an accurate way; presents

    new observations
    (17-18 points)

    Integrates personal observations
    and knowledge in an accurate and

    highly insightful way; presents
    new observations

    (19-20 points)

    Response to
    Classmates

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Responds in a cursory
    manner to classmates’

    postings
    (1-13 points)

    Constructively responds
    to classmates’ postings

    (14-16 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; offers

    insight that encourages other
    students to think critically

    about their own work.
    (17-18 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; masterfully
    connects the material presented
    in classmates’ postings to their

    responses; encourages classmates
    to think critically about their own

    work.
    (19-20 points)

    Organization,
    Word Choice,
    and Sentence

    Structure

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Posts are disorganized and
    information is not presented
    in a logical sequence; word

    choice and sentence
    structure are not suitable

    (1-13 points)

    Posts are somewhat
    disorganized, and
    information is not

    presented in a logical
    sequence; word choice
    and sentence structure

    are not suitable
    (14-16 points)

    Posts are organized, and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word
    choice and sentence

    structure are suitable; there
    are a few errors; however,

    errors do not affect
    readability.

    (17-18 points)

    Posts are organized and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word choice and
    sentence structure are suitable;

    no errors in the response.
    (19-20 points)

    References No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Includes no sources to
    support conclusions

    (1-13 points)

    Includes 1 outside
    source to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    sources are properly cited in

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and enrich the
    discussion; sources are cited using

    APA format; style guidelines are

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    sources are not properly
    cited in APA format

    (14-16 points)

    APA format and are properly
    integrated into the discussion

    response
    (17-18 points)

    masterfully integrated into the
    discussion response.

    (19-20 points)

    **## WEEK6DISRES78HRA549.docx**

    **Specifically, focus your responses to your peers' initial postings FOR 1A AND B. Cite scholarly authors, C & D discussion.**

    **1A KW…** I believe there should not be a strict age limit on when individuals must stop working as long as they can perform their duties effectively. While many still see 65 as a reasonable retirement age, others prefer to work into their 70s or beyond. The elimination of mandatory retirement under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) reflects that individuals should not be forced to leave the workforce solely based on age (Moran, 2014).

    As people age, many want to stay engaged in the workforce for financial reasons or personal fulfillment (Harrar, 2022). However, concerns about productivity and safety are valid, particularly in physically demanding roles. Employers should assess employees based on their abilities rather than making assumptions about age-related decline. Age bias remains a significant issue, as highlighted by a survey from the American Staffing Association (ASA), which found that 78% of baby boomers feel their age negatively impacts their hiring chances. Moreover, only 24% of boomers are considering job changes this year, compared to higher rates among younger generations (Terrell, 2024).

    To further protect employees from discrimination, additional policies could strengthen existing laws. For example, expanding workplace accommodations, implementing robust training to address age bias, and enhancing legal protections against subtle forms of discrimination could foster a more inclusive work environment. AARP (2023) suggests that employers include age as part of their diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy, ensure age-neutral hiring practices, and offer career development opportunities to workers of all ages. Furthermore, they advocate for strengthening and enforcing age discrimination laws to better protect older workers (Choi-Allum, 2023).

    **References:**

    Choi-Allum, L. (2023, September 5).
    _The value of older workers: Breaking barriers and embracing experience_. AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/work-finances-retirement/employers-workforce/value-of-older-workers-breaking-barriers-embracing-experience](https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/work-finances-retirement/employers-workforce/value-of-older-workers-breaking-barriers-embracing-experience)

    Harrar, S. (2022, June 6).
    _It’s time to throw out stereotypes on aging._ AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2022/aging-survey.html](https://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-2022/aging-survey.html)

    Moran, J. J. (2014).
    _Employment law: New challenges in the business environment_(7th ed.). Pearson.

    Terrell, K. (2024, March 22).
    _Does age matter when looking for jobs? Most boomers say yes_. AARP.
    [https://www.aarp.org/work/job-search/boomers-age-looking-for-jobs/](https://www.aarp.org/work/job-search/boomers-age-looking-for-jobs/)

    **1B**. The retirement age in America is constantly in question. In 1983, Congress passed a law that gradually increased the full retirement age (FRA) since people are living longer. For individuals born between 1943 and 1954, their FRA is 66. They can start receiving Social Security benefits at 62. For people born after 1960, their FRA is 67 even though they can also start receiving Social Security benefits at 62 (SSA, n.d.). Recently, the Republican Study Committee (RSC) recommended the FRA be increased to 69. Under current law, the FRA is set at 67 (Ross, 2024).

    Personally, I am of the opinion that people should be allowed to work for as long as they have the mental, emotional, and physical capacity to do so. If people want to work past the age of 65, they should be allowed to. BettyReid Sokin made history as the longest serving National Park Services Park Ranger. She retired at 100 years old. She started working for the NPS when she was 84 years old (National Park Service, 2022).

    Many Americans are choosing to delay their retirement or re-enter the workforce due to the economy. Due to this, more and more senior citizens are in the workforce. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protects employees over the age of 40 from discrimination due to their age. They are protected in “hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms, conditions or privileges of employment” (U.S. Department of Labor, n.d.). I think this law is adequate, however; there could be some additional laws to strengthen protections. As the FRA increases, more senior citizens will need protection.

    ‌References

    Benefits Planner: Retirement | Born between 1943 and 1954 | SSA. (n.d.).
    [www.ssa.gov](https://www.ssa.gov/).
    [https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1943.html](https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1943.html)

    ‌Ross, K. (2024, July 31). Raising the Retirement Age for Social Security Would Cut Benefits by Thousands of Dollars Each Year. Center for American Progress.
    [https://doi.org/10.2105//AJPH.2023.307310/](https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307310/)

    U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). Age Discrimination | U.S. Department of Labor. Dol.gov; U.S. Department of Labor.
    [https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination/agedisc](https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/discrimination/agedisc)

    ‌100 year-old National Park Service Ranger Betty Reid Soskin retires after remarkable career – Office of Communications (U.S. National Park Service). (2022, March 31). Nps.gov.
    [https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/soskin-retires-2022.htm](https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/soskin-retires-2022.htm)

    **1C. DIS**….Think about your own orientation and onboarding experiences in the workplace. Describe examples of experiences you have had as a new hire that have been particularly effective and/or ineffective. Why were they effective or ineffective? What could have been done to improve your experiences? Did your experiences affect your decision to remain employed in the organization(s)?

    **1D:** Conduct either an exit interview OR what Sullivan calls a “stay interview”:

    **Exit Interview**
    Conduct a “post-exit” interview with someone who has
    **_voluntarily_** left a job within the past 2 years. You
    **may not** interview yourself, and you
    **may not** interview someone who was fired, laid off (no involuntary turnover), or someone who left due to retirement or a medical issue (no unavoidable turnover).

    **Stay Interview**
    Conduct a stay interview with a colleague, friend, or significant other who has been with his or her organization for at least 2 years. Again, you
    **may not** interview yourself. Likewise, do not interview a coworker unless it is within your power to make changes based on the coworker’s feedback.

    **In your interview, obtain the following information:**

    · Job title

    · Brief job description

    · Approximate length of time in the job

    **For an exit interview:**

    · Reasons for leaving the job

    · Any attempts to negotiate with the organization before leaving

    **For a stay interview:**

    · Reasons for staying on the job

    · Reasons the employee would consider leaving

    Summarize this information in a discussion post to share with your classmates. Additionally, use what you have learned from this module’s readings to highlight aspects of the job that may lead/or may have led to voluntary turnover and any retention efforts that could be/could have been used to keep that employee working at the job.

  • [Solved] week 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Section 1** African American psychologist Dr. Kenneth B. Clark’s famous "doll test" was designed to gather social-science evidence of the effects of racial discrimination. That evidence would eventually be presented in the court case Brown v. Board of Education to argue that racial discrimination …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Section 1**

    African American psychologist Dr. Kenneth B. Clark’s famous "doll test" was designed to gather social-science evidence of the effects of racial discrimination. That evidence would eventually be presented in the court case Brown v. Board of Education to argue that racial discrimination in public schools was a violation of the Constitution and psychologically harmful to African American children. Please review this 5-minute video segment re-enacting the doll test: [_Simple Justice 2: Social Science EvidenceLinks to an external site._](https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/osi04.soc.ush.civil.dolltest/simple-justice-2-social-science-evidence/) _._

    Q1. What did you learn from the Clark Doll experiment about the impact of racism on children’s development? Please use the text or a resource to support your thinking. (200 words min.)

    **Section 2**

    Did you know that the Clark Doll experiment has been conducted in modern times? These new studies have been conducted formally and informally. Please read the following short article describing one woman’s experience: [_What I learned when I recreated the famous ‘doll test’ that looked at how Black kids see race_Links to an external site.](https://theconversation.com/what-i-learned-when-i-recreated-the-famous-doll-test-that-looked-at-how-black-kids-see-race-153780).

    Q2. How can you, as an educational professional, encourage children you work with to embrace anti-bias attitudes? What other experiences and teaching practices for young children do you think would be helpful to ensure that children from minoritized backgrounds will thrive and that all children will be successful? Give at least one example. Please use the text or a resource to support your thinking. Be sure to respond in the [first person.Links to an external site.](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/first-vs-third-person) (200 words min.)

    – 2 years ago