Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] 700 words #1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    For this term paper, you are to explore the concept of division of labor. Please make sure to address the following questions: How important is the division of labor to a capitalist economy? How does the division of labor lead to more efficient production? What are some examples of division of labor…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    For this term paper, you are to explore the concept of division of labor. Please make sure to address the following questions:
    How important is the division of labor to a capitalist economy?
    How does the division of labor lead to more efficient production?
    What are some examples of division of labor and specialization from your personal experiences?
    You are encouraged to do your own research on the division of labor to supplement the concepts we've covered in the first half of the course. You may also find the following links to be useful:

  • [Solved] 700 words #2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    For this term paper, you are required to pick a current economic topic that relates to the material we have covered or will cover in this course. You will research and find an article that covers the topic you have chosen. You can use an article online or offline from any reputable source. You will …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    For this term paper, you are required to pick a current economic topic that relates to the material we have covered or will cover in this course. You will research and find an article that covers the topic you have chosen. You can use an article online or offline from any reputable source. You will write up a review of the article and integrate course concepts into your review. Please make sure you both summarize the article and discuss how it relates to the course.
    Microsoft Word document in APA format.

  • [Solved] mod 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering mod 5.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Nursing mod 5 assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing mod 5 assignment.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] ENG

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering ENG.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Crime lab management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Managing a Lab is no different than managing another group of people. You have a boss, employees belonging to various unions, publicity, oversight, budget issues, discipline, etc. The oldest person is not necessarily to wisest or the best at managing. You wear many hats and you have friends and enem…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Managing a Lab is no different than managing another group of people. You have a boss, employees belonging to various unions, publicity, oversight, budget issues, discipline, etc. The oldest person is not necessarily to wisest or the best at managing. You wear many hats and you have friends and enemies. Most lab personnel just want to do their job, get paid and go home. They do not want management responsiblity. When I was a worker I always thought my managers were only interested in covering themselves. As I moved up, I gained a new outlook. Do you want to be a manager? Why or why not.

  • [Solved] Help Needed

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachments – ## TaskVIII.docx – ## AddHealthCodebookSection21–CriminalOffendingandVictimization2.pdf – AddHealthCodebooksection10–Military2.pdf **## TaskVIII.docx** Your job in this project is rather simple: to operationalize the two central variables in this research – combat experien…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachments

    – ## TaskVIII.docx

    – ## AddHealthCodebookSection21–CriminalOffendingandVictimization2.pdf

    – AddHealthCodebooksection10–Military2.pdf

    **## TaskVIII.docx**

    Your job in this project is rather simple: to operationalize the two central variables in this

    research – combat experience and serious violent offending – by creating an index/scale for each variable. To accomplish this task, you will be using data from Wave IV (2008) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add-Health), collected by social scientists at The University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill. I have uploaded the relevant codebooks to Canvas (Military Experience and Violent Offending and Victimization), along with the data. Students will be accessing the data directly from the ICPSR website, via the UNA Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Center (we will go through this process together). Once the data has been downloaded, students will be asked to construct and compute two scales in order to

    operationalize the independent and dependent variables: (1) a five-item combat experience

    scale, which includes a number of relevant combat-related measures (shooting/killing someone

    in combat, the experience of being wounded/injured during combat, and witnessing individuals

    being wounded or killed); and (2) a scale of serious violent behavior. I will provide students

    with considerable assistance in constructing the combat experience scale, but students will be

    expected to create their scale of serious violence on their own. Fortunately, The Add Health

    has arranged the five combat variables in consecutive order in the Military Codebook (section

    10). The five variables comprising the scale are as follows:

    R_H4MI14: During your combat deployment have you ever killed, or thought you killed, someone

    R_H4MI15: During your combat deployment, were you wounded or injured?

    R_H4MI16A: During combat deployment, did you see a friend/ ally wounded, killed, dead?

    R_H4MI16B: “” an enemy combatant?

    R_H4MI16C : “” a civilian?

    Students are simply asked to
    **_create a summated scale of these five items_**

    (TRANSFORM/COMPUTE command within SPSS), entitled COMBAT_EXP. The Variable

    Label should be “five-item summated scale for combat experience”. Since the variables are

    all measured on the same metric, more or less, there will be no need for performing any recodes on your initial scale.
    **VERY IMPORTANT: REMEMBER THAT WHEN COMPUTING SCALES AND RECODING VARIABLES STUDENTS SHOULD PASTE ALL OF THEIR PROCEDURES INTO A SYNTAX FILE IN SPSS.**

    As for your scale on serious violence scale/index, students are to go through the Section 21 Add-

    Health Codebook (Violent Offending and Victimization – see uploaded file in Canvas), and

    select the items that they think should comprise the serious violent offending scale (Hint: I

    think there are six items that “can” be used here, but students are to make their own choices,

    and defend them). Please keep in mind that some of these items are on different metrics, (two are dichotomous, the others are on a four-point scale), so recodes may be necessary, as to ensure that we are comparing “apples to apples”. In the event that students need to perform recodes on some of these measures (four of them), I would recommend dummy-coding all scale indicators, as to where the values indicate (0 = have not committed the act at least once in the past year, and 1 = have committed the act at least once in the past year the following). This can be done via the following steps:
    _recode these items into different variables (_
    _**SPSS: TRANSFORM/RECODE INTO DIFFERENT VARIABLES**) and change the OLD values (2-3) into NEW values (1). Copy the OLD values 0 and 1. Remember, I recommend renaming your newly recoded variables with the “R” designation._ Therefore, all of the indicators that comprise your soon-to-be created scale will have the values 0 or 1. When creating the summated violence scale in SPSS, I recommend using the following name: SERIOUS_VIOLENCE. I would label the variable “summated scale for serious violent behavior”. Again, students have the freedom to choose the indicators that they prefer, as long as they can defend their choices.

    When the scales have been constructed, students are encouraged to run a frequency distribution of their scales, and see if anything looks odd (e.g., are some of the attributes not represented in your scales, and may be in need of being collapsed/merged into another attribute/value?).

    Lastly, students are to perform a reliability analysis on their newly-created scales by performing

    the following procedures in SPSS: ANALYZE/SCALE/RELIABILITY ANALYSIS. Students use the proper statistics to measure reliability (as indicated in the TWO classroom demonstrations).

    After performing these procedures, students are asked to answer the following discussion questions, which will be used as the primary means of assessment for class project V.

    **1. Why were some of the indicators of your violence scale recoded? Does this choice make sense? Why or why not?**

    **2. Run a frequency distribution of your two newly-minted scales. Do any of your scales need to be recoded? Why or why not?**

    **a. If your scales need to be recoded (I think at least one of them might), how would you recode them and why?**

    **3. Comment on the**
    **reliability of your two scales. In particular, are the two scales reliable?**

    **a. What procedure in SPSS did you use to make this determination?**

    **b. After performing the procedure, how did you come to the conclusion that your measures were reliable, or lacking in reliability? In other words, what threshold did you use to make this determination?**

    **4. Comment on the validity of these two measures. Do you think that you have accurately captured combat-related PTSD, and serious violent behavior? Why or why not (be prepared to defend your choices)?**

    **a. What procedure did you use to make this determination?**

    **b. Are there statistical procedures that can assess validity?**

    **5. Discuss the process by which you moved from the abstract (what does violence really mean, man? What is post-traumatic stress), through conceptualization and operationalization to the final point of real-world measurement. Discuss the “science” behind the procedures you performed, while also giving some attention to the position that this science may still be viewed by some as being “soft”.**

    · Students should include the syntax files for all procedures used. As a matter of fact, while students will not receive a grade on their syntax submission, the syntax file is of equal importance to your assignment submission, as I will use your syntax file to determine if you have performed all procedures properly. Only the class project VIII assignment drop box will actually be evaluated.

    **## AddHealthCodebookSection21–CriminalOffendingandVictimization2.pdf**

    Wave IV Section 21: Criminal Offending and Victimization

    Number of observations: 15,701

    The next questions are about things you may have done in the past 12 months.

    H4DS1 Num 1. In the past 12 months, how often did you deliberately damage
    property that didn't belong to you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15011 96% 0 never

    558 4% 1 1 or 2 times

    52 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    33 0% 3 5 or more times

    28 0% 6 refused

    19 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS2 Num 2. In the past 12 months, how often did you steal something worth
    more than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15384 98% 0 never

    220 1% 1 1 or 2 times

    31 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    25 0% 3 5 or more times

    30 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS3 Num 3. In the past 12 months, how often did you go into a house or building
    to steal something?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15556 99% 0 never

    71 0% 1 1 or 2 times

    19 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    12 0% 3 5 or more times

    31 0% 6 refused

    12 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS4 Num 4. In the past 12 months, how often did you use or threaten to use a
    weapon to get something from someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15526 99% 0 never

    104 1% 1 1 or 2 times

    9 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    17 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    13 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS5 Num 5. In the past 12 months, how often did you sell marijuana or other
    drugs?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15001 96% 0 never

    275 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    98 1% 2 3 or 4 times

    286 2% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS6 Num 6. In the past 12 months, how often did you steal something worth less
    than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15038 96% 0 never

    495 3% 1 1 or 2 times

    63 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    63 0% 3 5 or more times

    31 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS7 Num 7. In the past 12 months, how often did you take part in a physical fight
    where a group of your friends was against another group?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15163 97% 0 never

    431 3% 1 1 or 2 times

    46 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    18 0% 3 5 or more times

    33 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS8 Num 8. In the past 12 months, how often did you buy, sell, or hold stolen
    property?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15238 97% 0 never

    328 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    53 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    39 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS9 Num 9. In the past 12 months, how often did you use someone else's credit
    card, bank card, or automatic teller card without their permission or
    knowledge?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15556 99% 0 never

    78 0% 1 1 or 2 times

    14 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    10 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS10 Num 10. In the past 12 months, how often did you deliberately write a bad
    check?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15357 98% 0 never

    244 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    33 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    25 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS11 Num 11. In the past 12 months, how often did you get into a serious
    physical fight?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    14851 95% 0 never

    713 5% 1 1 or 2 times

    59 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    34 0% 3 5 or more times

    35 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    If Q11=1, 2, 3, ask Q.12, else skip to Q.13.

    H4DS12 Num 12. In the past 12 months, how often did you hurt someone badly
    enough in a physical fight that he or she needed care from a doctor or
    nurse?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    508 3% 0 never

    263 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    23 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    10 0% 3 5 or more times

    14895 95% 7 legitimate skip

    2 0% 8 don't know

    Which of the following things happened in the past 12 months:

    H4DS13 Num 13. Someone stole something from you worth more than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    10351 66% 0 no

    3882 25% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    12 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS14 Num 14. You saw someone shoot or stab another person?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13034 83% 0 no

    1200 8% 1 yes

    34 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS15 Num 15. Someone pulled a knife or gun on you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13248 84% 0 no

    985 6% 1 yes

    35 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS16 Num 16. Someone shot or stabbed you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13733 87% 0 no

    503 3% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS17 Num 17. Someone slapped, hit, choked, or kicked you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    12766 81% 0 no

    1469 9% 1 yes

    31 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS18 Num 18. You were beaten up?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13787 88% 0 no

    449 3% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS19 Num 19. You pulled a knife or gun on someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13874 88% 0 no

    361 2% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS20 Num 20. You shot or stabbed someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    14077 90% 0 no

    156 1% 1 yes

    37 0% 6 refused

    7 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    **AddHealthCodebooksection10–Military2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/addhealthcodebooksection10-military2-pdf)

    **AddHealthCodebooksection10–Military2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/addhealthcodebooksection10-military2-pdf)

    **## TaskVIII.docx**

    Your job in this project is rather simple: to operationalize the two central variables in this

    research – combat experience and serious violent offending – by creating an index/scale for each variable. To accomplish this task, you will be using data from Wave IV (2008) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add-Health), collected by social scientists at The University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill. I have uploaded the relevant codebooks to Canvas (Military Experience and Violent Offending and Victimization), along with the data. Students will be accessing the data directly from the ICPSR website, via the UNA Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Center (we will go through this process together). Once the data has been downloaded, students will be asked to construct and compute two scales in order to

    operationalize the independent and dependent variables: (1) a five-item combat experience

    scale, which includes a number of relevant combat-related measures (shooting/killing someone

    in combat, the experience of being wounded/injured during combat, and witnessing individuals

    being wounded or killed); and (2) a scale of serious violent behavior. I will provide students

    with considerable assistance in constructing the combat experience scale, but students will be

    expected to create their scale of serious violence on their own. Fortunately, The Add Health

    has arranged the five combat variables in consecutive order in the Military Codebook (section

    10). The five variables comprising the scale are as follows:

    R_H4MI14: During your combat deployment have you ever killed, or thought you killed, someone

    R_H4MI15: During your combat deployment, were you wounded or injured?

    R_H4MI16A: During combat deployment, did you see a friend/ ally wounded, killed, dead?

    R_H4MI16B: “” an enemy combatant?

    R_H4MI16C : “” a civilian?

    Students are simply asked to
    **_create a summated scale of these five items_**

    (TRANSFORM/COMPUTE command within SPSS), entitled COMBAT_EXP. The Variable

    Label should be “five-item summated scale for combat experience”. Since the variables are

    all measured on the same metric, more or less, there will be no need for performing any recodes on your initial scale.
    **VERY IMPORTANT: REMEMBER THAT WHEN COMPUTING SCALES AND RECODING VARIABLES STUDENTS SHOULD PASTE ALL OF THEIR PROCEDURES INTO A SYNTAX FILE IN SPSS.**

    As for your scale on serious violence scale/index, students are to go through the Section 21 Add-

    Health Codebook (Violent Offending and Victimization – see uploaded file in Canvas), and

    select the items that they think should comprise the serious violent offending scale (Hint: I

    think there are six items that “can” be used here, but students are to make their own choices,

    and defend them). Please keep in mind that some of these items are on different metrics, (two are dichotomous, the others are on a four-point scale), so recodes may be necessary, as to ensure that we are comparing “apples to apples”. In the event that students need to perform recodes on some of these measures (four of them), I would recommend dummy-coding all scale indicators, as to where the values indicate (0 = have not committed the act at least once in the past year, and 1 = have committed the act at least once in the past year the following). This can be done via the following steps:
    _recode these items into different variables (_
    _**SPSS: TRANSFORM/RECODE INTO DIFFERENT VARIABLES**) and change the OLD values (2-3) into NEW values (1). Copy the OLD values 0 and 1. Remember, I recommend renaming your newly recoded variables with the “R” designation._ Therefore, all of the indicators that comprise your soon-to-be created scale will have the values 0 or 1. When creating the summated violence scale in SPSS, I recommend using the following name: SERIOUS_VIOLENCE. I would label the variable “summated scale for serious violent behavior”. Again, students have the freedom to choose the indicators that they prefer, as long as they can defend their choices.

    When the scales have been constructed, students are encouraged to run a frequency distribution of their scales, and see if anything looks odd (e.g., are some of the attributes not represented in your scales, and may be in need of being collapsed/merged into another attribute/value?).

    Lastly, students are to perform a reliability analysis on their newly-created scales by performing

    the following procedures in SPSS: ANALYZE/SCALE/RELIABILITY ANALYSIS. Students use the proper statistics to measure reliability (as indicated in the TWO classroom demonstrations).

    After performing these procedures, students are asked to answer the following discussion questions, which will be used as the primary means of assessment for class project V.

    **1. Why were some of the indicators of your violence scale recoded? Does this choice make sense? Why or why not?**

    **2. Run a frequency distribution of your two newly-minted scales. Do any of your scales need to be recoded? Why or why not?**

    **a. If your scales need to be recoded (I think at least one of them might), how would you recode them and why?**

    **3. Comment on the**
    **reliability of your two scales. In particular, are the two scales reliable?**

    **a. What procedure in SPSS did you use to make this determination?**

    **b. After performing the procedure, how did you come to the conclusion that your measures were reliable, or lacking in reliability? In other words, what threshold did you use to make this determination?**

    **4. Comment on the validity of these two measures. Do you think that you have accurately captured combat-related PTSD, and serious violent behavior? Why or why not (be prepared to defend your choices)?**

    **a. What procedure did you use to make this determination?**

    **b. Are there statistical procedures that can assess validity?**

    **5. Discuss the process by which you moved from the abstract (what does violence really mean, man? What is post-traumatic stress), through conceptualization and operationalization to the final point of real-world measurement. Discuss the “science” behind the procedures you performed, while also giving some attention to the position that this science may still be viewed by some as being “soft”.**

    · Students should include the syntax files for all procedures used. As a matter of fact, while students will not receive a grade on their syntax submission, the syntax file is of equal importance to your assignment submission, as I will use your syntax file to determine if you have performed all procedures properly. Only the class project VIII assignment drop box will actually be evaluated.

    **## AddHealthCodebookSection21–CriminalOffendingandVictimization2.pdf**

    Wave IV Section 21: Criminal Offending and Victimization

    Number of observations: 15,701

    The next questions are about things you may have done in the past 12 months.

    H4DS1 Num 1. In the past 12 months, how often did you deliberately damage
    property that didn't belong to you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15011 96% 0 never

    558 4% 1 1 or 2 times

    52 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    33 0% 3 5 or more times

    28 0% 6 refused

    19 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS2 Num 2. In the past 12 months, how often did you steal something worth
    more than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15384 98% 0 never

    220 1% 1 1 or 2 times

    31 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    25 0% 3 5 or more times

    30 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS3 Num 3. In the past 12 months, how often did you go into a house or building
    to steal something?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15556 99% 0 never

    71 0% 1 1 or 2 times

    19 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    12 0% 3 5 or more times

    31 0% 6 refused

    12 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS4 Num 4. In the past 12 months, how often did you use or threaten to use a
    weapon to get something from someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15526 99% 0 never

    104 1% 1 1 or 2 times

    9 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    17 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    13 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS5 Num 5. In the past 12 months, how often did you sell marijuana or other
    drugs?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15001 96% 0 never

    275 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    98 1% 2 3 or 4 times

    286 2% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS6 Num 6. In the past 12 months, how often did you steal something worth less
    than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15038 96% 0 never

    495 3% 1 1 or 2 times

    63 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    63 0% 3 5 or more times

    31 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS7 Num 7. In the past 12 months, how often did you take part in a physical fight
    where a group of your friends was against another group?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15163 97% 0 never

    431 3% 1 1 or 2 times

    46 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    18 0% 3 5 or more times

    33 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS8 Num 8. In the past 12 months, how often did you buy, sell, or hold stolen
    property?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15238 97% 0 never

    328 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    53 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    39 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS9 Num 9. In the past 12 months, how often did you use someone else's credit
    card, bank card, or automatic teller card without their permission or
    knowledge?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15556 99% 0 never

    78 0% 1 1 or 2 times

    14 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    10 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS10 Num 10. In the past 12 months, how often did you deliberately write a bad
    check?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15357 98% 0 never

    244 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    33 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    25 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS11 Num 11. In the past 12 months, how often did you get into a serious
    physical fight?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    14851 95% 0 never

    713 5% 1 1 or 2 times

    59 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    34 0% 3 5 or more times

    35 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    If Q11=1, 2, 3, ask Q.12, else skip to Q.13.

    H4DS12 Num 12. In the past 12 months, how often did you hurt someone badly
    enough in a physical fight that he or she needed care from a doctor or
    nurse?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    508 3% 0 never

    263 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    23 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    10 0% 3 5 or more times

    14895 95% 7 legitimate skip

    2 0% 8 don't know

    Which of the following things happened in the past 12 months:

    H4DS13 Num 13. Someone stole something from you worth more than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    10351 66% 0 no

    3882 25% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    12 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS14 Num 14. You saw someone shoot or stab another person?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13034 83% 0 no

    1200 8% 1 yes

    34 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS15 Num 15. Someone pulled a knife or gun on you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13248 84% 0 no

    985 6% 1 yes

    35 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS16 Num 16. Someone shot or stabbed you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13733 87% 0 no

    503 3% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS17 Num 17. Someone slapped, hit, choked, or kicked you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    12766 81% 0 no

    1469 9% 1 yes

    31 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS18 Num 18. You were beaten up?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13787 88% 0 no

    449 3% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS19 Num 19. You pulled a knife or gun on someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13874 88% 0 no

    361 2% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS20 Num 20. You shot or stabbed someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    14077 90% 0 no

    156 1% 1 yes

    37 0% 6 refused

    7 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    **AddHealthCodebooksection10–Military2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/addhealthcodebooksection10-military2-pdf)

    **## TaskVIII.docx**

    Your job in this project is rather simple: to operationalize the two central variables in this

    research – combat experience and serious violent offending – by creating an index/scale for each variable. To accomplish this task, you will be using data from Wave IV (2008) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add-Health), collected by social scientists at The University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill. I have uploaded the relevant codebooks to Canvas (Military Experience and Violent Offending and Victimization), along with the data. Students will be accessing the data directly from the ICPSR website, via the UNA Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Center (we will go through this process together). Once the data has been downloaded, students will be asked to construct and compute two scales in order to

    operationalize the independent and dependent variables: (1) a five-item combat experience

    scale, which includes a number of relevant combat-related measures (shooting/killing someone

    in combat, the experience of being wounded/injured during combat, and witnessing individuals

    being wounded or killed); and (2) a scale of serious violent behavior. I will provide students

    with considerable assistance in constructing the combat experience scale, but students will be

    expected to create their scale of serious violence on their own. Fortunately, The Add Health

    has arranged the five combat variables in consecutive order in the Military Codebook (section

    10). The five variables comprising the scale are as follows:

    R_H4MI14: During your combat deployment have you ever killed, or thought you killed, someone

    R_H4MI15: During your combat deployment, were you wounded or injured?

    R_H4MI16A: During combat deployment, did you see a friend/ ally wounded, killed, dead?

    R_H4MI16B: “” an enemy combatant?

    R_H4MI16C : “” a civilian?

    Students are simply asked to
    **_create a summated scale of these five items_**

    (TRANSFORM/COMPUTE command within SPSS), entitled COMBAT_EXP. The Variable

    Label should be “five-item summated scale for combat experience”. Since the variables are

    all measured on the same metric, more or less, there will be no need for performing any recodes on your initial scale.
    **VERY IMPORTANT: REMEMBER THAT WHEN COMPUTING SCALES AND RECODING VARIABLES STUDENTS SHOULD PASTE ALL OF THEIR PROCEDURES INTO A SYNTAX FILE IN SPSS.**

    As for your scale on serious violence scale/index, students are to go through the Section 21 Add-

    Health Codebook (Violent Offending and Victimization – see uploaded file in Canvas), and

    select the items that they think should comprise the serious violent offending scale (Hint: I

    think there are six items that “can” be used here, but students are to make their own choices,

    and defend them). Please keep in mind that some of these items are on different metrics, (two are dichotomous, the others are on a four-point scale), so recodes may be necessary, as to ensure that we are comparing “apples to apples”. In the event that students need to perform recodes on some of these measures (four of them), I would recommend dummy-coding all scale indicators, as to where the values indicate (0 = have not committed the act at least once in the past year, and 1 = have committed the act at least once in the past year the following). This can be done via the following steps:
    _recode these items into different variables (_
    _**SPSS: TRANSFORM/RECODE INTO DIFFERENT VARIABLES**) and change the OLD values (2-3) into NEW values (1). Copy the OLD values 0 and 1. Remember, I recommend renaming your newly recoded variables with the “R” designation._ Therefore, all of the indicators that comprise your soon-to-be created scale will have the values 0 or 1. When creating the summated violence scale in SPSS, I recommend using the following name: SERIOUS_VIOLENCE. I would label the variable “summated scale for serious violent behavior”. Again, students have the freedom to choose the indicators that they prefer, as long as they can defend their choices.

    When the scales have been constructed, students are encouraged to run a frequency distribution of their scales, and see if anything looks odd (e.g., are some of the attributes not represented in your scales, and may be in need of being collapsed/merged into another attribute/value?).

    Lastly, students are to perform a reliability analysis on their newly-created scales by performing

    the following procedures in SPSS: ANALYZE/SCALE/RELIABILITY ANALYSIS. Students use the proper statistics to measure reliability (as indicated in the TWO classroom demonstrations).

    After performing these procedures, students are asked to answer the following discussion questions, which will be used as the primary means of assessment for class project V.

    **1. Why were some of the indicators of your violence scale recoded? Does this choice make sense? Why or why not?**

    **2. Run a frequency distribution of your two newly-minted scales. Do any of your scales need to be recoded? Why or why not?**

    **a. If your scales need to be recoded (I think at least one of them might), how would you recode them and why?**

    **3. Comment on the**
    **reliability of your two scales. In particular, are the two scales reliable?**

    **a. What procedure in SPSS did you use to make this determination?**

    **b. After performing the procedure, how did you come to the conclusion that your measures were reliable, or lacking in reliability? In other words, what threshold did you use to make this determination?**

    **4. Comment on the validity of these two measures. Do you think that you have accurately captured combat-related PTSD, and serious violent behavior? Why or why not (be prepared to defend your choices)?**

    **a. What procedure did you use to make this determination?**

    **b. Are there statistical procedures that can assess validity?**

    **5. Discuss the process by which you moved from the abstract (what does violence really mean, man? What is post-traumatic stress), through conceptualization and operationalization to the final point of real-world measurement. Discuss the “science” behind the procedures you performed, while also giving some attention to the position that this science may still be viewed by some as being “soft”.**

    · Students should include the syntax files for all procedures used. As a matter of fact, while students will not receive a grade on their syntax submission, the syntax file is of equal importance to your assignment submission, as I will use your syntax file to determine if you have performed all procedures properly. Only the class project VIII assignment drop box will actually be evaluated.

    **## AddHealthCodebookSection21–CriminalOffendingandVictimization2.pdf**

    Wave IV Section 21: Criminal Offending and Victimization

    Number of observations: 15,701

    The next questions are about things you may have done in the past 12 months.

    H4DS1 Num 1. In the past 12 months, how often did you deliberately damage
    property that didn't belong to you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15011 96% 0 never

    558 4% 1 1 or 2 times

    52 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    33 0% 3 5 or more times

    28 0% 6 refused

    19 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS2 Num 2. In the past 12 months, how often did you steal something worth
    more than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15384 98% 0 never

    220 1% 1 1 or 2 times

    31 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    25 0% 3 5 or more times

    30 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS3 Num 3. In the past 12 months, how often did you go into a house or building
    to steal something?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15556 99% 0 never

    71 0% 1 1 or 2 times

    19 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    12 0% 3 5 or more times

    31 0% 6 refused

    12 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS4 Num 4. In the past 12 months, how often did you use or threaten to use a
    weapon to get something from someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15526 99% 0 never

    104 1% 1 1 or 2 times

    9 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    17 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    13 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS5 Num 5. In the past 12 months, how often did you sell marijuana or other
    drugs?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15001 96% 0 never

    275 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    98 1% 2 3 or 4 times

    286 2% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS6 Num 6. In the past 12 months, how often did you steal something worth less
    than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15038 96% 0 never

    495 3% 1 1 or 2 times

    63 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    63 0% 3 5 or more times

    31 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS7 Num 7. In the past 12 months, how often did you take part in a physical fight
    where a group of your friends was against another group?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15163 97% 0 never

    431 3% 1 1 or 2 times

    46 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    18 0% 3 5 or more times

    33 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS8 Num 8. In the past 12 months, how often did you buy, sell, or hold stolen
    property?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15238 97% 0 never

    328 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    53 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    39 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS9 Num 9. In the past 12 months, how often did you use someone else's credit
    card, bank card, or automatic teller card without their permission or
    knowledge?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15556 99% 0 never

    78 0% 1 1 or 2 times

    14 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    10 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS10 Num 10. In the past 12 months, how often did you deliberately write a bad
    check?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    15357 98% 0 never

    244 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    33 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    25 0% 3 5 or more times

    32 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    H4DS11 Num 11. In the past 12 months, how often did you get into a serious
    physical fight?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    14851 95% 0 never

    713 5% 1 1 or 2 times

    59 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    34 0% 3 5 or more times

    35 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    If Q11=1, 2, 3, ask Q.12, else skip to Q.13.

    H4DS12 Num 12. In the past 12 months, how often did you hurt someone badly
    enough in a physical fight that he or she needed care from a doctor or
    nurse?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    508 3% 0 never

    263 2% 1 1 or 2 times

    23 0% 2 3 or 4 times

    10 0% 3 5 or more times

    14895 95% 7 legitimate skip

    2 0% 8 don't know

    Which of the following things happened in the past 12 months:

    H4DS13 Num 13. Someone stole something from you worth more than $50?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    10351 66% 0 no

    3882 25% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    12 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS14 Num 14. You saw someone shoot or stab another person?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13034 83% 0 no

    1200 8% 1 yes

    34 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS15 Num 15. Someone pulled a knife or gun on you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13248 84% 0 no

    985 6% 1 yes

    35 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS16 Num 16. Someone shot or stabbed you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13733 87% 0 no

    503 3% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS17 Num 17. Someone slapped, hit, choked, or kicked you?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    12766 81% 0 no

    1469 9% 1 yes

    31 0% 6 refused

    11 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS18 Num 18. You were beaten up?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13787 88% 0 no

    449 3% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    9 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS19 Num 19. You pulled a knife or gun on someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    13874 88% 0 no

    361 2% 1 yes

    32 0% 6 refused

    10 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    H4DS20 Num 20. You shot or stabbed someone?

    Frequency Percent Value Label

    14077 90% 0 no

    156 1% 1 yes

    37 0% 6 refused

    7 0% 8 don't know

    1424 9% . missing

    **AddHealthCodebooksection10–Military2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/addhealthcodebooksection10-military2-pdf)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] 848 U5 Dis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 848 U5 Dis.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] 848 Literature Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 848 Literature Review.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Stakeholder Position Paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Snapshot of stakeholder – Stakeholder framing of the issue – Strategic alliances with other stakeholders – Resource availability (financial, social, human, symbolic capital) – Efforts to engage public opinion and/or responses to public opinion framed within public sphere theory – Success or failur…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Snapshot of stakeholder
    – Stakeholder framing of the issue
    – Strategic alliances with other stakeholders
    – Resource availability (financial, social, human, symbolic capital)
    – Efforts to engage public opinion and/or responses to public opinion framed within public sphere theory
    – Success or failure in presenting and advancing case (based on factors such as progress in negotiations to date, chosen success indicators or objectives, short versus long term goals).