My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] PLAGIARISM FREE “A” WORK IN 18 HOURS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHMENT – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf – ## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf **## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf** Write: Content Expectations Complete the following sections for your Action Research Proposal: Stud…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHMENT

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf

    – ## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf

    **## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf**

    Write: Content Expectations

    Complete the following sections for your Action Research Proposal: Study and
    Research Draft:

    • Intervention Plan: In two pages,
    o Describe in chronological order how you will implement your

    intervention and provide a hypothetical yet practical timeframe for
    these steps.

    o You may include a chart that organizes how you would implement your
    intervention from week to week.

    ▪ This will be a timeline including dates and tasks.
    ▪ Your chart could include date, tasks, people, location, etc.

    o Ethical Considerations: Informed Consent and Institutional Review
    Board (IRB) Approval: In two paragraphs,

    ▪ Discuss how you would approach informed consent and IRB
    approval if you were to implement your action research study.

    ▪ Explain how you would ensure that participants enter the
    research of their free will and with an understanding of the study
    and any potential dangers.

    ▪ Review the UAGC Institutional Review Board (ATTACHED)
    ▪ page for information as needed.
    ▪ Ethical Considerations: Freedom from Harm: In two

    paragraphs,
    ▪ Explain how the literature you reviewed and your plan for

    implementation leads you to believe what you are doing is an
    appropriate intervention and not exposing your participants to
    risk.

    ▪ Ethical Considerations: Anonymity and Confidentiality: In one
    paragraph,

    ▪ Explain your planned measures to use anonymity and
    confidentiality to avoid privacy invasion and potential harm.

    Next Steps

    The Action Research Proposal: Proposed Study and Research Draft paper
    • Must be five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references

    pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
    • Must include a separate title page with the following:

    o Title of paper in bold font
    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the

    information on the title page.
    o Student’s name
    o Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    [https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board](https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board)

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    o Course name and number
    o Instructor’s name
    o Due date

    • Must utilize academic voice.
    • Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction

    paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose
    of your paper.

    • Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed, credible sources in addition to the
    course textbooks

    Course Textbooks:
    Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.

    Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Retrieved from

    http://www.ebrary.com/corp

    [https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1)

    [https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152)

    **## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf**

    Institutional Review Board
    About the Board

    The purpose of the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to
    ensure ethical research practices among its faculty and students. Individuals affiliated with the
    University of Arizona Global Campus who are conducting research projects must receive approval
    from the IRB before commencing the study. IRB policies and procedures apply to all research
    involving human participants, funded or non-funded, sponsored or not sponsored, and carried out
    by the University of Arizona Global Campus faculty, staff, and students, on or off campus, whenever
    human participants are included. The University of Arizona Global Campus’s Institutional Review
    Board is registered with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) though the U.S.
    Department of Health and Human Services (IRB00010175). This registration is listed on the OHRP
    website at https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx.

    Statement of Ethical Principles

    The University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to the highest ethical standards in conduct
    of research. For projects involving humans as participants, the University of Arizona Global
    Campus is guided by the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, the National
    Commission for the Protection of Human Participants of Biomedical and Behavioral Research’s
    Ethical Principles, and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Participants of Research: The
    Belmont Report. In addition, the University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to ensuring that
    all human participant research, regardless of funding source, follows the requirements set forth in
    Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The following broad principles are the basis for
    the University of Arizona Global Campus policy concerning review of research involving humans:

    • Whereas the participation of humans in research projects may raise fundamental ethical
    and civil rights questions, all such research, funded and unfunded projects, sponsored and
    not sponsored, which is carried out by the University of Arizona Global Campus students,
    faculty, or other University of Arizona Global Campus employees, on or off campus, shall be
    covered by the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (hereinafter
    referred to as IRB) for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Policies and
    Procedures covered by this document.

    • All activities involving human participants must provide for the rights, safety, health, and
    welfare of each individual participant.

    • The direct or potential benefit to the participant and the importance of the knowledge
    gained must outweigh any inherent risk to the individual.

    • Participation in research must be voluntary and informed consent procedures must
    conform to the IRB Policies and Procedures.

    • An individual does not abdicate any rights by consenting to be a research participant. A
    participant has the right to refuse to participate or may withdraw from research at any time
    without penalty or loss of benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled.

    [https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx](https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx)

    [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki)

    • Safeguarding information about an individual that has been obtained in the course of an
    investigation is a primary obligation of the principal investigator.

    • The primary responsibility for protection of human participants rests with the principal
    investigator and with support, approval, and monitoring by the University of Arizona Global
    Campus as set forth in the IRB Policies and Procedures.

    All proposals to conduct research must be submitted to the IRB through the application process.
    The investigator must obtain IRB approval before undertaking the research and beginning data
    collection. All principal investigators submitting proposals must show certification of training within
    the last three years, or undergo training, and submit the appropriate documentation of successful
    human subjects training either offered by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Collaborative
    Institutional Collaborative Initiative (CITI) training along with each proposal. Proposals should be
    submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format to IRB@uagc.edu. Please review the Forms tab for
    additional guidance. Any concerns regarding research involving human subjects should be directed
    to the IRB Chair. For more information on research misconduct please visit responding to
    allegations of research misconduct.

    [mailto:irb@uagc.edu](mailto:irb@uagc.edu)

    [https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)

    [https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)

    **## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf**

    Institutional Review Board
    About the Board

    The purpose of the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to
    ensure ethical research practices among its faculty and students. Individuals affiliated with the
    University of Arizona Global Campus who are conducting research projects must receive approval
    from the IRB before commencing the study. IRB policies and procedures apply to all research
    involving human participants, funded or non-funded, sponsored or not sponsored, and carried out
    by the University of Arizona Global Campus faculty, staff, and students, on or off campus, whenever
    human participants are included. The University of Arizona Global Campus’s Institutional Review
    Board is registered with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) though the U.S.
    Department of Health and Human Services (IRB00010175). This registration is listed on the OHRP
    website at https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx.

    Statement of Ethical Principles

    The University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to the highest ethical standards in conduct
    of research. For projects involving humans as participants, the University of Arizona Global
    Campus is guided by the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, the National
    Commission for the Protection of Human Participants of Biomedical and Behavioral Research’s
    Ethical Principles, and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Participants of Research: The
    Belmont Report. In addition, the University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to ensuring that
    all human participant research, regardless of funding source, follows the requirements set forth in
    Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The following broad principles are the basis for
    the University of Arizona Global Campus policy concerning review of research involving humans:

    • Whereas the participation of humans in research projects may raise fundamental ethical
    and civil rights questions, all such research, funded and unfunded projects, sponsored and
    not sponsored, which is carried out by the University of Arizona Global Campus students,
    faculty, or other University of Arizona Global Campus employees, on or off campus, shall be
    covered by the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (hereinafter
    referred to as IRB) for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Policies and
    Procedures covered by this document.

    • All activities involving human participants must provide for the rights, safety, health, and
    welfare of each individual participant.

    • The direct or potential benefit to the participant and the importance of the knowledge
    gained must outweigh any inherent risk to the individual.

    • Participation in research must be voluntary and informed consent procedures must
    conform to the IRB Policies and Procedures.

    • An individual does not abdicate any rights by consenting to be a research participant. A
    participant has the right to refuse to participate or may withdraw from research at any time
    without penalty or loss of benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled.

    [https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx](https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx)

    [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki)

    • Safeguarding information about an individual that has been obtained in the course of an
    investigation is a primary obligation of the principal investigator.

    • The primary responsibility for protection of human participants rests with the principal
    investigator and with support, approval, and monitoring by the University of Arizona Global
    Campus as set forth in the IRB Policies and Procedures.

    All proposals to conduct research must be submitted to the IRB through the application process.
    The investigator must obtain IRB approval before undertaking the research and beginning data
    collection. All principal investigators submitting proposals must show certification of training within
    the last three years, or undergo training, and submit the appropriate documentation of successful
    human subjects training either offered by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Collaborative
    Institutional Collaborative Initiative (CITI) training along with each proposal. Proposals should be
    submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format to IRB@uagc.edu. Please review the Forms tab for
    additional guidance. Any concerns regarding research involving human subjects should be directed
    to the IRB Chair. For more information on research misconduct please visit responding to
    allegations of research misconduct.

    [mailto:irb@uagc.edu](mailto:irb@uagc.edu)

    [https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)

    [https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)

    **## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf**

    Write: Content Expectations

    Complete the following sections for your Action Research Proposal: Study and
    Research Draft:

    • Intervention Plan: In two pages,
    o Describe in chronological order how you will implement your

    intervention and provide a hypothetical yet practical timeframe for
    these steps.

    o You may include a chart that organizes how you would implement your
    intervention from week to week.

    ▪ This will be a timeline including dates and tasks.
    ▪ Your chart could include date, tasks, people, location, etc.

    o Ethical Considerations: Informed Consent and Institutional Review
    Board (IRB) Approval: In two paragraphs,

    ▪ Discuss how you would approach informed consent and IRB
    approval if you were to implement your action research study.

    ▪ Explain how you would ensure that participants enter the
    research of their free will and with an understanding of the study
    and any potential dangers.

    ▪ Review the UAGC Institutional Review Board (ATTACHED)
    ▪ page for information as needed.
    ▪ Ethical Considerations: Freedom from Harm: In two

    paragraphs,
    ▪ Explain how the literature you reviewed and your plan for

    implementation leads you to believe what you are doing is an
    appropriate intervention and not exposing your participants to
    risk.

    ▪ Ethical Considerations: Anonymity and Confidentiality: In one
    paragraph,

    ▪ Explain your planned measures to use anonymity and
    confidentiality to avoid privacy invasion and potential harm.

    Next Steps

    The Action Research Proposal: Proposed Study and Research Draft paper
    • Must be five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references

    pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
    • Must include a separate title page with the following:

    o Title of paper in bold font
    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the

    information on the title page.
    o Student’s name
    o Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    [https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board](https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board)

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    o Course name and number
    o Instructor’s name
    o Due date

    • Must utilize academic voice.
    • Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction

    paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose
    of your paper.

    • Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed, credible sources in addition to the
    course textbooks

    Course Textbooks:
    Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.

    Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Retrieved from

    http://www.ebrary.com/corp

    [https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1)

    [https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152)

    **## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf**

    Institutional Review Board
    About the Board

    The purpose of the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to
    ensure ethical research practices among its faculty and students. Individuals affiliated with the
    University of Arizona Global Campus who are conducting research projects must receive approval
    from the IRB before commencing the study. IRB policies and procedures apply to all research
    involving human participants, funded or non-funded, sponsored or not sponsored, and carried out
    by the University of Arizona Global Campus faculty, staff, and students, on or off campus, whenever
    human participants are included. The University of Arizona Global Campus’s Institutional Review
    Board is registered with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) though the U.S.
    Department of Health and Human Services (IRB00010175). This registration is listed on the OHRP
    website at https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx.

    Statement of Ethical Principles

    The University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to the highest ethical standards in conduct
    of research. For projects involving humans as participants, the University of Arizona Global
    Campus is guided by the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, the National
    Commission for the Protection of Human Participants of Biomedical and Behavioral Research’s
    Ethical Principles, and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Participants of Research: The
    Belmont Report. In addition, the University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to ensuring that
    all human participant research, regardless of funding source, follows the requirements set forth in
    Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The following broad principles are the basis for
    the University of Arizona Global Campus policy concerning review of research involving humans:

    • Whereas the participation of humans in research projects may raise fundamental ethical
    and civil rights questions, all such research, funded and unfunded projects, sponsored and
    not sponsored, which is carried out by the University of Arizona Global Campus students,
    faculty, or other University of Arizona Global Campus employees, on or off campus, shall be
    covered by the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (hereinafter
    referred to as IRB) for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Policies and
    Procedures covered by this document.

    • All activities involving human participants must provide for the rights, safety, health, and
    welfare of each individual participant.

    • The direct or potential benefit to the participant and the importance of the knowledge
    gained must outweigh any inherent risk to the individual.

    • Participation in research must be voluntary and informed consent procedures must
    conform to the IRB Policies and Procedures.

    • An individual does not abdicate any rights by consenting to be a research participant. A
    participant has the right to refuse to participate or may withdraw from research at any time
    without penalty or loss of benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled.

    [https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx](https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx)

    [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki)

    • Safeguarding information about an individual that has been obtained in the course of an
    investigation is a primary obligation of the principal investigator.

    • The primary responsibility for protection of human participants rests with the principal
    investigator and with support, approval, and monitoring by the University of Arizona Global
    Campus as set forth in the IRB Policies and Procedures.

    All proposals to conduct research must be submitted to the IRB through the application process.
    The investigator must obtain IRB approval before undertaking the research and beginning data
    collection. All principal investigators submitting proposals must show certification of training within
    the last three years, or undergo training, and submit the appropriate documentation of successful
    human subjects training either offered by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Collaborative
    Institutional Collaborative Initiative (CITI) training along with each proposal. Proposals should be
    submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format to IRB@uagc.edu. Please review the Forms tab for
    additional guidance. Any concerns regarding research involving human subjects should be directed
    to the IRB Chair. For more information on research misconduct please visit responding to
    allegations of research misconduct.

    [mailto:irb@uagc.edu](mailto:irb@uagc.edu)

    [https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)

    [https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)

    **## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf**

    Write: Content Expectations

    Complete the following sections for your Action Research Proposal: Study and
    Research Draft:

    • Intervention Plan: In two pages,
    o Describe in chronological order how you will implement your

    intervention and provide a hypothetical yet practical timeframe for
    these steps.

    o You may include a chart that organizes how you would implement your
    intervention from week to week.

    ▪ This will be a timeline including dates and tasks.
    ▪ Your chart could include date, tasks, people, location, etc.

    o Ethical Considerations: Informed Consent and Institutional Review
    Board (IRB) Approval: In two paragraphs,

    ▪ Discuss how you would approach informed consent and IRB
    approval if you were to implement your action research study.

    ▪ Explain how you would ensure that participants enter the
    research of their free will and with an understanding of the study
    and any potential dangers.

    ▪ Review the UAGC Institutional Review Board (ATTACHED)
    ▪ page for information as needed.
    ▪ Ethical Considerations: Freedom from Harm: In two

    paragraphs,
    ▪ Explain how the literature you reviewed and your plan for

    implementation leads you to believe what you are doing is an
    appropriate intervention and not exposing your participants to
    risk.

    ▪ Ethical Considerations: Anonymity and Confidentiality: In one
    paragraph,

    ▪ Explain your planned measures to use anonymity and
    confidentiality to avoid privacy invasion and potential harm.

    Next Steps

    The Action Research Proposal: Proposed Study and Research Draft paper
    • Must be five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references

    pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
    • Must include a separate title page with the following:

    o Title of paper in bold font
    ▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the

    information on the title page.
    o Student’s name
    o Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)

    [https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board](https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board)

    [https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)

    o Course name and number
    o Instructor’s name
    o Due date

    • Must utilize academic voice.
    • Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction

    paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose
    of your paper.

    • Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed, credible sources in addition to the
    course textbooks

    Course Textbooks:
    Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.

    Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Retrieved from

    http://www.ebrary.com/corp

    [https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1)

    [https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152)

    **## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf**

    Institutional Review Board
    About the Board

    The purpose of the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to
    ensure ethical research practices among its faculty and students. Individuals affiliated with the
    University of Arizona Global Campus who are conducting research projects must receive approval
    from the IRB before commencing the study. IRB policies and procedures apply to all research
    involving human participants, funded or non-funded, sponsored or not sponsored, and carried out
    by the University of Arizona Global Campus faculty, staff, and students, on or off campus, whenever
    human participants are included. The University of Arizona Global Campus’s Institutional Review
    Board is registered with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) though the U.S.
    Department of Health and Human Services (IRB00010175). This registration is listed on the OHRP
    website at https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx.

    Statement of Ethical Principles

    The University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to the highest ethical standards in conduct
    of research. For projects involving humans as participants, the University of Arizona Global
    Campus is guided by the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, the National
    Commission for the Protection of Human Participants of Biomedical and Behavioral Research’s
    Ethical Principles, and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Participants of Research: The
    Belmont Report. In addition, the University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to ensuring that
    all human participant research, regardless of funding source, follows the requirements set forth in
    Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The following broad principles are the basis for
    the University of Arizona Global Campus policy concerning review of research involving humans:

    • Whereas the participation of humans in research projects may raise fundamental ethical
    and civil rights questions, all such research, funded and unfunded projects, sponsored and
    not sponsored, which is carried out by the University of Arizona Global Campus students,
    faculty, or other University of Arizona Global Campus employees, on or off campus, shall be
    covered by the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (hereinafter
    referred to as IRB) for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Policies and
    Procedures covered by this document.

    • All activities involving human participants must provide for the rights, safety, health, and
    welfare of each individual participant.

    • The direct or potential benefit to the participant and the importance of the knowledge
    gained must outweigh any inherent risk to the individual.

    • Participation in research must be voluntary and informed consent procedures must
    conform to the IRB Policies and Procedures.

    • An individual does not abdicate any rights by consenting to be a research participant. A
    participant has the right to refuse to participate or may withdraw from research at any time
    without penalty or loss of benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled.

    [https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx](https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx)

    [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki)

    • Safeguarding information about an individual that has been obtained in the course of an
    investigation is a primary obligation of the principal investigator.

    • The primary responsibility for protection of human participants rests with the principal
    investigator and with support, approval, and monitoring by the University of Arizona Global
    Campus as set forth in the IRB Policies and Procedures.

    All proposals to conduct research must be submitted to the IRB through the application process.
    The investigator must obtain IRB approval before undertaking the research and beginning data
    collection. All principal investigators submitting proposals must show certification of training within
    the last three years, or undergo training, and submit the appropriate documentation of successful
    human subjects training either offered by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Collaborative
    Institutional Collaborative Initiative (CITI) training along with each proposal. Proposals should be
    submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format to IRB@uagc.edu. Please review the Forms tab for
    additional guidance. Any concerns regarding research involving human subjects should be directed
    to the IRB Chair. For more information on research misconduct please visit responding to
    allegations of research misconduct.

    [mailto:irb@uagc.edu](mailto:irb@uagc.edu)

    [https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)

    [https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## peds.docx **## peds.docx** Getting Started with Pediatrics ![A child sitting in a chair with a doctor and a person in a white coat AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-20887825) Primary care of children from newborns…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## peds.docx

    **## peds.docx**

    Getting Started with Pediatrics

    ![A child sitting in a chair with a doctor and a person in a white coat AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-20887825)

    Primary care of children from newborns to those on the cusp of adulthood requires considerable knowledge, as well as the finesse to manage parents and families of all types, and the changing needs, attitudes, and independence of young people as they grow and mature. Considering that this week—in fact, this entire first module—is focused on growth and development, it is fitting for you to reflect on your current and anticipated growth and development in advanced nursing, and specifically, in pediatric care. When you made your decision to pursue training as a Family Nurse Practitioner, how did pediatrics factor in your thinking? Is the opportunity to work with children and adolescents a strong motivator, or does it rank for you as more of a concern?

    As you get started with this course, take time to reflect on your present capacity as you prepare to immerse yourself in the requirements of pediatric care as a nurse practitioner. How can you benefit most from this course, and how can it further you along the professional path you have chosen or in achieving your career goals?

    This Discussion can be a catalyst for self-assessment and offer valuable insights from your colleagues. It is also an opportunity to get to know them and to introduce yourself, in anticipation of further interaction as you engage in the course i-Human Assignments.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/161182/modules/items/6416043)

    ·
    **Garzon, D. L., Dirks, M., Driessnack, M., Duderstadt, K. G., & Gaylord, N. M., (Eds.). (2025).**
    **_Burns’ pediatric primary care_ (8th ed.). Elsevier.**

    ·
    **Chapter 1, “Pediatric Primary Care” (pp. 1–5)**

    ·
    **Chapter 4, “Justice, Equality, Inclusion, and Diversity” (pp. 27–30)**

    ·
    **Chapter 5, “Pediatric and Family Assessment” (pp. 31–37)**

    ·
    **Chapter 8, “Developmental Principles and Theories” (pp. 83–90)**

    ·
    **Chapter 9, “Developmental Management of Newborns and Neonates" (pp. 91–102)**

    ·
    **Chapter 23, “Prescribing Traditional and Complementary Therapies” (pp. 320–328)**

    ·
    **Chapter 27, “Congenital and Inherited Disorders” (pp. 376–394)**

    ·
    **Mudd, S. S., Quinn, M., Busch, D., Key, S. M., Brown, K., Gilbert, G. E., & Hawkins-Walsh, E. (2023).** [**Evaluating the practice of pediatric nurse practitioners: Is it time for dual primary and acute care preparation?Links to an external site.**](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891524522002383) **_Journal of Pediatric Healthcare, 37_(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.08.005**

    ·
    **U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.).** [**_Healthy people 2030 objectives: ChildrenLinks to an external site._**](https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/children) **_._ https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/children**

    **To prepare:**

    · Review this week’s Learning Resources, and particularly Chapters 10, 11, 13, and 18 of the Burns’ Pediatric Primary Care text.

    · Consider the roles and responsibilities of a nurse practitioner providing pediatric primary care. Work to define the strengths you bring to the position of Family Nurse Practitioner and the challenges you face.

    · Reflect on this course and what you expect to learn and do, such as by reviewing the course description, outcomes, and course introduction. Consider how the next 11 weeks can help build your strengths and address your challenges.

    · Also consider your career goals and objectives and how this course can support and/or further them. Be detailed in your thinking.

    By Day 3 of Week 1

    **Post** a brief introduction of yourself that includes an explanation of your strengths and challenges as they apply to pediatrics and the role of a Family Nurse Practitioner. Also explain your career goals and objectives, and how your work in this course can help to accomplish those goals and objectives as a Family Nurse Practitioner. Use your research to support your explanations by providing credible and scholarly sources.

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6 of Week 1

    **Respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues’ posts on
    **two different days** by offering suggestions or resources to help your colleagues in addressing their professional strengths, challenges, or career goals and objectives. Use your research to support your suggestions. Provide at least 3 credible and current scholarly sources.

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## peds.docx**

    Getting Started with Pediatrics

    ![A child sitting in a chair with a doctor and a person in a white coat AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/discussion-20887825)

    Primary care of children from newborns to those on the cusp of adulthood requires considerable knowledge, as well as the finesse to manage parents and families of all types, and the changing needs, attitudes, and independence of young people as they grow and mature. Considering that this week—in fact, this entire first module—is focused on growth and development, it is fitting for you to reflect on your current and anticipated growth and development in advanced nursing, and specifically, in pediatric care. When you made your decision to pursue training as a Family Nurse Practitioner, how did pediatrics factor in your thinking? Is the opportunity to work with children and adolescents a strong motivator, or does it rank for you as more of a concern?

    As you get started with this course, take time to reflect on your present capacity as you prepare to immerse yourself in the requirements of pediatric care as a nurse practitioner. How can you benefit most from this course, and how can it further you along the professional path you have chosen or in achieving your career goals?

    This Discussion can be a catalyst for self-assessment and offer valuable insights from your colleagues. It is also an opportunity to get to know them and to introduce yourself, in anticipation of further interaction as you engage in the course i-Human Assignments.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/161182/modules/items/6416043)

    ·
    **Garzon, D. L., Dirks, M., Driessnack, M., Duderstadt, K. G., & Gaylord, N. M., (Eds.). (2025).**
    **_Burns’ pediatric primary care_ (8th ed.). Elsevier.**

    ·
    **Chapter 1, “Pediatric Primary Care” (pp. 1–5)**

    ·
    **Chapter 4, “Justice, Equality, Inclusion, and Diversity” (pp. 27–30)**

    ·
    **Chapter 5, “Pediatric and Family Assessment” (pp. 31–37)**

    ·
    **Chapter 8, “Developmental Principles and Theories” (pp. 83–90)**

    ·
    **Chapter 9, “Developmental Management of Newborns and Neonates" (pp. 91–102)**

    ·
    **Chapter 23, “Prescribing Traditional and Complementary Therapies” (pp. 320–328)**

    ·
    **Chapter 27, “Congenital and Inherited Disorders” (pp. 376–394)**

    ·
    **Mudd, S. S., Quinn, M., Busch, D., Key, S. M., Brown, K., Gilbert, G. E., & Hawkins-Walsh, E. (2023).** [**Evaluating the practice of pediatric nurse practitioners: Is it time for dual primary and acute care preparation?Links to an external site.**](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891524522002383) **_Journal of Pediatric Healthcare, 37_(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.08.005**

    ·
    **U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.).** [**_Healthy people 2030 objectives: ChildrenLinks to an external site._**](https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/children) **_._ https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/children**

    **To prepare:**

    · Review this week’s Learning Resources, and particularly Chapters 10, 11, 13, and 18 of the Burns’ Pediatric Primary Care text.

    · Consider the roles and responsibilities of a nurse practitioner providing pediatric primary care. Work to define the strengths you bring to the position of Family Nurse Practitioner and the challenges you face.

    · Reflect on this course and what you expect to learn and do, such as by reviewing the course description, outcomes, and course introduction. Consider how the next 11 weeks can help build your strengths and address your challenges.

    · Also consider your career goals and objectives and how this course can support and/or further them. Be detailed in your thinking.

    By Day 3 of Week 1

    **Post** a brief introduction of yourself that includes an explanation of your strengths and challenges as they apply to pediatrics and the role of a Family Nurse Practitioner. Also explain your career goals and objectives, and how your work in this course can help to accomplish those goals and objectives as a Family Nurse Practitioner. Use your research to support your explanations by providing credible and scholarly sources.

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6 of Week 1

    **Respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues’ posts on
    **two different days** by offering suggestions or resources to help your colleagues in addressing their professional strengths, challenges, or career goals and objectives. Use your research to support your suggestions. Provide at least 3 credible and current scholarly sources.

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] see attached

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## NU675Unit8Assignment.docx **## NU675Unit8Assignment.docx** **NU675 Unit 8 Assignment – Clinical-Journal Reflection-800 words. 4 references. Due 3-1-25** Address the Following Items: 1. Compare and contrast methadone and buprenorphine. Include mechanism of action, an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## NU675Unit8Assignment.docx

    **## NU675Unit8Assignment.docx**

    **NU675 Unit 8 Assignment – Clinical-Journal Reflection-800 words. 4 references. Due 3-1-25**

    Address the Following Items:

    1. Compare and contrast methadone and buprenorphine. Include mechanism of action, and pros/cons.

    2. Do you plan or have a desire to work with substance use disorders in an in-depth All components must be discussed to receive full credit as complete.

    3. Why is it important for all PMHNP’s to be knowledgeable regarding substance use disorder detox and maintenance therapy?

    · All work should be original and submitted as a Word document unless otherwise indicated in the assignment instructions

    · All work should be accompanied by a title page and reference page in APA 7thedition format. Work submitted without a title page will receive a grade of zero.

    ![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/see-attached-20887823)

    ## image1.png

    **## NU675Unit8Assignment.docx**

    **NU675 Unit 8 Assignment – Clinical-Journal Reflection-800 words. 4 references. Due 3-1-25**

    Address the Following Items:

    1. Compare and contrast methadone and buprenorphine. Include mechanism of action, and pros/cons.

    2. Do you plan or have a desire to work with substance use disorders in an in-depth All components must be discussed to receive full credit as complete.

    3. Why is it important for all PMHNP’s to be knowledgeable regarding substance use disorder detox and maintenance therapy?

    · All work should be original and submitted as a Word document unless otherwise indicated in the assignment instructions

    · All work should be accompanied by a title page and reference page in APA 7thedition format. Work submitted without a title page will receive a grade of zero.

    ![A screenshot of a white sheet AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/see-attached-20887823)

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] Need help asap

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Whoever can help me I need an assistant for 1 hour top – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    Whoever can help me I need an assistant for 1 hour top

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Week 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] IEP Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In- text citations – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    In- text citations

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Business

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your help – [\ \ Week7ADiscussion.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week7adiscussion-jpeg "Week7ADiscussion.jpeg") – [\ \ Week7aresponse.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week7aresponse-jpeg "Week7aresponse.jpeg") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your help

    – [\
    \
    Week7ADiscussion.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week7adiscussion-jpeg "Week7ADiscussion.jpeg")
    – [\
    \
    Week7aresponse.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week7aresponse-jpeg "Week7aresponse.jpeg")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow instructions carefully – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## PSY-452-RS-T2-TopicProposalAndOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.docx – Topic2AssignmentInstructions.PNG – PSY-452Rubric-TopicProposalandOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.pdf **## PSY-452-RS-T2-TopicProposalAndOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow instructions carefully

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## PSY-452-RS-T2-TopicProposalAndOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.docx

    – Topic2AssignmentInstructions.PNG
    – PSY-452Rubric-TopicProposalandOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.pdf

    **## PSY-452-RS-T2-TopicProposalAndOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-20887799)

    **Topic Proposal and Operational Definitions Worksheet**

    **Directions:** The goal of this class is to create an original research proposal in the field of psychology. Your research study can be anything to do with psychology! This worksheet will help you finalize a research topic, think of research questions related to that topic, and then identify and operationalize the key variables of those questions. Review the topic resources, the following five questions below.

    · Describe your research topic choice in one to three sentences. Make at least one connection to the literature demonstrating the current research on your variables.

    · Create your research questions. Your research questions related to this topic should be created based on what interests you the most about the topic. (Hint: Phrase your questions as something you can answer quantitatively, such as “is there a difference between two or more groups?” or “Is there a relationship between two or more variables?”)

    · Identify your hypothesis for each research question. Remember, your hypotheses are answers to your research questions. You will have a hypothesis for each research question you pose.

    · Identify the key variables in your research questions.

    · Create operational definitions for each variable. (Remember: When you operationalize a variable you define it and describe how you will measure it in your study.)

    ©2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.png

    **Topic2AssignmentInstructions.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic2assignmentinstructions-png)

    **PSY-452Rubric-TopicProposalandOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/psy-452rubric-topicproposalandoperationaldefinitionsworksheet-pdf)

    **PSY-452Rubric-TopicProposalandOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/psy-452rubric-topicproposalandoperationaldefinitionsworksheet-pdf)

    **## PSY-452-RS-T2-TopicProposalAndOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-20887799)

    **Topic Proposal and Operational Definitions Worksheet**

    **Directions:** The goal of this class is to create an original research proposal in the field of psychology. Your research study can be anything to do with psychology! This worksheet will help you finalize a research topic, think of research questions related to that topic, and then identify and operationalize the key variables of those questions. Review the topic resources, the following five questions below.

    · Describe your research topic choice in one to three sentences. Make at least one connection to the literature demonstrating the current research on your variables.

    · Create your research questions. Your research questions related to this topic should be created based on what interests you the most about the topic. (Hint: Phrase your questions as something you can answer quantitatively, such as “is there a difference between two or more groups?” or “Is there a relationship between two or more variables?”)

    · Identify your hypothesis for each research question. Remember, your hypotheses are answers to your research questions. You will have a hypothesis for each research question you pose.

    · Identify the key variables in your research questions.

    · Create operational definitions for each variable. (Remember: When you operationalize a variable you define it and describe how you will measure it in your study.)

    ©2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.png

    **Topic2AssignmentInstructions.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic2assignmentinstructions-png)

    **PSY-452Rubric-TopicProposalandOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/psy-452rubric-topicproposalandoperationaldefinitionsworksheet-pdf)

    **## PSY-452-RS-T2-TopicProposalAndOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.docx**

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/assessment-20887799)

    **Topic Proposal and Operational Definitions Worksheet**

    **Directions:** The goal of this class is to create an original research proposal in the field of psychology. Your research study can be anything to do with psychology! This worksheet will help you finalize a research topic, think of research questions related to that topic, and then identify and operationalize the key variables of those questions. Review the topic resources, the following five questions below.

    · Describe your research topic choice in one to three sentences. Make at least one connection to the literature demonstrating the current research on your variables.

    · Create your research questions. Your research questions related to this topic should be created based on what interests you the most about the topic. (Hint: Phrase your questions as something you can answer quantitatively, such as “is there a difference between two or more groups?” or “Is there a relationship between two or more variables?”)

    · Identify your hypothesis for each research question. Remember, your hypotheses are answers to your research questions. You will have a hypothesis for each research question you pose.

    · Identify the key variables in your research questions.

    · Create operational definitions for each variable. (Remember: When you operationalize a variable you define it and describe how you will measure it in your study.)

    ©2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

    ## image1.png

    **Topic2AssignmentInstructions.PNG**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic2assignmentinstructions-png)

    **PSY-452Rubric-TopicProposalandOperationalDefinitionsWorksheet.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/psy-452rubric-topicproposalandoperationaldefinitionsworksheet-pdf)

  • [Solved] discussions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    120 words each use citations – [\ \ Topic3Dis2.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic3dis2-png-10208533 "Topic3Dis2.PNG") – [\ \ Topic2Dis1.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic2dis1-png "Topic2Dis1.PNG") – [\ \ Topic2Dis2.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic2dis2-png "Topic2…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    120 words each

    use citations

    – [\
    \
    Topic3Dis2.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic3dis2-png-10208533 "Topic3Dis2.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    Topic2Dis1.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic2dis1-png "Topic2Dis1.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    Topic2Dis2.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic2dis2-png "Topic2Dis2.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    Topic3Dis1.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/topic3dis1-png-10208539 "Topic3Dis1.PNG")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Criminal Justice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Research criminal trials in the United States with convictions (e.g., Aaron Hernandez, Jodi Arias, Drew Peterson, Amber Guyger). Select one case to address in your presentation. Create a **10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Research criminal trials in the United States with convictions (e.g., Aaron Hernandez, Jodi Arias, Drew Peterson, Amber Guyger). Select one case to address in your presentation.

    Create a **10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation** about your chosen case, **illustrating how criminal justice policy and due rights processes were applied** as the case was processed throughout the 3 subdomains of the criminal justice system (law enforcement, courts, corrections).

    Audience: Your presentation will be given in a workshop for newly hired victim’s advocates.

    Consider the following examples of policies and procedures in criminal justice as you create your presentation:

    – Bail guidelines
    – Jury selection/jury duty/jury instructions/jury deliberations
    – Plea bargaining
    – Sentencing guidelines
    – Truth in sentencing
    – Verdict/mistrial
    – Capital punishment
    – Appeals process

    Include the following in your presentation:

    – Case Overview: Describe your selected case from arrest to sentencing and appeal (if applicable).
    – What was the legal basis for making the arrest?
    – What were the trial steps/phases of the case (e.g., jury selection, presentation of evidence, deliberation)?
    – If the defendant appealed, what level of court was involved in the appeal?
    – Criminal Justice Policy and/or Procedures: Provide 2 examples of a criminal justice policy or procedure that had a significant impact on the case in one or more of the criminal justice system subdomains.
    – Due Process: Explain how the due process model was applied in at least 2 subdomains of the criminal justice system (law enforcement, courts, corrections).
    – Relationships Between Subdomains: Explain how police, the courts, and corrections work together to process cases in the criminal justice system. Explain how each of these subdomains influenced the other in the selected case.

    – 2 years ago