Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] Negotiation Styles

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) We negotiate multiple times every day in encounters with others. Negotiation occurs when two or more parties have conflicting goals or interests. Reflect on the past week and identify an …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    We negotiate multiple times every day in encounters with others. Negotiation occurs when two or more parties have conflicting goals or interests.

    Reflect on the past week and identify an instance where you negotiated with someone—at home, at work, or anytime you had contact with another person.

    For **the first paragraph** of your initial post, describe the negotiation event, including the participants, the key issues, and the outcome.

    For **the second part** of your initial post **, evaluate one** of the following starter bullet points, using research on course concepts to inform your analysis:

    – Negotiators tend to have consistent styles. How would you assess your style in the negotiation? How would you assess the style of the other party? How might your style have been different had you been negotiating the same issue with a different person?

    – Was your negotiation an example of distributive negotiation or integrative negotiation? Was each party engaged in the negotiation using the same approach? What behaviors existed that      demonstrated the approach? What advantages or disadvantages might have emerged if a different approach (distributive versus integrative) had been used?

    – What other outcome alternatives might have been possible, and how might they have influenced the actual outcome? How did the parties determine what other alternatives exist? How did the parties determine which alternative to use?

    – How might each party assess the outcome of the negotiation? Does each party view it as successful? What is the basis for evaluating how parties view the outcome? What did each party do to achieve success in the negotiation?

    – Negotiations have a reputation for being secretive actions with overtones of espionage, mistrust, and strategizing. What are the positives and negatives of sharing your strategies or your desired point of settlement with the other person in a negotiation? How did the level of secrecy or sharing impact the negotiation process and outcome in your example? What behaviors demonstrated the level of secrecy and sharing that existed?

    – The desired outcome in a negotiation is to achieve the goal you want. What can opposing parties in a negotiation do to identify their common points and minimize their differences? Analyze how your negotiation example might have had a better-negotiated outcome if common      points had been enhanced and differences minimized during the negotiation.

    **Conclude your posting** with a summary paragraph that synthesizes one or two key issues or points of your initial post.

    **Submission Details:**

    · Your initial post should be 1–2 pages (500–1,000 words) long. Cite any sources you use in APA format.

    – Each Covered Heading must contain 3+ credible cited sources and a conclusion summarizing talking points.

    **Due by 2/14/25 at 10:30pm CST**

    **Requirements:**

    1. **Make certain to include in text citations from your course text in addition to your outside leadership resources within your main post. This adds credibility to your argument.**

    **[Textbooks]:**

    Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., & Barry, B. (2023). [_Negotiation (9th ed.)_](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=123652&type=lti&rcode=southu-1697227&srcou=6922). McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN: 9781265608750

    **and**

    Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2014). [_Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases (7th ed.)_](https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=123652&type=lti&rcode=southu-1697228&srcou=6922). McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions. ISBN: 0077862422

    2. _No plagiarism will be tolerated. Must be in 7th Edition APA format with cited sources within the last 5 years._

    **3.** **No AI support, score must be 0% and less than < 10% score on Turnitin**

    – [\
    \
    Wk1DiscussionPost-NegotiationStyles-AssignmentDetails.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk1discussionpost-negotiationstyles-assignmentdetails-docx "Wk1DiscussionPost-NegotiationStyles-AssignmentDetails.docx")
    – [\
    \
    Wk1DiscussionPostGradingRubric.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/wk1discussionpostgradingrubric-docx "Wk1DiscussionPostGradingRubric.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Case 1 Capital Budgeting Decision

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Your task is to complete the Coral Bay Electronics case using Excel. You can find the case in the pdf file. Based on the information provided in the case, you are required to complete the cash flow estimation and conduct capital budgeting techniques to evaluate this proposal and make a final recomme…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Your task is to complete the Coral Bay Electronics case using Excel. You can find the case in the pdf file. Based on the information provided in the case, you are required to complete the cash flow estimation and conduct capital budgeting techniques to evaluate this proposal and make a final recommendation. The areas marked in yellow in the spreadsheet are the answers you should provide.

    The case and the Excel spreadsheet are below. You will have two weeks to complete the spreadsheet and upload it here. When submitting your spreadsheet, change the file name to " Coral Bay Electronics_YOUR NAME."

    – [\
    \
    CoralBayElectronics_Student_2.xlsx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/coralbayelectronics-student-2-xlsx-10193393 "CoralBayElectronics_Student_2.xlsx")
    – [\
    \
    CoralBayElectronics_2.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/coralbayelectronics-2-pdf-10193395 "CoralBayElectronics_2.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    InstructionsforCoralBayElectronicsCase.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/instructionsforcoralbayelectronicscase-pdf-10193397 "InstructionsforCoralBayElectronicsCase.pdf")

    – 2 years ago
    – 0.01

  • [Solved] Can this be done in 2 hours (50 words) 5015wk6

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Here are some ideas to get you started: – Critique Bulanda and McCrea's 2013 article, "The Promise of an Accumulation of Care," found in your [Week 6: Qualitative Research Methods and AnalysisLinks to an external site.](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/25014…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Here are some ideas to get you started:

    – Critique Bulanda and McCrea's 2013 article, "The Promise of an Accumulation of Care," found in your [Week 6: Qualitative Research Methods and AnalysisLinks to an external site.](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2501490320006731?auth=SAML&section=2501658090006731 "Select this link to launch this material in a new window.") reading list. This article uses a qualitative program evaluation model.

    – What are the strengths of the design?
    – What are weaknesses or limitations to the methodology, analysis, and conclusions drawn from the data?
    – How would you recommend strengthening the design?
    – Apply concepts of qualitative research to the program evaluation design that you started in the previous discussion post or based on a previous or current work, internship, or volunteer experience.
    – How would you collect qualitative data and analyze it?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Management 1st assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Need help with this in a few hours – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    Need help with this in a few hours

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Applied Sciences Healthcare Homework APA Format

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachment No plagiarism – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Casestudy4.docx **## Casestudy4.docx** APA FORMAT TOPIC: System Selection AHIMA Competency lll.2 Case Study #5: Identify the steps in the system selection process with graphic examples demonstrating the use of project management to…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachment

    No plagiarism

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Casestudy4.docx

    **## Casestudy4.docx**

    APA FORMAT

    TOPIC:  System Selection

    AHIMA Competency lll.2

    Case Study #5:

    Identify the steps in the system selection process with graphic examples demonstrating the use of project management tools; e.g. Gantt and PERT charts.

    **## Casestudy4.docx**

    APA FORMAT

    TOPIC:  System Selection

    AHIMA Competency lll.2

    Case Study #5:

    Identify the steps in the system selection process with graphic examples demonstrating the use of project management tools; e.g. Gantt and PERT charts.

  • [Solved] Applied Sciences Healthcare Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attachments. – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## DRGCALCULATIONS.docx – ## CopyofAB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx **## DRGCALCULATIONS.docx** 1. **MS-DRG Calculations (Level 4—Analyzing)** For this exercise, use the file titled [AB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx](https://bccc.instructure.com/cou…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attachments.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## DRGCALCULATIONS.docx

    – ## CopyofAB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx

    **## DRGCALCULATIONS.docx**

    1.
    **MS-DRG Calculations (Level 4—Analyzing)**

    For this exercise, use the file titled
    [AB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx](https://bccc.instructure.com/courses/36562/files/3329385?wrap=1) [Download AB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx](https://bccc.instructure.com/courses/36562/files/3329385/download?download_frd=1), tabs MS-DRG Calculation Example and MS-DRG Calculations. This assignment consists of 10 inpatient acute care admissions: 5 for Community Hospital and 5 for Memorial Hospital. Calculate the MS-DRG reimbursement rate for each admission. Notice the fully adjusted base rate, charges, and cost-to-charge ratio are different for each facility. Remember that the fully adjusted base rate already includes adjustments for IME, DSH, and wage index. Once you have completed the calculations, answer the following questions.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Question** | **Answer** |
    | Which figure has the biggest impact in determining profit/loss for an admission; base rate or cost-to-charge ratio (CCR)? Why? | |
    | What is the definition of a CC/MCC? How does the presence of a CC/MCC code impact the reimbursement for an admission | |
    | Why do surgical cases tend to have a higher relative weight (RW), and in turn payment, than medical cases? | |
    | What can Memorial Hospital do to improve their profit? | |

    **## CopyofAB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx**

    ## MS-DRG Calculation Example

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Basic MS-DRG Calculations |
    | Hospital | Happy Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 |
    | MS-DRG | 387 | Inflammatory bowel disease w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 0.7007 |
    | Charges | $ 9,456.82 |
    | CCR | 0.429 |
    | LOS | 3 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | $ 4,344.34 | | Multiply the fully adjusted hospital specific base rate × the MS-DRG Relative Weight (RW) |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | $ 4,056.98 | | Multiply the charges × the cost to charge ration (CCR) |
    | Profit/Loss | | | $ 287.36 | | Subtract the cost of the encounter from the MS-DRG Reimbursement |

    Example: This example shows how to calculate the MS-DRG reimbursment rate for an acute care inpatient admission. The hospital specific base rate we are using for this example includes adjustments for IME, DSH and wage index.

    ## MS-DRG Calculations

    | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Basic MS-DRG Calculations |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 192 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/o CC/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 192 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 0.7092 | | | | | | | RW | 0.7092 |
    | Charges | $ 15,000.00 | | | | | | | Charges | $17,500.00 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 3 | | | | | | | LOS | 4 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 190 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 190 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w MCC |
    | RW | 1.144 | | | | | | | RW | 1.144 |
    | Charges | $ 14,975.24 | | | | | | | Charges | $16,578.24 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 4 | | | | | | | LOS | 5 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 473 | Cervical spinal fusion w/o CC/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 473 | Cervical spinal fusion w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 2.5124 | | | | | | | RW | 2.5124 |
    | Charges | $ 30,245.87 | | | | | | | Charges | $31,674.10 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 2 | | | | | | | LOS | 2 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 472 | Cervical spinal fusion w CC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 472 | Cervical spinal fusion w CC |
    | RW | 3.0415 | | | | | | | RW | 3.0415 |
    | Charges | $ 30,384.64 | | | | | | | Charges | $35,384.57 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 3 | | | | | | | LOS | 3 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 001 | Heart transplant or implant of heart assist system w/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 001 | Heart transplant or implant of heart assist system w/MCC |
    | RW | 27.6339 | | | | | | | RW | 27.6339 |
    | Charges | $ 315,258.74 | | | | | | | Charges | $330,879.54 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 35 | | | | | | | LOS | 38 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |

    Instructions: Calculate the MS-DRG reimbursment rate for each case. Notice the changes in base rate for each facility. Remember the hospital specific base rate includes adjustments for IME, DSH and wage index.
    Once you have completed the calculations, answer the questions in the Student Workbook.

    **## CopyofAB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx**

    ## MS-DRG Calculation Example

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Basic MS-DRG Calculations |
    | Hospital | Happy Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 |
    | MS-DRG | 387 | Inflammatory bowel disease w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 0.7007 |
    | Charges | $ 9,456.82 |
    | CCR | 0.429 |
    | LOS | 3 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | $ 4,344.34 | | Multiply the fully adjusted hospital specific base rate × the MS-DRG Relative Weight (RW) |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | $ 4,056.98 | | Multiply the charges × the cost to charge ration (CCR) |
    | Profit/Loss | | | $ 287.36 | | Subtract the cost of the encounter from the MS-DRG Reimbursement |

    Example: This example shows how to calculate the MS-DRG reimbursment rate for an acute care inpatient admission. The hospital specific base rate we are using for this example includes adjustments for IME, DSH and wage index.

    ## MS-DRG Calculations

    | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Basic MS-DRG Calculations |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 192 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/o CC/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 192 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 0.7092 | | | | | | | RW | 0.7092 |
    | Charges | $ 15,000.00 | | | | | | | Charges | $17,500.00 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 3 | | | | | | | LOS | 4 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 190 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 190 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w MCC |
    | RW | 1.144 | | | | | | | RW | 1.144 |
    | Charges | $ 14,975.24 | | | | | | | Charges | $16,578.24 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 4 | | | | | | | LOS | 5 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 473 | Cervical spinal fusion w/o CC/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 473 | Cervical spinal fusion w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 2.5124 | | | | | | | RW | 2.5124 |
    | Charges | $ 30,245.87 | | | | | | | Charges | $31,674.10 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 2 | | | | | | | LOS | 2 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 472 | Cervical spinal fusion w CC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 472 | Cervical spinal fusion w CC |
    | RW | 3.0415 | | | | | | | RW | 3.0415 |
    | Charges | $ 30,384.64 | | | | | | | Charges | $35,384.57 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 3 | | | | | | | LOS | 3 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 001 | Heart transplant or implant of heart assist system w/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 001 | Heart transplant or implant of heart assist system w/MCC |
    | RW | 27.6339 | | | | | | | RW | 27.6339 |
    | Charges | $ 315,258.74 | | | | | | | Charges | $330,879.54 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 35 | | | | | | | LOS | 38 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |

    Instructions: Calculate the MS-DRG reimbursment rate for each case. Notice the changes in base rate for each facility. Remember the hospital specific base rate includes adjustments for IME, DSH and wage index.
    Once you have completed the calculations, answer the questions in the Student Workbook.

    **## DRGCALCULATIONS.docx**

    1.
    **MS-DRG Calculations (Level 4—Analyzing)**

    For this exercise, use the file titled
    [AB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx](https://bccc.instructure.com/courses/36562/files/3329385?wrap=1) [Download AB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx](https://bccc.instructure.com/courses/36562/files/3329385/download?download_frd=1), tabs MS-DRG Calculation Example and MS-DRG Calculations. This assignment consists of 10 inpatient acute care admissions: 5 for Community Hospital and 5 for Memorial Hospital. Calculate the MS-DRG reimbursement rate for each admission. Notice the fully adjusted base rate, charges, and cost-to-charge ratio are different for each facility. Remember that the fully adjusted base rate already includes adjustments for IME, DSH, and wage index. Once you have completed the calculations, answer the following questions.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Question** | **Answer** |
    | Which figure has the biggest impact in determining profit/loss for an admission; base rate or cost-to-charge ratio (CCR)? Why? | |
    | What is the definition of a CC/MCC? How does the presence of a CC/MCC code impact the reimbursement for an admission | |
    | Why do surgical cases tend to have a higher relative weight (RW), and in turn payment, than medical cases? | |
    | What can Memorial Hospital do to improve their profit? | |

    **## CopyofAB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx**

    ## MS-DRG Calculation Example

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Basic MS-DRG Calculations |
    | Hospital | Happy Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 |
    | MS-DRG | 387 | Inflammatory bowel disease w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 0.7007 |
    | Charges | $ 9,456.82 |
    | CCR | 0.429 |
    | LOS | 3 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | $ 4,344.34 | | Multiply the fully adjusted hospital specific base rate × the MS-DRG Relative Weight (RW) |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | $ 4,056.98 | | Multiply the charges × the cost to charge ration (CCR) |
    | Profit/Loss | | | $ 287.36 | | Subtract the cost of the encounter from the MS-DRG Reimbursement |

    Example: This example shows how to calculate the MS-DRG reimbursment rate for an acute care inpatient admission. The hospital specific base rate we are using for this example includes adjustments for IME, DSH and wage index.

    ## MS-DRG Calculations

    | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Basic MS-DRG Calculations |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 192 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/o CC/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 192 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 0.7092 | | | | | | | RW | 0.7092 |
    | Charges | $ 15,000.00 | | | | | | | Charges | $17,500.00 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 3 | | | | | | | LOS | 4 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 190 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 190 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w MCC |
    | RW | 1.144 | | | | | | | RW | 1.144 |
    | Charges | $ 14,975.24 | | | | | | | Charges | $16,578.24 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 4 | | | | | | | LOS | 5 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 473 | Cervical spinal fusion w/o CC/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 473 | Cervical spinal fusion w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 2.5124 | | | | | | | RW | 2.5124 |
    | Charges | $ 30,245.87 | | | | | | | Charges | $31,674.10 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 2 | | | | | | | LOS | 2 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 472 | Cervical spinal fusion w CC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 472 | Cervical spinal fusion w CC |
    | RW | 3.0415 | | | | | | | RW | 3.0415 |
    | Charges | $ 30,384.64 | | | | | | | Charges | $35,384.57 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 3 | | | | | | | LOS | 3 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 001 | Heart transplant or implant of heart assist system w/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 001 | Heart transplant or implant of heart assist system w/MCC |
    | RW | 27.6339 | | | | | | | RW | 27.6339 |
    | Charges | $ 315,258.74 | | | | | | | Charges | $330,879.54 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 35 | | | | | | | LOS | 38 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |

    Instructions: Calculate the MS-DRG reimbursment rate for each case. Notice the changes in base rate for each facility. Remember the hospital specific base rate includes adjustments for IME, DSH and wage index.
    Once you have completed the calculations, answer the questions in the Student Workbook.

    **## DRGCALCULATIONS.docx**

    1.
    **MS-DRG Calculations (Level 4—Analyzing)**

    For this exercise, use the file titled
    [AB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx](https://bccc.instructure.com/courses/36562/files/3329385?wrap=1) [Download AB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx](https://bccc.instructure.com/courses/36562/files/3329385/download?download_frd=1), tabs MS-DRG Calculation Example and MS-DRG Calculations. This assignment consists of 10 inpatient acute care admissions: 5 for Community Hospital and 5 for Memorial Hospital. Calculate the MS-DRG reimbursement rate for each admission. Notice the fully adjusted base rate, charges, and cost-to-charge ratio are different for each facility. Remember that the fully adjusted base rate already includes adjustments for IME, DSH, and wage index. Once you have completed the calculations, answer the following questions.

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | **Question** | **Answer** |
    | Which figure has the biggest impact in determining profit/loss for an admission; base rate or cost-to-charge ratio (CCR)? Why? | |
    | What is the definition of a CC/MCC? How does the presence of a CC/MCC code impact the reimbursement for an admission | |
    | Why do surgical cases tend to have a higher relative weight (RW), and in turn payment, than medical cases? | |
    | What can Memorial Hospital do to improve their profit? | |

    **## CopyofAB202019_Ch05_Exercises.xlsx**

    ## MS-DRG Calculation Example

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Basic MS-DRG Calculations |
    | Hospital | Happy Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 |
    | MS-DRG | 387 | Inflammatory bowel disease w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 0.7007 |
    | Charges | $ 9,456.82 |
    | CCR | 0.429 |
    | LOS | 3 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | $ 4,344.34 | | Multiply the fully adjusted hospital specific base rate × the MS-DRG Relative Weight (RW) |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | $ 4,056.98 | | Multiply the charges × the cost to charge ration (CCR) |
    | Profit/Loss | | | $ 287.36 | | Subtract the cost of the encounter from the MS-DRG Reimbursement |

    Example: This example shows how to calculate the MS-DRG reimbursment rate for an acute care inpatient admission. The hospital specific base rate we are using for this example includes adjustments for IME, DSH and wage index.

    ## MS-DRG Calculations

    | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Basic MS-DRG Calculations |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 192 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/o CC/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 192 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 0.7092 | | | | | | | RW | 0.7092 |
    | Charges | $ 15,000.00 | | | | | | | Charges | $17,500.00 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 3 | | | | | | | LOS | 4 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 190 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 190 | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w MCC |
    | RW | 1.144 | | | | | | | RW | 1.144 |
    | Charges | $ 14,975.24 | | | | | | | Charges | $16,578.24 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 4 | | | | | | | LOS | 5 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 473 | Cervical spinal fusion w/o CC/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 473 | Cervical spinal fusion w/o CC/MCC |
    | RW | 2.5124 | | | | | | | RW | 2.5124 |
    | Charges | $ 30,245.87 | | | | | | | Charges | $31,674.10 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 2 | | | | | | | LOS | 2 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 472 | Cervical spinal fusion w CC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 472 | Cervical spinal fusion w CC |
    | RW | 3.0415 | | | | | | | RW | 3.0415 |
    | Charges | $ 30,384.64 | | | | | | | Charges | $35,384.57 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 3 | | | | | | | LOS | 3 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |
    | Hospital | Community Hopsital | | Base Rate | $6,200 | | | | Hospital | Memorial Hospital | | | Base Rate | $7,300 |
    | MS-DRG | 001 | Heart transplant or implant of heart assist system w/MCC | | | | | | MS-DRG | 001 | Heart transplant or implant of heart assist system w/MCC |
    | RW | 27.6339 | | | | | | | RW | 27.6339 |
    | Charges | $ 315,258.74 | | | | | | | Charges | $330,879.54 |
    | CCR | 0.429 | | | | | | | CCR | 0.531 |
    | LOS | 35 | | | | | | | LOS | 38 |
    | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | | | | | | MS-DRG Reimbursment | | | |
    | Cost of the encounter | | | | | | | | Cost of the encounter | | | |
    | Profit/Loss | | | | | | | | Profit/Loss | | | |

    Instructions: Calculate the MS-DRG reimbursment rate for each case. Notice the changes in base rate for each facility. Remember the hospital specific base rate includes adjustments for IME, DSH and wage index.
    Once you have completed the calculations, answer the questions in the Student Workbook.

  • [Solved] Allied Health Professionals Issues

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) 2 paragraphs include reference – Analyze the different problems with allied professional responsibilities and overlapping general roles as they apply to a multidisciplinary approach to patient care. – Next, pr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    2 paragraphs include reference

    – Analyze the different problems with allied professional responsibilities and overlapping general roles as they apply to a multidisciplinary approach to patient care.
    – Next, provide a real-life example of problems with overlapping roles of nurses and physicians.
    – Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts.

    Read the following article to augment your understanding of the discussion topic:

    – [Multidisciplinary In-Hospital Teams Improve Patient Outcomes.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173201/)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Access to food around the world

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**NOTE: If you use any references, data, statistics, information, or similar, you need to add the link or URL of your online source at the end of your work; if you know, you can list those sources in APA VII format.**_ Stable access to food is incredibly important for the well-being of humans and o…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**NOTE: If you use any references, data, statistics, information, or similar, you need to add the link or URL of your online source at the end of your work; if you know, you can list those sources in APA VII format.**_

    Stable access to food is incredibly important for the well-being of humans and our societies. Think about your observations of the world and discuss what you think might support or hinder access to food for various populations.

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    – How do you think these situations might impact the overall health of the different populations?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 4k25 research 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## 4025Researchassess4.docx **## 4025Researchassess4.docx** 4025 Research Assessment 4 Presenting Your PICOT Process Finding to Your Professional Peers Create a 5–10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you propose an evidence-based plan to improve the out…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## 4025Researchassess4.docx

    **## 4025Researchassess4.docx**

    4025 Research

    Assessment 4

    Presenting Your PICOT Process Finding to Your Professional Peers

    Create a 5–10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes for your diagnosis.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    As part of the critical role that EBP plays in nursing, professional nurses share their findings with their peers and others. A big part of research is sharing knowledge so that others can also learn. Professional nurses attend seminars and read journals specific to their practice, and they also publish and present what they have learned. This assessment prepares you to share your knowledge with others.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 5–10 minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video and written narrative:

    · Review your findings from Assessment 3.

    · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 (see the samples in the
    [Assessment 4: Poster Template Examples](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3452314540006731?auth=SAML&section=3452315100006731) reading list). Include:

    · An explanation of the diagnosis.

    · The research question you developed using PICO(T).

    · A summary of your sources.

    · The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

    · Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

    · Give a professional presentation to your peers, showing your poster with your voice narration using Kaltura or similar software.

    · Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

    Refer to
    [Using Kaltura](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4533) Campus resource as needed to record and upload your video.

    **Note**: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact
    [DisabilityServices@Capella.edu](mailto:disabilityservices@capella.edu) to request accommodations. If, for some reason, you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

    **Additional Requirements**

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    ·
    **Length of video**: 5–10 minutes.

    ·
    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    ·
    **APA reference page**: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

    ·
    **Video and narrative**: You must submit a written narrative of all of your video content. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications.

    · Summarize the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    · Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.

    · Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    · Explain the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence.

    · Describe key steps of care based on the evidence.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Organize content in a poster presentation and written narrative so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Communicate effectively in a professional audiovisual presentation with clear light and sound.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

    **## 4025Researchassess4.docx**

    4025 Research

    Assessment 4

    Presenting Your PICOT Process Finding to Your Professional Peers

    Create a 5–10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes for your diagnosis.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    As part of the critical role that EBP plays in nursing, professional nurses share their findings with their peers and others. A big part of research is sharing knowledge so that others can also learn. Professional nurses attend seminars and read journals specific to their practice, and they also publish and present what they have learned. This assessment prepares you to share your knowledge with others.

    **Instructions**

    For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 5–10 minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video and written narrative:

    · Review your findings from Assessment 3.

    · Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 (see the samples in the
    [Assessment 4: Poster Template Examples](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3452314540006731?auth=SAML&section=3452315100006731) reading list). Include:

    · An explanation of the diagnosis.

    · The research question you developed using PICO(T).

    · A summary of your sources.

    · The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

    · Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

    · Give a professional presentation to your peers, showing your poster with your voice narration using Kaltura or similar software.

    · Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

    Refer to
    [Using Kaltura](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=4533) Campus resource as needed to record and upload your video.

    **Note**: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact
    [DisabilityServices@Capella.edu](mailto:disabilityservices@capella.edu) to request accommodations. If, for some reason, you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

    **Additional Requirements**

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    ·
    **Length of video**: 5–10 minutes.

    ·
    **References**: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

    ·
    **APA reference page**: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

    ·
    **Video and narrative**: You must submit a written narrative of all of your video content. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    · Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications.

    · Summarize the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    · Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.

    · Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    · Explain the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence.

    · Describe key steps of care based on the evidence.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    · Organize content in a poster presentation and written narrative so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Communicate effectively in a professional audiovisual presentation with clear light and sound.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

  • [Solved] 4105 db 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    After reading your materials and the additional handout from Chapter 3, discuss the purpose of continuous improvement and why we use it in health care. Identify an area in health care that could benefit from continuous improvement and explain. (Reminder: sources need to be noted for in-text citation…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    After reading your materials and the additional handout from Chapter 3, discuss the purpose of continuous improvement and why we use it in health care.  Identify an area in health care that could benefit from continuous improvement and explain. (Reminder: sources need to be noted for in-text citations and in your reference list in APA format).

    – This original post should be no less than 350 words.. Make sure to use good details.
    – **No direct quotes.**  This should be written in your own words of your understanding of the materials.  Paraphrasing needs to be referenced with in-text citations and the source referenced at the bottom of the post. Use in-text citations throughout response
    – **Be sure that you proof-read..**
    – **Failure to use in-text citations and/or list references when using sources results in plagiarism and a zero for the discussion board assignment.**

    **Book that screenshots is from:: The Well-Managed Healthcare Organization** **9th Edition**

    Author(s)John R. Griffith; Kenneth R. White 2016

    – [\
    \
    IMG_3150.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3150-png-10192513 "IMG_3150.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_3151.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3151-png-10192515 "IMG_3151.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_3152.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3152-png-10192517 "IMG_3152.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_3153.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-3153-png-10192519 "IMG_3153.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    MGMT-Chapter4PowerPointLecture.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mgmt-chapter4powerpointlecture-pptx "MGMT-Chapter4PowerPointLecture.pptx")

    – 2 years ago