My Blog

Tag: Psychology

  • [Solved] Discussion Board

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Discuss your interactions with medical or primary care services during your placement. What types of collaborations are typical for your agency? Have you heard positive or negative feedback from clients on communication between providers (medical, social care, behavioral health, etc)? (examples) Wha…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Discuss your interactions with medical or primary care services during your placement. What types of collaborations are typical for your agency?  Have you heard positive or negative feedback from clients on communication between providers (medical, social care, behavioral health, etc)? (examples)  What are some strategies to increase positive communication and collaborative care efforts for the clients you are serving at your agency.  For those in macro practice, apply these concepts to your interactions with other organizations, or between programs at your agency.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Can this be done in 2 hours? 50 words 5016

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ### **The Pros and Cons of the Telehealth Approach** Telehealth is often used to deliver services to populations that otherwise would not receive them, however, there are barriers and downsides as well. For this discussion, post something to the discussion board related to telehealth or your Week 5 …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ### **The Pros and Cons of the Telehealth Approach**

    Telehealth is often used to deliver services to populations that otherwise would not receive them, however, there are barriers and downsides as well. For this discussion, post something to the discussion board related to telehealth or your Week 5 readings.

    Here are some ideas to get you started:

    – Present an argument for the use of telehealth for social work services. Use [**SummonLinks to an external site.**](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3326) **2** in the [**Capella University LibraryLinks to an external site.**](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1651) to find a scholarly article to support your position.
    – Present an argument against the use of telehealth for social work services. Use [**SummonLinks to an external site.**](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=3326) **2** in the [**Capella University LibraryLinks to an external site.**](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1651) to find a scholarly article to support your position.
    – Share something from the readings that resonated with you. Discuss your experiences with this concept or how you can use this information in the future.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Can this be done in 2 hours? 50 words..5015

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    For this discussion, post something to the discussion board related to ethics and cultural competence in program evaluation or your Week 5 readings. Here are some ideas to get you started: – Thinking about your Program Evaluation and Methodology assignment, discuss the ethical issues you are address…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    For this discussion, post something to the discussion board related to ethics and cultural competence in program evaluation or your Week 5 readings.

    Here are some ideas to get you started:

    – Thinking about your Program Evaluation and Methodology assignment, discuss the ethical issues you are addressing related to your selected method of program evaluation.
    – Thinking about your Program Evaluation and Methodology assignment, discuss how you took into account cultural diversity when designing your program evaluation.
    – Share something from the readings that resonated with you. Discuss your experiences with this concept or how you can use this information in the future.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Discussion: Focus on the Family

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ IMG_0230.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0230-jpeg-10183921 "IMG_0230.jpeg") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    IMG_0230.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0230-jpeg-10183921 "IMG_0230.jpeg")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] MA

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering MA.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] After watching the “I Left… Ethical Issues in Behavior Analysis (w/ Sharon Trew)” video, share your thoughts and reflect upon the following:

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    After watching the "I Left… Ethical Issues in Behavior Analysis (w/ Sharon Trew)" video, share your thoughts and reflect upon the following: 1. What was done by staff that was unethical and which ethical elements were violated with these acts? 2. She mentioned she spoke to management; what would…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    After watching the "I Left… Ethical Issues in Behavior Analysis (w/ Sharon Trew)" video, share your thoughts and reflect upon the following:

    1. What was done by staff that was unethical and which ethical elements were violated with these acts?

    2. She mentioned she spoke to management; what would you have said to management (be specific)?

    3. What would you have done similar to what she did?

    4. What would you have done differently than what she did?

    5. Share your overall thoughts on the video, how it impacted you, and your ethical viewpoint as a behavior practitioner

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] reserch 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    attached – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## vertionofthebook.docx – ## reserch1.docx **## vertionofthebook.docx** [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732) **## reserch1.docx** Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## vertionofthebook.docx

    – ## reserch1.docx

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## reserch1.docx**

    Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of nonverbal communication in different cultures.
    **For this 3-4 page essay, you should choose 2 cultures and evaluate the nonverbal communication using your textbook.** Choose a specific topic reviewed in this class (for example, eye contact) and reflect on the two cultures based on the interactions. Make sure to include terminology and theory connections to describe the specific interaction and/or relationship.

    Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available in the assignment description.

    Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021)

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Knowledge | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them) | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert critical thinking by making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong critical thinking by making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay reflects basic critical thinking by making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor critical thinking by failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Have a logical organization of ideas and thoughts | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of excellent use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Clearly express knowledge in communication and culture in writing | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, by following correct formatting style, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, by following correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, by barely following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay has no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, by not following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    **## reserch1.docx**

    Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of nonverbal communication in different cultures.
    **For this 3-4 page essay, you should choose 2 cultures and evaluate the nonverbal communication using your textbook.** Choose a specific topic reviewed in this class (for example, eye contact) and reflect on the two cultures based on the interactions. Make sure to include terminology and theory connections to describe the specific interaction and/or relationship.

    Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available in the assignment description.

    Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021)

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Knowledge | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them) | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert critical thinking by making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong critical thinking by making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay reflects basic critical thinking by making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor critical thinking by failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Have a logical organization of ideas and thoughts | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of excellent use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Clearly express knowledge in communication and culture in writing | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, by following correct formatting style, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, by following correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, by barely following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay has no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, by not following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## reserch1.docx**

    Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of nonverbal communication in different cultures.
    **For this 3-4 page essay, you should choose 2 cultures and evaluate the nonverbal communication using your textbook.** Choose a specific topic reviewed in this class (for example, eye contact) and reflect on the two cultures based on the interactions. Make sure to include terminology and theory connections to describe the specific interaction and/or relationship.

    Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available in the assignment description.

    Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021)

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Knowledge | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them) | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert critical thinking by making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong critical thinking by making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay reflects basic critical thinking by making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor critical thinking by failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Have a logical organization of ideas and thoughts | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of excellent use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Clearly express knowledge in communication and culture in writing | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, by following correct formatting style, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, by following correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, by barely following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay has no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, by not following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## reserch1.docx**

    Your essay is designed to increase your understanding of nonverbal communication in different cultures.
    **For this 3-4 page essay, you should choose 2 cultures and evaluate the nonverbal communication using your textbook.** Choose a specific topic reviewed in this class (for example, eye contact) and reflect on the two cultures based on the interactions. Make sure to include terminology and theory connections to describe the specific interaction and/or relationship.

    Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available in the assignment description.

    Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021)

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Essay/Paper Rubric 100 (2021) |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Knowledge | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them) | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 40 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert critical thinking by making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points | 35 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong critical thinking by making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points | 30 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay reflects basic critical thinking by making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others | 20 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor critical thinking by failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately | | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Have a logical organization of ideas and thoughts | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of excellent use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication <br>Clearly express knowledge in communication and culture in writing | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 10 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, by following correct formatting style, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 8.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, by following correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, and falling between the minimum and maximum page requirement | 7 pts <br>Satisfactory<br>The essay has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, by barely following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 5.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay has no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, by not following correct formatting style, and does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

  • [Solved] certification

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    certification – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## mentalhealthp..docx **## mentalhealthp..docx** This is intended to help you investigate needs for the upcoming transition from graduate to PMHNP. Include the following slides: 1. Title slide: Name, PMHNP graduate, state for license 2. ANCC: What is th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    certification

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## mentalhealthp..docx

    **## mentalhealthp..docx**

    This is intended to help you investigate needs for the upcoming transition from graduate to PMHNP.

    Include the following slides:

    1. Title slide: Name, PMHNP graduate, state for license

    2. ANCC: What is the application process and eligibility for the PMHNP exam?

    3. What are your preparations for the ANCC board certification exam?

    4. Licensing: What state are you planning to initially license in? What are requirements and steps for license?

    5. Prescribing license: Does your state require a separate license to prescribe? Does your state require specific hours of pharmacology for initial license?

    6. ConEd.: What continuing education requirements are required for renewal of license for your state?

    7. Autonomous Practice: Does your state allow autonomous practice? If so, are there requirements or can you practice independently upon board certification and license being received?

    8. Insurance Credentialing: Research the insurance credentialing process for a new provider. How long will this take before you can practice if you plan to accept insurance and be paneled by insurance companies? (Note: This may increase your time from graduation to start date of employment with some employers)

    9. Job Search: What particular specialty/population will you be searching for in psychiatric care? How do you plan to stand out and differentiate yourself from other applicants for your dream job?

    10. Summary your PMHNP student experience

    11. References (APA format, minimum of 3 references used)

    **## mentalhealthp..docx**

    This is intended to help you investigate needs for the upcoming transition from graduate to PMHNP.

    Include the following slides:

    1. Title slide: Name, PMHNP graduate, state for license

    2. ANCC: What is the application process and eligibility for the PMHNP exam?

    3. What are your preparations for the ANCC board certification exam?

    4. Licensing: What state are you planning to initially license in? What are requirements and steps for license?

    5. Prescribing license: Does your state require a separate license to prescribe? Does your state require specific hours of pharmacology for initial license?

    6. ConEd.: What continuing education requirements are required for renewal of license for your state?

    7. Autonomous Practice: Does your state allow autonomous practice? If so, are there requirements or can you practice independently upon board certification and license being received?

    8. Insurance Credentialing: Research the insurance credentialing process for a new provider. How long will this take before you can practice if you plan to accept insurance and be paneled by insurance companies? (Note: This may increase your time from graduation to start date of employment with some employers)

    9. Job Search: What particular specialty/population will you be searching for in psychiatric care? How do you plan to stand out and differentiate yourself from other applicants for your dream job?

    10. Summary your PMHNP student experience

    11. References (APA format, minimum of 3 references used)

  • [Solved] see below

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please follow instructions very well – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## SteinfeldtClayPriestertemplate.docx – SteinfeldtClayPriesterarticle-1.pdf **## SteinfeldtClayPriestertemplate.docx** **Week 4 Assignment 3 Template** **Article: Prevalence and perceived importance of racial matching in the psychot…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please follow instructions very well

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## SteinfeldtClayPriestertemplate.docx

    – SteinfeldtClayPriesterarticle-1.pdf

    **## SteinfeldtClayPriestertemplate.docx**

    **Week 4 Assignment 3 Template**

    **Article: Prevalence and perceived importance of racial matching in the psychotherapeutic dyad: A national survey of addictions treatment clinical practices**

    **Instructions:** Read the article posted in Announcements and use the following guidelines to complete the sections below.

    · Write evidence statements and a summary using original scholarly evidence from the
    **Background,** **Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion** sections of the assigned article;
    **do not** include evidence from other sources cited within the article.

    · Write evidence statements using effective paraphrasing; do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article.

    · Write a summary using the MEAL Plan strategy explained in this week’s Learning Resources. Your summary should use effective paraphrasing; do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article.

    · Use APA style citations where necessary in evidence statements and the summary paragraph(s) and provide an APA style reference for the assigned article.

    1) Value Statement: It should be a priority to match clients with racially similar counselors in substance use treatment centers.

    Use what you learned about paraphrasing to write your own supporting Evidence Statement (1–2 sentences). Do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article. Also, remember to use evidence from the Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion sections of the assigned article rather than evidence from other sources cited in the article.

    2) Anecdote Statement: I have a strong connection to my counselor and have achieved good outcomes.

    Use what you learned about paraphrasing to write a supporting Evidence Statement (1–2 sentences). Do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article. Also, remember to use evidence from the Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion sections of the assigned article rather than evidence from other sources cited in the article.

    3) MEAL Plan summary of the article (1–2 paragraphs):

    4) APA Style Reference for the journal article:

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 2

    **SteinfeldtClayPriesterarticle-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/steinfeldtclaypriesterarticle-1-pdf)

    **SteinfeldtClayPriesterarticle-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/steinfeldtclaypriesterarticle-1-pdf)

    **## SteinfeldtClayPriestertemplate.docx**

    **Week 4 Assignment 3 Template**

    **Article: Prevalence and perceived importance of racial matching in the psychotherapeutic dyad: A national survey of addictions treatment clinical practices**

    **Instructions:** Read the article posted in Announcements and use the following guidelines to complete the sections below.

    · Write evidence statements and a summary using original scholarly evidence from the
    **Background,** **Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion** sections of the assigned article;
    **do not** include evidence from other sources cited within the article.

    · Write evidence statements using effective paraphrasing; do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article.

    · Write a summary using the MEAL Plan strategy explained in this week’s Learning Resources. Your summary should use effective paraphrasing; do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article.

    · Use APA style citations where necessary in evidence statements and the summary paragraph(s) and provide an APA style reference for the assigned article.

    1) Value Statement: It should be a priority to match clients with racially similar counselors in substance use treatment centers.

    Use what you learned about paraphrasing to write your own supporting Evidence Statement (1–2 sentences). Do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article. Also, remember to use evidence from the Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion sections of the assigned article rather than evidence from other sources cited in the article.

    2) Anecdote Statement: I have a strong connection to my counselor and have achieved good outcomes.

    Use what you learned about paraphrasing to write a supporting Evidence Statement (1–2 sentences). Do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article. Also, remember to use evidence from the Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion sections of the assigned article rather than evidence from other sources cited in the article.

    3) MEAL Plan summary of the article (1–2 paragraphs):

    4) APA Style Reference for the journal article:

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 2

    **SteinfeldtClayPriesterarticle-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/steinfeldtclaypriesterarticle-1-pdf)

    **## SteinfeldtClayPriestertemplate.docx**

    **Week 4 Assignment 3 Template**

    **Article: Prevalence and perceived importance of racial matching in the psychotherapeutic dyad: A national survey of addictions treatment clinical practices**

    **Instructions:** Read the article posted in Announcements and use the following guidelines to complete the sections below.

    · Write evidence statements and a summary using original scholarly evidence from the
    **Background,** **Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion** sections of the assigned article;
    **do not** include evidence from other sources cited within the article.

    · Write evidence statements using effective paraphrasing; do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article.

    · Write a summary using the MEAL Plan strategy explained in this week’s Learning Resources. Your summary should use effective paraphrasing; do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article.

    · Use APA style citations where necessary in evidence statements and the summary paragraph(s) and provide an APA style reference for the assigned article.

    1) Value Statement: It should be a priority to match clients with racially similar counselors in substance use treatment centers.

    Use what you learned about paraphrasing to write your own supporting Evidence Statement (1–2 sentences). Do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article. Also, remember to use evidence from the Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion sections of the assigned article rather than evidence from other sources cited in the article.

    2) Anecdote Statement: I have a strong connection to my counselor and have achieved good outcomes.

    Use what you learned about paraphrasing to write a supporting Evidence Statement (1–2 sentences). Do not use direct quotations or copy and paste from the article. Also, remember to use evidence from the Results, Discussion, and/or Conclusion sections of the assigned article rather than evidence from other sources cited in the article.

    3) MEAL Plan summary of the article (1–2 paragraphs):

    4) APA Style Reference for the journal article:

    © 2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 2

    **SteinfeldtClayPriesterarticle-1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/steinfeldtclaypriesterarticle-1-pdf)

  • [Solved] Professional Counseling

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    What are some challenges for counselors in rural areas. – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Articleinstructionscopy.docx – DualRoleRelationshipsinRuralCommunitiesArticle1copy.pdf **## Articleinstructionscopy.docx** You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    What are some challenges for counselors in rural areas.

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Articleinstructionscopy.docx

    – DualRoleRelationshipsinRuralCommunitiesArticle1copy.pdf

    **## Articleinstructionscopy.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **DualRoleRelationshipsinRuralCommunitiesArticle1copy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dualrolerelationshipsinruralcommunitiesarticle1copy-pdf)

    **DualRoleRelationshipsinRuralCommunitiesArticle1copy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dualrolerelationshipsinruralcommunitiesarticle1copy-pdf)

    **## Articleinstructionscopy.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **DualRoleRelationshipsinRuralCommunitiesArticle1copy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dualrolerelationshipsinruralcommunitiesarticle1copy-pdf)

    **## Articleinstructionscopy.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    · Were the findings important to a reader?

    · Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    · If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **DualRoleRelationshipsinRuralCommunitiesArticle1copy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dualrolerelationshipsinruralcommunitiesarticle1copy-pdf)