Executive Solution Overview
attached – ## assig1.docx **## assig1.docx** **General but important information about Assignments 1 and 2 . – You will find that both assignments 1 and 2 are somewhat similar. Both of these assignments focus on effective interventions used in school settings. Assignment 1 asks for you to identify a…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
attached
– ## assig1.docx
**## assig1.docx**
**General but important information about Assignments 1 and 2 . – You will find that both assignments 1 and 2 are somewhat similar. Both of these assignments focus on effective interventions used in school settings. Assignment 1 asks for you to identify and write a short narrative about 3 evidence based practices that promote appropriate behavior in schools. In Assignment 2 we ask you to select 3 interventions and more completely discuss them than you did in Assignment 1 (Yes, you may use the three you selected for Assignment 1). In Assignment 2, while you still asked to provide an enhanced view of three positive interventions, you are also to select 3 interventions that have little or no empirical evidence to support their use but, nevertheless, are still are used.**
**Assignment 2 gives a bigger picture of effective interventions because they also examine those interventions that are effective and those that are ineffective. Further, Assignment 1 is your first writing assignment in the class in which you have to use APA. While both Assignment 1 and 2 are graded, Assignment 2 requires a much more empirical report of the literature surrounding effective interventions and provides a clear idea why some interventions are ineffective. So this report draws a clear and definitive picture of interventions effectiveness.**
**Assignment 2 is also a Critical Task which means that you have to receive a passing score on this assignment in order to receive a grade for the class. If you do not receive a passing score on Assignment 2, then you will have to work with me to remediate the weaknesses identified in your submission. This often means a delay in receiving a grade for the course. Further, you will already have submitted feedback on Assignment 1 and will have useful feedback on, writing style, the use of APA and efficacy of interventions. So, in writing assignment 2 you will have the advantage of some feedback from a prior assignment.**
**The biggest difference in content between Assignment 1 and 2 is the depth of review or evidence from prior studies. In both assignment you are not to use personal pronouns or opinions but rather you should provide evidence from the professional literature. But, this level of analysis needs to be more extensive in Assignment 2.**
**Assignment # 1 – In this assignment you will examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence Based Practices (EBP) and examine at least 3 Evidence Based Practices that can be used in RTI settings. RTI settings allow for a lot of room related to program delivery so you should be able to examine how RTI and EBP are connected in real life classrooms. You should also examine the role of evidence based practices and the criteria that you used to determine if these interventions were adequately vetted classroom practices. This paper is not to be lengthy – a maximum of 5 pages. The assignment rubric will be used for this assignment but feedback will be in comments about your submission. This paper should reflect the professional literature – not your opinion. As stated previously – no personal pronouns, please.**
Rubric
**Assignment and Discussion Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Assignment and Discussion Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrasp Readings | **4 ptsExcellent** Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis | **4 ptsExcellent** Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence | **4 ptsExcellent** Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** Evidence is weak and lacking in detail. Some opinion.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Clarity | **4 ptsExcellent** Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics | **4 ptsExcellent** When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. | 4 pts |
Total Points: 20
**## assig1.docx**
**General but important information about Assignments 1 and 2 . – You will find that both assignments 1 and 2 are somewhat similar. Both of these assignments focus on effective interventions used in school settings. Assignment 1 asks for you to identify and write a short narrative about 3 evidence based practices that promote appropriate behavior in schools. In Assignment 2 we ask you to select 3 interventions and more completely discuss them than you did in Assignment 1 (Yes, you may use the three you selected for Assignment 1). In Assignment 2, while you still asked to provide an enhanced view of three positive interventions, you are also to select 3 interventions that have little or no empirical evidence to support their use but, nevertheless, are still are used.**
**Assignment 2 gives a bigger picture of effective interventions because they also examine those interventions that are effective and those that are ineffective. Further, Assignment 1 is your first writing assignment in the class in which you have to use APA. While both Assignment 1 and 2 are graded, Assignment 2 requires a much more empirical report of the literature surrounding effective interventions and provides a clear idea why some interventions are ineffective. So this report draws a clear and definitive picture of interventions effectiveness.**
**Assignment 2 is also a Critical Task which means that you have to receive a passing score on this assignment in order to receive a grade for the class. If you do not receive a passing score on Assignment 2, then you will have to work with me to remediate the weaknesses identified in your submission. This often means a delay in receiving a grade for the course. Further, you will already have submitted feedback on Assignment 1 and will have useful feedback on, writing style, the use of APA and efficacy of interventions. So, in writing assignment 2 you will have the advantage of some feedback from a prior assignment.**
**The biggest difference in content between Assignment 1 and 2 is the depth of review or evidence from prior studies. In both assignment you are not to use personal pronouns or opinions but rather you should provide evidence from the professional literature. But, this level of analysis needs to be more extensive in Assignment 2.**
**Assignment # 1 – In this assignment you will examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence Based Practices (EBP) and examine at least 3 Evidence Based Practices that can be used in RTI settings. RTI settings allow for a lot of room related to program delivery so you should be able to examine how RTI and EBP are connected in real life classrooms. You should also examine the role of evidence based practices and the criteria that you used to determine if these interventions were adequately vetted classroom practices. This paper is not to be lengthy – a maximum of 5 pages. The assignment rubric will be used for this assignment but feedback will be in comments about your submission. This paper should reflect the professional literature – not your opinion. As stated previously – no personal pronouns, please.**
Rubric
**Assignment and Discussion Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Assignment and Discussion Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrasp Readings | **4 ptsExcellent** Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis | **4 ptsExcellent** Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence | **4 ptsExcellent** Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** Evidence is weak and lacking in detail. Some opinion.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Clarity | **4 ptsExcellent** Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. | 4 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics | **4 ptsExcellent** When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues.<br> <br>**2 ptsGood** Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues.<br> <br>**1 ptsDeveloping** There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues.<br> <br>**0 ptsNeeds Improvement** Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. | 4 pts |
Total Points: 20
Leave a Reply