[Solved] module 3 discussion 3-What makes a team?

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

– ## Whatmakesateam-week3discussionmodule3.docx

**## Whatmakesateam-week3discussionmodule3.docx**

**_What makes a team?_**

Reflect on your experiences as a member of a clinical team. What makes a team effective or ineffective in terms of achieving expected outcomes for the patients? (Saunders, 2014)

**Submission Instructions:**

· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

· You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

· All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

· Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

· You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.


**Grading Rubric**

**Discussion Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Discussion Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts | **5 pts Distinguished** Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.<br> <br>**4 pts Excellent** Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.<br> <br>**2 pts Fair** Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.<br> <br>**1 pts Poor** Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines | **3 pts Distinguished** Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.<br> <br>**2 pts Excellent** Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.<br> <br>**1 pts Fair** Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br> <br>**0 pts Poor** Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Response to Posts of Peers | **2 pts Distinguished** Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.<br> <br>**1 pts Fair** Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.<br> <br>**0 pts Poor** Student provided no response to a peer's post. | 2 pts |

Total Points: 10

## image1.png

**## Whatmakesateam-week3discussionmodule3.docx**

**_What makes a team?_**

Reflect on your experiences as a member of a clinical team. What makes a team effective or ineffective in terms of achieving expected outcomes for the patients? (Saunders, 2014)

**Submission Instructions:**

· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

· You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

· All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

· Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

· You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.


**Grading Rubric**

**Discussion Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Discussion Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts | **5 pts Distinguished** Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.<br> <br>**4 pts Excellent** Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.<br> <br>**2 pts Fair** Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.<br> <br>**1 pts Poor** Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines | **3 pts Distinguished** Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.<br> <br>**2 pts Excellent** Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.<br> <br>**1 pts Fair** Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<br> <br>**0 pts Poor** Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. | 3 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Response to Posts of Peers | **2 pts Distinguished** Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.<br> <br>**1 pts Fair** Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.<br> <br>**0 pts Poor** Student provided no response to a peer's post. | 2 pts |

Total Points: 10

## image1.png