Executive Solution Overview
Need help with a writing assignment – ## GraduateParagraphAssignmentInstructions1.docx – ## GraduateParagraphTemplate1.docx – ## GraduateParagraphGradingRubric1.pdf **## GraduateParagraphAssignmentInstructions1.docx** SOWK 500 **Graduate Paragraph Assignment Instructions** Overview This assignment p…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
Need help with a writing assignment
– ## GraduateParagraphAssignmentInstructions1.docx
– ## GraduateParagraphTemplate1.docx
– ## GraduateParagraphGradingRubric1.pdf
**## GraduateParagraphAssignmentInstructions1.docx**
SOWK 500
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment Instructions**
Overview
This assignment provides you with the opportunity to practice graduate writing skills. You will use APA format and a professional voice. You will provide a summary, personal perspective, and biblical analysis of an article.
Instructions
Please keep in mind that
**Liberty University uses** **artificial intelligence-detecting software**. It detects the use of programs such as Grammarly, Google, ChatGPT, and many others. The use of artificial intelligence aids will result in earning zeros on assignments and sometimes an “F” in a course. The Department of Social Work realizes that many of you may be returning to school after many years or do not consider yourselves wonderful writers. Liberty University has an Online Writing Center to help you grow in your writing competency. We encourage you to use this resource.
**First** **Watch in Modules 3 & 4**: 1)
_Anatomy of a Research Journal Article_, 2)
_Anatomy of a Journal Article Video, and_ 3)
_Best Practices in Graduate Writing_
**Next**, take the
_Graduate Writing Quiz_.
The watch items and quiz will help prepare you for this writing assignment.
**Next**, read Trammel et al. (2020), which is a read item in this module.
**Next,** using the
**Graduate Paragraph Template** and the principles from the
**_Best Practices in Graduate Writing_** Watch item
**,** complete the chart, and write a 325 to 450-word graduate-level paper about the article in 3 paragraphs. The assignment will have an APA-style cover page and an APA-style reference page.
This paper will contain the following.
· A chart with some details of the study conducted by Trammel et al. (2020)
· A summary of the study conducted by Trammel et al. (2020)
· A biblical analysis of the topic. Compare the findings of the study to biblical principles
· Your personal views on the findings of the study including implications for you as a social work practitioner (use first person and personal examples)
· One sentence from Trammel et al. (2020) that contains a short quotation with an APA citation, which enhances the quality of the paragraph
· At least one in-text citation for a sentence that contains a paraphrase reflecting the intent of Trammel et al. (2020)
· At least one in-text citation for the biblical principle or verse(s) used to analyze the topic
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## GraduateParagraphTemplate1.docx**
Running head: TITLE OF PAPER 1
1
GRADUATE PARAGRAPH
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment**
Name
School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University
**Author Note**
Name
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Name
Email: xxx@liberty.edu
Delete everything in red and replace with applicable material.
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment**
Complete this Chart
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Questions** | **Information**<br>**_Bullets are fine_**<br>**_No need for full sentences_** | **Page, Paragraph, or Section Number(s) where Information was Found** |
| **What was the purpose of the study?** | | |
| **Who were the participants?** | | |
| **What did the participants do and for how long?** | | |
| **What was measured, how was it measured, and when was it measured?** | | |
| **What were the results?** | | |
| **How were the results determined?** | | |
The body of the paper is to be written in double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman font.
**The Study**
Use the information from the chart to write a summary of the study in one paragraph. .
**Biblical Comparison**
In one paragraph, compare the study to biblical principles.
**Personal Views**
In one paragraph, discuss your personal views in relation to the findings of study.
**References**
Remember to alphabetize this list
Cite whatever Bible version or biblical resource you use.
Use this as a resource for proper citation if you cite from the Bible and/or another book:
[https://libguides.liberty.edu/c.php?g=1036190&p=7511541](https://libguides.liberty.edu/c.php?g=1036190&p=7511541)
Cite the journal article
Author last name, initials, Last name, initial, & Last name, initial. (year). Name of article (first word capitalized and work after the ‘:’).
_Journal Name Italicized, volume number italicized_(issue number inside parentheses), page numbers. https://doi.org/number/number
Journal article information:
Authors: Trammel, R.C., Park, G., & Karlsson, I.
Year: 2020
Title: Religiously Oriented Mindfulness for Social Workers: Effects on Mindfulness, Heart Rate Variability, and Personal Burnout (remember to capitalize this according to APA format)
Journal Name: Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought
Volume Number: 40
Issue Number: 1
Page Numbers: 19-38
Doi:
[https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2020.1818358](https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2020.1818358)
**## GraduateParagraphGradingRubric1.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Content:
Chart
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. The
chart was accurately
completed with relevant
information, including
where the information
was found.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment the
requirements and
generally followed the
template well for this
section. The chart was
generally accurately
completed with mostly
relevant information,
including where the
information was found.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
the assignment
requirements and
minimally followed the
template for this section.
The chart may be
incomplete, be inaccurate,
and/or contain irrelevant
information. Where the
information was found may
not have been included.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content:
Study
Summary
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A
one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article was excellent and
accurate. A strong direct
quotation from the article
that enhances the
section's quality has been
effectively and accurately
integrated into the
section. The article was
cited properly or close to
properly in-text and on
the reference page.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template for this section.
A one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article was good and
mostly accurate. A direct
quotation from the article
enhanced the section's
quality and was integrated
into the section relatively
well. The article was cited
mostly properly in-text and
on the reference page.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and minimally followed the
template for this section.
One or more of the
following were present. A
one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article needed multiple
corrections. A direct
quotation from the article
was non-existent or poorly
integrated into the section.
The article was improperly
cited or may not have been
cited in-text and on the
reference page.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Content:
Biblical
Comparison
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A
100 to 150-word
one-paragraph biblical
comparison was
excellent and accurate. A
biblical perspective with
citation was effectively
and accurately integrated
into this section. The
Bible/biblical resource
was cited properly or
close to properly in-text
and on the reference
page.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template for this section.
A 100 to 150-word
one-paragraph biblical
comparison was accurate
and well-developed. A
biblical perspective was
accurately integrated into
the section. The
Bible/biblical resource was
cited somewhat properly
in-text and on the
reference page.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and minimally followed the
template for this section.
One or more of the
following were present. A
one-paragraph 100 to
150-word biblical
comparison needed further
development. A biblical
perspective was not
present or could use
further development. The
Bible/biblical resource may
have been improperly cited
or may not have been cited
in-text and on the
reference page.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
Content:
Personal
Views
14 to >12 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A 75
to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
well to the prompts and
study. A degree of depth
and personal analysis
was conveyed.
12 to >11 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template well for this
section. A 75 to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
well to the prompts and
study.
11 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and somewhat followed the
template for this section. A
75 to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
somewhat to the prompts
and study.
0 pts
Not
Present
14 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure:
APA Format
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
structure expectations,
with only 2 or less areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text
citations and reference
page entries for the
Bible/biblical resource
and journal article made
use of proper APA
format. The title and
reference page were
properly integrated with
the correct content.
Demonstration of the
APA tips from Watch item
Best Practices in
Graduate Writing was
present.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper mostly met
structure expectations,
with less than 5 areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text
citations and reference
page entries for the
Bible/biblical resource and
journal article generally
made use of proper APA
format. The title and
reference page were
generally properly
integrated with the correct
content. Some evidence
of the APA tips from the
Watch item: Best
Practices in Graduate
Writing was present.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper minimally met
structure expectations,
with 5 or more areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text citations
and reference page entries
for the bible/biblical
resource and journal article
made improper use of APA
format. The title and/or
reference page may not
have been properly
integrated with the correct
content. Evidence of the
incorporation of the APA
tips from the Watch item
Best Practices in Graduate
Writing is needed.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Structure:
Grammar
and Spelling
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
structure expectations,
with less than 2 areas
needing correction in
grammar and/or spelling.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper is mostly met
structure expectations,
with 2 areas needing
correction in grammar
and/or spelling.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper needs further
development to meet
structure expectations with
3 or more areas needing
correction in grammar
and/or spelling.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Structure:
Structure,
Organization,
Flow
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
expectations in structure,
organization, and flow,
providing a congruent
paper that is easy to
follow and read. No
corrections are needed.
The narrative section of
the paper is 300 to 400
words and three
paragraphs. Best
Practices in Graduate
Writing was
demonstrated.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper mostly met
expectations with
structure, flow, and
organization, providing a
generally congruent paper
that is typically easy to
follow and read. Some
corrections are needed.
The body of the paper is
completed in three
paragraphs and 300 to
400 words. Best Practices
in Graduate Writing was
demonstrated.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper needs further
development to meet
expectations with
structure, flow, and
organization. The provided
text is an often incongruent
paper that is not always
easy to follow and read.
Many corrections are
needed. The body of the
paper may be completed in
more or less than three
paragraphs and outside of
the word count
requirements.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 120
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
**## GraduateParagraphGradingRubric1.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Content:
Chart
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. The
chart was accurately
completed with relevant
information, including
where the information
was found.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment the
requirements and
generally followed the
template well for this
section. The chart was
generally accurately
completed with mostly
relevant information,
including where the
information was found.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
the assignment
requirements and
minimally followed the
template for this section.
The chart may be
incomplete, be inaccurate,
and/or contain irrelevant
information. Where the
information was found may
not have been included.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content:
Study
Summary
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A
one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article was excellent and
accurate. A strong direct
quotation from the article
that enhances the
section's quality has been
effectively and accurately
integrated into the
section. The article was
cited properly or close to
properly in-text and on
the reference page.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template for this section.
A one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article was good and
mostly accurate. A direct
quotation from the article
enhanced the section's
quality and was integrated
into the section relatively
well. The article was cited
mostly properly in-text and
on the reference page.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and minimally followed the
template for this section.
One or more of the
following were present. A
one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article needed multiple
corrections. A direct
quotation from the article
was non-existent or poorly
integrated into the section.
The article was improperly
cited or may not have been
cited in-text and on the
reference page.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Content:
Biblical
Comparison
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A
100 to 150-word
one-paragraph biblical
comparison was
excellent and accurate. A
biblical perspective with
citation was effectively
and accurately integrated
into this section. The
Bible/biblical resource
was cited properly or
close to properly in-text
and on the reference
page.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template for this section.
A 100 to 150-word
one-paragraph biblical
comparison was accurate
and well-developed. A
biblical perspective was
accurately integrated into
the section. The
Bible/biblical resource was
cited somewhat properly
in-text and on the
reference page.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and minimally followed the
template for this section.
One or more of the
following were present. A
one-paragraph 100 to
150-word biblical
comparison needed further
development. A biblical
perspective was not
present or could use
further development. The
Bible/biblical resource may
have been improperly cited
or may not have been cited
in-text and on the
reference page.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
Content:
Personal
Views
14 to >12 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A 75
to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
well to the prompts and
study. A degree of depth
and personal analysis
was conveyed.
12 to >11 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template well for this
section. A 75 to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
well to the prompts and
study.
11 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and somewhat followed the
template for this section. A
75 to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
somewhat to the prompts
and study.
0 pts
Not
Present
14 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure:
APA Format
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
structure expectations,
with only 2 or less areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text
citations and reference
page entries for the
Bible/biblical resource
and journal article made
use of proper APA
format. The title and
reference page were
properly integrated with
the correct content.
Demonstration of the
APA tips from Watch item
Best Practices in
Graduate Writing was
present.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper mostly met
structure expectations,
with less than 5 areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text
citations and reference
page entries for the
Bible/biblical resource and
journal article generally
made use of proper APA
format. The title and
reference page were
generally properly
integrated with the correct
content. Some evidence
of the APA tips from the
Watch item: Best
Practices in Graduate
Writing was present.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper minimally met
structure expectations,
with 5 or more areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text citations
and reference page entries
for the bible/biblical
resource and journal article
made improper use of APA
format. The title and/or
reference page may not
have been properly
integrated with the correct
content. Evidence of the
incorporation of the APA
tips from the Watch item
Best Practices in Graduate
Writing is needed.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Structure:
Grammar
and Spelling
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
structure expectations,
with less than 2 areas
needing correction in
grammar and/or spelling.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper is mostly met
structure expectations,
with 2 areas needing
correction in grammar
and/or spelling.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper needs further
development to meet
structure expectations with
3 or more areas needing
correction in grammar
and/or spelling.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Structure:
Structure,
Organization,
Flow
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
expectations in structure,
organization, and flow,
providing a congruent
paper that is easy to
follow and read. No
corrections are needed.
The narrative section of
the paper is 300 to 400
words and three
paragraphs. Best
Practices in Graduate
Writing was
demonstrated.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper mostly met
expectations with
structure, flow, and
organization, providing a
generally congruent paper
that is typically easy to
follow and read. Some
corrections are needed.
The body of the paper is
completed in three
paragraphs and 300 to
400 words. Best Practices
in Graduate Writing was
demonstrated.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper needs further
development to meet
expectations with
structure, flow, and
organization. The provided
text is an often incongruent
paper that is not always
easy to follow and read.
Many corrections are
needed. The body of the
paper may be completed in
more or less than three
paragraphs and outside of
the word count
requirements.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 120
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
**## GraduateParagraphAssignmentInstructions1.docx**
SOWK 500
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment Instructions**
Overview
This assignment provides you with the opportunity to practice graduate writing skills. You will use APA format and a professional voice. You will provide a summary, personal perspective, and biblical analysis of an article.
Instructions
Please keep in mind that
**Liberty University uses** **artificial intelligence-detecting software**. It detects the use of programs such as Grammarly, Google, ChatGPT, and many others. The use of artificial intelligence aids will result in earning zeros on assignments and sometimes an “F” in a course. The Department of Social Work realizes that many of you may be returning to school after many years or do not consider yourselves wonderful writers. Liberty University has an Online Writing Center to help you grow in your writing competency. We encourage you to use this resource.
**First** **Watch in Modules 3 & 4**: 1)
_Anatomy of a Research Journal Article_, 2)
_Anatomy of a Journal Article Video, and_ 3)
_Best Practices in Graduate Writing_
**Next**, take the
_Graduate Writing Quiz_.
The watch items and quiz will help prepare you for this writing assignment.
**Next**, read Trammel et al. (2020), which is a read item in this module.
**Next,** using the
**Graduate Paragraph Template** and the principles from the
**_Best Practices in Graduate Writing_** Watch item
**,** complete the chart, and write a 325 to 450-word graduate-level paper about the article in 3 paragraphs. The assignment will have an APA-style cover page and an APA-style reference page.
This paper will contain the following.
· A chart with some details of the study conducted by Trammel et al. (2020)
· A summary of the study conducted by Trammel et al. (2020)
· A biblical analysis of the topic. Compare the findings of the study to biblical principles
· Your personal views on the findings of the study including implications for you as a social work practitioner (use first person and personal examples)
· One sentence from Trammel et al. (2020) that contains a short quotation with an APA citation, which enhances the quality of the paragraph
· At least one in-text citation for a sentence that contains a paraphrase reflecting the intent of Trammel et al. (2020)
· At least one in-text citation for the biblical principle or verse(s) used to analyze the topic
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## GraduateParagraphTemplate1.docx**
Running head: TITLE OF PAPER 1
1
GRADUATE PARAGRAPH
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment**
Name
School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University
**Author Note**
Name
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Name
Email: xxx@liberty.edu
Delete everything in red and replace with applicable material.
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment**
Complete this Chart
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Questions** | **Information**<br>**_Bullets are fine_**<br>**_No need for full sentences_** | **Page, Paragraph, or Section Number(s) where Information was Found** |
| **What was the purpose of the study?** | | |
| **Who were the participants?** | | |
| **What did the participants do and for how long?** | | |
| **What was measured, how was it measured, and when was it measured?** | | |
| **What were the results?** | | |
| **How were the results determined?** | | |
The body of the paper is to be written in double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman font.
**The Study**
Use the information from the chart to write a summary of the study in one paragraph. .
**Biblical Comparison**
In one paragraph, compare the study to biblical principles.
**Personal Views**
In one paragraph, discuss your personal views in relation to the findings of study.
**References**
Remember to alphabetize this list
Cite whatever Bible version or biblical resource you use.
Use this as a resource for proper citation if you cite from the Bible and/or another book:
[https://libguides.liberty.edu/c.php?g=1036190&p=7511541](https://libguides.liberty.edu/c.php?g=1036190&p=7511541)
Cite the journal article
Author last name, initials, Last name, initial, & Last name, initial. (year). Name of article (first word capitalized and work after the ‘:’).
_Journal Name Italicized, volume number italicized_(issue number inside parentheses), page numbers. https://doi.org/number/number
Journal article information:
Authors: Trammel, R.C., Park, G., & Karlsson, I.
Year: 2020
Title: Religiously Oriented Mindfulness for Social Workers: Effects on Mindfulness, Heart Rate Variability, and Personal Burnout (remember to capitalize this according to APA format)
Journal Name: Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought
Volume Number: 40
Issue Number: 1
Page Numbers: 19-38
Doi:
[https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2020.1818358](https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2020.1818358)
**## GraduateParagraphGradingRubric1.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Content:
Chart
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. The
chart was accurately
completed with relevant
information, including
where the information
was found.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment the
requirements and
generally followed the
template well for this
section. The chart was
generally accurately
completed with mostly
relevant information,
including where the
information was found.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
the assignment
requirements and
minimally followed the
template for this section.
The chart may be
incomplete, be inaccurate,
and/or contain irrelevant
information. Where the
information was found may
not have been included.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content:
Study
Summary
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A
one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article was excellent and
accurate. A strong direct
quotation from the article
that enhances the
section's quality has been
effectively and accurately
integrated into the
section. The article was
cited properly or close to
properly in-text and on
the reference page.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template for this section.
A one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article was good and
mostly accurate. A direct
quotation from the article
enhanced the section's
quality and was integrated
into the section relatively
well. The article was cited
mostly properly in-text and
on the reference page.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and minimally followed the
template for this section.
One or more of the
following were present. A
one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article needed multiple
corrections. A direct
quotation from the article
was non-existent or poorly
integrated into the section.
The article was improperly
cited or may not have been
cited in-text and on the
reference page.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Content:
Biblical
Comparison
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A
100 to 150-word
one-paragraph biblical
comparison was
excellent and accurate. A
biblical perspective with
citation was effectively
and accurately integrated
into this section. The
Bible/biblical resource
was cited properly or
close to properly in-text
and on the reference
page.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template for this section.
A 100 to 150-word
one-paragraph biblical
comparison was accurate
and well-developed. A
biblical perspective was
accurately integrated into
the section. The
Bible/biblical resource was
cited somewhat properly
in-text and on the
reference page.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and minimally followed the
template for this section.
One or more of the
following were present. A
one-paragraph 100 to
150-word biblical
comparison needed further
development. A biblical
perspective was not
present or could use
further development. The
Bible/biblical resource may
have been improperly cited
or may not have been cited
in-text and on the
reference page.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
Content:
Personal
Views
14 to >12 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A 75
to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
well to the prompts and
study. A degree of depth
and personal analysis
was conveyed.
12 to >11 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template well for this
section. A 75 to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
well to the prompts and
study.
11 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and somewhat followed the
template for this section. A
75 to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
somewhat to the prompts
and study.
0 pts
Not
Present
14 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure:
APA Format
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
structure expectations,
with only 2 or less areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text
citations and reference
page entries for the
Bible/biblical resource
and journal article made
use of proper APA
format. The title and
reference page were
properly integrated with
the correct content.
Demonstration of the
APA tips from Watch item
Best Practices in
Graduate Writing was
present.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper mostly met
structure expectations,
with less than 5 areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text
citations and reference
page entries for the
Bible/biblical resource and
journal article generally
made use of proper APA
format. The title and
reference page were
generally properly
integrated with the correct
content. Some evidence
of the APA tips from the
Watch item: Best
Practices in Graduate
Writing was present.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper minimally met
structure expectations,
with 5 or more areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text citations
and reference page entries
for the bible/biblical
resource and journal article
made improper use of APA
format. The title and/or
reference page may not
have been properly
integrated with the correct
content. Evidence of the
incorporation of the APA
tips from the Watch item
Best Practices in Graduate
Writing is needed.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Structure:
Grammar
and Spelling
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
structure expectations,
with less than 2 areas
needing correction in
grammar and/or spelling.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper is mostly met
structure expectations,
with 2 areas needing
correction in grammar
and/or spelling.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper needs further
development to meet
structure expectations with
3 or more areas needing
correction in grammar
and/or spelling.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Structure:
Structure,
Organization,
Flow
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
expectations in structure,
organization, and flow,
providing a congruent
paper that is easy to
follow and read. No
corrections are needed.
The narrative section of
the paper is 300 to 400
words and three
paragraphs. Best
Practices in Graduate
Writing was
demonstrated.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper mostly met
expectations with
structure, flow, and
organization, providing a
generally congruent paper
that is typically easy to
follow and read. Some
corrections are needed.
The body of the paper is
completed in three
paragraphs and 300 to
400 words. Best Practices
in Graduate Writing was
demonstrated.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper needs further
development to meet
expectations with
structure, flow, and
organization. The provided
text is an often incongruent
paper that is not always
easy to follow and read.
Many corrections are
needed. The body of the
paper may be completed in
more or less than three
paragraphs and outside of
the word count
requirements.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 120
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
**## GraduateParagraphAssignmentInstructions1.docx**
SOWK 500
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment Instructions**
Overview
This assignment provides you with the opportunity to practice graduate writing skills. You will use APA format and a professional voice. You will provide a summary, personal perspective, and biblical analysis of an article.
Instructions
Please keep in mind that
**Liberty University uses** **artificial intelligence-detecting software**. It detects the use of programs such as Grammarly, Google, ChatGPT, and many others. The use of artificial intelligence aids will result in earning zeros on assignments and sometimes an “F” in a course. The Department of Social Work realizes that many of you may be returning to school after many years or do not consider yourselves wonderful writers. Liberty University has an Online Writing Center to help you grow in your writing competency. We encourage you to use this resource.
**First** **Watch in Modules 3 & 4**: 1)
_Anatomy of a Research Journal Article_, 2)
_Anatomy of a Journal Article Video, and_ 3)
_Best Practices in Graduate Writing_
**Next**, take the
_Graduate Writing Quiz_.
The watch items and quiz will help prepare you for this writing assignment.
**Next**, read Trammel et al. (2020), which is a read item in this module.
**Next,** using the
**Graduate Paragraph Template** and the principles from the
**_Best Practices in Graduate Writing_** Watch item
**,** complete the chart, and write a 325 to 450-word graduate-level paper about the article in 3 paragraphs. The assignment will have an APA-style cover page and an APA-style reference page.
This paper will contain the following.
· A chart with some details of the study conducted by Trammel et al. (2020)
· A summary of the study conducted by Trammel et al. (2020)
· A biblical analysis of the topic. Compare the findings of the study to biblical principles
· Your personal views on the findings of the study including implications for you as a social work practitioner (use first person and personal examples)
· One sentence from Trammel et al. (2020) that contains a short quotation with an APA citation, which enhances the quality of the paragraph
· At least one in-text citation for a sentence that contains a paraphrase reflecting the intent of Trammel et al. (2020)
· At least one in-text citation for the biblical principle or verse(s) used to analyze the topic
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
**## GraduateParagraphTemplate1.docx**
Running head: TITLE OF PAPER 1
1
GRADUATE PARAGRAPH
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment**
Name
School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University
**Author Note**
Name
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Name
Email: xxx@liberty.edu
Delete everything in red and replace with applicable material.
**Graduate Paragraph Assignment**
Complete this Chart
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| **Questions** | **Information**<br>**_Bullets are fine_**<br>**_No need for full sentences_** | **Page, Paragraph, or Section Number(s) where Information was Found** |
| **What was the purpose of the study?** | | |
| **Who were the participants?** | | |
| **What did the participants do and for how long?** | | |
| **What was measured, how was it measured, and when was it measured?** | | |
| **What were the results?** | | |
| **How were the results determined?** | | |
The body of the paper is to be written in double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman font.
**The Study**
Use the information from the chart to write a summary of the study in one paragraph. .
**Biblical Comparison**
In one paragraph, compare the study to biblical principles.
**Personal Views**
In one paragraph, discuss your personal views in relation to the findings of study.
**References**
Remember to alphabetize this list
Cite whatever Bible version or biblical resource you use.
Use this as a resource for proper citation if you cite from the Bible and/or another book:
[https://libguides.liberty.edu/c.php?g=1036190&p=7511541](https://libguides.liberty.edu/c.php?g=1036190&p=7511541)
Cite the journal article
Author last name, initials, Last name, initial, & Last name, initial. (year). Name of article (first word capitalized and work after the ‘:’).
_Journal Name Italicized, volume number italicized_(issue number inside parentheses), page numbers. https://doi.org/number/number
Journal article information:
Authors: Trammel, R.C., Park, G., & Karlsson, I.
Year: 2020
Title: Religiously Oriented Mindfulness for Social Workers: Effects on Mindfulness, Heart Rate Variability, and Personal Burnout (remember to capitalize this according to APA format)
Journal Name: Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought
Volume Number: 40
Issue Number: 1
Page Numbers: 19-38
Doi:
[https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2020.1818358](https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2020.1818358)
**## GraduateParagraphGradingRubric1.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Content:
Chart
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. The
chart was accurately
completed with relevant
information, including
where the information
was found.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment the
requirements and
generally followed the
template well for this
section. The chart was
generally accurately
completed with mostly
relevant information,
including where the
information was found.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
the assignment
requirements and
minimally followed the
template for this section.
The chart may be
incomplete, be inaccurate,
and/or contain irrelevant
information. Where the
information was found may
not have been included.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Content:
Study
Summary
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A
one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article was excellent and
accurate. A strong direct
quotation from the article
that enhances the
section's quality has been
effectively and accurately
integrated into the
section. The article was
cited properly or close to
properly in-text and on
the reference page.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template for this section.
A one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article was good and
mostly accurate. A direct
quotation from the article
enhanced the section's
quality and was integrated
into the section relatively
well. The article was cited
mostly properly in-text and
on the reference page.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and minimally followed the
template for this section.
One or more of the
following were present. A
one-paragraph 150 to
200-word summary of the
article needed multiple
corrections. A direct
quotation from the article
was non-existent or poorly
integrated into the section.
The article was improperly
cited or may not have been
cited in-text and on the
reference page.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Content:
Biblical
Comparison
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A
100 to 150-word
one-paragraph biblical
comparison was
excellent and accurate. A
biblical perspective with
citation was effectively
and accurately integrated
into this section. The
Bible/biblical resource
was cited properly or
close to properly in-text
and on the reference
page.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template for this section.
A 100 to 150-word
one-paragraph biblical
comparison was accurate
and well-developed. A
biblical perspective was
accurately integrated into
the section. The
Bible/biblical resource was
cited somewhat properly
in-text and on the
reference page.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and minimally followed the
template for this section.
One or more of the
following were present. A
one-paragraph 100 to
150-word biblical
comparison needed further
development. A biblical
perspective was not
present or could use
further development. The
Bible/biblical resource may
have been improperly cited
or may not have been cited
in-text and on the
reference page.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
Content:
Personal
Views
14 to >12 pts
Advanced
The paper met or
exceeded the assignment
requirements and
followed the template
well for this section. A 75
to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
well to the prompts and
study. A degree of depth
and personal analysis
was conveyed.
12 to >11 pts
Proficient
The paper mostly met
assignment requirements
and generally followed the
template well for this
section. A 75 to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
well to the prompts and
study.
11 to >0 pts
Developing
The paper minimally met
assignment requirements
and somewhat followed the
template for this section. A
75 to 100-word
one-paragraph personal
views section connected
somewhat to the prompts
and study.
0 pts
Not
Present
14 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure:
APA Format
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
structure expectations,
with only 2 or less areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text
citations and reference
page entries for the
Bible/biblical resource
and journal article made
use of proper APA
format. The title and
reference page were
properly integrated with
the correct content.
Demonstration of the
APA tips from Watch item
Best Practices in
Graduate Writing was
present.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper mostly met
structure expectations,
with less than 5 areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text
citations and reference
page entries for the
Bible/biblical resource and
journal article generally
made use of proper APA
format. The title and
reference page were
generally properly
integrated with the correct
content. Some evidence
of the APA tips from the
Watch item: Best
Practices in Graduate
Writing was present.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper minimally met
structure expectations,
with 5 or more areas
needing correction in APA
format. The in-text citations
and reference page entries
for the bible/biblical
resource and journal article
made improper use of APA
format. The title and/or
reference page may not
have been properly
integrated with the correct
content. Evidence of the
incorporation of the APA
tips from the Watch item
Best Practices in Graduate
Writing is needed.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Structure:
Grammar
and Spelling
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
structure expectations,
with less than 2 areas
needing correction in
grammar and/or spelling.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper is mostly met
structure expectations,
with 2 areas needing
correction in grammar
and/or spelling.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper needs further
development to meet
structure expectations with
3 or more areas needing
correction in grammar
and/or spelling.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Structure:
Structure,
Organization,
Flow
12 to >10 pts
Advanced
Paper met or exceeded
expectations in structure,
organization, and flow,
providing a congruent
paper that is easy to
follow and read. No
corrections are needed.
The narrative section of
the paper is 300 to 400
words and three
paragraphs. Best
Practices in Graduate
Writing was
demonstrated.
10 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper mostly met
expectations with
structure, flow, and
organization, providing a
generally congruent paper
that is typically easy to
follow and read. Some
corrections are needed.
The body of the paper is
completed in three
paragraphs and 300 to
400 words. Best Practices
in Graduate Writing was
demonstrated.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper needs further
development to meet
expectations with
structure, flow, and
organization. The provided
text is an often incongruent
paper that is not always
easy to follow and read.
Many corrections are
needed. The body of the
paper may be completed in
more or less than three
paragraphs and outside of
the word count
requirements.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Total Points: 120
Graduate Paragraph Grading Rubric
– 1
– 2
– 3
Leave a Reply