My Blog

Category: Essay & Composition

  • [Solved] Help with English

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Help with English.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Week 7 comm

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    typically your program of study and the job you hope **files (2)** – ## Week7comm.docx – ## Week7Assignment_FinalProject-COMM120.pdf **## Week7comm.docx** **Goal:** The goal of the Week 7 Assignment: Final Project is for students to find, evaluate, and use carefully curated information and present …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    typically your program of study and the job you hope

    **files (2)**

    – ## Week7comm.docx

    – ## Week7Assignment_FinalProject-COMM120.pdf

    **## Week7comm.docx**

    **Goal:**

    The goal of the Week 7 Assignment: Final Project is for students to find, evaluate, and use carefully curated information and present this information to an audience to inform and enlighten.

    **Description:**

    For the Week 7 Final Project, you will present your topic and communicate it to an audience in a professional and informative manner. The topic for the COMM120 Final Project is typically your program of study and the job you hope to get with that degree or a topic that is unique to you (hobby, activity, non-controversial aspect of history,
    _et cetera_).

    The presentation should include the following broad ideas:

    · Active use of the Big6 Model

    · A discussion of the topic that you brainstormed during the  Week 3 Assignment

    · Effective use of the sources you found and vetted during the Week 5 Assignment

    · Effectively communicate the knowledge you have gained during COMM120

    When putting together your Week 7 Final Project, please consider the following:

    · The Final Project will be a presentation. You can use PowerPoint, Prezi, or some other easily accessible presentation software. Your presentation needs to include the following:

    · Introduction (1 slide)

    · Body (5-7 slides)

    · conclusion (1-2 slides)

    · Reference page (1-2 slides) that are properly formatted in the citation style of your degree program (APA, MLA, Chicago,
    _et cetera_)

    · Provide clear evidence that the topic was researched and that you built upon the Week 3 Topic and Brainstorming.

    · Provide clear evidence that you used the sources you found for the Week 5 Source Evaluation. You need to include at least
    **three** vetted quality sources, of which one must be from the APUS library.

    · The presentation will provide the audience with information to increase their knowledge of the topic presented.

    · The presentation should engage the audience by using elements such as images, graphs, and charts. Appropriate citations must be included.

    · Appropriate length: 8–12 slides.

    **Optional Multimedia:**

    If you have multimedia skills (digital literacy) and want to add creative content to your presentation, please do! Try to add any of the following enhancements, and as you do, think about how it will impact your presentation and improve communication with the intended audience.

    · Voice narration, closed captioning, script

    · Appropriate background music (must be cited on reference page)

    · Creative use of slide animations and transitions

    **Note**:

    The Week 7 Final Project is a presentation and must be turned in as a PowerPoint, a Prezi, or a different type of presentation software. If you chose something other than PowerPoint, you have to do the following:

    · Submit a link to the presentation, such as for Prezi.

    · Ensure that the faculty can open the presentation.

    · Turn in a document with the presentation material so it can go through Turnitin.

    · If you have a question, please contact your faculty member.

    **Assignment Guidelines**

    · Read all of the Learning Material in Weeks 1 – 7.

    · Make sure you followed the directions carefully and each source is fully described.

    · Thoroughly edit. One way to catch mistakes is by reading it out loud a minimum of three times.

    · Your submission will go through Turnitin and the AI Detector. Review the individual flags, decide why that text is flagged, and make corrections as appropriate.)

    · Please double-check that your assignment was submitted.

    For more information about how the Week 7: Final Project will be graded, please see the
    **grading rubric**.

    **## Week7Assignment_FinalProject-COMM120.pdf**

    COMM120 Week 7 Assignment Rubric
    Course: COMM120 B011 Summer 2026

    Criter
    ia

    EXEMPLARY Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Con

    tent

    kno

    wle

    dge

    / 40

    Org

    aniz

    atio

    n

    / 30

    40 points

    Student submit-

    ted a well-orga-

    nized presenta-

    tion that in-

    cludes clear evi-

    dence that the

    topic was re-

    searched, ex-

    panded upon

    the project plan,

    and provides

    the audience

    with substantive

    information that

    increases their

    knowledge of

    the topic

    34 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion that in-

    cludes evidence

    that the topic

    was researched,

    minimally ex-

    panded upon

    the project plan,

    and provides

    the audience

    with informa-

    tion that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    30 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion with mini-

    mal evidence

    that the topic

    was researched,

    did not improve

    the project plan,

    and did not pro-

    vide the audi-

    ence with infor-

    mation that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    26 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion that was

    not researched,

    did not improve

    the project plan,

    and did not pro-

    vide the audi-

    ence with infor-

    mation that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    30 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    conclusion, and

    properly format-

    ted

    reference/works

    cited page.

    25.5 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    conclusion, and

    reference/works

    cited page.

    22.5 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    and conclusion,

    but no

    reference/works

    cited page

    19.5 points

    The presenta-

    tion lacks a co-

    hesive organiza-

    tion or a

    reference/works

    cited page.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Criter
    ia

    EXEMPLARY Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Cre

    di-

    ble

    Sou

    rces

    / 15

    Wri

    ting

    Qua

    lity

    / 15

    15 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    three (3) vetted,

    credible sources

    of which one (1)

    is a scholarly

    source from the

    library.

    Reference

    page/works

    cited page

    included.

    12.75 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    two (2) vetted,

    credible sources

    of which one (1)

    is a scholarly

    source from the

    library.

    11.205 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    three (3) vetted,

    credible sources

    but none are

    scholarly

    sources from

    the library.

    9.75 points

    Includes and

    uses at one (1)

    or two (2) vet-

    ted, credible

    sources but

    none are schol-

    arly sources

    from the library.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    15 points

    The writing is

    accurate and

    free of errors.

    12.75 points

    There are occa-

    sional grammar,

    spelling, or me-

    chanical errors

    but they do not

    obscure the

    readability of

    the forum posts.

    11.25 points

    There are nu-

    merous gram-

    mar, spelling,

    and mechanical

    errors that are

    distracting but

    do not obscure

    the readability

    of the forum.

    9.75 points

    There are so

    many grammar,

    spelling, and

    mechanical er-

    rors that they

    obscure the

    meaning of the

    forum post.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    EXEMPLARY
    90 points minimum

    Accomplished
    80 points minimum

    Developing
    70 points minimum

    Beginning
    60 points minimum

    Did not attempt
    0 points minimum

    **## Week7Assignment_FinalProject-COMM120.pdf**

    COMM120 Week 7 Assignment Rubric
    Course: COMM120 B011 Summer 2026

    Criter
    ia

    EXEMPLARY Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Con

    tent

    kno

    wle

    dge

    / 40

    Org

    aniz

    atio

    n

    / 30

    40 points

    Student submit-

    ted a well-orga-

    nized presenta-

    tion that in-

    cludes clear evi-

    dence that the

    topic was re-

    searched, ex-

    panded upon

    the project plan,

    and provides

    the audience

    with substantive

    information that

    increases their

    knowledge of

    the topic

    34 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion that in-

    cludes evidence

    that the topic

    was researched,

    minimally ex-

    panded upon

    the project plan,

    and provides

    the audience

    with informa-

    tion that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    30 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion with mini-

    mal evidence

    that the topic

    was researched,

    did not improve

    the project plan,

    and did not pro-

    vide the audi-

    ence with infor-

    mation that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    26 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion that was

    not researched,

    did not improve

    the project plan,

    and did not pro-

    vide the audi-

    ence with infor-

    mation that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    30 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    conclusion, and

    properly format-

    ted

    reference/works

    cited page.

    25.5 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    conclusion, and

    reference/works

    cited page.

    22.5 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    and conclusion,

    but no

    reference/works

    cited page

    19.5 points

    The presenta-

    tion lacks a co-

    hesive organiza-

    tion or a

    reference/works

    cited page.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Criter
    ia

    EXEMPLARY Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Cre

    di-

    ble

    Sou

    rces

    / 15

    Wri

    ting

    Qua

    lity

    / 15

    15 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    three (3) vetted,

    credible sources

    of which one (1)

    is a scholarly

    source from the

    library.

    Reference

    page/works

    cited page

    included.

    12.75 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    two (2) vetted,

    credible sources

    of which one (1)

    is a scholarly

    source from the

    library.

    11.205 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    three (3) vetted,

    credible sources

    but none are

    scholarly

    sources from

    the library.

    9.75 points

    Includes and

    uses at one (1)

    or two (2) vet-

    ted, credible

    sources but

    none are schol-

    arly sources

    from the library.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    15 points

    The writing is

    accurate and

    free of errors.

    12.75 points

    There are occa-

    sional grammar,

    spelling, or me-

    chanical errors

    but they do not

    obscure the

    readability of

    the forum posts.

    11.25 points

    There are nu-

    merous gram-

    mar, spelling,

    and mechanical

    errors that are

    distracting but

    do not obscure

    the readability

    of the forum.

    9.75 points

    There are so

    many grammar,

    spelling, and

    mechanical er-

    rors that they

    obscure the

    meaning of the

    forum post.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    EXEMPLARY
    90 points minimum

    Accomplished
    80 points minimum

    Developing
    70 points minimum

    Beginning
    60 points minimum

    Did not attempt
    0 points minimum

    **## Week7comm.docx**

    **Goal:**

    The goal of the Week 7 Assignment: Final Project is for students to find, evaluate, and use carefully curated information and present this information to an audience to inform and enlighten.

    **Description:**

    For the Week 7 Final Project, you will present your topic and communicate it to an audience in a professional and informative manner. The topic for the COMM120 Final Project is typically your program of study and the job you hope to get with that degree or a topic that is unique to you (hobby, activity, non-controversial aspect of history,
    _et cetera_).

    The presentation should include the following broad ideas:

    · Active use of the Big6 Model

    · A discussion of the topic that you brainstormed during the  Week 3 Assignment

    · Effective use of the sources you found and vetted during the Week 5 Assignment

    · Effectively communicate the knowledge you have gained during COMM120

    When putting together your Week 7 Final Project, please consider the following:

    · The Final Project will be a presentation. You can use PowerPoint, Prezi, or some other easily accessible presentation software. Your presentation needs to include the following:

    · Introduction (1 slide)

    · Body (5-7 slides)

    · conclusion (1-2 slides)

    · Reference page (1-2 slides) that are properly formatted in the citation style of your degree program (APA, MLA, Chicago,
    _et cetera_)

    · Provide clear evidence that the topic was researched and that you built upon the Week 3 Topic and Brainstorming.

    · Provide clear evidence that you used the sources you found for the Week 5 Source Evaluation. You need to include at least
    **three** vetted quality sources, of which one must be from the APUS library.

    · The presentation will provide the audience with information to increase their knowledge of the topic presented.

    · The presentation should engage the audience by using elements such as images, graphs, and charts. Appropriate citations must be included.

    · Appropriate length: 8–12 slides.

    **Optional Multimedia:**

    If you have multimedia skills (digital literacy) and want to add creative content to your presentation, please do! Try to add any of the following enhancements, and as you do, think about how it will impact your presentation and improve communication with the intended audience.

    · Voice narration, closed captioning, script

    · Appropriate background music (must be cited on reference page)

    · Creative use of slide animations and transitions

    **Note**:

    The Week 7 Final Project is a presentation and must be turned in as a PowerPoint, a Prezi, or a different type of presentation software. If you chose something other than PowerPoint, you have to do the following:

    · Submit a link to the presentation, such as for Prezi.

    · Ensure that the faculty can open the presentation.

    · Turn in a document with the presentation material so it can go through Turnitin.

    · If you have a question, please contact your faculty member.

    **Assignment Guidelines**

    · Read all of the Learning Material in Weeks 1 – 7.

    · Make sure you followed the directions carefully and each source is fully described.

    · Thoroughly edit. One way to catch mistakes is by reading it out loud a minimum of three times.

    · Your submission will go through Turnitin and the AI Detector. Review the individual flags, decide why that text is flagged, and make corrections as appropriate.)

    · Please double-check that your assignment was submitted.

    For more information about how the Week 7: Final Project will be graded, please see the
    **grading rubric**.

    **## Week7Assignment_FinalProject-COMM120.pdf**

    COMM120 Week 7 Assignment Rubric
    Course: COMM120 B011 Summer 2026

    Criter
    ia

    EXEMPLARY Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Con

    tent

    kno

    wle

    dge

    / 40

    Org

    aniz

    atio

    n

    / 30

    40 points

    Student submit-

    ted a well-orga-

    nized presenta-

    tion that in-

    cludes clear evi-

    dence that the

    topic was re-

    searched, ex-

    panded upon

    the project plan,

    and provides

    the audience

    with substantive

    information that

    increases their

    knowledge of

    the topic

    34 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion that in-

    cludes evidence

    that the topic

    was researched,

    minimally ex-

    panded upon

    the project plan,

    and provides

    the audience

    with informa-

    tion that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    30 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion with mini-

    mal evidence

    that the topic

    was researched,

    did not improve

    the project plan,

    and did not pro-

    vide the audi-

    ence with infor-

    mation that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    26 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion that was

    not researched,

    did not improve

    the project plan,

    and did not pro-

    vide the audi-

    ence with infor-

    mation that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    30 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    conclusion, and

    properly format-

    ted

    reference/works

    cited page.

    25.5 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    conclusion, and

    reference/works

    cited page.

    22.5 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    and conclusion,

    but no

    reference/works

    cited page

    19.5 points

    The presenta-

    tion lacks a co-

    hesive organiza-

    tion or a

    reference/works

    cited page.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Criter
    ia

    EXEMPLARY Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Cre

    di-

    ble

    Sou

    rces

    / 15

    Wri

    ting

    Qua

    lity

    / 15

    15 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    three (3) vetted,

    credible sources

    of which one (1)

    is a scholarly

    source from the

    library.

    Reference

    page/works

    cited page

    included.

    12.75 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    two (2) vetted,

    credible sources

    of which one (1)

    is a scholarly

    source from the

    library.

    11.205 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    three (3) vetted,

    credible sources

    but none are

    scholarly

    sources from

    the library.

    9.75 points

    Includes and

    uses at one (1)

    or two (2) vet-

    ted, credible

    sources but

    none are schol-

    arly sources

    from the library.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    15 points

    The writing is

    accurate and

    free of errors.

    12.75 points

    There are occa-

    sional grammar,

    spelling, or me-

    chanical errors

    but they do not

    obscure the

    readability of

    the forum posts.

    11.25 points

    There are nu-

    merous gram-

    mar, spelling,

    and mechanical

    errors that are

    distracting but

    do not obscure

    the readability

    of the forum.

    9.75 points

    There are so

    many grammar,

    spelling, and

    mechanical er-

    rors that they

    obscure the

    meaning of the

    forum post.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    EXEMPLARY
    90 points minimum

    Accomplished
    80 points minimum

    Developing
    70 points minimum

    Beginning
    60 points minimum

    Did not attempt
    0 points minimum

    **## Week7comm.docx**

    **Goal:**

    The goal of the Week 7 Assignment: Final Project is for students to find, evaluate, and use carefully curated information and present this information to an audience to inform and enlighten.

    **Description:**

    For the Week 7 Final Project, you will present your topic and communicate it to an audience in a professional and informative manner. The topic for the COMM120 Final Project is typically your program of study and the job you hope to get with that degree or a topic that is unique to you (hobby, activity, non-controversial aspect of history,
    _et cetera_).

    The presentation should include the following broad ideas:

    · Active use of the Big6 Model

    · A discussion of the topic that you brainstormed during the  Week 3 Assignment

    · Effective use of the sources you found and vetted during the Week 5 Assignment

    · Effectively communicate the knowledge you have gained during COMM120

    When putting together your Week 7 Final Project, please consider the following:

    · The Final Project will be a presentation. You can use PowerPoint, Prezi, or some other easily accessible presentation software. Your presentation needs to include the following:

    · Introduction (1 slide)

    · Body (5-7 slides)

    · conclusion (1-2 slides)

    · Reference page (1-2 slides) that are properly formatted in the citation style of your degree program (APA, MLA, Chicago,
    _et cetera_)

    · Provide clear evidence that the topic was researched and that you built upon the Week 3 Topic and Brainstorming.

    · Provide clear evidence that you used the sources you found for the Week 5 Source Evaluation. You need to include at least
    **three** vetted quality sources, of which one must be from the APUS library.

    · The presentation will provide the audience with information to increase their knowledge of the topic presented.

    · The presentation should engage the audience by using elements such as images, graphs, and charts. Appropriate citations must be included.

    · Appropriate length: 8–12 slides.

    **Optional Multimedia:**

    If you have multimedia skills (digital literacy) and want to add creative content to your presentation, please do! Try to add any of the following enhancements, and as you do, think about how it will impact your presentation and improve communication with the intended audience.

    · Voice narration, closed captioning, script

    · Appropriate background music (must be cited on reference page)

    · Creative use of slide animations and transitions

    **Note**:

    The Week 7 Final Project is a presentation and must be turned in as a PowerPoint, a Prezi, or a different type of presentation software. If you chose something other than PowerPoint, you have to do the following:

    · Submit a link to the presentation, such as for Prezi.

    · Ensure that the faculty can open the presentation.

    · Turn in a document with the presentation material so it can go through Turnitin.

    · If you have a question, please contact your faculty member.

    **Assignment Guidelines**

    · Read all of the Learning Material in Weeks 1 – 7.

    · Make sure you followed the directions carefully and each source is fully described.

    · Thoroughly edit. One way to catch mistakes is by reading it out loud a minimum of three times.

    · Your submission will go through Turnitin and the AI Detector. Review the individual flags, decide why that text is flagged, and make corrections as appropriate.)

    · Please double-check that your assignment was submitted.

    For more information about how the Week 7: Final Project will be graded, please see the
    **grading rubric**.

    **## Week7Assignment_FinalProject-COMM120.pdf**

    COMM120 Week 7 Assignment Rubric
    Course: COMM120 B011 Summer 2026

    Criter
    ia

    EXEMPLARY Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Con

    tent

    kno

    wle

    dge

    / 40

    Org

    aniz

    atio

    n

    / 30

    40 points

    Student submit-

    ted a well-orga-

    nized presenta-

    tion that in-

    cludes clear evi-

    dence that the

    topic was re-

    searched, ex-

    panded upon

    the project plan,

    and provides

    the audience

    with substantive

    information that

    increases their

    knowledge of

    the topic

    34 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion that in-

    cludes evidence

    that the topic

    was researched,

    minimally ex-

    panded upon

    the project plan,

    and provides

    the audience

    with informa-

    tion that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    30 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion with mini-

    mal evidence

    that the topic

    was researched,

    did not improve

    the project plan,

    and did not pro-

    vide the audi-

    ence with infor-

    mation that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    26 points

    Student submit-

    ted a presenta-

    tion that was

    not researched,

    did not improve

    the project plan,

    and did not pro-

    vide the audi-

    ence with infor-

    mation that in-

    creases their

    knowledge of

    the topic.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    30 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    conclusion, and

    properly format-

    ted

    reference/works

    cited page.

    25.5 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    conclusion, and

    reference/works

    cited page.

    22.5 points

    The organiza-

    tion of the pre-

    sentation in-

    cludes an intro-

    duction, body,

    and conclusion,

    but no

    reference/works

    cited page

    19.5 points

    The presenta-

    tion lacks a co-

    hesive organiza-

    tion or a

    reference/works

    cited page.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Criter
    ia

    EXEMPLARY Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Cre

    di-

    ble

    Sou

    rces

    / 15

    Wri

    ting

    Qua

    lity

    / 15

    15 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    three (3) vetted,

    credible sources

    of which one (1)

    is a scholarly

    source from the

    library.

    Reference

    page/works

    cited page

    included.

    12.75 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    two (2) vetted,

    credible sources

    of which one (1)

    is a scholarly

    source from the

    library.

    11.205 points

    Includes and

    uses at least

    three (3) vetted,

    credible sources

    but none are

    scholarly

    sources from

    the library.

    9.75 points

    Includes and

    uses at one (1)

    or two (2) vet-

    ted, credible

    sources but

    none are schol-

    arly sources

    from the library.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    15 points

    The writing is

    accurate and

    free of errors.

    12.75 points

    There are occa-

    sional grammar,

    spelling, or me-

    chanical errors

    but they do not

    obscure the

    readability of

    the forum posts.

    11.25 points

    There are nu-

    merous gram-

    mar, spelling,

    and mechanical

    errors that are

    distracting but

    do not obscure

    the readability

    of the forum.

    9.75 points

    There are so

    many grammar,

    spelling, and

    mechanical er-

    rors that they

    obscure the

    meaning of the

    forum post.

    0 points

    Student

    did not

    attempt.

    EXEMPLARY
    90 points minimum

    Accomplished
    80 points minimum

    Developing
    70 points minimum

    Beginning
    60 points minimum

    Did not attempt
    0 points minimum

  • [Solved] Looking for help with Communications 101.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need help with communication assignments. **files (2)** – ## comm101specialoccasionspeech.docx – ## comm101informativespeech.docx **## comm101specialoccasionspeech.docx** **Instructions** For this assignment, please prepare and deliver a **3-5-minute special occasion speech**. Here are some guidelin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need help with communication assignments.

    **files (2)**

    – ## comm101specialoccasionspeech.docx

    – ## comm101informativespeech.docx

    **## comm101specialoccasionspeech.docx**

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, please prepare and deliver a
    **3-5-minute special occasion speech**. Here are some guidelines to follow for your project:

    · Choose an appropriate topic for a special occasion speech. This can be a toast, tribute, eulogy, introductory, acceptance, or inspirational speech of your choosing. Remember that the
    **purpose of a special occasion speech is to celebrate or commemorate** a special event such as a wedding or an anniversary.

    · Record yourself delivering your speech using a camera and save the recording. Your computer webcam should work just fine. Make sure you set up the recording to capture your gestures and expressions.

    · You may refer to notes or index cards during the speech; however, please be sure to maintain eye contact with the camera.

    You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you may also use external sources. All sources should be cited using APA format.

    **Formatting**

    Please write your project in APA format and submit it as the following:

    · Oral presentation video as a link to your cloud storage, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive, containing your work. Please ensure the privacy settings allow access. For example, if you're using Google Drive, make sure the file is set to 'anyone with the link can view'.

    · Additional visual aids (e.g., slideshows as a PowerPoint or Google Slides file) if applicable

    · A works cited page as a Word or Google Doc

    **Grading**

    Your project will be graded based on the following rubric:

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Category** | **Unacceptable (0-1)** | **Needs Improvement (2-3)** | **Good (4)** | **Excellent (5)** | **Total Possible Points** |
    | Purpose (x2) | Main points are nonexistent or irrelevant to overall purpose | Main points are difficult to identify or under-developed | Main points are clearly related to overall purpose | Main points are developed and well-supported, connecting clearly to overall purpose | 10 |
    | Clarity (x2) | Disorganized and illogical structure hinders understanding | Somewhat disorganized, but structure does not detract from understanding of main points | Structure is logical; main points are supported by organization | Organization is logical; structure enhances clarity and delivery of main ideas | 10 |
    | Language Use (x2) | Language is inappropriate for topic and audience; word choice is informal and demonstrates bias | Language is somewhat inappropriate for topic or audience; overuse of slang or jargon | Language is appropriate with minor usage of slang; no detectable bias | Language is formal, concise, and appropriate for topic; no slang or jargon and no detectable bias | 10 |
    | Delivery (x2) | Tone and gestures are inappropriate, offensive or distracting; pacing is unnatural with little to no eye contact | Tone and gestures are unnatural or somewhat distracting; poor pacing with regular breaks in eye contact; low engagement | Tone is appropriate and eye contact mostly maintained; comfortable gestures and pacing with a good level of engagement | Confident delivery with very natural tone, volume, gestures, and eye contact; great pacing and engagement | 10 |

    **## comm101informativespeech.docx**

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, please prepare and deliver a
    **5-7-minute informative speech** with accompanying visual aids. Here are some guidelines to follow for your project:

    · Choose an appropriate topic for an informative speech. We recommend choosing a topic you're familiar enough with that you can comfortably fill a 5-7-minute time period. Remember that the
    **purpose of an informative speech is to educate** those listening to you on your topic of choice. Informative speeches can be about objects, processes, concepts or an event.

    · Choose appropriate visual aids that would work best for your presentation, such as slideshows, poster boards, demonstrations, etc. If you choose to do a slideshow, please use PowerPoint or a suitable alternative (such as Google Slides).

    · Record yourself delivering your speech using a camera and save the recording. Your computer webcam should work just fine. Make sure you set up the recording to capture your gestures and expressions.

    · You may refer to notes or index cards during the speech; however, please be sure to maintain eye contact with the camera.

    You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you must also use
    **2 external sources**. All sources should be cited using APA format.

    **Formatting**

    Please write your project in APA format and submit it as the following:

    · Oral presentation video as a link to your cloud storage, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive, containing your work. Please ensure the privacy settings allow access. For example, if you're using Google Drive, make sure the file is set to 'anyone with the link can view'.

    · Additional visual aids (e.g., slideshows as a PowerPoint or Google Slides file) if applicable

    · A works cited page as a Word or Google Doc

    **Grading**

    Your project will be graded based on the following rubric:

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Category** | **Unacceptable (0-1)** | **Needs Improvement (2-3)** | **Good (4)** | **Excellent (5)** | **Total Possible Points** |
    | Purpose (x2) | Main points are nonexistent or irrelevant to overall purpose | Main points are difficult to identify or under-developed | Main points are clearly related to overall purpose | Main points are developed and well-supported, connecting clearly to overall purpose | 10 |
    | Clarity (x2) | Disorganized and illogical structure hinders understanding | Somewhat disorganized, but structure does not detract from understanding of main points | Structure is logical; main points are supported by organization | Organization is logical; structure enhances clarity and delivery of main ideas | 10 |
    | Subject Knowledge (x4) | Inaccurate or incorrect facts; unfamiliar and uncomfortable with topic; few or no sources cited if applicable. | Somewhat familiar with the topic; some incorrect knowledge; few source cited if applicable. | Comfortable with topic; not too reliant on notes; proper citation of sources if applicable. | Clear understanding and mastery of topic; proper use and citation of sources if applicable | 20 |
    | Language Use (x2) | Language is inappropriate for topic and audience; word choice is informal and demonstrates bias | Language is somewhat inappropriate for topic or audience; overuse of slang or jargon | Language is appropriate with minor usage of slang; no detectable bias | Language is formal, concise, and appropriate for topic; no slang or jargon and no detectable bias | 10 |
    | Delivery (x4) | Tone and gestures are inappropriate, offensive or distracting; pacing is unnatural with little to no eye contact | Tone and gestures are unnatural or somewhat distracting; poor pacing with regular breaks in eye contact; low engagement | Tone is appropriate and eye contact mostly maintained; comfortable gestures and pacing with a good level of engagement | Confident delivery with very natural tone, volume, gestures, and eye contact; great pacing and engagement | 20 |
    | Visual Aids (x2) | Visual aids are irrelevant or missing completely | Visuals are included, but some are irrelevant to the speech or unappealing | Relevant and engaging visuals support the speech | Highly engaging visuals enhance the speech without being distracting | 10 |

    **## comm101informativespeech.docx**

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, please prepare and deliver a
    **5-7-minute informative speech** with accompanying visual aids. Here are some guidelines to follow for your project:

    · Choose an appropriate topic for an informative speech. We recommend choosing a topic you're familiar enough with that you can comfortably fill a 5-7-minute time period. Remember that the
    **purpose of an informative speech is to educate** those listening to you on your topic of choice. Informative speeches can be about objects, processes, concepts or an event.

    · Choose appropriate visual aids that would work best for your presentation, such as slideshows, poster boards, demonstrations, etc. If you choose to do a slideshow, please use PowerPoint or a suitable alternative (such as Google Slides).

    · Record yourself delivering your speech using a camera and save the recording. Your computer webcam should work just fine. Make sure you set up the recording to capture your gestures and expressions.

    · You may refer to notes or index cards during the speech; however, please be sure to maintain eye contact with the camera.

    You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you must also use
    **2 external sources**. All sources should be cited using APA format.

    **Formatting**

    Please write your project in APA format and submit it as the following:

    · Oral presentation video as a link to your cloud storage, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive, containing your work. Please ensure the privacy settings allow access. For example, if you're using Google Drive, make sure the file is set to 'anyone with the link can view'.

    · Additional visual aids (e.g., slideshows as a PowerPoint or Google Slides file) if applicable

    · A works cited page as a Word or Google Doc

    **Grading**

    Your project will be graded based on the following rubric:

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Category** | **Unacceptable (0-1)** | **Needs Improvement (2-3)** | **Good (4)** | **Excellent (5)** | **Total Possible Points** |
    | Purpose (x2) | Main points are nonexistent or irrelevant to overall purpose | Main points are difficult to identify or under-developed | Main points are clearly related to overall purpose | Main points are developed and well-supported, connecting clearly to overall purpose | 10 |
    | Clarity (x2) | Disorganized and illogical structure hinders understanding | Somewhat disorganized, but structure does not detract from understanding of main points | Structure is logical; main points are supported by organization | Organization is logical; structure enhances clarity and delivery of main ideas | 10 |
    | Subject Knowledge (x4) | Inaccurate or incorrect facts; unfamiliar and uncomfortable with topic; few or no sources cited if applicable. | Somewhat familiar with the topic; some incorrect knowledge; few source cited if applicable. | Comfortable with topic; not too reliant on notes; proper citation of sources if applicable. | Clear understanding and mastery of topic; proper use and citation of sources if applicable | 20 |
    | Language Use (x2) | Language is inappropriate for topic and audience; word choice is informal and demonstrates bias | Language is somewhat inappropriate for topic or audience; overuse of slang or jargon | Language is appropriate with minor usage of slang; no detectable bias | Language is formal, concise, and appropriate for topic; no slang or jargon and no detectable bias | 10 |
    | Delivery (x4) | Tone and gestures are inappropriate, offensive or distracting; pacing is unnatural with little to no eye contact | Tone and gestures are unnatural or somewhat distracting; poor pacing with regular breaks in eye contact; low engagement | Tone is appropriate and eye contact mostly maintained; comfortable gestures and pacing with a good level of engagement | Confident delivery with very natural tone, volume, gestures, and eye contact; great pacing and engagement | 20 |
    | Visual Aids (x2) | Visual aids are irrelevant or missing completely | Visuals are included, but some are irrelevant to the speech or unappealing | Relevant and engaging visuals support the speech | Highly engaging visuals enhance the speech without being distracting | 10 |

    **## comm101specialoccasionspeech.docx**

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, please prepare and deliver a
    **3-5-minute special occasion speech**. Here are some guidelines to follow for your project:

    · Choose an appropriate topic for a special occasion speech. This can be a toast, tribute, eulogy, introductory, acceptance, or inspirational speech of your choosing. Remember that the
    **purpose of a special occasion speech is to celebrate or commemorate** a special event such as a wedding or an anniversary.

    · Record yourself delivering your speech using a camera and save the recording. Your computer webcam should work just fine. Make sure you set up the recording to capture your gestures and expressions.

    · You may refer to notes or index cards during the speech; however, please be sure to maintain eye contact with the camera.

    You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you may also use external sources. All sources should be cited using APA format.

    **Formatting**

    Please write your project in APA format and submit it as the following:

    · Oral presentation video as a link to your cloud storage, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive, containing your work. Please ensure the privacy settings allow access. For example, if you're using Google Drive, make sure the file is set to 'anyone with the link can view'.

    · Additional visual aids (e.g., slideshows as a PowerPoint or Google Slides file) if applicable

    · A works cited page as a Word or Google Doc

    **Grading**

    Your project will be graded based on the following rubric:

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Category** | **Unacceptable (0-1)** | **Needs Improvement (2-3)** | **Good (4)** | **Excellent (5)** | **Total Possible Points** |
    | Purpose (x2) | Main points are nonexistent or irrelevant to overall purpose | Main points are difficult to identify or under-developed | Main points are clearly related to overall purpose | Main points are developed and well-supported, connecting clearly to overall purpose | 10 |
    | Clarity (x2) | Disorganized and illogical structure hinders understanding | Somewhat disorganized, but structure does not detract from understanding of main points | Structure is logical; main points are supported by organization | Organization is logical; structure enhances clarity and delivery of main ideas | 10 |
    | Language Use (x2) | Language is inappropriate for topic and audience; word choice is informal and demonstrates bias | Language is somewhat inappropriate for topic or audience; overuse of slang or jargon | Language is appropriate with minor usage of slang; no detectable bias | Language is formal, concise, and appropriate for topic; no slang or jargon and no detectable bias | 10 |
    | Delivery (x2) | Tone and gestures are inappropriate, offensive or distracting; pacing is unnatural with little to no eye contact | Tone and gestures are unnatural or somewhat distracting; poor pacing with regular breaks in eye contact; low engagement | Tone is appropriate and eye contact mostly maintained; comfortable gestures and pacing with a good level of engagement | Confident delivery with very natural tone, volume, gestures, and eye contact; great pacing and engagement | 10 |

    **## comm101informativespeech.docx**

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, please prepare and deliver a
    **5-7-minute informative speech** with accompanying visual aids. Here are some guidelines to follow for your project:

    · Choose an appropriate topic for an informative speech. We recommend choosing a topic you're familiar enough with that you can comfortably fill a 5-7-minute time period. Remember that the
    **purpose of an informative speech is to educate** those listening to you on your topic of choice. Informative speeches can be about objects, processes, concepts or an event.

    · Choose appropriate visual aids that would work best for your presentation, such as slideshows, poster boards, demonstrations, etc. If you choose to do a slideshow, please use PowerPoint or a suitable alternative (such as Google Slides).

    · Record yourself delivering your speech using a camera and save the recording. Your computer webcam should work just fine. Make sure you set up the recording to capture your gestures and expressions.

    · You may refer to notes or index cards during the speech; however, please be sure to maintain eye contact with the camera.

    You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you must also use
    **2 external sources**. All sources should be cited using APA format.

    **Formatting**

    Please write your project in APA format and submit it as the following:

    · Oral presentation video as a link to your cloud storage, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive, containing your work. Please ensure the privacy settings allow access. For example, if you're using Google Drive, make sure the file is set to 'anyone with the link can view'.

    · Additional visual aids (e.g., slideshows as a PowerPoint or Google Slides file) if applicable

    · A works cited page as a Word or Google Doc

    **Grading**

    Your project will be graded based on the following rubric:

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Category** | **Unacceptable (0-1)** | **Needs Improvement (2-3)** | **Good (4)** | **Excellent (5)** | **Total Possible Points** |
    | Purpose (x2) | Main points are nonexistent or irrelevant to overall purpose | Main points are difficult to identify or under-developed | Main points are clearly related to overall purpose | Main points are developed and well-supported, connecting clearly to overall purpose | 10 |
    | Clarity (x2) | Disorganized and illogical structure hinders understanding | Somewhat disorganized, but structure does not detract from understanding of main points | Structure is logical; main points are supported by organization | Organization is logical; structure enhances clarity and delivery of main ideas | 10 |
    | Subject Knowledge (x4) | Inaccurate or incorrect facts; unfamiliar and uncomfortable with topic; few or no sources cited if applicable. | Somewhat familiar with the topic; some incorrect knowledge; few source cited if applicable. | Comfortable with topic; not too reliant on notes; proper citation of sources if applicable. | Clear understanding and mastery of topic; proper use and citation of sources if applicable | 20 |
    | Language Use (x2) | Language is inappropriate for topic and audience; word choice is informal and demonstrates bias | Language is somewhat inappropriate for topic or audience; overuse of slang or jargon | Language is appropriate with minor usage of slang; no detectable bias | Language is formal, concise, and appropriate for topic; no slang or jargon and no detectable bias | 10 |
    | Delivery (x4) | Tone and gestures are inappropriate, offensive or distracting; pacing is unnatural with little to no eye contact | Tone and gestures are unnatural or somewhat distracting; poor pacing with regular breaks in eye contact; low engagement | Tone is appropriate and eye contact mostly maintained; comfortable gestures and pacing with a good level of engagement | Confident delivery with very natural tone, volume, gestures, and eye contact; great pacing and engagement | 20 |
    | Visual Aids (x2) | Visual aids are irrelevant or missing completely | Visuals are included, but some are irrelevant to the speech or unappealing | Relevant and engaging visuals support the speech | Highly engaging visuals enhance the speech without being distracting | 10 |

    **## comm101specialoccasionspeech.docx**

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, please prepare and deliver a
    **3-5-minute special occasion speech**. Here are some guidelines to follow for your project:

    · Choose an appropriate topic for a special occasion speech. This can be a toast, tribute, eulogy, introductory, acceptance, or inspirational speech of your choosing. Remember that the
    **purpose of a special occasion speech is to celebrate or commemorate** a special event such as a wedding or an anniversary.

    · Record yourself delivering your speech using a camera and save the recording. Your computer webcam should work just fine. Make sure you set up the recording to capture your gestures and expressions.

    · You may refer to notes or index cards during the speech; however, please be sure to maintain eye contact with the camera.

    You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you may also use external sources. All sources should be cited using APA format.

    **Formatting**

    Please write your project in APA format and submit it as the following:

    · Oral presentation video as a link to your cloud storage, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive, containing your work. Please ensure the privacy settings allow access. For example, if you're using Google Drive, make sure the file is set to 'anyone with the link can view'.

    · Additional visual aids (e.g., slideshows as a PowerPoint or Google Slides file) if applicable

    · A works cited page as a Word or Google Doc

    **Grading**

    Your project will be graded based on the following rubric:

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Category** | **Unacceptable (0-1)** | **Needs Improvement (2-3)** | **Good (4)** | **Excellent (5)** | **Total Possible Points** |
    | Purpose (x2) | Main points are nonexistent or irrelevant to overall purpose | Main points are difficult to identify or under-developed | Main points are clearly related to overall purpose | Main points are developed and well-supported, connecting clearly to overall purpose | 10 |
    | Clarity (x2) | Disorganized and illogical structure hinders understanding | Somewhat disorganized, but structure does not detract from understanding of main points | Structure is logical; main points are supported by organization | Organization is logical; structure enhances clarity and delivery of main ideas | 10 |
    | Language Use (x2) | Language is inappropriate for topic and audience; word choice is informal and demonstrates bias | Language is somewhat inappropriate for topic or audience; overuse of slang or jargon | Language is appropriate with minor usage of slang; no detectable bias | Language is formal, concise, and appropriate for topic; no slang or jargon and no detectable bias | 10 |
    | Delivery (x2) | Tone and gestures are inappropriate, offensive or distracting; pacing is unnatural with little to no eye contact | Tone and gestures are unnatural or somewhat distracting; poor pacing with regular breaks in eye contact; low engagement | Tone is appropriate and eye contact mostly maintained; comfortable gestures and pacing with a good level of engagement | Confident delivery with very natural tone, volume, gestures, and eye contact; great pacing and engagement | 10 |

    **## comm101informativespeech.docx**

    **Instructions**

    For this assignment, please prepare and deliver a
    **5-7-minute informative speech** with accompanying visual aids. Here are some guidelines to follow for your project:

    · Choose an appropriate topic for an informative speech. We recommend choosing a topic you're familiar enough with that you can comfortably fill a 5-7-minute time period. Remember that the
    **purpose of an informative speech is to educate** those listening to you on your topic of choice. Informative speeches can be about objects, processes, concepts or an event.

    · Choose appropriate visual aids that would work best for your presentation, such as slideshows, poster boards, demonstrations, etc. If you choose to do a slideshow, please use PowerPoint or a suitable alternative (such as Google Slides).

    · Record yourself delivering your speech using a camera and save the recording. Your computer webcam should work just fine. Make sure you set up the recording to capture your gestures and expressions.

    · You may refer to notes or index cards during the speech; however, please be sure to maintain eye contact with the camera.

    You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you must also use
    **2 external sources**. All sources should be cited using APA format.

    **Formatting**

    Please write your project in APA format and submit it as the following:

    · Oral presentation video as a link to your cloud storage, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive, containing your work. Please ensure the privacy settings allow access. For example, if you're using Google Drive, make sure the file is set to 'anyone with the link can view'.

    · Additional visual aids (e.g., slideshows as a PowerPoint or Google Slides file) if applicable

    · A works cited page as a Word or Google Doc

    **Grading**

    Your project will be graded based on the following rubric:

    | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Category** | **Unacceptable (0-1)** | **Needs Improvement (2-3)** | **Good (4)** | **Excellent (5)** | **Total Possible Points** |
    | Purpose (x2) | Main points are nonexistent or irrelevant to overall purpose | Main points are difficult to identify or under-developed | Main points are clearly related to overall purpose | Main points are developed and well-supported, connecting clearly to overall purpose | 10 |
    | Clarity (x2) | Disorganized and illogical structure hinders understanding | Somewhat disorganized, but structure does not detract from understanding of main points | Structure is logical; main points are supported by organization | Organization is logical; structure enhances clarity and delivery of main ideas | 10 |
    | Subject Knowledge (x4) | Inaccurate or incorrect facts; unfamiliar and uncomfortable with topic; few or no sources cited if applicable. | Somewhat familiar with the topic; some incorrect knowledge; few source cited if applicable. | Comfortable with topic; not too reliant on notes; proper citation of sources if applicable. | Clear understanding and mastery of topic; proper use and citation of sources if applicable | 20 |
    | Language Use (x2) | Language is inappropriate for topic and audience; word choice is informal and demonstrates bias | Language is somewhat inappropriate for topic or audience; overuse of slang or jargon | Language is appropriate with minor usage of slang; no detectable bias | Language is formal, concise, and appropriate for topic; no slang or jargon and no detectable bias | 10 |
    | Delivery (x4) | Tone and gestures are inappropriate, offensive or distracting; pacing is unnatural with little to no eye contact | Tone and gestures are unnatural or somewhat distracting; poor pacing with regular breaks in eye contact; low engagement | Tone is appropriate and eye contact mostly maintained; comfortable gestures and pacing with a good level of engagement | Confident delivery with very natural tone, volume, gestures, and eye contact; great pacing and engagement | 20 |
    | Visual Aids (x2) | Visual aids are irrelevant or missing completely | Visuals are included, but some are irrelevant to the speech or unappealing | Relevant and engaging visuals support the speech | Highly engaging visuals enhance the speech without being distracting | 10 |

  • [Solved] temp 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering temp 1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] DB1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Respond to below discussion board questions with 300 word minimum response 1. What are you looking for in this class? Advanced Topics in Organizational Management 2. Complete Exercise 3 in DTL Workbook (p. 6-7) and summarize results in DB Post (Note: You may not be currently working with a team an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Respond to below discussion board questions with 300 word minimum response

    1. What are you looking for in this class? Advanced Topics in Organizational Management

    2. Complete Exercise 3 in DTL Workbook (p. 6-7) and summarize results in DB Post (Note: You may not be currently working with a team and that's okay. Think back to previous experiences and Specifically tackle the first paragraph: _Think about this list of behaviors, then write down the three that you think present the most significant barriers to courageous leadership amongst groups or teams_

    – [\
    \
    DTL-Read-Along-Workbook_092221-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dtl-read-along-workbook-092221-1-pdf "DTL-Read-Along-Workbook_092221-1.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    BrownIntroductionP.3-15-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/brownintroductionp-3-15-1-pdf "BrownIntroductionP.3-15-1.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    MoLChapter1-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/molchapter1-1-pdf "MoLChapter1-1.pdf")

  • [Solved] Theory

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (2)** – ## Assignment1_NursingTheoryPaper1.pdf – EBSCO-FullText-08_26_2026.pdf **## Assignment1_NursingTheoryPaper1.pdf** Please write a 3–4 page nursing theory paper on Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings, excluding the title and reference pages. Use the EBSCO PDF as the main…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (2)**

    – ## Assignment1_NursingTheoryPaper1.pdf

    – EBSCO-FullText-08_26_2026.pdf

    **## Assignment1_NursingTheoryPaper1.pdf**

    Please write a 3–4 page nursing theory paper on Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human
    Beings, excluding the title and reference pages. Use the EBSCO PDF as the main scholarly
    guide/source for developing the paper while following all requirements in the assignment rubric. Also
    use the Nurses labs sources provided in the assignment: Martha Rogers – Science of Unitary
    Human Beings: https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/ and Nursing
    Theories and Theorists: https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#. Include and properly cite the
    information from these sources explaining that in 1970, Martha Rogers viewed nursing as both a
    science and an art that provides a way of viewing the unitary human being as integral with the
    universe. Explain the major concepts of Rogers’ theory, including Person, defined as an indivisible,
    energy field identified by a pattern whose whole cannot be predicted simply by examining its
    individual parts; Health, defined as an expression of the life process; Nursing, which aims to assist
    people in achieving their maximum health potential; and Environment, which involves unitary,
    irreducible, and indivisible human and environmental fields, or people and their world. Use the
    EBSCO article to further develop these concepts and explain energy fields, pattern, openness, and
    integrality, as well as the relationship between humans, their environments, health, and well-being.
    The paper should follow APA 7th edition, be written entirely in third person, and include
    appropriate Level 1 and Level 2 headings. Begin with an introductory paragraph containing a clear
    purpose statement, summarize the principles and key concepts of the theory, explain the significance
    of the theory to nursing practice with an example from an organizational or healthcare setting, and
    describe how the theory could be implemented in nursing practice while maintaining third-person
    writing. End with a clear conclusion summarizing the main points. Include at least three references
    from professional peer-reviewed nursing journals, use appropriate APA in-text citations
    throughout, and list the references alphabetically. The Hedlund (2023) EBSCO article should be
    used throughout the paper as a guide, particularly when connecting Rogers’ theory to nursing
    practice, work environments, and nurses’ health and well-being. All source information should be
    paraphrased rather than copied directly, with proper APA citations.

    [https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/](https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/)

    [https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#](https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#)

    **EBSCO-FullText-08_26_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-08-26-2026-pdf)

    **EBSCO-FullText-08_26_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-08-26-2026-pdf)

    **## Assignment1_NursingTheoryPaper1.pdf**

    Please write a 3–4 page nursing theory paper on Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human
    Beings, excluding the title and reference pages. Use the EBSCO PDF as the main scholarly
    guide/source for developing the paper while following all requirements in the assignment rubric. Also
    use the Nurses labs sources provided in the assignment: Martha Rogers – Science of Unitary
    Human Beings: https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/ and Nursing
    Theories and Theorists: https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#. Include and properly cite the
    information from these sources explaining that in 1970, Martha Rogers viewed nursing as both a
    science and an art that provides a way of viewing the unitary human being as integral with the
    universe. Explain the major concepts of Rogers’ theory, including Person, defined as an indivisible,
    energy field identified by a pattern whose whole cannot be predicted simply by examining its
    individual parts; Health, defined as an expression of the life process; Nursing, which aims to assist
    people in achieving their maximum health potential; and Environment, which involves unitary,
    irreducible, and indivisible human and environmental fields, or people and their world. Use the
    EBSCO article to further develop these concepts and explain energy fields, pattern, openness, and
    integrality, as well as the relationship between humans, their environments, health, and well-being.
    The paper should follow APA 7th edition, be written entirely in third person, and include
    appropriate Level 1 and Level 2 headings. Begin with an introductory paragraph containing a clear
    purpose statement, summarize the principles and key concepts of the theory, explain the significance
    of the theory to nursing practice with an example from an organizational or healthcare setting, and
    describe how the theory could be implemented in nursing practice while maintaining third-person
    writing. End with a clear conclusion summarizing the main points. Include at least three references
    from professional peer-reviewed nursing journals, use appropriate APA in-text citations
    throughout, and list the references alphabetically. The Hedlund (2023) EBSCO article should be
    used throughout the paper as a guide, particularly when connecting Rogers’ theory to nursing
    practice, work environments, and nurses’ health and well-being. All source information should be
    paraphrased rather than copied directly, with proper APA citations.

    [https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/](https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/)

    [https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#](https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#)

    **EBSCO-FullText-08_26_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-08-26-2026-pdf)

    **## Assignment1_NursingTheoryPaper1.pdf**

    Please write a 3–4 page nursing theory paper on Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human
    Beings, excluding the title and reference pages. Use the EBSCO PDF as the main scholarly
    guide/source for developing the paper while following all requirements in the assignment rubric. Also
    use the Nurses labs sources provided in the assignment: Martha Rogers – Science of Unitary
    Human Beings: https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/ and Nursing
    Theories and Theorists: https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#. Include and properly cite the
    information from these sources explaining that in 1970, Martha Rogers viewed nursing as both a
    science and an art that provides a way of viewing the unitary human being as integral with the
    universe. Explain the major concepts of Rogers’ theory, including Person, defined as an indivisible,
    energy field identified by a pattern whose whole cannot be predicted simply by examining its
    individual parts; Health, defined as an expression of the life process; Nursing, which aims to assist
    people in achieving their maximum health potential; and Environment, which involves unitary,
    irreducible, and indivisible human and environmental fields, or people and their world. Use the
    EBSCO article to further develop these concepts and explain energy fields, pattern, openness, and
    integrality, as well as the relationship between humans, their environments, health, and well-being.
    The paper should follow APA 7th edition, be written entirely in third person, and include
    appropriate Level 1 and Level 2 headings. Begin with an introductory paragraph containing a clear
    purpose statement, summarize the principles and key concepts of the theory, explain the significance
    of the theory to nursing practice with an example from an organizational or healthcare setting, and
    describe how the theory could be implemented in nursing practice while maintaining third-person
    writing. End with a clear conclusion summarizing the main points. Include at least three references
    from professional peer-reviewed nursing journals, use appropriate APA in-text citations
    throughout, and list the references alphabetically. The Hedlund (2023) EBSCO article should be
    used throughout the paper as a guide, particularly when connecting Rogers’ theory to nursing
    practice, work environments, and nurses’ health and well-being. All source information should be
    paraphrased rather than copied directly, with proper APA citations.

    [https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/](https://nurseslabs.com/martha-e-rogers-theory-unitary-human-beings/)

    [https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#](https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-theories/#)

    **EBSCO-FullText-08_26_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-08-26-2026-pdf)

  • [Solved] Remove plagiarism

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attach **files (2)** – ## Task.docx – sample.doc **## Task.docx** **Healthcare Case** **A. Case Study** The selected case study is **Case Study #1: Healthcare Case**. The case involves two geriatric nurses, Anika and Daniel, who disagree about the appropriate treatment for a patient whose dement…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attach

    **files (2)**

    – ## Task.docx

    – sample.doc

    **## Task.docx**

    **Healthcare Case**

    **A. Case Study**

    The selected case study is
    **Case Study #1: Healthcare Case**. The case involves two geriatric nurses, Anika and Daniel, who disagree about the appropriate treatment for a patient whose dementia is worsening. Anika supports continuing the doctor's prescribed treatment, while Daniel believes an alternative sound therapy should be tried.

    **B. Premise(s) and Conclusion**

    The following argument is Anika's argument regarding the continued use of cholinesterase inhibitors:

    **Premise 1:** The doctor's orders to use cholinesterase inhibitors are based on peer-reviewed literature.

    **Premise 2:** Rigorous testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine, which helps brain cells communicate.

    **Conclusion:** Continuing to follow the doctor's orders and use the cholinesterase inhibitors is likely to help the patient.

    These premises and conclusion represent one distinct argument made by Anika in support of continuing the patient's prescribed treatment.

    **B1. Deductive/Inductive**

    **Type: Inductive**

    Anika's argument is inductive because the premises provide evidence that makes the conclusion probable rather than certain. The peer-reviewed literature and rigorous testing provide support for the effectiveness of the cholinesterase inhibitors. However, these facts do not guarantee that the medication will improve the condition of this particular patient. Anika states that following the doctor's orders is
    **likely** to help the patient, which indicates that her conclusion is based on probability. Therefore, the argument is inductive rather than deductive.

    **B2. Validity/Strength**

    **Strength: Strong**

    Anika's argument is a strong inductive argument because the premises provide relevant evidence that makes the conclusion reasonably probable. The doctor's treatment instructions are supported by peer-reviewed literature, and rigorous testing has demonstrated that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine. Both premises directly support Anika's conclusion that continuing the treatment is likely to help the patient. Although the evidence cannot guarantee improvement for this individual patient, it provides substantial support for the conclusion. Therefore, the argument can reasonably be classified as a strong inductive argument.

    **C. Argument Map**

    The propositions in the argument are numbered as follows:

    **① Premise 1:** The doctor's orders to use cholinesterase inhibitors are based on peer-reviewed literature.

    **② Premise 2:** Rigorous testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine.

    **③ Conclusion:** Continuing to follow the doctor's orders and use the cholinesterase inhibitors is likely to help the patient.

    **Argument Map:**

    **① + ②** **↓** **③**

    Premises ① and ② work together to support conclusion ③. In the submitted Word document, the propositions should be placed inside numbered circles with arrows showing their support for the conclusion, as required by the task instructions. The supporting instructions specifically direct the student to represent propositions with numbered circles and their support relationships with arrows.

    **D. Information Source**

    One information source identified in the case study is the
    **peer-reviewed literature supporting the doctor's orders regarding cholinesterase inhibitors**. Anika refers to this research as evidence supporting the continued use of the prescribed treatment.

    **D1. Reliability**

    The peer-reviewed literature is presented as a reliable source of information in the case study because it has undergone peer review and is supported by rigorous testing. The case explains that testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine. This provides research-based support for the treatment rather than relying solely on an individual's opinion or personal experience. The source is therefore more reliable than the online forum comments, personal anecdote, and wellness influencer endorsement Daniel uses to support sound therapy.

    **E. Bias Name**

    **Confirmation Bias**

    Daniel demonstrates confirmation bias in the healthcare case study. He already believes that mainstream treatments recommended by doctors never work and evaluates the available information from the perspective of that existing belief.

    **E1. Bias Impact**

    Daniel's confirmation bias affects his reasoning because it causes him to favor information that supports his existing belief while rejecting information that conflicts with it. He dismisses the peer-reviewed research and testing supporting the doctor's treatment because he already believes mainstream treatments do not work. He then searches for alternative treatments and accepts information from an online health forum, his personal experience involving his grandmother, and a wellness influencer discussing a sound therapy device. This bias makes his evaluation of the evidence less objective because he gives greater consideration to information that agrees with what he already believes while discounting evidence that challenges his position.

    **F. Fallacy Name**

    **Ad Hominem**

    **F1. Fallacy**

    Daniel uses an ad hominem fallacy when he responds to Anika's concerns about sound therapy by attacking an irrelevant personal characteristic instead of addressing her reasoning. Daniel tells Anika that because she is from the Midwest, her medical reasoning should not be trusted. Her geographic background has no logical relationship to whether her medical reasoning or evidence is correct. By focusing on where Anika is from rather than responding to the evidence she presents, Daniel attempts to discredit Anika personally instead of addressing the actual argument. This is an example of an ad hominem fallacy.

    **G. Sources**

    Case study

    **sample.doc**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-doc-10589527)

    **sample.doc**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-doc-10589527)

    **## Task.docx**

    **Healthcare Case**

    **A. Case Study**

    The selected case study is
    **Case Study #1: Healthcare Case**. The case involves two geriatric nurses, Anika and Daniel, who disagree about the appropriate treatment for a patient whose dementia is worsening. Anika supports continuing the doctor's prescribed treatment, while Daniel believes an alternative sound therapy should be tried.

    **B. Premise(s) and Conclusion**

    The following argument is Anika's argument regarding the continued use of cholinesterase inhibitors:

    **Premise 1:** The doctor's orders to use cholinesterase inhibitors are based on peer-reviewed literature.

    **Premise 2:** Rigorous testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine, which helps brain cells communicate.

    **Conclusion:** Continuing to follow the doctor's orders and use the cholinesterase inhibitors is likely to help the patient.

    These premises and conclusion represent one distinct argument made by Anika in support of continuing the patient's prescribed treatment.

    **B1. Deductive/Inductive**

    **Type: Inductive**

    Anika's argument is inductive because the premises provide evidence that makes the conclusion probable rather than certain. The peer-reviewed literature and rigorous testing provide support for the effectiveness of the cholinesterase inhibitors. However, these facts do not guarantee that the medication will improve the condition of this particular patient. Anika states that following the doctor's orders is
    **likely** to help the patient, which indicates that her conclusion is based on probability. Therefore, the argument is inductive rather than deductive.

    **B2. Validity/Strength**

    **Strength: Strong**

    Anika's argument is a strong inductive argument because the premises provide relevant evidence that makes the conclusion reasonably probable. The doctor's treatment instructions are supported by peer-reviewed literature, and rigorous testing has demonstrated that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine. Both premises directly support Anika's conclusion that continuing the treatment is likely to help the patient. Although the evidence cannot guarantee improvement for this individual patient, it provides substantial support for the conclusion. Therefore, the argument can reasonably be classified as a strong inductive argument.

    **C. Argument Map**

    The propositions in the argument are numbered as follows:

    **① Premise 1:** The doctor's orders to use cholinesterase inhibitors are based on peer-reviewed literature.

    **② Premise 2:** Rigorous testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine.

    **③ Conclusion:** Continuing to follow the doctor's orders and use the cholinesterase inhibitors is likely to help the patient.

    **Argument Map:**

    **① + ②** **↓** **③**

    Premises ① and ② work together to support conclusion ③. In the submitted Word document, the propositions should be placed inside numbered circles with arrows showing their support for the conclusion, as required by the task instructions. The supporting instructions specifically direct the student to represent propositions with numbered circles and their support relationships with arrows.

    **D. Information Source**

    One information source identified in the case study is the
    **peer-reviewed literature supporting the doctor's orders regarding cholinesterase inhibitors**. Anika refers to this research as evidence supporting the continued use of the prescribed treatment.

    **D1. Reliability**

    The peer-reviewed literature is presented as a reliable source of information in the case study because it has undergone peer review and is supported by rigorous testing. The case explains that testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine. This provides research-based support for the treatment rather than relying solely on an individual's opinion or personal experience. The source is therefore more reliable than the online forum comments, personal anecdote, and wellness influencer endorsement Daniel uses to support sound therapy.

    **E. Bias Name**

    **Confirmation Bias**

    Daniel demonstrates confirmation bias in the healthcare case study. He already believes that mainstream treatments recommended by doctors never work and evaluates the available information from the perspective of that existing belief.

    **E1. Bias Impact**

    Daniel's confirmation bias affects his reasoning because it causes him to favor information that supports his existing belief while rejecting information that conflicts with it. He dismisses the peer-reviewed research and testing supporting the doctor's treatment because he already believes mainstream treatments do not work. He then searches for alternative treatments and accepts information from an online health forum, his personal experience involving his grandmother, and a wellness influencer discussing a sound therapy device. This bias makes his evaluation of the evidence less objective because he gives greater consideration to information that agrees with what he already believes while discounting evidence that challenges his position.

    **F. Fallacy Name**

    **Ad Hominem**

    **F1. Fallacy**

    Daniel uses an ad hominem fallacy when he responds to Anika's concerns about sound therapy by attacking an irrelevant personal characteristic instead of addressing her reasoning. Daniel tells Anika that because she is from the Midwest, her medical reasoning should not be trusted. Her geographic background has no logical relationship to whether her medical reasoning or evidence is correct. By focusing on where Anika is from rather than responding to the evidence she presents, Daniel attempts to discredit Anika personally instead of addressing the actual argument. This is an example of an ad hominem fallacy.

    **G. Sources**

    Case study

    **sample.doc**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-doc-10589527)

    **## Task.docx**

    **Healthcare Case**

    **A. Case Study**

    The selected case study is
    **Case Study #1: Healthcare Case**. The case involves two geriatric nurses, Anika and Daniel, who disagree about the appropriate treatment for a patient whose dementia is worsening. Anika supports continuing the doctor's prescribed treatment, while Daniel believes an alternative sound therapy should be tried.

    **B. Premise(s) and Conclusion**

    The following argument is Anika's argument regarding the continued use of cholinesterase inhibitors:

    **Premise 1:** The doctor's orders to use cholinesterase inhibitors are based on peer-reviewed literature.

    **Premise 2:** Rigorous testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine, which helps brain cells communicate.

    **Conclusion:** Continuing to follow the doctor's orders and use the cholinesterase inhibitors is likely to help the patient.

    These premises and conclusion represent one distinct argument made by Anika in support of continuing the patient's prescribed treatment.

    **B1. Deductive/Inductive**

    **Type: Inductive**

    Anika's argument is inductive because the premises provide evidence that makes the conclusion probable rather than certain. The peer-reviewed literature and rigorous testing provide support for the effectiveness of the cholinesterase inhibitors. However, these facts do not guarantee that the medication will improve the condition of this particular patient. Anika states that following the doctor's orders is
    **likely** to help the patient, which indicates that her conclusion is based on probability. Therefore, the argument is inductive rather than deductive.

    **B2. Validity/Strength**

    **Strength: Strong**

    Anika's argument is a strong inductive argument because the premises provide relevant evidence that makes the conclusion reasonably probable. The doctor's treatment instructions are supported by peer-reviewed literature, and rigorous testing has demonstrated that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine. Both premises directly support Anika's conclusion that continuing the treatment is likely to help the patient. Although the evidence cannot guarantee improvement for this individual patient, it provides substantial support for the conclusion. Therefore, the argument can reasonably be classified as a strong inductive argument.

    **C. Argument Map**

    The propositions in the argument are numbered as follows:

    **① Premise 1:** The doctor's orders to use cholinesterase inhibitors are based on peer-reviewed literature.

    **② Premise 2:** Rigorous testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine.

    **③ Conclusion:** Continuing to follow the doctor's orders and use the cholinesterase inhibitors is likely to help the patient.

    **Argument Map:**

    **① + ②** **↓** **③**

    Premises ① and ② work together to support conclusion ③. In the submitted Word document, the propositions should be placed inside numbered circles with arrows showing their support for the conclusion, as required by the task instructions. The supporting instructions specifically direct the student to represent propositions with numbered circles and their support relationships with arrows.

    **D. Information Source**

    One information source identified in the case study is the
    **peer-reviewed literature supporting the doctor's orders regarding cholinesterase inhibitors**. Anika refers to this research as evidence supporting the continued use of the prescribed treatment.

    **D1. Reliability**

    The peer-reviewed literature is presented as a reliable source of information in the case study because it has undergone peer review and is supported by rigorous testing. The case explains that testing has shown that cholinesterase inhibitors help prevent the breakdown of acetylcholine. This provides research-based support for the treatment rather than relying solely on an individual's opinion or personal experience. The source is therefore more reliable than the online forum comments, personal anecdote, and wellness influencer endorsement Daniel uses to support sound therapy.

    **E. Bias Name**

    **Confirmation Bias**

    Daniel demonstrates confirmation bias in the healthcare case study. He already believes that mainstream treatments recommended by doctors never work and evaluates the available information from the perspective of that existing belief.

    **E1. Bias Impact**

    Daniel's confirmation bias affects his reasoning because it causes him to favor information that supports his existing belief while rejecting information that conflicts with it. He dismisses the peer-reviewed research and testing supporting the doctor's treatment because he already believes mainstream treatments do not work. He then searches for alternative treatments and accepts information from an online health forum, his personal experience involving his grandmother, and a wellness influencer discussing a sound therapy device. This bias makes his evaluation of the evidence less objective because he gives greater consideration to information that agrees with what he already believes while discounting evidence that challenges his position.

    **F. Fallacy Name**

    **Ad Hominem**

    **F1. Fallacy**

    Daniel uses an ad hominem fallacy when he responds to Anika's concerns about sound therapy by attacking an irrelevant personal characteristic instead of addressing her reasoning. Daniel tells Anika that because she is from the Midwest, her medical reasoning should not be trusted. Her geographic background has no logical relationship to whether her medical reasoning or evidence is correct. By focusing on where Anika is from rather than responding to the evidence she presents, Daniel attempts to discredit Anika personally instead of addressing the actual argument. This is an example of an ad hominem fallacy.

    **G. Sources**

    Case study

    **sample.doc**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-doc-10589527)

  • [Solved] R3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering R3.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] R2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering R2.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] R1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering R1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.