My Blog

Category: Jurisprudence & Legal Studies

  • [Solved] Law portfolio assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Law portfolio assignment.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Reflection Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **Write,** at minimum, a 500-word post addressing at least one of the following leading questions for this week's module. Meaningful and substantive contributions will require 1.) that you carefully read (and reflect on) the m…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **Write,** at minimum, a 500-word post addressing at least one of the following leading questions for this week's module. Meaningful and substantive contributions will require 1.) that you carefully read (and reflect on) the material, and 2.) that you think about the arguments, evidence, and interpretations presented in the paper.

    1. Although Massey and his colleagues argue that no single theory (i.e., reason) can explain why people migrate. In your view, which one of the four theories that explain the initiation of migration comes very close to explaining why people migrate, and why?

    2. Based on what Massey and his colleagues present in their paper, one of the ways the United States government can deal with high migration inflows from Nigeria is to go into Nigeria and fix Nigeria's youth unemployment challenges. Would you support such an approach to immigration control by the United States government? If yes, why? If no, why?

    3. Thinking about the reasons that have been laid out in the paper to explain why migration perpetuates across time and space, why might one person's decision to migrate make it more likely that their family members, friends, or people from their community will migrate later?

    Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. _Population and development review_, 431-466.

    [Massey et al. (1993).pdf](https://canvas.fau.edu/courses/204065/files/48085578?wrap=1 "Massey et al. (1993).pdf")

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QrUegs-kUsLinks to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QrUegs-kUs)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QrUegs-kUsLinks to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QrUegs-kUs)

    [https://youtu.be/g6RdwwQpDhs?si=7yix75DwTzH2Kab0Links to an external site.](https://youtu.be/g6RdwwQpDhs?si=7yix75DwTzH2Kab0)

  • [Solved] Law Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Assignment.pdf **## Assignment.pdf** Project: Information Systems Security © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved. www.jblearning.com Page 1 Purpose This project provides you an opportunity to analyze risks, threats, and vulnerabi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assignment.pdf

    **## Assignment.pdf**

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 1

    Purpose

    This project provides you an opportunity to analyze risks, threats, and vulnerabilities, apply

    countermeasures, and audit an information systems environment.

    Required Source Information and Tools

    To complete the project, you need the following:

    1. Course textbook

    2. A Windows 7, 8 or Windows 10 computer, preferably with the default installation

    3. Access to the Internet

    4. The following documentation:

     NIST SP 800-30 revision 1, Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments (also available at

    http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf)

     Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE) (focus on the

    Allegro version) (also available at http://www.cert.org/resilience/products-services/octave/)

    Learning Objectives and Outcomes

    You will:

    Explain how to assess risks, threats, and vulnerabilities

    Evaluate potential outcomes of a malware attack and exposure of confidential information

    Evaluate information systems security countermeasures

    Create a gap analysis plan

    Evaluate and select a risk assessment methodology

    Analyze the purposes of system hardening

    Analyze Windows security events

    Evaluate information systems security activities in terms of business success

    Introduction

    Contemporary organizations collect, store, and transmit a tremendous amount of highly sensitive data.

    Despite the many benefits that information technology offers, these systems are not always completely

    secure. Proper controls must be put in place to mitigate security risks and protect vital business

    information.

    Web References: Links to web references are subject to change without prior notice. If a web reference

    is no longer available, try searching for an updated version on Google or by using the Wayback Machine

    (https://archive.org/web/) to access it.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    [http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf](http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf)

    [http://www.cert.org/resilience/products-services/octave/](http://www.cert.org/resilience/products-services/octave/)

    [https://archive.org/web/](https://archive.org/web/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 2

    Deliverables

    The project is divided into three parts. Details for each deliverable can be found in this document. Your

    instructor will assign due dates for each part.

    Project Part 1: Risks, Threats, and Vulnerabilities

    Project Part 2: Gap Analysis Plan and Risk Assessment Methodology

    Project Part 3: System Hardening and Auditing

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 3

    Project Part 1: Risks, Threats, and Vulnerabilities

    Scenario

    Fullsoft, Inc. is a software development company based in New York City. Fullsoft’s software product

    development code is kept confidential in an effort to safeguard the company’s competitive advantage in

    the marketplace. Fullsoft recently experienced a malware attack; as a result, proprietary information was

    leaked. The company is now in the process of recovering from this breach.

    You are a security professional who reports into Fullsoft’s infrastructure operations team. The chief

    technology officer (CTO) asks you and your colleagues to participate in a team meeting to discuss the

    incident and its potential impact on the company.

    Tasks

    1. Prepare for the meeting by deliberating on the following questions:

     What circumstances may have allowed this incident to occur, or could allow a similar incident

    to occur in the future?

     What insights about risks, threats, and/or vulnerabilities can you glean from reports of similar

    incidents that have occurred in other organizations?

     What potential outcomes should the company anticipate as a result of the malware attack

    and possible exposure of intellectual property?

     Which countermeasures would you recommend the company implement to detect current

    vulnerabilities, respond to the effects of this and other successful attacks, and prevent future

    incidents?

    2. Write an outline of key points related to the questions above that the team should discuss at the

    meeting.

    Required Resources

    Textbook for this course

    Internet access

    Submission Requirements

    Format: Microsoft Word or compatible 

    Font: Arial 12-point, double-spaced

     Citation Style: APA

     Length: 2-3 pages (page length does not include coversheet and references pages)

     Include a coversheet and references page

    You are encouraged to respond creatively, but you must cite credible sources to support your work.

    Self-Assessment Checklist

    I created an outline that describes key points the team should discuss at the meeting. My outline

    describes:

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 4

    o Circumstances that may have allowed the malware infection to occur, or could allow a similar

    incident to occur in the future

    o Insights about risks, threats, and/or vulnerabilities from reports of similar incidents that have

    occurred in other organizations

    o Potential outcomes of a malware attack and exposure of confidential information

    o Countermeasures the company should implement

    I conducted adequate independent research for this part of the project.

    I followed the submission guidelines.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 5

    Project Part 2: Gap Analysis Plan and Risk Assessment Methodology

    Scenario

    After the productive team meeting, Fullsoft’s chief technology officer (CTO) wants further analysis

    performed and a high-level plan created to mitigate future risks, threats, and vulnerabilities. As part of this

    request, you and your team members will create a plan for performing a gap analysis, and then research

    and select an appropriate risk assessment methodology to be used for future reviews of the Fullsoft IT

    environment.

    An IT gap analysis may be a formal investigation or an informal survey of an organization's overall IT

    security. The first step of a gap analysis is to compose clear objectives and goals concerning an

    organization's IT security. For each objective or goal, the person performing the analysis must gather

    information about the environment, determine the present status, and identify what must be changed to

    achieve goals. The analysis most often reveals gaps in security between "where you are" and "where you

    want to be."

    Two popular risk assessment methodologies are NIST SP 800-30 revision 1, Guide for Conducting Risk

    Assessments, and Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE). Your

    focus will be on the OCTAVE Allegro version, which is a more concise version of OCTAVE. When

    reviewing the methodologies, consider the following:

    Which features or factors of each methodology are most important and relevant to Fullsoft?

    Which methodology is easier to follow?

    Which methodology appears to require fewer resources, such as time and staff, but still provides

    for a thorough assessment?

    Tasks

    Create a high-level plan to perform a gap analysis.

    Review the following two risk assessment methodologies:

     NIST SP 800-30 rev. 1, Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments (formerly titled " Risk

    Management Guide for Information Technology Systems")

     Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE), Allegro version

    Create a report that includes the gap analysis plan, a brief description of each risk assessment

    methodology, a recommendation for which methodology Fullsoft should follow, and justification

    for your choice.

    Required Resources

    Textbook for this course

    Internet access

    Submission Requirements

    Format: Microsoft Word or compatible 

    Font: Arial 12-point, double-spaced

     Citation Style: APA

     Length: 3-4 pages (page length does not include coversheet and references pages)

     Include a coversheet and references page

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 6

    You are encouraged to respond creatively, but you must cite credible sources to support your work.

    Self-Assessment Checklist

    I created a plan for performing a gap analysis of the IT environment.

    I evaluated and selected a risk assessment methodology.

    I summarized each methodology, recommended which methodology Fullsoft should follow, and

    provided justification for my choice.

    I conducted adequate independent research for this part of the project.

    I followed the submission guidelines.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 7

    Project Part 3: System Hardening and Auditing

    Scenario

    Fullsoft’s chief technology officer (CTO) established a plan to mitigate risks, threats, and vulnerabilities.

    As part of the mitigation plan, you and your team members will configure baseline security controls on all

    workstations (harden the systems), which run either Windows 7 or Windows 10. For this effort, you will

    ensure that the antivirus software is running properly and implement a control related to password-

    hacking attempts.

    In addition, Fullsoft’s CTO has asked your team to pay special consideration to continuously monitoring,

    testing, and improving countermeasures. The CTO points out that within the first 24 hours of configuring

    baseline security, you may sometimes receive alerts that malware has been quarantined within an

    antivirus program or notice a failed logon attempt captured by the Windows audit log. In response, you

    make a note to check the security of the workstation for which you will configure baseline security.

    The CTO also requests a report on the work you performed, part of which will be incorporated into the

    company's IT security policy procedures. The report should also include the purposes of system

    hardening and auditing, and an additional area of concern or emerging trend related to information

    systems security that's relevant to Fullsoft.

    At the end of the report, include a brief statement that explains how your work on this project relates to

    the larger responsibility you have for supporting the company’s success regarding IT security. Your

    statement will be considered a part of your upcoming performance review.

    Tasks

    If possible, complete the hardening and auditing tasks using a personal computer with the default

    installation of Windows 7 or Windows 10. If you do not own the necessary hardware and software, consult

    with your instructor about alternatives. After your work on this project is complete, you may need to return

    the settings to the previous configuration.

    1. Ensure that you are logged in as an administrator. Using a computer that has Windows 7 or

    Windows 10 installed:

    a. Review the antivirus program. Ensure that it is up to date, is configured for automatic

    updates, and is scheduled to run quick scans regularly. Note when the last full system

    scan was run and any issues you observe with the software.

    b. Configure audit logging to identify all failed password attempts into the system.

    2. After at least 24 hours, check the Windows workstation for security events. Be sure to review the

    audit log in Windows Event Viewer.

    3. Write a report in which you:

     Explain how you ensured the antivirus program is up to date, scheduled to run regular quick

    scans, and when the last full system scan was run. Describe anything significant you

    observed.

     Explain how you configured audit logging to record all failed password attempts into the

    system.

     Describe all the potentially problematic security events that occurred in the 24-hour period

    after checking the antivirus software and configuring audit logging.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 8

     Explain what was done (or should be done) to correct any problems encountered.

     Explain the purposes of system hardening and auditing in terms of the company’s goal of

    maintaining information systems security. Also describe an additional area of concern or an

    emerging trend related to information systems security that you think warrants the company’s

    attention in the immediate future.

     Briefly explain how your work on this project relates to your responsibility to help the

    company achieve its IT security goals.

    Required Resources

    Textbook for this course

    A Windows 7 or Windows 7 computer, preferably with a default installation

    Internet access

    Additional Resources

    Audit logon events: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/itpro/windows/keep-secure/basic-audit-

    logon-events

    How to See Who Logged Into a Computer and When:

    http://www.howtogeek.com/124313/how-to-see-who-logged-into-a-computer-and-when/

    Event Logs: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc722404(v=ws.11).aspx

    Using Event Viewer to Troubleshoot Problems: http://www.howtogeek.com/school/using-

    windows-admin-tools-like-a-pro/lesson3/

    Submission Requirements

    Format: Microsoft Word or compatible 

    Font: Arial 12-point, double-spaced

     Citation Style: APA

     Length: 3-4 pages (page length does not include coversheet and references pages)

     Include a coversheet and references page

    You are encouraged to respond creatively, but you must cite credible sources to support your work.

    Self-Assessment Checklist

    I summarized the system-hardening and auditing configuration steps I implemented on a

    computer using Windows 7 or Windows 10, including:

    o How I ensured the antivirus software is running properly

    o How I configured audit logging of all failed password attempts

    I described potentially problematic security events that occurred within a 24-hour period, and

    noted actions that were taken (or should be taken) to address them.

     I explained the purposes of system hardening and auditing in terms of the company’s overarching

    goal of maintaining information systems security.

    I proposed at least one area of concern or emerging trend related to information systems security

    that warrants additional attention.

    I explained how my work on this project relates to my professional responsibility to help the

    company achieve its IT security goals.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    [http://www.howtogeek.com/124313/how-to-see-who-logged-into-a-computer-and-when/](http://www.howtogeek.com/124313/how-to-see-who-logged-into-a-computer-and-when/)

    [http://www.howtogeek.com/school/using-](http://www.howtogeek.com/school/using-)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 9

    I conducted adequate independent research for this part of the project.

    I followed the submission guidelines.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    **## Assignment.pdf**

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 1

    Purpose

    This project provides you an opportunity to analyze risks, threats, and vulnerabilities, apply

    countermeasures, and audit an information systems environment.

    Required Source Information and Tools

    To complete the project, you need the following:

    1. Course textbook

    2. A Windows 7, 8 or Windows 10 computer, preferably with the default installation

    3. Access to the Internet

    4. The following documentation:

     NIST SP 800-30 revision 1, Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments (also available at

    http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf)

     Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE) (focus on the

    Allegro version) (also available at http://www.cert.org/resilience/products-services/octave/)

    Learning Objectives and Outcomes

    You will:

    Explain how to assess risks, threats, and vulnerabilities

    Evaluate potential outcomes of a malware attack and exposure of confidential information

    Evaluate information systems security countermeasures

    Create a gap analysis plan

    Evaluate and select a risk assessment methodology

    Analyze the purposes of system hardening

    Analyze Windows security events

    Evaluate information systems security activities in terms of business success

    Introduction

    Contemporary organizations collect, store, and transmit a tremendous amount of highly sensitive data.

    Despite the many benefits that information technology offers, these systems are not always completely

    secure. Proper controls must be put in place to mitigate security risks and protect vital business

    information.

    Web References: Links to web references are subject to change without prior notice. If a web reference

    is no longer available, try searching for an updated version on Google or by using the Wayback Machine

    (https://archive.org/web/) to access it.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    [http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf](http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf)

    [http://www.cert.org/resilience/products-services/octave/](http://www.cert.org/resilience/products-services/octave/)

    [https://archive.org/web/](https://archive.org/web/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 2

    Deliverables

    The project is divided into three parts. Details for each deliverable can be found in this document. Your

    instructor will assign due dates for each part.

    Project Part 1: Risks, Threats, and Vulnerabilities

    Project Part 2: Gap Analysis Plan and Risk Assessment Methodology

    Project Part 3: System Hardening and Auditing

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 3

    Project Part 1: Risks, Threats, and Vulnerabilities

    Scenario

    Fullsoft, Inc. is a software development company based in New York City. Fullsoft’s software product

    development code is kept confidential in an effort to safeguard the company’s competitive advantage in

    the marketplace. Fullsoft recently experienced a malware attack; as a result, proprietary information was

    leaked. The company is now in the process of recovering from this breach.

    You are a security professional who reports into Fullsoft’s infrastructure operations team. The chief

    technology officer (CTO) asks you and your colleagues to participate in a team meeting to discuss the

    incident and its potential impact on the company.

    Tasks

    1. Prepare for the meeting by deliberating on the following questions:

     What circumstances may have allowed this incident to occur, or could allow a similar incident

    to occur in the future?

     What insights about risks, threats, and/or vulnerabilities can you glean from reports of similar

    incidents that have occurred in other organizations?

     What potential outcomes should the company anticipate as a result of the malware attack

    and possible exposure of intellectual property?

     Which countermeasures would you recommend the company implement to detect current

    vulnerabilities, respond to the effects of this and other successful attacks, and prevent future

    incidents?

    2. Write an outline of key points related to the questions above that the team should discuss at the

    meeting.

    Required Resources

    Textbook for this course

    Internet access

    Submission Requirements

    Format: Microsoft Word or compatible 

    Font: Arial 12-point, double-spaced

     Citation Style: APA

     Length: 2-3 pages (page length does not include coversheet and references pages)

     Include a coversheet and references page

    You are encouraged to respond creatively, but you must cite credible sources to support your work.

    Self-Assessment Checklist

    I created an outline that describes key points the team should discuss at the meeting. My outline

    describes:

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 4

    o Circumstances that may have allowed the malware infection to occur, or could allow a similar

    incident to occur in the future

    o Insights about risks, threats, and/or vulnerabilities from reports of similar incidents that have

    occurred in other organizations

    o Potential outcomes of a malware attack and exposure of confidential information

    o Countermeasures the company should implement

    I conducted adequate independent research for this part of the project.

    I followed the submission guidelines.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 5

    Project Part 2: Gap Analysis Plan and Risk Assessment Methodology

    Scenario

    After the productive team meeting, Fullsoft’s chief technology officer (CTO) wants further analysis

    performed and a high-level plan created to mitigate future risks, threats, and vulnerabilities. As part of this

    request, you and your team members will create a plan for performing a gap analysis, and then research

    and select an appropriate risk assessment methodology to be used for future reviews of the Fullsoft IT

    environment.

    An IT gap analysis may be a formal investigation or an informal survey of an organization's overall IT

    security. The first step of a gap analysis is to compose clear objectives and goals concerning an

    organization's IT security. For each objective or goal, the person performing the analysis must gather

    information about the environment, determine the present status, and identify what must be changed to

    achieve goals. The analysis most often reveals gaps in security between "where you are" and "where you

    want to be."

    Two popular risk assessment methodologies are NIST SP 800-30 revision 1, Guide for Conducting Risk

    Assessments, and Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE). Your

    focus will be on the OCTAVE Allegro version, which is a more concise version of OCTAVE. When

    reviewing the methodologies, consider the following:

    Which features or factors of each methodology are most important and relevant to Fullsoft?

    Which methodology is easier to follow?

    Which methodology appears to require fewer resources, such as time and staff, but still provides

    for a thorough assessment?

    Tasks

    Create a high-level plan to perform a gap analysis.

    Review the following two risk assessment methodologies:

     NIST SP 800-30 rev. 1, Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments (formerly titled " Risk

    Management Guide for Information Technology Systems")

     Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE), Allegro version

    Create a report that includes the gap analysis plan, a brief description of each risk assessment

    methodology, a recommendation for which methodology Fullsoft should follow, and justification

    for your choice.

    Required Resources

    Textbook for this course

    Internet access

    Submission Requirements

    Format: Microsoft Word or compatible 

    Font: Arial 12-point, double-spaced

     Citation Style: APA

     Length: 3-4 pages (page length does not include coversheet and references pages)

     Include a coversheet and references page

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 6

    You are encouraged to respond creatively, but you must cite credible sources to support your work.

    Self-Assessment Checklist

    I created a plan for performing a gap analysis of the IT environment.

    I evaluated and selected a risk assessment methodology.

    I summarized each methodology, recommended which methodology Fullsoft should follow, and

    provided justification for my choice.

    I conducted adequate independent research for this part of the project.

    I followed the submission guidelines.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 7

    Project Part 3: System Hardening and Auditing

    Scenario

    Fullsoft’s chief technology officer (CTO) established a plan to mitigate risks, threats, and vulnerabilities.

    As part of the mitigation plan, you and your team members will configure baseline security controls on all

    workstations (harden the systems), which run either Windows 7 or Windows 10. For this effort, you will

    ensure that the antivirus software is running properly and implement a control related to password-

    hacking attempts.

    In addition, Fullsoft’s CTO has asked your team to pay special consideration to continuously monitoring,

    testing, and improving countermeasures. The CTO points out that within the first 24 hours of configuring

    baseline security, you may sometimes receive alerts that malware has been quarantined within an

    antivirus program or notice a failed logon attempt captured by the Windows audit log. In response, you

    make a note to check the security of the workstation for which you will configure baseline security.

    The CTO also requests a report on the work you performed, part of which will be incorporated into the

    company's IT security policy procedures. The report should also include the purposes of system

    hardening and auditing, and an additional area of concern or emerging trend related to information

    systems security that's relevant to Fullsoft.

    At the end of the report, include a brief statement that explains how your work on this project relates to

    the larger responsibility you have for supporting the company’s success regarding IT security. Your

    statement will be considered a part of your upcoming performance review.

    Tasks

    If possible, complete the hardening and auditing tasks using a personal computer with the default

    installation of Windows 7 or Windows 10. If you do not own the necessary hardware and software, consult

    with your instructor about alternatives. After your work on this project is complete, you may need to return

    the settings to the previous configuration.

    1. Ensure that you are logged in as an administrator. Using a computer that has Windows 7 or

    Windows 10 installed:

    a. Review the antivirus program. Ensure that it is up to date, is configured for automatic

    updates, and is scheduled to run quick scans regularly. Note when the last full system

    scan was run and any issues you observe with the software.

    b. Configure audit logging to identify all failed password attempts into the system.

    2. After at least 24 hours, check the Windows workstation for security events. Be sure to review the

    audit log in Windows Event Viewer.

    3. Write a report in which you:

     Explain how you ensured the antivirus program is up to date, scheduled to run regular quick

    scans, and when the last full system scan was run. Describe anything significant you

    observed.

     Explain how you configured audit logging to record all failed password attempts into the

    system.

     Describe all the potentially problematic security events that occurred in the 24-hour period

    after checking the antivirus software and configuring audit logging.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 8

     Explain what was done (or should be done) to correct any problems encountered.

     Explain the purposes of system hardening and auditing in terms of the company’s goal of

    maintaining information systems security. Also describe an additional area of concern or an

    emerging trend related to information systems security that you think warrants the company’s

    attention in the immediate future.

     Briefly explain how your work on this project relates to your responsibility to help the

    company achieve its IT security goals.

    Required Resources

    Textbook for this course

    A Windows 7 or Windows 7 computer, preferably with a default installation

    Internet access

    Additional Resources

    Audit logon events: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/itpro/windows/keep-secure/basic-audit-

    logon-events

    How to See Who Logged Into a Computer and When:

    http://www.howtogeek.com/124313/how-to-see-who-logged-into-a-computer-and-when/

    Event Logs: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc722404(v=ws.11).aspx

    Using Event Viewer to Troubleshoot Problems: http://www.howtogeek.com/school/using-

    windows-admin-tools-like-a-pro/lesson3/

    Submission Requirements

    Format: Microsoft Word or compatible 

    Font: Arial 12-point, double-spaced

     Citation Style: APA

     Length: 3-4 pages (page length does not include coversheet and references pages)

     Include a coversheet and references page

    You are encouraged to respond creatively, but you must cite credible sources to support your work.

    Self-Assessment Checklist

    I summarized the system-hardening and auditing configuration steps I implemented on a

    computer using Windows 7 or Windows 10, including:

    o How I ensured the antivirus software is running properly

    o How I configured audit logging of all failed password attempts

    I described potentially problematic security events that occurred within a 24-hour period, and

    noted actions that were taken (or should be taken) to address them.

     I explained the purposes of system hardening and auditing in terms of the company’s overarching

    goal of maintaining information systems security.

    I proposed at least one area of concern or emerging trend related to information systems security

    that warrants additional attention.

    I explained how my work on this project relates to my professional responsibility to help the

    company achieve its IT security goals.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

    [http://www.howtogeek.com/124313/how-to-see-who-logged-into-a-computer-and-when/](http://www.howtogeek.com/124313/how-to-see-who-logged-into-a-computer-and-when/)

    [http://www.howtogeek.com/school/using-](http://www.howtogeek.com/school/using-)

    Project: Information Systems Security

    © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. All rights reserved.
    www.jblearning.com Page 9

    I conducted adequate independent research for this part of the project.

    I followed the submission guidelines.

    [http://www.jblearning.com/](http://www.jblearning.com/)

  • [Solved] See attachment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **files (1)** – ## unit6.docx **## unit6.docx** CoM Public CoM Public CoM Public Welcome to Week 6 of the course. Similar to all weeks, please complete the _read_ and _attend_ sections before producing the discussion assignmen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **files (1)**

    – ## unit6.docx

    **## unit6.docx**

    CoM Public

    CoM Public

    CoM Public

    Welcome to Week 6 of the course.  Similar to all weeks, please complete the
    _read_ and
    _attend_ sections before producing the discussion assignments. The Complete essay relates this week to comparing seven (7) cases. These are
    _Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, Lewis v. New Orleans,_ _Bousquet v. Arkansas, United States v. Williams, United States v. Whorley, United States v. Kilbride,_ and
    _Lawrence v. Texas_.  This is a large number of cases, but do not feel overwhelmed, most are comparisons of findings.

           The topics this week are primarily concerned with the first amendment’s freedom of speech declarations (fighting words) and the concept of obscenity.

    | |
    | — |
    | Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or <br>abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. |

            Section 1 focuses on the use of fighting words and disorderly conduct. When does a person’s free speech become restricted or even criminal?      Section 2 involves offensive speech against police officers. As most of you are
    _in the profession_, I am certain you have heard angry words from citizens from time to time. Are fighting words treated differently if directed at police officers? Hmmmmmm?

    Sections 3 and 4 approach the idea of obscenity, or the
    _legal definition_ of obscenity in particular.  Keep in mind, what may be obscene to you personally, could be legal (or not legally obscene).

         The Complete assignment has a minimum expectation of 2,000 words (total assignment) and five scholarly sources, one of these must be a peer reviewed journal article published in the past 7 years.  One source can be the textbook provided in the course.

           Your Complete assignment should be in essay format and include a title section, introduction paragraph, appropriate headings, conclusion, and reference section.

          Below I have provided an outline for your Complete essays.

    **Week 6 Essay**(add descriptive words)

    **Your Name**

    **Bethel University**

    Introductory paragraph (introduce briefly the essay parts)

    **Capstone case of**
    **_Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire_**

    **_Lewis v. New Orleans_, 415 U. S. 130 (1974) and**
    **_Bousquet v. Arkansas_,**

    **Capstone case of**
    **_United States v. Williams_**

    **_Analyzing United States v. Whorley &_ _United States v. Kilbride in Comparison with_ _Lawrence v. Texas_.**

    **Conclusion**

    (Summarize briefly what you said-remind your reader of your topics)

    **References**

    (as this is a graduate program, perfect APA technique is expected)

    General Instructions

    Key Concepts: Elements of Offense, i.e., Protected Speech, Obscenity laws

    Capstone Cases:
    _Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire,Lewis v. New Orleans_,
    _Bousquet v. Arkansas_,
    _United States v. Williams, United States v. Whorley_,
    _United States v. Kilbride,_ and
    _Lawrence v. Texas._

    Assignment: The completes must be in essay format and include a title section, introduction paragraph, appropriate headings and Reference section. I expect perfect APA technique. The minimum requirement is five (5) scholarly sources, one of these must be a peer reviewed journal article published in the past 7 years. The textbook may count as one source. In Complete essays 1-7, there is a minimum of a 2,000- word count overall. Word counts are based on content only; references are not included in the word count assessment

    The narrative essay should clearly define the key concepts of protected speech and the legal concept of obscenity
    and will apply these principles to the Capstone cases of
    _Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire,Lewis v. New Orleans_,
    _Bousquet v. Arkansas_,
    _United States v. Williams, United States v. Whorley_,
    _United States v. Kilbride,_ and
    _Lawrence v. Texas._

    Your response will include the overview of the cases and will also need to address each question or statement listed below in an essay format.

    · In the Capstone case of
    _Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire,_ the Appellant was convicted in the municipal court of Rochester, New Hampshire, for violation of Chapter 378, Section 2, of the Public Laws of New Hampshire: “No person shall address any offensive, derisive or annoying word to any other person who is lawfully in any street or other public place, nor call him by any offensive or derisive name, nor make any noise or exclamation in his presence and hearing with intent to deride, offend or annoy him, or to prevent him from pursuing his lawful business or occupation.” The charge was based on the claim that Chaplinsky stated in a public place, “You are a God damned racketeer” and “a damned Fascist and the whole government of Rochester are Fascists or agents of Fascists.”Do you think that the language used by Chaplinsky should be subject to governmental regulation? Why or why not?

    · Do you believe that all manner of speech should be protected by the First Amendment? If not, what limits would you put on such protections?

    · What are “fighting words”? Why aren’t they protected by the First Amendment?

    · Read the two cases from your textbook—
    _Lewis v. New Orleans_, 415 U. S. 130 (1974) and
    _Bousquet v. Arkansas_, 548 S. W. 2d 125 (1977)—involving offensive language directed at a police officer. Should these types of disorderly conduct or fighting words cases be treated differently because the target of the language is a public official?

    · What factors are relevant to your judgment?

    · In the Capstone case of
    _United States v. Williams,_ the United States Code criminalizes, in certain specified circumstances, the pandering or solicitation of child pornography. This case presents the question whether that statute is overbroad under the First Amendment or impermissibly vague under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Should speech in the form of an offer to engage in a criminal act (exchange child pornography) be sufficient to establish criminal liability?

    · Does your answer to question 1 change if there is no apparent ability to actually exchange child pornography?

    · Read the opinions in
    _United States v. Whorley_, 550 F. 3d 326 (4th Cir. 2008) and
    _United States v. Kilbride,_ 534 F. 3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2009). Then consider these two rulings in light of the Supreme Court’s 2003 opinion in
    _Lawrence v. Texas_. Are obscenity laws still constitutional in light of the Court’s opinion in
    _Lawrence_?

    **## unit6.docx**

    CoM Public

    CoM Public

    CoM Public

    Welcome to Week 6 of the course.  Similar to all weeks, please complete the
    _read_ and
    _attend_ sections before producing the discussion assignments. The Complete essay relates this week to comparing seven (7) cases. These are
    _Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, Lewis v. New Orleans,_ _Bousquet v. Arkansas, United States v. Williams, United States v. Whorley, United States v. Kilbride,_ and
    _Lawrence v. Texas_.  This is a large number of cases, but do not feel overwhelmed, most are comparisons of findings.

           The topics this week are primarily concerned with the first amendment’s freedom of speech declarations (fighting words) and the concept of obscenity.

    | |
    | — |
    | Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or <br>abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. |

            Section 1 focuses on the use of fighting words and disorderly conduct. When does a person’s free speech become restricted or even criminal?      Section 2 involves offensive speech against police officers. As most of you are
    _in the profession_, I am certain you have heard angry words from citizens from time to time. Are fighting words treated differently if directed at police officers? Hmmmmmm?

    Sections 3 and 4 approach the idea of obscenity, or the
    _legal definition_ of obscenity in particular.  Keep in mind, what may be obscene to you personally, could be legal (or not legally obscene).

         The Complete assignment has a minimum expectation of 2,000 words (total assignment) and five scholarly sources, one of these must be a peer reviewed journal article published in the past 7 years.  One source can be the textbook provided in the course.

           Your Complete assignment should be in essay format and include a title section, introduction paragraph, appropriate headings, conclusion, and reference section.

          Below I have provided an outline for your Complete essays.

    **Week 6 Essay**(add descriptive words)

    **Your Name**

    **Bethel University**

    Introductory paragraph (introduce briefly the essay parts)

    **Capstone case of**
    **_Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire_**

    **_Lewis v. New Orleans_, 415 U. S. 130 (1974) and**
    **_Bousquet v. Arkansas_,**

    **Capstone case of**
    **_United States v. Williams_**

    **_Analyzing United States v. Whorley &_ _United States v. Kilbride in Comparison with_ _Lawrence v. Texas_.**

    **Conclusion**

    (Summarize briefly what you said-remind your reader of your topics)

    **References**

    (as this is a graduate program, perfect APA technique is expected)

    General Instructions

    Key Concepts: Elements of Offense, i.e., Protected Speech, Obscenity laws

    Capstone Cases:
    _Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire,Lewis v. New Orleans_,
    _Bousquet v. Arkansas_,
    _United States v. Williams, United States v. Whorley_,
    _United States v. Kilbride,_ and
    _Lawrence v. Texas._

    Assignment: The completes must be in essay format and include a title section, introduction paragraph, appropriate headings and Reference section. I expect perfect APA technique. The minimum requirement is five (5) scholarly sources, one of these must be a peer reviewed journal article published in the past 7 years. The textbook may count as one source. In Complete essays 1-7, there is a minimum of a 2,000- word count overall. Word counts are based on content only; references are not included in the word count assessment

    The narrative essay should clearly define the key concepts of protected speech and the legal concept of obscenity
    and will apply these principles to the Capstone cases of
    _Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire,Lewis v. New Orleans_,
    _Bousquet v. Arkansas_,
    _United States v. Williams, United States v. Whorley_,
    _United States v. Kilbride,_ and
    _Lawrence v. Texas._

    Your response will include the overview of the cases and will also need to address each question or statement listed below in an essay format.

    · In the Capstone case of
    _Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire,_ the Appellant was convicted in the municipal court of Rochester, New Hampshire, for violation of Chapter 378, Section 2, of the Public Laws of New Hampshire: “No person shall address any offensive, derisive or annoying word to any other person who is lawfully in any street or other public place, nor call him by any offensive or derisive name, nor make any noise or exclamation in his presence and hearing with intent to deride, offend or annoy him, or to prevent him from pursuing his lawful business or occupation.” The charge was based on the claim that Chaplinsky stated in a public place, “You are a God damned racketeer” and “a damned Fascist and the whole government of Rochester are Fascists or agents of Fascists.”Do you think that the language used by Chaplinsky should be subject to governmental regulation? Why or why not?

    · Do you believe that all manner of speech should be protected by the First Amendment? If not, what limits would you put on such protections?

    · What are “fighting words”? Why aren’t they protected by the First Amendment?

    · Read the two cases from your textbook—
    _Lewis v. New Orleans_, 415 U. S. 130 (1974) and
    _Bousquet v. Arkansas_, 548 S. W. 2d 125 (1977)—involving offensive language directed at a police officer. Should these types of disorderly conduct or fighting words cases be treated differently because the target of the language is a public official?

    · What factors are relevant to your judgment?

    · In the Capstone case of
    _United States v. Williams,_ the United States Code criminalizes, in certain specified circumstances, the pandering or solicitation of child pornography. This case presents the question whether that statute is overbroad under the First Amendment or impermissibly vague under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Should speech in the form of an offer to engage in a criminal act (exchange child pornography) be sufficient to establish criminal liability?

    · Does your answer to question 1 change if there is no apparent ability to actually exchange child pornography?

    · Read the opinions in
    _United States v. Whorley_, 550 F. 3d 326 (4th Cir. 2008) and
    _United States v. Kilbride,_ 534 F. 3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2009). Then consider these two rulings in light of the Supreme Court’s 2003 opinion in
    _Lawrence v. Texas_. Are obscenity laws still constitutional in light of the Court’s opinion in
    _Lawrence_?

  • [Solved] M2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **Write,** at minimum, a 500-word post addressing at least one of the following leading questions for this week's module. Meaningful and substantive contributions will require 1.) that you carefully read (and reflect on) the m…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **Write,** at minimum, a 500-word post addressing at least one of the following leading questions for this week's module. Meaningful and substantive contributions will require 1.) that you carefully read (and reflect on) the material, and 2.) that you think about the arguments, evidence, and interpretations presented in the paper.

    1. Release rates for people without convictions fell from 35% to 7%, while their deportation rate rose sharply. What are the competing interests at stake here? Is it public safety, due process, cost, deterrence? How would you personally weigh them if you were setting policy?

    2. After reviewing the materials, what specific piece of evidence that you did not currently have stuck out to you? Would you argue that this enforcement shift is working as intended, or having unintended consequences?

    3. Why is it important to distinguish between "immigrant," "unauthorized immigrant," "lawful permanent resident," and "naturalized citizen"?

    4. Does the evidence support the claim that recent enforcement increases have primarily focused on immigrants who have been convicted of serious or violent crimes? Why or why not?

    **Reading and Learning Materials**

    Kramer, S., &amp; Passel, J. S. (2025, August 21). What the data say about immigrants in the U.S. Pew Research Center. Washington DC.

    [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/08/21/key-findings-about-us-immigrants/Links to an external site.](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/08/21/key-findings-about-us-immigrants/)

    Blair, G., &amp; Hausman, D. (2026, April 7). One Year of Immigration Enforcement. Deportation Data Project. _**[Read pages 1 to 11]**_ **.**

    [Blair & Hausman (2026).pdf](https://canvas.fau.edu/courses/204065/files/48087934?wrap=1)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmiqQmjgozo](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmiqQmjgozo)

    [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9mPEquFKKA](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9mPEquFKKA)

  • [Solved] Law Assignment 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Please be specific about policy management elements, stages in the policy life cycle and other strategic considerations.** **assignment attached** **use citations.** – [\ \ IMG_2966.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2966-jpeg-10591377 "IMG_2966.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Please be specific about policy management elements, stages in the policy life cycle and other strategic considerations.**

    **assignment attached**

    **use citations.**

    – [\
    \
    IMG_2966.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2966-jpeg-10591377 "IMG_2966.jpeg")

  • [Solved] week 1 paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) **files (2)** – ## WEEK1paper.docx – ## rubric.pdf **## WEEK1paper.docx** 1 3 **Research Problem** A question that I'm really curious about when it comes to criminal justice is whether or not community policing is a better mea…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    **files (2)**

    – ## WEEK1paper.docx

    – ## rubric.pdf

    **## WEEK1paper.docx**

    1

    3

    **Research Problem**

    A question that I'm really curious about when it comes to criminal justice is whether or not community policing is a better means of gaining public trust in the police and their perception of safety in the community. Community trust in law enforcement is critical because residents will be more likely to report crime, participate in investigations, and do crime prevention work if they feel law enforcement officers treat them fairly, with respect, and are responsive (Hevi, et al., 2022).

    The problem is that community policing is frequently touted as a means of improving police-community relations but may not be equally effective in all communities. Residents may feel more trusting of the police if police are visible, communicate, are perceived as fair, respond to the residents, and permit participation in their community. Criminal justice agencies may not be able to identify the most effective practices of community policing without systematically exploring these factors.

    My
    **research problem** is:
    _There is insufficient evidence about the relationship between community-policing practices and residents’ trust in law enforcement and perceptions of neighborhood safety._ A research question that emerged from this problem is: How are community policing practices related to residents' trust in the police and perceptions of neighborhood safety? A researchable question involves data collection from the community, and the experiences with police, perceptions of police fairness and responsiveness, trust in police, and feelings of safety could be measured.

    This topic was selected as it is important that criminal justice is not only effective in enforcing the law but that good relations exist between the police force and the communities they serve. The second chapter focuses on the need for a research problem to be clearly defined, manageable, and able to be studied systematically. The topic meets those requirements since it is able to describe concepts that are subject to measurement and empirical examination. The results may also prove significant for law enforcement to enhance engagement with the community and to craft strategies that build trust in the community (Alehegn et al., 2025).

    **Reference**

    Alehegn, D., Karunakaran, R., & Engida, B. (2025). The role of community policing structures in enhancing safety, security, and local crime prevention in Addis Ababa City Administration.
    _SN Social Sciences_,
    _5_(10), 168.

    Hevi, S. S., Ketemepi, G. E., Dorkoo, C., & Wuttor, A. (2022). Community policing experience, public trust in the police, citizens’ psychological safety and community well-being in Ghana.
    _Safer communities_,
    _21_(2), 123-136.

    Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical Research: Design and Process (13th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780138088781

    **Research paper**

    **Writing the First Section of the Criminal Justice Proposal**

    Using the Criminal Justice research problem you identified in Discussion 2 and the Practical Application on pages 55-56 in your text, write the first section of your proposal by answering the first seven associated questions. You must complete the assignment with a minimum of 500 words.

    Textbook

    Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical Research: Design and Process (13th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780138088781

    **## rubric.pdf**

    Writing Assignment Rubric
    Course: MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Conceptual

    Developme

    nt and

    Application

    of the

    Theories

    / 10

    Research

    Quality and

    Thoroughn

    ess

    / 10

    10 points

    Demonstrates

    all 5 of the fol-

    lowing compe-

    tencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    8 points

    Demonstrates

    3-4 of the fol-

    lowing compe-

    tencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    3 points

    Demonstrates 2

    or less of the

    following com-

    petencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    References at

    least 1 sources

    that are credi-

    ble and relevant

    to the research

    question.

    0 points 0 points 0 points

    No references

    used.

    8/31/26, 11:01 AM Writing Assignment 1 – MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2134103&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1060421 1/3

    Total / 50

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Writing

    Quality

    / 10

    Structure,

    Organizatio

    n, and

    Length

    / 10

    Format and

    APA

    / 10

    10 points

    Proper use of

    sentence struc-

    ture, grammar,

    spelling, syntax,

    etc.

    8 points

    Uses some

    proper sentence

    structure, gram-

    mar, spelling,

    syntax, etc.

    3 points

    Does not use

    proper sentence

    structure, gram-

    mar, spelling,

    syntax, etc.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    Proper use

    structure, logi-

    cal flow, organi-

    zation, and re-

    quired length

    based on the

    assignment spe-

    cific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    8 points

    Uses some

    proper struc-

    ture, flow, orga-

    nization, and

    some required

    length based on

    the assignment

    specific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    3 points

    Improper use of

    structure, logi-

    cal flow, organi-

    zation, and not

    required length

    based on the

    assignment spe-

    cific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    Proper use of

    APA formatting

    and meets all

    requirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    8 points

    1- 4 specific

    problems with

    APA formatting

    and meets some

    requirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    3 points

    Five or more

    problems with

    APA formatting

    and does not

    meets all re-

    quirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    0 points

    8/31/26, 11:01 AM Writing Assignment 1 – MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2134103&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1060421 2/3

    **## rubric.pdf**

    Writing Assignment Rubric
    Course: MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Conceptual

    Developme

    nt and

    Application

    of the

    Theories

    / 10

    Research

    Quality and

    Thoroughn

    ess

    / 10

    10 points

    Demonstrates

    all 5 of the fol-

    lowing compe-

    tencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    8 points

    Demonstrates

    3-4 of the fol-

    lowing compe-

    tencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    3 points

    Demonstrates 2

    or less of the

    following com-

    petencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    References at

    least 1 sources

    that are credi-

    ble and relevant

    to the research

    question.

    0 points 0 points 0 points

    No references

    used.

    8/31/26, 11:01 AM Writing Assignment 1 – MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2134103&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1060421 1/3

    Total / 50

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Writing

    Quality

    / 10

    Structure,

    Organizatio

    n, and

    Length

    / 10

    Format and

    APA

    / 10

    10 points

    Proper use of

    sentence struc-

    ture, grammar,

    spelling, syntax,

    etc.

    8 points

    Uses some

    proper sentence

    structure, gram-

    mar, spelling,

    syntax, etc.

    3 points

    Does not use

    proper sentence

    structure, gram-

    mar, spelling,

    syntax, etc.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    Proper use

    structure, logi-

    cal flow, organi-

    zation, and re-

    quired length

    based on the

    assignment spe-

    cific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    8 points

    Uses some

    proper struc-

    ture, flow, orga-

    nization, and

    some required

    length based on

    the assignment

    specific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    3 points

    Improper use of

    structure, logi-

    cal flow, organi-

    zation, and not

    required length

    based on the

    assignment spe-

    cific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    Proper use of

    APA formatting

    and meets all

    requirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    8 points

    1- 4 specific

    problems with

    APA formatting

    and meets some

    requirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    3 points

    Five or more

    problems with

    APA formatting

    and does not

    meets all re-

    quirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    0 points

    8/31/26, 11:01 AM Writing Assignment 1 – MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2134103&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1060421 2/3

    **## WEEK1paper.docx**

    1

    3

    **Research Problem**

    A question that I'm really curious about when it comes to criminal justice is whether or not community policing is a better means of gaining public trust in the police and their perception of safety in the community. Community trust in law enforcement is critical because residents will be more likely to report crime, participate in investigations, and do crime prevention work if they feel law enforcement officers treat them fairly, with respect, and are responsive (Hevi, et al., 2022).

    The problem is that community policing is frequently touted as a means of improving police-community relations but may not be equally effective in all communities. Residents may feel more trusting of the police if police are visible, communicate, are perceived as fair, respond to the residents, and permit participation in their community. Criminal justice agencies may not be able to identify the most effective practices of community policing without systematically exploring these factors.

    My
    **research problem** is:
    _There is insufficient evidence about the relationship between community-policing practices and residents’ trust in law enforcement and perceptions of neighborhood safety._ A research question that emerged from this problem is: How are community policing practices related to residents' trust in the police and perceptions of neighborhood safety? A researchable question involves data collection from the community, and the experiences with police, perceptions of police fairness and responsiveness, trust in police, and feelings of safety could be measured.

    This topic was selected as it is important that criminal justice is not only effective in enforcing the law but that good relations exist between the police force and the communities they serve. The second chapter focuses on the need for a research problem to be clearly defined, manageable, and able to be studied systematically. The topic meets those requirements since it is able to describe concepts that are subject to measurement and empirical examination. The results may also prove significant for law enforcement to enhance engagement with the community and to craft strategies that build trust in the community (Alehegn et al., 2025).

    **Reference**

    Alehegn, D., Karunakaran, R., & Engida, B. (2025). The role of community policing structures in enhancing safety, security, and local crime prevention in Addis Ababa City Administration.
    _SN Social Sciences_,
    _5_(10), 168.

    Hevi, S. S., Ketemepi, G. E., Dorkoo, C., & Wuttor, A. (2022). Community policing experience, public trust in the police, citizens’ psychological safety and community well-being in Ghana.
    _Safer communities_,
    _21_(2), 123-136.

    Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical Research: Design and Process (13th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780138088781

    **Research paper**

    **Writing the First Section of the Criminal Justice Proposal**

    Using the Criminal Justice research problem you identified in Discussion 2 and the Practical Application on pages 55-56 in your text, write the first section of your proposal by answering the first seven associated questions. You must complete the assignment with a minimum of 500 words.

    Textbook

    Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical Research: Design and Process (13th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780138088781

    **## rubric.pdf**

    Writing Assignment Rubric
    Course: MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Conceptual

    Developme

    nt and

    Application

    of the

    Theories

    / 10

    Research

    Quality and

    Thoroughn

    ess

    / 10

    10 points

    Demonstrates

    all 5 of the fol-

    lowing compe-

    tencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    8 points

    Demonstrates

    3-4 of the fol-

    lowing compe-

    tencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    3 points

    Demonstrates 2

    or less of the

    following com-

    petencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    References at

    least 1 sources

    that are credi-

    ble and relevant

    to the research

    question.

    0 points 0 points 0 points

    No references

    used.

    8/31/26, 11:01 AM Writing Assignment 1 – MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2134103&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1060421 1/3

    Total / 50

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Writing

    Quality

    / 10

    Structure,

    Organizatio

    n, and

    Length

    / 10

    Format and

    APA

    / 10

    10 points

    Proper use of

    sentence struc-

    ture, grammar,

    spelling, syntax,

    etc.

    8 points

    Uses some

    proper sentence

    structure, gram-

    mar, spelling,

    syntax, etc.

    3 points

    Does not use

    proper sentence

    structure, gram-

    mar, spelling,

    syntax, etc.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    Proper use

    structure, logi-

    cal flow, organi-

    zation, and re-

    quired length

    based on the

    assignment spe-

    cific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    8 points

    Uses some

    proper struc-

    ture, flow, orga-

    nization, and

    some required

    length based on

    the assignment

    specific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    3 points

    Improper use of

    structure, logi-

    cal flow, organi-

    zation, and not

    required length

    based on the

    assignment spe-

    cific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    Proper use of

    APA formatting

    and meets all

    requirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    8 points

    1- 4 specific

    problems with

    APA formatting

    and meets some

    requirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    3 points

    Five or more

    problems with

    APA formatting

    and does not

    meets all re-

    quirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    0 points

    8/31/26, 11:01 AM Writing Assignment 1 – MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2134103&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1060421 2/3

    **## WEEK1paper.docx**

    1

    3

    **Research Problem**

    A question that I'm really curious about when it comes to criminal justice is whether or not community policing is a better means of gaining public trust in the police and their perception of safety in the community. Community trust in law enforcement is critical because residents will be more likely to report crime, participate in investigations, and do crime prevention work if they feel law enforcement officers treat them fairly, with respect, and are responsive (Hevi, et al., 2022).

    The problem is that community policing is frequently touted as a means of improving police-community relations but may not be equally effective in all communities. Residents may feel more trusting of the police if police are visible, communicate, are perceived as fair, respond to the residents, and permit participation in their community. Criminal justice agencies may not be able to identify the most effective practices of community policing without systematically exploring these factors.

    My
    **research problem** is:
    _There is insufficient evidence about the relationship between community-policing practices and residents’ trust in law enforcement and perceptions of neighborhood safety._ A research question that emerged from this problem is: How are community policing practices related to residents' trust in the police and perceptions of neighborhood safety? A researchable question involves data collection from the community, and the experiences with police, perceptions of police fairness and responsiveness, trust in police, and feelings of safety could be measured.

    This topic was selected as it is important that criminal justice is not only effective in enforcing the law but that good relations exist between the police force and the communities they serve. The second chapter focuses on the need for a research problem to be clearly defined, manageable, and able to be studied systematically. The topic meets those requirements since it is able to describe concepts that are subject to measurement and empirical examination. The results may also prove significant for law enforcement to enhance engagement with the community and to craft strategies that build trust in the community (Alehegn et al., 2025).

    **Reference**

    Alehegn, D., Karunakaran, R., & Engida, B. (2025). The role of community policing structures in enhancing safety, security, and local crime prevention in Addis Ababa City Administration.
    _SN Social Sciences_,
    _5_(10), 168.

    Hevi, S. S., Ketemepi, G. E., Dorkoo, C., & Wuttor, A. (2022). Community policing experience, public trust in the police, citizens’ psychological safety and community well-being in Ghana.
    _Safer communities_,
    _21_(2), 123-136.

    Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical Research: Design and Process (13th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780138088781

    **Research paper**

    **Writing the First Section of the Criminal Justice Proposal**

    Using the Criminal Justice research problem you identified in Discussion 2 and the Practical Application on pages 55-56 in your text, write the first section of your proposal by answering the first seven associated questions. You must complete the assignment with a minimum of 500 words.

    Textbook

    Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical Research: Design and Process (13th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/9780138088781

    **## rubric.pdf**

    Writing Assignment Rubric
    Course: MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Conceptual

    Developme

    nt and

    Application

    of the

    Theories

    / 10

    Research

    Quality and

    Thoroughn

    ess

    / 10

    10 points

    Demonstrates

    all 5 of the fol-

    lowing compe-

    tencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    8 points

    Demonstrates

    3-4 of the fol-

    lowing compe-

    tencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    3 points

    Demonstrates 2

    or less of the

    following com-

    petencies in the

    development of

    the written

    assignment:

    (1) Knowledge,

    (2)

    Comprehension,

    (3) Application,

    (4) Analysis,

    (5) Synthesis,

    (6) Evaluation.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    References at

    least 1 sources

    that are credi-

    ble and relevant

    to the research

    question.

    0 points 0 points 0 points

    No references

    used.

    8/31/26, 11:01 AM Writing Assignment 1 – MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2134103&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1060421 1/3

    Total / 50

    Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Criterion Score

    Writing

    Quality

    / 10

    Structure,

    Organizatio

    n, and

    Length

    / 10

    Format and

    APA

    / 10

    10 points

    Proper use of

    sentence struc-

    ture, grammar,

    spelling, syntax,

    etc.

    8 points

    Uses some

    proper sentence

    structure, gram-

    mar, spelling,

    syntax, etc.

    3 points

    Does not use

    proper sentence

    structure, gram-

    mar, spelling,

    syntax, etc.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    Proper use

    structure, logi-

    cal flow, organi-

    zation, and re-

    quired length

    based on the

    assignment spe-

    cific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    8 points

    Uses some

    proper struc-

    ture, flow, orga-

    nization, and

    some required

    length based on

    the assignment

    specific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    3 points

    Improper use of

    structure, logi-

    cal flow, organi-

    zation, and not

    required length

    based on the

    assignment spe-

    cific instruc-

    tions each

    week.

    0 points

    No Submission

    10 points

    Proper use of

    APA formatting

    and meets all

    requirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    8 points

    1- 4 specific

    problems with

    APA formatting

    and meets some

    requirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    3 points

    Five or more

    problems with

    APA formatting

    and does not

    meets all re-

    quirements

    (e.g., 1” margins

    all around, ref-

    erence page,

    appendices,

    proper citation,

    no white space,

    etc.).

    0 points

    8/31/26, 11:01 AM Writing Assignment 1 – MSCJ 500 DEA – RESEARCH DESIGN – Columbia College of Missouri

    https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2134103&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1060421 2/3

  • [Solved] Police Psychology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Explain the difference between actuarial tools and clinical judgement. Then, highlight one risk/downside of each as it pertains to pre-employment screening for police officers. Describe the role of psychology in EITHER officer…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Explain the difference between actuarial tools and clinical judgement. Then, highlight one risk/downside of each as it pertains to pre-employment screening for police officers.

    Describe the role of psychology in EITHER officer performance measurement or promotion selection. Then, outline one ethical issue psychologists face in that role and which APA Ethical standard should we review to address that ethical issue.

    What is meant (in Chapter 11) by Police De-selection and offer an example of a face-to-face oral question you might ask a candidate to assess for their social and emotional intelligence.

    Name a common misconception about the role of psychologists in assessment of officers and how would you respond if asked?

  • [Solved] Law Assignment 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Will she be successful on these claims? use IRAC method use 3 United States case and 3 united States statutes use proper citations no title page necessary. assignment attached – [\ \ IMG_2963.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2963-jpeg-10591383 "IMG_2963.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Will she be successful on these claims?

    use IRAC method

    use 3 United States case and 3 united States statutes

    use proper citations

    no title page necessary.

    assignment attached

    – [\
    \
    IMG_2963.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2963-jpeg-10591383 "IMG_2963.jpeg")

  • [Solved] Law Assignment 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please discuss any arguments Leslie should make to support her FMLA claim. assignment attached use IRAC METHOD 3 United States cases and 3 United States statutes proper citations required no title page necessary – [\ \ IMG_2964.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2964-jpeg-10591381 "IMG_29…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please discuss any arguments Leslie should make to support her FMLA claim.

    assignment attached

    use IRAC METHOD

    3 United States cases and 3 United States statutes

    proper citations required

    no title page necessary

    – [\
    \
    IMG_2964.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-2964-jpeg-10591381 "IMG_2964.jpeg")