Category: Psychology

  • [Solved] Thread Response 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    At least 400 words · At least two scholarly citations in APA format. · Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. · Acceptable sources include the Bible, course texts, relevant books, and peer-reviewed articles. \ ReplytoMartha.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/repl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    At least 400 words
    · At least two scholarly citations in APA format.
    · Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years.
    · Acceptable sources include the Bible, course texts, relevant books, and peer-reviewed articles.
    \
    ReplytoMartha.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replytomartha-docx-10450415 "ReplytoMartha.docx")

  • [Solved] Ethnic Diversity in Research

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Critique Current Research on Child Development. – ## L7RequiredResources.docx – ## L7Instructions.docx **## L7RequiredResources.docx** **Week 7 Required Resources** · [**Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research**](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Critique Current Research on Child Development.

    – ## L7RequiredResources.docx

    – ## L7Instructions.docx

    **## L7RequiredResources.docx**

    **Week 7 Required Resources**

    ·
    [**Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research**](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=eric&AN=EJ1088307&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=natuniv)

    Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., & Higareda, M. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research.
    _Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46_(2), 698–703.

    **This article specifically addresses the challenges and strategies involved in recruiting and retaining minority children in research, which is directly relevant to the ethical inclusion of ethnic minorities in research studies. It provides concrete examples of how researchers can ensure minority children's well-being and respect their rights.**

    ·
    [**The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook**](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/nu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmethods.sagepub.com%2Fbook%2Fmono%2Fthe-ethics-of-research-with-children-and-young-people-2e%2Ftoc)

    Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2020).
    _The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook._ SAGE Publications, Ltd.

    **Read Chapters 9 and 10.**
    **This book provides a comprehensive overview of the ethical principles involved in research with children and young people. It covers essential topics such as informed consent, harm prevention, and respect for participants, making it highly relevant for addressing the ethical treatment of children in research.**

    **Week 7 Optional Resources**

    ·
    [**Negotiating power dynamics through co‐reflexivity in research with young children in disadvantaged communities**](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=a9h&AN=170008847&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=natuniv)

    El Gemayel, S. M., & Salema, Y. (2023). Negotiating power dynamics through co‐reflexivity in research with young children in disadvantaged communities.
    _Children & Society, 37_(5), 1596–1611.

    **As a supplemental resource, this paper can offer additional depth to the discussion by providing concrete examples of how ethical principles are applied in specific research settings. It can help illustrate the importance of addressing power dynamics and ensuring ongoing consent, which are critical considerations in ethical research.**

    ·
    [**Challenges and innovations in research on childhood**](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/nu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmethods.sagepub.com%2Fbook%2Fthe-sage-handbook-of-child-research%2Fn20.xml)

    Weller, D., Hobbs, S., & Goodman, G. (2014). Challenges and innovations in research on childhood. In
    _The SAGE Handbook of Child Research_(pp. 363-370). SAGE Publications Ltd.

    **This chapter provides an overview of the challenges and innovations in conducting research with children. While it is informative and covers broad ethical considerations, it is less focused on the inclusion of ethnic minorities.**

    **## L7Instructions.docx**

    **Ethnic Diversity in Research**

    Zamora, Williams, Higareda, Wheeler, and Levitt, (2016) report on research design biases in health research. Studies tend to underrepresent Latinos and other ethnic minorities. Latinos are underrepresented because of the exclusion of non-English speakers. Studies frequently classify Latinos and other non-white participants in an ‘‘other’’ category. The authors point to surveys that indicate that African American and Latino participants frequently distrust research and the medical community. Sometimes, they may have limited knowledge about what research, especially biomedical research entails and the potential consequences and/or benefits of participation.

    According to Burlew et al. (2011), research findings that utilize predominantly European-American substance-using samples may not be generalizable to specific racial/ethnic minorities. Therefore, it is necessary that when you conduct your study that more research focus on racial and ethnic minorities to obtain information that will reduce and ultimately eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of substance use and to accurately evaluate the efficacy of substance abuse treatment interventions with racial and ethnic minorities (Burlew et al., 2011).

    George, Duran, and Norris, K. (2014) emphasize that despite an understanding of the importance of racial and ethnic minority participation in clinical research, racial and ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in clinical research. This absence of ethnic diversity creates problems with the generalizability of research findings and equality in the provision of health care. The report that despite the fact that racial and ethnic minorities constitute more than 30 percent of the U.S. population, racial and ethnic minorities constituted only 17 percent of FDA clinical trial participants in 185 studies over a 5-year period. One of the reasons given for this disparity is that research has historically been conducted by White researchers and has targeted mostly White participants. Recruitment strategies developed for White participants were found not to be effective in the recruitment of minorities.

    Be sure to review the resources carefully. You are expected to apply the information from these resources when you prepare the assignments

    References

    Burlew, A. K., Weekes, J. C., Montgomery, L., Feaster, D. J., Robbins, M. S., Rosa, C. L., & … Wu, L. (2011). Conducting research with racial/ethnic minorities: Methodological lessons from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 37(5), 324-332.

    George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16-e31

    Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., Higareda, M., Wheeler, B. Y., & Levitt, P. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research. Journal of Autism And Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 698-703.

    **Critique Current Research on Child Development**

    Background Information

    You are a researcher planning to conduct a study involving children in an inner-city school. The school principal has informed you that parents might be hesitant to allow their children to participate. To address these concerns, you will write an article aimed at parents, showcasing examples of recent research involving ethnic minority school-age children. The goal of your article is to reassure parents that the research will be conducted ethically and to demonstrate that their children will be well-protected.

    **Instructions**

    Your article should include the following:

    Selection of Research Articles: Choose five recent peer-reviewed research articles that involved ethnic minority school-age children as participants. These articles should exemplify ethical research practices.

    Summaries of Research Articles: Provide a concise summary of each selected research article, highlighting the key findings and how the study was conducted.

    Protection from Harm: Explain how each study ensured that participants were protected from harm and that their decisions were respected.

    Well-being of Participants: Describe the measures taken in the research to ensure the well-being of all participants.

    Fairness and Benefits: Discuss how the outcomes of the research emphasized fairness, particularly in the distribution of benefits among participants.

    Inclusion of Ethnic Minorities: Highlight how each study included ethnic minorities as subjects, emphasizing the importance of their inclusion in research.

    **Writing Guidelines:**

    Tone: Write in an informal, yet informative tone that is appropriate for an audience of parents. The tone should be conversational and accessible, helping to build trust with the parents.

    APA Documentation: Even though the article should be informal, you must still document your sources using APA format, 7th edition including in-text citations and a reference page.

    References: Support your article with the five selected scholarly research articles. You may also include additional appropriate scholarly resources, such as seminal articles, if relevant.

    Length: Your article should be 4-5 pages long, not including the title and reference pages. Ensure that your paper is formatted according to APA guidelines, 7th edition (e.g., double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font).

    Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

    **## L7Instructions.docx**

    **Ethnic Diversity in Research**

    Zamora, Williams, Higareda, Wheeler, and Levitt, (2016) report on research design biases in health research. Studies tend to underrepresent Latinos and other ethnic minorities. Latinos are underrepresented because of the exclusion of non-English speakers. Studies frequently classify Latinos and other non-white participants in an ‘‘other’’ category. The authors point to surveys that indicate that African American and Latino participants frequently distrust research and the medical community. Sometimes, they may have limited knowledge about what research, especially biomedical research entails and the potential consequences and/or benefits of participation.

    According to Burlew et al. (2011), research findings that utilize predominantly European-American substance-using samples may not be generalizable to specific racial/ethnic minorities. Therefore, it is necessary that when you conduct your study that more research focus on racial and ethnic minorities to obtain information that will reduce and ultimately eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of substance use and to accurately evaluate the efficacy of substance abuse treatment interventions with racial and ethnic minorities (Burlew et al., 2011).

    George, Duran, and Norris, K. (2014) emphasize that despite an understanding of the importance of racial and ethnic minority participation in clinical research, racial and ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in clinical research. This absence of ethnic diversity creates problems with the generalizability of research findings and equality in the provision of health care. The report that despite the fact that racial and ethnic minorities constitute more than 30 percent of the U.S. population, racial and ethnic minorities constituted only 17 percent of FDA clinical trial participants in 185 studies over a 5-year period. One of the reasons given for this disparity is that research has historically been conducted by White researchers and has targeted mostly White participants. Recruitment strategies developed for White participants were found not to be effective in the recruitment of minorities.

    Be sure to review the resources carefully. You are expected to apply the information from these resources when you prepare the assignments

    References

    Burlew, A. K., Weekes, J. C., Montgomery, L., Feaster, D. J., Robbins, M. S., Rosa, C. L., & … Wu, L. (2011). Conducting research with racial/ethnic minorities: Methodological lessons from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 37(5), 324-332.

    George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16-e31

    Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., Higareda, M., Wheeler, B. Y., & Levitt, P. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research. Journal of Autism And Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 698-703.

    **Critique Current Research on Child Development**

    Background Information

    You are a researcher planning to conduct a study involving children in an inner-city school. The school principal has informed you that parents might be hesitant to allow their children to participate. To address these concerns, you will write an article aimed at parents, showcasing examples of recent research involving ethnic minority school-age children. The goal of your article is to reassure parents that the research will be conducted ethically and to demonstrate that their children will be well-protected.

    **Instructions**

    Your article should include the following:

    Selection of Research Articles: Choose five recent peer-reviewed research articles that involved ethnic minority school-age children as participants. These articles should exemplify ethical research practices.

    Summaries of Research Articles: Provide a concise summary of each selected research article, highlighting the key findings and how the study was conducted.

    Protection from Harm: Explain how each study ensured that participants were protected from harm and that their decisions were respected.

    Well-being of Participants: Describe the measures taken in the research to ensure the well-being of all participants.

    Fairness and Benefits: Discuss how the outcomes of the research emphasized fairness, particularly in the distribution of benefits among participants.

    Inclusion of Ethnic Minorities: Highlight how each study included ethnic minorities as subjects, emphasizing the importance of their inclusion in research.

    **Writing Guidelines:**

    Tone: Write in an informal, yet informative tone that is appropriate for an audience of parents. The tone should be conversational and accessible, helping to build trust with the parents.

    APA Documentation: Even though the article should be informal, you must still document your sources using APA format, 7th edition including in-text citations and a reference page.

    References: Support your article with the five selected scholarly research articles. You may also include additional appropriate scholarly resources, such as seminal articles, if relevant.

    Length: Your article should be 4-5 pages long, not including the title and reference pages. Ensure that your paper is formatted according to APA guidelines, 7th edition (e.g., double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font).

    Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

    **## L7RequiredResources.docx**

    **Week 7 Required Resources**

    ·
    [**Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research**](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=eric&AN=EJ1088307&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=natuniv)

    Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., & Higareda, M. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research.
    _Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46_(2), 698–703.

    **This article specifically addresses the challenges and strategies involved in recruiting and retaining minority children in research, which is directly relevant to the ethical inclusion of ethnic minorities in research studies. It provides concrete examples of how researchers can ensure minority children's well-being and respect their rights.**

    ·
    [**The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook**](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/nu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmethods.sagepub.com%2Fbook%2Fmono%2Fthe-ethics-of-research-with-children-and-young-people-2e%2Ftoc)

    Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2020).
    _The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook._ SAGE Publications, Ltd.

    **Read Chapters 9 and 10.**
    **This book provides a comprehensive overview of the ethical principles involved in research with children and young people. It covers essential topics such as informed consent, harm prevention, and respect for participants, making it highly relevant for addressing the ethical treatment of children in research.**

    **Week 7 Optional Resources**

    ·
    [**Negotiating power dynamics through co‐reflexivity in research with young children in disadvantaged communities**](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=a9h&AN=170008847&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=natuniv)

    El Gemayel, S. M., & Salema, Y. (2023). Negotiating power dynamics through co‐reflexivity in research with young children in disadvantaged communities.
    _Children & Society, 37_(5), 1596–1611.

    **As a supplemental resource, this paper can offer additional depth to the discussion by providing concrete examples of how ethical principles are applied in specific research settings. It can help illustrate the importance of addressing power dynamics and ensuring ongoing consent, which are critical considerations in ethical research.**

    ·
    [**Challenges and innovations in research on childhood**](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/nu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmethods.sagepub.com%2Fbook%2Fthe-sage-handbook-of-child-research%2Fn20.xml)

    Weller, D., Hobbs, S., & Goodman, G. (2014). Challenges and innovations in research on childhood. In
    _The SAGE Handbook of Child Research_(pp. 363-370). SAGE Publications Ltd.

    **This chapter provides an overview of the challenges and innovations in conducting research with children. While it is informative and covers broad ethical considerations, it is less focused on the inclusion of ethnic minorities.**

    **## L7Instructions.docx**

    **Ethnic Diversity in Research**

    Zamora, Williams, Higareda, Wheeler, and Levitt, (2016) report on research design biases in health research. Studies tend to underrepresent Latinos and other ethnic minorities. Latinos are underrepresented because of the exclusion of non-English speakers. Studies frequently classify Latinos and other non-white participants in an ‘‘other’’ category. The authors point to surveys that indicate that African American and Latino participants frequently distrust research and the medical community. Sometimes, they may have limited knowledge about what research, especially biomedical research entails and the potential consequences and/or benefits of participation.

    According to Burlew et al. (2011), research findings that utilize predominantly European-American substance-using samples may not be generalizable to specific racial/ethnic minorities. Therefore, it is necessary that when you conduct your study that more research focus on racial and ethnic minorities to obtain information that will reduce and ultimately eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of substance use and to accurately evaluate the efficacy of substance abuse treatment interventions with racial and ethnic minorities (Burlew et al., 2011).

    George, Duran, and Norris, K. (2014) emphasize that despite an understanding of the importance of racial and ethnic minority participation in clinical research, racial and ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in clinical research. This absence of ethnic diversity creates problems with the generalizability of research findings and equality in the provision of health care. The report that despite the fact that racial and ethnic minorities constitute more than 30 percent of the U.S. population, racial and ethnic minorities constituted only 17 percent of FDA clinical trial participants in 185 studies over a 5-year period. One of the reasons given for this disparity is that research has historically been conducted by White researchers and has targeted mostly White participants. Recruitment strategies developed for White participants were found not to be effective in the recruitment of minorities.

    Be sure to review the resources carefully. You are expected to apply the information from these resources when you prepare the assignments

    References

    Burlew, A. K., Weekes, J. C., Montgomery, L., Feaster, D. J., Robbins, M. S., Rosa, C. L., & … Wu, L. (2011). Conducting research with racial/ethnic minorities: Methodological lessons from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 37(5), 324-332.

    George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16-e31

    Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., Higareda, M., Wheeler, B. Y., & Levitt, P. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research. Journal of Autism And Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 698-703.

    **Critique Current Research on Child Development**

    Background Information

    You are a researcher planning to conduct a study involving children in an inner-city school. The school principal has informed you that parents might be hesitant to allow their children to participate. To address these concerns, you will write an article aimed at parents, showcasing examples of recent research involving ethnic minority school-age children. The goal of your article is to reassure parents that the research will be conducted ethically and to demonstrate that their children will be well-protected.

    **Instructions**

    Your article should include the following:

    Selection of Research Articles: Choose five recent peer-reviewed research articles that involved ethnic minority school-age children as participants. These articles should exemplify ethical research practices.

    Summaries of Research Articles: Provide a concise summary of each selected research article, highlighting the key findings and how the study was conducted.

    Protection from Harm: Explain how each study ensured that participants were protected from harm and that their decisions were respected.

    Well-being of Participants: Describe the measures taken in the research to ensure the well-being of all participants.

    Fairness and Benefits: Discuss how the outcomes of the research emphasized fairness, particularly in the distribution of benefits among participants.

    Inclusion of Ethnic Minorities: Highlight how each study included ethnic minorities as subjects, emphasizing the importance of their inclusion in research.

    **Writing Guidelines:**

    Tone: Write in an informal, yet informative tone that is appropriate for an audience of parents. The tone should be conversational and accessible, helping to build trust with the parents.

    APA Documentation: Even though the article should be informal, you must still document your sources using APA format, 7th edition including in-text citations and a reference page.

    References: Support your article with the five selected scholarly research articles. You may also include additional appropriate scholarly resources, such as seminal articles, if relevant.

    Length: Your article should be 4-5 pages long, not including the title and reference pages. Ensure that your paper is formatted according to APA guidelines, 7th edition (e.g., double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font).

    Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

    **## L7RequiredResources.docx**

    **Week 7 Required Resources**

    ·
    [**Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research**](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=eric&AN=EJ1088307&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=natuniv)

    Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., & Higareda, M. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research.
    _Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46_(2), 698–703.

    **This article specifically addresses the challenges and strategies involved in recruiting and retaining minority children in research, which is directly relevant to the ethical inclusion of ethnic minorities in research studies. It provides concrete examples of how researchers can ensure minority children's well-being and respect their rights.**

    ·
    [**The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook**](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/nu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmethods.sagepub.com%2Fbook%2Fmono%2Fthe-ethics-of-research-with-children-and-young-people-2e%2Ftoc)

    Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2020).
    _The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook._ SAGE Publications, Ltd.

    **Read Chapters 9 and 10.**
    **This book provides a comprehensive overview of the ethical principles involved in research with children and young people. It covers essential topics such as informed consent, harm prevention, and respect for participants, making it highly relevant for addressing the ethical treatment of children in research.**

    **Week 7 Optional Resources**

    ·
    [**Negotiating power dynamics through co‐reflexivity in research with young children in disadvantaged communities**](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=a9h&AN=170008847&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=natuniv)

    El Gemayel, S. M., & Salema, Y. (2023). Negotiating power dynamics through co‐reflexivity in research with young children in disadvantaged communities.
    _Children & Society, 37_(5), 1596–1611.

    **As a supplemental resource, this paper can offer additional depth to the discussion by providing concrete examples of how ethical principles are applied in specific research settings. It can help illustrate the importance of addressing power dynamics and ensuring ongoing consent, which are critical considerations in ethical research.**

    ·
    [**Challenges and innovations in research on childhood**](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/nu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmethods.sagepub.com%2Fbook%2Fthe-sage-handbook-of-child-research%2Fn20.xml)

    Weller, D., Hobbs, S., & Goodman, G. (2014). Challenges and innovations in research on childhood. In
    _The SAGE Handbook of Child Research_(pp. 363-370). SAGE Publications Ltd.

    **This chapter provides an overview of the challenges and innovations in conducting research with children. While it is informative and covers broad ethical considerations, it is less focused on the inclusion of ethnic minorities.**

    **## L7Instructions.docx**

    **Ethnic Diversity in Research**

    Zamora, Williams, Higareda, Wheeler, and Levitt, (2016) report on research design biases in health research. Studies tend to underrepresent Latinos and other ethnic minorities. Latinos are underrepresented because of the exclusion of non-English speakers. Studies frequently classify Latinos and other non-white participants in an ‘‘other’’ category. The authors point to surveys that indicate that African American and Latino participants frequently distrust research and the medical community. Sometimes, they may have limited knowledge about what research, especially biomedical research entails and the potential consequences and/or benefits of participation.

    According to Burlew et al. (2011), research findings that utilize predominantly European-American substance-using samples may not be generalizable to specific racial/ethnic minorities. Therefore, it is necessary that when you conduct your study that more research focus on racial and ethnic minorities to obtain information that will reduce and ultimately eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of substance use and to accurately evaluate the efficacy of substance abuse treatment interventions with racial and ethnic minorities (Burlew et al., 2011).

    George, Duran, and Norris, K. (2014) emphasize that despite an understanding of the importance of racial and ethnic minority participation in clinical research, racial and ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in clinical research. This absence of ethnic diversity creates problems with the generalizability of research findings and equality in the provision of health care. The report that despite the fact that racial and ethnic minorities constitute more than 30 percent of the U.S. population, racial and ethnic minorities constituted only 17 percent of FDA clinical trial participants in 185 studies over a 5-year period. One of the reasons given for this disparity is that research has historically been conducted by White researchers and has targeted mostly White participants. Recruitment strategies developed for White participants were found not to be effective in the recruitment of minorities.

    Be sure to review the resources carefully. You are expected to apply the information from these resources when you prepare the assignments

    References

    Burlew, A. K., Weekes, J. C., Montgomery, L., Feaster, D. J., Robbins, M. S., Rosa, C. L., & … Wu, L. (2011). Conducting research with racial/ethnic minorities: Methodological lessons from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 37(5), 324-332.

    George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16-e31

    Zamora, I., Williams, M. E., Higareda, M., Wheeler, B. Y., & Levitt, P. (2016). Brief report: Recruitment and retention of minority children for autism research. Journal of Autism And Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 698-703.

    **Critique Current Research on Child Development**

    Background Information

    You are a researcher planning to conduct a study involving children in an inner-city school. The school principal has informed you that parents might be hesitant to allow their children to participate. To address these concerns, you will write an article aimed at parents, showcasing examples of recent research involving ethnic minority school-age children. The goal of your article is to reassure parents that the research will be conducted ethically and to demonstrate that their children will be well-protected.

    **Instructions**

    Your article should include the following:

    Selection of Research Articles: Choose five recent peer-reviewed research articles that involved ethnic minority school-age children as participants. These articles should exemplify ethical research practices.

    Summaries of Research Articles: Provide a concise summary of each selected research article, highlighting the key findings and how the study was conducted.

    Protection from Harm: Explain how each study ensured that participants were protected from harm and that their decisions were respected.

    Well-being of Participants: Describe the measures taken in the research to ensure the well-being of all participants.

    Fairness and Benefits: Discuss how the outcomes of the research emphasized fairness, particularly in the distribution of benefits among participants.

    Inclusion of Ethnic Minorities: Highlight how each study included ethnic minorities as subjects, emphasizing the importance of their inclusion in research.

    **Writing Guidelines:**

    Tone: Write in an informal, yet informative tone that is appropriate for an audience of parents. The tone should be conversational and accessible, helping to build trust with the parents.

    APA Documentation: Even though the article should be informal, you must still document your sources using APA format, 7th edition including in-text citations and a reference page.

    References: Support your article with the five selected scholarly research articles. You may also include additional appropriate scholarly resources, such as seminal articles, if relevant.

    Length: Your article should be 4-5 pages long, not including the title and reference pages. Ensure that your paper is formatted according to APA guidelines, 7th edition (e.g., double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font).

    Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Marital Intimacy and Finances _disc7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – At least 800 words – At least three scholarly citations in APA format. – Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. – Acceptable sources include the Bible, course texts, relevant books, and peer-reviewed articles. \ DiscussionInstructions-MaritalIntimacyandFinances.doc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – At least 800 words
    – At least three scholarly citations in APA format.
    – Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years.
    – Acceptable sources include the Bible, course texts, relevant books, and peer-reviewed articles.
    \
    DiscussionInstructions-MaritalIntimacyandFinances.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussioninstructions-maritalintimacyandfinances-docx "DiscussionInstructions-MaritalIntimacyandFinances.docx")
    \
    VIDEOS.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/videos-docx-10450043 "VIDEOS.docx")
    \
    Reading-WrightN.1992.ThePremaritalCounselingHandbook.Chapt.8-9.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-wrightn-1992-thepremaritalcounselinghandbook-chapt-8-9-pdf "Reading-WrightN.1992.ThePremaritalCounselingHandbook.Chapt.8-9.pdf")

  • [Solved] Psychology FINAL SUBMISSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS _As 7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Scholarly citations in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the Bible, course texts, relevant books, and peer-reviewed articles. Follow FINAL SUBMISSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Instructions Follow Premarital Project – Final Sub…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Scholarly citations in APA format.
    Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years.
    Acceptable sources include the Bible, course texts, relevant books, and peer-reviewed articles.
    Follow FINAL SUBMISSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Instructions
    Follow Premarital Project – Final Submission Grading Rubric
    \
    AssignmentInstructions-PremaritalProjectFinalSubmission.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignmentinstructions-premaritalprojectfinalsubmission-docx "AssignmentInstructions-PremaritalProjectFinalSubmission.docx")
    \
    PremaritalProject-FinalSubmissionGradingRubric.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/premaritalproject-finalsubmissiongradingrubric-pdf "PremaritalProject-FinalSubmissionGradingRubric.pdf")
    \
    VIDEOS.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/videos-docx-10450055 "VIDEOS.docx")
    \
    Reading-WrightN.1992.ThePremaritalCounselingHandbook.Chapt.8-9.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-wrightn-1992-thepremaritalcounselinghandbook-chapt-8-9-pdf-10450057 "Reading-WrightN.1992.ThePremaritalCounselingHandbook.Chapt.8-9.pdf")

  • [Solved] Thread Response 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    · At least 400 words · At least two scholarly citations in APA format. · Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. · Acceptable sources include the Bible, course texts, relevant books, and peer-reviewed articles. \ ReplytoChiquita.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    · At least 400 words
    · At least two scholarly citations in APA format.
    · Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years.
    · Acceptable sources include the Bible, course texts, relevant books, and peer-reviewed articles.
    \
    ReplytoChiquita.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/replytochiquita-docx-10449947 "ReplytoChiquita.docx")

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] dis 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    attached – ## dis2.docx – ## rubric.docx **## dis2.docx** Rules for Discussion 2 – RTI and EBP Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts and 2 replies. Canvas often groups posts and I will respond to posts of the same topic. So, I may not be able to respond to each and every post, but…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    attached

    – ## dis2.docx

    – ## rubric.docx

    **## dis2.docx**

    Rules for Discussion 2 – RTI and EBP

    Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts and 2 replies.  Canvas often groups posts and I will respond to posts of the same topic. So, I may not be able to respond to each and every post, but I will group my responses to make sure to address the topics presented. Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment. More information about discussions is in the Discussion file in Modules.

    This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric displayed earlier in the course. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion you will present two effective RTI and/or EBP strategies. You can do 2 of EBP or RTI or 1 on each of the topics.  You should also have 2 replies to posts of your classmates. Your responses should be related to  2 different posts.  This is a little different from the requirements associated with Discussion 1. Your discussion should reflect best practice as found in the literature and not just a personal preference. Your posts do not have to be long but complete enough that others can understand the intervention or strategy and how it is used. Do not hesitate to reach out to me for assistance.

    RTI and EBP cover a lot of territory. Obviously, you could not cover the entire content of these topics in one or two responses so focus your posts on a specific element(s) of RTI or EBP such as the state of the literature in these topics, issues and problems with some element of RTI or EBP or issues with implementation of RTI or EBP. Please free to focus on any elements of EBP or RtI that you find interesting.

    Please be aware that discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another response. So, please complete this assignment on time.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **General Rubric For All Assignments**

    This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Criteria                                                                     Ratings** |
    | | | | | |
    | **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
    | | | | | |

    **## rubric.docx**

    **General Rubric For All Assignments**

    This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Criteria                                                                     Ratings** |
    | | | | | |
    | **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
    | | | | | |

    **## dis2.docx**

    Rules for Discussion 2 – RTI and EBP

    Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts and 2 replies.  Canvas often groups posts and I will respond to posts of the same topic. So, I may not be able to respond to each and every post, but I will group my responses to make sure to address the topics presented. Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment. More information about discussions is in the Discussion file in Modules.

    This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric displayed earlier in the course. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion you will present two effective RTI and/or EBP strategies. You can do 2 of EBP or RTI or 1 on each of the topics.  You should also have 2 replies to posts of your classmates. Your responses should be related to  2 different posts.  This is a little different from the requirements associated with Discussion 1. Your discussion should reflect best practice as found in the literature and not just a personal preference. Your posts do not have to be long but complete enough that others can understand the intervention or strategy and how it is used. Do not hesitate to reach out to me for assistance.

    RTI and EBP cover a lot of territory. Obviously, you could not cover the entire content of these topics in one or two responses so focus your posts on a specific element(s) of RTI or EBP such as the state of the literature in these topics, issues and problems with some element of RTI or EBP or issues with implementation of RTI or EBP. Please free to focus on any elements of EBP or RtI that you find interesting.

    Please be aware that discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another response. So, please complete this assignment on time.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **General Rubric For All Assignments**

    This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Criteria                                                                     Ratings** |
    | | | | | |
    | **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
    | | | | | |

    **## dis2.docx**

    Rules for Discussion 2 – RTI and EBP

    Each student is to make a minimum of 2 substantive posts and 2 replies.  Canvas often groups posts and I will respond to posts of the same topic. So, I may not be able to respond to each and every post, but I will group my responses to make sure to address the topics presented. Discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another assignment. More information about discussions is in the Discussion file in Modules.

    This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric displayed earlier in the course. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion you will present two effective RTI and/or EBP strategies. You can do 2 of EBP or RTI or 1 on each of the topics.  You should also have 2 replies to posts of your classmates. Your responses should be related to  2 different posts.  This is a little different from the requirements associated with Discussion 1. Your discussion should reflect best practice as found in the literature and not just a personal preference. Your posts do not have to be long but complete enough that others can understand the intervention or strategy and how it is used. Do not hesitate to reach out to me for assistance.

    RTI and EBP cover a lot of territory. Obviously, you could not cover the entire content of these topics in one or two responses so focus your posts on a specific element(s) of RTI or EBP such as the state of the literature in these topics, issues and problems with some element of RTI or EBP or issues with implementation of RTI or EBP. Please free to focus on any elements of EBP or RtI that you find interesting.

    Please be aware that discussions cannot be made up or substituted with another response. So, please complete this assignment on time.

    **## rubric.docx**

    **General Rubric For All Assignments**

    This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | | **Criteria                                                                     Ratings** |
    | | | | | |
    | **Grasp of readings** | **Excellent**<br>Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments. | **Good**<br>Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail. | **Developing**<br>Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Critical analysis** | **Excellent**<br>Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue. | **Good**<br>Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining. | **Developing**<br>Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Evidence** | **Excellent**<br>Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated. | **Good**<br>Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated. | **Developing**<br>Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.<br>Some opinion. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Organization & Clarity** | **Excellent**<br>Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research. | **Good**<br>Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly. | **Developing**<br>Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion. |
    | | | | | |
    | **Mechanics** | **Excellent**<br>When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues. | **Good**<br>Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues. | **Developing**<br>There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues. | **Needs Improvement**<br>Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors. |
    | | | | | |

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] resp 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    attached – ## resp3.docx **## resp3.docx** **Response to your classmate:** **Post 2- Self-management.** Another evidence-based intervention that can be used in a school setting is self-management intervention. Smith et al. (2022) found positive results in a systematic review for the self-management …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    attached

    – ## resp3.docx

    **## resp3.docx**

    **Response to your classmate:**

    **Post 2- Self-management.**

    Another evidence-based intervention that can be used in a school setting is self-management intervention. Smith et al. (2022) found positive results in a systematic review for the self-management procedures in all grades, improving behaviors and students’ academic growth.

    A self-management procedure will increase autonomy, regulation, and motivation, as the student will monitor and reinforce their behavior. It opens their participation in the behavior change process, creating a foundation for fading the intensity of the support needed. Self-management does have to be taught and is an effective strategy to support students' goal achievement; the intervention can be used in all tiers, promoting more independence and participation to have skills to be in an inclusive school environment.

    The program "We have choices" is a self-management strategy and was found to have positive results in a study conducted by Smolkowski et al. (2022); with general classroom students, the students showed more participation, engagement, and independence and less maladaptive behavior. The strategy consists of letting students choose some aspects of the tasks; for example, what subject they wanted to work on first, what type of materials they would prefer, environmental choices, and work area. They could choose between working in silence or discussing with others, working on the floor or at the table, and how they would show the teacher the work.

    Reference:

    Smith, T. E., Thompson, A. M., & Maynard, B. R. (2022). Self-management interventions for reducing challenging behaviors among school-age students: A systematic review.
    _Campbell systematic reviews_,
    _18_(1), e1223.
    [https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1223Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1223)

    Smolkowski, K. Marquez, B. Marquez, J. Vincent, C. Pennefather, J. walker, H. & Strycker, L.A. (2022). Teaching self-management strategies to upper-elementary students: Evidence of promise from the we have choices
    program.
    _Psychology in the Schools, 60_(6).

    [**https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22710** Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22710)

    **## resp3.docx**

    **Response to your classmate:**

    **Post 2- Self-management.**

    Another evidence-based intervention that can be used in a school setting is self-management intervention. Smith et al. (2022) found positive results in a systematic review for the self-management procedures in all grades, improving behaviors and students’ academic growth.

    A self-management procedure will increase autonomy, regulation, and motivation, as the student will monitor and reinforce their behavior. It opens their participation in the behavior change process, creating a foundation for fading the intensity of the support needed. Self-management does have to be taught and is an effective strategy to support students' goal achievement; the intervention can be used in all tiers, promoting more independence and participation to have skills to be in an inclusive school environment.

    The program "We have choices" is a self-management strategy and was found to have positive results in a study conducted by Smolkowski et al. (2022); with general classroom students, the students showed more participation, engagement, and independence and less maladaptive behavior. The strategy consists of letting students choose some aspects of the tasks; for example, what subject they wanted to work on first, what type of materials they would prefer, environmental choices, and work area. They could choose between working in silence or discussing with others, working on the floor or at the table, and how they would show the teacher the work.

    Reference:

    Smith, T. E., Thompson, A. M., & Maynard, B. R. (2022). Self-management interventions for reducing challenging behaviors among school-age students: A systematic review.
    _Campbell systematic reviews_,
    _18_(1), e1223.
    [https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1223Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1223)

    Smolkowski, K. Marquez, B. Marquez, J. Vincent, C. Pennefather, J. walker, H. & Strycker, L.A. (2022). Teaching self-management strategies to upper-elementary students: Evidence of promise from the we have choices
    program.
    _Psychology in the Schools, 60_(6).

    [**https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22710** Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22710)

  • [Solved] resp 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    attched – ## resp4.docx **## resp4.docx** Response to your classmate Post 1: One effective RTI strategy is progress monitoring. This approach helps teachers keep track of how well students are learning after an intervention begins. It involves using short and frequent checks such as reading or math …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    attched

    – ## resp4.docx

    **## resp4.docx**

    Response to your classmate

    Post 1:

    One effective RTI strategy is progress monitoring. This approach helps teachers keep track of how well students are learning after an intervention begins. It involves using short and frequent checks such as reading or math assessments to measure improvement over time. For instance, if a student is receiving reading support, the teacher might listen to the student read for one minute each week and record the number of correct words. The results are placed on a simple graph so that both the teacher and student can see if growth is happening. When the progress line stays flat, it is a signal that something needs to change. The teacher may increase the time spent on instruction or introduce a different strategy to meet the student’s needs.

    Progress monitoring gives teachers real information about how well an intervention is working before a learning problem becomes more serious. It allows instruction to be adjusted early so students stay on track and continue to grow. This practice has been shown to improve learning outcomes and reduce the number of students who need intensive Tier III support because teachers can make timely instructional decisions based on data instead of assumptions (Skaar et al., 2022).

    Skaar, N. R., Schmitz, S. L., & Beckman, N. (2022). An Investigation of RtI/MTSS Knowledge, Skill, and Confidence Within Teacher Education: A Study of Faculty and Students.
    _International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development_,
    _5_(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTEPD.295540

    **## resp4.docx**

    Response to your classmate

    Post 1:

    One effective RTI strategy is progress monitoring. This approach helps teachers keep track of how well students are learning after an intervention begins. It involves using short and frequent checks such as reading or math assessments to measure improvement over time. For instance, if a student is receiving reading support, the teacher might listen to the student read for one minute each week and record the number of correct words. The results are placed on a simple graph so that both the teacher and student can see if growth is happening. When the progress line stays flat, it is a signal that something needs to change. The teacher may increase the time spent on instruction or introduce a different strategy to meet the student’s needs.

    Progress monitoring gives teachers real information about how well an intervention is working before a learning problem becomes more serious. It allows instruction to be adjusted early so students stay on track and continue to grow. This practice has been shown to improve learning outcomes and reduce the number of students who need intensive Tier III support because teachers can make timely instructional decisions based on data instead of assumptions (Skaar et al., 2022).

    Skaar, N. R., Schmitz, S. L., & Beckman, N. (2022). An Investigation of RtI/MTSS Knowledge, Skill, and Confidence Within Teacher Education: A Study of Faculty and Students.
    _International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development_,
    _5_(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTEPD.295540