My Blog

Category: Psychology

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Discussion Question: The Impact of Longevity on Health and Function in Older Adults** As medical advancements and lifestyle changes contribute to increased life expectancy, older adults are living longer than ever before. However, longevity also brings challenges related to health, mobility, cogni…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Discussion Question: The Impact of Longevity on Health and Function in Older Adults**

    As medical advancements and lifestyle changes contribute to increased life expectancy, older adults are living longer than ever before. However, longevity also brings challenges related to health, mobility, cognitive function, and overall quality of life.

    **Discussion Prompt:**

    What do you think are the most significant factors that influence the health and functional ability of older adults as they age? Consider aspects such as genetics, lifestyle choices (diet, exercise, social engagement), healthcare access, and environmental factors. How can society better support older adults in maintaining their independence and well-being as they live longer?

    **Instructions:**

    – Provide at least one real-world example or research-based insight to support your response.
    – Engage with at least two of your peers by responding to their posts with thoughtful reflections, additional insights, or respectful counterpoints.
    – Be sure to cite any sources used in your discussion.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Hypothetical case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Create a [hypothetical case](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/files/14079069?wrap=1 "PM Hypothetical Case Study Project Rubric.pdf") [s](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/pages/module-8-part-3-assignments?module_item_id=3524687#) tudy of a performance issue in an organization. The f…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Create a [hypothetical case](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/files/14079069?wrap=1 "PM Hypothetical Case Study Project Rubric.pdf") [s](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/pages/module-8-part-3-assignments?module_item_id=3524687#) tudy  of a performance issue in an organization. The final document should be 8-11 pages, 12 point font, single spaced, and you are encouraged to be creative in how to display the information as if this was a case study that you were going to share with your hypothetical company.

    Here are the major sections that will be required for your case study:

    1. **Executive Summary** – Provide a less-than-1-page summary of the (hypothetical) performance management project, as if an executive of the organization only has 2 minutes to read it. This should be written in plain language (no behavioral jargon). Include the purpose of the document, the major points, results, and recommendations. Writing this is best saved for last, but should be included as the stand alone first page of your case report. Feel free to look online for examples of executive summary documents for inspiration.
    2. **The Problem (1-2 pages, single spaced)**
    1. **Describe the Organization** – Include the hypothetical company name, location(s), industry, products/services provided, years in operation, and number of employees. How is the organization performing as a whole? Is there anything unique about it?
    2. **Pinpoint the Performance Issue** – Select a hypothetical performance issue to assess. Pinpoint the behavior associated with the performance, and describe the outputs of that performance. Ensure any pinpoints are specific and pass the “dead person’s test”! Were leaders in the organization using any labels/generalities/states to describe the issue? How did you address that? How did the organization discover the issue?
    3. **Describe Why It Matters** – Why does this performance matter? Describe potential impacts to the business, the staff, the clients/customers, and society as a whole.
    4. **Why is PM the Appropriate Solution** – Describe to the team what Performance Management is (briefly) and describe why behavior science is the best choice for helping resolve this issue.
    3. **The Assessments (3-4 pages, single spaced, not including the PDC and ABC table)**
    1. **Historical Assessment –** Briefly describe the purpose and process of conducting a historical assessment. Describe the organizational documents you would review to influence your interventions. Are there past performance data available, and what does it look like? Are there industry or organizational standards/policies that need to be taken into consideration? Specify at least 3 sources of historical information you would seek out related to the performance.
    2. **Indirect Assessment 1 –** Describe the process you would complete to conduct a Performance Diagnostic checklist, and what the purpose of the tool is. Who would you interview? How many people? Complete the PDC checklist for one hypothetical interview, and provide the completed checklist with your case report.
    3. **Indirect Assessment 2 –** Describe the process of conducting a PICNIC™ analysis, and what the purpose of the analysis is. Who would you interview? Complete an analysis of the undesired performance and the desired performance, including at least 5 potential consequences for each and their PICNIC™ labels. Include the ABC table with your case study.
    4. **Direct Assessment –** After completing your indirect assessments, what would direct observation of the performance issue look like? Describe how you would collect data on the behavior of interest. Are these fundamental, derived, or some other type of measure? How would you control for reactivity of staff? What MOs might be impacting staff? Refer back to your course readings.
    5. **Preference Assessment –** Include an assessment of staff preferences for potential reinforcers in your process. How will you conduct the preference assessment for staff? How often? Include a brief example of the tool you will use to assess, and include at least 10 items/experiences in your array.
    4. **The Solutions (1-2 pages, single spaced)**
    1. **Antecedent Interventions** – Describe the current antecedents that you discovered during your assessment. Are they effective? How would you change the existing antecedents, and what antecedents would you add to the environment to help improve performance? Describe at least 3 antecedent intervention suggestions. Refer back to your assessments and readings to justify your selections.
    2. **Consequence Interventions** – Describe the current consequences that you discovered during your assessment. Are they effective? How would you change the existing consequence systems, and what additional consequences would you add to encourage staff performance? Describe at least 3 consequence intervention suggestions. Refer back to your assessments and readings to justify your selections.
    3. **Selected Interventions** – Choose one antecedent and one consequence intervention that you believe will be the most effective, given the results of the assessment. Describe the hypothesized cost and resources required for implementation.
    5. **The Results (1-2 pages (with graphs), single spaced)**
    1. Create a hypothetical graph of the performance of an employee, and add 2 phase change lines as if you had chosen to intervene with your antecedent and consequence. Do you think the interventions would work?
    2. Create a hypothetical graph of a business result (revenue, productivity, expenses, staff/client satisfaction, etc.) related to the performance, and add the same phase changes. Would business result changes be apparent immediately after staff performance changed?
    3. Briefly describe the result of your intervention. Did either of the interventions work? If no, why? If yes, how did the organization benefit from your intervention?
    6. **Summary (<1 page, single spaced)**

    Provide a short summary and description of what you learned of from your hypothetical project.

    —

    To be successful  ensure that you review the [project](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/files/14079069?wrap=1 "PM Hypothetical Case Study Project Rubric.pdf") rubric. [Actions](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/pages/module-8-part-3-assignments?module_item_id=3524687#) and make sure your final product meets the following criteria:

    – Project contains less than 3 grammatical or spelling errors
    – Citations are in APA format, and
    – are used throughout the document to justify and support the case study.
    – No fewer than 10 citations/references from the course or other peer-reviewed journals are included.

    **Executive Summary:**

    – Is less than 1 page,
    – written in plain language, and
    – contains a summary of purpose, major points, results, and recommendations.

    **Problem:**

    – Includes the description of the organization,
    – behavior and output pinpoints that pass “the dead person’s test”,
    – why it matters, and
    – why PM is the appropriate solution.

    **Assessment:**

    – Includes the purpose and process for all assessments.
    – 3 sources of historical information are included for the historical assessment.

    **PICNIC:**

    – ABC table is included and
    – includes both desired and undesired behavior for analysis, and
    – 5 categorized consequences for each.

    **Performance Diagnostic Checklist:**

    – Completed PDC checklist is provided.

    **Preference assessment:**

    – Preference assessment is included,
    – 10 items/experiences are in the array, and
    – describes the procedure for conducting the assessment.

    **Solutions:**

    – Current antecedents and consequences are described based on the assessment.
    – 3 interventions for each are selected.
    – 2 final interventions are included, with the costs and resources required described.

    **Results:**

    – Includes one behavior graph with phase change lines,
    – one business result graph, and
    – a brief description of the hypothetical result.

    Bonus points are available as well!

    **+5 Bonus**: Is formatted in a professional or creative manner AND includes a performance or permanent product checklist in the direct observation assessment section.

    or

    **+3 Bonus**: Is formatted in a professional or creative manner OR includes a performance or permanent product checklist in the direct observation assessment section.

    – [\
    \
    PMHypotheticalCaseStudyProjectRubric.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pmhypotheticalcasestudyprojectrubric-pdf-10182485 "PMHypotheticalCaseStudyProjectRubric.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Article review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Help with Article Review – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## articlereviewinsructions.docx – ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf **## articlereviewinsructions.docx** You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by s…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Help with Article Review

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## articlereviewinsructions.docx

    – ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf

    **## articlereviewinsructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalidentitydevelopmentarticle2-pdf-10182569)

    **ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalidentitydevelopmentarticle2-pdf-10182569)

    **## articlereviewinsructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalidentitydevelopmentarticle2-pdf-10182569)

    **## articlereviewinsructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalidentitydevelopmentarticle2-pdf-10182569)

  • [Solved] RESUME SENIOR SEMINAR

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering RESUME SENIOR SEMINAR.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Research proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I am looking for guidance on how to locate 12-15 sources for a research proposal outline that addresses the effects of counseling in an adverse work culture. In addition, I need further guidance with a literature review, and a methodology/action plan. I must be able to pull at least 10 of the articl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I am looking for guidance on how to locate 12-15 sources for a research proposal outline that addresses the effects of counseling in an adverse work culture. In addition, I need further guidance with a literature review, and a methodology/action plan. I must be able to pull at least 10 of the articles if i log into the school's databases. The attachment shows areas I need guidance on.

    – [\
    \
    ResearchOutilne–Template.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchoutilne-template-docx-10183613 "ResearchOutilne–Template.docx")
    – [\
    \
    ResearchOutline–Example1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/researchoutline-example1-pdf-10183651 "ResearchOutline–Example1.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] CLP DISCUSSION 8 REPLIES

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering CLP DISCUSSION 8 REPLIES.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] CLP DISCUSSION 8 INITIAL POST

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering CLP DISCUSSION 8 INITIAL POST.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] SOP DISCUSSION 8 REPLIES

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering SOP DISCUSSION 8 REPLIES.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] SOP DISCUSSION 8 INITIAL POST

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering SOP DISCUSSION 8 INITIAL POST.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Principle of Ethics

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## week5principleofethics.docx **## week5principleofethics.docx** First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. ( Week 3; Abortion and Ethics There are few issues that have brought as much controversy in contemporary society as abortion. There have be…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## week5principleofethics.docx

    **## week5principleofethics.docx**

    First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. ( Week 3; Abortion and Ethics

    There are few issues that have brought as much controversy in contemporary society as abortion. There have been debates and camps that have formed around the topic, with the issue being a legislative, judicial, and social discussion point for years. Abortion is defined as the intentional termination of pregnancy (Newman et al., 2023). This is done before the fetus is viable outside the womb, with various methods being used to execute it. There have been two camps that have emerged that are discussing abortion.)

    · Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?

    · Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions  using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).

    · Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.

    Include the following:

    · Publication details

    · Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)

    Each annotation section should include the following:

    · Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).

    · Describe the controversies or "problems" raised by the articles.

    · State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.

    · Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.

    · Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.

    · Use the following as a model:

    · APA Reference
    Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.

    · Annotation Example
    In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between "instrumental" and "communicative" learning. "Instrumental learning" refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. "Communicative learning," on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls "critical-dialectical-discourse," (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is "transformative learning," (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that "hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse" (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don't think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we'd see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.

    **## week5principleofethics.docx**

    First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. ( Week 3; Abortion and Ethics

    There are few issues that have brought as much controversy in contemporary society as abortion. There have been debates and camps that have formed around the topic, with the issue being a legislative, judicial, and social discussion point for years. Abortion is defined as the intentional termination of pregnancy (Newman et al., 2023). This is done before the fetus is viable outside the womb, with various methods being used to execute it. There have been two camps that have emerged that are discussing abortion.)

    · Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?

    · Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions  using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).

    · Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.

    Include the following:

    · Publication details

    · Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)

    Each annotation section should include the following:

    · Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).

    · Describe the controversies or "problems" raised by the articles.

    · State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.

    · Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.

    · Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.

    · Use the following as a model:

    · APA Reference
    Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.

    · Annotation Example
    In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between "instrumental" and "communicative" learning. "Instrumental learning" refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. "Communicative learning," on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls "critical-dialectical-discourse," (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is "transformative learning," (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that "hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse" (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don't think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we'd see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.