Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (2)**
– ## PERSONALWELLNESSREFLECTIONASSIGNMENT.docx
– ## Rubric-PersonalWellnessReflection.pdf
**## PERSONALWELLNESSREFLECTIONASSIGNMENT.docx**
PERSONAL WELLNESS REFLECTION ASSIGNMENT
NO AI OR CHAT GPT PLEASE
Based on the spiritual, emotional, and burnout resources I attached. Write a 350-500-word self-care plan that includes the following:
1. How to deal with compassion fatigue and burnout.
2. How to promote your own mental, physical, and spiritual health.
3. How your self-care impacts your ability to care for others.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric.
Some of the resources are below:
[https://www.caring.com/caregivers/burnout/](https://www.caring.com/caregivers/burnout/)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2668/
[https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=1e0f117a-cabb-49aa-9085-b4eb808dbae1%40redis](https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=1e0f117a-cabb-49aa-9085-b4eb808dbae1%40redis)
**## Rubric-PersonalWellnessReflection.pdf**
2/22/25, 3:16 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Personal Wellness Reflection – Rubric Total 50 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Compassion Fatigue and
Burnout
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout
0 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is insufficient.
6.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is vague.
7.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear.
8.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear and
realistic.
10 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear, realistic,
and insightful.
Mental, Physical, and
Spiritual Health
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health
0 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is insufficient.
6.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is vague.
7.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear.
8.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear and realistic.
10 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear, realistic,
and insightful.
Self-Care and Ability to
Care for Others
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others
0 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
insufficient.
9.75 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
vague.
11.25 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear.
12.75 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear and realistic.
15 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear, realistic, and
insightful.
Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
2.28 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.
2.63 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is limited
awareness of the
appropriate audience.
2.98 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness
of the appropriate
audience is demonstrated.
3.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or
purpose throughout
writing; conclusion aligns
to and evolves from
development.
0 points
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose
is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate.
No conclusion is offered.
2.28 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the
overall development of the
purpose.
2.63 points
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose
is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the
purpose.
2.98 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in
most aspects. Ideas clearly
build on each other.
Conclusion aligns to the
development of the
purpose.
3.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically
advanced throughout. The
progression of ideas is
coherent and unified. A
clear and logical conclusion
aligns to the development
of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other
perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose
is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective
of the writer.
1.95 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is superficial
or incorrect.
2.25 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or integration
of other perspectives is
present.
2.55 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other perspectives
is used.
3 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
1.95 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
2.25 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
2.55 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
3 points
All format elements are
correct.
Format/Documentation
2/22/25, 3:16 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
1.3 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
1.5 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
1.7 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used
with only minor errors.
2 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## Rubric-PersonalWellnessReflection.pdf**
2/22/25, 3:16 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Personal Wellness Reflection – Rubric Total 50 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Compassion Fatigue and
Burnout
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout
0 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is insufficient.
6.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is vague.
7.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear.
8.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear and
realistic.
10 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear, realistic,
and insightful.
Mental, Physical, and
Spiritual Health
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health
0 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is insufficient.
6.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is vague.
7.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear.
8.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear and realistic.
10 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear, realistic,
and insightful.
Self-Care and Ability to
Care for Others
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others
0 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
insufficient.
9.75 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
vague.
11.25 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear.
12.75 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear and realistic.
15 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear, realistic, and
insightful.
Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
2.28 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.
2.63 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is limited
awareness of the
appropriate audience.
2.98 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness
of the appropriate
audience is demonstrated.
3.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or
purpose throughout
writing; conclusion aligns
to and evolves from
development.
0 points
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose
is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate.
No conclusion is offered.
2.28 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the
overall development of the
purpose.
2.63 points
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose
is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the
purpose.
2.98 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in
most aspects. Ideas clearly
build on each other.
Conclusion aligns to the
development of the
purpose.
3.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically
advanced throughout. The
progression of ideas is
coherent and unified. A
clear and logical conclusion
aligns to the development
of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other
perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose
is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective
of the writer.
1.95 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is superficial
or incorrect.
2.25 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or integration
of other perspectives is
present.
2.55 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other perspectives
is used.
3 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
1.95 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
2.25 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
2.55 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
3 points
All format elements are
correct.
Format/Documentation
2/22/25, 3:16 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
1.3 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
1.5 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
1.7 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used
with only minor errors.
2 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## PERSONALWELLNESSREFLECTIONASSIGNMENT.docx**
PERSONAL WELLNESS REFLECTION ASSIGNMENT
NO AI OR CHAT GPT PLEASE
Based on the spiritual, emotional, and burnout resources I attached. Write a 350-500-word self-care plan that includes the following:
1. How to deal with compassion fatigue and burnout.
2. How to promote your own mental, physical, and spiritual health.
3. How your self-care impacts your ability to care for others.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric.
Some of the resources are below:
[https://www.caring.com/caregivers/burnout/](https://www.caring.com/caregivers/burnout/)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2668/
[https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=1e0f117a-cabb-49aa-9085-b4eb808dbae1%40redis](https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=1e0f117a-cabb-49aa-9085-b4eb808dbae1%40redis)
**## Rubric-PersonalWellnessReflection.pdf**
2/22/25, 3:16 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Personal Wellness Reflection – Rubric Total 50 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Compassion Fatigue and
Burnout
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout
0 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is insufficient.
6.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is vague.
7.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear.
8.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear and
realistic.
10 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear, realistic,
and insightful.
Mental, Physical, and
Spiritual Health
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health
0 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is insufficient.
6.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is vague.
7.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear.
8.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear and realistic.
10 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear, realistic,
and insightful.
Self-Care and Ability to
Care for Others
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others
0 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
insufficient.
9.75 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
vague.
11.25 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear.
12.75 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear and realistic.
15 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear, realistic, and
insightful.
Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
2.28 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.
2.63 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is limited
awareness of the
appropriate audience.
2.98 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness
of the appropriate
audience is demonstrated.
3.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or
purpose throughout
writing; conclusion aligns
to and evolves from
development.
0 points
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose
is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate.
No conclusion is offered.
2.28 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the
overall development of the
purpose.
2.63 points
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose
is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the
purpose.
2.98 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in
most aspects. Ideas clearly
build on each other.
Conclusion aligns to the
development of the
purpose.
3.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically
advanced throughout. The
progression of ideas is
coherent and unified. A
clear and logical conclusion
aligns to the development
of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other
perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose
is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective
of the writer.
1.95 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is superficial
or incorrect.
2.25 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or integration
of other perspectives is
present.
2.55 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other perspectives
is used.
3 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
1.95 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
2.25 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
2.55 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
3 points
All format elements are
correct.
Format/Documentation
2/22/25, 3:16 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
1.3 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
1.5 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
1.7 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used
with only minor errors.
2 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)
**## PERSONALWELLNESSREFLECTIONASSIGNMENT.docx**
PERSONAL WELLNESS REFLECTION ASSIGNMENT
NO AI OR CHAT GPT PLEASE
Based on the spiritual, emotional, and burnout resources I attached. Write a 350-500-word self-care plan that includes the following:
1. How to deal with compassion fatigue and burnout.
2. How to promote your own mental, physical, and spiritual health.
3. How your self-care impacts your ability to care for others.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric.
Some of the resources are below:
[https://www.caring.com/caregivers/burnout/](https://www.caring.com/caregivers/burnout/)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2668/
[https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=1e0f117a-cabb-49aa-9085-b4eb808dbae1%40redis](https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=1e0f117a-cabb-49aa-9085-b4eb808dbae1%40redis)
**## Rubric-PersonalWellnessReflection.pdf**
2/22/25, 3:16 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Personal Wellness Reflection – Rubric Total 50 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Compassion Fatigue and
Burnout
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout
0 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is insufficient.
6.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is vague.
7.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear.
8.5 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear and
realistic.
10 points
Explanation of how to
personally deal with
compassion fatigue and
burnout is clear, realistic,
and insightful.
Mental, Physical, and
Spiritual Health
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health
0 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is insufficient.
6.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is vague.
7.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear.
8.5 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear and realistic.
10 points
Explanation of how to
promote personal mental,
physical, and spiritual
health is clear, realistic,
and insightful.
Self-Care and Ability to
Care for Others
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others
0 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
insufficient.
9.75 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
vague.
11.25 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear.
12.75 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear and realistic.
15 points
Explanation of how self-
care impacts personal
ability to care for others is
clear, realistic, and
insightful.
Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
2.28 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.
2.63 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is limited
awareness of the
appropriate audience.
2.98 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness
of the appropriate
audience is demonstrated.
3.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or
purpose throughout
writing; conclusion aligns
to and evolves from
development.
0 points
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose
is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate.
No conclusion is offered.
2.28 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the
overall development of the
purpose.
2.63 points
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose
is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the
purpose.
2.98 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in
most aspects. Ideas clearly
build on each other.
Conclusion aligns to the
development of the
purpose.
3.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically
advanced throughout. The
progression of ideas is
coherent and unified. A
clear and logical conclusion
aligns to the development
of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other
perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose
is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective
of the writer.
1.95 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is superficial
or incorrect.
2.25 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or integration
of other perspectives is
present.
2.55 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other perspectives
is used.
3 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
1.95 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
2.25 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
2.55 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
3 points
All format elements are
correct.
Format/Documentation
2/22/25, 3:16 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
Uses appropriate style,
such as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography,
etc., appropriate to
assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not
used. No documentation of
sources is provided.
1.3 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
1.5 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
1.7 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are used
with only minor errors.
2 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are
present.
© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[https://www.gce.com/](https://www.gce.com/)