Assignment Prompt & Instructions
SEE ATTACHMENT
– 2 years ago
**files (2)**
– ## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf
– ## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf
**## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf**
Write: Content Expectations
Complete the following sections for your Action Research Proposal: Study and
Research Draft:
• Intervention Plan: In two pages,
o Describe in chronological order how you will implement your
intervention and provide a hypothetical yet practical timeframe for
these steps.
o You may include a chart that organizes how you would implement your
intervention from week to week.
▪ This will be a timeline including dates and tasks.
▪ Your chart could include date, tasks, people, location, etc.
o Ethical Considerations: Informed Consent and Institutional Review
Board (IRB) Approval: In two paragraphs,
▪ Discuss how you would approach informed consent and IRB
approval if you were to implement your action research study.
▪ Explain how you would ensure that participants enter the
research of their free will and with an understanding of the study
and any potential dangers.
▪ Review the UAGC Institutional Review Board (ATTACHED)
▪ page for information as needed.
▪ Ethical Considerations: Freedom from Harm: In two
paragraphs,
▪ Explain how the literature you reviewed and your plan for
implementation leads you to believe what you are doing is an
appropriate intervention and not exposing your participants to
risk.
▪ Ethical Considerations: Anonymity and Confidentiality: In one
paragraph,
▪ Explain your planned measures to use anonymity and
confidentiality to avoid privacy invasion and potential harm.
Next Steps
The Action Research Proposal: Proposed Study and Research Draft paper
• Must be five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references
pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
o Title of paper in bold font
▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the
information on the title page.
o Student’s name
o Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
[https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board](https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board)
[https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)
o Course name and number
o Instructor’s name
o Due date
• Must utilize academic voice.
• Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction
paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose
of your paper.
• Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed, credible sources in addition to the
course textbooks
Course Textbooks:
Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.
Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Retrieved from
http://www.ebrary.com/corp
[https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1)
[https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152)
**## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf**
Institutional Review Board
About the Board
The purpose of the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to
ensure ethical research practices among its faculty and students. Individuals affiliated with the
University of Arizona Global Campus who are conducting research projects must receive approval
from the IRB before commencing the study. IRB policies and procedures apply to all research
involving human participants, funded or non-funded, sponsored or not sponsored, and carried out
by the University of Arizona Global Campus faculty, staff, and students, on or off campus, whenever
human participants are included. The University of Arizona Global Campus’s Institutional Review
Board is registered with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) though the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (IRB00010175). This registration is listed on the OHRP
website at https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx.
Statement of Ethical Principles
The University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to the highest ethical standards in conduct
of research. For projects involving humans as participants, the University of Arizona Global
Campus is guided by the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, the National
Commission for the Protection of Human Participants of Biomedical and Behavioral Research’s
Ethical Principles, and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Participants of Research: The
Belmont Report. In addition, the University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to ensuring that
all human participant research, regardless of funding source, follows the requirements set forth in
Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The following broad principles are the basis for
the University of Arizona Global Campus policy concerning review of research involving humans:
• Whereas the participation of humans in research projects may raise fundamental ethical
and civil rights questions, all such research, funded and unfunded projects, sponsored and
not sponsored, which is carried out by the University of Arizona Global Campus students,
faculty, or other University of Arizona Global Campus employees, on or off campus, shall be
covered by the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (hereinafter
referred to as IRB) for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Policies and
Procedures covered by this document.
• All activities involving human participants must provide for the rights, safety, health, and
welfare of each individual participant.
• The direct or potential benefit to the participant and the importance of the knowledge
gained must outweigh any inherent risk to the individual.
• Participation in research must be voluntary and informed consent procedures must
conform to the IRB Policies and Procedures.
• An individual does not abdicate any rights by consenting to be a research participant. A
participant has the right to refuse to participate or may withdraw from research at any time
without penalty or loss of benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled.
[https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx](https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki)
• Safeguarding information about an individual that has been obtained in the course of an
investigation is a primary obligation of the principal investigator.
• The primary responsibility for protection of human participants rests with the principal
investigator and with support, approval, and monitoring by the University of Arizona Global
Campus as set forth in the IRB Policies and Procedures.
All proposals to conduct research must be submitted to the IRB through the application process.
The investigator must obtain IRB approval before undertaking the research and beginning data
collection. All principal investigators submitting proposals must show certification of training within
the last three years, or undergo training, and submit the appropriate documentation of successful
human subjects training either offered by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Collaborative
Institutional Collaborative Initiative (CITI) training along with each proposal. Proposals should be
submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format to IRB@uagc.edu. Please review the Forms tab for
additional guidance. Any concerns regarding research involving human subjects should be directed
to the IRB Chair. For more information on research misconduct please visit responding to
allegations of research misconduct.
[mailto:irb@uagc.edu](mailto:irb@uagc.edu)
[https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)
[https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)
**## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf**
Institutional Review Board
About the Board
The purpose of the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to
ensure ethical research practices among its faculty and students. Individuals affiliated with the
University of Arizona Global Campus who are conducting research projects must receive approval
from the IRB before commencing the study. IRB policies and procedures apply to all research
involving human participants, funded or non-funded, sponsored or not sponsored, and carried out
by the University of Arizona Global Campus faculty, staff, and students, on or off campus, whenever
human participants are included. The University of Arizona Global Campus’s Institutional Review
Board is registered with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) though the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (IRB00010175). This registration is listed on the OHRP
website at https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx.
Statement of Ethical Principles
The University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to the highest ethical standards in conduct
of research. For projects involving humans as participants, the University of Arizona Global
Campus is guided by the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, the National
Commission for the Protection of Human Participants of Biomedical and Behavioral Research’s
Ethical Principles, and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Participants of Research: The
Belmont Report. In addition, the University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to ensuring that
all human participant research, regardless of funding source, follows the requirements set forth in
Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The following broad principles are the basis for
the University of Arizona Global Campus policy concerning review of research involving humans:
• Whereas the participation of humans in research projects may raise fundamental ethical
and civil rights questions, all such research, funded and unfunded projects, sponsored and
not sponsored, which is carried out by the University of Arizona Global Campus students,
faculty, or other University of Arizona Global Campus employees, on or off campus, shall be
covered by the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (hereinafter
referred to as IRB) for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Policies and
Procedures covered by this document.
• All activities involving human participants must provide for the rights, safety, health, and
welfare of each individual participant.
• The direct or potential benefit to the participant and the importance of the knowledge
gained must outweigh any inherent risk to the individual.
• Participation in research must be voluntary and informed consent procedures must
conform to the IRB Policies and Procedures.
• An individual does not abdicate any rights by consenting to be a research participant. A
participant has the right to refuse to participate or may withdraw from research at any time
without penalty or loss of benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled.
[https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx](https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki)
• Safeguarding information about an individual that has been obtained in the course of an
investigation is a primary obligation of the principal investigator.
• The primary responsibility for protection of human participants rests with the principal
investigator and with support, approval, and monitoring by the University of Arizona Global
Campus as set forth in the IRB Policies and Procedures.
All proposals to conduct research must be submitted to the IRB through the application process.
The investigator must obtain IRB approval before undertaking the research and beginning data
collection. All principal investigators submitting proposals must show certification of training within
the last three years, or undergo training, and submit the appropriate documentation of successful
human subjects training either offered by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Collaborative
Institutional Collaborative Initiative (CITI) training along with each proposal. Proposals should be
submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format to IRB@uagc.edu. Please review the Forms tab for
additional guidance. Any concerns regarding research involving human subjects should be directed
to the IRB Chair. For more information on research misconduct please visit responding to
allegations of research misconduct.
[mailto:irb@uagc.edu](mailto:irb@uagc.edu)
[https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)
[https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)
**## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf**
Write: Content Expectations
Complete the following sections for your Action Research Proposal: Study and
Research Draft:
• Intervention Plan: In two pages,
o Describe in chronological order how you will implement your
intervention and provide a hypothetical yet practical timeframe for
these steps.
o You may include a chart that organizes how you would implement your
intervention from week to week.
▪ This will be a timeline including dates and tasks.
▪ Your chart could include date, tasks, people, location, etc.
o Ethical Considerations: Informed Consent and Institutional Review
Board (IRB) Approval: In two paragraphs,
▪ Discuss how you would approach informed consent and IRB
approval if you were to implement your action research study.
▪ Explain how you would ensure that participants enter the
research of their free will and with an understanding of the study
and any potential dangers.
▪ Review the UAGC Institutional Review Board (ATTACHED)
▪ page for information as needed.
▪ Ethical Considerations: Freedom from Harm: In two
paragraphs,
▪ Explain how the literature you reviewed and your plan for
implementation leads you to believe what you are doing is an
appropriate intervention and not exposing your participants to
risk.
▪ Ethical Considerations: Anonymity and Confidentiality: In one
paragraph,
▪ Explain your planned measures to use anonymity and
confidentiality to avoid privacy invasion and potential harm.
Next Steps
The Action Research Proposal: Proposed Study and Research Draft paper
• Must be five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references
pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
o Title of paper in bold font
▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the
information on the title page.
o Student’s name
o Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
[https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board](https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board)
[https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)
o Course name and number
o Instructor’s name
o Due date
• Must utilize academic voice.
• Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction
paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose
of your paper.
• Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed, credible sources in addition to the
course textbooks
Course Textbooks:
Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.
Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Retrieved from
http://www.ebrary.com/corp
[https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1)
[https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152)
**## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf**
Institutional Review Board
About the Board
The purpose of the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to
ensure ethical research practices among its faculty and students. Individuals affiliated with the
University of Arizona Global Campus who are conducting research projects must receive approval
from the IRB before commencing the study. IRB policies and procedures apply to all research
involving human participants, funded or non-funded, sponsored or not sponsored, and carried out
by the University of Arizona Global Campus faculty, staff, and students, on or off campus, whenever
human participants are included. The University of Arizona Global Campus’s Institutional Review
Board is registered with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) though the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (IRB00010175). This registration is listed on the OHRP
website at https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx.
Statement of Ethical Principles
The University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to the highest ethical standards in conduct
of research. For projects involving humans as participants, the University of Arizona Global
Campus is guided by the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, the National
Commission for the Protection of Human Participants of Biomedical and Behavioral Research’s
Ethical Principles, and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Participants of Research: The
Belmont Report. In addition, the University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to ensuring that
all human participant research, regardless of funding source, follows the requirements set forth in
Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The following broad principles are the basis for
the University of Arizona Global Campus policy concerning review of research involving humans:
• Whereas the participation of humans in research projects may raise fundamental ethical
and civil rights questions, all such research, funded and unfunded projects, sponsored and
not sponsored, which is carried out by the University of Arizona Global Campus students,
faculty, or other University of Arizona Global Campus employees, on or off campus, shall be
covered by the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (hereinafter
referred to as IRB) for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Policies and
Procedures covered by this document.
• All activities involving human participants must provide for the rights, safety, health, and
welfare of each individual participant.
• The direct or potential benefit to the participant and the importance of the knowledge
gained must outweigh any inherent risk to the individual.
• Participation in research must be voluntary and informed consent procedures must
conform to the IRB Policies and Procedures.
• An individual does not abdicate any rights by consenting to be a research participant. A
participant has the right to refuse to participate or may withdraw from research at any time
without penalty or loss of benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled.
[https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx](https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki)
• Safeguarding information about an individual that has been obtained in the course of an
investigation is a primary obligation of the principal investigator.
• The primary responsibility for protection of human participants rests with the principal
investigator and with support, approval, and monitoring by the University of Arizona Global
Campus as set forth in the IRB Policies and Procedures.
All proposals to conduct research must be submitted to the IRB through the application process.
The investigator must obtain IRB approval before undertaking the research and beginning data
collection. All principal investigators submitting proposals must show certification of training within
the last three years, or undergo training, and submit the appropriate documentation of successful
human subjects training either offered by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Collaborative
Institutional Collaborative Initiative (CITI) training along with each proposal. Proposals should be
submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format to IRB@uagc.edu. Please review the Forms tab for
additional guidance. Any concerns regarding research involving human subjects should be directed
to the IRB Chair. For more information on research misconduct please visit responding to
allegations of research misconduct.
[mailto:irb@uagc.edu](mailto:irb@uagc.edu)
[https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)
[https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)
**## ActionResearchProposalProposedStudyandResearchDraft.pdf**
Write: Content Expectations
Complete the following sections for your Action Research Proposal: Study and
Research Draft:
• Intervention Plan: In two pages,
o Describe in chronological order how you will implement your
intervention and provide a hypothetical yet practical timeframe for
these steps.
o You may include a chart that organizes how you would implement your
intervention from week to week.
▪ This will be a timeline including dates and tasks.
▪ Your chart could include date, tasks, people, location, etc.
o Ethical Considerations: Informed Consent and Institutional Review
Board (IRB) Approval: In two paragraphs,
▪ Discuss how you would approach informed consent and IRB
approval if you were to implement your action research study.
▪ Explain how you would ensure that participants enter the
research of their free will and with an understanding of the study
and any potential dangers.
▪ Review the UAGC Institutional Review Board (ATTACHED)
▪ page for information as needed.
▪ Ethical Considerations: Freedom from Harm: In two
paragraphs,
▪ Explain how the literature you reviewed and your plan for
implementation leads you to believe what you are doing is an
appropriate intervention and not exposing your participants to
risk.
▪ Ethical Considerations: Anonymity and Confidentiality: In one
paragraph,
▪ Explain your planned measures to use anonymity and
confidentiality to avoid privacy invasion and potential harm.
Next Steps
The Action Research Proposal: Proposed Study and Research Draft paper
• Must be five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references
pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
o Title of paper in bold font
▪ Space should appear between the title and the rest of the
information on the title page.
o Student’s name
o Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
[https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board](https://www.uagc.edu/institutional-review-board)
[https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/apa-style)
o Course name and number
o Instructor’s name
o Due date
• Must utilize academic voice.
• Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction
paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose
of your paper.
• Must use at least six scholarly, peer-reviewed, credible sources in addition to the
course textbooks
Course Textbooks:
Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.
Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Retrieved from
http://www.ebrary.com/corp
[https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1](https://uagc.instructure.com/courses/142830/external_tools/retrieve?display=borderless&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.uagc.edu%2Flti%3Fbookcode%3DMills.3071.18.1)
[https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152](https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ashford-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3002152)
**## InstitutionalReviewBoard.pdf**
Institutional Review Board
About the Board
The purpose of the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to
ensure ethical research practices among its faculty and students. Individuals affiliated with the
University of Arizona Global Campus who are conducting research projects must receive approval
from the IRB before commencing the study. IRB policies and procedures apply to all research
involving human participants, funded or non-funded, sponsored or not sponsored, and carried out
by the University of Arizona Global Campus faculty, staff, and students, on or off campus, whenever
human participants are included. The University of Arizona Global Campus’s Institutional Review
Board is registered with the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) though the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (IRB00010175). This registration is listed on the OHRP
website at https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx.
Statement of Ethical Principles
The University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to the highest ethical standards in conduct
of research. For projects involving humans as participants, the University of Arizona Global
Campus is guided by the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki, the National
Commission for the Protection of Human Participants of Biomedical and Behavioral Research’s
Ethical Principles, and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Participants of Research: The
Belmont Report. In addition, the University of Arizona Global Campus is committed to ensuring that
all human participant research, regardless of funding source, follows the requirements set forth in
Title 45, Part 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The following broad principles are the basis for
the University of Arizona Global Campus policy concerning review of research involving humans:
• Whereas the participation of humans in research projects may raise fundamental ethical
and civil rights questions, all such research, funded and unfunded projects, sponsored and
not sponsored, which is carried out by the University of Arizona Global Campus students,
faculty, or other University of Arizona Global Campus employees, on or off campus, shall be
covered by the University of Arizona Global Campus Institutional Review Board (hereinafter
referred to as IRB) for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Policies and
Procedures covered by this document.
• All activities involving human participants must provide for the rights, safety, health, and
welfare of each individual participant.
• The direct or potential benefit to the participant and the importance of the knowledge
gained must outweigh any inherent risk to the individual.
• Participation in research must be voluntary and informed consent procedures must
conform to the IRB Policies and Procedures.
• An individual does not abdicate any rights by consenting to be a research participant. A
participant has the right to refuse to participate or may withdraw from research at any time
without penalty or loss of benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled.
[https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx](https://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki)
• Safeguarding information about an individual that has been obtained in the course of an
investigation is a primary obligation of the principal investigator.
• The primary responsibility for protection of human participants rests with the principal
investigator and with support, approval, and monitoring by the University of Arizona Global
Campus as set forth in the IRB Policies and Procedures.
All proposals to conduct research must be submitted to the IRB through the application process.
The investigator must obtain IRB approval before undertaking the research and beginning data
collection. All principal investigators submitting proposals must show certification of training within
the last three years, or undergo training, and submit the appropriate documentation of successful
human subjects training either offered by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or Collaborative
Institutional Collaborative Initiative (CITI) training along with each proposal. Proposals should be
submitted electronically in .doc or .docx format to IRB@uagc.edu. Please review the Forms tab for
additional guidance. Any concerns regarding research involving human subjects should be directed
to the IRB Chair. For more information on research misconduct please visit responding to
allegations of research misconduct.
[mailto:irb@uagc.edu](mailto:irb@uagc.edu)
[https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)
[https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct](https://policy.arizona.edu/ethics-and-conduct/responding-allegations-research-misconduct)