Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] Project Charter

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    BOOK Name: Kloppenborg, T. J., Anantatmula, V., & Wells, K. N. (2023). Contemporary project management: Plan-driven and agile approaches (5th ed.). Cengage Learning Using the project management case study, develop a project charter (use headings) of three to four pages (no more than four pages). In …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    BOOK Name:    Kloppenborg, T. J., Anantatmula, V., & Wells, K. N. (2023). Contemporary project management: Plan-driven and agile approaches (5th ed.). Cengage Learning
    Using the project management case study, develop a project charter (use headings) of three to four pages (no more than four pages). In addition to the course textbook, research two additional resources. In your charter,
    – Summarize the project’s scope and limitations.
    – Design a business case for the project.
    – Assess how the project will enable the corporate strategy.
    – Assess how the project will apply CSR values.
    – Calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) for the project business case. Derive the NPV using the following data and submit an Excel spreadsheet as an appendix:
    – Purchase price of $400,000
    – One-time project costs total of $100,000 spent in Year 0
    – Net benefits after taxes of $150,000 per year for five years
    – Salvage value for Year 6 and beyond of $400,000.
    – Summarize your results of NPV in the paper and refer to the Appendix.
    – Develop a milestone schedule that includes five to seven elements.
    – Use the case study to derive the milestones. If the case is lacking, feel free to include a solution or milestone that you think Walmart would value.
    – Predict the project's risks, threats, and opportunities.
    – Outline the resources needed for the project.
    – Develop your plan to form a high-performing project team.
    – Identify five important groups of stakeholders.
    The Project Charter Development paper
    – must be three to four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
    –  must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
    –  must use at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed, or credible sources
    \
    WalmartCaseStudy_week1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/walmartcasestudy-week1-docx-10449807 "WalmartCaseStudy_week1.docx")
    \
    PROJECTMANAGEMENTCASESTUDYWeek1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/projectmanagementcasestudyweek1-docx-10449809 "PROJECTMANAGEMENTCASESTUDYWeek1.docx")

  • [Solved] INT 220 Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric Overview

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## INT 220 Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric ### Overview This journal assignment explores the actions and ethical considerations of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) during global financial crises. By examining a specific example, such as the IMF’s intervention in Greece’s debt crisis, …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## INT 220 Module Four Journal Guidelines and Rubric
    ### Overview
    This journal assignment explores the actions and ethical considerations of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) during global financial crises. By examining a specific example, such as the IMF’s intervention in Greece’s debt crisis, you will reflect on when economic bailouts are justified, who should provide them, and the ethical implications of financial assistance with strict conditions. This reflection will help you better understand how international financial organizations influence global economic stability and decision making during crises.
    ### Directions
    The IMF has faced both support and criticism for its role in stabilizing global economies during financial crises. To help frame your journal reflection, consider the IMF’s involvement during Greece’s economic crisis beginning in 2009, when Greece required multiple bailouts after facing severe debt issues. The IMF provided financial assistance but attached strict requirements that sparked debate about the effectiveness and fairness of such interventions.
    In this journal assignment, you will explore a specific IMF intervention and analyze its impact.
    Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
    – **IMF Intervention:** Provide a clear example of an IMF intervention in a global financial crisis. Summarize the IMF’s actions and the rationale for its involvement.
    – **Ethical Considerations**: Discuss the ethical implications of the IMF’s intervention, including whether the conditions attached to financial assistance were justified.
    – **Lessons Learned**: Summarize key lessons from the IMF’s involvement in the selected crisis and discuss how they apply to future economic bailouts.
    ### What to Submit
    Submit this assignment as a 2- to 3-paragraph Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Cite any sources used in APA format.
    ### Module Four Journal Rubric
    CriteriaExceeds Expectations (100%)Meets Expectations (85%)Partially Meets Expectations (55%)Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)Value **IMF Intervention** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerProvides a clear example of an IMF intervention in a global financial crisis with an adequate summary and rationale with supporting detailsProvides an example of an IMF intervention in a global financial crisis with a limited summary and rationale or minimal supporting detailsDoes not attempt criterion25 **Ethical Considerations** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDiscusses the ethical implications of the IMF’s intervention, including whether the conditions attached to financial assistance were justified with sufficient detail and understandingDiscusses ethical implications of the IMF’s intervention, but lacks depth or clarity in the explanationDoes not attempt criterion25 **Lessons Learned** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerSummarizes key lessons from the IMF’s involvement in the selected crisis with adequate detail and discusses how they apply to future economic bailoutsSummarizes lessons from the IMF’s involvement, but lacks depth or clarity regarding future applicationsDoes not attempt criterion25 **Clear Communication** Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understandingConsistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audienceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understandingShows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication15 **Citations and Attributions** Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errorsDoes not use citations for ideas requiring attribution10 **Total:** 100%

  • [Solved] create a video

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You will create a 1 – 1.5 minute commercial. This propaganda commercial can be made using Clips or iMovie from your iPad. See below for a short tutorial. You must incorporate at least 2 images that are primary sources. You must use history research to find all the accurate information for your comme…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You will create a 1 – 1.5 minute commercial. This propaganda commercial can be made using Clips or iMovie from your iPad. See below for a short tutorial. You must incorporate at least 2 images that are primary sources. You must use history research to find all the accurate information for your commercial.  You will upload your file as a .MOV to Canvas, you will also upload a Word or Google doc that has your work cited page. Yes, they must be cited correctly or you will be docked points. Add both of theses files to this assignment.
    Choose one of the following topics for your commercial:
    1. Recruit soldiers for World War I
    2. Try to stop World War I

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Management INT 220 Module Four Assignment Guidelines and Rubric Overview

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## INT 220 Module Four Assignment Guidelines and Rubric ### Overview Foreign exchange impacts the profitability of transactions in international markets. It can turn a profitable business into one that loses money and can turn an unprofitable business into one that makes money. In this assignment, y…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## INT 220 Module Four Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
    ### Overview
    Foreign exchange impacts the profitability of transactions in international markets. It can turn a profitable business into one that loses money and can turn an unprofitable business into one that makes money.
    In this assignment, you will analyze the impact of foreign exchange on different business scenarios and present your findings in a short business memo.
    ### Scenario
    You manage the international business for a manufacturing company. You are responsible for the overall profitability of your business unit. Your company ships your products to Malaysia. The retail stores that buy your products there pay you in their local currency, the Malaysian ringgit (MYR). All sales for the first quarter are paid on April 1 and use the exchange rate at the close of business on April 1 or the first business day after April 1 if it falls on a Saturday or Sunday. The company has sales contracts with different vendors that determine the number of units sold well in advance. The company is contractually obligated to sell 5,000 units for exactly 1.50 million MYR for the first quarter. The break-even point for each unit is $75 in U.S. dollars. Use the following foreign exchange rates:
    – On January 1, the daily spot rate is 3.13 MYR, and the forward rate is 0.317 U.S. dollars per MYR for April 1 of the same year.
    – On April 1, the daily spot rate is 3.52 MYR.
    ### Directions
    Using the information above, create a short business memo that explains the profitability, viability, and importance of considering foreign exchange on the basis of the scenarios below.
    – **Scenario 1**: The company uses the spot rate on April 1 to convert its sales revenue in MYR to U.S. dollars.
    – **Scenario 2**: On January 1, the company uses that day’s forward rate today to lock in a foreign exchange rate for its expected 1.5 million MYR in sales. This means the company agreed to exchange 1.5 million MYR using the forward rate on January 1 when April 1 arrives.
    – **Scenario 3**: Another option for the company is to spend the foreign currency and avoid any currency exchange. Because it is a manufacturing company, raw materials are always needed.
    Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
    – **Foreign Exchange Calculations**: Determine the profitability of the international business by using foreign exchange calculations for the first and second scenarios.
    – **Spend or Save**: Analyze the viability of spending foreign currency to purchase raw materials as a strategy to mitigate foreign exchange risk, considering the factors that determine its feasibility and effectiveness for the company.
    – **Conclusion**: After determining the result for each scenario, make conclusions about the importance to a company’s financial results of foreign exchange risk.
    ### What to Submit
    Submit this assignment as a 250- to 300-word Microsoft Word document with double spacing, one-inch margins, and 12-point Times New Roman font. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
    ### Module Four Assignment Rubric
    CriteriaExceeds Expectations (100%)Meets Expectations (85%)Partially Meets Expectations (55%)Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)Value **Foreign Exchange Calculations** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines the profitability of the international business by using foreign exchange calculationsShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include performing foreign exchange calculations correctlyDoes not attempt criterion40 **Spend or Save** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerAnalyzes the viability of spending the foreign currency instead of exchanging itShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include identifying more elements that can complicate the process of getting raw materials to the company’s factoriesDoes not attempt criterion20 **Conclusion** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerMakes conclusions about the importance to a company’s financial results of foreign exchange riskShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include making conclusions that align with foreign exchange calculations and using the break-even point in analysisDoes not attempt criterion20 **Clear Communication** Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understandingConsistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audienceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understandingShows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication10 **Citations and Attributions** Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errorsDoes not use citations for ideas requiring attribution10 **Total:** 100%

  • [Solved] Feedback Candice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Program evaluation is a critical procedure that is used to ascertain whether the community-based mental health services deliver their desired results or not. Assessments bring out evidence to enhance service delivery, accountability and resource allocation. The outpatient anxiety treatment program i…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Program evaluation is a critical procedure that is used to ascertain whether the community-based mental health services deliver their desired results or not. Assessments bring out evidence to enhance service delivery, accountability and resource allocation. The outpatient anxiety treatment program in the Grand Concourse Counseling Center seeks to evaluate the efficacy of the interventions that were implemented to minimize anxiety and enhance the functioning of the clients in the community. By examining such programs, the progress is not only measured, but obstacles and areas of improvement are also established in the treatment implementation. According to Fink (2023), meaningful evaluation entails organized collection and analysis of data in order to examine the quality, effectiveness and value of the program.
    1. Outcome Being Evaluated
    The outcome under consideration is a reduction in anxiety symptoms of the clients attending the Outpatient Anxiety Treatment Program. The outcome will be assessed with the help of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7), according to which a reduction of the scores during the intake and discharge will signal an improvement.
    1. Evaluation Design
    This program evaluation will be based on a self-controlled pre/ post design that compares the GAD-7 clients' scores at the time of intake and at the time of discharge. This design is suitable for the program since clients already undergo screenings during the initial time they receive services, and they are reassessed during treatment planning or discharge. The program is conducted on a regular schedule of weekly therapy sessions, which provide sufficient time for a quantifiable change can be noticed. This approach is also a suitable method since the clients will develop at a pace unique to each individual, and having each person compared with their own norms will not make any assumptions regarding consistent progressions. The program does not divide the clients into various treatment categories, and thus, there will be no feasibility to establish a control group. Therefore, the pre-/post-design is acceptable and compatible with the current practices of the program to gather data.
    1. Limitations of the Design
    Maturation is one of the limitations of the pre-/post-design since clients can improve over time without any treatment. Some individuals may naturally adapt to the stress, or they may have a shift in their life situation, which will aid in the alleviation of symptoms. This matters for anxiety outcomes since the therapy may not be the sole reason why it has improved. While the program is expected to contribute to the reduction of anxiety, natural recovery or external support systems might also contribute. This limitation does not prevent evaluation, but must be taken into consideration in the interpretation of results.
    1. Sampling Strategy
    The sample will consist of all clients admitted to the program between January and June 2025 who complete both an intake and discharge assessment. This design is considered most appropriate since it applies to actual participants who are receiving services, therefore avoiding sampling bias. It also ensures that the assessment reflects the normal clients in the program so that any conclusions drawn regarding effectiveness have meaning.
    **References**
    Fink, A. (2023). _Program evaluation: A primer for effectiveness, quality, and value_. Routledge.

  • [Solved] SOAP 2 WEND

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    PLEASE SEE AND READ CAREFULLY THE RUBRIC ATTACHED FOR THIS SOAP NOTE – TOPIC: POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME (PCOS) -30 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT – EACH SECTION IN THE TEMPLATE MUST BE FILL IT PROPERLY WITH ADEQUATE INFORMATION AS THE RUBRIC REQUIRES PLEASE COMPLETE EACH SECTION – THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE G…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    PLEASE SEE AND READ CAREFULLY THE RUBRIC ATTACHED FOR THIS SOAP NOTE
    – TOPIC: POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME (PCOS)
    -30 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT
    – EACH SECTION IN THE TEMPLATE MUST BE FILL IT PROPERLY WITH ADEQUATE INFORMATION AS THE RUBRIC REQUIRES PLEASE COMPLETE EACH SECTION
    – THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE GRADED BASED ON THE RUBRIC ATTACHED. PLEASE READ RUBRIC
    – THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN CHECKING PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT ( CAN'T BE MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT)
    – AGAIN NOTE THE RUBRIC FOR COMPLETE EACH SECTION
    – APA FORMAT IS REQUIRED , AND CHECK YOUR GRAMMAR BECAUSE POINTS CAN BE DEDUCTED.
    – 3-4 SCHOLARLY REFERENCES WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS IN APA FORMAT,
    – REQUIRES IN-TEXT CITATIONS
    – DUE DATE NOVEMBER 14, 2025 NO LATER
    \
    SOAPNoteTemplate-1-1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/soapnotetemplate-1-1-docx-10449855 "SOAPNoteTemplate-1-1.docx")
    \
    SOAPNoteRubric-1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/soapnoterubric-1-pdf-10449857 "SOAPNoteRubric-1.pdf")

  • [Solved] english

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    need help organizing ideas – ## UnderstandingaWritingPrompt211.pdf – ## ENGL1101_AnnotatedBibliographyAssignmentSheet2.docx **## UnderstandingaWritingPrompt211.pdf** Understanding a Writing Prompt Overview for Writing Prompts Before you can choose an effective topic or viewpoint, you need to know t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    need help organizing ideas

    – ## UnderstandingaWritingPrompt211.pdf

    – ## ENGL1101_AnnotatedBibliographyAssignmentSheet2.docx

    **## UnderstandingaWritingPrompt211.pdf**

    Understanding a Writing Prompt
    Overview for Writing Prompts
    Before you can choose an effective topic or viewpoint, you need to know the purpose of the

    assignment and its requirements. Types of writing assignments can vary from department to

    department, class to class, instructor to instructor, and even assignment to assignment. So

    before you begin, you need to thoroughly understand the assignment.

    Choosing a Topic
    Sometimes an instructor will assign a topic or provide a list from which you can choose. If this

    happens, you can simply begin with the general topic and narrow it down to your specific

    viewpoint. Some instructors have very specific instructions, but others may give a general topic

    that you then need to consider a smaller element of that general topic. For instance, the topic of

    gender is too large of a discussion to write about in a five-page essay, so narrow it down to

    gender roles for men or gender expectations for women.

    If you must choose your own topic, like for a research paper, here is a list of possible methods

    for choosing a topic.

     Look over class notes or previous writings for interesting ideas.

     Focus on discussions, writings, or articles that you find interesting. You may also think

    about interesting news stories.

     Consider points or opinions when someone, including the instructor, may have indicated

    that not many people discuss or consider.

     Consider any personal experience that you may have to draw from.

     Consider how you might expand a previous writing assignment or explore a different

    point of view about that topic.

     Look through textbooks, journals, or other collection of articles for a topic that interests

    you.

     Ask your instructor for ideas.

     If you disagree with someone, even if that person is considered an expert, about a topic,

    you could mirror their argument but use your own opposing ideas.

    Once you have a topic, even if it is a general topic, consider some specific aspects of the

    assignment. Here are a few that you need to think about:

    1. The purpose and mode of writing

    2. The audience of the essay

    3. The amount of research necessary and what you already know about your topic before

    research

    4. Length requirements and other minimum requirements

    5. Possible approaches (logically, ethically, emotionally)

    6. How your writing will be graded

    a. Original thoughts

    b. Use of appropriate research or other evidence

    c. Use of correct writing strategies

    d. Style of writing, including use of grammar

    The Assignment Prompt
    If the assignment is written in an official prompt, you should read the document carefully. What

    specific words are used in the prompt? Those words will help you determine how you should

    approach this essay.

     Argue (agree/disagree)

     Criticize

     Define

     Describe

     Discuss

     Evaluate

     Explain

     Compare and contrast

     Reflect

     Summarize

    If there are topic-specific terms that appear in discussion and articles about your topic, you

    should familiarize yourself with them. Make sure you fully understand the term’s definition in

    relation to the topic, its context or history, and its correct usage in a sentence.

    If you have a prompt that includes suggestions for writing, consider how you could use those

    suggestions to structure your argument. This could also help with an outline.

    If the prompt specifies that you are to use a certain strategy for writing, make sure you

    understand that method of structuring an essay, including use of transitions.

    Have a working thesis idea, or central idea that you are building around in writing and research.

    This idea is not set in stone, so it may change or evolve over the course of your writing. You can

    edit this thesis idea into your actual thesis statement later in the writing process.

    Once you come up with your topic and your specific viewpoint, you can start the writing process.

    **## ENGL1101_AnnotatedBibliographyAssignmentSheet2.docx**

    ## ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:

    ## An Explanation and Requirements

    ## Introduction

    In preparation for your research essay (your next essay), you will complete your research and include the sources in an annotated bibliography. Your sources must consist of full-text peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles along with quotations you plan to use as support for your research essay, an argumentative essay.

    ## Explanation: What is an annotated bibliography?

    An annotated bibliography is an extended works cited page that includes below each source your annotation or information about the source and your assessment of the source. Generally, after writing the standard works cited source entry, the researcher (a student or academic) write an annotation which includes a summary of the article and a critical assessment. Research writers compose annotated bibliographies primarily during the research phase of their prewriting process so that they can refer to it during their writing process to help them remember key points of particular sources without having to reread the entire article to determine if they have what they need or if they need to locate new sources.

    ## Your Annotation Requirements

    For this class, your annotation should consist of
    **six-to-ten good sentences** (compound sentences, complex sentences, compound-complex sentences and no more than one or two simple sentences).

    **_Those six-to-ten sentences should include the following:_**
    · A three-to-four sentence summary of the article, focusing on the main points of the article, revealing the research method the author or authors conducted to formulate their conclusion(s), and the research findings (or conclusions).

    · Your critical evaluation or assessment of the source, including how you can see it informing your own essay. (
    _Obviously, you should not include any sources that you do not consider relevant to your topic_.)

    _Your critical evaluation should include answers to the following questions_ (not in any particular order – just answer the questions):

    · Which side does each article support: your stance or your opposition’s?

    · How can you use this source within your essay?

    · Could you use it background information concerning common debates? (You may use no more than one source background information.)

    · Could you use it to develop your anticipation (your understanding of your opposition’s stance)?

    · Could you use it to develop your refutation (your argument to counter your opposition’s stance)?

    **_Determining Quality Quotations:_**
    Below each annotation, I want you to include source quotations that you could use to support your anticipation or refutation. If you have indicated within the annotation that the source will help you write your anticipation, then the quotations should provide details about the opposition’s stance. If you in have indicated within your annotation that the source will help you with your refutation, then the quotations should provide details about research that supports your stance.

    · As you read through your sources, highlight quotations that will help you as you write your own essay. Does the research support your stance or does it provide insight into the opposition’s stance?

    · Does the quotation mention the research results: the study and the conclusions derived from that study? Remember: someone’s opinion about something is not worthy of a quotation. You are looking for research-based conclusions that support your stance, especially if you are writing any type of an argument based on the sciences or social sciences: medical/pharmacology, psychology, sociology, et cetera. Please do not write even some researcher’s opinion unless his or her opinion is grounded in the results of scientific research.

    · You will need to number these quotations and place the quotations in quotation marks and provide an in-text citation at the end of each quotation
    **OUTSIDE** the closed quotation mark. A period should follow the closed parenthesis.
    _See the sample student annotated bibliography for correct formatting_.

    **NOTE:** You may use first-person pronouns when you are explaining how you can use the source. For example, “I can use this source to inform my annotation as it provides insight into my opposition’s stance.”

    **Additional Requirements:**
    · All sources must come from full-text, peer-reviewed journal articles that you can retrieve from Galileo.

    · Your annotated bibliography must include three sources that support your argument and two sources that support your opposition.

    · Note: You may not use dictionaries, encyclopedias, random websites (non-credible,), or any other source of which the credibility is questionable as research sources (e.g. Wikipedia, blogs, .com sites, etcetera).

    · You will, of course, use MLA formatting and compose your bibliography in Microsoft Word, so you will include the following:

    · Submit your annotated bibliography as a Word document! Any other format will receive the grade of 0.

    · One-inch margins all the way around

    · Times New Roman, 12-point font

    · True double spacing – remember to remove the space before and after paragraph

    · An inserted page number, including your last name and a space between your name and number

    · (Remember to change the font and the font size in the page number because they will revert to default (Calibri 11pt).)

    · An MLA heading – NOT a running header in the page number section—with your first and last names, my name, English 1101, the due date (The MLA heading is left-justified at the one-inch margin.)

    · A tentative title followed by the phrase ‘An Annotated Bibliography’ (Example: To Vote or Not to Vote- That is the Question: An Annotated Bibliography)

    · Each source formatted with a hanging indent.

    · Sources should appear in alphabetical order based on the author’s (or if you have more than one author, the first author’s) last name. If you have no author, use the first letter of the title to determine alphabetical order.)

    · The second line of the source should be indented ½ inch from the one-inch margin.

    · Press the ‘tab’ key two times before typing the annotation paragraph. All subsequent lines of the annotation paragraph will fall under the ½ indented second line of the hanging indent. See the example below on the next page.

    Xu, Jianhua, Qi Kang, Zhiqiang Song, and Christopher P Clarke. "Applications of Mobile Social Media: Wechat Among Academic Libraries in China."
    _Journal of Academic Librarianship_ 41.1 (2015): 21-30.
    _Academic Search Complete_. Web. 1 Apr. 2015.

    You should start typing your brief summary of the source here after pressing the tab key twice. See the information above in
    [_Your Annotation Requirements_](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/english-20949577#_Your_Annotation_Requirements) to determine what information to include in your annotation. All other lines of your annotation and the numbered quotations should fall under the second line of the source entry as this line does.

    1. “Your first quotation will begin under the second line of your annotation” (page

    number).

    2. “You should include at least three quotations from each source” (page number).

    3.
    “Each quotation can be one – two sentences, but please do not include block quotations in your research essay” (page number).

    **## ENGL1101_AnnotatedBibliographyAssignmentSheet2.docx**

    ## ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:

    ## An Explanation and Requirements

    ## Introduction

    In preparation for your research essay (your next essay), you will complete your research and include the sources in an annotated bibliography. Your sources must consist of full-text peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles along with quotations you plan to use as support for your research essay, an argumentative essay.

    ## Explanation: What is an annotated bibliography?

    An annotated bibliography is an extended works cited page that includes below each source your annotation or information about the source and your assessment of the source. Generally, after writing the standard works cited source entry, the researcher (a student or academic) write an annotation which includes a summary of the article and a critical assessment. Research writers compose annotated bibliographies primarily during the research phase of their prewriting process so that they can refer to it during their writing process to help them remember key points of particular sources without having to reread the entire article to determine if they have what they need or if they need to locate new sources.

    ## Your Annotation Requirements

    For this class, your annotation should consist of
    **six-to-ten good sentences** (compound sentences, complex sentences, compound-complex sentences and no more than one or two simple sentences).

    **_Those six-to-ten sentences should include the following:_**
    · A three-to-four sentence summary of the article, focusing on the main points of the article, revealing the research method the author or authors conducted to formulate their conclusion(s), and the research findings (or conclusions).

    · Your critical evaluation or assessment of the source, including how you can see it informing your own essay. (
    _Obviously, you should not include any sources that you do not consider relevant to your topic_.)

    _Your critical evaluation should include answers to the following questions_ (not in any particular order – just answer the questions):

    · Which side does each article support: your stance or your opposition’s?

    · How can you use this source within your essay?

    · Could you use it background information concerning common debates? (You may use no more than one source background information.)

    · Could you use it to develop your anticipation (your understanding of your opposition’s stance)?

    · Could you use it to develop your refutation (your argument to counter your opposition’s stance)?

    **_Determining Quality Quotations:_**
    Below each annotation, I want you to include source quotations that you could use to support your anticipation or refutation. If you have indicated within the annotation that the source will help you write your anticipation, then the quotations should provide details about the opposition’s stance. If you in have indicated within your annotation that the source will help you with your refutation, then the quotations should provide details about research that supports your stance.

    · As you read through your sources, highlight quotations that will help you as you write your own essay. Does the research support your stance or does it provide insight into the opposition’s stance?

    · Does the quotation mention the research results: the study and the conclusions derived from that study? Remember: someone’s opinion about something is not worthy of a quotation. You are looking for research-based conclusions that support your stance, especially if you are writing any type of an argument based on the sciences or social sciences: medical/pharmacology, psychology, sociology, et cetera. Please do not write even some researcher’s opinion unless his or her opinion is grounded in the results of scientific research.

    · You will need to number these quotations and place the quotations in quotation marks and provide an in-text citation at the end of each quotation
    **OUTSIDE** the closed quotation mark. A period should follow the closed parenthesis.
    _See the sample student annotated bibliography for correct formatting_.

    **NOTE:** You may use first-person pronouns when you are explaining how you can use the source. For example, “I can use this source to inform my annotation as it provides insight into my opposition’s stance.”

    **Additional Requirements:**
    · All sources must come from full-text, peer-reviewed journal articles that you can retrieve from Galileo.

    · Your annotated bibliography must include three sources that support your argument and two sources that support your opposition.

    · Note: You may not use dictionaries, encyclopedias, random websites (non-credible,), or any other source of which the credibility is questionable as research sources (e.g. Wikipedia, blogs, .com sites, etcetera).

    · You will, of course, use MLA formatting and compose your bibliography in Microsoft Word, so you will include the following:

    · Submit your annotated bibliography as a Word document! Any other format will receive the grade of 0.

    · One-inch margins all the way around

    · Times New Roman, 12-point font

    · True double spacing – remember to remove the space before and after paragraph

    · An inserted page number, including your last name and a space between your name and number

    · (Remember to change the font and the font size in the page number because they will revert to default (Calibri 11pt).)

    · An MLA heading – NOT a running header in the page number section—with your first and last names, my name, English 1101, the due date (The MLA heading is left-justified at the one-inch margin.)

    · A tentative title followed by the phrase ‘An Annotated Bibliography’ (Example: To Vote or Not to Vote- That is the Question: An Annotated Bibliography)

    · Each source formatted with a hanging indent.

    · Sources should appear in alphabetical order based on the author’s (or if you have more than one author, the first author’s) last name. If you have no author, use the first letter of the title to determine alphabetical order.)

    · The second line of the source should be indented ½ inch from the one-inch margin.

    · Press the ‘tab’ key two times before typing the annotation paragraph. All subsequent lines of the annotation paragraph will fall under the ½ indented second line of the hanging indent. See the example below on the next page.

    Xu, Jianhua, Qi Kang, Zhiqiang Song, and Christopher P Clarke. "Applications of Mobile Social Media: Wechat Among Academic Libraries in China."
    _Journal of Academic Librarianship_ 41.1 (2015): 21-30.
    _Academic Search Complete_. Web. 1 Apr. 2015.

    You should start typing your brief summary of the source here after pressing the tab key twice. See the information above in
    [_Your Annotation Requirements_](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/english-20949577#_Your_Annotation_Requirements) to determine what information to include in your annotation. All other lines of your annotation and the numbered quotations should fall under the second line of the source entry as this line does.

    1. “Your first quotation will begin under the second line of your annotation” (page

    number).

    2. “You should include at least three quotations from each source” (page number).

    3.
    “Each quotation can be one – two sentences, but please do not include block quotations in your research essay” (page number).

    **## UnderstandingaWritingPrompt211.pdf**

    Understanding a Writing Prompt
    Overview for Writing Prompts
    Before you can choose an effective topic or viewpoint, you need to know the purpose of the

    assignment and its requirements. Types of writing assignments can vary from department to

    department, class to class, instructor to instructor, and even assignment to assignment. So

    before you begin, you need to thoroughly understand the assignment.

    Choosing a Topic
    Sometimes an instructor will assign a topic or provide a list from which you can choose. If this

    happens, you can simply begin with the general topic and narrow it down to your specific

    viewpoint. Some instructors have very specific instructions, but others may give a general topic

    that you then need to consider a smaller element of that general topic. For instance, the topic of

    gender is too large of a discussion to write about in a five-page essay, so narrow it down to

    gender roles for men or gender expectations for women.

    If you must choose your own topic, like for a research paper, here is a list of possible methods

    for choosing a topic.

     Look over class notes or previous writings for interesting ideas.

     Focus on discussions, writings, or articles that you find interesting. You may also think

    about interesting news stories.

     Consider points or opinions when someone, including the instructor, may have indicated

    that not many people discuss or consider.

     Consider any personal experience that you may have to draw from.

     Consider how you might expand a previous writing assignment or explore a different

    point of view about that topic.

     Look through textbooks, journals, or other collection of articles for a topic that interests

    you.

     Ask your instructor for ideas.

     If you disagree with someone, even if that person is considered an expert, about a topic,

    you could mirror their argument but use your own opposing ideas.

    Once you have a topic, even if it is a general topic, consider some specific aspects of the

    assignment. Here are a few that you need to think about:

    1. The purpose and mode of writing

    2. The audience of the essay

    3. The amount of research necessary and what you already know about your topic before

    research

    4. Length requirements and other minimum requirements

    5. Possible approaches (logically, ethically, emotionally)

    6. How your writing will be graded

    a. Original thoughts

    b. Use of appropriate research or other evidence

    c. Use of correct writing strategies

    d. Style of writing, including use of grammar

    The Assignment Prompt
    If the assignment is written in an official prompt, you should read the document carefully. What

    specific words are used in the prompt? Those words will help you determine how you should

    approach this essay.

     Argue (agree/disagree)

     Criticize

     Define

     Describe

     Discuss

     Evaluate

     Explain

     Compare and contrast

     Reflect

     Summarize

    If there are topic-specific terms that appear in discussion and articles about your topic, you

    should familiarize yourself with them. Make sure you fully understand the term’s definition in

    relation to the topic, its context or history, and its correct usage in a sentence.

    If you have a prompt that includes suggestions for writing, consider how you could use those

    suggestions to structure your argument. This could also help with an outline.

    If the prompt specifies that you are to use a certain strategy for writing, make sure you

    understand that method of structuring an essay, including use of transitions.

    Have a working thesis idea, or central idea that you are building around in writing and research.

    This idea is not set in stone, so it may change or evolve over the course of your writing. You can

    edit this thesis idea into your actual thesis statement later in the writing process.

    Once you come up with your topic and your specific viewpoint, you can start the writing process.

    **## ENGL1101_AnnotatedBibliographyAssignmentSheet2.docx**

    ## ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:

    ## An Explanation and Requirements

    ## Introduction

    In preparation for your research essay (your next essay), you will complete your research and include the sources in an annotated bibliography. Your sources must consist of full-text peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles along with quotations you plan to use as support for your research essay, an argumentative essay.

    ## Explanation: What is an annotated bibliography?

    An annotated bibliography is an extended works cited page that includes below each source your annotation or information about the source and your assessment of the source. Generally, after writing the standard works cited source entry, the researcher (a student or academic) write an annotation which includes a summary of the article and a critical assessment. Research writers compose annotated bibliographies primarily during the research phase of their prewriting process so that they can refer to it during their writing process to help them remember key points of particular sources without having to reread the entire article to determine if they have what they need or if they need to locate new sources.

    ## Your Annotation Requirements

    For this class, your annotation should consist of
    **six-to-ten good sentences** (compound sentences, complex sentences, compound-complex sentences and no more than one or two simple sentences).

    **_Those six-to-ten sentences should include the following:_**
    · A three-to-four sentence summary of the article, focusing on the main points of the article, revealing the research method the author or authors conducted to formulate their conclusion(s), and the research findings (or conclusions).

    · Your critical evaluation or assessment of the source, including how you can see it informing your own essay. (
    _Obviously, you should not include any sources that you do not consider relevant to your topic_.)

    _Your critical evaluation should include answers to the following questions_ (not in any particular order – just answer the questions):

    · Which side does each article support: your stance or your opposition’s?

    · How can you use this source within your essay?

    · Could you use it background information concerning common debates? (You may use no more than one source background information.)

    · Could you use it to develop your anticipation (your understanding of your opposition’s stance)?

    · Could you use it to develop your refutation (your argument to counter your opposition’s stance)?

    **_Determining Quality Quotations:_**
    Below each annotation, I want you to include source quotations that you could use to support your anticipation or refutation. If you have indicated within the annotation that the source will help you write your anticipation, then the quotations should provide details about the opposition’s stance. If you in have indicated within your annotation that the source will help you with your refutation, then the quotations should provide details about research that supports your stance.

    · As you read through your sources, highlight quotations that will help you as you write your own essay. Does the research support your stance or does it provide insight into the opposition’s stance?

    · Does the quotation mention the research results: the study and the conclusions derived from that study? Remember: someone’s opinion about something is not worthy of a quotation. You are looking for research-based conclusions that support your stance, especially if you are writing any type of an argument based on the sciences or social sciences: medical/pharmacology, psychology, sociology, et cetera. Please do not write even some researcher’s opinion unless his or her opinion is grounded in the results of scientific research.

    · You will need to number these quotations and place the quotations in quotation marks and provide an in-text citation at the end of each quotation
    **OUTSIDE** the closed quotation mark. A period should follow the closed parenthesis.
    _See the sample student annotated bibliography for correct formatting_.

    **NOTE:** You may use first-person pronouns when you are explaining how you can use the source. For example, “I can use this source to inform my annotation as it provides insight into my opposition’s stance.”

    **Additional Requirements:**
    · All sources must come from full-text, peer-reviewed journal articles that you can retrieve from Galileo.

    · Your annotated bibliography must include three sources that support your argument and two sources that support your opposition.

    · Note: You may not use dictionaries, encyclopedias, random websites (non-credible,), or any other source of which the credibility is questionable as research sources (e.g. Wikipedia, blogs, .com sites, etcetera).

    · You will, of course, use MLA formatting and compose your bibliography in Microsoft Word, so you will include the following:

    · Submit your annotated bibliography as a Word document! Any other format will receive the grade of 0.

    · One-inch margins all the way around

    · Times New Roman, 12-point font

    · True double spacing – remember to remove the space before and after paragraph

    · An inserted page number, including your last name and a space between your name and number

    · (Remember to change the font and the font size in the page number because they will revert to default (Calibri 11pt).)

    · An MLA heading – NOT a running header in the page number section—with your first and last names, my name, English 1101, the due date (The MLA heading is left-justified at the one-inch margin.)

    · A tentative title followed by the phrase ‘An Annotated Bibliography’ (Example: To Vote or Not to Vote- That is the Question: An Annotated Bibliography)

    · Each source formatted with a hanging indent.

    · Sources should appear in alphabetical order based on the author’s (or if you have more than one author, the first author’s) last name. If you have no author, use the first letter of the title to determine alphabetical order.)

    · The second line of the source should be indented ½ inch from the one-inch margin.

    · Press the ‘tab’ key two times before typing the annotation paragraph. All subsequent lines of the annotation paragraph will fall under the ½ indented second line of the hanging indent. See the example below on the next page.

    Xu, Jianhua, Qi Kang, Zhiqiang Song, and Christopher P Clarke. "Applications of Mobile Social Media: Wechat Among Academic Libraries in China."
    _Journal of Academic Librarianship_ 41.1 (2015): 21-30.
    _Academic Search Complete_. Web. 1 Apr. 2015.

    You should start typing your brief summary of the source here after pressing the tab key twice. See the information above in
    [_Your Annotation Requirements_](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/english-20949577#_Your_Annotation_Requirements) to determine what information to include in your annotation. All other lines of your annotation and the numbered quotations should fall under the second line of the source entry as this line does.

    1. “Your first quotation will begin under the second line of your annotation” (page

    number).

    2. “You should include at least three quotations from each source” (page number).

    3.
    “Each quotation can be one – two sentences, but please do not include block quotations in your research essay” (page number).

    **## UnderstandingaWritingPrompt211.pdf**

    Understanding a Writing Prompt
    Overview for Writing Prompts
    Before you can choose an effective topic or viewpoint, you need to know the purpose of the

    assignment and its requirements. Types of writing assignments can vary from department to

    department, class to class, instructor to instructor, and even assignment to assignment. So

    before you begin, you need to thoroughly understand the assignment.

    Choosing a Topic
    Sometimes an instructor will assign a topic or provide a list from which you can choose. If this

    happens, you can simply begin with the general topic and narrow it down to your specific

    viewpoint. Some instructors have very specific instructions, but others may give a general topic

    that you then need to consider a smaller element of that general topic. For instance, the topic of

    gender is too large of a discussion to write about in a five-page essay, so narrow it down to

    gender roles for men or gender expectations for women.

    If you must choose your own topic, like for a research paper, here is a list of possible methods

    for choosing a topic.

     Look over class notes or previous writings for interesting ideas.

     Focus on discussions, writings, or articles that you find interesting. You may also think

    about interesting news stories.

     Consider points or opinions when someone, including the instructor, may have indicated

    that not many people discuss or consider.

     Consider any personal experience that you may have to draw from.

     Consider how you might expand a previous writing assignment or explore a different

    point of view about that topic.

     Look through textbooks, journals, or other collection of articles for a topic that interests

    you.

     Ask your instructor for ideas.

     If you disagree with someone, even if that person is considered an expert, about a topic,

    you could mirror their argument but use your own opposing ideas.

    Once you have a topic, even if it is a general topic, consider some specific aspects of the

    assignment. Here are a few that you need to think about:

    1. The purpose and mode of writing

    2. The audience of the essay

    3. The amount of research necessary and what you already know about your topic before

    research

    4. Length requirements and other minimum requirements

    5. Possible approaches (logically, ethically, emotionally)

    6. How your writing will be graded

    a. Original thoughts

    b. Use of appropriate research or other evidence

    c. Use of correct writing strategies

    d. Style of writing, including use of grammar

    The Assignment Prompt
    If the assignment is written in an official prompt, you should read the document carefully. What

    specific words are used in the prompt? Those words will help you determine how you should

    approach this essay.

     Argue (agree/disagree)

     Criticize

     Define

     Describe

     Discuss

     Evaluate

     Explain

     Compare and contrast

     Reflect

     Summarize

    If there are topic-specific terms that appear in discussion and articles about your topic, you

    should familiarize yourself with them. Make sure you fully understand the term’s definition in

    relation to the topic, its context or history, and its correct usage in a sentence.

    If you have a prompt that includes suggestions for writing, consider how you could use those

    suggestions to structure your argument. This could also help with an outline.

    If the prompt specifies that you are to use a certain strategy for writing, make sure you

    understand that method of structuring an essay, including use of transitions.

    Have a working thesis idea, or central idea that you are building around in writing and research.

    This idea is not set in stone, so it may change or evolve over the course of your writing. You can

    edit this thesis idea into your actual thesis statement later in the writing process.

    Once you come up with your topic and your specific viewpoint, you can start the writing process.

    **## ENGL1101_AnnotatedBibliographyAssignmentSheet2.docx**

    ## ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:

    ## An Explanation and Requirements

    ## Introduction

    In preparation for your research essay (your next essay), you will complete your research and include the sources in an annotated bibliography. Your sources must consist of full-text peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles along with quotations you plan to use as support for your research essay, an argumentative essay.

    ## Explanation: What is an annotated bibliography?

    An annotated bibliography is an extended works cited page that includes below each source your annotation or information about the source and your assessment of the source. Generally, after writing the standard works cited source entry, the researcher (a student or academic) write an annotation which includes a summary of the article and a critical assessment. Research writers compose annotated bibliographies primarily during the research phase of their prewriting process so that they can refer to it during their writing process to help them remember key points of particular sources without having to reread the entire article to determine if they have what they need or if they need to locate new sources.

    ## Your Annotation Requirements

    For this class, your annotation should consist of
    **six-to-ten good sentences** (compound sentences, complex sentences, compound-complex sentences and no more than one or two simple sentences).

    **_Those six-to-ten sentences should include the following:_**
    · A three-to-four sentence summary of the article, focusing on the main points of the article, revealing the research method the author or authors conducted to formulate their conclusion(s), and the research findings (or conclusions).

    · Your critical evaluation or assessment of the source, including how you can see it informing your own essay. (
    _Obviously, you should not include any sources that you do not consider relevant to your topic_.)

    _Your critical evaluation should include answers to the following questions_ (not in any particular order – just answer the questions):

    · Which side does each article support: your stance or your opposition’s?

    · How can you use this source within your essay?

    · Could you use it background information concerning common debates? (You may use no more than one source background information.)

    · Could you use it to develop your anticipation (your understanding of your opposition’s stance)?

    · Could you use it to develop your refutation (your argument to counter your opposition’s stance)?

    **_Determining Quality Quotations:_**
    Below each annotation, I want you to include source quotations that you could use to support your anticipation or refutation. If you have indicated within the annotation that the source will help you write your anticipation, then the quotations should provide details about the opposition’s stance. If you in have indicated within your annotation that the source will help you with your refutation, then the quotations should provide details about research that supports your stance.

    · As you read through your sources, highlight quotations that will help you as you write your own essay. Does the research support your stance or does it provide insight into the opposition’s stance?

    · Does the quotation mention the research results: the study and the conclusions derived from that study? Remember: someone’s opinion about something is not worthy of a quotation. You are looking for research-based conclusions that support your stance, especially if you are writing any type of an argument based on the sciences or social sciences: medical/pharmacology, psychology, sociology, et cetera. Please do not write even some researcher’s opinion unless his or her opinion is grounded in the results of scientific research.

    · You will need to number these quotations and place the quotations in quotation marks and provide an in-text citation at the end of each quotation
    **OUTSIDE** the closed quotation mark. A period should follow the closed parenthesis.
    _See the sample student annotated bibliography for correct formatting_.

    **NOTE:** You may use first-person pronouns when you are explaining how you can use the source. For example, “I can use this source to inform my annotation as it provides insight into my opposition’s stance.”

    **Additional Requirements:**
    · All sources must come from full-text, peer-reviewed journal articles that you can retrieve from Galileo.

    · Your annotated bibliography must include three sources that support your argument and two sources that support your opposition.

    · Note: You may not use dictionaries, encyclopedias, random websites (non-credible,), or any other source of which the credibility is questionable as research sources (e.g. Wikipedia, blogs, .com sites, etcetera).

    · You will, of course, use MLA formatting and compose your bibliography in Microsoft Word, so you will include the following:

    · Submit your annotated bibliography as a Word document! Any other format will receive the grade of 0.

    · One-inch margins all the way around

    · Times New Roman, 12-point font

    · True double spacing – remember to remove the space before and after paragraph

    · An inserted page number, including your last name and a space between your name and number

    · (Remember to change the font and the font size in the page number because they will revert to default (Calibri 11pt).)

    · An MLA heading – NOT a running header in the page number section—with your first and last names, my name, English 1101, the due date (The MLA heading is left-justified at the one-inch margin.)

    · A tentative title followed by the phrase ‘An Annotated Bibliography’ (Example: To Vote or Not to Vote- That is the Question: An Annotated Bibliography)

    · Each source formatted with a hanging indent.

    · Sources should appear in alphabetical order based on the author’s (or if you have more than one author, the first author’s) last name. If you have no author, use the first letter of the title to determine alphabetical order.)

    · The second line of the source should be indented ½ inch from the one-inch margin.

    · Press the ‘tab’ key two times before typing the annotation paragraph. All subsequent lines of the annotation paragraph will fall under the ½ indented second line of the hanging indent. See the example below on the next page.

    Xu, Jianhua, Qi Kang, Zhiqiang Song, and Christopher P Clarke. "Applications of Mobile Social Media: Wechat Among Academic Libraries in China."
    _Journal of Academic Librarianship_ 41.1 (2015): 21-30.
    _Academic Search Complete_. Web. 1 Apr. 2015.

    You should start typing your brief summary of the source here after pressing the tab key twice. See the information above in
    [_Your Annotation Requirements_](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/english-20949577#_Your_Annotation_Requirements) to determine what information to include in your annotation. All other lines of your annotation and the numbered quotations should fall under the second line of the source entry as this line does.

    1. “Your first quotation will begin under the second line of your annotation” (page

    number).

    2. “You should include at least three quotations from each source” (page number).

    3.
    “Each quotation can be one – two sentences, but please do not include block quotations in your research essay” (page number).

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Dysfunctional families

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    For this assignment you will view the [Video: Confessions of a Dysfunctional Family: A Structural Family Systems Approach](https://bconline.broward.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=693433&type=content&rcode=bconlinecdtest-5286617), you will observe the role-play, and discuss the the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    For this assignment you will view the [Video: Confessions of a Dysfunctional Family: A Structural Family Systems Approach](https://bconline.broward.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=693433&type=content&rcode=bconlinecdtest-5286617), you will observe the role-play, and discuss the therapeutic alliance.a

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework week 11

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Create a SOAP notes, the template and the case is attached, using 3 or more references, No AI, plagiarism less than 20 % – ## AsthmaExacerbation.docx – ## SOAP_NOTE_Template_20254.docx **## AsthmaExacerbation.docx** **Asthma Exacerbation** **Date of Encounter:** 09/01/2025 **Age/Sex:** 29-year-ol…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Create a SOAP notes, the template and the case is attached, using 3 or more references, No AI, plagiarism less than 20 %

    – ## AsthmaExacerbation.docx

    – ## SOAP_NOTE_Template_20254.docx

    **## AsthmaExacerbation.docx**

    **Asthma Exacerbation**

    **Date of Encounter:** 09/01/2025

    **Age/Sex:** 29-year-old Female

    **Race:** Hispanic

    **Insurance:** PPO

    **Referral:** No referral

    **Reason for Visit:** New Consult

    **Chief Complaint:** Shortness of breath, wheezing, and cough for 2 days

    **Type of H&P:** Focused

    **Type of Decision-Making:** Moderate

    **Time with Patient:** 35 minutes

    **Consult with Preceptor:** 10 minutes

    **Social Problems Addressed:** Education/Language, Safety

    **Medications:** Albuterol 90 mcg inhaler PRN, Prednisone 40 mg daily x5 days

    **Adherence Issues:** None reported

    **ICD-10 Codes:**

    · J45.901 – Unspecified asthma with (acute) exacerbation

    **CPT® Billing Codes:**

    · 99213 – Office/outpatient visit, established patient

    **Clinical Notes:**
    Patient presents with SOB, wheezing, and cough for 2 days. O₂ sat 94%, scattered expiratory wheezes. Nebulized albuterol given in office with improvement. Prescribed short course of oral steroids and advised inhaler use every 4–6 hrs as needed. Patient educated on trigger avoidance and follow-up in 1 week.

    **## SOAP_NOTE_Template_20254.docx**

    ![A blue and black logo Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-week-11)

    **(Student Name)**

    **Miami Regional University**

    **Date of Encounter:**

    **Preceptor/Clinical Site:**

    **Clinical Instructor:**

    **Soap Note # ____ Main Diagnosis ______________**

    **PATIENT INFORMATION**

    **Name**:

    **Age**:

    **Gender at Birth:**

    **Gender Identity**:

    **Source**:

    **Allergies**:

    **Current Medications: (including OTC and vitamins)**

    ·

    **PMH:**

    **Immunizations:**

    **Preventive Care**:

    **Preventive Screenings: (for results already obtained before this encounter)**
    **- Pap smear: ______**
    **- Mammogram: ______**
    **- Colonoscopy: ______**
    **- Lipid panel: ______**
    **- A1C: ______**
    **- STI screen: ______**
    **- Depression screen (PHQ-9): ______**

    **Surgical History**:

    **Family History**:

    **Social History**:

    **Sexual Orientation**:

    **Nutrition History**:

    **SUBJECTIVE DATE**

    **Chief Complaint** **(which must be stated between “__”)**

    **Symptom analysis/HPI:**

    **Clinical Tools Used (if applicable), otherwise state N/A**
    **- PHQ-9: ___ /27**
    **- GAD-7: ___ /21**
    **- AUDIT-C / DAST:**

    **Review of Systems (ROS) (This section is what the patient says, therefore it should state “Pt denies… or Pt states…”)**

    **CONSTITUTIONAL**:

    **NEUROLOGIC**:

    **HEENT**:

    **RESPIRATORY**:

    **CARDIOVASCULAR**:

    **GASTROINTESTINAL**:

    **GENITOURINARY**:

    **MUSCULOSKELETAL**:

    **SKIN**:

    **OBJECTIVE DATA**

    **VITAL SIGNS:** **LABS / DIAGNOSTICS REVIEWED (if available):**
    **- CBC:**
    **- Lipid Panel:**
    **- A1C:**
    **- EKG:**
    **- Imaging (if done):**

    **GENERAL APPREARANCE**:

    **NEUROLOGIC:**

    **HEENT:**

    **CARDIOVASCULAR:**

    **RESPIRATORY:**

    **GASTROINTESTINAL:**

    **MUSKULOSKELETAL:**

    **INTEGUMENTARY:**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    **Red Flags / Reasons for Escalation:**
    **- [ ] None noted**
    **- [ ] Positive suicidal ideation**
    **- [ ] Unstable vital signs**
    **- [ ] Abnormal exam requiring urgent referral**

    **Clinical Note**

    **(In a paragraph you should state “your encounter with your patient and your findings (including subjective and objective data)**

    **Main Diagnosis**

    (Include the name of your Main Diagnosis along with its ICD10 I10. (Look at PDF example provided) Include the in-text reference/s as per APA style 6th or 7th Edition.

    **Differential diagnosis (minimum 3) along with the rationale behind them.**
    **_(why you decide to include these differential diagnosis for this patient? What part of your assessment supports them?)_**

    **-**

    **-**

    **-**

    **PLAN**

    **Labs and Diagnostic Test to be ordered (if applicable)**

    · –

    · –

    **Pharmacological treatment:**

    **-**

    **Non-Pharmacologic treatment**:

    **Education (provide the most relevant ones – tailored to this specific patient**
    **_– not in general)_**

    **Follow-ups/Referrals**

    **Visit Complexity / CPT Code: _______**

    **References (in APA Style)**

    Examples

    Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.).

    ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0

    Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2010). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2010

    (25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series).

    ## image1.png

    **## SOAP_NOTE_Template_20254.docx**

    ![A blue and black logo Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-week-11)

    **(Student Name)**

    **Miami Regional University**

    **Date of Encounter:**

    **Preceptor/Clinical Site:**

    **Clinical Instructor:**

    **Soap Note # ____ Main Diagnosis ______________**

    **PATIENT INFORMATION**

    **Name**:

    **Age**:

    **Gender at Birth:**

    **Gender Identity**:

    **Source**:

    **Allergies**:

    **Current Medications: (including OTC and vitamins)**

    ·

    **PMH:**

    **Immunizations:**

    **Preventive Care**:

    **Preventive Screenings: (for results already obtained before this encounter)**
    **- Pap smear: ______**
    **- Mammogram: ______**
    **- Colonoscopy: ______**
    **- Lipid panel: ______**
    **- A1C: ______**
    **- STI screen: ______**
    **- Depression screen (PHQ-9): ______**

    **Surgical History**:

    **Family History**:

    **Social History**:

    **Sexual Orientation**:

    **Nutrition History**:

    **SUBJECTIVE DATE**

    **Chief Complaint** **(which must be stated between “__”)**

    **Symptom analysis/HPI:**

    **Clinical Tools Used (if applicable), otherwise state N/A**
    **- PHQ-9: ___ /27**
    **- GAD-7: ___ /21**
    **- AUDIT-C / DAST:**

    **Review of Systems (ROS) (This section is what the patient says, therefore it should state “Pt denies… or Pt states…”)**

    **CONSTITUTIONAL**:

    **NEUROLOGIC**:

    **HEENT**:

    **RESPIRATORY**:

    **CARDIOVASCULAR**:

    **GASTROINTESTINAL**:

    **GENITOURINARY**:

    **MUSCULOSKELETAL**:

    **SKIN**:

    **OBJECTIVE DATA**

    **VITAL SIGNS:** **LABS / DIAGNOSTICS REVIEWED (if available):**
    **- CBC:**
    **- Lipid Panel:**
    **- A1C:**
    **- EKG:**
    **- Imaging (if done):**

    **GENERAL APPREARANCE**:

    **NEUROLOGIC:**

    **HEENT:**

    **CARDIOVASCULAR:**

    **RESPIRATORY:**

    **GASTROINTESTINAL:**

    **MUSKULOSKELETAL:**

    **INTEGUMENTARY:**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    **Red Flags / Reasons for Escalation:**
    **- [ ] None noted**
    **- [ ] Positive suicidal ideation**
    **- [ ] Unstable vital signs**
    **- [ ] Abnormal exam requiring urgent referral**

    **Clinical Note**

    **(In a paragraph you should state “your encounter with your patient and your findings (including subjective and objective data)**

    **Main Diagnosis**

    (Include the name of your Main Diagnosis along with its ICD10 I10. (Look at PDF example provided) Include the in-text reference/s as per APA style 6th or 7th Edition.

    **Differential diagnosis (minimum 3) along with the rationale behind them.**
    **_(why you decide to include these differential diagnosis for this patient? What part of your assessment supports them?)_**

    **-**

    **-**

    **-**

    **PLAN**

    **Labs and Diagnostic Test to be ordered (if applicable)**

    · –

    · –

    **Pharmacological treatment:**

    **-**

    **Non-Pharmacologic treatment**:

    **Education (provide the most relevant ones – tailored to this specific patient**
    **_– not in general)_**

    **Follow-ups/Referrals**

    **Visit Complexity / CPT Code: _______**

    **References (in APA Style)**

    Examples

    Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.).

    ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0

    Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2010). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2010

    (25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series).

    ## image1.png

    **## AsthmaExacerbation.docx**

    **Asthma Exacerbation**

    **Date of Encounter:** 09/01/2025

    **Age/Sex:** 29-year-old Female

    **Race:** Hispanic

    **Insurance:** PPO

    **Referral:** No referral

    **Reason for Visit:** New Consult

    **Chief Complaint:** Shortness of breath, wheezing, and cough for 2 days

    **Type of H&P:** Focused

    **Type of Decision-Making:** Moderate

    **Time with Patient:** 35 minutes

    **Consult with Preceptor:** 10 minutes

    **Social Problems Addressed:** Education/Language, Safety

    **Medications:** Albuterol 90 mcg inhaler PRN, Prednisone 40 mg daily x5 days

    **Adherence Issues:** None reported

    **ICD-10 Codes:**

    · J45.901 – Unspecified asthma with (acute) exacerbation

    **CPT® Billing Codes:**

    · 99213 – Office/outpatient visit, established patient

    **Clinical Notes:**
    Patient presents with SOB, wheezing, and cough for 2 days. O₂ sat 94%, scattered expiratory wheezes. Nebulized albuterol given in office with improvement. Prescribed short course of oral steroids and advised inhaler use every 4–6 hrs as needed. Patient educated on trigger avoidance and follow-up in 1 week.

    **## SOAP_NOTE_Template_20254.docx**

    ![A blue and black logo Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-week-11)

    **(Student Name)**

    **Miami Regional University**

    **Date of Encounter:**

    **Preceptor/Clinical Site:**

    **Clinical Instructor:**

    **Soap Note # ____ Main Diagnosis ______________**

    **PATIENT INFORMATION**

    **Name**:

    **Age**:

    **Gender at Birth:**

    **Gender Identity**:

    **Source**:

    **Allergies**:

    **Current Medications: (including OTC and vitamins)**

    ·

    **PMH:**

    **Immunizations:**

    **Preventive Care**:

    **Preventive Screenings: (for results already obtained before this encounter)**
    **- Pap smear: ______**
    **- Mammogram: ______**
    **- Colonoscopy: ______**
    **- Lipid panel: ______**
    **- A1C: ______**
    **- STI screen: ______**
    **- Depression screen (PHQ-9): ______**

    **Surgical History**:

    **Family History**:

    **Social History**:

    **Sexual Orientation**:

    **Nutrition History**:

    **SUBJECTIVE DATE**

    **Chief Complaint** **(which must be stated between “__”)**

    **Symptom analysis/HPI:**

    **Clinical Tools Used (if applicable), otherwise state N/A**
    **- PHQ-9: ___ /27**
    **- GAD-7: ___ /21**
    **- AUDIT-C / DAST:**

    **Review of Systems (ROS) (This section is what the patient says, therefore it should state “Pt denies… or Pt states…”)**

    **CONSTITUTIONAL**:

    **NEUROLOGIC**:

    **HEENT**:

    **RESPIRATORY**:

    **CARDIOVASCULAR**:

    **GASTROINTESTINAL**:

    **GENITOURINARY**:

    **MUSCULOSKELETAL**:

    **SKIN**:

    **OBJECTIVE DATA**

    **VITAL SIGNS:** **LABS / DIAGNOSTICS REVIEWED (if available):**
    **- CBC:**
    **- Lipid Panel:**
    **- A1C:**
    **- EKG:**
    **- Imaging (if done):**

    **GENERAL APPREARANCE**:

    **NEUROLOGIC:**

    **HEENT:**

    **CARDIOVASCULAR:**

    **RESPIRATORY:**

    **GASTROINTESTINAL:**

    **MUSKULOSKELETAL:**

    **INTEGUMENTARY:**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    **Red Flags / Reasons for Escalation:**
    **- [ ] None noted**
    **- [ ] Positive suicidal ideation**
    **- [ ] Unstable vital signs**
    **- [ ] Abnormal exam requiring urgent referral**

    **Clinical Note**

    **(In a paragraph you should state “your encounter with your patient and your findings (including subjective and objective data)**

    **Main Diagnosis**

    (Include the name of your Main Diagnosis along with its ICD10 I10. (Look at PDF example provided) Include the in-text reference/s as per APA style 6th or 7th Edition.

    **Differential diagnosis (minimum 3) along with the rationale behind them.**
    **_(why you decide to include these differential diagnosis for this patient? What part of your assessment supports them?)_**

    **-**

    **-**

    **-**

    **PLAN**

    **Labs and Diagnostic Test to be ordered (if applicable)**

    · –

    · –

    **Pharmacological treatment:**

    **-**

    **Non-Pharmacologic treatment**:

    **Education (provide the most relevant ones – tailored to this specific patient**
    **_– not in general)_**

    **Follow-ups/Referrals**

    **Visit Complexity / CPT Code: _______**

    **References (in APA Style)**

    Examples

    Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.).

    ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0

    Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2010). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2010

    (25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series).

    ## image1.png

    **## AsthmaExacerbation.docx**

    **Asthma Exacerbation**

    **Date of Encounter:** 09/01/2025

    **Age/Sex:** 29-year-old Female

    **Race:** Hispanic

    **Insurance:** PPO

    **Referral:** No referral

    **Reason for Visit:** New Consult

    **Chief Complaint:** Shortness of breath, wheezing, and cough for 2 days

    **Type of H&P:** Focused

    **Type of Decision-Making:** Moderate

    **Time with Patient:** 35 minutes

    **Consult with Preceptor:** 10 minutes

    **Social Problems Addressed:** Education/Language, Safety

    **Medications:** Albuterol 90 mcg inhaler PRN, Prednisone 40 mg daily x5 days

    **Adherence Issues:** None reported

    **ICD-10 Codes:**

    · J45.901 – Unspecified asthma with (acute) exacerbation

    **CPT® Billing Codes:**

    · 99213 – Office/outpatient visit, established patient

    **Clinical Notes:**
    Patient presents with SOB, wheezing, and cough for 2 days. O₂ sat 94%, scattered expiratory wheezes. Nebulized albuterol given in office with improvement. Prescribed short course of oral steroids and advised inhaler use every 4–6 hrs as needed. Patient educated on trigger avoidance and follow-up in 1 week.

    **## SOAP_NOTE_Template_20254.docx**

    ![A blue and black logo Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/nursing-homework-week-11)

    **(Student Name)**

    **Miami Regional University**

    **Date of Encounter:**

    **Preceptor/Clinical Site:**

    **Clinical Instructor:**

    **Soap Note # ____ Main Diagnosis ______________**

    **PATIENT INFORMATION**

    **Name**:

    **Age**:

    **Gender at Birth:**

    **Gender Identity**:

    **Source**:

    **Allergies**:

    **Current Medications: (including OTC and vitamins)**

    ·

    **PMH:**

    **Immunizations:**

    **Preventive Care**:

    **Preventive Screenings: (for results already obtained before this encounter)**
    **- Pap smear: ______**
    **- Mammogram: ______**
    **- Colonoscopy: ______**
    **- Lipid panel: ______**
    **- A1C: ______**
    **- STI screen: ______**
    **- Depression screen (PHQ-9): ______**

    **Surgical History**:

    **Family History**:

    **Social History**:

    **Sexual Orientation**:

    **Nutrition History**:

    **SUBJECTIVE DATE**

    **Chief Complaint** **(which must be stated between “__”)**

    **Symptom analysis/HPI:**

    **Clinical Tools Used (if applicable), otherwise state N/A**
    **- PHQ-9: ___ /27**
    **- GAD-7: ___ /21**
    **- AUDIT-C / DAST:**

    **Review of Systems (ROS) (This section is what the patient says, therefore it should state “Pt denies… or Pt states…”)**

    **CONSTITUTIONAL**:

    **NEUROLOGIC**:

    **HEENT**:

    **RESPIRATORY**:

    **CARDIOVASCULAR**:

    **GASTROINTESTINAL**:

    **GENITOURINARY**:

    **MUSCULOSKELETAL**:

    **SKIN**:

    **OBJECTIVE DATA**

    **VITAL SIGNS:** **LABS / DIAGNOSTICS REVIEWED (if available):**
    **- CBC:**
    **- Lipid Panel:**
    **- A1C:**
    **- EKG:**
    **- Imaging (if done):**

    **GENERAL APPREARANCE**:

    **NEUROLOGIC:**

    **HEENT:**

    **CARDIOVASCULAR:**

    **RESPIRATORY:**

    **GASTROINTESTINAL:**

    **MUSKULOSKELETAL:**

    **INTEGUMENTARY:**

    **ASSESSMENT**

    **Red Flags / Reasons for Escalation:**
    **- [ ] None noted**
    **- [ ] Positive suicidal ideation**
    **- [ ] Unstable vital signs**
    **- [ ] Abnormal exam requiring urgent referral**

    **Clinical Note**

    **(In a paragraph you should state “your encounter with your patient and your findings (including subjective and objective data)**

    **Main Diagnosis**

    (Include the name of your Main Diagnosis along with its ICD10 I10. (Look at PDF example provided) Include the in-text reference/s as per APA style 6th or 7th Edition.

    **Differential diagnosis (minimum 3) along with the rationale behind them.**
    **_(why you decide to include these differential diagnosis for this patient? What part of your assessment supports them?)_**

    **-**

    **-**

    **-**

    **PLAN**

    **Labs and Diagnostic Test to be ordered (if applicable)**

    · –

    · –

    **Pharmacological treatment:**

    **-**

    **Non-Pharmacologic treatment**:

    **Education (provide the most relevant ones – tailored to this specific patient**
    **_– not in general)_**

    **Follow-ups/Referrals**

    **Visit Complexity / CPT Code: _______**

    **References (in APA Style)**

    Examples

    Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.).

    ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0

    Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2010). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2010

    (25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series).

    ## image1.png

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] nursinh home work help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering nursinh home work help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.