Tag: Human Resource Management Analysis

  • [Solved] Human Resource Management wk7plalaw assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attached – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf – ## HRAplclawwk7homework.docx – ## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed4.docx **## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf** TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf

    – ## HRAplclawwk7homework.docx

    – ## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed4.docx

    **## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf**

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    Criteria No Submission

    0 points

    Novice
    (Criterion is missing or not

    in evidence)
    1-13 points

    Basic
    (works towards meeting

    expectations;
    performance needs

    improvement)
    14-16 points

    Proficient
    (meets expectations;

    performance is satisfactory)
    17-18 points

    Exemplary
    (exceeds expectations;

    performance is outstanding)
    19-20 points

    Support of
    Week's Reading

    No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not refer to the
    readings to support postings

    (1-13 points)

    Alludes to the readings
    to support postings

    (14-16 points)

    Refers to examples from the
    readings to support postings

    (17-18 points)

    Provides concrete examples from
    the readings to support postings;

    integrates prior readings in
    postings

    (19-20 points)

    Observations No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not integrate personal
    observations or knowledge;

    does not present new
    observations
    (1-13 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and

    knowledge in a cursory
    manner; does not

    present new
    observations

    (14-16 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and knowledge
    in an accurate way; presents

    new observations
    (17-18 points)

    Integrates personal observations
    and knowledge in an accurate and

    highly insightful way; presents
    new observations

    (19-20 points)

    Response to
    Classmates

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Responds in a cursory
    manner to classmates’

    postings
    (1-13 points)

    Constructively responds
    to classmates’ postings

    (14-16 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; offers

    insight that encourages other
    students to think critically

    about their own work.
    (17-18 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; masterfully
    connects the material presented
    in classmates’ postings to their

    responses; encourages classmates
    to think critically about their own

    work.
    (19-20 points)

    Organization,
    Word Choice,
    and Sentence

    Structure

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Posts are disorganized and
    information is not presented
    in a logical sequence; word

    choice and sentence
    structure are not suitable

    (1-13 points)

    Posts are somewhat
    disorganized, and
    information is not

    presented in a logical
    sequence; word choice
    and sentence structure

    are not suitable
    (14-16 points)

    Posts are organized, and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word
    choice and sentence

    structure are suitable; there
    are a few errors; however,

    errors do not affect
    readability.

    (17-18 points)

    Posts are organized and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word choice and
    sentence structure are suitable;

    no errors in the response.
    (19-20 points)

    References No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Includes no sources to
    support conclusions

    (1-13 points)

    Includes 1 outside
    source to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    sources are properly cited in

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and enrich the
    discussion; sources are cited using

    APA format; style guidelines are

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    sources are not properly
    cited in APA format

    (14-16 points)

    APA format and are properly
    integrated into the discussion

    response
    (17-18 points)

    masterfully integrated into the
    discussion response.

    (19-20 points)

    **## HRAplclawwk7homework.docx**

    **Module 7 assignments are as follows: Used APA Format. *Cite outside Scholarly articles.**

    **\*\* Cite textbook: Moran, J. J. (2014). Employment law: new challenges in the business environment (6th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.**

    **1A.** These are practical assignments where you will practice skills related to employment law that will translate into real-life skills that will be utilized in your career as a human resources specialist.

    As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is as follows:
    1.    Review the following fact pattern:

    Eva, an IT employee, was driving a company car headed to a supplier to pick up computer parts to repair a downed server. On her way to the supplier, her car was struck from behind by another vehicle whose driver was texting. Eva suffered a concussion, back and neck injuries, and broken ribs. She was taken to a local hospital after the accident and has been recovering at home for the past month.

    2.   Prepare a Memorandum:

    a.    outlining the steps to be taken in evaluating the worker’s injury and the company’s responsibility under the applicable workers’ compensation laws; and
    b.    addressing steps that should be taken to avoid or reduce the company’s legal liability in this regard.

    **1B.**
    **_Part One:of 1B_**

    The purpose of the Final Project is to demonstrate an understanding of the concepts contained in this course.  Please read the information contained below carefully. Be sure to provide complete responses to receive maximum credit. Use and include information from the course module content and outside sources to support the information contained in the project. All sources should be cited in proper APA format (in-text citations and a reference list). Be cognizant of spelling, punctuation, and grammar. If you have any questions, please reach out to your instructor for clarification.

    **ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTION**

    **Prepare a written plan containing the following information:** **1.    INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH.**  Write an introductory paragraph with a thesis sentence.

    **2.    BODY – PART 1: HYPOTHETICAL COMPANY**. Create a hypothetical company. Describe the company: name, purpose, location, size, etc.  Also, include any other important information about the company.

    **3.    BODY – PART 2: LEGAL LIABILITY #1.**

    · Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    · Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **4.    BODY – PART 3: LEGAL LIABILITY #2.**

    · Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    · Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **5.** **BODY – PART 4: LEGAL LIABILITY #3.**

    Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with
    **_Part Two:_**

    · regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **6**.
    **CONCLUSION**. Write a conclusion paragraph briefly summarizing the points made in the plan.

    **Prepare a presentation with the following information:**

    For the presentation, you will utilize the presentation software of your choice (PowerPoint, Prezi, etc.) to create a digital slide show discussing the information contained in the Final Portfolio.

    **Bullet points are preferred**- only essential language should exist on the slides. Illustrations or other demonstratives may be inserted on the slides as well.

    **Be cognizant of grammar, spelling, and punctuation.  In addition, APA requires you to:**

    1) paraphrase;

    2) include properly formatted APA in-text citations; and

    3) include a properly formatted APA reference list.

    **The following describes how the slides of the presentation are to be organized** – each section corresponds to the stated section from the written plan:

    1.    TITLE SLIDE.  Be sure to include your name and the class designation on the initial slide.  This slide is not numbered to avoid confusion.
    2.    SLIDE 1:  Introduction.
    3.    SLIDE 2:  Description of Company.
    4.    SLIDE 3:   Legal Liability #1 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    5.    SLIDE 4:   Legal Liability #2 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    6.    SLIDE 5:   Legal Liability #3 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    7.    SLIDE 6:   Conclusion
    8.    SLIDE 7:   References

    **## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed4.docx**

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    **Chapter 2- Interwest HealthCare Corp**

    **Karen Tillery** **Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
    MBA-540 Managerial Economics

    Professor Dr. Rita Ray

    May 12, 2024

    **Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**

    My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

    1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

    2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

    3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

    4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

    5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

    6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

    **Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

    **Student Signature: Karen Tillery**

    **Abstract**

    Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
    _Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.

    _Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.

    The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.

    ****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
    Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
    **one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.

    **All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**

    You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).

    **New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**

    **_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**

    Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
    A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
    _every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.

    **_Second Rule_**

    The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
    _first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
    _each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.

    **Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.

    **Punctuating In-Text Citations**

    So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
    _before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
    _after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:

    Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
    _only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
    _after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)

    If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]

    **References [Centered, Bold]**

    Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
    _Publication Name_,
    _234_(2), 40-190.
    [https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)

    Surname, C. C. (Year).
    _This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)

    REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed4.docx**

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    **Chapter 2- Interwest HealthCare Corp**

    **Karen Tillery** **Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
    MBA-540 Managerial Economics

    Professor Dr. Rita Ray

    May 12, 2024

    **Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**

    My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

    1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

    2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

    3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

    4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

    5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

    6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

    **Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

    **Student Signature: Karen Tillery**

    **Abstract**

    Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
    _Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.

    _Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.

    The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.

    ****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
    Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
    **one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.

    **All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**

    You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).

    **New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**

    **_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**

    Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
    A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
    _every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.

    **_Second Rule_**

    The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
    _first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
    _each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.

    **Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.

    **Punctuating In-Text Citations**

    So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
    _before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
    _after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:

    Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
    _only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
    _after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)

    If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]

    **References [Centered, Bold]**

    Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
    _Publication Name_,
    _234_(2), 40-190.
    [https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)

    Surname, C. C. (Year).
    _This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)

    REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf**

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    Criteria No Submission

    0 points

    Novice
    (Criterion is missing or not

    in evidence)
    1-13 points

    Basic
    (works towards meeting

    expectations;
    performance needs

    improvement)
    14-16 points

    Proficient
    (meets expectations;

    performance is satisfactory)
    17-18 points

    Exemplary
    (exceeds expectations;

    performance is outstanding)
    19-20 points

    Support of
    Week's Reading

    No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not refer to the
    readings to support postings

    (1-13 points)

    Alludes to the readings
    to support postings

    (14-16 points)

    Refers to examples from the
    readings to support postings

    (17-18 points)

    Provides concrete examples from
    the readings to support postings;

    integrates prior readings in
    postings

    (19-20 points)

    Observations No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not integrate personal
    observations or knowledge;

    does not present new
    observations
    (1-13 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and

    knowledge in a cursory
    manner; does not

    present new
    observations

    (14-16 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and knowledge
    in an accurate way; presents

    new observations
    (17-18 points)

    Integrates personal observations
    and knowledge in an accurate and

    highly insightful way; presents
    new observations

    (19-20 points)

    Response to
    Classmates

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Responds in a cursory
    manner to classmates’

    postings
    (1-13 points)

    Constructively responds
    to classmates’ postings

    (14-16 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; offers

    insight that encourages other
    students to think critically

    about their own work.
    (17-18 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; masterfully
    connects the material presented
    in classmates’ postings to their

    responses; encourages classmates
    to think critically about their own

    work.
    (19-20 points)

    Organization,
    Word Choice,
    and Sentence

    Structure

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Posts are disorganized and
    information is not presented
    in a logical sequence; word

    choice and sentence
    structure are not suitable

    (1-13 points)

    Posts are somewhat
    disorganized, and
    information is not

    presented in a logical
    sequence; word choice
    and sentence structure

    are not suitable
    (14-16 points)

    Posts are organized, and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word
    choice and sentence

    structure are suitable; there
    are a few errors; however,

    errors do not affect
    readability.

    (17-18 points)

    Posts are organized and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word choice and
    sentence structure are suitable;

    no errors in the response.
    (19-20 points)

    References No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Includes no sources to
    support conclusions

    (1-13 points)

    Includes 1 outside
    source to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    sources are properly cited in

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and enrich the
    discussion; sources are cited using

    APA format; style guidelines are

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    sources are not properly
    cited in APA format

    (14-16 points)

    APA format and are properly
    integrated into the discussion

    response
    (17-18 points)

    masterfully integrated into the
    discussion response.

    (19-20 points)

    **## HRAplclawwk7homework.docx**

    **Module 7 assignments are as follows: Used APA Format. *Cite outside Scholarly articles.**

    **\*\* Cite textbook: Moran, J. J. (2014). Employment law: new challenges in the business environment (6th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.**

    **1A.** These are practical assignments where you will practice skills related to employment law that will translate into real-life skills that will be utilized in your career as a human resources specialist.

    As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is as follows:
    1.    Review the following fact pattern:

    Eva, an IT employee, was driving a company car headed to a supplier to pick up computer parts to repair a downed server. On her way to the supplier, her car was struck from behind by another vehicle whose driver was texting. Eva suffered a concussion, back and neck injuries, and broken ribs. She was taken to a local hospital after the accident and has been recovering at home for the past month.

    2.   Prepare a Memorandum:

    a.    outlining the steps to be taken in evaluating the worker’s injury and the company’s responsibility under the applicable workers’ compensation laws; and
    b.    addressing steps that should be taken to avoid or reduce the company’s legal liability in this regard.

    **1B.**
    **_Part One:of 1B_**

    The purpose of the Final Project is to demonstrate an understanding of the concepts contained in this course.  Please read the information contained below carefully. Be sure to provide complete responses to receive maximum credit. Use and include information from the course module content and outside sources to support the information contained in the project. All sources should be cited in proper APA format (in-text citations and a reference list). Be cognizant of spelling, punctuation, and grammar. If you have any questions, please reach out to your instructor for clarification.

    **ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTION**

    **Prepare a written plan containing the following information:** **1.    INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH.**  Write an introductory paragraph with a thesis sentence.

    **2.    BODY – PART 1: HYPOTHETICAL COMPANY**. Create a hypothetical company. Describe the company: name, purpose, location, size, etc.  Also, include any other important information about the company.

    **3.    BODY – PART 2: LEGAL LIABILITY #1.**

    · Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    · Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **4.    BODY – PART 3: LEGAL LIABILITY #2.**

    · Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    · Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **5.** **BODY – PART 4: LEGAL LIABILITY #3.**

    Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with
    **_Part Two:_**

    · regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **6**.
    **CONCLUSION**. Write a conclusion paragraph briefly summarizing the points made in the plan.

    **Prepare a presentation with the following information:**

    For the presentation, you will utilize the presentation software of your choice (PowerPoint, Prezi, etc.) to create a digital slide show discussing the information contained in the Final Portfolio.

    **Bullet points are preferred**- only essential language should exist on the slides. Illustrations or other demonstratives may be inserted on the slides as well.

    **Be cognizant of grammar, spelling, and punctuation.  In addition, APA requires you to:**

    1) paraphrase;

    2) include properly formatted APA in-text citations; and

    3) include a properly formatted APA reference list.

    **The following describes how the slides of the presentation are to be organized** – each section corresponds to the stated section from the written plan:

    1.    TITLE SLIDE.  Be sure to include your name and the class designation on the initial slide.  This slide is not numbered to avoid confusion.
    2.    SLIDE 1:  Introduction.
    3.    SLIDE 2:  Description of Company.
    4.    SLIDE 3:   Legal Liability #1 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    5.    SLIDE 4:   Legal Liability #2 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    6.    SLIDE 5:   Legal Liability #3 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    7.    SLIDE 6:   Conclusion
    8.    SLIDE 7:   References

    **## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed4.docx**

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    **Chapter 2- Interwest HealthCare Corp**

    **Karen Tillery** **Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
    MBA-540 Managerial Economics

    Professor Dr. Rita Ray

    May 12, 2024

    **Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**

    My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

    1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

    2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

    3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

    4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

    5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

    6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

    **Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

    **Student Signature: Karen Tillery**

    **Abstract**

    Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
    _Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.

    _Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.

    The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.

    ****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
    Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
    **one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.

    **All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**

    You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).

    **New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**

    **_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**

    Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
    A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
    _every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.

    **_Second Rule_**

    The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
    _first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
    _each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.

    **Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.

    **Punctuating In-Text Citations**

    So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
    _before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
    _after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:

    Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
    _only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
    _after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)

    If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]

    **References [Centered, Bold]**

    Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
    _Publication Name_,
    _234_(2), 40-190.
    [https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)

    Surname, C. C. (Year).
    _This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)

    REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## GradDiscussionRubric.pdf**

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    Criteria No Submission

    0 points

    Novice
    (Criterion is missing or not

    in evidence)
    1-13 points

    Basic
    (works towards meeting

    expectations;
    performance needs

    improvement)
    14-16 points

    Proficient
    (meets expectations;

    performance is satisfactory)
    17-18 points

    Exemplary
    (exceeds expectations;

    performance is outstanding)
    19-20 points

    Support of
    Week's Reading

    No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not refer to the
    readings to support postings

    (1-13 points)

    Alludes to the readings
    to support postings

    (14-16 points)

    Refers to examples from the
    readings to support postings

    (17-18 points)

    Provides concrete examples from
    the readings to support postings;

    integrates prior readings in
    postings

    (19-20 points)

    Observations No Student
    Submission
    (0 points)

    Does not integrate personal
    observations or knowledge;

    does not present new
    observations
    (1-13 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and

    knowledge in a cursory
    manner; does not

    present new
    observations

    (14-16 points)

    Integrates personal
    observations and knowledge
    in an accurate way; presents

    new observations
    (17-18 points)

    Integrates personal observations
    and knowledge in an accurate and

    highly insightful way; presents
    new observations

    (19-20 points)

    Response to
    Classmates

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Responds in a cursory
    manner to classmates’

    postings
    (1-13 points)

    Constructively responds
    to classmates’ postings

    (14-16 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; offers

    insight that encourages other
    students to think critically

    about their own work.
    (17-18 points)

    Constructively responds to
    classmates’ postings; masterfully
    connects the material presented
    in classmates’ postings to their

    responses; encourages classmates
    to think critically about their own

    work.
    (19-20 points)

    Organization,
    Word Choice,
    and Sentence

    Structure

    No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Posts are disorganized and
    information is not presented
    in a logical sequence; word

    choice and sentence
    structure are not suitable

    (1-13 points)

    Posts are somewhat
    disorganized, and
    information is not

    presented in a logical
    sequence; word choice
    and sentence structure

    are not suitable
    (14-16 points)

    Posts are organized, and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word
    choice and sentence

    structure are suitable; there
    are a few errors; however,

    errors do not affect
    readability.

    (17-18 points)

    Posts are organized and
    information is presented in a

    logical sequence; word choice and
    sentence structure are suitable;

    no errors in the response.
    (19-20 points)

    References No Student
    Submission

    (0 points)

    Includes no sources to
    support conclusions

    (1-13 points)

    Includes 1 outside
    source to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and
    enrich the discussion;

    sources are properly cited in

    Includes 2 or more outside
    sources to support and enrich the
    discussion; sources are cited using

    APA format; style guidelines are

    TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric

    sources are not properly
    cited in APA format

    (14-16 points)

    APA format and are properly
    integrated into the discussion

    response
    (17-18 points)

    masterfully integrated into the
    discussion response.

    (19-20 points)

    **## HRAplclawwk7homework.docx**

    **Module 7 assignments are as follows: Used APA Format. *Cite outside Scholarly articles.**

    **\*\* Cite textbook: Moran, J. J. (2014). Employment law: new challenges in the business environment (6th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.**

    **1A.** These are practical assignments where you will practice skills related to employment law that will translate into real-life skills that will be utilized in your career as a human resources specialist.

    As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is as follows:
    1.    Review the following fact pattern:

    Eva, an IT employee, was driving a company car headed to a supplier to pick up computer parts to repair a downed server. On her way to the supplier, her car was struck from behind by another vehicle whose driver was texting. Eva suffered a concussion, back and neck injuries, and broken ribs. She was taken to a local hospital after the accident and has been recovering at home for the past month.

    2.   Prepare a Memorandum:

    a.    outlining the steps to be taken in evaluating the worker’s injury and the company’s responsibility under the applicable workers’ compensation laws; and
    b.    addressing steps that should be taken to avoid or reduce the company’s legal liability in this regard.

    **1B.**
    **_Part One:of 1B_**

    The purpose of the Final Project is to demonstrate an understanding of the concepts contained in this course.  Please read the information contained below carefully. Be sure to provide complete responses to receive maximum credit. Use and include information from the course module content and outside sources to support the information contained in the project. All sources should be cited in proper APA format (in-text citations and a reference list). Be cognizant of spelling, punctuation, and grammar. If you have any questions, please reach out to your instructor for clarification.

    **ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTION**

    **Prepare a written plan containing the following information:** **1.    INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH.**  Write an introductory paragraph with a thesis sentence.

    **2.    BODY – PART 1: HYPOTHETICAL COMPANY**. Create a hypothetical company. Describe the company: name, purpose, location, size, etc.  Also, include any other important information about the company.

    **3.    BODY – PART 2: LEGAL LIABILITY #1.**

    · Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    · Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **4.    BODY – PART 3: LEGAL LIABILITY #2.**

    · Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    · Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **5.** **BODY – PART 4: LEGAL LIABILITY #3.**

    Choose one employment-related legal liability (ie: discrimination, harassment, etc.) pertaining to this company that we have discussed this term and describe how and why it is a concern for your hypothetical company;

    Discuss what can be done to avoid or reduce the company’s risk with
    **_Part Two:_**

    · regard to this legal liability; and

    · Describe what can be done after an incident involving this legal liability arises to mitigate (reduce) the damage (cost) to the company.

    **6**.
    **CONCLUSION**. Write a conclusion paragraph briefly summarizing the points made in the plan.

    **Prepare a presentation with the following information:**

    For the presentation, you will utilize the presentation software of your choice (PowerPoint, Prezi, etc.) to create a digital slide show discussing the information contained in the Final Portfolio.

    **Bullet points are preferred**- only essential language should exist on the slides. Illustrations or other demonstratives may be inserted on the slides as well.

    **Be cognizant of grammar, spelling, and punctuation.  In addition, APA requires you to:**

    1) paraphrase;

    2) include properly formatted APA in-text citations; and

    3) include a properly formatted APA reference list.

    **The following describes how the slides of the presentation are to be organized** – each section corresponds to the stated section from the written plan:

    1.    TITLE SLIDE.  Be sure to include your name and the class designation on the initial slide.  This slide is not numbered to avoid confusion.
    2.    SLIDE 1:  Introduction.
    3.    SLIDE 2:  Description of Company.
    4.    SLIDE 3:   Legal Liability #1 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    5.    SLIDE 4:   Legal Liability #2 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    6.    SLIDE 5:   Legal Liability #3 (describe; steps to avoid; steps to mitigate)
    7.    SLIDE 6:   Conclusion
    8.    SLIDE 7:   References

    **## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed4.docx**

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    **Chapter 2- Interwest HealthCare Corp**

    **Karen Tillery** **Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
    MBA-540 Managerial Economics

    Professor Dr. Rita Ray

    May 12, 2024

    **Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**

    My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

    1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

    2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

    3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

    4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

    5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

    6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

    **Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

    **Student Signature: Karen Tillery**

    **Abstract**

    Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
    _Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.

    _Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.

    The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.

    ****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
    Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
    **one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.

    **All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**

    You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).

    **New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**

    **_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**

    Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
    A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
    _every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.

    **_Second Rule_**

    The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
    _first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
    _each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.

    **Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.

    **Punctuating In-Text Citations**

    So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
    _before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
    _after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:

    Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
    _only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
    _after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)

    If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]

    **References [Centered, Bold]**

    Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
    _Publication Name_,
    _234_(2), 40-190.
    [https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)

    Surname, C. C. (Year).
    _This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)

    REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

  • [Solved] Sanders HRM 4301 Unit 5 DB and reply

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## SandersHRM4301Unit5DBandreply.docx **## SandersHRM4301Unit5DBandreply.docx** Please note that there are two posts needed to successfully complete the discussion board assignment. An initial post addressing the discussion board topic is due by end of day Saturday. A r…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## SandersHRM4301Unit5DBandreply.docx

    **## SandersHRM4301Unit5DBandreply.docx**

    Please note that there are two posts needed to successfully complete the discussion board assignment. An initial post addressing the discussion board topic is due by end of day Saturday. A response post to at least one other student is due by end of day Tuesday.

    The method of training used can have an impact on the behavior and cognitive learning of the trainees; therefore, in meeting the needs of those being trained, you should consider the various methods of how training is delivered (i.e., traditional vs. web-based).

    What are the differences between behavioral and cognitive learning? Describe two traditional training methods and two technology-based training methods. Of the traditional types or web-based types of methods available to you, which would you select when developing training sessions for your organization? Why?

    Part 2

    Please respond to this DB:

    **Amela Tadic**

    Top of Form

    When designing a training program, it is important to understand the differences between behavioral and cognitive learning. Behavioral learning focuses on actions and is based on reinforcement which means people learn through practice, repetition, and feedback. This approach works well for hands-on training, like role-playing or on-the-job training, where employees develop new skills through direct experience. Cognitive learning is all about understanding and mental processes. It involves critical thinking, problem-solving, and knowledge retention, making it a good fit for training methods that require discussion, reflection, and deeper comprehension (Noe, 2020).

    Traditional training methods still play a big role in many workplaces. Instructor-led training is one of the most common, where a trainer delivers content in a classroom setting. This method allows for real-time interaction, immediate feedback, and hands-on activities, making it especially effective for complex topics that need discussion and explanation. Another traditional approach is on-the-job training, where employees learn by doing. This type of training is practical and helps employees gain direct experience under the supervision of a mentor or trainer, which is great for roles that require technical or physical skills (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021).

    Technology has opened up new possibilities for training as well. E-learning, or self-paced online training, is a popular option because it offers flexibility. Employees can complete courses at their own pace, using digital resources, videos, and quizzes to reinforce learning. This method is cost-effective and scalable, making it a great fit for large organizations. Virtual instructor-led training is another tech-based option, providing live training sessions through video conferencing. It keeps the interactive benefits of traditional Instructor-led training while allowing employees to join from anywhere, making it a good solution for remote teams (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021).

    If I were developing a training program for my organization, I would take a blended approach, combining both traditional and web-based methods. Instructor-led training is valuable for complex topics that need in-depth discussions, while e-learning offers flexibility for employees to learn on their own schedule. Virtual instructor-led training is another great option, especially for remote employees, since it keeps training interactive without requiring everyone to be in the same location. A mix of these methods ensures that different learning styles are supported, employees get both hands-on and conceptual learning, and training remains engaging and effective (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021).

    Bottom of Form

    **## SandersHRM4301Unit5DBandreply.docx**

    Please note that there are two posts needed to successfully complete the discussion board assignment. An initial post addressing the discussion board topic is due by end of day Saturday. A response post to at least one other student is due by end of day Tuesday.

    The method of training used can have an impact on the behavior and cognitive learning of the trainees; therefore, in meeting the needs of those being trained, you should consider the various methods of how training is delivered (i.e., traditional vs. web-based).

    What are the differences between behavioral and cognitive learning? Describe two traditional training methods and two technology-based training methods. Of the traditional types or web-based types of methods available to you, which would you select when developing training sessions for your organization? Why?

    Part 2

    Please respond to this DB:

    **Amela Tadic**

    Top of Form

    When designing a training program, it is important to understand the differences between behavioral and cognitive learning. Behavioral learning focuses on actions and is based on reinforcement which means people learn through practice, repetition, and feedback. This approach works well for hands-on training, like role-playing or on-the-job training, where employees develop new skills through direct experience. Cognitive learning is all about understanding and mental processes. It involves critical thinking, problem-solving, and knowledge retention, making it a good fit for training methods that require discussion, reflection, and deeper comprehension (Noe, 2020).

    Traditional training methods still play a big role in many workplaces. Instructor-led training is one of the most common, where a trainer delivers content in a classroom setting. This method allows for real-time interaction, immediate feedback, and hands-on activities, making it especially effective for complex topics that need discussion and explanation. Another traditional approach is on-the-job training, where employees learn by doing. This type of training is practical and helps employees gain direct experience under the supervision of a mentor or trainer, which is great for roles that require technical or physical skills (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021).

    Technology has opened up new possibilities for training as well. E-learning, or self-paced online training, is a popular option because it offers flexibility. Employees can complete courses at their own pace, using digital resources, videos, and quizzes to reinforce learning. This method is cost-effective and scalable, making it a great fit for large organizations. Virtual instructor-led training is another tech-based option, providing live training sessions through video conferencing. It keeps the interactive benefits of traditional Instructor-led training while allowing employees to join from anywhere, making it a good solution for remote teams (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021).

    If I were developing a training program for my organization, I would take a blended approach, combining both traditional and web-based methods. Instructor-led training is valuable for complex topics that need in-depth discussions, while e-learning offers flexibility for employees to learn on their own schedule. Virtual instructor-led training is another great option, especially for remote employees, since it keeps training interactive without requiring everyone to be in the same location. A mix of these methods ensures that different learning styles are supported, employees get both hands-on and conceptual learning, and training remains engaging and effective (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021).

    Bottom of Form

  • [Solved] unit 8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Answer each question using complete sentences and proper APA format. Please be sure to answer each question fully and include references to your textbook and at least 2 supplemental resources. Each response should be at least 500 words in length. 1. A 55-year-old single woman with multiple sclerosi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Answer each question using complete sentences and proper APA format. Please be sure to answer each question fully and include references to your textbook and at least 2 supplemental resources. Each response should be at least 500 words in length.

    1. A 55-year-old single woman with multiple sclerosis (MS) is in crisis; she can no longer work at her life-long career. What are some of the issues related to her disease that impact her crisis, and what types of supports are available? Research MS and write about your findings using the biopsychosocial model. Please also be sure to suggest some interventions that can be applied to this case.

    2.  Define and discuss the philosophy of palliative care. Then define and discuss the philosophy of hospice care. How do these services differ? How are the philosophies similar? In your writing, identify some strategies to incorporate into palliative and/or hospice care services to prevent caregiver burnout.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] HUMN RESOURCES WEEK 1B DQ

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Week 1 Discussion: Why Human Services? If you could answer the questions “Why human services?” and “Why a master’s degree?” what would you say? Any number of reasons could have brought you here to Walden—for example, a desire to advance your career, be a stronger advocate for diverse populations,…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Week 1 Discussion: Why Human Services?

    If you could answer the questions “Why human services?” and “Why a master’s degree?” what would you say? Any number of reasons could have brought you here to Walden—for example, a desire to advance your career, be a stronger advocate for diverse populations, or hone human services leadership skills. As you continue in your program, it will be important for you to remain connected to these reasons and to your professional goals.

    In this first Discussion, you share your vision for your future work as an advanced human services professional practitioner.

    ### To Prepare

    – Review your course announcements for possible information related to this week’s Discussion and Assignment.
    – Review the materials on writing effective Discussion posts and responses provided in the Learning Resources.
    – View the Alumni Stories videos showcasing two of Walden’s Human Services alumni.
    – Reflect on what has motivated you to pursue your MS in Human Services degree, and envision where the degree will take you as a leader and advanced human services professional practitioner.

    ### Resources

    ![](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/icons/resources.svg)

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/156493/modules/items/6282579 "Click this link to access the weekly resources (open in a new tab)")

    ### By Day 4

    **Post** an explanation of your career aspirations as an advanced human services professional practitioner. Specifically, explain why you have chosen human services as a field and describe the impact you have made and would like to make. If you could imagine your own alumni video at the end of your master’s journey, what would it look like? How would you envision yourself as a leader? What kinds of projects would you be involved in?

    Ensure that your post is specific, relevant, and supported by examples and professional experiences.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Human Resource Management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Case Study – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Instructions.docx – ## Rubric.docx **## Instructions.docx** **Case Study** **Purpose:** Flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness to the external environment is essential if organizations are going to survive and thrive in a rapidly changing environmen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Case Study

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Instructions.docx

    – ## Rubric.docx

    **## Instructions.docx**

    **Case Study**

    **Purpose:**

    Flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness to the external environment is essential if organizations are going to survive and thrive in a rapidly changing environment. Therefore, leaders and managers must know how to
    **implement change** successfully in their organizations or departments in response to rapidly shifting conditions. The ability to respond to change is partially determined by an
    **organization's structure and culture, along with having the knowledge of how to implement change effectively.** The purpose of this project is to examine your understanding of the roles and skills of managers and to build a set of skills that will help you understand how to implement organizational change strategies. Using a case study, you will be asked to demonstrate how
    **motivation**,
    **relationship building**, and
    **trust** affect organizational effectiveness as change is implemented.

    **Step 1:** Carefully read the case study below.

    **Step 2:** Comprise a
    **5-6 page paper** (excluding the title page and reference list page) that includes ALL of the following points:

    ·
    **Research** the
    concepts of organizational structure and change management and use this as the basis for creating your change management plan.

    ·
    **Research** the
    concepts of motivation, trust, and behavior as they individually, and collectively, relate to the ability for leaders to create sound management relationships that ultimately lead to successful organizations; and the
    concepts of organizational structure and change managementas they relate to the creation and implementation of a global organizational structure.

    ·
    **Apply** your research on the concepts
    of motivation, trust, and behavior to the
    relationship-building issues identified in the case study.

    ·
    **Develop** a forward strategy for leadership and management that focuses on relationship building, diversity and trust that will help the organization implement these new strategies.

    ·
    **Consider** change management and global organizational culture as you develop your plan.

    ·
    **Explain** the reasoning/conclusions behind your plan elements and support them with your research, class materials, and case-study facts.

    **INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PREPARE THE SUBMISSION:**

    · Carefully read the
    **grading rubric** for the assignment!

    Check the instructions to make sure
    **ALL** elements of the assignment have been covered

    · Students are expected to use a
    **variety as well as multiple course readings and research** to support ideas, reasoning, and conclusions.

    · This assignment
    requires the use of, at minimum,
    **5 scholarly references/sources**

    · Follow an approved writing style format such as MLA, APA, or Chicago style, and format guidelines to ensure that your final submission includes a
    **Title Page, In-Text Citations, and a Reference  List**.

    · Paraphrase from relevant sources to show a greater understanding of the topics. Limit quotes, though when used explain their significance. Provide the page or paragraph number as appropriate. Note that a reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.

    · The analysis should begin with an introductory paragraph that clearly and succinctly explains what you intend to cover in the body of the paper.

    · The analysis should end with a conclusion/summary paragraph that clearly and succinctly explains what you covered in the body of the paper.

    ·
    **Third-person writing is required.** Third-person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first-person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second-person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link:
    [https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person](https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person) .

    · Contractions are not used in business writing, so the expectation is that students do NOT use contractions in the assignment.

    · The paper must be double-spaced with 1-inch margins with 12 pt. font.

    · Submit the final project into the appropriate assignment submission folder by the due date.

    **NOTE:  All submitted work is to be your original work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet, or an online clearinghouse.  You are expected to understand the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy and know that it is your responsibility to learn about instructor and general academic expectations with regard to proper citation of sources.**

    **Case Study**

    Ann McConnell is chief information officer (CIO) at Jackson Spice Ingredients (JSI), a large Maryland spice and food ingredient company. In an industry that has a large national market presence, yet is global in its need for raw materials, JSI is always looking for ways to increase productivity and speed things up while staying connected to its worldwide sources.  The mission of the organization is “to profitably expand its global leadership position in the spice, seasoning markets while being good stewards of the environment.”

         Two years into the job, McConnell suggested to company president, Charles Jackson, that it implement a new global organizational structure that is focused on divisions or geographic areas, thus enabling a stronger focus on local environments and sustainability. One of the first steps would be to reorganize the current functional structure and moving or hiring new managers for each of the new divisions.  The new divisional structure will enable more of a focus on the local environment, thus assisting managements in understanding how they can impact each demographic area.

        In a meeting with managers,  Charles and Ann need to introduce the new strategies. They know that 3 of the 7 current managers will be reluctant to change to the new organizational structure and strategy.   Charles and Ann need to consider what management strategies they will need to focus on how to get all the managers on board and they need to consider what management skills will be most needed to implement the new strategies.

         Taking into consideration what you have learned the past few weeks on learning organizations, culture, and human capital, develop a strategy for leadership to use that will help management in their new roles and that will focus on the organizational vision and purpose

    **## Rubric.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Developing** | **Needs Improvement** | **Failing** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Requirements of the assignment | 2 points<br>Met or exceeded requirements of the assignment.  Included analysis of case study; issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of research, class material and case study facts; reflects an insightful and complex understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management | 1.8 points<br>Met most of the requirements of the assignment. Including identification of case study issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects an good  understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing one issue discussion or one or two were not developed. | 1.4 points<br>Met someofthe requirements of the assignment, including identification of case study issues were mostly concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects a satisfactory understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing two issues from the discussion or three were not developed leaving the impression of a general discussion. | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to identify some of the issues but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present. | 0 points<br>No Identification and/or explanation was not made leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts. | Score of Requirements of the assignment,<br>/ 2 |
    | Content | 2 points<br>Demonstrates strong knowledge and understanding of of motivation, trust and relationship building along with these impact organizational effectiveness | 1.8 points<br>Demonstrates a thorough analysis of motivation, trust and relationship building | 1.4 points<br>Includes an analysis of the topics though not in depth | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to address the topics with many elements missing. | 0 points<br>Does not address the topics | Score of Content,<br>/ 2 |
    | Analysis | 2 points<br>Provides a strong critical analysis. Strategies for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were thoroughly supported by course and research material and showed insightful and complex understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to success | 1.8 points<br>Recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing examples. | 1.4 points<br>Most recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material and showed a sufficient understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to successful handling; the supporting discussion was   underdeveloped because of missing examples or case study fact application. | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to make plan  but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present. | 0 points<br>No plan recommendations were made and/or the explanation was lacking supportive reasoning. | Score of Analysis,<br>/ 2 |
    | Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended | 1.5 points<br>More than the required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. | 1.2 points<br>Met requirement for sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion | 1.05 points<br>Fewer than required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they mostly were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. | 0.9 points<br>Sources used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and/or the academic quality were not valid or failed to be appropriate to the topic under discussion. | 0 points<br>No outside reference material was used. | Score of Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended,<br>/ 1.5 |
    | Writing Mechanics | 1.25 points<br>Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used.  0 to 2 errors noted. | 1 point<br>Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 3 to 6 errors noted. | 0.875 points<br>Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 7 to 10 errors noted. | 0.75 points<br>Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found. | 0 points<br>Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count. | Score of Writing Mechanics,<br>/ 1.25 |
    | Writing Style | 1.25 points<br>Excellent use of proper writing style format and style. One to 2 writing style or usage errors; Paraphrases using proper citation of source material used throughout paper; Reference titles follow writing style guidelines with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized. | 1 point<br>Good use of APA format. Attempts to paraphrase with in-text citations and reference list but 3 – 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times. | 0.875 points<br>Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; writing style errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to include proper citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times in document. | 0.75 points<br>Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to include proper citations when appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when required citations are needed throughout the document. | 0 points<br>No attempt at proper writing style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other. | Score of Writing Style,<br>/ 1.25 |

    Total

    Score of Case Study- 10%,

    / 10

    **## Rubric.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Developing** | **Needs Improvement** | **Failing** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Requirements of the assignment | 2 points<br>Met or exceeded requirements of the assignment.  Included analysis of case study; issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of research, class material and case study facts; reflects an insightful and complex understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management | 1.8 points<br>Met most of the requirements of the assignment. Including identification of case study issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects an good  understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing one issue discussion or one or two were not developed. | 1.4 points<br>Met someofthe requirements of the assignment, including identification of case study issues were mostly concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects a satisfactory understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing two issues from the discussion or three were not developed leaving the impression of a general discussion. | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to identify some of the issues but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present. | 0 points<br>No Identification and/or explanation was not made leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts. | Score of Requirements of the assignment,<br>/ 2 |
    | Content | 2 points<br>Demonstrates strong knowledge and understanding of of motivation, trust and relationship building along with these impact organizational effectiveness | 1.8 points<br>Demonstrates a thorough analysis of motivation, trust and relationship building | 1.4 points<br>Includes an analysis of the topics though not in depth | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to address the topics with many elements missing. | 0 points<br>Does not address the topics | Score of Content,<br>/ 2 |
    | Analysis | 2 points<br>Provides a strong critical analysis. Strategies for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were thoroughly supported by course and research material and showed insightful and complex understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to success | 1.8 points<br>Recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing examples. | 1.4 points<br>Most recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material and showed a sufficient understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to successful handling; the supporting discussion was   underdeveloped because of missing examples or case study fact application. | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to make plan  but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present. | 0 points<br>No plan recommendations were made and/or the explanation was lacking supportive reasoning. | Score of Analysis,<br>/ 2 |
    | Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended | 1.5 points<br>More than the required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. | 1.2 points<br>Met requirement for sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion | 1.05 points<br>Fewer than required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they mostly were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. | 0.9 points<br>Sources used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and/or the academic quality were not valid or failed to be appropriate to the topic under discussion. | 0 points<br>No outside reference material was used. | Score of Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended,<br>/ 1.5 |
    | Writing Mechanics | 1.25 points<br>Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used.  0 to 2 errors noted. | 1 point<br>Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 3 to 6 errors noted. | 0.875 points<br>Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 7 to 10 errors noted. | 0.75 points<br>Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found. | 0 points<br>Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count. | Score of Writing Mechanics,<br>/ 1.25 |
    | Writing Style | 1.25 points<br>Excellent use of proper writing style format and style. One to 2 writing style or usage errors; Paraphrases using proper citation of source material used throughout paper; Reference titles follow writing style guidelines with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized. | 1 point<br>Good use of APA format. Attempts to paraphrase with in-text citations and reference list but 3 – 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times. | 0.875 points<br>Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; writing style errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to include proper citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times in document. | 0.75 points<br>Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to include proper citations when appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when required citations are needed throughout the document. | 0 points<br>No attempt at proper writing style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other. | Score of Writing Style,<br>/ 1.25 |

    Total

    Score of Case Study- 10%,

    / 10

    **## Instructions.docx**

    **Case Study**

    **Purpose:**

    Flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness to the external environment is essential if organizations are going to survive and thrive in a rapidly changing environment. Therefore, leaders and managers must know how to
    **implement change** successfully in their organizations or departments in response to rapidly shifting conditions. The ability to respond to change is partially determined by an
    **organization's structure and culture, along with having the knowledge of how to implement change effectively.** The purpose of this project is to examine your understanding of the roles and skills of managers and to build a set of skills that will help you understand how to implement organizational change strategies. Using a case study, you will be asked to demonstrate how
    **motivation**,
    **relationship building**, and
    **trust** affect organizational effectiveness as change is implemented.

    **Step 1:** Carefully read the case study below.

    **Step 2:** Comprise a
    **5-6 page paper** (excluding the title page and reference list page) that includes ALL of the following points:

    ·
    **Research** the
    concepts of organizational structure and change management and use this as the basis for creating your change management plan.

    ·
    **Research** the
    concepts of motivation, trust, and behavior as they individually, and collectively, relate to the ability for leaders to create sound management relationships that ultimately lead to successful organizations; and the
    concepts of organizational structure and change managementas they relate to the creation and implementation of a global organizational structure.

    ·
    **Apply** your research on the concepts
    of motivation, trust, and behavior to the
    relationship-building issues identified in the case study.

    ·
    **Develop** a forward strategy for leadership and management that focuses on relationship building, diversity and trust that will help the organization implement these new strategies.

    ·
    **Consider** change management and global organizational culture as you develop your plan.

    ·
    **Explain** the reasoning/conclusions behind your plan elements and support them with your research, class materials, and case-study facts.

    **INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PREPARE THE SUBMISSION:**

    · Carefully read the
    **grading rubric** for the assignment!

    Check the instructions to make sure
    **ALL** elements of the assignment have been covered

    · Students are expected to use a
    **variety as well as multiple course readings and research** to support ideas, reasoning, and conclusions.

    · This assignment
    requires the use of, at minimum,
    **5 scholarly references/sources**

    · Follow an approved writing style format such as MLA, APA, or Chicago style, and format guidelines to ensure that your final submission includes a
    **Title Page, In-Text Citations, and a Reference  List**.

    · Paraphrase from relevant sources to show a greater understanding of the topics. Limit quotes, though when used explain their significance. Provide the page or paragraph number as appropriate. Note that a reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.

    · The analysis should begin with an introductory paragraph that clearly and succinctly explains what you intend to cover in the body of the paper.

    · The analysis should end with a conclusion/summary paragraph that clearly and succinctly explains what you covered in the body of the paper.

    ·
    **Third-person writing is required.** Third-person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first-person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second-person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link:
    [https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person](https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person) .

    · Contractions are not used in business writing, so the expectation is that students do NOT use contractions in the assignment.

    · The paper must be double-spaced with 1-inch margins with 12 pt. font.

    · Submit the final project into the appropriate assignment submission folder by the due date.

    **NOTE:  All submitted work is to be your original work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet, or an online clearinghouse.  You are expected to understand the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy and know that it is your responsibility to learn about instructor and general academic expectations with regard to proper citation of sources.**

    **Case Study**

    Ann McConnell is chief information officer (CIO) at Jackson Spice Ingredients (JSI), a large Maryland spice and food ingredient company. In an industry that has a large national market presence, yet is global in its need for raw materials, JSI is always looking for ways to increase productivity and speed things up while staying connected to its worldwide sources.  The mission of the organization is “to profitably expand its global leadership position in the spice, seasoning markets while being good stewards of the environment.”

         Two years into the job, McConnell suggested to company president, Charles Jackson, that it implement a new global organizational structure that is focused on divisions or geographic areas, thus enabling a stronger focus on local environments and sustainability. One of the first steps would be to reorganize the current functional structure and moving or hiring new managers for each of the new divisions.  The new divisional structure will enable more of a focus on the local environment, thus assisting managements in understanding how they can impact each demographic area.

        In a meeting with managers,  Charles and Ann need to introduce the new strategies. They know that 3 of the 7 current managers will be reluctant to change to the new organizational structure and strategy.   Charles and Ann need to consider what management strategies they will need to focus on how to get all the managers on board and they need to consider what management skills will be most needed to implement the new strategies.

         Taking into consideration what you have learned the past few weeks on learning organizations, culture, and human capital, develop a strategy for leadership to use that will help management in their new roles and that will focus on the organizational vision and purpose

    **## Rubric.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Developing** | **Needs Improvement** | **Failing** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Requirements of the assignment | 2 points<br>Met or exceeded requirements of the assignment.  Included analysis of case study; issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of research, class material and case study facts; reflects an insightful and complex understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management | 1.8 points<br>Met most of the requirements of the assignment. Including identification of case study issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects an good  understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing one issue discussion or one or two were not developed. | 1.4 points<br>Met someofthe requirements of the assignment, including identification of case study issues were mostly concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects a satisfactory understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing two issues from the discussion or three were not developed leaving the impression of a general discussion. | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to identify some of the issues but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present. | 0 points<br>No Identification and/or explanation was not made leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts. | Score of Requirements of the assignment,<br>/ 2 |
    | Content | 2 points<br>Demonstrates strong knowledge and understanding of of motivation, trust and relationship building along with these impact organizational effectiveness | 1.8 points<br>Demonstrates a thorough analysis of motivation, trust and relationship building | 1.4 points<br>Includes an analysis of the topics though not in depth | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to address the topics with many elements missing. | 0 points<br>Does not address the topics | Score of Content,<br>/ 2 |
    | Analysis | 2 points<br>Provides a strong critical analysis. Strategies for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were thoroughly supported by course and research material and showed insightful and complex understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to success | 1.8 points<br>Recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing examples. | 1.4 points<br>Most recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material and showed a sufficient understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to successful handling; the supporting discussion was   underdeveloped because of missing examples or case study fact application. | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to make plan  but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present. | 0 points<br>No plan recommendations were made and/or the explanation was lacking supportive reasoning. | Score of Analysis,<br>/ 2 |
    | Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended | 1.5 points<br>More than the required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. | 1.2 points<br>Met requirement for sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion | 1.05 points<br>Fewer than required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they mostly were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. | 0.9 points<br>Sources used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and/or the academic quality were not valid or failed to be appropriate to the topic under discussion. | 0 points<br>No outside reference material was used. | Score of Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended,<br>/ 1.5 |
    | Writing Mechanics | 1.25 points<br>Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used.  0 to 2 errors noted. | 1 point<br>Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 3 to 6 errors noted. | 0.875 points<br>Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 7 to 10 errors noted. | 0.75 points<br>Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found. | 0 points<br>Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count. | Score of Writing Mechanics,<br>/ 1.25 |
    | Writing Style | 1.25 points<br>Excellent use of proper writing style format and style. One to 2 writing style or usage errors; Paraphrases using proper citation of source material used throughout paper; Reference titles follow writing style guidelines with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized. | 1 point<br>Good use of APA format. Attempts to paraphrase with in-text citations and reference list but 3 – 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times. | 0.875 points<br>Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; writing style errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to include proper citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times in document. | 0.75 points<br>Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to include proper citations when appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when required citations are needed throughout the document. | 0 points<br>No attempt at proper writing style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other. | Score of Writing Style,<br>/ 1.25 |

    Total

    Score of Case Study- 10%,

    / 10

    **## Instructions.docx**

    **Case Study**

    **Purpose:**

    Flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness to the external environment is essential if organizations are going to survive and thrive in a rapidly changing environment. Therefore, leaders and managers must know how to
    **implement change** successfully in their organizations or departments in response to rapidly shifting conditions. The ability to respond to change is partially determined by an
    **organization's structure and culture, along with having the knowledge of how to implement change effectively.** The purpose of this project is to examine your understanding of the roles and skills of managers and to build a set of skills that will help you understand how to implement organizational change strategies. Using a case study, you will be asked to demonstrate how
    **motivation**,
    **relationship building**, and
    **trust** affect organizational effectiveness as change is implemented.

    **Step 1:** Carefully read the case study below.

    **Step 2:** Comprise a
    **5-6 page paper** (excluding the title page and reference list page) that includes ALL of the following points:

    ·
    **Research** the
    concepts of organizational structure and change management and use this as the basis for creating your change management plan.

    ·
    **Research** the
    concepts of motivation, trust, and behavior as they individually, and collectively, relate to the ability for leaders to create sound management relationships that ultimately lead to successful organizations; and the
    concepts of organizational structure and change managementas they relate to the creation and implementation of a global organizational structure.

    ·
    **Apply** your research on the concepts
    of motivation, trust, and behavior to the
    relationship-building issues identified in the case study.

    ·
    **Develop** a forward strategy for leadership and management that focuses on relationship building, diversity and trust that will help the organization implement these new strategies.

    ·
    **Consider** change management and global organizational culture as you develop your plan.

    ·
    **Explain** the reasoning/conclusions behind your plan elements and support them with your research, class materials, and case-study facts.

    **INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PREPARE THE SUBMISSION:**

    · Carefully read the
    **grading rubric** for the assignment!

    Check the instructions to make sure
    **ALL** elements of the assignment have been covered

    · Students are expected to use a
    **variety as well as multiple course readings and research** to support ideas, reasoning, and conclusions.

    · This assignment
    requires the use of, at minimum,
    **5 scholarly references/sources**

    · Follow an approved writing style format such as MLA, APA, or Chicago style, and format guidelines to ensure that your final submission includes a
    **Title Page, In-Text Citations, and a Reference  List**.

    · Paraphrase from relevant sources to show a greater understanding of the topics. Limit quotes, though when used explain their significance. Provide the page or paragraph number as appropriate. Note that a reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.

    · The analysis should begin with an introductory paragraph that clearly and succinctly explains what you intend to cover in the body of the paper.

    · The analysis should end with a conclusion/summary paragraph that clearly and succinctly explains what you covered in the body of the paper.

    ·
    **Third-person writing is required.** Third-person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first-person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second-person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link:
    [https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person](https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person) .

    · Contractions are not used in business writing, so the expectation is that students do NOT use contractions in the assignment.

    · The paper must be double-spaced with 1-inch margins with 12 pt. font.

    · Submit the final project into the appropriate assignment submission folder by the due date.

    **NOTE:  All submitted work is to be your original work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet, or an online clearinghouse.  You are expected to understand the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy and know that it is your responsibility to learn about instructor and general academic expectations with regard to proper citation of sources.**

    **Case Study**

    Ann McConnell is chief information officer (CIO) at Jackson Spice Ingredients (JSI), a large Maryland spice and food ingredient company. In an industry that has a large national market presence, yet is global in its need for raw materials, JSI is always looking for ways to increase productivity and speed things up while staying connected to its worldwide sources.  The mission of the organization is “to profitably expand its global leadership position in the spice, seasoning markets while being good stewards of the environment.”

         Two years into the job, McConnell suggested to company president, Charles Jackson, that it implement a new global organizational structure that is focused on divisions or geographic areas, thus enabling a stronger focus on local environments and sustainability. One of the first steps would be to reorganize the current functional structure and moving or hiring new managers for each of the new divisions.  The new divisional structure will enable more of a focus on the local environment, thus assisting managements in understanding how they can impact each demographic area.

        In a meeting with managers,  Charles and Ann need to introduce the new strategies. They know that 3 of the 7 current managers will be reluctant to change to the new organizational structure and strategy.   Charles and Ann need to consider what management strategies they will need to focus on how to get all the managers on board and they need to consider what management skills will be most needed to implement the new strategies.

         Taking into consideration what you have learned the past few weeks on learning organizations, culture, and human capital, develop a strategy for leadership to use that will help management in their new roles and that will focus on the organizational vision and purpose

    **## Rubric.docx**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Criteria | **Excellent** | **Good** | **Developing** | **Needs Improvement** | **Failing** | **Criterion Score** |
    | Requirements of the assignment | 2 points<br>Met or exceeded requirements of the assignment.  Included analysis of case study; issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of research, class material and case study facts; reflects an insightful and complex understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management | 1.8 points<br>Met most of the requirements of the assignment. Including identification of case study issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects an good  understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing one issue discussion or one or two were not developed. | 1.4 points<br>Met someofthe requirements of the assignment, including identification of case study issues were mostly concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects a satisfactory understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing two issues from the discussion or three were not developed leaving the impression of a general discussion. | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to identify some of the issues but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present. | 0 points<br>No Identification and/or explanation was not made leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts. | Score of Requirements of the assignment,<br>/ 2 |
    | Content | 2 points<br>Demonstrates strong knowledge and understanding of of motivation, trust and relationship building along with these impact organizational effectiveness | 1.8 points<br>Demonstrates a thorough analysis of motivation, trust and relationship building | 1.4 points<br>Includes an analysis of the topics though not in depth | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to address the topics with many elements missing. | 0 points<br>Does not address the topics | Score of Content,<br>/ 2 |
    | Analysis | 2 points<br>Provides a strong critical analysis. Strategies for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were thoroughly supported by course and research material and showed insightful and complex understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to success | 1.8 points<br>Recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing examples. | 1.4 points<br>Most recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material and showed a sufficient understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to successful handling; the supporting discussion was   underdeveloped because of missing examples or case study fact application. | 1.2 points<br>Attempt was made to make plan  but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present. | 0 points<br>No plan recommendations were made and/or the explanation was lacking supportive reasoning. | Score of Analysis,<br>/ 2 |
    | Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended | 1.5 points<br>More than the required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. | 1.2 points<br>Met requirement for sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion | 1.05 points<br>Fewer than required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they mostly were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. | 0.9 points<br>Sources used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and/or the academic quality were not valid or failed to be appropriate to the topic under discussion. | 0 points<br>No outside reference material was used. | Score of Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended,<br>/ 1.5 |
    | Writing Mechanics | 1.25 points<br>Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used.  0 to 2 errors noted. | 1 point<br>Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 3 to 6 errors noted. | 0.875 points<br>Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 7 to 10 errors noted. | 0.75 points<br>Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found. | 0 points<br>Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count. | Score of Writing Mechanics,<br>/ 1.25 |
    | Writing Style | 1.25 points<br>Excellent use of proper writing style format and style. One to 2 writing style or usage errors; Paraphrases using proper citation of source material used throughout paper; Reference titles follow writing style guidelines with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized. | 1 point<br>Good use of APA format. Attempts to paraphrase with in-text citations and reference list but 3 – 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times. | 0.875 points<br>Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; writing style errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to include proper citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times in document. | 0.75 points<br>Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to include proper citations when appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when required citations are needed throughout the document. | 0 points<br>No attempt at proper writing style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other. | Score of Writing Style,<br>/ 1.25 |

    Total

    Score of Case Study- 10%,

    / 10