My Blog

Tag: Law

  • [Solved] P2R2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## P2R2.docx **## P2R2.docx** 100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Charlize Investigators are required to use a range of different techniques when they are trying to solve a domestic violence case. Domestic violence cases often come with uniqu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## P2R2.docx

    **## P2R2.docx**

    100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Charlize

    Investigators are required to use a range of different techniques when they are trying to solve a domestic violence case. Domestic violence cases often come with unique challenges, particularly when clear evidence is lacking. Behavioral analysis is critical during a domestic violence case. Investigators can assess how the suspect and victim behave during interviews and can provide insight into coercion, fear, or deception. According to Osterburg and Ward, "an investigator must carefully evaluate behavioral cues, as suspects may exhibit deceptive tactics while victims may display fear or reluctance due to trauma" (2013). The investigator should study their behavioral patterns, when they are with both parties and on their own. Ongoing abuse patterns can be identified through past police reports, protective orders, or 911 call history. Investigators can witness statements from neighbors, family, or co workers, to provide context. Investigators can also ask paramedics or police officers, at the scene, to describe the victim’s immediate physical and emotional state. Investigators can use crime scene evidence to indicate a struggle. Forensic science can be used to help identify and document injuries, even if they are not obvious to the eye. Trained professionals can identify subtle signs of strangulation. In 2020, a person was convicted after strangulation was proven. Using forensic nurses’ assessments, medical imaging, and the victim’s recorded statements made during an emergency call, investigators were able to put Smith behind bars in the case of
    _People v. Smith (2020)._ By integrating forensic science and digital footprints this case was able to be solved. Investigators can use digital footprints, such as threatening or angry texts, emails, calls,as coercion or intimidation. Recordings, logs from security systems, or smart speakers, have been used in cases to corroborate or refute allegations. Many times, victims will be scared to come forward due to retaliation, financial instability, or emotional ties to the abuse. Investigators can use trauma informed interviewing and connect the victim to helpful resources to try to help their participation and gain their trust. Investigators must rely on a range of techniques to build a substantiated case while addressing victim reluctance and conflicting testimonies.

    **## P2R2.docx**

    100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Charlize

    Investigators are required to use a range of different techniques when they are trying to solve a domestic violence case. Domestic violence cases often come with unique challenges, particularly when clear evidence is lacking. Behavioral analysis is critical during a domestic violence case. Investigators can assess how the suspect and victim behave during interviews and can provide insight into coercion, fear, or deception. According to Osterburg and Ward, "an investigator must carefully evaluate behavioral cues, as suspects may exhibit deceptive tactics while victims may display fear or reluctance due to trauma" (2013). The investigator should study their behavioral patterns, when they are with both parties and on their own. Ongoing abuse patterns can be identified through past police reports, protective orders, or 911 call history. Investigators can witness statements from neighbors, family, or co workers, to provide context. Investigators can also ask paramedics or police officers, at the scene, to describe the victim’s immediate physical and emotional state. Investigators can use crime scene evidence to indicate a struggle. Forensic science can be used to help identify and document injuries, even if they are not obvious to the eye. Trained professionals can identify subtle signs of strangulation. In 2020, a person was convicted after strangulation was proven. Using forensic nurses’ assessments, medical imaging, and the victim’s recorded statements made during an emergency call, investigators were able to put Smith behind bars in the case of
    _People v. Smith (2020)._ By integrating forensic science and digital footprints this case was able to be solved. Investigators can use digital footprints, such as threatening or angry texts, emails, calls,as coercion or intimidation. Recordings, logs from security systems, or smart speakers, have been used in cases to corroborate or refute allegations. Many times, victims will be scared to come forward due to retaliation, financial instability, or emotional ties to the abuse. Investigators can use trauma informed interviewing and connect the victim to helpful resources to try to help their participation and gain their trust. Investigators must rely on a range of techniques to build a substantiated case while addressing victim reluctance and conflicting testimonies.

  • [Solved] P2R1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## P2R1.docx **## P2R1.docx** 100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Carol Domestic violence investigations often require nuanced approaches, particularly in the absence of clear physical evidence. Discuss a range of investigative techniques an …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## P2R1.docx

    **## P2R1.docx**

    100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Carol

    Domestic violence investigations often require nuanced approaches, particularly in the absence of clear physical evidence. Discuss a range of investigative techniques an investigator might employ to substantiate a domestic violence case. How can behavioral analysis, witness statements, forensic evidence, and digital footprints be integrated into the investigation? Examine how investigators can address barriers to victim cooperation or instances of conflicting testimony, emphasizing trauma-informed practices and legal frameworks. Provide examples of cases or scenarios where these techniques were effectively utilized.

    **Investigative Techniques**

             Domestic violence investigation can be complex primarily because of the limited physical evidence presented. Witnesses’ statements, forensic evidence, behavioral analysis, and digital footprints are investigative techniques that are deployed in domestic violence cases. Investigators can analyze a suspect's behavior and the victim involved in a case. Behavioral analysis allows investigators to monitor distress-related emotional patterns and responses (Catlin et al., 2023). For instance, an investigator might observe a victim display anxiety and nervous traits when asked to explain the order of events. The observations assist the investigators in suggesting the possible involvement of a suspect in a domestic violence claim. The digital footprint approach examines technological communication, such as text messages, online activities, and transactions (Catlin et al., 2023). Digital footprints help in the revealing of social media patterns and timelines that are crucial during the investigation. For instance, law enforcers may investigate the digital patterns of a suspect to determine if there might be any threats made across different social media platforms of a victim.

             The statements investigators gather from witnesses lead to essential information about what happened during the incident. The investigation receives external validation about emotional stress during arguments from witness statements (Catlin et al., 2023). The residents, alongside members of the household, must describe everything they experienced and observed when neighbors fight in the neighborhood. The forensic investigation of domestic violence requires both biological evidence collection of fingerprints and DNA samples. The evidence collected by investigators provides physical elements that support the claim of the attacker's participation, according to Catlin et al. (2023). In a domestic violence case involving sexual assault, there are significant DNA samples taken from the victim's sexual evidence that become vital proof to identify the suspect.

    **Integration of Techniques**

             Behavioral science research enables police officers to determine the essentials of their interrogation approach (Catlin et al., 2023). The research findings about victims' emotional distress behaviors allow investigators to develop specific questions for information collection during an investigation. Such knowledge lets police officers become aware of the delicate nature of events under investigation. Scientists use Forensic evidence to obtain physical proof that directly opposes what victims say during questioning (Catlin et al., 2023). Case evidence becomes stronger through the investigative process, which verifies statements by using concrete physical information. DNA evidence combined with fingerprints found at crime locations serves as forensic proof to connect suspects with their actions when they deny victim testimonies. The reconstruction of accurate timelines happens through digital footprints because these records offer contextual evidence that supports statements from incident victims (Catlin et al., 2023). Suspicious individuals who declare their location during a specific criminal period can trigger investigators to pursue additional facts about their movements.

    **Addressing Barriers to Cooperation**

    Law enforcers should approach victims with understanding to recognize the impact of trauma (Huecker et al., 2023). This may include creating a comfortable environment that does not trigger them. Therefore, the victims can express themselves without any rush or pressure. Familiarity with the law regarding domestic violence, such as protective laws, inspires victims to share their tragic experiences (Huecker et al., 2023). Besides offering them knowledge of what the law can do for them, the available resources can encourage cooperation.

    **Example of Effective Use of Techniques**

    In a scenario where a victim feels unsafe to report abuse, investigators can utilize digital footprints by analyzing their social media interactions. They can identify any threats posed to the victim, combined with witness statements about the behavior change. The technique will assist in establishing strong cases against the suspect. In another case when neighbors report frequent arguments and loud bangs with their residents, and the victim was appearing hurt and in distress. Witness statements from the neighbors can provide the investigators with sufficient information to allow an intervention if they suspect abuse in the home.

    **## P2R1.docx**

    100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Carol

    Domestic violence investigations often require nuanced approaches, particularly in the absence of clear physical evidence. Discuss a range of investigative techniques an investigator might employ to substantiate a domestic violence case. How can behavioral analysis, witness statements, forensic evidence, and digital footprints be integrated into the investigation? Examine how investigators can address barriers to victim cooperation or instances of conflicting testimony, emphasizing trauma-informed practices and legal frameworks. Provide examples of cases or scenarios where these techniques were effectively utilized.

    **Investigative Techniques**

             Domestic violence investigation can be complex primarily because of the limited physical evidence presented. Witnesses’ statements, forensic evidence, behavioral analysis, and digital footprints are investigative techniques that are deployed in domestic violence cases. Investigators can analyze a suspect's behavior and the victim involved in a case. Behavioral analysis allows investigators to monitor distress-related emotional patterns and responses (Catlin et al., 2023). For instance, an investigator might observe a victim display anxiety and nervous traits when asked to explain the order of events. The observations assist the investigators in suggesting the possible involvement of a suspect in a domestic violence claim. The digital footprint approach examines technological communication, such as text messages, online activities, and transactions (Catlin et al., 2023). Digital footprints help in the revealing of social media patterns and timelines that are crucial during the investigation. For instance, law enforcers may investigate the digital patterns of a suspect to determine if there might be any threats made across different social media platforms of a victim.

             The statements investigators gather from witnesses lead to essential information about what happened during the incident. The investigation receives external validation about emotional stress during arguments from witness statements (Catlin et al., 2023). The residents, alongside members of the household, must describe everything they experienced and observed when neighbors fight in the neighborhood. The forensic investigation of domestic violence requires both biological evidence collection of fingerprints and DNA samples. The evidence collected by investigators provides physical elements that support the claim of the attacker's participation, according to Catlin et al. (2023). In a domestic violence case involving sexual assault, there are significant DNA samples taken from the victim's sexual evidence that become vital proof to identify the suspect.

    **Integration of Techniques**

             Behavioral science research enables police officers to determine the essentials of their interrogation approach (Catlin et al., 2023). The research findings about victims' emotional distress behaviors allow investigators to develop specific questions for information collection during an investigation. Such knowledge lets police officers become aware of the delicate nature of events under investigation. Scientists use Forensic evidence to obtain physical proof that directly opposes what victims say during questioning (Catlin et al., 2023). Case evidence becomes stronger through the investigative process, which verifies statements by using concrete physical information. DNA evidence combined with fingerprints found at crime locations serves as forensic proof to connect suspects with their actions when they deny victim testimonies. The reconstruction of accurate timelines happens through digital footprints because these records offer contextual evidence that supports statements from incident victims (Catlin et al., 2023). Suspicious individuals who declare their location during a specific criminal period can trigger investigators to pursue additional facts about their movements.

    **Addressing Barriers to Cooperation**

    Law enforcers should approach victims with understanding to recognize the impact of trauma (Huecker et al., 2023). This may include creating a comfortable environment that does not trigger them. Therefore, the victims can express themselves without any rush or pressure. Familiarity with the law regarding domestic violence, such as protective laws, inspires victims to share their tragic experiences (Huecker et al., 2023). Besides offering them knowledge of what the law can do for them, the available resources can encourage cooperation.

    **Example of Effective Use of Techniques**

    In a scenario where a victim feels unsafe to report abuse, investigators can utilize digital footprints by analyzing their social media interactions. They can identify any threats posed to the victim, combined with witness statements about the behavior change. The technique will assist in establishing strong cases against the suspect. In another case when neighbors report frequent arguments and loud bangs with their residents, and the victim was appearing hurt and in distress. Witness statements from the neighbors can provide the investigators with sufficient information to allow an intervention if they suspect abuse in the home.

  • [Solved] P1R2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## P1R2.docx **## P1R2.docx** 100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Epps The legal concepts of reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy shape law enforcement procedures and criminal investigations. These princ…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## P1R2.docx

    **## P1R2.docx**

    100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Epps

    The legal concepts of reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy shape law enforcement procedures and criminal investigations. These principles define the boundaries of search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, ensuring a balance between security and individual rights (Carpenter v. United States, 2018). This paper explores their meanings, legal importance, and challenges in law enforcement.

    a) Reasonable Suspicion

    Reasonable suspicion allows officers to stop and briefly detain individuals based on specific, articulable facts suggesting criminal activity (Terry v. Ohio, 1968). This standard is lower than probable cause but must be grounded in objective reasoning (Ornelas v. United States, 1996). Courts have applied this concept flexibly, considering location, behavior, and tips from informants (Illinois v. Wardlow, 2000). However, concerns about racial profiling remain a challenge (Harris, 2021). The Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio (1968) upheld stop-and-frisk procedures based on reasonable suspicion.

    b) Probable Cause

    Probable cause requires a reasonable belief, supported by evidence, that a crime has occurred (Beck v. Ohio, 1964). It is necessary for arrests, search warrants, and some warrantless searches. Courts determine probable cause by evaluating the totality of circumstances (Illinois v. Gates, 1983). The challenge lies in balancing law enforcement effectiveness with constitutional rights (Kerr, 2019). In Maryland v. Pringle (2003), the Court upheld arrests based on probable cause when contraband was found in a shared vehicle.

    c) Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

    The reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine, established in Katz v. United States (1967), protects individuals from unwarranted government intrusion. If a person expects privacy in a way society deems reasonable, law enforcement typically needs a warrant to search. Courts have debated privacy rights concerning digital data, GPS tracking, and third-party records (Riley v. California, 2014; Carpenter v. United States, 2018). In Carpenter (2018), the Supreme Court ruled that accessing cell phone location data without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment.

    Reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy provide crucial safeguards against overreach while enabling law enforcement to investigate crimes. Courts continue refining these doctrines to address modern challenges, such as digital privacy and evolving technology.

    .

    **## P1R2.docx**

    100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Epps

    The legal concepts of reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy shape law enforcement procedures and criminal investigations. These principles define the boundaries of search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, ensuring a balance between security and individual rights (Carpenter v. United States, 2018). This paper explores their meanings, legal importance, and challenges in law enforcement.

    a) Reasonable Suspicion

    Reasonable suspicion allows officers to stop and briefly detain individuals based on specific, articulable facts suggesting criminal activity (Terry v. Ohio, 1968). This standard is lower than probable cause but must be grounded in objective reasoning (Ornelas v. United States, 1996). Courts have applied this concept flexibly, considering location, behavior, and tips from informants (Illinois v. Wardlow, 2000). However, concerns about racial profiling remain a challenge (Harris, 2021). The Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio (1968) upheld stop-and-frisk procedures based on reasonable suspicion.

    b) Probable Cause

    Probable cause requires a reasonable belief, supported by evidence, that a crime has occurred (Beck v. Ohio, 1964). It is necessary for arrests, search warrants, and some warrantless searches. Courts determine probable cause by evaluating the totality of circumstances (Illinois v. Gates, 1983). The challenge lies in balancing law enforcement effectiveness with constitutional rights (Kerr, 2019). In Maryland v. Pringle (2003), the Court upheld arrests based on probable cause when contraband was found in a shared vehicle.

    c) Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

    The reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine, established in Katz v. United States (1967), protects individuals from unwarranted government intrusion. If a person expects privacy in a way society deems reasonable, law enforcement typically needs a warrant to search. Courts have debated privacy rights concerning digital data, GPS tracking, and third-party records (Riley v. California, 2014; Carpenter v. United States, 2018). In Carpenter (2018), the Supreme Court ruled that accessing cell phone location data without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment.

    Reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy provide crucial safeguards against overreach while enabling law enforcement to investigate crimes. Courts continue refining these doctrines to address modern challenges, such as digital privacy and evolving technology.

    .

  • [Solved] P1R1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## P1R1.docx **## P1R1.docx** 100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation Due 2/7/2025 Charlize There are many principles that shape the boundaries of law enforcement actions and criminal investigations. Reasonable suspicion is the legal standard that allows law …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## P1R1.docx

    **## P1R1.docx**

    100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Charlize

    There are many principles that shape the boundaries of law enforcement actions and criminal investigations. Reasonable suspicion is the legal standard that allows law enforcement officers to stop and detain a person, when there is factual evidence of criminal activity arising. This standard was established after a Cleveland police officer observed three men frantic in front of a store. The officer thought they were preparing for potential robbery, based on his training, and stopped them. He performed a quick pat-down, and found a concealed weapon on one of the suspects, leading to his conviction. Due to the
    _Terry v. Ohio (1968)_ case, officers can conduct a limited pat-down search for weapons if they suspect a threat to their safety. There must be facts to back up the stop, it can’t be based on a hunch. There are now traffic stops, airport security screenings, and school searches. Depending on the facts being used the court will decide how to interpret this concept. Officers tend to struggle distinguishing between reasonable suspicion and mere intuition. Probable cause is the standard required for arrests, search warrants, and some warrantless searches. Based on facts and circumstances, investigators can conclude if there is a fair probability that a crime has been committed, or that crime exists in a particular place. Osterburg and Ward states "Probable cause requires more than bare suspicion but less than evidence that would justify a conviction." (2013, p. 157). There must be probable cause based on evidence for an officer to make an arrest. Officers are allowed to search a car without a search warrant if they have probable cause. For instance, if an officer smells THC or observes a beer bottle in the car, that is enough evidence for them to conclude an individual has driven intoxicated. Courts examine whether the officer’s belief was objectively reasonable under the circumstances. Inconsistent rulings on what constitutes sufficient probable cause is a big challenge due to varying interpretations by judges. Probable cause can also be challenged in suppression hearings. The principle Reasonable Expectation of Privacy, determines whether government action constitutes a "search" under the Fourth Amendment. This principle was put in place after the government convicted Katz of transmitting wagering information out of state. The government recorded Katz conversations inside a public phone booth, then Katz argued that it was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Katz won the case and the courts found it unlawful. Due to
    _Katz V. United States (1967)_, privacy extends beyond physical property. Privacy includes personal places where an individual has a subjective privacy that society deems reasonable. Courts struggle to define the limits of privacy in rapidly evolving areas. These principles set boundaries on officers authority, ensuring investigative actions comply with constitutional protections. In these areas, challenges will always arise as long as people and the earth evolve. The courts interpret these principles based on the totality of circumstances. The interplay between these principles shapes the balance between individual rights and public safety.

    **## P1R1.docx**

    100 word response with 1 reference/intext citation

    Due 2/7/2025

    Charlize

    There are many principles that shape the boundaries of law enforcement actions and criminal investigations. Reasonable suspicion is the legal standard that allows law enforcement officers to stop and detain a person, when there is factual evidence of criminal activity arising. This standard was established after a Cleveland police officer observed three men frantic in front of a store. The officer thought they were preparing for potential robbery, based on his training, and stopped them. He performed a quick pat-down, and found a concealed weapon on one of the suspects, leading to his conviction. Due to the
    _Terry v. Ohio (1968)_ case, officers can conduct a limited pat-down search for weapons if they suspect a threat to their safety. There must be facts to back up the stop, it can’t be based on a hunch. There are now traffic stops, airport security screenings, and school searches. Depending on the facts being used the court will decide how to interpret this concept. Officers tend to struggle distinguishing between reasonable suspicion and mere intuition. Probable cause is the standard required for arrests, search warrants, and some warrantless searches. Based on facts and circumstances, investigators can conclude if there is a fair probability that a crime has been committed, or that crime exists in a particular place. Osterburg and Ward states "Probable cause requires more than bare suspicion but less than evidence that would justify a conviction." (2013, p. 157). There must be probable cause based on evidence for an officer to make an arrest. Officers are allowed to search a car without a search warrant if they have probable cause. For instance, if an officer smells THC or observes a beer bottle in the car, that is enough evidence for them to conclude an individual has driven intoxicated. Courts examine whether the officer’s belief was objectively reasonable under the circumstances. Inconsistent rulings on what constitutes sufficient probable cause is a big challenge due to varying interpretations by judges. Probable cause can also be challenged in suppression hearings. The principle Reasonable Expectation of Privacy, determines whether government action constitutes a "search" under the Fourth Amendment. This principle was put in place after the government convicted Katz of transmitting wagering information out of state. The government recorded Katz conversations inside a public phone booth, then Katz argued that it was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Katz won the case and the courts found it unlawful. Due to
    _Katz V. United States (1967)_, privacy extends beyond physical property. Privacy includes personal places where an individual has a subjective privacy that society deems reasonable. Courts struggle to define the limits of privacy in rapidly evolving areas. These principles set boundaries on officers authority, ensuring investigative actions comply with constitutional protections. In these areas, challenges will always arise as long as people and the earth evolve. The courts interpret these principles based on the totality of circumstances. The interplay between these principles shapes the balance between individual rights and public safety.

  • [Solved] emergency management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) answer within one hour APA format AI and Turnitin report – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    answer within one hour

    APA format

    AI and Turnitin report

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Criminal Justice

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Literature-2.docx **## Literature-2.docx** **You are required to write a research proposal that covers an introduction, literature review, and methods section. For this assignment, you will for…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Literature-2.docx

    **## Literature-2.docx**

    **You are required to write a research proposal that covers an introduction, literature review, and methods section. For this assignment, you will formulate a research question and hypothesis and reviews relevant literature and develop a research design to address research questions. I have divided this project into four assignments.**

    **In the first part, which is due this week, you will submit your introduction section including the introducing the topic, the importance of investigating the topic, and the major question that you are trying to answer.**

    **In the second part, which is due this week, you will submit your Literature Review section including different relevant studies that you found and the gap that you found in the literature. You should explain how your topic fills this gap in the literature.**

    **Assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.com. AI will not be accepted.**

    **## Literature-2.docx**

    **You are required to write a research proposal that covers an introduction, literature review, and methods section. For this assignment, you will formulate a research question and hypothesis and reviews relevant literature and develop a research design to address research questions. I have divided this project into four assignments.**

    **In the first part, which is due this week, you will submit your introduction section including the introducing the topic, the importance of investigating the topic, and the major question that you are trying to answer.**

    **In the second part, which is due this week, you will submit your Literature Review section including different relevant studies that you found and the gap that you found in the literature. You should explain how your topic fills this gap in the literature.**

    **Assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.com. AI will not be accepted.**

  • [Solved] 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) please view attachments – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## quiz3.docx **## quiz3.docx** 1. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), discuss the differences between closed-systems models (classical perspective) and open-systems mo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    please view attachments

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## quiz3.docx

    **## quiz3.docx**

    1. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), discuss the differences between closed-systems models (classical perspective) and open-systems models (humanistic perspective).

    2. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), describe scientific management.

    3. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), describe administrative management and Fayol's General Principles of Management.

    4. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), describe bureaucratic management and Weber's bureaucratic principles.

    5. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), explain the four elements of the Total Quality Management (TQM) model.

    6. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), explain the Supply Chain/Synergy Model and how it can be applied to the criminal justice system.

    7. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), briefly discuss some of the different sets of challenges for the criminal justice system that have developed as a result of rapid changes in the environment (e.g., globalization, internet, rapid technological changes, etc.).

    8. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), explain the five areas of organizational design that need to be changed in order to effectively deal with rapid changes in the criminal justice environment.

    9. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what are two problems that exist with the criminal justice system that need to be addressed in order improve productivity and reduce cost?

    10. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what constitutes a service?

    11. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what are the differences between commercial services and noncommercial services?

    12. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), who are the customers of criminal justice services and why is it important to involve them in the design of the service process?

    13. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), how can we define and measure service quality?

    14. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), how can we measure service quality within the criminal justice system?

    15. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), identify and describe some of the criminal justice services provided to victims, offenders, and society in general.

    16. According to Giblin (2014), describe Contingency Theory and the SARFIT model.

    17. According to Giblin (2014), describe Resource Dependency Theory and how it applies to criminal justice organizations.

    18. According to Giblin (2014), explain Institutional Theory.

    19. According to Giblin (2014), explain the concept of isomorphism.

    20. According to Giblin (2014), explain the concept of decoupling.

    21. According to Giblin (2014), define organizational deviance.

    22. According to Giblin (2014), explain Administrative Breakdown.

    23. According to Giblin (2014), explain some of the organizational characteristics that may contribute to organizational deviance.

    24. According to Giblin (2014), what can be done to prevent organizational deviance?

    25. According to Giblin (2014), define organizational termination.

    NOTE: YOU MUST REFERENCE THE PAGE NUMBER(S) FOR EACH ANSWER FROM THE BOOK TO RECEIVE CREDIT FOR THE QUESTION.

    **Assigned Book Readings:**

    Allen, J. M., & Sawhney, R. (2019). Administration and management in criminal justice: A service quality approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.

    Chapter 2: Open versus closed systems

    Chapter 3: Service quality approach

    Giblin, M. J. (2014). Organization and management in the criminal justice system: A text/reader. SAGE.

    Section 3. Organizational theory: How do we explain what organizations look like?

    Section 4. Organizational deviance and termination: What explains failure in criminal justice agencies?

    ![A screenshot of a book AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/3-20882517)

    ## image1.png

    **## quiz3.docx**

    1. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), discuss the differences between closed-systems models (classical perspective) and open-systems models (humanistic perspective).

    2. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), describe scientific management.

    3. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), describe administrative management and Fayol's General Principles of Management.

    4. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), describe bureaucratic management and Weber's bureaucratic principles.

    5. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), explain the four elements of the Total Quality Management (TQM) model.

    6. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), explain the Supply Chain/Synergy Model and how it can be applied to the criminal justice system.

    7. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), briefly discuss some of the different sets of challenges for the criminal justice system that have developed as a result of rapid changes in the environment (e.g., globalization, internet, rapid technological changes, etc.).

    8. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), explain the five areas of organizational design that need to be changed in order to effectively deal with rapid changes in the criminal justice environment.

    9. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what are two problems that exist with the criminal justice system that need to be addressed in order improve productivity and reduce cost?

    10. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what constitutes a service?

    11. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what are the differences between commercial services and noncommercial services?

    12. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), who are the customers of criminal justice services and why is it important to involve them in the design of the service process?

    13. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), how can we define and measure service quality?

    14. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), how can we measure service quality within the criminal justice system?

    15. According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), identify and describe some of the criminal justice services provided to victims, offenders, and society in general.

    16. According to Giblin (2014), describe Contingency Theory and the SARFIT model.

    17. According to Giblin (2014), describe Resource Dependency Theory and how it applies to criminal justice organizations.

    18. According to Giblin (2014), explain Institutional Theory.

    19. According to Giblin (2014), explain the concept of isomorphism.

    20. According to Giblin (2014), explain the concept of decoupling.

    21. According to Giblin (2014), define organizational deviance.

    22. According to Giblin (2014), explain Administrative Breakdown.

    23. According to Giblin (2014), explain some of the organizational characteristics that may contribute to organizational deviance.

    24. According to Giblin (2014), what can be done to prevent organizational deviance?

    25. According to Giblin (2014), define organizational termination.

    NOTE: YOU MUST REFERENCE THE PAGE NUMBER(S) FOR EACH ANSWER FROM THE BOOK TO RECEIVE CREDIT FOR THE QUESTION.

    **Assigned Book Readings:**

    Allen, J. M., & Sawhney, R. (2019). Administration and management in criminal justice: A service quality approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.

    Chapter 2: Open versus closed systems

    Chapter 3: Service quality approach

    Giblin, M. J. (2014). Organization and management in the criminal justice system: A text/reader. SAGE.

    Section 3. Organizational theory: How do we explain what organizations look like?

    Section 4. Organizational deviance and termination: What explains failure in criminal justice agencies?

    ![A screenshot of a book AI-generated content may be incorrect.](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/3-20882517)

    ## image1.png

  • [Solved] PAPER 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) you will locate and describe a criminal justice policy of your choice, and think through the important components of that policy's context, intentions, probable effectiveness, and apparent costs. The paper is designed to be an…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    you will locate and describe a criminal justice policy of your choice, and think through the important components of that policy's context, intentions, probable effectiveness, and apparent costs.

    The paper is designed to be an exercise in critical thinking, not a "book report" that requires you to locate published research related to the policy (though you may do so, if you like). The main objective here is to get us all thinking about where CJ policy comes from, how it changes or persists over time, and whether or not we agree with Mears (2010) in describing it as "irrational."

    – [\
    \
    PAPER1.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/paper1-docx-10184213 "PAPER1.docx")
    – [\
    \
    Mears-Chapter4.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mears-chapter4-pdf "Mears-Chapter4.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Corrections

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## Corrections.docx – Outline.docx **## Corrections.docx** Make corrections on the attached outline. Due 2/9/2025 As to the "comments" from the public section, you do not respond properly to that section of the outline. You need to find public comments made by the gener…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## Corrections.docx

    – Outline.docx

    **## Corrections.docx**

    Make corrections on the attached outline.

    Due 2/9/2025

    As to the "comments" from the public section, you do not respond properly to that section of the outline.  You need to find public comments made by the general public or those who submitted comments to the agency about its rule/regulation (during the notice/comment process).  You talk about the "US Major Question Doctrine"–but that is not a public comment.  Please make sure you redo this section for your final paper and collect, cite and explain the public's comments and submissions.

    As to your commentary about the "good/bad" of the agency rule/regulation/action–you need to examine both the good and bad.  You only seem to explain the "good"–what about the "bad"?  This caused loss of revenues to the government (repayment interest); It damaged those investors in student loan servicing companies–lost value and profits; what about the other students who graduated and paid back their entire student loans—is this fair to them?  What about  the US Tax Payer who is now forced to pay for these loss of income by paying taxes and they never wanted to pay for student loans, or even go to higher education institutions—but their tax payments are now going towards replacing the federal funds lost from these loan repayments?

    Also, your list of stakeholders for the utilitarian analysis is not complete (see above interests) and also what about universities?  Banks?  etc.  You need to brainstorm all of the possible stakeholders who are impacted, good or bad, by this activity and identify their interests in this part.

    **Outline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outline-docx-10184729)

    **Outline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outline-docx-10184729)

    **## Corrections.docx**

    Make corrections on the attached outline.

    Due 2/9/2025

    As to the "comments" from the public section, you do not respond properly to that section of the outline.  You need to find public comments made by the general public or those who submitted comments to the agency about its rule/regulation (during the notice/comment process).  You talk about the "US Major Question Doctrine"–but that is not a public comment.  Please make sure you redo this section for your final paper and collect, cite and explain the public's comments and submissions.

    As to your commentary about the "good/bad" of the agency rule/regulation/action–you need to examine both the good and bad.  You only seem to explain the "good"–what about the "bad"?  This caused loss of revenues to the government (repayment interest); It damaged those investors in student loan servicing companies–lost value and profits; what about the other students who graduated and paid back their entire student loans—is this fair to them?  What about  the US Tax Payer who is now forced to pay for these loss of income by paying taxes and they never wanted to pay for student loans, or even go to higher education institutions—but their tax payments are now going towards replacing the federal funds lost from these loan repayments?

    Also, your list of stakeholders for the utilitarian analysis is not complete (see above interests) and also what about universities?  Banks?  etc.  You need to brainstorm all of the possible stakeholders who are impacted, good or bad, by this activity and identify their interests in this part.

    **Outline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outline-docx-10184729)

    **## Corrections.docx**

    Make corrections on the attached outline.

    Due 2/9/2025

    As to the "comments" from the public section, you do not respond properly to that section of the outline.  You need to find public comments made by the general public or those who submitted comments to the agency about its rule/regulation (during the notice/comment process).  You talk about the "US Major Question Doctrine"–but that is not a public comment.  Please make sure you redo this section for your final paper and collect, cite and explain the public's comments and submissions.

    As to your commentary about the "good/bad" of the agency rule/regulation/action–you need to examine both the good and bad.  You only seem to explain the "good"–what about the "bad"?  This caused loss of revenues to the government (repayment interest); It damaged those investors in student loan servicing companies–lost value and profits; what about the other students who graduated and paid back their entire student loans—is this fair to them?  What about  the US Tax Payer who is now forced to pay for these loss of income by paying taxes and they never wanted to pay for student loans, or even go to higher education institutions—but their tax payments are now going towards replacing the federal funds lost from these loan repayments?

    Also, your list of stakeholders for the utilitarian analysis is not complete (see above interests) and also what about universities?  Banks?  etc.  You need to brainstorm all of the possible stakeholders who are impacted, good or bad, by this activity and identify their interests in this part.

    **Outline.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/outline-docx-10184729)

  • [Solved] Responses 2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Document.docx **## Document.docx** 1.Privatization of government services has become increasingly prevalent, particularly in areas such as healthcare, corrections, and infrastructure. Proponent…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Document.docx

    **## Document.docx**

    1.Privatization of government services has become increasingly prevalent, particularly in areas such as healthcare, corrections, and infrastructure. Proponents argue that privatization improves efficiency, reduces costs, and enhances service quality by fostering competition. Private companies often have greater adaptability in operations, allowing for innovation and responsiveness to market demands. Additionally, privatization can ease the financial burden on taxpayers by shifting operational costs to private entities.

    However, opponents highlight several concerns. Privatization can lead to profit-driven policy decisions, potentially compromising public interest, especially in essential services like healthcare and corrections. In private prisons, for instance, cost-cutting measures may result in reduced staffing, inadequate healthcare, and poor living conditions for inmates. Furthermore, lack of transparency and accountability in private organizations may contribute to corruption, mismanagement, and declining service quality.

    While privatization offers benefits in auxiliary services, I believe that crucial public services such as law enforcement, corrections, and healthcare should remain under government control to uphold accountability and public welfare. Where privatization is necessary, strong regulatory oversight must be in place to prevent exploitation and service deterioration. A balanced approach, incorporating public-private partnerships (PPPs), could be an effective way to combine private-sector efficiency with public-sector oversight, safeguarding sustainable and equitable service delivery.

    2.Some benefits of privitization could include:

    increased efficiency – seeing that some companies live off profit, they can cut off any ineffiencies to help improve productivity

    more competition – the more people that are being added to the market can lead to more competition and service quality

    it can save the taxpayers money

    also imporoves service quality

    Detriments of privitaztion include:

    price increases – it can lead to price increases if the private company increases the prices to exploit the consumers

    can lead to social inequliaty

    can lead to decreased jobs

    loss of national sovereignty (Hall, 2020)

    The way I feel about privitization is pretty undecided. It has it's pros and its cons which makes it hard to decide on which side to be on. It benefits because it can improve producitivity and service quality. It calso help taxpayers, like us, save money, and it attracts foreighn investment; however, it can cause a price increase, jobs losses, and social inequliaty. With this being said, it is hard for me to choose.

    3.The trend toward privatization of governmental services has sparked significant debate over its benefits and detriments. Privatization involves transferring services traditionally performed by government agencies to private sector entities. One of the primary benefits is increased efficiency. Private companies often have a profit incentive to reduce costs and improve service
    delivery, leading to potentially better resource allocation and innovation (Hall, 2020). Additionally, privatization can result in cost savings for governments, as private entities may achieve economies of scale and operate with less bureaucratic oversight.
    However, there are also notable detriments to privatization. Critics argue that privatization can lead to reduced accountability, as private companies are not subject to the same transparency and oversight as public agencies. This lack of accountability can result in a decline in service quality or prioritization of profit over public interest (Hall, 2020). Furthermore, privatization can
    make inequality worse , as essential services like healthcare or utilities may become less accessible to low-income individuals due to increased costs.
    My position on privatization is critical. While I acknowledge the potential for efficiency gains, I believe the risks associated with reduced accountability and potential harm to vulnerable populations outweigh the benefits. Essential services, particularly those related to public welfare, should remain under government control to ensure equitable access and maintain public trust. Governments should focus on improving the efficiency of public services rather than outsourcing them to other places whose primary motivation is profit. This approach balances the need for effective service delivery with the responsibility to protect public interest.

    4.Validity is extremely crucial in the research process as it ensures accuracy and lends to credibility. Research validity refers to how accurate measures and variables correspond to one another (Rennison & Hart, 2019). For example, age cannot be measured by colors as they do not correspond with one another. Attributes, such as young and old, do correspond with age but lack clarity and accuracy. A more appropriate measure would be years, as this appears to clearly and accurately measure age. The is known as face validity. Another consideration of validity involves content validity. This refers to how well a measure covers the definition of an established concept. A third validity, as discussed in the textbook, is criterion validity. This is the best validity as it involves accepted and accurate criteria as a measure, such as GPA criteria to academic performance (Nikolopoulou, 2022).

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is used to measure stress, which can be universally defined and accepted as the body’s reaction to either positive or negative demands (What Is Stress, 2025). In my opinion, the PSS seems to have face validity as the questions all appear to measure stress, however, appear deficient in content and construct validity. The measures capture the negative aspect of stress but seem to disregard positive stress. The results of the PSS would appear to indicate the presence, or lack of presence, of only negative stress. On the other hand, if the PSS was designed to measure only negative stress, it would appear valid and reliable.

    5.The five types of validity are face, content, construct, pragmatic, and convergent-discriminant (Hagan, 2017). Face validity refers to how much a test seems to do what it is supposed to do just by looking at it briefly. Content validity is how well a test measures what it is supposed to measure. Construct validity is about how well a test measures what it is supposed to measure. Pragmatic validity refers to how valuable and relevant a test is in real-life situations. Convergent-discriminant validity is a type of construct validity. It checks how much a test is related to other tests it should relate to and how it does not relate to tests it should be different from.

    The article "Young Adults Reduced Drinking During and After Pandemic" attempts to show that alcohol consumption dropped during the pandemic. The study relies on the sample group sharing their own information, and results were collected every six months. Here are the points about face validity that I see in this piece. This study seems to support its central idea at first glance, but a closer look shows that it does not truly reflect all young people aged 21-29 because the sample only included white individuals. The study does not meet the standards for construct validity. Not including young people from different ethnic backgrounds makes the study unreliable and incorrect.

    **## Document.docx**

    1.Privatization of government services has become increasingly prevalent, particularly in areas such as healthcare, corrections, and infrastructure. Proponents argue that privatization improves efficiency, reduces costs, and enhances service quality by fostering competition. Private companies often have greater adaptability in operations, allowing for innovation and responsiveness to market demands. Additionally, privatization can ease the financial burden on taxpayers by shifting operational costs to private entities.

    However, opponents highlight several concerns. Privatization can lead to profit-driven policy decisions, potentially compromising public interest, especially in essential services like healthcare and corrections. In private prisons, for instance, cost-cutting measures may result in reduced staffing, inadequate healthcare, and poor living conditions for inmates. Furthermore, lack of transparency and accountability in private organizations may contribute to corruption, mismanagement, and declining service quality.

    While privatization offers benefits in auxiliary services, I believe that crucial public services such as law enforcement, corrections, and healthcare should remain under government control to uphold accountability and public welfare. Where privatization is necessary, strong regulatory oversight must be in place to prevent exploitation and service deterioration. A balanced approach, incorporating public-private partnerships (PPPs), could be an effective way to combine private-sector efficiency with public-sector oversight, safeguarding sustainable and equitable service delivery.

    2.Some benefits of privitization could include:

    increased efficiency – seeing that some companies live off profit, they can cut off any ineffiencies to help improve productivity

    more competition – the more people that are being added to the market can lead to more competition and service quality

    it can save the taxpayers money

    also imporoves service quality

    Detriments of privitaztion include:

    price increases – it can lead to price increases if the private company increases the prices to exploit the consumers

    can lead to social inequliaty

    can lead to decreased jobs

    loss of national sovereignty (Hall, 2020)

    The way I feel about privitization is pretty undecided. It has it's pros and its cons which makes it hard to decide on which side to be on. It benefits because it can improve producitivity and service quality. It calso help taxpayers, like us, save money, and it attracts foreighn investment; however, it can cause a price increase, jobs losses, and social inequliaty. With this being said, it is hard for me to choose.

    3.The trend toward privatization of governmental services has sparked significant debate over its benefits and detriments. Privatization involves transferring services traditionally performed by government agencies to private sector entities. One of the primary benefits is increased efficiency. Private companies often have a profit incentive to reduce costs and improve service
    delivery, leading to potentially better resource allocation and innovation (Hall, 2020). Additionally, privatization can result in cost savings for governments, as private entities may achieve economies of scale and operate with less bureaucratic oversight.
    However, there are also notable detriments to privatization. Critics argue that privatization can lead to reduced accountability, as private companies are not subject to the same transparency and oversight as public agencies. This lack of accountability can result in a decline in service quality or prioritization of profit over public interest (Hall, 2020). Furthermore, privatization can
    make inequality worse , as essential services like healthcare or utilities may become less accessible to low-income individuals due to increased costs.
    My position on privatization is critical. While I acknowledge the potential for efficiency gains, I believe the risks associated with reduced accountability and potential harm to vulnerable populations outweigh the benefits. Essential services, particularly those related to public welfare, should remain under government control to ensure equitable access and maintain public trust. Governments should focus on improving the efficiency of public services rather than outsourcing them to other places whose primary motivation is profit. This approach balances the need for effective service delivery with the responsibility to protect public interest.

    4.Validity is extremely crucial in the research process as it ensures accuracy and lends to credibility. Research validity refers to how accurate measures and variables correspond to one another (Rennison & Hart, 2019). For example, age cannot be measured by colors as they do not correspond with one another. Attributes, such as young and old, do correspond with age but lack clarity and accuracy. A more appropriate measure would be years, as this appears to clearly and accurately measure age. The is known as face validity. Another consideration of validity involves content validity. This refers to how well a measure covers the definition of an established concept. A third validity, as discussed in the textbook, is criterion validity. This is the best validity as it involves accepted and accurate criteria as a measure, such as GPA criteria to academic performance (Nikolopoulou, 2022).

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is used to measure stress, which can be universally defined and accepted as the body’s reaction to either positive or negative demands (What Is Stress, 2025). In my opinion, the PSS seems to have face validity as the questions all appear to measure stress, however, appear deficient in content and construct validity. The measures capture the negative aspect of stress but seem to disregard positive stress. The results of the PSS would appear to indicate the presence, or lack of presence, of only negative stress. On the other hand, if the PSS was designed to measure only negative stress, it would appear valid and reliable.

    5.The five types of validity are face, content, construct, pragmatic, and convergent-discriminant (Hagan, 2017). Face validity refers to how much a test seems to do what it is supposed to do just by looking at it briefly. Content validity is how well a test measures what it is supposed to measure. Construct validity is about how well a test measures what it is supposed to measure. Pragmatic validity refers to how valuable and relevant a test is in real-life situations. Convergent-discriminant validity is a type of construct validity. It checks how much a test is related to other tests it should relate to and how it does not relate to tests it should be different from.

    The article "Young Adults Reduced Drinking During and After Pandemic" attempts to show that alcohol consumption dropped during the pandemic. The study relies on the sample group sharing their own information, and results were collected every six months. Here are the points about face validity that I see in this piece. This study seems to support its central idea at first glance, but a closer look shows that it does not truly reflect all young people aged 21-29 because the sample only included white individuals. The study does not meet the standards for construct validity. Not including young people from different ethnic backgrounds makes the study unreliable and incorrect.