– Assume that you are the director of international marketing for a company producing refrigerators. Select one country in Latin America and one in Europe and developescreening criteria to use in evaluating the two countries. Make any additional assumptions that are necessary about your company. – A…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– Assume that you are the director of international marketing for a company producing refrigerators. Select one country in Latin America and one in Europe and developescreening criteria to use in evaluating the two countries. Make any additional assumptions that are necessary about your company.
– Assuming that consumption plays some role in identity, critically evaluate the contention that, a powerful, popular advertisement is just as meaningful as any news story.
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering help with understanding.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
Need help looking for a research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Need help looking for a research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design
Remember to cite all your sources, even if you only use the textbook. Assignment #5 Chapter 9: Compensation and Benefits The purpose of this chapter is to cover the basic concepts of compensation and benefits. The chapter starts by examining how compensation strategies are developed and then turns t…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Remember to cite all your sources, even if you only use the textbook.
Assignment #5
Chapter 9: Compensation and Benefits
The purpose of this chapter is to cover the basic concepts of compensation and benefits. The chapter starts by examining how compensation strategies are developed and then turns to the administration of compensation programs and how organizations evaluate their compensation programs. The reasons for benefit plans are discussed along with the different types of benefit plans typically found in organizations. Executive compensation is also discussed, and the chapter concludes with a discussion of legal issues associated with compensation and benefit programs.
Deliverable: Write responses to questions in a single paragraph format and include references for each answer.
Several questions for students to consider regarding the information in the Unique Compensation at Wegmans case.
Why does Wegmans’ approach to compensation seem to work so well?
In your opinion, why don’t other grocery chains use the same compensation model as Wegmans?
Nucor is a steel company that has not laid off employees. Policies were established in the 1960s under the theory that workers would be more productive if an employer went out of its way to share authority with them, respect what they accomplished, and compensate them as handsomely as possible. If a shirt can turn out a defect-free batch of steel, every worker is entitled to a bonus, and can potentially triple their take-home pay. If a batch has defects and it reaches the customer, workers may lose up to three times what they would have received as a bonus. Everyone has incentive pay. This system works because employees share financial risks and benefits and are therefore a lot like owners.
Would you want to work under a compensation system like Nucor’s? Why or why not?
Why don’t more firms use approaches to compensation along the lines of Nucor’s model?
Chapter 10: Performance Appraisal and Career Management
The purpose of this chapter is to describe performance appraisal systems and their implications for how individuals manage their careers. The chapter also covers careers from other perspectives. The focus of this chapter is on performance appraisal, while performance management is considered in much more detail in a later chapter. Finally, the chapter will also look to summarize research that has been completed in this area.
Meijer is a family-owned discounting chain in the Midwest. Meijer instituted a system to track the time that checkout operations take with each customer and creates a baseline based on the number and type of items being purchased; the operator is scored for each transaction and needs to maintain performance of at least 95 percent of the baseline. Operators agree that they work faster with this system, but feel stressed; customers have mixed reactions as well
Deliverable: Write responses to questions in a single paragraph format and include references for each answer.
How would you feel about working under the Meijer system?
What other kinds of jobs might be amendable to this sort of performance measurement technology?
Darden Restaurants see employees as vital resources that give them a real competitive advantage. Darden has been named one of the best companies to work for in America by Fortune magazine. Employee turnover is about 20 percent lower than the industry average. The company offers extensive career planning to all employees
What factors have led Darden to take its current approach to employee development and advancement?
Darden owns both family-oriented casual restaurants such as Olive Garden and more sophisticated upscale places such as Capital Grill. What effects might this structure have on employee development?
– ## feedbackforrhetoricalanalysis.docx – ## redodraft.docx – ## engl111perrypartaandb.docx – ## nikeprewriting.docx **## feedbackforrhetoricalanalysis.docx** **FEEDBACK Please refer to this when correcting the paper you did for me. I received a zero for this, so please correct. I shouldn’t have to …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– ## feedbackforrhetoricalanalysis.docx
– ## redodraft.docx
– ## engl111perrypartaandb.docx
– ## nikeprewriting.docx
**## feedbackforrhetoricalanalysis.docx**
**FEEDBACK Please refer to this when correcting the paper you did for me. I received a zero for this, so please correct. I shouldn’t have to pay another tutor to redo this sinc I paid you for it.**
Review assignment description and pre-writing and planning assignments:
· this is not a personal response yet
· you are not telling us whether you will support Nike or not on basis of the three appeals
· you are not sorting the appeal-driven paragraphs to show overall decision
· review claim grounds warrant structure in the planning assignment and remember to lead with and then prove YOUR decision
· this is too general and not as required. do not look up things but show me how YOU are thinking. don't refer to a general audience.
**## redodraft.docx**
Perry May
Frank Merksamer
English 111
**Draft of Rhetorical Analysis**
Unlike many commercials, which rely on product demonstrations, Nike’s advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick's logical appeal lies in its central message, alongside its slogan. The ad's main message, "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything" (Nike, 2018), suggests that achieving the best outcomes or progress requires sticking to one's values or principles despite personal loss. The creator reinforces this reasoning by using Kaepernick's real-life experiences as evidence, as he lost his career after kneeling during the national anthem to protest against racial injustices. Through the use of "Just Do It!", the ad indirectly indicates that the central message is the logical way for anyone with dreams to chase. Through using a well-known athlete with an impactful story, in addition to the slogan, the ad establishes a cause-and-effect relationship that makes its argument logical and compelling. Personally, the appeal is persuasive because it links the brand's identity with the universal idea of confidence through action, portraying Nike as a brand that supports people who take risks for what they believe in. This reasoning convinces that Nike is a company that stands for perseverance and integrity, proving that it's one of the best brands to use.
The ad uses emotionally charged visuals of Kaepernick, which immediately draws viewer attention due to the black and white close-up of his serious face, combined with the inspiring message about sacrifices (Nike, 2018). The ad’s visual design is simple, allowing the quote to stand out, which can appeal to viewers who seek bravery and inspiration. For many fans, Kaepernick’s story is inspiring, therefore, his facial expression in the ad may evoke a feeling of determination and courage in the fans, connecting the brand to supporting the pursuit of beliefs. The emotional connection the ad evokes from the message and use of the athlete represents Nike as a symbol of justice, resilience, and hope, not just a sports brand. Personally, the ad's central message is the powerful emotional appeal, which prompts a viewer to reflect on their pursuits and encourages viewers who stand out for their beliefs. However, for viewers who oppose Kaepernick's actions, the ad can evoke negative emotions like frustration and anger, creating national debates and controversy. As such, the ad's emotional depth makes it more memorable and influential.
The ad creates the brand's credibility and trust through Kaepernick's personal integrity and Nike's identity. The campaign is created on the public perception of Kaepernick's character, not just his athletic skills. Kaepernick is an athlete known for his integrity and activism, and the ad demonstrates his act of risking his career for social justice as a courageous act, making his character a symbol of the message. The ad's minimalist style, combined with a recognizable slogan, 'swoosh' logo, and reputation as a leading sports brand, further adds to the ad's credibility and trust (Nike, 2018). Personally, Nike’s association with Kaepernick deeply resonates with me because it shows the brand's willingness to take a stand in social justice. Additionally, it also makes the company appear trustworthy, socially responsible, and brave, qualities that make viewers likely to support and purchase its products. How the ad builds its credibility and trust appeals to young and socially conscious audiences, who value brands that are inclusive and support social justice issues.
Works Cited
Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.).
_The rhetorical triangle: Making your communications persuasive._ Mind Tools.
[https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm)
Nike. (2018).
_Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything_ [Advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick]. Nike Inc.
UofLIFE (2013). Writing Center: Rhetorical Analysis. YouTube.
[https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg](https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg)
**## engl111perrypartaandb.docx**
**Part A**
**Mandatory draft of the rhetorical analysis**
Instructions
**Important: this draft uses the same ad that you did the earlier prewriting on. Build on that earlier thinking but don't simply copy and paste it! Prewriting is loose, thinking heavy, while drafting is simply a formal / top-down organization of your existing thinking.**
Make sure that you've done earlier work for the week as these prepare you for this step. Remember that a draft is assembled thinking. We've already thought things through. We've already made plans! In fact, you should strongly consider outlining each of the three body paragraphs before attempting them. Remember that a body paragraph is formal. This means that it should
Make a claim in the topic sentence, which is one of the first two sentences of a paragraph
Give strong, focused evidence of that claim, lasting typically for 3-4 sentences
Explain how that evidence leads to the claim, lasting typically for 3-4 sentences
**Instructions**
**Turn in three formal (see structure above and read the paragraph materials from the first week if you haven't!) paragraphs that RESPOND to the three rhetorical appeals (logos, pathos, ethos) on your chosen image. The nature of this response is spelled out in the prewriting assignment. Basically, you need to explain overall why you will or will not buy Nike materials on the basis of the given ad's rhetorical appeals. Each paragraph therefore should**
**–>Make a claim about how the given appeal influences you (ex "I share a left-leaning attitude with the advertisement, which makes the message seem to be a matter of necessary social restructuring.")**
**Clarify focused detail from that appeal (describe something about the ad, looking from the perspective of ethos, pathos, or logos) (ex "pull out the materialism in the ad, the assumption of an interconnected society that needs to function as such")**
**Explain how that appeal influences you (ex "agree with the assumption above, clarifying my own commitment to such elsewhere)**
**I will grade each of the above paragraphs 25% for the degree to which you organize the rhetorical analysis in a unified and coherent manner as above. I will grade the other 25% for the degree to which you put these appeals in a coherent manner, building your overall response as you go. This involves connections and transitions!**
**Part B**
take notes on rhetorical analysis
**Instructions**
Look at these two resources before taking notes as below.
As a summary, we use the rhetorical triangle to conduct rhetorical analysis, which is the art of understanding how effecting an argument is and using that understanding to focus our own response or argument.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s84EDd8jFgw
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm
**Instructions**
**1) Skim the materials above**
**2) using the materials above (no others), give definitions for the following terms in your own words (no credit for simply copying and pasting)**
**a. rhetorical analysis**
**b. logos**
**c. pathos**
**d. ethos**
**3. come up with examples of your own for each of the rhetorical appeals (logos, pathos, and ethos). These examples can come from TV, your past writing, or anywhere else provided that you do the thinking here!**
**I will grade each part equally for clarity and accuracy. You do not need a ton of writing here but should think about things rather than borrowing everything verbatim.**
**Part C**
planning the rhetorical analysis
Review the draft description as well as class notes. Use this assignment to turn in three outlines for three different body paragraphs. Remember that a body paragraph addresses the major question for a paper, which in our case is about how the text (ad) in question does or does not encourage you to buy or otherwise support Nike (go back to the pre-writing assignment to see what you did there). You will have a paragraph concerning each of the following rhetorical appeals and how they are involved in your decision:
1. logos
2. pathos
3. ethos
Besides showing me
claim
grounds
warrant
for each of the three paragraphs, you should reflect briefly on the order of the paragraphs and how they relate to each other. I will grade each of these four parts equally. Don't draft here!
**## nikeprewriting.docx**
**pre-writing for the rhetorical analysis**
Make sure that you've done the homework for the week that introduces you to rhetorical analysis. Note that all of the images used in this assignment come from Nike print ads. Do not look up other people's analysis of those ads but do your own thinking!
**Instructions**
1) choose ONE of the images below and briefly describe why you picked it and not the others
2) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the logos appeal of your chosen ad
3) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the pathos appeal of your chosen ad
4) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the ethos appeal of your chosen ad
5) if we say, simply, that the purpose of each ad is to get you to buy Nikes (shoes or other items), how and to what extent does the ad convince you to do so? Answer loosely but with about 5 sentences and be sure to reference the appeals above. In other words, get your thoughts together here about how the ad works as an argument to get you, the consumer, to buy something. Whether or not you would buy something is important here in indicating whether the argument as succeeded or not. Using the appeals in your reasoning will allow you later, in the draft, to formally clarify your thinking about the ad. Right now, answer loosely and overall. Remember that we think a lot and write loosely (like this) before organizing our thoughts into a draft.
I will grade each of the above equally for accuracy and clarity. Here are the images to choose from: I was not able to open the downloads, so I went and found a nike ad that shown Colin Kapernick which I have put in here. If you are able to open them, you can use which ever one you decide upon, but I found the assignment in chatgpt, however I need you to rewrite this without Ai.
[nike3.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009248/download?wrap=1) [Download nike3.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009248/download?download_frd=1)
[nike4.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009246/download?wrap=1) [Download nike4.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009246/download?download_frd=1)
[nike5.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009245/download?wrap=1) [Download nike5.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009245/download?download_frd=1)
[nike1.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009247/download?wrap=1) [Download nike1.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009247/download?download_frd=1)
[nike2.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009244/download?wrap=1)
Perfect — this is your
**pre-writing assignment** for a rhetorical analysis of a
**Nike print ad**. Since you didn’t specify which image you chose, I’ll model one using a common Nike ad:
➡️
**Image choice: nike4.jpg (Colin Kaepernick ad – “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.”)**
You can adjust this if you pick a different image — I can rewrite it for another one in seconds if you upload or name it.
**1️⃣ Why I picked this ad**
I chose the ad featuring
**Colin Kaepernick** because it’s bold, emotional, and socially powerful. Unlike the other ads, this one isn’t focused on sports performance or physical ability but on
**values, sacrifice, and courage**. It connects sports to larger social issues, which makes it stand out. The black-and-white close-up of Kaepernick’s face gives the message a serious and emotional tone. The quote — “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.” — challenges viewers to think about what they personally stand for.
**2️⃣ Logos (logical appeal)**
The ad’s logic comes from cause and effect:
**standing up for your beliefs leads to real change, even at personal cost.** Nike uses Kaepernick as evidence of this idea since he lost his NFL career for protesting racial injustice. The message suggests that Nike supports those who act on their principles, which logically connects the brand to strength and integrity. There’s also an implied argument that Nike’s products are made for people who push boundaries, not just in sports but in life. This reasoning ties the brand’s identity to courage and purpose.
**3️⃣ Pathos (emotional appeal)**
The emotional appeal is strong. The close-up of Kaepernick’s serious face, combined with the message about sacrifice, evokes feelings of
**admiration, empathy, and determination**. It appeals to people who value justice and bravery, and it can make viewers feel inspired to take action or make bold choices themselves. For some, it may even bring feelings of defiance or solidarity. Nike taps into emotions of pride and moral courage, not just athletic ambition. The overall mood is both solemn and uplifting.
**4️⃣ Ethos (credibility appeal)**
Nike builds ethos through its
**association with Kaepernick**, an athlete known for integrity and activism. This gives the company moral credibility — it appears brave enough to support someone controversial for standing up for justice. The professional, minimalist design and Nike’s reputation as a leading sports brand add further credibility. The use of a real public figure rather than a model strengthens the authenticity of the message. Nike’s “swoosh” and slogan “Just Do It” connect the message to its long-standing brand identity of courage and persistence.
**5️⃣ Overall purpose and effectiveness**
The ad persuades consumers to buy Nike products by
**linking the brand to courage, conviction, and moral strength.** It’s not just selling shoes — it’s selling identity and values. The logos appeal presents a logical connection between belief and sacrifice; the pathos appeal stirs strong emotions of pride and courage; and the ethos appeal builds trust through association with a respected (though polarizing) figure. Personally, I find the argument powerful — it makes Nike seem bold and socially aware. Even if someone disagrees with Kaepernick’s stance, the ad still makes Nike memorable and gives consumers something to believe in. Overall, it’s an effective argument that aligns the brand with bravery and purpose.
Would you like me to rewrite this for one of the other ads (nike1–nike5)?
If you tell me which one you picked, I’ll tailor the 5 sections exactly to that image.
**## nikeprewriting.docx**
**pre-writing for the rhetorical analysis**
Make sure that you've done the homework for the week that introduces you to rhetorical analysis. Note that all of the images used in this assignment come from Nike print ads. Do not look up other people's analysis of those ads but do your own thinking!
**Instructions**
1) choose ONE of the images below and briefly describe why you picked it and not the others
2) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the logos appeal of your chosen ad
3) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the pathos appeal of your chosen ad
4) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the ethos appeal of your chosen ad
5) if we say, simply, that the purpose of each ad is to get you to buy Nikes (shoes or other items), how and to what extent does the ad convince you to do so? Answer loosely but with about 5 sentences and be sure to reference the appeals above. In other words, get your thoughts together here about how the ad works as an argument to get you, the consumer, to buy something. Whether or not you would buy something is important here in indicating whether the argument as succeeded or not. Using the appeals in your reasoning will allow you later, in the draft, to formally clarify your thinking about the ad. Right now, answer loosely and overall. Remember that we think a lot and write loosely (like this) before organizing our thoughts into a draft.
I will grade each of the above equally for accuracy and clarity. Here are the images to choose from: I was not able to open the downloads, so I went and found a nike ad that shown Colin Kapernick which I have put in here. If you are able to open them, you can use which ever one you decide upon, but I found the assignment in chatgpt, however I need you to rewrite this without Ai.
[nike3.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009248/download?wrap=1) [Download nike3.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009248/download?download_frd=1)
[nike4.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009246/download?wrap=1) [Download nike4.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009246/download?download_frd=1)
[nike5.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009245/download?wrap=1) [Download nike5.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009245/download?download_frd=1)
[nike1.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009247/download?wrap=1) [Download nike1.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009247/download?download_frd=1)
[nike2.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009244/download?wrap=1)
Perfect — this is your
**pre-writing assignment** for a rhetorical analysis of a
**Nike print ad**. Since you didn’t specify which image you chose, I’ll model one using a common Nike ad:
➡️
**Image choice: nike4.jpg (Colin Kaepernick ad – “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.”)**
You can adjust this if you pick a different image — I can rewrite it for another one in seconds if you upload or name it.
**1️⃣ Why I picked this ad**
I chose the ad featuring
**Colin Kaepernick** because it’s bold, emotional, and socially powerful. Unlike the other ads, this one isn’t focused on sports performance or physical ability but on
**values, sacrifice, and courage**. It connects sports to larger social issues, which makes it stand out. The black-and-white close-up of Kaepernick’s face gives the message a serious and emotional tone. The quote — “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.” — challenges viewers to think about what they personally stand for.
**2️⃣ Logos (logical appeal)**
The ad’s logic comes from cause and effect:
**standing up for your beliefs leads to real change, even at personal cost.** Nike uses Kaepernick as evidence of this idea since he lost his NFL career for protesting racial injustice. The message suggests that Nike supports those who act on their principles, which logically connects the brand to strength and integrity. There’s also an implied argument that Nike’s products are made for people who push boundaries, not just in sports but in life. This reasoning ties the brand’s identity to courage and purpose.
**3️⃣ Pathos (emotional appeal)**
The emotional appeal is strong. The close-up of Kaepernick’s serious face, combined with the message about sacrifice, evokes feelings of
**admiration, empathy, and determination**. It appeals to people who value justice and bravery, and it can make viewers feel inspired to take action or make bold choices themselves. For some, it may even bring feelings of defiance or solidarity. Nike taps into emotions of pride and moral courage, not just athletic ambition. The overall mood is both solemn and uplifting.
**4️⃣ Ethos (credibility appeal)**
Nike builds ethos through its
**association with Kaepernick**, an athlete known for integrity and activism. This gives the company moral credibility — it appears brave enough to support someone controversial for standing up for justice. The professional, minimalist design and Nike’s reputation as a leading sports brand add further credibility. The use of a real public figure rather than a model strengthens the authenticity of the message. Nike’s “swoosh” and slogan “Just Do It” connect the message to its long-standing brand identity of courage and persistence.
**5️⃣ Overall purpose and effectiveness**
The ad persuades consumers to buy Nike products by
**linking the brand to courage, conviction, and moral strength.** It’s not just selling shoes — it’s selling identity and values. The logos appeal presents a logical connection between belief and sacrifice; the pathos appeal stirs strong emotions of pride and courage; and the ethos appeal builds trust through association with a respected (though polarizing) figure. Personally, I find the argument powerful — it makes Nike seem bold and socially aware. Even if someone disagrees with Kaepernick’s stance, the ad still makes Nike memorable and gives consumers something to believe in. Overall, it’s an effective argument that aligns the brand with bravery and purpose.
Would you like me to rewrite this for one of the other ads (nike1–nike5)?
If you tell me which one you picked, I’ll tailor the 5 sections exactly to that image.
**## feedbackforrhetoricalanalysis.docx**
**FEEDBACK Please refer to this when correcting the paper you did for me. I received a zero for this, so please correct. I shouldn’t have to pay another tutor to redo this sinc I paid you for it.**
Review assignment description and pre-writing and planning assignments:
· this is not a personal response yet
· you are not telling us whether you will support Nike or not on basis of the three appeals
· you are not sorting the appeal-driven paragraphs to show overall decision
· review claim grounds warrant structure in the planning assignment and remember to lead with and then prove YOUR decision
· this is too general and not as required. do not look up things but show me how YOU are thinking. don't refer to a general audience.
**## redodraft.docx**
Perry May
Frank Merksamer
English 111
**Draft of Rhetorical Analysis**
Unlike many commercials, which rely on product demonstrations, Nike’s advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick's logical appeal lies in its central message, alongside its slogan. The ad's main message, "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything" (Nike, 2018), suggests that achieving the best outcomes or progress requires sticking to one's values or principles despite personal loss. The creator reinforces this reasoning by using Kaepernick's real-life experiences as evidence, as he lost his career after kneeling during the national anthem to protest against racial injustices. Through the use of "Just Do It!", the ad indirectly indicates that the central message is the logical way for anyone with dreams to chase. Through using a well-known athlete with an impactful story, in addition to the slogan, the ad establishes a cause-and-effect relationship that makes its argument logical and compelling. Personally, the appeal is persuasive because it links the brand's identity with the universal idea of confidence through action, portraying Nike as a brand that supports people who take risks for what they believe in. This reasoning convinces that Nike is a company that stands for perseverance and integrity, proving that it's one of the best brands to use.
The ad uses emotionally charged visuals of Kaepernick, which immediately draws viewer attention due to the black and white close-up of his serious face, combined with the inspiring message about sacrifices (Nike, 2018). The ad’s visual design is simple, allowing the quote to stand out, which can appeal to viewers who seek bravery and inspiration. For many fans, Kaepernick’s story is inspiring, therefore, his facial expression in the ad may evoke a feeling of determination and courage in the fans, connecting the brand to supporting the pursuit of beliefs. The emotional connection the ad evokes from the message and use of the athlete represents Nike as a symbol of justice, resilience, and hope, not just a sports brand. Personally, the ad's central message is the powerful emotional appeal, which prompts a viewer to reflect on their pursuits and encourages viewers who stand out for their beliefs. However, for viewers who oppose Kaepernick's actions, the ad can evoke negative emotions like frustration and anger, creating national debates and controversy. As such, the ad's emotional depth makes it more memorable and influential.
The ad creates the brand's credibility and trust through Kaepernick's personal integrity and Nike's identity. The campaign is created on the public perception of Kaepernick's character, not just his athletic skills. Kaepernick is an athlete known for his integrity and activism, and the ad demonstrates his act of risking his career for social justice as a courageous act, making his character a symbol of the message. The ad's minimalist style, combined with a recognizable slogan, 'swoosh' logo, and reputation as a leading sports brand, further adds to the ad's credibility and trust (Nike, 2018). Personally, Nike’s association with Kaepernick deeply resonates with me because it shows the brand's willingness to take a stand in social justice. Additionally, it also makes the company appear trustworthy, socially responsible, and brave, qualities that make viewers likely to support and purchase its products. How the ad builds its credibility and trust appeals to young and socially conscious audiences, who value brands that are inclusive and support social justice issues.
Works Cited
Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.).
_The rhetorical triangle: Making your communications persuasive._ Mind Tools.
[https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm)
Nike. (2018).
_Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything_ [Advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick]. Nike Inc.
UofLIFE (2013). Writing Center: Rhetorical Analysis. YouTube.
[https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg](https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg)
**## engl111perrypartaandb.docx**
**Part A**
**Mandatory draft of the rhetorical analysis**
Instructions
**Important: this draft uses the same ad that you did the earlier prewriting on. Build on that earlier thinking but don't simply copy and paste it! Prewriting is loose, thinking heavy, while drafting is simply a formal / top-down organization of your existing thinking.**
Make sure that you've done earlier work for the week as these prepare you for this step. Remember that a draft is assembled thinking. We've already thought things through. We've already made plans! In fact, you should strongly consider outlining each of the three body paragraphs before attempting them. Remember that a body paragraph is formal. This means that it should
Make a claim in the topic sentence, which is one of the first two sentences of a paragraph
Give strong, focused evidence of that claim, lasting typically for 3-4 sentences
Explain how that evidence leads to the claim, lasting typically for 3-4 sentences
**Instructions**
**Turn in three formal (see structure above and read the paragraph materials from the first week if you haven't!) paragraphs that RESPOND to the three rhetorical appeals (logos, pathos, ethos) on your chosen image. The nature of this response is spelled out in the prewriting assignment. Basically, you need to explain overall why you will or will not buy Nike materials on the basis of the given ad's rhetorical appeals. Each paragraph therefore should**
**–>Make a claim about how the given appeal influences you (ex "I share a left-leaning attitude with the advertisement, which makes the message seem to be a matter of necessary social restructuring.")**
**Clarify focused detail from that appeal (describe something about the ad, looking from the perspective of ethos, pathos, or logos) (ex "pull out the materialism in the ad, the assumption of an interconnected society that needs to function as such")**
**Explain how that appeal influences you (ex "agree with the assumption above, clarifying my own commitment to such elsewhere)**
**I will grade each of the above paragraphs 25% for the degree to which you organize the rhetorical analysis in a unified and coherent manner as above. I will grade the other 25% for the degree to which you put these appeals in a coherent manner, building your overall response as you go. This involves connections and transitions!**
**Part B**
take notes on rhetorical analysis
**Instructions**
Look at these two resources before taking notes as below.
As a summary, we use the rhetorical triangle to conduct rhetorical analysis, which is the art of understanding how effecting an argument is and using that understanding to focus our own response or argument.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s84EDd8jFgw
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm
**Instructions**
**1) Skim the materials above**
**2) using the materials above (no others), give definitions for the following terms in your own words (no credit for simply copying and pasting)**
**a. rhetorical analysis**
**b. logos**
**c. pathos**
**d. ethos**
**3. come up with examples of your own for each of the rhetorical appeals (logos, pathos, and ethos). These examples can come from TV, your past writing, or anywhere else provided that you do the thinking here!**
**I will grade each part equally for clarity and accuracy. You do not need a ton of writing here but should think about things rather than borrowing everything verbatim.**
**Part C**
planning the rhetorical analysis
Review the draft description as well as class notes. Use this assignment to turn in three outlines for three different body paragraphs. Remember that a body paragraph addresses the major question for a paper, which in our case is about how the text (ad) in question does or does not encourage you to buy or otherwise support Nike (go back to the pre-writing assignment to see what you did there). You will have a paragraph concerning each of the following rhetorical appeals and how they are involved in your decision:
1. logos
2. pathos
3. ethos
Besides showing me
claim
grounds
warrant
for each of the three paragraphs, you should reflect briefly on the order of the paragraphs and how they relate to each other. I will grade each of these four parts equally. Don't draft here!
**## nikeprewriting.docx**
**pre-writing for the rhetorical analysis**
Make sure that you've done the homework for the week that introduces you to rhetorical analysis. Note that all of the images used in this assignment come from Nike print ads. Do not look up other people's analysis of those ads but do your own thinking!
**Instructions**
1) choose ONE of the images below and briefly describe why you picked it and not the others
2) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the logos appeal of your chosen ad
3) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the pathos appeal of your chosen ad
4) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the ethos appeal of your chosen ad
5) if we say, simply, that the purpose of each ad is to get you to buy Nikes (shoes or other items), how and to what extent does the ad convince you to do so? Answer loosely but with about 5 sentences and be sure to reference the appeals above. In other words, get your thoughts together here about how the ad works as an argument to get you, the consumer, to buy something. Whether or not you would buy something is important here in indicating whether the argument as succeeded or not. Using the appeals in your reasoning will allow you later, in the draft, to formally clarify your thinking about the ad. Right now, answer loosely and overall. Remember that we think a lot and write loosely (like this) before organizing our thoughts into a draft.
I will grade each of the above equally for accuracy and clarity. Here are the images to choose from: I was not able to open the downloads, so I went and found a nike ad that shown Colin Kapernick which I have put in here. If you are able to open them, you can use which ever one you decide upon, but I found the assignment in chatgpt, however I need you to rewrite this without Ai.
[nike3.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009248/download?wrap=1) [Download nike3.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009248/download?download_frd=1)
[nike4.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009246/download?wrap=1) [Download nike4.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009246/download?download_frd=1)
[nike5.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009245/download?wrap=1) [Download nike5.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009245/download?download_frd=1)
[nike1.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009247/download?wrap=1) [Download nike1.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009247/download?download_frd=1)
[nike2.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009244/download?wrap=1)
Perfect — this is your
**pre-writing assignment** for a rhetorical analysis of a
**Nike print ad**. Since you didn’t specify which image you chose, I’ll model one using a common Nike ad:
➡️
**Image choice: nike4.jpg (Colin Kaepernick ad – “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.”)**
You can adjust this if you pick a different image — I can rewrite it for another one in seconds if you upload or name it.
**1️⃣ Why I picked this ad**
I chose the ad featuring
**Colin Kaepernick** because it’s bold, emotional, and socially powerful. Unlike the other ads, this one isn’t focused on sports performance or physical ability but on
**values, sacrifice, and courage**. It connects sports to larger social issues, which makes it stand out. The black-and-white close-up of Kaepernick’s face gives the message a serious and emotional tone. The quote — “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.” — challenges viewers to think about what they personally stand for.
**2️⃣ Logos (logical appeal)**
The ad’s logic comes from cause and effect:
**standing up for your beliefs leads to real change, even at personal cost.** Nike uses Kaepernick as evidence of this idea since he lost his NFL career for protesting racial injustice. The message suggests that Nike supports those who act on their principles, which logically connects the brand to strength and integrity. There’s also an implied argument that Nike’s products are made for people who push boundaries, not just in sports but in life. This reasoning ties the brand’s identity to courage and purpose.
**3️⃣ Pathos (emotional appeal)**
The emotional appeal is strong. The close-up of Kaepernick’s serious face, combined with the message about sacrifice, evokes feelings of
**admiration, empathy, and determination**. It appeals to people who value justice and bravery, and it can make viewers feel inspired to take action or make bold choices themselves. For some, it may even bring feelings of defiance or solidarity. Nike taps into emotions of pride and moral courage, not just athletic ambition. The overall mood is both solemn and uplifting.
**4️⃣ Ethos (credibility appeal)**
Nike builds ethos through its
**association with Kaepernick**, an athlete known for integrity and activism. This gives the company moral credibility — it appears brave enough to support someone controversial for standing up for justice. The professional, minimalist design and Nike’s reputation as a leading sports brand add further credibility. The use of a real public figure rather than a model strengthens the authenticity of the message. Nike’s “swoosh” and slogan “Just Do It” connect the message to its long-standing brand identity of courage and persistence.
**5️⃣ Overall purpose and effectiveness**
The ad persuades consumers to buy Nike products by
**linking the brand to courage, conviction, and moral strength.** It’s not just selling shoes — it’s selling identity and values. The logos appeal presents a logical connection between belief and sacrifice; the pathos appeal stirs strong emotions of pride and courage; and the ethos appeal builds trust through association with a respected (though polarizing) figure. Personally, I find the argument powerful — it makes Nike seem bold and socially aware. Even if someone disagrees with Kaepernick’s stance, the ad still makes Nike memorable and gives consumers something to believe in. Overall, it’s an effective argument that aligns the brand with bravery and purpose.
Would you like me to rewrite this for one of the other ads (nike1–nike5)?
If you tell me which one you picked, I’ll tailor the 5 sections exactly to that image.
**## feedbackforrhetoricalanalysis.docx**
**FEEDBACK Please refer to this when correcting the paper you did for me. I received a zero for this, so please correct. I shouldn’t have to pay another tutor to redo this sinc I paid you for it.**
Review assignment description and pre-writing and planning assignments:
· this is not a personal response yet
· you are not telling us whether you will support Nike or not on basis of the three appeals
· you are not sorting the appeal-driven paragraphs to show overall decision
· review claim grounds warrant structure in the planning assignment and remember to lead with and then prove YOUR decision
· this is too general and not as required. do not look up things but show me how YOU are thinking. don't refer to a general audience.
**## redodraft.docx**
Perry May
Frank Merksamer
English 111
**Draft of Rhetorical Analysis**
Unlike many commercials, which rely on product demonstrations, Nike’s advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick's logical appeal lies in its central message, alongside its slogan. The ad's main message, "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything" (Nike, 2018), suggests that achieving the best outcomes or progress requires sticking to one's values or principles despite personal loss. The creator reinforces this reasoning by using Kaepernick's real-life experiences as evidence, as he lost his career after kneeling during the national anthem to protest against racial injustices. Through the use of "Just Do It!", the ad indirectly indicates that the central message is the logical way for anyone with dreams to chase. Through using a well-known athlete with an impactful story, in addition to the slogan, the ad establishes a cause-and-effect relationship that makes its argument logical and compelling. Personally, the appeal is persuasive because it links the brand's identity with the universal idea of confidence through action, portraying Nike as a brand that supports people who take risks for what they believe in. This reasoning convinces that Nike is a company that stands for perseverance and integrity, proving that it's one of the best brands to use.
The ad uses emotionally charged visuals of Kaepernick, which immediately draws viewer attention due to the black and white close-up of his serious face, combined with the inspiring message about sacrifices (Nike, 2018). The ad’s visual design is simple, allowing the quote to stand out, which can appeal to viewers who seek bravery and inspiration. For many fans, Kaepernick’s story is inspiring, therefore, his facial expression in the ad may evoke a feeling of determination and courage in the fans, connecting the brand to supporting the pursuit of beliefs. The emotional connection the ad evokes from the message and use of the athlete represents Nike as a symbol of justice, resilience, and hope, not just a sports brand. Personally, the ad's central message is the powerful emotional appeal, which prompts a viewer to reflect on their pursuits and encourages viewers who stand out for their beliefs. However, for viewers who oppose Kaepernick's actions, the ad can evoke negative emotions like frustration and anger, creating national debates and controversy. As such, the ad's emotional depth makes it more memorable and influential.
The ad creates the brand's credibility and trust through Kaepernick's personal integrity and Nike's identity. The campaign is created on the public perception of Kaepernick's character, not just his athletic skills. Kaepernick is an athlete known for his integrity and activism, and the ad demonstrates his act of risking his career for social justice as a courageous act, making his character a symbol of the message. The ad's minimalist style, combined with a recognizable slogan, 'swoosh' logo, and reputation as a leading sports brand, further adds to the ad's credibility and trust (Nike, 2018). Personally, Nike’s association with Kaepernick deeply resonates with me because it shows the brand's willingness to take a stand in social justice. Additionally, it also makes the company appear trustworthy, socially responsible, and brave, qualities that make viewers likely to support and purchase its products. How the ad builds its credibility and trust appeals to young and socially conscious audiences, who value brands that are inclusive and support social justice issues.
Works Cited
Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.).
_The rhetorical triangle: Making your communications persuasive._ Mind Tools.
[https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm)
Nike. (2018).
_Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything_ [Advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick]. Nike Inc.
UofLIFE (2013). Writing Center: Rhetorical Analysis. YouTube.
[https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg](https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg)
**## engl111perrypartaandb.docx**
**Part A**
**Mandatory draft of the rhetorical analysis**
Instructions
**Important: this draft uses the same ad that you did the earlier prewriting on. Build on that earlier thinking but don't simply copy and paste it! Prewriting is loose, thinking heavy, while drafting is simply a formal / top-down organization of your existing thinking.**
Make sure that you've done earlier work for the week as these prepare you for this step. Remember that a draft is assembled thinking. We've already thought things through. We've already made plans! In fact, you should strongly consider outlining each of the three body paragraphs before attempting them. Remember that a body paragraph is formal. This means that it should
Make a claim in the topic sentence, which is one of the first two sentences of a paragraph
Give strong, focused evidence of that claim, lasting typically for 3-4 sentences
Explain how that evidence leads to the claim, lasting typically for 3-4 sentences
**Instructions**
**Turn in three formal (see structure above and read the paragraph materials from the first week if you haven't!) paragraphs that RESPOND to the three rhetorical appeals (logos, pathos, ethos) on your chosen image. The nature of this response is spelled out in the prewriting assignment. Basically, you need to explain overall why you will or will not buy Nike materials on the basis of the given ad's rhetorical appeals. Each paragraph therefore should**
**–>Make a claim about how the given appeal influences you (ex "I share a left-leaning attitude with the advertisement, which makes the message seem to be a matter of necessary social restructuring.")**
**Clarify focused detail from that appeal (describe something about the ad, looking from the perspective of ethos, pathos, or logos) (ex "pull out the materialism in the ad, the assumption of an interconnected society that needs to function as such")**
**Explain how that appeal influences you (ex "agree with the assumption above, clarifying my own commitment to such elsewhere)**
**I will grade each of the above paragraphs 25% for the degree to which you organize the rhetorical analysis in a unified and coherent manner as above. I will grade the other 25% for the degree to which you put these appeals in a coherent manner, building your overall response as you go. This involves connections and transitions!**
**Part B**
take notes on rhetorical analysis
**Instructions**
Look at these two resources before taking notes as below.
As a summary, we use the rhetorical triangle to conduct rhetorical analysis, which is the art of understanding how effecting an argument is and using that understanding to focus our own response or argument.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s84EDd8jFgw
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm
**Instructions**
**1) Skim the materials above**
**2) using the materials above (no others), give definitions for the following terms in your own words (no credit for simply copying and pasting)**
**a. rhetorical analysis**
**b. logos**
**c. pathos**
**d. ethos**
**3. come up with examples of your own for each of the rhetorical appeals (logos, pathos, and ethos). These examples can come from TV, your past writing, or anywhere else provided that you do the thinking here!**
**I will grade each part equally for clarity and accuracy. You do not need a ton of writing here but should think about things rather than borrowing everything verbatim.**
**Part C**
planning the rhetorical analysis
Review the draft description as well as class notes. Use this assignment to turn in three outlines for three different body paragraphs. Remember that a body paragraph addresses the major question for a paper, which in our case is about how the text (ad) in question does or does not encourage you to buy or otherwise support Nike (go back to the pre-writing assignment to see what you did there). You will have a paragraph concerning each of the following rhetorical appeals and how they are involved in your decision:
1. logos
2. pathos
3. ethos
Besides showing me
claim
grounds
warrant
for each of the three paragraphs, you should reflect briefly on the order of the paragraphs and how they relate to each other. I will grade each of these four parts equally. Don't draft here!
**## nikeprewriting.docx**
**pre-writing for the rhetorical analysis**
Make sure that you've done the homework for the week that introduces you to rhetorical analysis. Note that all of the images used in this assignment come from Nike print ads. Do not look up other people's analysis of those ads but do your own thinking!
**Instructions**
1) choose ONE of the images below and briefly describe why you picked it and not the others
2) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the logos appeal of your chosen ad
3) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the pathos appeal of your chosen ad
4) take brief notes, about 5 sentences worth, on the ethos appeal of your chosen ad
5) if we say, simply, that the purpose of each ad is to get you to buy Nikes (shoes or other items), how and to what extent does the ad convince you to do so? Answer loosely but with about 5 sentences and be sure to reference the appeals above. In other words, get your thoughts together here about how the ad works as an argument to get you, the consumer, to buy something. Whether or not you would buy something is important here in indicating whether the argument as succeeded or not. Using the appeals in your reasoning will allow you later, in the draft, to formally clarify your thinking about the ad. Right now, answer loosely and overall. Remember that we think a lot and write loosely (like this) before organizing our thoughts into a draft.
I will grade each of the above equally for accuracy and clarity. Here are the images to choose from: I was not able to open the downloads, so I went and found a nike ad that shown Colin Kapernick which I have put in here. If you are able to open them, you can use which ever one you decide upon, but I found the assignment in chatgpt, however I need you to rewrite this without Ai.
[nike3.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009248/download?wrap=1) [Download nike3.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009248/download?download_frd=1)
[nike4.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009246/download?wrap=1) [Download nike4.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009246/download?download_frd=1)
[nike5.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009245/download?wrap=1) [Download nike5.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009245/download?download_frd=1)
[nike1.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009247/download?wrap=1) [Download nike1.jfif](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009247/download?download_frd=1)
[nike2.jpg](https://durhamtech.instructure.com/courses/16475/files/2009244/download?wrap=1)
Perfect — this is your
**pre-writing assignment** for a rhetorical analysis of a
**Nike print ad**. Since you didn’t specify which image you chose, I’ll model one using a common Nike ad:
➡️
**Image choice: nike4.jpg (Colin Kaepernick ad – “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.”)**
You can adjust this if you pick a different image — I can rewrite it for another one in seconds if you upload or name it.
**1️⃣ Why I picked this ad**
I chose the ad featuring
**Colin Kaepernick** because it’s bold, emotional, and socially powerful. Unlike the other ads, this one isn’t focused on sports performance or physical ability but on
**values, sacrifice, and courage**. It connects sports to larger social issues, which makes it stand out. The black-and-white close-up of Kaepernick’s face gives the message a serious and emotional tone. The quote — “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.” — challenges viewers to think about what they personally stand for.
**2️⃣ Logos (logical appeal)**
The ad’s logic comes from cause and effect:
**standing up for your beliefs leads to real change, even at personal cost.** Nike uses Kaepernick as evidence of this idea since he lost his NFL career for protesting racial injustice. The message suggests that Nike supports those who act on their principles, which logically connects the brand to strength and integrity. There’s also an implied argument that Nike’s products are made for people who push boundaries, not just in sports but in life. This reasoning ties the brand’s identity to courage and purpose.
**3️⃣ Pathos (emotional appeal)**
The emotional appeal is strong. The close-up of Kaepernick’s serious face, combined with the message about sacrifice, evokes feelings of
**admiration, empathy, and determination**. It appeals to people who value justice and bravery, and it can make viewers feel inspired to take action or make bold choices themselves. For some, it may even bring feelings of defiance or solidarity. Nike taps into emotions of pride and moral courage, not just athletic ambition. The overall mood is both solemn and uplifting.
**4️⃣ Ethos (credibility appeal)**
Nike builds ethos through its
**association with Kaepernick**, an athlete known for integrity and activism. This gives the company moral credibility — it appears brave enough to support someone controversial for standing up for justice. The professional, minimalist design and Nike’s reputation as a leading sports brand add further credibility. The use of a real public figure rather than a model strengthens the authenticity of the message. Nike’s “swoosh” and slogan “Just Do It” connect the message to its long-standing brand identity of courage and persistence.
**5️⃣ Overall purpose and effectiveness**
The ad persuades consumers to buy Nike products by
**linking the brand to courage, conviction, and moral strength.** It’s not just selling shoes — it’s selling identity and values. The logos appeal presents a logical connection between belief and sacrifice; the pathos appeal stirs strong emotions of pride and courage; and the ethos appeal builds trust through association with a respected (though polarizing) figure. Personally, I find the argument powerful — it makes Nike seem bold and socially aware. Even if someone disagrees with Kaepernick’s stance, the ad still makes Nike memorable and gives consumers something to believe in. Overall, it’s an effective argument that aligns the brand with bravery and purpose.
Would you like me to rewrite this for one of the other ads (nike1–nike5)?
If you tell me which one you picked, I’ll tailor the 5 sections exactly to that image.
– 1
– 2
– 3
– 4
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering compare.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
Use AI to draft a professional proposal, then edit the proposal to improve it (using track changes); justifying your edits in reference to unit materials and evaluating the benefits and limitations of using Gen-AI.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Use AI to draft a professional proposal, then edit the proposal to improve it (using track changes); justifying your edits in reference to unit materials and evaluating the benefits and limitations of using Gen-AI.