Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] crime lab management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I Need a response to this post (Summarize) Lois Gibson is globally recognized as one of the most successful and prolific forensic artists, credited with helping law enforcement identify over 700 suspects and victims since the 1980s. Her work involves creating composite sketches, post-mortem reconstr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I Need a response to this post (Summarize)
    Lois Gibson is globally recognized as one of the most successful and prolific forensic artists, credited with helping law enforcement identify over 700 suspects and victims since the 1980s. Her work involves creating composite sketches, post-mortem reconstructions, and age progressions based on witness descriptions and skeletal remains.
    Lois Gibson often emphasizes that her success is rooted not just in her artistic skill, but in her unique interviewing techniques and her ability to gain the trust of often traumatized witnesses. She has stated, "I'm not drawing a picture, I'm drawing what's in their head."
    Discuss the critical role of psychology and communication in forensic art. How might Gibson's specific interviewing approach (such as patience, empathy, avoiding leading questions) be as important (or even more important) than her drawing skill in achieving an accurate composite sketch?
    I work for a law enforcement agency and, with the beginning of the new fiscal year, recently had to choose my objectives for the year. This year I chose to take on the training required to qualify for the relief supervisor position. My goal (which I made clear) is not necessarily to become the relief supervisor for my team, but to 1. determine if management in any capacity is something I wish to pursue and, 2. to gain some additional perspective on the behind-the-scenes managerial aspects of my agency.
    I’ve never aspired to be a supervisor, although it wasn’t something I was certain I wanted to avoid. When I considered long term career paths, financial motivation was the leading factor in pursuing management roles – I consider that the worst reason to become a supervisor! Lately, when reflecting on what I view as shortcomings of my own management chain, and in discussing with my coworkers how and where and why I would’ve handled a situation this way or that, my motivations for pursuing the management path have changed to determining if I think I could be the change I want to see. It’s tricky!
    I need a short summary of this question
    create a thread on any forensic topic and reply to your classmates.
    Managing a Lab is no different than managing another group of people. You have a boss, employees belonging to various unions, publicity, oversight, budget issues, discipline, etc. The oldest person is not necessarily to wisest or the best at managing. You wear many hats and you have friends and enemies. Most lab personnel just want to do their job, get paid and go home. They do not want management responsiblity. When I was a worker I always thought my managers were only interested in covering themselves. As I moved up, I gained a new outlook. Do you want to be a manager? Why or why not.

  • [Solved] Nursing assignment 99

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see the attachments – ## paperprimary1outline.docx – ## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx – SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx **## paperprimary1outline.docx** I am writing this paper as a family **nurse practitioner student:** Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper sho…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see the attachments

    – ## paperprimary1outline.docx

    – ## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx

    – SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx

    **## paperprimary1outline.docx**

    I am writing this paper as a family
    **nurse practitioner student:**

    Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper should review a specific population with a specific disease process and seek out the evidence-based interventions that could close the gap towards optimum health  in that particular population. The paper is
    **not to** compare one race against another. The paper aims to identify an
    **adult** population, health problem (s), innovative and evidence-based health promotion or intervention strategies, and proposed changes related to the nurse practitioner's
    **primary care** role. The population may be defined by gender, ethnic culture,or age group and then look at the disease outcomes.  Health problems should be among the topics presented in this course.
    **Proposed interventions must be based on the evidence (based on the literature review students do for this paper)**.  This is a scholarly paper and should be referenced accordingly.

    · Papers that are not coherent or have poor mechanics will not be accepted and the student will be referred to the writing center.

    · This paper is subject to Copyleaks Plagiarism scrutiny and must be turned in through this mechanism to be considered for grading.
    **Do not** **plagiarize** your paper. If unfamiliar with what constitutes plagiarism, please work with the Writing Center

    My topic:
    **Obesity and Cardio metabolic Risk in Middle-Aged Hispanic Women**

    **Instructor suggestion: would suggest is that it should not focus on screening, but on the actual diagnosis. We want to see how the outcomes are different when a certain population has the disease, not just being screened or not screened for it.**

    **See the Rubric and sample paper that I attached**

    **## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx**

    **Healthcare Disparity Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Healthcare Disparity Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of problem and population | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>1. The problems and are thoroughly addressed with emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. In-depth description of problem. 2. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem. 3. In-depth description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given. 4. Background provides context for the Problem & phenomenon of interest on a national scale. 5. Significance is clearly articulated. 6. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data/) 7. Purpose statement is clear and relates to the entire paper. | **24 pts**<br>**B**<br>The problems are discussed but weak emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem but references are weak. Description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given but not in depth. Background provides context for the problem & phenomenon of interest but no data on a national scale. Significance is articulated but clear. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data but not thorough. Purpose statement is ambiguous and not clear and relates to the entire paper. | **21 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 5-6 points are addressed In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **18 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism. ( 0 point) | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Innovative solutions & recommendations for change. | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **50 pts**<br>**A**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. Well- researched with all references cited. How the review of literature was done is clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. The review includes sufficient studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest. The review is critical and not a catalog of studies 3. A summary statement at the end of the review synthesizes major research findings that point to the scientific/clinical importance of phenomenon (the problem that you discussed in the introductory section) under question. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, or are clear and appropriate to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are articulated and prioritized The proposed intervention plan is reasonable, feasible, and sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5. The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is clearly articulated. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are clearly described Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions. | **40 pts**<br>**B**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. But references are not relevant or not cited. The process of the review of literature is not clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. Studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest is weak and not enough. The review is critical but not in depth. 3. A summary statement at the end of the review is present but not clear and thorough. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet minimum expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, are ambiguous or not related to to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are not articulated or prioritized The proposed intervention plan is not reasonable, feasible, or sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5 The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is articulated but not in detail. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are described but not in depth Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided but weak. 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions but not in depth. | **35 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Not enough of references Conclusion is present but not clear neither strong. | **30 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 1-2 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Lack of references Conclusion is missing. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism | | 50 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence and mechanisms of writing. | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• There is evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • Almost no errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Good organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Very good flow and readability is evident | **8 pts**<br>**8**<br>• There is weak evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • < 10 errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Fair organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Good flow and readability is evident | **7 pts**<br>**C**<br>Critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper is not present. Many errors in in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted Poorly organized paper with poor standard English structures are noted Poor | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Difficult to read. Numerous and major mechanical errors. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Writing is very unclear. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• Works are cited correctly in 7th edition APA Citations are complete and correct. No formatting errors | **8 pts**<br>**B**<br>5 -10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**C**<br>More than 10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Incomplete or weak citations to points in the paper AND Major formatting errors | **0 pts**<br>**NoF Marks**<br>No citations. Difficult to read | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    **SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/samplehealthdisparitypaper-capaamales31-docx)

    **SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/samplehealthdisparitypaper-capaamales31-docx)

    **## paperprimary1outline.docx**

    I am writing this paper as a family
    **nurse practitioner student:**

    Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper should review a specific population with a specific disease process and seek out the evidence-based interventions that could close the gap towards optimum health  in that particular population. The paper is
    **not to** compare one race against another. The paper aims to identify an
    **adult** population, health problem (s), innovative and evidence-based health promotion or intervention strategies, and proposed changes related to the nurse practitioner's
    **primary care** role. The population may be defined by gender, ethnic culture,or age group and then look at the disease outcomes.  Health problems should be among the topics presented in this course.
    **Proposed interventions must be based on the evidence (based on the literature review students do for this paper)**.  This is a scholarly paper and should be referenced accordingly.

    · Papers that are not coherent or have poor mechanics will not be accepted and the student will be referred to the writing center.

    · This paper is subject to Copyleaks Plagiarism scrutiny and must be turned in through this mechanism to be considered for grading.
    **Do not** **plagiarize** your paper. If unfamiliar with what constitutes plagiarism, please work with the Writing Center

    My topic:
    **Obesity and Cardio metabolic Risk in Middle-Aged Hispanic Women**

    **Instructor suggestion: would suggest is that it should not focus on screening, but on the actual diagnosis. We want to see how the outcomes are different when a certain population has the disease, not just being screened or not screened for it.**

    **See the Rubric and sample paper that I attached**

    **## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx**

    **Healthcare Disparity Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Healthcare Disparity Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of problem and population | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>1. The problems and are thoroughly addressed with emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. In-depth description of problem. 2. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem. 3. In-depth description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given. 4. Background provides context for the Problem & phenomenon of interest on a national scale. 5. Significance is clearly articulated. 6. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data/) 7. Purpose statement is clear and relates to the entire paper. | **24 pts**<br>**B**<br>The problems are discussed but weak emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem but references are weak. Description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given but not in depth. Background provides context for the problem & phenomenon of interest but no data on a national scale. Significance is articulated but clear. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data but not thorough. Purpose statement is ambiguous and not clear and relates to the entire paper. | **21 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 5-6 points are addressed In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **18 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism. ( 0 point) | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Innovative solutions & recommendations for change. | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **50 pts**<br>**A**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. Well- researched with all references cited. How the review of literature was done is clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. The review includes sufficient studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest. The review is critical and not a catalog of studies 3. A summary statement at the end of the review synthesizes major research findings that point to the scientific/clinical importance of phenomenon (the problem that you discussed in the introductory section) under question. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, or are clear and appropriate to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are articulated and prioritized The proposed intervention plan is reasonable, feasible, and sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5. The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is clearly articulated. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are clearly described Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions. | **40 pts**<br>**B**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. But references are not relevant or not cited. The process of the review of literature is not clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. Studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest is weak and not enough. The review is critical but not in depth. 3. A summary statement at the end of the review is present but not clear and thorough. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet minimum expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, are ambiguous or not related to to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are not articulated or prioritized The proposed intervention plan is not reasonable, feasible, or sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5 The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is articulated but not in detail. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are described but not in depth Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided but weak. 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions but not in depth. | **35 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Not enough of references Conclusion is present but not clear neither strong. | **30 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 1-2 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Lack of references Conclusion is missing. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism | | 50 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence and mechanisms of writing. | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• There is evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • Almost no errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Good organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Very good flow and readability is evident | **8 pts**<br>**8**<br>• There is weak evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • < 10 errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Fair organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Good flow and readability is evident | **7 pts**<br>**C**<br>Critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper is not present. Many errors in in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted Poorly organized paper with poor standard English structures are noted Poor | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Difficult to read. Numerous and major mechanical errors. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Writing is very unclear. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• Works are cited correctly in 7th edition APA Citations are complete and correct. No formatting errors | **8 pts**<br>**B**<br>5 -10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**C**<br>More than 10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Incomplete or weak citations to points in the paper AND Major formatting errors | **0 pts**<br>**NoF Marks**<br>No citations. Difficult to read | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    **SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/samplehealthdisparitypaper-capaamales31-docx)

    **## paperprimary1outline.docx**

    I am writing this paper as a family
    **nurse practitioner student:**

    Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper should review a specific population with a specific disease process and seek out the evidence-based interventions that could close the gap towards optimum health  in that particular population. The paper is
    **not to** compare one race against another. The paper aims to identify an
    **adult** population, health problem (s), innovative and evidence-based health promotion or intervention strategies, and proposed changes related to the nurse practitioner's
    **primary care** role. The population may be defined by gender, ethnic culture,or age group and then look at the disease outcomes.  Health problems should be among the topics presented in this course.
    **Proposed interventions must be based on the evidence (based on the literature review students do for this paper)**.  This is a scholarly paper and should be referenced accordingly.

    · Papers that are not coherent or have poor mechanics will not be accepted and the student will be referred to the writing center.

    · This paper is subject to Copyleaks Plagiarism scrutiny and must be turned in through this mechanism to be considered for grading.
    **Do not** **plagiarize** your paper. If unfamiliar with what constitutes plagiarism, please work with the Writing Center

    My topic:
    **Obesity and Cardio metabolic Risk in Middle-Aged Hispanic Women**

    **Instructor suggestion: would suggest is that it should not focus on screening, but on the actual diagnosis. We want to see how the outcomes are different when a certain population has the disease, not just being screened or not screened for it.**

    **See the Rubric and sample paper that I attached**

    **## HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx**

    **Healthcare Disparity Rubric**

    | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | Healthcare Disparity Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of problem and population | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 pts**<br>**Full Marks**<br>1. The problems and are thoroughly addressed with emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. In-depth description of problem. 2. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem. 3. In-depth description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given. 4. Background provides context for the Problem & phenomenon of interest on a national scale. 5. Significance is clearly articulated. 6. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data/) 7. Purpose statement is clear and relates to the entire paper. | **24 pts**<br>**B**<br>The problems are discussed but weak emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem but references are weak. Description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given but not in depth. Background provides context for the problem & phenomenon of interest but no data on a national scale. Significance is articulated but clear. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data but not thorough. Purpose statement is ambiguous and not clear and relates to the entire paper. | **21 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 5-6 points are addressed In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **18 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism. ( 0 point) | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Innovative solutions & recommendations for change. | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **50 pts**<br>**A**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. Well- researched with all references cited. How the review of literature was done is clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. The review includes sufficient studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest. The review is critical and not a catalog of studies 3. A summary statement at the end of the review synthesizes major research findings that point to the scientific/clinical importance of phenomenon (the problem that you discussed in the introductory section) under question. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, or are clear and appropriate to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are articulated and prioritized The proposed intervention plan is reasonable, feasible, and sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5. The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is clearly articulated. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are clearly described Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions. | **40 pts**<br>**B**<br>1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. But references are not relevant or not cited. The process of the review of literature is not clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. Studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest is weak and not enough. The review is critical but not in depth. 3. A summary statement at the end of the review is present but not clear and thorough. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet minimum expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, are ambiguous or not related to to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are not articulated or prioritized The proposed intervention plan is not reasonable, feasible, or sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5 The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is articulated but not in detail. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are described but not in depth Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided but weak. 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions but not in depth. | **35 pts**<br>**C**<br>Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Not enough of references Conclusion is present but not clear neither strong. | **30 pts**<br>**D**<br>Only 1-2 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Lack of references Conclusion is missing. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Plagiarism | | 50 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence and mechanisms of writing. | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• There is evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • Almost no errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Good organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Very good flow and readability is evident | **8 pts**<br>**8**<br>• There is weak evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • < 10 errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Fair organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Good flow and readability is evident | **7 pts**<br>**C**<br>Critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper is not present. Many errors in in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted Poorly organized paper with poor standard English structures are noted Poor | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Difficult to read. Numerous and major mechanical errors. | **0 pts**<br>**F**<br>Writing is very unclear. | | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **10 pts**<br>**A**<br>• Works are cited correctly in 7th edition APA Citations are complete and correct. No formatting errors | **8 pts**<br>**B**<br>5 -10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**C**<br>More than 10 APA errors including formatting errors | **6 pts**<br>**D**<br>Incomplete or weak citations to points in the paper AND Major formatting errors | **0 pts**<br>**NoF Marks**<br>No citations. Difficult to read | | 10 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    **SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/samplehealthdisparitypaper-capaamales31-docx)

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Business

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Business.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] I need two pages back by Monday, November 17th, 2025 APA Style Plagarism & AI free

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. Post your Case Study Section on Interagency and Social Service Evaluation Draft. This section must include the following components: – Assess the effectiveness of interagency coordination. – Evaluate communication, resource sharing, and policy alignment between justice agencies and social servic…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1.  Post your Case Study Section on Interagency and Social Service  Evaluation Draft.  This section must include the following components:
    – Assess the effectiveness of interagency coordination.
    – Evaluate communication, resource sharing, and policy alignment between justice agencies and social services.
    – Identify challenges such as organizational culture clashes, funding limitations, or conflicting priorities.
    2.  Complete two student peer reviews.
    **When reviewing, address the following:**
    a. Clarity and  Organization:  Is the executive summary clearly written and easy to  follow?  Does it provide a logical flow from background to significance  to key issues?
    b. Content and  Analysis: Are the key issues (e.g., administrative barriers, policy  challenges, program impact) well explained? Does the study connect to  interagency collaboration and social service integration? Does the  summary highlight why the initiative is important for criminal justice  administration?
    c. Use of  Sources and Evidence:  Are at least three peer-reviewed sources used  appropriately?  Do the sources support the claims? Is APA 7 format  applied correctly?
    d. Constructive Feedback: Identify strengths and areas for improvement.

  • [Solved] Nursing SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] E1301_1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need help with a question – ## RoughDraft3Instructions.docx – ## MWP3EssayInstructions.docx – ## Previousassignment_E1301.pdf **## RoughDraft3Instructions.docx** **Professor** **MWP #3** **Rough Draft Instructions** **Length and Formatting:** 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified m…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need help with a question

    – ## RoughDraft3Instructions.docx

    – ## MWP3EssayInstructions.docx

    – ## Previousassignment_E1301.pdf

    **## RoughDraft3Instructions.docx**

    **Professor**

    **MWP #3**

    **Rough Draft Instructions**

    **Length and Formatting:** 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, black 12-point, Times New Roman font, written in 3rd person.

    **Assignment**: Submit a completed version of your paper following the containments of the essay’s instructions.

    **What is a Rough Draft:** A rough draft is a version of your essay that is raw and unpolished, containing the main ideas put together in a coherent way. A rough draft is about making sure your ideas are present and laid out clearly (remove holes from your writing).

    **Purpose:** Writing a rough draft is an essential part of the writing process and is an opportunity to write your first ideas and thoughts on paper. The sole purpose of a rough draft is to give you a place to start to formally put together your ideas from your mind map and sentence outline. Additionally, writing a rough draft lets you gauge if you need to do more research or change the purpose of the writing. What do I need to write a rough draft?

    **Constraints:** Read and Review the essay instructions and make sure you are meeting the minimum requirements.

    1

    **## MWP3EssayInstructions.docx**

    Professor xxxx

    xxxx

    **PAPER #3:**

    **Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical Perspective on a**

    **Cultural or Ethnic Group**

    **Due: 4PM (CST), November 17th**

    **MLA or APA format acceptable**

    **Weight**: 20% of the Final Grade

    **Length and Formatting:** 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, black 12-point, Times New Roman font, written in 3rd person.

    **Brainstorming for the Essay:** Think about essays one and two write a few sentences about what Ethical Perspectives are at play in and among Social Circles, Communities, Education, and Employment within those essays. Next, in one sentence try to flesh out what Ethical Perspective Trevor Noah is pointing out, and what are the main points with which he seemed to want to leave readers. (Remember this is not a book report, you are using Trevor Noah as a starting point to help ground and provide evidence for your Synthesis.) Then, underneath each sentence list the evidence provided by each of the writers such as: examples? Numeric data? Or Something else?

    **Assignment:** What is an ethical position that the population should adopt, on the role of cultural activism in relationship to formal or informal situations among Racial Group Dominance and Subordination? Consider: The value of how social circles among cultures work, how communities view cultural activism that is not of their own native origin, how educational and employment opportunities differ.

    There is not one definitive answer here, but a range of possible positions, each of which may affect how we see and treat people who continue to survive in a socially controversial world. For example, the position that the majority population takes on this topic may influence the level of respect that your readers give to people who learn how to deal with different cultures. Or the position that you propose may ultimately influence the value with which many of your peers continue forming their own social circles, communities, education, or employment.

    · As you write your paper, you should give specific evidence from 3 of the (individual chapters) within Trevor Noah.

    · You should provide what the perspectives are within social circles, communities, education, or employment; the perspectives may overlap with one or more of the works that you cite, but even so, the highlighted position should come across clearly.

    · Include one visual to illustrate your own perspective.

    **Audience:** Imagine that your paper will be read by local city leaders who can influence the higher education and job training options in Houston. These leaders are studying the perspectives of community members like you before they do further research and then make recommendations to local leaders in education, business, and industry about the kinds of postsecondary education and/or job training to support in the coming years.

    **Research:** If you choose to obtain outside sources you are limited to 2 sources only. Do not use Google. Resources that can be used for this assignment should only be comprised of in-class text, Jstor, or the Library. If you choose to utilize quotes from these sources for this paper, you will need to make sure you are introducing the quote or quotes correctly, make sure that it is absolutely necessary to have the author's words exactly and not your own words.

    **Rationale:** Accurately and respectfully synthesizing other people’s texts is a large part of working with complex ideas and identifying your own position in relation to others’ ideas marks you as a discerning thinker and writer. These are among the skills that you will continue refining in ENGL 1302 and beyond. Additionally, this assignment gives you your most formal audience yet, and in doing so, the assignment forces you to polish your prose by the time you complete your final draft. Many, though not all, college and professional writing situations will require a writing tone that is formal but not stuffy. With Paper #3, you can practice using that tone.

    1

    **## Previousassignment_E1301.pdf**

    Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical

    Perspective on Cultural Activism under

    Racial Dominance and Subordination:

    Insights from Born a Crime

    Selected Image

    • This image illustrates the essay’s
    focus on cultural presence in
    shared spaces. It shows people
    from different racial and cultural
    backgrounds interacting freely,
    which highlights the central claim
    that multicultural communities
    function best when diverse
    identities are visible, affirmed, and
    not forced to conform to a single
    dominant norm.

    Introduction

    Multicultural societies must decide how to respond when subordinated
    racial or cultural groups assert identity or resist exclusion.

    Cultural activism (language, history, music, political speech) is often
    misread as divisive.

    Trevor Noah’s Born a Crime shows that such activism is often the only
    strategy for people formed under racial hierarchy (Noah 2016).

    Thesis: This essay argues that the population should ethically legitimize
    cultural activism, because it (1) recognizes what is owed to subordinated
    groups, (2) corrects informal exclusion in social circles, and (3) demands
    institutional inclusion in education and employment.

    Key Term 1: Ethical Recognition

    An ethical perspective asks what is owed to groups whose lives have
    been shaped by dominance and subordination.

    Young argues that when public norms come from the dominant group,
    minority claims for visibility are claims of justice, not special pleading
    (Young 1989, pp. 251–253).

    Noah shows that in apartheid/post-apartheid South Africa, rules were
    made by others, but subordinated people still had to survive inside them
    (Noah 2016, pp. 52–54).

    Therefore, the first move is active legitimation of cultural activism, not
    “neutrality,” which only protects dominant norms (Kymlicka 1992, pp.
    142–146).

    Key Term 2: Informal Belonging (Social
    Circles)

    Informal social circles are where people first feel cultural rules and
    policing.

    In “Chameleon,” Noah shows that belonging depended on
    sounding like the group and signaling the right racial position (Noah
    2016, pp. 94–97).

    Subordinated people do extra cultural work (code-switching, self-
    editing) just to be accepted.

    Ethically, when they bring in their own language or cultural
    reference, it should be read as an attempt to equalize the space,
    not to fragment it — which matters for Houston-style cohort
    programmes.

    Key Term 3: Institutional Inclusion
    (Education and Employment)

    Schools and workplaces magnify the effects of acceptance or rejection
    because they are gatekeeping institutions.

    Noah’s school stories show that institutions rewarded those closest to the
    dominant cultural template (Noah 2016, pp. 141–144; 157–160).

    Cultural associations, curriculum changes, or challenges to biased
    recruitment are not demands for favours; they are attempts to correct
    standards built without subordinated groups (Kymlicka 1992, pp. 144–
    147).

    So, an ethical stance requires building in space for culturally grounded
    leadership and recognition of minority practices.

    Conclusion

    Cultural activism is a response to existing racial dominance, not the
    cause of division.

    Noah, Young, and Kymlicka together show that neutrality leaves
    dominant norms in place (Noah 2016; Young 1989; Kymlicka 1992).

    Local leaders in cities like Houston should frame cultural activism
    as ethically necessary for fair education and job-training outcomes.

    Programmes that welcome such activism will better retain
    subordinated groups; programmes that suppress it will reproduce
    hierarchy.

    Works Cited

    Kymlicka, W. (1992) ‘The Rights of Minority Cultures: Reply to
    Kukathas’, Political Theory, 20(1), pp. 140–146. Available at:
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/191782 (Accessed: 3 November 2025).

    Noah, T. (2016) Born a Crime: Stories from a South African
    Childhood. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

    Young, I.M. (1989) ‘Polity and group difference: A critique of the
    ideal of universal citizenship’, Ethics, 99(2), pp. 250–274. Available
    at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2381434 (Accessed: 3 November
    2025).

    **## Previousassignment_E1301.pdf**

    Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical

    Perspective on Cultural Activism under

    Racial Dominance and Subordination:

    Insights from Born a Crime

    Selected Image

    • This image illustrates the essay’s
    focus on cultural presence in
    shared spaces. It shows people
    from different racial and cultural
    backgrounds interacting freely,
    which highlights the central claim
    that multicultural communities
    function best when diverse
    identities are visible, affirmed, and
    not forced to conform to a single
    dominant norm.

    Introduction

    Multicultural societies must decide how to respond when subordinated
    racial or cultural groups assert identity or resist exclusion.

    Cultural activism (language, history, music, political speech) is often
    misread as divisive.

    Trevor Noah’s Born a Crime shows that such activism is often the only
    strategy for people formed under racial hierarchy (Noah 2016).

    Thesis: This essay argues that the population should ethically legitimize
    cultural activism, because it (1) recognizes what is owed to subordinated
    groups, (2) corrects informal exclusion in social circles, and (3) demands
    institutional inclusion in education and employment.

    Key Term 1: Ethical Recognition

    An ethical perspective asks what is owed to groups whose lives have
    been shaped by dominance and subordination.

    Young argues that when public norms come from the dominant group,
    minority claims for visibility are claims of justice, not special pleading
    (Young 1989, pp. 251–253).

    Noah shows that in apartheid/post-apartheid South Africa, rules were
    made by others, but subordinated people still had to survive inside them
    (Noah 2016, pp. 52–54).

    Therefore, the first move is active legitimation of cultural activism, not
    “neutrality,” which only protects dominant norms (Kymlicka 1992, pp.
    142–146).

    Key Term 2: Informal Belonging (Social
    Circles)

    Informal social circles are where people first feel cultural rules and
    policing.

    In “Chameleon,” Noah shows that belonging depended on
    sounding like the group and signaling the right racial position (Noah
    2016, pp. 94–97).

    Subordinated people do extra cultural work (code-switching, self-
    editing) just to be accepted.

    Ethically, when they bring in their own language or cultural
    reference, it should be read as an attempt to equalize the space,
    not to fragment it — which matters for Houston-style cohort
    programmes.

    Key Term 3: Institutional Inclusion
    (Education and Employment)

    Schools and workplaces magnify the effects of acceptance or rejection
    because they are gatekeeping institutions.

    Noah’s school stories show that institutions rewarded those closest to the
    dominant cultural template (Noah 2016, pp. 141–144; 157–160).

    Cultural associations, curriculum changes, or challenges to biased
    recruitment are not demands for favours; they are attempts to correct
    standards built without subordinated groups (Kymlicka 1992, pp. 144–
    147).

    So, an ethical stance requires building in space for culturally grounded
    leadership and recognition of minority practices.

    Conclusion

    Cultural activism is a response to existing racial dominance, not the
    cause of division.

    Noah, Young, and Kymlicka together show that neutrality leaves
    dominant norms in place (Noah 2016; Young 1989; Kymlicka 1992).

    Local leaders in cities like Houston should frame cultural activism
    as ethically necessary for fair education and job-training outcomes.

    Programmes that welcome such activism will better retain
    subordinated groups; programmes that suppress it will reproduce
    hierarchy.

    Works Cited

    Kymlicka, W. (1992) ‘The Rights of Minority Cultures: Reply to
    Kukathas’, Political Theory, 20(1), pp. 140–146. Available at:
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/191782 (Accessed: 3 November 2025).

    Noah, T. (2016) Born a Crime: Stories from a South African
    Childhood. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

    Young, I.M. (1989) ‘Polity and group difference: A critique of the
    ideal of universal citizenship’, Ethics, 99(2), pp. 250–274. Available
    at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2381434 (Accessed: 3 November
    2025).

    **## RoughDraft3Instructions.docx**

    **Professor**

    **MWP #3**

    **Rough Draft Instructions**

    **Length and Formatting:** 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, black 12-point, Times New Roman font, written in 3rd person.

    **Assignment**: Submit a completed version of your paper following the containments of the essay’s instructions.

    **What is a Rough Draft:** A rough draft is a version of your essay that is raw and unpolished, containing the main ideas put together in a coherent way. A rough draft is about making sure your ideas are present and laid out clearly (remove holes from your writing).

    **Purpose:** Writing a rough draft is an essential part of the writing process and is an opportunity to write your first ideas and thoughts on paper. The sole purpose of a rough draft is to give you a place to start to formally put together your ideas from your mind map and sentence outline. Additionally, writing a rough draft lets you gauge if you need to do more research or change the purpose of the writing. What do I need to write a rough draft?

    **Constraints:** Read and Review the essay instructions and make sure you are meeting the minimum requirements.

    1

    **## MWP3EssayInstructions.docx**

    Professor xxxx

    xxxx

    **PAPER #3:**

    **Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical Perspective on a**

    **Cultural or Ethnic Group**

    **Due: 4PM (CST), November 17th**

    **MLA or APA format acceptable**

    **Weight**: 20% of the Final Grade

    **Length and Formatting:** 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, black 12-point, Times New Roman font, written in 3rd person.

    **Brainstorming for the Essay:** Think about essays one and two write a few sentences about what Ethical Perspectives are at play in and among Social Circles, Communities, Education, and Employment within those essays. Next, in one sentence try to flesh out what Ethical Perspective Trevor Noah is pointing out, and what are the main points with which he seemed to want to leave readers. (Remember this is not a book report, you are using Trevor Noah as a starting point to help ground and provide evidence for your Synthesis.) Then, underneath each sentence list the evidence provided by each of the writers such as: examples? Numeric data? Or Something else?

    **Assignment:** What is an ethical position that the population should adopt, on the role of cultural activism in relationship to formal or informal situations among Racial Group Dominance and Subordination? Consider: The value of how social circles among cultures work, how communities view cultural activism that is not of their own native origin, how educational and employment opportunities differ.

    There is not one definitive answer here, but a range of possible positions, each of which may affect how we see and treat people who continue to survive in a socially controversial world. For example, the position that the majority population takes on this topic may influence the level of respect that your readers give to people who learn how to deal with different cultures. Or the position that you propose may ultimately influence the value with which many of your peers continue forming their own social circles, communities, education, or employment.

    · As you write your paper, you should give specific evidence from 3 of the (individual chapters) within Trevor Noah.

    · You should provide what the perspectives are within social circles, communities, education, or employment; the perspectives may overlap with one or more of the works that you cite, but even so, the highlighted position should come across clearly.

    · Include one visual to illustrate your own perspective.

    **Audience:** Imagine that your paper will be read by local city leaders who can influence the higher education and job training options in Houston. These leaders are studying the perspectives of community members like you before they do further research and then make recommendations to local leaders in education, business, and industry about the kinds of postsecondary education and/or job training to support in the coming years.

    **Research:** If you choose to obtain outside sources you are limited to 2 sources only. Do not use Google. Resources that can be used for this assignment should only be comprised of in-class text, Jstor, or the Library. If you choose to utilize quotes from these sources for this paper, you will need to make sure you are introducing the quote or quotes correctly, make sure that it is absolutely necessary to have the author's words exactly and not your own words.

    **Rationale:** Accurately and respectfully synthesizing other people’s texts is a large part of working with complex ideas and identifying your own position in relation to others’ ideas marks you as a discerning thinker and writer. These are among the skills that you will continue refining in ENGL 1302 and beyond. Additionally, this assignment gives you your most formal audience yet, and in doing so, the assignment forces you to polish your prose by the time you complete your final draft. Many, though not all, college and professional writing situations will require a writing tone that is formal but not stuffy. With Paper #3, you can practice using that tone.

    1

    **## Previousassignment_E1301.pdf**

    Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical

    Perspective on Cultural Activism under

    Racial Dominance and Subordination:

    Insights from Born a Crime

    Selected Image

    • This image illustrates the essay’s
    focus on cultural presence in
    shared spaces. It shows people
    from different racial and cultural
    backgrounds interacting freely,
    which highlights the central claim
    that multicultural communities
    function best when diverse
    identities are visible, affirmed, and
    not forced to conform to a single
    dominant norm.

    Introduction

    Multicultural societies must decide how to respond when subordinated
    racial or cultural groups assert identity or resist exclusion.

    Cultural activism (language, history, music, political speech) is often
    misread as divisive.

    Trevor Noah’s Born a Crime shows that such activism is often the only
    strategy for people formed under racial hierarchy (Noah 2016).

    Thesis: This essay argues that the population should ethically legitimize
    cultural activism, because it (1) recognizes what is owed to subordinated
    groups, (2) corrects informal exclusion in social circles, and (3) demands
    institutional inclusion in education and employment.

    Key Term 1: Ethical Recognition

    An ethical perspective asks what is owed to groups whose lives have
    been shaped by dominance and subordination.

    Young argues that when public norms come from the dominant group,
    minority claims for visibility are claims of justice, not special pleading
    (Young 1989, pp. 251–253).

    Noah shows that in apartheid/post-apartheid South Africa, rules were
    made by others, but subordinated people still had to survive inside them
    (Noah 2016, pp. 52–54).

    Therefore, the first move is active legitimation of cultural activism, not
    “neutrality,” which only protects dominant norms (Kymlicka 1992, pp.
    142–146).

    Key Term 2: Informal Belonging (Social
    Circles)

    Informal social circles are where people first feel cultural rules and
    policing.

    In “Chameleon,” Noah shows that belonging depended on
    sounding like the group and signaling the right racial position (Noah
    2016, pp. 94–97).

    Subordinated people do extra cultural work (code-switching, self-
    editing) just to be accepted.

    Ethically, when they bring in their own language or cultural
    reference, it should be read as an attempt to equalize the space,
    not to fragment it — which matters for Houston-style cohort
    programmes.

    Key Term 3: Institutional Inclusion
    (Education and Employment)

    Schools and workplaces magnify the effects of acceptance or rejection
    because they are gatekeeping institutions.

    Noah’s school stories show that institutions rewarded those closest to the
    dominant cultural template (Noah 2016, pp. 141–144; 157–160).

    Cultural associations, curriculum changes, or challenges to biased
    recruitment are not demands for favours; they are attempts to correct
    standards built without subordinated groups (Kymlicka 1992, pp. 144–
    147).

    So, an ethical stance requires building in space for culturally grounded
    leadership and recognition of minority practices.

    Conclusion

    Cultural activism is a response to existing racial dominance, not the
    cause of division.

    Noah, Young, and Kymlicka together show that neutrality leaves
    dominant norms in place (Noah 2016; Young 1989; Kymlicka 1992).

    Local leaders in cities like Houston should frame cultural activism
    as ethically necessary for fair education and job-training outcomes.

    Programmes that welcome such activism will better retain
    subordinated groups; programmes that suppress it will reproduce
    hierarchy.

    Works Cited

    Kymlicka, W. (1992) ‘The Rights of Minority Cultures: Reply to
    Kukathas’, Political Theory, 20(1), pp. 140–146. Available at:
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/191782 (Accessed: 3 November 2025).

    Noah, T. (2016) Born a Crime: Stories from a South African
    Childhood. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

    Young, I.M. (1989) ‘Polity and group difference: A critique of the
    ideal of universal citizenship’, Ethics, 99(2), pp. 250–274. Available
    at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2381434 (Accessed: 3 November
    2025).

    **## RoughDraft3Instructions.docx**

    **Professor**

    **MWP #3**

    **Rough Draft Instructions**

    **Length and Formatting:** 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, black 12-point, Times New Roman font, written in 3rd person.

    **Assignment**: Submit a completed version of your paper following the containments of the essay’s instructions.

    **What is a Rough Draft:** A rough draft is a version of your essay that is raw and unpolished, containing the main ideas put together in a coherent way. A rough draft is about making sure your ideas are present and laid out clearly (remove holes from your writing).

    **Purpose:** Writing a rough draft is an essential part of the writing process and is an opportunity to write your first ideas and thoughts on paper. The sole purpose of a rough draft is to give you a place to start to formally put together your ideas from your mind map and sentence outline. Additionally, writing a rough draft lets you gauge if you need to do more research or change the purpose of the writing. What do I need to write a rough draft?

    **Constraints:** Read and Review the essay instructions and make sure you are meeting the minimum requirements.

    1

    **## MWP3EssayInstructions.docx**

    Professor xxxx

    xxxx

    **PAPER #3:**

    **Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical Perspective on a**

    **Cultural or Ethnic Group**

    **Due: 4PM (CST), November 17th**

    **MLA or APA format acceptable**

    **Weight**: 20% of the Final Grade

    **Length and Formatting:** 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, black 12-point, Times New Roman font, written in 3rd person.

    **Brainstorming for the Essay:** Think about essays one and two write a few sentences about what Ethical Perspectives are at play in and among Social Circles, Communities, Education, and Employment within those essays. Next, in one sentence try to flesh out what Ethical Perspective Trevor Noah is pointing out, and what are the main points with which he seemed to want to leave readers. (Remember this is not a book report, you are using Trevor Noah as a starting point to help ground and provide evidence for your Synthesis.) Then, underneath each sentence list the evidence provided by each of the writers such as: examples? Numeric data? Or Something else?

    **Assignment:** What is an ethical position that the population should adopt, on the role of cultural activism in relationship to formal or informal situations among Racial Group Dominance and Subordination? Consider: The value of how social circles among cultures work, how communities view cultural activism that is not of their own native origin, how educational and employment opportunities differ.

    There is not one definitive answer here, but a range of possible positions, each of which may affect how we see and treat people who continue to survive in a socially controversial world. For example, the position that the majority population takes on this topic may influence the level of respect that your readers give to people who learn how to deal with different cultures. Or the position that you propose may ultimately influence the value with which many of your peers continue forming their own social circles, communities, education, or employment.

    · As you write your paper, you should give specific evidence from 3 of the (individual chapters) within Trevor Noah.

    · You should provide what the perspectives are within social circles, communities, education, or employment; the perspectives may overlap with one or more of the works that you cite, but even so, the highlighted position should come across clearly.

    · Include one visual to illustrate your own perspective.

    **Audience:** Imagine that your paper will be read by local city leaders who can influence the higher education and job training options in Houston. These leaders are studying the perspectives of community members like you before they do further research and then make recommendations to local leaders in education, business, and industry about the kinds of postsecondary education and/or job training to support in the coming years.

    **Research:** If you choose to obtain outside sources you are limited to 2 sources only. Do not use Google. Resources that can be used for this assignment should only be comprised of in-class text, Jstor, or the Library. If you choose to utilize quotes from these sources for this paper, you will need to make sure you are introducing the quote or quotes correctly, make sure that it is absolutely necessary to have the author's words exactly and not your own words.

    **Rationale:** Accurately and respectfully synthesizing other people’s texts is a large part of working with complex ideas and identifying your own position in relation to others’ ideas marks you as a discerning thinker and writer. These are among the skills that you will continue refining in ENGL 1302 and beyond. Additionally, this assignment gives you your most formal audience yet, and in doing so, the assignment forces you to polish your prose by the time you complete your final draft. Many, though not all, college and professional writing situations will require a writing tone that is formal but not stuffy. With Paper #3, you can practice using that tone.

    1

    **## Previousassignment_E1301.pdf**

    Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical

    Perspective on Cultural Activism under

    Racial Dominance and Subordination:

    Insights from Born a Crime

    Selected Image

    • This image illustrates the essay’s
    focus on cultural presence in
    shared spaces. It shows people
    from different racial and cultural
    backgrounds interacting freely,
    which highlights the central claim
    that multicultural communities
    function best when diverse
    identities are visible, affirmed, and
    not forced to conform to a single
    dominant norm.

    Introduction

    Multicultural societies must decide how to respond when subordinated
    racial or cultural groups assert identity or resist exclusion.

    Cultural activism (language, history, music, political speech) is often
    misread as divisive.

    Trevor Noah’s Born a Crime shows that such activism is often the only
    strategy for people formed under racial hierarchy (Noah 2016).

    Thesis: This essay argues that the population should ethically legitimize
    cultural activism, because it (1) recognizes what is owed to subordinated
    groups, (2) corrects informal exclusion in social circles, and (3) demands
    institutional inclusion in education and employment.

    Key Term 1: Ethical Recognition

    An ethical perspective asks what is owed to groups whose lives have
    been shaped by dominance and subordination.

    Young argues that when public norms come from the dominant group,
    minority claims for visibility are claims of justice, not special pleading
    (Young 1989, pp. 251–253).

    Noah shows that in apartheid/post-apartheid South Africa, rules were
    made by others, but subordinated people still had to survive inside them
    (Noah 2016, pp. 52–54).

    Therefore, the first move is active legitimation of cultural activism, not
    “neutrality,” which only protects dominant norms (Kymlicka 1992, pp.
    142–146).

    Key Term 2: Informal Belonging (Social
    Circles)

    Informal social circles are where people first feel cultural rules and
    policing.

    In “Chameleon,” Noah shows that belonging depended on
    sounding like the group and signaling the right racial position (Noah
    2016, pp. 94–97).

    Subordinated people do extra cultural work (code-switching, self-
    editing) just to be accepted.

    Ethically, when they bring in their own language or cultural
    reference, it should be read as an attempt to equalize the space,
    not to fragment it — which matters for Houston-style cohort
    programmes.

    Key Term 3: Institutional Inclusion
    (Education and Employment)

    Schools and workplaces magnify the effects of acceptance or rejection
    because they are gatekeeping institutions.

    Noah’s school stories show that institutions rewarded those closest to the
    dominant cultural template (Noah 2016, pp. 141–144; 157–160).

    Cultural associations, curriculum changes, or challenges to biased
    recruitment are not demands for favours; they are attempts to correct
    standards built without subordinated groups (Kymlicka 1992, pp. 144–
    147).

    So, an ethical stance requires building in space for culturally grounded
    leadership and recognition of minority practices.

    Conclusion

    Cultural activism is a response to existing racial dominance, not the
    cause of division.

    Noah, Young, and Kymlicka together show that neutrality leaves
    dominant norms in place (Noah 2016; Young 1989; Kymlicka 1992).

    Local leaders in cities like Houston should frame cultural activism
    as ethically necessary for fair education and job-training outcomes.

    Programmes that welcome such activism will better retain
    subordinated groups; programmes that suppress it will reproduce
    hierarchy.

    Works Cited

    Kymlicka, W. (1992) ‘The Rights of Minority Cultures: Reply to
    Kukathas’, Political Theory, 20(1), pp. 140–146. Available at:
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/191782 (Accessed: 3 November 2025).

    Noah, T. (2016) Born a Crime: Stories from a South African
    Childhood. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

    Young, I.M. (1989) ‘Polity and group difference: A critique of the
    ideal of universal citizenship’, Ethics, 99(2), pp. 250–274. Available
    at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2381434 (Accessed: 3 November
    2025).

    – 1
    – 2
    – 3

  • [Solved] Business

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    \ Screenshot2025-11-136.19.40PM1.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-11-136-19-40pm1-png-10451321 "Screenshot2025-11-136.19.40PM1.png")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    \
    Screenshot2025-11-136.19.40PM1.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2025-11-136-19-40pm1-png-10451321 "Screenshot2025-11-136.19.40PM1.png")

  • [Solved] Nursing IVC and Crisis assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    For this assignment, you will need to write in narrative form. **PLEASE NOTE THAT CUTTING AND PASTING THE INFORMATION FROM WEBSITES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT. This is very important because you may need this information quickly and not have time in an emergency to be trying to figure thi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    For this assignment, you will need to write in narrative form.   **PLEASE NOTE THAT CUTTING AND PASTING THE INFORMATION FROM WEBSITES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT.  This is very important because you may need this information quickly and not have time in an emergency to be trying to figure this out.**
    1. Identify your state
    2. Identify the process of IVC in your state in your own words, not taken from a website and pasted.
    3. Does your state have an outpatient commitment? What is the process, and what facilities in your area could a patient go to for this treatment?  Specific names of places to suggest to a patient in your area, if available, or surrounding areas.
    4. Identify the crisis intervention resources and any other services where a patient can be sent in a psychiatric emergency situation, such as a mental health facility. In your area, do you have a crisis center? Do you have a crisis line? List the resources, including the  crisis line, as follows
    XYZ Crisis Center
    phone number
    address
    hours
    referral process
    If you do not have either, say that and then document if your law enforcement officers are trained in crisis management for psychiatric emergencies.
    5.  You must use numbered titles for each section (example **1. Identify your state**) with bold font.
    It may take you some time to find this information, so plan your time accordingly.  You can call the magistrate's office, your local crisis center, or the Emergency Department to help find this information as well as any other source you find.
    State: Florida

  • [Solved] Buildings Sustainable futures

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Attachments \ IMG_5410.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5410-jpeg-10451075 "IMG_5410.jpeg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Attachments
    \
    IMG_5410.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-5410-jpeg-10451075 "IMG_5410.jpeg")

  • [Solved] psych

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering psych.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.