Editing video clips in adobe premiere pro
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Editing video clips in adobe premiere pro
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering data analytics.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
– Describe a few ways that JavaScript can be used maliciously. – What is a cookie and how can developers use/code them? – What are the security implications of cookies? – Describe terms, methods and other components you learned in this week's lesson.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– Describe a few ways that JavaScript can be used maliciously.
– What is a cookie and how can developers use/code them?
– What are the security implications of cookies?
– Describe terms, methods and other components you learned in this week's lesson.
**General Instructions for your Assignments:** During Week 1 through Week 7 of this course, you will have a new assignment each week. You should create a new set of files for each assignment. During Weeks 1 through 7 you are NOT building on your previous assignment, like you did in WEBD121. Instead …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →**General Instructions for your Assignments:**
During Week 1 through Week 7 of this course, you will have a new assignment each week. You should create a new set of files for each assignment. During Weeks 1 through 7 you are NOT building on your previous assignment, like you did in WEBD121. Instead you are creating a new set of files for each assignment. However, make sure you save all of your files from each assignment because you will need them later for your Final Project. During Week 8, for your Final Project, you will create a Home Page with a navigation menu that uses JavaScript for drop-down sub-menus, which will link all of your previous assignments together, creating a comprehensive website that showcases all of your work this semester.
You must write the code files by hand for all assignments in this class. A simple text editor, such as Notepad or Notepad++ will suffice (or TextEdit on the Mac). DO NOT use GUI editors, such as FrontPage, Dreamweaver, etc. You must write the code for your web page files yourself. If you are using a PC, it is strongly recommended that you download the free [Notepad++](https://notepad-plus-plus.org/) text editor because it contains extra features which assist with debugging, such as line numbering and color coding of different elements of syntax. **Mac users** should use the TextEdit text editor that comes with the Mac OS. However, if you are a Mac user, make sure you set [TextEdit](https://www.tekrevue.com/tip/textedit-plain-text-mode/) to use Plain Text by default.
Make sure all of your web pages comply with the HTML 5 standards and CSS standards. DO NOT use obsolete HTML elements and attributes from previous versions of HTML. By including the HTML 5 DOCTYPE declaration in your webpages, and validating all of your [HTML files,](https://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_upload) you can be sure that your code complies with HTML 5. Also, make sure that your external style sheet (.css file) passes validation at the W3C [CSS Validation](https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_upload) Service. Make sure you use the "Validate by File Upload" option (and NOT the "Validate by Direct Input" option), on both of these validators since this is the way your instructor will check your pages when grading your assignments.
**Specific Instructions for Assignment 7:**
Perform all of the following steps to complete this assignment:
1) Begin by creating a new file in your text editor and include all of the basic HTML code like you did in your previous assignments. Or you can simply make a copy of your HTML file from last week and name the new copy LastFirstAssignment7.html (where "Last" is your last name and "First" is your first name), but be careful not to overwrite your file from last week because you will need it again when you do your Final Project during Week 8.
2) Make sure you change the contents of the <title> tag to "Assignment 7" (just the words – not the quotation marks) and make sure your full name is inside of the <h1> heading, just like in your previous assignments. Also, delete the contents of the <script> tag — everything between the <!– and //–> tags, if you created your new file by making a copy of your previous file, because you will be creating a brand new page with different JavaScript code for this assignment. Save your file.
3) Upload this file to the HTML [validator](https://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_upload) to check for compliance with the HTML5 standards. Your file should pass validation. If you receive any errors or warnings, then go back through the previous steps of the assignment again until you have corrected all errors and your file passes validation.
4) Create another new file in your text editor and save it as Assignment7.css or make a copy of last week's CSS file, being careful not to overwrite last week's file.
5) In your CSS file, write code to set the background color of your page to #FFB3B3 and write code to center the h1 element. Save your CSS file.
6) Access your webpage again in your browser and confirm that your page has a pale red background and that the heading is centered. Upload your CSS file to the CSS validator to check for compliance with the CSS [standards](https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_upload). Your file should pass validation. If you receive any errors or warnings, debug your CSS code until you have corrected all errors and your file passes validation.
7) Open your Assignment 7 HTML file for editing. Next, you will reuse and slightly modify code from Lab 11-4. Make sure you change the value of "expires" to a future date. Similar to Lab 11-4, prompt the user to enter a hexidecimal color code. However, instead of prompting them for their name, prompt them to enter their age. Your code should set a cookie with the information the user enters and then retrieve that information from the cookie and set the page background to the color entered by the user.
Note: It is recommended that you test this assignment in Internet Explorer and/or Firefox. This code may not work correctly in Chrome.
8) You may add any additional HTML, CSS, or JavaScript content that you wish, to practice more of the features that you have learned about in your online textbook, as long as all of your code files still pass validation. However, do not add anything to your files that would make them invalid according to the standards. You can confirm this by making sure your files still pass validation.
9) Before submitting your assignment, validate your HTML and CSS files one last time at [Validation Service](https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_upload) AND [W3C](https://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_upload), using the "Validate by File Upload" option. **Note: It is critical that you debug and fix ALL errors identified by the validator before submitting your assignments. Contact your instructor for assistance if you are having difficulty debugging and fixing your errors because it is imperative that all of your code files pass validation.**
10) Create a zip archive containing all pages pertaining to your website (.html files, .css files, .js files, image files, etc). Make sure you maintain the necessary directory structure in your zip archive so that your webpages will refer correctly when unzipped. In other words, if your images are in a sub-folder, in relation to the folder containing your .html file, then you need to maintain that same directory structure in your zip archive, too, including the sub-folder. **Submit only the zip file for grading.**
**Validation Requirements:**
Before submitting your web site:
1. Validate your HTML file at [W3C](https://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_upload), using the "Validate by File Upload" option, and fix any errors that the validator identifies before submitting your web site for grading.
2. Validate your CSS file, using the " [Validate by File Upload](https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_upload)" option, and fix any errors that the validator identifies before submitting your web site for grading.
**Note: It is critical that you debug and fix ALL errors identified by these two code validators before submitting your assignments. Contact your instructor for assistance if you are having difficulty debugging and fixing your errors because it is imperative that your code files pass validation.** Remember that valid JavaScript relies on a foundation of valid HTML and valid CSS to function as intended.
**Submission Instructions:** Create a zip file containing all files related to your web page (.html files, .css files, .js files, image files, etc). Make sure you maintain the necessary directory structure in your zip file so that your webpages will access correctly when unzipped. In other words, if your images are in a sub-folder on your computer, in relation to the folder containing your .html file, then you need to maintain that same directory structure in your zip file, too. Submit only the zip file for grading.
In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering A-23- Article Review.
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.
The answers to the weekly discussion questions must be substantial, meaning fully answering the question(s) with examples (qualitative) and writing at least 300 words (quantitative). Lastly, a question must be posed to the course professor and peer(s) in your initial discussion board post. C&P Quest…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →The answers to the weekly discussion questions must be substantial, meaning fully answering the question(s) with examples (qualitative) and writing at least 300 words (quantitative). Lastly, a question must be posed to the course professor and peer(s) in your initial discussion board post.
C&P
Question 1
Which of the many reentry challenges that ex-prisoners face seems most likely to contribute to increased offending rather than desistance? Which ones seem most amenable to policy intervention in ways that would improve rather than worsen reentry outcomes?
Primary Literature for question 1
Garland, B., Wodahl, E., & Cota, L. (2016). Measuring public support for prisoner reentry options. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(12), 1406-1424.
Schanzenbach, D. W., Nunn, R., Bauer, L., Breitwieser, A., Mumford, M., & Nantz, G. (2016). Twelve facts about incarceration and prisoner reentry. Hamilton Project.
Visher, C. A., Lattimore, P. K., Barrick, K., & Tueller, S. (2017). Evaluating the long-term effects of prisoner reentry services on recidivism: What types of services matter?. Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 136-165.
Weisburd, D., Farrington, D. P., & Gill, C. (2017). What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: An assessment of systematic reviews. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(2), 415-449
Question 2
Discussion Question:
Discuss the importance of internal and external validity. Select an evaluation from extant literature and tell us how they preserved internal and external validity in their research design
Reading for Question 2
Practical Program Evaluation for Criminal Justice. Vito & Higgins (2014). Chapter 6
Hyatt, J. M., & Ostermann, M. (2019). Better to stay home: Evaluating the impact of day reporting centers on offending. Crime & Delinquency, 65(1), 94-121.
Bottcher, J., & Ezell, M. E. (2005). Examining the effectiveness of boot camps: A randomized experiment with a long-term follow up. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(3), 309-332.
Sherman, L. W., & Harris, H. M. (2015). Increased death rates of domestic violence victims from arresting vs. warning suspects in the Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment (MilDVE). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(1), 1-20.
Gaffney, H., Jolliffe, D., Eggins, E., Ferreira, J. G., Skinner, G., Ariel, B., & Strang, H. (2024). Protocol: The effect of restorative justice interventions for young people on offending and reoffending: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2), 1-20.
Weblinks
How to Conduct a Systematic Review [https://www.lib.uwo.ca/tutorials/how_to_perform_a_systematic_review/index.html](https://www.lib.uwo.ca/tutorials/how_to_perform_a_systematic_review/index.html)
Systematic Review Lib Guide [Steps of a Systematic Review – Systematic Review – Research Guides at University of Maryland Libraries](https://lib.guides.umd.edu/SR/steps)
– ## mandatoryfinaldraft.docx – ## Draftrhetorical.docx **## mandatoryfinaldraft.docx** **Mandatory final draft of the rhetorical analysis (this was the rough draft). Can you please turn in a new paper that builds on the old one? This teacher is giving me hell with this assignment. Just do the best …
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →– ## mandatoryfinaldraft.docx
– ## Draftrhetorical.docx
**## mandatoryfinaldraft.docx**
**Mandatory final draft of the rhetorical analysis (this was the rough draft). Can you please turn in a new paper that builds on the old one? This teacher is giving me hell with this assignment. Just do the best you can.**
Instructions
Turn in a revised and edited version of the rhetorical analysis. For revision,
1) think about appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) and your responses to them as we are discussing in class this week
2) break thoughts into unified and coherent paragraphs, connecting them with transitions, as we are also discussing this week
Edit for all of the grammar that we've discussed (sentence-level construction, modifiers, and pronouns)
**I'll grade 45% for the three body paragraphs, for unity and coherence as is related to the appeals and response to them.**
**I'll grade 25% for the intro and conclusion (standard form).**
**I'll grade 30% for editing as above.**
**I'll take a 40% penalty for work that shows little to no substantive revision.**
**## Draftrhetorical.docx**
Perry May
Frank Merksamer
English 111
**Draft of Rhetorical Analysis**
The attempt of Nike’s advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick's to use logical reasoning does not convience me to buy the product. This is because the logical connection it tries to create from the message, belief and sacrifice, does not fully support the reason for purchasing the shoes or products. The ad’s logic, "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything"(Nike, 2018), suggests that achieving the best outcomes or progress requires sticking to one's values or principles despite personal loss, which does not relate with buying the product. The creator reinforces their logical reasoning by using Kaepernick's real-life experiences as evidence since sacrifices his NFL carrer to protect against racial injustice, and slogan, “Just Do It!”. This establishes a cause-and-effect relationship that makes the ad’s argument logical and indicates Nike’s support principled risks. Although this logic makes sense, does not logically provide information about the product like the performance, quality or how purchasing the shoe actually supports the social change the slogan. The as assume that I will transfer the athlete’s moral stance into the brand, but this is an assumption that does not convience me to buy the product. In my perspective, the gap between the actual product and ad’s message keeps their logos from influencing me to consider or buy the product.
The ad’s emotional appeal strongly influences me, but this does actually make me more willing to buy Nike products. The athlete’s image and the inspiring message that resonates with me is what draws my attention and curiosity about the product. The ad uses emotionally charged visuals of Kaepernick, as the black and white close-up of the athletes, which gives the image a serious face abd intimate feeling immediately draws my attention (Nike, 2018). The inspiring message, particularly the line about “sacrificing everything” heightens the ad’s emotional impact because I can resonate with it and invokes themes of commitment, courage and pain, The ad’s visual design is also simple, allowing the quote to stand out, which can appeals to as an invidual who seek bravery and inspiration. These emotional cues works on me because they make the ad feel more personal than commercial. Often, when I feel moved or inspired by something, I naturally want to align myself with the values the brand portrays, influencing me to by the product and become part of the brand. In my onion, the emotions the ad’s message evokes, solidarity and bravery, successfully pulls me towards supporting Nike or buying the product.
As a big fan of Kaepernick, the ad’s association with him for this compaign persuades me to reconsider or buy the products. This association changes my perspective of the Nike, as it makes the brand credible and principled in a way that it can influence my decision to buy their products. The ad’s develops its credibility arounds public perception of Kaepernick's character, who is known for his integrity and activism, but his athletic skills. The central message in the ad reinforces his known act of risking his career for social justice as a courageous, making his behavior or trait a symbol of the message. The ad uses a the usual brand’s minimalist style and combines it with a recognizable slogan, 'swoosh' logo, and reputation as a leading sports brand, further adds to the ad's credibility and trust (Nike, 2018). Associating with Kaepernick makes me view Nike’s as a company that support social justice, increasing my interest in their product. Today, many brand’s priority financial gain, and influcers reputation over social issues or polictics, therefore, seeing a brand that supporting a controversial individual like Kaepernick for their moral reasoning, I view it as trustworthy and socially responsible, that’ is why the ad feels credible to me. As a young and socially conscious person, who value brands that are inclusive and support social justice issues, the use of the athlete in addition to the central message supports my final decision to buy the product and support Nike.
Works Cited
Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.).
_The rhetorical triangle: Making your communications persuasive._ Mind Tools.
[https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm)
Nike. (2018).
_Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything_ [Advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick]. Nike Inc.
UofLIFE (2013). Writing Center: Rhetorical Analysis. YouTube.
[https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg](https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg)
**## Draftrhetorical.docx**
Perry May
Frank Merksamer
English 111
**Draft of Rhetorical Analysis**
The attempt of Nike’s advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick's to use logical reasoning does not convience me to buy the product. This is because the logical connection it tries to create from the message, belief and sacrifice, does not fully support the reason for purchasing the shoes or products. The ad’s logic, "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything"(Nike, 2018), suggests that achieving the best outcomes or progress requires sticking to one's values or principles despite personal loss, which does not relate with buying the product. The creator reinforces their logical reasoning by using Kaepernick's real-life experiences as evidence since sacrifices his NFL carrer to protect against racial injustice, and slogan, “Just Do It!”. This establishes a cause-and-effect relationship that makes the ad’s argument logical and indicates Nike’s support principled risks. Although this logic makes sense, does not logically provide information about the product like the performance, quality or how purchasing the shoe actually supports the social change the slogan. The as assume that I will transfer the athlete’s moral stance into the brand, but this is an assumption that does not convience me to buy the product. In my perspective, the gap between the actual product and ad’s message keeps their logos from influencing me to consider or buy the product.
The ad’s emotional appeal strongly influences me, but this does actually make me more willing to buy Nike products. The athlete’s image and the inspiring message that resonates with me is what draws my attention and curiosity about the product. The ad uses emotionally charged visuals of Kaepernick, as the black and white close-up of the athletes, which gives the image a serious face abd intimate feeling immediately draws my attention (Nike, 2018). The inspiring message, particularly the line about “sacrificing everything” heightens the ad’s emotional impact because I can resonate with it and invokes themes of commitment, courage and pain, The ad’s visual design is also simple, allowing the quote to stand out, which can appeals to as an invidual who seek bravery and inspiration. These emotional cues works on me because they make the ad feel more personal than commercial. Often, when I feel moved or inspired by something, I naturally want to align myself with the values the brand portrays, influencing me to by the product and become part of the brand. In my onion, the emotions the ad’s message evokes, solidarity and bravery, successfully pulls me towards supporting Nike or buying the product.
As a big fan of Kaepernick, the ad’s association with him for this compaign persuades me to reconsider or buy the products. This association changes my perspective of the Nike, as it makes the brand credible and principled in a way that it can influence my decision to buy their products. The ad’s develops its credibility arounds public perception of Kaepernick's character, who is known for his integrity and activism, but his athletic skills. The central message in the ad reinforces his known act of risking his career for social justice as a courageous, making his behavior or trait a symbol of the message. The ad uses a the usual brand’s minimalist style and combines it with a recognizable slogan, 'swoosh' logo, and reputation as a leading sports brand, further adds to the ad's credibility and trust (Nike, 2018). Associating with Kaepernick makes me view Nike’s as a company that support social justice, increasing my interest in their product. Today, many brand’s priority financial gain, and influcers reputation over social issues or polictics, therefore, seeing a brand that supporting a controversial individual like Kaepernick for their moral reasoning, I view it as trustworthy and socially responsible, that’ is why the ad feels credible to me. As a young and socially conscious person, who value brands that are inclusive and support social justice issues, the use of the athlete in addition to the central message supports my final decision to buy the product and support Nike.
Works Cited
Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.).
_The rhetorical triangle: Making your communications persuasive._ Mind Tools.
[https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm)
Nike. (2018).
_Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything_ [Advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick]. Nike Inc.
UofLIFE (2013). Writing Center: Rhetorical Analysis. YouTube.
[https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg](https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg)
**## mandatoryfinaldraft.docx**
**Mandatory final draft of the rhetorical analysis (this was the rough draft). Can you please turn in a new paper that builds on the old one? This teacher is giving me hell with this assignment. Just do the best you can.**
Instructions
Turn in a revised and edited version of the rhetorical analysis. For revision,
1) think about appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) and your responses to them as we are discussing in class this week
2) break thoughts into unified and coherent paragraphs, connecting them with transitions, as we are also discussing this week
Edit for all of the grammar that we've discussed (sentence-level construction, modifiers, and pronouns)
**I'll grade 45% for the three body paragraphs, for unity and coherence as is related to the appeals and response to them.**
**I'll grade 25% for the intro and conclusion (standard form).**
**I'll grade 30% for editing as above.**
**I'll take a 40% penalty for work that shows little to no substantive revision.**
**## Draftrhetorical.docx**
Perry May
Frank Merksamer
English 111
**Draft of Rhetorical Analysis**
The attempt of Nike’s advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick's to use logical reasoning does not convience me to buy the product. This is because the logical connection it tries to create from the message, belief and sacrifice, does not fully support the reason for purchasing the shoes or products. The ad’s logic, "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything"(Nike, 2018), suggests that achieving the best outcomes or progress requires sticking to one's values or principles despite personal loss, which does not relate with buying the product. The creator reinforces their logical reasoning by using Kaepernick's real-life experiences as evidence since sacrifices his NFL carrer to protect against racial injustice, and slogan, “Just Do It!”. This establishes a cause-and-effect relationship that makes the ad’s argument logical and indicates Nike’s support principled risks. Although this logic makes sense, does not logically provide information about the product like the performance, quality or how purchasing the shoe actually supports the social change the slogan. The as assume that I will transfer the athlete’s moral stance into the brand, but this is an assumption that does not convience me to buy the product. In my perspective, the gap between the actual product and ad’s message keeps their logos from influencing me to consider or buy the product.
The ad’s emotional appeal strongly influences me, but this does actually make me more willing to buy Nike products. The athlete’s image and the inspiring message that resonates with me is what draws my attention and curiosity about the product. The ad uses emotionally charged visuals of Kaepernick, as the black and white close-up of the athletes, which gives the image a serious face abd intimate feeling immediately draws my attention (Nike, 2018). The inspiring message, particularly the line about “sacrificing everything” heightens the ad’s emotional impact because I can resonate with it and invokes themes of commitment, courage and pain, The ad’s visual design is also simple, allowing the quote to stand out, which can appeals to as an invidual who seek bravery and inspiration. These emotional cues works on me because they make the ad feel more personal than commercial. Often, when I feel moved or inspired by something, I naturally want to align myself with the values the brand portrays, influencing me to by the product and become part of the brand. In my onion, the emotions the ad’s message evokes, solidarity and bravery, successfully pulls me towards supporting Nike or buying the product.
As a big fan of Kaepernick, the ad’s association with him for this compaign persuades me to reconsider or buy the products. This association changes my perspective of the Nike, as it makes the brand credible and principled in a way that it can influence my decision to buy their products. The ad’s develops its credibility arounds public perception of Kaepernick's character, who is known for his integrity and activism, but his athletic skills. The central message in the ad reinforces his known act of risking his career for social justice as a courageous, making his behavior or trait a symbol of the message. The ad uses a the usual brand’s minimalist style and combines it with a recognizable slogan, 'swoosh' logo, and reputation as a leading sports brand, further adds to the ad's credibility and trust (Nike, 2018). Associating with Kaepernick makes me view Nike’s as a company that support social justice, increasing my interest in their product. Today, many brand’s priority financial gain, and influcers reputation over social issues or polictics, therefore, seeing a brand that supporting a controversial individual like Kaepernick for their moral reasoning, I view it as trustworthy and socially responsible, that’ is why the ad feels credible to me. As a young and socially conscious person, who value brands that are inclusive and support social justice issues, the use of the athlete in addition to the central message supports my final decision to buy the product and support Nike.
Works Cited
Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.).
_The rhetorical triangle: Making your communications persuasive._ Mind Tools.
[https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm)
Nike. (2018).
_Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything_ [Advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick]. Nike Inc.
UofLIFE (2013). Writing Center: Rhetorical Analysis. YouTube.
[https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg](https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg)
**## mandatoryfinaldraft.docx**
**Mandatory final draft of the rhetorical analysis (this was the rough draft). Can you please turn in a new paper that builds on the old one? This teacher is giving me hell with this assignment. Just do the best you can.**
Instructions
Turn in a revised and edited version of the rhetorical analysis. For revision,
1) think about appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) and your responses to them as we are discussing in class this week
2) break thoughts into unified and coherent paragraphs, connecting them with transitions, as we are also discussing this week
Edit for all of the grammar that we've discussed (sentence-level construction, modifiers, and pronouns)
**I'll grade 45% for the three body paragraphs, for unity and coherence as is related to the appeals and response to them.**
**I'll grade 25% for the intro and conclusion (standard form).**
**I'll grade 30% for editing as above.**
**I'll take a 40% penalty for work that shows little to no substantive revision.**
**## Draftrhetorical.docx**
Perry May
Frank Merksamer
English 111
**Draft of Rhetorical Analysis**
The attempt of Nike’s advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick's to use logical reasoning does not convience me to buy the product. This is because the logical connection it tries to create from the message, belief and sacrifice, does not fully support the reason for purchasing the shoes or products. The ad’s logic, "Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything"(Nike, 2018), suggests that achieving the best outcomes or progress requires sticking to one's values or principles despite personal loss, which does not relate with buying the product. The creator reinforces their logical reasoning by using Kaepernick's real-life experiences as evidence since sacrifices his NFL carrer to protect against racial injustice, and slogan, “Just Do It!”. This establishes a cause-and-effect relationship that makes the ad’s argument logical and indicates Nike’s support principled risks. Although this logic makes sense, does not logically provide information about the product like the performance, quality or how purchasing the shoe actually supports the social change the slogan. The as assume that I will transfer the athlete’s moral stance into the brand, but this is an assumption that does not convience me to buy the product. In my perspective, the gap between the actual product and ad’s message keeps their logos from influencing me to consider or buy the product.
The ad’s emotional appeal strongly influences me, but this does actually make me more willing to buy Nike products. The athlete’s image and the inspiring message that resonates with me is what draws my attention and curiosity about the product. The ad uses emotionally charged visuals of Kaepernick, as the black and white close-up of the athletes, which gives the image a serious face abd intimate feeling immediately draws my attention (Nike, 2018). The inspiring message, particularly the line about “sacrificing everything” heightens the ad’s emotional impact because I can resonate with it and invokes themes of commitment, courage and pain, The ad’s visual design is also simple, allowing the quote to stand out, which can appeals to as an invidual who seek bravery and inspiration. These emotional cues works on me because they make the ad feel more personal than commercial. Often, when I feel moved or inspired by something, I naturally want to align myself with the values the brand portrays, influencing me to by the product and become part of the brand. In my onion, the emotions the ad’s message evokes, solidarity and bravery, successfully pulls me towards supporting Nike or buying the product.
As a big fan of Kaepernick, the ad’s association with him for this compaign persuades me to reconsider or buy the products. This association changes my perspective of the Nike, as it makes the brand credible and principled in a way that it can influence my decision to buy their products. The ad’s develops its credibility arounds public perception of Kaepernick's character, who is known for his integrity and activism, but his athletic skills. The central message in the ad reinforces his known act of risking his career for social justice as a courageous, making his behavior or trait a symbol of the message. The ad uses a the usual brand’s minimalist style and combines it with a recognizable slogan, 'swoosh' logo, and reputation as a leading sports brand, further adds to the ad's credibility and trust (Nike, 2018). Associating with Kaepernick makes me view Nike’s as a company that support social justice, increasing my interest in their product. Today, many brand’s priority financial gain, and influcers reputation over social issues or polictics, therefore, seeing a brand that supporting a controversial individual like Kaepernick for their moral reasoning, I view it as trustworthy and socially responsible, that’ is why the ad feels credible to me. As a young and socially conscious person, who value brands that are inclusive and support social justice issues, the use of the athlete in addition to the central message supports my final decision to buy the product and support Nike.
Works Cited
Mind Tools Content Team. (n.d.).
_The rhetorical triangle: Making your communications persuasive._ Mind Tools.
[https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm](https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/RhetoricalTriangle.htm)
Nike. (2018).
_Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything_ [Advertisement featuring Colin Kaepernick]. Nike Inc.
UofLIFE (2013). Writing Center: Rhetorical Analysis. YouTube.
[https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg](https://youtu.be/s84EDd8jFgw?si=sXn4JPuXZxxruikg)
– 1
– 2
Enterprise MPI (E-MPI) As the assistant health information management (HIM) director of a growing health system network that currently includes 3 hospitals and 16 outpatient clinics, you are a member on the Information Systems Committee. You have been asked to oversee the development of a standardiz…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Enterprise MPI (E-MPI)
As the assistant health information management (HIM) director of a growing health system network that currently includes 3 hospitals and 16 outpatient clinics, you are a member on the Information Systems Committee. You have been asked to oversee the development of a standardized, system-wide enterprise MPI that will include all patients and their information from all encounters within the system network.
1. Research the recommend core elements of a single-entity MPI and then a multi-facility enterprise MPI. Indicate the core elements and importance for each element. Be sure to research using professional journals and list references used (e.g., Journal of AHIMA).
Please look over the attached documents for directions. Part 1 is due Thu, the other Sun. – ## JournalLit.docx **## JournalLit.docx** Writer's Journal: Plan Your Work Due Nov 23 Purpose This assignment is intended to help you learn to draft a literature review. Overview In this entry to your Writer’…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Please look over the attached documents for directions. Part 1 is due Thu, the other Sun.
– ## JournalLit.docx
**## JournalLit.docx**
Writer's Journal: Plan Your Work Due Nov 23
Purpose
This assignment is intended to help you learn to draft a literature review.
Overview
In this entry to your Writer’s Journal, you will think through the remaining steps you need to take to complete your literature review. Respond to these prompts:
· What are the remaining pieces you’d like to incorporate into your literature review?
· What are my most important priorities for completion?
· What will take the most time?
· What will take the least time?
· What help do I need?
Literature Review: Complete Draft – Peer Review Due Nov 20
Purpose
This assignment is intended to help you learn to do the following:
· Draft a literature review.
· Evaluate peers' work.
Overview
This assignment includes two steps. First, you will develop a complete draft of your literature review. Then, you will provide feedback to a peer on their draft.
**Step 1: Develop the complete draft of your literature review**
Draft your literature review according to the requirements as described in the “Complete Draft” section of the
[Literature Review Assignments and Peer Reviews](https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/23269/pages/literature-review-assignments-and-peer-review) page. You may also review the rubric for this assignment to see the criteria your peer will use to evaluate your work.
**## JournalLit.docx**
Writer's Journal: Plan Your Work Due Nov 23
Purpose
This assignment is intended to help you learn to draft a literature review.
Overview
In this entry to your Writer’s Journal, you will think through the remaining steps you need to take to complete your literature review. Respond to these prompts:
· What are the remaining pieces you’d like to incorporate into your literature review?
· What are my most important priorities for completion?
· What will take the most time?
· What will take the least time?
· What help do I need?
Literature Review: Complete Draft – Peer Review Due Nov 20
Purpose
This assignment is intended to help you learn to do the following:
· Draft a literature review.
· Evaluate peers' work.
Overview
This assignment includes two steps. First, you will develop a complete draft of your literature review. Then, you will provide feedback to a peer on their draft.
**Step 1: Develop the complete draft of your literature review**
Draft your literature review according to the requirements as described in the “Complete Draft” section of the
[Literature Review Assignments and Peer Reviews](https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/23269/pages/literature-review-assignments-and-peer-review) page. You may also review the rubric for this assignment to see the criteria your peer will use to evaluate your work.
In addition to learning about genetic disease, the purpose of this assignment is to reinforce information literacy. The American Library Association defines information literacy as a set of abilities requiring individuals to “recognize when information is needed and have the ability to locate, evalu…
Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →In addition to learning about genetic disease, the purpose of this assignment is to reinforce information literacy. The American Library Association defines information literacy as a set of abilities requiring individuals to “recognize when information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate, and use effectively the needed information.” You will be writing a 2-3-page paper about a genetic disease of your choice.