My Blog

Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] des

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Q1 topics. [Asia After World War II](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3539/modules/items/274551 "Videos/Asia After World War II") [The Korean War, A History. With Bruce Cumings](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3539/modules/items/274554 "Videos/The Korean War, A History. With Bruce Cumings -…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Q1

    topics.

    [Asia After World War II](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3539/modules/items/274551 "Videos/Asia After World War II")

    [The Korean War, A History.  With Bruce Cumings](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3539/modules/items/274554 "Videos/The Korean War, A History. With Bruce Cumings – Part 1")

    Q2

    Topics

    [American Expeditionary Forces in Siberia, Russia | 1918-1920 | US Army Documentary](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3539/modules/items/274523 "Videos/American Expeditionary Forces in Siberia, Russia | 1918-1920 | US Army Documentary")

    [1917: Lenin, Wilson, and the Birth of the New World Disorder](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3539/modules/items/274524 "Videos/1917: Lenin, Wilson, and the Birth of the New World Disorder")

    [Videos/The Korean War, A History. With Bruce Cumings – Part 1](https://ecsu.instructure.com/courses/3539/modules/items/274554 "Videos/The Korean War, A History. With Bruce Cumings – Part 1")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Asssigment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (4)** – ## Week11APPENDIXAPETPROCESSGUIDE.docx – ## w1Assgn1_Garcia_M.docx – AppendixAPETProcess2.docx – P1S1S2Assgn3-Marta-Garcia.docx **## Week11APPENDIXAPETPROCESSGUIDE.docx** Week 11 APPENDIX A PET PROCESS GUIDE Resources Be sure to review the Learning Resources before co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (4)**

    – ## Week11APPENDIXAPETPROCESSGUIDE.docx

    – ## w1Assgn1_Garcia_M.docx

    – AppendixAPETProcess2.docx
    – P1S1S2Assgn3-Marta-Garcia.docx

    **## Week11APPENDIXAPETPROCESSGUIDE.docx**

    Week 11 APPENDIX A PET PROCESS GUIDE

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/146270/modules/items/5786409)

    By Day 7 of Week 11

    **Submit** your Week 11
    **Appendix A: PET Process Guide** document.

    Complete a final Appendix A: PET Process document by addressing all the components on the Term Plan. Be sure to clearly detail your individual plans and goals related to your DNP Project as reflected during the past 11 weeks.

    **## w1Assgn1_Garcia_M.docx**

    2

    **Goals for the Term**

    Marta Lilian Garcia

    Foun Essen Doctor Nurs Practic, Walden University

    DNP Project Mentoring

    Dr. Mary Garner

    December 2, 2024

    **Goals for the Term**

    My SMART goal for this term is to complete DNP Project Phases 1 and 2. The project phases entail developing, approving, and refining the project action plan through a formal Action Plan Presentation. This will ensure that I remain on schedule to complete subsequent project implementation and data collection phases in later terms, if necessary. Specific objectives I plan to accomplish during this term include the following:

    · Refining the Project Proposal: I will be working very closely with my faculty advisor and project mentor to complete the action plan, assure alignment with the DNP Project Checklist, and make sure all materials meet standards for ethical and scholarly rigor.

    · Completion of the Ethics Pledge: After the action plan is approved by the committee, I will promptly complete the online ethics pledge and obtain the confirmation required by the SRA.

    · Scheduling and Conducting the Action Plan Presentation: Collaborate with my faculty advisor, mentor, and any stakeholders in coordinating the Microsoft Teams meeting for my Action Plan Presentation; this shall include a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation and supporting documentation for review.

    **Timeline for Goal Completion**

    To maintain steady progress, I have established the following timeline for achieving my goals:

    · Weeks 1-3: Complete the project proposal with the input of my mentor and faculty advisor. Provide draft materials for early feedback.

    · Week 4-5: Feedback Integration and Refining of Action Plan. Submission for committee review and approval of the project action plan.

    · Week 6: Complete the online ethics pledge when invited to do so by the SRA. Confirm readiness to present the action plan.

    · Week 7: The action plan presentation should be made in the meeting via Microsoft Teams and should also be recorded for documentation.

    · Week 8: Reflect on the feedback from the committee as a result of the presentation and finalize the action plan for implementation, making revisions as necessary.

    **Plans for Continued Progress**

    I will communicate problems and questions to my faculty advisor and my project mentor throughout the term on a regular basis. I also plan to provide updates on a regular basis during scheduled meetings, which helps in keeping all stakeholders aware of the progress I make towards my goals. In addition, I will use the DNP Capstone Resources website and templates for guidance of work to ensure that I meet all guidelines and requirements (Turkson‐Ocran et al., 2020).

    My SMART goal for this term is to complete all the components of Phases 1 and 2 of the DNP Project by adhering to my timeline, fulfilling the described requirements, and further successfully collaborating with my project team. This will ultimately better prepare me for a successful transition into the implementation phase, if necessary, in the next term.

    **References**

    Turkson‐Ocran, R. N., Spaulding, E. M., Renda, S., Pandian, V., Rittler, H., Davidson, P. M., Nolan, M. T., & D’Aoust, R. (2020). A 10‐year evaluation of projects in a doctor of nursing practice programme.
    _Journal of Clinical Nursing_,
    _29_(21-22), 4090–4103. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15435

    **AppendixAPETProcess2.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixapetprocess2-docx)

    **P1S1S2Assgn3-Marta-Garcia.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/p1s1s2assgn3-marta-garcia-docx)

    **P1S1S2Assgn3-Marta-Garcia.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/p1s1s2assgn3-marta-garcia-docx)

    **## Week11APPENDIXAPETPROCESSGUIDE.docx**

    Week 11 APPENDIX A PET PROCESS GUIDE

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/146270/modules/items/5786409)

    By Day 7 of Week 11

    **Submit** your Week 11
    **Appendix A: PET Process Guide** document.

    Complete a final Appendix A: PET Process document by addressing all the components on the Term Plan. Be sure to clearly detail your individual plans and goals related to your DNP Project as reflected during the past 11 weeks.

    **## w1Assgn1_Garcia_M.docx**

    2

    **Goals for the Term**

    Marta Lilian Garcia

    Foun Essen Doctor Nurs Practic, Walden University

    DNP Project Mentoring

    Dr. Mary Garner

    December 2, 2024

    **Goals for the Term**

    My SMART goal for this term is to complete DNP Project Phases 1 and 2. The project phases entail developing, approving, and refining the project action plan through a formal Action Plan Presentation. This will ensure that I remain on schedule to complete subsequent project implementation and data collection phases in later terms, if necessary. Specific objectives I plan to accomplish during this term include the following:

    · Refining the Project Proposal: I will be working very closely with my faculty advisor and project mentor to complete the action plan, assure alignment with the DNP Project Checklist, and make sure all materials meet standards for ethical and scholarly rigor.

    · Completion of the Ethics Pledge: After the action plan is approved by the committee, I will promptly complete the online ethics pledge and obtain the confirmation required by the SRA.

    · Scheduling and Conducting the Action Plan Presentation: Collaborate with my faculty advisor, mentor, and any stakeholders in coordinating the Microsoft Teams meeting for my Action Plan Presentation; this shall include a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation and supporting documentation for review.

    **Timeline for Goal Completion**

    To maintain steady progress, I have established the following timeline for achieving my goals:

    · Weeks 1-3: Complete the project proposal with the input of my mentor and faculty advisor. Provide draft materials for early feedback.

    · Week 4-5: Feedback Integration and Refining of Action Plan. Submission for committee review and approval of the project action plan.

    · Week 6: Complete the online ethics pledge when invited to do so by the SRA. Confirm readiness to present the action plan.

    · Week 7: The action plan presentation should be made in the meeting via Microsoft Teams and should also be recorded for documentation.

    · Week 8: Reflect on the feedback from the committee as a result of the presentation and finalize the action plan for implementation, making revisions as necessary.

    **Plans for Continued Progress**

    I will communicate problems and questions to my faculty advisor and my project mentor throughout the term on a regular basis. I also plan to provide updates on a regular basis during scheduled meetings, which helps in keeping all stakeholders aware of the progress I make towards my goals. In addition, I will use the DNP Capstone Resources website and templates for guidance of work to ensure that I meet all guidelines and requirements (Turkson‐Ocran et al., 2020).

    My SMART goal for this term is to complete all the components of Phases 1 and 2 of the DNP Project by adhering to my timeline, fulfilling the described requirements, and further successfully collaborating with my project team. This will ultimately better prepare me for a successful transition into the implementation phase, if necessary, in the next term.

    **References**

    Turkson‐Ocran, R. N., Spaulding, E. M., Renda, S., Pandian, V., Rittler, H., Davidson, P. M., Nolan, M. T., & D’Aoust, R. (2020). A 10‐year evaluation of projects in a doctor of nursing practice programme.
    _Journal of Clinical Nursing_,
    _29_(21-22), 4090–4103. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15435

    **AppendixAPETProcess2.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixapetprocess2-docx)

    **P1S1S2Assgn3-Marta-Garcia.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/p1s1s2assgn3-marta-garcia-docx)

    **## Week11APPENDIXAPETPROCESSGUIDE.docx**

    Week 11 APPENDIX A PET PROCESS GUIDE

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/146270/modules/items/5786409)

    By Day 7 of Week 11

    **Submit** your Week 11
    **Appendix A: PET Process Guide** document.

    Complete a final Appendix A: PET Process document by addressing all the components on the Term Plan. Be sure to clearly detail your individual plans and goals related to your DNP Project as reflected during the past 11 weeks.

    **## w1Assgn1_Garcia_M.docx**

    2

    **Goals for the Term**

    Marta Lilian Garcia

    Foun Essen Doctor Nurs Practic, Walden University

    DNP Project Mentoring

    Dr. Mary Garner

    December 2, 2024

    **Goals for the Term**

    My SMART goal for this term is to complete DNP Project Phases 1 and 2. The project phases entail developing, approving, and refining the project action plan through a formal Action Plan Presentation. This will ensure that I remain on schedule to complete subsequent project implementation and data collection phases in later terms, if necessary. Specific objectives I plan to accomplish during this term include the following:

    · Refining the Project Proposal: I will be working very closely with my faculty advisor and project mentor to complete the action plan, assure alignment with the DNP Project Checklist, and make sure all materials meet standards for ethical and scholarly rigor.

    · Completion of the Ethics Pledge: After the action plan is approved by the committee, I will promptly complete the online ethics pledge and obtain the confirmation required by the SRA.

    · Scheduling and Conducting the Action Plan Presentation: Collaborate with my faculty advisor, mentor, and any stakeholders in coordinating the Microsoft Teams meeting for my Action Plan Presentation; this shall include a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation and supporting documentation for review.

    **Timeline for Goal Completion**

    To maintain steady progress, I have established the following timeline for achieving my goals:

    · Weeks 1-3: Complete the project proposal with the input of my mentor and faculty advisor. Provide draft materials for early feedback.

    · Week 4-5: Feedback Integration and Refining of Action Plan. Submission for committee review and approval of the project action plan.

    · Week 6: Complete the online ethics pledge when invited to do so by the SRA. Confirm readiness to present the action plan.

    · Week 7: The action plan presentation should be made in the meeting via Microsoft Teams and should also be recorded for documentation.

    · Week 8: Reflect on the feedback from the committee as a result of the presentation and finalize the action plan for implementation, making revisions as necessary.

    **Plans for Continued Progress**

    I will communicate problems and questions to my faculty advisor and my project mentor throughout the term on a regular basis. I also plan to provide updates on a regular basis during scheduled meetings, which helps in keeping all stakeholders aware of the progress I make towards my goals. In addition, I will use the DNP Capstone Resources website and templates for guidance of work to ensure that I meet all guidelines and requirements (Turkson‐Ocran et al., 2020).

    My SMART goal for this term is to complete all the components of Phases 1 and 2 of the DNP Project by adhering to my timeline, fulfilling the described requirements, and further successfully collaborating with my project team. This will ultimately better prepare me for a successful transition into the implementation phase, if necessary, in the next term.

    **References**

    Turkson‐Ocran, R. N., Spaulding, E. M., Renda, S., Pandian, V., Rittler, H., Davidson, P. M., Nolan, M. T., & D’Aoust, R. (2020). A 10‐year evaluation of projects in a doctor of nursing practice programme.
    _Journal of Clinical Nursing_,
    _29_(21-22), 4090–4103. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15435

    **AppendixAPETProcess2.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/appendixapetprocess2-docx)

    **P1S1S2Assgn3-Marta-Garcia.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/p1s1s2assgn3-marta-garcia-docx)

  • [Solved] Article review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Help with Article Review – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## articlereviewinsructions.docx – ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf **## articlereviewinsructions.docx** You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by s…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Help with Article Review

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## articlereviewinsructions.docx

    – ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf

    **## articlereviewinsructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalidentitydevelopmentarticle2-pdf-10182569)

    **ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalidentitydevelopmentarticle2-pdf-10182569)

    **## articlereviewinsructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalidentitydevelopmentarticle2-pdf-10182569)

    **## articlereviewinsructions.docx**

    You will write an article review, relevant to this week's learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases. The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

    The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

    **Reference.** Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

    **Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:**

    · A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)

    · The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)

    · A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don't know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer

    · The purpose of the present study

    · The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.

    · State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?

    · What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?

    · Why was it important to publish these ideas?

    **Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:**

    · The
    **participants** and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).

    · The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study

    · A description of the
    **tools/measures** used and research design employed.

    · A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

    **Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:**

    · Specific demographic characteristics of the sample

    · A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses

    · If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?

    · If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted "stand alone" (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

    **Discussion. The discussion is where the author "wraps up the research". This section should include:**

    · A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found

    · Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?

    · A discussion of how the author's findings compares to those found in prior research

    · The limitations of the study

    · The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

    **Critique.**

    In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about
    **your impressions** and the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    ·

    . Were the findings important to a reader?

    . Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?

    . If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

    **Conclusion.**

    Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

    **APA Format Review**

    If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

    **Grading Criteria**

    I will grade your paper based upon:

    · How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)

    · How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique

    · How accurately you used APA format

    · your organization, grammar, and spelling

    · Integration of assigned weekly readings

    **ProfessionalIdentityDevelopmentArticle2.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/professionalidentitydevelopmentarticle2-pdf-10182569)

  • [Solved] c mitchell

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    . How did the Russian Empire change the lives of its conquered peoples and the land itself? 2. What were some of the distinct features of the empire established by the Qing Dynasty? 3. What were some of the distinct features of the Mughal Empire? 4. What was the significance of the Ottoman Empire …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    . How did the Russian Empire change the lives of its conquered peoples and the land itself?

    2.  What were some of the distinct features of the empire established by the Qing Dynasty?

    3. What were some of the distinct features of the Mughal Empire?

    4.  What was the significance of the Ottoman Empire in the early modern world?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] tina

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **critically** addressing some aspect of the required reading In either case, you should try to make a point by supporting a **contested** claim with reasons and supporting your reasons with evidence (or **by organizing facts logically)**. Do not write a descriptive paragraph either making random co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **critically**  addressing some aspect of the required reading

    In either case, you should try to make a point by supporting a **contested** claim with reasons and supporting your reasons with evidence (or **by organizing facts logically)**.  Do not write a descriptive paragraph either making random comments or  merely providing information without using it to support a claim.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Hypothetical case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Create a [hypothetical case](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/files/14079069?wrap=1 "PM Hypothetical Case Study Project Rubric.pdf") [s](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/pages/module-8-part-3-assignments?module_item_id=3524687#) tudy of a performance issue in an organization. The f…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Create a [hypothetical case](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/files/14079069?wrap=1 "PM Hypothetical Case Study Project Rubric.pdf") [s](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/pages/module-8-part-3-assignments?module_item_id=3524687#) tudy  of a performance issue in an organization. The final document should be 8-11 pages, 12 point font, single spaced, and you are encouraged to be creative in how to display the information as if this was a case study that you were going to share with your hypothetical company.

    Here are the major sections that will be required for your case study:

    1. **Executive Summary** – Provide a less-than-1-page summary of the (hypothetical) performance management project, as if an executive of the organization only has 2 minutes to read it. This should be written in plain language (no behavioral jargon). Include the purpose of the document, the major points, results, and recommendations. Writing this is best saved for last, but should be included as the stand alone first page of your case report. Feel free to look online for examples of executive summary documents for inspiration.
    2. **The Problem (1-2 pages, single spaced)**
    1. **Describe the Organization** – Include the hypothetical company name, location(s), industry, products/services provided, years in operation, and number of employees. How is the organization performing as a whole? Is there anything unique about it?
    2. **Pinpoint the Performance Issue** – Select a hypothetical performance issue to assess. Pinpoint the behavior associated with the performance, and describe the outputs of that performance. Ensure any pinpoints are specific and pass the “dead person’s test”! Were leaders in the organization using any labels/generalities/states to describe the issue? How did you address that? How did the organization discover the issue?
    3. **Describe Why It Matters** – Why does this performance matter? Describe potential impacts to the business, the staff, the clients/customers, and society as a whole.
    4. **Why is PM the Appropriate Solution** – Describe to the team what Performance Management is (briefly) and describe why behavior science is the best choice for helping resolve this issue.
    3. **The Assessments (3-4 pages, single spaced, not including the PDC and ABC table)**
    1. **Historical Assessment –** Briefly describe the purpose and process of conducting a historical assessment. Describe the organizational documents you would review to influence your interventions. Are there past performance data available, and what does it look like? Are there industry or organizational standards/policies that need to be taken into consideration? Specify at least 3 sources of historical information you would seek out related to the performance.
    2. **Indirect Assessment 1 –** Describe the process you would complete to conduct a Performance Diagnostic checklist, and what the purpose of the tool is. Who would you interview? How many people? Complete the PDC checklist for one hypothetical interview, and provide the completed checklist with your case report.
    3. **Indirect Assessment 2 –** Describe the process of conducting a PICNIC™ analysis, and what the purpose of the analysis is. Who would you interview? Complete an analysis of the undesired performance and the desired performance, including at least 5 potential consequences for each and their PICNIC™ labels. Include the ABC table with your case study.
    4. **Direct Assessment –** After completing your indirect assessments, what would direct observation of the performance issue look like? Describe how you would collect data on the behavior of interest. Are these fundamental, derived, or some other type of measure? How would you control for reactivity of staff? What MOs might be impacting staff? Refer back to your course readings.
    5. **Preference Assessment –** Include an assessment of staff preferences for potential reinforcers in your process. How will you conduct the preference assessment for staff? How often? Include a brief example of the tool you will use to assess, and include at least 10 items/experiences in your array.
    4. **The Solutions (1-2 pages, single spaced)**
    1. **Antecedent Interventions** – Describe the current antecedents that you discovered during your assessment. Are they effective? How would you change the existing antecedents, and what antecedents would you add to the environment to help improve performance? Describe at least 3 antecedent intervention suggestions. Refer back to your assessments and readings to justify your selections.
    2. **Consequence Interventions** – Describe the current consequences that you discovered during your assessment. Are they effective? How would you change the existing consequence systems, and what additional consequences would you add to encourage staff performance? Describe at least 3 consequence intervention suggestions. Refer back to your assessments and readings to justify your selections.
    3. **Selected Interventions** – Choose one antecedent and one consequence intervention that you believe will be the most effective, given the results of the assessment. Describe the hypothesized cost and resources required for implementation.
    5. **The Results (1-2 pages (with graphs), single spaced)**
    1. Create a hypothetical graph of the performance of an employee, and add 2 phase change lines as if you had chosen to intervene with your antecedent and consequence. Do you think the interventions would work?
    2. Create a hypothetical graph of a business result (revenue, productivity, expenses, staff/client satisfaction, etc.) related to the performance, and add the same phase changes. Would business result changes be apparent immediately after staff performance changed?
    3. Briefly describe the result of your intervention. Did either of the interventions work? If no, why? If yes, how did the organization benefit from your intervention?
    6. **Summary (<1 page, single spaced)**

    Provide a short summary and description of what you learned of from your hypothetical project.

    —

    To be successful  ensure that you review the [project](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/files/14079069?wrap=1 "PM Hypothetical Case Study Project Rubric.pdf") rubric. [Actions](https://uwf.instructure.com/courses/58183/pages/module-8-part-3-assignments?module_item_id=3524687#) and make sure your final product meets the following criteria:

    – Project contains less than 3 grammatical or spelling errors
    – Citations are in APA format, and
    – are used throughout the document to justify and support the case study.
    – No fewer than 10 citations/references from the course or other peer-reviewed journals are included.

    **Executive Summary:**

    – Is less than 1 page,
    – written in plain language, and
    – contains a summary of purpose, major points, results, and recommendations.

    **Problem:**

    – Includes the description of the organization,
    – behavior and output pinpoints that pass “the dead person’s test”,
    – why it matters, and
    – why PM is the appropriate solution.

    **Assessment:**

    – Includes the purpose and process for all assessments.
    – 3 sources of historical information are included for the historical assessment.

    **PICNIC:**

    – ABC table is included and
    – includes both desired and undesired behavior for analysis, and
    – 5 categorized consequences for each.

    **Performance Diagnostic Checklist:**

    – Completed PDC checklist is provided.

    **Preference assessment:**

    – Preference assessment is included,
    – 10 items/experiences are in the array, and
    – describes the procedure for conducting the assessment.

    **Solutions:**

    – Current antecedents and consequences are described based on the assessment.
    – 3 interventions for each are selected.
    – 2 final interventions are included, with the costs and resources required described.

    **Results:**

    – Includes one behavior graph with phase change lines,
    – one business result graph, and
    – a brief description of the hypothetical result.

    Bonus points are available as well!

    **+5 Bonus**: Is formatted in a professional or creative manner AND includes a performance or permanent product checklist in the direct observation assessment section.

    or

    **+3 Bonus**: Is formatted in a professional or creative manner OR includes a performance or permanent product checklist in the direct observation assessment section.

    – [\
    \
    PMHypotheticalCaseStudyProjectRubric.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/pmhypotheticalcasestudyprojectrubric-pdf-10182485 "PMHypotheticalCaseStudyProjectRubric.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] writing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## PPTWeek4WebsiteEvaluation11.pptx **## PPTWeek4WebsiteEvaluation11.pptx** Website Evaluation Using Your Population Health Topic (By: Your Name) Government or Organizational Name Authority Accuracy Bias/Objectivity Currency/Timeliness Coverage Usefulness Popular Websit…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## PPTWeek4WebsiteEvaluation11.pptx

    **## PPTWeek4WebsiteEvaluation11.pptx**

    Website Evaluation Using Your Population Health Topic (By: Your Name)

    Government or Organizational Name

    Authority

    Accuracy

    Bias/Objectivity

    Currency/Timeliness

    Coverage

    Usefulness

    Popular Website Name

    Authority

    Accuracy

    Bias/Objectivity

    Currency/Timeliness

    Coverage

    Usefulness

    Review your two chosen websites on your population health topic using criteria and resources in Week 4. Based on the criteria will you recommend to Trust it or Trash it.

    **## PPTWeek4WebsiteEvaluation11.pptx**

    Website Evaluation Using Your Population Health Topic (By: Your Name)

    Government or Organizational Name

    Authority

    Accuracy

    Bias/Objectivity

    Currency/Timeliness

    Coverage

    Usefulness

    Popular Website Name

    Authority

    Accuracy

    Bias/Objectivity

    Currency/Timeliness

    Coverage

    Usefulness

    Review your two chosen websites on your population health topic using criteria and resources in Week 4. Based on the criteria will you recommend to Trust it or Trash it.

  • [Solved] CRITIQUE

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    look at the attachment – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## RANDOMIZEDCONTROLTRIALCRITIQUEANDLITERATUREREVIEWTABLEPURPOSE.pdf **## RANDOMIZEDCONTROLTRIALCRITIQUEANDLITERATUREREVIEWTABLEPURPOSE.pdf** RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL CRITIQUE AND LITERATURE REVIEW TABLE PURPOSE "The impact of Multimodal Analgesia…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    look at the attachment

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## RANDOMIZEDCONTROLTRIALCRITIQUEANDLITERATUREREVIEWTABLEPURPOSE.pdf

    **## RANDOMIZEDCONTROLTRIALCRITIQUEANDLITERATUREREVIEWTABLEPURPOSE.pdf**

    RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL CRITIQUE AND LITERATURE REVIEW TABLE
    PURPOSE

    "The impact of Multimodal Analgesia on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and
    Pain Control in surgical Patients"

    The general purpose of a research critique is to enable the researcher to refine and
    improve their research endeavors. It has the function of enhancing the researcher's
    knowledge and competencies so that they can discover scientific and humanistic truths.

    Using a review matrix enables the researcher to quickly compare and contrast articles in
    order to determine the scope of research across time. A review matrix can help the
    researcher more easily spot differences and similarities between journal articles about a
    research topic.

    TASK

    Complete a critique of randomized control articles for your quality improvement project.
    Find 4 published peer -reviewed articles with within 5 years in a peer-reviewed journal
    of your choice. In a 10 – 15 page paper (does NOT include Literature review chart
    with 4 randomized control studies, the title page and reference page), use the
    following resources for the assignment. Do a boolean search and write a methodology
    See instructions Literature searching for Practice Research.pdf . Please follow this
    article for the methodology: 12-step-guideline-for-authors (4).pdf

    Use the following data toolkits:

    • Chapter 4 – Toolkit.docx
    • Chapter 5 – Toolkit.docx

    To evaluate the evidence by answering the questions on the forms. Answer the
    following questions in essay format for each article while completing the critique: Do not
    place these questions in the paper: it will increase the Turnitin Score. Simply answer the
    question in narrative form.

    1. Did the review explicitly address a sensible question? (30 points) The
    systematic review should address a specific question that indicates the
    patient problem (PICO), the exposure and one or more outcomes. General
    reviews, which usually do not address specific questions, may be too broad to
    provide an answer to the clinical question for which you are seeking
    information.

    2. Was the search for relevant studies detailed and exhaustive? (20 points)
    Researchers should conduct a thorough search of appropriate bibliographic
    databases. The databases and search strategies should be outlined in the
    methodology section. Researchers should also show evidence of searching
    for non-published evidence by contacting experts in the field. Cited references
    at the end of articles should also be checked.

    3. Were the primary studies of high methodological quality? (20 points)
    Researchers should evaluate the validity of each study included in the
    systematic review. The same EBP criteria used to critically appraise studies
    should be used to evaluate studies to be included in the systematic review.

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/modules/1604157](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/modules/1604157)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/35166418?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/35166418?wrap=1)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/35166135?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/35166135?wrap=1)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899881?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899881?wrap=1)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899869?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899869?wrap=1)

    Differences in study results may be explained by differences in methodology
    and study design. Did they use high-level studies (hierarchy of levels of
    evidence)?

    4. Complete Literature review chart with 4 randomized control studies less
    than 5 years pertaining to your quality improvement project subject matter.
    Literature Review Matrix Template.docx. No copy and paste from article,
    summarize the information. Chart must be in AMA format. Review Text.

    Grammar, Spelling, Sentence Structure, and AMA Format (30 points) The Critique
    must be in a narrative format and have a scholarly flow, must follow strict AMA
    guidelines, and be submitted through its assigned dropbox which is integrated with
    Turnitin. The paper will be graded and your score will be available after the due date.

    Late assignments will receive a zero (0)

    Guidelines:

    10 – 15 page paper (does NOT include the title page and reference page)

    • Use AMA Style Format AMA.pdf / EndNote
    • Turnitin Similarity score should be 25% or less for Plagiarism and AI. (See

    Accessing the Similarity Report.)
    • Use Grammarly – submit report with paper
    • Refer to the following rubric for the grading criteria.
    • No screenshots or jpg, png allowed

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899840?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899840?wrap=1)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899852/download?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899852/download?wrap=1)

    [https://help.turnitin.com/feedback-studio/canvas/plagiarism-framework/student/the-similarity-report/accessing-the-similarity-report.htm](https://help.turnitin.com/feedback-studio/canvas/plagiarism-framework/student/the-similarity-report/accessing-the-similarity-report.htm)

    **## RANDOMIZEDCONTROLTRIALCRITIQUEANDLITERATUREREVIEWTABLEPURPOSE.pdf**

    RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL CRITIQUE AND LITERATURE REVIEW TABLE
    PURPOSE

    "The impact of Multimodal Analgesia on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and
    Pain Control in surgical Patients"

    The general purpose of a research critique is to enable the researcher to refine and
    improve their research endeavors. It has the function of enhancing the researcher's
    knowledge and competencies so that they can discover scientific and humanistic truths.

    Using a review matrix enables the researcher to quickly compare and contrast articles in
    order to determine the scope of research across time. A review matrix can help the
    researcher more easily spot differences and similarities between journal articles about a
    research topic.

    TASK

    Complete a critique of randomized control articles for your quality improvement project.
    Find 4 published peer -reviewed articles with within 5 years in a peer-reviewed journal
    of your choice. In a 10 – 15 page paper (does NOT include Literature review chart
    with 4 randomized control studies, the title page and reference page), use the
    following resources for the assignment. Do a boolean search and write a methodology
    See instructions Literature searching for Practice Research.pdf . Please follow this
    article for the methodology: 12-step-guideline-for-authors (4).pdf

    Use the following data toolkits:

    • Chapter 4 – Toolkit.docx
    • Chapter 5 – Toolkit.docx

    To evaluate the evidence by answering the questions on the forms. Answer the
    following questions in essay format for each article while completing the critique: Do not
    place these questions in the paper: it will increase the Turnitin Score. Simply answer the
    question in narrative form.

    1. Did the review explicitly address a sensible question? (30 points) The
    systematic review should address a specific question that indicates the
    patient problem (PICO), the exposure and one or more outcomes. General
    reviews, which usually do not address specific questions, may be too broad to
    provide an answer to the clinical question for which you are seeking
    information.

    2. Was the search for relevant studies detailed and exhaustive? (20 points)
    Researchers should conduct a thorough search of appropriate bibliographic
    databases. The databases and search strategies should be outlined in the
    methodology section. Researchers should also show evidence of searching
    for non-published evidence by contacting experts in the field. Cited references
    at the end of articles should also be checked.

    3. Were the primary studies of high methodological quality? (20 points)
    Researchers should evaluate the validity of each study included in the
    systematic review. The same EBP criteria used to critically appraise studies
    should be used to evaluate studies to be included in the systematic review.

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/modules/1604157](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/modules/1604157)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/35166418?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/35166418?wrap=1)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/35166135?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/35166135?wrap=1)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899881?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899881?wrap=1)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899869?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899869?wrap=1)

    Differences in study results may be explained by differences in methodology
    and study design. Did they use high-level studies (hierarchy of levels of
    evidence)?

    4. Complete Literature review chart with 4 randomized control studies less
    than 5 years pertaining to your quality improvement project subject matter.
    Literature Review Matrix Template.docx. No copy and paste from article,
    summarize the information. Chart must be in AMA format. Review Text.

    Grammar, Spelling, Sentence Structure, and AMA Format (30 points) The Critique
    must be in a narrative format and have a scholarly flow, must follow strict AMA
    guidelines, and be submitted through its assigned dropbox which is integrated with
    Turnitin. The paper will be graded and your score will be available after the due date.

    Late assignments will receive a zero (0)

    Guidelines:

    10 – 15 page paper (does NOT include the title page and reference page)

    • Use AMA Style Format AMA.pdf / EndNote
    • Turnitin Similarity score should be 25% or less for Plagiarism and AI. (See

    Accessing the Similarity Report.)
    • Use Grammarly – submit report with paper
    • Refer to the following rubric for the grading criteria.
    • No screenshots or jpg, png allowed

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899840?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899840?wrap=1)

    [https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899852/download?wrap=1](https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/218448/files/33899852/download?wrap=1)

    [https://help.turnitin.com/feedback-studio/canvas/plagiarism-framework/student/the-similarity-report/accessing-the-similarity-report.htm](https://help.turnitin.com/feedback-studio/canvas/plagiarism-framework/student/the-similarity-report/accessing-the-similarity-report.htm)

  • [Solved] brumsey

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Students will identify the cultures and societies (plural) of the United States. – Students will evaluate the place of the United States within a larger global context. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Students will identify the cultures and societies (plural) of the United States.
    – Students will evaluate the place of the United States within a larger global context.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] lorem, ipsum

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    nursing – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## NursingProcessTableTemplate….docx **## NursingProcessTableTemplate….docx** This assignment addresses the following objective: · Evaluate caring, compassionate, culturally competent, and evidence-based practices in the roles of the nurse using the nursing …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    nursing

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## NursingProcessTableTemplate….docx

    **## NursingProcessTableTemplate….docx**

    This assignment addresses the following objective:

    · Evaluate caring, compassionate, culturally competent, and evidence-based practices in the roles of the nurse using the nursing process to provide patient-centered care in a variety of healthcare settings.

    The goal of this assignment is to describe one nursing practice issue/problem and how it can be addressed through patient-centered care of the individual, family, and community using evidence-based care that is compassionate and culturally competent.

    1. Please download and use the Nursing Process Table template document attached below to complete this assignment. Please type directly into the table and include citations within the table as directed.

    2. A minimum of 4 scholarly references within the past 5 years are required (One for the nursing problem (Part 1) and one for each evidence-based intervention (Part 2).

    3. This assignment should include a list of references in APA format at the bottom of the template document (Part 3).

    Complete this assignment and submit it to this assignment Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.

    Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

    Nursing Process Table Template Instructions

    Part 1- Describe the Nursing Problem/Issue

    Using the attached Nursing Process Table template document, describe one current nursing practice issue/problem of choice that can be addressed at the individual, family, and community level.  Include definition, prevalence, and one nursing goal of addressing the issue. Provide at least one citation for Part 1.  Please type directly into the table.

    Part 2:  Care Plan Interventions

    Using the attached Nursing Process Table template document, describe how your identified nursing care issue/problem can be addressed for an individual, family, and community.  Provide a minimum of one citation within the table for each evidence-based intervention in Column 1. Please type directly into the table.

    **Column 1:**  Describe one evidence-based nursing intervention for care of each group (the individual, family, and community) with citation.

    **Column 2:**  Describe how the EBP intervention reflects compassionate care for each group (the individual, family, and community) with citations optional.

    **Column 3:**  Describe how the EBP intervention reflects culturally competent care for each group (the individual, family, and community) with citations optional.

    Part 3:  APA Reference List

    Using the attached Nursing Process Table template document, please provide a minimum of 4 APA references that correspond with citations within the table.  Use APA format.

    **NU 601 Assignment – Unit 5**

    **Nursing Process Table Template**

    **Instructions:**

    1. Please download and use this Nursing Process Table template document to complete this assignment. Please type directly into the table and include citations within the table as directed.

    2. A minimum of 4 scholarly references within the past 5 years are required (One for the nursing problem (Part 1) and one for each evidence-based intervention (Part 2).

    3.
    **This assignment should include a list of references in APA format at the bottom of the template document (Part 3).**

    ****NAME OF STUDENT:****

    ****Nursing Process Table Template Instructions:****

    ****Part 1- Describe the Nursing Problem/Issue****

    **Complete the table below and describe one current nursing practice issue/problem of choice that can be addressed at the individual, family, and community level. Include definition, prevalence, and one nursing goal of addressing the issue. Provide at least one citation for Part 1. Please type directly into the table.**

    **| | | |**
    **| — | — | — |**
    **| **Table**<br>**Part 1** | | **Type Answers in the Spaces below** |**
    **| | **Define/describe the nursing Practice issue/problem including prevalence (with citation)** | |**
    **| | **Provide one nursing goal of addressing the issue** | |**

    ****Part 2:** **Care Plan Interventions****

    **Complete the table below to describe how your identified nursing care issue/problem can be addressed for an individual, family, and community. Provide a minimum of one citation within the table for each evidence-based intervention in Column 1. Please type directly into the table.**

    ****Column 1:** Describe one evidence-based nursing intervention for care of each group (the individual, family, and community) with citation.**

    ****Column 2:** Describe how the EBP intervention reflects compassionate care for each group (the individual, family, and community) with citations optional.**

    ****Column 3:** Describe how the EBP intervention reflects culturally competent care for each group (the individual, family, and community) with citations optional.**

    **| | | | |**
    **| — | — | — | — |**
    **| **Table**<br>**Part 2** | **Column 1** | **Column 2** | **Column 3** |**
    **| | **Describe the Evidence-based Intervention with citation**<br>**(3 separate interventions; 1 for each group)** | **Describe how it reflects Compassionate Care** | **Describe how it reflects Culturally Competent**<br>**Care** |**
    **| **Care of an Individual** | | | |**
    **| **Care of a Family** | | | |**
    **| **Care of a Community** | | | |**

    ****Part 3: APA Reference List****

    **Please provide a minimum of 4 APA references that correspond with citations within the table. Use APA format.**

    ****References****

    **## NursingProcessTableTemplate….docx**

    This assignment addresses the following objective:

    · Evaluate caring, compassionate, culturally competent, and evidence-based practices in the roles of the nurse using the nursing process to provide patient-centered care in a variety of healthcare settings.

    The goal of this assignment is to describe one nursing practice issue/problem and how it can be addressed through patient-centered care of the individual, family, and community using evidence-based care that is compassionate and culturally competent.

    1. Please download and use the Nursing Process Table template document attached below to complete this assignment. Please type directly into the table and include citations within the table as directed.

    2. A minimum of 4 scholarly references within the past 5 years are required (One for the nursing problem (Part 1) and one for each evidence-based intervention (Part 2).

    3. This assignment should include a list of references in APA format at the bottom of the template document (Part 3).

    Complete this assignment and submit it to this assignment Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.

    Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

    Nursing Process Table Template Instructions

    Part 1- Describe the Nursing Problem/Issue

    Using the attached Nursing Process Table template document, describe one current nursing practice issue/problem of choice that can be addressed at the individual, family, and community level.  Include definition, prevalence, and one nursing goal of addressing the issue. Provide at least one citation for Part 1.  Please type directly into the table.

    Part 2:  Care Plan Interventions

    Using the attached Nursing Process Table template document, describe how your identified nursing care issue/problem can be addressed for an individual, family, and community.  Provide a minimum of one citation within the table for each evidence-based intervention in Column 1. Please type directly into the table.

    **Column 1:**  Describe one evidence-based nursing intervention for care of each group (the individual, family, and community) with citation.

    **Column 2:**  Describe how the EBP intervention reflects compassionate care for each group (the individual, family, and community) with citations optional.

    **Column 3:**  Describe how the EBP intervention reflects culturally competent care for each group (the individual, family, and community) with citations optional.

    Part 3:  APA Reference List

    Using the attached Nursing Process Table template document, please provide a minimum of 4 APA references that correspond with citations within the table.  Use APA format.

    **NU 601 Assignment – Unit 5**

    **Nursing Process Table Template**

    **Instructions:**

    1. Please download and use this Nursing Process Table template document to complete this assignment. Please type directly into the table and include citations within the table as directed.

    2. A minimum of 4 scholarly references within the past 5 years are required (One for the nursing problem (Part 1) and one for each evidence-based intervention (Part 2).

    3.
    **This assignment should include a list of references in APA format at the bottom of the template document (Part 3).**

    ****NAME OF STUDENT:****

    ****Nursing Process Table Template Instructions:****

    ****Part 1- Describe the Nursing Problem/Issue****

    **Complete the table below and describe one current nursing practice issue/problem of choice that can be addressed at the individual, family, and community level. Include definition, prevalence, and one nursing goal of addressing the issue. Provide at least one citation for Part 1. Please type directly into the table.**

    **| | | |**
    **| — | — | — |**
    **| **Table**<br>**Part 1** | | **Type Answers in the Spaces below** |**
    **| | **Define/describe the nursing Practice issue/problem including prevalence (with citation)** | |**
    **| | **Provide one nursing goal of addressing the issue** | |**

    ****Part 2:** **Care Plan Interventions****

    **Complete the table below to describe how your identified nursing care issue/problem can be addressed for an individual, family, and community. Provide a minimum of one citation within the table for each evidence-based intervention in Column 1. Please type directly into the table.**

    ****Column 1:** Describe one evidence-based nursing intervention for care of each group (the individual, family, and community) with citation.**

    ****Column 2:** Describe how the EBP intervention reflects compassionate care for each group (the individual, family, and community) with citations optional.**

    ****Column 3:** Describe how the EBP intervention reflects culturally competent care for each group (the individual, family, and community) with citations optional.**

    **| | | | |**
    **| — | — | — | — |**
    **| **Table**<br>**Part 2** | **Column 1** | **Column 2** | **Column 3** |**
    **| | **Describe the Evidence-based Intervention with citation**<br>**(3 separate interventions; 1 for each group)** | **Describe how it reflects Compassionate Care** | **Describe how it reflects Culturally Competent**<br>**Care** |**
    **| **Care of an Individual** | | | |**
    **| **Care of a Family** | | | |**
    **| **Care of a Community** | | | |**

    ****Part 3: APA Reference List****

    **Please provide a minimum of 4 APA references that correspond with citations within the table. Use APA format.**

    ****References****