Tag: PayPal Instant Download

  • [Solved] nursing, nursing process

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    need help better understanding nursing assignment/theory – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    need help better understanding nursing assignment/theory

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Discussion: Focus on the Family

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ IMG_0230.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0230-jpeg-10183921 "IMG_0230.jpeg") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    IMG_0230.jpeg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0230-jpeg-10183921 "IMG_0230.jpeg")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Nursing NUR 501/600 DISCUSSION AND ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need your assist in proof reading my assignment. Thanks! – 2 years ago **files (4)** – ## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages – ## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages – ## NUR501600DISWK5.pdf – ## NUR501600PPWK5.pdf **## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages** ## Data/PresetImageFill3-26.jpg ## Data/PresetImageFill2-25.jpg ##…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need your assist in proof reading my assignment. Thanks!

    – 2 years ago

    **files (4)**

    – ## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages

    – ## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages

    – ## NUR501600DISWK5.pdf

    – ## NUR501600PPWK5.pdf

    **## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages**

    ## Data/PresetImageFill3-26.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill2-25.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill1-24.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill5-28.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill4-27.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill0-23.jpg

    ## Data/bullet_gbutton_gray-29.png

    ## preview.jpg

    **## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages**

    ## Data/PresetImageFill3-26.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill2-25.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill1-24.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill5-28.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill4-27.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill0-23.jpg

    ## Data/bullet_gbutton_gray-29.png

    ## preview.jpg

    **## NUR501600DISWK5.pdf**

    Principles of Research and Evidence-Based Practice

    Discuss the principles of research and evidence-based practice and how to effectively
    implement them for advanced practice nurses.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Treatments for Gastrointestinal & Endocrine Disorders

    Based on Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the
    following questions:

    1. Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment
    recommendations

    2. Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management

    3. Compare and contrast Crohn's disease and Ulcerative colitis

    4. Discuss Diabetes, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

    an essay format.

    ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

    followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-5-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-5-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1)

    **## NUR501600PPWK5.pdf**

    Drug PowerPoint Presentation

    For this week you will present a voiceover Powerpoint presentation (with the video on)
    on your drug of choice. You are to be dressed in office attire. The purpose of the
    presentation is for you to educate your colleagues on the drug you have selected. The
    presentation must include information about the:

    • Drug pharmacology, pharmacokinetics

    • Brand name

    • Generic name

    • Dosing

    • Indications for use

    • Side effects

    • Contraindications

    • Pregnancy class

    • You must also perform a cost analysis of the drug.

    • Provide a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you

    have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies
    related to the drug.

    • Describe the appropriate patient education.

    • What is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this

    patient on your case study presentation?

    • Describe the monitoring and follow-up.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Voiceover Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA
    style including citation of references.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly
    journal articles within your work.

    • PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the
    reference slide.

    • The presentation is clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper
    grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

    • Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the
    Sunday due date.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Identification of
    Drug

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of all 5
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, and indications for use.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 4
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 3
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 2
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    / 4 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation of
    Issues/
    Probelms

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and
    evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost
    analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most
    of the side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of
    the drug, and pregnancy class.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and
    evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost
    analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of
    side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the
    drug, and pregnancy class.

    / 4 pts

    Demonstrates a
    Conceptual
    Understanding

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive
    responses to providing a patient case study on a
    patient in which you would utilize the drug you have
    selected and include at least two peer-reviewed
    evidence-based studies related to the drug and
    describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner
    for prescribing this medication to this patient on your
    case study presentation and shows a high level of
    conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Provides competent and interpretive responses to
    providing a patient case study on a patient in which
    you would utilize the drug you have selected and
    include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based
    studies related to the drug and describing what is
    your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this
    medication to this patient on your case study
    presentation and shows a moderate level of
    conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Provides competent responses to providing a patient
    case study on a patient in which you would utilize the
    drug you have selected and include at least two peer-
    reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug
    and describing what is your role as a Nurse
    Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this
    patient on your case study presentation, but lacks
    interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual
    understanding.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to providing a
    patient case study on a patient in which you would
    utilize the drug you have selected and include at least
    two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to
    the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse
    Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this
    patient on your case study presentation, and lacks
    interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual

    / 4 pts

    Use of Citations
    to Course
    Readings and
    Additional
    Research/
    Literature

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations
    and extended referencing.

    / 4 pts

    Writing
    Mechanics and
    APA Formatting
    Guidelines
    view longer

    description

    4 pts

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and
    attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is
    free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and
    writing mechanics need more precision and attention
    to detail.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style
    and writing mechanics need more precision and
    attention to detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating
    clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious
    attention.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

    PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice

    Goal:

    The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a
    framework for a future evidence-based project

    Content Requirements:

    1. Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced
    practice nursing.

    2. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice
    nursing.

    3. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or
    concern which you identified.

    4. Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the issues or
    concerns within your selected area of advanced practice

    5. Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based
    practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective
    offered through the application of this theory or model.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist
    of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.

    • The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes
    expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

    • The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA guidelines and references
    should be current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or
    primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)

    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal
    articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal
    articles and books should be referenced according to current APA guidelines (the library
    has a copy of the 7th Edition APA Manual).

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Identification of
    Main Issues/
    Problems

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated
    understanding of the issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    / 4 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation of
    Issues/
    Probelms

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and
    evaluation of issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most
    of the issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and
    evaluation of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of
    issues/problems.

    / 4 pts

    Demonstrates a
    Conceptual
    Understanding

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive
    responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high
    level of conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to
    all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of
    conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/
    problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate
    level of conceptual understanding.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/
    problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate
    level of conceptual understanding.

    / 4 pts

    Use of Citations
    to Course
    Readings and
    Additional
    Research/
    Literature

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations
    and extended referencing.

    / 4 pts

    Choose a submission type

    Writing
    Mechanics and
    APA Formatting
    Guidelines
    view longer

    description

    4 pts

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and
    attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is
    free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and
    writing mechanics need more precision and attention
    to detail.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style
    and writing mechanics need more precision and
    attention to detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating
    clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious
    attention.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

    **## NUR501600PPWK5.pdf**

    Drug PowerPoint Presentation

    For this week you will present a voiceover Powerpoint presentation (with the video on)
    on your drug of choice. You are to be dressed in office attire. The purpose of the
    presentation is for you to educate your colleagues on the drug you have selected. The
    presentation must include information about the:

    • Drug pharmacology, pharmacokinetics

    • Brand name

    • Generic name

    • Dosing

    • Indications for use

    • Side effects

    • Contraindications

    • Pregnancy class

    • You must also perform a cost analysis of the drug.

    • Provide a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you

    have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies
    related to the drug.

    • Describe the appropriate patient education.

    • What is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this

    patient on your case study presentation?

    • Describe the monitoring and follow-up.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Voiceover Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA
    style including citation of references.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly
    journal articles within your work.

    • PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the
    reference slide.

    • The presentation is clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper
    grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

    • Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the
    Sunday due date.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Identification of
    Drug

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of all 5
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, and indications for use.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 4
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 3
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 2
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    / 4 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation of
    Issues/
    Probelms

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and
    evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost
    analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most
    of the side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of
    the drug, and pregnancy class.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and
    evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost
    analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of
    side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the
    drug, and pregnancy class.

    / 4 pts

    Demonstrates a
    Conceptual
    Understanding

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive
    responses to providing a patient case study on a
    patient in which you would utilize the drug you have
    selected and include at least two peer-reviewed
    evidence-based studies related to the drug and
    describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner
    for prescribing this medication to this patient on your
    case study presentation and shows a high level of
    conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Provides competent and interpretive responses to
    providing a patient case study on a patient in which
    you would utilize the drug you have selected and
    include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based
    studies related to the drug and describing what is
    your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this
    medication to this patient on your case study
    presentation and shows a moderate level of
    conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Provides competent responses to providing a patient
    case study on a patient in which you would utilize the
    drug you have selected and include at least two peer-
    reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug
    and describing what is your role as a Nurse
    Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this
    patient on your case study presentation, but lacks
    interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual
    understanding.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to providing a
    patient case study on a patient in which you would
    utilize the drug you have selected and include at least
    two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to
    the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse
    Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this
    patient on your case study presentation, and lacks
    interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual

    / 4 pts

    Use of Citations
    to Course
    Readings and
    Additional
    Research/
    Literature

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations
    and extended referencing.

    / 4 pts

    Writing
    Mechanics and
    APA Formatting
    Guidelines
    view longer

    description

    4 pts

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and
    attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is
    free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and
    writing mechanics need more precision and attention
    to detail.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style
    and writing mechanics need more precision and
    attention to detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating
    clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious
    attention.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

    PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice

    Goal:

    The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a
    framework for a future evidence-based project

    Content Requirements:

    1. Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced
    practice nursing.

    2. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice
    nursing.

    3. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or
    concern which you identified.

    4. Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the issues or
    concerns within your selected area of advanced practice

    5. Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based
    practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective
    offered through the application of this theory or model.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist
    of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.

    • The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes
    expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

    • The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA guidelines and references
    should be current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or
    primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)

    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal
    articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal
    articles and books should be referenced according to current APA guidelines (the library
    has a copy of the 7th Edition APA Manual).

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Identification of
    Main Issues/
    Problems

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated
    understanding of the issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    / 4 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation of
    Issues/
    Probelms

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and
    evaluation of issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most
    of the issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and
    evaluation of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of
    issues/problems.

    / 4 pts

    Demonstrates a
    Conceptual
    Understanding

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive
    responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high
    level of conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to
    all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of
    conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/
    problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate
    level of conceptual understanding.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/
    problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate
    level of conceptual understanding.

    / 4 pts

    Use of Citations
    to Course
    Readings and
    Additional
    Research/
    Literature

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations
    and extended referencing.

    / 4 pts

    Choose a submission type

    Writing
    Mechanics and
    APA Formatting
    Guidelines
    view longer

    description

    4 pts

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and
    attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is
    free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and
    writing mechanics need more precision and attention
    to detail.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style
    and writing mechanics need more precision and
    attention to detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating
    clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious
    attention.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

    **## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages**

    ## Data/PresetImageFill3-26.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill2-25.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill1-24.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill5-28.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill4-27.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill0-23.jpg

    ## Data/bullet_gbutton_gray-29.png

    ## preview.jpg

    **## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages**

    ## Data/PresetImageFill3-26.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill2-25.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill1-24.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill5-28.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill4-27.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill0-23.jpg

    ## Data/bullet_gbutton_gray-29.png

    ## preview.jpg

    **## NUR501600DISWK5.pdf**

    Principles of Research and Evidence-Based Practice

    Discuss the principles of research and evidence-based practice and how to effectively
    implement them for advanced practice nurses.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Treatments for Gastrointestinal & Endocrine Disorders

    Based on Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the
    following questions:

    1. Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment
    recommendations

    2. Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management

    3. Compare and contrast Crohn's disease and Ulcerative colitis

    4. Discuss Diabetes, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

    an essay format.

    ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

    followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-5-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-5-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1)

    **## NUR501600PPWK5.pdf**

    Drug PowerPoint Presentation

    For this week you will present a voiceover Powerpoint presentation (with the video on)
    on your drug of choice. You are to be dressed in office attire. The purpose of the
    presentation is for you to educate your colleagues on the drug you have selected. The
    presentation must include information about the:

    • Drug pharmacology, pharmacokinetics

    • Brand name

    • Generic name

    • Dosing

    • Indications for use

    • Side effects

    • Contraindications

    • Pregnancy class

    • You must also perform a cost analysis of the drug.

    • Provide a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you

    have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies
    related to the drug.

    • Describe the appropriate patient education.

    • What is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this

    patient on your case study presentation?

    • Describe the monitoring and follow-up.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Voiceover Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA
    style including citation of references.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly
    journal articles within your work.

    • PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the
    reference slide.

    • The presentation is clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper
    grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

    • Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the
    Sunday due date.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Identification of
    Drug

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of all 5
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, and indications for use.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 4
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 3
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 2
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    / 4 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation of
    Issues/
    Probelms

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and
    evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost
    analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most
    of the side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of
    the drug, and pregnancy class.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and
    evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost
    analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of
    side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the
    drug, and pregnancy class.

    / 4 pts

    Demonstrates a
    Conceptual
    Understanding

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive
    responses to providing a patient case study on a
    patient in which you would utilize the drug you have
    selected and include at least two peer-reviewed
    evidence-based studies related to the drug and
    describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner
    for prescribing this medication to this patient on your
    case study presentation and shows a high level of
    conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Provides competent and interpretive responses to
    providing a patient case study on a patient in which
    you would utilize the drug you have selected and
    include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based
    studies related to the drug and describing what is
    your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this
    medication to this patient on your case study
    presentation and shows a moderate level of
    conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Provides competent responses to providing a patient
    case study on a patient in which you would utilize the
    drug you have selected and include at least two peer-
    reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug
    and describing what is your role as a Nurse
    Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this
    patient on your case study presentation, but lacks
    interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual
    understanding.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to providing a
    patient case study on a patient in which you would
    utilize the drug you have selected and include at least
    two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to
    the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse
    Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this
    patient on your case study presentation, and lacks
    interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual

    / 4 pts

    Use of Citations
    to Course
    Readings and
    Additional
    Research/
    Literature

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations
    and extended referencing.

    / 4 pts

    Writing
    Mechanics and
    APA Formatting
    Guidelines
    view longer

    description

    4 pts

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and
    attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is
    free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and
    writing mechanics need more precision and attention
    to detail.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style
    and writing mechanics need more precision and
    attention to detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating
    clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious
    attention.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

    PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice

    Goal:

    The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a
    framework for a future evidence-based project

    Content Requirements:

    1. Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced
    practice nursing.

    2. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice
    nursing.

    3. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or
    concern which you identified.

    4. Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the issues or
    concerns within your selected area of advanced practice

    5. Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based
    practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective
    offered through the application of this theory or model.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist
    of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.

    • The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes
    expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

    • The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA guidelines and references
    should be current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or
    primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)

    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal
    articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal
    articles and books should be referenced according to current APA guidelines (the library
    has a copy of the 7th Edition APA Manual).

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Identification of
    Main Issues/
    Problems

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated
    understanding of the issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    / 4 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation of
    Issues/
    Probelms

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and
    evaluation of issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most
    of the issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and
    evaluation of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of
    issues/problems.

    / 4 pts

    Demonstrates a
    Conceptual
    Understanding

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive
    responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high
    level of conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to
    all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of
    conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/
    problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate
    level of conceptual understanding.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/
    problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate
    level of conceptual understanding.

    / 4 pts

    Use of Citations
    to Course
    Readings and
    Additional
    Research/
    Literature

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations
    and extended referencing.

    / 4 pts

    Choose a submission type

    Writing
    Mechanics and
    APA Formatting
    Guidelines
    view longer

    description

    4 pts

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and
    attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is
    free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and
    writing mechanics need more precision and attention
    to detail.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style
    and writing mechanics need more precision and
    attention to detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating
    clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious
    attention.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

    **## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages**

    ## Data/PresetImageFill3-26.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill2-25.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill1-24.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill5-28.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill4-27.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill0-23.jpg

    ## Data/bullet_gbutton_gray-29.png

    ## preview.jpg

    **## NUR600BENZOASSIGNWK4.pages**

    ## Data/PresetImageFill3-26.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill2-25.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill1-24.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill5-28.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill4-27.jpg

    ## Data/PresetImageFill0-23.jpg

    ## Data/bullet_gbutton_gray-29.png

    ## preview.jpg

    **## NUR501600DISWK5.pdf**

    Principles of Research and Evidence-Based Practice

    Discuss the principles of research and evidence-based practice and how to effectively
    implement them for advanced practice nurses.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Treatments for Gastrointestinal & Endocrine Disorders

    Based on Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the
    following questions:

    1. Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment
    recommendations

    2. Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management

    3. Compare and contrast Crohn's disease and Ulcerative colitis

    4. Discuss Diabetes, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

    an essay format.

    ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

    followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-5-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-5-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1)

    **## NUR501600PPWK5.pdf**

    Drug PowerPoint Presentation

    For this week you will present a voiceover Powerpoint presentation (with the video on)
    on your drug of choice. You are to be dressed in office attire. The purpose of the
    presentation is for you to educate your colleagues on the drug you have selected. The
    presentation must include information about the:

    • Drug pharmacology, pharmacokinetics

    • Brand name

    • Generic name

    • Dosing

    • Indications for use

    • Side effects

    • Contraindications

    • Pregnancy class

    • You must also perform a cost analysis of the drug.

    • Provide a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you

    have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies
    related to the drug.

    • Describe the appropriate patient education.

    • What is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this

    patient on your case study presentation?

    • Describe the monitoring and follow-up.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Voiceover Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA
    style including citation of references.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly
    journal articles within your work.

    • PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the
    reference slide.

    • The presentation is clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper
    grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

    • Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the
    Sunday due date.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Identification of
    Drug

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of all 5
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, and indications for use.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 4
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 3
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 2
    areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand
    name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

    / 4 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation of
    Issues/
    Probelms

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and
    evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost
    analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most
    of the side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of
    the drug, and pregnancy class.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and
    evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost
    analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of
    side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the
    drug, and pregnancy class.

    / 4 pts

    Demonstrates a
    Conceptual
    Understanding

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive
    responses to providing a patient case study on a
    patient in which you would utilize the drug you have
    selected and include at least two peer-reviewed
    evidence-based studies related to the drug and
    describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner
    for prescribing this medication to this patient on your
    case study presentation and shows a high level of
    conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Provides competent and interpretive responses to
    providing a patient case study on a patient in which
    you would utilize the drug you have selected and
    include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based
    studies related to the drug and describing what is
    your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this
    medication to this patient on your case study
    presentation and shows a moderate level of
    conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Provides competent responses to providing a patient
    case study on a patient in which you would utilize the
    drug you have selected and include at least two peer-
    reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug
    and describing what is your role as a Nurse
    Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this
    patient on your case study presentation, but lacks
    interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual
    understanding.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to providing a
    patient case study on a patient in which you would
    utilize the drug you have selected and include at least
    two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to
    the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse
    Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this
    patient on your case study presentation, and lacks
    interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual

    / 4 pts

    Use of Citations
    to Course
    Readings and
    Additional
    Research/
    Literature

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations
    and extended referencing.

    / 4 pts

    Writing
    Mechanics and
    APA Formatting
    Guidelines
    view longer

    description

    4 pts

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and
    attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is
    free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and
    writing mechanics need more precision and attention
    to detail.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style
    and writing mechanics need more precision and
    attention to detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating
    clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious
    attention.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

    PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice

    Goal:

    The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a
    framework for a future evidence-based project

    Content Requirements:

    1. Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced
    practice nursing.

    2. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice
    nursing.

    3. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or
    concern which you identified.

    4. Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the issues or
    concerns within your selected area of advanced practice

    5. Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based
    practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective
    offered through the application of this theory or model.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist
    of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.

    • The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes
    expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

    • The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA guidelines and references
    should be current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or
    primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)

    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal
    articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal
    articles and books should be referenced according to current APA guidelines (the library
    has a copy of the 7th Edition APA Manual).

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Identification of
    Main Issues/
    Problems

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated
    understanding of the issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable
    understanding of most of issues/problems.

    / 4 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation of
    Issues/
    Probelms

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and
    evaluation of issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most
    of the issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and
    evaluation of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of
    issues/problems.

    / 4 pts

    Demonstrates a
    Conceptual
    Understanding

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive
    responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high
    level of conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to
    all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of
    conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/
    problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate
    level of conceptual understanding.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/
    problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate
    level of conceptual understanding.

    / 4 pts

    Use of Citations
    to Course
    Readings and
    Additional
    Research/
    Literature

    4 pts

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. Moderate use of citations and
    extended referencing.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to
    inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations
    and extended referencing.

    / 4 pts

    Choose a submission type

    Writing
    Mechanics and
    APA Formatting
    Guidelines
    view longer

    description

    4 pts

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and
    attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is
    free of grammar and spelling errors.

    3 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and
    writing mechanics need more precision and attention
    to detail.

    2 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style
    and writing mechanics need more precision and
    attention to detail.

    1 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating
    clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious
    attention.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

  • [Solved] Mal wk 4 engl

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Malwk4engl.docx **## Malwk4engl.docx** **Part A** Top of Form For this assignment, you will compose either a script or a blog in response to another article. Be sure to read the instructions and pay attention to the resources as they will help you format your assignm…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Malwk4engl.docx

    **## Malwk4engl.docx**

    **Part A**

    Top of Form

    For this assignment, you will compose either a script or a blog in response to another article. Be sure to read the instructions and pay attention to the resources as they will help you format your assignment correctly.

    **Assignment**

    Choose one of the topics and pre-existing texts below to
    **respond** to in a text drafted for new media. You are not required to film a video or edit a TikTok. Instead, you will be demonstrating an understanding of the rhetorical context of new media through drafting
    _either_ a script for a video that would be posted to YouTube or some other video aggregate site
    _or_ a blog post that could be submitted to a digital publisher specializing in reader-generated content.

    **Texts for Response (choose one)**

    ·
    ["Editorial: How Can Kids Learn Without Homework and Rigid Deadlines? Quite Well, It Turns Out"](https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-11-15/editorial-how-can-kids-learn-without-homework-and-rigid-deadlines-quite-well-it-turns-out) by Los Angeles Times Editorial Board for the
    _Los Angeles Times_ (opens in new window): Frame your response around whether or not you agree with the editorial board's stance on homework and deadlines. Would it be better if we relaxed homework expectations for kids? Should this be implemented across all levels of education? Or is this dangerous?

    ·
    ["The Case for Lowering the Drinking Age to 18"](https://yuobserver.org/2020/02/the-case-for-lowering-the-drinking-age-to-18/) by Shayna Herszage for
    _The Yeshiva University Observer_ (opens in new window): Frame your response around whether you agree with the points made by Herszage. Why do you agree? Why do you disagree? What do you think the drinking age should be?

    ·
    ["I'm an Influencer and I think Social Media is Toxic,"](https://slate.com/technology/2022/02/instagram-tiktok-influencer-social-media-dangers.html) by Lydia Keating for
    _Slate_ (opens in new window): Frame your response around whether or not you agree with Keating's take. Can you understand why she feels the way she feels? Can you understand why she continues to do the work even while feeling this way? How do you feel about the toxicity of social media in general?

    ·
    ["AI Could Threaten Creators, But Only If Humans Let It"](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/11/24/ai-llm-intellectual-property-crisis/) by
    _The Washington Post_ Editorial Board (opens in new window): Frame your response around whether you agree with issues of copyright and ownership in the age of AI.

    **Grading Criteria:**

    · You
    _must_ refer to your chosen text in your response. You're
    _responding_ to it. Choose a handful of specific points made in the original text you wish to respond to. Quote the original and offer your take.

    · Think about how texts written for new media acknowledge sources. You
    _must_ acknowledge any sources you use in your writing according to expectations for new media. This includes your chosen text and any other source material you incorporate.

    · Submissions should be around 700 words and in the format appropriate to your chosen genre.

    **Resources:**

    ·
    ["How to Write a Text Response"](https://literacyideas.com/text-response/) from Literacy Ideas (opens in new tab): A detailed look at how to draft a piece of response writing

    ·
    ["How to Write a Script for a YouTube Video (5 Step Template)"](https://primalvideo.com/youtube-growth/optimization/how-to-make-a-good-youtube-video-simple-video-script-structure/) from PrimalVideo (opens in new tab): A template and step-by-step guide for drafting a script for a video project to be posted for online engagement

    ·
    ["How to Write a Blog Post"](https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-write-a-blog-post) from MasterClass (opens in new tab): A guide for writing compelling blog posts

    **Part B**

    **Introduction**

    It is common to have conversations about our favorite and least favorite movies and restaurants which makes evaluation one of the most common arguments that we employ, often using the technique on a daily basis. You convince your friends which movies or tv series they should watch, which albums they should stream, and which video games they should download. This is all part of a review process in which you have previously experienced what you are describing, and now, you are making reasoned quality judgments.

    **Assignment**

    Compose a critical evaluation of some piece of media or some experience or product. Take the prewriting that you do on your own and expand it into a full-length film/ restaurant/ album/ TV review using techniques learned in class. Your review can be positive or negative, but your opinion must be grounded in experience and logic. Additionally, your review
    _must_ be evaluative and analytical and
    _not_ exclusively summative. Remember readings from last week about establishing criteria. Your review should be written in a professional voice for traditional media.

    **The review must be a minimum of 700 words in length and in proper MLA format.**
    **_Papers not meeting these expectations will not be accepted_.**

    **Grading Criteria**

    · Your review must be specific and name the media/ product/ experience you are reviewing. Essentially, anything you can spend time or money on can be reviewed.

    · Think about how texts written for traditional media acknowledge sources. You
    _must_ acknowledge any sources you use in your writing according to expectations for traditional media. This includes your chosen text and any other source material you incorporate.

    · Submissions should be around 700 words and in MLA style, including a Works Cited page for any sources used, including the piece of media being evaluated.

    **Resources**

    ·
    ["Evaluation"](https://idaho.pressbooks.pub/write/chapter/evaluation/) by Liza Long (opens in new tab): A detailed look at evaluative writing including how to establish criteria and more.

    ·
    ["Thesis Statements"](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/thesis-statements/) from UNC (opens in new window): An instructional text that looks at drafting strong thesis statements

    ·
    ["Introductions and Conclusions"](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) from the University of Arizona Global Campus (opens in a new window): pay close attention especially to the academic introductions and conclusions sections of this reading

    ·
    ["The Anatomy of a Paragraph"](https://historyprofessor.org/organization/the-anatomy-of-a-paragraph/) by Zachary Schrag (opens in a new window): an overview of the different types of sentences that make up a paragraph

    ·
    ["Citing Sources"](https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g=29803&p=185939) from Sacred Heart University (opens in a new window): an overview of citation to include rationale and execution

    Bottom of Form

    **## Malwk4engl.docx**

    **Part A**

    Top of Form

    For this assignment, you will compose either a script or a blog in response to another article. Be sure to read the instructions and pay attention to the resources as they will help you format your assignment correctly.

    **Assignment**

    Choose one of the topics and pre-existing texts below to
    **respond** to in a text drafted for new media. You are not required to film a video or edit a TikTok. Instead, you will be demonstrating an understanding of the rhetorical context of new media through drafting
    _either_ a script for a video that would be posted to YouTube or some other video aggregate site
    _or_ a blog post that could be submitted to a digital publisher specializing in reader-generated content.

    **Texts for Response (choose one)**

    ·
    ["Editorial: How Can Kids Learn Without Homework and Rigid Deadlines? Quite Well, It Turns Out"](https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-11-15/editorial-how-can-kids-learn-without-homework-and-rigid-deadlines-quite-well-it-turns-out) by Los Angeles Times Editorial Board for the
    _Los Angeles Times_ (opens in new window): Frame your response around whether or not you agree with the editorial board's stance on homework and deadlines. Would it be better if we relaxed homework expectations for kids? Should this be implemented across all levels of education? Or is this dangerous?

    ·
    ["The Case for Lowering the Drinking Age to 18"](https://yuobserver.org/2020/02/the-case-for-lowering-the-drinking-age-to-18/) by Shayna Herszage for
    _The Yeshiva University Observer_ (opens in new window): Frame your response around whether you agree with the points made by Herszage. Why do you agree? Why do you disagree? What do you think the drinking age should be?

    ·
    ["I'm an Influencer and I think Social Media is Toxic,"](https://slate.com/technology/2022/02/instagram-tiktok-influencer-social-media-dangers.html) by Lydia Keating for
    _Slate_ (opens in new window): Frame your response around whether or not you agree with Keating's take. Can you understand why she feels the way she feels? Can you understand why she continues to do the work even while feeling this way? How do you feel about the toxicity of social media in general?

    ·
    ["AI Could Threaten Creators, But Only If Humans Let It"](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/11/24/ai-llm-intellectual-property-crisis/) by
    _The Washington Post_ Editorial Board (opens in new window): Frame your response around whether you agree with issues of copyright and ownership in the age of AI.

    **Grading Criteria:**

    · You
    _must_ refer to your chosen text in your response. You're
    _responding_ to it. Choose a handful of specific points made in the original text you wish to respond to. Quote the original and offer your take.

    · Think about how texts written for new media acknowledge sources. You
    _must_ acknowledge any sources you use in your writing according to expectations for new media. This includes your chosen text and any other source material you incorporate.

    · Submissions should be around 700 words and in the format appropriate to your chosen genre.

    **Resources:**

    ·
    ["How to Write a Text Response"](https://literacyideas.com/text-response/) from Literacy Ideas (opens in new tab): A detailed look at how to draft a piece of response writing

    ·
    ["How to Write a Script for a YouTube Video (5 Step Template)"](https://primalvideo.com/youtube-growth/optimization/how-to-make-a-good-youtube-video-simple-video-script-structure/) from PrimalVideo (opens in new tab): A template and step-by-step guide for drafting a script for a video project to be posted for online engagement

    ·
    ["How to Write a Blog Post"](https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-write-a-blog-post) from MasterClass (opens in new tab): A guide for writing compelling blog posts

    **Part B**

    **Introduction**

    It is common to have conversations about our favorite and least favorite movies and restaurants which makes evaluation one of the most common arguments that we employ, often using the technique on a daily basis. You convince your friends which movies or tv series they should watch, which albums they should stream, and which video games they should download. This is all part of a review process in which you have previously experienced what you are describing, and now, you are making reasoned quality judgments.

    **Assignment**

    Compose a critical evaluation of some piece of media or some experience or product. Take the prewriting that you do on your own and expand it into a full-length film/ restaurant/ album/ TV review using techniques learned in class. Your review can be positive or negative, but your opinion must be grounded in experience and logic. Additionally, your review
    _must_ be evaluative and analytical and
    _not_ exclusively summative. Remember readings from last week about establishing criteria. Your review should be written in a professional voice for traditional media.

    **The review must be a minimum of 700 words in length and in proper MLA format.**
    **_Papers not meeting these expectations will not be accepted_.**

    **Grading Criteria**

    · Your review must be specific and name the media/ product/ experience you are reviewing. Essentially, anything you can spend time or money on can be reviewed.

    · Think about how texts written for traditional media acknowledge sources. You
    _must_ acknowledge any sources you use in your writing according to expectations for traditional media. This includes your chosen text and any other source material you incorporate.

    · Submissions should be around 700 words and in MLA style, including a Works Cited page for any sources used, including the piece of media being evaluated.

    **Resources**

    ·
    ["Evaluation"](https://idaho.pressbooks.pub/write/chapter/evaluation/) by Liza Long (opens in new tab): A detailed look at evaluative writing including how to establish criteria and more.

    ·
    ["Thesis Statements"](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/thesis-statements/) from UNC (opens in new window): An instructional text that looks at drafting strong thesis statements

    ·
    ["Introductions and Conclusions"](https://writingcenter.uagc.edu/introductions-conclusions) from the University of Arizona Global Campus (opens in a new window): pay close attention especially to the academic introductions and conclusions sections of this reading

    ·
    ["The Anatomy of a Paragraph"](https://historyprofessor.org/organization/the-anatomy-of-a-paragraph/) by Zachary Schrag (opens in a new window): an overview of the different types of sentences that make up a paragraph

    ·
    ["Citing Sources"](https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g=29803&p=185939) from Sacred Heart University (opens in a new window): an overview of citation to include rationale and execution

    Bottom of Form

  • [Solved] Lion survivor

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Anatomy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-anatomy) After viewing this module’s content (including course readings, live classroom, lab, and other supporting material), answer each of the following questions. All of your answers should be written _**in your own words**_, usin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Anatomy homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/biology-anatomy)

    After viewing this module’s content (including course readings, live classroom, lab, and other supporting material), answer each of the following questions. All of your answers should be written _**in your own words**_, using full sentences, correct terminology, and proper spelling and grammar.

    1. Explain the **anatomical** concepts associated with the respiratory system. Summarize this module’s key points on this topic in 5-6 sentences.
    2. Explain the **physiological** concepts associated with the respiratory system. Summarize this module’s key points on this topic in 5-6 sentences.
    3. Explain a pathology associated with the respiratory system. Summarize this module’s key points on this topic in 5-6 sentences.
    4. Which topic(s) within this module did you struggle to understand and why?

    **Submission Requirements**

    1. In your submission, include the questions with their corresponding answers.
    2. Submit your work in a Microsoft Word document or as a .pdf.
    3. The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] infodiss

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Discuss **relational database terminolog** y (table, tuple, constraints, relationship, especially the various keys). Include an example of a primary key (other than the one in the text). **Include one question for your peers to research and answer.** A web search for relevant articles and informatio…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Discuss **relational database terminolog** y (table, tuple, constraints, relationship, especially the various keys). Include an example of a primary key (other than the one in the text). **Include one question for your peers to research and answer.** A web search for relevant articles and information could be employed to further assist you in your response.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] INFO22

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – What is meant by the term ‘client-server architecture’ and what are the advantages of this approach? – Compare the client-server architecture with two other architectures. Include a description of the 3 service models defined by NIST. – Which cloud computing benefit do you feel is the most importa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – What is meant by the term ‘client-server architecture’ and what are the advantages of this approach?
    – Compare the client-server architecture with two other architectures. Include a description of the 3 service models defined by NIST.
    – Which cloud computing benefit do you feel is the most important and why?
    – Which cloud computing risk do you feel is the most important and why?
    – Describe the DBMS MS Access

    – How is MS Access used in contrast to SQLite?
    – What are the primary uses of MS Access?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] I need help with an evidence based prctice project nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering I need help with an evidence based prctice project nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Hypertension power point

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    EDUCATIONAL POWER POINT TOPIC IS HYPERTENSION – A description of the diagnosis and common symptoms using lay terms – A holistic treatment plan that includes: One medication and one evidenced-based non-pharmacologic treatment that is used for this diagnosis. Briefly explain how each will help the pat…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    EDUCATIONAL POWER POINT

    TOPIC IS HYPERTENSION

    – A description of the diagnosis and common symptoms using lay terms
    – A holistic treatment plan that includes: One medication and one evidenced-based non-pharmacologic treatment that is used for this diagnosis. Briefly explain how each will help the patient
    – As a provider briefly outline how you will assess SDOH in your plan of care (i.e. through motivational interviewing, engaging community health workers, etc.) LINK IS BELOW. Briefly explain how different SDOH can affect the patient’s health outcomes (housing, transportation, food security, healthcare access)
    – Appropriate resources for patients to get further information and/ or support
    – The last slide should include your references

    https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Human Resource Management HOMEWORK 4 WEEK

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    SEE ATTACHED – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## HOMEWORKassignment4HRA545.docx – ## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed18.docx **## HOMEWORKassignment4HRA545.docx** 1 3 **Textbook:** **Moran, J. J. (2014).** **_Employment law: new challenges in the business environment_ (6th ed.). Boston: Pea…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    SEE ATTACHED

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## HOMEWORKassignment4HRA545.docx

    – ## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed18.docx

    **## HOMEWORKassignment4HRA545.docx**

    1

    3

    **Textbook:** **Moran, J. J. (2014).**
    **_Employment law: new challenges in the business environment_ (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.**

    ****3 Assignments below: Cite textbook and other scholarly authors.**

    **1.As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum**:

    1) creating a new company policy pertaining to sexual harassment that complies with all applicable laws;

    · 2) discussing potential employee training that can be enacted to help avoid or reduce any company legal liability associated with sexual harassment; and

    · 3) addressing steps that should be taken in the event a complaint is received pertaining to sexual harassment.

    **2. As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum analyzing the following scenario:**

    Sofoklis Eliopoulos is employed in the shipping and receiving department of your company. His religion requires him to pray at noon each day. A major shipment of tech supplies arrives one day, and Sofoklis is told to work through his break at lunch. He refuses to do so and goes on break to pray. His supervisor informs Sofoklis that he must work through his lunch break and pray at a different time when major shipments arrive that have to be unloaded immediately. Sofoklis resigns and files a claim with the EEOC.

    · Write a memorandum addressing the following:

    · 1) What the employer’s duty is in this situation?
    2) Whether the employee's situation falls under the definition of religious practice (i.e., whether it requires the employer to reasonably accommodate said religious belief).
    3) If the religious belief requires an accommodation, does the accommodation create an undue burden on the employer?
    4) If the accommodation does not create an undue burden, what accommodation should be implemented?
    5) What additional steps should be taken to help the company avoid or reduce legal liability concerning religious discrimination?

    **3. As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum:**

    1) Creating a new company policy pertaining to age discrimination that complies with all applicable laws;
    2) Discussing potential employee training that can be enacted to help avoid or reduce any company legal liability associated with age discrimination; and
    3) Addressing steps that should be taken in the event a complaint is received pertaining to age discrimination.

    **## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed18.docx**

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    **Your Paper’s Title: Title Is Centered and Bold, Three or Four Lines Down**

    LEAVE A BLANK SPACE

    ## Your Name

    **Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
    Course Number and Name, e.g. DBA701: Doctoral Success Lab

    Your Professor’s Name, e.g. Professor Waddell

    Assignment Due Date, e.g. January 21, 2020

    **Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**

    My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

    1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

    2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

    3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

    4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

    5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

    6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

    **Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

    **Student Signature: [Type Full Name Here]**

    **Abstract [Centered, Bold]**

    Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
    _Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.

    _Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.

    The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.

    ****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
    Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
    **one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.

    **All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**

    You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).

    **New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**

    **_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**

    Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
    A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
    _every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.

    **_Second Rule_**

    The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
    _first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
    _each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.

    **Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.

    **Punctuating In-Text Citations**

    So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
    _before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
    _after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:

    Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
    _only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
    _after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)

    If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]

    **References [Centered, Bold]**

    Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
    _Publication Name_,
    _234_(2), 40-190.
    [https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)

    Surname, C. C. (Year).
    _This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)

    REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed18.docx**

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    **Your Paper’s Title: Title Is Centered and Bold, Three or Four Lines Down**

    LEAVE A BLANK SPACE

    ## Your Name

    **Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
    Course Number and Name, e.g. DBA701: Doctoral Success Lab

    Your Professor’s Name, e.g. Professor Waddell

    Assignment Due Date, e.g. January 21, 2020

    **Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**

    My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

    1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

    2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

    3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

    4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

    5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

    6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

    **Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

    **Student Signature: [Type Full Name Here]**

    **Abstract [Centered, Bold]**

    Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
    _Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.

    _Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.

    The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.

    ****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
    Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
    **one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.

    **All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**

    You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).

    **New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**

    **_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**

    Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
    A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
    _every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.

    **_Second Rule_**

    The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
    _first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
    _each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.

    **Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.

    **Punctuating In-Text Citations**

    So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
    _before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
    _after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:

    Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
    _only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
    _after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)

    If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]

    **References [Centered, Bold]**

    Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
    _Publication Name_,
    _234_(2), 40-190.
    [https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)

    Surname, C. C. (Year).
    _This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)

    REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## HOMEWORKassignment4HRA545.docx**

    1

    3

    **Textbook:** **Moran, J. J. (2014).**
    **_Employment law: new challenges in the business environment_ (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.**

    ****3 Assignments below: Cite textbook and other scholarly authors.**

    **1.As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum**:

    1) creating a new company policy pertaining to sexual harassment that complies with all applicable laws;

    · 2) discussing potential employee training that can be enacted to help avoid or reduce any company legal liability associated with sexual harassment; and

    · 3) addressing steps that should be taken in the event a complaint is received pertaining to sexual harassment.

    **2. As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum analyzing the following scenario:**

    Sofoklis Eliopoulos is employed in the shipping and receiving department of your company. His religion requires him to pray at noon each day. A major shipment of tech supplies arrives one day, and Sofoklis is told to work through his break at lunch. He refuses to do so and goes on break to pray. His supervisor informs Sofoklis that he must work through his lunch break and pray at a different time when major shipments arrive that have to be unloaded immediately. Sofoklis resigns and files a claim with the EEOC.

    · Write a memorandum addressing the following:

    · 1) What the employer’s duty is in this situation?
    2) Whether the employee's situation falls under the definition of religious practice (i.e., whether it requires the employer to reasonably accommodate said religious belief).
    3) If the religious belief requires an accommodation, does the accommodation create an undue burden on the employer?
    4) If the accommodation does not create an undue burden, what accommodation should be implemented?
    5) What additional steps should be taken to help the company avoid or reduce legal liability concerning religious discrimination?

    **3. As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum:**

    1) Creating a new company policy pertaining to age discrimination that complies with all applicable laws;
    2) Discussing potential employee training that can be enacted to help avoid or reduce any company legal liability associated with age discrimination; and
    3) Addressing steps that should be taken in the event a complaint is received pertaining to age discrimination.

    **## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed18.docx**

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    **Your Paper’s Title: Title Is Centered and Bold, Three or Four Lines Down**

    LEAVE A BLANK SPACE

    ## Your Name

    **Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
    Course Number and Name, e.g. DBA701: Doctoral Success Lab

    Your Professor’s Name, e.g. Professor Waddell

    Assignment Due Date, e.g. January 21, 2020

    **Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**

    My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

    1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

    2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

    3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

    4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

    5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

    6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

    **Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

    **Student Signature: [Type Full Name Here]**

    **Abstract [Centered, Bold]**

    Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
    _Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.

    _Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.

    The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.

    ****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
    Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
    **one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.

    **All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**

    You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).

    **New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**

    **_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**

    Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
    A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
    _every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.

    **_Second Rule_**

    The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
    _first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
    _each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.

    **Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.

    **Punctuating In-Text Citations**

    So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
    _before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
    _after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:

    Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
    _only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
    _after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)

    If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]

    **References [Centered, Bold]**

    Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
    _Publication Name_,
    _234_(2), 40-190.
    [https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)

    Surname, C. C. (Year).
    _This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)

    REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |

    **## HOMEWORKassignment4HRA545.docx**

    1

    3

    **Textbook:** **Moran, J. J. (2014).**
    **_Employment law: new challenges in the business environment_ (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.**

    ****3 Assignments below: Cite textbook and other scholarly authors.**

    **1.As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum**:

    1) creating a new company policy pertaining to sexual harassment that complies with all applicable laws;

    · 2) discussing potential employee training that can be enacted to help avoid or reduce any company legal liability associated with sexual harassment; and

    · 3) addressing steps that should be taken in the event a complaint is received pertaining to sexual harassment.

    **2. As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum analyzing the following scenario:**

    Sofoklis Eliopoulos is employed in the shipping and receiving department of your company. His religion requires him to pray at noon each day. A major shipment of tech supplies arrives one day, and Sofoklis is told to work through his break at lunch. He refuses to do so and goes on break to pray. His supervisor informs Sofoklis that he must work through his lunch break and pray at a different time when major shipments arrive that have to be unloaded immediately. Sofoklis resigns and files a claim with the EEOC.

    · Write a memorandum addressing the following:

    · 1) What the employer’s duty is in this situation?
    2) Whether the employee's situation falls under the definition of religious practice (i.e., whether it requires the employer to reasonably accommodate said religious belief).
    3) If the religious belief requires an accommodation, does the accommodation create an undue burden on the employer?
    4) If the accommodation does not create an undue burden, what accommodation should be implemented?
    5) What additional steps should be taken to help the company avoid or reduce legal liability concerning religious discrimination?

    **3. As the HR specialist for a large technology company, your next task is to complete a memorandum:**

    1) Creating a new company policy pertaining to age discrimination that complies with all applicable laws;
    2) Discussing potential employee training that can be enacted to help avoid or reduce any company legal liability associated with age discrimination; and
    3) Addressing steps that should be taken in the event a complaint is received pertaining to age discrimination.

    **## APA_RequiredCoverPage_and_Template_7thed18.docx**

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    SHORTENED TITLE IN ALL CAPITALS 1

    **Your Paper’s Title: Title Is Centered and Bold, Three or Four Lines Down**

    LEAVE A BLANK SPACE

    ## Your Name

    **Donald R. Tapia College of Business, Saint Leo University**
    Course Number and Name, e.g. DBA701: Doctoral Success Lab

    Your Professor’s Name, e.g. Professor Waddell

    Assignment Due Date, e.g. January 21, 2020

    **Graduate Studies in Business Academic Honesty Statement**

    My signature entered below constitutes my pledge that all the writing in this document is my own work, except for those portions which are properly documented and cited. I understand and accept the following definition of plagiarism:

    1. Plagiarism includes the literal repetition without acknowledgment of the writings of another author. All significant phrases, clauses, or passages in this paper which have been taken directly from source material have been enclosed in quotation marks and acknowledged in the text itself as well as on the Reference page.

    2. Plagiarism includes borrowing another’s ideas and representing them as my own.

    3. To paraphrase the thoughts of another writer without acknowledgement is plagiarism.

    4. Plagiarism also includes inadequate paraphrasing. Paraphrased passages (those put into my own words) have been properly acknowledged in the text and in the references.

    5. Plagiarism includes using another person or organization to prepare this paper and then submitting it as my own work.

    6. Plagiarism includes resubmitting my own previous work, in whole, or in part for a current assignment without the written consent of the current instructor.

    **Saint Leo University’s core value of integrity** requires that students pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed. I fully understand what plagiarism is, and I further understand that if plagiarism is detected in my paper, my professor will follow the procedures for academic dishonesty set forth by Saint Leo University, the Donald R. Tapia College of Business and the Graduate Student Handbook.

    **Student Signature: [Type Full Name Here]**

    **Abstract [Centered, Bold]**

    Start the abstract flush with the left margin; do not indent. According to the
    _Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association_(APA), “An abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper” (APA, 2020, p. 38). It allows readers to survey the contents of an article quickly and, like a title, it enables persons interested in the document to retrieve it from abstracting and indexing databases. The first line of the abstract is not indented. An abstract may range from 150 to 250 words (APA, 2020). Because an abstract is not always required for student papers, adhere to your instructor’s requirements.

    _Keywords:_ Follow the abstract with a selection of keywords that describe the important ideas or subjects in your paper. These help online readers search for your paper in a database.

    The keyword list should have its first line indented 0.5 inches. keywords are written in lowercase (except for proper nouns) and separated by commas. Do not place a period at the end of the list.

    ****Title of Your Paper [Centered, Bold]****
    Begin your paper on the next double-spaced line after the title, and indent all paragraphs 1/2 inch. In the updated manual on p. 154, writers are asked to include only
    **one space** between sentences rather than two spaces. When writing in APA style, you have two choices for in-text citations: narrative citations or parenthetical citations. According to a fictitious book by Harding and Jiménez (2020), a narrative citation occurs when you include “authors’ names as part of your sentence” (p. 24). Furthermore, Harding and Jiménez (2020) explain that you only need to provide a page number at the end of a narrative citation when directly quoting from the source. If the authors’ names do not appear in your sentence, you will use a “parenthetical citation” (Harding & Jiménez, 2020, p. 24). Similar to the above example, you only need to include a page number when quoting the authors’ original words (Harding & Jiménez, 2020). The APA manual summarizes these rules and related concepts on pp. 261-264.

    **All Headings Are Bold and Written in Title Case (Level 1, Bold, Centered)**

    You can read more about formatting section headings in the APA manual on pp. 47-49. Not included in this template is a level 5 heading, which is virtually identical to a level 4 heading, except it is italicized. According to the APA (2020), “The number of levels of heading needed for a paper depends on its length and complexity; three is average. … [S]hort student papers may not require any headings” (p. 48).

    **New Rules for Citations (Level 2, Bold, Left Justified)**

    **_First Rule_(Level 3, Flush Left, Italicized, Bold, No Punctuation)**

    Begin indented paragraph on the next line.
    A couple of important new rules concerning in-text citations appear in the APA manual. The first pertains to citing works by three or more authors. Instead of writing each author’s name in the first citation, then utilizing the abbreviation “et al.” for all subsequent citations, the APA advises writers to use the “et al.” abbreviation for
    _every_ in-text citation for works by three or more authors. For example, my first in-text citation for a work by three authors would look like this (Harris et al., 2020). This new guideline reduces the amount of clutter created by listing each author’s name. You can read more about the use of “et al.” on p. 266 of the APA manual.

    **_Second Rule_**

    The other significant change to in-text citation formatting has to do with repeating narrative citations. For example, if I am writing a paragraph focused specifically on the work of Brown (2016), I would need to provide the year in parenthesis only after the
    _first_ reference to Brown. As you can see, I could write more about the groundbreaking work of Brown without cluttering my paragraph with multiple in-text citations containing the year. However, if I am referencing more than one work by Brown, I must provide a complete in-text citation after
    _each_ reference to Brown. That way, my reader won’t be confused. I would also need to provide the year in any parenthetical citation referencing the author (Brown, 2016). This new rule is described on pp. 265-266 in the APA manual.

    **Similar Rule. (Level 4, Indented, Plain Text, Begins Paragraph, Punctuated)** In a similar vein, if I am writing a long paraphrase of a single work, I need to provide only one in-text citation at the beginning of the paragraph as long as “the context of the writing makes it clear that the same work continues to be paraphrased” (APA, 2020, p. 269). In other words, I could continue to write more about how the manual provides a helpful figure of this rule on p. 270. I would not need to provide a citation when telling you that if the paraphrase is long enough to warrant the creation of a new paragraph, you will need to provide an in-text citation at the top of the new paragraph. As you can see, I am still discussing the APA manual in a specific context, so I am not required to cite the manual again in this paragraph unless I introduce information from a new source. Even so, if you think your professor or reader might question where you found a certain piece of information, it won’t hurt to provide an extra citation or two.

    **Punctuating In-Text Citations**

    So far, you might have noticed that parenthetical citations typically appear
    _before_ the sentence’s end punctuation, because the parenthetical citation is just another element belonging to the sentence. However, there is one specific instance when the parenthetical citation comes
    _after_ the end punctuation. In the case of block quotations (a quotation of 40 words or more), you will introduce the quotation and demarcate it using special indentation:

    Pretend that this is the beginning of the block quotation. First, notice that this long quotation is not surrounded by marks. It is the
    _only_ time in your paper where you will quote something without using quotation marks. Next, the quotation is indented 1/2 inch from the left, and it’s left-justified, meaning that the quote’s left margin forms a straight line up and down. Last but not least, you will provide the parenthetical citation
    _after_ the end punctuation (and because it’s a direct quotation, you will include the page number). Use block quotes sparingly. (Harding, 2020, p. 49)

    If the original paragraph continues after the quotation, begin on the next double-spaced line, making sure that the line is flush left. If you want to begin a new paragraph after the block quotation, you will indent the new paragraph 1/2 inch from the left margin. Finally, if you include a narrative citation when introducing the block quote (i.e. “According to Harding (2020) …”), only include the page number in the parenthetical citation after the block quote. You can read more about these rules on pp. 272-273 of the APA manual.]

    **References [Centered, Bold]**

    Surname, A. A., & Surname B. B. (Year). Reference entry titles are written in sentence case: Sentence case titles for articles and shorter works are plain text and capitalized as if you were writing a sentence.
    _Publication Name_,
    _234_(2), 40-190.
    [https://doi.org/12.029303](https://doi.org/12.029303) (Example of journal article with DOI. DOI should be formatted as an active hyperlink)

    Surname, C. C. (Year).
    _This is the title of a book about China and India: Notice that book titles and titles of longer works are italicized_. Publisher Name. (Example of book and e-book. Writers are no longer required to identify e-book platform (e.g. “Kindle”) or database (e.g. “EBSCO”). For e-books, provide a DOI or URL if one is available. Read more on p. 321 of the manual.)

    REMOVE ALL YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS IF YOU USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A WORKABLE TEMPLATE!

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | | | |