[Solved] A6 – MC

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Follow all instructions

**files (6)**

– ## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx

– ## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf

– ## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf

– ## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx

– WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf
– Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf

**## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx**

EDCO 811

**Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**

Roger is a 43-year old husband and father. He has been married for 11 years and has two children, eight and five. Currently, he works as a middle manager for a large engineering firm. The office is located almost an hour away and it is an extremely stressful work environment because of bidding competition and project deadlines. The company has mentioned a possible downsizing of the workforce due to ongoing economic pressures and middle management is seen as being the most vulnerable. Roger has been with the company for seven years now.

Annette, Roger’s wife also works. She is an office manager for a local pediatrician but may have to leave due to recurring back problems and other health concerns. The possible loss of her income has strained the marriage a bit, especially over the past six months.

Roger works late many days and sometimes doesn’t get home until after the children have gone to bed. Lately, he has appeared to be increasingly irritable and frequently “loses it” and ends up yelling at Annette or the kids. During his senior year in high school and also while attending college, Roger would drink socially with friends and occasionally get drunk. Annette knew of his drinking when they started dating, but it never seemed to be a problem and she had never actually seen him drunk. Roger’s mother was an alcoholic and died four years ago from complications related to her drinking. She was 67 at the time. Her brother (Roger’s uncle) has also been in a detox center twice for drinking problems. One of the reasons Roger was coming home late was because he was stopping at a bar to have a drink with several of his coworkers. What started out as a beer or two once a week after work, became a six-pack three or four times a week. Drinking on the weekends also became more routine and he no longer tried to hide it from Annette. She also recently found pornography on his computer. Annette greatly resents the drinking and is becoming increasingly concerned.

Her primary way of dealing with the issue is to lecture and moralize the situation. Roger responds with anger, sullenness and most recently, by leaving the house for hours at a time. He doesn’t believe he has a serious problem with alcohol and that he could stop if he really wanted to. Besides, he feels like it, “calms him down” after the stress of his workday. He appears aloof and somewhat suspicious of others.

About a month ago, Roger stopped attending church with his family. Annette has explored the possibility of seeing a counselor for help. After a lot of asking, complaining and even a threat by Annette to separate, Roger has agreed to come in. He says he loves his family, but doesn’t know, “what the big deal” is really all about. He doesn’t believe that the Bible expressly prohibits drinking altogether.

**## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 105 to >97 pts

Advanced

All components as
described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed. Student
followed the Case
Study Analysis
Template and used
headings A through
E. Student
demonstrated
advanced critical
thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
demonstrated
advanced prowess
in elaborating on
the Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student
incorporated and
synthesized course
materials.

97 to >88 pts

Proficient

Most components
as described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed.
Student followed
the Case Study
Analysis Template
and used headings
A through E.
Student proficiently
demonstrated
critical thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
was proficient at
elaborating on the
Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student adequately
incorporated and
synthesized course
materials.

88 to >80 pts

Developing

Few components
as described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed.
Student followed
most of the Case
Study Analysis
Template and used
headings A
through E. Student
exemplified
developing
demonstration of
critical thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
elaborated on the
Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student
incorporated and
synthesized
course materials.

80 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Few components as
described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed. Student
inadequately followed
the Case Study
Analysis Template
and used headings A
through E.
Organization was
lacking. Student
inadequately
demonstrated critical
thinking,
problem-solving, and
an organized,
theory-based
counseling approach.
Student did not meet
expectations in
elaborating on the
Chosen Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope is 2
pages). Student failed
to adequately
incorporate and
synthesize course
materials.

0 pts

Not
present

/ 105
pts

Mechanics 45 to >40 pts

Advanced

Student
demonstrated
exemplary
grammar, diction
and APA
formatting.

40 to >38 pts

Proficient

Student
demonstrated
proficient grammar,
diction and APA
formatting.

38 to >33 pts

Developing

Student
demonstrated
average quality
grammar, diction
and APA
formatting.

33 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Student demonstrated
poor grammar, diction
and APA formatting.

0 pts

No
Marks

/ 45
pts

Total Points: –

Case Study Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

**## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

**## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx**

EDCO 811

**Case Study Analyses Assignment Instructions**

**Overview**

You must complete 2
**Case Study Analyses Assignments**. Review files for both
**Case Study Analysis: Paul and Diane** and
**Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**. Both describe hypothetical presenting problems with a couple. Using the
**Case Study Analysis Template** (see below), provide a thorough, systematic, and holistic summary.

**Instruction**

· Suggested scope: 5 pages (excluding title page and reference page).

· Devote 2 of your pages to the integration of your selected theoretical model

· Current APA format

· Include 5 scholarly references published within the last 12 years

· Utilize the
**Case Study and Analysis Template** (see below) to write your paper

· Description of how you would approach working with the couple

· The theoretical orientation/model you are using.

· Your analysis/assessment of the case;

Important: Follow the template,
**Case Study Analysis Template,** Headings A through E, to organize and present your paper. All of these sections must be included in your final submission.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

—————————————————————-

## Case Study Management and Analysis Form

## Each case study summary should incorporate the following elements: A – _Achieving_ a Connection

How would you connect with this couple and begin to form a helping relationship (in 2-3 paragraphs)?

**B –**
**_Breaking Down_ the Problem**

1. Define/summarize the following (in bullet-point format):

· Physical and/or Medical needs and issues

· Emotional needs and issues

· Family/Social/Relational needs and issues

· Mental/Psychological needs and issues

· Financial, Vocational or Other/Practical needs and issues

· Spiritual needs and Issues

2. Assess the scope of the presenting problems by utilizing the scales (1-10) below, state the overall level of risk/distress, and provide a summary paragraph:

**_Frequency_ Score:**

How often are problems occurring, issues arising and/or certain behaviors being displayed?

0 2 4 6 8 10

< 1x per month weekly daily

**_Intensity_ Score:**

How strong/evident is the level of pain, distress, or crisis – physically, emotionally, relationally, psychologically, financially/vocationally, spiritually, etc.?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| mild | | | moderate | | | extreme |

**_Duration_ Score:**

How long does the impact of crisis moments linger/last when they manifest?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| a few hours | | | 1-2 days | | | > 1 week |

Page 2 of 2

**_Variability_ Score:**

How many different issues, problems and/or crisis points are present in the marriage?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| one issue | | | 3-4 issues | | | > 6 issues |

## Overall Score:

(
**4-15:** Low Risk;
**16-25:** Moderate Risk;
**26-40:** High Risk)

**C –**
**_Committing_ to a Plan of Action**

What steps does the
**_counselor_** need to consider/take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

What steps does the
**_couple_** need to consider take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

**D –**
**_Documenting_ the Interaction**

What are the potential legal, ethical, and/or liability related issues, if any (in bullet-point format)?

**E –**
**_Explaining_ the Chosen Theoretical Orientation**

Select one theoretical orientation/model for marriage counseling (e.g., behavioral, emotion- centered, psychodynamic, multigenerational, social constructionist, etc.) and describe (in a two-page summary) how a counselor would work with the couple using the constructs, techniques, and interventions specifically related to the chosen theory.

A different theoretical orientation/model will be used for each case study.

**WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscriptamarriagetwodieforpart3-pdf)

**Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582525)

**Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582525)

**## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx**

EDCO 811

**Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**

Roger is a 43-year old husband and father. He has been married for 11 years and has two children, eight and five. Currently, he works as a middle manager for a large engineering firm. The office is located almost an hour away and it is an extremely stressful work environment because of bidding competition and project deadlines. The company has mentioned a possible downsizing of the workforce due to ongoing economic pressures and middle management is seen as being the most vulnerable. Roger has been with the company for seven years now.

Annette, Roger’s wife also works. She is an office manager for a local pediatrician but may have to leave due to recurring back problems and other health concerns. The possible loss of her income has strained the marriage a bit, especially over the past six months.

Roger works late many days and sometimes doesn’t get home until after the children have gone to bed. Lately, he has appeared to be increasingly irritable and frequently “loses it” and ends up yelling at Annette or the kids. During his senior year in high school and also while attending college, Roger would drink socially with friends and occasionally get drunk. Annette knew of his drinking when they started dating, but it never seemed to be a problem and she had never actually seen him drunk. Roger’s mother was an alcoholic and died four years ago from complications related to her drinking. She was 67 at the time. Her brother (Roger’s uncle) has also been in a detox center twice for drinking problems. One of the reasons Roger was coming home late was because he was stopping at a bar to have a drink with several of his coworkers. What started out as a beer or two once a week after work, became a six-pack three or four times a week. Drinking on the weekends also became more routine and he no longer tried to hide it from Annette. She also recently found pornography on his computer. Annette greatly resents the drinking and is becoming increasingly concerned.

Her primary way of dealing with the issue is to lecture and moralize the situation. Roger responds with anger, sullenness and most recently, by leaving the house for hours at a time. He doesn’t believe he has a serious problem with alcohol and that he could stop if he really wanted to. Besides, he feels like it, “calms him down” after the stress of his workday. He appears aloof and somewhat suspicious of others.

About a month ago, Roger stopped attending church with his family. Annette has explored the possibility of seeing a counselor for help. After a lot of asking, complaining and even a threat by Annette to separate, Roger has agreed to come in. He says he loves his family, but doesn’t know, “what the big deal” is really all about. He doesn’t believe that the Bible expressly prohibits drinking altogether.

**## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 105 to >97 pts

Advanced

All components as
described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed. Student
followed the Case
Study Analysis
Template and used
headings A through
E. Student
demonstrated
advanced critical
thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
demonstrated
advanced prowess
in elaborating on
the Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student
incorporated and
synthesized course
materials.

97 to >88 pts

Proficient

Most components
as described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed.
Student followed
the Case Study
Analysis Template
and used headings
A through E.
Student proficiently
demonstrated
critical thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
was proficient at
elaborating on the
Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student adequately
incorporated and
synthesized course
materials.

88 to >80 pts

Developing

Few components
as described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed.
Student followed
most of the Case
Study Analysis
Template and used
headings A
through E. Student
exemplified
developing
demonstration of
critical thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
elaborated on the
Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student
incorporated and
synthesized
course materials.

80 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Few components as
described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed. Student
inadequately followed
the Case Study
Analysis Template
and used headings A
through E.
Organization was
lacking. Student
inadequately
demonstrated critical
thinking,
problem-solving, and
an organized,
theory-based
counseling approach.
Student did not meet
expectations in
elaborating on the
Chosen Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope is 2
pages). Student failed
to adequately
incorporate and
synthesize course
materials.

0 pts

Not
present

/ 105
pts

Mechanics 45 to >40 pts

Advanced

Student
demonstrated
exemplary
grammar, diction
and APA
formatting.

40 to >38 pts

Proficient

Student
demonstrated
proficient grammar,
diction and APA
formatting.

38 to >33 pts

Developing

Student
demonstrated
average quality
grammar, diction
and APA
formatting.

33 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Student demonstrated
poor grammar, diction
and APA formatting.

0 pts

No
Marks

/ 45
pts

Total Points: –

Case Study Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

**## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

**## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx**

EDCO 811

**Case Study Analyses Assignment Instructions**

**Overview**

You must complete 2
**Case Study Analyses Assignments**. Review files for both
**Case Study Analysis: Paul and Diane** and
**Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**. Both describe hypothetical presenting problems with a couple. Using the
**Case Study Analysis Template** (see below), provide a thorough, systematic, and holistic summary.

**Instruction**

· Suggested scope: 5 pages (excluding title page and reference page).

· Devote 2 of your pages to the integration of your selected theoretical model

· Current APA format

· Include 5 scholarly references published within the last 12 years

· Utilize the
**Case Study and Analysis Template** (see below) to write your paper

· Description of how you would approach working with the couple

· The theoretical orientation/model you are using.

· Your analysis/assessment of the case;

Important: Follow the template,
**Case Study Analysis Template,** Headings A through E, to organize and present your paper. All of these sections must be included in your final submission.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

—————————————————————-

## Case Study Management and Analysis Form

## Each case study summary should incorporate the following elements: A – _Achieving_ a Connection

How would you connect with this couple and begin to form a helping relationship (in 2-3 paragraphs)?

**B –**
**_Breaking Down_ the Problem**

1. Define/summarize the following (in bullet-point format):

· Physical and/or Medical needs and issues

· Emotional needs and issues

· Family/Social/Relational needs and issues

· Mental/Psychological needs and issues

· Financial, Vocational or Other/Practical needs and issues

· Spiritual needs and Issues

2. Assess the scope of the presenting problems by utilizing the scales (1-10) below, state the overall level of risk/distress, and provide a summary paragraph:

**_Frequency_ Score:**

How often are problems occurring, issues arising and/or certain behaviors being displayed?

0 2 4 6 8 10

< 1x per month weekly daily

**_Intensity_ Score:**

How strong/evident is the level of pain, distress, or crisis – physically, emotionally, relationally, psychologically, financially/vocationally, spiritually, etc.?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| mild | | | moderate | | | extreme |

**_Duration_ Score:**

How long does the impact of crisis moments linger/last when they manifest?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| a few hours | | | 1-2 days | | | > 1 week |

Page 2 of 2

**_Variability_ Score:**

How many different issues, problems and/or crisis points are present in the marriage?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| one issue | | | 3-4 issues | | | > 6 issues |

## Overall Score:

(
**4-15:** Low Risk;
**16-25:** Moderate Risk;
**26-40:** High Risk)

**C –**
**_Committing_ to a Plan of Action**

What steps does the
**_counselor_** need to consider/take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

What steps does the
**_couple_** need to consider take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

**D –**
**_Documenting_ the Interaction**

What are the potential legal, ethical, and/or liability related issues, if any (in bullet-point format)?

**E –**
**_Explaining_ the Chosen Theoretical Orientation**

Select one theoretical orientation/model for marriage counseling (e.g., behavioral, emotion- centered, psychodynamic, multigenerational, social constructionist, etc.) and describe (in a two-page summary) how a counselor would work with the couple using the constructs, techniques, and interventions specifically related to the chosen theory.

A different theoretical orientation/model will be used for each case study.

**WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscriptamarriagetwodieforpart3-pdf)

**Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582525)

**## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx**

EDCO 811

**Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**

Roger is a 43-year old husband and father. He has been married for 11 years and has two children, eight and five. Currently, he works as a middle manager for a large engineering firm. The office is located almost an hour away and it is an extremely stressful work environment because of bidding competition and project deadlines. The company has mentioned a possible downsizing of the workforce due to ongoing economic pressures and middle management is seen as being the most vulnerable. Roger has been with the company for seven years now.

Annette, Roger’s wife also works. She is an office manager for a local pediatrician but may have to leave due to recurring back problems and other health concerns. The possible loss of her income has strained the marriage a bit, especially over the past six months.

Roger works late many days and sometimes doesn’t get home until after the children have gone to bed. Lately, he has appeared to be increasingly irritable and frequently “loses it” and ends up yelling at Annette or the kids. During his senior year in high school and also while attending college, Roger would drink socially with friends and occasionally get drunk. Annette knew of his drinking when they started dating, but it never seemed to be a problem and she had never actually seen him drunk. Roger’s mother was an alcoholic and died four years ago from complications related to her drinking. She was 67 at the time. Her brother (Roger’s uncle) has also been in a detox center twice for drinking problems. One of the reasons Roger was coming home late was because he was stopping at a bar to have a drink with several of his coworkers. What started out as a beer or two once a week after work, became a six-pack three or four times a week. Drinking on the weekends also became more routine and he no longer tried to hide it from Annette. She also recently found pornography on his computer. Annette greatly resents the drinking and is becoming increasingly concerned.

Her primary way of dealing with the issue is to lecture and moralize the situation. Roger responds with anger, sullenness and most recently, by leaving the house for hours at a time. He doesn’t believe he has a serious problem with alcohol and that he could stop if he really wanted to. Besides, he feels like it, “calms him down” after the stress of his workday. He appears aloof and somewhat suspicious of others.

About a month ago, Roger stopped attending church with his family. Annette has explored the possibility of seeing a counselor for help. After a lot of asking, complaining and even a threat by Annette to separate, Roger has agreed to come in. He says he loves his family, but doesn’t know, “what the big deal” is really all about. He doesn’t believe that the Bible expressly prohibits drinking altogether.

**## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 105 to >97 pts

Advanced

All components as
described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed. Student
followed the Case
Study Analysis
Template and used
headings A through
E. Student
demonstrated
advanced critical
thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
demonstrated
advanced prowess
in elaborating on
the Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student
incorporated and
synthesized course
materials.

97 to >88 pts

Proficient

Most components
as described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed.
Student followed
the Case Study
Analysis Template
and used headings
A through E.
Student proficiently
demonstrated
critical thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
was proficient at
elaborating on the
Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student adequately
incorporated and
synthesized course
materials.

88 to >80 pts

Developing

Few components
as described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed.
Student followed
most of the Case
Study Analysis
Template and used
headings A
through E. Student
exemplified
developing
demonstration of
critical thinking,
problem-solving,
and an organized,
theory-based
counseling
approach. Student
elaborated on the
Chosen
Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope
is 2 pages).
Student
incorporated and
synthesized
course materials.

80 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Few components as
described in the
assignment have
been thoroughly
addressed. Student
inadequately followed
the Case Study
Analysis Template
and used headings A
through E.
Organization was
lacking. Student
inadequately
demonstrated critical
thinking,
problem-solving, and
an organized,
theory-based
counseling approach.
Student did not meet
expectations in
elaborating on the
Chosen Theoretical
Orientation
(suggested scope is 2
pages). Student failed
to adequately
incorporate and
synthesize course
materials.

0 pts

Not
present

/ 105
pts

Mechanics 45 to >40 pts

Advanced

Student
demonstrated
exemplary
grammar, diction
and APA
formatting.

40 to >38 pts

Proficient

Student
demonstrated
proficient grammar,
diction and APA
formatting.

38 to >33 pts

Developing

Student
demonstrated
average quality
grammar, diction
and APA
formatting.

33 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Student demonstrated
poor grammar, diction
and APA formatting.

0 pts

No
Marks

/ 45
pts

Total Points: –

Case Study Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

**## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

**## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx**

EDCO 811

**Case Study Analyses Assignment Instructions**

**Overview**

You must complete 2
**Case Study Analyses Assignments**. Review files for both
**Case Study Analysis: Paul and Diane** and
**Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**. Both describe hypothetical presenting problems with a couple. Using the
**Case Study Analysis Template** (see below), provide a thorough, systematic, and holistic summary.

**Instruction**

· Suggested scope: 5 pages (excluding title page and reference page).

· Devote 2 of your pages to the integration of your selected theoretical model

· Current APA format

· Include 5 scholarly references published within the last 12 years

· Utilize the
**Case Study and Analysis Template** (see below) to write your paper

· Description of how you would approach working with the couple

· The theoretical orientation/model you are using.

· Your analysis/assessment of the case;

Important: Follow the template,
**Case Study Analysis Template,** Headings A through E, to organize and present your paper. All of these sections must be included in your final submission.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

—————————————————————-

## Case Study Management and Analysis Form

## Each case study summary should incorporate the following elements: A – _Achieving_ a Connection

How would you connect with this couple and begin to form a helping relationship (in 2-3 paragraphs)?

**B –**
**_Breaking Down_ the Problem**

1. Define/summarize the following (in bullet-point format):

· Physical and/or Medical needs and issues

· Emotional needs and issues

· Family/Social/Relational needs and issues

· Mental/Psychological needs and issues

· Financial, Vocational or Other/Practical needs and issues

· Spiritual needs and Issues

2. Assess the scope of the presenting problems by utilizing the scales (1-10) below, state the overall level of risk/distress, and provide a summary paragraph:

**_Frequency_ Score:**

How often are problems occurring, issues arising and/or certain behaviors being displayed?

0 2 4 6 8 10

< 1x per month weekly daily

**_Intensity_ Score:**

How strong/evident is the level of pain, distress, or crisis – physically, emotionally, relationally, psychologically, financially/vocationally, spiritually, etc.?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| mild | | | moderate | | | extreme |

**_Duration_ Score:**

How long does the impact of crisis moments linger/last when they manifest?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| a few hours | | | 1-2 days | | | > 1 week |

Page 2 of 2

**_Variability_ Score:**

How many different issues, problems and/or crisis points are present in the marriage?

| | | | | | | |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| one issue | | | 3-4 issues | | | > 6 issues |

## Overall Score:

(
**4-15:** Low Risk;
**16-25:** Moderate Risk;
**26-40:** High Risk)

**C –**
**_Committing_ to a Plan of Action**

What steps does the
**_counselor_** need to consider/take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

What steps does the
**_couple_** need to consider take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

**D –**
**_Documenting_ the Interaction**

What are the potential legal, ethical, and/or liability related issues, if any (in bullet-point format)?

**E –**
**_Explaining_ the Chosen Theoretical Orientation**

Select one theoretical orientation/model for marriage counseling (e.g., behavioral, emotion- centered, psychodynamic, multigenerational, social constructionist, etc.) and describe (in a two-page summary) how a counselor would work with the couple using the constructs, techniques, and interventions specifically related to the chosen theory.

A different theoretical orientation/model will be used for each case study.

**WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscriptamarriagetwodieforpart3-pdf)

**Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582525)