Category: Clinical & Abnormal Psychology

  • [Solved] D6- MC

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow Instructions **files (4)** – ## DiscussionInstructions-SacrificeandAccountability.docx – ## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf – ## WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf – Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf **## DiscussionInstructions-Sacrificeand…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow Instructions

    **files (4)**

    – ## DiscussionInstructions-SacrificeandAccountability.docx

    – ## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf

    – ## WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf

    – Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf

    **## DiscussionInstructions-SacrificeandAccountability.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Sacrifice and Accountability**

    This Discussion features part 3 of the video lecture “A Marriage Two Die For.”

    In this presentation, Dr. Scalise continues outlining 7 factors in creating good marriages. This Discussion Activity covers the last two: Sacrifice and Accountability.

    What happens to two individuals when they marry? Discuss the challenges and rewards of becoming a couple. Be mindful that this is a process, not an event. Whether you have been married for a few days or a few decades, the task is ongoing.

    Based on your knowledge and/or experience, discuss your own approach to teaching concepts related to sacrifice and accountability in marriage. Even if you are not married, approach this from a theoretical perspective.

    Support your assertions and, of course, you may use scripture.

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 6 Discussion Activities in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 500 words. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly references (with accompanying citations) in current APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last 12 years. Acceptable sources include our textbooks, scholarly articles, and the Bible.

    **## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    **## WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

    We've now unpacked five of the seven factors that I believe help contribute to
    dynamic, healthy,
    vibrant marriages. Now let's look
    at the final two to look completely
    at the roadmap. I'm trying to give
    you some things that I think it's
    important for you to pay attention
    to engaged couples and spouses as you're
    doing marriage work. The sixth factor
    is sacrifice, hence the title of this
    three part series, A Marriage to Die For. If people want to have
    a marriage to die for, it often takes
    two people who are willing to die for it. Sacrifice is an
    important part of any healthy marriage. It's certainly
    a theme that is expressed many times
    over in scripture, is it Not necessarily
    the story of Christ and his coming to the Earth and his
    work on the cross. It's a matter
    of sacrifice. Sacrifice is
    defined, Thus, forfeiture of
    something highly valued for the
    sake of something considered to have
    a greater value or claim relinquishment
    at a cost. Boy, I like
    that forfeiture of something highly valued for the sake of something considered to
    have a greater value. I think it's important
    for husbands and wives almost to see the marriage
    as an entity, as having greater value than either of
    them individually. I've talked to couples before, they'll say, hey, we have a great
    marriage, we got a 50, 50 marriage. And I'll say that's
    half a marriage. And look and
    say, no, no, no. Both say, listen, 50, 50 is not a
    whole marriage. You giving 100 and your husband or
    wife given 100, that makes for a
    whole marriage. It's equal in that sense. What did Jesus
    say in Luke 923? He says, if anyone
    wishes to come after me, he must deny himself,
    take up his cross, and follow me with any marriage
    relationship comes a little bit of the need to be able to lay
    down my rights, my wants, my
    wishes, my needs, my expectations for
    the sake of the other. I realize there's balance. I realize there's
    principles here and certain boundaries
    in terms of morality and a
    number of things. But a healthy marriage often is when two
    people come together, and at some level
    they can both say, listen, I get
    it, I get it, that I don't get
    everything I want when I want and how I want
    it, and that's okay. I'm thinking of my spouse. It's practicing what I call

    relational
    gift giving. Most couples you work
    with, if you said, hey, have you ever
    given each other a gift, Christmas, a birthday anniversary,
    Valentine, whatever most husbands
    and wife would say. Sure. If you said, well, why did you give a
    gift to your spouse? Many people would
    say, well listen, I give gifts because it's a way of
    saying I love you. It's a way of
    saying you're important to me,
    I care for you. I enjoy seeing you
    blessed and happy. All great answers, right? So I often say, listen, as you're
    shopping for a gift or as you're
    considering a gift, maybe you're making it or producing it or buying it. The focus
    is where
    the focus isn't on the one who's purchasing the gift or
    making the gift. What would please them or make them happy, right? For example, I
    don't have a, I don't care a whole
    lot about jewelry. I don't wear a
    lot of jewelry. Watches, necklaces, bracelets, what, whatever. But my wife loves
    jewelry. Okay? And so it's
    easy to shop for her. Sometimes she
    particularly likes rings. And so as I'm
    shopping, I'm like, it doesn't matter
    if the jewelry, if the ring doesn't
    give me a great wow, it's not for me,
    it's for her. And so I talk about relational gift giving
    in terms of hey, it's okay if it's
    not about you, it's for your spouse, it may be sacrificial. You are no doubt
    familiar with
    Gary Chapman's, the five Love Languages. And you might say,
    but my love language is words of affirmation. Gee, I sure wish
    that they would speak more words of
    affirmation to me. But the spouses might
    be quality time, so I say, hey,
    sacrifice time. And it might be a sacrifice for
    you to give time, if that's your spouse's
    love language, because it's a way of
    being sacrificial. The longer I've
    walked with God, and perhaps this is
    for you as well. Have you ever had
    the sense that God has asked you
    to do something sacrificial on his
    behalf or for another? Probably you have. I have, but there are
    also times when I feel like God has
    come to me and said, Eric, I'm not necessarily asking you to do something
    sacrificial for somebody I'm asking you to
    be the sacrifice, and that's a whole
    different game, and there are many, many times in a marriage thank God is saying
    no, no, no, no. Yeah. There are

    times I want you to do something
    sacrificial, but there are also
    times I want you to be the sacrifice for your
    husband or your wife. I often ask couples
    when they come in, like I do with
    many clients. Okay. What are we
    aiming at here? What's the goal
    of counseling? What are we looking
    at? Because I like to get a sense of the
    target. Right? And so I was talking
    and I asked the couple, I said, okay, so
    help me understand, you know, what
    we're aiming at. And he looked at
    me and he said, I'm hoping I want resurrection in
    my marriage. That's how we framed it. I want our marriage
    resurrected, which is a fine goal. It was perhaps
    in the moment, but I looked at him on
    the spot and I said, okay, are you willing to experience the death
    that precedes it? I'm thinking, well,
    resurrection is great, but you can't have resurrection unless
    something died. In essence, I was saying, what is it you
    need to die for or die on behalf of
    your marriage or your spouse in
    order to experience the resurrection
    that you're saying that you
    want to focus on? I think that's important. Um, sacrifice is part of any healthy
    marriage. I help couples
    unpack that. What does it look
    like? Are you willing are you willing to carry that
    cross if Christ asks you to do that?
    It's an important piece. A marriage to die
    for, not just one. Both are willing
    to die. I get it. Then the last
    factor I want to look at is
    accountability. Call it coachability. If you want, the
    great ones seem to surround themselves
    with others who continue to speak
    in their lives. It is such a
    critical factor. Listen, Michael Jordan, as great as he was,
    had a coach. Tiger Woods, as
    great as he is a golf player in his prime, had
    a swing coach. I mean, the thought of someone teaching
    or helping him swing a golf club seems on the surface
    ludicrous, right? Yo yo ma. The great
    cellist. Guess what? He has a music
    coach, Pavarati, the great Italian tenor,
    had a voice coach. The people who are great surround themselves
    with others. And they invite others to continue to speak
    into their lives, train them, orient them. That is such a
    critical factor. Someone once told me that accountability was the breakfast

    of champions, but too many of us skip the most important
    meal of the day. Let me give you
    a definition of accountability,
    answerability, a willing obligation
    to accept responsibility to account
    for one's actions. It's a form of
    trustworthiness. I really like that because I so often see people, No, no, no, no
    one's
    telling me what to do. Right. It's part of broken, fallen
    human nature. To be self oriented
    in a marriage, we have to be thinking
    of the marriage and the spouse,
    and so I get it. Accountability is good. Ecclesiastic.
    49 Solomon says this two are
    better than one. If either of them
    falls, the one will lift up
    his companion, woe to the one who falls, and there's not another
    to lift them up in a three fold cord is not
    easily broken apart. Listen, I used to climb quite a bit, used
    to mountain climb, and so I'm very
    familiar with the metaphor of being
    roped up with somebody. When you're at 3,000
    feet up on the face, a piece of granite, life becomes a little bit more focused for
    you. And I was always tuned in to if I was
    leading the climb, that I literally had my climbing partner's life in the palm of my
    hand because I might be anchored in, but the rope is
    just around you and you're just blaying them up that mountain. And so I often see
    marriage the same way. There are some risks
    out there on the face, but the goal was not
    for me to sum it, and my partner not
    to, or vice versa. The goal was, hey, let's
    both get to the top, Let's do it
    together because we're roped up and we have some accountability and responsibility
    with each other in overcoming these obstacles
    called the mountain. Marriage is much
    the same way, but I understand that
    there is warfare. I already mentioned that I think the enemy of
    our soul, Satan, hates the picture
    of marriage, and he'll try to destroy
    that any way he can. And so we have to
    understand there is a spiritual
    warfare component in doing marriage work within a Christian
    context. I was channel surfing some time ago and I was, I think it was
    animal planet, I don't know why, but it was a story about lions and how they hunt.
    It interested me, so I paused and I found out, actually the lionesses
    do the hunting. The guys just eat first. And I thought, okay, I
    get it, I'm watching. And apparently,
    intuitively, lions will seek
    out of a herd, a weak, a sick,
    an injured, or a smaller animal. And they'll work

    in 2.3 to target that identified animal
    and try to glean it out of the herd
    because they would sort of chase
    it and run alongside. And you think, well,
    why didn't they just jump on the one
    that was closest? Because they're
    working together very intentionally to glean out that
    targeted animal. And it was a herd
    of water buffalo, and there was one
    that was limping that these two lionesses
    had their eyes on, and they kept scattering the herd. Scattering
    the herd. And when this targeted limping water buffalo
    was all alone, they broke off what they were doing and
    they jumped it. And the minute I saw that scene on television, the scripture and
    first Peter 58 came to me says, be wary of your adversary who prowls around like a
    roaring lion looking
    for someone to devour. And I thought, wow, that is an important principle
    in working with couples because
    the enemy of our soul prowls around
    looking for a lion. But I noticed this, he's looking for some one. Satan rarely
    looks for the many. He's a coward. But he will look
    for the one, he'll look for the
    one that's isolated. The one who's
    cut off, the one who has no
    support systems. The one who is
    just, you know, in that victim
    place or wherever it is because they're
    the vulnerable one. They're the one
    most at risk. And he'll look to
    pick that one off. And so it's important
    that we work with couples to have
    accountability. You as a counselor will be an accountability
    partner for a season. But I love the thought
    of marriage mentoring. I love the thought of couples working
    with couples. I love the thought
    of established, healthy older
    couples working with some of those young or
    newly married ones. And so I believe that we have to
    encourage this. Let me share a scripture in closing that
    highlights this, because this is, to me, is a really
    important principle. I was doing my
    Bible reading. Reading the Bible
    through a year. You read some
    Old Testament, some New Testament, five Psalms and a
    proverbs, right? Some of you maybe have
    done that before. I'm reading my Old
    Testament passage from the day I'm reading in First Kings,
    Chapter four. I don't know
    about you, but I don't particularly
    like lists, especially lists of names. I can barely

    pronounce. I'm like, why is that in the
    scripture God? What relevance
    does it have? I'm reading in first Kings four and I'm reading out of the new
    American
    standard here. Says now King
    Solomon was king over all of Israel and these were his officials. I'm like God. It's
    a list really these are
    his officials. As the son of Zadok
    was the priest, El Hoof and Asha, the sons of Shisha,
    were secretaries. Say that three
    times. Real fast. I thought, well,
    it's interesting the guy had two
    secretaries. But so what? I don't care. Jehoshaphat, the son of a hilud was the
    recorder,
    whatever that is. Ben and I, the
    son of Johda, was over the army. Zadok and Abathar were
    priests. I don't care. As the son of Nathan
    was over the deputies, Aisha was over
    the household. Adar, the son of Abda was over the
    men's subject. I'm like, yeah,
    okay, interesting. But what relevance? And then I read
    this and Zabud, the son of
    Nathan, a priest, was the king's friend.
    Oh my goodness. All of a sudden,
    it makes sense. Here's the wisest
    man supposedly, who ever lived, who had the wisdom to
    have on his team. At least one person
    who appeared to serve the primary role of being his friend. The question I have
    of a couple is, who is around you? That their role is
    to be that friend, to be that
    accountability partner, the person that
    you can unpack your dirty laundry with, that you can be
    honest and real with, and you allow them to be a truth teller back
    into your life. Let me say it again. The son of
    Nathan, a priest. Now I want you to
    think about this. Who is Zabsatherathan? Do you remember
    the story of Nathan and Solomon's
    father, David? Nathan had some
    interesting things to say to David when he sinned with
    Bathsheba, didn't he? Here is the
    prophet's son, now, the best friend of the king's son somewhere.
    Solomon got it. That was probably a
    good thing for my dad. It's probably a
    good thing for me. As you're working
    with couples, encourage them
    to find a zab. Yes, husbands and wives
    within their marriage need to help have
    some accountability. But listen, men and
    women are wired a little differently and husbands need other men, and wives need
    other women That we surround ourselves

    with a few key people, a few people that
    can help hold them accountable for
    the things that God might be doing
    in their life, in their walk with him, and in their marriage. So I've given you
    seven factors in what I believe helps create healthy gold medal
    world class marriages. Capacity, having a focus or a goal
    orientation, right? Time, perseverance,
    consistency, sacrifice and
    accountability. These are all
    very critical. And so I hope as you're working with couples that you have an
    opportunity to engage them on some
    of these topics. And if they
    engage in a way that's dynamic,
    forthright, honest. And they will, I believe, have the right
    kind of roadmap, the right kind of tools that they can have
    a healthy marriage. So I just wanted to say God bless you
    in your work, hope this is helpful in your own ministry or
    career path. God bless

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582533)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582533)

    **## DiscussionInstructions-SacrificeandAccountability.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Sacrifice and Accountability**

    This Discussion features part 3 of the video lecture “A Marriage Two Die For.”

    In this presentation, Dr. Scalise continues outlining 7 factors in creating good marriages. This Discussion Activity covers the last two: Sacrifice and Accountability.

    What happens to two individuals when they marry? Discuss the challenges and rewards of becoming a couple. Be mindful that this is a process, not an event. Whether you have been married for a few days or a few decades, the task is ongoing.

    Based on your knowledge and/or experience, discuss your own approach to teaching concepts related to sacrifice and accountability in marriage. Even if you are not married, approach this from a theoretical perspective.

    Support your assertions and, of course, you may use scripture.

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 6 Discussion Activities in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 500 words. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly references (with accompanying citations) in current APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last 12 years. Acceptable sources include our textbooks, scholarly articles, and the Bible.

    **## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    **## WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

    We've now unpacked five of the seven factors that I believe help contribute to
    dynamic, healthy,
    vibrant marriages. Now let's look
    at the final two to look completely
    at the roadmap. I'm trying to give
    you some things that I think it's
    important for you to pay attention
    to engaged couples and spouses as you're
    doing marriage work. The sixth factor
    is sacrifice, hence the title of this
    three part series, A Marriage to Die For. If people want to have
    a marriage to die for, it often takes
    two people who are willing to die for it. Sacrifice is an
    important part of any healthy marriage. It's certainly
    a theme that is expressed many times
    over in scripture, is it Not necessarily
    the story of Christ and his coming to the Earth and his
    work on the cross. It's a matter
    of sacrifice. Sacrifice is
    defined, Thus, forfeiture of
    something highly valued for the
    sake of something considered to have
    a greater value or claim relinquishment
    at a cost. Boy, I like
    that forfeiture of something highly valued for the sake of something considered to
    have a greater value. I think it's important
    for husbands and wives almost to see the marriage
    as an entity, as having greater value than either of
    them individually. I've talked to couples before, they'll say, hey, we have a great
    marriage, we got a 50, 50 marriage. And I'll say that's
    half a marriage. And look and
    say, no, no, no. Both say, listen, 50, 50 is not a
    whole marriage. You giving 100 and your husband or
    wife given 100, that makes for a
    whole marriage. It's equal in that sense. What did Jesus
    say in Luke 923? He says, if anyone
    wishes to come after me, he must deny himself,
    take up his cross, and follow me with any marriage
    relationship comes a little bit of the need to be able to lay
    down my rights, my wants, my
    wishes, my needs, my expectations for
    the sake of the other. I realize there's balance. I realize there's
    principles here and certain boundaries
    in terms of morality and a
    number of things. But a healthy marriage often is when two
    people come together, and at some level
    they can both say, listen, I get
    it, I get it, that I don't get
    everything I want when I want and how I want
    it, and that's okay. I'm thinking of my spouse. It's practicing what I call

    relational
    gift giving. Most couples you work
    with, if you said, hey, have you ever
    given each other a gift, Christmas, a birthday anniversary,
    Valentine, whatever most husbands
    and wife would say. Sure. If you said, well, why did you give a
    gift to your spouse? Many people would
    say, well listen, I give gifts because it's a way of
    saying I love you. It's a way of
    saying you're important to me,
    I care for you. I enjoy seeing you
    blessed and happy. All great answers, right? So I often say, listen, as you're
    shopping for a gift or as you're
    considering a gift, maybe you're making it or producing it or buying it. The focus
    is where
    the focus isn't on the one who's purchasing the gift or
    making the gift. What would please them or make them happy, right? For example, I
    don't have a, I don't care a whole
    lot about jewelry. I don't wear a
    lot of jewelry. Watches, necklaces, bracelets, what, whatever. But my wife loves
    jewelry. Okay? And so it's
    easy to shop for her. Sometimes she
    particularly likes rings. And so as I'm
    shopping, I'm like, it doesn't matter
    if the jewelry, if the ring doesn't
    give me a great wow, it's not for me,
    it's for her. And so I talk about relational gift giving
    in terms of hey, it's okay if it's
    not about you, it's for your spouse, it may be sacrificial. You are no doubt
    familiar with
    Gary Chapman's, the five Love Languages. And you might say,
    but my love language is words of affirmation. Gee, I sure wish
    that they would speak more words of
    affirmation to me. But the spouses might
    be quality time, so I say, hey,
    sacrifice time. And it might be a sacrifice for
    you to give time, if that's your spouse's
    love language, because it's a way of
    being sacrificial. The longer I've
    walked with God, and perhaps this is
    for you as well. Have you ever had
    the sense that God has asked you
    to do something sacrificial on his
    behalf or for another? Probably you have. I have, but there are
    also times when I feel like God has
    come to me and said, Eric, I'm not necessarily asking you to do something
    sacrificial for somebody I'm asking you to
    be the sacrifice, and that's a whole
    different game, and there are many, many times in a marriage thank God is saying
    no, no, no, no. Yeah. There are

    times I want you to do something
    sacrificial, but there are also
    times I want you to be the sacrifice for your
    husband or your wife. I often ask couples
    when they come in, like I do with
    many clients. Okay. What are we
    aiming at here? What's the goal
    of counseling? What are we looking
    at? Because I like to get a sense of the
    target. Right? And so I was talking
    and I asked the couple, I said, okay, so
    help me understand, you know, what
    we're aiming at. And he looked at
    me and he said, I'm hoping I want resurrection in
    my marriage. That's how we framed it. I want our marriage
    resurrected, which is a fine goal. It was perhaps
    in the moment, but I looked at him on
    the spot and I said, okay, are you willing to experience the death
    that precedes it? I'm thinking, well,
    resurrection is great, but you can't have resurrection unless
    something died. In essence, I was saying, what is it you
    need to die for or die on behalf of
    your marriage or your spouse in
    order to experience the resurrection
    that you're saying that you
    want to focus on? I think that's important. Um, sacrifice is part of any healthy
    marriage. I help couples
    unpack that. What does it look
    like? Are you willing are you willing to carry that
    cross if Christ asks you to do that?
    It's an important piece. A marriage to die
    for, not just one. Both are willing
    to die. I get it. Then the last
    factor I want to look at is
    accountability. Call it coachability. If you want, the
    great ones seem to surround themselves
    with others who continue to speak
    in their lives. It is such a
    critical factor. Listen, Michael Jordan, as great as he was,
    had a coach. Tiger Woods, as
    great as he is a golf player in his prime, had
    a swing coach. I mean, the thought of someone teaching
    or helping him swing a golf club seems on the surface
    ludicrous, right? Yo yo ma. The great
    cellist. Guess what? He has a music
    coach, Pavarati, the great Italian tenor,
    had a voice coach. The people who are great surround themselves
    with others. And they invite others to continue to speak
    into their lives, train them, orient them. That is such a
    critical factor. Someone once told me that accountability was the breakfast

    of champions, but too many of us skip the most important
    meal of the day. Let me give you
    a definition of accountability,
    answerability, a willing obligation
    to accept responsibility to account
    for one's actions. It's a form of
    trustworthiness. I really like that because I so often see people, No, no, no, no
    one's
    telling me what to do. Right. It's part of broken, fallen
    human nature. To be self oriented
    in a marriage, we have to be thinking
    of the marriage and the spouse,
    and so I get it. Accountability is good. Ecclesiastic.
    49 Solomon says this two are
    better than one. If either of them
    falls, the one will lift up
    his companion, woe to the one who falls, and there's not another
    to lift them up in a three fold cord is not
    easily broken apart. Listen, I used to climb quite a bit, used
    to mountain climb, and so I'm very
    familiar with the metaphor of being
    roped up with somebody. When you're at 3,000
    feet up on the face, a piece of granite, life becomes a little bit more focused for
    you. And I was always tuned in to if I was
    leading the climb, that I literally had my climbing partner's life in the palm of my
    hand because I might be anchored in, but the rope is
    just around you and you're just blaying them up that mountain. And so I often see
    marriage the same way. There are some risks
    out there on the face, but the goal was not
    for me to sum it, and my partner not
    to, or vice versa. The goal was, hey, let's
    both get to the top, Let's do it
    together because we're roped up and we have some accountability and responsibility
    with each other in overcoming these obstacles
    called the mountain. Marriage is much
    the same way, but I understand that
    there is warfare. I already mentioned that I think the enemy of
    our soul, Satan, hates the picture
    of marriage, and he'll try to destroy
    that any way he can. And so we have to
    understand there is a spiritual
    warfare component in doing marriage work within a Christian
    context. I was channel surfing some time ago and I was, I think it was
    animal planet, I don't know why, but it was a story about lions and how they hunt.
    It interested me, so I paused and I found out, actually the lionesses
    do the hunting. The guys just eat first. And I thought, okay, I
    get it, I'm watching. And apparently,
    intuitively, lions will seek
    out of a herd, a weak, a sick,
    an injured, or a smaller animal. And they'll work

    in 2.3 to target that identified animal
    and try to glean it out of the herd
    because they would sort of chase
    it and run alongside. And you think, well,
    why didn't they just jump on the one
    that was closest? Because they're
    working together very intentionally to glean out that
    targeted animal. And it was a herd
    of water buffalo, and there was one
    that was limping that these two lionesses
    had their eyes on, and they kept scattering the herd. Scattering
    the herd. And when this targeted limping water buffalo
    was all alone, they broke off what they were doing and
    they jumped it. And the minute I saw that scene on television, the scripture and
    first Peter 58 came to me says, be wary of your adversary who prowls around like a
    roaring lion looking
    for someone to devour. And I thought, wow, that is an important principle
    in working with couples because
    the enemy of our soul prowls around
    looking for a lion. But I noticed this, he's looking for some one. Satan rarely
    looks for the many. He's a coward. But he will look
    for the one, he'll look for the
    one that's isolated. The one who's
    cut off, the one who has no
    support systems. The one who is
    just, you know, in that victim
    place or wherever it is because they're
    the vulnerable one. They're the one
    most at risk. And he'll look to
    pick that one off. And so it's important
    that we work with couples to have
    accountability. You as a counselor will be an accountability
    partner for a season. But I love the thought
    of marriage mentoring. I love the thought of couples working
    with couples. I love the thought
    of established, healthy older
    couples working with some of those young or
    newly married ones. And so I believe that we have to
    encourage this. Let me share a scripture in closing that
    highlights this, because this is, to me, is a really
    important principle. I was doing my
    Bible reading. Reading the Bible
    through a year. You read some
    Old Testament, some New Testament, five Psalms and a
    proverbs, right? Some of you maybe have
    done that before. I'm reading my Old
    Testament passage from the day I'm reading in First Kings,
    Chapter four. I don't know
    about you, but I don't particularly
    like lists, especially lists of names. I can barely

    pronounce. I'm like, why is that in the
    scripture God? What relevance
    does it have? I'm reading in first Kings four and I'm reading out of the new
    American
    standard here. Says now King
    Solomon was king over all of Israel and these were his officials. I'm like God. It's
    a list really these are
    his officials. As the son of Zadok
    was the priest, El Hoof and Asha, the sons of Shisha,
    were secretaries. Say that three
    times. Real fast. I thought, well,
    it's interesting the guy had two
    secretaries. But so what? I don't care. Jehoshaphat, the son of a hilud was the
    recorder,
    whatever that is. Ben and I, the
    son of Johda, was over the army. Zadok and Abathar were
    priests. I don't care. As the son of Nathan
    was over the deputies, Aisha was over
    the household. Adar, the son of Abda was over the
    men's subject. I'm like, yeah,
    okay, interesting. But what relevance? And then I read
    this and Zabud, the son of
    Nathan, a priest, was the king's friend.
    Oh my goodness. All of a sudden,
    it makes sense. Here's the wisest
    man supposedly, who ever lived, who had the wisdom to
    have on his team. At least one person
    who appeared to serve the primary role of being his friend. The question I have
    of a couple is, who is around you? That their role is
    to be that friend, to be that
    accountability partner, the person that
    you can unpack your dirty laundry with, that you can be
    honest and real with, and you allow them to be a truth teller back
    into your life. Let me say it again. The son of
    Nathan, a priest. Now I want you to
    think about this. Who is Zabsatherathan? Do you remember
    the story of Nathan and Solomon's
    father, David? Nathan had some
    interesting things to say to David when he sinned with
    Bathsheba, didn't he? Here is the
    prophet's son, now, the best friend of the king's son somewhere.
    Solomon got it. That was probably a
    good thing for my dad. It's probably a
    good thing for me. As you're working
    with couples, encourage them
    to find a zab. Yes, husbands and wives
    within their marriage need to help have
    some accountability. But listen, men and
    women are wired a little differently and husbands need other men, and wives need
    other women That we surround ourselves

    with a few key people, a few people that
    can help hold them accountable for
    the things that God might be doing
    in their life, in their walk with him, and in their marriage. So I've given you
    seven factors in what I believe helps create healthy gold medal
    world class marriages. Capacity, having a focus or a goal
    orientation, right? Time, perseverance,
    consistency, sacrifice and
    accountability. These are all
    very critical. And so I hope as you're working with couples that you have an
    opportunity to engage them on some
    of these topics. And if they
    engage in a way that's dynamic,
    forthright, honest. And they will, I believe, have the right
    kind of roadmap, the right kind of tools that they can have
    a healthy marriage. So I just wanted to say God bless you
    in your work, hope this is helpful in your own ministry or
    career path. God bless

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582533)

    **## DiscussionInstructions-SacrificeandAccountability.docx**

    **Discussion Thread: Sacrifice and Accountability**

    This Discussion features part 3 of the video lecture “A Marriage Two Die For.”

    In this presentation, Dr. Scalise continues outlining 7 factors in creating good marriages. This Discussion Activity covers the last two: Sacrifice and Accountability.

    What happens to two individuals when they marry? Discuss the challenges and rewards of becoming a couple. Be mindful that this is a process, not an event. Whether you have been married for a few days or a few decades, the task is ongoing.

    Based on your knowledge and/or experience, discuss your own approach to teaching concepts related to sacrifice and accountability in marriage. Even if you are not married, approach this from a theoretical perspective.

    Support your assertions and, of course, you may use scripture.

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The student will complete 6 Discussion Activities in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 500 words. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly references (with accompanying citations) in current APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last 12 years. Acceptable sources include our textbooks, scholarly articles, and the Bible.

    **## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    **## WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

    We've now unpacked five of the seven factors that I believe help contribute to
    dynamic, healthy,
    vibrant marriages. Now let's look
    at the final two to look completely
    at the roadmap. I'm trying to give
    you some things that I think it's
    important for you to pay attention
    to engaged couples and spouses as you're
    doing marriage work. The sixth factor
    is sacrifice, hence the title of this
    three part series, A Marriage to Die For. If people want to have
    a marriage to die for, it often takes
    two people who are willing to die for it. Sacrifice is an
    important part of any healthy marriage. It's certainly
    a theme that is expressed many times
    over in scripture, is it Not necessarily
    the story of Christ and his coming to the Earth and his
    work on the cross. It's a matter
    of sacrifice. Sacrifice is
    defined, Thus, forfeiture of
    something highly valued for the
    sake of something considered to have
    a greater value or claim relinquishment
    at a cost. Boy, I like
    that forfeiture of something highly valued for the sake of something considered to
    have a greater value. I think it's important
    for husbands and wives almost to see the marriage
    as an entity, as having greater value than either of
    them individually. I've talked to couples before, they'll say, hey, we have a great
    marriage, we got a 50, 50 marriage. And I'll say that's
    half a marriage. And look and
    say, no, no, no. Both say, listen, 50, 50 is not a
    whole marriage. You giving 100 and your husband or
    wife given 100, that makes for a
    whole marriage. It's equal in that sense. What did Jesus
    say in Luke 923? He says, if anyone
    wishes to come after me, he must deny himself,
    take up his cross, and follow me with any marriage
    relationship comes a little bit of the need to be able to lay
    down my rights, my wants, my
    wishes, my needs, my expectations for
    the sake of the other. I realize there's balance. I realize there's
    principles here and certain boundaries
    in terms of morality and a
    number of things. But a healthy marriage often is when two
    people come together, and at some level
    they can both say, listen, I get
    it, I get it, that I don't get
    everything I want when I want and how I want
    it, and that's okay. I'm thinking of my spouse. It's practicing what I call

    relational
    gift giving. Most couples you work
    with, if you said, hey, have you ever
    given each other a gift, Christmas, a birthday anniversary,
    Valentine, whatever most husbands
    and wife would say. Sure. If you said, well, why did you give a
    gift to your spouse? Many people would
    say, well listen, I give gifts because it's a way of
    saying I love you. It's a way of
    saying you're important to me,
    I care for you. I enjoy seeing you
    blessed and happy. All great answers, right? So I often say, listen, as you're
    shopping for a gift or as you're
    considering a gift, maybe you're making it or producing it or buying it. The focus
    is where
    the focus isn't on the one who's purchasing the gift or
    making the gift. What would please them or make them happy, right? For example, I
    don't have a, I don't care a whole
    lot about jewelry. I don't wear a
    lot of jewelry. Watches, necklaces, bracelets, what, whatever. But my wife loves
    jewelry. Okay? And so it's
    easy to shop for her. Sometimes she
    particularly likes rings. And so as I'm
    shopping, I'm like, it doesn't matter
    if the jewelry, if the ring doesn't
    give me a great wow, it's not for me,
    it's for her. And so I talk about relational gift giving
    in terms of hey, it's okay if it's
    not about you, it's for your spouse, it may be sacrificial. You are no doubt
    familiar with
    Gary Chapman's, the five Love Languages. And you might say,
    but my love language is words of affirmation. Gee, I sure wish
    that they would speak more words of
    affirmation to me. But the spouses might
    be quality time, so I say, hey,
    sacrifice time. And it might be a sacrifice for
    you to give time, if that's your spouse's
    love language, because it's a way of
    being sacrificial. The longer I've
    walked with God, and perhaps this is
    for you as well. Have you ever had
    the sense that God has asked you
    to do something sacrificial on his
    behalf or for another? Probably you have. I have, but there are
    also times when I feel like God has
    come to me and said, Eric, I'm not necessarily asking you to do something
    sacrificial for somebody I'm asking you to
    be the sacrifice, and that's a whole
    different game, and there are many, many times in a marriage thank God is saying
    no, no, no, no. Yeah. There are

    times I want you to do something
    sacrificial, but there are also
    times I want you to be the sacrifice for your
    husband or your wife. I often ask couples
    when they come in, like I do with
    many clients. Okay. What are we
    aiming at here? What's the goal
    of counseling? What are we looking
    at? Because I like to get a sense of the
    target. Right? And so I was talking
    and I asked the couple, I said, okay, so
    help me understand, you know, what
    we're aiming at. And he looked at
    me and he said, I'm hoping I want resurrection in
    my marriage. That's how we framed it. I want our marriage
    resurrected, which is a fine goal. It was perhaps
    in the moment, but I looked at him on
    the spot and I said, okay, are you willing to experience the death
    that precedes it? I'm thinking, well,
    resurrection is great, but you can't have resurrection unless
    something died. In essence, I was saying, what is it you
    need to die for or die on behalf of
    your marriage or your spouse in
    order to experience the resurrection
    that you're saying that you
    want to focus on? I think that's important. Um, sacrifice is part of any healthy
    marriage. I help couples
    unpack that. What does it look
    like? Are you willing are you willing to carry that
    cross if Christ asks you to do that?
    It's an important piece. A marriage to die
    for, not just one. Both are willing
    to die. I get it. Then the last
    factor I want to look at is
    accountability. Call it coachability. If you want, the
    great ones seem to surround themselves
    with others who continue to speak
    in their lives. It is such a
    critical factor. Listen, Michael Jordan, as great as he was,
    had a coach. Tiger Woods, as
    great as he is a golf player in his prime, had
    a swing coach. I mean, the thought of someone teaching
    or helping him swing a golf club seems on the surface
    ludicrous, right? Yo yo ma. The great
    cellist. Guess what? He has a music
    coach, Pavarati, the great Italian tenor,
    had a voice coach. The people who are great surround themselves
    with others. And they invite others to continue to speak
    into their lives, train them, orient them. That is such a
    critical factor. Someone once told me that accountability was the breakfast

    of champions, but too many of us skip the most important
    meal of the day. Let me give you
    a definition of accountability,
    answerability, a willing obligation
    to accept responsibility to account
    for one's actions. It's a form of
    trustworthiness. I really like that because I so often see people, No, no, no, no
    one's
    telling me what to do. Right. It's part of broken, fallen
    human nature. To be self oriented
    in a marriage, we have to be thinking
    of the marriage and the spouse,
    and so I get it. Accountability is good. Ecclesiastic.
    49 Solomon says this two are
    better than one. If either of them
    falls, the one will lift up
    his companion, woe to the one who falls, and there's not another
    to lift them up in a three fold cord is not
    easily broken apart. Listen, I used to climb quite a bit, used
    to mountain climb, and so I'm very
    familiar with the metaphor of being
    roped up with somebody. When you're at 3,000
    feet up on the face, a piece of granite, life becomes a little bit more focused for
    you. And I was always tuned in to if I was
    leading the climb, that I literally had my climbing partner's life in the palm of my
    hand because I might be anchored in, but the rope is
    just around you and you're just blaying them up that mountain. And so I often see
    marriage the same way. There are some risks
    out there on the face, but the goal was not
    for me to sum it, and my partner not
    to, or vice versa. The goal was, hey, let's
    both get to the top, Let's do it
    together because we're roped up and we have some accountability and responsibility
    with each other in overcoming these obstacles
    called the mountain. Marriage is much
    the same way, but I understand that
    there is warfare. I already mentioned that I think the enemy of
    our soul, Satan, hates the picture
    of marriage, and he'll try to destroy
    that any way he can. And so we have to
    understand there is a spiritual
    warfare component in doing marriage work within a Christian
    context. I was channel surfing some time ago and I was, I think it was
    animal planet, I don't know why, but it was a story about lions and how they hunt.
    It interested me, so I paused and I found out, actually the lionesses
    do the hunting. The guys just eat first. And I thought, okay, I
    get it, I'm watching. And apparently,
    intuitively, lions will seek
    out of a herd, a weak, a sick,
    an injured, or a smaller animal. And they'll work

    in 2.3 to target that identified animal
    and try to glean it out of the herd
    because they would sort of chase
    it and run alongside. And you think, well,
    why didn't they just jump on the one
    that was closest? Because they're
    working together very intentionally to glean out that
    targeted animal. And it was a herd
    of water buffalo, and there was one
    that was limping that these two lionesses
    had their eyes on, and they kept scattering the herd. Scattering
    the herd. And when this targeted limping water buffalo
    was all alone, they broke off what they were doing and
    they jumped it. And the minute I saw that scene on television, the scripture and
    first Peter 58 came to me says, be wary of your adversary who prowls around like a
    roaring lion looking
    for someone to devour. And I thought, wow, that is an important principle
    in working with couples because
    the enemy of our soul prowls around
    looking for a lion. But I noticed this, he's looking for some one. Satan rarely
    looks for the many. He's a coward. But he will look
    for the one, he'll look for the
    one that's isolated. The one who's
    cut off, the one who has no
    support systems. The one who is
    just, you know, in that victim
    place or wherever it is because they're
    the vulnerable one. They're the one
    most at risk. And he'll look to
    pick that one off. And so it's important
    that we work with couples to have
    accountability. You as a counselor will be an accountability
    partner for a season. But I love the thought
    of marriage mentoring. I love the thought of couples working
    with couples. I love the thought
    of established, healthy older
    couples working with some of those young or
    newly married ones. And so I believe that we have to
    encourage this. Let me share a scripture in closing that
    highlights this, because this is, to me, is a really
    important principle. I was doing my
    Bible reading. Reading the Bible
    through a year. You read some
    Old Testament, some New Testament, five Psalms and a
    proverbs, right? Some of you maybe have
    done that before. I'm reading my Old
    Testament passage from the day I'm reading in First Kings,
    Chapter four. I don't know
    about you, but I don't particularly
    like lists, especially lists of names. I can barely

    pronounce. I'm like, why is that in the
    scripture God? What relevance
    does it have? I'm reading in first Kings four and I'm reading out of the new
    American
    standard here. Says now King
    Solomon was king over all of Israel and these were his officials. I'm like God. It's
    a list really these are
    his officials. As the son of Zadok
    was the priest, El Hoof and Asha, the sons of Shisha,
    were secretaries. Say that three
    times. Real fast. I thought, well,
    it's interesting the guy had two
    secretaries. But so what? I don't care. Jehoshaphat, the son of a hilud was the
    recorder,
    whatever that is. Ben and I, the
    son of Johda, was over the army. Zadok and Abathar were
    priests. I don't care. As the son of Nathan
    was over the deputies, Aisha was over
    the household. Adar, the son of Abda was over the
    men's subject. I'm like, yeah,
    okay, interesting. But what relevance? And then I read
    this and Zabud, the son of
    Nathan, a priest, was the king's friend.
    Oh my goodness. All of a sudden,
    it makes sense. Here's the wisest
    man supposedly, who ever lived, who had the wisdom to
    have on his team. At least one person
    who appeared to serve the primary role of being his friend. The question I have
    of a couple is, who is around you? That their role is
    to be that friend, to be that
    accountability partner, the person that
    you can unpack your dirty laundry with, that you can be
    honest and real with, and you allow them to be a truth teller back
    into your life. Let me say it again. The son of
    Nathan, a priest. Now I want you to
    think about this. Who is Zabsatherathan? Do you remember
    the story of Nathan and Solomon's
    father, David? Nathan had some
    interesting things to say to David when he sinned with
    Bathsheba, didn't he? Here is the
    prophet's son, now, the best friend of the king's son somewhere.
    Solomon got it. That was probably a
    good thing for my dad. It's probably a
    good thing for me. As you're working
    with couples, encourage them
    to find a zab. Yes, husbands and wives
    within their marriage need to help have
    some accountability. But listen, men and
    women are wired a little differently and husbands need other men, and wives need
    other women That we surround ourselves

    with a few key people, a few people that
    can help hold them accountable for
    the things that God might be doing
    in their life, in their walk with him, and in their marriage. So I've given you
    seven factors in what I believe helps create healthy gold medal
    world class marriages. Capacity, having a focus or a goal
    orientation, right? Time, perseverance,
    consistency, sacrifice and
    accountability. These are all
    very critical. And so I hope as you're working with couples that you have an
    opportunity to engage them on some
    of these topics. And if they
    engage in a way that's dynamic,
    forthright, honest. And they will, I believe, have the right
    kind of roadmap, the right kind of tools that they can have
    a healthy marriage. So I just wanted to say God bless you
    in your work, hope this is helpful in your own ministry or
    career path. God bless

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582533)

  • [Solved] A6 – MC

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow all instructions **files (6)** – ## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx – ## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf – ## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf – ## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx – WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf – Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-ve…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow all instructions

    **files (6)**

    – ## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx

    – ## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf

    – ## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf

    – ## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf
    – Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf

    **## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**

    Roger is a 43-year old husband and father. He has been married for 11 years and has two children, eight and five. Currently, he works as a middle manager for a large engineering firm. The office is located almost an hour away and it is an extremely stressful work environment because of bidding competition and project deadlines. The company has mentioned a possible downsizing of the workforce due to ongoing economic pressures and middle management is seen as being the most vulnerable. Roger has been with the company for seven years now.

    Annette, Roger’s wife also works. She is an office manager for a local pediatrician but may have to leave due to recurring back problems and other health concerns. The possible loss of her income has strained the marriage a bit, especially over the past six months.

    Roger works late many days and sometimes doesn’t get home until after the children have gone to bed. Lately, he has appeared to be increasingly irritable and frequently “loses it” and ends up yelling at Annette or the kids. During his senior year in high school and also while attending college, Roger would drink socially with friends and occasionally get drunk. Annette knew of his drinking when they started dating, but it never seemed to be a problem and she had never actually seen him drunk. Roger’s mother was an alcoholic and died four years ago from complications related to her drinking. She was 67 at the time. Her brother (Roger’s uncle) has also been in a detox center twice for drinking problems. One of the reasons Roger was coming home late was because he was stopping at a bar to have a drink with several of his coworkers. What started out as a beer or two once a week after work, became a six-pack three or four times a week. Drinking on the weekends also became more routine and he no longer tried to hide it from Annette. She also recently found pornography on his computer. Annette greatly resents the drinking and is becoming increasingly concerned.

    Her primary way of dealing with the issue is to lecture and moralize the situation. Roger responds with anger, sullenness and most recently, by leaving the house for hours at a time. He doesn’t believe he has a serious problem with alcohol and that he could stop if he really wanted to. Besides, he feels like it, “calms him down” after the stress of his workday. He appears aloof and somewhat suspicious of others.

    About a month ago, Roger stopped attending church with his family. Annette has explored the possibility of seeing a counselor for help. After a lot of asking, complaining and even a threat by Annette to separate, Roger has agreed to come in. He says he loves his family, but doesn’t know, “what the big deal” is really all about. He doesn’t believe that the Bible expressly prohibits drinking altogether.

    **## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 105 to >97 pts

    Advanced

    All components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed. Student
    followed the Case
    Study Analysis
    Template and used
    headings A through
    E. Student
    demonstrated
    advanced critical
    thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    demonstrated
    advanced prowess
    in elaborating on
    the Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student
    incorporated and
    synthesized course
    materials.

    97 to >88 pts

    Proficient

    Most components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed.
    Student followed
    the Case Study
    Analysis Template
    and used headings
    A through E.
    Student proficiently
    demonstrated
    critical thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    was proficient at
    elaborating on the
    Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student adequately
    incorporated and
    synthesized course
    materials.

    88 to >80 pts

    Developing

    Few components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed.
    Student followed
    most of the Case
    Study Analysis
    Template and used
    headings A
    through E. Student
    exemplified
    developing
    demonstration of
    critical thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    elaborated on the
    Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student
    incorporated and
    synthesized
    course materials.

    80 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Few components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed. Student
    inadequately followed
    the Case Study
    Analysis Template
    and used headings A
    through E.
    Organization was
    lacking. Student
    inadequately
    demonstrated critical
    thinking,
    problem-solving, and
    an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling approach.
    Student did not meet
    expectations in
    elaborating on the
    Chosen Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope is 2
    pages). Student failed
    to adequately
    incorporate and
    synthesize course
    materials.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    / 105
    pts

    Mechanics 45 to >40 pts

    Advanced

    Student
    demonstrated
    exemplary
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    40 to >38 pts

    Proficient

    Student
    demonstrated
    proficient grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    38 to >33 pts

    Developing

    Student
    demonstrated
    average quality
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    33 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Student demonstrated
    poor grammar, diction
    and APA formatting.

    0 pts

    No
    Marks

    / 45
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Case Study Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    **## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    **## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Case Study Analyses Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    You must complete 2
    **Case Study Analyses Assignments**. Review files for both
    **Case Study Analysis: Paul and Diane** and
    **Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**. Both describe hypothetical presenting problems with a couple. Using the
    **Case Study Analysis Template** (see below), provide a thorough, systematic, and holistic summary.

    **Instruction**

    · Suggested scope: 5 pages (excluding title page and reference page).

    · Devote 2 of your pages to the integration of your selected theoretical model

    · Current APA format

    · Include 5 scholarly references published within the last 12 years

    · Utilize the
    **Case Study and Analysis Template** (see below) to write your paper

    · Description of how you would approach working with the couple

    · The theoretical orientation/model you are using.

    · Your analysis/assessment of the case;

    Important: Follow the template,
    **Case Study Analysis Template,** Headings A through E, to organize and present your paper. All of these sections must be included in your final submission.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    —————————————————————-

    ## Case Study Management and Analysis Form

    ## Each case study summary should incorporate the following elements: A – _Achieving_ a Connection

    How would you connect with this couple and begin to form a helping relationship (in 2-3 paragraphs)?

    **B –**
    **_Breaking Down_ the Problem**

    1. Define/summarize the following (in bullet-point format):

    · Physical and/or Medical needs and issues

    · Emotional needs and issues

    · Family/Social/Relational needs and issues

    · Mental/Psychological needs and issues

    · Financial, Vocational or Other/Practical needs and issues

    · Spiritual needs and Issues

    2. Assess the scope of the presenting problems by utilizing the scales (1-10) below, state the overall level of risk/distress, and provide a summary paragraph:

    **_Frequency_ Score:**

    How often are problems occurring, issues arising and/or certain behaviors being displayed?

    0 2 4 6 8 10

    < 1x per month weekly daily

    **_Intensity_ Score:**

    How strong/evident is the level of pain, distress, or crisis – physically, emotionally, relationally, psychologically, financially/vocationally, spiritually, etc.?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | mild | | | moderate | | | extreme |

    **_Duration_ Score:**

    How long does the impact of crisis moments linger/last when they manifest?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | a few hours | | | 1-2 days | | | > 1 week |

    Page 2 of 2

    **_Variability_ Score:**

    How many different issues, problems and/or crisis points are present in the marriage?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | one issue | | | 3-4 issues | | | > 6 issues |

    ## Overall Score:

    (
    **4-15:** Low Risk;
    **16-25:** Moderate Risk;
    **26-40:** High Risk)

    **C –**
    **_Committing_ to a Plan of Action**

    What steps does the
    **_counselor_** need to consider/take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

    What steps does the
    **_couple_** need to consider take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

    **D –**
    **_Documenting_ the Interaction**

    What are the potential legal, ethical, and/or liability related issues, if any (in bullet-point format)?

    **E –**
    **_Explaining_ the Chosen Theoretical Orientation**

    Select one theoretical orientation/model for marriage counseling (e.g., behavioral, emotion- centered, psychodynamic, multigenerational, social constructionist, etc.) and describe (in a two-page summary) how a counselor would work with the couple using the constructs, techniques, and interventions specifically related to the chosen theory.

    A different theoretical orientation/model will be used for each case study.

    **WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscriptamarriagetwodieforpart3-pdf)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582525)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582525)

    **## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**

    Roger is a 43-year old husband and father. He has been married for 11 years and has two children, eight and five. Currently, he works as a middle manager for a large engineering firm. The office is located almost an hour away and it is an extremely stressful work environment because of bidding competition and project deadlines. The company has mentioned a possible downsizing of the workforce due to ongoing economic pressures and middle management is seen as being the most vulnerable. Roger has been with the company for seven years now.

    Annette, Roger’s wife also works. She is an office manager for a local pediatrician but may have to leave due to recurring back problems and other health concerns. The possible loss of her income has strained the marriage a bit, especially over the past six months.

    Roger works late many days and sometimes doesn’t get home until after the children have gone to bed. Lately, he has appeared to be increasingly irritable and frequently “loses it” and ends up yelling at Annette or the kids. During his senior year in high school and also while attending college, Roger would drink socially with friends and occasionally get drunk. Annette knew of his drinking when they started dating, but it never seemed to be a problem and she had never actually seen him drunk. Roger’s mother was an alcoholic and died four years ago from complications related to her drinking. She was 67 at the time. Her brother (Roger’s uncle) has also been in a detox center twice for drinking problems. One of the reasons Roger was coming home late was because he was stopping at a bar to have a drink with several of his coworkers. What started out as a beer or two once a week after work, became a six-pack three or four times a week. Drinking on the weekends also became more routine and he no longer tried to hide it from Annette. She also recently found pornography on his computer. Annette greatly resents the drinking and is becoming increasingly concerned.

    Her primary way of dealing with the issue is to lecture and moralize the situation. Roger responds with anger, sullenness and most recently, by leaving the house for hours at a time. He doesn’t believe he has a serious problem with alcohol and that he could stop if he really wanted to. Besides, he feels like it, “calms him down” after the stress of his workday. He appears aloof and somewhat suspicious of others.

    About a month ago, Roger stopped attending church with his family. Annette has explored the possibility of seeing a counselor for help. After a lot of asking, complaining and even a threat by Annette to separate, Roger has agreed to come in. He says he loves his family, but doesn’t know, “what the big deal” is really all about. He doesn’t believe that the Bible expressly prohibits drinking altogether.

    **## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 105 to >97 pts

    Advanced

    All components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed. Student
    followed the Case
    Study Analysis
    Template and used
    headings A through
    E. Student
    demonstrated
    advanced critical
    thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    demonstrated
    advanced prowess
    in elaborating on
    the Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student
    incorporated and
    synthesized course
    materials.

    97 to >88 pts

    Proficient

    Most components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed.
    Student followed
    the Case Study
    Analysis Template
    and used headings
    A through E.
    Student proficiently
    demonstrated
    critical thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    was proficient at
    elaborating on the
    Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student adequately
    incorporated and
    synthesized course
    materials.

    88 to >80 pts

    Developing

    Few components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed.
    Student followed
    most of the Case
    Study Analysis
    Template and used
    headings A
    through E. Student
    exemplified
    developing
    demonstration of
    critical thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    elaborated on the
    Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student
    incorporated and
    synthesized
    course materials.

    80 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Few components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed. Student
    inadequately followed
    the Case Study
    Analysis Template
    and used headings A
    through E.
    Organization was
    lacking. Student
    inadequately
    demonstrated critical
    thinking,
    problem-solving, and
    an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling approach.
    Student did not meet
    expectations in
    elaborating on the
    Chosen Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope is 2
    pages). Student failed
    to adequately
    incorporate and
    synthesize course
    materials.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    / 105
    pts

    Mechanics 45 to >40 pts

    Advanced

    Student
    demonstrated
    exemplary
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    40 to >38 pts

    Proficient

    Student
    demonstrated
    proficient grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    38 to >33 pts

    Developing

    Student
    demonstrated
    average quality
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    33 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Student demonstrated
    poor grammar, diction
    and APA formatting.

    0 pts

    No
    Marks

    / 45
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Case Study Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    **## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    **## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Case Study Analyses Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    You must complete 2
    **Case Study Analyses Assignments**. Review files for both
    **Case Study Analysis: Paul and Diane** and
    **Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**. Both describe hypothetical presenting problems with a couple. Using the
    **Case Study Analysis Template** (see below), provide a thorough, systematic, and holistic summary.

    **Instruction**

    · Suggested scope: 5 pages (excluding title page and reference page).

    · Devote 2 of your pages to the integration of your selected theoretical model

    · Current APA format

    · Include 5 scholarly references published within the last 12 years

    · Utilize the
    **Case Study and Analysis Template** (see below) to write your paper

    · Description of how you would approach working with the couple

    · The theoretical orientation/model you are using.

    · Your analysis/assessment of the case;

    Important: Follow the template,
    **Case Study Analysis Template,** Headings A through E, to organize and present your paper. All of these sections must be included in your final submission.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    —————————————————————-

    ## Case Study Management and Analysis Form

    ## Each case study summary should incorporate the following elements: A – _Achieving_ a Connection

    How would you connect with this couple and begin to form a helping relationship (in 2-3 paragraphs)?

    **B –**
    **_Breaking Down_ the Problem**

    1. Define/summarize the following (in bullet-point format):

    · Physical and/or Medical needs and issues

    · Emotional needs and issues

    · Family/Social/Relational needs and issues

    · Mental/Psychological needs and issues

    · Financial, Vocational or Other/Practical needs and issues

    · Spiritual needs and Issues

    2. Assess the scope of the presenting problems by utilizing the scales (1-10) below, state the overall level of risk/distress, and provide a summary paragraph:

    **_Frequency_ Score:**

    How often are problems occurring, issues arising and/or certain behaviors being displayed?

    0 2 4 6 8 10

    < 1x per month weekly daily

    **_Intensity_ Score:**

    How strong/evident is the level of pain, distress, or crisis – physically, emotionally, relationally, psychologically, financially/vocationally, spiritually, etc.?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | mild | | | moderate | | | extreme |

    **_Duration_ Score:**

    How long does the impact of crisis moments linger/last when they manifest?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | a few hours | | | 1-2 days | | | > 1 week |

    Page 2 of 2

    **_Variability_ Score:**

    How many different issues, problems and/or crisis points are present in the marriage?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | one issue | | | 3-4 issues | | | > 6 issues |

    ## Overall Score:

    (
    **4-15:** Low Risk;
    **16-25:** Moderate Risk;
    **26-40:** High Risk)

    **C –**
    **_Committing_ to a Plan of Action**

    What steps does the
    **_counselor_** need to consider/take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

    What steps does the
    **_couple_** need to consider take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

    **D –**
    **_Documenting_ the Interaction**

    What are the potential legal, ethical, and/or liability related issues, if any (in bullet-point format)?

    **E –**
    **_Explaining_ the Chosen Theoretical Orientation**

    Select one theoretical orientation/model for marriage counseling (e.g., behavioral, emotion- centered, psychodynamic, multigenerational, social constructionist, etc.) and describe (in a two-page summary) how a counselor would work with the couple using the constructs, techniques, and interventions specifically related to the chosen theory.

    A different theoretical orientation/model will be used for each case study.

    **WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscriptamarriagetwodieforpart3-pdf)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582525)

    **## CaseStudyAnalysisRogerandAnnette.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**

    Roger is a 43-year old husband and father. He has been married for 11 years and has two children, eight and five. Currently, he works as a middle manager for a large engineering firm. The office is located almost an hour away and it is an extremely stressful work environment because of bidding competition and project deadlines. The company has mentioned a possible downsizing of the workforce due to ongoing economic pressures and middle management is seen as being the most vulnerable. Roger has been with the company for seven years now.

    Annette, Roger’s wife also works. She is an office manager for a local pediatrician but may have to leave due to recurring back problems and other health concerns. The possible loss of her income has strained the marriage a bit, especially over the past six months.

    Roger works late many days and sometimes doesn’t get home until after the children have gone to bed. Lately, he has appeared to be increasingly irritable and frequently “loses it” and ends up yelling at Annette or the kids. During his senior year in high school and also while attending college, Roger would drink socially with friends and occasionally get drunk. Annette knew of his drinking when they started dating, but it never seemed to be a problem and she had never actually seen him drunk. Roger’s mother was an alcoholic and died four years ago from complications related to her drinking. She was 67 at the time. Her brother (Roger’s uncle) has also been in a detox center twice for drinking problems. One of the reasons Roger was coming home late was because he was stopping at a bar to have a drink with several of his coworkers. What started out as a beer or two once a week after work, became a six-pack three or four times a week. Drinking on the weekends also became more routine and he no longer tried to hide it from Annette. She also recently found pornography on his computer. Annette greatly resents the drinking and is becoming increasingly concerned.

    Her primary way of dealing with the issue is to lecture and moralize the situation. Roger responds with anger, sullenness and most recently, by leaving the house for hours at a time. He doesn’t believe he has a serious problem with alcohol and that he could stop if he really wanted to. Besides, he feels like it, “calms him down” after the stress of his workday. He appears aloof and somewhat suspicious of others.

    About a month ago, Roger stopped attending church with his family. Annette has explored the possibility of seeing a counselor for help. After a lot of asking, complaining and even a threat by Annette to separate, Roger has agreed to come in. He says he loves his family, but doesn’t know, “what the big deal” is really all about. He doesn’t believe that the Bible expressly prohibits drinking altogether.

    **## CaseStudyGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 105 to >97 pts

    Advanced

    All components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed. Student
    followed the Case
    Study Analysis
    Template and used
    headings A through
    E. Student
    demonstrated
    advanced critical
    thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    demonstrated
    advanced prowess
    in elaborating on
    the Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student
    incorporated and
    synthesized course
    materials.

    97 to >88 pts

    Proficient

    Most components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed.
    Student followed
    the Case Study
    Analysis Template
    and used headings
    A through E.
    Student proficiently
    demonstrated
    critical thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    was proficient at
    elaborating on the
    Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student adequately
    incorporated and
    synthesized course
    materials.

    88 to >80 pts

    Developing

    Few components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed.
    Student followed
    most of the Case
    Study Analysis
    Template and used
    headings A
    through E. Student
    exemplified
    developing
    demonstration of
    critical thinking,
    problem-solving,
    and an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling
    approach. Student
    elaborated on the
    Chosen
    Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope
    is 2 pages).
    Student
    incorporated and
    synthesized
    course materials.

    80 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Few components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been thoroughly
    addressed. Student
    inadequately followed
    the Case Study
    Analysis Template
    and used headings A
    through E.
    Organization was
    lacking. Student
    inadequately
    demonstrated critical
    thinking,
    problem-solving, and
    an organized,
    theory-based
    counseling approach.
    Student did not meet
    expectations in
    elaborating on the
    Chosen Theoretical
    Orientation
    (suggested scope is 2
    pages). Student failed
    to adequately
    incorporate and
    synthesize course
    materials.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    / 105
    pts

    Mechanics 45 to >40 pts

    Advanced

    Student
    demonstrated
    exemplary
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    40 to >38 pts

    Proficient

    Student
    demonstrated
    proficient grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    38 to >33 pts

    Developing

    Student
    demonstrated
    average quality
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    33 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Student demonstrated
    poor grammar, diction
    and APA formatting.

    0 pts

    No
    Marks

    / 45
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Case Study Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    **## Clinicalhandbookofcoupletherapy6thed.Chap.16.pdf**

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher's prior
    permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    **## CaseStudyAnalysisAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Case Study Analyses Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    You must complete 2
    **Case Study Analyses Assignments**. Review files for both
    **Case Study Analysis: Paul and Diane** and
    **Case Study Analysis: Roger and Annette**. Both describe hypothetical presenting problems with a couple. Using the
    **Case Study Analysis Template** (see below), provide a thorough, systematic, and holistic summary.

    **Instruction**

    · Suggested scope: 5 pages (excluding title page and reference page).

    · Devote 2 of your pages to the integration of your selected theoretical model

    · Current APA format

    · Include 5 scholarly references published within the last 12 years

    · Utilize the
    **Case Study and Analysis Template** (see below) to write your paper

    · Description of how you would approach working with the couple

    · The theoretical orientation/model you are using.

    · Your analysis/assessment of the case;

    Important: Follow the template,
    **Case Study Analysis Template,** Headings A through E, to organize and present your paper. All of these sections must be included in your final submission.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    —————————————————————-

    ## Case Study Management and Analysis Form

    ## Each case study summary should incorporate the following elements: A – _Achieving_ a Connection

    How would you connect with this couple and begin to form a helping relationship (in 2-3 paragraphs)?

    **B –**
    **_Breaking Down_ the Problem**

    1. Define/summarize the following (in bullet-point format):

    · Physical and/or Medical needs and issues

    · Emotional needs and issues

    · Family/Social/Relational needs and issues

    · Mental/Psychological needs and issues

    · Financial, Vocational or Other/Practical needs and issues

    · Spiritual needs and Issues

    2. Assess the scope of the presenting problems by utilizing the scales (1-10) below, state the overall level of risk/distress, and provide a summary paragraph:

    **_Frequency_ Score:**

    How often are problems occurring, issues arising and/or certain behaviors being displayed?

    0 2 4 6 8 10

    < 1x per month weekly daily

    **_Intensity_ Score:**

    How strong/evident is the level of pain, distress, or crisis – physically, emotionally, relationally, psychologically, financially/vocationally, spiritually, etc.?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | mild | | | moderate | | | extreme |

    **_Duration_ Score:**

    How long does the impact of crisis moments linger/last when they manifest?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | a few hours | | | 1-2 days | | | > 1 week |

    Page 2 of 2

    **_Variability_ Score:**

    How many different issues, problems and/or crisis points are present in the marriage?

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | 0 | 2 | 4 | | 6 | 8 | 10 |
    | one issue | | | 3-4 issues | | | > 6 issues |

    ## Overall Score:

    (
    **4-15:** Low Risk;
    **16-25:** Moderate Risk;
    **26-40:** High Risk)

    **C –**
    **_Committing_ to a Plan of Action**

    What steps does the
    **_counselor_** need to consider/take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

    What steps does the
    **_couple_** need to consider take, including biblically oriented principles (in bullet-point format)?

    **D –**
    **_Documenting_ the Interaction**

    What are the potential legal, ethical, and/or liability related issues, if any (in bullet-point format)?

    **E –**
    **_Explaining_ the Chosen Theoretical Orientation**

    Select one theoretical orientation/model for marriage counseling (e.g., behavioral, emotion- centered, psychodynamic, multigenerational, social constructionist, etc.) and describe (in a two-page summary) how a counselor would work with the couple using the constructs, techniques, and interventions specifically related to the chosen theory.

    A different theoretical orientation/model will be used for each case study.

    **WatchTranscriptAMarriageTwoDieForPart3.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscriptamarriagetwodieforpart3-pdf)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582525)

  • [Solved] A-7 MC

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow all the uploaded instructions **files (7)** – ## ResearchPaperFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## ResearchPaper-FinalGradingRubric.pdf – ## Module2-FinalAssignmentRevised-ResearchPaperTopicAssignment.docx – Module5-FinalResearchPaperOutlineAssignment.docx – WatchTranscript-Dr.GaryChapmanonT…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow all the uploaded instructions

    **files (7)**

    – ## ResearchPaperFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## ResearchPaper-FinalGradingRubric.pdf

    – ## Module2-FinalAssignmentRevised-ResearchPaperTopicAssignment.docx

    – Module5-FinalResearchPaperOutlineAssignment.docx
    – WatchTranscript-Dr.GaryChapmanonTheFiveLoveLanguagesofApology.pdf
    – Reading-ChapmanG.2024.The5lovelanguages4thed..NorthfieldPublishing.Chapt.4-6.pdf
    – Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf

    **## ResearchPaperFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Research Paper: Final Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Based on your approved topic and your outline, write a comprehensive research paper that allows you to demonstrate your mastery of the material that we have studied. You have been exposed to the different counseling theories and will now demonstrate your ability to implement your studies into your practice. See the instructions for the parameters of your paper below.

    **Instruction Requirements**

    1. Addresses and reflects the chosen/approved topic.

    2. Demonstrates a thorough presentation/progression of the subject matter.

    3. Integrate theoretical and clinical counseling principles.

    4. Integrate biblical principles.

    5. Provide a minimum of 10 references from current sources, 8 of which are peer-reviewed research (including textbooks) or journal articles.

    6. Suggested scope is 15 pages (not including Title Page, Abstract, and References).

    7. Follow current APA format, including double-spaced content. Ensure that each citation has a corresponding reference (and vis-versa).

    8. Note that an abstract is a summation of your research, not an introduction to it. Abstracts are best formulated with your paper is finished.

    9. Use clear and concise language with correct grammar and structure.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaper-FinalGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 105 to >96 pts

    Advanced

    Thesis statement is
    clearly identifiable and
    strongly presented. It
    provides a clear
    overview of the paper’s
    contents. All
    components as
    described in the
    assignment have been
    thoroughly addressed.
    Assertions are relevant
    and properly supported
    by evidence. The
    conclusion offers a
    good summary of
    issues treated in the
    paper and offers
    practical application.
    Sources are scholarly,
    high-quality, and
    relevant. They are
    critically evaluated and
    correctly utilized. All
    required elements are
    included and presented
    with strong headings
    and organizational
    clarity. There are clear
    transitions between
    paragraphs and
    sections. The
    treatment of the topic is
    logically oriented. The
    paper meets the page
    length requirement.
    The paper meets the
    reference requirement.

    96 to >87 pts

    Proficient

    Thesis statement is
    identifiable and
    presented. It
    provides an
    overview of the
    paper’s contents.
    All components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been addressed.
    Assertions are
    mostly relevant and
    mostly supported by
    evidence. The
    conclusion offers a
    summary of issues
    treated in the paper
    and offers
    application.
    Sources are
    scholarly and
    relevant. They are
    evaluated and
    utilized. All required
    elements are
    included and
    organized. There
    are transitions
    between paragraphs
    and sections. The
    treatment of the
    topic is logically
    oriented. The paper
    meets the page
    length requirement
    or comes very close.
    The paper meets
    the reference
    requirement or
    comes very close.

    87 to >79 pts

    Developing

    Thesis statement is
    identifiable but
    needs
    improvement.
    Most components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been addressed, or
    all components are
    present but need
    improvement.
    Some assertions
    are relevant and
    supported by
    evidence. The
    conclusion may
    need improvement.
    Most sources are
    scholarly and most
    are relevant. Most
    are evaluated and
    utilized. Most
    required elements
    are included and
    are mostly
    organized. Most
    paragraphs and
    sections have
    transitions. The
    logical treatment of
    the topic needs
    improvement. The
    paper may not
    meet the page
    length requirement.
    The paper may not
    meet the reference
    requirement.

    79 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Thesis
    statement is not
    identifiable
    and/or does not
    provide an
    overview of the
    paper’s
    contents. Few
    components as
    described in the
    assignment
    have been
    addressed, or
    all components
    are missing.
    The conclusion
    is weak or is not
    present in the
    paper. Few or
    no sources are
    scholarly or
    relevant. Few or
    none are
    evaluated and
    utilized. Few or
    no required
    elements are
    included. Few
    or no transitions
    exist between
    paragraphs and
    sections. There
    may not be a
    logical
    treatment of the
    topic. The paper
    does not meet
    the reference
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 105
    pts

    Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Mechanics 45 to >41 pts

    Advanced

    Student demonstrated
    exemplary grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    41 to >37 pts

    Proficient

    Student
    demonstrated
    appropriate
    grammar, diction
    and APA formatting.

    37 to >33 pts

    Developing

    Student
    demonstrated
    average quality
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    33 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Student
    demonstrated
    poor grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 45
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    **## Module2-FinalAssignmentRevised-ResearchPaperTopicAssignment.docx**

    1

    **Repairing Trust After Disclosed Marital Infidelity: A Comparison of Accountability, Emotional Safety, Acceptance, and Relational Decision Making in Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy**

    Abraham De La Cruz

    School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University

    **Author Note**

    Abraham De La Cruz is a doctoral student in the Community Care and Counseling program at Liberty University.

    I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

    Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Abraham De La Cruz, School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University.

    **Repairing Trust After Disclosed Marital Infidelity: A Comparison of Accountability, Emotional Safety, Acceptance, and Relational Decision Making in Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy**

    **Category 4:** Infidelity and affairs.

    **Topic:** A comparative analysis of how Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy address accountability, emotional safety, acceptance, and relational decision-making during trust repair after disclosed marital infidelity.

    **Thesis Statement:** Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy offer complementary but distinct pathways for repairing trust after disclosed marital infidelity to promote emotional safety, informed relational decision making, and sustainable trust repair: the former develops emotional acceptance, empathic understanding, and targeted behavior change, whereas the latter strengthens accountability, transparency, conflict regulation, and renewed commitment.

    **Rationale**

    Infidelity in marriage is a topic that should be studied in detail since it interferes with trust, attachment security, and patterns of conflict and shared meaning between the couple. To get the paper out of the general discussion, a smaller comparison of two counseling approaches will help discuss how counselors organize recovery. Doss et al. (2022) point to integrative behavioral couple therapy as an established intervention for couple distress; it is appropriate to study acceptance, behavior change, and emotional reengagement following betrayal. Moreover, Gottman Method Couple Therapy has demonstrated the potential to recover from an affair, particularly in trust, conflict management, and relational satisfaction (Irvine et al., 2023). This analogy is important as counselors have to strike a balance between accountability and emotional safety. Couple healing literature focuses on meaning-making and deliberate rebuilding relationships after infidelity (Fife et al., 2023), whereas trust repair literature underlines transparency, responsiveness, and consistent behavioral evidence (Giacobbi & Lalot, 2025). Besides, therapists outline infidelity work as a clinically complicated one since couples usually come to the counseling with ambivalence and severe distress in relationships (O'Rourke et al., 2025). Injured partners also define recovery as a decision-making process that involves being clear, safe, and relational over time (Mitchell et al., 2026). Thus, the topic is applicable to marital counseling in the context of a marital crisis and two organized methods of responsible healing.

    **References**

    Doss, B. D., Roddy, M. K., Wiebe, S. A., & Johnson, S. M. (2022). A review of the research during 2010–2019 on evidence‐based treatments for couple relationship distress.
    _Journal of marital and family therapy_,
    _48_(1), 283–306.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12552](https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12552)

    Fife, S. T., Gossner, J. D., Theobald, A., Allen, E., Rivero, A., & Koehl, H. (2023). Couple healing from infidelity: A grounded theory study.
    _Journal of Social and Personal Relationships_,
    _40_(12), 3882–3905.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231177874](https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231177874)

    Giacobbi, M., & Lalot, F. (2025). Unpacking trust repair in couples: A systematic literature review.
    _Journal of Family Therapy_,
    _47_(1), e12483.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12483](https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12483)

    Irvine, T. J., Peluso, P. R., Benson, K., Cole, C., Cole, D., Gottman, J. M., & Schwartz Gottman, J. (2024). A pilot study examining the effectiveness of Gottman method couples therapy over treatment-as-usual approaches for treating couples dealing with infidelity.
    _The Family Journal_,
    _32_(1), 81–94.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231210123](https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231210123)

    Mitchell, E. A., Brown, K. S., Spencer, J., & Harris, K. (2026). Staying Together After Infidelity: An Exploration of the Decision‐Making Process of Recovery From the Perspective of the Injured Partner.
    _Journal of Marital and Family Therapy_,
    _52_(1), e70110.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70110](https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70110)

    O’Rourke, V., McElvaney, R., & Kirrane, M. (2025). Grappling with infidelity: The experiences of therapists.
    _Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy_,
    _24_(1), 24–48.
    [https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2024.2391965](https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2024.2391965)

    **Module5-FinalResearchPaperOutlineAssignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module5-finalresearchpaperoutlineassignment-docx)

    **WatchTranscript-Dr.GaryChapmanonTheFiveLoveLanguagesofApology.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscript-dr-garychapmanonthefivelovelanguagesofapology-pdf)

    **Reading-ChapmanG.2024.The5lovelanguages4thed..NorthfieldPublishing.Chapt.4-6.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-chapmang-2024-the5lovelanguages4thed-northfieldpublishing-chapt-4-6-pdf)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582901)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582901)

    **## ResearchPaperFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Research Paper: Final Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Based on your approved topic and your outline, write a comprehensive research paper that allows you to demonstrate your mastery of the material that we have studied. You have been exposed to the different counseling theories and will now demonstrate your ability to implement your studies into your practice. See the instructions for the parameters of your paper below.

    **Instruction Requirements**

    1. Addresses and reflects the chosen/approved topic.

    2. Demonstrates a thorough presentation/progression of the subject matter.

    3. Integrate theoretical and clinical counseling principles.

    4. Integrate biblical principles.

    5. Provide a minimum of 10 references from current sources, 8 of which are peer-reviewed research (including textbooks) or journal articles.

    6. Suggested scope is 15 pages (not including Title Page, Abstract, and References).

    7. Follow current APA format, including double-spaced content. Ensure that each citation has a corresponding reference (and vis-versa).

    8. Note that an abstract is a summation of your research, not an introduction to it. Abstracts are best formulated with your paper is finished.

    9. Use clear and concise language with correct grammar and structure.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaper-FinalGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 105 to >96 pts

    Advanced

    Thesis statement is
    clearly identifiable and
    strongly presented. It
    provides a clear
    overview of the paper’s
    contents. All
    components as
    described in the
    assignment have been
    thoroughly addressed.
    Assertions are relevant
    and properly supported
    by evidence. The
    conclusion offers a
    good summary of
    issues treated in the
    paper and offers
    practical application.
    Sources are scholarly,
    high-quality, and
    relevant. They are
    critically evaluated and
    correctly utilized. All
    required elements are
    included and presented
    with strong headings
    and organizational
    clarity. There are clear
    transitions between
    paragraphs and
    sections. The
    treatment of the topic is
    logically oriented. The
    paper meets the page
    length requirement.
    The paper meets the
    reference requirement.

    96 to >87 pts

    Proficient

    Thesis statement is
    identifiable and
    presented. It
    provides an
    overview of the
    paper’s contents.
    All components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been addressed.
    Assertions are
    mostly relevant and
    mostly supported by
    evidence. The
    conclusion offers a
    summary of issues
    treated in the paper
    and offers
    application.
    Sources are
    scholarly and
    relevant. They are
    evaluated and
    utilized. All required
    elements are
    included and
    organized. There
    are transitions
    between paragraphs
    and sections. The
    treatment of the
    topic is logically
    oriented. The paper
    meets the page
    length requirement
    or comes very close.
    The paper meets
    the reference
    requirement or
    comes very close.

    87 to >79 pts

    Developing

    Thesis statement is
    identifiable but
    needs
    improvement.
    Most components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been addressed, or
    all components are
    present but need
    improvement.
    Some assertions
    are relevant and
    supported by
    evidence. The
    conclusion may
    need improvement.
    Most sources are
    scholarly and most
    are relevant. Most
    are evaluated and
    utilized. Most
    required elements
    are included and
    are mostly
    organized. Most
    paragraphs and
    sections have
    transitions. The
    logical treatment of
    the topic needs
    improvement. The
    paper may not
    meet the page
    length requirement.
    The paper may not
    meet the reference
    requirement.

    79 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Thesis
    statement is not
    identifiable
    and/or does not
    provide an
    overview of the
    paper’s
    contents. Few
    components as
    described in the
    assignment
    have been
    addressed, or
    all components
    are missing.
    The conclusion
    is weak or is not
    present in the
    paper. Few or
    no sources are
    scholarly or
    relevant. Few or
    none are
    evaluated and
    utilized. Few or
    no required
    elements are
    included. Few
    or no transitions
    exist between
    paragraphs and
    sections. There
    may not be a
    logical
    treatment of the
    topic. The paper
    does not meet
    the reference
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 105
    pts

    Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Mechanics 45 to >41 pts

    Advanced

    Student demonstrated
    exemplary grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    41 to >37 pts

    Proficient

    Student
    demonstrated
    appropriate
    grammar, diction
    and APA formatting.

    37 to >33 pts

    Developing

    Student
    demonstrated
    average quality
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    33 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Student
    demonstrated
    poor grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 45
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    **## Module2-FinalAssignmentRevised-ResearchPaperTopicAssignment.docx**

    1

    **Repairing Trust After Disclosed Marital Infidelity: A Comparison of Accountability, Emotional Safety, Acceptance, and Relational Decision Making in Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy**

    Abraham De La Cruz

    School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University

    **Author Note**

    Abraham De La Cruz is a doctoral student in the Community Care and Counseling program at Liberty University.

    I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

    Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Abraham De La Cruz, School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University.

    **Repairing Trust After Disclosed Marital Infidelity: A Comparison of Accountability, Emotional Safety, Acceptance, and Relational Decision Making in Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy**

    **Category 4:** Infidelity and affairs.

    **Topic:** A comparative analysis of how Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy address accountability, emotional safety, acceptance, and relational decision-making during trust repair after disclosed marital infidelity.

    **Thesis Statement:** Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy offer complementary but distinct pathways for repairing trust after disclosed marital infidelity to promote emotional safety, informed relational decision making, and sustainable trust repair: the former develops emotional acceptance, empathic understanding, and targeted behavior change, whereas the latter strengthens accountability, transparency, conflict regulation, and renewed commitment.

    **Rationale**

    Infidelity in marriage is a topic that should be studied in detail since it interferes with trust, attachment security, and patterns of conflict and shared meaning between the couple. To get the paper out of the general discussion, a smaller comparison of two counseling approaches will help discuss how counselors organize recovery. Doss et al. (2022) point to integrative behavioral couple therapy as an established intervention for couple distress; it is appropriate to study acceptance, behavior change, and emotional reengagement following betrayal. Moreover, Gottman Method Couple Therapy has demonstrated the potential to recover from an affair, particularly in trust, conflict management, and relational satisfaction (Irvine et al., 2023). This analogy is important as counselors have to strike a balance between accountability and emotional safety. Couple healing literature focuses on meaning-making and deliberate rebuilding relationships after infidelity (Fife et al., 2023), whereas trust repair literature underlines transparency, responsiveness, and consistent behavioral evidence (Giacobbi & Lalot, 2025). Besides, therapists outline infidelity work as a clinically complicated one since couples usually come to the counseling with ambivalence and severe distress in relationships (O'Rourke et al., 2025). Injured partners also define recovery as a decision-making process that involves being clear, safe, and relational over time (Mitchell et al., 2026). Thus, the topic is applicable to marital counseling in the context of a marital crisis and two organized methods of responsible healing.

    **References**

    Doss, B. D., Roddy, M. K., Wiebe, S. A., & Johnson, S. M. (2022). A review of the research during 2010–2019 on evidence‐based treatments for couple relationship distress.
    _Journal of marital and family therapy_,
    _48_(1), 283–306.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12552](https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12552)

    Fife, S. T., Gossner, J. D., Theobald, A., Allen, E., Rivero, A., & Koehl, H. (2023). Couple healing from infidelity: A grounded theory study.
    _Journal of Social and Personal Relationships_,
    _40_(12), 3882–3905.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231177874](https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231177874)

    Giacobbi, M., & Lalot, F. (2025). Unpacking trust repair in couples: A systematic literature review.
    _Journal of Family Therapy_,
    _47_(1), e12483.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12483](https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12483)

    Irvine, T. J., Peluso, P. R., Benson, K., Cole, C., Cole, D., Gottman, J. M., & Schwartz Gottman, J. (2024). A pilot study examining the effectiveness of Gottman method couples therapy over treatment-as-usual approaches for treating couples dealing with infidelity.
    _The Family Journal_,
    _32_(1), 81–94.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231210123](https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231210123)

    Mitchell, E. A., Brown, K. S., Spencer, J., & Harris, K. (2026). Staying Together After Infidelity: An Exploration of the Decision‐Making Process of Recovery From the Perspective of the Injured Partner.
    _Journal of Marital and Family Therapy_,
    _52_(1), e70110.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70110](https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70110)

    O’Rourke, V., McElvaney, R., & Kirrane, M. (2025). Grappling with infidelity: The experiences of therapists.
    _Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy_,
    _24_(1), 24–48.
    [https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2024.2391965](https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2024.2391965)

    **Module5-FinalResearchPaperOutlineAssignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module5-finalresearchpaperoutlineassignment-docx)

    **WatchTranscript-Dr.GaryChapmanonTheFiveLoveLanguagesofApology.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscript-dr-garychapmanonthefivelovelanguagesofapology-pdf)

    **Reading-ChapmanG.2024.The5lovelanguages4thed..NorthfieldPublishing.Chapt.4-6.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-chapmang-2024-the5lovelanguages4thed-northfieldpublishing-chapt-4-6-pdf)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582901)

    **## ResearchPaperFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 811

    **Research Paper: Final Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Based on your approved topic and your outline, write a comprehensive research paper that allows you to demonstrate your mastery of the material that we have studied. You have been exposed to the different counseling theories and will now demonstrate your ability to implement your studies into your practice. See the instructions for the parameters of your paper below.

    **Instruction Requirements**

    1. Addresses and reflects the chosen/approved topic.

    2. Demonstrates a thorough presentation/progression of the subject matter.

    3. Integrate theoretical and clinical counseling principles.

    4. Integrate biblical principles.

    5. Provide a minimum of 10 references from current sources, 8 of which are peer-reviewed research (including textbooks) or journal articles.

    6. Suggested scope is 15 pages (not including Title Page, Abstract, and References).

    7. Follow current APA format, including double-spaced content. Ensure that each citation has a corresponding reference (and vis-versa).

    8. Note that an abstract is a summation of your research, not an introduction to it. Abstracts are best formulated with your paper is finished.

    9. Use clear and concise language with correct grammar and structure.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaper-FinalGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content 105 to >96 pts

    Advanced

    Thesis statement is
    clearly identifiable and
    strongly presented. It
    provides a clear
    overview of the paper’s
    contents. All
    components as
    described in the
    assignment have been
    thoroughly addressed.
    Assertions are relevant
    and properly supported
    by evidence. The
    conclusion offers a
    good summary of
    issues treated in the
    paper and offers
    practical application.
    Sources are scholarly,
    high-quality, and
    relevant. They are
    critically evaluated and
    correctly utilized. All
    required elements are
    included and presented
    with strong headings
    and organizational
    clarity. There are clear
    transitions between
    paragraphs and
    sections. The
    treatment of the topic is
    logically oriented. The
    paper meets the page
    length requirement.
    The paper meets the
    reference requirement.

    96 to >87 pts

    Proficient

    Thesis statement is
    identifiable and
    presented. It
    provides an
    overview of the
    paper’s contents.
    All components as
    described in the
    assignment have
    been addressed.
    Assertions are
    mostly relevant and
    mostly supported by
    evidence. The
    conclusion offers a
    summary of issues
    treated in the paper
    and offers
    application.
    Sources are
    scholarly and
    relevant. They are
    evaluated and
    utilized. All required
    elements are
    included and
    organized. There
    are transitions
    between paragraphs
    and sections. The
    treatment of the
    topic is logically
    oriented. The paper
    meets the page
    length requirement
    or comes very close.
    The paper meets
    the reference
    requirement or
    comes very close.

    87 to >79 pts

    Developing

    Thesis statement is
    identifiable but
    needs
    improvement.
    Most components
    as described in the
    assignment have
    been addressed, or
    all components are
    present but need
    improvement.
    Some assertions
    are relevant and
    supported by
    evidence. The
    conclusion may
    need improvement.
    Most sources are
    scholarly and most
    are relevant. Most
    are evaluated and
    utilized. Most
    required elements
    are included and
    are mostly
    organized. Most
    paragraphs and
    sections have
    transitions. The
    logical treatment of
    the topic needs
    improvement. The
    paper may not
    meet the page
    length requirement.
    The paper may not
    meet the reference
    requirement.

    79 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Thesis
    statement is not
    identifiable
    and/or does not
    provide an
    overview of the
    paper’s
    contents. Few
    components as
    described in the
    assignment
    have been
    addressed, or
    all components
    are missing.
    The conclusion
    is weak or is not
    present in the
    paper. Few or
    no sources are
    scholarly or
    relevant. Few or
    none are
    evaluated and
    utilized. Few or
    no required
    elements are
    included. Few
    or no transitions
    exist between
    paragraphs and
    sections. There
    may not be a
    logical
    treatment of the
    topic. The paper
    does not meet
    the reference
    requirement.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 105
    pts

    Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Mechanics 45 to >41 pts

    Advanced

    Student demonstrated
    exemplary grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    41 to >37 pts

    Proficient

    Student
    demonstrated
    appropriate
    grammar, diction
    and APA formatting.

    37 to >33 pts

    Developing

    Student
    demonstrated
    average quality
    grammar, diction
    and APA
    formatting.

    33 to >0 pts

    Below
    Expectations

    Student
    demonstrated
    poor grammar,
    diction and APA
    formatting.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 45
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO811_D01_202630

    **## Module2-FinalAssignmentRevised-ResearchPaperTopicAssignment.docx**

    1

    **Repairing Trust After Disclosed Marital Infidelity: A Comparison of Accountability, Emotional Safety, Acceptance, and Relational Decision Making in Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy**

    Abraham De La Cruz

    School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University

    **Author Note**

    Abraham De La Cruz is a doctoral student in the Community Care and Counseling program at Liberty University.

    I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

    Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Abraham De La Cruz, School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University.

    **Repairing Trust After Disclosed Marital Infidelity: A Comparison of Accountability, Emotional Safety, Acceptance, and Relational Decision Making in Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy**

    **Category 4:** Infidelity and affairs.

    **Topic:** A comparative analysis of how Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy address accountability, emotional safety, acceptance, and relational decision-making during trust repair after disclosed marital infidelity.

    **Thesis Statement:** Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and Gottman Method Couple Therapy offer complementary but distinct pathways for repairing trust after disclosed marital infidelity to promote emotional safety, informed relational decision making, and sustainable trust repair: the former develops emotional acceptance, empathic understanding, and targeted behavior change, whereas the latter strengthens accountability, transparency, conflict regulation, and renewed commitment.

    **Rationale**

    Infidelity in marriage is a topic that should be studied in detail since it interferes with trust, attachment security, and patterns of conflict and shared meaning between the couple. To get the paper out of the general discussion, a smaller comparison of two counseling approaches will help discuss how counselors organize recovery. Doss et al. (2022) point to integrative behavioral couple therapy as an established intervention for couple distress; it is appropriate to study acceptance, behavior change, and emotional reengagement following betrayal. Moreover, Gottman Method Couple Therapy has demonstrated the potential to recover from an affair, particularly in trust, conflict management, and relational satisfaction (Irvine et al., 2023). This analogy is important as counselors have to strike a balance between accountability and emotional safety. Couple healing literature focuses on meaning-making and deliberate rebuilding relationships after infidelity (Fife et al., 2023), whereas trust repair literature underlines transparency, responsiveness, and consistent behavioral evidence (Giacobbi & Lalot, 2025). Besides, therapists outline infidelity work as a clinically complicated one since couples usually come to the counseling with ambivalence and severe distress in relationships (O'Rourke et al., 2025). Injured partners also define recovery as a decision-making process that involves being clear, safe, and relational over time (Mitchell et al., 2026). Thus, the topic is applicable to marital counseling in the context of a marital crisis and two organized methods of responsible healing.

    **References**

    Doss, B. D., Roddy, M. K., Wiebe, S. A., & Johnson, S. M. (2022). A review of the research during 2010–2019 on evidence‐based treatments for couple relationship distress.
    _Journal of marital and family therapy_,
    _48_(1), 283–306.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12552](https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12552)

    Fife, S. T., Gossner, J. D., Theobald, A., Allen, E., Rivero, A., & Koehl, H. (2023). Couple healing from infidelity: A grounded theory study.
    _Journal of Social and Personal Relationships_,
    _40_(12), 3882–3905.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231177874](https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231177874)

    Giacobbi, M., & Lalot, F. (2025). Unpacking trust repair in couples: A systematic literature review.
    _Journal of Family Therapy_,
    _47_(1), e12483.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12483](https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12483)

    Irvine, T. J., Peluso, P. R., Benson, K., Cole, C., Cole, D., Gottman, J. M., & Schwartz Gottman, J. (2024). A pilot study examining the effectiveness of Gottman method couples therapy over treatment-as-usual approaches for treating couples dealing with infidelity.
    _The Family Journal_,
    _32_(1), 81–94.
    [https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231210123](https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231210123)

    Mitchell, E. A., Brown, K. S., Spencer, J., & Harris, K. (2026). Staying Together After Infidelity: An Exploration of the Decision‐Making Process of Recovery From the Perspective of the Injured Partner.
    _Journal of Marital and Family Therapy_,
    _52_(1), e70110.
    [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70110](https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70110)

    O’Rourke, V., McElvaney, R., & Kirrane, M. (2025). Grappling with infidelity: The experiences of therapists.
    _Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy_,
    _24_(1), 24–48.
    [https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2024.2391965](https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2024.2391965)

    **Module5-FinalResearchPaperOutlineAssignment.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module5-finalresearchpaperoutlineassignment-docx)

    **WatchTranscript-Dr.GaryChapmanonTheFiveLoveLanguagesofApology.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/watchtranscript-dr-garychapmanonthefivelovelanguagesofapology-pdf)

    **Reading-ChapmanG.2024.The5lovelanguages4thed..NorthfieldPublishing.Chapt.4-6.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-chapmang-2024-the5lovelanguages4thed-northfieldpublishing-chapt-4-6-pdf)

    **Sample-Paper-APA-7th-professional-version-FINAL-051220201.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/sample-paper-apa-7th-professional-version-final-051220201-pdf-10582901)

  • [Solved] Discussion Question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Can someone help me with my discussion question?

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Can someone help me with my discussion question?

  • [Solved] Prof Double R

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    DISCUSSION QUESTION 1 Chapter 10 and the articles "Decade of Research on the Rich-Poor Divide in Education: Many Studies Show Large and Growing Inequities" and "Why White School Districts Have So Much More Money" suggest that education in the United States reflects social stratification, which, you …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    DISCUSSION QUESTION 1

    Chapter 10 and the articles "Decade of Research on the Rich-Poor Divide in Education: Many Studies Show Large and Growing Inequities" and "Why White School Districts Have So Much More Money" suggest that education in the United States reflects social stratification, which, you may recall from Module Four, is the division of society into groups that are arranged in a hierarchy. Your discussion posting for this module should explain the following:

    – What does it mean to say that education reflects social stratification?
    – Based on the readings, consider how educational reform could potentially break the cycle of inequality. What do you think individuals can do to help combat inequality in education?
    – What can social agencies do to help combat inequality in education?
    – How is racial discrimination reflected in educational social stratification?

    Please provide evidence and specific examples from the readings or other sources to support your argument. Remember to use in-text citations and references when you use ideas or information from other sources.

    DISCUSSION QUESTION 2

    There have been many social changes and social movements in the past several decades. The Civil Rights Movement, Black Lives Matter movement, Gay Rights Movement, and the #MeToo movement are just a few examples of social movements that accompanied social change. Sociologists often describe social change as the only constant in society. Your post should explain what they mean by that and provide an example of social change that has occurred during your lifetime. Your post should also address how this social change has impacted or changed society's understanding of social roles or inequalities.

  • [Solved] Psychology Week 4 Assignment: Workshop Presentation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Employee Burnout and Retention Among Human Resources Professionals: Historical Foundations, Current Practices, and Theoretical Perspectives – [\ \ Untitleddocument10.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/untitleddocument10-pdf-10583401 "Untitleddocument10.pdf")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Employee Burnout and Retention Among Human Resources Professionals: Historical Foundations, Current Practices, and Theoretical Perspectives

    – [\
    \
    Untitleddocument10.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/untitleddocument10-pdf-10583401 "Untitleddocument10.pdf")

  • [Solved] Psychology Week 3 Assignment: Project Topic and Annotated Bibliography

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **How does employee burnout influence retention among human resources professionals?** **files (1)** – ## Untitleddocument8.pdf **## Untitleddocument8.pdf** In this assignment, you will introduce your project topic with an annotated bibliography as the beginning of your course project. You will inve…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **How does employee burnout influence retention among human resources professionals?**

    **files (1)**

    – ## Untitleddocument8.pdf

    **## Untitleddocument8.pdf**

    In this assignment, you will introduce your project topic with an annotated bibliography

    as the beginning of your course project. You will investigate a topic in your specialization

    area for your project. Because ethics is so fundamental to the field of psychology, you

    will also make a preliminary assessment of ethical concerns that should be considered

    in relation to your topic.

    Review the Applying Theory to Practice course project description. For your annotated

    bibliography, present at least seven current, peer-reviewed journal articles from the

    literature of the field that address your chosen subfield of I/O psychology. (For this

    assignment, current resources are defined as materials published within the last 3–5

    years.) Use the I/O topic guides in the Capella University Library. Incorporate both

    theoretical and empirical studies in your annotated bibliography. Focus your research on

    the current practices in your chosen subfield and on the historical and theoretical

    background that has influenced its development.

    Select the most relevant resources from your research thus far, and write a full APA

    reference for each. Complete a bibliographical annotation for each of your resources,

    incorporating a brief summary of each article, an evaluation of its relevance to your

    project topic, any ethical concerns, and the other features of a complete annotation (as

    outlined in the instructions below). The annotation for each resource should be no more

    than two paragraphs in length.

    The following instructions, adapted from J. D. Lester's Writing Research Papers, outline

    general guidelines for approaching your annotated bibliography:

    1. List the complete APA citation for the material.
    2. Explain the main purpose of the material.
    3. Briefly describe the content in a 1–2 paragraph summary.
    4. Evaluate the relevance of the information and indicate how you think it

    applies well to your subject in one paragraph.
    5. Note any special features of the material, including tables or graphs, that

    contribute to its value.
    6. Identify any ethical considerations.

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1651](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1651)

    Refer to these additional helpful links for further guidance on writing your annotated

    bibliography:

    ● Annotated Bibliography.
    ● How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles?
    ● Capella University Library: Topic Exploration: I/O Psychology.

    Your assignment should meet the following requirements:

    ● Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract
    from the overall message.

    ● APA formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to
    current APA style and formatting. Refer to Evidence and APA.

    ● Number of resources: A minimum of seven resources.
    ● Length of paper: 4–5 typed, double-spaced pages, including title page.
    ● Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    Reference

    Lester, J. D. (1998). Writing research papers (9th ed.). Addison-Wesley.

    Competencies Measured
    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the

    following course competencies and rubric criteria:

    ● Competency 3: Analyze the tenets of ethical standards and diversity in the
    field of industrial and organizational psychology.

    ○ Ethical considerations are addressed.
    ● Competency 4: Apply theory and research to different specialization areas

    within industrial and organizational psychology.
    ○ The project topic is clear and is an I/O psychology subtopic.
    ○ The resources are less than five years old.

    ● Competency 5: Apply critical thinking to evaluate current trends and practices
    in the field of industrial and organizational psychology.

    ○ Articles are summarized.
    ○ The relevance of the information to the topic is explained.

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2148](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2148)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1650](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1650)

    [http://capellauniversity.libguides.com/PR_IOP](http://capellauniversity.libguides.com/PR_IOP)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540)

    ● Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and
    consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.

    ○ There are seven resources.
    ○ There is a complete correct APA citation for each resource.

    – Reference
    – Competencies Measured

    **## Untitleddocument8.pdf**

    In this assignment, you will introduce your project topic with an annotated bibliography

    as the beginning of your course project. You will investigate a topic in your specialization

    area for your project. Because ethics is so fundamental to the field of psychology, you

    will also make a preliminary assessment of ethical concerns that should be considered

    in relation to your topic.

    Review the Applying Theory to Practice course project description. For your annotated

    bibliography, present at least seven current, peer-reviewed journal articles from the

    literature of the field that address your chosen subfield of I/O psychology. (For this

    assignment, current resources are defined as materials published within the last 3–5

    years.) Use the I/O topic guides in the Capella University Library. Incorporate both

    theoretical and empirical studies in your annotated bibliography. Focus your research on

    the current practices in your chosen subfield and on the historical and theoretical

    background that has influenced its development.

    Select the most relevant resources from your research thus far, and write a full APA

    reference for each. Complete a bibliographical annotation for each of your resources,

    incorporating a brief summary of each article, an evaluation of its relevance to your

    project topic, any ethical concerns, and the other features of a complete annotation (as

    outlined in the instructions below). The annotation for each resource should be no more

    than two paragraphs in length.

    The following instructions, adapted from J. D. Lester's Writing Research Papers, outline

    general guidelines for approaching your annotated bibliography:

    1. List the complete APA citation for the material.
    2. Explain the main purpose of the material.
    3. Briefly describe the content in a 1–2 paragraph summary.
    4. Evaluate the relevance of the information and indicate how you think it

    applies well to your subject in one paragraph.
    5. Note any special features of the material, including tables or graphs, that

    contribute to its value.
    6. Identify any ethical considerations.

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1651](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1651)

    Refer to these additional helpful links for further guidance on writing your annotated

    bibliography:

    ● Annotated Bibliography.
    ● How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles?
    ● Capella University Library: Topic Exploration: I/O Psychology.

    Your assignment should meet the following requirements:

    ● Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract
    from the overall message.

    ● APA formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to
    current APA style and formatting. Refer to Evidence and APA.

    ● Number of resources: A minimum of seven resources.
    ● Length of paper: 4–5 typed, double-spaced pages, including title page.
    ● Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    Reference

    Lester, J. D. (1998). Writing research papers (9th ed.). Addison-Wesley.

    Competencies Measured
    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the

    following course competencies and rubric criteria:

    ● Competency 3: Analyze the tenets of ethical standards and diversity in the
    field of industrial and organizational psychology.

    ○ Ethical considerations are addressed.
    ● Competency 4: Apply theory and research to different specialization areas

    within industrial and organizational psychology.
    ○ The project topic is clear and is an I/O psychology subtopic.
    ○ The resources are less than five years old.

    ● Competency 5: Apply critical thinking to evaluate current trends and practices
    in the field of industrial and organizational psychology.

    ○ Articles are summarized.
    ○ The relevance of the information to the topic is explained.

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2148](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2148)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1650](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1650)

    [http://capellauniversity.libguides.com/PR_IOP](http://capellauniversity.libguides.com/PR_IOP)

    [https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=1540)

    ● Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and
    consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.

    ○ There are seven resources.
    ○ There is a complete correct APA citation for each resource.

    – Reference
    – Competencies Measured

  • [Solved] Psychology Week 3 Assignment: Ethical Principles and Standards in Research and Publication

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Why is informed consent essential to maintaining ethical standards and protecting research participants in psychological research? – [\ \ HUMANRESOURCES.docx1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/humanresources-docx1-pdf "HUMANRESOURCES.docx1.pdf") – [\ \ Untitleddocument9.pdf](https://www.swee…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Why is informed consent essential to maintaining ethical standards and protecting research participants in psychological research?

    – [\
    \
    HUMANRESOURCES.docx1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/humanresources-docx1-pdf "HUMANRESOURCES.docx1.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    Untitleddocument9.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/untitleddocument9-pdf-10583399 "Untitleddocument9.pdf")

  • [Solved] Reply to discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need help with 2 replies, 150 words each. Can someone please help me?

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need help with 2 replies, 150 words each. Can someone please help me?

  • [Solved] Psychology homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Psychology homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.