My Blog

Category: Clinical & Abnormal Psychology

  • [Solved] Response to Interview Questions

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    all information in the attachments please read carefully and follow all directions and follow the rubric **files (2)** – ## Rubric-ResponsetoInterviewQuestions2.pdf – Screenshot2026-08-23at10.36.00AM.png **## Rubric-ResponsetoInterviewQuestions2.pdf** Response to Interview Questions – Rubric Total 2…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    all information in the attachments please read carefully and follow all directions and follow the rubric

    **files (2)**

    – ## Rubric-ResponsetoInterviewQuestions2.pdf

    – Screenshot2026-08-23at10.36.00AM.png

    **## Rubric-ResponsetoInterviewQuestions2.pdf**

    Response to Interview Questions – Rubric Total 250 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less Than
    Satisfactory

    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Experience of Being a

    Doctoral Learner

    0 points

    Fails to provide specific

    examples; response is

    vague or unrelated to the

    doctoral experience. Lacks

    detail and personal

    reflection.

    62.05 points

    Provides limited examples;

    response lacks depth and

    personal insight.

    Somewhat related to the

    doctoral experience, but

    insufficiently described.

    69.7 points

    Provides a clear example;

    response gives some

    insight into personal

    experience as a doctoral

    learner, but lacks depth or

    reflection.

    77.35 points

    Provides detailed

    examples; response is well-

    articulated and relates

    directly to the doctoral

    experience, showing good

    reflection and insight.

    85 points

    Provides comprehensive,

    detailed examples;

    response is deeply

    reflective and insightful,

    clearly illustrating the

    personal experience and

    significance of being a

    doctoral learner

    Embracing Psychological

    Theories (e.g.,

    Persistence, Grit, Self-

    Efficacy, Resilience)

    0 points

    Fails to explain or

    inaccurately describes how

    psychological theories can

    help; lacks understanding

    of theories.

    41.98 points

    Provides limited

    explanation; some

    understanding of theories,

    but lacks depth.

    Connection to personal

    perseverance is weak or

    vague.

    47.15 points

    Adequately explains how

    one or more theories help;

    demonstrates basic

    understanding and relates

    to personal perseverance

    in a general sense.

    52.33 points

    Clearly explains and

    connects one or more

    theories to personal

    perseverance;

    demonstrates good

    understanding and

    provides relevant personal

    examples.

    57.5 points

    Thoroughly explains and

    connects multiple theories

    to personal perseverance;

    demonstrates excellent

    understanding with highly

    relevant and insightful

    personal examples.

    HTE and Positive

    Psychology Tenets

    0 points

    Fails to describe or

    inaccurately describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; lacks

    connection to forming a

    doctoral identity.

    41.98 points

    Provides limited

    description of HTE and

    positive psychology tenets;

    weak connection to

    forming a doctoral identity;

    lacks depth.

    47.15 points

    Adequately describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; shows

    understanding and makes

    some connection to

    forming a doctoral identity.

    52.33 points

    Clearly describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; demonstrates

    good understanding and

    makes a clear connection

    to forming a doctoral

    identity.

    57.5 points

    Thoroughly describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; shows

    excellent understanding

    and makes a deep,

    insightful connection to

    forming a doctoral identity.

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible

    overall purpose or

    organizing claim.

    18.25 points

    Thesis is insufficiently

    developed or vague.

    Purpose is not clear.

    20.5 points

    Thesis is apparent and

    appropriate to purpose.

    22.75 points

    Thesis is clear and

    forecasts the development

    of the paper. Thesis is

    descriptive and reflective

    of the arguments and

    appropriate to the

    purpose.

    25 points

    Thesis is comprehensive

    and contains the essence

    of the paper. Thesis

    statement makes the

    purpose of the paper clear.

    Mechanics of Writing 0 points

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough that they

    impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate

    word choice or sentence

    construction is used.

    9.13 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice

    (register) or word choice

    are present. Sentence

    structure is correct, but not

    varied.

    10.25 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting

    to the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    11.38 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors,

    although a few may be

    present. The writer uses a

    variety of effective

    sentence structures and

    figures of speech.

    12.5 points

    Writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    APA Format 0 points

    Required format is rarely

    followed correctly. No

    reference page is included.

    No in-text citations are

    used.

    9.13 points

    Required format elements

    are missing or incorrect. A

    lack of control with

    formatting is apparent.

    Reference page is present.

    However, in-text citations

    are inconsistently used.

    10.25 points

    Required format is

    generally correct. However,

    errors are present (e.g.,

    font, cover page, margins,

    and in-text citations).

    Reference page is included

    and lists sources used in

    the paper. Sources are

    appropriately documented

    though some errors are

    11.38 points

    Required format is used,

    but minor errors are

    present (e.g., headings and

    direct quotes). Reference

    page is present and

    includes all cited sources.

    Documentation is

    appropriate and citation

    style is usually correct.

    12.5 points

    The document is correctly

    formatted. In-text citations

    and a reference page are

    complete and correct. The

    documentation of cited

    sources is free of error.

    **Screenshot2026-08-23at10.36.00AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-08-23at10-36-00am-png)

    **Screenshot2026-08-23at10.36.00AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-08-23at10-36-00am-png)

    **## Rubric-ResponsetoInterviewQuestions2.pdf**

    Response to Interview Questions – Rubric Total 250 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less Than
    Satisfactory

    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Experience of Being a

    Doctoral Learner

    0 points

    Fails to provide specific

    examples; response is

    vague or unrelated to the

    doctoral experience. Lacks

    detail and personal

    reflection.

    62.05 points

    Provides limited examples;

    response lacks depth and

    personal insight.

    Somewhat related to the

    doctoral experience, but

    insufficiently described.

    69.7 points

    Provides a clear example;

    response gives some

    insight into personal

    experience as a doctoral

    learner, but lacks depth or

    reflection.

    77.35 points

    Provides detailed

    examples; response is well-

    articulated and relates

    directly to the doctoral

    experience, showing good

    reflection and insight.

    85 points

    Provides comprehensive,

    detailed examples;

    response is deeply

    reflective and insightful,

    clearly illustrating the

    personal experience and

    significance of being a

    doctoral learner

    Embracing Psychological

    Theories (e.g.,

    Persistence, Grit, Self-

    Efficacy, Resilience)

    0 points

    Fails to explain or

    inaccurately describes how

    psychological theories can

    help; lacks understanding

    of theories.

    41.98 points

    Provides limited

    explanation; some

    understanding of theories,

    but lacks depth.

    Connection to personal

    perseverance is weak or

    vague.

    47.15 points

    Adequately explains how

    one or more theories help;

    demonstrates basic

    understanding and relates

    to personal perseverance

    in a general sense.

    52.33 points

    Clearly explains and

    connects one or more

    theories to personal

    perseverance;

    demonstrates good

    understanding and

    provides relevant personal

    examples.

    57.5 points

    Thoroughly explains and

    connects multiple theories

    to personal perseverance;

    demonstrates excellent

    understanding with highly

    relevant and insightful

    personal examples.

    HTE and Positive

    Psychology Tenets

    0 points

    Fails to describe or

    inaccurately describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; lacks

    connection to forming a

    doctoral identity.

    41.98 points

    Provides limited

    description of HTE and

    positive psychology tenets;

    weak connection to

    forming a doctoral identity;

    lacks depth.

    47.15 points

    Adequately describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; shows

    understanding and makes

    some connection to

    forming a doctoral identity.

    52.33 points

    Clearly describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; demonstrates

    good understanding and

    makes a clear connection

    to forming a doctoral

    identity.

    57.5 points

    Thoroughly describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; shows

    excellent understanding

    and makes a deep,

    insightful connection to

    forming a doctoral identity.

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible

    overall purpose or

    organizing claim.

    18.25 points

    Thesis is insufficiently

    developed or vague.

    Purpose is not clear.

    20.5 points

    Thesis is apparent and

    appropriate to purpose.

    22.75 points

    Thesis is clear and

    forecasts the development

    of the paper. Thesis is

    descriptive and reflective

    of the arguments and

    appropriate to the

    purpose.

    25 points

    Thesis is comprehensive

    and contains the essence

    of the paper. Thesis

    statement makes the

    purpose of the paper clear.

    Mechanics of Writing 0 points

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough that they

    impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate

    word choice or sentence

    construction is used.

    9.13 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice

    (register) or word choice

    are present. Sentence

    structure is correct, but not

    varied.

    10.25 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting

    to the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    11.38 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors,

    although a few may be

    present. The writer uses a

    variety of effective

    sentence structures and

    figures of speech.

    12.5 points

    Writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    APA Format 0 points

    Required format is rarely

    followed correctly. No

    reference page is included.

    No in-text citations are

    used.

    9.13 points

    Required format elements

    are missing or incorrect. A

    lack of control with

    formatting is apparent.

    Reference page is present.

    However, in-text citations

    are inconsistently used.

    10.25 points

    Required format is

    generally correct. However,

    errors are present (e.g.,

    font, cover page, margins,

    and in-text citations).

    Reference page is included

    and lists sources used in

    the paper. Sources are

    appropriately documented

    though some errors are

    11.38 points

    Required format is used,

    but minor errors are

    present (e.g., headings and

    direct quotes). Reference

    page is present and

    includes all cited sources.

    Documentation is

    appropriate and citation

    style is usually correct.

    12.5 points

    The document is correctly

    formatted. In-text citations

    and a reference page are

    complete and correct. The

    documentation of cited

    sources is free of error.

    **Screenshot2026-08-23at10.36.00AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-08-23at10-36-00am-png)

    **## Rubric-ResponsetoInterviewQuestions2.pdf**

    Response to Interview Questions – Rubric Total 250 points

    Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
    2. Less Than
    Satisfactory

    3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

    Experience of Being a

    Doctoral Learner

    0 points

    Fails to provide specific

    examples; response is

    vague or unrelated to the

    doctoral experience. Lacks

    detail and personal

    reflection.

    62.05 points

    Provides limited examples;

    response lacks depth and

    personal insight.

    Somewhat related to the

    doctoral experience, but

    insufficiently described.

    69.7 points

    Provides a clear example;

    response gives some

    insight into personal

    experience as a doctoral

    learner, but lacks depth or

    reflection.

    77.35 points

    Provides detailed

    examples; response is well-

    articulated and relates

    directly to the doctoral

    experience, showing good

    reflection and insight.

    85 points

    Provides comprehensive,

    detailed examples;

    response is deeply

    reflective and insightful,

    clearly illustrating the

    personal experience and

    significance of being a

    doctoral learner

    Embracing Psychological

    Theories (e.g.,

    Persistence, Grit, Self-

    Efficacy, Resilience)

    0 points

    Fails to explain or

    inaccurately describes how

    psychological theories can

    help; lacks understanding

    of theories.

    41.98 points

    Provides limited

    explanation; some

    understanding of theories,

    but lacks depth.

    Connection to personal

    perseverance is weak or

    vague.

    47.15 points

    Adequately explains how

    one or more theories help;

    demonstrates basic

    understanding and relates

    to personal perseverance

    in a general sense.

    52.33 points

    Clearly explains and

    connects one or more

    theories to personal

    perseverance;

    demonstrates good

    understanding and

    provides relevant personal

    examples.

    57.5 points

    Thoroughly explains and

    connects multiple theories

    to personal perseverance;

    demonstrates excellent

    understanding with highly

    relevant and insightful

    personal examples.

    HTE and Positive

    Psychology Tenets

    0 points

    Fails to describe or

    inaccurately describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; lacks

    connection to forming a

    doctoral identity.

    41.98 points

    Provides limited

    description of HTE and

    positive psychology tenets;

    weak connection to

    forming a doctoral identity;

    lacks depth.

    47.15 points

    Adequately describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; shows

    understanding and makes

    some connection to

    forming a doctoral identity.

    52.33 points

    Clearly describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; demonstrates

    good understanding and

    makes a clear connection

    to forming a doctoral

    identity.

    57.5 points

    Thoroughly describes the

    tenets of HTE and positive

    psychology; shows

    excellent understanding

    and makes a deep,

    insightful connection to

    forming a doctoral identity.

    Thesis Development and

    Purpose

    0 points

    Paper lacks any discernible

    overall purpose or

    organizing claim.

    18.25 points

    Thesis is insufficiently

    developed or vague.

    Purpose is not clear.

    20.5 points

    Thesis is apparent and

    appropriate to purpose.

    22.75 points

    Thesis is clear and

    forecasts the development

    of the paper. Thesis is

    descriptive and reflective

    of the arguments and

    appropriate to the

    purpose.

    25 points

    Thesis is comprehensive

    and contains the essence

    of the paper. Thesis

    statement makes the

    purpose of the paper clear.

    Mechanics of Writing 0 points

    Surface errors are

    pervasive enough that they

    impede communication of

    meaning. Inappropriate

    word choice or sentence

    construction is used.

    9.13 points

    Frequent and repetitive

    mechanical errors distract

    the reader. Inconsistencies

    in language choice

    (register) or word choice

    are present. Sentence

    structure is correct, but not

    varied.

    10.25 points

    Some mechanical errors or

    typos are present, but they

    are not overly distracting

    to the reader. Correct and

    varied sentence structure

    and audience-appropriate

    language are employed.

    11.38 points

    Prose is largely free of

    mechanical errors,

    although a few may be

    present. The writer uses a

    variety of effective

    sentence structures and

    figures of speech.

    12.5 points

    Writer is clearly in

    command of standard,

    written, academic English.

    APA Format 0 points

    Required format is rarely

    followed correctly. No

    reference page is included.

    No in-text citations are

    used.

    9.13 points

    Required format elements

    are missing or incorrect. A

    lack of control with

    formatting is apparent.

    Reference page is present.

    However, in-text citations

    are inconsistently used.

    10.25 points

    Required format is

    generally correct. However,

    errors are present (e.g.,

    font, cover page, margins,

    and in-text citations).

    Reference page is included

    and lists sources used in

    the paper. Sources are

    appropriately documented

    though some errors are

    11.38 points

    Required format is used,

    but minor errors are

    present (e.g., headings and

    direct quotes). Reference

    page is present and

    includes all cited sources.

    Documentation is

    appropriate and citation

    style is usually correct.

    12.5 points

    The document is correctly

    formatted. In-text citations

    and a reference page are

    complete and correct. The

    documentation of cited

    sources is free of error.

    **Screenshot2026-08-23at10.36.00AM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-08-23at10-36-00am-png)

  • [Solved] LP762-L2 WEEK 1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    TEXTBOOKS / READINGS Required Textbooks: Bennis, W. (2009). On becoming a leader (4th edition). New York, NY: Basic Books. Burns, J.M. (2010). Leadership (Harper Perennial Political Classics). New York, NY: HarperPerennial. Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap…and othe…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    TEXTBOOKS / READINGS

    Required Textbooks:

    Bennis, W. (2009). On becoming a leader (4th edition). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Burns, J.M. (2010). Leadership (Harper Perennial Political Classics). New York, NY:

    HarperPerennial.

    Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap…and others don’t. New

    York, NY: HarperBusiness.

    Kellerman, B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.

    – [\
    \
    Screenshot2026-08-23at11.22.27AM.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-08-23at11-22-27am-png "Screenshot2026-08-23at11.22.27AM.png")
    – [\
    \
    LP762Notes1.pptx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/lp762notes1-pptx "LP762Notes1.pptx")
    – [\
    \
    Week1DiscussionBoard.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week1discussionboard-pdf-10588581 "Week1DiscussionBoard.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    1-.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/1-pdf-10589111 "1-.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    2.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/2-pdf-10589113 "2.pdf")

  • [Solved] assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Application of Psychology to the Court Case/ 3000 words** • Detailed description and understanding of key psychological theories and/or constructs • Critical assessment and synthesis of relevant psychological literature • Evidence of wider reading around the topic to support discussion with a bala…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Application of Psychology to the Court Case/ 3000 words**

    • Detailed description and understanding of key psychological theories and/or constructs

    • Critical assessment and synthesis of relevant psychological literature

    • Evidence of wider reading around the topic to support discussion with a balance of seminal and contemporary reference sources

    • Clear focus on answering the question

    • A coherent structure to the report, presenting a concise argument supported by examples from relevant psychological literature

    – [\
    \
    AssessmentBrief.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assessmentbrief-pdf-10588849 "AssessmentBrief.pdf")

  • [Solved] Dis 2 von

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Read the following two articles from the Harvey and De Meuse, Eds. (2021) Book titled** _**The Age of Agility: Building Learning Age Leaders and Organizations. Discuss Mindful Awareness.**_ _**1. Chapter 6: Harvey & Prager (2021). Developing Learning Agile Behavior: A Model and Overview. pages 14…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Read the following two articles from the Harvey and De Meuse, Eds. (2021) Book titled** _**The Age of Agility:  Building Learning Age Leaders and Organizations.   Discuss Mindful Awareness.**_

    _**1. Chapter 6:  Harvey & Prager (2021). Developing Learning Agile Behavior:  A Model and Overview. pages 145-181.**_ **See Contributions of Mindfulness to Learning Agility. p. 153.  See p. 151 on                   Model of agile learning process and behaviors.** _**(1. Observing; 2. Doing; 3. Connecting; 4.   Thinking; and 5. Mobilizing)**_

    _**2. Chapter 7:  Lee (2021).  Cultivating Learning Agility through Mindfulness.  See pages 182-203.  Mindfulness is  "paying full attention to one's present moment experience and maintaining an attitude of                                     receptiveness and curiosity" pages 183-185. (Metacognition, A Model of Learning Agility, Mindset –  Growth Mindset and Stress Resilience, Awareness, Action, Integration – Reflection and                                           Conceptualization, Application)**_

  • [Solved] Master in Psychology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## REACTIONPAPER.docx **## REACTIONPAPER.docx** **Short reaction papers that use the material you are reading and discussions in class are a great way to accomplish that. You can integrate the readings with (a) class discussions, (b) something you read in the news, (c) something you …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## REACTIONPAPER.docx

    **## REACTIONPAPER.docx**

    **Short reaction papers that use the material you are reading and discussions in class are a great way to accomplish that. You can integrate the readings with (a) class discussions, (b) something you read in the news, (c) something you are learning in another course, or (d) something that actually happened to you in the reaction papers. Each paper should have at least 3 journal sources. An empirical study can be created to test a hypothesis. You may look up Alabama laws and report on what you find. You can present two arguments on different sides of an issue. Critical thinking must be clearly through your presentation of the dilemma and your argument. Each reaction paper should be between 750-1000 words, double-spaced, and typed in a 12-point Times New Roman font using APA formatting.**

    **TOPIC:**

    **A. Ethical Considerations in Psychological Research: Discuss the importance of ethical guidelines in conducting psychological research, highlighting cases where unethical practices have led to negative consequences. Explore the balance between the benefits of research and the potential harm to participants**.

    **GRADING GUIDE**

    **Content: Topic Background (10 points):** __________

    • Topic background and connection to course content (lecture notes, text) are covered thoroughly, clearly, and accurately.

    • 3 peer-reviewed journal articles pertaining to reaction paper used

    **Content: Opinions & points of view (10 points):** __________

    • At least three key points addressed thoroughly, clearly, and accurately

    **Content: New info learned (10 points): __________**

    • At least three new pieces of information were described

    • Personal opinion/reactions to journal articles or the question, along with reasons for your opinion

    **Writing (10 points): __________**

    • Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct

    • Logical progression of sentence structure and paragraph structure

    **Format (10 points): __________**

    •APA Formatting & Style (Paper is typed, 12-point font, 1-inch margins, etc.)

    • Paper is at least 2 pages (excluding title, name, etc.)

    **NO AI MUST BE SUBMITTED THRU TURNITIN.COM**

    **## REACTIONPAPER.docx**

    **Short reaction papers that use the material you are reading and discussions in class are a great way to accomplish that. You can integrate the readings with (a) class discussions, (b) something you read in the news, (c) something you are learning in another course, or (d) something that actually happened to you in the reaction papers. Each paper should have at least 3 journal sources. An empirical study can be created to test a hypothesis. You may look up Alabama laws and report on what you find. You can present two arguments on different sides of an issue. Critical thinking must be clearly through your presentation of the dilemma and your argument. Each reaction paper should be between 750-1000 words, double-spaced, and typed in a 12-point Times New Roman font using APA formatting.**

    **TOPIC:**

    **A. Ethical Considerations in Psychological Research: Discuss the importance of ethical guidelines in conducting psychological research, highlighting cases where unethical practices have led to negative consequences. Explore the balance between the benefits of research and the potential harm to participants**.

    **GRADING GUIDE**

    **Content: Topic Background (10 points):** __________

    • Topic background and connection to course content (lecture notes, text) are covered thoroughly, clearly, and accurately.

    • 3 peer-reviewed journal articles pertaining to reaction paper used

    **Content: Opinions & points of view (10 points):** __________

    • At least three key points addressed thoroughly, clearly, and accurately

    **Content: New info learned (10 points): __________**

    • At least three new pieces of information were described

    • Personal opinion/reactions to journal articles or the question, along with reasons for your opinion

    **Writing (10 points): __________**

    • Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct

    • Logical progression of sentence structure and paragraph structure

    **Format (10 points): __________**

    •APA Formatting & Style (Paper is typed, 12-point font, 1-inch margins, etc.)

    • Paper is at least 2 pages (excluding title, name, etc.)

    **NO AI MUST BE SUBMITTED THRU TURNITIN.COM**

  • [Solved] A-1 CT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow the uploaded instructions **files (10)** – ## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsWorksheet_TopicPopulationofInterestThesis.docx – ## UsingChatGPTtoHelpFurtherSpecifyaFocusPopulation.docx – ## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx – ## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## Tr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow the uploaded instructions

    **files (10)**

    – ## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsWorksheet_TopicPopulationofInterestThesis.docx

    – ## UsingChatGPTtoHelpFurtherSpecifyaFocusPopulation.docx

    – ## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx

    – ## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsGradingRubric.pdf

    – Reading-2Chapt.1-4LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf
    – Reading-1Chapt.1-4LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf
    – UsingCopilottoHelpSpecifyaTopic.docx
    – Thesis-Statements.pdf
    – ReadingChapt.1-2BriereJ.ScottC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsWorksheet_TopicPopulationofInterestThesis.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Study Foundations Worksheet: Topic, Population of Interest, Thesis**

    Answer each of the following questions and then complete your Study Foundations Paper

    1. What is a problem related to traumatology that you consider to have a gap with information or understanding?

    2. Why do you wish to study this problem?

    3. What are sub-components of this problem that you see need more study? (Name at least three)

    4. What reference(s) support your answers to questions 1 – 3?

    5. What is a population that is affected by this problem?

    6. What is a segment of this population that you consider to have a gap with information or understanding on this segment and the problem you stated?

    7. What is your interest in studying this population segment with this problem?

    8. What reference(s) support your answers to questions 5 – 7?

    9. Does your thesis statement:

    · Make an
    **argumentative assertion** about a topic; it states the
    **conclusions that you have reached** about your topic?

    · Makes a promise to the reader about the
    **scope, purpose,** and
    **direction** of your paper.?

    · Provide
    **focus** and
    **specificity** enough to be “proven” within the boundaries of your paper?

    **## UsingChatGPTtoHelpFurtherSpecifyaFocusPopulation.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Using ChatGPT to Help Further Specify a Focus Population**

    Student stated population: males in the United States who have experienced a miscarriage.

    **Question asked of ChatGPT:** “How can this population description be more specific: examining coping strategies used for males in the United States who have experienced a miscarriage?”

    **From ChatGPT:**

    That’s a good starting point – you’ve defined gender, country, and experience (miscarriage) – but it can be made more specific depending on your research focus. Here are several ways to refine it:

    **1. Clarify relationship context**

    Specify
    **whose** miscarriage it was, since “experienced a miscarriage” could mean different things:

    · “Males in the United States whose partners have experienced a miscarriage.”

    · “Men in heterosexual relationships in the United States who have experienced their partner’s miscarriage within the past 2 years.”

    This makes it clear that you’re studying
    **partners of individuals who miscarried**, not men with other related experiences (like those who experienced a miscarriage through a surrogate, for instance).

    **2. Add demographic details**

    You could focus on specific subgroups to make findings more meaningful or manageable:

    · Age range: “Adult males aged 25–45 in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    · Marital status: “Married men in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    · Cultural or ethnic group: “African American men in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    **3. Specify timeframe**

    Defining
    **when** the miscarriage occurred helps examine coping strategies across adjustment stages:

    · “Males in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage within the past 5 years.”

    · “Males in the U.S. who experienced a miscarriage over 6 months ago.”

    **4. Add context variables**

    If your study has a focus (e.g., emotional, social, or behavioral coping), include that:

    · “Males in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage and who sought peer or professional support.”

    · “Males in the U.S. who experienced a miscarriage during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

    **5. Possible refined version examples**

    · “Adult males in the United States whose partners experienced a miscarriage within the past 2 years, examining how they cope emotionally and socially.”

    · “Married men aged 25–45 in the U.S. who have experienced their partner’s miscarriage, focusing on adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies.”

    · “African American males in the U.S. who have experienced a partner’s miscarriage in the past 5 years, analyzing cultural influences on coping.”

    Would you like me to help you tailor the population statement for a quantitative or a qualitative study? The level of specificity and variables you highlight can differ depending on that.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Assignments Overview**

    Throughout EDCO 790, you will conduct a study across the eight weeks of the term on a specific topic and population of interest in traumatology. The purpose of this study is twofold.

    · Help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    ·
    Deepen the learner’s foundational understanding of trauma counseling

    A series of five assignments are integrated across the course modules and weeks, using the scaffolding strategy to give the learner support as new concepts and skills as required for the dissertation. The assignments in this series include:
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation,** and
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    Beginning with the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**, each study assignment will have five core sections: Discussion of the Topic of Study, Population of Interest, Associated Variables, Biblical Integration, and Topics for Future Research.
    **Note that all written assignments in the study should be submitted in a Word (versus PDF) document with Times New Roman 12-point font, as this is recommended by APA.**

    **Module 1: Week 1 – Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**

    · This is the foundation of the study, much as the first stage of building a house is to set the foundation.

    · The learner will review The Liberty Way regarding ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the document,
    _Thesis Statements – Defining, Developing, and Evaluating_ (Liberty University Academic Success Center.

    · The learner will identify a specific topic and a specifically focused population for that topic with their study in traumatology

    · The learner will explore the topic and population further through use of AI to more specifically narrowthiese.

    · The learner will conclude this assignment with a paper stating the topic and population for the study as well as a thesis which synthesizes the topic, population, and the main idea and primary conclusion that will capture the reader’s attention.

    **Module 3: Week 3 – Traumatology Outline Assignment**

    · The outline will include initial references that support the main points of the outline, with some initial development of topics throughout each of the 5 main sections of the outline.

    · The learner will review the webpage covering the APA Research Paper Outline format (provided on the assignment page) to present an outline for the introduction, five sections of the study, and conclusion.

    **Module 5: Week 5 – Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment**

    · The annotated outline is a structured plan for a research paper that builds on the outline of the main sections and sub-sections with brief annotations that describe the purpose, content and references of each part.

    · The learner will review the document for
    _Guidance and Example Annotated Outline_ for understanding and an example to follow.

    · The learner will expand on the outline with annotations for at least 3 points with support from peer-reviewed scholarly articles.

    **Module 6: Week 6 – Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**

    · The presentation provides an opportunity for scholarly presentation on a topic of interest as a required skill for doctoral learners that is used in the dissertation proposal and dissertation final defense.

    · The learner will present their study in a narrated presentation that is developed for a professional audience of emerging experts in the field of traumatology.

    **Module 7: Week 7 – Traumatology Paper Assignment**

    · The paper is the culminating assignment for the study conducted during the EDCO 790 course.

    · The learner will integrate what has been developed through the previous study assignments and feedback from the professor on these to write the final paper.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This assignment is the first in a series of the 5 assignments designed to allow a student to intentionally focus on and narrow in on a specific topic and population of interest across the 8 weeks of the term as they develop a study, much as they will develop the study for their dissertation.

    In this first assignment, students will identify a topic of interest in the field of traumatology and a specific population of interest that is related to that topic. Common topics include traumatic events, diagnoses known to be related to trauma, and evidence-based treatment modalities practiced in the field of traumatology.

    **Special Notes:**

    (1) This assignment guides the student to employ appropriate and ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The student should review The Liberty Way, which addresses use of AI in courses:

    Academic dishonesty involves a student’s attempt to improve their or another student’s academic standing through dishonest means. It includes, but is not limited to:

    · Artificial Intelligence (AI): Any use of AI writing tools to generate, modify, add, or delete content that compromises the originality or authenticity of coursework. Unauthorized AI tools include, but are not limited to:

    · AI language translation tools

    · Large Language Models (LLMs)

    · Paraphrasing software

    · Any other tool that compromises the originality or authenticity of coursework

    (2) This assignment also guides the student in development of a thesis statement. The student should review the document provided about Thesis Statements.

    **Instructions**

    1.
    **Topic Selection:** Identify a topic of interest in the field of traumatology and a specific population of interest that is related to that topic. Explore Artificial Intelligence (AI) to select and narrow this topic. Examples of AI to explore are ChatGPT and CoPilot. This exploration will provide appropriate and ethical use of AI to help further narrow the focus of study. Students should also explore the viability of their topic by checking for evidence-based article availability in the Jerry Falwell Library online.

    2.
    **Specific Population of Interest Selection:** Also identify a specific group that you would like to study with the topic that you identified. Explore Artificial Intelligence (AI) and evidence-based article availability in the Jerry Falwell Library online to select and narrow this population of interest.

    3.
    **Submit the following documents into the Week One Assignment Link for Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment.**

    a. Copy of the AI exploration for your focus topic for the study.

    b. Copy of the AI exploration for your focus population for the study.

    Note: Example searches using ChatGPT and CoPilot are provided for students to consult. (Students are
    **not** permitted to use any version of these examples).

    c. Traumatology Study Foundation Assignment paper that includes the following:

    ·
    **Professional APA style Title Page**

    ·
    **Introduction**– brief paragraph of rationale the focus of your study.

    ·
    **Sections with APA level one headings for**

    ·
    **Topic –** One paragraph description of a specific and narrow topic based on your exploration via AI. This paragraph should include 1 – 2 reference citation(s) that will support your study of this topic.

    ·
    **Population -** One paragraph description of a specific and narrow topic based on your exploration via AI. This paragraph should include 1 – 2 reference citation(s) that will support your study of this population.

    ·
    **Thesis –** A synthesized statement
    of focus topic and focus population with this topic for the study.
    **This statement should be one sentence.**

    ·
    **References page** that includes the citations noted in the paragraphs above.

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric** before

    beginning this assignment. No use of writing from previous courses can be included in this paper.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content:
    Exploration
    with Artificial
    Intelligence

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Documentation is
    provided of
    comprehensive
    exploration via AI to
    generate a narrowly
    specific study topic
    and population for
    that topic.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Documentation is
    provided with
    general AI
    exploration to
    examine topic
    and population
    with moderate
    narrowing of one
    or both topic and
    population.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    Documentation is
    provided with
    general AI
    exploration to
    examine topic
    and population
    with minimal
    narrowing of one
    or both topic and
    population.

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Documentation is
    provided for AI
    exploration of only
    the topic or the
    population for the
    study, but not both.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 20
    pts

    Content:
    Thesis
    Statement
    and Content
    Alignment
    with Topic
    and
    Population

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    A well-written thesis
    statement delineating
    a narrow
    traumatology topic
    and a specific
    population of interest
    is present.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    A thesis
    statement
    delineating a
    traumatology
    topic and a
    population of
    interest is
    present. Some
    minor
    adjustments to
    the topic or
    population may
    be needed.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    A thesis
    statement
    delineating a
    traumatology
    topic and a
    population of
    interest is
    present.
    Significant
    adjustments to
    the topic or
    population are
    needed.

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    There is no clear
    thesis statement; or
    the thesis statement
    does not identify a
    specific
    traumatology topic;
    or there is no clear
    population of
    interest present.
    Major edits or a
    change of topic or
    population are
    needed.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    / 20
    pts

    Content:
    Topic and
    Population
    of Interest

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Content is accurate
    and includes sources
    for all statements of
    fact. Content is
    developing in a way
    that is clearly tied to
    the narrow topic and
    population of interest
    to be presented in the
    Power Point and
    Paper. Content is
    well-organized and
    synthesis of
    information is already
    evident.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Content is
    accurate and
    includes sources
    in most or all
    areas of the
    outline. Content
    has a tie to the
    topic and a tie to
    the population of
    interest to be
    presented in the
    Power Point and
    Paper. Content is
    organized and of
    high quality.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    Content is
    accurate but may
    lack focus on
    topic or
    population of
    interest. Content
    may need to
    include additional
    sources or higher
    quality sources.
    Some content
    may lack
    organization or
    clear tie to the
    topic

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Content may lack
    accuracy and
    sources. The
    content may lack
    focus or may be
    broad. The content
    of some sources
    may lack a clear tie
    to the topic that is to
    be presented, or the
    topic may lack
    clarity throughout.
    The topic and
    content need further
    developed.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 20
    pts

    Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric |
    EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Structure:
    Professional
    APA Writing,
    Structure,
    and Style

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    The assignment
    contains no spelling
    and grammar errors.
    Excellent
    Professional APA
    style formatting is
    accurately applied
    throughout.
    Transitions and
    Headings are used to
    add to organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used
    consistently
    throughout the
    presentation. The
    body of the paper
    meets length
    requirements.

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    The assignment
    contains only
    minor spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used to add to
    organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used in
    the submission.
    The body of the
    paper mostly
    meets length
    requirements.

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    The assignment
    contains spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present but may
    have mistakes.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used but may
    have errors.
    Scholarly voice
    may not be used
    consistently. The
    paper somewhat
    meets length
    requirements.

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Spelling and
    grammar errors may
    be present in
    several areas of the
    submission. APA
    formatting may be
    present but may
    have mistakes or
    may be inconsistent.
    Transitions and
    Headings may not
    be used. Scholarly
    voice may not be
    used. The body of
    the paper may not
    have met length
    requirements.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 15
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric |
    EDCO790_B02_202640

    **Reading-2Chapt.1-4LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-2chapt-1-4leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **Reading-1Chapt.1-4LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-1chapt-1-4leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **UsingCopilottoHelpSpecifyaTopic.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/usingcopilottohelpspecifyatopic-docx)

    **Thesis-Statements.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/thesis-statements-pdf-10589157)

    **ReadingChapt.1-2BriereJ.ScottC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-1-2brierej-scottc-2025-principlesoftraumatherapy-pdf)

    **ReadingChapt.1-2BriereJ.ScottC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-1-2brierej-scottc-2025-principlesoftraumatherapy-pdf)

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsWorksheet_TopicPopulationofInterestThesis.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Study Foundations Worksheet: Topic, Population of Interest, Thesis**

    Answer each of the following questions and then complete your Study Foundations Paper

    1. What is a problem related to traumatology that you consider to have a gap with information or understanding?

    2. Why do you wish to study this problem?

    3. What are sub-components of this problem that you see need more study? (Name at least three)

    4. What reference(s) support your answers to questions 1 – 3?

    5. What is a population that is affected by this problem?

    6. What is a segment of this population that you consider to have a gap with information or understanding on this segment and the problem you stated?

    7. What is your interest in studying this population segment with this problem?

    8. What reference(s) support your answers to questions 5 – 7?

    9. Does your thesis statement:

    · Make an
    **argumentative assertion** about a topic; it states the
    **conclusions that you have reached** about your topic?

    · Makes a promise to the reader about the
    **scope, purpose,** and
    **direction** of your paper.?

    · Provide
    **focus** and
    **specificity** enough to be “proven” within the boundaries of your paper?

    **## UsingChatGPTtoHelpFurtherSpecifyaFocusPopulation.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Using ChatGPT to Help Further Specify a Focus Population**

    Student stated population: males in the United States who have experienced a miscarriage.

    **Question asked of ChatGPT:** “How can this population description be more specific: examining coping strategies used for males in the United States who have experienced a miscarriage?”

    **From ChatGPT:**

    That’s a good starting point – you’ve defined gender, country, and experience (miscarriage) – but it can be made more specific depending on your research focus. Here are several ways to refine it:

    **1. Clarify relationship context**

    Specify
    **whose** miscarriage it was, since “experienced a miscarriage” could mean different things:

    · “Males in the United States whose partners have experienced a miscarriage.”

    · “Men in heterosexual relationships in the United States who have experienced their partner’s miscarriage within the past 2 years.”

    This makes it clear that you’re studying
    **partners of individuals who miscarried**, not men with other related experiences (like those who experienced a miscarriage through a surrogate, for instance).

    **2. Add demographic details**

    You could focus on specific subgroups to make findings more meaningful or manageable:

    · Age range: “Adult males aged 25–45 in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    · Marital status: “Married men in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    · Cultural or ethnic group: “African American men in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    **3. Specify timeframe**

    Defining
    **when** the miscarriage occurred helps examine coping strategies across adjustment stages:

    · “Males in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage within the past 5 years.”

    · “Males in the U.S. who experienced a miscarriage over 6 months ago.”

    **4. Add context variables**

    If your study has a focus (e.g., emotional, social, or behavioral coping), include that:

    · “Males in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage and who sought peer or professional support.”

    · “Males in the U.S. who experienced a miscarriage during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

    **5. Possible refined version examples**

    · “Adult males in the United States whose partners experienced a miscarriage within the past 2 years, examining how they cope emotionally and socially.”

    · “Married men aged 25–45 in the U.S. who have experienced their partner’s miscarriage, focusing on adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies.”

    · “African American males in the U.S. who have experienced a partner’s miscarriage in the past 5 years, analyzing cultural influences on coping.”

    Would you like me to help you tailor the population statement for a quantitative or a qualitative study? The level of specificity and variables you highlight can differ depending on that.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Assignments Overview**

    Throughout EDCO 790, you will conduct a study across the eight weeks of the term on a specific topic and population of interest in traumatology. The purpose of this study is twofold.

    · Help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    ·
    Deepen the learner’s foundational understanding of trauma counseling

    A series of five assignments are integrated across the course modules and weeks, using the scaffolding strategy to give the learner support as new concepts and skills as required for the dissertation. The assignments in this series include:
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation,** and
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    Beginning with the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**, each study assignment will have five core sections: Discussion of the Topic of Study, Population of Interest, Associated Variables, Biblical Integration, and Topics for Future Research.
    **Note that all written assignments in the study should be submitted in a Word (versus PDF) document with Times New Roman 12-point font, as this is recommended by APA.**

    **Module 1: Week 1 – Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**

    · This is the foundation of the study, much as the first stage of building a house is to set the foundation.

    · The learner will review The Liberty Way regarding ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the document,
    _Thesis Statements – Defining, Developing, and Evaluating_ (Liberty University Academic Success Center.

    · The learner will identify a specific topic and a specifically focused population for that topic with their study in traumatology

    · The learner will explore the topic and population further through use of AI to more specifically narrowthiese.

    · The learner will conclude this assignment with a paper stating the topic and population for the study as well as a thesis which synthesizes the topic, population, and the main idea and primary conclusion that will capture the reader’s attention.

    **Module 3: Week 3 – Traumatology Outline Assignment**

    · The outline will include initial references that support the main points of the outline, with some initial development of topics throughout each of the 5 main sections of the outline.

    · The learner will review the webpage covering the APA Research Paper Outline format (provided on the assignment page) to present an outline for the introduction, five sections of the study, and conclusion.

    **Module 5: Week 5 – Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment**

    · The annotated outline is a structured plan for a research paper that builds on the outline of the main sections and sub-sections with brief annotations that describe the purpose, content and references of each part.

    · The learner will review the document for
    _Guidance and Example Annotated Outline_ for understanding and an example to follow.

    · The learner will expand on the outline with annotations for at least 3 points with support from peer-reviewed scholarly articles.

    **Module 6: Week 6 – Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**

    · The presentation provides an opportunity for scholarly presentation on a topic of interest as a required skill for doctoral learners that is used in the dissertation proposal and dissertation final defense.

    · The learner will present their study in a narrated presentation that is developed for a professional audience of emerging experts in the field of traumatology.

    **Module 7: Week 7 – Traumatology Paper Assignment**

    · The paper is the culminating assignment for the study conducted during the EDCO 790 course.

    · The learner will integrate what has been developed through the previous study assignments and feedback from the professor on these to write the final paper.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This assignment is the first in a series of the 5 assignments designed to allow a student to intentionally focus on and narrow in on a specific topic and population of interest across the 8 weeks of the term as they develop a study, much as they will develop the study for their dissertation.

    In this first assignment, students will identify a topic of interest in the field of traumatology and a specific population of interest that is related to that topic. Common topics include traumatic events, diagnoses known to be related to trauma, and evidence-based treatment modalities practiced in the field of traumatology.

    **Special Notes:**

    (1) This assignment guides the student to employ appropriate and ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The student should review The Liberty Way, which addresses use of AI in courses:

    Academic dishonesty involves a student’s attempt to improve their or another student’s academic standing through dishonest means. It includes, but is not limited to:

    · Artificial Intelligence (AI): Any use of AI writing tools to generate, modify, add, or delete content that compromises the originality or authenticity of coursework. Unauthorized AI tools include, but are not limited to:

    · AI language translation tools

    · Large Language Models (LLMs)

    · Paraphrasing software

    · Any other tool that compromises the originality or authenticity of coursework

    (2) This assignment also guides the student in development of a thesis statement. The student should review the document provided about Thesis Statements.

    **Instructions**

    1.
    **Topic Selection:** Identify a topic of interest in the field of traumatology and a specific population of interest that is related to that topic. Explore Artificial Intelligence (AI) to select and narrow this topic. Examples of AI to explore are ChatGPT and CoPilot. This exploration will provide appropriate and ethical use of AI to help further narrow the focus of study. Students should also explore the viability of their topic by checking for evidence-based article availability in the Jerry Falwell Library online.

    2.
    **Specific Population of Interest Selection:** Also identify a specific group that you would like to study with the topic that you identified. Explore Artificial Intelligence (AI) and evidence-based article availability in the Jerry Falwell Library online to select and narrow this population of interest.

    3.
    **Submit the following documents into the Week One Assignment Link for Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment.**

    a. Copy of the AI exploration for your focus topic for the study.

    b. Copy of the AI exploration for your focus population for the study.

    Note: Example searches using ChatGPT and CoPilot are provided for students to consult. (Students are
    **not** permitted to use any version of these examples).

    c. Traumatology Study Foundation Assignment paper that includes the following:

    ·
    **Professional APA style Title Page**

    ·
    **Introduction**– brief paragraph of rationale the focus of your study.

    ·
    **Sections with APA level one headings for**

    ·
    **Topic –** One paragraph description of a specific and narrow topic based on your exploration via AI. This paragraph should include 1 – 2 reference citation(s) that will support your study of this topic.

    ·
    **Population -** One paragraph description of a specific and narrow topic based on your exploration via AI. This paragraph should include 1 – 2 reference citation(s) that will support your study of this population.

    ·
    **Thesis –** A synthesized statement
    of focus topic and focus population with this topic for the study.
    **This statement should be one sentence.**

    ·
    **References page** that includes the citations noted in the paragraphs above.

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric** before

    beginning this assignment. No use of writing from previous courses can be included in this paper.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content:
    Exploration
    with Artificial
    Intelligence

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Documentation is
    provided of
    comprehensive
    exploration via AI to
    generate a narrowly
    specific study topic
    and population for
    that topic.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Documentation is
    provided with
    general AI
    exploration to
    examine topic
    and population
    with moderate
    narrowing of one
    or both topic and
    population.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    Documentation is
    provided with
    general AI
    exploration to
    examine topic
    and population
    with minimal
    narrowing of one
    or both topic and
    population.

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Documentation is
    provided for AI
    exploration of only
    the topic or the
    population for the
    study, but not both.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 20
    pts

    Content:
    Thesis
    Statement
    and Content
    Alignment
    with Topic
    and
    Population

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    A well-written thesis
    statement delineating
    a narrow
    traumatology topic
    and a specific
    population of interest
    is present.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    A thesis
    statement
    delineating a
    traumatology
    topic and a
    population of
    interest is
    present. Some
    minor
    adjustments to
    the topic or
    population may
    be needed.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    A thesis
    statement
    delineating a
    traumatology
    topic and a
    population of
    interest is
    present.
    Significant
    adjustments to
    the topic or
    population are
    needed.

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    There is no clear
    thesis statement; or
    the thesis statement
    does not identify a
    specific
    traumatology topic;
    or there is no clear
    population of
    interest present.
    Major edits or a
    change of topic or
    population are
    needed.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    / 20
    pts

    Content:
    Topic and
    Population
    of Interest

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Content is accurate
    and includes sources
    for all statements of
    fact. Content is
    developing in a way
    that is clearly tied to
    the narrow topic and
    population of interest
    to be presented in the
    Power Point and
    Paper. Content is
    well-organized and
    synthesis of
    information is already
    evident.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Content is
    accurate and
    includes sources
    in most or all
    areas of the
    outline. Content
    has a tie to the
    topic and a tie to
    the population of
    interest to be
    presented in the
    Power Point and
    Paper. Content is
    organized and of
    high quality.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    Content is
    accurate but may
    lack focus on
    topic or
    population of
    interest. Content
    may need to
    include additional
    sources or higher
    quality sources.
    Some content
    may lack
    organization or
    clear tie to the
    topic

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Content may lack
    accuracy and
    sources. The
    content may lack
    focus or may be
    broad. The content
    of some sources
    may lack a clear tie
    to the topic that is to
    be presented, or the
    topic may lack
    clarity throughout.
    The topic and
    content need further
    developed.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 20
    pts

    Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric |
    EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Structure:
    Professional
    APA Writing,
    Structure,
    and Style

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    The assignment
    contains no spelling
    and grammar errors.
    Excellent
    Professional APA
    style formatting is
    accurately applied
    throughout.
    Transitions and
    Headings are used to
    add to organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used
    consistently
    throughout the
    presentation. The
    body of the paper
    meets length
    requirements.

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    The assignment
    contains only
    minor spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used to add to
    organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used in
    the submission.
    The body of the
    paper mostly
    meets length
    requirements.

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    The assignment
    contains spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present but may
    have mistakes.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used but may
    have errors.
    Scholarly voice
    may not be used
    consistently. The
    paper somewhat
    meets length
    requirements.

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Spelling and
    grammar errors may
    be present in
    several areas of the
    submission. APA
    formatting may be
    present but may
    have mistakes or
    may be inconsistent.
    Transitions and
    Headings may not
    be used. Scholarly
    voice may not be
    used. The body of
    the paper may not
    have met length
    requirements.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 15
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric |
    EDCO790_B02_202640

    **Reading-2Chapt.1-4LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-2chapt-1-4leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **Reading-1Chapt.1-4LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-1chapt-1-4leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **UsingCopilottoHelpSpecifyaTopic.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/usingcopilottohelpspecifyatopic-docx)

    **Thesis-Statements.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/thesis-statements-pdf-10589157)

    **ReadingChapt.1-2BriereJ.ScottC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-1-2brierej-scottc-2025-principlesoftraumatherapy-pdf)

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsWorksheet_TopicPopulationofInterestThesis.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Study Foundations Worksheet: Topic, Population of Interest, Thesis**

    Answer each of the following questions and then complete your Study Foundations Paper

    1. What is a problem related to traumatology that you consider to have a gap with information or understanding?

    2. Why do you wish to study this problem?

    3. What are sub-components of this problem that you see need more study? (Name at least three)

    4. What reference(s) support your answers to questions 1 – 3?

    5. What is a population that is affected by this problem?

    6. What is a segment of this population that you consider to have a gap with information or understanding on this segment and the problem you stated?

    7. What is your interest in studying this population segment with this problem?

    8. What reference(s) support your answers to questions 5 – 7?

    9. Does your thesis statement:

    · Make an
    **argumentative assertion** about a topic; it states the
    **conclusions that you have reached** about your topic?

    · Makes a promise to the reader about the
    **scope, purpose,** and
    **direction** of your paper.?

    · Provide
    **focus** and
    **specificity** enough to be “proven” within the boundaries of your paper?

    **## UsingChatGPTtoHelpFurtherSpecifyaFocusPopulation.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Using ChatGPT to Help Further Specify a Focus Population**

    Student stated population: males in the United States who have experienced a miscarriage.

    **Question asked of ChatGPT:** “How can this population description be more specific: examining coping strategies used for males in the United States who have experienced a miscarriage?”

    **From ChatGPT:**

    That’s a good starting point – you’ve defined gender, country, and experience (miscarriage) – but it can be made more specific depending on your research focus. Here are several ways to refine it:

    **1. Clarify relationship context**

    Specify
    **whose** miscarriage it was, since “experienced a miscarriage” could mean different things:

    · “Males in the United States whose partners have experienced a miscarriage.”

    · “Men in heterosexual relationships in the United States who have experienced their partner’s miscarriage within the past 2 years.”

    This makes it clear that you’re studying
    **partners of individuals who miscarried**, not men with other related experiences (like those who experienced a miscarriage through a surrogate, for instance).

    **2. Add demographic details**

    You could focus on specific subgroups to make findings more meaningful or manageable:

    · Age range: “Adult males aged 25–45 in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    · Marital status: “Married men in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    · Cultural or ethnic group: “African American men in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage.”

    **3. Specify timeframe**

    Defining
    **when** the miscarriage occurred helps examine coping strategies across adjustment stages:

    · “Males in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage within the past 5 years.”

    · “Males in the U.S. who experienced a miscarriage over 6 months ago.”

    **4. Add context variables**

    If your study has a focus (e.g., emotional, social, or behavioral coping), include that:

    · “Males in the U.S. whose partners experienced a miscarriage and who sought peer or professional support.”

    · “Males in the U.S. who experienced a miscarriage during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

    **5. Possible refined version examples**

    · “Adult males in the United States whose partners experienced a miscarriage within the past 2 years, examining how they cope emotionally and socially.”

    · “Married men aged 25–45 in the U.S. who have experienced their partner’s miscarriage, focusing on adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies.”

    · “African American males in the U.S. who have experienced a partner’s miscarriage in the past 5 years, analyzing cultural influences on coping.”

    Would you like me to help you tailor the population statement for a quantitative or a qualitative study? The level of specificity and variables you highlight can differ depending on that.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyAssignmentsOverview-1.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Assignments Overview**

    Throughout EDCO 790, you will conduct a study across the eight weeks of the term on a specific topic and population of interest in traumatology. The purpose of this study is twofold.

    · Help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    ·
    Deepen the learner’s foundational understanding of trauma counseling

    A series of five assignments are integrated across the course modules and weeks, using the scaffolding strategy to give the learner support as new concepts and skills as required for the dissertation. The assignments in this series include:
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment, Traumatology Outline Assignment, Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment, Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation,** and
    **Traumatology Paper Assignment**. This series of assignments is contemplated to help prepare the learner for the dissertation requirements of deepening a single topic of interest over a period of time and presenting the findings using more than one modality.

    Beginning with the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**, each study assignment will have five core sections: Discussion of the Topic of Study, Population of Interest, Associated Variables, Biblical Integration, and Topics for Future Research.
    **Note that all written assignments in the study should be submitted in a Word (versus PDF) document with Times New Roman 12-point font, as this is recommended by APA.**

    **Module 1: Week 1 – Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment**

    · This is the foundation of the study, much as the first stage of building a house is to set the foundation.

    · The learner will review The Liberty Way regarding ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the document,
    _Thesis Statements – Defining, Developing, and Evaluating_ (Liberty University Academic Success Center.

    · The learner will identify a specific topic and a specifically focused population for that topic with their study in traumatology

    · The learner will explore the topic and population further through use of AI to more specifically narrowthiese.

    · The learner will conclude this assignment with a paper stating the topic and population for the study as well as a thesis which synthesizes the topic, population, and the main idea and primary conclusion that will capture the reader’s attention.

    **Module 3: Week 3 – Traumatology Outline Assignment**

    · The outline will include initial references that support the main points of the outline, with some initial development of topics throughout each of the 5 main sections of the outline.

    · The learner will review the webpage covering the APA Research Paper Outline format (provided on the assignment page) to present an outline for the introduction, five sections of the study, and conclusion.

    **Module 5: Week 5 – Traumatology Annotated Outline Assignment**

    · The annotated outline is a structured plan for a research paper that builds on the outline of the main sections and sub-sections with brief annotations that describe the purpose, content and references of each part.

    · The learner will review the document for
    _Guidance and Example Annotated Outline_ for understanding and an example to follow.

    · The learner will expand on the outline with annotations for at least 3 points with support from peer-reviewed scholarly articles.

    **Module 6: Week 6 – Peer-Review Discussion: Traumatology Presentation**

    · The presentation provides an opportunity for scholarly presentation on a topic of interest as a required skill for doctoral learners that is used in the dissertation proposal and dissertation final defense.

    · The learner will present their study in a narrated presentation that is developed for a professional audience of emerging experts in the field of traumatology.

    **Module 7: Week 7 – Traumatology Paper Assignment**

    · The paper is the culminating assignment for the study conducted during the EDCO 790 course.

    · The learner will integrate what has been developed through the previous study assignments and feedback from the professor on these to write the final paper.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    EDCO 790

    **Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    This assignment is the first in a series of the 5 assignments designed to allow a student to intentionally focus on and narrow in on a specific topic and population of interest across the 8 weeks of the term as they develop a study, much as they will develop the study for their dissertation.

    In this first assignment, students will identify a topic of interest in the field of traumatology and a specific population of interest that is related to that topic. Common topics include traumatic events, diagnoses known to be related to trauma, and evidence-based treatment modalities practiced in the field of traumatology.

    **Special Notes:**

    (1) This assignment guides the student to employ appropriate and ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The student should review The Liberty Way, which addresses use of AI in courses:

    Academic dishonesty involves a student’s attempt to improve their or another student’s academic standing through dishonest means. It includes, but is not limited to:

    · Artificial Intelligence (AI): Any use of AI writing tools to generate, modify, add, or delete content that compromises the originality or authenticity of coursework. Unauthorized AI tools include, but are not limited to:

    · AI language translation tools

    · Large Language Models (LLMs)

    · Paraphrasing software

    · Any other tool that compromises the originality or authenticity of coursework

    (2) This assignment also guides the student in development of a thesis statement. The student should review the document provided about Thesis Statements.

    **Instructions**

    1.
    **Topic Selection:** Identify a topic of interest in the field of traumatology and a specific population of interest that is related to that topic. Explore Artificial Intelligence (AI) to select and narrow this topic. Examples of AI to explore are ChatGPT and CoPilot. This exploration will provide appropriate and ethical use of AI to help further narrow the focus of study. Students should also explore the viability of their topic by checking for evidence-based article availability in the Jerry Falwell Library online.

    2.
    **Specific Population of Interest Selection:** Also identify a specific group that you would like to study with the topic that you identified. Explore Artificial Intelligence (AI) and evidence-based article availability in the Jerry Falwell Library online to select and narrow this population of interest.

    3.
    **Submit the following documents into the Week One Assignment Link for Traumatology Study Foundations Assignment.**

    a. Copy of the AI exploration for your focus topic for the study.

    b. Copy of the AI exploration for your focus population for the study.

    Note: Example searches using ChatGPT and CoPilot are provided for students to consult. (Students are
    **not** permitted to use any version of these examples).

    c. Traumatology Study Foundation Assignment paper that includes the following:

    ·
    **Professional APA style Title Page**

    ·
    **Introduction**– brief paragraph of rationale the focus of your study.

    ·
    **Sections with APA level one headings for**

    ·
    **Topic –** One paragraph description of a specific and narrow topic based on your exploration via AI. This paragraph should include 1 – 2 reference citation(s) that will support your study of this topic.

    ·
    **Population -** One paragraph description of a specific and narrow topic based on your exploration via AI. This paragraph should include 1 – 2 reference citation(s) that will support your study of this population.

    ·
    **Thesis –** A synthesized statement
    of focus topic and focus population with this topic for the study.
    **This statement should be one sentence.**

    ·
    **References page** that includes the citations noted in the paragraphs above.

    Be sure to review the criteria on the
    **Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric** before

    beginning this assignment. No use of writing from previous courses can be included in this paper.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    Page 2 of 2

    **## TraumatologyStudyFoundationsGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Content:
    Exploration
    with Artificial
    Intelligence

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Documentation is
    provided of
    comprehensive
    exploration via AI to
    generate a narrowly
    specific study topic
    and population for
    that topic.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Documentation is
    provided with
    general AI
    exploration to
    examine topic
    and population
    with moderate
    narrowing of one
    or both topic and
    population.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    Documentation is
    provided with
    general AI
    exploration to
    examine topic
    and population
    with minimal
    narrowing of one
    or both topic and
    population.

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Documentation is
    provided for AI
    exploration of only
    the topic or the
    population for the
    study, but not both.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 20
    pts

    Content:
    Thesis
    Statement
    and Content
    Alignment
    with Topic
    and
    Population

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    A well-written thesis
    statement delineating
    a narrow
    traumatology topic
    and a specific
    population of interest
    is present.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    A thesis
    statement
    delineating a
    traumatology
    topic and a
    population of
    interest is
    present. Some
    minor
    adjustments to
    the topic or
    population may
    be needed.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    A thesis
    statement
    delineating a
    traumatology
    topic and a
    population of
    interest is
    present.
    Significant
    adjustments to
    the topic or
    population are
    needed.

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    There is no clear
    thesis statement; or
    the thesis statement
    does not identify a
    specific
    traumatology topic;
    or there is no clear
    population of
    interest present.
    Major edits or a
    change of topic or
    population are
    needed.

    0 pts

    Not
    present

    / 20
    pts

    Content:
    Topic and
    Population
    of Interest

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Content is accurate
    and includes sources
    for all statements of
    fact. Content is
    developing in a way
    that is clearly tied to
    the narrow topic and
    population of interest
    to be presented in the
    Power Point and
    Paper. Content is
    well-organized and
    synthesis of
    information is already
    evident.

    17 to >16 pts

    Proficient

    Content is
    accurate and
    includes sources
    in most or all
    areas of the
    outline. Content
    has a tie to the
    topic and a tie to
    the population of
    interest to be
    presented in the
    Power Point and
    Paper. Content is
    organized and of
    high quality.

    16 to >12 pts

    Developing

    Content is
    accurate but may
    lack focus on
    topic or
    population of
    interest. Content
    may need to
    include additional
    sources or higher
    quality sources.
    Some content
    may lack
    organization or
    clear tie to the
    topic

    12 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Content may lack
    accuracy and
    sources. The
    content may lack
    focus or may be
    broad. The content
    of some sources
    may lack a clear tie
    to the topic that is to
    be presented, or the
    topic may lack
    clarity throughout.
    The topic and
    content need further
    developed.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 20
    pts

    Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric |
    EDCO790_B02_202640

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Structure:
    Professional
    APA Writing,
    Structure,
    and Style

    15 to >13 pts

    Advanced

    The assignment
    contains no spelling
    and grammar errors.
    Excellent
    Professional APA
    style formatting is
    accurately applied
    throughout.
    Transitions and
    Headings are used to
    add to organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used
    consistently
    throughout the
    presentation. The
    body of the paper
    meets length
    requirements.

    13 to >12 pts

    Proficient

    The assignment
    contains only
    minor spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used to add to
    organizational
    clarity. Scholarly
    voice is used in
    the submission.
    The body of the
    paper mostly
    meets length
    requirements.

    12 to >11 pts

    Developing

    The assignment
    contains spelling
    and grammar
    errors. APA style
    formatting is
    present but may
    have mistakes.
    Transitions and
    Headings are
    used but may
    have errors.
    Scholarly voice
    may not be used
    consistently. The
    paper somewhat
    meets length
    requirements.

    11 to >0 pts

    Below Expectations

    Spelling and
    grammar errors may
    be present in
    several areas of the
    submission. APA
    formatting may be
    present but may
    have mistakes or
    may be inconsistent.
    Transitions and
    Headings may not
    be used. Scholarly
    voice may not be
    used. The body of
    the paper may not
    have met length
    requirements.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    / 15
    pts

    Total Points: –

    Traumatology Study Foundations Grading Rubric |
    EDCO790_B02_202640

    **Reading-2Chapt.1-4LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-2chapt-1-4leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **Reading-1Chapt.1-4LeversL.L.2023.Traumacounseling.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/reading-1chapt-1-4leversl-l-2023-traumacounseling-pdf)

    **UsingCopilottoHelpSpecifyaTopic.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/usingcopilottohelpspecifyatopic-docx)

    **Thesis-Statements.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/thesis-statements-pdf-10589157)

    **ReadingChapt.1-2BriereJ.ScottC.2025.Principlesoftraumatherapy.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/readingchapt-1-2brierej-scottc-2025-principlesoftraumatherapy-pdf)

  • [Solved] Article Review

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Instructions uploaded below – [\ \ InstructionsforArticleReview.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/instructionsforarticlereview-pdf "InstructionsforArticleReview.pdf") – [\ \ PlagiarismArticle.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/plagiarismarticle-pdf "PlagiarismArticle.pdf")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Instructions uploaded below

    – [\
    \
    InstructionsforArticleReview.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/instructionsforarticlereview-pdf "InstructionsforArticleReview.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    PlagiarismArticle.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/plagiarismarticle-pdf "PlagiarismArticle.pdf")

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Watch: [The Illusionists: a film about global beauty](https://fiu.kanopy.com/video/illusionists-film-about-globalization-beauty)(Video Documentary) – Watch: [Killing us Softly 4: Advertising’s Image of Women](https://fiu.kanopy.com/video/killing-us-softly) (Video Documentary) ## Discussion 1 Instr…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Watch: [The Illusionists: a film about global beauty](https://fiu.kanopy.com/video/illusionists-film-about-globalization-beauty)(Video Documentary)
    – Watch: [Killing us Softly 4: Advertising’s Image of Women](https://fiu.kanopy.com/video/killing-us-softly) (Video Documentary)

    ## Discussion 1 Instructions:

    1. **Watch the Assigned Videos:**

    – The videos may be full-length documentaries, so please plan your time accordingly.
    – Pay attention to the thesis, argument, how the argument is presented, its limitations, benefits, logical structure, effects on society, and supporting evidence.
    2. **Answer Discussion Questions:**

    – Provide a few sentences for each discussion question, addressing the key points mentioned above.
    3. **Respond to a Classmate:**

    – Read and respond to one other student's answer.
    – Your response should also be a few sentences and should engage thoughtfully with their points.

    ### Questions:

    1. What is the thesis or main argument presented in The Illusionists?
    2. What is the thesis or main argument presented in Killing Us Softly 4: Advertising’s Image of Women?
    3. What does commercial advertising tell us about women?
    4. How does advertising’s image of women affect you?
    5. What would you propose as potential solutions to some of the problems identified in the documentaries?

  • [Solved] Understanding Methods

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    want you to focus on a fun research methods task. At the end of the chapter 1 slides, there is a link to the movie Ghostbusters, which has a horrible study. For the final part of this first week discussion, I want you to discuss this film clip. What was wrong with the Ghostbusters ESP experiment and…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    want you to focus on a fun research methods task. At the end of the chapter 1 slides, there is a link to the movie Ghostbusters, which has a horrible study. For the final part of this first week discussion, I want you to discuss this film clip. What was wrong with the Ghostbusters ESP experiment and how could it be improved to meet scientific standards? Specifically, try to identify three things: the hypothesis, the independent variable (the variable the researcher manipulated), and the dependent variable (the variable the researcher measured)

    https://youtu.be/fn7-JZq0Yxs

  • [Solved] iology of the mind and consciousness.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Recently, we learned about biology of the mind and consciousness. **Initial Post** Using your textbook, the course powerpoints, and other course material, answer the following prompts in 1+ paragraphs each: 1. Why do we sleep? 2. Describe how each aspect of the bio-psycho-social model (Powerpoint Fi…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Recently, we learned about biology of the mind and consciousness.

    **Initial Post**

    Using your textbook, the course powerpoints, and other course material, answer the following prompts in 1+ paragraphs each:

    1. Why do we sleep?
    2. Describe how each aspect of the bio-psycho-social model (Powerpoint Figure 3.24) explains why disordered drug use occurs.

    BE SURE TO INCLUDE MULTIPLE TERMS/CONCEPTS FROM THE COURSE MATERIAL IN EACH PROMPT OF YOUR DISCUSSION.