My Blog

Category: Nursing

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## AnalysisofaPertinentHealthcareIssue.docx **## AnalysisofaPertinentHealthcareIssue.docx** ### **Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue** The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issu…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## AnalysisofaPertinentHealthcareIssue.docx

    **## AnalysisofaPertinentHealthcareIssue.docx**

    ### **Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue**

    The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.

    Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. generally, It is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.

    In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.

    #### Resources

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.

    · Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.

    · Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

    **The Assignment (2 Pages):**

    **Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue**

    Develop a 2-to-3-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

    · Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).

    · Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

    · Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

    #### [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/158221/pages/module-1-learning-resources?module_item_id=6485569)

    · Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    · Chapter 2, “Transformational Leadership: Complexity, Change, and Strategic Planning” (pp. 34–62)

    · Chapter 3, “Current Challenges in Complex Health Care Organizations and the Quadruple Aim” (pp. 66–97)

    Read any TWO of the following (plus TWO additional readings on your selected issue):

    · Amalberti, R., Vincent, C., Nicklin, W., & Braithwaite, J. (2019).
    [Coping with more people with more illness Part 1: The nature of the challenge and the implications for safety and quality.\
    Links to an external site.](https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/31/2/154/5196520?login=false) International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31(2), 154–158.

    · Bangani, R. G., Menon, V., & Jovanov, E. (2021).
    [Personalized stress monitoring AI system for healthcare workers\
    Links to an external site.](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9669321?arnumber=9669321). 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2021 IEEE International Conference On, 2992–2997.

    · Carter, M. W., & Busby, C. R. (2023).
    [How can operational research make a real difference in healthcare? Challenges of implementation\
    Links to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS0377221722003368%3F). European Journal of Operational Research, 306(3), 1059–1068.

    · Dixon-Woods, M., McNicol, S., & Martin, G. (2012, October 1).
    [Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature\
    Links to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ten-challenges-improving-quality-healthcare/docview/1778806894/se-2?accountid=14872). BMJ Quality & Safety, 21(10), 876.

    · Gjellebæk, C., Svensson, A., Bjørkquist, C., Fladeby, N., & Grundén, K. (2020).
    [Management challenges for future digitalization of healthcare services\
    Links to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS0016328720301282%3F). Futures, 124.

    · Greco, E., Graziano, E. A., Stella, G. P., Mastrodascio, M., & Cedrone, F. (2022).
    [The impact of leadership on perceived work-related stress in healthcare facilities organisations\
    Links to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/impact-leadership-on-perceived-work-related/docview/2708592072/se-2?accountid=14872). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(4/5), 734-748.

    · Hale, K. (2021).
    [Benefits and challenges of social media in health care\
    Links to an external site.](https://access.ovid.com/custom/redirector/index.html?dest=https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00002727-202107000-00005&LSLINK=80&D=ovft). Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 44(3), 309–315.

    · Navaz, A. N., Serhani, M. A., El Kassabi, H. T., Al-Qirim, N., & Ismail, H. (2021).
    [Trends, technologies, and key challenges in smart and connected healthcare\
    Links to an external site.](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9427539). IEEE Access, Access, IEEE, 9, 74044–74067.

    · Slonim, A. (2023).
    [Top challenges facing healthcare: Back to basics\
    Links to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=bth&AN=162444310&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200). Physician Leadership Journal, 10(2), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.55834/plj.2064149664

    **## AnalysisofaPertinentHealthcareIssue.docx**

    ### **Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue**

    The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.

    Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. generally, It is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.

    In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.

    #### Resources

    **To Prepare:**

    · Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.

    · Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.

    · Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

    **The Assignment (2 Pages):**

    **Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue**

    Develop a 2-to-3-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

    · Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).

    · Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

    · Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

    #### [Required Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/158221/pages/module-1-learning-resources?module_item_id=6485569)

    · Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    · Chapter 2, “Transformational Leadership: Complexity, Change, and Strategic Planning” (pp. 34–62)

    · Chapter 3, “Current Challenges in Complex Health Care Organizations and the Quadruple Aim” (pp. 66–97)

    Read any TWO of the following (plus TWO additional readings on your selected issue):

    · Amalberti, R., Vincent, C., Nicklin, W., & Braithwaite, J. (2019).
    [Coping with more people with more illness Part 1: The nature of the challenge and the implications for safety and quality.\
    Links to an external site.](https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/31/2/154/5196520?login=false) International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31(2), 154–158.

    · Bangani, R. G., Menon, V., & Jovanov, E. (2021).
    [Personalized stress monitoring AI system for healthcare workers\
    Links to an external site.](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9669321?arnumber=9669321). 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2021 IEEE International Conference On, 2992–2997.

    · Carter, M. W., & Busby, C. R. (2023).
    [How can operational research make a real difference in healthcare? Challenges of implementation\
    Links to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS0377221722003368%3F). European Journal of Operational Research, 306(3), 1059–1068.

    · Dixon-Woods, M., McNicol, S., & Martin, G. (2012, October 1).
    [Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature\
    Links to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ten-challenges-improving-quality-healthcare/docview/1778806894/se-2?accountid=14872). BMJ Quality & Safety, 21(10), 876.

    · Gjellebæk, C., Svensson, A., Bjørkquist, C., Fladeby, N., & Grundén, K. (2020).
    [Management challenges for future digitalization of healthcare services\
    Links to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fpii%2FS0016328720301282%3F). Futures, 124.

    · Greco, E., Graziano, E. A., Stella, G. P., Mastrodascio, M., & Cedrone, F. (2022).
    [The impact of leadership on perceived work-related stress in healthcare facilities organisations\
    Links to an external site.](https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/impact-leadership-on-perceived-work-related/docview/2708592072/se-2?accountid=14872). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(4/5), 734-748.

    · Hale, K. (2021).
    [Benefits and challenges of social media in health care\
    Links to an external site.](https://access.ovid.com/custom/redirector/index.html?dest=https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00002727-202107000-00005&LSLINK=80&D=ovft). Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 44(3), 309–315.

    · Navaz, A. N., Serhani, M. A., El Kassabi, H. T., Al-Qirim, N., & Ismail, H. (2021).
    [Trends, technologies, and key challenges in smart and connected healthcare\
    Links to an external site.](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9427539). IEEE Access, Access, IEEE, 9, 74044–74067.

    · Slonim, A. (2023).
    [Top challenges facing healthcare: Back to basics\
    Links to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=bth&AN=162444310&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200). Physician Leadership Journal, 10(2), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.55834/plj.2064149664

  • [Solved] Nursing assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    General research assignment – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    General research assignment

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] discussion 7 aprn

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    500 words, 2 sources minimum and apa format – [\ \ module7discussionAPRN.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module7discussionaprn-png "module7discussionAPRN.png") – [\ \ APRNrubric.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/aprnrubric-png-10205637 "APRNrubric.png") – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    500 words, 2 sources minimum and apa format

    – [\
    \
    module7discussionAPRN.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/module7discussionaprn-png "module7discussionAPRN.png")
    – [\
    \
    APRNrubric.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/aprnrubric-png-10205637 "APRNrubric.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] discussion 7 patho

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1000 words total, minimum 2 sources, apa format – [\ \ discussion7pathopart1.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion7pathopart1-png "discussion7pathopart1.png") – [\ \ discussion7pathopart2.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion7pathopart2-png "discussion7pathopart2.png") – […

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1000 words total, minimum 2 sources, apa format

    – [\
    \
    discussion7pathopart1.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion7pathopart1-png "discussion7pathopart1.png")
    – [\
    \
    discussion7pathopart2.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/discussion7pathopart2-png "discussion7pathopart2.png")
    – [\
    \
    rubricpatho.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubricpatho-png-10205613 "rubricpatho.png")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] 4k35 safety n quality assess 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Assessment4.docx **## Assessment4.docx** **Assessment 4** **Improvement Plan Tool Kit** For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assessment4.docx

    **## Assessment4.docx**

    **Assessment 4**

    **Improvement Plan Tool Kit**

    For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Communication in the healthcare environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As healthcare organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical. Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote healthcare wellness at local and global levels (Kaminski, 2016).

    You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.

    **References**

    Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices.
    _AORN Journal, 102_(4), 329–342.

    Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors.
    _Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11_(4), 1–7.

    **Overview**

    Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices—sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an education or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees' new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use and resources are available to guide you.

    For this assessment, build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue and put the plan into action.

    **Preparation**

    Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or Google Docs login, or create an account following the directions under the "Create Account" menu. Visit
    [Wiki Resources](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=3333082830006731) for help.

    **Instructions**

    Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.

    It is recommended that you focus on the three or four most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative. For example, if your initiative concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.

    Following the recommended scheme, you would collect at least three resources on average for each of the four categories. ;Each resource listing should include the following:

    · An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.

    · A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.

    · A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative.

    · A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.

    Remember that you must make your site public so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources in the Wiki Resources above for more information.

    Here is an example entry:

    · Ko, S., Hsieh, M., & Huang, R. (2023). Human error analysis and modeling of medication-related adverse events in Taiwan using the human factors analysis and classification system regression.
    _Healthcare, 11_(14), 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142063

    · Nurses have a crucial responsibility in preventing medication errors. They should follow the "five rights of medication" to reduce the risk of such errors. These include the "right patient," "right medication," "right time," "right dose," and "right documentation." By understanding these rights, nurses can manage medication administration effectively and ensure patient safety.

    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Example Assessment**: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.

    ·
    [Assessment 4 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/38957/files/7122283/download).

    To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.

    **Example Google Site**: You may use the example Google Site found in
    [Assessment 4: Improved Heparin Infusion Safety](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=4040374690006731) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like for this assessment but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**.

    **Note:** If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Number of resources:** Your tool kit must include at least 12 professional or academically relevant resources that support the continued learning and implementation of knowledge and processes related to a safety improvement initiative. See the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed.

    ·
    **APA format:** Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations and each annotated resource. See the
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    · Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    · Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **## Assessment4.docx**

    **Assessment 4**

    **Improvement Plan Tool Kit**

    For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

    Expand All

    **Introduction**

    Communication in the healthcare environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As healthcare organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical. Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote healthcare wellness at local and global levels (Kaminski, 2016).

    You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.

    **References**

    Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices.
    _AORN Journal, 102_(4), 329–342.

    Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors.
    _Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11_(4), 1–7.

    **Overview**

    Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices—sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an education or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees' new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use and resources are available to guide you.

    For this assessment, build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue and put the plan into action.

    **Preparation**

    Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or Google Docs login, or create an account following the directions under the "Create Account" menu. Visit
    [Wiki Resources](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=3333082830006731) for help.

    **Instructions**

    Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.

    It is recommended that you focus on the three or four most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative. For example, if your initiative concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.

    Following the recommended scheme, you would collect at least three resources on average for each of the four categories. ;Each resource listing should include the following:

    · An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.

    · A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.

    · A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative.

    · A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.

    Remember that you must make your site public so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources in the Wiki Resources above for more information.

    Here is an example entry:

    · Ko, S., Hsieh, M., & Huang, R. (2023). Human error analysis and modeling of medication-related adverse events in Taiwan using the human factors analysis and classification system regression.
    _Healthcare, 11_(14), 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142063

    · Nurses have a crucial responsibility in preventing medication errors. They should follow the "five rights of medication" to reduce the risk of such errors. These include the "right patient," "right medication," "right time," "right dose," and "right documentation." By understanding these rights, nurses can manage medication administration effectively and ensure patient safety.

    Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

    **Example Assessment**: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.

    ·
    [Assessment 4 Example [PDF]](https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/38957/files/7122283/download).

    To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.

    **Example Google Site**: You may use the example Google Site found in
    [Assessment 4: Improved Heparin Infusion Safety](https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/3333081990006731?auth=SAML&section=4040374690006731) to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like for this assessment but
    **keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1**.

    **Note:** If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.

    **Additional Requirements**

    ·
    **Number of resources:** Your tool kit must include at least 12 professional or academically relevant resources that support the continued learning and implementation of knowledge and processes related to a safety improvement initiative. See the
    [BSN Nursing Program Library Guide](https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/BSN) as needed.

    ·
    **APA format:** Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations and each annotated resource. See the
    [APA Module](https://lat.strategiced.com/redirect?linkid=2586).

    **Competencies Measured**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    · Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

    · Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.

    · Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

    · Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

    · Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.

    · Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

    · Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.

    · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

    · Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.

  • [Solved] 445Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Using the "Literature Evaluation Table" assignment in Topic 1, and accompanying faculty feedback, you will synthesize the information created for your PICOT question into a literature review and evidence-based proposal. – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Using the "Literature Evaluation Table" assignment in Topic 1, and accompanying faculty feedback, you will synthesize the information created for your PICOT question into a literature review and evidence-based proposal.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Review the Resources and reflect on the definition and goal of EBP. – Choose a professional healthcare organization’s website (e.g., a reimbursing body, an accredited body, or a national initiative). – Explore the website to determine where and to what extent EBP is evident. Resourses – Melnyk, B….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Review the Resources and reflect on the definition and goal of EBP.
    – Choose a professional healthcare organization’s website (e.g., a reimbursing body, an accredited body, or a national initiative).
    – Explore the website to determine where and to what extent EBP is evident.

    Resourses

    – Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). _Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice_ (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

    – Chapter 1, “Making the Case for Evidence-Based Practice and Cultivating a Spirit of Inquiry” (pp. 7–36
    – Boller, J. (2017). [Nurse educators: Leading health care to the quadruple aim sweet spot.Links to an external site.](https://search.proquest.com/docview/1972281107?accountid=14872) _Journal of Nursing Education, 56_(12), 707–708. doi:10.3928/01484834-20171120-01
    – Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). [Improving patient care through nursing engagement in evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=114436496&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200). _Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13_(2), 172–175. doi:10.1111/wvn.12126
    – Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A.-M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). [Predictors of evidence-](https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=118687527&site=eds-live&scope=site&authtype=shib&custid=s6527200)

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] NUR 501/600 DISCUSSION

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## NUR501600DUSWK7.pdf – ## NUR501WEE.pdf **## NUR501600DUSWK7.pdf** Treatments for Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological Disorders Based on Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the following questions: 1. Describe the diagnostic…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## NUR501600DUSWK7.pdf

    – ## NUR501WEE.pdf

    **## NUR501600DUSWK7.pdf**

    Treatments for Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological Disorders

    Based on Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the
    following questions:

    1. Describe the diagnostic criteria of osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis

    2. Discuss types of headaches and their treatment

    3. Discuss types of seizures and treatment

    4. Discuss Parkinson's disease, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

    an essay format.

    ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

    followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Theory Development and Evaluation

    Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-7-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-7-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1)

    **## NUR501WEE.pdf**

    Critical Research Appraisal Assignment

    Goal:

    You will critically appraise a research design

    Content Requirements:

    You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative
    design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories:

    1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research

    ◦ Briefly, describe the characteristics of qualitative research and identify

    nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a qualitative research
    approach.

    ◦ Compare and contrast three different qualitative research methodologies.

    ◦ Briefly, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research

    evidence for informing nursing practice.

    ◦ Communicate how this research design used in research.

    2. The study, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigor, findings and limitations

    ◦ Identify the purpose of the study.

    ◦ Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is

    either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    ◦ Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not

    addressed.

    ◦ Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    ◦ Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims

    of the research.

    ◦ Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s)

    is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    ◦ Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of

    analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    ◦ Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be
    judged.

    ◦ Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    ◦ Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    ◦ Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study

    to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in
    your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    3. Discuss what you understand by the term Quantitative Research – Use the
    following dot points to guide your discussion (give reasons for your argument
    and support with references):

    ◦ Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.

    ◦ Identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a quantitative

    research approach

    ◦ Differentiate between observational and interventional research designs

    and also between experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

    ◦ Briefly, outline the difference between inferential and descriptive statistics

    and their relationship to levels of measurement.

    ◦ Communicate how this research design used in research.

    4. Critique the Quantitative Research Report – Use the following headings to guide
    your critique (in all discussions and explanations give reasons for your argument
    and support with references):

    ◦ The study

    ▪ Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    ▪ Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and

    discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    ▪ Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were

    not addressed.

    ◦  Sampling

    ▪ Explain the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was
    used.

    ▪ Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your
    discussion an explanation of terms used.

    ◦ Data collection

    ▪ Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data

    collection instrument(s).

    ▪ Define the terms validity and reliability and discuss how the validity

    & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this
    study and why this is important.

    ◦ Data analysis

    ▪ Outline how the data were analyzed.

    ▪ Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the

    data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion
    an explanation of terms used.

    ◦ Findings and limitations

    ▪ Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study

    ▪ Use the information that you have gained from your critique of

    the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability

    of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the

    term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical

    significance used in this study.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper
    grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    • The paper should be formatted per current APA and 4-5 pages in length,
    excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly
    journal articles  or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your
    work.

    • Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Final Essay/Paper Rubric

    Criteria

    Points

    Identification of Main Issues/Problems

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and

    shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a

    moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a

    moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation

    and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use

    of citations and extended referencing.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of

    citations and extended referencing.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use

    of citations and extended referencing.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An

    unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is

    correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more

    precision and attention to detail.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more

    precision and attention to detail.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing

    mechanics need serious attention.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    **## NUR501WEE.pdf**

    Critical Research Appraisal Assignment

    Goal:

    You will critically appraise a research design

    Content Requirements:

    You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative
    design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories:

    1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research

    ◦ Briefly, describe the characteristics of qualitative research and identify

    nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a qualitative research
    approach.

    ◦ Compare and contrast three different qualitative research methodologies.

    ◦ Briefly, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research

    evidence for informing nursing practice.

    ◦ Communicate how this research design used in research.

    2. The study, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigor, findings and limitations

    ◦ Identify the purpose of the study.

    ◦ Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is

    either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    ◦ Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not

    addressed.

    ◦ Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    ◦ Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims

    of the research.

    ◦ Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s)

    is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    ◦ Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of

    analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    ◦ Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be
    judged.

    ◦ Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    ◦ Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    ◦ Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study

    to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in
    your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    3. Discuss what you understand by the term Quantitative Research – Use the
    following dot points to guide your discussion (give reasons for your argument
    and support with references):

    ◦ Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.

    ◦ Identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a quantitative

    research approach

    ◦ Differentiate between observational and interventional research designs

    and also between experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

    ◦ Briefly, outline the difference between inferential and descriptive statistics

    and their relationship to levels of measurement.

    ◦ Communicate how this research design used in research.

    4. Critique the Quantitative Research Report – Use the following headings to guide
    your critique (in all discussions and explanations give reasons for your argument
    and support with references):

    ◦ The study

    ▪ Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    ▪ Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and

    discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    ▪ Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were

    not addressed.

    ◦  Sampling

    ▪ Explain the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was
    used.

    ▪ Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your
    discussion an explanation of terms used.

    ◦ Data collection

    ▪ Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data

    collection instrument(s).

    ▪ Define the terms validity and reliability and discuss how the validity

    & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this
    study and why this is important.

    ◦ Data analysis

    ▪ Outline how the data were analyzed.

    ▪ Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the

    data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion
    an explanation of terms used.

    ◦ Findings and limitations

    ▪ Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study

    ▪ Use the information that you have gained from your critique of

    the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability

    of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the

    term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical

    significance used in this study.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper
    grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    • The paper should be formatted per current APA and 4-5 pages in length,
    excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly
    journal articles  or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your
    work.

    • Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Final Essay/Paper Rubric

    Criteria

    Points

    Identification of Main Issues/Problems

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and

    shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a

    moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a

    moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation

    and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use

    of citations and extended referencing.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of

    citations and extended referencing.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use

    of citations and extended referencing.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An

    unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is

    correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more

    precision and attention to detail.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more

    precision and attention to detail.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing

    mechanics need serious attention.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    **## NUR501600DUSWK7.pdf**

    Treatments for Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological Disorders

    Based on Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the
    following questions:

    1. Describe the diagnostic criteria of osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis

    2. Discuss types of headaches and their treatment

    3. Discuss types of seizures and treatment

    4. Discuss Parkinson's disease, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

    an essay format.

    ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

    followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Theory Development and Evaluation

    Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-7-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-7-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1)

    **## NUR501WEE.pdf**

    Critical Research Appraisal Assignment

    Goal:

    You will critically appraise a research design

    Content Requirements:

    You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative
    design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories:

    1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research

    ◦ Briefly, describe the characteristics of qualitative research and identify

    nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a qualitative research
    approach.

    ◦ Compare and contrast three different qualitative research methodologies.

    ◦ Briefly, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research

    evidence for informing nursing practice.

    ◦ Communicate how this research design used in research.

    2. The study, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigor, findings and limitations

    ◦ Identify the purpose of the study.

    ◦ Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is

    either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    ◦ Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not

    addressed.

    ◦ Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    ◦ Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims

    of the research.

    ◦ Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s)

    is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    ◦ Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of

    analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    ◦ Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be
    judged.

    ◦ Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    ◦ Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    ◦ Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study

    to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in
    your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    3. Discuss what you understand by the term Quantitative Research – Use the
    following dot points to guide your discussion (give reasons for your argument
    and support with references):

    ◦ Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.

    ◦ Identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a quantitative

    research approach

    ◦ Differentiate between observational and interventional research designs

    and also between experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

    ◦ Briefly, outline the difference between inferential and descriptive statistics

    and their relationship to levels of measurement.

    ◦ Communicate how this research design used in research.

    4. Critique the Quantitative Research Report – Use the following headings to guide
    your critique (in all discussions and explanations give reasons for your argument
    and support with references):

    ◦ The study

    ▪ Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    ▪ Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and

    discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    ▪ Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were

    not addressed.

    ◦  Sampling

    ▪ Explain the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was
    used.

    ▪ Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your
    discussion an explanation of terms used.

    ◦ Data collection

    ▪ Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data

    collection instrument(s).

    ▪ Define the terms validity and reliability and discuss how the validity

    & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this
    study and why this is important.

    ◦ Data analysis

    ▪ Outline how the data were analyzed.

    ▪ Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the

    data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion
    an explanation of terms used.

    ◦ Findings and limitations

    ▪ Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study

    ▪ Use the information that you have gained from your critique of

    the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability

    of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the

    term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical

    significance used in this study.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper
    grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    • The paper should be formatted per current APA and 4-5 pages in length,
    excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly
    journal articles  or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your
    work.

    • Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Final Essay/Paper Rubric

    Criteria

    Points

    Identification of Main Issues/Problems

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and

    shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a

    moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a

    moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation

    and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use

    of citations and extended referencing.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of

    citations and extended referencing.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use

    of citations and extended referencing.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An

    unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is

    correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more

    precision and attention to detail.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more

    precision and attention to detail.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing

    mechanics need serious attention.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    **## NUR501600DUSWK7.pdf**

    Treatments for Musculoskeletal & Neurological/Psychological Disorders

    Based on Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the
    following questions:

    1. Describe the diagnostic criteria of osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis

    2. Discuss types of headaches and their treatment

    3. Discuss types of seizures and treatment

    4. Discuss Parkinson's disease, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current
    APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is
    worth 8 points.

    ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

    an essay format.

    ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

    followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

    Theory Development and Evaluation

    Examine the science and art of theory development and evaluation.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA
    style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8
    points.

    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/
    correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth
    2 points (1 point per response.)

    • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible

    [https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-7-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1](https://stu.instructure.com/courses/43426/pages/module-7-lecture-materials-and-resources?wrap=1)

    **## NUR501WEE.pdf**

    Critical Research Appraisal Assignment

    Goal:

    You will critically appraise a research design

    Content Requirements:

    You will select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative
    design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories:

    1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research

    ◦ Briefly, describe the characteristics of qualitative research and identify

    nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a qualitative research
    approach.

    ◦ Compare and contrast three different qualitative research methodologies.

    ◦ Briefly, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research

    evidence for informing nursing practice.

    ◦ Communicate how this research design used in research.

    2. The study, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigor, findings and limitations

    ◦ Identify the purpose of the study.

    ◦ Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is

    either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.

    ◦ Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not

    addressed.

    ◦ Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.

    ◦ Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims

    of the research.

    ◦ Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s)

    is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    ◦ Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of

    analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.

    ◦ Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be
    judged.

    ◦ Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.

    ◦ Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.

    ◦ Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study

    to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in
    your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.

    3. Discuss what you understand by the term Quantitative Research – Use the
    following dot points to guide your discussion (give reasons for your argument
    and support with references):

    ◦ Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.

    ◦ Identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a quantitative

    research approach

    ◦ Differentiate between observational and interventional research designs

    and also between experimental and quasi-experimental designs.

    ◦ Briefly, outline the difference between inferential and descriptive statistics

    and their relationship to levels of measurement.

    ◦ Communicate how this research design used in research.

    4. Critique the Quantitative Research Report – Use the following headings to guide
    your critique (in all discussions and explanations give reasons for your argument
    and support with references):

    ◦ The study

    ▪ Identify the purpose and design of the study.

    ▪ Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and

    discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.

    ▪ Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were

    not addressed.

    ◦  Sampling

    ▪ Explain the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was
    used.

    ▪ Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your
    discussion an explanation of terms used.

    ◦ Data collection

    ▪ Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data

    collection instrument(s).

    ▪ Define the terms validity and reliability and discuss how the validity

    & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this
    study and why this is important.

    ◦ Data analysis

    ▪ Outline how the data were analyzed.

    ▪ Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the

    data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion
    an explanation of terms used.

    ◦ Findings and limitations

    ▪ Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study

    ▪ Use the information that you have gained from your critique of

    the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability

    of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the

    term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical

    significance used in this study.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper
    grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

    • The paper should be formatted per current APA and 4-5 pages in length,
    excluding the title, abstract and references page.

    • Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly
    journal articles  or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your
    work.

    • Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

    • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

    of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of
    the instructor.

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    View Rubric

    Final Essay/Paper Rubric

    Criteria

    Points

    Identification of Main Issues/Problems

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/

    problems.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and

    shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a

    moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a

    moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation

    and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use

    of citations and extended referencing.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of

    citations and extended referencing.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use

    of citations and extended referencing.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An

    unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

    Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is

    correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

    10 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more

    precision and attention to detail.

    8 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more

    precision and attention to detail.

    6 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing

    mechanics need serious attention.

    4 pts

    /10 pts

  • [Solved] CLINICAL SKILLS AND PROCEDURES SELF ASSESSMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## PRAC-6531WK1ASSGN2.docx **## PRAC-6531WK1ASSGN2.docx** ### Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Before embarking on any professional or academic activity, it is important to understand the background, knowledge, and experience you bring to it. You might ask…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## PRAC-6531WK1ASSGN2.docx

    **## PRAC-6531WK1ASSGN2.docx**

    ### Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment

    Before embarking on any professional or academic activity, it is important to understand the background, knowledge, and experience you bring to it. You might ask yourself “What do I already know? What do I need to know? And what do I want to know?” This critical self-reflection is especially important for developing clinical skills, such as those for advanced practice nursing.

    The Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) Procedures List and Resource Review and FNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form or Adult Gerontology Primary Care Nurse Practitioner (AGPCNP) Clinical Skills Resource List and AGPCNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form provided in the Learning Resources can be used to celebrate your progress throughout your practicum and identify skills gaps. The lists cover all necessary skills you should demonstrate during your practicum course.

    For this Assignment, you assess where you are now in your clinical skill development and make plans for your practicum. Specifically, you will identify strengths and opportunities for improvement regarding the required practicum skills and procedures.

    In this practicum experience, when developing your goals and objectives, be sure to keep adult health guidelines and best practices in mind.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518792)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the resources and clinical skills in the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) Procedures List and Resource Review and FNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form or Adult Gerontology Primary Care Nurse Practitioner (AGPCNP) Clinical Skills Resource List and AGPCNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form
    _specific to your selected NP track_. It is recommended that you print out these documents to serve as guides throughout your practicum.

    · Download the Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form that applies to your NP track to complete this Assignment.

    Assignment

    Using the Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form specific to your NP track (i.e., FNP or AGPCNP):

    · Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the procedures identified on the Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form.

    · Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

    · Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop 3–4 goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form.

    **\*\* YOU MUST HAVE 3 NEW OBJECTIVES EACH QUARTER.  You may include previous practicum objectives; however, you still must have 3 new objectives for your current course.**

    By Day 7

    **Submit** your completed FNP or AGPCNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form.

    **Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK1Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **PRAC_6531_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | PRAC_6531_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRate yourself according to your confidence level performing the procedures identified on the Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 to >22.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response provides ratings for all procedures on the form. | **22 to >19.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response provides ratings for most of the procedures on the form. | **19.5 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response provides ratings for some of the procedures on the form. | **17 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides ratings for only a few procedures on the form, or ratings are missing. | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 to >26.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. | **26 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. | **20 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of the strengths and/or opportunities for improvement, or the summaries are missing. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop 3-4 goals and objectives for this Practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 to >26.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response provides 3–4 clear and appropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. | **26 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response provides 3–4 appropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. | **20 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience, or goals and objectives are missing. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct APA format with no errors. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | | 5 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518786) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518788)

    **## PRAC-6531WK1ASSGN2.docx**

    ### Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment

    Before embarking on any professional or academic activity, it is important to understand the background, knowledge, and experience you bring to it. You might ask yourself “What do I already know? What do I need to know? And what do I want to know?” This critical self-reflection is especially important for developing clinical skills, such as those for advanced practice nursing.

    The Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) Procedures List and Resource Review and FNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form or Adult Gerontology Primary Care Nurse Practitioner (AGPCNP) Clinical Skills Resource List and AGPCNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form provided in the Learning Resources can be used to celebrate your progress throughout your practicum and identify skills gaps. The lists cover all necessary skills you should demonstrate during your practicum course.

    For this Assignment, you assess where you are now in your clinical skill development and make plans for your practicum. Specifically, you will identify strengths and opportunities for improvement regarding the required practicum skills and procedures.

    In this practicum experience, when developing your goals and objectives, be sure to keep adult health guidelines and best practices in mind.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518792)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review the resources and clinical skills in the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) Procedures List and Resource Review and FNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form or Adult Gerontology Primary Care Nurse Practitioner (AGPCNP) Clinical Skills Resource List and AGPCNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form
    _specific to your selected NP track_. It is recommended that you print out these documents to serve as guides throughout your practicum.

    · Download the Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form that applies to your NP track to complete this Assignment.

    Assignment

    Using the Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form specific to your NP track (i.e., FNP or AGPCNP):

    · Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the procedures identified on the Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form.

    · Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

    · Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop 3–4 goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form.

    **\*\* YOU MUST HAVE 3 NEW OBJECTIVES EACH QUARTER.  You may include previous practicum objectives; however, you still must have 3 new objectives for your current course.**

    By Day 7

    **Submit** your completed FNP or AGPCNP Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form.

    **Reminder:** The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at
    [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing)). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK1Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **PRAC_6531_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric**

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | PRAC_6531_Week1_Assignment2_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRate yourself according to your confidence level performing the procedures identified on the Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **25 to >22.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response provides ratings for all procedures on the form. | **22 to >19.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response provides ratings for most of the procedures on the form. | **19.5 to >17.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response provides ratings for some of the procedures on the form. | **17 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides ratings for only a few procedures on the form, or ratings are missing. | | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 to >26.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. | **26 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement. | **20 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of the strengths and/or opportunities for improvement, or the summaries are missing. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBased on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop 3-4 goals and objectives for this Practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **30 to >26.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>The response provides 3–4 clear and appropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. | **26 to >23.0 pts**<br>**Good**<br>The response provides 3–4 appropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. | **23 to >20.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. | **20 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience, or goals and objectives are missing. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | **5 to >4.0 pts**<br>**Excellent**<br>Uses correct APA format with no errors. | **4 to >3.5 pts**<br>**Good**<br>Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. | **3.5 to >3.0 pts**<br>**Fair**<br>Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. | **3 to >0 pts**<br>**Poor**<br>Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | | 5 pts |
    | Total Points: 100 |

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518786) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/162007/modules/items/6518788)

  • [Solved] Review of Current Healthcare Issues

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Which social determinant(s) most affects this health issue? Then, describe how your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Which social determinant(s) most affects this health issue? Then, describe how your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.

    Resourses

    – Amalberti, R., Vincent, C., Nicklin, W., & Braithwaite, J. (2019). [Coping with more people with more illness Part 1: The nature of the challenge and the implications for safety and quality.Links to an external site.](https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/31/2/154/5196520?login=false) _International Journal for Quality in Health Care_, _31_(2), 154–158.
    – Bangani, R. G., Menon, V., & Jovanov, E. (2021). [Personalized stress monitoring AI system for healthcare workersLinks to an external site.](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9669321?arnumber=9669321). _2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2021 IEEE International Conference On_, 2992–2997.

    – 2 years ago