My Blog

Tag: Business & Finance

  • [Solved] week2 discussion OP management

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Week 2 Discussion Questions** Please review the follow video about [Taco Bell – Eat Like You, build your own 5 Cravings Box](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuzcrGYhVkM)(2021) (March 7, 2021 A. Verhoeven) Also read the finance article, [Taco Bell Launches $45 Cravings' Box as Fast Food Races to Be…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Week 2 Discussion Questions**
    Please review the follow video about [Taco Bell – Eat Like You, build your own 5 Cravings Box](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuzcrGYhVkM)(2021) (March 7, 2021 A. Verhoeven)
    Also read the finance article, [Taco Bell Launches $45 Cravings' Box as Fast Food Races to Be "Competitive on Value"](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/taco-bell-launches-5-build-your-own-cravings-box-as-fast-food-competition-ramps-up-value-offerings-150403310.html), By Brook Di Palma.
    Then prepare a response to the following discussion topics:
    1. Why Encourage customers to use their app for ordering?
    2. How is this an example of mass customization?

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Operations Management WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT OP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## Assignmentweek2OP.docx – ## sampleartreview11.pdf **## Assignmentweek2OP.docx** **Assignment 1: Topic Paper/Peer Reviewed Journal Article review instructions:** 1. Download a copy of the Sample Article Review. **sampleartreview1 (1).pdf** 2. Using the **exact** Sample Article Review format, w…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## Assignmentweek2OP.docx

    – ## sampleartreview11.pdf

    **## Assignmentweek2OP.docx**

    **Assignment 1: Topic Paper/Peer Reviewed Journal Article review instructions:**

    1. Download a copy of the Sample Article Review.

    **sampleartreview1 (1).pdf**

    2. Using the
    **exact** Sample Article Review format, write a review on 3 articles relating to your final research topic. Use the Library database or
    [http://scholar.google.com](http://scholar.google.com/) to find the
    **3 peer reviewed journal articles** relating to your final research topic.

    **Please note:** The articles you select for this assignment must be peer reviewed journal articles.
    **(\* Peer Reviewed Journal Articles contain a study conducted by the authors, and are usually 6 to 15 or more pages in length, with headings matching the headings in the sample article review)**. If you are unsure about the articles you've selected, please contact either the a library representative, or your instructor.

    ***Industry Magazines, eZines, .coms, Blog sites and wall street journal do not classify as peer reviewed journal articles for this assignment.**

    **Create a 3-slide PowerPoint Presentation:**

    Students will:

    1.) Present the rationale behind their final project selection, Identify the operations strategy,

    2.) Create a problem statement using one of the five strategies from the text, and

    3.) Project a forecast from the literature on the future (3 slides total)

    **Put both assignments onto one document.  Just copy your three slides into the word document at the bottom of the review.**

    **Submit your assignment in APA format (Must have a cover page and reference page)**

    **## sampleartreview11.pdf**

    Student Name              Sample Article Review 1

    Reference Information: Scanzoni, John (2001). From the Normal Family to Alternate
    Families to the Quest for Diversity With Interdependence, Journal or Family Issues, vol.
    22 No. 6, September 2001, 688­710.

    Purpose of Study: To look at the changes and the diversity of the households from the
    late 1960’s to present, both from the constructionist and the functionalistic view.  And
    figuring out which family style works the best to meet both the family and societies
    needs.

    Sampling Comments: Otto (1970), “man can create marriage and family possibilities
    uniquely suited to his time, place and situation.”  Sussman and Cogswell (1972)
    “…adults must live for themselves and not only for their children.”  The standard family
    (nuclear) stifled mutual confidant between mates.  Single parenting was viewed as a
    temporary condition, which would resolve when the parent remarried, thus it wasn’t seen
    as a “real” family.

    Measures: The standard family (or nuclear family) was faired to the different variant
    families such as single parents, homosexual, multi­marriages, and getting pregnant out of
    wedlock.  Scanzoni reviewed and summarized the functionalist and constructionalist
    models and theories starting from post World War II to the present.

    Findings/Results/Main Points: Functionalists support the model that views a new
    standard family were previous traditional roles are in place while the children are young
    in order to promote optimal child development.  Scanzoni’s research found that
    developmentalists believe that it is more the lifelong encounters between a child’s genetic
    makeup, personality and social context and not just the first few years of life.  While the
    functionalists want to exclude the community, the constructionalists believe that the
    community makes the family. “Families are produced and created by the actions of
    persons operating within the social structure and cultural milieu that surrounds them
    (Maines, 2000).”  They also believe that if the community views a groups as not
    mainstream than that group is likely not to succeed.

    Conclusion:  While one believes that negotiations build a stronger family and community
    the other does not believe in negotiation of any type.  The citizens that feel the
    neostandard model is better state they would have a hard time fairing up.  This self­doubt
    along with lack of support may stifle their innovations.  Most citizens admit to wanting
    the neostandard model for themselves and their children but are willing to accept the
    reality of the variant family.  “Because there is no best family pattern to stray from, there
    can be no variants that are invariably judged as lesser.  Then and only then have we taken
    the first step toward embracing genuine diversity, (Scanzoni 1989).”  To date there is no
    one household model that is flawless but household variety has been found to enrich the
    family.  Household diversity with interdependence that builds a strong sense of
    community has been found to be healthy.

    **## sampleartreview11.pdf**

    Student Name              Sample Article Review 1

    Reference Information: Scanzoni, John (2001). From the Normal Family to Alternate
    Families to the Quest for Diversity With Interdependence, Journal or Family Issues, vol.
    22 No. 6, September 2001, 688­710.

    Purpose of Study: To look at the changes and the diversity of the households from the
    late 1960’s to present, both from the constructionist and the functionalistic view.  And
    figuring out which family style works the best to meet both the family and societies
    needs.

    Sampling Comments: Otto (1970), “man can create marriage and family possibilities
    uniquely suited to his time, place and situation.”  Sussman and Cogswell (1972)
    “…adults must live for themselves and not only for their children.”  The standard family
    (nuclear) stifled mutual confidant between mates.  Single parenting was viewed as a
    temporary condition, which would resolve when the parent remarried, thus it wasn’t seen
    as a “real” family.

    Measures: The standard family (or nuclear family) was faired to the different variant
    families such as single parents, homosexual, multi­marriages, and getting pregnant out of
    wedlock.  Scanzoni reviewed and summarized the functionalist and constructionalist
    models and theories starting from post World War II to the present.

    Findings/Results/Main Points: Functionalists support the model that views a new
    standard family were previous traditional roles are in place while the children are young
    in order to promote optimal child development.  Scanzoni’s research found that
    developmentalists believe that it is more the lifelong encounters between a child’s genetic
    makeup, personality and social context and not just the first few years of life.  While the
    functionalists want to exclude the community, the constructionalists believe that the
    community makes the family. “Families are produced and created by the actions of
    persons operating within the social structure and cultural milieu that surrounds them
    (Maines, 2000).”  They also believe that if the community views a groups as not
    mainstream than that group is likely not to succeed.

    Conclusion:  While one believes that negotiations build a stronger family and community
    the other does not believe in negotiation of any type.  The citizens that feel the
    neostandard model is better state they would have a hard time fairing up.  This self­doubt
    along with lack of support may stifle their innovations.  Most citizens admit to wanting
    the neostandard model for themselves and their children but are willing to accept the
    reality of the variant family.  “Because there is no best family pattern to stray from, there
    can be no variants that are invariably judged as lesser.  Then and only then have we taken
    the first step toward embracing genuine diversity, (Scanzoni 1989).”  To date there is no
    one household model that is flawless but household variety has been found to enrich the
    family.  Household diversity with interdependence that builds a strong sense of
    community has been found to be healthy.

    **## Assignmentweek2OP.docx**

    **Assignment 1: Topic Paper/Peer Reviewed Journal Article review instructions:**

    1. Download a copy of the Sample Article Review.

    **sampleartreview1 (1).pdf**

    2. Using the
    **exact** Sample Article Review format, write a review on 3 articles relating to your final research topic. Use the Library database or
    [http://scholar.google.com](http://scholar.google.com/) to find the
    **3 peer reviewed journal articles** relating to your final research topic.

    **Please note:** The articles you select for this assignment must be peer reviewed journal articles.
    **(\* Peer Reviewed Journal Articles contain a study conducted by the authors, and are usually 6 to 15 or more pages in length, with headings matching the headings in the sample article review)**. If you are unsure about the articles you've selected, please contact either the a library representative, or your instructor.

    ***Industry Magazines, eZines, .coms, Blog sites and wall street journal do not classify as peer reviewed journal articles for this assignment.**

    **Create a 3-slide PowerPoint Presentation:**

    Students will:

    1.) Present the rationale behind their final project selection, Identify the operations strategy,

    2.) Create a problem statement using one of the five strategies from the text, and

    3.) Project a forecast from the literature on the future (3 slides total)

    **Put both assignments onto one document.  Just copy your three slides into the word document at the bottom of the review.**

    **Submit your assignment in APA format (Must have a cover page and reference page)**

    **## sampleartreview11.pdf**

    Student Name              Sample Article Review 1

    Reference Information: Scanzoni, John (2001). From the Normal Family to Alternate
    Families to the Quest for Diversity With Interdependence, Journal or Family Issues, vol.
    22 No. 6, September 2001, 688­710.

    Purpose of Study: To look at the changes and the diversity of the households from the
    late 1960’s to present, both from the constructionist and the functionalistic view.  And
    figuring out which family style works the best to meet both the family and societies
    needs.

    Sampling Comments: Otto (1970), “man can create marriage and family possibilities
    uniquely suited to his time, place and situation.”  Sussman and Cogswell (1972)
    “…adults must live for themselves and not only for their children.”  The standard family
    (nuclear) stifled mutual confidant between mates.  Single parenting was viewed as a
    temporary condition, which would resolve when the parent remarried, thus it wasn’t seen
    as a “real” family.

    Measures: The standard family (or nuclear family) was faired to the different variant
    families such as single parents, homosexual, multi­marriages, and getting pregnant out of
    wedlock.  Scanzoni reviewed and summarized the functionalist and constructionalist
    models and theories starting from post World War II to the present.

    Findings/Results/Main Points: Functionalists support the model that views a new
    standard family were previous traditional roles are in place while the children are young
    in order to promote optimal child development.  Scanzoni’s research found that
    developmentalists believe that it is more the lifelong encounters between a child’s genetic
    makeup, personality and social context and not just the first few years of life.  While the
    functionalists want to exclude the community, the constructionalists believe that the
    community makes the family. “Families are produced and created by the actions of
    persons operating within the social structure and cultural milieu that surrounds them
    (Maines, 2000).”  They also believe that if the community views a groups as not
    mainstream than that group is likely not to succeed.

    Conclusion:  While one believes that negotiations build a stronger family and community
    the other does not believe in negotiation of any type.  The citizens that feel the
    neostandard model is better state they would have a hard time fairing up.  This self­doubt
    along with lack of support may stifle their innovations.  Most citizens admit to wanting
    the neostandard model for themselves and their children but are willing to accept the
    reality of the variant family.  “Because there is no best family pattern to stray from, there
    can be no variants that are invariably judged as lesser.  Then and only then have we taken
    the first step toward embracing genuine diversity, (Scanzoni 1989).”  To date there is no
    one household model that is flawless but household variety has been found to enrich the
    family.  Household diversity with interdependence that builds a strong sense of
    community has been found to be healthy.

    **## Assignmentweek2OP.docx**

    **Assignment 1: Topic Paper/Peer Reviewed Journal Article review instructions:**

    1. Download a copy of the Sample Article Review.

    **sampleartreview1 (1).pdf**

    2. Using the
    **exact** Sample Article Review format, write a review on 3 articles relating to your final research topic. Use the Library database or
    [http://scholar.google.com](http://scholar.google.com/) to find the
    **3 peer reviewed journal articles** relating to your final research topic.

    **Please note:** The articles you select for this assignment must be peer reviewed journal articles.
    **(\* Peer Reviewed Journal Articles contain a study conducted by the authors, and are usually 6 to 15 or more pages in length, with headings matching the headings in the sample article review)**. If you are unsure about the articles you've selected, please contact either the a library representative, or your instructor.

    ***Industry Magazines, eZines, .coms, Blog sites and wall street journal do not classify as peer reviewed journal articles for this assignment.**

    **Create a 3-slide PowerPoint Presentation:**

    Students will:

    1.) Present the rationale behind their final project selection, Identify the operations strategy,

    2.) Create a problem statement using one of the five strategies from the text, and

    3.) Project a forecast from the literature on the future (3 slides total)

    **Put both assignments onto one document.  Just copy your three slides into the word document at the bottom of the review.**

    **Submit your assignment in APA format (Must have a cover page and reference page)**

    **## sampleartreview11.pdf**

    Student Name              Sample Article Review 1

    Reference Information: Scanzoni, John (2001). From the Normal Family to Alternate
    Families to the Quest for Diversity With Interdependence, Journal or Family Issues, vol.
    22 No. 6, September 2001, 688­710.

    Purpose of Study: To look at the changes and the diversity of the households from the
    late 1960’s to present, both from the constructionist and the functionalistic view.  And
    figuring out which family style works the best to meet both the family and societies
    needs.

    Sampling Comments: Otto (1970), “man can create marriage and family possibilities
    uniquely suited to his time, place and situation.”  Sussman and Cogswell (1972)
    “…adults must live for themselves and not only for their children.”  The standard family
    (nuclear) stifled mutual confidant between mates.  Single parenting was viewed as a
    temporary condition, which would resolve when the parent remarried, thus it wasn’t seen
    as a “real” family.

    Measures: The standard family (or nuclear family) was faired to the different variant
    families such as single parents, homosexual, multi­marriages, and getting pregnant out of
    wedlock.  Scanzoni reviewed and summarized the functionalist and constructionalist
    models and theories starting from post World War II to the present.

    Findings/Results/Main Points: Functionalists support the model that views a new
    standard family were previous traditional roles are in place while the children are young
    in order to promote optimal child development.  Scanzoni’s research found that
    developmentalists believe that it is more the lifelong encounters between a child’s genetic
    makeup, personality and social context and not just the first few years of life.  While the
    functionalists want to exclude the community, the constructionalists believe that the
    community makes the family. “Families are produced and created by the actions of
    persons operating within the social structure and cultural milieu that surrounds them
    (Maines, 2000).”  They also believe that if the community views a groups as not
    mainstream than that group is likely not to succeed.

    Conclusion:  While one believes that negotiations build a stronger family and community
    the other does not believe in negotiation of any type.  The citizens that feel the
    neostandard model is better state they would have a hard time fairing up.  This self­doubt
    along with lack of support may stifle their innovations.  Most citizens admit to wanting
    the neostandard model for themselves and their children but are willing to accept the
    reality of the variant family.  “Because there is no best family pattern to stray from, there
    can be no variants that are invariably judged as lesser.  Then and only then have we taken
    the first step toward embracing genuine diversity, (Scanzoni 1989).”  To date there is no
    one household model that is flawless but household variety has been found to enrich the
    family.  Household diversity with interdependence that builds a strong sense of
    community has been found to be healthy.

    – 1
    – 2

  • [Solved] Business Finance – Operations Management Homework help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Business Finance – Operations Management Homework help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Discussion Post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Unit IV Leadership Theory

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This assignment requires a three-page literature review and measures your mastery of ULOs 2.1 and 4.2. This literature review is a continuation of the Unit III assignment, as you will conduct further research of the two leadership theories you compared, specifically how they relate to motivation, sa…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This assignment requires a three-page literature review and measures your mastery of ULOs 2.1 and 4.2.
    This literature review is a continuation of the Unit III assignment, as you will conduct further research of the two leadership theories you compared, specifically how they relate to motivation, satisfaction, and performance.
    Select two of the following motivational theories:
    X and Y Theory of Motivation
    Hierarchy of Needs
    Motivation-Hygiene (Two-Factor) Theory
    Theory of Need
    Self-Determination Theory
    Goal-Setting Theory
    Expectancy Theory
    Equity Theory
    Complete the following:
    Explain the elements of the two motivational theories selected.
    Establish a connection between the two motivational theories selected and the leadership theories selected in the previous unit.
    Elaborate on how the connection can inform real-world solutions and how this research can enhance leadership and leadership decisions.
    Critically evaluate the sources used in the review that address your selected leadership theories. Briefly explain how you evaluated your sources for credibility such as the credentials of the researchers, the evidence of peer reviews, and the fidelity of the research-design principles. Explain how each source is valuable to the study of leadership.
    Your completed literature review must be a minimum of three pages in length. Include an introduction, and utilize at least three outside sources from the databases located in the CSU Online Library. You may use the same resources as Unit III, but this is not a requirement.
    Ensure your sources are high quality, such as peer-reviewed articles and empirical studies (quantitative and qualitative), published within the last 5 years.
    Apply level 1 and 2 headings. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.
    ##### Resources
    The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment.
    – [Citation Guide](https://www.columbiasouthern.edu/downloads/pdf/success/citation-guide)
    – [CSU Online Library Research Guide](http://libguides.columbiasouthern.edu/undergradbusiness)
    – [Submit Writing Center Request](https://mycsu.columbiasouthern.edu/student/forms/courses/writing-center-request)
    By submitting this assignment, I verify that I am submitting an original work in accordance with the Academic Integrity Policy in the [CSU Student Handbook](https://www.columbiasouthern.edu/downloads/pdf/handbook/csustudenthandbook.aspx).
    Aspiring Doctors, I wish you all a Happy Thanksgiving this week!
    In Unit IV we will be exploring followers from a leader's perspective. How does a leader get more out of followers (motivation) and how can their satisfaction and engagement be increased? Chapters 9 & 10 in text + study guide.
    Keep an eye out for something in Chapter 9 that I think many of us in this class have in common. On pp. 326 of the text the authors introduce "achievement orientation" and later "grit" on pp. 331. As a group of professionals seeking a Doctorate, I am confident many of you, like me, reflect this orientation and it may be worth some time examining it a bit.
    Another assignment is due this unit – you will be taking the two leadership theories you examined in Unit III and connecting them to two motivation theories you will select from a list (you will see my favorite – Herzberg's two factor). You will leverage high quality sources (as defined in the prompt) to help in your analysis. Again, please read all components of the assignment carefully as there are several of them.
    \
    FormalEssay1.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/formalessay1-pdf-10461439 "FormalEssay1.pdf")
    \
    UnitIV.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/unitiv-pdf-10461441 "UnitIV.pdf")

  • [Solved] Unit IV Doctorial Orientation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    For part 2 of this assignment, use the 18-month milestone chart to compile your personal milestone chart. Assume that you will start in about a year. Review the lesson for additional insight into this template. Fill in actual dates which will demonstrate to you when you could graduate with your doct…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    For part 2 of this assignment, use the 18-month milestone chart to compile your personal milestone chart. Assume that you will start in about a year. Review the lesson for additional insight into this template. Fill in actual dates which will demonstrate to you when you could graduate with your doctoral degree.
    Ensure each document for Part 1 and 2 of this assignment is submitted. External sources and APA formatting is not required for either part of this assignment.
    \
    DBAMILESTONES18_months.xlsx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/dbamilestones18-months-xlsx "DBAMILESTONES18_months.xlsx")

  • [Solved] week 8

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    your organization and leaders through the Kouzes and Posner – ## Week8.docx **## Week8.docx** Goal: Create a reflective 10-slide PowerPoint presentation that briefly summarizes what you have learned throughout this course. Instructions: Throughout the course, you have encountered definitions and the…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    your organization and leaders through the Kouzes and Posner

    – ## Week8.docx

    **## Week8.docx**

    Goal: Create a reflective 10-slide PowerPoint presentation that briefly summarizes what you have learned throughout this course.

    Instructions:

    Throughout the course, you have encountered definitions and theories related to leadership. You have also examined your organization and leaders through the Kouzes and Posner model and other relevant literature. As a final assignment, prepare a learning summary that incorporates the following:

    1. Reflect on your definition of leadership.  Has it changed?  What has influenced the change or kept it the same?  Reflect on 1-2 "Aha!" moments related to your eight-week study during this course.

    2. What impact does the encounter with theoretical material have on your view of leadership relevant to your work in your organization?

    3. What three recommendations do you propose for new or experienced leaders based on what you have assimilated into your understanding through this course.

    4. Support your assertions, views, and recommendations with scholarly research. Note that four (4) outside scholarly sources are the minimum (your course textbook does not count). Make sure you cite those sources inside your text on the appropriate slide(s).

    **## Week8.docx**

    Goal: Create a reflective 10-slide PowerPoint presentation that briefly summarizes what you have learned throughout this course.

    Instructions:

    Throughout the course, you have encountered definitions and theories related to leadership. You have also examined your organization and leaders through the Kouzes and Posner model and other relevant literature. As a final assignment, prepare a learning summary that incorporates the following:

    1. Reflect on your definition of leadership.  Has it changed?  What has influenced the change or kept it the same?  Reflect on 1-2 "Aha!" moments related to your eight-week study during this course.

    2. What impact does the encounter with theoretical material have on your view of leadership relevant to your work in your organization?

    3. What three recommendations do you propose for new or experienced leaders based on what you have assimilated into your understanding through this course.

    4. Support your assertions, views, and recommendations with scholarly research. Note that four (4) outside scholarly sources are the minimum (your course textbook does not count). Make sure you cite those sources inside your text on the appropriate slide(s).

  • [Solved] 4- Discussion Post

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering 4- Discussion Post.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] MIS – 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## MIS-5.docx **## MIS-5.docx** Back Week 5: Course Project Part 2: Value Proposition and MVP Design Due Dec 01 by 1:59am Points 125 Introduction Now that you’ve spent time exploring your users and synthesizing insights, it’s time to shift from understanding the problem to designing a solution. In…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## MIS-5.docx

    **## MIS-5.docx**

    Back

    Week 5: Course Project Part 2: Value Proposition and MVP Design

    Due Dec 01 by 1:59am Points 125

    Introduction

    Now that you’ve spent time exploring your users and synthesizing insights, it’s time to shift from understanding the problem to designing a solution.

    In this project assignment, you’ll articulate your startup’s value proposition and define the core elements of your Minimum Viable Product (MVP). You’ll take your understanding of your customer’s jobs, pains, and desired outcomes, and begin translating that into real features, experiences, and user flows.

    This assignment bridges the gap between discovery and prototyping. A well-defined value proposition ensures you’re solving the right problem, for the right person, in a way that truly resonates. Your MVP plan will help you avoid overbuilding by focusing on the smallest set of features that deliver meaningful value and test your riskiest assumptions.

    By the end of this assignment, you should have a clear, testable MVP that connects directly to customer needs—and a roadmap for how your team will bring it to life.

    Review the following video for this assignment.

    Format and Expectations

    This assignment continues your evolving project presentation—a visual PDF presentation that tells the story of your startup’s development. You should add these new slides directly after your Week 3 slides.

    Use design tools like Canva, Google Slides, PowerPoint, or Figma—just make sure your project presentation is polished, professional, and exported as a PDF. Organize your ideas visually. Use diagrams, canvases, and sketches wherever they help communicate your thinking.

    Instructions

    Use 5–6 slides to tell a clear and compelling story. Visuals, frameworks, and quotes are encouraged! Your presentation should include the following.

    Refined Persona and Problem Recap (1 slide)

    Begin with a summary of your target persona and the problem they’re facing. This slide should briefly reintroduce who your product is for and why their problem is worth solving. Update your earlier thinking based on what you learned in your Week 3 research. Your persona should feel grounded and specific, not generic. Include:

    Updated persona profile (if needed)

    Refined problem statement

    Why this problem matters most to this user

    Value Proposition Statement (1 slide)

    This slide should clearly state the unique value your product delivers to your target customer. A strong value proposition ties directly to the persona’s most important pain and clearly explains what sets your product apart. Use the Geoff Moore framework or your own variation to keep it structured and concise. Include:

    A one-sentence value proposition using: For [target user], who [problem], our [product] is a [category] that [key benefit]. Unlike [alternatives], it [differentiator].

    Use language your customer would understand

    Emphasize clarity over cleverness

    Value Proposition Canvas (1 slide)

    This visual tool shows how your product delivers value to your target user. The right side should reflect your user’s Jobs, Pains, and Gains. The left side describes your product’s features and how they relieve those pains or create those gains. This canvas should be specific and grounded in your research, not generic or theoretical. Include:

    3–4 product features

    2–3 pain relievers (how you reduce or eliminate key frustrations)

    1–2 gain creators (how you help the user succeed or feel better)

    Highlight the riskiest assumption(s) you’re testing

    MVP Feature Set (1 slide)

    This slide defines the 3–4 core features that will make up your MVP. These are not just “cool ideas”—they’re the minimum necessary to deliver your value proposition and test key assumptions. Explain how each feature connects to the Value Proposition Canvas and why it matters. Include:

    A list or visual of your 3–4 MVP features

    A short description of each

    What part of the value proposition it supports

    Why each is essential (not optional) for learning

    MVP Storyboard (1-2 slides)

    Use these slides to visually walk through how your customer will interact with your product. The storyboard should show your user experiencing one or more key features and receiving value from them. Think of this as a visual pitch for how your MVP works—focused, simple, and clear. Include:

    3–5 frames or scenes showing your user’s interaction with the product

    A title or caption for each frame (what’s happening?)

    Visuals can be sketches, icons, wireframes, or diagrams

    Make sure it aligns with your MVP features and value proposition

    Tips for Success

    Make sure every feature you list connects back to a real user need.

    Don’t worry about visual polish—focus on clear thinking.

    Use your storyboard to help people “see” how your MVP creates value.

    Stay focused on testing assumptions, not building the full product.

    BASED ON PREVIOUS WORK!!!

    Take This statement into consideration.

    For my supply chain visibility MVP, the feature I believe is most essential to test first is a real time tracking and centralized data view for inbound materials across multiple suppliers and production points.

    **## MIS-5.docx**

    Back

    Week 5: Course Project Part 2: Value Proposition and MVP Design

    Due Dec 01 by 1:59am Points 125

    Introduction

    Now that you’ve spent time exploring your users and synthesizing insights, it’s time to shift from understanding the problem to designing a solution.

    In this project assignment, you’ll articulate your startup’s value proposition and define the core elements of your Minimum Viable Product (MVP). You’ll take your understanding of your customer’s jobs, pains, and desired outcomes, and begin translating that into real features, experiences, and user flows.

    This assignment bridges the gap between discovery and prototyping. A well-defined value proposition ensures you’re solving the right problem, for the right person, in a way that truly resonates. Your MVP plan will help you avoid overbuilding by focusing on the smallest set of features that deliver meaningful value and test your riskiest assumptions.

    By the end of this assignment, you should have a clear, testable MVP that connects directly to customer needs—and a roadmap for how your team will bring it to life.

    Review the following video for this assignment.

    Format and Expectations

    This assignment continues your evolving project presentation—a visual PDF presentation that tells the story of your startup’s development. You should add these new slides directly after your Week 3 slides.

    Use design tools like Canva, Google Slides, PowerPoint, or Figma—just make sure your project presentation is polished, professional, and exported as a PDF. Organize your ideas visually. Use diagrams, canvases, and sketches wherever they help communicate your thinking.

    Instructions

    Use 5–6 slides to tell a clear and compelling story. Visuals, frameworks, and quotes are encouraged! Your presentation should include the following.

    Refined Persona and Problem Recap (1 slide)

    Begin with a summary of your target persona and the problem they’re facing. This slide should briefly reintroduce who your product is for and why their problem is worth solving. Update your earlier thinking based on what you learned in your Week 3 research. Your persona should feel grounded and specific, not generic. Include:

    Updated persona profile (if needed)

    Refined problem statement

    Why this problem matters most to this user

    Value Proposition Statement (1 slide)

    This slide should clearly state the unique value your product delivers to your target customer. A strong value proposition ties directly to the persona’s most important pain and clearly explains what sets your product apart. Use the Geoff Moore framework or your own variation to keep it structured and concise. Include:

    A one-sentence value proposition using: For [target user], who [problem], our [product] is a [category] that [key benefit]. Unlike [alternatives], it [differentiator].

    Use language your customer would understand

    Emphasize clarity over cleverness

    Value Proposition Canvas (1 slide)

    This visual tool shows how your product delivers value to your target user. The right side should reflect your user’s Jobs, Pains, and Gains. The left side describes your product’s features and how they relieve those pains or create those gains. This canvas should be specific and grounded in your research, not generic or theoretical. Include:

    3–4 product features

    2–3 pain relievers (how you reduce or eliminate key frustrations)

    1–2 gain creators (how you help the user succeed or feel better)

    Highlight the riskiest assumption(s) you’re testing

    MVP Feature Set (1 slide)

    This slide defines the 3–4 core features that will make up your MVP. These are not just “cool ideas”—they’re the minimum necessary to deliver your value proposition and test key assumptions. Explain how each feature connects to the Value Proposition Canvas and why it matters. Include:

    A list or visual of your 3–4 MVP features

    A short description of each

    What part of the value proposition it supports

    Why each is essential (not optional) for learning

    MVP Storyboard (1-2 slides)

    Use these slides to visually walk through how your customer will interact with your product. The storyboard should show your user experiencing one or more key features and receiving value from them. Think of this as a visual pitch for how your MVP works—focused, simple, and clear. Include:

    3–5 frames or scenes showing your user’s interaction with the product

    A title or caption for each frame (what’s happening?)

    Visuals can be sketches, icons, wireframes, or diagrams

    Make sure it aligns with your MVP features and value proposition

    Tips for Success

    Make sure every feature you list connects back to a real user need.

    Don’t worry about visual polish—focus on clear thinking.

    Use your storyboard to help people “see” how your MVP creates value.

    Stay focused on testing assumptions, not building the full product.

    BASED ON PREVIOUS WORK!!!

    Take This statement into consideration.

    For my supply chain visibility MVP, the feature I believe is most essential to test first is a real time tracking and centralized data view for inbound materials across multiple suppliers and production points.

  • [Solved] Leas – 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – ## LEAD-5.docx **## LEAD-5.docx** ### **The Executive Memo** Review the following video. ### **Note: I have extended the due date on this for the Thanksgiving Holiday Weekend. However, if you can front-load your week and knock it out, that would be better!** ### **Instructions** #### **Complete th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – ## LEAD-5.docx

    **## LEAD-5.docx**

    ### **The Executive Memo**

    Review the following video.

    ### **Note: I have extended the due date on this for the Thanksgiving Holiday Weekend. However, if you can front-load your week and knock it out, that would be better!**

    ### **Instructions**

    #### **Complete the following for this week's assignment.**

    1. Listen to the video on Customer Service vs Customer Experience (Week 5 Reading and Supplemental Materials).

    2. Using an organization you have been or still are affiliated with, write a one to two-page executive memo identifying at least three (3) customer or client concerns/issues that may negatively impact the digital transformation.

    3. Provide a resolution to address each concern or issue. (Consult AI [such as Perplexity AI, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude AI] to help develop ways to address each concern at your company.)

    4. Discuss how artificial intelligence can help manage the customer experience at this company.

    5. Include credible sources to support each resolution.

    COMPANY: SUZANO

    **## LEAD-5.docx**

    ### **The Executive Memo**

    Review the following video.

    ### **Note: I have extended the due date on this for the Thanksgiving Holiday Weekend. However, if you can front-load your week and knock it out, that would be better!**

    ### **Instructions**

    #### **Complete the following for this week's assignment.**

    1. Listen to the video on Customer Service vs Customer Experience (Week 5 Reading and Supplemental Materials).

    2. Using an organization you have been or still are affiliated with, write a one to two-page executive memo identifying at least three (3) customer or client concerns/issues that may negatively impact the digital transformation.

    3. Provide a resolution to address each concern or issue. (Consult AI [such as Perplexity AI, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude AI] to help develop ways to address each concern at your company.)

    4. Discuss how artificial intelligence can help manage the customer experience at this company.

    5. Include credible sources to support each resolution.

    COMPANY: SUZANO