Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**Advocacy Presentation: Organizational Care Dilemma, power point**
**files (2)**
– ## ASSIGNMENTMODULE7.1.docx
– ## Module7Assignment7.1RUBRIC.docx
**## ASSIGNMENTMODULE7.1.docx**
**Advocacy Presentation: Organizational Care Dilemma**
Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at
**least SIX (6)** sources throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices
**for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements.** Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Institutions have guidelines in place that support the development of institutional policies. Guidelines can be formal and/or informal and have an interest in promoting personal, professional, and organizational interests. Depending on the healthcare system, policy development can be a rigorous process. Review a formal policy within a healthcare organization and the steps identified by the organization to implement the policy. The policy can clinically be focused or focused on the workforce in the health care setting. Your PowerPoint presentation should include the following:
· Title (1 slide)
· What is the policy? (1 slide)
· Who is the population it serves? (2 slides)
· Who were the stakeholders involved in creating the policy? (1 slide)
· What steps were necessary to create the policy and implementation? (2 slides)
· How often is the policy reviewed? (2 slides)
· Where is the policy accessed? (2 slides)
· Why is the policy important to the organization? (3 slides)
· Did the creation of the policy solve problems? (3 slides)
· What recommendations do you have for the policy to enhance the policy’s effectiveness? (2 slides)
· References (1 slide)
**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**
·
**Length**: 20 -22 slides; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure**: Include a title slide and reference slide in APA style. These do not count in the number of slides.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Include at least SIX (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.**
· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations and review the rubric.
**Learning Materials**
Porche, D. J. (2023).
_Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN
9781284230321. Read chapters 14 & 16.
Whitlock, J.
_(2021). Why_ _patients are turning to medical tourism._ Verywellhealth.
[https://www](https://www.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869) [.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869](https://www.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869)
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**## Module7Assignment7.1RUBRIC.docx**
8/17/26, 6:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen U…
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1
Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Content/Qu
ality of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 40
0
points
Topic is inap
–
propriate to as
–
signment, not
based on
scholarly infor
–
mation (if re
–
quired), unclear
and difficult to
understand, no
hyperlinks to
credible sites;
did not include
required as
–
signment com
–
ponents; slide
notes missing
(
if required
).
28
points
Topic is mostly
covered and
appropriate to
assignment,
but not based
on scholarly in
–
formation (if
required);
mostly clear
and under
–
standable; may
contain hyper
–
links to non-
credible sites;
some of re
–
quired assign
–
ment compo
–
nents are
present; mini
–
mal use of slide
notes (if
required).
32
points
Good coverage
of topic and
appropriate to
assignment;
sound, re
–
search-based
(
if required) in
–
formation;
clear and un
–
derstandable;
hyperlinks to
credible sites;
all required as
–
signment com
–
ponents are ac
–
curate and
present; slide
notes used ap
–
propriately (if
required).
points
40
In-depth cover
–
age of topic
and assignment
components;
outstanding
clarity of infor
–
mation; de
–
tailed slide
notes ensure
all required
content is well
explained (if
required).
**Criterion Score**
Presentatio
n Weight:
20
%
/ 20
0
points
Unattractive;
difficult to in
–
terpret; poor
color choice
and slide con
–
trast; slide pre
–
sentation unor
–
ganized; slide
effects detract
from the con
–
tent; missing
slide headings
or sub-head
–
ings (if required
for organiza
–
tion purposes);
missing
title/reference
slides.
14
points
Attractive but
somewhat dif
–
ficult to inter
–
pret; some
–
what pleasing
contrast be
–
tween text and
background,
slide presenta
–
tion may be
somewhat dis
–
organized;
transitions and
slide effects
detract from
the content;
may be missing
title or refer
–
ence slides; in
–
cluded slide
headings/sub-
headings may
detract from
presentation.
16
points
Attractive;
easy to inter
–
pret, pleasing
colors with
strong contrast
between text
and back
–
ground, slide
presentation
organized,
good use of
transitions and
slide effects
which enhance
the presenta
–
tion; both title
and reference
slides are
present. Slide
headings/sub-
headings are
used appropri
–
ately to orga
–
nize the
presentation.
points
20
Excellent use
of transitions
and effects
that enhance
the presenta
–
tion.
Presentation is
organized and
designed for
maximum im
–
pact of
content.
**Criterion Score**
Use of
Multimedia,
Graphics,
Diagrams,
and/or
Illustrations
Weight:
30
%
/ 30
0
points
Does not in
–
clude required
multimedia,
graphics, dia
–
grams, and/or
illustrations or
they are irrele
–
vant to topic or
detract from
slide content
or presentation
as a whole.
points
21
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions are gen
–
erally relevant
but some may
not appropri
–
ately support
the slide
content.
24
points
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions are highly
relevant and
acceptably sup
–
port the slide
content; sized
and positioned
appropriately.
30
points
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions add clar
–
ity and sophis
–
tication to the
presentation
content; they
improve the ef
–
fectiveness of
the
presentation.
Total
/ 100
**Criterion Score**
Writing,
Mechanics,
and APA
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
Style is inap
–
propriate or
does not ad
–
dress given au
–
dience, pur
–
pose, etc.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, and punc
–
tuation; APA
format and
style are not
evident
throughout the
presentation.
7
points
Style is some
–
what appropri
–
ate to given
audience and
purpose.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
There are miss
–
ing APA ele
–
ments or some
are incorrectly
formatted
throughout the
presentation.
8
points
Style is appro
–
priate to the
given audience
and purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical or ty
–
pographical er
–
rors are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
Reference slide
and in-text ci
–
tations have
few formatting
errors.
points
10
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical and
typographical
errors.
Reference
slide and other
in-text cita
–
tions are for
–
matted cor
–
rectly using
APA elements.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
1/4
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403117/View 1/4
1/4
**## Module7Assignment7.1RUBRIC.docx**
8/17/26, 6:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen U…
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1
Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Content/Qu
ality of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 40
0
points
Topic is inap
–
propriate to as
–
signment, not
based on
scholarly infor
–
mation (if re
–
quired), unclear
and difficult to
understand, no
hyperlinks to
credible sites;
did not include
required as
–
signment com
–
ponents; slide
notes missing
(
if required
).
28
points
Topic is mostly
covered and
appropriate to
assignment,
but not based
on scholarly in
–
formation (if
required);
mostly clear
and under
–
standable; may
contain hyper
–
links to non-
credible sites;
some of re
–
quired assign
–
ment compo
–
nents are
present; mini
–
mal use of slide
notes (if
required).
32
points
Good coverage
of topic and
appropriate to
assignment;
sound, re
–
search-based
(
if required) in
–
formation;
clear and un
–
derstandable;
hyperlinks to
credible sites;
all required as
–
signment com
–
ponents are ac
–
curate and
present; slide
notes used ap
–
propriately (if
required).
points
40
In-depth cover
–
age of topic
and assignment
components;
outstanding
clarity of infor
–
mation; de
–
tailed slide
notes ensure
all required
content is well
explained (if
required).
**Criterion Score**
Presentatio
n Weight:
20
%
/ 20
0
points
Unattractive;
difficult to in
–
terpret; poor
color choice
and slide con
–
trast; slide pre
–
sentation unor
–
ganized; slide
effects detract
from the con
–
tent; missing
slide headings
or sub-head
–
ings (if required
for organiza
–
tion purposes);
missing
title/reference
slides.
14
points
Attractive but
somewhat dif
–
ficult to inter
–
pret; some
–
what pleasing
contrast be
–
tween text and
background,
slide presenta
–
tion may be
somewhat dis
–
organized;
transitions and
slide effects
detract from
the content;
may be missing
title or refer
–
ence slides; in
–
cluded slide
headings/sub-
headings may
detract from
presentation.
16
points
Attractive;
easy to inter
–
pret, pleasing
colors with
strong contrast
between text
and back
–
ground, slide
presentation
organized,
good use of
transitions and
slide effects
which enhance
the presenta
–
tion; both title
and reference
slides are
present. Slide
headings/sub-
headings are
used appropri
–
ately to orga
–
nize the
presentation.
points
20
Excellent use
of transitions
and effects
that enhance
the presenta
–
tion.
Presentation is
organized and
designed for
maximum im
–
pact of
content.
**Criterion Score**
Use of
Multimedia,
Graphics,
Diagrams,
and/or
Illustrations
Weight:
30
%
/ 30
0
points
Does not in
–
clude required
multimedia,
graphics, dia
–
grams, and/or
illustrations or
they are irrele
–
vant to topic or
detract from
slide content
or presentation
as a whole.
points
21
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions are gen
–
erally relevant
but some may
not appropri
–
ately support
the slide
content.
24
points
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions are highly
relevant and
acceptably sup
–
port the slide
content; sized
and positioned
appropriately.
30
points
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions add clar
–
ity and sophis
–
tication to the
presentation
content; they
improve the ef
–
fectiveness of
the
presentation.
Total
/ 100
**Criterion Score**
Writing,
Mechanics,
and APA
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
Style is inap
–
propriate or
does not ad
–
dress given au
–
dience, pur
–
pose, etc.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, and punc
–
tuation; APA
format and
style are not
evident
throughout the
presentation.
7
points
Style is some
–
what appropri
–
ate to given
audience and
purpose.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
There are miss
–
ing APA ele
–
ments or some
are incorrectly
formatted
throughout the
presentation.
8
points
Style is appro
–
priate to the
given audience
and purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical or ty
–
pographical er
–
rors are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
Reference slide
and in-text ci
–
tations have
few formatting
errors.
points
10
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical and
typographical
errors.
Reference
slide and other
in-text cita
–
tions are for
–
matted cor
–
rectly using
APA elements.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
1/4
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403117/View 1/4
1/4
**## ASSIGNMENTMODULE7.1.docx**
**Advocacy Presentation: Organizational Care Dilemma**
Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at
**least SIX (6)** sources throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices
**for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements.** Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Institutions have guidelines in place that support the development of institutional policies. Guidelines can be formal and/or informal and have an interest in promoting personal, professional, and organizational interests. Depending on the healthcare system, policy development can be a rigorous process. Review a formal policy within a healthcare organization and the steps identified by the organization to implement the policy. The policy can clinically be focused or focused on the workforce in the health care setting. Your PowerPoint presentation should include the following:
· Title (1 slide)
· What is the policy? (1 slide)
· Who is the population it serves? (2 slides)
· Who were the stakeholders involved in creating the policy? (1 slide)
· What steps were necessary to create the policy and implementation? (2 slides)
· How often is the policy reviewed? (2 slides)
· Where is the policy accessed? (2 slides)
· Why is the policy important to the organization? (3 slides)
· Did the creation of the policy solve problems? (3 slides)
· What recommendations do you have for the policy to enhance the policy’s effectiveness? (2 slides)
· References (1 slide)
**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**
·
**Length**: 20 -22 slides; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure**: Include a title slide and reference slide in APA style. These do not count in the number of slides.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Include at least SIX (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.**
· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations and review the rubric.
**Learning Materials**
Porche, D. J. (2023).
_Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN
9781284230321. Read chapters 14 & 16.
Whitlock, J.
_(2021). Why_ _patients are turning to medical tourism._ Verywellhealth.
[https://www](https://www.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869) [.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869](https://www.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869)
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**## Module7Assignment7.1RUBRIC.docx**
8/17/26, 6:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen U…
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1
Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Content/Qu
ality of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 40
0
points
Topic is inap
–
propriate to as
–
signment, not
based on
scholarly infor
–
mation (if re
–
quired), unclear
and difficult to
understand, no
hyperlinks to
credible sites;
did not include
required as
–
signment com
–
ponents; slide
notes missing
(
if required
).
28
points
Topic is mostly
covered and
appropriate to
assignment,
but not based
on scholarly in
–
formation (if
required);
mostly clear
and under
–
standable; may
contain hyper
–
links to non-
credible sites;
some of re
–
quired assign
–
ment compo
–
nents are
present; mini
–
mal use of slide
notes (if
required).
32
points
Good coverage
of topic and
appropriate to
assignment;
sound, re
–
search-based
(
if required) in
–
formation;
clear and un
–
derstandable;
hyperlinks to
credible sites;
all required as
–
signment com
–
ponents are ac
–
curate and
present; slide
notes used ap
–
propriately (if
required).
points
40
In-depth cover
–
age of topic
and assignment
components;
outstanding
clarity of infor
–
mation; de
–
tailed slide
notes ensure
all required
content is well
explained (if
required).
**Criterion Score**
Presentatio
n Weight:
20
%
/ 20
0
points
Unattractive;
difficult to in
–
terpret; poor
color choice
and slide con
–
trast; slide pre
–
sentation unor
–
ganized; slide
effects detract
from the con
–
tent; missing
slide headings
or sub-head
–
ings (if required
for organiza
–
tion purposes);
missing
title/reference
slides.
14
points
Attractive but
somewhat dif
–
ficult to inter
–
pret; some
–
what pleasing
contrast be
–
tween text and
background,
slide presenta
–
tion may be
somewhat dis
–
organized;
transitions and
slide effects
detract from
the content;
may be missing
title or refer
–
ence slides; in
–
cluded slide
headings/sub-
headings may
detract from
presentation.
16
points
Attractive;
easy to inter
–
pret, pleasing
colors with
strong contrast
between text
and back
–
ground, slide
presentation
organized,
good use of
transitions and
slide effects
which enhance
the presenta
–
tion; both title
and reference
slides are
present. Slide
headings/sub-
headings are
used appropri
–
ately to orga
–
nize the
presentation.
points
20
Excellent use
of transitions
and effects
that enhance
the presenta
–
tion.
Presentation is
organized and
designed for
maximum im
–
pact of
content.
**Criterion Score**
Use of
Multimedia,
Graphics,
Diagrams,
and/or
Illustrations
Weight:
30
%
/ 30
0
points
Does not in
–
clude required
multimedia,
graphics, dia
–
grams, and/or
illustrations or
they are irrele
–
vant to topic or
detract from
slide content
or presentation
as a whole.
points
21
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions are gen
–
erally relevant
but some may
not appropri
–
ately support
the slide
content.
24
points
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions are highly
relevant and
acceptably sup
–
port the slide
content; sized
and positioned
appropriately.
30
points
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions add clar
–
ity and sophis
–
tication to the
presentation
content; they
improve the ef
–
fectiveness of
the
presentation.
Total
/ 100
**Criterion Score**
Writing,
Mechanics,
and APA
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
Style is inap
–
propriate or
does not ad
–
dress given au
–
dience, pur
–
pose, etc.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, and punc
–
tuation; APA
format and
style are not
evident
throughout the
presentation.
7
points
Style is some
–
what appropri
–
ate to given
audience and
purpose.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
There are miss
–
ing APA ele
–
ments or some
are incorrectly
formatted
throughout the
presentation.
8
points
Style is appro
–
priate to the
given audience
and purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical or ty
–
pographical er
–
rors are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
Reference slide
and in-text ci
–
tations have
few formatting
errors.
points
10
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical and
typographical
errors.
Reference
slide and other
in-text cita
–
tions are for
–
matted cor
–
rectly using
APA elements.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
1/4
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403117/View 1/4
1/4
**## ASSIGNMENTMODULE7.1.docx**
**Advocacy Presentation: Organizational Care Dilemma**
Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at
**least SIX (6)** sources throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices
**for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements.** Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Institutions have guidelines in place that support the development of institutional policies. Guidelines can be formal and/or informal and have an interest in promoting personal, professional, and organizational interests. Depending on the healthcare system, policy development can be a rigorous process. Review a formal policy within a healthcare organization and the steps identified by the organization to implement the policy. The policy can clinically be focused or focused on the workforce in the health care setting. Your PowerPoint presentation should include the following:
· Title (1 slide)
· What is the policy? (1 slide)
· Who is the population it serves? (2 slides)
· Who were the stakeholders involved in creating the policy? (1 slide)
· What steps were necessary to create the policy and implementation? (2 slides)
· How often is the policy reviewed? (2 slides)
· Where is the policy accessed? (2 slides)
· Why is the policy important to the organization? (3 slides)
· Did the creation of the policy solve problems? (3 slides)
· What recommendations do you have for the policy to enhance the policy’s effectiveness? (2 slides)
· References (1 slide)
**The following specifications are required for this assignment:**
·
**Length**: 20 -22 slides; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.
·
**Structure**: Include a title slide and reference slide in APA style. These do not count in the number of slides.
·
**References**: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Include at least SIX (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.**
· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations and review the rubric.
**Learning Materials**
Porche, D. J. (2023).
_Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN
9781284230321. Read chapters 14 & 16.
Whitlock, J.
_(2021). Why_ _patients are turning to medical tourism._ Verywellhealth.
[https://www](https://www.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869) [.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869](https://www.verywellhealth.com/understanding-medical-tourism-4069869)
**References:** Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions.
**Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY.** Scholarly articles
**from**
**2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric.** **Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.**
**## Module7Assignment7.1RUBRIC.docx**
8/17/26, 6:29 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships – Aspen U…
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1
Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships
Criteria
**Does Not Meet**
**0**
**%**
**Approaches 70%**
**Meets 80%**
**Exceeds 100%**
**Criterion Score**
Content/Qu
ality of
Information
Weight:
40
%
/ 40
0
points
Topic is inap
–
propriate to as
–
signment, not
based on
scholarly infor
–
mation (if re
–
quired), unclear
and difficult to
understand, no
hyperlinks to
credible sites;
did not include
required as
–
signment com
–
ponents; slide
notes missing
(
if required
).
28
points
Topic is mostly
covered and
appropriate to
assignment,
but not based
on scholarly in
–
formation (if
required);
mostly clear
and under
–
standable; may
contain hyper
–
links to non-
credible sites;
some of re
–
quired assign
–
ment compo
–
nents are
present; mini
–
mal use of slide
notes (if
required).
32
points
Good coverage
of topic and
appropriate to
assignment;
sound, re
–
search-based
(
if required) in
–
formation;
clear and un
–
derstandable;
hyperlinks to
credible sites;
all required as
–
signment com
–
ponents are ac
–
curate and
present; slide
notes used ap
–
propriately (if
required).
points
40
In-depth cover
–
age of topic
and assignment
components;
outstanding
clarity of infor
–
mation; de
–
tailed slide
notes ensure
all required
content is well
explained (if
required).
**Criterion Score**
Presentatio
n Weight:
20
%
/ 20
0
points
Unattractive;
difficult to in
–
terpret; poor
color choice
and slide con
–
trast; slide pre
–
sentation unor
–
ganized; slide
effects detract
from the con
–
tent; missing
slide headings
or sub-head
–
ings (if required
for organiza
–
tion purposes);
missing
title/reference
slides.
14
points
Attractive but
somewhat dif
–
ficult to inter
–
pret; some
–
what pleasing
contrast be
–
tween text and
background,
slide presenta
–
tion may be
somewhat dis
–
organized;
transitions and
slide effects
detract from
the content;
may be missing
title or refer
–
ence slides; in
–
cluded slide
headings/sub-
headings may
detract from
presentation.
16
points
Attractive;
easy to inter
–
pret, pleasing
colors with
strong contrast
between text
and back
–
ground, slide
presentation
organized,
good use of
transitions and
slide effects
which enhance
the presenta
–
tion; both title
and reference
slides are
present. Slide
headings/sub-
headings are
used appropri
–
ately to orga
–
nize the
presentation.
points
20
Excellent use
of transitions
and effects
that enhance
the presenta
–
tion.
Presentation is
organized and
designed for
maximum im
–
pact of
content.
**Criterion Score**
Use of
Multimedia,
Graphics,
Diagrams,
and/or
Illustrations
Weight:
30
%
/ 30
0
points
Does not in
–
clude required
multimedia,
graphics, dia
–
grams, and/or
illustrations or
they are irrele
–
vant to topic or
detract from
slide content
or presentation
as a whole.
points
21
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions are gen
–
erally relevant
but some may
not appropri
–
ately support
the slide
content.
24
points
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions are highly
relevant and
acceptably sup
–
port the slide
content; sized
and positioned
appropriately.
30
points
Required multi
–
media, graph
–
ics, diagrams,
and/or illustra
–
tions add clar
–
ity and sophis
–
tication to the
presentation
content; they
improve the ef
–
fectiveness of
the
presentation.
Total
/ 100
**Criterion Score**
Writing,
Mechanics,
and APA
Weight:
%
10
/ 10
0
points
Style is inap
–
propriate or
does not ad
–
dress given au
–
dience, pur
–
pose, etc.
Inconsistent
grammar, spell
–
ing, and punc
–
tuation; APA
format and
style are not
evident
throughout the
presentation.
7
points
Style is some
–
what appropri
–
ate to given
audience and
purpose.
Repetitive me
–
chanical errors
distract the
reader.
Inconsistencies
in language,
sentence struc
–
ture, and/or
word choice
are present.
There are miss
–
ing APA ele
–
ments or some
are incorrectly
formatted
throughout the
presentation.
8
points
Style is appro
–
priate to the
given audience
and purpose.
Word choice is
specific and
purposeful, and
somewhat var
–
ied throughout.
Minimal me
–
chanical or ty
–
pographical er
–
rors are
present, but
are not overly
distracting.
Reference slide
and in-text ci
–
tations have
few formatting
errors.
points
10
Style shows
originality and
creativity.
Word choice is
dynamic and
varied. Free of
mechanical and
typographical
errors.
Reference
slide and other
in-text cita
–
tions are for
–
matted cor
–
rectly using
APA elements.
**Overall Score**
**Level 1**
0
points minimum
**Level 2**
70
points minimum
**Level 3**
80
points minimum
**Level 4**
100
points minimum
1/4
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403117/View 1/4
1/4