Tag: Clinical & Abnormal Psychology

  • [Solved] Congressman McEwan, Politics, and Integrity

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Must be 400 words , 2 scholarly sources and APA format 1. What is his definition of politics? Is it too simplified? Why or why not? 2. How do his presentations help you when it comes to learning how to debate and argue in an effective manner the positions you most want to defend? 3. In what ways doe…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Must be 400 words , 2 scholarly sources and APA format

    1. What is his definition of politics? Is it too simplified? Why or why not?
    2. How do his presentations help you when it comes to learning how to debate and argue in an effective manner the positions you most want to defend?
    3. In what ways does his definition using integrity complement the Rybacki and Rybacki text?

    – [\
    \
    AudioTranscrip.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/audiotranscrip-docx "AudioTranscrip.docx")
    – [\
    \
    AmericaInPeril.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/americainperil-pdf "AmericaInPeril.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    AvnerChapter2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/avnerchapter2-docx "AvnerChapter2.docx")
    – [\
    \
    RybackiRybackiChapters12.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rybackirybackichapters12-docx-10192361 "RybackiRybackiChapters12.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] how to lose weight

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Live laugh love – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Live laugh love

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] wk6-2025

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – Explain how different cultures construe primary and secondary control – Explain the differences between high-context cultures and low-context cultures – Explain the impact that language has on various domains according to the Whorfian hypothesis Find one research study (or more) to explain the …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – Explain how different cultures construe primary and secondary control

    – Explain the differences between high-context cultures and low-context cultures

    – Explain the impact that language has on various domains according to the Whorfian hypothesis

    Find one research study (or more) to explain the following concepts to provide either evidence for it (prove it) or against it (disprove it), you may provide evidence for either side. Explain, describe, compare and contrast:

    – Learned helplessness and cultural differences in the perception of choice

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] wk 7-2025

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    write a brief summary of the most interesting or valuable things that you have learned in this class(health psychology), and how this knowledge influenced you. How will you use this information to increase your physical and psychological health? – 2 years ago

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    write a brief summary of the most interesting or valuable things that you have learned in this class(health psychology), and how this knowledge influenced you. How will you use this information to increase your physical and psychological health?

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] wk 5-activity

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Write a post using the following format (without numbers) including numerous headings to label and separate each different part of the assignment. 1. **Introduction** 2a. **Theory** One: Describe, define, and explain one psychology theory (or model) that is relevant to the explanation of your topic….

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Write a post using the following format (without numbers) including numerous headings to label and separate each different part of the assignment.

    1. **Introduction**

    2a. **Theory** One: Describe, define, and explain one psychology theory (or model) that is relevant to the explanation of your topic.

    2b. **Explain** how this theory contributes to the understanding of your project. Why is it relevant?

    3a. **Theory** Two: Describe, define, and explain a second psychology theory (or model) that is relevant to the explanation of your topic.

    3b. **Explain** how this theory contributes to the understanding of your project. Why is it relevant?

    4. Conclusion

    5.References: The sources you used in APA format related to the topic of your project.

    Topic  Transmitted Culture

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Research proposal

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    I need guidance on a research proposal – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## ResearchProposal.docx – ## SignatureProjectStage1FirstSubmissionRubric.pdf – GoodExample_FinalSubmissionofSignatureProjectStage1.pdf **## ResearchProposal.docx** ## THE SIGNATURE PROJECT FINAL SUBMISSION The culminating require…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    I need guidance on a research proposal

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## ResearchProposal.docx

    – ## SignatureProjectStage1FirstSubmissionRubric.pdf

    – GoodExample_FinalSubmissionofSignatureProjectStage1.pdf

    **## ResearchProposal.docx**

    ## THE SIGNATURE PROJECT FINAL SUBMISSION

    The culminating requirement in ED504 is the final iteration of your Signature Project Stage 1. The Signature Project Stage 1 is your research proposal. It is designed to guide candidates through the steps for planning an experimental study to examine an in-depth school improvement project focused on improving teaching and learning. The project involves an opportunity for candidates to apply the knowledge, skills, and behaviors they gain from their respective programs.

    Cover Page

    Abstract

    Chapter 1: Research Problem

    Introduction

    Statement of the Research Problem (include hypothesis)

    Data Graphic and Discussion

    Impact on Student Achievement

    Research Methodology

    Summary (of chapter 1)

    Chapter 2: Literature Review

    Introduction

    Sub-headings (according to the organization of your study) Synthesis of Literature Review

    Chapter 3: Methodology

    Introduction

    Population

    Sample

    Sample Technique (with justification)

    Role of Participants and Impact on Participants (with explanation)

    Plan for Protection of Human Subjects Variables

    Timeline (with sequence of steps and timeline for data collection)

    Constitutive and Operation Definitions Description of Data (data needed) Reliability and Validity of Instrument Limitations References

    Appendix A: Consent Form

    Appendix B: Permission to Study

    Appendix C: Copy of the instrument or survey if one is used.

    ## General Guidelines

    · APA format.

    · Double-space using Times New Roman 12 pt. font size. Follow the example found in the Course Resource section of this course.

    · Top, bottom and side margins must be 1 inch.

    · Pages must be numbered, top flushed right.

    · Organize the literature review according to themes important to the study.

    · Direct quoting of other authors is not permitted. All written text should be in your own words.

    · Appropriately cite all information sources using APA.

    · Include a minimum of ten scholarly sources, five of these sources should come from the primary literature (ED504 requirement). All ten sources should primarily be from the past five years.

    · References should be in APA format and on a separate page in the document.

    · If your scholarly literature sources were obtained from an Internet site (e.g., online journal article), include the URL and the date downloaded as part of the bibliographic details presented. Check APA on formatting.

    · Grammar and spelling must be correct.

    **## SignatureProjectStage1FirstSubmissionRubric.pdf**

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Writing Components

    CATEGORY Unacceptable

    (0 points)

    Revisions Required

    (2.5 points)

    Target

    (5 points)

    Are the focus and purpose clear
    and ideas well supported?

    Missing thesis; confusion about or
    misunderstanding of topic; no sense of
    purpose

    Simplistic and unfocused ideas; limited
    sense of purpose; support is provided, but is
    not specific; support is only loosely relevant
    to the main points

    Developed thesis; represents sound
    understanding of the assigned topic;
    focused support is provided and is sound,
    valid, and logical

    Is the writing structured well
    organized? Is correct
    sentence structure and
    proper mechanics utilized?

    No paragraph structure; or single,
    rambling paragraph; or series of isolated
    paragraphs; Contains multiple and
    serious errors of sentence structure: i.e.,
    fragments, run-ons; unable to write
    simple sentences; numerous errors in
    spelling and capitalization; intrusive
    and/or inaccurate punctuation;
    communication is hindered

    Organization structure is present, but
    is confusing or disjointed; weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are missing or
    inappropriate; Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of simple
    sentences; errors in sentence structure;
    contains several punctuation, spelling,
    and/or capitalization errors (up to 6);
    errors may or may not interfere with
    meaning

    Clear organizational structure;
    easily followed; includes transitions;
    structured format; Effective and
    varied sentences; errors (if present) due
    to lack of careful proofreading; virtually
    free of punctuation, spelling,
    capitalization errors (no more than
    3); errors do not interfere with
    meaning

    Are vocabulary and word
    usage varied and
    appropriate?

    Vocabulary is unsophisticated; or subject
    specific vocabulary or sophisticated
    vocabulary used incorrectly

    Proper, but simple vocabulary used;

    subject specific vocabulary used
    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied, specific and
    appropriate; uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    Is the source requirement
    met and is APA format
    followed?

    Source requirements for the appropriate
    level were not met; there are significant
    format errors present; multiple (more
    than 6) of APA formatting errors; in the
    reference list and/or in-text citations

    Meets minimum requirements for
    degree level: Masters – A minimum of
    10 sources were utilized; Fewer than
    6 APA format errors are present in the
    reference list in-text; citations; header;
    headings; page numbers; etc.

    Five (5) sources beyond minimum
    requires were utilized; there are
    virtually no APA format errors present in
    either reference list in-text; citations;
    header; headings; page numbers; etc.

    Is proper evidence and support
    of original work provided in
    body of the review?

    Safe Assign originality report indicates
    match percentage of greater than 25
    percent

    Safe Assign originality report indicates
    match percentage of 15 to 25 percent

    Safe Assign originality report indicates a
    match percentage of less than 15
    percent

    Content Components

    CATEGORY Unacceptable

    (0 points)

    Revisions Required

    (2.5 points)

    Target

    (5 points)

    Source of data is credible, and
    data is representative of the
    scope requirements for the
    advanced degree being sought

    (InTASC 6, 9; CAEP A1.1)

    The source of the data is ambiguous or
    lacks credibility; data does not allow for
    problem/weakness identification
    appropriate for required project scope

    The source of the data is clear and
    credible; data does not allow for
    problem/weakness identification
    appropriate for required project scope

    The source of the data is clear and
    credible; data allows for identification
    of an of a classroom, multi-
    classroom, school or district level
    problem/weakness appropriate to
    the required project scope

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Graphical representation
    of compiled data allows
    for easy analysis

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Graphical format does not present the
    data in a clear manner; data is only
    partially presented

    Graphical format(s) is appropriate
    and clearly presents all the collected
    data

    Graphical format(s) is appropriate; clearly
    presents all the collected data; highlights
    visible patterns or trends

    Identified
    problem/weakness is
    supported by trends or
    patterns seen in the data

    (InTASC 6, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Problem/weakness is not clearly
    identified or does not align with the
    trends and patterns identified in the data

    Problem/weakness is clearly
    identified; aligns with the type of data
    collected, but connections between the
    trends/patterns in the data are not clearly
    described in the narrative

    Problem/weakness is clearly identified;
    aligns with the type of data collected;
    clear connections between the
    trends/patterns are drawn in the
    narrative

    Best practices are identified
    and supported by the literature
    as viable responses to
    weaknesses and problems
    represented by the data

    (InTASC 8, 9, 10; CAEPA1.1)

    Best practice(s) are not clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not support the
    identified best practice(s) as a viable
    option to improve achievement

    Best practice(s) are clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not support the
    identified best practice(s) as a viable option
    to improve achievement

    Best practice(s) are clearly identified;
    literature reviewed supports the
    identified best practices as viable
    responses to the problem/weakness
    identified

    Theories and/or trends are
    identified and connected with
    best practices in literature

    (InTASC 8, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Theory or trend is not identified;
    theory/trend identified are not connected
    with the best practice(s) via literature

    Theory or trend is clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not connect the
    identified theory/trend with the identified
    best practice

    Theory or trend is clearly identified;
    literature reviewed connects the
    identified theory/trend with all
    identified best practices

    Proper level of synthesis is
    achieved in the literature review

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Summaries were given; are not clear or
    fail to make clear connections with best
    practice(s) and/or theory/trend(s)
    identified as viable responses to
    problem/weakness

    Summaries are clear and concise;
    clear connections with best practice
    and/or theory/trend identified as
    viable response to problem/weakness
    may or may not be present

    Synthesis rather than summaries of
    content presented in the collection
    of sources is present, clear connections
    with best practice and/or theory/trend
    identified as viable response to
    problem/weakness present

    Description of plan is clear and
    easy to follow

    (InTASC 7, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Action plan is not described; description
    is not clear; steps in plan are not in a
    logical order

    Action plan description is provided,
    but additional detail may be warranted;
    steps in plan are outlined, but
    additional steps may be needed, or the
    order could be altered for better efficiency

    Action plan description is provided, and
    sufficient detail is included; steps in
    plan are outlined; exhaustive list of
    steps and sequence of steps allows
    for optimal efficiency and outcome.

    Project timeline accounts for all
    elements in the plan and
    allocates appropriate amounts
    of time for each element

    (InTASC 7, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Project timeline is missing or incomplete;
    time allocation is inadequate or too
    extensive for one or more elements
    included in the plan

    Project timeline is provided; all
    elements identified in the plan are
    included, but additional elements might
    be needed for an improved outcome; timing
    and/or time allocation could be improved

    Project timeline is provided; all
    necessary elements are included for
    optimal outcome

    Variables are identified and
    defined

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Variables are misidentified Variables are identified correctly, but
    with no clear definitions or explanations as
    to how they will be measured

    Variables are identified correctly, with
    clear definitions and explanations as
    to how they will be measured

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Required data needs are
    identified and plans for
    retrieving and protecting that
    data are clear (i.e., methods)

    (InTASC 6, 9; CAEP A1.1)

    Data needs are not identified or do not
    align with the problem; data retrieval
    plans are missing or inappropriate

    Data needs are identified; data
    retrieval plans are included, but plans
    for protecting the data and/or student
    confidentiality are not provided or are
    inadequate

    Data needs are identified; data retrieval
    plans are included; adequate plans for
    protecting student confidentiality
    and/or data are provided

    Description of the sample and
    sampling techniques are
    provided

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Detailed descriptions of the participants
    are not given and/or sampling technique
    is not provided

    Brief overview of the sample is given,
    and sampling technique may or may
    not be included

    Full descriptions of the participant
    sample, sampling technique and
    justifications for both the sample
    chosen and the sampling technique
    are given

    Needed resources are identified,
    justified, and a leverage plan for
    acquiring resources is clear and
    supported

    (InTASC 5, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Resources are not identified or are
    inadequate; no justification for the
    resources is provided; unclear how
    identified resources might be acquired;
    plan for acquiring resources is inadequate
    or ill conceived

    Resources are identified, but additional
    resources may be needed; justification
    for the resources is provided, but
    leverage plan for acquiring resources is not
    clear

    Exhaustive list of resources is
    identified; justification for the resources
    is provided; leverage plan for
    acquiring resources is outlined

    Justification for how the action
    plan will address the identified
    problem is clear

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    No connection between the action plan
    and the identified problem is provided

    Connection between the action plan
    and the identified problem is
    provided

    Connection between the action plan and
    the identified problem is provided;
    justification of that connection is
    included

    Connection between action plan
    and impact on student
    achievement is clear

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    No connection between action plan
    outcome and student achievement is
    provided

    Connection between action plan
    outcome and student achievement is
    provided; justification of that
    connection may or may not be
    included

    Connection between action plan outcome
    and student achievement is provided;
    justification of that connection is included;
    limitations or outside interferences
    to improved student achievement
    are identified

    Do appendices include
    necessary documentation?

    Most items required in the appendices are
    not presented in the appendices; the plan
    and necessary steps to protect human
    subjects in research are not clear

    Most required items are presented in the
    appendices; items and plan for ethical
    practices in protection of human subjects
    are weak

    All required items are presented in the
    appendices; items clearly demonstrate
    ethical practices in protection of
    human subjects

    **GoodExample_FinalSubmissionofSignatureProjectStage1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/goodexample-finalsubmissionofsignatureprojectstage1-pdf-10189843)

    **GoodExample_FinalSubmissionofSignatureProjectStage1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/goodexample-finalsubmissionofsignatureprojectstage1-pdf-10189843)

    **## ResearchProposal.docx**

    ## THE SIGNATURE PROJECT FINAL SUBMISSION

    The culminating requirement in ED504 is the final iteration of your Signature Project Stage 1. The Signature Project Stage 1 is your research proposal. It is designed to guide candidates through the steps for planning an experimental study to examine an in-depth school improvement project focused on improving teaching and learning. The project involves an opportunity for candidates to apply the knowledge, skills, and behaviors they gain from their respective programs.

    Cover Page

    Abstract

    Chapter 1: Research Problem

    Introduction

    Statement of the Research Problem (include hypothesis)

    Data Graphic and Discussion

    Impact on Student Achievement

    Research Methodology

    Summary (of chapter 1)

    Chapter 2: Literature Review

    Introduction

    Sub-headings (according to the organization of your study) Synthesis of Literature Review

    Chapter 3: Methodology

    Introduction

    Population

    Sample

    Sample Technique (with justification)

    Role of Participants and Impact on Participants (with explanation)

    Plan for Protection of Human Subjects Variables

    Timeline (with sequence of steps and timeline for data collection)

    Constitutive and Operation Definitions Description of Data (data needed) Reliability and Validity of Instrument Limitations References

    Appendix A: Consent Form

    Appendix B: Permission to Study

    Appendix C: Copy of the instrument or survey if one is used.

    ## General Guidelines

    · APA format.

    · Double-space using Times New Roman 12 pt. font size. Follow the example found in the Course Resource section of this course.

    · Top, bottom and side margins must be 1 inch.

    · Pages must be numbered, top flushed right.

    · Organize the literature review according to themes important to the study.

    · Direct quoting of other authors is not permitted. All written text should be in your own words.

    · Appropriately cite all information sources using APA.

    · Include a minimum of ten scholarly sources, five of these sources should come from the primary literature (ED504 requirement). All ten sources should primarily be from the past five years.

    · References should be in APA format and on a separate page in the document.

    · If your scholarly literature sources were obtained from an Internet site (e.g., online journal article), include the URL and the date downloaded as part of the bibliographic details presented. Check APA on formatting.

    · Grammar and spelling must be correct.

    **## SignatureProjectStage1FirstSubmissionRubric.pdf**

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Writing Components

    CATEGORY Unacceptable

    (0 points)

    Revisions Required

    (2.5 points)

    Target

    (5 points)

    Are the focus and purpose clear
    and ideas well supported?

    Missing thesis; confusion about or
    misunderstanding of topic; no sense of
    purpose

    Simplistic and unfocused ideas; limited
    sense of purpose; support is provided, but is
    not specific; support is only loosely relevant
    to the main points

    Developed thesis; represents sound
    understanding of the assigned topic;
    focused support is provided and is sound,
    valid, and logical

    Is the writing structured well
    organized? Is correct
    sentence structure and
    proper mechanics utilized?

    No paragraph structure; or single,
    rambling paragraph; or series of isolated
    paragraphs; Contains multiple and
    serious errors of sentence structure: i.e.,
    fragments, run-ons; unable to write
    simple sentences; numerous errors in
    spelling and capitalization; intrusive
    and/or inaccurate punctuation;
    communication is hindered

    Organization structure is present, but
    is confusing or disjointed; weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are missing or
    inappropriate; Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of simple
    sentences; errors in sentence structure;
    contains several punctuation, spelling,
    and/or capitalization errors (up to 6);
    errors may or may not interfere with
    meaning

    Clear organizational structure;
    easily followed; includes transitions;
    structured format; Effective and
    varied sentences; errors (if present) due
    to lack of careful proofreading; virtually
    free of punctuation, spelling,
    capitalization errors (no more than
    3); errors do not interfere with
    meaning

    Are vocabulary and word
    usage varied and
    appropriate?

    Vocabulary is unsophisticated; or subject
    specific vocabulary or sophisticated
    vocabulary used incorrectly

    Proper, but simple vocabulary used;

    subject specific vocabulary used
    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied, specific and
    appropriate; uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    Is the source requirement
    met and is APA format
    followed?

    Source requirements for the appropriate
    level were not met; there are significant
    format errors present; multiple (more
    than 6) of APA formatting errors; in the
    reference list and/or in-text citations

    Meets minimum requirements for
    degree level: Masters – A minimum of
    10 sources were utilized; Fewer than
    6 APA format errors are present in the
    reference list in-text; citations; header;
    headings; page numbers; etc.

    Five (5) sources beyond minimum
    requires were utilized; there are
    virtually no APA format errors present in
    either reference list in-text; citations;
    header; headings; page numbers; etc.

    Is proper evidence and support
    of original work provided in
    body of the review?

    Safe Assign originality report indicates
    match percentage of greater than 25
    percent

    Safe Assign originality report indicates
    match percentage of 15 to 25 percent

    Safe Assign originality report indicates a
    match percentage of less than 15
    percent

    Content Components

    CATEGORY Unacceptable

    (0 points)

    Revisions Required

    (2.5 points)

    Target

    (5 points)

    Source of data is credible, and
    data is representative of the
    scope requirements for the
    advanced degree being sought

    (InTASC 6, 9; CAEP A1.1)

    The source of the data is ambiguous or
    lacks credibility; data does not allow for
    problem/weakness identification
    appropriate for required project scope

    The source of the data is clear and
    credible; data does not allow for
    problem/weakness identification
    appropriate for required project scope

    The source of the data is clear and
    credible; data allows for identification
    of an of a classroom, multi-
    classroom, school or district level
    problem/weakness appropriate to
    the required project scope

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Graphical representation
    of compiled data allows
    for easy analysis

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Graphical format does not present the
    data in a clear manner; data is only
    partially presented

    Graphical format(s) is appropriate
    and clearly presents all the collected
    data

    Graphical format(s) is appropriate; clearly
    presents all the collected data; highlights
    visible patterns or trends

    Identified
    problem/weakness is
    supported by trends or
    patterns seen in the data

    (InTASC 6, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Problem/weakness is not clearly
    identified or does not align with the
    trends and patterns identified in the data

    Problem/weakness is clearly
    identified; aligns with the type of data
    collected, but connections between the
    trends/patterns in the data are not clearly
    described in the narrative

    Problem/weakness is clearly identified;
    aligns with the type of data collected;
    clear connections between the
    trends/patterns are drawn in the
    narrative

    Best practices are identified
    and supported by the literature
    as viable responses to
    weaknesses and problems
    represented by the data

    (InTASC 8, 9, 10; CAEPA1.1)

    Best practice(s) are not clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not support the
    identified best practice(s) as a viable
    option to improve achievement

    Best practice(s) are clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not support the
    identified best practice(s) as a viable option
    to improve achievement

    Best practice(s) are clearly identified;
    literature reviewed supports the
    identified best practices as viable
    responses to the problem/weakness
    identified

    Theories and/or trends are
    identified and connected with
    best practices in literature

    (InTASC 8, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Theory or trend is not identified;
    theory/trend identified are not connected
    with the best practice(s) via literature

    Theory or trend is clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not connect the
    identified theory/trend with the identified
    best practice

    Theory or trend is clearly identified;
    literature reviewed connects the
    identified theory/trend with all
    identified best practices

    Proper level of synthesis is
    achieved in the literature review

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Summaries were given; are not clear or
    fail to make clear connections with best
    practice(s) and/or theory/trend(s)
    identified as viable responses to
    problem/weakness

    Summaries are clear and concise;
    clear connections with best practice
    and/or theory/trend identified as
    viable response to problem/weakness
    may or may not be present

    Synthesis rather than summaries of
    content presented in the collection
    of sources is present, clear connections
    with best practice and/or theory/trend
    identified as viable response to
    problem/weakness present

    Description of plan is clear and
    easy to follow

    (InTASC 7, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Action plan is not described; description
    is not clear; steps in plan are not in a
    logical order

    Action plan description is provided,
    but additional detail may be warranted;
    steps in plan are outlined, but
    additional steps may be needed, or the
    order could be altered for better efficiency

    Action plan description is provided, and
    sufficient detail is included; steps in
    plan are outlined; exhaustive list of
    steps and sequence of steps allows
    for optimal efficiency and outcome.

    Project timeline accounts for all
    elements in the plan and
    allocates appropriate amounts
    of time for each element

    (InTASC 7, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Project timeline is missing or incomplete;
    time allocation is inadequate or too
    extensive for one or more elements
    included in the plan

    Project timeline is provided; all
    elements identified in the plan are
    included, but additional elements might
    be needed for an improved outcome; timing
    and/or time allocation could be improved

    Project timeline is provided; all
    necessary elements are included for
    optimal outcome

    Variables are identified and
    defined

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Variables are misidentified Variables are identified correctly, but
    with no clear definitions or explanations as
    to how they will be measured

    Variables are identified correctly, with
    clear definitions and explanations as
    to how they will be measured

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Required data needs are
    identified and plans for
    retrieving and protecting that
    data are clear (i.e., methods)

    (InTASC 6, 9; CAEP A1.1)

    Data needs are not identified or do not
    align with the problem; data retrieval
    plans are missing or inappropriate

    Data needs are identified; data
    retrieval plans are included, but plans
    for protecting the data and/or student
    confidentiality are not provided or are
    inadequate

    Data needs are identified; data retrieval
    plans are included; adequate plans for
    protecting student confidentiality
    and/or data are provided

    Description of the sample and
    sampling techniques are
    provided

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Detailed descriptions of the participants
    are not given and/or sampling technique
    is not provided

    Brief overview of the sample is given,
    and sampling technique may or may
    not be included

    Full descriptions of the participant
    sample, sampling technique and
    justifications for both the sample
    chosen and the sampling technique
    are given

    Needed resources are identified,
    justified, and a leverage plan for
    acquiring resources is clear and
    supported

    (InTASC 5, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Resources are not identified or are
    inadequate; no justification for the
    resources is provided; unclear how
    identified resources might be acquired;
    plan for acquiring resources is inadequate
    or ill conceived

    Resources are identified, but additional
    resources may be needed; justification
    for the resources is provided, but
    leverage plan for acquiring resources is not
    clear

    Exhaustive list of resources is
    identified; justification for the resources
    is provided; leverage plan for
    acquiring resources is outlined

    Justification for how the action
    plan will address the identified
    problem is clear

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    No connection between the action plan
    and the identified problem is provided

    Connection between the action plan
    and the identified problem is
    provided

    Connection between the action plan and
    the identified problem is provided;
    justification of that connection is
    included

    Connection between action plan
    and impact on student
    achievement is clear

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    No connection between action plan
    outcome and student achievement is
    provided

    Connection between action plan
    outcome and student achievement is
    provided; justification of that
    connection may or may not be
    included

    Connection between action plan outcome
    and student achievement is provided;
    justification of that connection is included;
    limitations or outside interferences
    to improved student achievement
    are identified

    Do appendices include
    necessary documentation?

    Most items required in the appendices are
    not presented in the appendices; the plan
    and necessary steps to protect human
    subjects in research are not clear

    Most required items are presented in the
    appendices; items and plan for ethical
    practices in protection of human subjects
    are weak

    All required items are presented in the
    appendices; items clearly demonstrate
    ethical practices in protection of
    human subjects

    **GoodExample_FinalSubmissionofSignatureProjectStage1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/goodexample-finalsubmissionofsignatureprojectstage1-pdf-10189843)

    **## ResearchProposal.docx**

    ## THE SIGNATURE PROJECT FINAL SUBMISSION

    The culminating requirement in ED504 is the final iteration of your Signature Project Stage 1. The Signature Project Stage 1 is your research proposal. It is designed to guide candidates through the steps for planning an experimental study to examine an in-depth school improvement project focused on improving teaching and learning. The project involves an opportunity for candidates to apply the knowledge, skills, and behaviors they gain from their respective programs.

    Cover Page

    Abstract

    Chapter 1: Research Problem

    Introduction

    Statement of the Research Problem (include hypothesis)

    Data Graphic and Discussion

    Impact on Student Achievement

    Research Methodology

    Summary (of chapter 1)

    Chapter 2: Literature Review

    Introduction

    Sub-headings (according to the organization of your study) Synthesis of Literature Review

    Chapter 3: Methodology

    Introduction

    Population

    Sample

    Sample Technique (with justification)

    Role of Participants and Impact on Participants (with explanation)

    Plan for Protection of Human Subjects Variables

    Timeline (with sequence of steps and timeline for data collection)

    Constitutive and Operation Definitions Description of Data (data needed) Reliability and Validity of Instrument Limitations References

    Appendix A: Consent Form

    Appendix B: Permission to Study

    Appendix C: Copy of the instrument or survey if one is used.

    ## General Guidelines

    · APA format.

    · Double-space using Times New Roman 12 pt. font size. Follow the example found in the Course Resource section of this course.

    · Top, bottom and side margins must be 1 inch.

    · Pages must be numbered, top flushed right.

    · Organize the literature review according to themes important to the study.

    · Direct quoting of other authors is not permitted. All written text should be in your own words.

    · Appropriately cite all information sources using APA.

    · Include a minimum of ten scholarly sources, five of these sources should come from the primary literature (ED504 requirement). All ten sources should primarily be from the past five years.

    · References should be in APA format and on a separate page in the document.

    · If your scholarly literature sources were obtained from an Internet site (e.g., online journal article), include the URL and the date downloaded as part of the bibliographic details presented. Check APA on formatting.

    · Grammar and spelling must be correct.

    **## SignatureProjectStage1FirstSubmissionRubric.pdf**

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Writing Components

    CATEGORY Unacceptable

    (0 points)

    Revisions Required

    (2.5 points)

    Target

    (5 points)

    Are the focus and purpose clear
    and ideas well supported?

    Missing thesis; confusion about or
    misunderstanding of topic; no sense of
    purpose

    Simplistic and unfocused ideas; limited
    sense of purpose; support is provided, but is
    not specific; support is only loosely relevant
    to the main points

    Developed thesis; represents sound
    understanding of the assigned topic;
    focused support is provided and is sound,
    valid, and logical

    Is the writing structured well
    organized? Is correct
    sentence structure and
    proper mechanics utilized?

    No paragraph structure; or single,
    rambling paragraph; or series of isolated
    paragraphs; Contains multiple and
    serious errors of sentence structure: i.e.,
    fragments, run-ons; unable to write
    simple sentences; numerous errors in
    spelling and capitalization; intrusive
    and/or inaccurate punctuation;
    communication is hindered

    Organization structure is present, but
    is confusing or disjointed; weak paragraph
    structure; transitions are missing or
    inappropriate; Formulaic sentence
    patterns or overuse of simple
    sentences; errors in sentence structure;
    contains several punctuation, spelling,
    and/or capitalization errors (up to 6);
    errors may or may not interfere with
    meaning

    Clear organizational structure;
    easily followed; includes transitions;
    structured format; Effective and
    varied sentences; errors (if present) due
    to lack of careful proofreading; virtually
    free of punctuation, spelling,
    capitalization errors (no more than
    3); errors do not interfere with
    meaning

    Are vocabulary and word
    usage varied and
    appropriate?

    Vocabulary is unsophisticated; or subject
    specific vocabulary or sophisticated
    vocabulary used incorrectly

    Proper, but simple vocabulary used;

    subject specific vocabulary used
    infrequently

    Vocabulary is varied, specific and
    appropriate; uses subject specific
    vocabulary correctly

    Is the source requirement
    met and is APA format
    followed?

    Source requirements for the appropriate
    level were not met; there are significant
    format errors present; multiple (more
    than 6) of APA formatting errors; in the
    reference list and/or in-text citations

    Meets minimum requirements for
    degree level: Masters – A minimum of
    10 sources were utilized; Fewer than
    6 APA format errors are present in the
    reference list in-text; citations; header;
    headings; page numbers; etc.

    Five (5) sources beyond minimum
    requires were utilized; there are
    virtually no APA format errors present in
    either reference list in-text; citations;
    header; headings; page numbers; etc.

    Is proper evidence and support
    of original work provided in
    body of the review?

    Safe Assign originality report indicates
    match percentage of greater than 25
    percent

    Safe Assign originality report indicates
    match percentage of 15 to 25 percent

    Safe Assign originality report indicates a
    match percentage of less than 15
    percent

    Content Components

    CATEGORY Unacceptable

    (0 points)

    Revisions Required

    (2.5 points)

    Target

    (5 points)

    Source of data is credible, and
    data is representative of the
    scope requirements for the
    advanced degree being sought

    (InTASC 6, 9; CAEP A1.1)

    The source of the data is ambiguous or
    lacks credibility; data does not allow for
    problem/weakness identification
    appropriate for required project scope

    The source of the data is clear and
    credible; data does not allow for
    problem/weakness identification
    appropriate for required project scope

    The source of the data is clear and
    credible; data allows for identification
    of an of a classroom, multi-
    classroom, school or district level
    problem/weakness appropriate to
    the required project scope

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Graphical representation
    of compiled data allows
    for easy analysis

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Graphical format does not present the
    data in a clear manner; data is only
    partially presented

    Graphical format(s) is appropriate
    and clearly presents all the collected
    data

    Graphical format(s) is appropriate; clearly
    presents all the collected data; highlights
    visible patterns or trends

    Identified
    problem/weakness is
    supported by trends or
    patterns seen in the data

    (InTASC 6, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Problem/weakness is not clearly
    identified or does not align with the
    trends and patterns identified in the data

    Problem/weakness is clearly
    identified; aligns with the type of data
    collected, but connections between the
    trends/patterns in the data are not clearly
    described in the narrative

    Problem/weakness is clearly identified;
    aligns with the type of data collected;
    clear connections between the
    trends/patterns are drawn in the
    narrative

    Best practices are identified
    and supported by the literature
    as viable responses to
    weaknesses and problems
    represented by the data

    (InTASC 8, 9, 10; CAEPA1.1)

    Best practice(s) are not clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not support the
    identified best practice(s) as a viable
    option to improve achievement

    Best practice(s) are clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not support the
    identified best practice(s) as a viable option
    to improve achievement

    Best practice(s) are clearly identified;
    literature reviewed supports the
    identified best practices as viable
    responses to the problem/weakness
    identified

    Theories and/or trends are
    identified and connected with
    best practices in literature

    (InTASC 8, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Theory or trend is not identified;
    theory/trend identified are not connected
    with the best practice(s) via literature

    Theory or trend is clearly identified;
    literature reviewed does not connect the
    identified theory/trend with the identified
    best practice

    Theory or trend is clearly identified;
    literature reviewed connects the
    identified theory/trend with all
    identified best practices

    Proper level of synthesis is
    achieved in the literature review

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Summaries were given; are not clear or
    fail to make clear connections with best
    practice(s) and/or theory/trend(s)
    identified as viable responses to
    problem/weakness

    Summaries are clear and concise;
    clear connections with best practice
    and/or theory/trend identified as
    viable response to problem/weakness
    may or may not be present

    Synthesis rather than summaries of
    content presented in the collection
    of sources is present, clear connections
    with best practice and/or theory/trend
    identified as viable response to
    problem/weakness present

    Description of plan is clear and
    easy to follow

    (InTASC 7, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Action plan is not described; description
    is not clear; steps in plan are not in a
    logical order

    Action plan description is provided,
    but additional detail may be warranted;
    steps in plan are outlined, but
    additional steps may be needed, or the
    order could be altered for better efficiency

    Action plan description is provided, and
    sufficient detail is included; steps in
    plan are outlined; exhaustive list of
    steps and sequence of steps allows
    for optimal efficiency and outcome.

    Project timeline accounts for all
    elements in the plan and
    allocates appropriate amounts
    of time for each element

    (InTASC 7, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Project timeline is missing or incomplete;
    time allocation is inadequate or too
    extensive for one or more elements
    included in the plan

    Project timeline is provided; all
    elements identified in the plan are
    included, but additional elements might
    be needed for an improved outcome; timing
    and/or time allocation could be improved

    Project timeline is provided; all
    necessary elements are included for
    optimal outcome

    Variables are identified and
    defined

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Variables are misidentified Variables are identified correctly, but
    with no clear definitions or explanations as
    to how they will be measured

    Variables are identified correctly, with
    clear definitions and explanations as
    to how they will be measured

    Signature Project Stage 1 First Submission Rubric

    Required data needs are
    identified and plans for
    retrieving and protecting that
    data are clear (i.e., methods)

    (InTASC 6, 9; CAEP A1.1)

    Data needs are not identified or do not
    align with the problem; data retrieval
    plans are missing or inappropriate

    Data needs are identified; data
    retrieval plans are included, but plans
    for protecting the data and/or student
    confidentiality are not provided or are
    inadequate

    Data needs are identified; data retrieval
    plans are included; adequate plans for
    protecting student confidentiality
    and/or data are provided

    Description of the sample and
    sampling techniques are
    provided

    (CAEP A1.1)

    Detailed descriptions of the participants
    are not given and/or sampling technique
    is not provided

    Brief overview of the sample is given,
    and sampling technique may or may
    not be included

    Full descriptions of the participant
    sample, sampling technique and
    justifications for both the sample
    chosen and the sampling technique
    are given

    Needed resources are identified,
    justified, and a leverage plan for
    acquiring resources is clear and
    supported

    (InTASC 5, 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    Resources are not identified or are
    inadequate; no justification for the
    resources is provided; unclear how
    identified resources might be acquired;
    plan for acquiring resources is inadequate
    or ill conceived

    Resources are identified, but additional
    resources may be needed; justification
    for the resources is provided, but
    leverage plan for acquiring resources is not
    clear

    Exhaustive list of resources is
    identified; justification for the resources
    is provided; leverage plan for
    acquiring resources is outlined

    Justification for how the action
    plan will address the identified
    problem is clear

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    No connection between the action plan
    and the identified problem is provided

    Connection between the action plan
    and the identified problem is
    provided

    Connection between the action plan and
    the identified problem is provided;
    justification of that connection is
    included

    Connection between action plan
    and impact on student
    achievement is clear

    (InTASC 9, 10; CAEP A1.1)

    No connection between action plan
    outcome and student achievement is
    provided

    Connection between action plan
    outcome and student achievement is
    provided; justification of that
    connection may or may not be
    included

    Connection between action plan outcome
    and student achievement is provided;
    justification of that connection is included;
    limitations or outside interferences
    to improved student achievement
    are identified

    Do appendices include
    necessary documentation?

    Most items required in the appendices are
    not presented in the appendices; the plan
    and necessary steps to protect human
    subjects in research are not clear

    Most required items are presented in the
    appendices; items and plan for ethical
    practices in protection of human subjects
    are weak

    All required items are presented in the
    appendices; items clearly demonstrate
    ethical practices in protection of
    human subjects

    **GoodExample_FinalSubmissionofSignatureProjectStage1.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/goodexample-finalsubmissionofsignatureprojectstage1-pdf-10189843)

  • [Solved] Discussion help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    When diagnosing vocal deficits, you may hear a strained, stressed voice pattern. The air may be constrained as the client attempts to speak. Are the client’s shoulders drawn upward? Do they express fatigue when attempting to speak with in this manner? The purpose of this Assignment is for you to gai…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    When diagnosing vocal deficits, you may hear a strained, stressed voice pattern. The air may be constrained as the client attempts to speak. Are the client’s shoulders drawn upward? Do they express fatigue when attempting to speak with in this manner? The purpose of this Assignment is for you to gain an understanding of vocal hyperfunction.

    This is intended to allow you to show evidence that you have completed the following Learning Outcome:

    CLO3: Apply knowledge of anatomy and physiology of communication to diagnose and treat patients with communication disorders (ILO3, PLO3)

    ##### **Directions**

    1. Describe and define deficits of vocal hyperfunction and research the medical conditions or environmental conditions that may lead to vocal hyperfunction. (Hints: think about kids yelling on the playground, a supervisor trying to talk over noise in a manufacturing plant to give employees instructions, and an anxious person attempting to explain their fears and worries.)

    Your short writing of approximately 500 words should use double spacing, 1-inch margins, and 12-point font. Spelling and grammar and APA style are important.

    RUBRIC IS ATTACHED (10 references needed at least 3 research articles)

    **Points possible:** 100.

    – [\
    \
    IMG_0298.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0298-png-10189693 "IMG_0298.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_0300.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0300-png-10189695 "IMG_0300.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_0301.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0301-png-10189697 "IMG_0301.PNG")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_0299.PNG](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-0299-png-10189699 "IMG_0299.PNG")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] PPT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Topic.docx **## Topic.docx** Topic: **Alcohol use disorder** 1. PPT presentation Title Slide 2. Epidemiology 3. Risk factors 4. The common and uncommon subjective and objective findings 5. The differentials to consider for your topic and the diagnostic workup ne…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Topic.docx

    **## Topic.docx**

    Topic:
    **Alcohol use disorder**

    1. PPT presentation Title Slide

    2. Epidemiology

    3. Risk factors

    4. The common and uncommon subjective and objective findings

    5. The differentials to consider for your topic and the diagnostic workup needed to determine the diagnosis

    6. The potential abnormal findings of your chosen topic

    7. A plan of care including pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic interventions, education, health promotion and maintenance, psychosocial needs, and referrals

    8. Reference list in APA format

    **## Topic.docx**

    Topic:
    **Alcohol use disorder**

    1. PPT presentation Title Slide

    2. Epidemiology

    3. Risk factors

    4. The common and uncommon subjective and objective findings

    5. The differentials to consider for your topic and the diagnostic workup needed to determine the diagnosis

    6. The potential abnormal findings of your chosen topic

    7. A plan of care including pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic interventions, education, health promotion and maintenance, psychosocial needs, and referrals

    8. Reference list in APA format

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## discussion10.docx **## discussion10.docx** Here are the course learning objectives for your review: **MN668-1:** Construct a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders and conditions for clients across the lifespan presenting in t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## discussion10.docx

    **## discussion10.docx**

    Here are the course learning objectives for your review:

    **MN668-1:** Construct a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders and conditions for clients across the lifespan presenting in the acute and/or primary care setting.

    **MN668-2:** Design a professional approach to transition to clinical practice in the PMHNP role.

    Provide evidence (citations and references) to support your statements and opinions.

    **Can you read what others have written and rewrite it. It does not have to be lengthy.**

    First response:

    **MN668-1: Construct a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders and conditions for clients across the lifespan presenting in the acute and/or primary care setting**

    **How the Objective Was Met**: This objective was met through various course materials and assignments that emphasized a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders. The course provided numerous resources to enhance our understanding and application of a standardized approach for evaluating and managing mental health disorders across various healthcare settings and throughout the lifespan (Dawood et al., 2024). For example, it utilized contemporary textbooks such as the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" and "Kaplan & Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry" to build a solid foundation of knowledge. Additionally, we were able to translate theoretical knowledge into practical applications through case studies and interactive discussions in the live seminars. By analyzing and discussing these cases in group settings, we developed a systematic and consistent approach to managing mental health disorders. The forum discussions and peer feedback enhanced our evaluation and management techniques and nurtured our critical thinking skills. Moreover, tasks such as creating treatment plans and conducting simulated examinations further reinforced the consistent approach we aimed to establish. Utilizing evidence-based protocols and validated assessment tools, we gained proficiency in assessing mental health disorders and tailoring appropriate interventions (Connors et al., 2020).

    **Examples**:

    1.
    **Weekly Live Seminars**: The live seminars provided an interactive platform to discuss case studies and review new learning content. These seminars encouraged engagement with the instructor and peers, fostering a deeper understanding of how to construct a consistent approach to evaluation and management.

    2.
    **Weekly SOAP Notes**: These assignments required students to document patient encounters, broadening their mindset to investigate differentials and treatment options. This practice was crucial in developing a systematic approach to patient care.

    3.
    **Case Studies**: The case studies during seminars allowed us to develop comprehensive treatment plans for patients. This exercise emphasized the importance of a detailed patient history, accurate diagnosis, and individualized treatment plans.

    Along with lectures, the course materials included case studies and clinical scenarios that required students to apply their knowledge of mental health evaluation and management. These practical exercises allowed students to create individualized treatment plans for clients with different mental health disorders, considering their unique needs and symptoms. Additionally, the course provided evidence-based guidelines and best practices in mental health management, ensuring that students developed a strong foundation for clinical decision-making.

    **MN668-2: Design a professional approach to transition to clinical practice in the PMHNP role**

    **How the Objective Was Met**: The course facilitated the creation of a professional transition plan into the PMHNP role and provided a consistent approach to evaluating and managing mental health disorders across the lifespan in various healthcare settings. By incorporating a variety of engaging assignments, activities, and learning resources, the MN668 course effectively met the majority of its learning objectives. This was achieved through focused weekly topics, practical assignments, and in-person clinical encounters. The course offered opportunities for self-reflection through the weekly reflective videos and soap notes that allowed us to assess our strengths and areas for growth as future PMHNPs. This process enabled us to identify specific learning needs for our transition to clinical practice and develop individualized professional development plans (Owen et al., 2020).

    **Examples**:

    1.
    **Reflective Video Journals**: These assignments encouraged self-reflection on clinical experiences, allowing students to critically evaluate their strengths and areas for improvement. This practice was instrumental in designing a professional approach to clinical practice.

    2.
    **Professional Portfolio**: Creating a professional portfolio helped students outline their steps for entering the clinical practice, including identifying potential employers, networking strategies, and continuing education plans. This structured approach was crucial for a smooth transition into the PMHNP role.

    3.
    **In-Person Clinical Hours**: The 130 hours of clinical encounters provided real-life exposure to a variety of patients, enhancing critical thinking and decision-making skills. This hands-on experience was invaluable in developing confidence and competence in clinical practice.

    In conclusion, the course effectively met the learning objectives by providing a robust framework for evaluating and managing mental health disorders and facilitating a smooth transition to clinical practice. The combination of theoretical knowledge, practical assignments, and reflective exercises equipped students with the necessary skills and confidence to excel as PMHNPs (Cardoso et al., 2021). The integration of diverse course materials allowed for a well-rounded understanding of mental health management across different settings, and I feel equipped to tackle the challenges I will face as a future PMHNP. . However, additional hands-on training in acute and primary care environments could further enhance the achievement of certain learning goals. Overall, the course offered prospective PMHNPs a solid foundation for success in their future clinical practice.

    **Second Response**

    **MN668-1: Construct a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders and conditions for clients across the lifespan presenting in the acute and/or primary care setting.**

    **I feel that I have met this objective, as I can now approach evaluations of mental health disorders systematically, integrate evidence-based interventions, and adapt my approach based on the patient’s needs. The course provided various case studies, and through these, I practiced how to perform comprehensive evaluations of clients presenting with mental health concerns. For example, in an assignment focused on the assessment of a patient with anxiety and depression, I was tasked with completing a full psychiatric evaluation. I used evidence-based tools, such as the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, to assess the severity of the patient’s symptoms, and based on the results, I developed an individualized treatment plan that included pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.  (Ford, 2020). This helped me refine my approach to creating a treatment plan that is both systematic and personalized to the patient's needs. Through these experiences, I gained a solid understanding of the importance of comprehensive assessments and the need to consider each patient’s unique context, including age, co-occurring conditions, and social determinants of health.**

    **MN668-2: Design a professional approach to transition to clinical practice in the PMHNP role.**

    **This objective focused on preparing for the transition into clinical practice as a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP). I believe I made significant strides in meeting this objective through self-reflection, feedback from preceptors, and actively engaging in clinical practice. One of the assignments that helped me with this transition was the professional development plan, which required me to outline goals for my clinical practice, identify strengths, and address areas for growth. (Ruzafa, 2024). This exercise was crucial in helping me assess my current skill set and set a roadmap for further development. The readings and videos on the PMHNP role were particularly helpful in understanding what is expected in clinical practice. For example, the course material prepared me for the complexities of clinical decision-making, confidentiality, and patient advocacy, all of which are crucial in the transition to clinical practice. These materials allowed me to integrate theory with the reality of patient care, especially in the context of the mental health field.**

    **References:**

    **Ford, J., Thomas, F., Byng, R., & McCabe, R. (2020). Use of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Practice: Interactions between patients and physicians.**
    **_Qualitative health research_,**
    **_30_(13), 2146–2159.** [**https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320924625**](https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320924625)

    **Ruzafa-Martínez, M., Pérez-Muñoz, V., Conesa-Ferrer, M. B., Ramos-Morcillo, A. J., & Molina-Rodríguez, A. (2024). Effectiveness of Training in Evidence-Based Practice on the Development of Communicative Skills in Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Design.**
    **_Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)_,**
    **_12_(18), 1895.** [**https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181895**](https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181895)

    **THIRD POST**

    **MN668-1**

    **I do believe that the course objectives were met. Throughout this semester, we discussed numerous psychiatric disorders such as somatic disorders and personality disorders while also discussing how to perform an assessment on psychiatric patients. The assessment of psychiatric patients can be tedious as some patients are void of trust and are not always in agreeance with a psychological evaluation. According to Srinath et al., (2019), some patients evade unveiling information as they may feel as if the information disclosed maybe uncomfortable or shameful. Given the avoidance of certain information, it requires careful questioning from numerous sources such as family members or other healthcare providers. The psychiatric interview process was also discussed, including topics on proper documentation of the mental status exam and its significance. According to Rocha Neto et al., (2019), within the domain of mental health practice, the mental status examination serves as a counterpart to the physical exam routinely employed in clinical setting. The mental status exam provides a standardized method for gathering objective data pertaining to the patient’s mental state. Nevertheless, the documentation of the mental status exam should be concise to assist providers in monitoring patient’s behavior and facilitating communication among healthcare professionals. For instance, documenting details such as tattoos or scars is essential especially in patients with a history of self-harm. Scars can serve as a narrative of past significant injuries, resulting from either accidental trauma, inflicted harm by another individual, or self-mutilation (Voss & Das, 2024). Common manifestations of self-inflicted injuries include superficial lacerations, injection sites from intravenous substance use, or remnants of past suicidal attempts (Voss & Das, 2024). This is particularly important in psychiatric emergencies such as suicidal crisis or violent aggressive behaviors which was discussed this semester.**

    **MN 668-2**

    **I do believe that these course objectives were met as I believe that this course provided a professional approach to transitioning into clinical practice as a PMHNP. One of the key elements that was utilized during the coursework was scenario-based questions which allowed students to appropriately diagnose patients. The information that was provided during the seminar not only prepared students for clinical practice but also prepared students for certification boards. Students were also provided with board style questions which allowed critical thinking to appropriately conclude the correct answer.  Throughout this semester we designed age-appropriate treatment plans which allowed us to depict the proper maintenance screening plans for patients. The utilization of tools like the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 is valuable information in clinical practice in aiding with the assessment and therapeutic treatment response of anxiety and depression (Vallath et al., 2024). Comprehensive and continuous management is essential for optimal outcomes in patients with mental health disorders. Measurement-based care, which involves regular assessment of symptom severity and treatment response, is a cornerstone of modern care. Accurate and efficient monitoring tools are crucial for guiding treatment decisions and facilitating early detection of treatment non-response or relapse.**

    **References**

    **Rocha Neto, H. G., Estellita-Lins, C. E., Lessa, J. L. M., & Cavalcanti, M. T. (2019). Mental**

    **State Examination and Its Procedures-Narrative Review of Brazilian Descriptive**

    **Psychopathology.**
    **_Frontiers in psychiatry_,**
    **_10_, 77. https://doi.org/10.3389**

    **/fpsyt.2019.00077**

    **Srinath, S., Jacob, P., Sharma, E., & Gautam, A. (2019). Clinical Practice Guidelines for**

    **Assessment of Children and Adolescents.**
    **_Indian journal of psychiatry_,**
    **_61_(Suppl 2), 158–**

    **175. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_580_18**

    **Vallath, A. L., Sivasubramanian, B. P., Ravikumar, D. B., Lalendran, A., Krishnan, S., Samanta,**

    **S., Banerjee, S., Das, T., Kundu, R., Richharia, V., More, R., Khithani, M., Nazimudeen,**

    **S., Gunturu, S., & Dasgupta, I. (2024). The importance of rapid assessment tools in**

    **evaluating mental health in emergency departments among patients with chronic**

    **diseases.**
    **_Frontiers in public health_,**
    **_12_, 1258749. https://doi.org/10.3389**

    **/fpubh.2024.1258749**

    **Voss, M. R., Das, M. J. (2024). Mental Status Examination.**
    **_StatPearls._ https://www.ncbi.nlm**

    **.nih.gov/books/NBK546682/**

    **## discussion10.docx**

    Here are the course learning objectives for your review:

    **MN668-1:** Construct a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders and conditions for clients across the lifespan presenting in the acute and/or primary care setting.

    **MN668-2:** Design a professional approach to transition to clinical practice in the PMHNP role.

    Provide evidence (citations and references) to support your statements and opinions.

    **Can you read what others have written and rewrite it. It does not have to be lengthy.**

    First response:

    **MN668-1: Construct a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders and conditions for clients across the lifespan presenting in the acute and/or primary care setting**

    **How the Objective Was Met**: This objective was met through various course materials and assignments that emphasized a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders. The course provided numerous resources to enhance our understanding and application of a standardized approach for evaluating and managing mental health disorders across various healthcare settings and throughout the lifespan (Dawood et al., 2024). For example, it utilized contemporary textbooks such as the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" and "Kaplan & Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry" to build a solid foundation of knowledge. Additionally, we were able to translate theoretical knowledge into practical applications through case studies and interactive discussions in the live seminars. By analyzing and discussing these cases in group settings, we developed a systematic and consistent approach to managing mental health disorders. The forum discussions and peer feedback enhanced our evaluation and management techniques and nurtured our critical thinking skills. Moreover, tasks such as creating treatment plans and conducting simulated examinations further reinforced the consistent approach we aimed to establish. Utilizing evidence-based protocols and validated assessment tools, we gained proficiency in assessing mental health disorders and tailoring appropriate interventions (Connors et al., 2020).

    **Examples**:

    1.
    **Weekly Live Seminars**: The live seminars provided an interactive platform to discuss case studies and review new learning content. These seminars encouraged engagement with the instructor and peers, fostering a deeper understanding of how to construct a consistent approach to evaluation and management.

    2.
    **Weekly SOAP Notes**: These assignments required students to document patient encounters, broadening their mindset to investigate differentials and treatment options. This practice was crucial in developing a systematic approach to patient care.

    3.
    **Case Studies**: The case studies during seminars allowed us to develop comprehensive treatment plans for patients. This exercise emphasized the importance of a detailed patient history, accurate diagnosis, and individualized treatment plans.

    Along with lectures, the course materials included case studies and clinical scenarios that required students to apply their knowledge of mental health evaluation and management. These practical exercises allowed students to create individualized treatment plans for clients with different mental health disorders, considering their unique needs and symptoms. Additionally, the course provided evidence-based guidelines and best practices in mental health management, ensuring that students developed a strong foundation for clinical decision-making.

    **MN668-2: Design a professional approach to transition to clinical practice in the PMHNP role**

    **How the Objective Was Met**: The course facilitated the creation of a professional transition plan into the PMHNP role and provided a consistent approach to evaluating and managing mental health disorders across the lifespan in various healthcare settings. By incorporating a variety of engaging assignments, activities, and learning resources, the MN668 course effectively met the majority of its learning objectives. This was achieved through focused weekly topics, practical assignments, and in-person clinical encounters. The course offered opportunities for self-reflection through the weekly reflective videos and soap notes that allowed us to assess our strengths and areas for growth as future PMHNPs. This process enabled us to identify specific learning needs for our transition to clinical practice and develop individualized professional development plans (Owen et al., 2020).

    **Examples**:

    1.
    **Reflective Video Journals**: These assignments encouraged self-reflection on clinical experiences, allowing students to critically evaluate their strengths and areas for improvement. This practice was instrumental in designing a professional approach to clinical practice.

    2.
    **Professional Portfolio**: Creating a professional portfolio helped students outline their steps for entering the clinical practice, including identifying potential employers, networking strategies, and continuing education plans. This structured approach was crucial for a smooth transition into the PMHNP role.

    3.
    **In-Person Clinical Hours**: The 130 hours of clinical encounters provided real-life exposure to a variety of patients, enhancing critical thinking and decision-making skills. This hands-on experience was invaluable in developing confidence and competence in clinical practice.

    In conclusion, the course effectively met the learning objectives by providing a robust framework for evaluating and managing mental health disorders and facilitating a smooth transition to clinical practice. The combination of theoretical knowledge, practical assignments, and reflective exercises equipped students with the necessary skills and confidence to excel as PMHNPs (Cardoso et al., 2021). The integration of diverse course materials allowed for a well-rounded understanding of mental health management across different settings, and I feel equipped to tackle the challenges I will face as a future PMHNP. . However, additional hands-on training in acute and primary care environments could further enhance the achievement of certain learning goals. Overall, the course offered prospective PMHNPs a solid foundation for success in their future clinical practice.

    **Second Response**

    **MN668-1: Construct a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders and conditions for clients across the lifespan presenting in the acute and/or primary care setting.**

    **I feel that I have met this objective, as I can now approach evaluations of mental health disorders systematically, integrate evidence-based interventions, and adapt my approach based on the patient’s needs. The course provided various case studies, and through these, I practiced how to perform comprehensive evaluations of clients presenting with mental health concerns. For example, in an assignment focused on the assessment of a patient with anxiety and depression, I was tasked with completing a full psychiatric evaluation. I used evidence-based tools, such as the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, to assess the severity of the patient’s symptoms, and based on the results, I developed an individualized treatment plan that included pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.  (Ford, 2020). This helped me refine my approach to creating a treatment plan that is both systematic and personalized to the patient's needs. Through these experiences, I gained a solid understanding of the importance of comprehensive assessments and the need to consider each patient’s unique context, including age, co-occurring conditions, and social determinants of health.**

    **MN668-2: Design a professional approach to transition to clinical practice in the PMHNP role.**

    **This objective focused on preparing for the transition into clinical practice as a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP). I believe I made significant strides in meeting this objective through self-reflection, feedback from preceptors, and actively engaging in clinical practice. One of the assignments that helped me with this transition was the professional development plan, which required me to outline goals for my clinical practice, identify strengths, and address areas for growth. (Ruzafa, 2024). This exercise was crucial in helping me assess my current skill set and set a roadmap for further development. The readings and videos on the PMHNP role were particularly helpful in understanding what is expected in clinical practice. For example, the course material prepared me for the complexities of clinical decision-making, confidentiality, and patient advocacy, all of which are crucial in the transition to clinical practice. These materials allowed me to integrate theory with the reality of patient care, especially in the context of the mental health field.**

    **References:**

    **Ford, J., Thomas, F., Byng, R., & McCabe, R. (2020). Use of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Practice: Interactions between patients and physicians.**
    **_Qualitative health research_,**
    **_30_(13), 2146–2159.** [**https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320924625**](https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320924625)

    **Ruzafa-Martínez, M., Pérez-Muñoz, V., Conesa-Ferrer, M. B., Ramos-Morcillo, A. J., & Molina-Rodríguez, A. (2024). Effectiveness of Training in Evidence-Based Practice on the Development of Communicative Skills in Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Design.**
    **_Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)_,**
    **_12_(18), 1895.** [**https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181895**](https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181895)

    **THIRD POST**

    **MN668-1**

    **I do believe that the course objectives were met. Throughout this semester, we discussed numerous psychiatric disorders such as somatic disorders and personality disorders while also discussing how to perform an assessment on psychiatric patients. The assessment of psychiatric patients can be tedious as some patients are void of trust and are not always in agreeance with a psychological evaluation. According to Srinath et al., (2019), some patients evade unveiling information as they may feel as if the information disclosed maybe uncomfortable or shameful. Given the avoidance of certain information, it requires careful questioning from numerous sources such as family members or other healthcare providers. The psychiatric interview process was also discussed, including topics on proper documentation of the mental status exam and its significance. According to Rocha Neto et al., (2019), within the domain of mental health practice, the mental status examination serves as a counterpart to the physical exam routinely employed in clinical setting. The mental status exam provides a standardized method for gathering objective data pertaining to the patient’s mental state. Nevertheless, the documentation of the mental status exam should be concise to assist providers in monitoring patient’s behavior and facilitating communication among healthcare professionals. For instance, documenting details such as tattoos or scars is essential especially in patients with a history of self-harm. Scars can serve as a narrative of past significant injuries, resulting from either accidental trauma, inflicted harm by another individual, or self-mutilation (Voss & Das, 2024). Common manifestations of self-inflicted injuries include superficial lacerations, injection sites from intravenous substance use, or remnants of past suicidal attempts (Voss & Das, 2024). This is particularly important in psychiatric emergencies such as suicidal crisis or violent aggressive behaviors which was discussed this semester.**

    **MN 668-2**

    **I do believe that these course objectives were met as I believe that this course provided a professional approach to transitioning into clinical practice as a PMHNP. One of the key elements that was utilized during the coursework was scenario-based questions which allowed students to appropriately diagnose patients. The information that was provided during the seminar not only prepared students for clinical practice but also prepared students for certification boards. Students were also provided with board style questions which allowed critical thinking to appropriately conclude the correct answer.  Throughout this semester we designed age-appropriate treatment plans which allowed us to depict the proper maintenance screening plans for patients. The utilization of tools like the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 is valuable information in clinical practice in aiding with the assessment and therapeutic treatment response of anxiety and depression (Vallath et al., 2024). Comprehensive and continuous management is essential for optimal outcomes in patients with mental health disorders. Measurement-based care, which involves regular assessment of symptom severity and treatment response, is a cornerstone of modern care. Accurate and efficient monitoring tools are crucial for guiding treatment decisions and facilitating early detection of treatment non-response or relapse.**

    **References**

    **Rocha Neto, H. G., Estellita-Lins, C. E., Lessa, J. L. M., & Cavalcanti, M. T. (2019). Mental**

    **State Examination and Its Procedures-Narrative Review of Brazilian Descriptive**

    **Psychopathology.**
    **_Frontiers in psychiatry_,**
    **_10_, 77. https://doi.org/10.3389**

    **/fpsyt.2019.00077**

    **Srinath, S., Jacob, P., Sharma, E., & Gautam, A. (2019). Clinical Practice Guidelines for**

    **Assessment of Children and Adolescents.**
    **_Indian journal of psychiatry_,**
    **_61_(Suppl 2), 158–**

    **175. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_580_18**

    **Vallath, A. L., Sivasubramanian, B. P., Ravikumar, D. B., Lalendran, A., Krishnan, S., Samanta,**

    **S., Banerjee, S., Das, T., Kundu, R., Richharia, V., More, R., Khithani, M., Nazimudeen,**

    **S., Gunturu, S., & Dasgupta, I. (2024). The importance of rapid assessment tools in**

    **evaluating mental health in emergency departments among patients with chronic**

    **diseases.**
    **_Frontiers in public health_,**
    **_12_, 1258749. https://doi.org/10.3389**

    **/fpubh.2024.1258749**

    **Voss, M. R., Das, M. J. (2024). Mental Status Examination.**
    **_StatPearls._ https://www.ncbi.nlm**

    **.nih.gov/books/NBK546682/**

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## DiscussionBoard.docx – CULTPSY3_Ch08_Motivation.pptx **## DiscussionBoard.docx** **Discussion Board** You will be required to participate in the eight discussion prompts posted on the Canvas Discussion Board throughout the course of the semester. These will relate …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## DiscussionBoard.docx

    – CULTPSY3_Ch08_Motivation.pptx

    **## DiscussionBoard.docx**

    **Discussion Board**

    You will be required to participate in the eight discussion prompts posted on the Canvas Discussion Board throughout the course of the semester. These will relate to assigned course materials. Your responses should incorporate course content assigned during that week and should be approximately 250 words (total, for both prompts).

    Please select and reply to two of the prompts below

    1- Ariana and Misha looked at the music charts. Ariana compared herself to Adelle (Ariana thinks she is worse than Adelle), while Misha compared herself to Mariah (Misha thinks she is better than Mariah). Name and define the processes in which Ariana and Misha engaged, respectively. Then, draw a graph that shows Ariana’s and Misha’s self-esteem before and after they make their comparisons. Assume that Ariana and Misha start out with the same level of self-esteem.

    2- In a political pamphlet being handed out to students on campus, the writer is suggesting that capitalism is a product of the trades and activities of Islamic merchants. According to Weber’s thesis that capitalism grew out of a belief system rooted in cultural ideas of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, do you agree or disagree with the pamphlet? Why or why not?

    3- Jessica and Jonathan are best friends. Jessica is very individualistic, while Jonathan is very collectivistic. Based on research regarding primary and secondary control, draw a graph for each person that shows the relationship between the amount of anxiety they would feel based on how much personal control they have in any given situation.

    4- Your school’s counseling department emphasizes the importance of convincing people to gain control by asserting themselves in their environment. Regardless of one’s cultural background, everyone feels a greater sense of power when changing the environment to suit himself or herself. Based on empirical research, do you agree with your counseling department’s perspective? Why or why not?

    5- Xiao Mao is an interdependent Chinese American child in elementary school, and Kitty is an independent Canadian child. They are in the mall with their fathers picking out board games as presents. How would their motivations to play board games compare if they chose the games themselves versus if their fathers chose the games for them?

    **CULTPSY3_Ch08_Motivation.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cultpsy3-ch08-motivation-pptx)

    **CULTPSY3_Ch08_Motivation.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cultpsy3-ch08-motivation-pptx)

    **## DiscussionBoard.docx**

    **Discussion Board**

    You will be required to participate in the eight discussion prompts posted on the Canvas Discussion Board throughout the course of the semester. These will relate to assigned course materials. Your responses should incorporate course content assigned during that week and should be approximately 250 words (total, for both prompts).

    Please select and reply to two of the prompts below

    1- Ariana and Misha looked at the music charts. Ariana compared herself to Adelle (Ariana thinks she is worse than Adelle), while Misha compared herself to Mariah (Misha thinks she is better than Mariah). Name and define the processes in which Ariana and Misha engaged, respectively. Then, draw a graph that shows Ariana’s and Misha’s self-esteem before and after they make their comparisons. Assume that Ariana and Misha start out with the same level of self-esteem.

    2- In a political pamphlet being handed out to students on campus, the writer is suggesting that capitalism is a product of the trades and activities of Islamic merchants. According to Weber’s thesis that capitalism grew out of a belief system rooted in cultural ideas of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, do you agree or disagree with the pamphlet? Why or why not?

    3- Jessica and Jonathan are best friends. Jessica is very individualistic, while Jonathan is very collectivistic. Based on research regarding primary and secondary control, draw a graph for each person that shows the relationship between the amount of anxiety they would feel based on how much personal control they have in any given situation.

    4- Your school’s counseling department emphasizes the importance of convincing people to gain control by asserting themselves in their environment. Regardless of one’s cultural background, everyone feels a greater sense of power when changing the environment to suit himself or herself. Based on empirical research, do you agree with your counseling department’s perspective? Why or why not?

    5- Xiao Mao is an interdependent Chinese American child in elementary school, and Kitty is an independent Canadian child. They are in the mall with their fathers picking out board games as presents. How would their motivations to play board games compare if they chose the games themselves versus if their fathers chose the games for them?

    **CULTPSY3_Ch08_Motivation.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cultpsy3-ch08-motivation-pptx)

    **## DiscussionBoard.docx**

    **Discussion Board**

    You will be required to participate in the eight discussion prompts posted on the Canvas Discussion Board throughout the course of the semester. These will relate to assigned course materials. Your responses should incorporate course content assigned during that week and should be approximately 250 words (total, for both prompts).

    Please select and reply to two of the prompts below

    1- Ariana and Misha looked at the music charts. Ariana compared herself to Adelle (Ariana thinks she is worse than Adelle), while Misha compared herself to Mariah (Misha thinks she is better than Mariah). Name and define the processes in which Ariana and Misha engaged, respectively. Then, draw a graph that shows Ariana’s and Misha’s self-esteem before and after they make their comparisons. Assume that Ariana and Misha start out with the same level of self-esteem.

    2- In a political pamphlet being handed out to students on campus, the writer is suggesting that capitalism is a product of the trades and activities of Islamic merchants. According to Weber’s thesis that capitalism grew out of a belief system rooted in cultural ideas of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, do you agree or disagree with the pamphlet? Why or why not?

    3- Jessica and Jonathan are best friends. Jessica is very individualistic, while Jonathan is very collectivistic. Based on research regarding primary and secondary control, draw a graph for each person that shows the relationship between the amount of anxiety they would feel based on how much personal control they have in any given situation.

    4- Your school’s counseling department emphasizes the importance of convincing people to gain control by asserting themselves in their environment. Regardless of one’s cultural background, everyone feels a greater sense of power when changing the environment to suit himself or herself. Based on empirical research, do you agree with your counseling department’s perspective? Why or why not?

    5- Xiao Mao is an interdependent Chinese American child in elementary school, and Kitty is an independent Canadian child. They are in the mall with their fathers picking out board games as presents. How would their motivations to play board games compare if they chose the games themselves versus if their fathers chose the games for them?

    **CULTPSY3_Ch08_Motivation.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/cultpsy3-ch08-motivation-pptx)