My Blog

Tag: Clinical & Abnormal Psychology

  • [Solved] CIA&OB Week 11 Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare:** – Review the media presentation, located in this week’s Learning Resources, to help you better understand criminal profiling through a neurobiopsychosocial lens. – Consider your Final Project that you submitted last week. – Role play that you are an expert witness testifying about th…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare:**

    – Review the media presentation, located in this week’s Learning Resources, to help you better understand criminal profiling through a neurobiopsychosocial lens.
    – Consider your Final Project that you submitted last week.
    – Role play that you are an expert witness testifying about the case study you focused on for the Final Project and you are asked to present your findings to the court.

    **Post** responses to the following as if you were an expert witness testifying about the case study you focused on for the Final Project, and you are asked to present your findings to the court.

    – Introduce the case study on which you focused for the Final Project.
    – Summarize the findings of your analysis.

    **Note:** Be sure to include the key concepts within your summarization.

    **Note:** Your posts should be substantial (350 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable as part of a meaningful post but cannot stand alone as the entire post.

    – 2 years ago
    – 0.25

  • [Solved] Job Analysis Data Collection

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## PSY8761UNIT5ASSIGNMENTGUIDELINES.docx **## PSY8761UNIT5ASSIGNMENTGUIDELINES.docx** Choose one of the following two options for this assignment. · Option 1: Job Analysis Questionnaire and Analysis. · Option 2: Job Observation and Analysis. Both options will be graded …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## PSY8761UNIT5ASSIGNMENTGUIDELINES.docx

    **## PSY8761UNIT5ASSIGNMENTGUIDELINES.docx**

    Choose one of the following two options for this assignment.

    · Option 1: Job Analysis Questionnaire and Analysis.

    · Option 2: Job Observation and Analysis.

    Both options will be graded on the same criteria. Select the best option for you to have access to the appropriate job experts. Collect data as soon as possible. You can build upon data collected during Week 3 or early in Week 4 for this assignment. The Additional Requirements are the same for each option.

    **Option 1: Job Analysis Questionnaire and Analysis**

    The purpose of a JAQ is to gather quantitative data from job experts to identify critical tasks and KSAOs for successful performance on the job.

    **Data Collection and Analysis/Interpretation**

    Complete the following:

    · Create a JAQ, including the 10–15 tasks and 10–15 competencies or KSAOs from the Week 3 assignment.

    · Administer the JAQ to 3–5 job expert incumbents in the job.

    · Enter JAQ ratings into a spreadsheet such as Excel or statistical software such as SPSS, and compute the mean and standard deviation.

    · Identify the critical tasks by applying a cutoff of "3 = important" for mean task importance ratings.

    · Identify the critical competencies for selection purposes by applying a cutoff of "3 = important" and "2 = needed at entry."

    · A competency must meet both cutoffs to inform selection procedures.

    · Create a linkage matrix to make judgments about which KSAOs are needed to perform each task based on your review of your job analysis results. You may also refer to your interview notes from the Week 3 assignment.

    · Use the linkage matrix format provided in Resources.

    · Tally the linkages to count the number of tasks to which each KSAO is linked.

    · Use the worksheet and table template provided in the resources.

    · Make a judgment of the most important KSAOs for selection based on:

    · The number of tasks for which it is needed.

    · The JAQ results (importance, needed at entry).

    · Note if any tasks are linked to many KSAOs; those tasks may be considered to simulate in selection assessment procedures.

    **Documentation**

    Write a 2–4 page job analysis report (plus an appendix). In your report, include:

    · A brief summary of:

    · The job that was analyzed as a foundation for selection procedures.

    · The job expert's qualifications.

    · The job analysis data collection methodology used, including how the surveys were administered and under what conditions, such as email or on hard-copy mailing.

    · How many JAQs were distributed and how many were received (response rate).

    · A summary of the results of your analysis.

    · You are required to administer 3–5 JAQs.

    · You might not get a 100 percent response rate.

    · Tips to increase response rate include sending a reminder if you are having difficulty getting at least three responses, trying to administer it in person if possible, or giving a short time frame to return the survey to you (48 hours).

    · You may administer the survey early for the best likelihood of response in case you need to give them more time or if you need to distribute more JAQs.

    · If you still do not get at least three participants after making additional effort, document the challenges, how you handled the challenges, and what you would have done differently, and report the results you were able to obtain.

    · Citations for at least two scholarly sources that support the job analysis methodology you used, as well as at least one professional standard. For example, "Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures" or SIOP "Principles for the Validation and Use of Selection Procedures".

    · Three tables within your document to summarize your results.

    · A table with the full task list and the mean importance rating for each task. Make a notation for the critical tasks.

    · A table that lists only the critical KSAOs that are also needed at entry.

    · The detailed summary with the mean ratings for the two rating scales will be shown in the appendix. Refer to the description of Appendix A below.

    · Remember the critical tasks or KSAOs are the most important tasks that meet your cutoff threshold. If all of your tasks and/or all of your KSAOs have a mean of "3 = important" or higher (which can happen in practice), make a notation in your tables to identify the most important tasks or KSAOs, such as those with a rating of "4 = very important or higher."

    · Describe the results in words to summarize the tables. For example, note any important KSAOs that are not needed at entry, and what that means for selection purposes.

    · A KSAO linkage summary table.

    · See the Example Linkage Table Report sheet in the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook provided in the resources.

    · Identify the KSAOs that were linked to the most tasks and note any tasks that were linked in many KSAOs.

    · A concluding paragraph on how the job analysis methods and the results from your study can be applied to inform selection procedures. Recommend at least one type of selection assessment or procedure based on your job analysis results, for example, cognitive ability, biodata, structured interview, or situational judgment test.

    ·
    **Appendix A**: Complete KSAO results with mean importance rating and mean needed at entry rating for each KSAO JAQ item.

    Be sure to follow current APA style and formatting in your report. Make sure the information you present is organized, is professional, and provides appropriate context for a business leader or organizational decision maker.

    **Supporting Materials Needed for Option 1**

    Submit the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook (linked in Resources) with the following worksheets completed:

    · Option 1 – JAQ Template.

    · Option 1 – Results for Report.

    · Job Analysis Linkage Worksheet.

    · Example Linkage Table Report.

    **Option 2 – Job Observation and Analysis**

    The purpose of a job observation is to gain first-hand knowledge of the job tasks, how they are performed, the KSAOs needed to perform the tasks, and the context in which work is performed. A job observation is particularly effective for jobs that involve observable behavior, such as physical tasks or interpersonal interactions, and is less informative for jobs that involve performing primarily cognitive activities such as emailing, writing, or programming. You may observe the same person you interviewed in the Week 3 assignment or select another person to observe in the same job.

    **Data Collection and Analysis/Interpretation**

    Complete the following:

    · Conduct a 30-minute job observation of one incumbent job expert, with their consent, assurance of confidentiality, and ability to stop the observation at any time. It is also advisable to obtain permission from the supervisor to make sure it is acceptable to observe the employee and to ensure you are positioned in an area that will allow you to observe without disrupting the business.

    · See the Option 2 – Observation Template sheet in Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook in the resources for an observation note-taking example.

    · Take behavioral notes during the observation, objectively noting what the job expert is doing and other relevant information such as how often they do it. For example, how many customers they assist.

    · Use quotations, if possible, instead of evaluative comments for any interactions made by the job expert.

    · If the job expert allows, you may ask clarification questions after the observation if an action or purpose of an action was unclear, but this is not required.

    · Summarize what you observed, after your observation is completed and you are in an area away from the job expert's view:

    · Describe briefly the work environment or working conditions.

    · Count the frequency with which tasks were performed, such as the number of times the task was performed (a count) and/or duration (total number of minutes).

    · Identify which KSAOs were demonstrated.

    · Note any challenges the SME faced and how the SME handled it.

    · Identify any new tasks or KSAOs that were not on your original task and KSAO list from the Week 3 assignment.

    · Update your list of tasks and KSAOs from the Week 3 assignment based on your job observation. Include a notation for any additional tasks or KSAOs that you added based on the observation.

    · Create a linkage matrix to make judgments about which KSAOs are needed to perform each task based on your review of your job observation notes.

    · Use the Job Analysis Linkage Worksheet in the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook provided in the resources.

    · You may also refer to your interview notes from the Week 3 assignment.

    · Tally the linkages to count the number of tasks to which each KSAO is linked.

    · Refer to Option 2 – Task Tally for Report and Example Linkage Table Report sheets in the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook provided in the resources.

    · Make a judgment of the most important KSAOs for selection based on:

    · The number of tasks for which it is needed.

    · Your job observation results.

    · Note if any tasks are linked to many KSAOs and the tasks that you observed in your job observation. Those tasks may be considered to simulate in selection assessment procedures.

    **Documentation**

    Write a 2–4 page job analysis report (plus and appendix). In your report, include:

    · A brief summary of:

    · The job analyzed as a foundation for selection procedures.

    · The job expert's qualifications.

    · The job analysis method you used, and what you observed.

    · Your observation notes will be shown in the appendix. Refer to the description of Appendix A below.

    · Include a brief description of the working conditions, such as the noise level, physical environment (for example, a lot of standing, sitting, or lifting boxes), interaction requirements, repetitive tasks, or work pace.

    · Note any key observations or themes based on your observation, such as something you observed frequently or any challenging situations.

    · Note any challenges you faced, how you handled it, and what you would have done differently.

    · Citations for at least two scholarly sources that support the job analysis methods you used, as well as at least one professional standard. For example, "Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures" or SIOP "Principles for the Validation and Use of Selection Procedures".

    · Three tables to summarize your results.

    · A table that lists all of the final tasks in your task list with a notation for the most important task statements based on your observation.

    · Include a column for the frequency/duration tally. For this assignment, the frequency/duration tally can inform your judgment on the most important tasks.

    · A table that lists the KSAOs you observed.

    · In your summary, briefly note the context in which you observed the most important KSAOS and indicate your justification for what you considered to be important.

    · KSAO linkage summary table.

    · Refer to the Example Linkage Table Report sheet in the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook linked in Resources.

    · Identify the KSAOs that were linked to the most tasks and note any tasks that were linked in many KSAOs.

    · A concluding paragraph on how the job analysis methods you used and the results from your study can be applied to inform selection procedures. Recommend at least one type of selection assessment or procedure based on your job analysis results, for example, cognitive ability, biodata, structured interview, or situational judgment test.

    ·
    **Appendix A:** Job observation notes. Do not include the employee's name. This can either be an image of your handwritten notes pasted into the document or typed notes.

    Be sure to follow current APA style and formatting in your report. Also, make sure the information you present is organized, is professional, and provides appropriate context for a business leader or organizational decision maker.

    **Supporting Materials Needed for Option 2**

    Submit the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook (linked in Resources) with the following worksheets completed:

    · Option 2 – Observation Template.

    · Option 2 – Task Tally for Report.

    · Job Analysis Linkage Worksheet.

    · Example Linkage Table Report.

    Refer to the Job Analysis Data Collection, Analysis, and Documentation rubric to examine the grading criteria on which your assignment will be evaluated.

    **## PSY8761UNIT5ASSIGNMENTGUIDELINES.docx**

    Choose one of the following two options for this assignment.

    · Option 1: Job Analysis Questionnaire and Analysis.

    · Option 2: Job Observation and Analysis.

    Both options will be graded on the same criteria. Select the best option for you to have access to the appropriate job experts. Collect data as soon as possible. You can build upon data collected during Week 3 or early in Week 4 for this assignment. The Additional Requirements are the same for each option.

    **Option 1: Job Analysis Questionnaire and Analysis**

    The purpose of a JAQ is to gather quantitative data from job experts to identify critical tasks and KSAOs for successful performance on the job.

    **Data Collection and Analysis/Interpretation**

    Complete the following:

    · Create a JAQ, including the 10–15 tasks and 10–15 competencies or KSAOs from the Week 3 assignment.

    · Administer the JAQ to 3–5 job expert incumbents in the job.

    · Enter JAQ ratings into a spreadsheet such as Excel or statistical software such as SPSS, and compute the mean and standard deviation.

    · Identify the critical tasks by applying a cutoff of "3 = important" for mean task importance ratings.

    · Identify the critical competencies for selection purposes by applying a cutoff of "3 = important" and "2 = needed at entry."

    · A competency must meet both cutoffs to inform selection procedures.

    · Create a linkage matrix to make judgments about which KSAOs are needed to perform each task based on your review of your job analysis results. You may also refer to your interview notes from the Week 3 assignment.

    · Use the linkage matrix format provided in Resources.

    · Tally the linkages to count the number of tasks to which each KSAO is linked.

    · Use the worksheet and table template provided in the resources.

    · Make a judgment of the most important KSAOs for selection based on:

    · The number of tasks for which it is needed.

    · The JAQ results (importance, needed at entry).

    · Note if any tasks are linked to many KSAOs; those tasks may be considered to simulate in selection assessment procedures.

    **Documentation**

    Write a 2–4 page job analysis report (plus an appendix). In your report, include:

    · A brief summary of:

    · The job that was analyzed as a foundation for selection procedures.

    · The job expert's qualifications.

    · The job analysis data collection methodology used, including how the surveys were administered and under what conditions, such as email or on hard-copy mailing.

    · How many JAQs were distributed and how many were received (response rate).

    · A summary of the results of your analysis.

    · You are required to administer 3–5 JAQs.

    · You might not get a 100 percent response rate.

    · Tips to increase response rate include sending a reminder if you are having difficulty getting at least three responses, trying to administer it in person if possible, or giving a short time frame to return the survey to you (48 hours).

    · You may administer the survey early for the best likelihood of response in case you need to give them more time or if you need to distribute more JAQs.

    · If you still do not get at least three participants after making additional effort, document the challenges, how you handled the challenges, and what you would have done differently, and report the results you were able to obtain.

    · Citations for at least two scholarly sources that support the job analysis methodology you used, as well as at least one professional standard. For example, "Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures" or SIOP "Principles for the Validation and Use of Selection Procedures".

    · Three tables within your document to summarize your results.

    · A table with the full task list and the mean importance rating for each task. Make a notation for the critical tasks.

    · A table that lists only the critical KSAOs that are also needed at entry.

    · The detailed summary with the mean ratings for the two rating scales will be shown in the appendix. Refer to the description of Appendix A below.

    · Remember the critical tasks or KSAOs are the most important tasks that meet your cutoff threshold. If all of your tasks and/or all of your KSAOs have a mean of "3 = important" or higher (which can happen in practice), make a notation in your tables to identify the most important tasks or KSAOs, such as those with a rating of "4 = very important or higher."

    · Describe the results in words to summarize the tables. For example, note any important KSAOs that are not needed at entry, and what that means for selection purposes.

    · A KSAO linkage summary table.

    · See the Example Linkage Table Report sheet in the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook provided in the resources.

    · Identify the KSAOs that were linked to the most tasks and note any tasks that were linked in many KSAOs.

    · A concluding paragraph on how the job analysis methods and the results from your study can be applied to inform selection procedures. Recommend at least one type of selection assessment or procedure based on your job analysis results, for example, cognitive ability, biodata, structured interview, or situational judgment test.

    ·
    **Appendix A**: Complete KSAO results with mean importance rating and mean needed at entry rating for each KSAO JAQ item.

    Be sure to follow current APA style and formatting in your report. Make sure the information you present is organized, is professional, and provides appropriate context for a business leader or organizational decision maker.

    **Supporting Materials Needed for Option 1**

    Submit the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook (linked in Resources) with the following worksheets completed:

    · Option 1 – JAQ Template.

    · Option 1 – Results for Report.

    · Job Analysis Linkage Worksheet.

    · Example Linkage Table Report.

    **Option 2 – Job Observation and Analysis**

    The purpose of a job observation is to gain first-hand knowledge of the job tasks, how they are performed, the KSAOs needed to perform the tasks, and the context in which work is performed. A job observation is particularly effective for jobs that involve observable behavior, such as physical tasks or interpersonal interactions, and is less informative for jobs that involve performing primarily cognitive activities such as emailing, writing, or programming. You may observe the same person you interviewed in the Week 3 assignment or select another person to observe in the same job.

    **Data Collection and Analysis/Interpretation**

    Complete the following:

    · Conduct a 30-minute job observation of one incumbent job expert, with their consent, assurance of confidentiality, and ability to stop the observation at any time. It is also advisable to obtain permission from the supervisor to make sure it is acceptable to observe the employee and to ensure you are positioned in an area that will allow you to observe without disrupting the business.

    · See the Option 2 – Observation Template sheet in Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook in the resources for an observation note-taking example.

    · Take behavioral notes during the observation, objectively noting what the job expert is doing and other relevant information such as how often they do it. For example, how many customers they assist.

    · Use quotations, if possible, instead of evaluative comments for any interactions made by the job expert.

    · If the job expert allows, you may ask clarification questions after the observation if an action or purpose of an action was unclear, but this is not required.

    · Summarize what you observed, after your observation is completed and you are in an area away from the job expert's view:

    · Describe briefly the work environment or working conditions.

    · Count the frequency with which tasks were performed, such as the number of times the task was performed (a count) and/or duration (total number of minutes).

    · Identify which KSAOs were demonstrated.

    · Note any challenges the SME faced and how the SME handled it.

    · Identify any new tasks or KSAOs that were not on your original task and KSAO list from the Week 3 assignment.

    · Update your list of tasks and KSAOs from the Week 3 assignment based on your job observation. Include a notation for any additional tasks or KSAOs that you added based on the observation.

    · Create a linkage matrix to make judgments about which KSAOs are needed to perform each task based on your review of your job observation notes.

    · Use the Job Analysis Linkage Worksheet in the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook provided in the resources.

    · You may also refer to your interview notes from the Week 3 assignment.

    · Tally the linkages to count the number of tasks to which each KSAO is linked.

    · Refer to Option 2 – Task Tally for Report and Example Linkage Table Report sheets in the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook provided in the resources.

    · Make a judgment of the most important KSAOs for selection based on:

    · The number of tasks for which it is needed.

    · Your job observation results.

    · Note if any tasks are linked to many KSAOs and the tasks that you observed in your job observation. Those tasks may be considered to simulate in selection assessment procedures.

    **Documentation**

    Write a 2–4 page job analysis report (plus and appendix). In your report, include:

    · A brief summary of:

    · The job analyzed as a foundation for selection procedures.

    · The job expert's qualifications.

    · The job analysis method you used, and what you observed.

    · Your observation notes will be shown in the appendix. Refer to the description of Appendix A below.

    · Include a brief description of the working conditions, such as the noise level, physical environment (for example, a lot of standing, sitting, or lifting boxes), interaction requirements, repetitive tasks, or work pace.

    · Note any key observations or themes based on your observation, such as something you observed frequently or any challenging situations.

    · Note any challenges you faced, how you handled it, and what you would have done differently.

    · Citations for at least two scholarly sources that support the job analysis methods you used, as well as at least one professional standard. For example, "Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures" or SIOP "Principles for the Validation and Use of Selection Procedures".

    · Three tables to summarize your results.

    · A table that lists all of the final tasks in your task list with a notation for the most important task statements based on your observation.

    · Include a column for the frequency/duration tally. For this assignment, the frequency/duration tally can inform your judgment on the most important tasks.

    · A table that lists the KSAOs you observed.

    · In your summary, briefly note the context in which you observed the most important KSAOS and indicate your justification for what you considered to be important.

    · KSAO linkage summary table.

    · Refer to the Example Linkage Table Report sheet in the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook linked in Resources.

    · Identify the KSAOs that were linked to the most tasks and note any tasks that were linked in many KSAOs.

    · A concluding paragraph on how the job analysis methods you used and the results from your study can be applied to inform selection procedures. Recommend at least one type of selection assessment or procedure based on your job analysis results, for example, cognitive ability, biodata, structured interview, or situational judgment test.

    ·
    **Appendix A:** Job observation notes. Do not include the employee's name. This can either be an image of your handwritten notes pasted into the document or typed notes.

    Be sure to follow current APA style and formatting in your report. Also, make sure the information you present is organized, is professional, and provides appropriate context for a business leader or organizational decision maker.

    **Supporting Materials Needed for Option 2**

    Submit the Week 5 Templates, Worksheets, and Tutorials Excel workbook (linked in Resources) with the following worksheets completed:

    · Option 2 – Observation Template.

    · Option 2 – Task Tally for Report.

    · Job Analysis Linkage Worksheet.

    · Example Linkage Table Report.

    Refer to the Job Analysis Data Collection, Analysis, and Documentation rubric to examine the grading criteria on which your assignment will be evaluated.

  • [Solved] TOFP Week 11 Project

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Final Project Guidelines In the Final Project for this course, due by Day 7 of Week 11, you will demonstrate your understanding of—as well as apply and critically evaluate—the major concepts presented in this course. For your Final Project, you will apply concepts and approaches presented in the cou…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Final Project Guidelines

    In the Final Project for this course, due by Day 7 of Week 11, you will

    demonstrate your understanding of—as well as apply and critically evaluate—the

    major concepts presented in this course.

    For your Final Project, you will apply concepts and approaches presented in the

    course to a scenario featuring an offender with multiple related factors (e.g.,

    gender, ethnicity, type of offense, and age).

    Your Final Project must be presented as a 12- to 15-page (not including

    references, title page, or abstract), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper. Please

    use 10 or 12 point, Times New Roman or Courier font. Reference citations

    should come from peer-reviewed journals, reputable periodicals, and non-

    commercial Web sites. Please note that Wikipedia is not considered a scholarly

    reference and is not accepted as a citable source.

    In your Final Project, you must:

    Identify which scenario you selected to use for your Final Project.

    Explain the offender category(ies) that concurs with the scenario client

    and discern the treatment considerations inherent in this category(ies).

    Describe the multicultural factors (e.g., age, gender, and ethnicity) evident

    in the scenario and explain how these factors affect treatment and

    treatment approach(es).

    Describe the treatment approach(es) and/or programs you would use with

    the offender and explain why.

    Describe any legal and ethical issues that might be involved in the

    treatment of your selected offender and explain how you would address

    these issues.

    Describe the model you would use to measure treatment outcomes and

    explain why you selected this model.

    Your Final Project will be graded on a 20-point scale and is worth 30% of your

    final grade.

    Although the Final Project is not to be submitted until Day 7 of Week 11, you

    should become familiar with the project requirements and have them in mind as

    you proceed through the course. Many of the Discussions and Application

    Assignments relate to and can be of use to you in writing your Final Project.

    The Final Project will be evaluated according to all four indicators in the

    Application Assignment and Final Project Writing Rubric, located in Course

    Info. Information on scholarly writing may be found in the APA Publication

    Manual and at the Walden Writing Center Web site. Also, see the “Policies on

    Academic Honesty” in the Syllabus-II, Walden University Policies and

    Information.

    Save your Final Project as a “.doc” or “.rtf” file with the filename FP+last

    name+your first initial. For example, Sally Ride’s assignment filename would

    be “FPRideS”. Use the Submit an Assignment link, choose the Week 11: Final

    Project basket, and then add your Final Project as an attachment.

    The Final Project is due on Day 7 of Week 11. See the Week 11 Final Project

    area for submission details

    – 2 years ago
    – 0.25

  • [Solved] TOFP Week 11 Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **To prepare for this Discussion:** – Review Chapter 3, "Prevention of Prisoner Sudden Deaths: Safety Guidelines and Suicide Screening Protocols," in the course text _Handbook of Forensic Mental Health with Victims and Offenders: Assessment, Treatment, and Research_. Focus on approaches to suicide p…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **To prepare for this Discussion:**

    – Review Chapter 3, "Prevention of Prisoner Sudden Deaths: Safety Guidelines and Suicide Screening Protocols," in the course text _Handbook of Forensic Mental Health with Victims and Offenders: Assessment, Treatment, and Research_. Focus on approaches to suicide prevention.

    – Review the article "Preventing Suicide in Prisons, Part II: International Comparisons of Suicide Prevention Services in Correctional Facilities" in this week's Learning Resources. Pay attention to suicide prevention approaches and programs in forensic settings.

    – Review the article "Prison Inmate Characteristics and Suicide Attempt Lethality: An Exploratory Study" in this week's Learning Resources. Consider the characteristics of offenders at risk for suicide. Think about factors that impact lethality rates, for example, Lethality of Suicide Attempt Rating Scales (LSARS) of offenders.

    – As you review the Learning Resources consider suicide risk factors of offenders and consider how those risk factors are addressed by forensic psychology professionals and programs.

    – Think about the components of suicide prevention and intervention approaches and programs. Consider the efficacy of these approaches and programs. Reflect on which of these components are important in forensic treatment settings.

    – Select two components of suicide prevention and intervention approaches and programs that you think are important in forensic treatment settings and consider why.

    **With these thoughts in mind:**

    **Post by Day 4** a brief description of two components of suicide prevention and intervention approaches and programs that you think are important in forensic treatment settings and explain why you think they are important.

    – 2 years ago
    – 0.25

  • [Solved] refle 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    attached – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## vertionofthebook.docx – ## refle3.docx – Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx **## vertionofthebook.docx** [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732) **## refle3.docx** Each 1-2-page refl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## vertionofthebook.docx

    – ## refle3.docx

    – Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## refle3.docx**

    Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page.

    For this assignment, please consider the following:

    _What nonverbal codes do you use to manage your identity?_

    **_IMPORTANT, PROFFESOR NOTE FOR THE LAST REFLECTION PAPER:_**

    **_“there is a  technical issue you need to address for your next essays: all direct quotes must be in open and closed quotation marks " " from your references to indicate where they begin and end – this is required.   Please be sure to address these issues in your next essays.”_**

    Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 15 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 10.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 7.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 4.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | |

    **Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bowman-2e-ch03-presentation-so-pptx)

    **Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bowman-2e-ch03-presentation-so-pptx)

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## refle3.docx**

    Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page.

    For this assignment, please consider the following:

    _What nonverbal codes do you use to manage your identity?_

    **_IMPORTANT, PROFFESOR NOTE FOR THE LAST REFLECTION PAPER:_**

    **_“there is a  technical issue you need to address for your next essays: all direct quotes must be in open and closed quotation marks " " from your references to indicate where they begin and end – this is required.   Please be sure to address these issues in your next essays.”_**

    Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 15 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 10.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 7.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 4.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | |

    **Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bowman-2e-ch03-presentation-so-pptx)

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## refle3.docx**

    Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page.

    For this assignment, please consider the following:

    _What nonverbal codes do you use to manage your identity?_

    **_IMPORTANT, PROFFESOR NOTE FOR THE LAST REFLECTION PAPER:_**

    **_“there is a  technical issue you need to address for your next essays: all direct quotes must be in open and closed quotation marks " " from your references to indicate where they begin and end – this is required.   Please be sure to address these issues in your next essays.”_**

    Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 15 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 10.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 7.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 4.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | |

    **Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bowman-2e-ch03-presentation-so-pptx)

  • [Solved] Discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Directions (2.5 points) –Using at least 100 words, summarize Marx and Engels (1908) arguments about the importance of commodities to capitalism (.5 point) –State your reaction to being classified by Marx and Engels (1908) as a commodity (.5 point) —State 1 implication for you being a commodity i…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Directions   (2.5 points)

    –Using at least 100 words, summarize Marx and Engels (1908) arguments about the importance of commodities to capitalism  (.5 point)

     –State your reaction to being classified by Marx and Engels (1908) as a commodity  (.5 point)

     —State 1 implication for you being a commodity in capitalist production  (.5 point)

    —Show your reading by using Purdue owl/APA formats to correctly cite one supportive

        scholarly source = (.5 point)

    —Use of English = (.5 point)

    References/Assignment Resources

    Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1908). Manifesto of the Communist Party. New York, NY: New York Labor News Co.

    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/31193/31193-h/31193-h.htm

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Assignment4.docx **## Assignment4.docx** 2 Insert your header here by using “Insert” then “Header” then “Edit” Running head: INSERT ABBREVIATED TITLE HERE 1 This is the Title of My Assignment My Name CNDV 5334 Measurement and Assessment Lamar University Repeat Your T…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assignment4.docx

    **## Assignment4.docx**

    2

    Insert your header here by using “Insert” then “Header” then “Edit”

    Running head: INSERT ABBREVIATED TITLE HERE 1

    This is the Title of My Assignment

    My Name

    CNDV 5334 Measurement and Assessment

    Lamar University

    Repeat Your Title Here

    This is where you introduce the purpose and format of the paper (Note that you do not type “Introduction”). Keep in mind that each section you create (under each subheading you create) will need at least one paragraph (i.e. a minimum of three sentences).

    **Goals and Purposes of the Assessment Program/Plan**

    Here is where you will discuss the overall goals an purposes of the assessment plan you are creating. Be sure to cite references in-text as you write

    **Information Needed**

    Here is where you will discuss the next point in your application. Specifically, you will identify the types of information needed to make decisions (for example for Schools – state and district assessment calendars, state standardized testing protocols for test integrity, state reporting requirements. For Mental Health – social history, family history, suicidal behavior)

    **Assessment Instruments**

    Here is where you will identify the specific instruments to be given and establish procedures for their selection and use. Develop sub-headings as needed to delineate the points you are making.

    **Disseminating Results**

    Assessment plans require dissemination of results. This section is where you will discuss your plan for sharing results with identified stakeholders.

    **Ongoing Evaluation**

    Here is where you will discuss how you will conduct ongoing evaluation of your plan. How will you know what you are doing is working?

    Add a concluding paragraph to your paper. You do not need to title it Conclusion.

    References

    (Notice that this starts on a new page. To make sure it stays on its own page, use Insert>Page Break.)Your references will follow the general format below and will be double spaced without additional spaces between. Be sure to consult your APA manual for specific instructions on reference formatting.

    LastName, FirstInitials. (year). Title of article in lower case unless first word, proper noun, or following a colon.
    _Journal Title in Italics, volume_, (issue), 00-00.

    **## Assignment4.docx**

    2

    Insert your header here by using “Insert” then “Header” then “Edit”

    Running head: INSERT ABBREVIATED TITLE HERE 1

    This is the Title of My Assignment

    My Name

    CNDV 5334 Measurement and Assessment

    Lamar University

    Repeat Your Title Here

    This is where you introduce the purpose and format of the paper (Note that you do not type “Introduction”). Keep in mind that each section you create (under each subheading you create) will need at least one paragraph (i.e. a minimum of three sentences).

    **Goals and Purposes of the Assessment Program/Plan**

    Here is where you will discuss the overall goals an purposes of the assessment plan you are creating. Be sure to cite references in-text as you write

    **Information Needed**

    Here is where you will discuss the next point in your application. Specifically, you will identify the types of information needed to make decisions (for example for Schools – state and district assessment calendars, state standardized testing protocols for test integrity, state reporting requirements. For Mental Health – social history, family history, suicidal behavior)

    **Assessment Instruments**

    Here is where you will identify the specific instruments to be given and establish procedures for their selection and use. Develop sub-headings as needed to delineate the points you are making.

    **Disseminating Results**

    Assessment plans require dissemination of results. This section is where you will discuss your plan for sharing results with identified stakeholders.

    **Ongoing Evaluation**

    Here is where you will discuss how you will conduct ongoing evaluation of your plan. How will you know what you are doing is working?

    Add a concluding paragraph to your paper. You do not need to title it Conclusion.

    References

    (Notice that this starts on a new page. To make sure it stays on its own page, use Insert>Page Break.)Your references will follow the general format below and will be double spaced without additional spaces between. Be sure to consult your APA manual for specific instructions on reference formatting.

    LastName, FirstInitials. (year). Title of article in lower case unless first word, proper noun, or following a colon.
    _Journal Title in Italics, volume_, (issue), 00-00.

  • [Solved] help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (2)** – ## ArticleCritiqueAPATemplate5334-3.doc – MMPIandBattererIntervention.pdf **## ArticleCritiqueAPATemplate5334-3.doc** [removed] **MMPIandBattererIntervention.pdf** This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mmpiandbatterer…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (2)**

    – ## ArticleCritiqueAPATemplate5334-3.doc

    – MMPIandBattererIntervention.pdf

    **## ArticleCritiqueAPATemplate5334-3.doc**

    [removed]

    **MMPIandBattererIntervention.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mmpiandbattererintervention-pdf)

    **MMPIandBattererIntervention.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mmpiandbattererintervention-pdf)

    **## ArticleCritiqueAPATemplate5334-3.doc**

    [removed]

    **MMPIandBattererIntervention.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mmpiandbattererintervention-pdf)

    **## ArticleCritiqueAPATemplate5334-3.doc**

    [removed]

    **MMPIandBattererIntervention.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/mmpiandbattererintervention-pdf)

  • [Solved] Discussion Board

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Each of the chapters in our textbook provides a box titled Thinking Like a Clinician, in which a family case study is presented, followed by several question prompts geared towards skill application from the chapter/theory(ies). For this week's discussion, you may select the Thinking Like a Clinicia…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Each of the chapters in our textbook provides a box titled Thinking Like a Clinician, in which a family case study is presented, followed by several question prompts geared towards skill application from the chapter/theory(ies).

    For this week's discussion, you may select the Thinking Like a Clinician activity from either Chapter 9 or Chapter 10 (Experiential or Structural).  Please review the family case study, and construct responses to each of the questions presented under the case study.

    Goldenberg, H. & Goldenberg, I. (2017) Family Therapy: An Overview, Cengage. ISBN: 1111828806, 9781111828806.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This opinion piece by Henry Cisneros, former secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, contends that housing options in America are not prepared for older adults’ growing desire to “age in place.” Please respond with at least 3 sentences for each question. – What is the majo…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This opinion piece by Henry Cisneros, former secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, contends that housing options in America are not prepared for older adults’ growing desire to “age in place.” Please respond with at least 3 sentences for each question.

    – What is the major problem that Cisneros presents in this article? Why is this problem becoming more urgent as time passes?
    – What properties does a house need to have to be safe for older adults? Attempt to brainstorm beyond the properties Cisneros mentions in the article.
    – What solutions can you think of to address the issue Cisneros presents? What do you think will actually happen in the coming decades?

    ## [**http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/10/16/housing-thats-not-a-luxury/elderly-will-need-help-as-they-age-at-hom**](http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/10/16/housing-thats-not-a-luxury/elderly-will-need-help-as-they-age-at-hom)

    – 2 years ago