My Blog

Tag: Homework Solution

  • [Solved] @ss@y II

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal) Each @rticle assigned in Weeks 3 and 4 presents a valid argument that reflects a stance at the time they were published. While they make compelling arguments regarding their individual topics, much has changed in our understan…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Criminal homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/law-criminal)

    Each @rticle assigned in Weeks 3 and 4 presents a valid argument that reflects a stance at the time they were published. While they make compelling arguments regarding their individual topics, much has changed in our understanding of the issues they raise.

    Choose one of the readings in Weeks 3 and 4 and update the research supporting their argument. Or, present an argument that may oppose or counter their argument, using valid research.

    Following the “They Say/I Say” model, you will use research from the Stafford Library databases to inform your approach to the issue you are writing about.

    In your ess@y, address the following questions. These questions can serve as an outline for your ess@y.

    1. How does the assigned article (from Weeks 3 or 4) reflect a current understanding of the topic? Which points still ring true today?
    2. What are some significant considerations that need to be updated or revised? Be sure to explain why.

    1. Present information that should be considered on this issue, making connections to the sources you found on this topic (see Discussions 7 and 9). Reference at least two peer-reviewed sources.
    2. What information should be added? Detail the information from your research that should be added to make the argument stronger.
    3. Tie it all together in your conclusion. Explain how the information from your research updates or refutes the argument.

    Follow the pattern for academic writing detailed in _They Say/I Say_ (Chapter 9) and _The Little Seagull Handbook_ (W-2). Refer to the Assignment Expectations in the Start Here module for more details.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Social Science QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS CODING ASSIGNMENT

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – WATCH: HOW TO CODE A DOCUMENT AND CREATE THEMES (YouTube link) – INSTRUCTIONS ARE ATTACHED BELOW [How to code a document and create themes – YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHv3RzKWNcQ) – [\ \ QualitativeAnalysisCodingAssignmentInstructions.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/quali…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – WATCH: HOW TO CODE A DOCUMENT AND CREATE THEMES (YouTube link)

    – INSTRUCTIONS ARE ATTACHED BELOW

    [How to code a document and create themes – YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHv3RzKWNcQ)

    – [\
    \
    QualitativeAnalysisCodingAssignmentInstructions.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/qualitativeanalysiscodingassignmentinstructions-docx "QualitativeAnalysisCodingAssignmentInstructions.docx")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Writing an IEP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Instructions** **Directions:** If possible, please indicate your contributions to the IEP by using a different color font or highlighting. Some students have done this, and it makes access & grading easier on my end. 1. Study the case studies below (1st grade or 11th grade) 2. Then read Table …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Instructions**

    **Directions:** If possible, please indicate your contributions to the IEP by using a different color font or highlighting. Some students have done this, and it makes access & grading easier on my end.

    1.  Study the case studies  below (1st grade or 11th grade)

    2. Then read Table 2-3 (IEP Requirements-Content of the IEP) on pages 38-39 of the textbook.

    3. Use the information from a given a case study evaluation to write a Standards-aligned IEP, including:

    – Measurable goals to address the student’s learning needs
    – The interventions to remove the barriers caused by the student’s disability in the learning environment
    – The supports and the additional services to be provided
    – A transition plan.

    – [\
    \
    BookFeb22025.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bookfeb22025-pdf "BookFeb22025.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    CaseforIEP_11thGradeLD.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/caseforiep-11thgradeld-docx "CaseforIEP_11thGradeLD.docx")
    – [\
    \
    WritinganIEPOutline.doc](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/writinganiepoutline-doc "WritinganIEPOutline.doc")
    – [\
    \
    ExampleofannotatedIEP.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/exampleofannotatediep-pdf "ExampleofannotatedIEP.pdf")
    – [\
    \
    WritinganIEPOutline_PDF.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/writinganiepoutline-pdf-pdf "WritinganIEPOutline_PDF.pdf")

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Social Media and Conflict

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see instruction. PPT only – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## Instuction_SocialMediaandConflict.pdf **## Instuction_SocialMediaandConflict.pdf** Research and analyze a public figure's social media conflict and create a presentation that tells their story and explains social media's impact on t…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see instruction. PPT only

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## Instuction_SocialMediaandConflict.pdf

    **## Instuction_SocialMediaandConflict.pdf**

    Research and analyze a public figure's social media conflict and create a presentation
    that tells their story and explains social media's impact on the conflict. To do this, create
    a 10 slide PowerPoint presentation in which you use text and visuals to support your
    narrative.
    Introduction:
    Social media has significantly influenced how interpersonal conflicts arise, escalate, and
    are resolved. The constant connectivity provided by social platforms increases
    opportunities for misunderstandings, as text-based communication often lacks the
    non-verbal cues essential for accurately interpreting messages. This can lead to
    frequent and intense disagreements. Moreover, the anonymity and distance of online
    interactions embolden individuals to express opinions more aggressively than they
    might face-to-face, exacerbating conflicts. The public nature of social media also means
    that conflicts can quickly escalate, drawing in a wider audience and adding pressure to
    the involved parties. However, social media also offers tools for conflict resolution, such
    as blocking or muting users and engaging in private conversations, as well as access to
    broader support networks that can provide valuable perspectives and aid in conflict
    management. Overall, while social media can amplify interpersonal conflicts, it also
    presents opportunities for improved communication and resolution if used thoughtfully.

    Instruction:
    For this assessment, tell a visual and written story that explains how social media can
    impact conflict with public figures. To do this, create a 10 PowerPoint presentation in
    which you use text and visuals to support your narrative.

    Note that one of the qualities of a good PowerPoint presentation is not having too much
    text on each slide. Use the slide notes feature to flesh out your points. You might think
    of this as a script for what you would say if you were presenting verbally.

    Research and Selection

    1. Select a Public Figure:
    ○ Choose a public figure who has been involved in a social

    media conflict. This can be a celebrity, politician, athlete, or any
    other prominent individual.

    ○ Ensure there is enough information available to analyze the
    conflict in detail.

    2. Gather Information:
    ○ Collect at least three credible sources that provide information

    about the conflict. These can include news articles, social
    media posts, interviews, and academic articles.

    ○ Summarize the key points from each source, highlighting the
    main aspects of the conflict and the public figure’s involvement.

    Analysis

    1. Conflict Description:
    ○ Provide a detailed description of the conflict. Include

    information on:
    ■ The background and context of the conflict.
    ■ The main parties involved.
    ■ How the conflict started and escalated.
    ■ The role of social media in escalation and/or

    de-escalation of the conflict.
    2. Communication Behaviors:

    ○ Analyze the communication behaviors of the public figure and
    other parties involved. Discuss how these behaviors
    contributed to the conflict.

    ○ Identify any specific posts, comments, or interactions that were
    pivotal in the conflict’s development.

    3. Impact and Consequences:
    ○ Discuss the impact of the conflict on the public figure’s

    reputation, relationships, and career.
    ○ Analyze the broader societal impact, if applicable.

    4. Conflict Resolution:
    ○ Describe any steps taken to resolve the conflict. Were they

    effective? Why or why not?
    ○ Recommend strategies that could have been used to manage

    and resolve the conflict more effectively.

    Assessment requirements.

    Your presentation should meet the following requirements:

    ● Written communication: Presentation is well organized and engaging.

    ● Visual communication: Use of images is professional and supports the
    ideas presented on the slides.

    ● Research: Collect at least three credible sources that provide information
    about the conflict. These can include news articles, social media posts,
    interviews, and academic articles.

    ● Length: 10 slides.
    ● APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to

    current APA style and format.

    Competencies measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 1: Identify variables within an organizational structure that can
    promote conflict.

    ○ Choose a public figure who has been involved in a social
    media conflict and provide detailed description of conflict.

    ● Competency 2: Apply theoretical perspectives on conflict.
    ○ Discuss the impact of the conflict on the public figure’s

    reputation, relationships, and career.
    ● Competency 3: Apply appropriate strategies to reduce or resolve conflicts.

    ○ Recommend strategies that could have been used to manage
    and resolve the conflict more effectively.

    ● Competency 4: Analyze the impact of conflict on relationship building in
    face-to-face, virtual, cyber, and group communication.

    ○ Collect at least three credible sources regarding the conflict
    and summarize key points from each source.

    ● Competency 5: Evaluate the outcome of proposed strategies of conflict
    resolution.

    ○ Incorporate relevant communication theories or conflict
    management styles to explain the dynamics of the conflict and
    propose resolution strategies.

    ● Competency 6: Communicate effectively in a variety of formats.
    ○ Create a presentation that articulates meaning relevant to its

    purpose and audience.

    – Research and Selection
    – Analysis

    **## Instuction_SocialMediaandConflict.pdf**

    Research and analyze a public figure's social media conflict and create a presentation
    that tells their story and explains social media's impact on the conflict. To do this, create
    a 10 slide PowerPoint presentation in which you use text and visuals to support your
    narrative.
    Introduction:
    Social media has significantly influenced how interpersonal conflicts arise, escalate, and
    are resolved. The constant connectivity provided by social platforms increases
    opportunities for misunderstandings, as text-based communication often lacks the
    non-verbal cues essential for accurately interpreting messages. This can lead to
    frequent and intense disagreements. Moreover, the anonymity and distance of online
    interactions embolden individuals to express opinions more aggressively than they
    might face-to-face, exacerbating conflicts. The public nature of social media also means
    that conflicts can quickly escalate, drawing in a wider audience and adding pressure to
    the involved parties. However, social media also offers tools for conflict resolution, such
    as blocking or muting users and engaging in private conversations, as well as access to
    broader support networks that can provide valuable perspectives and aid in conflict
    management. Overall, while social media can amplify interpersonal conflicts, it also
    presents opportunities for improved communication and resolution if used thoughtfully.

    Instruction:
    For this assessment, tell a visual and written story that explains how social media can
    impact conflict with public figures. To do this, create a 10 PowerPoint presentation in
    which you use text and visuals to support your narrative.

    Note that one of the qualities of a good PowerPoint presentation is not having too much
    text on each slide. Use the slide notes feature to flesh out your points. You might think
    of this as a script for what you would say if you were presenting verbally.

    Research and Selection

    1. Select a Public Figure:
    ○ Choose a public figure who has been involved in a social

    media conflict. This can be a celebrity, politician, athlete, or any
    other prominent individual.

    ○ Ensure there is enough information available to analyze the
    conflict in detail.

    2. Gather Information:
    ○ Collect at least three credible sources that provide information

    about the conflict. These can include news articles, social
    media posts, interviews, and academic articles.

    ○ Summarize the key points from each source, highlighting the
    main aspects of the conflict and the public figure’s involvement.

    Analysis

    1. Conflict Description:
    ○ Provide a detailed description of the conflict. Include

    information on:
    ■ The background and context of the conflict.
    ■ The main parties involved.
    ■ How the conflict started and escalated.
    ■ The role of social media in escalation and/or

    de-escalation of the conflict.
    2. Communication Behaviors:

    ○ Analyze the communication behaviors of the public figure and
    other parties involved. Discuss how these behaviors
    contributed to the conflict.

    ○ Identify any specific posts, comments, or interactions that were
    pivotal in the conflict’s development.

    3. Impact and Consequences:
    ○ Discuss the impact of the conflict on the public figure’s

    reputation, relationships, and career.
    ○ Analyze the broader societal impact, if applicable.

    4. Conflict Resolution:
    ○ Describe any steps taken to resolve the conflict. Were they

    effective? Why or why not?
    ○ Recommend strategies that could have been used to manage

    and resolve the conflict more effectively.

    Assessment requirements.

    Your presentation should meet the following requirements:

    ● Written communication: Presentation is well organized and engaging.

    ● Visual communication: Use of images is professional and supports the
    ideas presented on the slides.

    ● Research: Collect at least three credible sources that provide information
    about the conflict. These can include news articles, social media posts,
    interviews, and academic articles.

    ● Length: 10 slides.
    ● APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to

    current APA style and format.

    Competencies measured:

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in
    the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ● Competency 1: Identify variables within an organizational structure that can
    promote conflict.

    ○ Choose a public figure who has been involved in a social
    media conflict and provide detailed description of conflict.

    ● Competency 2: Apply theoretical perspectives on conflict.
    ○ Discuss the impact of the conflict on the public figure’s

    reputation, relationships, and career.
    ● Competency 3: Apply appropriate strategies to reduce or resolve conflicts.

    ○ Recommend strategies that could have been used to manage
    and resolve the conflict more effectively.

    ● Competency 4: Analyze the impact of conflict on relationship building in
    face-to-face, virtual, cyber, and group communication.

    ○ Collect at least three credible sources regarding the conflict
    and summarize key points from each source.

    ● Competency 5: Evaluate the outcome of proposed strategies of conflict
    resolution.

    ○ Incorporate relevant communication theories or conflict
    management styles to explain the dynamics of the conflict and
    propose resolution strategies.

    ● Competency 6: Communicate effectively in a variety of formats.
    ○ Create a presentation that articulates meaning relevant to its

    purpose and audience.

    – Research and Selection
    – Analysis

  • [Solved] workplace1

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering workplace1.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] • Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Post** a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences, [social determinants of healthLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/Library/sdoh), and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. -…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Post** a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences, [social determinants of healthLinks to an external site.](https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/Library/sdoh), and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan.

    – 2 years ago

  • [Solved] Wk 11 dis health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WK11DISCHEALTH.docx **## WK11DISCHEALTH.docx** Guided Reflection ![A person sitting at a desk with a computer and light bulbs above them Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-dis-health)Study without reflection is a waste of …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK11DISCHEALTH.docx

    **## WK11DISCHEALTH.docx**

    Guided Reflection

    ![A person sitting at a desk with a computer and light bulbs above them Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-dis-health)Study without reflection is a waste of time, Reflection without study is dangerous.
    —Confucius (Clark, 2011).

    Reflection of an experience, lesson learned, and/or importance of a role, demonstrates a clear understanding of process, comprehension, and expertise. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, personal connections, and next steps. As we come to the end of the course, it is important for you to consider what you learned and how to connect these lessons beyond this course.

    For this Discussion, you will reflect on what you learned throughout this course. What is the impact of what you learned? How might you approach engaging in policy advocacy moving forward?

    **Reference:** Clark, J. (2011). Let's reflect: What is the point?
    _British Journal of General Practice, 61_(593), 747.
    [https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232)

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/modules/items/5624153)

    [Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/pages/week-11-learning-resources?module_item_id=5624153)

    · Dawes, D. E. (2020).
    _The political determinants of health_. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    ·

    · Chapter 7, “The Future of Health Equity Begins and Ends with the Political Determinants of Health” (pp. 143–168)

    · Porche, D. J. (2023).
    _Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    ·

    · Chapter 7, “Global, International, and Planetary Health Policy” (pp. 93–100)

    [Media](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/pages/week-11-learning-resources?module_item_id=5624153)

    · Biography. (2018, March 13).
    [_Malala Yousafzai, activist: Biography_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6by9NEhT9GM) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6by9NEhT9GM

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 3 minutes.

    · TEDx Talks. (2016, July 11).
    [_A personal look at activism: Lauren Vague: TEDxWilliamPennCharterSchool_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bif4-FY25g) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bif4-FY25g

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.

    · TEDx Talks. (2018, January 30).
    [_Five steps to becoming an advocate: Joseph R. Campbell: TEDxAdelaideLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIo31mMB4P8) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIo31mMB4P8

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 7 minutes.

    · TEDx Talks. (2019, May 1).
    [_The power of personal activism: Moira Vane TEDxUAlbertaLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6axrEO0idCI): [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6axrEO0idCI

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 19 minutes.

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/modules/items/5624148)

    To Prepare:

    · Consider what you learned throughout this course and reflect on the impact.

    · Consider how you might use what you have learned beyond this course experience.

    By Day 3 of Week 11

    **Post** a response detailing the following:

    · How has this course impacted your knowledge, attitude, beliefs, perceptions about nurse engagement in policy advocacy and politics?

    · What are the takeaways as you move forward as a DNP, in your role as a policy advocate? What resonates with you and how will you use it?

    By Day 6 of Week 11

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ posts and
    **respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues on
    **two different days** by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your colleague or sharing additional perspectives on the issue described by your colleague.

    **Reply**

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/modules/items/5624139) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/modules/items/5624153)

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## WK11DISCHEALTH.docx**

    Guided Reflection

    ![A person sitting at a desk with a computer and light bulbs above them Description automatically generated](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-dis-health)Study without reflection is a waste of time, Reflection without study is dangerous.
    —Confucius (Clark, 2011).

    Reflection of an experience, lesson learned, and/or importance of a role, demonstrates a clear understanding of process, comprehension, and expertise. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, personal connections, and next steps. As we come to the end of the course, it is important for you to consider what you learned and how to connect these lessons beyond this course.

    For this Discussion, you will reflect on what you learned throughout this course. What is the impact of what you learned? How might you approach engaging in policy advocacy moving forward?

    **Reference:** Clark, J. (2011). Let's reflect: What is the point?
    _British Journal of General Practice, 61_(593), 747.
    [https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232)

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/modules/items/5624153)

    [Readings](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/pages/week-11-learning-resources?module_item_id=5624153)

    · Dawes, D. E. (2020).
    _The political determinants of health_. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    ·

    · Chapter 7, “The Future of Health Equity Begins and Ends with the Political Determinants of Health” (pp. 143–168)

    · Porche, D. J. (2023).
    _Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals_(3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    ·

    · Chapter 7, “Global, International, and Planetary Health Policy” (pp. 93–100)

    [Media](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/pages/week-11-learning-resources?module_item_id=5624153)

    · Biography. (2018, March 13).
    [_Malala Yousafzai, activist: Biography_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6by9NEhT9GM) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6by9NEhT9GM

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 3 minutes.

    · TEDx Talks. (2016, July 11).
    [_A personal look at activism: Lauren Vague: TEDxWilliamPennCharterSchool_ Links to an external site.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bif4-FY25g) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bif4-FY25g

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.

    · TEDx Talks. (2018, January 30).
    [_Five steps to becoming an advocate: Joseph R. Campbell: TEDxAdelaideLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIo31mMB4P8) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIo31mMB4P8

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 7 minutes.

    · TEDx Talks. (2019, May 1).
    [_The power of personal activism: Moira Vane TEDxUAlbertaLinks to an external site._](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6axrEO0idCI): [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6axrEO0idCI

    **Note:** The approximate length of this media piece is 19 minutes.

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/modules/items/5624148)

    To Prepare:

    · Consider what you learned throughout this course and reflect on the impact.

    · Consider how you might use what you have learned beyond this course experience.

    By Day 3 of Week 11

    **Post** a response detailing the following:

    · How has this course impacted your knowledge, attitude, beliefs, perceptions about nurse engagement in policy advocacy and politics?

    · What are the takeaways as you move forward as a DNP, in your role as a policy advocate? What resonates with you and how will you use it?

    By Day 6 of Week 11

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ posts and
    **respond** to
    **at least two** of your colleagues on
    **two different days** by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your colleague or sharing additional perspectives on the issue described by your colleague.

    **Reply**

    [Previous](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/modules/items/5624139) [Next](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/148513/modules/items/5624153)

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] refle 3

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    attached – 2 years ago **files (3)** – ## vertionofthebook.docx – ## refle3.docx – Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx **## vertionofthebook.docx** [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732) **## refle3.docx** Each 1-2-page refl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    attached

    – 2 years ago

    **files (3)**

    – ## vertionofthebook.docx

    – ## refle3.docx

    – Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## refle3.docx**

    Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page.

    For this assignment, please consider the following:

    _What nonverbal codes do you use to manage your identity?_

    **_IMPORTANT, PROFFESOR NOTE FOR THE LAST REFLECTION PAPER:_**

    **_“there is a  technical issue you need to address for your next essays: all direct quotes must be in open and closed quotation marks " " from your references to indicate where they begin and end – this is required.   Please be sure to address these issues in your next essays.”_**

    Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 15 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 10.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 7.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 4.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | |

    **Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bowman-2e-ch03-presentation-so-pptx)

    **Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bowman-2e-ch03-presentation-so-pptx)

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## refle3.docx**

    Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page.

    For this assignment, please consider the following:

    _What nonverbal codes do you use to manage your identity?_

    **_IMPORTANT, PROFFESOR NOTE FOR THE LAST REFLECTION PAPER:_**

    **_“there is a  technical issue you need to address for your next essays: all direct quotes must be in open and closed quotation marks " " from your references to indicate where they begin and end – this is required.   Please be sure to address these issues in your next essays.”_**

    Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 15 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 10.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 7.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 4.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | |

    **Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bowman-2e-ch03-presentation-so-pptx)

    **## vertionofthebook.docx**

    [https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732](https://www.coursesidekick.com/communications/3447732)

    **## refle3.docx**

    Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include
    **four** major sections: the
    **Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References** (please see
    [Purdue University's APA Style Guide](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html)

    [Links to an external site.](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html) for more information).
    Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page.

    For this assignment, please consider the following:

    _What nonverbal codes do you use to manage your identity?_

    **_IMPORTANT, PROFFESOR NOTE FOR THE LAST REFLECTION PAPER:_**

    **_“there is a  technical issue you need to address for your next essays: all direct quotes must be in open and closed quotation marks " " from your references to indicate where they begin and end – this is required.   Please be sure to address these issues in your next essays.”_**

    Reflection Assignment Rubric 75

    | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 30 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 24 pts <br>Good<br>The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. | 13.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. | 0 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem. | | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — |
    | 15 pts <br>Excellent<br>The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 10.5 pts <br>Good<br>The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 7.5 pts <br>Acceptable<br>The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | 4.5 pts <br>Unacceptable<br>The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. | | |

    **Bowman_2e_Ch03_Presentation_SO.pptx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/bowman-2e-ch03-presentation-so-pptx)

  • [Solved] WK 11 BLOG THEO

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – 2 years ago **files (1)** – ## WK11BLOGTHEO.docx **## WK11BLOGTHEO.docx** Blog: LOOKING BACK TO LOOK FORWARD ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-blog-theo) For this Blog, you will look back at your experience in this course and consider the most important things you learned, the challen…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – 2 years ago

    **files (1)**

    – ## WK11BLOGTHEO.docx

    **## WK11BLOGTHEO.docx**

    Blog: LOOKING BACK TO LOOK FORWARD

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-blog-theo)

    For this Blog, you will look back at your experience in this course and consider the most important things you learned, the challenges you faced, and the areas for improvement that you identified. Then, you will look forward and consider the ways you will implement what you have learned in your future professional practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/modules/items/5646793)

    · Amit-Aharon, A., Melnikov, S., & Warshawski, S. (2020).
    [The effect of evidence-based practice perception, information literacy self-efficacy, and academic motivation on nursing students’ future implementation of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722320300806).
    _Journal of Professional Nursing, 36_(6), 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.04.001

    · Bramer, W. M., De Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018).
    [A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searchesLinks to an external site.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6148622/).
    _Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106_(4), 531. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283

    · Heer, B. R., Gillette, C., Geary, A., & McDaniel, M. J. (2024).
    [Clinical physician assistant students’ perceptions of evidence-based medicine resources: A cross-sectional examinationLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02763869.2024.2329012).
    _Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 43_(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2024.2329012

    · Song, C. (2024).
    [Changes in evidence-based practice self-efficacy among nursing students and the impact of clinical competencies: Longitudinal descriptive studyLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691723003027).
    _Nurse Education Today, 132_, Article 106008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106008

    To Prepare

    · Review the learning resources for Week 11. Consider the role of the DNP-prepared nurse when it comes to advocating for or implementing a practice organization change or creating an organizational culture that embraces translation and application of evidence for quality improvement.

    · Reflect on your experiences in this course. Consider what challenged you the most. What areas for improvement have you identified?

    · Reflect on your experiences in this course. Consider what you learned that was totally new for you. What were your biggest takeaways, eye-openers, or revelations? Did you have any “aha” moments?

    · Think about your future professional practice as a DNP-prepared nurse. How do you plan to use what you have learned in thus course?

    By Day 3 Of Week 11

    **Post** the following related to your experiences in this course:

    · Describe something that was challenging for you. Explain why it was challenging and what you did about it. Be specific and provide examples.

    · Describe an area for improvement that you have identified. What are your plans to improve in this area? Be specific and provide examples.

    · Describe something you learned that was totally new for you or which you consider a key takeaway that you will use in the future. Be specific and provide examples.

    · Explain how you plan to use what you have learned in this course in your future professional practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ posts.

    By Day 6 of Week 11

    **Respond** to at least
    **two** of your colleagues, on different days, by offering suggestions or further insight related to the challenge they identified, the area for improvement they identified, the key takeaway they identified, and/or their plans for the future.

    **Note:** Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning experience for all students.

    **Return** to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.

    ## image1.jpeg

    **## WK11BLOGTHEO.docx**

    Blog: LOOKING BACK TO LOOK FORWARD

    ![](https://www.sweetstudy.com/questions/wk-11-blog-theo)

    For this Blog, you will look back at your experience in this course and consider the most important things you learned, the challenges you faced, and the areas for improvement that you identified. Then, you will look forward and consider the ways you will implement what you have learned in your future professional practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

    Resources

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/142660/modules/items/5646793)

    · Amit-Aharon, A., Melnikov, S., & Warshawski, S. (2020).
    [The effect of evidence-based practice perception, information literacy self-efficacy, and academic motivation on nursing students’ future implementation of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722320300806).
    _Journal of Professional Nursing, 36_(6), 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.04.001

    · Bramer, W. M., De Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018).
    [A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searchesLinks to an external site.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6148622/).
    _Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106_(4), 531. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283

    · Heer, B. R., Gillette, C., Geary, A., & McDaniel, M. J. (2024).
    [Clinical physician assistant students’ perceptions of evidence-based medicine resources: A cross-sectional examinationLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02763869.2024.2329012).
    _Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 43_(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2024.2329012

    · Song, C. (2024).
    [Changes in evidence-based practice self-efficacy among nursing students and the impact of clinical competencies: Longitudinal descriptive studyLinks to an external site.](https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691723003027).
    _Nurse Education Today, 132_, Article 106008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106008

    To Prepare

    · Review the learning resources for Week 11. Consider the role of the DNP-prepared nurse when it comes to advocating for or implementing a practice organization change or creating an organizational culture that embraces translation and application of evidence for quality improvement.

    · Reflect on your experiences in this course. Consider what challenged you the most. What areas for improvement have you identified?

    · Reflect on your experiences in this course. Consider what you learned that was totally new for you. What were your biggest takeaways, eye-openers, or revelations? Did you have any “aha” moments?

    · Think about your future professional practice as a DNP-prepared nurse. How do you plan to use what you have learned in thus course?

    By Day 3 Of Week 11

    **Post** the following related to your experiences in this course:

    · Describe something that was challenging for you. Explain why it was challenging and what you did about it. Be specific and provide examples.

    · Describe an area for improvement that you have identified. What are your plans to improve in this area? Be specific and provide examples.

    · Describe something you learned that was totally new for you or which you consider a key takeaway that you will use in the future. Be specific and provide examples.

    · Explain how you plan to use what you have learned in this course in your future professional practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

    **Read** a selection of your colleagues’ posts.

    By Day 6 of Week 11

    **Respond** to at least
    **two** of your colleagues, on different days, by offering suggestions or further insight related to the challenge they identified, the area for improvement they identified, the key takeaway they identified, and/or their plans for the future.

    **Note:** Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning experience for all students.

    **Return** to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.

    ## image1.jpeg

  • [Solved] Qualitative Research Article Critique416

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    a critical appraisal of the literature that demonstrates an understanding of qualitative research. **Chapter 7 Critiquing Criteria for Qualitative Research**, write a critique of a qualitative research article that you have read related to your clinical practice \*\*\* is to be clear and concise,…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    a critical appraisal of the literature that demonstrates an understanding of qualitative research.

    **Chapter 7 Critiquing Criteria for Qualitative Research**, write a critique of a qualitative research article that you have read related to your clinical practice

    \*\*\* is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspellings.

    – per the current APA and 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title page, abstract, and references page.

    **plagiarism through Turnitin report, NO AI  Book attached **

    – [\
    \
    GeriLobiondo-Wood_JudithHaber-NursingResearch_MethodsandCriticalAppraisalforEvidence-BasedPractice2017Mosby-libgen.li.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/gerilobiondo-wood-judithhaber-nursingresearch-methodsandcriticalappraisalforevidence-basedpractice2017mosby-libgen-li-pdf "GeriLobiondo-Wood_JudithHaber-NursingResearch_MethodsandCriticalAppraisalforEvidence-BasedPractice2017Mosby-libgen.li.pdf")

    – 2 years ago