Assignment Prompt & Instructions
– 2 years ago
**files (1)**
– ## olderadultAPApaper.docx
**## olderadultAPApaper.docx**
**NUR 2214 Individual APA Writing Assignment &**
**Group PPT Presentation Guidelines**
| | |
| — | — |
| **_1. Individual Paper—Topic:_** | **AACN Competencies** |
| **Suggested Topics:**<br>§ Ageism, exploring societies prejudices and biases toward the elder population.<br>§ Choose a theory or model related to gerontologic nursing and related it to the care of an elderly patient you have cared for.<br>§ Choose a theory or model and write about how that theory or model can be used to promote wellness with age-related changes in the elderly.<br>§ Sexually transmitted infections in the elderly population. Include statistics, incidents, contributing factors, patient education needs, and treatment adherence issues.<br>**Assignment Instructions:**<br>1. Construct a 4-7 page APA-formatted paper (not including title and reference pages).<br>· Include at a minimum the use of Level 1 & Level 2 headings.<br>1. Interpret and analyze the following bolded topics and subtopics (required) to guide the flow of discussion in your paper:<br>· Introduction (no heading)<br>· Define your topic.<br>1. -Why is this topic important to the profession of nursing?<br>2. -Why is this topic important or what impact does it have when caring for the elderly client?<br>· Present a literature review on your topic (3-5 articles within the past 5 years from peer reviewed journals)<br>· Discuss the conclusions you determined from review of the literature<br>· Discuss how your topic would effect the care the elderly client receives in different care settings or organizations.<br>· Identify local, state, and national resources which facilitate safe and effective transitions of care for older adults with this topic<br>· Conclusion<br>1. – What conclusions did you draw from exploration of this topic?<br>2. – How will this effect/change your nursing practice with the elderly?<br>3. – What recommendations might you want to make at an organizational level?<br>Use course content, your textbooks, professional journal articles, and professional websites as references for your work. (A minimum of 5 professional references with at least 3-5 nursing journal articles required.)<br>Submit your assignment electronically in the designated location. | **Domain 1**<br>**1.1, 1.2**<br>**Domain 3**<br>**3.3, 3.4**<br>**Domain 4**<br>**4.1, 4.2, 4.3**<br>**Domain 5**<br>**5.1**<br>**Domain 6**<br>**6.2, 6.3**<br>**Domain 7**<br>**7.1, 7.3**<br>**Domain 10**<br>**10.2**<br>**Course Competencies:**<br>**B1, B4, B5, B6** |
| **_._** | |
| | |
**Grading Rubric for Individual Paper (Points: 200)**
**1. Introduction (20 points)**
·
**20 points:** Thoroughly introduces the topic with a strong opening. Clearly defines the topic, explaining its importance to nursing and its impact on elderly care, supported by compelling rationale and context.
·
**16-19 points:** Effectively introduces the topic, with minor omissions in explanation or context. Defines the topic and addresses its relevance to nursing and elderly care.
·
**12-15 points:** Adequately introduces the topic but lacks depth or clear connections to its importance and impact.
·
**8-11 points:** Minimally addresses the topic, missing key points about its importance or impact on elderly care.
·
**0-7 points:** Does not adequately introduce or define the topic.
**2. Literature Review (35 points)**
·
**35 points:** Presents a comprehensive review of 3-5 current peer-reviewed journal articles (published within the last 5 years). Synthesizes key findings effectively, with clear relevance to the topic.
·
**30-34 points:** Provides a solid review of 3-5 articles, with minor omissions in synthesis or relevance.
·
**25-29 points:** Includes a basic review of articles but lacks depth in analysis or synthesis of findings.
·
**15-24 points:** Reviews fewer than 3 articles or includes irrelevant or poorly synthesized sources.
·
**0-14 points:** Does not provide an adequate literature review or fails to use peer-reviewed sources.
**3. Analysis and Conclusions from Literature (30 points)**
·
**30 points:** Clearly discusses key conclusions from the literature review, demonstrating critical thinking and clear connections to the topic.
·
**25-29 points:** Adequately discusses conclusions, with minor gaps in depth or connections to the topic.
·
**20-24 points:** Provides basic conclusions but lacks depth or clear analysis.
·
**10-19 points:** Minimally discusses conclusions, with vague or unclear connections to the topic.
·
**0-9 points:** Fails to address conclusions or analyze the literature.
**4. Impact on Elderly Care Across Settings (35 points)**
·
**35 points:** Provides an insightful discussion on how the topic affects care in various settings (e.g., home care, long-term care, hospitals). Includes specific examples and demonstrates thorough understanding.
·
**30-34 points:** Discusses the topic’s impact across care settings with minor omissions or less specific examples.
·
**25-29 points:** Provides a basic discussion of the topic’s impact but lacks depth or specificity.
·
**15-24 points:** Minimally discusses the topic’s impact, with unclear or unsupported points.
·
**0-14 points:** Does not adequately address the topic’s impact on elderly care.
**5. Resources for Transition of Care (25 points)**
·
**25 points:** Identifies a comprehensive range of local, state, and national resources that facilitate safe transitions of care, with clear explanations of their roles.
·
**20-24 points:** Identifies appropriate resources with minor gaps in explanation or breadth.
·
**15-19 points:** Provides a basic list of resources but lacks depth or clarity in explanations.
·
**10-14 points:** Minimally identifies resources, with vague or unclear relevance to transitions of care.
·
**0-9 points:** Does not identify relevant resources or explain their role.
**6. Conclusion and Recommendations (30 points)**
·
**30 points:** Draws clear, thoughtful conclusions from the exploration of the topic. Provides actionable recommendations for nursing practice and organizational change, showing insight and critical thinking.
·
**25-29 points:** Provides well-considered conclusions and recommendations, with minor omissions in depth or clarity.
·
**20-24 points:** Offers basic conclusions and recommendations but lacks depth or specificity.
·
**10-19 points:** Minimally addresses conclusions and recommendations, with vague or unsupported points.
·
**0-9 points:** Does not adequately conclude or provide recommendations.
**7. APA Formatting and References (15 points)**
·
**15 points:** Adheres to APA guidelines throughout (e.g., title page, headings, in-text citations, reference list). Contains no or very few minor errors. Uses at least 5 professional references, including 3-5 nursing journal articles.
·
**12-14 points:** Generally follows APA format but includes minor errors or inconsistencies. Uses required references but with minor omissions.
·
**9-11 points:** Attempts to follow APA format but includes multiple errors. References do not fully meet requirements.
·
**6-8 points:** Minimally follows APA format, with substantial errors or missing required references.
·
**0-5 points:** Does not follow APA format or fails to include required references.
**8. Writing Quality (10 points)**
·
**10 points:** Writing is clear, well-organized, and professional. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are flawless or nearly flawless.
·
**8-9 points:** Writing is clear and professional but includes minor errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.
·
**6-7 points:** Writing is generally clear but includes noticeable errors that affect readability.
·
**3-5 points:** Writing lacks clarity or organization, with frequent errors.
·
**0-2 points:** Writing is unclear and poorly organized, with pervasive errors.
**## olderadultAPApaper.docx**
**NUR 2214 Individual APA Writing Assignment &**
**Group PPT Presentation Guidelines**
| | |
| — | — |
| **_1. Individual Paper—Topic:_** | **AACN Competencies** |
| **Suggested Topics:**<br>§ Ageism, exploring societies prejudices and biases toward the elder population.<br>§ Choose a theory or model related to gerontologic nursing and related it to the care of an elderly patient you have cared for.<br>§ Choose a theory or model and write about how that theory or model can be used to promote wellness with age-related changes in the elderly.<br>§ Sexually transmitted infections in the elderly population. Include statistics, incidents, contributing factors, patient education needs, and treatment adherence issues.<br>**Assignment Instructions:**<br>1. Construct a 4-7 page APA-formatted paper (not including title and reference pages).<br>· Include at a minimum the use of Level 1 & Level 2 headings.<br>1. Interpret and analyze the following bolded topics and subtopics (required) to guide the flow of discussion in your paper:<br>· Introduction (no heading)<br>· Define your topic.<br>1. -Why is this topic important to the profession of nursing?<br>2. -Why is this topic important or what impact does it have when caring for the elderly client?<br>· Present a literature review on your topic (3-5 articles within the past 5 years from peer reviewed journals)<br>· Discuss the conclusions you determined from review of the literature<br>· Discuss how your topic would effect the care the elderly client receives in different care settings or organizations.<br>· Identify local, state, and national resources which facilitate safe and effective transitions of care for older adults with this topic<br>· Conclusion<br>1. – What conclusions did you draw from exploration of this topic?<br>2. – How will this effect/change your nursing practice with the elderly?<br>3. – What recommendations might you want to make at an organizational level?<br>Use course content, your textbooks, professional journal articles, and professional websites as references for your work. (A minimum of 5 professional references with at least 3-5 nursing journal articles required.)<br>Submit your assignment electronically in the designated location. | **Domain 1**<br>**1.1, 1.2**<br>**Domain 3**<br>**3.3, 3.4**<br>**Domain 4**<br>**4.1, 4.2, 4.3**<br>**Domain 5**<br>**5.1**<br>**Domain 6**<br>**6.2, 6.3**<br>**Domain 7**<br>**7.1, 7.3**<br>**Domain 10**<br>**10.2**<br>**Course Competencies:**<br>**B1, B4, B5, B6** |
| **_._** | |
| | |
**Grading Rubric for Individual Paper (Points: 200)**
**1. Introduction (20 points)**
·
**20 points:** Thoroughly introduces the topic with a strong opening. Clearly defines the topic, explaining its importance to nursing and its impact on elderly care, supported by compelling rationale and context.
·
**16-19 points:** Effectively introduces the topic, with minor omissions in explanation or context. Defines the topic and addresses its relevance to nursing and elderly care.
·
**12-15 points:** Adequately introduces the topic but lacks depth or clear connections to its importance and impact.
·
**8-11 points:** Minimally addresses the topic, missing key points about its importance or impact on elderly care.
·
**0-7 points:** Does not adequately introduce or define the topic.
**2. Literature Review (35 points)**
·
**35 points:** Presents a comprehensive review of 3-5 current peer-reviewed journal articles (published within the last 5 years). Synthesizes key findings effectively, with clear relevance to the topic.
·
**30-34 points:** Provides a solid review of 3-5 articles, with minor omissions in synthesis or relevance.
·
**25-29 points:** Includes a basic review of articles but lacks depth in analysis or synthesis of findings.
·
**15-24 points:** Reviews fewer than 3 articles or includes irrelevant or poorly synthesized sources.
·
**0-14 points:** Does not provide an adequate literature review or fails to use peer-reviewed sources.
**3. Analysis and Conclusions from Literature (30 points)**
·
**30 points:** Clearly discusses key conclusions from the literature review, demonstrating critical thinking and clear connections to the topic.
·
**25-29 points:** Adequately discusses conclusions, with minor gaps in depth or connections to the topic.
·
**20-24 points:** Provides basic conclusions but lacks depth or clear analysis.
·
**10-19 points:** Minimally discusses conclusions, with vague or unclear connections to the topic.
·
**0-9 points:** Fails to address conclusions or analyze the literature.
**4. Impact on Elderly Care Across Settings (35 points)**
·
**35 points:** Provides an insightful discussion on how the topic affects care in various settings (e.g., home care, long-term care, hospitals). Includes specific examples and demonstrates thorough understanding.
·
**30-34 points:** Discusses the topic’s impact across care settings with minor omissions or less specific examples.
·
**25-29 points:** Provides a basic discussion of the topic’s impact but lacks depth or specificity.
·
**15-24 points:** Minimally discusses the topic’s impact, with unclear or unsupported points.
·
**0-14 points:** Does not adequately address the topic’s impact on elderly care.
**5. Resources for Transition of Care (25 points)**
·
**25 points:** Identifies a comprehensive range of local, state, and national resources that facilitate safe transitions of care, with clear explanations of their roles.
·
**20-24 points:** Identifies appropriate resources with minor gaps in explanation or breadth.
·
**15-19 points:** Provides a basic list of resources but lacks depth or clarity in explanations.
·
**10-14 points:** Minimally identifies resources, with vague or unclear relevance to transitions of care.
·
**0-9 points:** Does not identify relevant resources or explain their role.
**6. Conclusion and Recommendations (30 points)**
·
**30 points:** Draws clear, thoughtful conclusions from the exploration of the topic. Provides actionable recommendations for nursing practice and organizational change, showing insight and critical thinking.
·
**25-29 points:** Provides well-considered conclusions and recommendations, with minor omissions in depth or clarity.
·
**20-24 points:** Offers basic conclusions and recommendations but lacks depth or specificity.
·
**10-19 points:** Minimally addresses conclusions and recommendations, with vague or unsupported points.
·
**0-9 points:** Does not adequately conclude or provide recommendations.
**7. APA Formatting and References (15 points)**
·
**15 points:** Adheres to APA guidelines throughout (e.g., title page, headings, in-text citations, reference list). Contains no or very few minor errors. Uses at least 5 professional references, including 3-5 nursing journal articles.
·
**12-14 points:** Generally follows APA format but includes minor errors or inconsistencies. Uses required references but with minor omissions.
·
**9-11 points:** Attempts to follow APA format but includes multiple errors. References do not fully meet requirements.
·
**6-8 points:** Minimally follows APA format, with substantial errors or missing required references.
·
**0-5 points:** Does not follow APA format or fails to include required references.
**8. Writing Quality (10 points)**
·
**10 points:** Writing is clear, well-organized, and professional. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are flawless or nearly flawless.
·
**8-9 points:** Writing is clear and professional but includes minor errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.
·
**6-7 points:** Writing is generally clear but includes noticeable errors that affect readability.
·
**3-5 points:** Writing lacks clarity or organization, with frequent errors.
·
**0-2 points:** Writing is unclear and poorly organized, with pervasive errors.