[Solved] help with assgn due in 24 hours

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

Attached

**files (1)**

– ## AIreflection.docx

**## AIreflection.docx**

Assignment: AI Debate Reflection Video

**Purpose**

This short reflection video is designed to give you low-pressure practice in public speaking while allowing you to think critically about your experience debating the AI tool. Public speaking is a skill that improves with practice. The more you do it in informal settings, the more confident you will feel in formal ones.

_This assignment is not about being polished or perfect. It is about showing up, speaking naturally, and reflecting honestly._

**What You Will Do**

1. After completing your AI debate in Week 9, record a short 3–5 minute video reflecting on your experience.

2. Speak informally, as if you are talking to a classmate or friend about what you just did. No need to script it word-for-word.

3. Upload your video to the Week 10 “Debate Video Reflection” assignment.

**Reflection Prompts**

Use the following guiding questions to shape your reflection.

· How did debating an AI tool affect your confidence or comfort level as a communicator and critical thinker? How did it feel to argue against a “non-human” opponent compared to how you would expect a peer debate to go?

· What did this experience teach you about your own communication or argument style? Did the AI bring up anything that surprised you or made you think differently?

· How might this debate influence the way you approach future discussions or presentations?

**Video Reflection Tips**

· 3–5 minutes in length

· Keep it informal and conversational. Imagine you are talking to someone who is curious about your experience.

· You do not need a fancy setup. Record on your phone, laptop, or any device with a camera. A quiet space is helpful, but perfection is not required.

· Try to speak naturally without reading directly from notes. It is fine to glance at your guiding questions but let your personality and true reflections on your debate come through.

· Review the rubric in detail to see the areas in which you are being graded. Be sure to address your debate content and what you learned from the experience.

Rubric

**AI Debate Reflection Video Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| AI Debate Reflection Video Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletion & Length | **15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent** Video is 3–5 minutes and fully complete.<br> <br>**13 to >10.0 ptsProficient** Video is slightly under time but complete.<br> <br>**10 to >7.0 ptsSatisfactory** Video is noticeably short.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Video is incomplete or only 1–2 minutes.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** No video submitted or video under 1 minute. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection on Debate Content & Argumentation | **20 to >16.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly explains what was challenging, surprising, or engaging in the debate; references specific moments or exchanges.<br> <br>**16 to >12.0 ptsProficient** Identifies challenges or insights with some detail.<br> <br>**12 to >9.0 ptsSatisfactory** Mentions challenges or insights in general terms only.<br> <br>**9 to >5.0 ptsDeveloping** Minimal or unclear discussion of debate experience.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsMissing** No reflection on debate content. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrompt Adherence | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Responds thoughtfully to at least 3 prompts; shows clear personal insight and genuine engagement.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Responds to at least 3 prompts with some insight; mostly thoughtful.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactory** Responds to 2 prompts, with limited detail or surface-level insight.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Responds minimally to prompts; little reflection.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** No real reflection present. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrowth & Takeaways | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Explains how the experience affected their confidence, communication approach, and/or future speaking goals. Reflection feels authentic and personal.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Identifies at least one takeaway related to communication or learning.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactory** Mentions takeaway(s) vaguely without elaboration.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Limited or unclear description of growth or lessons learned.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** No mention of personal growth. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication & Effort | **20 to >16.0 ptsExcellent** Speaks in a clear, conversational, and natural way that shows genuine effort. Does not need to be polished but still feels authentic.<br> <br>**16 to >12.0 ptsProficient** Speaks clearly most of the time; shows effort to be conversational even if a little scripted.<br> <br>**12 to >9.0 ptsSatisfactory** Understandable but uneven; relies too heavily on notes or feels rushed.<br> <br>**9 to >5.0 ptsDeveloping** Hard to follow due to low effort, mumbling, or unclear delivery.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsMissing** No real attempt at communication or video missing. | 20 pts |

Total Points: 75

**## AIreflection.docx**

Assignment: AI Debate Reflection Video

**Purpose**

This short reflection video is designed to give you low-pressure practice in public speaking while allowing you to think critically about your experience debating the AI tool. Public speaking is a skill that improves with practice. The more you do it in informal settings, the more confident you will feel in formal ones.

_This assignment is not about being polished or perfect. It is about showing up, speaking naturally, and reflecting honestly._

**What You Will Do**

1. After completing your AI debate in Week 9, record a short 3–5 minute video reflecting on your experience.

2. Speak informally, as if you are talking to a classmate or friend about what you just did. No need to script it word-for-word.

3. Upload your video to the Week 10 “Debate Video Reflection” assignment.

**Reflection Prompts**

Use the following guiding questions to shape your reflection.

· How did debating an AI tool affect your confidence or comfort level as a communicator and critical thinker? How did it feel to argue against a “non-human” opponent compared to how you would expect a peer debate to go?

· What did this experience teach you about your own communication or argument style? Did the AI bring up anything that surprised you or made you think differently?

· How might this debate influence the way you approach future discussions or presentations?

**Video Reflection Tips**

· 3–5 minutes in length

· Keep it informal and conversational. Imagine you are talking to someone who is curious about your experience.

· You do not need a fancy setup. Record on your phone, laptop, or any device with a camera. A quiet space is helpful, but perfection is not required.

· Try to speak naturally without reading directly from notes. It is fine to glance at your guiding questions but let your personality and true reflections on your debate come through.

· Review the rubric in detail to see the areas in which you are being graded. Be sure to address your debate content and what you learned from the experience.

Rubric

**AI Debate Reflection Video Rubric**

| | | |
| — | — | — |
| AI Debate Reflection Video Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletion & Length | **15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent** Video is 3–5 minutes and fully complete.<br> <br>**13 to >10.0 ptsProficient** Video is slightly under time but complete.<br> <br>**10 to >7.0 ptsSatisfactory** Video is noticeably short.<br> <br>**7 to >4.0 ptsDeveloping** Video is incomplete or only 1–2 minutes.<br> <br>**4 to >0 ptsMissing** No video submitted or video under 1 minute. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection on Debate Content & Argumentation | **20 to >16.0 ptsExcellent** Clearly explains what was challenging, surprising, or engaging in the debate; references specific moments or exchanges.<br> <br>**16 to >12.0 ptsProficient** Identifies challenges or insights with some detail.<br> <br>**12 to >9.0 ptsSatisfactory** Mentions challenges or insights in general terms only.<br> <br>**9 to >5.0 ptsDeveloping** Minimal or unclear discussion of debate experience.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsMissing** No reflection on debate content. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrompt Adherence | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Responds thoughtfully to at least 3 prompts; shows clear personal insight and genuine engagement.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Responds to at least 3 prompts with some insight; mostly thoughtful.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactory** Responds to 2 prompts, with limited detail or surface-level insight.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Responds minimally to prompts; little reflection.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** No real reflection present. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrowth & Takeaways | **10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent** Explains how the experience affected their confidence, communication approach, and/or future speaking goals. Reflection feels authentic and personal.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsProficient** Identifies at least one takeaway related to communication or learning.<br> <br>**6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactory** Mentions takeaway(s) vaguely without elaboration.<br> <br>**4 to >2.0 ptsDeveloping** Limited or unclear description of growth or lessons learned.<br> <br>**2 to >0 ptsMissing** No mention of personal growth. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication & Effort | **20 to >16.0 ptsExcellent** Speaks in a clear, conversational, and natural way that shows genuine effort. Does not need to be polished but still feels authentic.<br> <br>**16 to >12.0 ptsProficient** Speaks clearly most of the time; shows effort to be conversational even if a little scripted.<br> <br>**12 to >9.0 ptsSatisfactory** Understandable but uneven; relies too heavily on notes or feels rushed.<br> <br>**9 to >5.0 ptsDeveloping** Hard to follow due to low effort, mumbling, or unclear delivery.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsMissing** No real attempt at communication or video missing. | 20 pts |

Total Points: 75